Post on 05-Jan-2016
transcript
Some Properties of “aftershocks”
Some properties of AftershocksDave Jackson
UCLA
Oct 25, 2011
UC BERKELEY
Conclusions
• Aftershocks are not clearly defined• Whether aftershocks have different
magnitude dependence or triggering potential depends upon their definition
• For most reasonable definition, there is suggestive but weak evidence that triggered earthquakes have different magnitude distributions and triggering potential.
ETAS model of earthquake triggering, from Zhuang et al 2008
Stochastic Declustering
Definitions
• Mainshock: largest earthquake in a cluster• Foreshock : An earthquake in a cluster,
occuring before the mainshock• Aftershock: An earthquake in a cluster,
occuring after the mainshock• Triggered event: An earthquake with a low
value of the independence probablity , findependent of its own magnitude
• Spontaneous event: An earthquake with a high value of the independence probability
Empirical, So Cal, mt=4.2 plus = triggered, triangle = spontaneous
Synthetic data, same parameters as for empirical study
Synthetic data, triggering of mag 4.2+ by mag 3.7+
Magnitude distributions for spontaneous and triggered quakes, California m4.7+ after 1933
Magnitude distribution after randomizing the independence weightings
Conclusions
• Aftershocks are not clearly defined• Whether aftershocks have different magnitude
dependence or triggering potential depends upon their definition
• For most reasonable definition, there is suggestive but weak evidence that triggered earthquakes have different magnitude distributions and triggering potential. Conclusions depend on clustering model