Post on 01-Jun-2018
transcript
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
1/12
Leishmaniasis is one of the most significant of theneglected tropical diseases, with 350 million people in 88countries worldwide living at risk of developing one ofthe many forms of the disease1. It is caused by infectionwith one of several different species of protozoan para-sites of the genus Leishmania, which maintain their lifecycle through transmission between an insect (sandfly)and a mammalian host. The flagellated, motile formsof Leishmaniaspp. are called promastigotes. They arefound within the sandfly and progress through variousmorphologically distinct stages of differentiation to ulti-mately become the non-dividing, infectious metacyclicpromastigotes that are transmitted during a sandfly bite.Amastigotes do not have an exteriorized flagellum andlive as intracellular parasites in a variety of mammaliancells, most notably within professional phagocytes suchas macrophages (FIG. 1). Some Leishmaniaspp. causechronic, slow-to-heal diseases that are known as cutane-ous, mucocutaneous or diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis.In these diseases, the symptoms remain localized to the
skin or mucosal surfaces. Other Leishmaniaspp. dissemi-nate to internal organs such as the liver, spleen and bonemarrow to cause visceral leishmaniasis, which accountsfor most of the ~70,000 deaths per year that are dueto leishmaniasis1. Importantly, the clinical presentation ofleishmaniasis is dependent upon both the parasite speciesand the hosts immune response. For example, Leishmaniamajor, Leishmania mexicana, Leishmania amazonensisandLeishmania braziliensisprimarily cause cutaneous lesions,whereas Leishmania donovaniand Leishmania infantum(known as Leishmania chagasiin South America) cause
visceral leishmaniasis (TABLE 1). Similarly to other intra-cellular pathogens such asMycobacterium tuberculosis or
Mycobacterium leprae, the same microorganism can causea range of diseases depending upon the hosts immuneresponse, including subclinical infections, self-resolvinglesions and chronic disseminated disease.
Recent years have seen major advances in our under-standing of leishmanial biology: the genomes of severalLeishmania spp. have been sequenced2; post-genomicanalysis of these parasites and the host response is pro-ceeding rapidly3; sexual recombination between para-sites has been shown to occur4; and the intricacies of lifewithin an insect vector5,6and of natural transmission7arebeginning to be understood. In this Review, we focus onsome of the major advances from the past few years inour understanding of the immunology and cell biologyof the interactions between the host and Leishmania spp.,and highlight some of the differences in immune regu-lation that have been uncovered from studies of vari-ous Leishmaniaspp. in animal models and in humans.Although this Review is not completely comprehensive,we aim to provide a picture of the complexity that under-
pins the host response to these parasites, and hence tohighlight the potential pitfalls that are associated withdeveloping one simple model for leishmaniasis pathogen-esis. To what extent this complexity derives from intrinsicdifferences in the parasites themselves, from differences inhuman versus mouse host cell responses or from subtle-ties of experimental design remains largely unknown,as few truly comparative studies have been performed.Nevertheless, understanding diversity in hostparasiteinteractions in models, and ultimately in humans, shouldhelp to determine whether new tools for leishmaniasiscontrol can be truly broad spectrum or whether they willrequire specific tailoring to each form of the disease.
*Centre for Immunology and
Infection, Department ofBiology and Hull York
Medical School, University
of York, Wentworth Way,
York YO10 5YW, UK.Penn Institute for
Immunology, Department of
Pathobiology, School of
Veterinary Medicine,
University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19104-4539, USA.
Correspondence to P.K.
e-mail:paul.kaye@york.ac.uk
doi:10.1038/nrmicro2608
Published online 11 July 2011
Leishmaniasis: complexity at thehostpathogen interfacePaul Kaye* and Phillip Scott
Abstract | Leishmaniais a genus of protozoan parasites that are transmitted by the bite of
phlebotomine sandflies and give rise to a range of diseases (collectively known as
leishmaniases) that affect over 150 million people worldwide. Cellular immune mechanisms
have a major role in the control of infections with all Leishmaniaspp. However, as discussed in
this Review, recent evidence suggests that each hostpathogen combination evokesdifferent solutions to the problems of parasite establishment, survival and persistence.
Understanding the extent of this diversity will be increasingly important in ensuring the
development of broadly applicable vaccines, drugs and immunotherapeutic interventions.
R E V I E W S
604 |AUGUST 2011 |VOLUME 9 www.nature.com/reviews/micro
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
mailto:paul.kaye@york.ac.ukmailto:paul.kaye@york.ac.ukmailto:paul.kaye@york.ac.uk8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
2/12
Uptake
Attachment
Phagocyte
Phagolysosome
Intracellular amastigote
Proliferation
Lysis
Reinvasion
Sandfly bite Sandfly bite
Amastigotes
Procyclicpromastigotes
Proliferation in the midgut
Metacyclicpromastigotes
Two-photon intravitalimaging
A fluorescent-laser-based
microscopy technique that
allows real-time imaging of cells
that are deep within the tissues
of live animals.
Chemokines
A family of small (~810 kDa)
chemotactic cytokines that
regulate cell migration and
function. Different chemokine
families are defined by the
presence of specific motifs
known as C, CC, CXC and CX3C.
Host cells for Leishmaniaparasites
Leishmaniaspp. had been widely regarded as fastidious,obligate intracellular pathogens of macrophages, butrecent studies have confirmed that these parasites have afar greater degree of promiscuity in host cell range than
previously thought. Infections of multiple cell types, bothin vitroand in vivo, have been reported, including forhaematopoietic cells that arise from a common myeloidprecursor (BOX 1;FIG. 2), and for non-haematopoieticcells such as fibroblasts. On a cautionary note, parasitesmay spread between cells during tissue homogenization,posing an additional challenge to in vitrostudies of hostrange8,9. In this section, we describe studies on the relativeroles of different cell types as hosts for Leishmaniaspp.
The importance of the neutrophil.One of the major chal-lenges that is faced by the metacyclic promastigote afterit enters the mammalian host is to establish intracellular
residence in long-lived macrophages without trigger-ing their innate antimicrobial defences. In 2003, Laskayand colleagues suggested that neutrophils could act asTrojan Horses to help promastigotes to achieve thisgoal. Through studying L. major, they observed thatpromastigotes were readily phagocytosed by neutrophilsin vitro, but survived within neutrophil phagosomes. Theinfected neutrophils were induced to undergo apopto-sis and became a phagocytic meal for macrophages thatwere added to the culture. As apoptotic neutrophils arephagocytosed through receptor-mediated pathways thatfail to trigger macrophage defence responses10, their car-goes of promastigotes were thereby efficiently and safelyshuttled into the macrophage phagosome11. Neutrophilsare indeed present in the early lesions that follow L. majorinfection in mice, and they are also detectable by histo-pathology in many forms of human leishmaniasis.Two-photon intravital imaginghas recently provided a strik-ingly visual demonstration of the rapidity with whichneutrophils descend upon L. majorpromastigotes aftersandfly (or needle) transmission, and these cells can now
reasonably be regarded as one of the main early hosts forL. majorin vivo12.
Rapid infiltration of neutrophils into the skin is notlimited to those Leishmaniaspp. that cause cutaneousdisease, as it also occurs with L. infantum, which causes
visceral leishmaniasis13. The cues that drive this neutro-phil response are yet to be defined. The rapidity of theresponse and its association with local tissue damage sug-gests a role for alarmins, which are endogenous moleculesthat signal tissue and cell damage14. However, candidatealarmins such as interleukin-33 (IL-33)15have not yetbeen directly measured in leishmaniasis. Mononuclearphagocytes that are infected with Leishmaniaparasitesproduce various chemokines, which are known to attractneutrophils (reviewed in REF. 16). Cytokines also exertcontrol over neutrophil recruitment. For example, IL-17can promote17and type I interferons (IFNs) can inhibit18neutrophil recruitment, but their precise contributionto this immediate immune response is unclear. Finally,unlike needle infection, sandflies may co-transmit bac-teria and viruses, which may help drive inflammatoryresponses19,20. In situ imaging has shown that mostinfected neutrophils, which rapidly engulf promastig-otes on infection, are short-lived and release the parasitesbefore being actively phagocytosed by macrophages12. Infact, the same study showed that the numbers of para-sites in macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) of mice
are unchanged after neutrophil depletion, which suggeststhat neutrophils may merely scavenge parasites that areotherwise ignored. Further in situ analysis using trans-genic mice to visualize other potential host cells shouldprove to be equally informative (see later). In summary,although neutrophils clearly participate in the earlyresponse to infection, their role as a Trojan Horse has yetto be directly confirmed in vivo.
Although the studies noted above suggest that uptakeby neutrophils contributes to L. majorinfectivity and mayassist in life cycle progression, this may not be the caseduring infections with other Leishmaniaspp., or indeedunder all circumstances with L. major. For example,
Figure 1 |The life cycle of Leishmaniaparasites. Leishmaniaprocyclic promastigotes
differentiate in sandflies into infective, non-dividing metacyclic promastigotes, which
are located ready for transmission at the stomodeal valve (an invagination of the
foregut into the midgut). During blood feeding, the sandfly regurgitates metacyclic
promastigotes, together with immunomodulatory parasite-derived proteophospho-
glycans and various salivary components. The metacyclic promastigotes are then
phagocytosed by one of several possible cell types that are found in the localenvironment (FIG. 2).After establishing an intracellular residence, metacyclic
promastigotes transform into aflagellate amastigotes. Amastigotes undergo
replication within host cells, which rupture when too many amastigotes are present,
allowing reinfection of local phagocytes.The transmission cycle is complete when
infected phagocytes are taken up by another sandfly with the blood meal, and
amastigotes then convert into promastigotes in the sandfly midgut.
R E V I E W S
NATURE REVIEWS |MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 9 |AUGUST 2011 |605
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
3/12
neutrophil depletion in mice increased susceptibility toneedle-inoculated L. braziliensisinfection21. Some earlystudies with L. majorhave suggested that the effects ofneutrophil depletion are mouse strain dependent 22,but these studies often used a monoclonal antibody,RB6-8C5, that is now known to deplete inflammatorymonocytes as well as neutrophils. Contradictory rolesfor neutrophils are also evident from studies of anotherinnate neutrophil function, the extrusion of neutro-phil extracellular traps (NETs), which are composed offilamentous DNA that is decorated with antimicrobialpeptides. In human neutrophils, NET extrusion wasstimulated by L. donovanipromastigotes by a pathwaythat was independent of lipophosphoglycan (LPG)(BOX 2). However, whereas wild-type parasites survivedthis onslaught, LPG-deficient L. donovanidid not23, sug-gesting a parasite-protective role for this major surfaceglycoconjugate. By contrast, wild-type L. amazonensiswas susceptible to killing by NETs, and LPG that wasisolated from these parasites triggered NET release 24.Given the many diverse parts played by neutrophils inthe innate and adaptive immune response (as furtherdiscussed below), it will be technically challengingto directly confirm the importance of parasite transit
through neutrophils and the role of NETs in parasiteestablishment and disease progression in vivo.
Macrophages, monocytes and dendritic cells. Althoughparasites can readily be found in neutrophils, it is withinmononuclear phagocytes that there is the best evidencefor their replication and long-term survival. Two-photonintravital imaging of mouse skin following needle injec-tion of L. majorhas provided direct evidence that der-mal DCs take up parasites within the first few hoursof infection. The process of uptake is highly dynamic,with dermal DCs discriminating between parasites andinert beads and capturing their prey in a process that
involves pseudopodium extension25. Resident dermalmacrophages are also rapidly infected, and they becomethe dominant infected population after 24 hours12.Heterogeneity in the mechanism of phagocytic uptake(for example, coiling versus conventional zipper phago-cytosis) has been reported for different types of macro-phages in vitro26, but the mechanism (or mechanisms)that are used in vivoare not known. It is unclear whetherdermal DCs or macrophages are capable of transportingparasites from the initial site of infection to the lymphnode that drains that site and where acquired immuneresponses are initiated, but both questions are importantfor future study.
As the numbers of resident macrophages and DCsin the skin are too limited to sustain parasite multipli-cation, the progression of infection may require therecruitment of the immediate precursor of these cells,the monocyte. Importantly, this process is regulated byneutrophils27. After cutaneous infection with L. majorin mice, it seems that many of the monocytes that arerecruited to the infection site become monocyte-derived
DCs (moDCs28), which subsequently have apparentlycontradictory roles during the infection. On the onehand, moDCs are permissive host cells for the parasite,thus expanding the developing lesion9. Indeed, they mayfacilitate further monocyte recruitment by increasing theblood supply to the site of infection29. On the other hand,moDCs upregulate expression of major histocompatibil-ity complex class II (MHC class II) molecules, which arecritical for the ability of DCs to act as antigen-presentingcells. These cells also secrete IL-12, which is importantfor the induction of a host-protective T helper 1 (T
H1)-
type response9,28. Indeed, in mice lacking the chemokinereceptor CCR2 (and hence the ability to recruit mono-cytes to the lesions), a non-protective T
H
2 response isinduced by the infection30. Interestingly, whereas moDCsmay be critical for the induction of a T
H1 response, the
non-infected (bystander) DCs could be the key mediatorsof this response. This is supported by the fact that DCsthat are infected in vitrowith L. braziliensispromastigotesdo not upregulate MHC class II or secrete IL-12, whereasuninfected bystander DCs in the same culture do31. Thus,some of the most important functions of DCs in pro-moting protective immunity are inhibited in infectedcells. Bystander activation of DCs (measured by upregu-lation of MHC class II) was also found to occur in thespleen of mice that had been infected with L. donovaniamastigotes, but this study showed no impediment of
function in infected DCs32. Bystander DC activation andconsequently bystander T cell activation may provide ameans for facilitating a rapid T cell response at multiplesystemic sites.
In mouse models of visceral leishmaniasis that useintravenous inoculation of amastigotes to establish vis-ceral infection, a further degree of subtlety in host cellpreference is observed. Amastigotes of L. donovaniarepreferentially taken up by resident tissue macrophages(BOX 1)that lack the CD11b and CD11c markers, suchas marginal zone macrophages and marginal metallo-phils in the spleen, stromal macrophages in the bonemarrow and Kupffer cells in the liver 33. Resident splenic
Table 1 |The main species of Leishmaniathat affect humans*
Main disease manifestation Species
Old World, subgenus Leishmania
Visceral leishmaniasis Leishmania donovaniand Leishmaniainfantum
Cutaneous leishmaniasis Leishmania major, Leishmania tropicaandLeishmania aethiopica
Diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis L. aethiopica
New World, subgenus Leishmania
Visceral leishmaniasis L. infantum
Cutaneous leishmaniasis L. infantum, Leishmania mexicana, Leishmaniapifanoland Leishmania amazonensis
Diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis L. mexicanaand L. amazonensis
New World, subgenus Viannia
Cutaneous leishmaniasis Leishmania braziliensis, Leishmaniaguyanensis, Leishmania panamensisandLeishmania peruviana
Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis L. braziliensisand L. panamensis
*Adapted from REF. 119.
R E V I E W S
606 |AUGUST 2011 |VOLUME 9 www.nature.com/reviews/micro
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
4/12
Phagolysosome
Metacyclicpromastigote
Sandfly
Dermis
Tissue-residentmacrophage or DC
Neutrophil
Non-leishmanicidalvacuole
Blood vessel
To the lymph node?
moDC
macrophages that express epidermal growth factor-likemodule-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1(EMR1) and are experimentally defined by the mono-clonal antibody F4/80, and resident DCs in spleen andliver are infected to a far lesser extent. Furthermore, incontrast to the dominance of moDCs in both early andlate stages of cutaneous leishmaniasis, moDCs appear tohave a lesser role as hosts for L. donovani8. However, intissues that contain multiple populations of potential hostcells, apparent host cell preference may reflect both dif-fering levels of host cell permissiveness to infection andanatomical constraints to infection.
Stromal cells as host cells for Leishmaniaparasites.Thepresence of L. majorin skin and lymph node fibroblasts
was first highlighted over a decade ago34, and since thattime it has become apparent that infection of stromalcells can also occur in other forms of leishmaniasis. Itwas initially proposed that the residence of L. majorinthese cells provided a niche for survival in the face ofimmune attack, but recent studies also suggest that theinfection of stromal cells can contribute to immune eva-sion. For example, splenic stromal cells that are infectedwith L. donovaniexpress high levels of the chemokineCCL8. Together with CXCL12, this chemokine attractshaematopoietic stem cells into a niche that favours devel-opment of DCs that can reduce the effectiveness of T
H1
immunity35.
The intracellular fate of Leishmaniaparasites
The realization that Leishmaniaparasites can survivein diverse populations of phagocytes, which containphagosomes with differing microbicidal properties,raises an important question: do Leishmaniaparasitesrely on constitutive broad-acting countermeasures forprotection against the phagosomal environment, or dothey employ inducible virulence factors that are selec-tively expressed in differing intracellular environments?As yet, there are few answers to this question, probablyfor a number of reasons. First, post-genomic analysis ofleishmanial virulence factors is still in its infancy. Second,although it is the amastigote that ultimately inhabits andreplicates within the phagolysosomal niche, most studieson intracellular survival have focused on the early estab-
lishment of promastigotes, hence modelling only the firstwave of intracellular infection. Third, the historical useof easily accessible macrophage populations (for example,those derived from peritoneum or bone marrow) ignoresthe tissue-specific heterogeneity of the host cells36.Nevertheless, despite these limitations in studies to date,the complexity to come is already becoming evident.
Phagosome biogenesis.In mouse neutrophils, L. donovanimetacyclic promastigotes survive undamaged in thephagosome an intracellular membrane-bound com-partment that is related to the endoplasmic reticulum(ER)37 providing a mechanistic basis for the Trojan
Figure 2 |Multiple cell types are involved in the uptake of Leishmaniaparasites. Metacyclic promastigotes are
deposited in the dermis in a mixture of immunomodulatory salivary secretions and parasite-derived proteophosphoglycans.
The impact of these factors on local phagocyte function is poorly defined. Metacyclic promastigotes from the initialinoculum (or those that have been released from infected neutrophils) are phagocytosed by tissue-resident macrophages
and dermal dendritic cells (DCs). Capillary and other tissue damage resulting from the mechanical trauma of the bite may
result in the release of endothelial alarmins, such as interleukin-33 (IL-33), which facilitates the recruitment of neutrophils. The
neutrophils swarm around the extracellular metacyclic promastigotes, engulfing many in non-leishmanicidal vacuoles.
The death of neutrophils releases metacyclic promastigotes that may be pre-conditioned for survival in other myeloid
cells. Alarmins (such as high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) and IL-1), which are released from ruptured neutrophils,possibly aid in attracting inflammatory monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs) to the local site. Infected inflammatory moDCs
may facilitate parasite traffic to the draining lymph node. Long-term replication and perpetuation of the pathogen
principally involves either macrophages or moDCs, depending on the parasite species. It is not known whether neutrophils
are involved in amastigote uptake after the initial infection.
R E V I E W S
NATURE REVIEWS |MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 9 |AUGUST 2011 |607
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
5/12
Granules
Cytosolic particles within
neutrophils that are referred to
as primary, tertiary or specific,
based on their staining
characteristics and their
content. Primary granules (also
called azurophilic granules)
contain the enzyme
myeloperoxidase, which is
responsible for the green
colour of pus.
RAB GTPases
A large family of monomericguanine nucleotide binding
proteins that act as important
regulators of vesicle transport
and docking in eukaryotic cells.
Fc receptors
Cell surface receptors that
recognize the Fc tails of
antibody molecules. The
binding of particles that are
coated with antibody by the
Fc receptors on phagocytic
cells triggers internalisation
and potent antimicrobial
effector responses.
Horse model referred to earlier. Maintenance of thisER-like compartment requires LPG-dependent inhibi-tion of lysosomal fusion (a function for LPG that was firstdescribed when studying the infection of macrophages38).Thus, LPG acts as a virulence factor to allow safe pas-sage of metacyclic promastigotes through neutrophils,in addition to its other numerous roles. However, a ratherdifferent picture has emerged from studies of humanneutrophils that were infected with L. majoror L. donovani,in which no evidence for the involvement of the ER inphagosome formation was found39. In these neutrophils,primary granules could fuse with parasite-containingphagosomes, but parasite survival was ultimately deter-mined by whether or not fusion of the phagosome withtertiary and specific granules (which are responsible for
acidification and superoxide generation, respectively)had occurred (FIG. 3a).
In macrophages, it is generally accepted that parasite-containing phagosomes undergo maturation to acquirelysosomal properties, and promastigotes inhibit thisprocess. However, early events in phagosome biogen-esis are less clear. In support of an ER-mediated modelof phagocytosis, one study found that most phagosomesthat are formed around L. donovaniand Leishmaniapifanoipromastigotes in bone marrow-derived macro-phages contain the ER chaperone calnexin as well asSEC22b (a vesicle protein that is involved in ERGolgitransport). Using the toxin ricin as a tool to monitor
ERphagosome communication, this study further sug-gested that the ER and the phagosome were in continu-ous communication40. Delayed phagosomal maturation,first demonstrated with L. donovani 38, has also beenobserved using bone marrow-derived macrophages thatwere infected withL. mexicana. In this elegant study,many of the technical challenges of analysing asynchro-nous processes such as phagocytosis were overcome byusing real-time imaging of infection in macrophages thatwere derived from transgenic mice expressing RAB5(which is one of several RAB GTPasesand a key orches-trator of endosome and phagosome maturation) fused toGFP41. Surprisingly, RAB5 was detected in L. mexicana-containing phagosomes for only 12 min, indicating therapid maturation of these organelles. Phagosome matu-ration was delayed (measured by an increase in the timethat the parasite spent in a RAB5+compartment) whenLPG1-deficient promastigotes (which do not undergocomplement receptor-mediated phagocytosis) were used,or when wild-type parasites were opsonized with anti-body to target them for uptake by Fc receptors. However,
in contrast to earlier reports38, LPG-dependent inhibi-tion of phagosome maturation in this model did notultimately affect parasite intracellular survival41.
Various studies have demonstrated that the acidifi-cation of phagosomes that typically occurs during theirtransformation into phagolysosomes is transiently inhib-ited in parasite-containing phagosomes. For L. donovani,this has been reported to be due to the integration of LPGinto lipid microdomainsof the phagosome membrane thatcontain the ganglioside GM1. This process leads to exclu-sion or loss of synaptotagmin V, which is an essentialplayer in the recruitment of the vesicular proton ATPase(V-ATPase) that drives phagosome acidification42. Hence,LPG-deficient parasites were assumed to die as a result ofthe acidification that occurred before they became fullyadapted to an intracellular lifestyle. However, the obser-
vation that LPG-deficientL. majoris also rapidly killed inmacrophages that lack signal transducer and activator oftranscription 1 (STAT1), in which phagosome acidifica-tion fails owing to defective chloride channel function,suggests that the death of LPG-deficient L. majoris inde-pendent of acidification. Indeed, in these latter studies, ahost-protective effect for STAT1 dependent phagosomeacidification was observed to operate only on amastig-otes43. Related to this observation, a recent study has sug-gested that the shift in temperature that is associated withthe move from an invertebrate vector to a mammalian
host is the major determinant of amastigote-specific geneexpression44, rather than phagosome acidification.
In addition to the parasite- and cell type-specific dif-ferences noted above, host cell maturation status canalso influence the intracellular fate of Leishmaniapara-sites. For example, the maturation of parasite-containingphagosomes in immature bone marrow DCs is arrestedat the stage of the late endosome, whereas in maturebone marrow DCs the parasite-containing phagosomesacquire the small GTPase RAB7 and fuse with lysosomes(FIG. 3b). This might provide a mechanism for ensuringthat the immature DCs that are infected at local sites cantransport live parasites to systemic tissue. Unfortunately,
Box 1 | Monocyte and macrophage diversity
Monocytes, as well as neutrophils, originate in the bone marrow from a common
myeloid precursor cell. Monocytes have a critical role in leishmanial infections as they
differentiate into macrophages, which provide a home for parasite replication, but
can also differentiate into dendritic cells (DCs), which are crucial in priming a
protective immune response. The macrophages and DCs that arise from monocytes
exhibit many different phenotypes, which are thought to be determined by cues
within the infected tissues114
. In addition, monocytes are a heterogeneous populationof cells, which may also contribute to the generation of distinct macrophage and DC
subsets115. In humans, the best described subsets are classic monocytes, which are
defined by their expression of CD14, and pro-inflammatory monocytes, which in
addition to CD14 also express the low-affinity Fc receptor CD16. Different markers
define monocyte subsets in mice. One monocyte subset expresses CCR2 (a
chemokine receptor that is critical for release of cells from the bone marrow) and
LY6C (the function of which is unknown) and is recruited into inflammatory sites.
Another subset is potentially derived from LY6Chimonocytes and expresses the
fractalkine receptor, CX3CR1. The LY6Chimonocytes that migrate into leishmanial
lesions are the source of monocyte-derived DCs. Our understanding of how these
diverse monocyte subsets contribute to disease is still limited.
Macrophages also display considerable tissue-specific heterogeneity, reflected both
in function and phenotype. For example, in the spleen there are distinct populations
of macrophages in the red pulp (where they express F4/80) and the marginal zone
(where macrophages at the outer border express SIGNR1 (also known as CD209antigen-like protein B) and macrophages at the inner border, which are known as
metallophilic macrophages, express CD169). In lymph nodes, macrophages in the
subcapsular sinus have a defined role in antigen capture. In liver, resident tissue
macrophages are called Kupffer cells, but even these may be heterogeneous. Resident
tissue macrophages may have conventional roles for example, as phagocytes but
some may also have a supportive role in maintaining tissue structure or forming part of
the stem cell niche. As some of these macrophages have functions that are reminiscent
of fibroblasts, they may be referred to as stromal macrophages. Our understanding of
how these different types of macrophages contribute to the various forms of
leishmaniasis is very rudimentary8,33,72.
R E V I E W S
608 |AUGUST 2011 |VOLUME 9 www.nature.com/reviews/micro
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
6/12
Lipid microdomains
Regions of a biological
membrane that are enriched
in a particular protein or
lipid and can vary in size,
composition and function.
For example, lipid rafts are
highly dynamic microdomains,
10200 nm in size, that are
enriched in cholesterol and
sphingolipids and serve to
compartmentalize different
membrane functions.
similar studies examining phagosome biology inother host cells under various conditions of activationare lacking.
In infections with some Leishmania parasites fromthe New World, the parasite-containing phagosomes arestrikingly enlarged, and it has recently been suggestedthat this may help dilute the leishmanicidal effects ofnitric oxide. Lysosome size in cells is regulated by lyso-somal trafficking regulator (LYST; also known as Beigeprotein). Mice with mutations in Lyst and humans withChdiakHigashi syndrome (who carry mutations inthe human homologue, LYST) have large lysosomes andlysosome-related organelles, including phagosomes.When LYST was overexpressed in mouse macrophagesand fibroblasts, phagosomes were reduced in size and theparasites contained within them were more susceptible tokilling by nitric oxide. As LYST is induced during infec-tion with Leishmania parasites, it therefore behaves as aninducible innate response gene45.
Iron regulation in the phagosome.Although manyfactors contribute to the survival of Leishmaniapara-sites in the phagosome, access to iron has a central role(reviewed in REF. 46)(FIG. 4). Amastigotes can use ferrous
iron (Fe2+) as well as hemin (the Fe3+oxidation productof haem) and haemoglobin, and a high-affinity heminreceptor has recently been described in L. infantum47. Inmice, Slc11a1(also known as Nramp1 andLsh) encodesa phagosomal efflux pump that translocates Fe2+andMn2+into the cytosol48and thus limits iron availabilityto the parasite. As a countermeasure, L. amazonensisupregulates the expression of its own iron transporter,LIT1, after its entry into macrophages46,49.Recent stud-ies with L. donovani suggest that intra-phagosomalcompetition for iron may, by depleting the macrophagelabile-iron pool, activate the cytosolic iron sensorsIRP1 and IRP2, which leads indirectly to increased
production of the iron-binding protein transferrin andthus transferrin-mediated iron uptake50.
Subverting intracellular signalling
As Leishmaniaparasites inhabit an intracellular niche,it is perhaps not surprising that they have evolved vari-ous means to attenuate and/or subvert how their host cellintegrates signals from the external immune environ-ment. Indeed the literature has a rich history of reports ofLeishmaniaspp. affecting a range of diverse macrophagefunctions, including chemotaxis, cytokine productionand immune synapse formation. However, until recentlymany of these studies have been overshadowed at amechanistic level by the vexed issue of spatial segrega-tionthat is, how do intra-phagosomal parasites affectthe cytosolic signalling pathways of their host cell? In thissection we review recent studies that are beginning toprovide some clarity to this issue.
Cellular phosphotyrosine phosphatases.The role of a hostprotein phosphatase, SRC homology 2 domain phospho-
tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP1; also known as PTPN6), inregulating anti-leishmanial immunity has long been rec-ognized (reviewed in REF. 51). SHP1 has a central role inthe regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)and hence nitric oxide production, and it was recentlyshown that SHP1 binds to a conserved KTIM motif thatis found in multiple kinases that act downstream of SHP1and are associated with innate immunity (these kinasesinclude extracellular signal-related kinase 1 (ERK1),ERK2 and IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1)).L. donovaniincreases SHP1 activity and expression inhost macrophages, a process thought to contribute toparasite survival. But how is this achieved? New evidencepoints to a well-known leishmanial virulence factor,major surface protease (MSP; also known as GP63 andleishmanolysin)5254. MSP enters the host cell cytosol in aprocess that is dependent on the presence of cholesterol-rich lipid microdomains or lipid rafts in the host cellmembrane55, and appears to have an ability to selectivelycleave intra-cytosolic protein tyrosine phosphatases suchas SHP1, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) andT cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (TCPTP; also knownas PTPN2), leading to their activation55,56. The kinetics ofprotein tyrosine phosphatase cleavage after exposure toparasites or to recombinant MSP suggests that the raft-dependent entry of MSP into the host cell cytosol mayprecede internalization, but it is unclear whether this
continues while the parasite is within the phagosome.Leishmaniaspp. contain multiple MSP genes, and speciesdifferences in expression of these genes are well known;for example, in L. chagasiMSPs originate from three geneclasses and, in this species at least, there are importantdifferences in glycosylation and cellular localizationbetween MSPs in promastigotes and amastigotes54. It willbe important to determine whether all MSPs cleave intra-cytosolic protein tyrosine phosphatases. In L. donovani,MSP can be found on the promastigote surface as well asin the parasite cytoplasm, and it has been proposed thatthese pools of MSP are functionally distinct, with the sur-face MSP being involved in parasite development within
Box 2 | Surface coat of leishmanial promastigotes
Leishmaniapromastigotes are covered by a dense glycocalyx, which is composed of
several types of molecules that are attached to the plasma membrane using a glyco-
phospoinositol (GPI) anchor. The most abundant molecule is lipophosphoglycan (LPG),
which has an important role in the interactions between the parasite and the sandfly
and, once in the mammalian host, promotes the infectivity of the parasites. LPG is a long
phosphoglycan polymer with multiple repeating sugar residues, glycan side chains and
a capping oligosaccharide. Importantly, there is considerable diversity in LPG structureamong Leishmaniaspp., which explains their vector specificity116and may also affect
their immunological properties. A series of LPG mutants have been developed in
Leishmania spp. that have been extensively used to define the function of LPG both
within the sandfly and within the mammalian host117. Changes in LPG structure as the
parasites transform from a procyclic form to an infective metacyclic form are critical for
releasing the parasites from the sandfly midgut, as well as protecting the promastigotes
in the mammalian host from a variety of immune responses. The surface of
promastigotes also contains a variety of other phosphoglycans and GPI-anchored
glycoproteins. The most abundant surface glycoprotein is the zinc metalloproteinase
MSP(also known as GP63)55, which seems to have a significant role in leishmanial
virulence. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the expression levels of MSP, LPG, glycoinositol
phospholipids and other molecules that are associated with the hostparasite
interaction may vary between Leishmaniaspecies, strain and life cycle stage.
Broad-ranging, comprehensive analysis is therefore required to ascertain the biological
significance of this and other leishmanial virulence factors.
R E V I E W S
NATURE REVIEWS |MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 9 |AUGUST 2011 |609
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
7/12
Phagosome
Promastigote
Phagosome
Lysosome
a bNeutrophil DC
MPO-containingprimary granule
Tertiarygranule
Specificgranule
Parasitedegradation
Parasitedegradation
Parasitesurvival
Parasitesurvival
Immature DCs Mature DCs
LAMP1and LAMP2
CD68
RAB7
Signalosome
A high-molecular-mass
cytosolic or membrane-bound
complex that contains many of
the individual proteins that are
associated with a signalling
pathway, often together with
various scaffold proteins.
the sandfly and the cytoplasmic MSP being a pre-formedstore that is ready for rapid use in the mammalian host57,in a manner analogous to the various effectors that areused during type III secretion in bacteria58.
MSP is not alone in targeting SHP1, as the L. dono-vanipromastigote fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolaseimmunoprecipitates with SHP1 from macrophage cyto-sol. Likewise, MSP is somewhat promiscuous in its action;in fibroblasts, transforming growth factor--activatedkinase 1 (an upstream activator of p38 mitogen-activatedprotein kinase (p38 MAPK; also known as MAPK14)) isa target of enzymatic cleavage by MSP, providing a mech-anism for inactivating p38 MAPK56. Similarly, MSP alsoaffects peri-phagosomal actin accumulation, an essen-tial feature of phagosome maturation, by cleaving the
120 kDa scaffold protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPPEST,which is a key regulator of WiskottAldrich syndromeprotein (WASP) and actin remodelling56.
Host cellular protein tyrosine phosphatases may alsohave broader roles in anti-leishmanial immunity. Ofnote, SHP2 (also known as PTPN11), which shares manydownstream targets with SHP1, is coupled to signal-regulatory protein 1 (SIRP1; also known as PTPNS1),which is a myeloid-restricted inhibitory receptor59,60thatbinds the membrane glycoprotein CD47 when macro-phages encounter invariant natural killer T cells duringearly L. donovaniinfection61. Intriguingly, sodium stibo-gluconate, the first-line anti-leishmanial drug in most
parts of the world, also targets SHP1 at concentrationsthat are used for chemotherapy in humans62. Finally,and perhaps not surprisingly, the targeting of cellularphosphatases may not be a ubiquitous virulence mech-anism, and the disparate results for parasite survivaland lesion development that are seen in SHP1-deficientmacrophages and mice may reflect host genotype,the macrophages used (peritoneal versus a cell line), theuse of complement opsonization in vitro and eventhe route of inoculation63,64.
Protein kinase C and nuclear factor-B.Interference withhost cell signalling at the level of macrophage proteinkinase C (PKC) has also long been known65. An enzymewith PKC-like activity that is found in the infective pro-mastigotes of L. mexicanahas been recently reported tobe upregulated during early contact with macrophagesand to be involved in macrophage invasion66. Similarly, arole has been proposed for phosphatidylinositol kinasesin a variety of leishmanial signalling responses that arelinked to invasion. Hyporesponsiveness of host MAPK
and nuclear factor-B (NF-B) leads to cross-toleranceto activation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) andL. major67,68but does not appear to be due to the induc-tion of cellular protein tyrosine phosphatases, suggestingalternative means for parasites to inhibit host responsive-ness. L. amazonensispromotes the activity of the NF-Bp50p50 transcriptional-repressor complex, which nega-tively regulates iNOS gene expression. Furthermore, inL. amazonensis-infected macrophages that had been pre-
viously stimulated with LPS, the NF-B p50p50 dimerreplaced the NF-B p65p50 dimer (which is normallyproduced in LPS-stimulated macrophages). In addition,MSP cleaves the NF-B p65 subunit51. These resultssuggest an active process of immune deviation69.
Lipid microdomains.Lipid microdomains, includingrafts and caveolae, have an important role in the organi-zation of membrane proteins, in cellcell contact and innumerous signalling processes. Not surprisingly, they areincreasingly being implicated in the interactions betweenmacrophages and Leishmaniaparasites (FIG. 5). As notedabove, host cell lipid rafts may have a role in the entry ofleishmanial virulence factors such as MSP into the hostcell cytosol. However, rafts and other lipid microdomainsmay also serve as targets for disrupting host cell functionand, indeed, as a portal of parasite entry70. Microarrayanalysis indicates that macrophage lipid metabolic
pathways are perturbed by Leishmania infection71,72.Depletion of cholesterol, which is the major lipid com-ponent of lipid rafts, is observed in a variety of experi-mental and clinical settings and has been associatedwith defective antigen presentation following L. dono-vaniinfection73. Strikingly, this defect can be improvedby cholesterol replenishment, with dramatic effects ondisease progression in vivo. Cholesterol depletion hasalso been implicated in immune modulation by L. major.In L. major-infected macrophages, CD40 is preferen-tially associated with a signalosomecontaining TRAF6(tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated fac-tor 6) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), which results
Figure 3 |Phagosome fate is determined by factors from both the host and
Leishmaniaspp. a| In human neutrophils, all phagosomes containing promastigotes
fuse with myeloperoxidase (MPO)-containing primary granules. However, destruction
of the parasites requires the additional fusion of tertiary and specific granules. Fusion of
tertiary and specific granules induces a decrease in luminal pH and also results in an
increase in the concentration of reactive oxygen radicals. In mouse neutrophils, it hasbeen suggested that lipophosphoglycan (LPG) from the parasite has a role in regulating
phagosome fate, but the fusion of specific granules has not been determined. b| Late
endosomal markers such as lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1) and
LAMP2 are found in phagosomes containing Leishmania majorpromastigotes in
both immature dendritic cells (DCs) and mature DCs from mouse bone marrow. By
contrast, recruitment of the small GTPase RAB7, which facilitates lysosomal fusion,
was not observed in immature DCs; this suggests that inhibition of RAB7 recruitment
could be a mechanism that is used by Leishmania spp. to ensure the transport of live
parasites to lymph nodes118.
R E V I E W S
610 |AUGUST 2011 |VOLUME 9 www.nature.com/reviews/micro
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
8/12
Fe3+
TFFe3+
TF
TFR
Fe3+
Fe2+
Fe2+
Macrophagecytoplasm
Amastigote
Phagolysosome
Fe2+
Fe2+
Fe2+
SLC11A1
SLC11A2
TF
LIT1
in ERK1- and/or ERK2-dependent secretion of IL-10.This contrasts with the normal association of CD40 inuninfected cells with a signalosome that contains TRAF2,TRAF3, TRAF5 and the SRC kinase LYN and that leadsto p38 MAPK-dependent IL-12 production74. In addi-tion, L. majorinfection of macrophages has also beenshown to induce MAPK phosphatase 1 (MKP1), whichdephosphorylates p38 MAPK and reciprocally decreasesexpression of MKP3, a phosphatase with specificityfor ERK1 and ERK2 (REF. 75). Thus, parasite-mediatedperturbation of membrane and cytosolic componentsof the CD40 signalling pathway may influence theimmunoregulatory function of macrophages.
Lipid microdomains may also underlie the promiscu-ous functions of LPG. Following L. donovaniinfection,LPG associates with the phagolysosome membrane,regulating the accumulation of periphagosomal fila-mentous actin (F-actin) and thereby transiently inhibit-ing phagosomelysosome fusion (see earlier). A recentstudy indicates that LPG is associated with rafts on thephagolysosome membrane and that, after raft disruption,this and other functions of LPG are lost76. Raft-associated
LPG may also be responsible for the alteration in the sus-ceptibility of L. infantum-infected macrophages to HIVinfection77.
A role for exosomes.Exosomes are vesicles that bud fromthe plasma membrane, and have been found in cell-freesupernatants from a variety of cultured mammalian cellsand pathogens, including Leishmania spp. (reviewedin REF. 78). Recent proteomic analysis of leishmanialexosomes suggests that they contain many if not all ofthe molecules that have functionally been described asleishmanial virulence factors79. Hence, it is possible thatexosomes represent vehicles that allow the entry of these
virulence factors into the host cytoplasm, through fusionwith the mammalian cell plasma membrane or with thephagolysosome membrane. Although exosomes fromL. donovaniand L. majorhave some influence on dis-ease outcome when administered before experimentalinfection80, the precise role of exosomes in pathogenesisremains unclear, as there are no known means throughwhich their production by parasites can be manipulatedin vivo.
Type I interferons.Type I IFN responses are usuallyassociated with viral infections; however, both type IIFNs themselves and the signature genes they induce areincreasingly becoming seen as important in leishmaniasis.One example of such a response being beneficial to theparasite is seen during infection with L. amazonensis,which induces the expression in macrophages of PKR,a protein kinase that is activated by double-strandedRNA. PKR appears to promote parasite survival throughinduction of the macrophage-deactivating cytokineIL-10 (REF. 81). By contrast, there are other examples for
which type I IFN-induced proteins appear detrimen-tal rather than beneficial to intracellular survival. Forexample, interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF7), which isa master regulator of the type I IFN response, acts as anupstream regulator of leishmanicidal activity in L. dono-vani-infected stromal macrophages 72. But perhaps themost elegant example is that of Leishmaniaguyanensis,which is associated with mucocutaneous leishmaniasisand can carry its own virus (LeishmaniaRNA virus-1;LRV-1)82. The metastatic potential of different L.guy-anensisisolates correlates with the LRV-1 viral load.Importantly, the presence of LRV-1 was associated withincreased Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3)-dependent secre-tion of IFN and other pro-inflammatory cytokines frommacrophages. Furthermore, cutaneous lesion develop-ment was reduced in Tlr3/mice compared with wild-type mice when both were infected with L.guyanensisstrains that had high levels of LRV-1, but no differencewas observed when both were infected with L.guyanen-sisstrains that had low levels of or lacked LRV-1. Hence,the inflammatory potential of L.guyanensisis dependentupon the virus that it carries83.
Adaptive immunity
Host cells for Leishmania spp.also have a pivotal role inbridging the gap between innate and adaptive immunity.However, although many of the survival strategies noted
above may indirectly affect the three signals that arerequired for inducing T cell activation and differentiation(antigen processing and presentation, the expression ofco-stimulatory molecules and the production of host cellcytokines), there have been surprisingly few studies overthe past few years that directly address these pathways inan in vivocontext and/or in relation to defined virulencefactors or vaccine candidate antigens. Notably, few exam-ples have been found of bona fide virulence factors thatselectively target antigen presentation, although these areabundant in other intracellular pathogens. The tools ofin situ analysis hold great promise for addressing someof these questions in coming years. By contrast, there has
Figure 4 |Iron wars within macrophages infected with Leishmania parasites. Fe2+
transporters from both the host (SLC11A1) and Leishmaniaspp. (LIT1) compete for
phagosomal free iron. Studies in mouse macrophages that were infected with Leishmania
donovanisuggest that the resulting depletion of cytosolic Fe2+may lead to activation of
the host iron-responsive element binding proteins IRP1 and IRP2 (not shown)50. These
proteins enhance the stability of the transferrin (TF) receptor (TFR) mRNA, which in turn
leads to increased TFR-dependent uptake of extracellular Fe3+
. Reduction of Fe3+
to Fe2+
within the early endosome is followed by iron transport into the cytosol, which is
dependent upon the host transporter SLC11A2.
R E V I E W S
NATURE REVIEWS |MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 9 |AUGUST 2011 |611
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
9/12
Phagosome
Promastigote
Virulence factorsCD40MHCII
Lysosome
Plasma membrane
Actinremodelling
Altered antigen presentation
LPG-modifiedlipid microdomain
Lipid microdomain
been, and continues to be, much interest in defining thecellular mediators of acquired resistance. We describein this section some of the more recent nuances of theacquired immune response to Leishmania spp.
Host resistance and adaptive immunity. CD4+TH1 cells
are critical for the control of Leishmaniainfections,owing to their ability to make IFN, which activatesmacrophages and DCs, leading to parasite death (FIG. 6).The role of CD8+T cells in cutaneous leishmaniasis hasbeen less well appreciated. Although early studies indi-cated that CD8+T cells were important to control visceralleishmaniasis84, the initial studies with L. majorindicatedthat CD8+T cells were not important for control of a pri-mary infection but they participated in the resistance toreinfection85. However, when mice were infected with lowdoses of parasites, CD8+T cells appeared to be essen-tial for resolution of primary infection86, owing in partto the ability of IFN to promote a T
H1-type response87.
Nevertheless, CD8+T cells are not always associated
with disease resolution. For example, the recruitment ofCD8+T cells that express the granule-associated serineprotease granzyme B is correlated with lesion progressionin patients infected with L. braziliensis88. The factors thatdetermine when CD8+T cells are protective and whenthey promote disease remain to be elucidated. Moreover,it appears that CD8+T cell exhaustion following infec-tion with L. donovanimay contribute to the chronicityof infection89.
As noted above, moDCs that infiltrate the lesionsappear to be particularly important in the inductionof a CD4+T
H1-type response following L. majorinfec-
tion. Interestingly, it was recently found that CD8+T cell
activation following L. majorinfection appears to insteaddepend upon dermal DCs (defined by expression of theC-type lectin langerin (also known as CD207)). Thus,when dermal DCs were specifically depleted in mice (byadministering diphtheria toxin to mice that expressedthe simian diphtheria toxin receptor under control of thelangerin promoter), CD8+T cell responses were signifi-cantly diminished, but CD4+T cell responses were notaffected90. Importantly, CD8+T cells that are activatedduring Leishmaniainfections may not all be specific, asuninfected DCs that have matured during inflamma-tion can stimulate CD8+T cells to proliferate without theexpression of their cognate ligands32. The role of thesenon-leishmanial-specific CD8+T cells in the infection isnot clear, but when previously activated CD8+T cells areexpanded during infection, they can provide increasedresistance to previously encountered pathogens91.
Parasite persistence.In spite of the development of arobust immune response in resistant mice, as well as inmany patients, a small number of parasites persist fol-
lowing disease resolution. The production of IL-10 has alarge role in dampening the immune response and thusallowing some parasites to escape destruction. This wasshown by depleting IL-10 from mice that were infectedwith low doses of L. major, which led to sterile cure (thatis, no living parasites remained)92. Recent studies haveshown that IL-10 can come from a variety of sourcesfollowing leishmanial infections, including regulatory T(T
Reg)cells93, T
H1 cells9496, CD8+T cells92, B cells97, natural
killer cells98, regulatory DCs35, macrophages99and neutro-phils100. Which of these is most important as a sourceof IL-10 is less clear, but may depend upon differencesin the parasites and the stages of the infection. On onehand, IL-10-transgenic mice (in which IL-10 is only pro-duced in cells that express MHC class II molecules) areextremely susceptible to infection with L. major101. Onthe other hand, a recent study in mice expressing humanIL-10 (from a transgene encoded on a bacterial artificialchromosome) suggested that IL-10 production by T cells,rather than macrophages, may be more critical for para-site clearance102. In L. donovaniinfection, CD8+CD40+T cells may act as contra-T
Regcells by limiting the pro-
duction of IL-10 during the early phase of infection, butthemselves become susceptible to IL-10-induced apop-tosis as the disease progresses103. Thus, the question ofhow immunoregulatory mechanisms limit immuneresponses, and as a consequence lead to the persistence
of parasites following disease resolution, remains anarea of active investigation.
When leishmaniasis involves infection of lymphoidtissues, such as the spleen and lymph nodes, theseundergo dramatic remodelling33,104. Although erosion ofstromal cells and vascular remodelling represent the mostlikely underlying mechanism behind the loss of archi-tectural integrity, the main functional consequence maybe to develop a state of immune suppression dependentupon spatial segregation (REF. 105). Of note, interventionsthat restore the tissue microarchitecture can have impor-tant immune restorative functions104,106. Interestingly,recent studies suggest another instance for which the
Figure 5 |Lipid microdomains during Leishmaniainfection of macrophages.
During the initial encounter, lipid microdomains on the plasma membrane of the
macrophage have a role in directing parasite uptake and the entry of specific
virulence factors such as major surface protein (MSP, also known as GP63). Virulence
factors can also be transferred to the macrophage by parasite-produced exosomes.
Once the promastigote has entered the phagosome, lipophosphoglycan (LPG) inserts
into lipid rafts and inhibits phagosomelysosome fusion. Additional metacyclic pro-
mastigote-derived virulence factors may cross the phagosome membrane using lipid
microdomains or by exosomes, and thereby reach their cytosolic targets. Similar rolesfor lipid microdomains could be postulated for phagosomes containing amastigotes,
although little data exist to directly support this. Altered lipid rafts may also be
responsible for defective antigen presentation and CD40 signalling. MHC class II,
major histocompatibility complex class II.
R E V I E W S
612 |AUGUST 2011 |VOLUME 9 www.nature.com/reviews/micro
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
10/12
DC
DC
Monocyte
DC
CD4+ CD8+
CD8+
Macrophage
Central memoryEffector cells
IL-10
Antigen presentation
IFN
TReg
B cell
TH1
NK cell
Macrophage
Concomitant immunity
A situation in which
immunological resistance to
reinfection co-exists at the
same time as persistence of
the original infection.
mechanism behind an ineffective immune responseand, hence, enhanced parasite persistence could onlyhave been uncovered by in situ approaches. The interac-tions between CD4+T cells and L. major-infected hostcells have been visualized using two-photon imaging inestablished dermal lesions. Although many of the specificT cells were found to colocalize with parasite-infectedcells, there were areas of tissue where accumulations ofparasites were ignored by T cells107. Why this is the caseremains to be determined. However, avoidance of detec-tion at this level does not seem to occur in the case ofhepatic L. donovaniinfections, in which parasites arefound in defined granulomas and infiltrating effectorCD8+T cells appear to be readily able to seek out theirtargets8.
As mentioned earlier, there have been many mecha-nisms described by which parasites attempt to modulate
the ability of their host cells to respond to the signalsthat lead to induction of leishmanicidal activity. Fromthese observations one might conclude that completelyeliminating parasites may not be possible regardless ofthe magnitude of the immune response. However, earlierstudies in which IL-10 was eliminated have suggested thatsterile cure could be achieved in certain situations92. Morerecently, in mice lackingBCL-2-interacting mediator ofcell death (BIM), a pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family member,not only did L. majorinfections resolve, but also this reso-lution was associated with the clearance of all detectableparasites108. Hence, given a sufficient immune response,sterile cure can be achieved in leishmaniasis.
Memory and vaccination.As parasites generally per-sist, even after apparent clinical cure, the type of immu-nity that is induced by Leishmaniainfections is akin toconcomitant immunity. The T cell subsets that contributeto such immunity have been characterized over the pastseveral years, and include CD4+T cells with a phenotypeof central memory T cells109, effector T
H1 cells and resting
effector TH1 cells110. In addition, CD8+T cells can have a
critical role in resistance to reinfection85. The question ofhow to generate these cells by vaccination remains a chal-lenge, as does the question of which T cells may be mostlikely to survive and provide the best protection. Recentstudies suggest that the most protective CD4+T cells arethose that are multifunctional, capable of producing notonly IFN, but also IL-2 and TNF111. Consistent with thefindings that elimination of IL-10 can promote resistance,IL-10 appears to limit the generation of these protective
T cells during vaccination112. Unfortunately, althoughseveral approaches have been taken to develop a vaccinefor leishmaniasis, to date none have been successful inhumans (reviewed in REFS 1,113).
Concluding remarks
Challenges remain in understanding leishmanial biol-ogy, the host responses to the parasites and how to usesuch knowledge to develop new ways of combating theinfection. However, advances over the past several yearsprovide a roadmap for future discovery. The sequenc-ing of several leishmanial genomes provided a wealthof information that will be used to define new drug
Figure 6 |Cellular components of the anti-leishmanial immune response. Monocytes infiltrate the site of
infection and differentiate into dendritic cells (DCs). DCs become infected but fail to become activated, whereas
local uninfected DCs upregulate major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II). Macrophages are also
infected by the parasites. Uninfected DCs may pick up dead parasites or leishmanial antigen and become the critical
antigen-presenting cells (APCs). CD4+T cells are then activated and differentiate into T helper (TH1) cells, which
produce interferon-(IFN), and this promotes parasite killing by infected cells and also further promotes thedevelopment of T
H1 cells. Some CD4+T cells fail to become T
H1 cells, and adopt a central memory T cell phenotype.
CD8+T cells recognizing leishmanial antigens are also activated and also produce IFN. Control of the response islargely mediated by the production of interleukin-10 (IL-10), which can come from several different cell types,
including regulatory T (TReg
) cells, TH1 cells, CD8+cells, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells, macrophages and DCs.
R E V I E W S
NATURE REVIEWS |MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 9 |AUGUST 2011 |613
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
11/12
targets, mechanisms responsible for drug resistanceand virulence factors. Species diversity within the genusLeishmaniahas a major role in the manifestations of thedisease. Thus, the application of genomic approaches,such as the rapid sequencing of parasite genomes as wellas omics analyses of the parasite and the host cell duringinfection, will certainly lead to a better understanding ofthe pathogenesis of all forms of leishmaniasis.
A fresh look at the monocyte, macrophage andDC subsets that have central roles in the aetiologyof Leishmania infections, is likely to yield importantadvances that will lead to new ideas for treatment. Thequest for a prophylactic vaccine continues, although
whether it is possible to develop a vaccine that pro-vides long-term protection without constant boostingremains unknown. Nevertheless, harnessing the immuneresponse to control infection will require a better under-standing of the various types of T cells that promoteprotection as well as pathology and that regulateimmunity to the parasite. Finally, Leishmania spp. willcontinue to provide powerful tools to interrogate theimmune system, in exploring the function of myeloid-lineage cells, understanding the role of innate immuneresponses in both protection and pathology and defin-ing the development and interactions between effector,regulatory and memory T cells.
1. Kedzierski, L. Leishmaniasis vaccine: where are we
today?J. Glob. Infect. Dis.2, 177185 (2010).
2. Peacock, C. S.et al.Comparative genomic analysis of
three Leishmaniaspecies that cause diverse human
disease. Nature Genet.39, 839847 (2007).
3. Kaye, P. M. & Blackwell, J. M. Postgenomic research
on leishmaniasis: a critical self-appraisal. Trends
Parasitol.24, 401405 (2008).
4. Akopyants, N. S.et al.Demonstration of genetic
exchange during cyclical development of Leishmania
in the sand fly vector. Science324, 265268 (2009).
5. Dobson, D. E.et al.Leishmania majorsurvival in
selective Phlebotomus papatasisand fly vector
requires a specific SCG-encoded lipophosphoglycan
galactosylation pattern. PLoS Pathog.6, e1001185
(2010).
6. Sadlova, J.et al.The stage-regulated HASPB and
SHERP proteins are essential for differentiation of the
protozoan parasite Leishmania majorin its sand fly
vector, Phlebotomus papatasi. Cell. Microbiol.12,
17651779 (2010).
7. Rogers, M. E., Ilg, T., Nikolaev, A. V., Ferguson, M. A.
& Bates, P. A. Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis
by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG.
Nature430, 463467 (2004).
8. Beattie, L.et al.Dynamic imaging of experimental
Leishmania donovani-induced hepatic granulomas
detects Kupffer cell-restricted antigen presentation to
antigen-specific CD8 T cells. PLoS Pathog.6,
e1000805 (2010).9. De Trez, C.et al.iNOS-producing inflammatory
dendritic cells constitute the major infected cell type
during the chronic Leishmania majorinfection phase
of C57BL/6 resistant mice. PLoS Pathog.5,
e1000494 (2009).
10. Ravichandran, K. S. & Lorenz, U. Engulfment of
apoptotic cells: signals for a good meal. Nature Rev.
Immunol.7, 964974 (2007).11. Laskay, T., van Zandbergen, G. & Solbach, W.
Neutrophil granulocytes Trojan horses for
Leishmania majorand other intracellular microbes?
Trends Microbiol.11, 210214 (2003).
12. Peters, N. C.et al.In vivoimaging reveals an essential
role for neutrophils in leishmaniasis transmitted by
sand flies. Science321, 970974 (2008).
13. Thalhofer, C. J., Chen, Y., Sudan, B., Love-Homan, L. &
Wilson, M. E. Leukocytes infiltrating the skin and
draining lymph nodes in response to the protozoan
Leishmania infantum chagasi. Infect. Immun.79,
108117 (2010).14. Bianchi, M. E. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need
to know about danger.J. Leukoc. Biol.81, 15 (2007).
15. Haraldsen, G., Balogh, J., Pollheimer, J., Sponheim, J.
& Kuchler, A. M. Interleukin-33 cytokine of dual
function or novel alarmin? Trends Immunol.30,
227233 (2009).
16. Oghumu, S., Lezama-Davila, C. M., Isaac-Marquez, A. P.
& Satoskar, A. R. Role of chemokines in regulation of
immunity against leishmaniasis. Exp. Parasitol.126,
389396 (2010).
17. Lopez Kostka, S.et al.IL-17 promotes progression of
cutaneous leishmaniasis in susceptible mice.
J. Immunol.182, 30393046 (2009).
18. Xin, L.et al.Type I IFN receptor regulates neutrophil
functions and innate immunity to Leishmania
parasites.J. Immunol.184, 70477056 (2010).
19. Depaquit, J. , Grandadam, M., Fouque, F., Andry, P. E.
& Peyrefitte, C. Arthropod-borne viruses transmitted
by Phlebotomine sandflies in Europe: a review. Euro.
Surveill.15, 19507 (2010).
20. Hillesland, H.et al.Identification of aerobic gut
bacteria from the kala azar vector, Phlebotomus
argentipes: a platform for potential paratransgenic
manipulation of sand flies.Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.79,
881886 (2008).21. Novais, F. O.et al.Neutrophils and macrophages
cooperate in host resistance against Leishmania
braziliensisinfection.J. Immunol.183, 80888098
(2009).
22. Ribeiro-Gomes, F. L.et al.Macrophage interactions
with neutrophils regulate Leishmania majorinfection.
J. Immunol.172, 44544462 (2004).23. Gabriel, C., McMaster, W. R., Girard, D. &
Descoteaux, A. Leishmaniadonovanipromastigotes
evade the antimicrobial activity of neutrophil
extracellular traps.J. Immunol.185, 43194327
(2010).
24. Guimaraes-Costa, A. B.et al.Leishmania amazonensis
promastigotes induce and are killed by neutrophil
extracellular traps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106,
67486753 (2009).
25. Ng, L. G.et al.Migratory dermal dendritic cells act as
rapid sensors of protozoan parasites. PLoS Pathog.4,
e1000222 (2008).
26. Rittig, M. G.et al.Coiling phagocytosis of
trypanosomatids and fungal cells. Infect. Immun.66,
43314339 (1998).
27. Charmoy, M.et al.Neutrophil-derived CCL3 isessential for the rapid recruitment of dendritic cells to
the site of Leishmania majorinoculation in resistant
mice. PLoS Pathog.6, e1000755 (2010).
28. Leon, B., Lopez-Bravo, M. & Ardavin, C. Monocyte-
derived dendritic cells formed at the infection site
control the induction of protective T helper 1 responses
against Leishmania. Immunity26, 519531 (2007).
29. Horst, A. K.et al.CEACAM1+myeloid cells control
angiogenesis in inflammation. Blood113, 67266736
(2009).
30. Sato, N.et al.CC chemokine receptor (CCR)2 is
required for Langerhans cell migration and localization
of T helper cell type 1 (Th1)-inducing dendritic cells:
absence of CCR2 shifts the Leishmania majorresistant
phenotype to a susceptible state dominated by Th2
cytokines, B cell outgrowth, and sustained neutrophilic
inflammation.J. Exp. Med.192,
205218 (2000).
31. Carvalho, L. P., Pearce, E. J. & Scott, P. Functional
dichotomy of dendritic cells following interaction withLeishmania braziliensis: infected cells produce high
levels of TNF, whereas bystander dendritic cells areactivated to promote T cell responses.J. Immunol.
181, 64736480 (2008).
32. Maroof, A., Beattie, L., Kirby, A., Coles, M. & Kaye, P. M.
Dendritic cells matured by inflammation induce
CD86-dependent priming of naive CD8+T cells in the
absence of their cognate peptide antigen.J. Immunol.
183, 70957103 (2009).
33. Engwerda, C. R., Ato, M. & Kaye, P. M. Macrophages,
pathology and parasite persistence in experimental
visceral leishmaniasis. Trends Parasitol.20, 524530
(2004).
34. Bogdan, C.et al.Fibroblasts as host cells in latent
leishmaniosis.J. Exp. Med.191, 21212130 (2000).
35. Svensson, M., Maroof, A., Ato, M. & Kaye, P. M.
Stromal cells direct local differentiation of regulatory
dendritic cells. Immunity21, 805816 (2004).
36. Gorgani, N. N., Ma, Y. & Clark, H. F. Gene signatures
reflect the marked heterogeneity of tissue-resident
macrophages. Immunol. Cell Biol.86, 246254 (2008).
37. Gueirard, P., Laplante, A., Rondeau, C., Milon, G. &
Desjardins, M. Trafficking of Leishmania donovani
promastigotes in non-lytic compartments in
neutrophils enables the subsequent transfer of
parasites to macrophages. Cell. Microbiol.10,
100111 (2008).
38. Desjardins, M. & Descoteaux, A. Inhibition of
phagolysosomal biogenesis by the Leishmania
lipophosphoglycan.J. Exp. Med.185, 20612068
(1997).
39. Mollinedo, F., Janssen, H., de la Iglesia-Vicente, J.,
Villa-Pulgarin, J. A. & Calafat, J. Selective fusion of
azurophilic granules with Leishmania-containing
phagosomes in human neutrophils.J. Biol. Chem.
285, 3452834536 (2010).
40. Ndjamen, B., Kang, B. H., Hatsuzawa, K. & Kima, P. E.
Leishmaniaparasitophorousvacuoles interact
continuously with the host cells endoplasmic reticulum;
parasitophorous vacuoles are hybrid compartments.
Cell. Microbiol.12, 14801494 (2010).
41. Lippuner, C.et al.Real-time imaging of Leishmania
mexicana-infected early phagosomes: a study using
primary macrophages generated from green
fluorescent protein-Rab5 transgenic mice. FASEB J.
23, 483491 (2009).
42. Vinet, A. F., Fukuda, M., Turco, S. J. & Descoteaux, A.
The Leishmaniadonovanilipophosphoglycan excludesthe vesicular proton-ATPase from phagosomes by
impairing the recruitment of synaptotagmin V. PLoS
Pathog.5, e1000628 (2009).
43. Spath, G. F., Schlesinger, P., Schreiber, R. & Beverley,
S. M. A novel role for Stat1 in phagosome acidification
and natural host resistance to intracellular infection by
Leishmania major. PLoS Pathog.5, e1000381 (2009).
44. Alcolea, P. J.et al.Temperature increase prevails over
acidification in gene expression modulation of
amastigote differentiation in Leishmania infantum.
BMC Genomics11, 31 (2010).
45. Wilson, J.et al.Control of parasitophorous vacuole
expansion by LYST/Beige restricts the intracellular
growth of Leishmania amazonensis. PLoS Pathog.4,
e1000179 (2008).
46. Huynh, C. & Andrews, N. W. Iron acquisition within
host cells and the pathogenicity of Leishmania. Cell.
Microbiol.10, 293300 (2008).
47. Carvalho, S.et al.Heme as a source of iron to
Leishmania infantumamastigotes.Acta Trop.109,131135 (2009).
48. Blackwell, J. M.et al.SLC11A1 (formerly NRAMP1) and
disease resistance. Cell. Microbiol. 3, 773784 (2001).
49. Jacques, I., Andrews, N. W. & Huynh, C. Functional
characterization of LIT1, the Leishmania amazonensis
ferrous iron transporter. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
170, 2836 (2010).
50. Das, N. K., Biswas, S., Solanki, S. & Mukhopadhyay,
C. K. Leishmaniadonovanidepletes labile iron pool to
exploit iron uptake capacity of macrophage for its
intracellular growth. Cell. Microbiol. 11, 8394 (2009).
51. Gregory, D. J. & Olivier, M. Subversion of host cell
signalling by the protozoan parasite Leishmania.
Parasitology130Suppl S1, S27S35 (2005).
52. Joshi, P. B., Kelly, B. L., Kamhawi, S., Sacks, D. L. &
McMaster, W. R. Targeted gene deletion in Leishmania
majoridentifies leishmanolysin (GP63) as a virulence
factor. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.120, 3340 (2002).
R E V I E W S
614 |AUGUST 2011 |VOLUME 9 www.nature.com/reviews/micro
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
8/9/2019 Leishmaniasis (Nature)
12/12
53. Victoir, K.et al.Complexity of the major surface
protease (msp) gene organization in Leishmania(Viannia) braziliensis: evolutionary and functional
implications. Parasitology131, 207214 (2005).54. Hsiao, C. H., Yao, C., Storlie, P., Donelson, J. E. &
Wilson, M. E. The major surface protease (MSP orGP63) in the intracellular amastigote stage of
Leishmania chagasi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.157,148159 (2008).
55. Gomez, M. A.et al.LeishmaniaGP63 alters hostsignaling through cleavage-activated protein tyrosine
phosphatases. Sci. Signal.2, ra58 (2009).56. Halle, M.et al.The Leishmaniasurface protease GP63
cleaves multiple intracellular proteins and actively
participates in p38 mitogen-activated protein kinaseinactivation.J. Biol. Chem.284, 68936908 (2009).
57. Yao, C., Donelson, J. E. & Wilson, M. E. Internal andsurface-localized major surface proteases of
Leishmaniaspp. and their differential release frompromastigotes. Eukaryot. Cell6, 19051912 (2007).
58. Winnen, B.et al.Hierarchical effector protein
transport by the SalmonellaTyphimurium SPI-1type III secretion system. PLoS ONE3, e2178 (2008).
59. Barclay, A. N. & Brown, M. H. The SIRP family ofreceptors and immune regulation. Nature Rev.
Immunol.6, 457464 (2006).60. Takizawa, H. & Manz, M. G. Macrophage tolerance:
CD47SIRP-mediated signals matter. Nature
Immunol.8, 12871289 (2007).61. Beattie, L.et al.Leishmania donovani-induced
expression of signal regulatory protein alpha on
Kupffer cells enhances hepatic invariant NKT-cell
activation. Eur. J. Immunol.40, 117123 (2010).62. Pathak, M. K. & Yi, T. Sodium stibogluconate is a
potent inhibitor of protein tyrosine phosphatases andaugments cytokine responses in hemopoietic cell lines.
J. Immunol.167, 33913397 (2001).63. Forget, G.et al.Role of host phosphotyrosine
phosphatase SHP-1 in the development of murineleishmaniasis.Eur. J. Immunol.31, 31853196 (2001).
64. Spath, G. F., McDowell, M. A. & Beverley, S. M.
Leishmania majorintracellular survival is not alteredin SHP-1 deficient mevor CD45-/-mice.Exp. Parasitol.120, 275279 (2008).
65. Olivier, M., Baimbridge, K. G. & Reiner, N. E. Stimulus-
response coupling in monocytes infected withLeishmania. Attenuation of calcium transients is related
to defective agonist-induced accumulation of inositolphosphates.J. Immunol.148, 11881196 (1992).
66. Alvarez-Rueda, N., Biron, M. & Le Pape, P. Infectivityof Leishmaniamexicanais associated with differential
expression of protein kinase C-like triggered during a
cellcell contact. PLoS ONE4, e7581 (2009).
67. Ben-Othman, R., Dellagi , K. & Guizani-Tabbane, L.Leishmania majorparasites induced macrophagetolerance: implication of MAPK and NF-B pathways.
Mol. Immunol.46, 34383444 (2009).68. Ben-Othman, R., Guizani-Tabbane, L. & Dellagi, K.
Leishmaniainitially activates but subsequently down-regulates intracellular mitogen-activated protein
kinases and nuclear factor-B signaling in macrophages.
Mol. Immunol.45, 32223229 (2008).69. Calegari-Silva, T. C.et al.NF-B-mediated repression of
iNOS expression in Leishmania amazonensismacrophageinfection. Immunol. Lett.127, 1926 (2009).
70. Rodriguez, N. E., Gaur, U. & Wilson, M. E. Role ofcaveolae in Leishmaniachagasiphagocytosis and
intracellular survival in macrophages. Cell. Microbiol.8, 11061120 (2006).
71. Osorio y Fortea, J.et al.Transcriptional signatures ofBALB/c mouse macrophages housing multiplying
Leishmania amazonensisamastigotes. BMC Genomics10, 119 (2009).
72. Phillips, R.et al.Innate killing of Leishmania donovani
by macrophages of the splenic marginal zone requiresIRF-7. PLoS Pathog.6, e1000813 (2010).
73. Chakraborty, D.et al.Leishmania donovaniaffectsantigen presentation of macrophage by disrupting
lipid rafts.J. Immunol.175, 32143224 (2005).74. Rub, A.et al.Cholesterol depletion associated with
Leishmania majorinfection alters macrophage CD40signalosome composition and effector function.
Nature Immunol.10, 273280 (2009).75. Srivastava, N., Sudan, R. & Saha, B. CD40-modulated
dual-specificity phosphatases MAPK phosphatase
(MKP)-1 and MKP-3 reciprocally regulate Leishmaniamajorinfection.J. Immunol.186, 58635872 (2011).
76. Winberg, M. E.et al.Leishmania donovanilipophosphoglycan inhibits phagosomal maturation
via action on membrane rafts. Microbes Infect.11,215222 (2009).
77. Garg, R., Lodge, R., Descoteaux, A. & Tremblay, M. J.
Leishmania infantumpromastigotes reduce entry of
HIV-1 into macrophages through a lipophosphoglycan-
mediated disruption of lipid rafts.J. Infect. Dis.197,17011708 (2008).
78. Silverman, J. M. & Reiner, N. E. Exosomes and othermicrovesicles in infection biology: organelles with
unanticipated phenotypes. Cell. Microbiol.13, 19(2010).
79. Silverman, J. M.et al.An exosome-based secretionpathway is responsible for protein export from
Leishmaniaand communication with macrophages.
J. Cell Sci.123, 842852 (2010).80. Silverman, J. M.et al.Leishmaniaexosomes modulate
innate and adaptive immune responses througheffects on monocytes and dendritic cells.J. Immunol.185, 50115022 (2010).
81. Pereira, R. M.et al.Novel role for the double-stranded
RNA-activated protein kinase PKR: modulation ofmacrophage infection by the protozoan parasite
Leishmania. FASEB J.24, 617626 (2010).82. Guilbride, L., Myler, P. J. & Stuart, K. Distribution and
sequence divergence of LRV1 viruses among different
Leishmaniaspecies. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 54,101104 (1992).
83. Ives, A.et al.LeishmaniaRNA virus controls theseverity of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Science331, 775778 (2011).
84. Stern, J. J., Oca, M. J., Rubin, B. Y., Anderson, S. L. &
Murray, H. W. Role of L3T4+and LyT-2+cells inexperimental visceral leishmaniasis.J. Immunol.140,
39713977 (1988).85. Muller, I., Kropf, P., Etges, R. J. & Louis, J. A. Gamma
interferon response in secondary Leishmania major
infection: role of CD8+
T cells. Infect. Immun.61,37303738 (1993).86. Belkaid, Y.et al.CD8+T cells are required for primary
immunity in C57BL/6 mice following low-dose,
intradermal challenge with Leishmaniamajor.J. Immunol.168, 39924000 (2002).
87. Uzonna, J. E., Joyce, K. L. & Scott, P. Low dose
Leishmania majorpromotes a transient T helper cell
type 2 response that is down-regulated by interferon--producing CD8+T cells.J. Exp. Med.199,15591566 (2004).
88. Faria, D. R.et al.Recruitment of CD8+T cellsexpressing granzyme A is associated with lesion
progression in human cutaneous leishmaniasis.Parasite Immunol.31, 432439 (2009).
89. Joshi, T., Rodriguez, S., Perovic, V., Cockburn, I. A. &Stager, S. B7-H1 blockade increases survival of
dysfunctional CD8+T cells and confers protectionagainst Leishmania donovaniinfections. PLoS Pathog.5, e1000431 (2009).
90. Brewig, N.et al.Priming of CD8+and CD4+T cells in
experimental leishmaniasis is initiated by differentdendritic cell subtypes.J. Immunol.182, 774783(2009).
91. Polley, R., Sanos, S. L., Prickett, S., Haque, A. & Kaye,P. M. Chronic Leishmania donovaniinfection promotes
bystander CD8+-T-cell expansion and heterologousimmunity. Infect. Immun.73, 79968001 (2005).
92. Belkaid, Y.et al.The role of interleukin (IL)-10 in thepersistence of Leishmania majorin the skin after
healing and the therapeutic potential of anti-IL-10
receptor antibody for sterile cure.J. Exp. Med.194,14971506 (2001).
93. Belkaid, Y., Piccirillo, C. A., Mendez, S., Shevach, E. M.& Sacks, D. L. CD4+CD25+regulatory T cells control
Leishmania majorpersistence and immunity. Nature420, 502507 (2002).
94. Anderson, C. F., Oukka, M., Kuchroo, V. J. & Sacks, D.CD4+CD25Foxp3Th1 cells are the source of IL-10
mediated immune suppression in chronic cutaneous
leishmaniasis.J. Exp. Med.204, 285297 (2007).95. Nylen, S.et al.Splenic accumulation of IL-10 mRNA in
T cells distinct from CD4+CD25+(Foxp3) regulatoryT cells in human visceral leishmaniasis.J. Exp. Med.204, 805817 (2007).
96. Stager, S.et al.Distinct roles for IL-6 and IL-12p40 in
mediating protection against Leishmania donovaniand the expansion of IL-10+CD4+T cells. Eur.
J. Immunol.36, 17641771 (2006).97. Ronet, C.et al.Regulatory B cells shape the
development of Th2 immune responses in BALB/c
mice infected with Leishmania majorthrough IL-10production.J. Immunol.184, 886894 (2010).
98. Maroof, A.et al.Posttranscriptional regulation ofIL-10 gene expression allows natural killer cells to
express immunoregulatory function. Immunity29,295305 (2008).
99. Miles, S. A., Conrad, S. M., Alves, R. G., Jeronimo, S. M.& Mosser, D. M. A role for IgG immune complexes
during infection with the intracellular pathogen
Leishmania.J. Exp. Med.201, 747754 (2005).
100. Charmoy, M.et al.Leishmania majorinduces distinct
neutrophil phenotypes in mice that are resistant orsusceptible to infection.J. Leukoc. Biol.82, 288299
(2007).101. Groux, H.et al.A transgenic model to analyze the
immunoregulatory role of IL-10 secreted by antigen-presenting cells.J. Immunol.162, 17231729 (1999).
102. Ranatunga, D.et al.A human IL10BAC transgenereveals tissue-specific control of IL-10 expression and
alters disease outcome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 1712317128 (2009).
103. Martin, S., Pahari, S., Sudan, R. & Saha, B. CD40
signaling in CD8+CD40+T cells turns on contra-Tregulatory cell functions.J. Immunol.184,
55105518 (2010).104. Dalton, J. E.et al.Inhibition of receptor tyrosine
kinases restores immunocompetence and improvesimmune-dependent chemotherapy against
experimental leishmaniasis in mice.J. Clin. Invest.120, 12041216 (2010).
105.Ato, M., Stager, S., Engwerda, C. R. & Kaye, P. M.
Defective CCR7 expression on dendritic cellscontributes to the development of visceral
leishmaniasis. Nature Immunol.3, 11851191 (2002).106. Machado, P. R.et al.Oral pentoxifylline combined
with pentavalent antimony: a randomized trial formucosal leishmaniasis. Clin. Infect. Dis.44, 788793
(2007).107. Filipe-Santos, O.et al.A dynamic map of antigen
recognition by CD4 T cells at the site of Leishmania
majorinfection. Cell Host Microbe6, 2333 (2009).108. Reckling, S.et al.Proapoptotic Bcl-2 family member
Bim promotes persistent infection and limits protectiveimmunity . Infect. Immun.76, 11791185 (2008).109. Zaph, C., Uzonna, J., Beverley, S. M. & Scott, P.
Central memory T cells mediate long-term immunity to
Leishmania majorin the absence of persistentparasites. Nature Med.10, 11041110 (2004).
110. Colpitts, S. L., Dalton, N. M. & Scott, P. IL-7 receptorexpression provides the potential for long-term
survival of both CD62Lhighcentral memory T cells and
Th1 effector cells during Leishmania majorinfection.J. Immunol.182, 57025711 (2009).
111. Darrah, P. A.et al.Multifunctional TH1 cells define a
correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against
Leishmania major. Nature Med.13, 843850 (2007).112. Darrah, P. A.et al.IL-10 production differentially
influences the magnitude, quality, and protectivecapacity of Th1 responses depending on the vaccine
platform.J. Exp. Med.207, 14211433 (2010).113. Working Group on Research Priorities for
Development of Leishmaniasis Vaccineset al.Vaccines
for the leishmaniases: proposals for a research
agenda. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.5, e943 (2011).114. Mosser, D. M. & Edwards, J. P. Exploring the full
spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature Rev.
Immunol.8, 958969 (2008).115. Geissmann, F.et al.Development of monocytes,
macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science327,656661 (2010).
116. Sacks, D. L. Leishmania-sand fly interactionscontrolling species-specific vector competence. Cell.Microbiol.3, 189196 (2001).
117. Beverley, S. M. & Turco, S. J. Lipophosphoglycan (LPG)and the identification of virulence genes in the
protozoan parasite Leishmania. Trends Microbiol.6,3540 (1998).
118. Korner, U., Fuss, V., Steigerwald, J. & Moll, H. Biogenesisof Leishmaniamajor-harboring vacuoles in murine
dendritic cells. Infect. Immun.74, 13051312 (2006).119. World Health Organization. Control of the
leishmaniasis: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert
Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases (WHO,
Geneva, 2010).
AcknowledgmentsWork in the P.K. laboratory is funded by grants from the UK
Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. Work in the
P.S. laboratory is funded by grants from the National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of
Health.
Competing interests statementThe authors declare no competing financial interests.
FURTHER INFORMATIONPaul Kayes homepage:
http://www.york.ac.uk/cii/staff/academic/kaye/
Philip Scotts homepage: http://www.med.upenn.edu/apps/
faculty/index.php/g20001882/p4382139
ALL LINKS ARE ACTIVE IN THE ONLINE PDF
R E V I E W S
NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 9 | AUGUST 2011 | 615
http://www.york.ac.uk/cii/staff/academic/kaye/http://www.med.upenn.edu/apps/faculty/index.php/g20001882/p4382139http://www.med.upenn.edu/apps/faculty/index.php/g20001882/p4382139http://www.med.upenn.edu/apps/faculty/index.php/g20001882/p4382139http://www.med.upenn.edu/apps/faculty/index.php/g20001882/p4382139http://www.med.upenn.edu/apps/faculty/