Post on 09-Jan-2020
transcript
Adopted June 24, 2004
Amended February 7, 2013
LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page (i)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2.0 LAKES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM .................................................................................... 2
3.0 LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES INTENT ......................................................... 4
3.1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ....................................................................................................... 4
3.3 AREA OF INFLUENCE ........................................................................................................ 6
4.0 POLICIES AND GUIDELINES ............................................................................................ 7
4.1 SITE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................ 7
4.1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 7
4.1.2 Site Development Policies .............................................................................. 11
4.1.3 Site Development Guidelines.......................................................................... 13
4.2 PUBLIC ACCESS ............................................................................................................ 19
4.2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 19
4.2.2 Public Access Policies .................................................................................... 19
4.3 HAZARD PROTECTION .................................................................................................... 20
4.3.1 Background .................................................................................................. 20
4.3.2 Hazard Protection Policies .............................................................................. 20
4.3.3 Hazard Protection Guidelines ......................................................................... 21
4.4 INFRASTRUCTURE ......................................................................................................... 22
4.4.1 Background .................................................................................................. 22
4.4.2 Infrastructure Policies.................................................................................... 23
4.4.3 Infrastructure Guidelines ............................................................................... 23
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page (ii)
4.5 LAND USE ................................................................................................................... 25
4.5.1 Background .................................................................................................. 25
4.5.2 Land Use Policies .......................................................................................... 26
4.6 EDUCATION ................................................................................................................. 26
4.6.1 Background .................................................................................................. 26
4.6.2 Education Policies ......................................................................................... 27
5.0 IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................... 28
5.1 ZONING ..................................................................................................................... 28
5.2 COVENANTS ................................................................................................................ 28
5.3 CO-OPERATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES ............................................................................. 29
5.4 EDUCATION ................................................................................................................. 29
6.0 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS ............................................................................ 30
6.1 STEP 1 ...................................................................................................................... 30
6.2 STEP 2 ...................................................................................................................... 30
6.3 STEP 3 ...................................................................................................................... 30
6.4 STEP 4 ...................................................................................................................... 31
6.5 STEP 5 ...................................................................................................................... 31
7.0 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ................................................................................. 32
APPENDICES Appendix A References
Appendix B Lakes Classification
Appendix C Lakes Classification Methodology
Appendix D Lake Index
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Thompson Nicola Regional District initiated the preparation of the Lakeshore Development
Guidelines in response to current and anticipated increase of lakeside residential and commercial
development. The lakeside area is recognized as both an extremely valuable asset and a highly
sensitive zone requiring careful development and ongoing management. The lakeside is also an
area encompassing multiple interests which have been considered including forestry, agriculture,
tourism, First Nations, various government agencies, the land development industry, community
associations, environmental organizations and other interest groups.
In association with 1991 Lake Study Policy Statement and Zoning Bylaw No. 940, the Lakeshore
Development Guidelines are intended to improve the TNRD’s ability to handle the growing
development pressure on TNRD lakes.
With regards to the relationship between associated documents, the existing Lakes Study Policy Statement determines lakes that are suitable for development and how much development is
permitted. The Lakeshore Development Guidelines sets out acceptable standards and approvals
criteria for new development while the TNRD Zoning Bylaw No. 940 establishes permitted uses
and mandatory development characteristics. These three documents are the tools to provide
sound stewardship of the lake resource in the Thompson Nicola Regional District.
The contents of the Lakeshore Development Guidelines are based largely in response to issues
identified through public consultation, and input from government agencies, interest groups,
TNRD staff and board members. The assistance of agencies, organizations and individuals was
invaluable.
The topic of lakeside development attracts a great deal of attention and heated debate as to how
lakes should be managed. The fundamental premise of the Lakeshore Development Guidelines is
that lakeside development, if done in the right location, if it meets high development standards,
and if the property is carefully managed over time can provide new recreational development
opportunities that meet environmental quality goals. To achieve this, the guidelines have been
prepared with the intent of focussing on the most critical factors for development based on the
issues assessment and the cumulative experience of other agencies and organizations who are
providing successful leadership in managing development at the lake edge.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 2
2.0 LAKES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Lakes within the TNRD have been classified based on the 1991 Lakes Study Policy Statement and
have been designated under one or more of the following categories:
• Wilderness Lakes - those lakes with no development, and generally no motorized access
although rudimentary access may exist; however, there is an absence of near shore
logging.
• Natural Environment Lakes - those lakes with negligible development, limited near
shore logging and access; significant sportfish values, waterfowl and ungulate capabilities;
• General Use Lakes - those lakes that are generally used for public recreation, with some
private development;
• Development Lakes - those lakes that can withstand a variety of uses including
extensive public recreation and private development;
• Critical Lakes - those lakes which are at a critical point in their evolution and should have
no further development;
• Special Case Lakes - those lakes that require special management guidelines.
Background information pertinent to these classifications is provided in Appendix B – (Lake
Classifications) and Appendix C (Lake Classification Methodology) as outlined in the 1991 Lakes Study Policy Statement. An index of lakes is provided in Appendix D (Lake Index).
As part of the 1991 Lakes Study Policy Statement, each lake was assigned a “carrying capacity"
(see Appendix C). The capacity ratios and allowable percentage of shoreline development are
indicated in the following chart.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 3
Lake Classification* Allowable Capacity Ratios per Hectare of Water
Surface
Allowable Percentage of Shoreline Development
General Use Lakes .50 units/ha Up to 20% of perimeter
General Use - Developed Lake Subclass No further development No further development
Development Lakes .67 units/ha Up to 35% of perimeter for lakes less than 800 ha; 50% for lakes over 800 ha
Development Lakes -Developed Subclass No further development No further development
Natural Environment Lakes .25 units/ha Up to 5% of perimeter
Critical Lakes No further development No further development
Wilderness Lakes No further development No further development
Special Case Lakes Lake Management Plan required
Lake Management Plan required
* Lake Classifications are defined in greater detail in Appendix B and C
This document provides guidelines for development within one (1) kilometre of the lakeshore and
provides information on the TNRD’s Lake Classification System. It is important to note that
classifications on lakes will likely change over time. As development occurs on the lakeshore,
lake classifications may require amendment in accordance with the level of development on the
lake. When re-classifications are proposed, the proponent will be responsible for preparation of a
lake impact assessment and classification recommendations recognizing that final determination
of classification rests with the Board of Directors of the TNRD.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 4
3.0 LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES INTENT
3.1 Purpose
The purpose for the Lakeshore Development Guidelines is to ensure lake resources in the TNRD
will be available for the use and enjoyment of future generations. This will be achieved through
high quality development that preserves the integrity of shoreland and maintains the
environmental attributes of lakes.
The guidelines have been prepared with the recognition that each lake and development site is
different and “no one size fits all”. The guidelines should therefore be viewed as a baseline of
standards that to a degree are considered flexible providing development proponents can
demonstrate that policy objectives will be achieved. In particular, qualified professionals
engaged in larger scale multiple lot developments may propose guideline alternatives or
variations providing that acceptable development standards are achieved to the satisfaction of
the TNRD. The guidelines are not intended to conflict with existing provincial or federal policy
regulations and where this may occur the guidelines shall be superseded.
3.2 Guiding Principles
1. Protect the Environmental Quality of Lakes
The TNRD recognizes the environmental importance of our lakes and will seek ways to
protect the riparian, visual/scenic and water quality values.
2. Retain Access to Resources
Resource extraction is an integral part of the BC economy and development sites shall be
carefully selected to protect access to forest, agricultural, mineral and recreation resources.
3. Promote a Collaborative Approach
The TNRD is committed to an appropriate and balanced level of development that will
benefit all stakeholders including the development community, lake users, agencies, and
First Nations. The intent of the process is to work together towards solutions.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 5
4. Develop and Implement Clear and Appropriate Regulations
By creating policies and guidelines that are easy to understand, the TNRD will avoid
confusion and misunderstandings that can negatively impact our lakes.
5. Protect Lake Users and Development from Hazardous Conditions Steep slopes, unstable soils, wildfires and floods can threaten development, impact the
environment and compromise safety. Measures will be implemented to minimize exposure
to hazardous conditions.
6. Preserve Cultural and Heritage Values
Cultural and heritage values are an important part of our history. Development sites will
be managed to avoid areas of archaeological and cultural significance.
7. Maintain and Where Possible Enhance Public Access
Lakes are a public resource; and public access will be maintained and enhanced where
possible.
8. Promote Sustainable Lake Management Practices Through Stewardship and Awareness Programs
Understanding the importance of our lake resource and ways to preserve lakes from
detrimental development impacts will be important to the ongoing stewardship of this
valuable resource. The TNRD will promote awareness about shoreline friendly practices
and lake preservation.
9. Ensure Consistency With Other Planning Documents
The Lakeshore Development Guidelines shall be consistent with other higher level or
compatible planning documents wherever practical (i.e., Ministry of Forests Lakeshore
Harvesting Plans, Land and Resource Management Plans, etc.).
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 6
10. Encourage Economic Development and Diversification
High quality lakeside development represents economic growth opportunities for the TNRD
including construction, employment, tourism, and trade for existing businesses and service
centres.
3.3 Area of Influence
The Lakeshore Development Guidelines shall apply to all lakeside area within one (1) kilometre
from the lake shoreline.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 7
4.0 POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
4.1 Site Development
4.1.1 Background
Wildlife Habitat
Wildlife habitat can be degraded by existing and future shoreland development. Contributing
factors to shoreline sensitivity include:
• Intensive Use by Wildlife – 80% of all wildlife in BC utilizes shoreline areas sometime
during their life. Shorelines support many kinds of wildlife, including species at risk; 60%
of BC’s land based vertebrates-at-risk use shoreline areas for all or part of their habitat
needs (Living by Water). A United States Forest Service study found that there can be as
much as 500% greater species diversity in the shoreline area than in adjoining uplands
(Shoreland Restoration, University of Wisconsin).
• Shoreland Uniqueness – Shoreland areas provide a unique ecological zone that is required
for certain plant and animal species. Many species depend on shoreland habitat for
breeding, foraging, hunting, fishing, and other essential uses.
Fish Habitat
Fish habitat can be severely impacted by existing and future shoreland development that alters
natural conditions along and within the water’s edge. Shallower areas around the shoreline are
very important for fish particularly species at risk because this is where many of them obtain
their food, lay their eggs and spend their first weeks of life. Smaller lakes are particularly
sensitive fish habitat as a small disturbance in the balance of a small lake can have a huge
impact on its whole ecosystem. Potential fish habitat problems generally pertain to two major
factors:
• Vegetation Removal or Alteration – Food supply and water temperature are directly
affected by the removal of natural vegetation.
• Loss of Water Quality – New and existing development can result in an increase in surface
runoff, sedimentation, erosion, and the leaking of sewage effluent and toxic chemicals.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 8
Wetlands
The protection of wetland areas surrounding lakes and within the lake watersheds is critical to
both fish and wildlife habitat as well as to improving the quality of water flowing into lakes.
Wetland areas can be negatively impacted by new development including draining or filling,
altering drainage patterns and encroaching on wetland edges.
Erosion and Sedimentation
Excessive sedimentation in lakes and streams can reduce or destroy aesthetic and practical
values for recreation, wildlife and fish habitat and water supply. Existing and future development
can be a major source of erosion and sedimentation problems. Fundamental considerations in
erosion and sediment control include:
• Retain Vegetation – Protect and maintain existing shoreland vegetation. Effective
vegetation management is a major deterrent to soil erosion because it shields the soil from
raindrop impact and decreases flow velocity by increasing flow friction. Root systems
increase soil porosity thereby permitting greater water infiltration and reinforcing soil mass.
• Careful Site Planning – Careful site planning which preserves the natural vegetation
wherever possible, limits clearing and grading to the minimum necessary to accommodate
construction and re-establishes good cover following grading is the most effective method
of controlling erosion and sedimentation.
• Runoff Management – Site development grading including roads and parking areas can be
designed to divert runoff to vegetated areas capable of holding runoff versus more direct
discharge to the lake. Runoff should also be diverted away from denuded areas.
• Construction Management – Limiting the exposure time of unprotected graded areas and
revegetating disturbed areas as quickly as possible can help mitigate potential erosion and
sedimentation.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 9
Scenic Values
Visual impressions of the lake and surrounding landscape have a major impact on resident and
public user experience as well as property values. Although aesthetic values differ from person
to person and preferences will vary the retainment of the natural landscape, character is of
benefit to everyone. Visual considerations for existing and future development include:
• Critical Zones – The two most sensitive and critical visual landscape lines to be protected
are the tree line/horizon line and the shoreline.
• Viewshed Conflicts – The lake viewshed is significantly impacted by various land uses
including logging, mining, utility corridors and road construction which occur beyond the
shoreland management area.
• Existing Vegetation – The visual absorption capability of a lake in terms of development
impact is largely determined by the character of existing vegetation. Lakes with minimal
shoreland tree cover are especially sensitive to development.
Source: Living By Water
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 10
Vegetation
Loss of vegetation due to development is inevitable. However, it is possible to reduce and
minimize the amount of tree and understorey removal for the benefit of developers, home buyers
and the general public. Vegetation retention is one of the most effective methods for
maintaining the environmental integrity of the shoreland resource. The value of vegetation
retention includes:
• Soil Stabilization – Roots hold soil and help stabilize slopes.
• Water Quality – Vegetation helps protect water quality by filtering out nutrients and
pesticides that could otherwise reach a lake or stream.
• Microclimate – Trees provide shade and help moderate weather extremes such as strong
winds and hot sun.
• Buffers – Visual and audio buffers are provided by the retention of natural areas.
Source: Living By Water
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 11
4.1.2 Site Development Policies
.1 Shorelines shall be maintained in a predominantly natural state with tree cover and ground
vegetation as development occurs.
.2 Where new development sites lack existing tree cover and understorey, a development
plan including landscaping of the shoreland shall be required that promotes native and low
water consumptive plant varieties.
.3 Development shall retain and conserve natural features including wetlands, rock outcrops,
waterfalls, streams, islands, and other features contributing to the natural character of the
site and surrounding area.
.4 Development shall minimize site disturbance during construction including the
consideration of erosion and sediment control needs.
.5 Development shall be designed at a level of density and site coverage compatible with the
physical capabilities of the shoreland and water body.
.6 The location of new shoreland subdivisions shall be assessed on the basis of site suitability,
environment, and socio-economic impacts in the context of the entire lake.
.7 Site selection and development shall consider the impacts and compatibility with existing
and future land use and resource activities.
.8 Infill development will be encouraged as an extension of existing development where
feasible.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 12
.9 Linear waterfront development (consisting of individual dwellings situated along the
shoreline) and back lot development (consisting of individual dwellings within the lakeshore
designation without water frontage) are both considered acceptable residential
development forms.
.10 Cluster designs shall be encouraged and density bonusing may be considered in
conjunction with higher servicing standards and site conservation initiatives where
applicable. Servicing standards and the relationship to minimum parcel size are addressed
in Section 4.4.
.11 Private roads accessing shoreland lots are to be designed with aesthetic considerations in
mind including minimal tree removal, unobtrusive cuts and fills, alignments that follow
contours, and other design elements resulting in road construction that is well suited to the
landscape and maintains visual qualities.
.12 Nutrient input from outside sources (i.e. resource use, sewage disposal, erosion and
sedimentation, etc.) shall be recognized as a contributing factor to lake water quality and
collaborative initiatives to minimize non-point pollution shall be pursued.
Cluster Layout
Conventional Layout
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 13
.13 The development proponent shall submit all plans and drawings necessary to accurately
represent the extent of site changes including but not limited to building locations, roads
and parking, site servicing, grading and vegetation removal. The TNRD may request
supplementary drawings and reports as needed to determine development impacts.
.14 Subdivision and recreational community designs shall incorporate best management
practices as identified in:
a) Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat
b) Province of BC, Stewardship Bylaws “A Guideline for Local Government” and Stream Stewardship A Guide for Planners and Developers
c) Living By Water Project, On The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living
d) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards, 1142 – Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting and 1144 – Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire.
.15 Wildfire management shall be considered at the planning stage for lakeside subdivisions
including escape plans, fuel management, water supply and hydrant systems.
.16 Wildlife movement corridors and sensitive habitat areas shall be identified and
accommodated at the planning stage of lakeside subdivisions.
.17 A storm drainage management plan shall be prepared for lakeside subdivisions and
potentially include detention ponds, cut-off ditches and the establishment of new wetland
areas.
4.1.3 Site Development Guidelines
Sitework
.1 Minimize paved and other hard surface areas and use permeable paving materials that
allow for precipitation to filter into the ground.
.2 Use shrubs or water bars to redirect site drainage to avoid direct and rapid flow of surface
drainage to the lake.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 14
.3 All road or path stream crossings should be at right angles to the stream.
.4 Surface drainage should be managed so as to avoid direct discharge into the lake and to
maximize stormwater detention.
.5 Avoid the use of retaining walls at the water’s edge and introduce more natural treatment
including rocks and plantings set into a stable slope (2:1 maximum).
.6 Avoid creation of an artificial sand beach.
.7 Avoid dredging or filling when constructing a dock, deck or other shoreline structures.
.8 Avoid development in areas susceptible to erodable soils, and steep slopes.
.9 Environmentally sensitive areas within a subdivision or recreation community shall be
recognized to protect environmental values. These may include portions of wildlife habitat,
semi-enclosed marsh or shallow water bodies draining into or from the lake, steep slopes,
old growth forest areas adjacent to significant fish habitat, lands prone to flooding and
lands designated for recreation or conservation.
.10 Areas designated as environmentally sensitive shall remain undeveloped and undisturbed
which prohibits grading, excavating, filling and/or construction of roadways, driveways,
parking areas or structures.
.11 Development should not be considered for any island less than 2 hectares (5 acres) due to
concerns of environmental impacts.
.12 Road layout shall be aligned to conform to natural grades as much as possible.
.13 A 15 m minimum setback should be required from natural boundary on all streams.
Streamside buffer areas shall remain in a natural condition and to provide protection and
food source for fish and wildlife. Natural drainage courses shall be preserved as close as
possible to their natural location and appearance.
.14 Site works development shall not be permitted on slopes in excess of 20% unless a
geotechnical review confirms suitability. Slopes shall be measured over a horizontal
distance inland of 45 m/150 ft. from the shoreline.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 15
.15 Topsoil removed during construction should be conserved for use on areas requiring
vegetation or landscaping.
.16 Construct and continuously maintain sediment ponds, silt fences, filtration facilities, run-off
diversions, and other works as required, to protect creeks, watercourses and lakes from
siltation.
.17 Inspect silt fences during and immediately after prolonged rainfall. If undercutting is
observed immediately repair fence.
.18 Existing agricultural land use may require that fencing, cattle guards, and other measures
be included in site development to mitigate potential land use conflicts.
Vegetation
.1 Carefully prune or limb trees and shrubs instead of removing them to open up views to the
water.
.2 Leave a 30 m waterside setback from a lake (measured from the natural boundary) along
the shoreline where natural vegetation is retained.
.3 Within the front yard/waterside setback the natural landscape shall be retained except for
30% of the lot frontage which may be cleared to create unobstructed lake views and
access. Where trees and understorey have been removed, native landscape materials
should be introduced and allowed to re-establish so as to create a contiguous buffer.
.4 Use temporary fencing or flagging around trees and natural areas to avoid construction
damage.
.5 To retain trees adjacent to construction avoid any excavation or digging within 3 m of the
base of the tree.
.6 Remove aquatic plants only where they seriously interfere with recreational use of water
and then clear only the smallest possible area.
.7 For steep slopes greater than 20%, existing vegetation should be substantially retained on
all slope faces.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 16
.8 Hazard trees (trees which are leaning or in danger of falling) should be pruned or removed
where necessary from the property.
.9 Exposed slopes caused by site grading should be reseeded as soon as possible.
.10 Maximize the retention of mature trees.
.11 When selecting plant material to be introduced to the site, preference should be given to
native species which are drought tolerant. In addition, consideration should be given to
fire resistance.
Critical Dimensions
1. Lakeside buffer - building setback 30 m (100’ min)
2. Lakeside buffer clearing width 30% max of frontage
3. Lakeside frontage – variable depending on zoning
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 17
1 ha. Lot – Illustrative Plan (N t t S l )
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 18
Buildings
.1 Residences and accessory structures should be set back at least 30 m from high water
mark.
.2 Building height should be measured from the average finished ground level of the profile of
the building facing the lake to the highest point of the roof. Maximum height shall be 2
storeys for residential and 3 storeys for commercial development.
.3 Minimize the structure profile facing the water.
.4 Select building materials that are natural or have a natural appearance that blends into the
surroundings. Material selection should also consider combustibility as a wildfire
precaution.
.5 Avoid excessive shoreline structures that are visible from the lake to minimize visual clutter
of the shoreland.
.6 Locate accessory structures behind the main building and or existing vegetation to screen
views of the structure from the water.
.7 On steeply sloping sites (+20%) the proposed building shall step down the hillside.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 19
.8 Parking areas should not be visible from the lake.
.9 To maintain a balance of natural and built form, the maximum cumulative width of
shoreline structures, including all docks, storage sheds, decks and gazebo’s and
boathouses should be no more than 25% of the lot’s water frontage.
.10 The height of shoreland buildings should be appropriate to the lake setting including
background setting, slope, tree cover and buffer. High visual impact development will
generally not be permitted.
4.2 Public Access
4.2.1 Background
Lakes within the TNRD are a public resource for the benefit and enjoyment of recreationists,
residents and tourists. However, development should not jeopardize public access to lakes.
Potential conflicts pertaining to the introduction of new development can be avoided at the
planning stage by considering existing recreation uses both on land and in the water.
4.2.2 Public Access Policies
.1 Development design shall consider all existing public land and water based recreation
activities such that new development will minimize impact on existing activities.
.2 Development shall generally be accessed by a public road which is maintained year round.
However, where public road access is not available, the developer will be responsible for
road construction and maintenance either seasonally or on a year round basis.
.3 Subdivisions shall be designed to incorporate public trails and walkways near the lake
edge, but in a manner that will have a low environmental impact on riparian vegetation
and the waterbody.
.4 Public use of resort facilities, particularly recreational and docking facilities, is encouraged.
.5 Shared docking facilities and common waterfront access areas shall be encouraged.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 20
.6 Non-waterfront residential subdivisions shall provide access to the water and opportunities
for communal boat moorage.
4.3 Hazard Protection
4.3.1 Background
Within the TNRD there are many areas in the vicinity of lakes where development could be
contemplated. These lands are, in many cases, subject to conditions which could be hazardous
to development and could result in damage to property and people. Examples of these hazards
include:
• Steep Slopes - These are generally considered for slopes in excess of 20%.
• Unstable Soils - Soil composition, presence of groundwater and other factors can cause
soils to be unstable. This situation is often compounded by steep slopes.
• Avalanche Zones/Debris Fans - Many areas of the TNRD are subject to snow avalanches
and debris torrents (soil, rock and plant material carried down a contained path).
• Floodplain and High Water Areas - Inundation by water is a concern along many of the
region’s stream and lakes.
• Wildfires – The interface between buildings and forested areas poses potentially hazardous
situations.
There is considerable opportunity to minimize the risks associated with these hazards when
planning for new development. Additional guidelines related to hazard protection, including
wildfire management, are provided in sections pertaining to Site Development.
4.3.2 Hazard Protection Policies
.1 Development in lakeside areas will respect and be safeguarded from potentially hazardous
conditions.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 21
4.3.3 Hazard Protection Guidelines
.1 Proposed development within steep slope areas (i.e. greater than 20%), unstable soils,
avalanche zones or similar hazards will require review by an appropriately qualified
professional engineer experienced in geotechnical engineering. If the proposed
development is feasible pending implementation of remedial measures recommended by
the professional engineer, these measures will be required as a condition of development
approval.
.2 Development within areas of flood hazard or susceptible to erosion must comply with the
provisions of TNRD Zoning Bylaw No. 940 and regulations and guidelines established by
the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection.
.3 Development within or adjacent to forested areas will require consultation with the Ministry
of Forests prior to approval.
.4 Wildfire standards are to be included in rural subdivision design where appropriate and
may require integration of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards: 1142 –
Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting and 1144 – Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire.
.5 Where the risk of fire is significant, the TNRD may require the registration of restrictive
covenants on land titles to specify the installation and maintenance of wildfire safety
measures. The covenant will also save harmless the TNRD in the event of property or
adjacent resource damage.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 22
4.4 Infrastructure
4.4.1 Background
The term ‘infrastructure’ refers to three key types of services provided to lakeshore development:
• Sewage collection, treatment and disposal
• Water supply, treatment and distribution
• Stormwater collection and disposal
Sewage collection, treatment and disposal is a critical issue associated with lakeshore
development. Sewage contains both nutrients (such as phosphorous and nitrogen) and disease-
causing micro-organisms (bacteria, viruses and parasites) which have considerable potential to
impact water quality and human health. For example, enhanced levels of phosphorous in a
water body can stimulate the growth of plant materials which demand higher levels of oxygen for
photosynthesis and decay. This can limit the amount of dissolved oxygen available for fish and
other aquatic life. Human health can also be impacted by micro-organisms from sewage effluent
being discharged either directly to a water body or indirectly to ground which may interact with
surface and ground water supplies.
There are many variables which influence the degree to which sewage management may be a
concern to lakeshore development. The nature of the receiving environment – either soil
conditions in the case of on-site septic systems, or water chemistry and other biological factors in
the case of lake disposal – is a key variable. The concentration, type and density of development
is another important consideration. The quality of design and construction of the sewage
management system can also influence its effectiveness, as does attention paid to maintenance
(such as regular pumping of septic tanks). This latter consideration is dealt with extensively by
various provincial statutes and guidelines, including the BC Municipal Sewer Regulations and
Health Act – Sewage Regulations. Water supply, treatment and disposal are important health considerations. Water is supplied to
lakeshore developments from two principal sources – directly from the lake, or from
groundwater. In the case of lake sources, there has been increasing concern about the quality of
surface waters in BC and elsewhere in recent years. This has led to the recent introduction of
the Drinking Water Protection Act and attendant regulations, which have tightened controls on
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 23
the treatment of water and maintenance of water utilities supplying multiple users. Groundwater
sources are less regulated, yet can experience quality issues from either natural phenomena (ie.
high levels of iron) or human impacts (ie. contamination by adjacent in-ground septic treatment
and disposal systems).
Stormwater management has generally received less attention in the semi-arid interior of BC due
to the lower frequency of rainfall events in comparison to other areas of the province. The
Thompson Nicola region does, however, experience storm run-off due to rainfall (including
intense events which occur periodically), snowmelt, or other causes. This run-off can carry a
variety of organic (such as sediment, leaf litter, animal wastes, etc.) as well as inorganic (such as
oil and other petroleum products from vehicle and machinery use) into water bodies, thus
altering water quality. Limited regulation exists in this area, although the issue of both quality
and quantity of stormwater run-off is of increasing interest to both provincial and federal
environmental agencies.
4.4.2 Infrastructure Policies
.1 All new development shall be served by appropriately designed, constructed and
maintained sewer, water and stormwater systems.
.2 All new development will be encouraged to work with relevant agencies to review, approve
and ensure on-going management of sewer, water and stormwater systems.
4.4.3 Infrastructure Guidelines
Sewer Systems
.1 On-site septic treatment and disposal systems must be approved by the Interior Health
Authority under the Health Act - Sewage Regulations.
.2 The minimum setback of a septic field from any waterbody shall be 100 metres. If a
property owner wishes to install a septic field with a setback of less than 100 metres from
a waterbody, the property owner must engage an appropriately qualified engineer or
geoscientist to review the proposed siting of the septic field to ensure that there will be no
detrimental impacts on adjacent waterbodies. Any remedial measures recommended by
the engineer or geoscientist must be implemented by the property owner at their expense.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 24
.3 The minimum parcel size for a single-family subdivision of property adjacent to the
lakeshore and utilizing individual on-site sewage treatment and disposal facilities shall be 1
hectare. If a property owner wishes to subdivide a parcel of land less than 1 hectare in
size adjacent to the lakeshore and service that parcel with an on-site sewage treatment
and disposal system, the property owner must engage the services of an appropriately
qualified engineer or geoscientist. The absolute minimum parcel size when approved by a
qualified professional is 0.40 hectares (1 acre). The qualified professional must ensure that
the desired parcel of land will accommodate the on-site system in perpetuity without
negatively impacting adjacent land or water. Where parcel sizes of less than 1 hectare are
proposed for development, a community sewer system is encouraged.
.4 The minimum parcel size for an existing resort property adjacent to the lakeshore and
utilizing individual on-site sewage treatment and disposal facilities shall be 1 hectare. If a
property owner wishes to subdivide a parcel of land less than 1 hectare in size adjacent to
the lakeshore and service that parcel with an on-site sewage treatment and disposal
system, the property owner must engage the services of an appropriately qualified
engineer or geoscientist. The absolute minimum parcel size when approved by a qualified
professional is 0.20 hectares (1/2 acre). The qualified professional must ensure that the
desired parcel of land will accommodate the on-site system in perpetuity without negatively
impacting adjacent land or water. Where parcel sizes of less than 1 hectare are proposed
for development, a community sewer system is encouraged.
.5 Where developments include community water and sewer systems, parcel sizes less than
0.40 hectares (1 acre) may be acceptable depending on site specific
conditions/environmental capability of the site to accommodate higher densities.
.6 Community sewer systems are encouraged in order to minimize cumulative effects of
individual septic systems.
.7 Depending upon scale, sewer systems must be approved by the Interior Health Authority
under the Health Act – Sewage Regulations or the Ministry of Water, Land and Air
Protection under the Waste Management Act - Municipal Sewer Regulations.
.8 Proper on-going maintenance of septic systems is strongly encouraged. Property owners
should consult the maintenance standards provided by the Interior Health Authority, as
well as the publication On The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living by the
Living by Water Project available through the TNRD.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 25
Water Systems
.1 All new development must prove the availability of a sustainable potable water supply
which meets the criteria set by the appropriate authorities.
.2 Developments comprising two (2) or more parcels should be served by community water
systems. These systems must be approved by the Interior Health Authority, and shall
conform to the Drinking Water Protection Act.
.3 The provision of water for fire fighting purposes is encouraged. The National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) 1142 – Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting identifies minimum standards to assist rural and suburban fire departments in
developing sufficient water supplies.
Stormwater Management Systems
.1 Stormwater management plans are to be prepared for all new development to deal with
the cumulative impacts of run-off. The stormwater plan will ensure run-off resulting from
new development is minimized and retained on-site wherever possible.
.2 When relevant, the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection and/or Department of
Fisheries and Oceans shall be contacted and their advice and approval incorporated into
the development and/or stormwater management plan(s).
4.5 Land Use
4.5.1 Background
Existing and future land uses surrounding lakes can potentially impact lake oriented
development. Examples of land or resource use that a development proponent may need to be
aware of include:
• Heritage Sites - Cultural and historic sites contribute to the character and interest of the
lake resource and in the case of First Nations may include areas of spiritual significance.
• Agriculture - Agricultural activities within the lake watershed may impact surface water and
use fertilizers and pesticide use, tillage, livestock practices irrigation and drainage can
affect water quality and quantity. Livestock production practices including riparian grazing,
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 26
confined feeding operations, and manure management can also affect water quality.
Irrigation may impact water levels. In addition, to environmental impacts, grazing leases
often allow cattle to occupy lakeside property which may result in conflicts between
residents and ranchers.
• Forestry - Forestry activities in the watershed can adversely impact water quality and
aesthetics.
• Utilities - Utility transmission corridors within the lake viewshed can severely diminish visual
quality.
• Recreation – Recreational activities such as snowmobiling, hiking, biking and water sports
occur around lakes.
Development proponents should familiarize themselves with land tenure in the vicinity of their
project.
4.5.2 Land Use Policies
.1 Development in lakeside areas will recognize the need to accommodate and co-exist with
multiple use of lands surrounding lakes. Development plans shall be compatible with
existing uses and make necessary provisions for buffering, fencing, screening, scale, open
space, setback and other measures that can maximize compatibility with development.
.2 Archaeological and cultural resources shall be protected through the development process
such that any historically significant buildings, structures, features or areas identified shall
be preserved.
4.6 Education
4.6.1 Background
Existing and future owners of lakeside property have an important role to play in managing the
TNRD lake resource. A stewardship attitude adopted by parcel owners can complement
regulatory controls in the following ways:
• Data Collection/Monitoring – Lakeside property owners can assist lake management efforts
by providing environmental quality data as well as monitoring shoreland alterations not
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 27
conforming with guidelines. Lake associations
representing property owners and lake users should be
encouraged to form and play an active role in monitoring
lake resource value indicators including wildlife, fish,
water quality, user conflicts and shoreline alterations.
• Environmental Management – An understanding of the
environmental impacts of living in the shoreland area can
affect how residents manage their property. The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living, prepared by
the Living by Water Project, provides an excellent
reference for environmentally responsible property
owners.
4.6.2 Education Policies
.1 Citizen participation in retaining or improving lake
resource values shall be encouraged individually or
through the formation of lake associations.
.2 Integration of the On The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living, Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat, and
the direction provided in the Stewardship Bylaw “A Guideline for Local Government” shall be integrated
into all lakeshore planning, public awareness and
development initiatives.
.3 Lake associations wanting to have motorboat
restrictions applied (i.e., speed, motor type), establish
sensitive wildlife habitat areas, or undertake other
lake management initiatives shall be provided with
process information to guide association efforts.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 28
5.0 IMPLEMENTATION
The TNRD will implement the policies and guidelines through a number of mechanisms. Key
tools include:
• Zoning
• Covenants
• Co-operation with Other Agencies
• Education
Additional details on each of these implementation tools are provided below.
5.1 Zoning
Zones are set out in the TNRD’s Zoning Bylaw No. 940 which apply to lakeshore areas. These
zones specify use, density, siting, building setbacks, provision of approved water and sewer
systems and so forth with respect to lakeshore development. In cases where new lakeshore
development is proposed in areas not already zoned for lakeshore development, the proponent
will be required to rezone the property in question and may be required to justify lake
classification and environmental impact before development can occur.
5.2 Covenants
The guidelines set out in the previous section of this document deal with a number of issues
which are beyond the scope of zoning regulations. These include, for example, site work
regulations such as hard surfacing approaches and materials, vegetation management techniques
(tree retention and pruning), and specific building design and orientation details (building
materials, minimizing exposure of long blank walls to lake). These guidelines could be
implemented through covenants which are negotiated between the TNRD and the developer at
the time of rezoning (if this step in the development process is necessary), and appended to
property titles prior to reconsideration and adoption of the enabling zoning amendment bylaw or
at the time of subdivision.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 29
5.3 Co-operation with Other Agencies
Inherent in the lakeshore development process is extensive co-operation with other public
agencies. Key examples of these agencies, and specific areas of required co-operation, are set
out below.
• BC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection – work in or about a stream or waterbody;
approval of larger-scale community sewer and water systems
• Land and Water BC – water licensing; approval of foreshore works below the natural
boundary
• Interior Health Authority – approval of water and smaller-scale community sewer systems
(including on-site septic systems)
• BC Ministry of Transportation – subdivision approval and public road access
• Ministry of Forests – lakeshore harvesting guidelines and forest service road access and
perimeter cattle fencing.
• Fisheries and Oceans Canada – work within 30 m of a waterbody that contains fish (such
as salmon) that move between salt and fresh water
The TNRD will work with these and other agencies throughout the development process,
including during rezoning, subdivision and building permit activities. These agencies will assist
the TNRD in implementing the various guidelines set out in the previous section.
5.4 Education
Education of property owners in lakeshore areas is critical so that development projects are
properly designed, constructed and maintained. Other sections of this document (see Section
4.6), as well as additional reference materials (such as the publication On The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living), provide additional detail on this topic.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 30
6.0 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS
The following outlines the steps required for lakeshore development:
6.1 Step 1
• If you are now considering residential or cottage development the lake should be over 60
hectares. Lakes less than 16 hectares should not be considered for any form of intensive
development unless supported by a detailed environmental impact assessment funded by
the applicant. All new development shall be required to provide a user unit and perimeter
shoreline analysis supporting the proposed development plan.
• Locate the lake(s) in which you have an interest in the Lake Classification Index, in
Appendices B and D.
• If the lake is classified and approved by the Regional District, proceed to Step 2.
• If the lake is unclassified, proceed to Step 3.
6.2 Step 2
• Review current lake classification.
• Verify that the classification is current and for the amount of shoreline development
existing on the lake. This will tell you if new development is permitted.
• Proceed to Step 4.
6.3 Step 3
• Confirm with the Regional District that the lake is still unclassified.
• If the lake is still unclassified, notify the Regional District that you intend to seek
classification.
• The Regional District will seek assistance from Federal and Provincial agencies in its efforts
to classify the lake.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 31
• The Regional District may require you to hire a qualified consultant (at your own cost) in
order to substantiate request for classification.
• Once a classification has been given, review the sections relevant to that classification and
proceed to Step 4.
6.4 Step 4
• Check Regional District Official Community Plans, Zoning Bylaws, Land Use Contract,
Agricultural Land Reserve status, other special planning policies, studies and any other
provincial land use objectives such as relevant Land and Resource Management Plans
(LRMPs) that may affect the land in which you have an interest.
• Submit applications for subdivision approval with Ministry of Transportation.
• Submit applications(s) for Official Community Plan, Zoning or Land Use contract
amendments to the Regional District.
• Submit applications(s) for Development Permit and Building Permit to the Regional District.
6.5 Step 5
• Check with relevant ministries and authorities to determine whether they require
notification of works, permits or have jurisdictional interests (i.e., Ministry of Water, Lands
and Air Protection, Land and Water BC, Interior Health Authority, Fisheries and Oceans
Canada, Ministry of Forests).
• Once provincial approvals have been addressed, follow the TNRD Lakeshore Development
Guidelines for developing your property.
• Consult with Living by Water and the On The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living for suggested techniques on sustainable lakeshore development.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 32
7.0 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
1. I have an existing resort. Can I subdivide and develop residential property?
Answer: Please refer to TNRD Zoning Bylaw No. 940 and consult with TNRD staff.
2. How do I obtain information related to cattle grazing beside the lake?
Answer: Contact the Ministry of Agriculture.
3. How can I find out about water licensing?
Answer: Contact Land and Water British Colimbia’s (LWBC) water licensing department.
4. I want to put an addition on my cottage. Do I need approvals from the TNRD?
Answer: Building additions require a permit from the TNRD Building Department.
5. I am considering purchasing some undeveloped lakefront property. What should I do to
make sure I can develop the property the way I want to?
Answer: To avoid surprises review the Lakeside Development Guidelines and meet with TNRD representatives to have questions answered and discuss your preliminary ideas and plans for development.
6. Where do I obtain information regarding the sale and development of Crown land?
Answer: Land and Water British Columbia (LWBC) is only making lands available on lakes designated for additional development by the TNRD Lake Classification System. Contact LWBC for further information.
7. Who do I contact regarding the use of motorized watercraft on lakes?
Answer: The Federal Department of Transport is responsible for boating restriction on lakes. Lake Associations or other groups representing the majority interests of lake property owners can make application to Transport Canada.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 33
8. Who is in charge of lake water quality?
Answer: Lake water quality is the responsibility of the BC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, however other provincial ministries including Ministry of Forests and Land and Water BC, as well as the TNRD have an important role to play in ensuring that lakeside development and land uses in the watershed do not adversely impact water quality.
9. Who do I contact regarding forestry harvesting in my area?
Answer: Contact the Ministry of Forests for information on the Forest Management Plan in your area.
10. I think our lake has enough development, but according to the TNRD lake classification
more development is allowable. What can I do about it?
Answer: Lake Associations or individuals can present their case and request that the TNRD revise the classification of their lake.
11. If you buy a lakefront property, can you retain an existing small cottage and build a new
residence?
Answer: TNRD zoning may allow construction of additional units or may require rezoning. You are advised to refer to the TNRD Zoning Bylaw No. 940.
12. I’m building a new cottage on the lake. How many trees can I cut down?
Answer: Lakeside Development Guidelines stress the retention of vegetation balanced with wildfire prevention measures. You are allowed to clear an area for construction purposes including buildings, parking areas, walkways, septic fields and small yards. In addition, tree removal is permitted to open up waterfront views by way of selective thinning and/or a view corridor that clears no more than 30% of the total lake frontage.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 34
13. How can I acquire a lake front property that will be released from Crown land?
Answer: Refer to Land and Water British Columbia (LWBC)’s website for listings.
14. Is the TNRD going to allow development on all lakes throughout the District?
Answer: No. Only lakes that are classified as suitable for development shall be considered. Check TNRD Lake Classifications.
15. Who should I contact at the TNRD about issues at our lake?
Answer: Dan Wallace in the TNRD Development Services Department is the designated staff person addressing lakeside development approvals and issues.
16. Are the Lakeshore Development Guidelines applicable only to new development?
Answer: No. The Lakeshore Development Guidelines also provide information related to
stewardship practices as promoted by the Living by Water Project’s publication On The Living Edge – Your Handbook for Waterfront Living. Lakeshore residents are encouraged
to refer to this handbook.
17. Can I have a two family dwelling on a residential lakeshore lot?
Answer: Yes, provided appropriate zoning is in place. Check the TNRD Zoning Bylaw No. 940 to confirm.
18. Who can I contact regarding alteration of the foreshore (i.e. removing vegetation,
importing sand to create a beach)?
Answer: Contact Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection and Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
19. How many accessory buildings can I have on my property?
Answer: Accessory buildings are permitted in all zones related to lakeshore development. Please refer to TNRD Zoning Bylaw No. 940.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Page 35
APPENDIX A
References
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
0459.0016.01
APPENDIX A - REFERENCES
• Department of Fisheries and Oceans/Province of BC. Land Development Guidelines for the
Protection of Aquatic Habitat, 1992.
• Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat, Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, BC, Ministry of Land, Water and Air Protection, 1993.
• Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. Landscape Buffering Specifications, 1993.
• Minnesota Shoreland Management Resource Guide, 2001.
• National Fire Protection Association, 1142 – Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural
Fire Fighting, 2001.
• National Fire Protection Association, 1144 – Standard for Protection of Life and Property from
Wildfire, 2002.
• Peninsula Lake Plan, Bracebridge, Ontario, French Planning Services, 2001. • Province of BC, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. Stewardship Bylaws: A Guide for
Planners and Developers, 1993.
• Province of BC, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. Stewardship Bylaws: A Guide for Local
Government, 1997.
• Shoreland Best Management Practices, University of Minnesota, 2001.
• Sustainable Lakes Planning Workbook, Minnesota Lakes Association and University of Minnesota, 2000.
• The Corporation of the Township of Muskoka Lakes, Official Plan, 2001. • The Corporation of the Township of Muskoka Lakes, Comprehensive Zoning, 2002.
• The Federation of British Columbia Naturalists, Sarah Kipp and Clive Callaway, On the Living Edge: Your Handbook for Waterfront Living, 2002.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
APPENDIX B
Lakes Classification
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
APPENDIX B – LAKES CLASSIFICATION
LAKES CLASSIFICATION (based on 1991 Lakes Study Policy Statement)
WILDERNESS LAKES
Definition The primary objective of this category is to identify those lakes worthy of conservation in their natural un-
developed state. The secondary objective is to provide the opportunity for wilderness camping, travel,
peace, solitude and nature appreciation.
Criteria Required
1. There is no development or commercial use of either the water or the shoreline, and there is no
appreciable disturbance by logging or industrial activity near the lake.
2. Access is by hiking, horseback or non-motorized vehicular means.
and one of the following:
3. (a) The lake or its shoreline contains important, unique, or representative natural features (e.g.
wildlife habitat, rearing and spawning grounds for fish, vegetation, geological features), having
dominant Canada Land Inventory (C.L.I.) or Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks (Fish and
Wildlife Branch) ratings of good or high for ungulates, or C.L.I. or Ducks Unlimited waterfowl
capability of 1, 2 or 3.
(b) The lake has existing patterns of recreational use.
Exceptions
In certain cases, some lakes may fail to meet these criteria, yet can be included as Wilderness Lakes.
The intent here is to provide the opportunity for a wilderness-type recreational experience relatively close
to urban centres. These lakes shall be designated within the Wilderness Lakes category. Criteria (2)
must still apply. Criteria (1) may be relaxed to include lakes with a surrounding area which is more dev-
eloped. Criteria (3) may be waived.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Lakes
Andy Antler Bequith Blackwell Dagger *
Day Frankie Hiahkwah * Hoopatatkwa * Hoover *
John George Mollimarn * Monticola Pocket Stein
Stoney Tsikwustum Tsintsunko * Twin Willowgrouse *
* These lakes are in the Bonaparte Moratorium Area, and may be reclassified once decisions are
made regarding their future use.
These lakes, in the vicinity of Merritt, have been selected as candidates for Wilderness Lakes; their
classification should be determined individually in consultation with affected provincial regulatory
agencies if development is proposed:
Boulder Jackson LeRoy (East) Skunk Farr LeRoy (West) Little Douglas Walker Flat LeRoy (Middle) Mellin Wasley Management Guidelines
1. Allow no further development or commercial use, notwithstanding the development of primitive
campsite facilities.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES
Definition
Natural Environment Lakes are characterized by important scenic, waterfowl, wildlife, vegetation,
fisheries or other values worthy of conservation, and have motorized access. Their accessibility also
provides quality recreational opportunities within a natural setting.
Criteria Required
1. Less than 5% of the surrounding shoreline has been subdivided for cottaging lots.
2. There is motorized access to the lake.
3. The lake or shoreline within 400 metres has one of the following:
• C.L.I. or Ducks Unlimited (Canada) Waterfowl Capability of 1, 2, or 3.
• C.L.I. Ungulate Capability ratings of 1 or 2, or Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks
(Fish and Wildlife Branch) rating of high.
• C.L.I. Ungulate Capability ratings of 3, or Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Fish
and Wildlife Branch rating of good, plus C.L.I. Waterfowl Capability ratings of 3 on a
portion of the shoreline.
• high fisheries values for spawning, rearing and sportfishing; or, has been evaluated that
further development would not be compatible with the Fisheries Management Plan of
Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks (Fish and Wildlife Branch).
• outstanding or typical vegetation, scenery or geological features.
• an existing use for environmental education purposes.
• provides important wildlife habitat for species at risk.
Lakes
Akehurst Sportfish Values
Alberta Wildlife Habitat for Endangered Populations Alleyne Sportfish Values
Aylmer Sportfish Values
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Badger Sportfish Values
Bare Sportfish Values
Big O.K. Sportfish Values
Blue Sportfish Values
Blue Earth Sportfish Values
Cahility Sportfish Values
Campbell High Waterfowl Capability
Caverhill Sportfish Values
Chapperon High Waterfowl Capability
Chataway Sportfish Values
Chum Good Waterfowl Capability
Community Sportfish Values
Cunningham Waterfowl and Ungulate Capability
Dairy Sportfish Values
Deer Sportfish Values
Devick Sportfish Values
Dixon Sportfish Values
Dominic Sportfish Values
Duffy Sportfish Values
Edith Sportfish Values
Face Sportfish Values
Fatox Sportfish Values
Friendly Sportfish Values
Goose Environmental Education Use
Gordon Sportfish Values
Gorman Sportfish Values
Grizzly Sportfish Values
Gypsum Sportfish Values
Hammer Sportfish Values
Harbour Sportfish Values
Harmon Sportfish Values
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Harper Sportfish Values
Hatheume Sportfish Values
Hihium Sportfish Values
Index Excellent Waterfowl Capability
Jim High Fisheries Values
Johnson Good Ungulate Capability,
Good Waterfowl Capability and
Sportfish Values
Kentucky Sportfish Values
Lac du Bois High Waterfowl Capability
Latremouille Sportfish Values
Little McGillivray Sportfish Values
Little White High Waterfowl Capability
Loch Lomond Good Waterfowl Capability
Lodgepole Environmental Education Use
Lolo Sportfish Values
Long High Waterfowl Capability
Long Island Sportfish Values
Lundbom Sportfish Values
Lupin Sportfish Values
Lynn Sportfish Values
Machete High Ungulate Capability
Mamit Good Ungulate Capability and
Good Waterfowl Capability
McConnell Sportfish Values
McCorvie Sportfish Values
McGillivray Sportfish Values
McGlashan Sportfish Values
McQueen Environmental Education Use
Good Waterfowl Capability
Meadow Good Waterfowl Capability
Minnie High Waterfowl Capability
Moira Sportfish Values
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Morrisey Sportfish Values
Mud High Ungulate Capability
Neveu High Ungulate Capability
Nolan Sportfish Values
Pass Sportfish Values
Pattinson High Ungulate Capability
Pemberton Sportfish Values
Pennask High Ungulate Capability,
Sportfish Values,
Trout Egg Brood Lake
Pennie High Ungulate Capability
Peter Hope Sportfish Values
Pillar Sportfish Values
Powder Sportfish Values
Roche Sportfish Values
Rock Island Sportfish Values
Roscoe Sportfish Values
Rush Good Waterfowl Capability
Sabiston Sportfish Values
Saskum Sportfish Values
Saul Sportfish Values
Shea Sportfish Values
Silence High Ungulate Capability
Sock Sportfish Values
Spooney Sportfish Values
Star Sportfish Values
Stukemaptem Sportfish Values
Surrey Sportfish Values
Sussex Sportfish Values
Taweel Sportfish Values
Thuya Sportfish Values
Tintlhontan Sportfish Values
Tommy High Ungulate Capability and
High Waterfowl Capability
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Trapp Good Ungulate Capability and
Good Waterfowl Capability
Trurans Good Waterfowl Capability
Tumtum Sportfish Values
Tyner Sportfish Values
Upper Harbour Sportfish Values
Venables High Waterfowl Capability
Warren Sportfish Values
Wentworth Sportfish Values
Windy Sportfish Values
Woods Sportfish Values
Two unnamed lakes adjacent to Lac du Bois have special significance because they provide unique
examples of a magnesium sulphate lake and a sodium carbonate bicarbonate sulphate lake and their
representative invertebrate fauna.
Management Guidelines:
1. Where there is no existing subdivision or development, or where the only existing development is a
fishing camp, Ministry of Forests recreation site or park: allow no further subdivision or
development. Redevelopment of existing uses that do not significantly increase the percentage of
shoreline developed, nor the intensity of development by the user unit ratio may be permitted,
provided that the proposal meets all other criteria.
2. Where there are existing cottage lots, further subdivision and development up to a maximum of
5 % of the shoreline or 0.25 units/hectare of water surface, whichever is reached first, may be
allowed. Perimeter development shall be determined in accordance with the method described in
the 1991 Lakes Study Policy Statement.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
GENERAL USE LAKES
Definition
Those lakes primarily used for public recreation with some cottaging, in a predominantly natural and rural
landscape. Conservation of the natural environment is also an important objective.
Criteria Required
1. The lake or shoreline has a dominant C.L.I. Recreation Capabillity rating of 3 and 4, an area
greater than 60 hectares and a mean depth of greater than 5 metres.
2. Private cottaging lots, whether owned or leased, may constitute less than 20% of the perimeter,
providing that there is still greater than 0.5 units/hectare of water surface. (Lakes where
development has exceeded these standards may be included in this category, under the
Developed subclass.)
On lakes with subdivided or partly subdivided shoreline, the allowable portion of developable
private lands (up to 20%) shall lie outside of the Provincial Agricultural Land Reserve (A.L.R.). In
this category it is understood that a Provincial Agricultural Land Commission decision to permit
subdivision within the A.L.R. will result in a re-evaluation of the subject lake, where A.L.R. status
was used in the classifying criteria.
3. The following water quality criteria must be met, based on midsummer values of whichever
measurements are available:
• mean summer chlorophyll a is less than 7 milligrams per cubic metre (mgm3);
• secchi disk readings are greater than 3 metres;
• water quality is potable as determined by Ministry of Health
4. The lakeshore has adequate area that is not dominated by steep slopes or soils which are
unsuitable for nutrient removal from sewage effluent.
Lakes
Adams Douglas North Barriere
Hyas Missezula Snohoosh
Pimainus Sharpe Tranquille
Stump Tin Cup
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Management Guidelines
1. Allow subdivision and development up to the allowable level: 20% perimeter development or 0.5
units/hectare of water surface, whichever is reached first.
General Use Lakes: Developed Lake Subclass
Those lakes which have exceeded the standards specified for this category, having over 20% perimeter
development or less 0.50 units/hectare of water surface.
Allow no further subdivision or development except where the subdivision or development is in
conformity with existing zoning regulations, provided that the proposal does not significantly increase the
percentage of shoreline developed nor the intensity of development on the lake, as determined by the
user unit ratio, and that the proposal meets all other criteria.
Lakes
Glimpse Hallamore Paska Eagan
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
DEVELOPMENT LAKES
Definition
Those lakes capable of supporting a high level of mixed uses - i.e. cottaging, outdoor recreation and
agriculture. Conservation of the natural environment is also an important objective.
Criteria Required
1. The lake or shoreline has a dominant C.L.I. Recreation Capability rating of 1, 2 and 3, and the
lake has an area greater than 100 hectares and a mean depth greater than 5 metres.
2. Private cottaging lots, whether owned or leased, may constitute less than 35% of the perimeter
of the lake on lakes under 800 hectares and 50% of the perimeter on lakes over 800 hectares,
providing that there is still over 0.67 units per hectare of water surface. (Lakes on which
development has exceeded these standards may be included in this category under the
Developed subclass.)
3. The following water quality criteria must be met, based on the maximum of whichever
measurements are available:
• mean summer chlorophyll a is less than 5 milligrams per cubic metre (mgm3);
• secchi disk readings are greater than 3 metres;
• water quality is potable as determined by the Ministry of Health, Environmental Health
Protection. Where Total Dissolved Solids (T.D.S.) is the only water quality parameter
available, it may be used, but only with caution and at a general level. T.D.S. should be
less than 250 ppm. The difficulty of using Total Dissolved Solids is that it measures the
inorganic dissolved solids as well as the organic dissolved solids.
4. The lakeshore does not consist of steep slopes or soils which are unsuitable for nutrient removal
from sewage effluent.
5. On lakes with unsubdivided or partly subdivided shorelines the allowable portion of developable
private lands (up to 35%) shall lie outside of the Provincial Agricultural Land Reserve (A.L.R.). In
this category it is understood that a Provincial Agricultural Land Commission decision to permit
subdivision within the A.L.R. will result in a re-evaluation of the subject lake, where A.L.R. status
was used as the classifying criteria.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Lakes
Allan Little Shuswap Birch Mayson Bonaparte Montana Dunn Niskonlith Gustafson Paradise Lac des Roches Young
Management Guidelines
1. Allow subdivision and development up to the allowable level - 35% perimeter development on
lakes under 800 hectares and 50% perimeter development on lakes over 800 hectares, or to 0.67
units/hectares of water surface, whichever is reached first.
Development Lakes: Developed Subclass
Those lakes which have exceeded the standards specified for this category, having over 35% perimeter
development if it is a lake under 800 hectares or having over 50% perimeter development if it is a lake
over 800 hectares, or having less than 0.67 units/hectare of water surface.
Allow no further subdivision or development except where the subdivision or development is in
conformity with existing zoning regulations provided that the proposal does not significantly increase the
percentage of shoreline developed nor the intensity of development on the lake, as determined by the
user unit ratio, and that the proposal meets all other criteria.
Lakes
Big Bar East Barriere Heffley * Lac Le Jeune Paul Sullivan (Knouff) *
* See Section 1.3, page 10; Extract from Kamloops North Official Community Plan.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
CRITICAL LAKES
Definition
Those lakes which are not suitable for further development because of their natural or cultural eutrophic
status (characterized by severe algae blooms, extensive rooted aquatics, rapidly deteriorating water
quality and potential winter fish kill); their small size or shallow depth; potential health safety problems;
strongly perceived feelings of overcrowding expressed by the lake or shoreline users; or inadequate lake
surface for the number of users.
Criteria Required
(One or a combination of the following):
1. One of the following water quality measurements:
• chlorophyll a readings of over 7 milligrams per cubic metre (mgm3);
• a secchi disk reading of less than 3 metres;
• water samples and observations by Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks,
Environmental Protection Division, have determined a eutrophic status.
(Where Total Dissolved Solids (T.D.S.) is the only water quality parameter available,
and those T.D.S. measurements exceed about 250 ppm, then that lake may be
tentatively classified in this category. Consultation should occur with other agencies
and the lakes should be reconsidered when more information becomes available.)
2. Size under 60 hectares, or mean depth of less than 5 metres.
3. The shoreline and adjacent area consists of steep slopes, soils which are unsuitable for nutrient
removal or poorly drained soils.
4. Water quality, as measured by faecal coliform counts fails to meet Ministry of Health standards.
5. A widespread perception of overcrowding is expressed by lake users.
6. The percentage perimeter development significantly exceeds the following:
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
• 50% on lakes over 800 hectares;
• 35% on lakes between 100 hectares and 800 hectares;
• 20% on lakes between 60 hectares and 100 hectares.
7. The user unit per hectare of water surface ratio is less than 1 unit/hectare on lakes less than 100
hectares in size and 2 units/hectare on lakes over 100 hectares in size.
Lakes
Badger Water Quality
Barnes Water Quality
Black Water Quality
Bleeker Water Quality
Bowers Water Quality
Campbell Water Quality
Chapperon Water Quality
Chuwhels Water Quality
Community Water Quality
Corbett Water Quality
Courtney Water Quality
Dairy Water Quality
Douglas Water Quality
Duffy Water Quality
Durand Water Quality
Dutch Water Quality
Edith Water Quality
Eleanor Water Quality
Frisken Water Quality
Genier Water Quality
Green Water Quality
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Hatheume Water Quality
Horseshoe Water Quality
Isobel Water Quality
Jacko Water Quality
John Frank Water Quality
Lac du Bois Water Quality
Leighton Water Quality
Le Joie Water Quality
Little Big Bar Over Carrying Capacity
Little Dairy Water Quality
Lodgepole Water Quality
Loon Water Quality
Mamit Water Quality
Marquart Water Quality
McGlashan Water Quality
McQueen Water Quality
Minnie Water Quality
Monte Water Quality
Napier Water Quality
Ned Roberts Water Quality
Nicola Water Quality
Pass Water Quality
Pat Water Quality
Pinantan Water Quality and
Over Carrying Capacity
Pressy Small Size
Red Water Quality
Rose Water Quality
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Ross Moore Water Quality
Sabiston Water Quality
Salmon Water Quality
Shumway Water Quality
Six Mile Water Quality
Stake Water Quality
Stoney Water Quality
Trapp Water Quality
Tulip Water Quality
Tunkwa Water Quality
Venables Water Quality
Walloper Water Quality
Wasley Water Quality
Management Guidelines
1. Lakes in the Critical classification should be subject to no further residential subdivision or
development of shoreland to prevent the acceleration of deteriorating water quality or to avoid
further development or overcrowding of surface water.
2. Further development or residential subdivision which is in conformity with existing land use
regulations may be considered wherein no additional nutrient input is allowed into the lake.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
SPECIAL CASE LAKES
Special case lakes have significant features; their present or proposed uses will require special planning,
preferably a Lake Management Plan, before further development is considered. Lakes may be placed in this category for one or more of several reasons, including irrigation use; Ducks Unlimited project sites; native cultural sites; Coquihalla corridor proximity and potential for recreational use; and, heritage trails in the vicinity.
Irrigation or Agricultural Use
Allan Badger Barnes Beaverdam Big O.K. Bog* Botanie Brouseau
Calling Campbell Chapperon Chum Community Corbett Cultus Dairy Devic Dominic Duffy Dum Eagan** Edith
Frogmoore Gallagher Genier Glimpse Gordon Gustafson Hatheume Heffley Hyas Jacko Johnson Lac Du Bois Lolo Loon Machete**
Mamit Marquart Martin Meadows McConnell McCorvie* McLean McQueen
Meadow** Minnie Monte Mowich Napier Neilson
Nicola Niskonlith Paradise Pasulko Paul Pennask Pennie Peter Hope Pillar Pimainus Red Roche Rossmoore Rush Salmon** Saul
Shumway Six Mile
Skmana
Snohoosh Spooney Stake Star Sullivan (Knouff)
Surrey Sussex Thuya Tranquille Trapp Trurans Tunkwa Upper Loon Venables Walloper Wentworth White* Willard
* no storage dam constructed, although water storage license issued (as of previous study date) ** storage dam constructed but without issuance of water license (as of previous study date)
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Ducks Unlimited Sites
Batstone (near Missezula Lake)
Beaverdam
Beaverhouse (near Tunkwa Lake)
Curry (Robbins Range)
Davis (near Aspen Grove)
Freshwater (near Beaverdam Lake)
Horseshoe (near Roche Lake)
Hutchinson (Fly Creek drainage)
Index (near Chapperon Lake)
Isobel (near Rayleigh)
John Frank (near Roche Lake)
Kane (near Merritt)
Ketchan (near Missezula Lake)
Lac du Bois
Little Big Bear Magnesia
Marsden
McQueen (near Rayleigh)
Moutray
Rall's (Carabine Creek)
Red
Rush (near Chapperon Lake)
Rush (near Clinton)
Sparks
Stephens (near Monte Lake)
Trurans (near Clinton)
Valenzuela
White
Native Cultural Sites
Adams Azure Clearwater Courtney Crescent Crown Douglas
Dunn Dutch Face Hihium Jacko Kamloops
Lady King Little Shuswap Loon
Lundbom
Mamit Napier
North Barriere
Pillar Reservoir Roche
Stinking
Young
Coquihalla Corridor
Alleyne Corbett Courtney Harmon
Kentucky Leighton Lundbom McConnell
Paradise Pennask
Peter Hope
Roche
Stake
Sunset Tunkwa
Walloper
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Lakes with Heritage Trails In The Vicinity*
Courtney Kamloops Loch Lomond Loon Hihium Latremouille Long Stump
* This list is subject to further expansion as additional lakes may be added.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
APPENDIX C
Lake Classification Methodology
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
APPENDIX C – LAKE CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY
The TNRD Lakes Classification System is based upon the TNRD Lake Study Policy Statement
prepared in 1991. The following section is extracted directly from the 1991 Lake Study Policy
Statement and outlines the methodology used to determine the Lake Classification System.
METHODOLOGY for 1991 Lakes Classification System
Design of Original Study
The concept of the original Lake Study was developed in the mid-1970s, the result of the
perceived need for direction in management of lakeside development to maintain a diversity of
lakes for recreation, settlement and commercial use.
The Lake Study began in mid May of 1978 with a meeting of the Lake Study Steering Committee.
This committee had representatives from various agencies, including B.C. Fish and Wildlife
Branch, B.C. Forest Service Recreation Division, B.C. Pollution Control Branch, B.C. Lands
Management Branch, South Central Health Unit and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. At the first
meeting it was decided that an inventory of the information available be assembled as a
preliminary step to the study. The previously mentioned agencies were consulted as well as the
B.C. Water Rights Branch, B.C. Parks Branch and Ducks Unlimited (Canada).
Under consideration were 220 lakes selected by the Planning Department of the Thompson-
Nicola Regional District. These were generally lakes over 16 hectares in area, but the list
included some smaller lakes and excluded some larger lakes. The initial inventory was conducted
with the intent of choosing several lakes for which there was good information available for more
detailed study. Information was gathered on land status, Canada Land Inventory ratings and
biophysical characteristics of the basic list of lakes. This process revealed that much information
was available on a number of lakes within the Regional District. Lake studies from other areas of
the Province were also reviewed.
Initially, the study was to be directed at only a few lakes to provide a baseline against which the
merits of development proposals might be measured. This approach was abandoned in June
1978 in favour of two new studies - a Lake User questionnaire and a Lake Classification system -
which appeared to have more practical application.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
The Lake User Survey was the first priority due to the time required for calculations and
interpretations. The survey consisted of four segments; the Public Lake User Survey, the Cottage
Owner Survey, the Resort Owner Survey and Resort Patron Survey. The Public Lake User Survey
was undertaken first, on Canada Day, July 1, and work on all segments proceeded through 1978.
Also in 1978, data gathering, interpretations and discussions resulted in the formulation of a
preliminary Lake Classification System. The lake classification process was refined during the
summer. In September the Lake Classification System was presented and discussed at a
combined meeting of the Steering Committee and the Technical Planning Committee. At a
second meeting the classification of specific lakes commenced. Steering Committee members
and various agencies were invited to send in their submissions on the classification of various
lakes.
Original Criteria Used
In designating General Use and Development Lakes, criteria for water quality and suitability for
development were derived primarily from Proposed Guidelines for Control of Development of
Lakeshore Property (Ableson, 1978), from the Ontario Lake Planning Guidelines (Ontario, 1977),
and from personal communications with B.C. Fish and Wildlife staff. The standards from Ableson
have their origins in the worldwide lake eutrophication studies which took place as part of the
International Biological Program. These studies indicated that the sensitivity of a lake to
eutrophication is dependent upon its level of productivity. Mean summer chlorophyll a content is
the most accurate measure of the productivity of a lake, which in turn reflects the nutrient
content of the lake. This approach was particularly useful in selecting an initial listing of Critical
Lakes - those which are in advanced stages of eutrophication. This listing has been considerably
expanded as a result of sampling information provided by Environmental Protection Branch of
B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks.
The use of Canada Land Inventory (C.L.I.) Capabilities in the study is modelled after the Red
Deer Regional Planning Commission's Regional Lake Perspective (RDRPC, 1976). Sport fish
capability was not available for the Thompson-Nicola Regional District so the recommendations of
the Lake Development and Access section of the Fisheries Management Plan, (Cartwright, 1978)
were used. Ducks Unlimited (Canada) has made more detailed surveys of some areas for
Waterfowl Capability, so their capability ratings were also utilized. Because C.L.I. ratings tend to
be generalized over extensive areas there has been frequent consultation with B.C. Fish and
Wildlife Branch for more local, refined information in the interior. The classification system
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
attempts to avoid placing recreational subdivisions on lakes with high (i.e. 1, 2 or 3) C.L.I. ratings
for ungulates or waterfowl. Where it is judged that extensive development may degrade a sport
fishery there are similar restrictions.
Carrying capacity standards (allowable percentage perimeter development and hectares per user
unit) have been influenced by those of Ableson (1978) and those which have been adopted by
the Okanagan-Similkameen Regional District. However, these have been modified as a result of
data compiled in the Lake Study and the Lake User Survey.
The allowable hectares (acres) of water surface per user unit ratio is used specifically as a
measure against lake surface crowding and to help maintain a quality recreational experience for
the lake surface users. The need for such a ratio has been demonstrated by the results of the
Lake User Survey, which showed that a high percentage of interfering activities was perceived by
lake users. For these reasons a "user unit" has been established as a flexible guideline for each
classification of lake.
Each use, (each cottage lot whether vacant or developed, campsite, picnic site, Forestry Service
recreation site, Special Use Permit, fishing camp cabin or fishing camp campsite) within one-half
kilometre of the lake is assigned a "user unit" value of one. (Where the number of campsites or
picnic sites is difficult to determine, such as in Forest Service recreation sites, the number of
parking spaces or the average level of summer use shall be used.) The surface area of the lake
is then divided by the number of "user units" to determine the "user unit ratio" (see Ableson,
1978, for details of calculations).
The allowable percentage perimeter development standard is intended to ensure a relatively
natural visual landscape for lake users. It has been assumed from the results of the Lake User
Survey that lake users highly value the natural surroundings as a major element of the lake's
environment. At the public hearings held in early 1977, the desire to leave a moderate to large
(50-80%) portion of the lakeshore in its natural state was commonly expressed. A survey
conducted at four lakes (Tunkwa, Leighton, Stake and McConnell) within the Regional District by
the Recreation Section of B.C. Forest Service (Lake User Study, 1978) revealed that the natural
landscape of the lakes and their surroundings was the second major attraction (next to fishing)
of those interviewed. The use of the allowable percentage perimeter development standard will
serve to accommodate public access, ensure that lakes will never reach the state of having the
total shoreline under intensive development, and reinforce the safeguards for the lake ecosystem
noted by Ableson.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
The following criteria are used in measuring shoreline or perimeter development: all private and
Crown lease lots and Special Use permits to 8 hectares in size are measured by actual lake
frontage or 90 metres per lot (whichever is less); commercial, industrial, parks, campsites and
Forest Service recreation sites are measured by actual lake frontage; and lots greater than 8
hectares, vacant Crown land and land held under grazing lease, licence or permit are not counted
as development. Both the "user unit ratio" and the "percentage perimeter development" should
be used in determining whether or not additional development may be permitted on a lake.
Results of the Lake User questionnaire pointed out a wish for a conservative approach to setting
limits on shoreline development. Lake users had an underlying wish to retain, insofar as
possible, the appearance of a natural shoreline environment. The recommendation of a 100
metre buffer zone in which no logging may occur was derived following an examination of a
number of other studies. The Red Deer Regional Lake Perspective (1976) calls for a 1.6
kilometre buffer zone. The Lake User questionnaire showed a concern by lake users about the
effect of possible logging upon viewing areas. Initially, it was judged that a minimum buffer zone
of 100 metres would ensure that a relatively natural visual landscape would remain after logging.
Requiring a minimum buffer zone of 100 metres ensures a relatively natural visual landscape for
lake users. The 100 metre buffer zone, within which no logging is recommended, would also
help safeguard the lake against the effects of erosion, fluctuation in water levels, pollution with
wood debris, nutrient loading, and siltation of eggs or the micro-organisms which support rearing
fish. The buffer zone will also maintain nesting hole sites for tree or snag nesting ducks and
other birds, and provide a shelterbelt for wintering ungulates.
Current Update
There is now (1991) no rigid policy on logging in the vicinity of lakes, rather this is decided,
within each Timber Supply Area, on a lake-by-lake basis by a consultative committee
representing a broad range of agency and public interests. For those lakes which have not been
classified for Visual Quality Objectives (see Ministry of Forests "Lakeshore Harvesting Guidelines",
1991), a 200 metre flexible "leave strip" buffer zone around lakes has been informally agreed
upon until appropriate classifications have been collectively determined in order to preserve
values associated with unclassified lakes and their riparian zone.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
For the relatively few lakes which have been classified for Visual Quality Objectives, more
appropriate lakeshore logging guidelines are recognized. This system has allowed for placement
of several lakes in the Wilderness Lakes category.
In addition to those lakes recognized as water storage sites and classed as Special Case Lakes in
the 1984 study, three new sources have expanded that listing. Ducks Unlimited has provided a
listing of those lakes which support waterfowl enhancement projects. Parks Branch of the
Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks has identified the lakes which are foreseen to have an
exceptionally high recreation demand as a result of completion of the Coquihalla Highway. The
Archaeology Branch of the Ministry of Tourism and Minister Responsible for Culture has provided
access to mapping of lakes with known native cultural sites.
Unfortunately, the Lake Classification Committee has been inoperative since 1984, so no further
formal classifications have been made in the General Use and Development lakes categories.
However, recommendations pertaining to subdivision development have been obtained from
agencies on request.
The overall approach in the 1991 update relied on the following information gathering processes:
• Regional District staff interview for operational level feedback;
• discussion with major government and non-government agencies;
• an inter-agency ad hoc meeting to share information;
• request to twenty-three regional districts concerning other related policy statements, nine
of which responded that they had developed some form of policy guidelines;
• a press release and media interviews resulted in some public input; letters and other
materials submitted were reviewed.
A special emphasis was placed on lakes opened up for easier access by the Coquihalla Highways.
A special technical review was undertaken by sub-consultant Ira Withler (biologist and zoologist),
and a recreational use overview was carried out by sub-consultant Debbie Clarke of Forecon
Consulting. Particular emphasis was placed on lake carrying capacities.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
Neither budget nor timeframe was available for public hearings or for questionnaires. However,
this does not preclude the need for special hearings on particular lake shoreland development
proposals which may arise from time to time.
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
APPENDIX D
Lake Index
Lakeshore Development Guidelines
APPENDIX D – INDEX
LAKES OVER 16 HECTARES
General Instructions: This listing contains lakes over 16 hectares in the Thompson-Nicola
Regional District. It also includes some unsurveyed lakes, marked with *, which may be under 16
hectares. If the lake in which you are interested is not listed here, it may be under 16 hectares.
Lakes marked "Unclassified" (U) had not had their status determined by an interagency
committee, as of date of study completion. Lakes given more than one classification are subject
to the guidelines of the dominant classification, shown in bold; however, the guidelines of other
classifications may also be applied.
KEY: WILDERNESS LAKES W
WILDERNESS LAKES CANDIDATE (W) NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES NE
GENERAL USE LAKES GU
GENERAL USE LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) GU(D) DEVELOPMENT LAKES D
DEVELOPMENT LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) D(D) CRITICAL LAKES C
SPECIAL CASE LAKES SC
UNCLASSIFIED U ELECTORAL AREA EA
LAKE CLASSIF. EA LAKE CLASSIF. EA
Adams GU,SC O/P Adler U O
Akehurst NE O
Alberta NE E Allan D,SC O
Alleyne NE,SC N Andy W L
Antler W I
Aylmer NE P Azure SC A
Badger C,NE,SC P Batstone* SC N
Bare NE O Barnes C,SC I
Beauregard U O
Beaverdam SC E Beaverhouse* SC L
Big Bar D(D) E Big O.K. NE,SC I
Birch D O
Black C O Blackwell W L
Bleeker C L Blue NE I
LAKES OVER 16 HECTARES
KEY:
WILDERNESS LAKES W
WILDERNESS LAKES CANDIDATE (W) NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES NE
GENERAL USE LAKES GU GENERAL USE LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) GU(D)
DEVELOPMENT LAKES D
DEVELOPMENT LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) D(D) CRITICAL LAKES C
SPECIAL CASE LAKES SC
UNCLASSIFIED U ELECTORAL AREA EA
LAKE CLASSIF. EA LAKE CLASSIF. EA
Blue Earth NE I
Bog SC J Bonaparte D O/E
Boss U N
Botanie SC I Boulder* (W) M
Boyer U J Brouseau SC I
Cahility NE O
Calling SC I Campbell C,NE,SC L
Caverhill NE O
Chapperon C,NE,SC M Chataway NE I
Chum NE,SC L Clearwater SC A
Community C,NE,SC O
Corbett C,SC N Courtney C,SC N
Cultus SC I Cunningham NE E
Curry SC L
Dagger W O Dairy C,NE,SC J
Davis SC N Deadman U J
Deer NE O
Devick NE,SC P Dixon NE O
Dominic NE,SC J
Dot U M Douglas C,GU,SC M
Duffy C,NE,SC J Dum SC O
Dunn D,SC O Dunsapie U O
Dutch C,SC A
Eagan GU(D),SC E East Barriere D(D) O
Edith C,NE,SC J Ejdee U A
Elbow U J
Eleanor C B Ellen U M
Ernest U L
Face NE,SC J Farr* (W) I
Fatox NE J Flat* (W) L
Forest U O
Friendly NE O Frisken C L
LAKES OVER 16 HECTARES
KEY:
WILDERNESS LAKES W
WILDERNESS LAKES CANDIDATE (W) NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES NE
GENERAL USE LAKES GU GENERAL USE LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) GU(D)
DEVELOPMENT LAKES D
DEVELOPMENT LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) D(D) CRITICAL LAKES C
SPECIAL CASE LAKES SC
UNCLASSIFIED U ELECTORAL AREA EA
LAKE CLASSIF. EA LAKE CLASSIF. EA Frogmoore SC M
Gallagher SC I Gannett U O
Genier C,SC O
Gisborne U J Glimpse GU(D),SC M
Goose NE J Gordon NE,SC I
Gorman NE O
Green C E Grizzly NE A
Gustafson D,SC E
Gypsum NE M Haggan U L
Hallamore GU (D) A Hammer NE E
Harbour NE O
Harmon NE,SC N Harper NE L
Hatheume C,NE,SC M Heffley D(D),SC P
Hiahkwah W O
Hihium NE,SC I Hoopatatkwa W O
Hoover W O Hutchinson SC E
Hyas GU,SC P
Index NE,SC M Isobel C,SC J
Jim NE E
Jacko C,SC J Jackson* (W) M
John George W I
John Frank C,SC L Johnson NE,SC O
Kamloops SC J
Kane SC N Kelly U E
Kentucky NE,SC N Ketchan* SC M
Kwoiek U I
Lac des Roches D O Lac du Bois C,NE,SC J
Lac Le Jeune D(D) J
Latremouille NE,SC O Leighton C,SC J
LeRoy (West)* (W) M LeRoy (Mid)* (W) M
LeRoy (East)* (W) M
Little Big Bar C,SC E
LAKES OVER 16 HECTARES
KEY:
WILDERNESS LAKES W
WILDERNESS LAKES CANDIDATE (W) NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES NE
GENERAL USE LAKES GU GENERAL USE LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) GU(D)
DEVELOPMENT LAKES D
DEVELOPMENT LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) D(D) CRITICAL LAKES C
SPECIAL CASE LAKES SC
UNCLASSIFIED U ELECTORAL AREA EA
LAKE CLASSIF. EA LAKE CLASSIF. EA Little Douglas* (W) M
Little McGillivray NE P Little Shuswap D,SC P
Little White NE E
Loch Lomond NE,SC E Lodgepole C,NE J
Lolo NE,SC A Long NE,SC J
Long Island NE O
Loon C,SC E Louis U P
Lundbom NE,SC N
Lupin NE O Lynn NE O
Machete NE,SC E Magnesia SC E
Mamit C,NE,SC M
Marquart C,SC N Martin Meadow SC O
Mayson D O McConnell NE,SC J
McCormic U B
McCorvie NE,SC A McGillivray NE P
McGlashan C,NE L
McLean SC I
McQueen C,NE,SC J Meadow NE,SC E
Mellin (W) M
Millar U L Minnie C,NE,SC M
Missezula GU M Moira NE A
Mollimarn W O
Momich W O Montana D E
Monte C,SC L
Monticola W O Moose U A
Morrisey NE P Mowich SC J
Mud NE B
Murray U N Napier C,SC L
Neilson SC E Neveu NE M
Nicola C,SC M
Niskonlith D,SC P Nolan NE E
Nomans U O
LAKES OVER 16 HECTARES
KEY:
WILDERNESS LAKES W
WILDERNESS LAKES CANDIDATE (W) NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES NE
GENERAL USE LAKES GU GENERAL USE LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) GU(D)
DEVELOPMENT LAKES D
DEVELOPMENT LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) D(D) CRITICAL LAKES C
SPECIAL CASE LAKES SC
UNCLASSIFIED U ELECTORAL AREA EA
LAKE CLASSIF. EA LAKE CLASSIF. EA North Barriere GU,SC O
Paradise D,SC M Paska GU(D) J
Pass C,NE J
Pasulko SC I Patrick U O
Pattinson NE M Paul D(D),SC P
Pemberton NE P
Pennask NE,SC M Pennie NE,SC I
Peter Hope NE,SC M
Phinetta U O Pillar NE,SC L
Pimainus GU,SC I Pinantan C P
Powder NE O
Pressy C E Rat U M
Red C,SC J Reflector U A
Reservoir SC M
Roche NE,SC L Rock Island NE O
Roscoe NE I Ross Moore C,SC J
Rouse U M
Rush NE,SC M Sabiston C,NE J
Salmon C,SC M
Saskum NE O Saul NE,SC J
Scot U E Scott U O
Sharpe GU E
Shea NE N Shelley U O
Shumway C,SC L
Silence NE A Six Mile C,SC J
Skmana SC P Skookum U J
Skunk* (W) M
Snohoosh GU,SC J Sock NE A
Spectacle U E Spooney NE,SC O
South Barriere U O
Stake C,SC J Star NE,SC A
Stein W I Stephens SC L
LAKES OVER 16 HECTARES
KEY:
WILDERNESS LAKES W
WILDERNESS LAKES CANDIDATE (W) NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKES NE
GENERAL USE LAKES GU GENERAL USE LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) GU(D)
DEVELOPMENT LAKES D
DEVELOPMENT LAKES (DEVELOPED SUBCLASS) D(D) CRITICAL LAKES C
SPECIAL CASE LAKES SC
UNCLASSIFIED U ELECTORAL AREA EA
LAKE CLASSIF. EA LAKE CLASSIF. EA
Stinking SC I Stukemaptem NE O
Stump GU,SC M Sullivan(Knouff) D(D),SC P
Surprise U A
Surrey NE,SC M Sussex NE,SC M
Tahla U N Taweel NE O
Thalia U N
Thuya NE,SC O Tin Cup GU E
Tintlhontan NE O
Tommy NE M Tortoise U O
Tranquille GU,SC J Trapp C,NE,SC L
Trurans NE,SC E
Tsikwustum W O
Tsintsunko W O Tumtum NE B
Tunkwa C,SC J Tyner NE M
Upper Harbour NE O
Upper Loon SC E Venables C,NE,SC I
Vidette U J Walker* (W) M
Walloper C,SC J
Warren NE P Wasley C,(W) M
Wentworth NE,SC O
White SC E Willard SC I
Willowgrouse W O Windy NE O
Woods NE L
Young D,SC E