Optical Wireless: Benefits and Challenges -...

Post on 05-May-2018

218 views 5 download

transcript

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 1

Optical Wireless: Benefits and Challenges

Maha Achour, Ph.D.President and CTO

machour@ulmtech.comwww.ulmtech.com

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 2

About UlmTech..

• Two Divisions: Free-Space optics and e-Learning

• Free-Space Optics Division:

• Developing the first commercial software that simulates atmospheric propagation of optical wireless signals, the Simulight™ (release date: March 01, 2002);

• e-Learning Division:

• Intelligent Real-Time Multimedia Platform for Online Learning and Collaboration;

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 3

Telecom Vertical Markets

Component Boards

Emerging Industry

Products

CashBoxes Service

Provider

Corporate

• Collapse of data delivery business model,

• Telecom Deregulation Act 1996,

• Lack of the killer innovative application led to end-user slow broadband adoption.

• Last mile connectivity.

• Will e-Learning be the solution ?

Added-Value

Services

Individual

VoIP Games Video on Demand

e-Learning

….

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 4

Broadband Access• Service providers need to access paying customers quickly, cost effectively and reliably.

• Fiber often does not reach paying customers.

• Only 3% of worldwide Businesses are on fiber, and 75% are within a mile from fiber.

• Speed limitation, cost and asymmetrical properties of DSL, Cable, Satellite and other existing technologies.

• Broadband wireless communications, with Unlicensed Wireless Technologies UWT in particular will play major role in Broadband connectivity.

• At the end of the day someone, besides investors, needs to pay for all those tremendous optical and networking advances and improvements.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 5

Unlicensed Wireless Technologies (UWT)

FCC part 15.249. No IEEE standards

Radios in this band are provided by Sierra Digital and are affected by rain.

24.05-24.250 GHz

ISM Band: FCC part 15.247 and 15.249. No IEEE standard

Open in Asia and part of Europe, DS spread spectrum, and some radios with 25 Mbps speed.

5.725-5.85 GHz

• UNII band: FCC part 15.407 • IEEE standard 802.11a

Limited global coverage, Hiperlan in Europe (B1 and B2), indoor/outdoor (B2 and B3), 54 Mbps using OFDM on twelve non-overlapping 20 MHz bands, and some non-IEEE radios support 450 Mbps using QAM.

B1 5.15-5.25 B2 5.25-5.35 B3 5.725-5.825

• ISM band: FCC part 15.247 and 15.249 • IEEE standard 802.11b,g

Worldwide Coverage, indoor/outdoor, 11 and 22 Mbps, up to 15 miles, DS spreading and OFDM.

2.4 – 2.4825 GHz

Regulations and StandardsTechnologySpectrum Band

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 6

Unlicensed Wireless Technologies (Cont.)

• Eye-safety IEC, FDA and ANSI regulation•No FCC regulation• No standards

Free-Space Optics (FSO) using short (785-850nm), mid (1550nm) and long (10µm)wavelengths, OOK modulation, no delay, speeds up to 2.5 Gbps and few kilometers in distances.

200-300 THz

FCC part 15.255 and 15.249. No IEEE standards.

Radios with Gigabit speeds, OOK modulation, no delay, few hundred meters in range due to Oxygen absorption.

57-64 GHz (90 GHz and 120 GHz in progress)

Regulations and StandardsTechnologySpectrum Band

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 7

Quick Deployment• No licenses required on a global scale, • No frequency planning due to narrow Optical Beam,• Practical size units that look like security cameras,• Safe when units comply with the IEC safety standard,• Protocol independent,

Optical Wireless: Benefits

Low Cost / Scalability• Uses off-the-shelf components from the Fiber industry,• Highly scalable in bandwidth, • Low power consumption, with some do not require EOE conversion,

Reliability • Reliable hardware• Communication link availability is based on the location, deployed unit and distance.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 8

Wide Technologies

• Short Wavelengths: 750-850 nm

• Mid Wavelengths: 1300-1550 nm ex: Terabeam @ 1550 nm

AOptix (Adaptive Optics)

• Long Wavelengths: 10 µmex: Maxima Corporation

Optical Wireless: Benefits

Terabeam Elliptica:

• About the size of a slightly deflated basketball.

• The laser is a CDRH Class 1 laser, meaning it is so eye-safe as to not require any warning labels.

Source: Terabeam

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 9

• Microwave signals above 10 GHz are mostly affected by rain.

• The availability of extensive global precipitation databases and rain fade (rainfall) simple modeling accurately estimates microwave deployment link availability.

• Free-Space Optics is affected by various weather conditions with Fog (visibility, fog type) in particular → channel modeling (Simulight™) and weather databases.

Formed in February 2001 to unify vendors and service providers efforts to bring proper awareness and understanding of the technology.

www.fsoalliance.com

Optical Wireless: Challenges

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 10

Meteorological Visual Range

“Using Camera Imagery to measure Visibility and fog”, MIT Lincoln Lab Report 2001

Background Contrast

Visibility: Distance for which the Contrast transmission of the atmosphere is 2% in reference to the wavelength 550 nm that the eye has the greatest sensitivity.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 11

About Simulight™..

Simulight™ considers the following optical propagation effects:

• Low altitudes propagation,

• Haze, rain, fog, low clouds and molecular scattering,

• Geometrical beam dispersion including diffraction effects,

• Water and carbon dioxide absorption,

• Absorption due to the presence of water vapor in the air,

• It supports wavelengths that span from 750 nm to 12 µm.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 12

Atmospheric Propagation

Modeling FSO atmospheric propagation:Deployment parameters: are related to the location and application of the FSO system installation: Range, Bandwidth, Wavelength …

FSO system parameters: are related to the deployed FSO system: location of the FSO system installation: number of transmitters (Tx) and Receivers (Rx), Tx diameter, Rx diameter, Tx power, Rx sensitivity, additional amplification, additional hardware losses..

Weather parameters: Meteorological Visual Range (Visibility), Temperature, Relative Humidity, fog model (non-selective, evolving, stable)…

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 13

Atmospheric attenuation

FSO systems are affected by the following weather conditions:

Absorption: is a Quantum effect with H2O and CO2 absorption bands defining the eight atmospheric windows 720 nm – 12000 nm (fine line absorption). Increasing humidity cause additional water absorption.

Rayleigh Scattering: due to scattering by air molecule. Very small compared to Mie scattering and is proportional to λ-4

Mie Scattering: Due to scattering by small particles of sizes comparable to wavelength.

Turbulences (scintillation): Beam deviation, wander, broadening and power fluctuation.

Rain Fade: Considered non-selective scattering. The attenuation is proportional to the rainfall rate (drop size distribution)

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 14

Scattering Effects

Scattering patterns of electromagnetic waves by spherical particles.

(a) Small Particles with diameter < λ/10

Small Particles with diameter ≅ λ/4

Small Particles with diameter > λ

Incident Beam with wavelength λ Incident Beam with wavelength λ

Incident Beam with wavelength λ

Earl J. McCartney, Optics of the Atmosphere: Scattering by Molecules and Particles,Wiley & Sons, New York, [1976].

Multiple-order scattering between Tx and Rx

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 15

Weather Parameters

Absolute Humidity: Mass of water vapor in a unit volume of air. Saturation: Refers to the maximum possible amount of water vapor that air can hold (Temperature dependent) per unit volume.

Dew Point: Is the temperature at which saturation occurs. Related to temperature and Dewpoint.

Relative Humidity: The ratio of the absolute humidity to saturation. This parameter, along with temperature, is useful to determine additional water absorption.

Visibility: Distance for which the Contrast transmission of the atmosphere is 2% in reference to the wavelength 550 nm that the eye has the greatest sensitivity. It is a function of the extinction coefficient βext(λ).

V = |ln(0.02)|/ βext(λ) = 3.91/ βext(λ=0.55µ)

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 16

Meteorological Visual Range

• Relative contrast is defined as follows:

• The above approximation holds when Lmin(0) << Lmax(0) and Lmin(0)=Lmin(V).

• If the background is the horizon, then Lmin(0)=Lmin(V).

• Complete understanding of visibility measurement is essential.

• Meteorological visual ranges V are defined with the above two approximations. .

• The problem is how to use V to derive βscat(λ).

V-

max

max

minmax

min

min

minmax e (0)L(V)L

(0)L - (0)L(0)L

(V)L(V)L (V)L

C(0)C(V) α=≅

−=

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 17

Rainfall Attenuation

• Is considered non-selective scattering because the size of a raindrop (Diameter 0.01-10 mm) is much larger than the incident wavelength.

• In 1920, F.W. Preston, in an almost forgotten paper, claimed that the obscuring power of falling rain is proportional only to the number of drops falling on unit area of the earth’s surface per second.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 18

Rainfall Attenuation

Simulation Results:

• Rainfall between 10-100 mm/hr

• Wavelength independent

Num

ber o

f dro

ps p

er m

3

Drop Diameter in mm Drop Diameter in mm

Rainfall rate in mm/hr

Rai

nfal

l rat

e in

mm

/hr

Rai

nfal

l atte

nuat

ion

dB/k

m

Caption:

mm/hr

(+) 10

(o) 20

(*) 30

(◊) 40

(●) 50

(x) 60

(□) 70

( ) 80

( ) 90

( ) 100

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 19

Mie Scattering

• Based on slide 14 assumptions, Visibility can be related to the extinction coefficient β(λ=0.55µ) by the following relation:

• In most literatures, relating β(λ=0.55µ) to β(λ) was performed using the following equation:

• The exponent δ = 1.6 for good visibility, 1.3 for V=6-50 Km and 0.585 V1/3 for visibility less than 6 Km.

• Problem: exponent value and the one-to-one relation between visibility and attenuation coefficient independent of droplet sizes and distributions.

)0.55(λ

3.91 )0.55(λ

ln(0.02) V

µβµβ ==

==

55.0

3.91 55.0

)0.55(λ β(λ)δδ λλµβ

−−

=

==

V(1)

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 20

Mie Scattering

• The general equation to derive scattering coefficient is:

βscatt (λ)= ∑a π a2 Na Qscatt (x)

where, x=2πa/ λ.• λ dependence is not trivial due to the analytical expression of Q.

Q(x)

x

x

x

Q(x 850/550)

Q(x)

Q(x 1550/550)

Q(x)

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 21

Mie Scattering

• Build a virtual fog/haze model that reproduces the same results as the equation below at λ = 850 nm:

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

550

3.91 550

)0.55(λ β(λ)1/31/3 V585.0V585.0 −−

=

==

λλµβV

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

5

10

15

20

25

30

Atte

nuat

ion

in d

B/K

m

Con

cent

ratio

n in

cm

3

Drop Radius in µm Visibility in Km

Black 785nm

Red 1550 nm

Blue 10 µm

(+) Based on Drop Distribution Model

Visibility 0.5 Km

Visibility 4 Km

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 22

Mie Scattering

• Defining Drop-sizes distribution function by identifying the peaks and the slope of the curve at both ends.

• Use the general Mie definition of the scattering coefficient.

• More choices of haze/fog/cloud distributions based on visibility than raindrops distributions based on rainfall rates: Due to the behavior of large drops in the air.

• There are other constraints that small drops need to satisfy.

• Visibility along with fog type provide sufficient information to calculate FSO attenuations.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 23

Mie Scattering

Weather ConditionsClear: It includes light Haze and Rain: Visibilities over 4 Km.

Rain: Weather conditions that accounts of rain only.

Evolving Fog: Weather conditions between light haze, dense haze and stable fog: Visibilities between 1 and 4 Km.

Stable Fog: Foggy weather conditions: Visibilities up to 1.5 Km.

Selective Fog: Weather conditions between fog and low clouds: Visibilities up to 0.75 Km.

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 24

Mie Scattering

18.118.4512.6710,100 / 10,1003c

41.368.465.781230 /12303b

50.13Jan24 1812-1824

62.957.72750 / 6550.303a

110.42263.4213.6510,100 / 10,1002c

185.64247.33239.21230 /12302b

209.73Jan29/30 2106-2306

226.2227.06750 / 6550.075Stable2a

3.17.30.9310,100 / 10,1001c

10.617.3718.81230 / 12301b

14.16Dec 11, 222015.217.09750 / 6551Evolving1a

Equation (1) (dB/Km)

Experiment*Day/Time

Experiment*(dB/Km)

Simulight™Mie Loss (dB/Km)

Wavelength (nm)Simulight / Experiments

Visibility(Km)

FogModel

(*) Clay, M. R. and Lenham A. P., Transmission of electromagnetic radiation in fogs in the 0.53-10.1 µm wavelength range, Applied Optics, Vol. 20, No. 22, 1981, page 3831

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 25

Mie Scattering

Sample of the fog droplet distribution for case 1: Evolving 1 Km Visibility

Sample of the fog droplet distribution for case 2: Stable 75 m Visibility

CLEO / LEAP 2002, May 22, Long Beach, California Maha Achour, Ph.D. 26

Concluding Remarks

• Free-Space Optics offer quick, scalable and cost-effective solutions to the access network,

• Wide selection of products from T1 to OC48 and soon 10 Gbps speeds,

• Global deployments over the past decade,

• Need extensive weather database,

• Need to classify fogs for very low visibilities,

• Properly convey the technology limitations