Post on 19-Feb-2016
description
transcript
Agenda
• Importance of a Brand– Consumers’ perspective
• Brand Positioning – Point of difference– Point of parity
Consumer Perspective
1. Identification
2. Practicality
Keller (2008) Chapter 1
Consumer Perspective
3. Guarantee
4. Optimisation
Keller (2008) Chapter 1
Consumer Perspective
5. Continuity
6. Badge
Keller (2008) Chapter 1
Consumer Perspective
7. Hedonistic
8. Ethical
Keller (2008) Chapter 1
Brands create perceived value in
order to differentiate the product or
service in the eyes of the consumer.
Keller (2008) Chapter 1
Brand Positioning
• What is Brand Positioning?
– Brand positioning is an act of designing the company’s offer and image so that it occupies a distinct and valued place in the target customers’ minds.
Positioning Criteria
1. Target Customers
2. Nature of Competition
3. Point of Difference
4. Point of ParityKeller (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57(1), pp. 1-29
Competitive Frame of Reference• Target Market
– Identifying which segment of customers have a strong favourable and unique association with the brand
• Nature of Competition
– The product’s category membership tells consumers about the benefits when using the product and helps marketers to identify their competitors
Positioning Criteria
• Point of Difference
– Attributes or benefits that consumers strongly associate with a brand, positively evaluate and believe that they could not find to the same extent with a competitive brand
Keller et al. (2002), “Three Questions you Need to Ask About Your Brand,” Harvard Business Review 80(9), pp. 80-89
Point of Difference
PODs
Functional, performance-related
Abstract,Imagery-related
Choosing PODs
PODs
Desirability Deliverability
Relevance Distinctiveness Believability
Choosing PODs• Relevance
– Target consumers must find the POD personally relevant and important
• Distinctiveness– Target consumers must find the POD
distinctive and superior
• Believability– A brand must offer a compelling and credible
reason for choosing it over the other options
Choosing PODs
PODs
Desirability Deliverability
Feasibility Communicability Sustainability
Choosing PODs• Feasibility
– The product and marketing must be designed to support the desired association
• Communicability– Factual, verifiable evidence marketers use to
communicate as support to the brand and its desired association
• Sustainability– The PODs need to pre-emptive, defensible
and difficult to attack
Positioning Criteria
• Point of Parity
– Associations that are not necessarily unique to the brand but may in fact be shared by other brands
Keller et al. (2002), “Three Questions you Need to Ask About Your Brand,” Harvard Business Review 80(9), pp. 80-89
Putting them together…
• First POPs:
– A brand does not have to be seen as literally equal to competitors, but consumer must feel that it does “good enough” on a a particular attribute or benefit.
• Then PODs
– Consumers can then base their evaluation on other attributes potentially more favourable to the brand
Putting them together…
• When PODs and POPs are negatively correlated….
– i.e. Tasty vs. Low in Calories
– High in Choices vs. Low in Price
Putting them together…
• Separate the attributes
– Launch two different marketing campaigns each devoted to a different brand attribute
Keller (2008) Chpt 3Low-fare, Exclusively Business Class
Putting them together…
• Leverage equity of another entity
– The brand “borrowed” the equity of well-known and well-liked celebrities to lend credibility to a negatively correlated benefits
Keller (2008) Chpt 3
Putting them together…
• Redefine the relationship
– Convince the consumers that the relationship is in fact positive
Keller (2008) Chpt 3