METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

Post on 03-Jan-2016

237 views 2 download

transcript

METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH

PSYC 338

ETIC APPROACHES

* Culture general

* Comparative

* Seeks to explore universals

* Uses culture as an IV

CRITICAL ISSUE IN ETIC METHODOLOGY: EQUIVALENCE• Stimuli

• Conceptual (construct)

• Linguistic

• Functional

• Metric

STIMULI EQUIVALENCEAppropriateness of stimuli/test materials; equivalent familiarity (or unfamiliarity) withtest materials across cultural groups

THE CHITLIN TEST

By Adrian Dove

WHICH WORD IS MOST OUT OF PLACE?

A) Splib

B) Blood

C) Gray

D) Spook

E) Black

HOW LONG DO YOU HAVE TO COOK CHITLINS SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE RUBBERY?

• One hour• 15 minutes• 6 hours• 24 hours• One week

CONCEPTUAL EQUIVALENCE:

The meaning or essence of a constructis the same or equivalent

CULTURAL CONCEPTIONS OF INTELLIGENCE

• Nzelu (Zambia)- wisdom• Obugezi (Uganda)-stable, cautious,

friendly• Gnom (Kipsigis)- readiness to carry out

tasks in the service of the community

CULTURAL CONCEPTIONS OF INTELLIGENCE

Western tests may not adequately capture the notion of intelligence in other cultures

LINGUISTIC EQUIVALENCE

* Appropriate translation of materials to ensure equivalence of meaning

* Relates to both stimuli and conceptual equivalence

TRANSLATION METHODS

* Back translation

• Individual translation

• Team translation

EXAMPLES OF TRANSLATIONS

Outside a Hong Kong tailor shop…..

In a Thai dry cleaners…

In a Greek hotel…

Ladies may have a fit upstairs

Drop your trousers here for best results

Visitors are expected to complain at the office between the hours of 9 and 11 am daily

EXAMPLES OF TRANSLATIONS

At an Italian physician’s office….

Detour sign in Japan…

In a Greek tailor shop…

Lederer (1987)

Specialist in women and other diseases

Stop! Drive sideways

Order your suits here; because of big rush we will execute customers in strict rotation

FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE:

Exists when behaviours or processescompared serve the same or very similar functions across cultures

EXAMPLES OF FUNCTIONAL INEQUIVALENCE

* Nonverbal behaviours such as gaze, proxemics, gestures

* Agreements with statements such as “I like myself alot”

METRIC EQUIVALENCE:

the same coherent psychometric properties found in two or more sets of data from different cultural groups (includes scalar equivalence)

METRIC CONSIDERATIONS

* Reliability, validity

* Factor structure, coefficient of congruence

• Scalar equivalence

• Item response theory

• Standardization

EMIC APPROACHES

* Culture specific

* Seeks to understand culture in its own terms

* May unfold as indigenous or cultural psychology

CRITICAL ISSUE IN EMIC RESEARCH

* A sensitive and appropriate methodology for the specific cultural context

AN EXAMPLE FROM THE PHILIPPINES

Background:

indigenization from within

pakapa-kapa (inductive approach)

interdisciplinary perspectives

Method: Pagtatanong-tanong

CHARACTERISTICS OF PAGTATATANONG-TANONG

• “Asking questions”

• Participatory

• Equal status

• Adaptable, flexible

• Can be integrated with other methods

• Ethical concerns

PROCESS OF PAGTATATANONG-TANONG

• Preparation

• Selection of convenient and comfortable time and place

• Researcher and participant get to know each other

• “Asking questions” goes both ways

• Smooth ending

LEVELS OF INTERACTION

A. Ibang-tao (Outsider category)

1. Pakikitungo (civility)

2. Pakikisalamuha (interaction with)

3. Pakikilahok (participation with)

4. Pakikibagay (in accord with)

5. Pakikisama (being along with)

LEVELS OF INTERACTION

B. Hindi Ibang-tao (One of us category)

6. Pakikpagpalagayang- loob (mutual

trust)

7. Pakikisangkot (active involvement)

8. Pakikiisa (being one with)

CONCLUDING CONCERNS

• Power sharing

• Ethical issues: treatment and dissemination of data

* Benefits for community

QUESTIONS:

• What are the critical methodological standards for emic and etic approaches?

• Can and do we meet these standards on our research?

• How would you use the information on methodologies to evaluate research on culture and psychology?