S1.3.Precision phenotyping for improving drought stress tolerant maize in Thailand

Post on 19-Jun-2015

1,760 views 5 download

Tags:

description

Presentacion de 11th Asian Maize Conference which took place in Beijing, China from November 7 – 11, 2011.

transcript

Precision phenotyping for improving drought stress tolerant maize in Thailand

Sutatsane Vongsupathai Suriphat Thaitad Tatsanee Budthong Pichet Grudloyma

Nakhon Sawan Field Crops Research Center (NSFCRC) Tak Fa, Nakhon Sawan, THAILAND 1

Problem • In Thailand, drought was reported as a

priority constrain for maize production in many agro-ecological zones and it is observed almost every year.

• Maize is usually affected to drought stress at difference stage.

2

Objectives

• To compare the performance of hybrids maize and to understand the association of yield with morphological and physiological traits under water stress condition 3

Materials : • The set of hybrids maize from CIMMYT 148 + 2 local check hybrids Local checks :NS2 and NS3

• 10x15 Alpha lattice design with 2 replications • 2 rows/ plot of 5.0 m. long • 66,000 plants ha-1

Planting period :

Materials and methods

Design :

• during dry season in 2009, NSFCRC.

4

Temperature (oC) rain fall (mm.) and RH distribution at NSFCRC,

from Dec 2009 to Feb 2010

RH%(max)

Max.temp (oC)

Min.temp (oC)

Stop irrigated

Planting date 3 Dec 2009

Rain(mm.)

Flowering

5

WS WW Well watered Flowering drought

: The irrigation was stopped from 9th leaf stage to

two weeks after mid flowering (15 Jan-15 Feb. 2010)

: weekly irrigation about 30 mm./time

Water stress (Flowering stage drought) (WS)

Well watered (ww)

Water management:

6

Data Collections

Agronomic traits Secondary traits

7

Agronomic traits

Field weight

Root and stalk lodging

Moisture content

Plant and ear height Silking date

Anthesis date

Hundred kernel weight

8

Secondary traits

1) anthesis-silking interval (days)

2) leaf rolling : - 2,3 weeks after stop irrigation

(Score 1-5) - before re-irrigation

3) Senescence: - 3 weeks after stop irrigation

(Score 1-10) - before re-irrigation

- 30 days after silking

9

Green Seeker: NDVI values can be used to predict green biomass

Vegetative stage : Weekly measurements from 3 leaves until 8 leaves stage.

Grain filling stage : weekly from two weeks after male flowering till one week prior maturity

4) Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI)

10

5) Stomata conductance and Leaf temperature 5) Stomata conductance (mmol/H2O m-2s-1)

Leaf porometer :

Vegetative stage : 4-5 weeks after planting and again in 2 weeks later.

Reproductive stage : 2 day after stopped irrigation and then every weekly until re-irrigation.

Measurements : - 3 plants/ plot. - one leaf per plant - at the 4th leaf below flag leaf. -10-15 h. sunydays

11

Infrared thermometer:

Vegetative stage : 4-5 weeks after planting and again 2 weeks later.

Reproductive stage : 2 day after stopped irrigation and then every weekly until re-irrigation.

6) Leaf temperature (Co)

Measurements : - 3 plants/ plot. - one leaf per plant - at the 4th leaf below flag leaf. -10-15 h. sunny days

12

7) Chlorophyll content

SPAD meter :

Flowering stage : 1 time.

Grain filling : every week during grain filling for 5 weeks.

Measurements : - 6 plants/ plot. - one leaf per plant. - at the 4th leaf below flag leaf.

13

14

No. Pedigree WS WW ASI (days)

1 NS 3 (Local check 2) 5.09 8.26 2

2 CLQ-RCYQ54=(CML176 x CL-G2501)-B-3-1-B-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR 5.00 6.79 2

3 DTPWC9-F67-2-2-1-B-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR 4.84 7.59 3

4 [P591c4 1y2 GEN F23-1-1-1-B-B-B x CML486]-1-1-B-B / CML-312 SR 4.77 6.62 3

5 CML-332-B-B / CML-312 SR 4.73 7.54 4

6 CL-04935=(PR8549xP23C2)-5-1-3-B*14-B-B-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR 4.41 5.68 4

7 DTPWC9-F24-4-3-1-B-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR 4.32 7.00 1

8 La Posta Seq C7-F78-2-1-1-1-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR 4.30 8.27 5

9 S87P69Q(SIYF) 109-1-1-4-B / CML-312 SR 4.21 6.33 2

10 XZY 460-1 / CML-312 SR 4.21 7.63 3

11 CML-442/CML-444 (Check 3 late maturity) 2.49 8.89 10

Mean 2.59 6.48 5

LSD(0.05) 1.55 1.14 2

Table 1 Mean grain yield (ton/ha) of top ten hybrids maize under water stress condition at NSFCRC in 2010D.

Table 2 Phenotypic correlation coefficient (r) between grain yield and importance agronomic traits, 2010D.

Traits Grain Yield (t/ha)

WS

Anthesis silking interval (ASI) -0.2745*

Leaf senescence -0.4158*

Leaf rolling -0.5199*

Ear per plant 0.2317*

Hundred kernel weight

Moisture content

0.2729*

0.3746*

16

Table 3 Phenotypic correlation coefficient (r) between grain yield and NDVI, 2010D.

Green Seeker

(Day after anthesis)

Grain Yield (t/ha)

WS

-41 0.0687ns

-34 0.1291ns

-25 0.2098*

-18 0.1444ns

15 0.3785*

21 0.2398*

28 0.2800*

35 0.2302*

Flowering drought period 17

Table 4 Phenotypic correlation coefficient (r) between grain yield and stomata conductance, 2010D.

Leaf porometer

(Day after anthesis)

Grain Yield (t/ha)

WS

-23 0.1676*

-9 0.1172ns

7 0.3572*

15 0.2087*

21 0.0805ns

35 0.0578ns

Flowering drought period 18

Table 5 Phenotypic correlation coefficient (r) between grain yield and leaf temperature (oC), 2010D.

Infrared thermometer

(Day after anthesis)

Grain Yield (t/ha)

T1S2 (WS)

-23 -0.1127ns

-9 -0.1245ns

7 -0.3635*

15 -0.1435ns

21 -0.0393ns

35 -0.0637ns

Flowering drought period 19

Table 6 Phenotypic correlation coefficient (r) between grain yield and chlorophyll content, 2010D.

SPAD meter

(Day after anthesis)

Grain Yield (t/ha)

WS

4 0.3628*

11 0.4911*

19 0.5531*

26 0.4468*

35 0.2170*

42 0.1739*

Flowering drought period 20

1 weeks after stop irrigation

21

2 weeks after stop irrigation

(A.T.Z.T.R.L.BA90 5-3-3P-1P-4P-2P-1-1-1-B x G9B C0 R.L.23-1P-2P-3-2P-3-2P-1P-B-B-B)-B-16TL-3-1-4-B-B-B / CML-312 SR

La Posta Seq C7-F18-3-2-1-1-B-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR

22

3 weeks after stop irrigation 4 weeks after stop irrigation

23

WATER STRESS

CML-442/CML-444 (Check 3 late maturity)

WELL WATERED

NS 3 (Local check 2) 24

WATER STRESS WELL WATERED

La Posta Seq C7-F78-2-1-1-1-B-B-B-B / CML-312 SR

XZY 460-1 / CML-312 SR 25

• Selection for drought tolerance by increase EPP, HKW, CHE, NDVI and stomata conductance were linked to higher yield drought stress.

• Reduction ASI, LRO, Senescence and leaf temperature suggesting that were increasing higher yield

Conclusions

26

Thank you