Post on 28-Dec-2015
transcript
(High/Middle School)(High/Middle School)HSTW/MMGWHSTW/MMGW Site Presentation Site Presentation
((Month Date, 2006)Month Date, 2006)
(High/Middle School)(High/Middle School)HSTW/MMGWHSTW/MMGW Site Presentation Site Presentation
((Month Date, 2006)Month Date, 2006)Promising PracticesPromising Practices
Next StepsNext Steps
Major ChallengesMajor Challenges
Technical Review Visit (TRV)
Our School(Customize – example only) We are a 7th & 8th Grade Middle School
with just over 500 students Sending Elementary Schools: Receiving High Schools: 2006 School’s Performance Rating: AYP Status:
Our Faculty/Staff(Customize – example only)
Administrators: Faculty: Staff/Aides/Paraprofessionals: Counselors: # Highly Qualified: # Elementary/Middle School Certified: # High School Certified:
STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICSKey: (Customize) A=African American, W=White, Other=O,
ED=Economically Disadvantaged, SN=Special Needs, ESL= English as Second Language
Grade Total F M
SingleParentHome
sA W O ED SN ESL
7
8
NT Non-
Tested
Total#
%
DAILY SCHEDULE(A/B)
Key: HR = Home Room (Customize)
Grade
HR7:50-7:58
1st
7:58- 8:48
2nd 3rd 4th HR
7 ELA Math
8
SN
DSTP Extra Help
Closing the Achievement Gap
AYP Proficiency Comparisons
OverallSchool
Spring ‘05
Spring ‘06
AYP Status
Reading
Math
L.A.
’05 AYP Reading –%’05 AYP Math –%
’06 AYP Reading –%’06 AYP Math –%
NCLB
Sub-Group ComparisonsOverall School
Spring ’05
Reading
Spring ’06
Reading
+ or – AYP met
For ‘06
Spring ’05
Math
Spring ’06
Math
+ or – AYP met
For ‘06
White 78.9%
88.6% +9.7yes
80% 82.6% +2.6yes
Hispanic 52.8%
62.5% +9.7yes
58.2% 64.4% +6.2yes
SWD 6.5% 28.5% +22yes
22.2% 23.8% +1.6No
Limited English
Speaking
36% 32.8% -3.2No
46.6% 41.7% -4.9No
Econ Dis. 60.7%
73.9% +13.2yes
61.5% 68.3% +6.8yes
Closing the Achievement Gap85 percent of students to perform at the basic level
with increasing numbers performing at the proficient and advanced levels on the HSTW/MG Assessment
2006 HSTW/MG Assessment Results Compared to High Scoring Sites
Meeting Goal
2006Site
2006High
Scoring
Site
% Gap(-/+)
2008HSTW/MGAGoal
2006%
Gap(-/+)
Reading
Mathematics
Science
Source: 2006 HSTW/MG Assessment
Closing the Achievement GapAll students to perform at proficient on the OAT/OGT
2006 OAT/OGT Results Compared to State Goal
(Customize)
AllStudents
AfricanAmerican
White Students With
Disabilities
Economically Dis-
advantage
06 Gap +/-
06 Gap +/-
06 Gap
+/-
06 Gap +/-
06 Gap +/-
Reading
Writing
Math
Science
Citizenship/Social Studies
Source: 2006 Ohio State Report Cards Gap Calculations: +/- for each group compared to the state goal
Goal # 1Rigorous Academics
(Customize – Examples only)
What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”
OAT/OGT scores are up. (School), for the past several years, has shown an increase in proficiency scores by overall school results.
Most content areas have district adopted guides and maps in place and share common assessments.
Goal # 1Rigorous Academics
(Customize – Examples only)
What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”
Require all teachers post objectives on the board and students write in their agendas. Quality student work is displayed.
Goal # 1Rigorous Academics
(Customize – Examples only)
Why We Need to Address This Goal Data shows students not meeting state, federal and HSTW/MMGW standards. Have not eliminated the general track. Not teaching all students to rigorous academic standards. Not requiring reading and writing in all classes. Not requiring all 7th graders to take pre-algebra and all 8th graders Algebra I.
Goal #2High Expectations/Extra
Help(Customize – Examples only)
What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”
Higher Expectations (Effort, Pride, Respect)
All parents are notified if students drop to a “D” or below.
Reduced Tardy Rate as a result of higher expectations & effective consequences (lunch detention).
Goal #2High Expectations/Extra
Help(Customize – Examples only)
What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Academic Assembly Homework policy Required in school extra help for
students earning a D or F
Goal #2High Expectations/Extra
Help(Customize – Examples only)
Why We Need to Address This Goal
Low attendance Rate.High Promotion/Low Retentions of
low performing students.No policy for revision of work until it
meets standards.Homework policy is not enforced.Summer School Program is needed.
Goal #3 Active Student Engagement
(Customize – Examples only)
What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”
Most teachers are practicing on a regular basis best instructional practices. Staff implements many hands-on activities that are thought provoking and promotes higher order thinking.
Goal #3 Active Student Engagement
(Customize – Examples only)
What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Provide all staff with professional
development on Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) to improve instruction.
Goal #3 Active Student
Engagement(Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal Not using students’
strengths/challenges to plan instruction and curricular experiences.
Not providing time for teachers to develop integrated projects with a written paper, oral presentation, product or service.
Goal #4Guidance/Advisement
(Customize – Examples only)
What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”
Students lead parents during P/T Conferences.
Goal #4Guidance/Advisement
(Customize – Examples only)
What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Require all 8th/9-12th to develop a five-
year plan and review it annually with advisors, teachers and parents.
Explore successful advisor/advisee programs at high performing HSTW/MMGW sites.
Goal #4Guidance/Advisement
(Customize – Examples only)
Why We Need to Address This Goal No strategies in place to provide career
exploration for all students. No requirement of a five-year plan early in the
eighth grade year that includes parental involvement/annual review by students, parents and teachers in grades 9 - 12.
No structured adviser/advisee program. Low parent conference participation rates. Little evidence of open & frequent
communication with parents.
Goal #5Climate of Continuous
Improvement(Customize – Examples only)
What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”
All departments share and analyze data to guide instruction. (Friday Department Meetings)
Active Leadership Team
Goal #5Climate of Continuous
Improvement(Customize – Examples only)
What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Professional Development
1. Continued implementation of best instructional practices.
2. Introduce Differentiated Instruction3. Implement Literacy Plan: Classroom
strategies in vocabulary, word analysis & comprehension.
Goal #5Climate of Continuous
Improvement(Customize – Examples only)
Why We Need to Address This Goal Not all staff are participating on school
improvement focus teams. Inconsistent use or analysis of data by all
staff to adjust instruction. Irregular monitoring of classroom
instruction to observe and support ongoing improvements in teaching & learning.