Post on 18-Jan-2016
transcript
MMicroicroSSoiloil®® Biomassters, Inc.Biomassters, Inc.
Founded 1996Founded 1996©©Copyright 2004Copyright 2004
www.microsoil.com
All rights reserved by Biomassters, Inc. Copyright ©January 2006
SUGAR CANE
Fertilization of sugarcane test using MICROSOIL® and other organic matter,
instead of chemical fertilization.
Tests were conducted by the
ATENZINGO SUGAR REFINERY
IN PUEBLA MEXICO
MEXICO
2005 - 2006
General DataGeneral Data
General Test Data
* CULTIVATION: SUGAR CANE• VARIETY: 51 (MEX 57-473)• CUTS: SOCA• TREATMENTS: 3 WITH 2 REPETITIONS• FERTILIZATION: 1,600 KG IN 2 APPLICATIONS• SAMPLE PARCEL: 217.80 M2 / REPETITION• SOIL TYPE: CLEAR AND SANDY SOIL• WATERING: ROTATED EVERY 20 DAYS• DURATION OF TEST: 12 MONTHS (MARCH 2005
TO MARCH 2006
TREATMENTS
TREATMENT A TREATMENT
B TREATMENT C TECHNOLOGICAL PACKAGE + 25 %
CHEMICAL FERTILIZER
TECHNOLOGICAL PACKAGE + 50 %
CHEMICAL FERTILIZER
100 % CHEMICAL FERTILIZATION
(WITNESS)
MICROSOIL® MICROSOIL®
HUMIC ACIDS HUMIC ACIDS
VITAMIN B12 VITAMIN B12
MOLASSES MOLASSES
FORMULA 20-10-10 FORMULA 20-10-10 FORMULA 20-10-10
AMONIA SULFATE AMONIA SULFATE AMONIA SULFATE
TEST IMAGES
TEST IMAGES
TEST IMAGES
PRODUCTIVITY
2005-2006
CROP YEILDS (TONS)
73,08
102,3692,02
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)
TREATMENT
YIELD / TOTAL-”CRUSHED STALKS”
1319
50
1346
80
7308
0
1023
60
9202
0
1228
50
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
TALLOS MOLEDEROS/HA RENDIMIENTO TON/HA
TREATMENT
PARAMETORS OF
QUALITY
PARAMETORS OF
QUALITY
2005-2006
BRIX-”SUGAR CONTENT”
16,82
17,39
16,33
15,8
16
16,2
16,4
16,6
16,8
17
17,2
17,4
17,6
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)EN COSECHA 19.59
TREATMENT
SUCROSE-”SUGAR CONTENT
14,89
15,32
14,33
13,8
14
14,2
14,4
14,6
14,8
15
15,2
15,4
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)
EN COSECHA 17,70
TREATMENT
PURITY
88,56
88,08
87,81
87,40
87,60
87,80
88,00
88,20
88,40
88,60
88,80
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)EN COSECHA 90.37
TREATMENT
FIBER
12,24
12,1
11,91
11,7
11,8
11,9
12
12,1
12,2
12,3
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)EN COSECHA 11.10
TREATMENT
72,7
72,41
73,48
71,8
72
72,2
72,4
72,6
72,8
73
73,2
73,4
73,6
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)
% OF HUMIDITY
EN COSECHA 69.50
TREATMENT
REDUCTORES- “REDUCTIONS”
0,18 0,18
0,28
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)
EN COSECHA 0.132
TREATMENT
AT HARVEST 0.132
ECONOMIC RESULTS ECONOMIC RESULTS
2005-2006
TREATMENT
YIELD
PER HECTARE
(TON)
PRICE PER TON OF
SUGAR CANE
GROSS INCOME PER HECTARE
A 73.10 $37.00 USD $2,709.00 USD
B 102.40 $37.00 USD $ 3,795.00 USD
C 92.00 $37.00 USD $ 3,409.00 USD
INCOME PER HECTARE
COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS
TREATMENTNET INCOME
PER HECTARE
FERTILIZATION COST PER HECTARE
NET PER HECTARE
A $2,709.00 USD $250.00 USD $2,458.00 USD
B $3,795.00 USD $350.00 USD $3,445.00 USD
C $3,409.00 USD $407.00 USD $3,002.00 USD
COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS
TREATMENT “B” GENERATED AN ADDITIONAL INCOME OF $ 442.00 USD PER HECTARE OR $175.00 PER US ACRE
($ 4,780.00 Mexican Pecos Per Hectare)
CONCLUSION
MICROSOIL® DEMONSTRATED THAT WITH ITS USE ON SUGARCANE:
• A BETTER ASSILIMATION OF NUTRIENTS (MACROS AND MICROS).
• A 50% SAVINGS IN CHEMICAL FERTILIZER• GREATER PRODUCTION (10 TON
MAS/HECTARE)• GREATER INCOME FOR THE PRODUCER
$ 442.00 USD Per Hectare ($ 4,780.00 Pecos Per HECTARE )
• Muchas Gracias!!TESTS CONDUCTED UNDER DIRECTION OF
AGRICLOA GENETICA
MEXICO CITY, MEXICO S.A.