LCA13: Common Clk Framework DVFS Roadmap

Post on 16-Jun-2015

377 views 2 download

Tags:

description

Resource: LCA13 Name: Common Clk Framework DVFS Roadmap Date: 06-03-2013 Speaker: Mike Turquette

transcript

Common Clk Framework DVFS RoadmapMike TurquetteLinaro, Inc.

Not a how-to

Not a how-toNot a tutorial

Not a how-toNot a tutorialQ&A at the end

"But I want to know how to use the framework!"

● Gregory Clement (Free Electrons) did a great overview presentation at ELC 2013

○ covers the CCF from the perspective of the framework consumer

○ details construction of some DT bindings

○ http://events.linuxfoundation.org/images/stories/slides/elc2013_clement.pdf

You are in luck

A quick recap

Where we are today

● Lots of ARM platforms converted to CCF○ MIPS support merged and x86 patches on the list

● Many DT bindings○ Some basic clock types have DT bindings○ Many platform-specific clock types have bindings

● No new users of clk-private.h○ Tegra migrated over to dynamic registration○ OMAP is the only remaining user

■ Discussion on the list is promising● http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/94429

Open issues

● clk_round_rate 2GHz issue

● clk.c is too big

● clk-private.h

● __clk_get_name(...)

● clk_unregister and clk_put unimplemented

Various core design issues

● registration functions are ugly

● string name lookups for parent clocks

● initializing clocks in early init before slab is up

The future

Last week's RFC

● Allows the clk api to re-enter itself○ Rajagopal Venkat (ST-E/Linaro) had the idea to use

get_current() for establishing context

● Opens the door for dynamic voltage & frequency scaling (dvfs)○ accomplished via rate-change notifiers

● Series includes dvfs helper functions○ convenient for existing users of the OPP library○ platforms not using OPP library can register their

own callbacks

Why reentrancy?

Boring code

static bool clk_is_reentrant(void){ if (mutex_is_locked(&prepare_lock)) if ((void *) atomic_read(&context) == get_current()) return true;

return false;}

static void clk_fwk_lock(void){ /* hold the framework-wide lock, context == NULL */ mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);

/* set context for any reentrant calls */ atomic_set(&context, (int) get_current());}

static void clk_fwk_unlock(void){ /* clear the context */ atomic_set(&context, 0);

/* release the framework-wide lock, context == NULL */ mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);}

int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk){ int ret;

/* re-enter if call is from the same context */ if (clk_is_reentrant()) { ret = __clk_prepare(clk); goto out; }

clk_fwk_lock(); ret = __clk_prepare(clk); clk_fwk_unlock();out: return ret;}EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_prepare);

Re-entering the clk api, slow parts

● clk_ops callbacks may now call top-level clk.h apis

● clk_{un}prepare, clk_set_rate & clk_set_parent may all call each other○ above calls can also call clk_{en|dis}able

Re-entering the clk api, fast parts

● clk_{en|dis}able may call clk_{en|dis}able

● may not call other clk api functions○ clk_{un}prepare, clk_set_rate & clk_set_parent may

sleep

Useful combinations

● clk_set_rate may now call clk_set_parent○ does away with __clk_reparent(...)

● clk_set_parent may now call clk_{un}prepare and clk_{en|dis}able

● clk_{un}prepare may call clk_{un}prepare and clk_{en|dis}able○ as shown in the amazing reentrancy diagram

● remove __clk_foo() functions in clk-provider.h

● update users of __clk_foo() functions to use the first class versions reentrantly

Todo

DVFS

DVFSA proposal

Voltage scaling in notifiers

● clk_set_rate and clk_set_parent fire pre rate-change notifiers and post rate-change notifiers○ call regulator_set_voltage()

● devices can register their own notifier handlers

● clk_{en|dis}able and clk_{un}prepare do not have notifiers○ use run-time pm

More boring code

drivers/clk/dvfs.c ... /* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */ if (new_rate > old_rate) { ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(di->reg, volt_new, di->tol);

if (ret) return notifier_from_errno(ret); }

/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */ if (new_rate < old_rate) { ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(di->reg, volt_new, di->tol);

if (ret) return notifier_from_errno(ret); }

return NOTIFY_OK;

Key concepts

● dvfs is device-centric○ regulator voltage is a function of a device operating

at a given rate○ distinct from a clock operating at a given rate

● multiple devices may register voltage scaling callbacks for the same clock○ integrators do not have to consider all cases ahead

of time○ driver authors use the voltages from their data sheet

Devfreq & cpufreq

● Frameworks implementing dvfs policy○ policy should be built upon a common method of

implementing dvfs

● devfreq and cpufreq drivers can stop managing regulators directly○ removes another barrier from consolidating custom

ARM SoC cpufreq driver into something generic■ cpufreq-cpu0.c?

Where does the data go?

● DT bindings for operating points○ tie devices, clocks, frequencies, regulators and

voltages together in one place

● Need to gather requirements from you on the needs of your platform○ Ideally a single binding can work for all

● group clock rate changes as part of dvfs transition○ e.g. scaling CPU frequency requires async bridge

divider updates as well as changing DDR clock speed

● centralized approach versus distributed approach○ must be easy for driver authors

DVFS unresolved topics

Alternative approach

● Create a new api○ dvfs_set_rate() or dvfs_set_opp()

● Does away with relying on clock rate-change notifiers

● Extra burden on driver authors to learn about a new api/framework○ Driver authors must choose whether to use

clk_set_rate or dvfs_set_rate

Questions?