Post on 30-Apr-2020
transcript
NAPTP
May 24, 2012
Risks and Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation includes “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Exchange Commission. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this presentation that address activities, events or developments that the partnership expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “believes,” and similar words are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions made by the partnership based on its experience and perception of historical trends current made by the partnership based on its experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the partnership, which may cause our actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. These include risks relating to financial performance and results, availability of sufficient cash flow to pay distributions and execute our business plan, prices and demand for natural gas and oil, our ability to replace reserves and efficiently develop and produce our current reserves and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected as described in more detail in our reports filed with the Securities and from those projected as described in more detail in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available at www.sec.gov or on our web site, or by calling us at 713-651-1144. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 10-K, available from us at www.evenergypartners.com or from the SEC at www.sec.gov.
2
Why EV Energy Partners?
▶ Proven Track Record in AcquisitionsProven Track Record in Acquisitions▶ Multiple Acquisition Sources▶ EnerVest Provides Operating Leverage and Scale in
M lti l B iMultiple Basins▶ Diverse Set of Properties with Organic Growth Potential▶ Demonstrated Conservative Capital Structure and e o s a ed Co se a e Cap a S uc u e a d
Financing Philosophy▶ Utica Shale Upside
3
EV Energy Partners, L.P.
▶ Upstream MLP Created in September 2006 p p(Nasdaq: EVEP)
▶ GP Ownership ◊ EnerVest & Management (76 25%)◊ EnerVest & Management (76.25%)◊ Encap (23.75%)
▶ 42.3 million outstanding units◊ $3 0 billi t i l ◊ $3.0 billion enterprise value
▶ Strong balance sheet▶ Current yield of 5.8%y▶ Solid returns since IPO
◊ Total return 241%◊ Compound annual rate of return 29%◊ Compound annual rate of return 29%
Note: Current yield based on $0.764 per unit 1Q12 distribution paid on May 15, 2012. Includes 3,873,357 Class B Units. Unit price as of May 17, 2012. 4
Diverse Asset Base
Total Proved Reserves: 1,144 BcfePercent Developed: 68%pPercent Gas: 71%2011 Avg. Production: 112.8 MMcfe/dReserve-Life Index: 19 yearsGross Productive Wells: Over 18,000
MichiganProved Reserves: 44.9 Bcfe2011 Production: 6.7 Mmcfe/d
Mid-ContinentProved Reserves: 81.2 Bcfe2011 Production: 18.6 Mmcfe/d
San Juan BasinProved Reserves: 68.6 Bcfe2011 Production: 8.4 Mmcfe/d
Permian BasinProved Reserves: 54.1 Bcfe2011 d i 6 f /d
Appalachian BasinProved Reserves: 126.4 Bcfe 2011 Production: 21.8 Mmcfe/d
C t l d E t T
2011 Production: 6.5 Mmcfe/dMonroe FieldProved Reserves: 60.9 Bcfe2011 Production: 7.4 Mmcfe/d
Barnett ShaleProved Reserves: 647.4 Bcfe 2011 Production: 25.6 Mmcfe/d
Central and East TexasProved Reserves: 60.9 Bcfe2011 Production: 17.8 Mmcfe/d
5
A Strong Strategic Partnership with EnerVest
▶ EnerVest is recognized as one of the largest and most successful the largest and most successful managers of oil and gas assets for institutional investors
▶ Sizeable EnerVest operating base
◊ ~ 4 Tcfe of Proved Reserves◊ 500 Mmcfe daily production
3 9 illi d l◊ 3.9 million gross acres under lease◊ Over $6.3 billion of acquisitions
since inception▶ ~ 800 employees 800 employees▶ EnerVest currently investing
$1.5 billion Fund XII▶ EnerVest operates 93% of
EVEP
EnerVest Institutional
Recent EVEP Acquisitions
pEVEP’s assets
6
Disciplined Acquirer
2011Since 2007
2011
Since 2007
2011
Since 2007
2011
(Since 1/1/2007) EVEP Upstream MLPs¹
Number of Deals: 23 77
Total ($b): $1.8 $15.0($ ) $ $
R/P Ratio: 21 18
Note: 1/1/07 to 5/18/2012 ¹Source: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. (Excludes EVEP) and company press releases²Source: Raymond James and Associates – onshore US acquisitions greater than $20mm
7
Over Five Years of Growth and Diversification
September 2006 (at IPO)
e s cat o
December 31, 2011
Appalachia11%
Appalachia69%
11%
51 Bcfe2 Basins
8
1,144 Bcfe8 Basins
2012 Organic Growth Activity
Appalachian Basin: Ongoing CHK JV activity I iti l E V t Uti D illiInitial EnerVest Utica DrillingPotential Utica Monetization/SwapOngoing Knox Activity
Mid Continent: Continuing Granite Wash, Cleveland and Cano/Woodford Drilling
Austin Chalk:
Barnett Shale: 3-5 Rig Drilling Program
Austin Chalk:1-2 Rig Drilling Program Horizontal and Multistage Fracs
9
Barnett Shale
▶ Joint purchases with EnerVest Institutional Partnerships totaling over
EVEP / EnerVest is a Top 6 Barnett Shale Producer
▶ Reserves◊ Located primarily in core and combo
areas◊ 647 Bcfe Proved Reserves*
g$2.2 billion since December 2010◊ $695 million net to EVEP
◊ 647 Bcfe Proved Reserves*◊ 72% natural gas / 28% liquids◊ 52% Proved Developed◊ Current net production: ~ 68.0 Mmcfe/d◊ Reserve-life index: 26 years
EVEP Acreage
◊ Reserve life index: 26 years◊ Over 1,000 active wells and over 700
PUDS (~ 99% Operated)◊ PV-10*: $623 million◊ Actively drilling and permitting ◊ ~ $70 million capital budget
▶ Acreage Position◊ ~ 113,000 gross acres
(~ 32,000 net acres)◊ 29% average WI
10* Based on SEC Reserves at December 31, 2011.
EnerVest’s Dominant Ohio Position
Largest Producer in Ohio▶ Producing assets acquired
in 5 separate transactions in 5 separate transactions since 2003◊ >8,700 gross wells◊ 85 MMcfe/d gross
productionproduction◊ >200 employees
▶ Massive proprietary geological database◊ 600+ open-hole logs◊ Petrophysical model with
C bi d A
◊ Petrophysical model with 267 normalized logs
◊ 7 whole cores + numerous sidewall cores
◊ ~ 900 square miles 3D Combined Acreage◊ 900 square miles 3D seismic
11
EVEP Utica Shale Position
▶ EnerVest entities control 1.2 million gross acres
EVEP JV Acreage
Legend
gross acres◊ ~ 700,000 net acres◊ ~ 60% operated by EnerVest
EVEP Non-JV AcreageEnerVest Fund Acreage
▶ EVEP net Utica leasehold ◊ ~ 150,000 net WI acres
~ 20,000 net acres in CHK JV (Blue) 130 000 non JV net ac es (Red)~ 130,000 non-JV net acres (Red)» EnerVest operated
◊ Average 2% ORRI on ~ 880,000 gross acresgross acres
Average 1.3% ORRI on 460,000 gross acres associated with CHK JV (Blue)Average 2.7% ORRI on 420,000 non JV gross acres (Red)non-JV gross acres (Red)
12
Recent Ohio Utica Shale Activity
Overall Utica Activity▶ 211 wells permitted
EV Locations
CHK/EV JV Wells
Other/EV JV Wells
Non EV Wellp
▶ 90 wells spud to date▶ 10 wells producing
CHK Activity
Non EV Wells
EV Cores
CHK Activity▶ 135 wells permitted▶ 54 wells drilled or drilling
◊ EnerVest/EVEP has WI in 34 wells
▶ 10 rigs running
EnerVest 2012 Activity▶ 7 wells permitted7 wells permitted▶ 3-5 operated wells to drill▶ Oil window emphasis▶ First 2 wells to be turned in line
in Junein June▶ Initiate monetization process
13
Production/Completion Observations
▶ Emphasis to date has been wet gas window▶ CHK has 10 rigs running and plans to drill
120 wells in 2012 in CHK/Total JV▶ Recent initial production in oil window
▶ Common Completion techniques:▶ Common Completion techniques:◊ Slickwater, Gel, & Xlink◊ 1,500 lbs/ft of proppant◊ 11,000 bbls/stage of fluid, / g
▶ Intentional post frac shut-in time (“dissipation”) to improve well performance
▶ Wet Gas Window◊ Condensate averages from 25 to 175
bbls/MMCF/◊ NGL yield averages from 120 to 160
bbls/MMCF14
Oil Window ActivityNoble and Guernsey Counties
CNX’s Troyer Well in western Tuscawaras Co.
RHDK 8H
Anadarko’s 2 Spencer wells60 days online435 Boe/d76% il76% oil
Anadarko’s Brookfield well20 days online
/
APC’s FREC‐Meigs permit: EVEP WI = 5%
15
575 Boe/d83% oil
Midstream Activity Ramping Up
MARINER WESTDeliver Ethane from SUNOCODeliver Ethane from SUNOCOto SARNIA65 MBBL/dIn Service: Mid 2013
SHELL CrackerProposed
Momentum/CHK/EVEPProcessing: 600 MMcf/dNGL Storage: 870 MBBLFrac Capacity: 90 MBBL/dEthane: ATEXResidue: TPG, DEOIn Service: 2Q 2013
SUNOCO
NiSourceProcessing: 200 MMcf/dResidue: TETCO, REX, NiSourceIn Service: 4Q 2012
MARKWESTExisting Frac - Houston PAProcessing: 200 MMcf/d
SUNOCODelmont PA toMARINER WEST
Processing: 200 MMcf/dFrac Capacity: 100 MBBL/dEthane: MARINER WESTResidue: TETCO, DTI, TCOIn Service: Mid 2013
DTI
ATEXWashington PA to Mont BelvieuIn Service: 1Q 2014
16
DTIProcessing: 200 MMcf/d ; 400 MMcf/dFrac Capacity: 36 MBBL/d ; 59 MBBL/dEthane: ATEXResidue: DTIIn Service: 12/2012 ; 3Q 2013
CAIMANProcessing: 520 MMcf/dFrac Capacity: 43 MBBL/dEthane: MARINER WESTResidue: TETCOIn Service: 4Q 2012
2012 Utica Plans
▶ Continue De-risking the Play◊ Part of wet gas window is de-risked
Pad drilling has commencedAverage cost/well has dropped 33%
◊ Oil window continues to be tested
▶ Initiating process for monetization of all or part of Utica Shale working interest position◊ Expect to launch process near end of second
quarter 2012◊ Have retained Jefferies & Co. as financial advisors◊ Initial focus on operated acreage◊ Completion expected prior to year-end◊ Prefer asset swap for EVEPp◊ Plan to retain ORRI
▶ Continue midstream implementation◊ Cardinal Gas Services gathering RDHK well◊ Cardinal Gas Services – gathering◊ Utica East Ohio – pipelines, processing and
fractionation
17
RDHK well
Capital Structure
($ millions)
Bank Debt @ 3/31 $ 235/ $Senior Notes Due 2019 $ 500Equity Market Capitalization $ 2,245Enterprise Value $ 2,980
Note: Equity market capitalization based on unit price at May 17, 2012. Includes 3,873,357 Class B Units. 18
Disciplined Financing Strategy
■ Since 2006, completed $1.8 billion of acquisitions, 61% of which were financed with equity and free cash flowq y
Capital Activity (1)
Acquisition Financing Since IPO
Equity $1,027 56%
Free Cash Flow $94 5%Free Cash Flow $94 5%
Debt Financing $707 39%
Total Acquisitions $1,848 100%
= Equity = Debt = Free Cash Flow
(1) Total dollar amounts represent acquisition activity by period. 19
Commodity Hedging: Natural Gas
Gas Prices Hedged ($/MMbtu)Gas Volume Hedged (MMbtu/d)
Note: Estimated NYMEX Henry Hub equivalent with basis differentials of: Dominion Appalachia $0.18, MichCon Citygate $0.27, Houston Ship Channel ($0.05) and El Paso Permian ($0.27), El Paso San Juan ($0.35), NGPL TX/OK ($0.12) and TCO $0.15.
20
Commodity Hedging: Oil
Oil Prices Hedged ($/Bbl)Oil Volume Hedged (Bbl/d)
21
Commodity Hedging: NGLs
Propane Volume Hedged (Bbl/d)Ethane Volume Hedged (Bbl/d)
22
2012 Guidance
Full Year 2012Net Production:Natural Gas (MMcf) 40,250 - 44,500( ) , ,Crude Oil (MBbls) 1,065 - 1,155Natural Gas Liquids (MBbls) 1,645 - 1,820
Total MMcfe 56,510 - 62,350
Average Daily Production (MMcfe/d) 154.4 - 170.4
Average Price Differential vs. NYMEXNatural Gas (% of NYMEX Natural Gas) 96% - 103%Crude Oil (% of NYMEX Crude Oil) 91% - 97%
Transportation Margin ($ thousands) (1) 1,200 - 1,400
Expenses:Operating Expenses:LOE and Other ($ thousands) 101,000 - 113,000P d ti T ( % f ) 4 0% 4 4%Production Taxes (as % of revenue) 4.0% - 4.4%
General and Administrative Expenses ($ thousands) (2) 23,600 - 26,400
Capital Expenditures ($ thousands) (3) 140,000 - 180,000
(1) Represents estimated transportation and marketing-related revenues less cost of purchased natural gas.(2) Excludes non-cash general and administrative expense, of which non-cash unit based compensation is a part. Does not include any future acquisition related due diligence or
transaction costs.(3) Represents estimates for drilling and related capital expenditures. Does not include any amounts for acquisitions of oil and gas properties or midstream capital expenditures.
23
NAPTP
May 24, 2012