Post on 20-Feb-2022
transcript
RAPID ASSESSMENT OF
BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
USAID Jalin December 2019 – January 2020
This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of DAI Global LLC and partners and do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | ii
RAPID ASSESSMENT OF
BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
USAID Jalin December 2019 – January 2020
Cover photo: A Bidan Delima midwife in her private practice.
© Oscar Siagian/USAID Jalin
This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of DAI Global LLC and partners and do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | iii
FOREWORD
USAID/Indonesia’s Jalin Project supports the Ministry of Health (MOH) to achieve an accelerated
reduction in maternal and newborn deaths – a priority recently reconfirmed by the President of
Indonesia. The maternal and newborn mortality rates are among the highest in the region; are far
above Indonesia’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) targets; and have stagnated in recent years.
The overarching problem that Jalin strives to resolve is that the quality of care accessible to mothers
and newborns is uneven across the country in both public and private facilities and at both primary
and secondary levels of care.
USAID Jalin Project focuses on working towards two results: 1) Improved maternal and newborn
health quality of care in public and private, and primary and secondary facilities, at scale; and 2)
Improved efficiency and effectiveness of the emergency referral system at community and facility
levels, at scale.
Recognizing the significance of private midwives’ contribution in maternal newborn health services in
Indonesia, the Project works with the Indonesian Midwives Association (IBI) to sustain the
improvements in quality of care by private midwives. One of the project strategies is to revive and
strengthen Bidan Delima Program, the flagship private midwives’ quality improvement program
initiated by IBI in 2003 with support from USAID. The project undertook a Rapid Assessment of
Bidan Delima Program to understand the constraints and strengths in reviving and strengthening the
Bidan Delima Program. Results and findings from the rapid assessment are presented in this report
and have guided IBI and the Project to co-create an enhanced business model of Bidan Delima
Program and the implementation plan which documented as the Bidan Delima Program
Enhancement Recommendations.
On behalf of USAID Jalin, I would like to extend our appreciation tothe team who carried out the
Bidan Delima Program Rapid Assessment diligently and gathered valuable insights regarding the Bidan
Delima Program and to all key informants (DHO, provincial and district chapters of IBI and Bidan
Delima Program Executive Unit/UPBD, and midwives) in the study areas who generously shared
their time, experience and thoughts for this assessment. I am also very grateful for the leadership,
support and valuable input from Dr. Emi Nurjasmi, MKes., the President of IBI, and team of central
level IBI and UPBD leadership during the review and finalization of this report.
We hope that this document will be used as a reference for the continuous improvement of private
sector engagement in the maternal-newborn health services, particularly by private midwives.
Ella Hoxha
Chief of Party
USAID Jalin
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Rapid Assessment Implementation Team:
▪ Dr. Bimo, M.D., MPH (Team Leader)
▪ Dr. Esty Febriani MKes (Field Assessment Lead)
▪ Abigail Wohing Ati, SPsi, MA (Assessor and qualitative data analyst)
▪ Dr. Asmuyeni, Dra. MKes (Assessor)
▪ Eli, AMKeb, SKM (Assessor)
▪ Fransiska Mardiananingsih, M.D., MPH (Assessor)
▪ Julie Rostina, SKM, MKM (Assessor)
▪ Santi Deliani R, SST, SKM, M.Epid (Assessor)
▪ Dr. Wayan Aryati. SKM. MKes (Assessor)
▪ Yusti Amalia, SKM (Assessor)
Reviewer Team from the Indonesian Midwives Association (Ikatan Bidan Indonesia-IBI):
▪ Dr. Emi Nurjasmi, MKes (President of IBI)
▪ Nunik Endang Sunarsih, SST, SH, MSc (First Vice President of IBI)
▪ Sri Poerwaningsih, SST, SKM, M.Kes (Manager of Central Level Bidan Delima Program
Executive Unit)
▪ Ike Kurnia, S.Keb. Bd (Technical Staff)
▪ Innana Mardhatillah, SST, MKM (Technical Staff)
▪ Lukmanul Hakim, SKM, MSi. (Han) (Technical Staff)
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ANC Antenatal Care
APN Asuhan Persalinan Normal (Normal Delivery Care)
BKKBN Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional (National Population Family
Planning Board)
BLUD Badan Layanan Umum Daerah (Regional Public Service Agency)
BPJS Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (Social Security Administration Agency)
BPJS-K Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan SosialKesehatan (Health Social Insurance Administration
Organization)
BPS Badan Pusat Statistik(Central Bureau of Statistics)
CTU Contraceptive Technology Update
DE Developmental Evaluation
DHO District Health Office
FGD Focus Group Discussion
FKTP Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama (Primary Health Care Facility)
FP Family Planning
GP General Practitioner
HSP Health Services Program
HP+ Health Policy Plus
IBI Ikatan Bidan Indonesia (Indonesian Midwives Association)
Jampersal Jaminan Persalinan (Childbirth Assurance)
Jhpiego Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics
JKN Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (National Health Insurance)
KIA Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak (Maternal and Child Health)
KII Key Informant Interviews
MCH Maternal Child Health
MH Maternal Health
MMR Maternal Mortality Ratio
MNH Maternal and Neonatal Health
MOH Ministry of Health
MU Midwifery Update
NMR Neonatal Mortality Rate
OB/GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology
P2JK Pusat Pembiayaan dan Jaminan Kesehatan (Center for Health Insurance and Financing)
PNC Postnatal Care
PPSDM Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya ManusiaKesehatan (Agency for Health
Human Resource Development)
PPJK Pusat Pembiayaan dan Jaminan Kesehatan(Center for Financing and Health Insurance
Puskesmas Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat (Community Health Center)
RPJMN Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (National Medium-term
Development Plan)
SD Sekolah Dasar (Elementary School)
SHP Strategic Health Purchasing
SiBiMa Sistem Informasi Bidan Mandiri- digital application for maternal neonatal information
system in Depok
SiCantik Sidoarjo Mencegah Angka Kematian Ibu dan Anak– digital application for maternal
neonatal information system in Sidoarjo
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | vi
SijariEMAS Sistem Informasi dan Komunikasi Jejaring Pelayanan Kesehatan
SIPB Surat Izin Praktek Bidan (Midwife Practice License)
SMA Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School)
SMP Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School)
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SPGDT Sistem Penanggulangan Garurat Darurat Terpadu (Integrated Emergency Response
System in Depok)
STARH Sustaining Technical Achievements in Reproductive Health project.
TWG Technical Working Group
UNFPA United Nations Fund for Population Activities / United Nation Population Fund
UPBD Unit PelaksanaBidan Delima (Bidan Delima Executive Unit)
USAID US Agency for International Development
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................. v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... vii
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. viii
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ viii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 1
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 4
1.1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 5
2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 7
2.1. DATA COLLECTION ............................................................................................................................. 7
2.2. DOCUMENT REVIEW AND SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS ................................................. 8
2.3. CLINICAL OBSERVATION ................................................................................................................... 8
2.4. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS AND IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS .............................................. 9
2.5. LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 10
3. ASSESSMENT FINDINGS ............................................................................................ 11
3.1. FINDINGS FROM DESK REVIEW AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS .............................. 11
3.2. STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM ...................................... 24
3.3. MIDWIVES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT JOINING THE BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM ........... 27
3.4. FINDINGS OF CLINICAL OBSERVATION ................................................................................... 29
3.5. DOCUMENT AND RECORD REVIEW .......................................................................................... 36
3.6. THE READINESS OF PRIVATE MIDWIVES TO PROVIDE SERVICES .................................... 37
3.7. HEALTH INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR BIDAN DELIMA SERVICES .................... 39
4. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 47
4.1. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM IN ASSURING QUALITY .. 47
4.2. PROGRAM RELEVANCE AND VALUE .......................................................................................... 48
4.3. BIDAN DELIMA AS A STRATEGIC DIRECTION FOR A BUSINESS MODEL IN THE
FUTURE ................................................................................................................................................... 49
5. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 51
5.1. STRENGTHEN THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MECHANISM OF THE BIDAN DELIMA
PROGRAM .............................................................................................................................................. 51
5.2. STRENGTHEN BIDAN DELIMA MANAGEMENT ...................................................................... 51
5.3. ENHANCE COLLABORATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS TO SUPPORT THE BIDAN
DELIMA PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................. 52
5.4. STRENGTHEN COLLABORATION WITH BPJS/JKN AND INVOLVEMENT IN
STRATEGIC HEALTH PURCHASING DISCUSSIONS ............................................................... 52
5.5. PROMOTING THE BRAND OF BIDAN DELIMA ....................................................................... 52
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 54
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | viii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1: BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM RAPID ASSESSMENT AREAS .............................................................. 7
TABLE 2: LIST OF KEY INFORMANTS FOR IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS ........................................................... 9
TABLE 3: DEMOGRAPHIC DATA OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM RAPID ASSESSMENT AREAS ...... 13
TABLE4: PRIVATE MIDWIFE DATA IN ASSESSED DISTRICTS, PER DECEMBER 2019 ........................... 14
TABLE 5: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PREGNANT WOMEN WHO WERE INTERVIEWED ............ 25
TABLE 6:THE CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTPARTUM MOTHERS WHO WERE INTERVIEWED ...... 26
TABLE 7: THE THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS OF PRIVATE MIDWIVES ABOUT BIDAN DELIMA .... 27
TABLE 8: CHARACTERISTICS OF PRIVATE MIDWIVES SAMPLED FOR THE CLINICAL
OBSERVATION ............................................................................................................................................ 29
TABLE 9: RESULTS OF PARTOGRAPH DOCUMENT REVIEW ...................................................................... 34
TABLE 10: AVAILABILITY OF EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES IN PRIVATE MIDWIFE PRACTICES ....... 39
TABLE 11: REASONS FOR NOT EMPANELING AS MNH PROVIDER FOR JKN ...................................... 40
TABLE 12: THE CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY OF CARE OF SAMPLE MIDWIVES ..................... 47
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: NUMBER OF BIDAN DELIMA MIDWIVES IN THE RAPID ASSESSMENT AREAS FROM
2011 – 2019 ................................................................................................................................................. 16
FIGURE 2: BIDAN DELIMA CERTIFICATION PROCESS AS EXPLAINED BY THE BIDAN DELIMA
MIDWIVES ................................................................................................................................................... 17
FIGURE3: COMPETENCY IN FAMILY PLANNING COUNSELING ............................................................... 31
FIGURE 4 FAMILY PLANNING COUNSELING SKILLS BY INDICATORS ................................................... 31
FIGURE 5: COMPETENCY IN THE ANTENATAL CARE .................................................................................. 32
FIGURE 6: ANC SKILL BY INDICATORS ............................................................................................................... 33
FIGURE7: COMPETENCY IN USING PARTOGRAPH ...................................................................................... 34
FIGURE 8: THE COMPETENCY IN NEWBORN RESUSCITATION .............................................................. 35
FIGURE 9: RESUSCITATION SKILLS PER INDICATOR ..................................................................................... 36
FIGURE 10: RESULTS OF OBSERVATION ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE MIDWIFE
PRACTICE ................................................................................................................................................... 37
FIGURE 11: THE RESULT OF OBSERVATION ON FACILITIES AND SUPPLIES OF PRIVATE
MIDWIFE PRACTICE ............................................................................................................................... 38
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
The Bidan Delima program was established in 2003 with USAID support as a franchise model of
Ikatan Bidan Indonesia (Indonesian Midwives Association – IBI). The aim was to enhance the
performance of private midwives and ensure their adherence to standards for safe pregnancy and
delivery practices. Private midwives who have practiced for three years, have a practice license, and
are motivated to improve their facilities, skills, and knowledge can apply to join the program. Once
certified, they are supervised and mentored by facilitators who are also private midwives and who
conduct the supportive role on a voluntary basis. By 2019 the membership had grown to include
over 19,000 private midwives, or about 40 percent of all private midwives in the country, and over
2,000 facilitators.
Recent analyses in Indonesia have shown that the performance of private midwives is often sub-
optimal, and maternal and newborn health outcomes are not on a par with neighboring countries in
the region. In addition, the rapid expansion of the national health insurance program has created
challenges for private midwives in terms of accessing the financing mechanisms, resulting in
substantial decreases in caseloads for some midwives. In the longer term, this is likely to further
exacerbate deficiencies in the quality of care available for pregnant women and newborns, thus
detracting from the government’s desire to accelerate reductions in preventable mortality and
morbidity.
Global evidence shows that a strong and well-supported midwifery workforce is a critical element in
achieving such goals and is cost-effective.1Therefore, as one of its core programmatic areas, the
USAID Jalin project is supporting the Ministry of Health (MOH) and IBI to strengthen the
performance of private midwives. It is envisaged that enhancing the Bidan Delima program will be an
important part of this process and, thus, a rapid review was commissioned to identify key challenges
and ways to improve the future relevance and effectiveness of the Bidan Delima model.
METHODOLOGY
The review had three main objectives, namely: assessment of the quality of care provided by the
Bidan Delima program; examination of the program relevance and value; and identification of the
future strategic direction regarding the business model. The review was conducted between
December 2019 and January 2020 and the methods used included:
1. A review of relevant reports, case studies, and policy and planning documents;
2. Observation of clinical practice using standard assessment tools in selected Bidan Delima and
non-Bidan Delima sites across eight districts in four provinces – three USAID Jalin-supported
(East Java, West Java and North Sumatra) and one not supported by any donor partner (Central
Kalimantan) – altogether 23 Bidan Delima and 23 non-Bidan Delima midwives were assessed;
3. Group discussions (18) and in-depth interviews (43) with key informants at national and sub-
national levels.
1 The Lancet Midwifery series 2014: https://www.thelancet.com/series/midwifery
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 2
FINDINGS
The document review confirmed that private midwives are an important part of the maternal and
newborn health workforce in Indonesia. However, since the launch of the Jaminan Kesehatan
Nasional (National Health Insurance – JKN) program, many private midwives have faced challenges
accessing the funding opportunities arising from this as they cannot register easily as providers.
Although the Bidan Delima program is assumed to ensure a higher quality of midwifery practice and
it has been suggested that having certification could provide benefit for JKN registration, the
program has not been formally reviewed since 2011. Nevertheless, the MOH is keen to test new
contracting mechanisms to improve the inclusion of private midwives in JKN and stimulate enhanced
quality of care.
The clinical assessment conducted on a small sample of private midwives provides a snapshot of
better facility readiness and the quality of care among Bidan Delima midwives. Facility readiness was
measured in terms of management (infrastructure, recording and reporting systems, written
procedures and guidelines) and availability and condition of facilities and supplies. The competency of
midwives was measured in terms of skills in family planning (FP) counseling, antenatal care (ANC),
using partographs and resuscitation of a newborn baby.
Overall, the Bidan Delima facilities and midwives had higher scores compared to non-Bidan Delima,
for example:
BIDAN DELIMA NON-BIDAN DELIMA
Facility management 77% 45%
Facilities and supplies
availability/condition 93% 84%
FP counselling skills 77% 46%
ANC skills 72% 54%
Use of partograph 61% 39%
Newborn resuscitation 44% 31%
The Bidan Delima program is still generally perceived by most stakeholders as being relevant and of
value to the health system. It is associated with quality midwifery services by health officials and
midwives, and the tools developed for the program, as well as its staff, have been widely used and
appreciated by other partners. Nevertheless, many problems with registration, supervision, and
maintaining motivation were identified as challenges going forward. There was also little awareness
about the program among some of the key stakeholders and the clients interviewed showing an
urgent need for greater promotion of the brand.
Since the rapid expansion of the national health insurance scheme, many private midwives, including
Bidan Delima midwives, have experienced a significant drop in their caseloads. As one key
motivation for joining the Bidan Delima program is to have an increased caseload, this has serious
implications for the sustainability and validity of the business model. In addition, the rapid assessment
revealed that many midwives just find the processes and costs associated with joining Bidan Delima
too onerous.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 3
RECOMMENDATIONS
These fall under five areas:
1. Strengthening the quality assurance mechanism of the Bidan Delima program: including reviewing
the Bidan Delima instruments and guidelines and revising the tools and validation process;
specifically addressing critical gaps in midwifery competencies that affect the quality of care;
finding creative ways to recruit and incentivize facilitators; enhancing routine monitoring and
feedback mechanisms for midwives; and including reward mechanisms for quality midwifery
services rendered.
2. Strengthening Bidan Delima management: including a formal review of the overall management
by IBI and MOH; a review of the financial management and sustainability of the program; and
improvement of the entire Bidan Delima information management system to enable better
monitoring of the management and technical performance of the program at district, provincial
and national levels.
3. Enhancing collaboration with stakeholders to support the Bidan Delima program: MOH and
Provincial and District Health Offices should work with IBI at all levels to develop stronger
partnerships with key stakeholders at national and sub-national levels, such as General
Practitioners, OB/GYN consultants and the professional associations, as well as other private
sector players including pharmacies, banks and local companies.
4. Strengthening collaboration with JKN: including reviewing the processes for certification of
private midwives and ensuring that IBI is fully engaged in the Strategic Health Purchasing
discussion and working groups where midwives are concerned.
5. Promoting the brand of Bidan Delima: MOH and IBI should work together to agree on the
future direction of the program and how best to revitalize the brand. This will include enhancing
the added value of services provided by Bidan Delima midwives and promoting this value widely
through multiple channels to increase awareness and stimulate higher demand by clients and in
the population in general.
If these recommendations are implemented, the Bidan Delima program can become a driving force
for strengthening the midwifery profession in Indonesia. Placing midwives at the center of the health
system with an approach that values their contribution and complements their services with higher
level support when needed, is likely to help achieve the desired improvements in health outcomes
for mothers and newborns.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 4
1. INTRODUCTION
USAID Jalin conducted a rapid assessment of the Bidan Delima program in coordination with the
Indonesian Midwives Association (IBI). The assessment findings will inform development of an
enhanced program that is responsive to the changing environment brought about by the scale up of
the national health insurance program, the national focus on improving the quality of maternal and
newborn health (MNH) services to reduce maternal and newborn mortality, and the prevention of
stunting throughout the country.
1.1. BACKGROUND
1.1.1. NATIONAL FOCUS ON REDUCING MATERNAL MORTALITY IN RPJMN 2020-2024
The President of Indonesia, Joko Widodo has signed the Presidential Regulation, Perpres 18/2020
regarding the National Medium-term Development plan (RPJMN) 2020-2024. RPJMN is the main
planning reference for the next five years. Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) and stunting reduction
were among the list of 41 Major Projects which are considered as Strategic Priority Projects in this
plan, called “Acceleration of reduction of MMR and stunting”. The MMR goal set for 2024 is a
reduction to183 per 100,000 livebirths. The baseline data used was the 2015 Intercensal survey
MMR estimate of 305 per 100,000 livebirths.
1.1.2. PRIVATE MIDWIVES’CONTRIBUTIONS IN MNH CAREAND BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
Private midwives are important contributors in the provision of MNH care in Indonesia. The 2018
Basic Health Survey2shows that private midwives provide 42.5 percent of antenatal care (ANC) and
conduct up to 34.5 percent of deliveries in Indonesia. Private midwives also provided 52 percent of
family planning (FP) services in 2019.3 Evidence, however, suggests that the quality of maternal and
newborn care provided by private midwives is highly variable. To address quality assurance issues
related to private midwives, Ikatan Bidan Indonesia (Indonesian Midwives Association – IBI), with
USAID support, initiated the Bidan Delima program in 2003. The program educates and incentivizes
private midwives to meet and maintain adherence to the standards for safe pregnancy and delivery
practices.4 Bidan Delima is designed for private midwives who have practiced for three years, have a
practice license, and are motivated to improve their facilities, skills, and knowledge.5
Initially started in six provinces (East, Central, West Java, Banten, North Sumatra and South
Sulawesi), the Bidan Delima program has expanded to 23 provinces covering 281 districts in
Indonesia by March 2020.6
1.1.3. USAID JALIN SUPPORT TO INDONESIAN MIDWIVES
USAID Jalin in partnership with IBI, works to strengthen the systems for building and sustaining the
competencies and quality of care provided by midwives, with a special focus on private midwives.
USAID Jalin aims to strengthen the Bidan Delima program to enable private midwives to better
deliver maternal and newborn services along the continuum of care and to adeptly identify, manage
and refer emergency maternal and newborn complications when required. USAID Jalin and IBI need
to understand the status, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges pertaining to the
2 2018 Basic Health Survey (Riset Kesehatan Dasar/Riskesdas), MOH Republic of Indonesia, 2019 3 2019 Welfare Statistics, BPS (the Central Bureau of Statistics), 2019 4 Maharani Cynthia et al, The Implementation of a Franchise Model in Regulating Performance of Private Midwife in
Indonesia, A Case Study, 2011 5 Developmental Evaluation for USAID Jalin Bidan Delima technical brief, November 2019 6http://www.bidan-delima.org/isianggota.php, access date 9 March, 2020
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 5
Bidan Delima program implementation in order to
develop the most appropriate and effective Bidan Delima
enhancement strategies.
The latest available review of the Bidan Delima program
is dated July 2011.7Since then, the landscape of the
Indonesia health system has changed substantially,
particularly by the implementation of the Jaminan
Kesehatan Nasional (National Health Insurance – JKN)
program launched in January 2014. Therefore, an
updated review was required to gain a better
understanding of the value of Bidan Delima certification
in the context of JKN, the opportunities to evolve the
model, and the challenges to be addressed.
1.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE ASSESSMENT
The main purpose of the assessment was to provide USAID Jalin and IBI with up-to-date information
regarding the Bidan Delima program’s effectiveness, relevance, and value. Results of the assessment
will inform the development of strategic directions for the Bidan Delima program enhancement and
the refinement of its business model.
The specific study questions are described below.
A. Program effectiveness in assuring quality of service:
A.1. To what extent does the Bidan Delima program increase the quality of care provided by
private midwives?
i. How does facility readiness and competencies and clinical practices of Bidan Delima
compare to non-Bidan Delima midwives?
ii. Do midwives who go through the Bidan Delima certification process improve after
becoming qualified as a Bidan Delima as measured by scores on quality assessments?
A.2. What gaps exist in the model in assuring quality?
B. Program relevance and value:
B.1. How have private midwife practices changed since implementation of JKN and what are
the implications for the Bidan Delima program?
B.2. How do private midwives currently perceive the value of Bidan Delima? (e.g. why do
midwives join or not? Renew or not renew?) What would make it of more value?
B.3. What is the perspective of MOH, Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (Social Insurance
Administration Organization - BPJS), IBI and other stakeholders on the value of the Bidan
Delima program and the potential for enhancing the program to support MOH goals for
reduced maternal and newborn mortality?
B.4. What do pregnant women know and think about Bidan Delima and private midwives in
general?
7 Maharani Cynthia et al, The Implementation of a Franchise Model in Regulating Performance of Private Midwife in
Indonesia, A Case Study, 2011
The USAID Jalin Project is a five-year initiative
implemented by DAI Global, LLC and its
consortium of partners – IntraHealth, Vital
Strategies, and Market Share Associates – that
supports the Ministry of Health (MOH) and other
stakeholders towards achieving the following
results:
1. Improved MNH quality of care in public and
private, and primary and secondary facilities,
at scale; and
2. Improved efficiency and effectiveness of the
emergency referral system at community and
facility levels, at scale.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 6
C. Bidan Delima Business Model:
C.1. How has the Bidan Delima model evolved since the program was last documented in
2011?
C.2. What Bidan Delima program modifications are needed to ensure its future viability? This
will include identification and prioritization of new elements of the program, financing
mechanisms, staffing, information systems, and governance and leadership. Specifically, the
assessment will address:
i. What program enhancements would be feasible and add value to the program? e.g.
digital health tools (assessment of usefulness of each suggested tool, the midwife’s
competency in using digital tools and enabling factors to support scale up), referral
mechanisms, certification for JKN participation, marketing, formation of provider
network for contracting with primary health care providers or directly with BPJS.
ii. What financing mechanisms are in place or could be developed to cover the cost of
program operations (e.g. staffing, information systems) and enhanced member benefits
(e.g. digital tools, increased mentoring, JKN certification)?
iii. What more is required from current information systems to capture the volume and
quality of services provided by private midwives and elements of the program that can
give information for continuous improvement?
iv. What modifications are recommended to strengthen the peer mentoring and support
mechanisms given that facilitators are fewer in number than needed to fully support
Bidan Delima midwives?
v. Are there modifications needed to the governance leadership and structure of the
program?
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 7
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1. DATA COLLECTION
Data and information for this assessment were collected through the following activities:
a. Desk review
b. Clinical observation: Assessment of midwives’ clinical skills was carried out through a direct
observation when the respondent handled clients. However, if this is not possible, then the
observation of clinical skills is carried out through roleplay in which one member of the research
team will act as a client.
c. Qualitative assessments, i.e. focus group discussions (FGD)and in-depth interviews.
USAID Jalin assigned a team consisting of one Lead Researcher, one Field Assessment Lead, and
eight Field Assessors to carry out the rapid assessment. The team had a mix of medical/midwifery
and advanced public health expertise. The Lead Researcher was in charge of desk review and in-
depth interviews with national level stakeholders. The Field Assessment Lead and Field Assessors
were responsible for FGDs and in-depth interviews with provincial and district level stakeholders, as
well as the clinical observation. All Field Assessors were provided with a one-day orientation on the
methodology and assessment tools before collecting data from the field.
Clinical observation and qualitative assessments were conducted from December 12 – 22, 2019 in
four provinces that include three of USAID Jalin’s target provinces (North Sumatra, West Java, and
East Java) and one non-USAID Jalin province (Central Kalimantan). Central Kalimantan was selected
based on IBI’s recommendation to represent areas where IBI expanded the Bidan Delima program
without USAID funding support. In each province, two districts were purposively selected to
represent the following variations:
- Urban vs. rural districts.
- Districts with high and low number of Bidan Delima midwives and different ratios between
facilitator and Bidan Delima midwives.
The selected districts for the field assessment are as in Table 1.
Table 1: Bidan Delima Program Rapid Assessment Areas
Province Notes Districts
North Sumatra
USAID Jalin supported areas
1. Deli Serdang
2. Asahan
West Java 1. Depok City
2. Sukabumi
East Java 1. Sidoarjo City
2. Pasuruan District
Central Kalimantan Non-USAID Jalin supported area 1. Kotawaringin Barat
2. Kotawaraingin Timur
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 8
Details on each of the data/information collection activities are as follows:
2.2. DOCUMENT REVIEW AND SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS
The reviewed documents include past Bidan Delima program evaluations, case studies, latest surveys
related to MNH services, and relevant policy and planning documents. The review highlights the
scale and scope of private midwifery practices in Indonesia and documents changes in the
environment since JKN implementation to estimate its impact on private midwives and provide an
updated profile of the Bidan Delima program. The secondary data reviewed includes updated data
on membership, renewals, monitoring data and other data available in IBI’s Bidan Delima routine
data sources.
The document reviewed are as follow:
1. Bidan Delima Evaluation Report. Sustaining Technical Achievements in Reproductive Health
(STARH) project 2006.
2. Bidan Delima, Expanding Quality Midwifery Services in Indonesia. Concept Paper for Donors,
2007.
3. Evaluation of Health Service Program (HSP) in Indonesia. Taking Stock and Looking Forward.
USAID, 2008.
4. Bidan Delima Accreditation: The implementation of a franchise model in Regulating Performance
of Private Midwives in Indonesia, A Case Study. Centre for Health Care Innovation, Mercy
Corps, 2011.
5. Revealing the Missing Link: Private Sector Supply-Side Readiness for Primary Maternal Health
Services in Indonesia, World Bank.
6. UNFPA Midwifery Consulting report, September 2014.
7. IBI internal information, presentations and data base on Bidan Delima.
8. Updated Midwifery law – Law No 4, 2019 on Midwifery.
9. Technical Guideline Mentoring and Supervision of Private Midwifery Practice, 2018.
10. Bidan Delima program description by Developmental Evaluation (DE) internal document for
USAID Jalin.
11. 2018 Basic Health Survey Report, MOH, 2019.
12. RPJMN /Perpres No. 18.
13. Strategic Health Purchasing for Maternal Health, Summary for Decision Makers (Draft,),
Strategic Health Purchasing team (MOH, USAID, World Bank Group and BPJS), 2019.
14. Bidan Delima Technical Guidelines, 4th edition, October 2014.
2.3. CLINICAL OBSERVATION
The clinical observation aimed to compare the quality of care of Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima
midwives, particularly on the following aspects:
1. Clinical readiness, which includes clinical management, condition and completeness of the facility
and supplies.
2. Midwife’s competence
Clinical competencies assessed were selected from the list of mandatory skills-set in the
validation instrument for Bidan Delima candidates. The selected skills for observation are ANC,
Family Planning counseling, neonatal resuscitation, and use of partograph. Considering the ease
of its implementation, the skill to deliver baby was not selected as an object in the clinical skills
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 9
assessment because it requires the use of specific dummy-model which is quite expensive, not
easily obtained or moved.
Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess the quality of care of Bidan Delima
and non-Bidan Delima practices. Forty-six private midwife practices were purposively sampled; 23
practices are owned by Bidan Delima certified midwives and the other 23 by non-Bidan Delima
certified midwives. The selection of Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima midwives was based on
several criteria; years of experience as Bidan Delima, years of experience in midwifery practice,
location, number of clients, education background, training information, midwife age and access to
private midwife practice. The summary of clinical observation by clinic and district was analyzed by
using MS Excel software.
In addition, exit interviews were conducted with the clients of the sampled midwives to explore
their perception regarding the quality of midwives’ services. The exit interviews involved 18
pregnant and 17 post-partum women.
2.4. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS AND IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS
FGDs and in-depth interviews with key informants (KIIs) were conducted at the national and district
levels. Key questions were developed to guide the FGDs and interviews.
In total, 18 FGD sessions were conducted during the assessment. There were 17 FGD sessions
conducted in the eight districts of study from December 12-22, 2019. They include seven FGD
sessions with the Bidan Delima midwives, eight with non-Bidan Delima midwives, and two with Bidan
Delima Facilitators. Each session involved 8-12 participants. One FGD session was conducted in
Jakarta on January 16, 2020. The last FGD session involved the management board of IBI at central
level, the chairperson of IBI of the assessed provinces and districts. It aimed to validate the findings
of the assessment and facilitate further discussion about the strategy in strengthening the Bidan
Delima program and other relevant issues.
In-depth interviews were carried out from December 10, 2019 – January 16, 2020 with 43 key
stakeholders at national and sub-national levels, representing government agencies, Bidan Delima
management, development partners, non-government organizations, and professional organizations.
Organizations and roles of the43 key informants are listed in Table 2.
Table 2: List of Key Informants for In-depth Interviews
National Level Sub-National Level
• Directorate of Family Health, MOH
• Directorate of Health Services, MOH
• Center for Health Insurance and Financing (P2JK),
MOH
• IBI
• Bidan Delima Management
• POGI (Indonesian Obstetrics and Gynecology
Association)
• MNH Partners: UNFPA, Jhpiego, HP+
• Chairperson of IBI district chapter (8 persons)
• Head of Family Health section in DHO (8
persons)
• Provincial and district managers of Bidan Delima
(12 persons)
• Facilitators of Bidan Delima in six select districts
(6 persons)
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 10
The recording and transcripts of FGDs and in-depth interviews were analyzed using NVivo software
version 12.
2.5. LIMITATIONS
This assessment intended to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the current Bidan Delima
program. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to gain insights from people from different
perspectives (e.g. rural and urban, size of facilities and years of experience), cultures (different
Indonesian provinces and islands) and situations (Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima). The
assessment however does not allow for conclusions to be drawn about the actual frequency of
findings across the country, as it does not define the size of the denominator and did not assess a
significant sample size to allow for statistical significance.
Additionally, the selection of the key informants for interviewing has an influence on the kind of
findings gained including their interpretation. Though the assessment team contacted BPJS for an
interview they were not able to schedule an appointment during the assessment period. The absence
of information from BPJS must be considered in the interpretation of the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations from this assessment, specifically on the Bidan Delima business and financing
related issues.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 11
3. ASSESSMENT FINDINGS
3.1. FINDINGS FROM DESK REVIEW AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS
3.1.1. BIDAN DELIMA INCEPTION AND EXPANSION
The Bidan Delima program was initiated by IBI in 2003 in collaboration with the USAID Project in
Family Planning and Reproductive Health following the advice from government partners to
implement a quality improvement program through the private sector rather than the public sector
to enhance program implementation.8 It followed the successful implementation of the government’s
Family Planning program to expand the FP services into the private sector through the introduction
of the Blue Circle program.9 The name and logo of “Bidan Delima” (Pomegranate Midwife) were
selected after extensive consultation with IBI management and members, and based on IBI’s logo.
The program consists of two complementary parts: one, to increase the supply of high-quality
service providers by promoting standards and offering training as needed to meet those standards;
and two, to create a brand identity among clients and among providers so that clients seek services
from a “Bidan Delima” midwife, thereby increasing her caseload (and income).10
The conception and early expansion of the Bidan Delima certification program was supported by
two consecutive USAID flagship health projects, i.e. STARH and HSP [1]. IBI also collaborated with
private companies (such as Johnson&Johnson and Exxon) to expand the Bidan Delima program.
Initially the program was implemented in six provinces (DKI Jakarta, West Java, Central Java, East
Java, North Sumatra, and South Sulawesi). By 2009, the Bidan Delima program had expanded to 203
districts and 15 provinces[2]. By March 2020, the program has reached 281 districts in 23
provinces[3].
Replicability is recognized as one of the Bidan Delima program’s strengths. The USAID-HSP
evaluation report noted that the Bidan Delima program had positioned the idea of midwives as
entrepreneurs who have pride in their services and live up to a standard of care[1]. However, the
report also pointed out that Bidan Delima midwives perceived limited value added by the program
because the rise in caseloads was not so much affected by the brand of Bidan Delima but by the
improvement of their practices. A more recent review on the Bidan Delima program [2]highlighted
further that the unmet expectation of accreditation versus increased caseload is likely to demotivate
midwives to pursue or renew their Bidan Delima certification. This situation poses a risk to the
sustainability of the program.
One district manager explained the indicators she uses to judge Bidan Delima’s improvement:
• The increasing number of Bidan Delima midwives; there were only 60 Bidan Delima in Sukabumi
district before 2014 and now there are 245 BD midwives.
• The number of Bidan Delima facilitators.
• The number of branches (sub-district) with Bidan Delima; there were initially only six branches
with Bidan Delima initially and now there are ten branches due to a new policy to establish each
hospital as a branch.
• A better structured management board.
• More intensive meetings.
8 USAID-STARH. Bidan Delima Evaluation Report 9 Barron T. Indonesia Family Planning aims for sustainability. Family Plan World. 2002 Nov-Dec; 1(2):22-3, 30 10 USAID-STARH. Bidan Delima Evaluation Report
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 12
Midwifery Law
The Law No 4 Year 2019 is the statute on midwifery approved by Joko Widodo, President of
Indonesia on 13 March 2019. The law regulates midwifery education, registration and practice
licenses, including midwives who are Indonesian citizens who have graduated abroad, foreign
midwives, midwifery practices, rights and obligations, midwifery professional organizations,
empowerment of midwifes, and coaching and supervision.
The midwifery profession has been strengthened by the enactment of the new law. Two issues relate
to private practice: 1) Midwives should obtain a professional bachelor’s degree to be recognized as a
professional midwife, and hence eligible for a license, and 2) Midwifery private practice is defined as a
health service facility in this law. To be fully implemented, some implementing regulation(s) would
need to be put in place. Interviews with key informants suggested it will take two years to have the
implementing regulation in place, not only to develop but also to review and adapt the existing
regulation, such as the MOH Decree, PMK 28/2017, with the new law. This decree will still be valid
until 2026, when the transition to the new professional degree requirement becomes official as a
requirement for licensing. The educational system would need adaptation to establish schools to
provide a bachelor’s degree education for new midwifery students, and for development of the
adaptation process for existing midwives with a D3 certificate. Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan
Sumber Daya Manusia (The Center for Health Human Resource Development – PPSDM) is expected
to be the lead on this six-year transition for midwifery professional education.
During data collection in the districts, most of the heads of IBI and/or the Unit Pelaksana Bidan
Delima (Bidan Delima Executive Unit– UPBD) were very aware of the change in the midwifery
education requirement in the law and have a plan to accelerate the process of improving the private
midwife education level. IBI Pasuruan plans to work with Politehnik Kesehatan (Health Polytechnic –
Poltekkes) Malang to establish a new professional midwifery education program.
The enactment of the new law is assumed to bring some changes, such as:
• Private midwives will be more internet literate, and be more active in WhatsApp groups
• Senior midwives –who are D3 graduates–will be reluctant to pursue the professional degree, so
they might stop practicing
• Private midwife practices will tend to refer patients to Puskesmas
• Midwives are not allowed to use public facilities for their private practice. For example, Bidan
Delima will not be able to open private practice in Polindes after office hours. Consequently, the
number of Bidan Delima midwives will decrease, because many dual practice midwives will stop
their private practices
• Four-hand delivery will be enforced, but fortunately most midwives already practice it
• The law gives clarity about a midwife’s authority
• It also provides legal protection to midwives and the patients, “It will make us feel peaceful, we
have legal protection… you know, we are frequently suspected to conduct malpractice and so on. That’s
why we put our best effort to have this law.”- (Bidan Delima, Sidoarjo)
3.1.2. CHARACTERISTIC OF THE RAPID ASSESSMENT AREAS
Maternal and Neonatal Mortality Figures
The demographic data of assessed districts was collected during the assessment from several
sources such as; District Health Office (DHO), reputable websites and data published by Badan Pusat
Statistik (Central Agency of Statistics – BPS). Some of the districts that were assessed showed a
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 13
major contribution to the number of maternal and newborn deaths at the provincial level. Table 3
summarizes relevant demographic data of the assessed districts.
Table 3: Demographic Data of Bidan Delima Program Rapid Assessment Areas
Province/District Population Number of Maternal
Deaths
Number of Neonatal
Deaths
North Sumatra
Deli Serdang 2,234,320 13 NA
Asahan 1,605,307 15 112
East Java
Sidoarjo 2,262,440 17 157 (2018)
Pasuruan 1,779,405 19 121
West Java
Sukabumi 2,523,992 41 218
Depok 2,254,513 32 78
Central Kalimantan
Kotawaringin Barat 290,000 7 28
Kotawaringin Timur 460,000 16 97
Geographic Conditions
Geography is one of the big challenges in these districts. For example, Sukabumi district is quite large
and many locations are difficult to reach—including the three referral hospitals. Travel constraints
discouraged midwives to join the certification process. Equally, Kotawaringin Timur is a hard to
reach area.
MNH Service System
As in all of the districts in Indonesia, the DHO takes a lead in efforts to reduce maternal and
newborn mortalityin USAID Jalin’s rapid assessment areas. The DHO in all districts or municipalities
authorizes the sub-district Puskesmas to supervise and coordinate the health facilities in their area as
networks. The network that includes Puskemas Pembantu, Puskesmas Keliling, Poliklinik Desa, Bidan
Desa is called Jaringan or network Puskesmas, while Jejaring Puskesmas consists of the Jaringan, with
hospitals, private clinics and private midwife practices. In addition, these networks are required to
report data to the DHO on a monthly basis which feeds into district health reports.
A number of activities have been conducted by the DHO to improve the quality of midwives. Some
DHO officials acknowledged that their training plan is supposed to include all health facilities in the
area that are in Jejaring Puskesmas in the program but because of limited resources, the midwives
who work in Puskesmas and its Jaringan are prioritized for participation. In addition, the DHO is also
responsible for conducting regular supervision and monitoring activities but the implementation
varies in terms of the frequency and mechanism.
“In the supervision visit, they checked the rooms in my private practice, and the reports about babies
and pregnant mothers. The doctor and coordinator midwife usually do the supervision visit from the
Puskesmas, IBI does not come along. IBI only supervises for SIPB renewal. Before IBI visit, I usually
asked the Puskesmas to check [my private practice].” - (non-Bidan Delima, Pasuruan)
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 14
In Kotawaringin Barat, midwives reported that the Puskesmas supervision just started in the last
three years. One of the non-Bidan Delima midwives acknowledged the visits from Puskesmas and
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional (National Population Family Planning Board -
BKKBN) for supervision purposes. Sidoarjo’s non-Bidan Delima midwives confirmed that in their
Jejaring Puskesmas meetings were conducted every two months to strengthen the Jejaring as well as
to refresh their knowledge. In addition, quarterly visits to private midwife practices were conducted
by Puskesmas to assess compliance with the quality standards. Similar activities were also reported
in Depok, Sukabumi and Pasuruan.
Data reporting to the district is a requirement for private providers but private midwives expressed
some challenges in complying with requirements. Private midwives in some districts prepare their
service reports manually by filling out hardcopy forms and sending them to the Puskesmas. Private
midwife practices can use the online application Si Cantik in Sidoarjo and Sistem Informasi Bidan
Mandiri (Mandiri Midwife Information System-- SiBiMa) in Depok to report their services. Use of the
Si Cantik application is a prerequisite to renew the Surat Izin Praktek Bidan (Midwife Practice License
–SIPB). Midwives who never report service data through the application will not be granted a new
SIPB. Some senior midwives who were not familiar with computers and technology sought help from
other people.
Other difficulties raised by midwives in using a digital application for reporting included: lack of
familiarity with the application, poor internet connection, no internet quota, and size of application
on cellular phone screen.
“It’s important and faster if we use email or technology like that, but I am not capable at operating
a computer, so I asked other people to do that”. - (DHO Sidoarjo)
Private Midwives
Private midwives work as government health workers during regular office hours and work as
independent practitioners in the remaining time. Generally, midwives in Indonesia run a dual-
practice, which means the midwives run private practices and also work in Puskesmas, hospitals,
other clinics or training institutes. For midwives in dual-practice, providing maternal and newborn
services in their private practice during working hours (0800-1400) is unacceptable. All services
during working hours should be conducted in Puskesmas and only in their private practice after
office hours. The resource persons interviewed in the assessment estimated 50 percent of midwives
run dual-practice but not all districts provided information about this. In West Kotawaringin, only 20
percent of private midwives purely work as a private midwife compared to 52 percent in Sukabumi
and 67 percent in Depok (see Table 4).
Table 4: Private Midwife Data in Assessed Districts, per December 2019
Province/
District
Number of
Midwives
Pure Private
Midwife
Practices
Number
of Private
Midwives
Number of
Bidan
Delima11
Number of
Facilitators
Ratio
Facilitator
and Bidan
Delima
North Sumatra
Deli Serdang 1,400 NA12 506 240 47% 24 1:10
Asahan 1,200 NA 600 22 4% 2 1:11
11 Based on UPBIDAN DELIMA district report 12 NA = Not available
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 15
Province/
District
Number of
Midwives
Pure Private
Midwife
Practices
Number
of Private
Midwives
Number of
Bidan
Delima11
Number of
Facilitators
Ratio
Facilitator
and Bidan
Delima
East Java
Sidoarjo 1,400 NA 506 379 74% 24 1:15
Pasuruan 1,189 NA 456 354 77% 36 1:10
West Java
Sukabumi 1,246 216 416 245 75% 16 1:15
Depok 1,004 275 410 304 74% 27 1:11
Central Kalimantan
West Kotawaringin 530 85 415 3 6% 1 -
East Kotawaringin 500 NA 35 2 4% 1 -
Source: District routine monitoring data
Overall, the DHO is responsible for efforts to improve the quality of MNH services in the districts
while efforts to improve quality for all private midwife practices are the responsibility of IBI through
the Bidan Delima program.
“We had no control over the quality of private practice midwives after they got their licenses ...
Bidan Delima program is the only way for us to be able to monitor the quality of their services.” -
(IBI Depok)
3.1.3. BIDAN DELIMA MEMBERSHIP
In the national scope, the number of Bidan Delima members appears to be continuously increasing
from 1,407 midwives (including 748 Facilitators ) in 2005 [3] to 18,206 midwives (including 1.786
Facilitators) in March 2020 [4].
Bidan Delima certification becomes a compulsory program for midwives who run private practices in
areas where increasing the number of Bidan Delima members is considered essential, like Depok and
Pasuruan. All IBI members who are not members of Bidan Delima but working in a clinic or hospitals
or in other sectors are termed Bidan Delima candidates. In Pasuruan, every midwife who wants to
have a midwife practice license (SIPB) must be a member of Bidan Delima, and follow through the
qualification process, regardless of her interests. IBI in East Java province is aiming to have 100
percent of private midwives in the Bidan Delima program by 2023.
However, Bidan Delima membership data indicate that the number of active Bidan Delima13is either
stagnant or declining in some districts in recent years. As seen in Figure 1 the number of active Bidan
Delima midwives is declining in Pasuruan, Sidoarjo and Depok, while in Deli Serdang it is stagnant2
Asahan district has not had any Bidan Delima midwives since 2011. According to the interviewed
district UPBD managers, the major reasons for declining number of active Bidan Delima members
are:
- Some Bidan Delima midwives are retired (due to old age or sickness)
- Some Bidan Delima midwives relocated out of the district (either for personal or
professional purposes)
13 Active members of Bidan Delima are midwives whose Bidan Delima certificate is still valid.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 16
- Some midwives decided not to renew their Bidan Delima membership due to decreasing
number of patients since the implementation of the JKN program. The decreasing number of
patients means less income, so they found it hard to pay the Bidan Delima fee, in addition to
the IBI membership fee.
Figure 1: Number of Bidan Delima Midwives in the Rapid Assessment Areas from 2011 – 2019
3.1.4. BIDAN DELIMA CERTIFICATION PROCESS AND COSTS
A case study of Bidan Delima that was published in 2011 [2]explained the Bidan Delima certification
process and costs as follows:
It starts when a private midwife practitioner proposes her candidacy to be a Bidan Delima midwife
and takes a pre-qualification test. Next the candidate is given self-learning modules on the Bidan
Delima program. Then the facilitators validate the candidate’s aptitude and understanding of the
Bidan Delima standards. Bidan Delima certification is given to those who pass the aptitude test and
the facilitators continue their mentoring process until the new Bidan Delima midwife is ready to work
on her own. Those who pass the test pay the first membership fees of IDR 350,000 (USD 40) and
in return are certified and authorized to post the Bidan Delima logo on their name boards. To keep
their membership, Bidan Delima midwives pay as much as IDR 250,000 (USD 28) annually. The
certificate is good for up to five years, at which point they need to renew the certificate.
The information given by respondents in USAID Jalin’s rapid assessment confirms that the same
steps are still applied in the process of becoming a Bidan Delima midwife today. Figure 2 summarizes
the Bidan Delima certification process as explained by USAID Jalin’s rapid assessment respondents.
208
150
231 237
136
162
269 250
66
244
344
171176
307
398
375
12
117 117 118
31
0 0 00
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2011 2014 2017 2019
Sukabumi Depok Sidoarjo Pasuruan Deli Serdang Asahan
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 17
Figure 2: Bidan Delima Certification Process as Explained by the Bidan Delima Midwives
The Bidan Delima certification process and costs are described in more detail by the respondents of
USAID Jalin’s rapid assessment as follows:
1. Workshop
The workshop is conducted after more or less 40 private midwives have registered to join Bidan
Delima, to provide detailed information about Bidan Delima. During the workshop, the
UPBD/IBI shares guidance on self-assessment including the assessment tool with Bidan Delima
candidates.
2. Pre-Qualification
The pre-qualification process already shows the midwife the standard that must be fulfilled as
Bidan Delima. After registering as a Bidan Delima candidate, the private midwife must complete
the pre-qualification tools and fulfill 75 percent of criteria standards. The standards used by the
Bidan Delima program are in accordance with the standards that must be met to obtain a SIPB
as stated in the law, the Ministry of Health decree or Permenkes number 28, 2017.
3. Validation process
The Bidan Delima candidate is also equipped with self-assessment tools which include the health
facility readiness standard regarding the readiness of the facility to provide services and also
measure midwife competency. Before the validation process, the candidate uses the self-
assessment tool to measure the readiness for becoming a certified Bidan Delima midwife and the
facilitator provides mentoring during this process.
The completeness of facility and infrastructure is the most difficult part to fulfill according to
midwives. It takes quite a lot of time and money to renovate the facilities to follow the
recommended floor plan and provide the complete set of instruments. Collaboration with other
health services for waste disposal management was also mentioned as somewhat troublesome
for Bidan Delima midwives in Depok, because of the high cost: 1,500,000-2,500,000 IDR per
month. During the report review process, the Central Level IBI caretaker provided information
that the waste management fees are not determined by the local government but involve a third
party, thus varies across the regions.
For the clinical competency assessment, a Bidan Delima candidate must perform different clinical
skills on patients in front of the Bidan Delima validator.
Improving
clinic facility
Registration
Pre-
Qualification
Self-
Assessment
Validation
Certified
Bidan Delima
Passing grade
100%
Workshop
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 18
“Bidan Delima facilitator/validator came and asked about the barriers, how many [indicators] from
the checklist is met, and after the [indicators in the] checklist were met, I had clinical competency
assessment with the facilitator, a comprehensive one, from pregnancy examination, delivery,
perinatal check-up, all were tested using a checklist. My validator was Ibu K.” - (Bidan Delima)
Usually they need to arrange with approximately five other Bidan Delima candidates that are
located in the same or nearby areas to save on the validation visit budget and time. Non-Bidan
Delima midwives perceived this step to be costly, because of the sense of obligation to provide
refreshments for the validators. The validation process may require several repeat visits
depending on the assessment result, because the required score is 100 percent, or all indicators
met.
4. Inauguration
The respondents informed that inauguration ceremony and Bidan Delima kit cost approximately
1,650,000 IDR per midwife and has to be paid prior to the inauguration. For some midwives,
particularly the non-Bidan Delima respondents the cost was too high for them to afford.
During the report finalization, the Central Level IBI caretaker clarified the standard fees that due
to the midwives during the process of becoming a Bidan Delima and the following years, as
follows:
• Fee to attend the Bidan Delima registration workshop costs at the district/city level IDR
75,000 per person. The participating midwife will receive a workshop kit: pre-qualification
forms and self-assessment books, meals and accommodation.
• The first-year fee as Bidan Delima is IDR 600,000 to cover the following items:
- IDR 550,000 for the production and delivery of Bidan Delima starter kit that consists
of certificate, pin, signage, printed material of 10 steps in Family Planning service
(posters, leaflets, stickers), Bidan Delima manual books, bag with Bidan Delima logo,
audio-visual for e-learning, and apron.
- IDR 50,000 for mentoring service by UPBD at district/city level.
• Annual fee to be paid from the second year of IDR 250,000. This fund is allocated to
financed operational and activities of UPBD with the following details:
- IDR 150,000 for district/city level UPBD,
- IDR 50,000 for provincial level UPBD,
- IDR 50,000 for central level UPBD.
The central level IBI caretaker emphasizes that additional fees beyond the standard as mentioned
above is the discretion of district/city/province level UPBD. The additional fees are usually to cover
the costs of inauguration ceremony, which include accommodation, meals, fee for guest speakers,
and uniform for the Bidan Delima midwives.
The entire process from workshop to the inauguration takes from a month up to a year, as reported
by our respondents across the study areas. However, the amount of time needed to prepare for the
certification (including clinic renovation and waste management improvements to meet the Bidan
Delima standards) may be substantially longer than for the certification process itself.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 19
“Before I launched my private practice, I have prepared everything, from infrastructure to
instruments. I checked the requirements and looked for examples online. Then I registered, and it
took only a year for me to process to become Bidan Delima. But the preparation itself took five to
ten years, during which I worked as a midwife in a private practice.” - (Bidan Delima, Depok)
3.1.5. PRIVATE MIDWIVES IN THE JKN ERA
The Indonesia national health insurance program, JKN, started on January 1, 2014.The financing
component in the JKN program is administered by BPJS, a special agency sanctioned by the Law no.
24/2011 and reporting directly to the President.
The regulations currently imposed by BPJS have resulted in two main challenges for private
midwives’ empanelment to JKN:
1. BPJS does not recognize private midwife practices as facilities. Thus, private midwives cannot
directly provide MNH services to JKN participants but must go through contractual
agreements with Puskesmas or private clinics that have partnered with BPJS. According to
the President of IBI, the problem lays in the absence of clear regulations regarding the
distribution of tariffs between the midwives and the contractor facilities as anecdotal reports
suggest that some contractor facilities take up to 40 percent of the tariff that paid for the
midwives' services.14This has resulted in low participation of private midwives – including
Bidan Delima midwives – in the JKN. IBI data indicates roughly only 58 percent of private
midwives and 45 percent of Bidan Delima midwives were empaneled to JKN in 2016.15 It is
necessary to note, that the proportion of respondents in this assessment who have engaged
with BPJS’ providers is higher in the Bidan Delima group than in the non-Bidan Delima
group (71% or 12 of 17 Bidan Delima respondents vs 53% or 9 out of 17 non-Bidan Delima
group).
2. The tariff of services set by BPJS is too low to adequately cover the operational costs of
private midwives. Unlike public facilities, private practices generally do not have other
sources of funds to cover the operational costs other than service fees paid by the clients.
In 2017, a policy paper was developed based on a review of private providers by analyzing data on
the “missing link” of primary maternal health service provision. It was seen as a critical issue since 54
percent of all deliveries in Indonesia currently occur in the private sector, compared to 22 percent
in the public sector. Key findings from the analysis elucidate the potential value of the private
sector in expanding access to MNH services covered by the strategic and financial purchasing
umbrella of JKN, the effectiveness of these private MNH services, and patient satisfaction.16
The review found that there was low coverage of private MNH providers under JKN because
of low reimbursement rates and non-fulfilment of eligibility criteria. It was found also that the
private MNH providers were relatively weak concerning their supply of emergency obstetric
drugs and the actual use of diagnostic tests (measured by patient exit interviews) .
Based on these reviews the policy paper presented some policy implications around the theme:
14 Kompas, Bidan Enggan Ikut Jejaring JKN, June 26, 2014. 15 Nurjasmi, Emi., Pandangan Profesi Bidan Serta Rekomendasi Perbaikan Kebijakan Belanja Strategis Kesehatan, presentation,
2016. 16 Yap, Wei A., et al. Revealing the missing link: private sector supply-side readiness for primary maternal health services in
Indonesia - maternal health report (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, 2017
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 20
‘Spend more, right and better. MNH is a key human development investment
opportunity; investments should be made conditional on BPJS advancing its capabilities
from passive claims administration to active strategic purchasing’.
In addition, improving private midwives’ empanelment to JKN, coupled with accelerating and
sustaining improvements in the quality of care by private midwives, could also substantially
contribute to national goals of reducing maternal and infant mortality and also address stunting.17
Strategic Health Purchasing Summary Report
In 2017-2019, a strategic health purchasing (SHP) piece of work was initiated by Pusat
Pembiayaan dan Jaminan Kesehatan (Center for Financing and Health Insurance – PPJK) at the MOH.
This office convened a multi-stakeholder SHP Technical Working Group (TWG)18 for maternal
health, which has completed a draft policy brief for decision makers.19
The policy brief confirms that 2017 IDHS shows good program coverage rates of at least four ANC
visits (77 percent), births delivered with a skilled health worker (91 percent), and births in a health
facility (74 percent). But this does not correspond to low maternal mortality. The policy makers
should focus their attention on improving the quality of services, including adherence to
standards, and continuity of care from the time of pregnancy until the postpartum period.
One of the recommendations of this draft policy brief is to improve quality of services by testing
new types of Badan Pengelola Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan (Health Social Insurance Administration
Organization– BPJS-K) contracting arrangements for midwives, such as networks of midwives (e.g.
Bidan Delima), provider associations (i.e. IBI), and/or maternity clinics (i.e. rumah bersalin). The
contracting unit would be responsible for accreditation and management of payments to individual
midwives.
3.1.6. BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Following one of the recommendations from the USAID-HSP evaluation [1] i.e. “to form a dedicated
committee comprised of program staff, board representatives, and donors to guide management and
expansion of the program” IBI established a dedicated unit to manage the Bidan Delima program
namely the UPBD. The UPBD is located at national, provincial, and district levels. All personnel in
the UPBD work on a voluntary basis (except national UPBD). At the central level the managers are
appointed and report directly to the IBI President.
The management team at central level is chaired by a General Manager who oversees the Quality
Assurance Manager, Bidan Delima System Development Manager, Human Resources Manager,
Finance and Accounting Manager, Administration and Logistics Manager. However, the current
situation is that the General Manager is unable to work full time as she is also appointed to be a
Surveyor, and instead of having a full team of five managers, there are only three managers with one
of the vacant positions being the Quality Assurance Manager.
“We at the central management have weaknesses. It should be that each manager thinks about
each of their activities, but we are short of managers so we all just do it together scatter...” -
(National UPBD)
17 Several specific and sensitive intervention to prevent stunting are in the midwives` standard of procedures for quality
care. (Ref: ‘National strategy for acceleration of stunting prevention’) 18 Members of the Core TWG included MOH (PPJK, YANKES, NTP), BPJS-K, and development partners 19 Strategic Health Purchasing for Maternal Health, Summary for Decision Makers (draft)
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 21
The district or municipality UPBD management consists of a manager, secretary, financial manager,
recruitment department and quality assurance department. The quality assurance department
supervises facilitators and has responsibility for quality improvement of the Bidan Delima service.
This management team is the key player to ensure the Bidan Delima program is progressive at the
district level, while the provincial UPBD assumes the function to facilitate the coordination between
national level and district level UPBD.
The UPBD selection is made simultaneously with the IBI board of management selection, every five
years. The steps are: 1) IBI board meeting to identify candidates that suit the requirements, 2) the IBI
board at the district level chooses from the candidates,3) the list of selected candidates is proposed
to IBI National board, 4) IBI National board inaugurates the selected UPBD personnel. One of the
requirements for UPBD manager is not holding any position in the IBI board. UPBD and IBI need to
have close coordination and according to the West Java UPBD manager, this is one of the key
factors for a successful Bidan Delima program.
“The leadership factor at Province and District is very influential. The system is not yet developed
well, so that its success depends on the leadership...” - (National UPBD)
During the assessment, Bidan Delima midwives from half of the areas assessed were unhappy with
the way the UPBD manages the program. Terms used to express their unhappiness were: ineffective,
overly busy with other roles, unsupportive to Bidan Delima midwives and not prioritizing Bidan
Delima.
Based on those weaknesses, the suggestions made to UPBD by Bidan Delima midwives were:
• Must be smart
• Try to get financial support
• Focus on their assignments as UPBD
• Support and prioritize Bidan Delima midwives in various activities
• Choose senior, retired or pure private midwives with no other job or focus
Choosing retired or senior midwives to manage Bidan Delima is a compelling suggestion. Depok,
whose UPBD are senior midwives, received positive feedback from Bidan Delima midwife groups for
spending more time monitoring and mentoring, particularly in Bidan Delima practices. Depok’s
UPBD is the only UPBD where the midwives commented,
“Oh my... it’s almost monitoring time again? They just visited me for monitoring not long ago!” -
(Bidan Delima)
3.1.7. BIDAN DELIMA QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM
According to the 2014 Bidan Delima Program Technical Guideline for District Chapter IBI [5] the
monitoring of Bidan Delima midwives’ quality of services is conducted by a monitoring team at the
district UPBD that consists of:
• Supervisor of the recruitment and mentoring at the district UPBD;
• Facilitators;
• Clinical trainer (if available).
Findings from USAID Jalin’s rapid assessment indicate thatthe regular quality monitoring activities
was in practice conducted by the facilitators only.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 22
The prerequisites to become a Bidan Delima facilitator are described in the Bidan Delima technical
guidelines, i.e. have been active as a Bidan Delima midwife and have commitment to mentor
candidates for Bidan Delima. The FGD participants confirmed the prerequisites as: 1) operating
private practice, 2) willing to spend time to undertake facilitator’s tasks, and 3) committed to self-
improvement.
Being a facilitator means becoming a role model for Bidan Delima, therefore, the prerequisites are
indispensable. The main tasks of the facilitator are: 1) to assist Bidan Delima candidates during the
selection process, 2) to validate the self-assessment results, and 3) to monitor and mentor Bidan
Delima midwives in maintaining and improving the quality of care.
According to managers of UPBD and facilitators who were interviewed in the assessment, in general,
Bidan Delima members become facilitators due to the appointment by UPBD managers instead of
self-nomination. The selected facilitators must participate in facilitators’ training that is conducted at
provincial level, and then the IBI National board releases an official letter to announce their position
as facilitator.The training costs 2,500,000 IDR and is supposedly paid by the district UPBD. But since
2017 the facilitator training has not been conducted as frequently as expected.
UPBD at district and provincial levels and IBI estimated the ideal ratio between facilitators and Bidan
Delima midwives is 1:10. However, as presented in Table 4 the ratio in Sukabumi, Sidoarjo and
Asahan is less than ideal. In Sukabumi, one facilitator supervises 27-28 Bidan Delima midwives, and
on top of that, all facilitators reside in central business areas so Bidan Delima midwives on the
outskirts of Sukabumi are rarely visited.
In Depok, although the proportion is close to ideal, like in Sukabumi uneven distribution is another
problem to resolve. They are distributed across 11 sub-districts or ranting, but not in proportion to
the Bidan Delima midwives. For instance, Tapos sub-district in Depok with 44 Bidan Delima
midwives has only two facilitators, while Cilodong sub-district with 26 Bidan Delima midwives has
four facilitators. This affects the burden of each facilitator in mentoring Bidan Delima midwives.
Facilitators reported that they receive rewards in the form of a facilitator training certificate,
improved knowledge and Bidan Delima membership fee waiver, but they still have to pay extra
expenses incurred when visiting Bidan Delima’s practices to assume their roles, since the
transportation and consumption allowance from UPBD is very small.
UPBD in Kotawaringin Timur, whose members were just three midwives, could not financially
support facilitator’s activities, so “… we really expect to get financial support to cover the operation of
Bidan Delima, so we can improve this program.”
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 23
The evaluation of USAID-HSP [1] has also highlighted the heavy reliance on volunteerism as a
weakness in Bidan Delima program operations that potentially hampers further expansions and
sustainability of the program. The evaluator recommended development of a new system in which
paid staff augment facilitators in performing validation and supervisory visits. The 2011 review of the
Bidan Delima program conducted by Mercy Corps [2]reiterated the need to find an effective
incentives scheme for volunteers amongst UPBD and field facilitators to stimulate active monitoring
and reporting.
3.1.8. BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM FINANCING
Bidan Delima members pay a mandatory annual membership fee of IDR 250,000. The amount is
similar across areas, but payment methods are different across sub-districts. The annual fee can be
paid at once or as monthly installments. The payment period is also varied across the districts. Some
collect the money in the middle of the year, some at the end of the year. In addition to the
mandatory fee, sub-districts may request additional fees for their operations/programs.
The collected annual fee is shared with all levels of UPBD with the following composition:
• IDR50,000 per Bidan Delima midwife for central level UPBD;
• IDR50,000 per Bidan Delima midwife for provincial level UPBD;
• IDR150,000 per Bidan Delima midwife for district/city level UPBD.
The district UPBD is authorized to manage their funds. Some district UPBD manage their finances
completely separated from IBI, while some others, although they have a treasurer or financial
manager, maintain a joint bank account with IBI in the district, or simply save all UPBD income to
IBI’s account.
Not all Bidan Delima midwives pay the membership fee, but UPBD cannot insist on the collection of
unpaid feeds or punish members who have not paid. There is no clear information regarding the
compliance of Bidan Delima midwives to pay the annual fee but the IBI National board mentioned
that only 50 percent pay it regularly. It has been difficult for the UPBD to take action on this as they
could not show the advantage of joining Bidan Delima.
The challenges faced by Facilitators to promote Bidan Delima
“We had an interesting experience when trying to develop Bidan Delima in Sukamara district. Bidan Delima is a brand
of excellent quality of care, in order to eliminate the MMR and NMR. So…. I tried to introduce it to a neighborhood
district, hoping they can develop Bidan Delima program. Because the road was still on construction, and also the
private midwife’s practices opening hour, I left home at 5 a.m., and later I arrived home at 9 p.m. In the introduction
process, the private midwives were very enthusiastic, three of them were eager to join Bidan Delima, so we continued
the process with verification, validation, and so on. But two weeks before the inauguration, those three midwives stated
that they cancelled the application. At that time, the provincial UPBD was the one who provided data and guidance
through WhatsApp.
The reason why they cancelled their membership is a big question for me. It is an unforgettable memory! My sacrifice
did not yield a good result”
(Facilitator – Kotawaringin Barat)
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 24
UPBD Asahan explained that their members have never paid membership fees. The reason is not yet
clear but possibly it is because they do not currently have facilitators in the district. While in Deli
Serdang, the UPBD manager decided not to collect membership fees in 2019, because there was no
supervision and mentoring from provincial and national UPBD.
3.2. STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
3.2.1. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND NATIONAL LEVEL STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVE
The MOH respondents recognize the Bidan Delima program as the mechanism to improve quality of
private midwives by IBI as a professional association. They also recognize that Bidan Delima
standards of service quality are in compliance with the most updated MOH regulation on the
Licensing and Operations of Midwife Practices i.e. PMK no. 28/2017, thus aligned with the other
MNH tools produced and utilized by the MOH including the MCH Handbook20and SiMatneo (i.e.
MOH’s digital application for maternal-neonatal health indicators tracking).
“Bidan Delima is a form of member management and supervision (pembinaan) by IBI to members.
It has helped DHO to extend supervision to private midwives. Items in the facilitative supervision
tools used by DHO have similar items with Bidan Delima’s tools.” - (MOH Family Health
Directorate)
Bidan Delima program’s quality assurance mechanism also gains recognition from international
development agencies. UNFPA, for example, has adopted Bidan Delima’s coaching/mentoring
approach to expand the skills and quality improvement supports to midwives in the public and
private sector, beyond the Bidan Delima members. The UNFPA project that was implemented in
West Java, Bekasi, DKI Jakarta, Lampung, Surabaya, and Makassar, recruited the existing Bidan
Delima facilitators as coaches because they were more ready and familiar with the quality
improvement tool including the MOH’s facilitative supervision tool.
3.2.2. DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICIALS’ PERSPECTIVE
The majority of resource persons from DHO highlighted the strength of Bidan Delima’s concept in
improving quality of care,
“Bidan Delima’s concept is excellent, but it has to be implemented.” - (DHO Sidoarjo)
As a program that focuses on quality improvement of private midwife practices, Bidan Delima is
valuable for the government. Private midwife practices contribute to increasing coverage of antenatal
visits, kunjungan 1-4 (K1-K4) and complement the MNH services of Puskesmas. They often are
located closer to where the pregnant women live, particularly in remote areas like Kotawaringin.
“If private midwife practices are to be accredited, the answer is Bidan Delima.” - (Family Health
section DHO, Pasuruan)
Bidan Delima is under the radar of some policy makers at district level. They have not fully
understood the program, although they know that Bidan Delima is run by IBI. They consider
improving Bidan Delima to be an internal IBI issue.
20 MCH Handbook (Buku KIA) contains health records of pregnant and post-partum women and children 0-5 years old as
well as relevant health care advises. The MOH distributes the book to all pregnant women and mother with children under
5 years old through health facilities, including midwife practices.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 25
“We in the DHO haven’t read the detailed guidelines of Bidan Delima,”, the head of Family Health section
in Kotawaringin Timur stated. She was not able to tell the difference between Bidan Delima and non-
Bidan Delima midwives. The Head of Family Health section of DHO Deli Serdang also seemed to
lack understanding of Bidan Delima. She said, “as I have explained, I don’t know and am not familiar with
Bidan Delima… I only know at first that Bidan Delima encouraged SOP compliance, human resources and
facilities.”
The lack of DHO's understanding of Bidan Delima has caused a lack of support for the program
itself.
“There’s no appreciation and endorsement from other stakeholders, particularly the DHO.” - (UPBD
manager)
3.2.3. CLIENTS’ PERSPECTIVE
During clinical observation, the assessor also conducted interviews with pregnant women in Bidan
Delima and non-Bidan Delima practices. The characteristics of the interviewee can be seen in Table
5. Among the interviewees, some already had experience in receiving assistance for childbirth at the
same practice with the same midwife.
The interviews show that no clients knew about the meaning of Bidan Delima. The preferences of
clients in choosing the midwife practice for ANC are: 1) midwife is well known in community; 2)
friendliness of the midwife; 3) the private midwife practice was nearby her house and low cost.
Generally, information regarding the private midwife practice is received from colleagues, family,
midwives, parents, relatives, Posyandu (health post) and friends. Only a few clients knew about the
practice from an advertisement, social media (Facebook)or BPJS clinic.
Table 5: The Characteristics of Pregnant Women who were Interviewed
Item Bidan Delima Practice (N=9) Non-Bidan Delima Practice (N=9)
Age (range) 22 – 37 years 19 – 32 years
Pregnant
Child number 1 (n=2) Child number 1 (n=4)
Child number 2 (n=3) Child number 2 (n=2)
Child number 3 (n=4) Child number 3 (n=2)
Education
Elementary (SD) (n= 2) Elementary (SD) (n= 1)
Senior High School (SMA) (n= 6) Junior High School (SMP) (n= 5)
University (n= 1)
Senior High School (SMA) (n= 1)
University (n= 8)
Number of visits 2 - 10 times 1 - 8 times
All the clients of Bidan Delima practices confirmed that they already received ANC and FP
counseling and five out of nine were educated about initial breastfeeding. Most of the clients in non-
Bidan Delima practices confirmed that they already received ANC services but only two out of nine
were educated about initial breastfeeding and three out nine were educated about FP.
Interviews were also conducted with postpartum mothers with characteristics as shown in Table 6.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 26
Table 6:The Characteristics of Postpartum Mothers who were Interviewed
Item Bidan Delima Practice (N=9) Non-Bidan Delima Practice (N=8)
Age (range) 18-38 22-37
Number of Children
Child number 1 (n=1) Child number 1 (n=1)
Child number 2 (n=4) Child number 2 (n=2)
Child number 3 (n=3) Child number 3 (n=3)
Child number 4 (n=1)
Child number 4 (n=1)
Child number 5 (n=1)
Education
Elementary (SD) n = 2 Elementary (SD) n = 1
Junior High School (SMP) n = 2 Junior High School (SMP) n = 5
Senior High School (SMA)n = 4 Senior High School (SMA) n = 1
University n = 1 University n = 1
The length of stay after delivery 5 – 48 hours 8 – 24 hours
The baby's weight 2.5 – 4 kgs 2.7 – 4.2 kgs
The same answer was given by most of the interviewees regarding the reasons for choosing the
clinic for the delivery process. One client in a Bidan Delima clinic mentioned that she heard about
Bidan Delima from her employer (factory) who suggested the employees should deliver the baby in
the Bidan Delima practice, but she did not know about the clinic.
None of the clients in the private midwife practices mentioned difficulties during pregnancy and
delivery, nor about complications during labor or after wards. But based on one Bidan Delima
midwife’s explanation, there was one mother who experienced obstructed delivery or shoulder
dystocia during the labor process.
Most of the clients in the private midwife practices explained that after delivery, the midwife took
action to check the temperature, check the pad or ask about bleeding. Two out of nine mothers in
Bidan Delima practices and one out of eight mothers in non-Bidan Delima practices mentioned that
the midwife did not encourage them to start early breastfeeding.
All pregnant and postpartum mothers were satisfied with the services and there was no specific
suggestion regarding the quality of services. Only one Bidan Delima client suggested to reduce the
waiting time by adding more midwives and to have ultrasound available and one non-Bidan Delima
client suggested to open the practice earlier in the morning.
On the other hand, many midwives who were key informants in the assessment are convinced that
Bidan Delima has gained popularity in their areas, and even beyond, although increasing patient flow
to at least the pre-BPJS level is one contemporary challenge to resolve.
“Patients are more satisfied with Bidan Delima’s service,” is a common presumption across Bidan Delima
and non-Bidan Delima groups. The non-Bidan Delima group also presumed that people see Bidan
Delima as more experienced, and compliant to standards.
The Bidan Delima groups are presumed to be seen as more innovative and different from the
average midwife. This presumption possibly comes from the variety of services they provide for
pregnant women and their significant other services, such as pregnancy yoga and baby spa.
But some midwives also admitted that people are no longer familiar with Bidan Delima. Patients
often thought Delima is the midwife’s name, so they called the midwife “Ibu Delima”. Sometimes,
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 27
after seeing the Bidan Delima signboard, they asked their private midwife what Bidan Delima is, and
the differences between Bidan Delima and other midwives, regardless of whether or not she is a
Bidan Delima midwife.
Lack of promotion was thought to be the reason why not many clients know Bidan Delima. The
majority of Bidan Delima midwives affirmed that signboards are the only means to promote Bidan
Delima nowadays. Previously there used to be TV advertisements, and a series of promotions, such
as karaoke contests at district level.
3.2.4. MIDWIVES’ PERSPECTIVE
Bidan Delima midwives have a positive view of themselves and felt entitled to charge higher service
fees because of their superior service compared to other midwives. Generally, non-Bidan Delima
midwives also recognized the quality level of Bidan Delima’s administration, facilities and equipment.
Table 7 show the list of midwives’ perceptions about Bidan Delima.
Table 7: The Thoughts and Opinions of Private Midwives about Bidan Delima
Positive Challenges
• Highly trustworthy, a good brand of quality
midwife
• Higher self-confidence
• Higher number of patients
• More experienced
• Have support group to discuss experiences and
problems
• Broad and updated knowledge
• Better quality, i.e. facilities, waste management,
complete IEC materials, recording, higher
compliance to standard, administration
• Higher membership fee (annual fee, Bidan
Delima kit package)
• Costly, funds needed for private practice
renovation
• More reporting obligations
• Extra expenditure to become Bidan Delima
3.3. MIDWIVES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT JOINING THE BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
3.3.1. COMMON MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS FOR BECOMING A BIDAN DELIMA MIDWIFE
• Advancing knowledge through trainings, seminars, groups of learners
• Providing excellent services including prioritizing patients’ satisfaction, meeting the standard
operating procedure (SOP), and being well-known and trusted by patients and the community in
the area
• Increasing income from higher patient flow and confidence to charge higher fees for services
• Surpassing other private midwives, through innovative services, and better networking – this is
actually an indirect benefit from joining Bidan Delima.
• Facilitating the licensing (SIPB) process
“When you need to renew your SIPB, you’ll see that the requirements... you have to have this and
that instruments” “We, the Bidan Delimas, already have complete instruments as required.”- (Bidan
Delima, Pasuruan)
• Expanding their network, thus facilitating the referral process due to acquaintances with
OB/GYN and referral facilities.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 28
But, on other hand, several non-Bidan Delima midwives across groups thought that Bidan Delima is
no longer associated with quality improvement. Even some Bidan Delima acknowledged there are
non-Bidan Delima midwives who have better competencies than the Bidan Delima ones.
“Maybe people want to know what Bidan Delima is, and we say Bidan Delima is quality of service.
But the thing is… there’s no difference between Bidan Delima and other private midwife practices.”
- (Bidan Delima, Asahan)
They particularly mentioned that the private midwife practice’s floor plan met the regulation of
Ministry of Health. However, they were implicitly apprehensive about the amount of money and
effort spent to achieve that quality level, through Bidan Delima.
In Pasuruan, specifically, Bidan Delima seemed to feel more secure facing legal cases or lawsuits if
they had followed the SOPs. Legal cases, such as suspected malpractice, were not mentioned in any
other Bidan Delima groups. When the assessment was underway, there was a recent maternal
mortality case that involved Bidan Delima in Sukabumi. The Bidan Delima group did not mention it,
but the non-Bidan Delima group and other resource persons discussed it. In Sidoarjo, four maternal
mortality cases last year were referred from Bidan Delima.
“Please show us the added value, whatever that is, because until now we haven’t been able to see
the added value of Bidan Delima.” - (Non-Bidan Delima, Sukabumi)
Monitoring and evaluation, according to a Family Health section head in Sidoarjo, is essential to
ensure quality and to see the differences between Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima, because,
“… sometimes it’s difficult to tell. Some have been certified as Bidan Delima but still cheat... our
friends in IBI often complained about that.” - (DHO Sidoarjo)
3.3.2. COMMON DEMOTIVATING FACTORS FOR BECOMING A BIDAN DELIMA MIDWIFE
There are some reasons why private midwives may still be hesitant to join Bidan Delima;
• Inability to fulfill the requirements
“From 33 midwives, only one wanted to join Bidan Delima. The rest actually wanted to but thought
that the requirements were too hard to fulfill.” - (Facilitator, Kotawaringin Barat)
• Burden of midwife administration work
Some noted that being a Bidan Delima midwife means having extra administration work to add
to their already heavy workload such as: patient’s registration, cohort, recording and reporting
obligations from the Puskesmas/DHO, to BPJS supporting documents, and so on.
• Higher annual fees
In addition to the Bidan Delima annual fee of 250,000 IDR per year and 600,000 IDR for the
Bidan Delima kit package, they also had to pay an annual fee as an IBI member of 300,000 IDR
per year.
• Negative thoughts about the Bidan Delima program
Non-Bidan Delima midwives were wary that the UPBD or facilitator would scrutinize their
financial reports.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 29
“They scrutinize the financial report... Other midwives will know [our internal issues], it’s like we’re
being watched closely... Why do you do it that way?” - (Non-Bidan Delima)
Lack of complete and clear information is the reason for this situation. One non-Bidan Delima
midwife showed her limited knowledge regarding this program during focus group discussion.
“I don’t know, I’ve never been offered to be Bidan Delima or informed about what Bidan Delima is.
I just saw it on the signboard, but then forgot to ask in the meeting. The Bidan Delimas are all
seniors, they rarely meet us, either.” - (Non-Bidan Delima)
However, the UPBD stated that they still promote Bidan Delima among IBI members to acquire
more Bidan Delima midwives, through IBI sub-district meetings. During the meetings they commonly
discussed issues with mixed participants, including IBI members and Bidan Delima, and expected to
attract non-Bidan Delima IBI members to join Bidan Delima.
“IBI routinely built the competency of private midwives, and then did some interventions and pushed
those who have filled the prequalification form [to become a Bidan Delima].” - (UPBD, Kotawaringin
Timur)
3.4. FINDINGS OF CLINICAL OBSERVATION
In total, 46 private midwives were sampled for the clinical observation, including 23 Bidan Delima
midwives and 23 non-Bidan Delima midwives. The characteristics of the sampled midwives are
summarized in Table 8.
Table 8: Characteristics of Private Midwives Sampled for the Clinical Observation
Characteristic Bidan Delima
(N=23)
Non-Bidan Delima
(N=23)
Age
26 - 37 years 3 12
38 - 49 years 15 7
>50 years 5 4
Have a valid license
Yes 23 21
No 0 0
Number of cases in last 3 month
ANC
0 - 8/month 2 9
9 - 23/month 5 10
>= 24/month 16 4
Family planning
0 - 60/month 8 9
61 - 110/month 7 10
>111/month 8 4
Delivery
0 - 4/month 8 16
5 - 9/month 7 5
> 10/month 8 2
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 30
Characteristic Bidan Delima
(N=23)
Non-Bidan Delima
(N=23)
Training activities within the last 3 years
Normal Delivery Care (APN) 1 5
Contraceptive Technology Update (CTU) 8 7
Midwifery Update (MU) 13 14
3.4.1. AGE DISTRIBUTION
As seen in Table 8, Bidan Delima midwives were more likely to be within the age range of 38 – 49
years than those in the non-Bidan Delima group. Most (12 out 23) of the non-Bidan Delima group
were within the age range of 26 – 37 years.
In Depok, Deli Serdang, Kotawaringin Barat and Timur, the majority of Bidan Delima midwives were
senior midwives. The seniors provide examples for the juniors in many aspects. A senior midwife is
expected to join Bidan Delima, to be a role model of a quality midwife for junior midwives,
expanding their network, thus facilitating the referral process due to acquaintances with OB/GYN
specialists and referral facilities.
3.4.2. OWNERSHIP OF VALID LICENSE
The private midwife license, SIPB, provides authorization to carry out midwifery practices based on
the DHO recommendation.
All Bidan Delima midwives had a valid license, whereas two non-Bidan Delima midwives did not have
a license. The first was a newly practicing midwife in Sidoardjo and she had already started providing
ANC and FP services and other general treatment in the last two months. Previously, this midwife
provided services at another Bidan Delima practice. The second midwife, who had no license opened
a private practice in Deli Serdang. However, her license is in the process of renewal, so she has not
provided any services at her practice in the last three months.
In addition to issues regarding the unavailability of valid licenses, other findings relate to the types of
services that midwives are allowed to provide. Based on Law 4, 2019 on midwifery; the tasks of
midwife practice are to provide maternal health services, child health services and women's
reproductive health services and family planning. But in practice, some private midwives still provide
general treatment services.
3.4.3. MIDWIFE COMPETENCY
a. Counseling Skills in Family Planning
FP counseling skills were observed based on direct interaction with clients or simulation activities.
Only two out of 46 observations were direct counseling practice with FP clients, the rest were
based on simulation. Figure 3 shows an overview of the Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima
competency in conducting FP counseling.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 31
Figure 3: Competency in Family Planning Counseling
In general, the competency of Bidan Delima midwives in counseling is better than non-Bidan Delima
midwives, as shown by the average score of counseling skills of Bidan Delima midwives of 77
percent, compared to that of non-Bidan Delima midwives of 46 percent. Three Bidan Delima
midwives scored 100 percent on this skill while four Bidan Delima midwives scored under 50
percent.
Figure 4 shows that all private midwives met the criteria of treating the client with respect. This
figure also shows that Bidan Delima midwives are better at some counseling indicators, i.e. ask open
questions, encourage clients to ask questions, use visual aids, use medical records and ensure client's
confidentiality. But non-Bidan Delima midwives are better in other counseling indicators, i.e. treat
client personally, discuss about the next visit and ask about the client’s concerns. There is a notable
gap for five out of 23 Bidan Delima and 10 out of 23 non-Bidan Delima midwives who have no
dedicated counseling room. These midwives provided counseling in an open space or carried out
counseling in the ANC room or in a room with only a fabric divider.
Figure 4: Family Planning Counseling Skills by Indicators
It should also be noted that generally midwives did not explain all FP methods but directly made the
decision to explain one method or continued with the type of contraception desired by the client.
85%
69%78%
67%
82% 78% 82% 78%
100%
40%
69%
52%
37% 37%48%
37%48%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Deli Serdang Asahan Depok Sukabumi Sidoarjo Pasuruan Kotawaringin
BaratKotawaringin
TimurParameter
Bidan Delima Non Bidan Delima
23
2019
1817
16
14 1413
2323
1312
16
19
14
16
7
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
Treat client
with respect
Encourage
client to raise
the question
Ask with open
question
Ensure client
confidentiallity
Discuss about
the next visit
Use medical
record
Ask clien't
concern
Use visual aids Treat client
personally
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
Encourage
client to raise
questions
Ask open
questions Ask about
client’s
concerns
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 32
b. Antenatal Care Skill
One strategy for decreasing MMR is high quality ANC. ANC aims to monitor and maintain the
health and safety of the mother and the baby, detect all complications of pregnancy and take the
necessary actions, respond to complaints, prepare for birth and promote a healthy lifestyle. Access
to ANC by pregnant women has increased to 77 percent according to IDHS 2017, with most of it
provided by midwives. The national survey (Riskesdas) results of 2013 to 2018 show that midwives
continue to be the main providers of ANC, although the number decreased from 87.7 percent to
84.8 percent. Key causes of MMR in order of incidence are: 1) postpartum and antepartum
hemorrhage, and 2) eclampsia and preeclampsia.21 The risks for those conditions may be
exacerbated by underlying tuberculosis, heart and liver problems, or diabetes. Potential risk for
eclampsia and preeclampsia can be identified early inpregnancy by 18-20 weeks by ultrasonography
of the uterine artery. In support of the RPJMN’s plan for MMR reduction acceleration, the MOH is
working on defining the standard for ANC as six visits, including a visit to a doctor to screen for
high-risk pregnancy and potential risk for delivery. Pregnant women with normal pregnancy could
continue ANC with a midwife. The high-risk women would be referred to a health facility 22.
The ANC skills were observed by the assessor based on the midwife’s practice with clients or
simulation. Only one out of 46 observations were based on direct practice with a pregnant woman,
the rest on simulation.
Figure 5: Competency in the Antenatal Care
Figure 5 provides an overview of private midwife competency in ANC. Generally, the competency of
Bidan Delima midwives is better than non-Bidan Delima midwives, based on the average score for
Bidan Delima midwives of 72 percent while the average non-Bidan Delima score is 54 percent. Even
21 Yap, Wei A., et al. Revealing the missing link: private sector supply-side readiness for primary maternal health services in
Indonesia - maternal health report (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, 2017 22 Interview with key informants, MOH and POGI
85%82%
64%
73%
67% 68% 67% 68%
100%
47%
78%
59%
45% 45%
55%
45%
55%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Deli Serdang Asahan Depok Sukabumi Sidoarjo Pasuruan Kotawaringin
Barat
Kotawaringin
Timur
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 33
so, the average scores for ANC competencies of Bidan Delima midwives in most districts are less
than 75 percent, except for two districts: Deli Serdang (85 percent) and Asahan (82 percent).
Seven out of 23 Bidan Delima midwives achieved a score under 60 percent, and the score of one
Bidan Delima midwife in Sukabumi was 47 percent. Aspects that showed poor performance include:
hand wash before and after, ask about the baby’s movement, record examination result in medical
record, provide tetanus vaccine, discuss about birth preparation and complication, discuss about FP
contraceptive, and complete the status of pregnant mother.
Figure 6 shows that all private midwives practiced measuring blood pressure during ANC
observation. Bidan Delima midwives also performed other measures, i.e. explaining to the mother
about the result, providing healthy behavior information and checking the fetal heart rate. It is
notable that the gaps in ANC skills for Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima midwives were similar
despite scoring differences. The least met indicators were hand washing before and after
examination and discuss with mother about birth preparedness and possibility for complication.
Figure 6: ANC Skill by Indicators23
c. Skill in using Partograph
The private midwives’ competency in using a partograph was observed by asking the midwife to fill
the partograph based on a case study and answer questions related to the case study. This is also
23The indicator of ensuring the baby’s position (more than 36 weeks) was not applied for this case study, since the
mother’s pregnancy was still 27 weeks (see Annex 1, the tools assessment).
8
6
8
7
14
13
13
15
22
20
14
14
20
13
21
23
23
7
8
10
11
11
17
18
18
20
20
21
21
22
23
23
23
0 5 10 15 20 25
Hand wash after examination
Hand wash before examination
Discuss birth preparation
Ask about baby's movement (>= 26 weeks)
Discuss about contraceptive for Family Planning
Provide and explain about mother and child health (KIA) book
Provide tetanus vaccination
Encourage mother to raise questions
Ask about mother's concerns
Explain to mother about the examination
Complete mother's status
Record examination result in medical record and KIA book
Checking fetal heart rate (> 16 weeks' gestation)
Educate mother about healthy behavior
Explain to mother about the result of examination
Measure blood pressure
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 34
one of the midwife competency areas that needs to be improved. In general, the midwives’
competency in using a partograph was very low as shown in Figure 7.
Figure7: Competency in Using Partograph
Figure 7 shows that overall, there is a difference between Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima
midwives’ skills in using a partograph. However, non-Bidan Delima midwives in some districts have
the same average competency as Bidan Delima midwives or even better. The average score of Bidan
Delima competency in using a partograph is 61 percent and 39 percent for non-Bidan Delima
midwives. Altogether 14 out of 23 Bidan Delima midwives and eight out of 23 non-Bidan Delima
midwives filled the partograph and answered the questions correctly or achieved a score of 100
percent.
Many private practice midwives were unable to complete partographs and were unable to provide
precise answers to the questions. The biggest mistakes during observation were: errors in describing
labor contractions, information not provided about amniotic rupture, fluid or food intake and output
were not measured, fetal heart rate was not recorded, blood pressure and pulse filling were
incomplete, and did not fill the signs of head descent.
Beside assessing the competency and knowledge of midwife in filling the partograph, assessors also
reviewed five copies of partographs. These copies were the records of the last five deliveries in
private midwife practices.
Table 9: Results of Partograph Document Review
No Result
Bidan
Delima
(N=23)
Non-Bidan
Delima
(N=23)
1 Partographs were available, all information was filled correctly, used
routinely to monitor the progress of labor
3 0
2 Partographs were available, all information was filled correctly but
not used routinely to monitor the progress of labor or was completed
after delivery
9 7
3 Partographs were available, not all information was filled
correctly, not used routinely to monitor the progress of labor or
completed after delivery
8 8
33% 33% 33%
67% 67% 67% 67% 67%
100%
0%
33%
67%
33%
0%
67%
0%
67%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Deli Serdang Asahan Depok Sukabumi Sidoarjo Pasuruan Kotawaringin
barat
Kotawaringin
timur
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 35
No Result
Bidan
Delima
(N=23)
Non-Bidan
Delima
(N=23)
4 There were no copies of the last partographs in private midwife
practice, it was sent to BPJS
3 4
5 There were no delivery services in private midwife practice 0 4
Table 9 shows the result of the partograph document review by the assessors. Only three out of 23
Bidan Delima midwives filled the partograph correctly and used it routinely to monitor the progress
of labor in practice. Nine out of 23 Bidan Delima midwives used the partograph for each delivery
and filled it correctly but it was not used to monitor the progress of labor or was completed after
delivery.
d. Newborn Resuscitation Skills
Newborn resuscitation skills were observed by the assessor based on simulation with a baby doll
and ambu bag. The assessor did not just observe but also asked questions regarding SOPs for
resuscitation skills. The assessment results show that midwives' skills in this aspect need to be
improved as can be seen in Figure 8.
Figure 8 shows the average score of Bidan Delima midwives is 44 percent while that of non-Bidan
Delima midwives is 31 percent. There is not a big difference in the Bidan Delima and non-Bidan
Delima scores, and in some districts, the average score of non-Bidan Delima midwives was higher
than that of Bidan Delima midwives. Only Bidan Delima midwives in Deli Serdang showed a good
performance in this skill. It should also be noted that none of the private midwives in Depok and
non-Bidan Delima midwives in Deli Serdang could demonstrate their competency in this skill.
Figure 8: The Competency in Newborn Resuscitation
The most fulfilled indicator for resuscitation skill area was installing the ambu bag properly (see
Figure 9). Notably, some private midwife practices do not have an ambu bag or lack the proper size
ambu bag.
Based on the observation results of the role play, there were many midwives in Sidoarjo and
Pasuruan who did not take the correct steps in handling asphyxia in newborns including: in assessing
when the baby should be resuscitated and when newborn care can be given and when the baby
should be referred to the hospital, and if the baby must be referred, the midwife also did not
97%
60%
0%
33%23%
40%
23%
40%
75%
0%
67%
0%
40%30% 30% 30% 30%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Deli Serdang Asahan Depok Sukabumi Sidoarjo Pasuruan Kotawaringin
Barat
Kotawaringin
Timur
Cut of point
Bidan Delima Non Bidan Delima
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 36
remember what needs to be prepared and what should be monitored during the referral process
until the baby arrives at the referral hospital.
Figure 9: Resuscitation Skills per Indicator
During the assessment, private midwives provided reasons for the lack of competency in
resuscitation skills. They noted that there were no cases so far or they were very rare and some had
never undertaken resuscitation so they did not feel confident to carry out the newborn resuscitation
practice. Some private midwives also mentioned that they just referred the patient to the primary
health facility.
3.5. DOCUMENT AND RECORD REVIEW
3.5.1. THE SERVICE LOAD OF PRIVATE MIDWIVES
Based on Table 8, it was shown that, in the last three months, Bidan Delima midwives provided a
higher number of services compared with non-Bidan Delima midwives. In the sampled group, 11 out
of 46 are single practitioners and the remaining work with more than one midwife or occasionally
there may be a “midwife assistant”. The number of midwives who work in one Bidan Delima
practice is generally more than two midwives, but there are even private practices with nine
midwives.
Bidan Delima clinics were more likely to have five or more deliveries per month compared to non-
Bidan Delima where 16 of 23 practices had four or less deliveries per month. There are several
private midwife practices with a high number of normal deliveries per month. A Bidan Delima
practice in Sukabumi district had the highest number of deliveries per month (40) and a non-Bidan
Delima practice in Depok had 14 normal deliveries per month.
On the other hand, there was a practice with no normal deliveries in the last three months, but the
midwife still provided ANC services (65 per month). This private practice just referred the client to
2
2
9
9
8
3
12
6
15
23
5
5
7
8
8
8
10
12
14
0 5 10 15 20 25
assess the newborn baby and stop ventilation
assess and then refer the baby
Assess the baby
Cut the umbilical cord quickly
Counseling to refer baby with mother and family
Continue resuscitation, monitor danger signs, monitor
umbilical cord
Prepare a referral letter.
Ventilate Positive Pressure 20x in 30 seconds (pressure
20cm water). Value every 30 seconds.
Install the ambu bag
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
Prepare a referral letter
Assess and then refer the baby
Assess the newborn baby and stop ventilation
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 37
the health facility for childbirth. Single practitioner private midwives conducted on average one or
two deliveries in the last three months and a maximum of four deliveries.
3.5.2. TRAINING ACTIVITIES
Information about the training activities of private midwives was collected during the assessment.
The assessors asked about the type of the training that was followed by the midwife within the last
three years. There is no regulation regarding the type of training that must be attended by Bidan
Delima midwives. IBI just encourages all midwives to be trained for improving their knowledge and
skills as Bidan Delima, and midwives must be trained in Asuhan Persalinan Normal (Normal Delivery
Care – APN) and Contraceptive Technology Update (CTU). The participation in clinical training is
one of the factors to consider in the pre-qualification process for joining Bidan Delima.24
Table 8 shows that there was no difference in the level of participation of Bidan Delima and non-
Bidan Delima midwives in training activities. All Bidan Delima midwives in the six districts in three
provinces (West Java, East Java and North Sumatra) had already been trained in APN and CTU, but
most of them were trained before 2015 and have had no refresher training after that. In Central
Kalimantan, none of the Bidan Delima midwives were trained in APN. However, most of them were
already trained in Midwifery Update (MU). This was also the case for non-Bidan Delima midwives.
APN is a competency-based training, the trainee must be competent in the model and dealing with
clients. MU is not a competency-based training, the trainee is updated on all knowledge related to
maternal, neonatal and family planning. The trainee just needs to be familiar with the model. IBI has
conducted MU training since 2017.
3.6. THE READINESS OF PRIVATE MIDWIVES TO PROVIDE SERVICES
The assessors evaluated the readiness of private midwife practices for providing services by
observing the management and the availability, completeness and condition of facilities and supplies.
During the assessment, the assessor did not just observe but also reviewed documents and asked
some questions of the private midwife to complete the observation tools.
Figure 10: Results of Observation on the Management of Private Midwife Practice25
24 Panduan Pra Kualifikasi Bidan Delima 25 The percentage 0% implies that all management or facilities or supplies had none of the service readiness indicators
(unweighted) met; while the score of 100 % implies that all facilities met all the service readiness.
73%80% 77%
63% 63% 67%
80%
67%
100%
13% 10%
23% 23%
37% 37%
60%
43%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Deli Serdang Asahan Depok Sukabumi Sidoarjo Pasuruan Kotawaringin
Barat
Kotawaringin
Timur
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non Bidan Delima
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 38
The standard quality benchmark is 100 percent as for the Bidan Delima program. The result of the
observations is shown in Figure 10. The management indicators measure the readiness of practices
in providing quality services and cover: cleanliness, client registration, written procedures and
guidelines including emergency preparedness, regular recording and reporting including financial
aspects.
Overall, Bidan Delima practices show better management compared with non-Bidan Delima
practices. The average score of fulfilled criteria indicators in management of Bidan Delima practices
is 77 percent while for non-Bidan Delima practices it is 45 percent. Nevertheless, four out of 23
Bidan Delima practices have an average score for management of under 50 percent.
Seven out of 23 non-Bidan Delima practices have a management score less than 30 percent and
three out of those seven practices did not meet any management indicators (0 percent). However, it
is notable that the non-Bidan Delima practice in Sidoarjo demonstrated good management. The
private midwife just opened her practice in the last two months but has already achieved 80 percent
of the management indicators. This midwife is undertaking the process to become a Bidan Delima
midwife.
The least met criteria for management indicators in Bidan Delima practices are: the availability of a
regular cleanliness schedule, financial balance book, documentation or filling complete forms.
Figure 11: The Result of Observation on Facilities and Supplies of Private Midwife Practice26
Figure 11 shows the availability of facilities and supplies in private midwife practices. This observation
covered: physical facilities, i.e. counseling room, basic amenities, pelvic inspection equipment,
delivery set, newborn care including resuscitation equipment, infection prevention and supplies
including medicines for emergency preparedness.
Overall, the scores of all private midwife practices regarding availability of facilities and supplies are
good. The average facility and supplies score of Bidan Delima practices is 93 percent, while that of
non-Bidan Delima practices is 84 percent.
26 The percentage 0% implies that all management or facilities or supplies had none of the service readiness indicators
(unweighted) met; while the score of 100% implies that all facilities met all the service readiness.
99% 99% 99% 99% 96%91% 89% 85%
100%
86% 87% 88% 92% 88%84% 82%
78%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Deli Serdang Asahan Depok Sukabumi Sidoarjo Pasuruan Kotawaringin
Barat
Kotawaringin
Timur
Parameter
Bidan Delima Non Bidan Delima
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 39
Table 10: Availability of Equipment and Supplies in Private Midwife Practices
No Item Bidan Delima (N=23) Non-Bidan Delima (N=23)
1 Basic amenities 95% 88%
2 Delivery set 96% 92%
3 Suturing set 96% 89%
4 Newborn care equipment 95% 85%
5 Supplies 95% 93%
6 Infection prevention 89% 70%
Table 10 shows the readiness of facilities and availability of supplies in private midwife practices. It
shows that Bidan Delima midwives maintain supplies and equipment for infection prevention at
higher levels than non-Bidan Delima practices which need to improve their readiness especially in
this sub-category
Emergency preparedness
Availability of oxytocin. Oxytocin or Syntocinon is provided in the practices to address
postpartum hemorrhage, the most common cause of maternal mortality. All private midwifepractices
provided it except two out of 23 non-Bidan Delima practices.
Availability of emergency medicine–Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4). Based on the assessment, all
private midwife practices provided MgSO4, except two out of 23 non-Bidan Delima practices.
However, the MgSO4 at one Bidan Delima practice and one non-Bidan practice had expired.
Most of the private midwife practices stored oxytocin and MgSO4 in the refrigerator, but some are
stored with food or skincare. During the assessment, there was also a practice that stored drugs in
an emergency bag which was hung on the wall of the labor room.
Although it is not an assessment indicator, it should be noted that there were two Bidan Delima
practices and four non-Bidan Delima practices that provided formula milk for 0 – 6 months old
babies.
3.7. HEALTH INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR BIDAN DELIMA SERVICES
3.7.1. BIDAN DELIMA MIDWIVES AND JKN EMPANELMENT
The implementation of JKN/BPJS requires private midwives to adjust and inevitably brings
controversies. To some extent midwives see JKN/BPJS as indispensable and helpful, but on the other
hand, they experience a variety of adverse effects on their practices, both private and public.
Private midwives’ decisions regarding JKN empanelment fall into five categories:
1. Interested to join or continue with JKN
2. Unhappy but still persist as an empaneled provider of JKN
3. Undecided or hesitate to join JKN
4. Refuse to join JKN
5. Withdrew from JKN network
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 40
The involvement of private sector providers is encouraged to broaden care availability under JKN
but private midwives are required to collaborate in a network with Puskesmas, private clinics,
independent and individual GPs and private clinics with two or more GPs in group practice27, thus
become empaneled private Maternal Health (MH) providers. Their connection to BPJS is mediated
by the primary health care providers’ network. The private midwife is allowed to empanel with
maximum two primary health care providers.
“They [JKN] want us to provide excellent service but they are careless about the money needed to
improve the quality. It’s more about money.”- (Non-Bidan Delima)
Being empaneled MH providers with an indirect connection to JKN brings various problems to
private midwife practices. Discussing further about how JKN affects their clinics day-to-day
operation, midwives across areas and groups said their experiences led them to perceive that lack of
information, which actually stemmed from their position as a partner or “mitra” of the primary
healthcare provider network of JKN, is considered as a big barrier for them to operate under JKN.
MOH - Health Services has provided a strong statement about the meaning of working in a Jejaring
or network in Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama (Primary Health Care Facility – FKTP) and the need
for this to be strengthened. It should not be for administrative purposes only, but also technical. It
should be clear where the responsibility lies. Patients’ safety while being treated in FKTP or its
network of services should be under the responsibility of the doctor/GP of the FKTP. The
performance monitoring of an active FKTP is the cumulative measure of performances by the FKTP
and sub-clinic(s) in its network.
Reasons for Not Engaging with JKN
The situation regarding private midwives and JKN was also raised during the clinical observation.
The assessor interviewed private midwives about this when asking about the referral mechanism.
Ten out of 23 Bidan Delima and 13 out of 23 non-Bidan Delima clinics were not empaneled as MH
providers for JKN. Six out of all assessed private midwives had experience with JKN but had already
withdrawn from the primary health care network for empaneling with JKN. The reasons these
private midwives were not engaged with JKN are shown in Table 11.
Table 11: Reasons for not Empaneling as MNH Provider for JKN28
Reasons Given for Not Empaneling with JKN Number of Private Midwife Practices
JKN requirements not met 7
Experience with delayed claim disbursement 6
Puskesmas quota for JKN network was exceeded 1
Payment too low 2
Not interested 3
Did not receive claim reimbursement 3
Patient numbers too low 2
Complicated process for claim 1
Have no license 1
27 MOH Degree 71/2013 28 One clinic could have more than one reason for not empaneling with JKN
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 41
JKN Requirements for Service Providers
Midwives are recognized by MOH PPJK as health providers for delivery assistance, for which JKN
provides support for midwifery services within the context of the FKTP. As they could not have a
direct contract with BPJS, they could register through the FKTP. Another option would be through
Jampersal, which is available for mothers who are not covered under BPJS but would like Jampersal
instead (refer to later subsection on Jampersal).
The difficulty to fulfill the JKN requirement was one of the main reasons for not engaging in JKN. But
it is also notable that six out of seven private midwives who gave this reason also showed the lowest
scores or less than 10 percent in management, facility and supplies indicators during the clinical
observation.
The primary health care provider needs to collect copies of ID card, family card, tax file number,
bank account, and most importantly private midwife practicing license/ permit and registration
certificate and carry out verification before preparing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and
the private midwife only needs to sign it as a proof of agreement.
According to the midwives, there are no JKN regulations and how-to manual on hand that they can
refer to, as guidance in service provision for JKN holders. Besides, private practices or Puskesmas, as
their JKN parent network, do not effectively act as a mediator between the private midwives and
JKN. The important information is either not written in the MoU, or a number of midwives admitted
they had not scrutinized the MoU in order to sign it. Thus, the willingness and ability of clinics to
communicate with the private midwives, as well as to mediate communication between the midwives
and BPJS determine the smoothness of BPJS procedure implementation.
Limited JKN socialization to public audiences regarding its terms and conditions makes it challenging
for private midwives to provide maternity services under BPJS, particularly in areas where most
patients come from lower socio-economic classes.
Patients may be manipulative to ensure BPJS covers services received from health providers, both
public and private. “We wrote the diagnosis based on the conditions of our patient, ma’am. Sometimes they
dramatized it, like rolling over [acting like they’re in pain],”one midwife said. In other cases, a pregnant
woman would wait until they reach 8-9 cm dilation before going to a midwife for delivery because
BPJS is not applicable if the dilation has not reached 5 cm This was seen as a way to get BPJS
coverage, and raised concerns among midwives about dealing with potential problems during
delivery, like hypertensive disorders, when the patient comes late.
3.7.2. BARRIER FOR JKN EMPANELMENT: FEE FOR SERVICE
As can be seen in Table 11, “payment too low” is also one of the reasons given by midwives for not
engaging with JKN. This issue was also raised by midwives in the assessment. The JKN fee-for-
service is considered inappropriate or unsuitable for the level of effort, in addition to equipment and
medical supplies that need to be provided by midwives. The amount of the service fee was reported
to be similar across areas, 700,000 IDR for assisting childbirth, and 50,000 IDR for each of the four
ANC visits and four postnatal care (PNC) visits. Pregnant women are recommended to get services
from one MH provider to assure the providers’ familiarity with the patient’s pregnancy condition and
readiness to assist the delivery. However, the fee-for-service applied by JKN is very small or almost
one third of the normal fee for vaginal delivery at private midwife practices in many areas, which is
approximately 1,500,000 - 2,000,000 IDR.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 42
Currently, some Puskesmas are already authorized to receive income directly or are included in
BPJS capitation and also manage the process directly without going through local government,
namely Badan Layanan Umum Daerah (Regional Public Service Agency – BLUD). Midwives assumed
that the BLUD Puskesmas needed to gain more money since the district government does not
provide financial assistance anymore. Hence, midwives reported that the fee for service received
from BLUD Puskesmas was approximately 187,000 IDR (60 percent fee-for-service, 40 percent is for
administration work, etc.).
Non-BLUD Puskesmas usually transfer 700,000 IDR fee-for-service to the empaneled private
midwives (fee-for-service is 60 percent of the claim). However, in private practices, midwives feel
obligated to give back some funds to the Puskesmas from the service claims; depending on the
agreement with midwives in the Puskesmas, this is approximately 100,000 IDR per delivery.
For most dual-practice midwives, even if they are allowed to assist deliveries in their private
practice, they choose not to. Whether the delivery is conducted at the Puskesmas or private
practice, they receive the same amount of fee-for-service because that is the only portion of JKN
fee-for-service for which they are eligible. When they assist deliveries in their private practice,
expenditure on supplies is not covered by JKN.
“I used to have 20 deliveries (in private practice) in a month, but now, after the Puskesmas nearby
opens 24 hours, I only help maximum five deliveries a month....” – (Bidan Delima)
Regarding ANC and PNC fees, JKN provides a higher amount than the actual expenditure for ANC,
although the number of ANC visits is limited to four. Midwives need to inform patients and obtain
their agreement to pay personally if they come for ANC more than four times.
“50,000 from BPJS is enough to give them Gentiamin, Folic acid and other vitamins for pregnant
women. We usually charged them 35 or 40 thousand rupiah. However, because they only cover
four ANC visits and forbid us from charging higher fees, we have to talk with the patient that after
four visits, they have to pay by themselves and not to complain about it.” - (Non-Bidan Delima FGD,
Kotawaringin Barat)
Some midwives in other areas disagreed with this statement. They said they never claimed any
ANC/PNC services performed because the fee-for-service is too low. Just like the delivery service,
they thought that the fee for ANC/PNC was unsuitable given the cost midwives paid.
3.7.3. JKN REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISM BY BPJS-K
Reimbursement or claim processing was one issue that midwives across areas, groups and BPJS-K
empaneled status complained about. BPJS-K uses a fee-for-service, a retrospective or reimbursement
method, in which payment is made by BPJS-K after the health service is provided. The empaneled
midwives submit a fee-for-service claim with all documents required and wait until the decision
about the payment is made and the money is transferred. Some private midwives had negative
experiences regarding the reimbursement mechanism:
1. Delayed reimbursement
The waiting time can be very long, from two months up to two years, according to midwives.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 43
2. Rejected claims
Claims can be rejected for different reasons, predominantly lack of documentation, and ineligible
services. Since it is a retrospective claim, and the midwife was sure that the claim met the
requirement of BPJS coverage, the patient would have already been discharged from the clinic
without paying. In that situation, midwives sadly said they could not, “chase the patient to pay
the claim rejected by BPJS”. Hence, it is a financial loss for them.
Another issue is related to patients’ BPJS membership. Many patients became aware of BPJS and
the benefits it provides just before their delivery date, so they registered with BPJS directly.
Midwives could not claim fees because the service was provided prior to the patient’s
membership approval.
On the other hand, some patients who were already aware of the benefits, registered, received
the service (usually delivery) and immediately stopped paying the compulsory monthly payment
after they were released from the private midwife practice. In this case, the midwife’s claim
would also be rejected because the claim was received after the membership cancelation,
although the service was performed when the patient still paid the monthly fee.
3. Unclear methods for submitting claims
Midwives also reported two methods to submit claims to BPJS: digital (for secondary and
tertiary health service providers, or hospitals) and manual. In Asahan, midwives were
disappointed because of the ever-changing methods BPJS use to submit claims and required
documents. In Kotawaringin Barat, midwives who worked in the hospital were not informed that
they had to submit claims through both methods, digital and hard copy, so the claims that were
submitted through the online system expired because the hard copy document had not been
received by BPJS.
Although these incidents happened in the hospital, not in the midwife’s private practice, the
negative experiences affected their inclination toward BPJS as a midwife who also runs a private
midwife practice.
3.7.4. JKN AND THE REFERRAL MECHANISM
Midwives felt strongly that JKN facilitates referral cases. With JKN coverage, the patient’s family
does not have to worry about the cost for emergency service. What they need to do is to ensure
that the midwife sends the patient to a secondary or tertiary health care provider in the JKN
network.
However, some also thought that in non-emergency cases BPJS seems to put the burden on the
midwives’ shoulders to send patients to other primary health care providers before sending the
patient to the hospital. This obligation is considered time-consuming and unnecessary.
A different situation occurs in private midwife practices which are empaneled with MH providers for
JKN. These private midwives have no clear referral mechanism. The midwife will refer the client to
the primary health care facility or to the hospital after going through several stages:
1. Discuss with patients regarding the selection of referral facilities.
BPJS patients will be referred to health facilities that receive JKN and non-JKN patients, and will
be referred to the client’s preferred clinic;
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 44
2. The midwife will directly contact the selected health facility by phone, and then the client will be
referred if confirmation is received;
3. Four Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima midwives in Depok and Sukabumi explained that they
contacted the SijariEMAS Call Center before making a referral but two other midwives stated
that the mechanism through SijariEMAS was too long, so they immediately coordinated with the
Sistem Penanggulangan Garurat Darurat Terpadu(Integrated Emergency Management System –
SPGDT) through a WhatsApp group which also involved the referral hospital.
3.7.5. COPING WITH CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES
In general, private midwives stated that income from their private practices was sufficient to cover
the operation of the practice with some profit to cover their necessities, although as noted, the flow
of patients has been decreasing due to BPJS and other regulations that restricted them from assisting
deliveries.
The day-to-day operation expenses are usually paid monthly, and comprise logistics and medicine,
utilities, waste management fee, and assistant’s salary if applicable. Without an assistant, to comply
with the four-hand or six-hand delivery, midwives need to collaborate with one or two other
midwives to help with the delivery. This means they have to include the collaborator’s fee in their
expenditure, usually by sharing the delivery fee, as explained in the BPJS fee-for-service section. The
same mechanism applies to the normal delivery fee (non-JKN) as well.
Although the fee for delivery was found to be similar in some areas (between 1,500,000-2,000,000
IDR per delivery), midwives stated there was variation in fees across areas, even in the same district.
Non-JKN service fees were determined based on: 1) agreement with midwives in the area (sub-
district). In Beji and Cimanggis, Depok, midwives agreed on the lowest fee below which they were
not allowed to charge patients, 2) other midwives’ fees for comparison. Midwives said that they had
calculated the expenditures carefully although in determining the amount they followed the norms
among midwives. Some explained that they could adjust the fee based on the patients’ profile,
particularly when the patient seemed to come from a lower socio-economic class.
Midwives believed that excellent service enabled them to charge higher fees, so that many of them
provided extra services, “For example, [the patient is charged] 2 million IDR for delivery, but that includes
baby massage when the baby is one month old. So that’s the innovation”. Nevertheless, they were also
aware that choices patients made are mainly based on the fees.
“Sometimes, although we give them good service, they’re still shocked knowing the fee they have to
pay. We have patient with hemorrhage who needs intravenous fluid…when we charge 2 million,
they are like… blank… why is it that expensive?”- (Bidan Delima)
Many midwives, Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima, planned to open a side business to cope with
the circumstances they faced. In Kotawaringin Timur and Barat, Asahan, and Depok, they aspired to
conduct trainings for pregnant women and their partners on massage, hypnobirthing, and classes for
prenatal yoga and pregnancy exercise. Some other midwives thought about opening a baby shop or
even a non-maternity related shop, such as an ice cream shop. In Depok, a formula producer offered
a business partnership to midwives. To open a prenatal yoga class, the yoga institute would provide
the equipment and trainer, but the midwife was required to gather at least 20 class members. Water
birth, the novel maternity business, has caused controversies, particularly in Depok. IBI has issued a
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 45
letter to restrict water birth practice, as it was not included in the SOP. Yet, some midwives in
Depok were identified as water birth endorsers and practitioners.
Expanding business by opening a private midwife clinic is challenging in Sukabumi because midwives
are only allowed to commit to two practices in one district. A midwife who tried to open a branch
in a nearby district failed because of that restriction.
3.7.6. JAMPERSAL
The other health financing scheme covering MNH services is the Jaminan Persalinan (Childbirth
Assurance – Jampersal) program. Jampersal provided a comprehensive MNH services package
before JKN, regardless of socio-economic status. This program was discontinued after the
implementation of JKN in 2014, but then re-introduced in 2016 with modification to the benefit and
coverage. Jampersal II only covers services for uninsured-poor women29.
“There is still some delivery financed through Jampersal. For mothers who are not member of JKN
and would like to be covered by Jampersal...”- (MOH)
Midwives in Central Kalimantan (Kotawaringin Timur and Kotawaringin Barat) explained about the
use of Jampersal instead of JKN. Jampersal covers delivery services for people who have a certificate
indicating poverty, although they do not havea local ID card. Some midwives mentioned that a
certificate of domicile and a referral form are required to access Jampersal assistance. The DHO of
Kotawaringin Barat permitted primary healthcare providers to shift fee-for-service claims that were
overdue in BPJS to Jampersal.
The idea is considered controversial because Jampersal is actually meant to cover people who
cannot afford JKN. In Central Kalimantan, blue-collar workers of companies (usually mining and
logging) that neither can afford nor access JKN are the targets of Jampersal. Unfortunately, as
described by midwives, to be eligible for Jampersal, the workers still need to bribe officials to get the
domicile certificate as a substitute for the ID card, with help from the midwife who empathizes with
their situation.
Midwives liked Jampersal more than JKN because the claims were always paid within three months
without hassle, the process is clearer and the fee-for-service is on a par with JKN.
3.7.7. STRATEGIC HEALTH PURCHASING
Strategic purchasing means active, evidence-based engagement in defining the service mix and
volume, and selecting the provider mix in order to maximize societal objectives. Improving the
strategic purchasing of health services is central to improving health system performance and making
progress towards universal health coverage.
A strategic purchasing program approach is being develop by a multi-stakeholder TWG that involves
MOH (PPJK, Family Health Directorate, Planning Bureau etc.), BPJS, development partners, and
other stakeholders: IBI, POGI, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Finance.
“This is quality purchasing service. The service will be paid if it is a quality service....” -(MOH)
29 Yap, Wei A., et al. Revealing the missing link : private sector supply-side readiness for primary maternal health services in
Indonesia - maternal health report (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, 2017
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 46
Led by PPJK-MOH, this TWG is working on approaches on how to have an effective purchasing
system. According to a national key informant, private midwives would need to be in a network with
the Puskesmas. The purpose of strategic health purchasing is to ensure a good payment mechanism
and contract system. The TWG is also working on how to integrate resources from other program
sources. There will be a need for strong accountability in order to bundle services into an integrated
system. A policy brief has been produced after about one year of mapping and discussing the
problems, with recommendations on suggested changes to be made. The recommended changes will
be piloted first.
IBI sees strategic purchasing as a way to guarantee the quality of service. The requirement that
private midwives must be in a network creates many challenges; if the reimbursement rate cannot
meet the operational needs of midwives, then the midwife’s motivation decreases. The networking
of private midwives with primary clinics is currently more on the administrative side. To include
technical aspects in the networking with FKTP, IBI wants to have an in-depth discussion first. This
idea is still under development and being discussed in the TWG. In the end, strategic purchasing
might still require the private midwife to be in a network, but without the problems experienced
currently.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 47
4. CONCLUSIONS
The rapid assessment of the Bidan Delima program is summarized based on the three key objectives
of the assessment:
4.1. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM IN ASSURING QUALITY
The analysis of effectiveness of the program focuses on the facility readiness and midwife
competency in a small sample of facilities in selected districts. The findings are not intended to be
conclusive, but rather to flag some critical issues about the Bidan Delima program. The facility
readiness was measured in terms of management (infrastructure, recording and reporting system,
written procedures and guidelines) and availability and condition of facilities and supplies. The
competency of midwives was measured in terms of skills in FP counseling, ANC, resuscitation of a
newborn baby and using partographs.
Based on the results of the assessment, it can be concluded that the Bidan Delima program has
contributed to enabling private midwives to provide quality maternal and neonatal services in many
areas. Overall, Bidan Delima practices had higher scores in terms of facility readiness and midwife
competency compared to non-Bidan Delima practices. The characteristics and quality care of Bidan
Delima midwives are summarized in Table 12.
Table 12: The Characteristics and Quality of Care of Sample Midwives
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
Characteristics
• All assessed Bidan Delima midwives have a valid
license
• A high number of cases in the last 3 months.
There are 8 midwives with more than 10
deliveries per months
• No difference in the training activities of Bidan
Delima and non-Bidan Delima midwives
• Two non-Bidan Delima were found to have no
license
• A small number of cases in the last 3 months. There
are 16 midwives with less than 4 deliveries per
months.
Facility readiness
• The average score of Bidan Delima practices in
management is 77%
• Three out of 23 Bidan Delima fulfilled 100% of
management indicators but 4 out of 23 had an
average score less than 50%
• The average score of Bidan Delima practices in
facility and supplies availability is 93%
• One Bidan Delima practice had expired MGSO4
• The average score of non-Bidan Delima practices is
45%
• Eleven out of 23 non-Bidan Delima practices scored
less than 50%
• The average score of non-Bidan Delima practices in
facility and supplies availability is 84%
• Two out of 23 non-Bidan Delima lacked availability
of oxytocin
• One non-Bidan Delima practice had expired MgSO4
Midwife competency
• The average score of Bidan Delima midwives for
FP counseling is 77%
• The average score of Bidan Delima midwives in
ANC skills is 72%
• The average score of Bidan Delima midwives in
resuscitation skills is 44%
• The average score of Bidan Delima midwives in
• The average score of non-Bidan Delima midwives
for FP counseling is 46%
• The average score of non-Bidan Delima midwives in
ANC skills is 54%
• The average score of non-Bidan Delima midwives in
resuscitation skills is 31%
• The average score of non-Bidan Delima midwives in
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 48
Bidan Delima Non-Bidan Delima
using partograph is 61% using partograph is 39%
Quality gap
• Overall, the quality of care provided by Bidan Delima midwives is better than that of non-Bidan Delima
midwives, even though some still need to improve their competency, especially regarding resuscitation of
newborn babies and skills in using partographs
• There is a lack of facilitators to undertake validation of Bidan Delima candidates and monitoring of the
existing Bidan Delima midwives
• Regular monitoring and supervision are currently insufficient to attain and maintain the quality of services. A
feedback mechanism of post-supervision and monitoring activities would be helpful to show the midwife the
specific quality gaps that need to be improved.
4.2. PROGRAM RELEVANCE AND VALUE
Midwives cover a great proportion of essential MNH services (e.g. ANC, safe delivery services, etc.)
that can support reduction of MMR and NMR and are often the first point of contact for pregnant
women.
The Bidan Delima program is still relevant as a program which focuses on promoting quality private
midwifery practice. The relevance of this program was concluded based on the current status of
Bidan Delima, the added value of the program and the positive impression of stakeholders regarding
the program.
4.2.1. PROGRESS OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
About 50 percent of private midwives run dual-practices as providers in Puskesmas, hospitals or
other clinics while also running private practices. The number of certified Bidan Delima midwives
was increasing until 2011, especially in the three provinces (West Java, East Java, North Sumatra)
which had received donor support until then. The progress was steady and increased again after the
program was revitalized in 2014. This progress was shown in several districts such as; Sukabumi,
Depok, Sidoarjo and Pasuruan. However, the certification mechanism has not been improved. There
is no "stick and carrot" for Bidan Delima midwives who are no longer active. Based on analysis of
routine data, there is a notable reduction in the number of active midwives or the certification is out
of date. Some midwives reported that they had withdrawn from Bidan Delima because of three
reasons: the midwives decided to retire because of old age or sickness, the decreasing number of
patients due to BPJS/JKN, or other obligations that obliged the midwives to move out of the district.
4.2.2. THE ADDED VALUE OF BIDAN DELIMA
Some added value of Bidan Delima includes; highly trustworthy with a good brand of quality
midwifery services in terms of the facility readiness and high competency of the midwife, high level of
self-confidence, high number of patients, more experience, access to a support group to discuss
experiences and problems, broad and updated knowledge and the validation process can be used to
facilitate the license or SIPB process. These advantages motivate private midwives to join Bidan
Delima.
Nonetheless, there are factors that discourage some private midwives from joining Bidan Delima
such as: lack of confidence to fulfill the standard requirements, burden of administration work,
higher annual fee and “negative thoughts” related to data confidentiality. These were, to some
extent, caused by unclear and incomplete information about the program.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 49
4.2.3. THE PERSPECTIVE OF STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM
The Bidan Delima program as a quality midwifery program was recognized by the district, especially
the DHO. But, lack of information, including information about the challenges faced by the program,
resulted in a lack of support from the DHO to strengthen the program. Despite the identification of
areas for improvement, stakeholders appreciated that the Bidan Delima program is closely aligned
with DHO quality improvement efforts in that it uses the same tools, complies to the same
standards and supports licensing efforts. UNFPA appreciated that Bidan Delima facilitators had
developed competencies to provide supervision and use quality improvement tools.
4.2.4. THE CLIENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BIDAN DELIMA SERVICES
None of the clients interviewed recognized Bidan Delima as a sign of a quality midwife. All clients
were satisfied with Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima services. Lack of knowledge of clients
regarding the standard of services results in low demand from clients for quality services. The main
preferences of clients in choosing the health facility are: the midwife is well known among the
community, friendliness of the midwife, and access to the facility. Increasing the awareness of the
clients about quality services will encourage the health facility to provide quality services.
4.3. BIDAN DELIMA AS A STRATEGIC DIRECTION FOR A BUSINESS MODEL IN THE
FUTURE
The document review revealed the need to revisit the Bidan Delima program outputs defined in the
initial design and assess whether the intended outputs reflect the social and business impacts
envisioned by the certification process, which can be considered as a Social Franchise model. The
program performance indicators appear to aim solely towards compliance with the standards of care
and not necessarily increasing caseloads. A Social Franchise model in health programs is adopted
mainly to improve access to quality health services for the public (as the provision of quality health
services is argued to be the right for everyone). The adoption of Social Franchise models, such as
with the Bidan Delima model, has business implications since the Bidan Delima midwives have the
potential to increase their income by increasing their caseloads after being certified as Bidan Delima
midwives.30
The Bidan Delima assessment found that the program succeeded in encouraging private practice
midwives to achieve quality midwifery standards, improving the readiness of facility and midwife
competency, and it built their self-confidence to provide better services. This assessment also found
that there is a difference between Bidan Delima and non-Bidan Delima caseloads for FP, ANC and
delivery services in the previous three months. But there is no evidence to show an increase in
caseloads after joining Bidan Delima. It is notable that there is a general perception that Bidan
Delima practices have higher caseloads compared to non-Bidan Delima practices.
The assessment found that the caseload in private midwives’ practices is strongly influenced by the
JKN system. To some extent private midwives see JKN as indispensable and helpful, but on the
other hand, they experience a variety of adverse effects on their practices. Half of all assessed
private midwives are either not empaneled or have withdrawn empanelment with MH providers for
many reasons, e.g. difficulties to fulfill the requirements, experienced delayed claim reimbursement,
payments too low, complicated claim process. Other private midwives are also not happy with JKN
30 Maharani, et al. 2014. Bidan Delima Accreditation: The Implementation of a Franchise Model in Regulating Performance
of Private Midwives in Indonesia – A case study.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 50
but still empaneled with MH providers. Some dual-practice midwives assisted deliveries at the
Puskesmas because the costs for supplies were not covered by BPJS resulting in a decreasing number
of deliveries by private midwives.
The current business model which relies on volunteer facilitators is challenging to sustain and has
not produced adequate supervision or support for Bidan Delima midwives or enabled verification of
compliance once the clinic is certified.
Overall, many gaps were found during the assessment but there were also many opportunities and
strengths that could be developed from the Bidan Delima midwifery program. There is a high level of
interest among private midwives to join Bidan Delima, although there are also private midwives that
are still not interested in joining. This all supports IBI’s ongoing commitment to keep promoting
quality MNH services through the Bidan Delima program.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 51
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1. STRENGTHEN THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MECHANISM OF THE BIDAN DELIMA
PROGRAM
The quality assurance mechanism in the Bidan Delima program needs to be improved in terms of the
certification processes and maintaining the quality of certified Bidan Delima midwives. Specific action
points for consideration include:
• IBI should review the Bidan Delima instruments and guidelines (management and technical) and
revise the tools and validation process so that they are more appropriate for Bidan Delima
candidates.
• IBI should explore ways, in collaboration with other partners, such as MOH, UNFPA, USAID
Jalin, and professional associations, to specifically address gaps in midwifery competencies that
affect the quality of care, including newborn resuscitation, management of obstructed labor and
other complications.
• IBI must find ways to overcome the current barriers to recruiting facilitators and incentivizing
them, for example, increasing their access to further training, provision of annual awards,
creating better opportunities for promotion, providing stronger support for them so they will
be able to conduct regular supervision and mentoring to certified Bidan Delima midwives. This
will require support and collaboration from partners, such as, MOH, DHO, professional
associations, civil society organizations, and the private sector.
• The certified Bidan Delima midwives need to receive constructive and written feedback, which
will guide them to find appropriate and effective solutions to solve the challenges they face in
providing quality services. For example, peer group mechanisms could be established to help
them share experiences and learn from each other. IBI also needs to support them to have
greater access to information and updates on clinical practice. The routine mentoring by
facilitators needs to be strengthened to ensure Bidan Delima midwives perform with high
quality of care.
• An incentive mechanism should be developed to encourage the certified Bidan Delima midwives
to maintain quality services. Reward mechanisms should be incorporated into the program, such
as, opportunities to attend trainings and workshops, or being promoted as champions.
5.2. STRENGTHEN BIDAN DELIMA MANAGEMENT
The management of the Bidan Delima program needs a formal revision with committed leadership,
strengthening of the organizational systems, a proper staffing structure and reporting structures at
national, provincial and district levels. This should be undertaken jointly by IBI and MOH, with other
partners involved as appropriate.
There is also a need to review the financial management and sustainability of the program, including
reviewing the fee structure, financial transparency about program revenues and costs, other sources
of funding required to support the program, and other income generating activities that could be
developed.
A strengthened information management system should be established so that IBI can track data on
certified midwives including quality indicators, status of certification, training, fee payment and many
other indicators to effectively run a certification program. IBI, with the Bidan Delima management
team, needs to define what are the measurable output indicators of the program and select the key
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 52
indicators for a program and management dashboard. The existing Bidan Delima monitoring
guidelines can be used. There are many local digital applications being used in various districts which
would need to be reviewed and integrated as much as possible.
These modalities could be used to refine the management supervision mechanism to be
implemented regularly every six months to monitor the management and technical performance of
the Bidan Delima program at district and provincial levels.
5.3. ENHANCE COLLABORATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS TO SUPPORT THE BIDAN
DELIMA PROGRAM
This program could be potentially highly strategic as a key part of a strong health system that values
and promotes midwifery as a quality profession in Indonesia. MOH and PHO/DHO along with key
stakeholders at national and sub-national levels need to be involved and support IBI in this process.
This will include collaborations with GPs, OB/GYN consultants and the professional associations,
and requires ongoing strengthening of the referral system so that midwives are not operating in a
vacuum but are critical players for improved MNH outcomes. MOH and IBI should lead this process
with support from other key actors in the health sector. This collaboration will provide potential
opportunities for the Bidan Delima program to be linked with other quality improvement efforts
within government and with other potential partners, for example, pharmacies, banks, and local
companies.
5.4. STRENGTHEN COLLABORATION WITH BPJS/JKN AND INVOLVEMENT IN
STRATEGIC HEALTH PURCHASING DISCUSSIONS
The MOH and its partners in health financing should review the processes for certification of private
midwives in BPJS so that midwives can become stronger and more active partners in the provision of
MNH services. The current blockages that are preventing midwives from joining should be reviewed
and efforts made to simplify the processes and ensure easier participation by midwives.
The current discussions around SHP relate to plans to pilot a new mechanism of contracting private
midwives with revised and improved payment conditions. This would provide an opportunity for IBI
to position the Bidan Delima certification to be accepted among the criteria for registration in BPJS-
K (new BPJS-K post SHP pilot). Therefore, IBI should be fully engaged in the SHP discussion and
working groups, and the MOH should fully support this involvement.
5.5. PROMOTING THE BRAND OF BIDAN DELIMA
Once the quality of care aspect is well established and a sustainable business model is developed, an
effective communication strategy will be developed which includes brand promotion. There is a need
to enhance the added value of services provided by Bidan Delima midwives and to promote this
value widely through multiple channels to increase awareness and stimulate higher demand.
Some ways of doing this could include:
• More opportunities for continuous professional development
• E-learning platforms
• Technical support and toolkits to help midwives participate in JKN
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 53
• Consumer facing services that could be branded such as helplines, mother baby classes, mobile
applications
• Marketing and advertising
• Business management classes for midwives
• Links to financing programs and group purchasing equipment lease programs
The demand by the community or client for quality services is likely to be increased through such
measures if accompanied by continuous awareness-raising about the patient’s right to receive good
quality services and improved information dissemination about what constitutes these services.
Increasing clients’ awareness and demand will be one effective way to encourage private midwives to
provide quality services. The Bidan Delima program can play an important role in this by creating a
new and refreshed image of a quality midwife and dispelling any negative associations with the brand.
USAID JALIN RAPID ASSESSMENT OF BIDAN DELIMA PROGRAM | 54
REFERENCES
[1] D. A. C. e. al., "Evaluation of the Health Services Program (HSP) in Indonesia: Taking Stock and
Looking Forward," USAID, Washington, 2008.
[2] A. C. e. a. Maharani, "Bidan Delima Accreditation: The Implementation of a Franchise Model in
Regulating Performance of Private Midwives in Indonesia A Case Study," Mercy Corps, Jakarta,
2011.
[3] N. Emi, Pandangan Profesi Bidan Serta Rekomendasi Perbaikan Kebijakan Terkait Belanja Strategis JKN,
Jakarta: PP IBI, 2016.
[4] "Informasi Anggota Bidan Delima," [Online]. Available: http://www.bidan-
delima.org/isianggota.php. [Accessed 09 March 2020].
[5] Unit Pelaksana Bidan Delima Pusat, "Bab XII: Monitoring Kualitas Pelayanan Bidan Delima," in
Petunjuk Teknis Program Bidan Delima Tingkat Cabang, Jakarta, PP IBI, 2014, pp. 66-70.
[6] Unit Pelaksana Bidan Delima, Petunjuk Teknis Program Bidan Delima, 4th Edition, Jakarta: Ikatan
Bidan Indonesia, October 2014.
USAID JalinWorld Trade Center 5, 16th floorJl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 29 Jakarta Selatan 12920 Indonesia