Something Old, Something New - YOW! Conferences · 2019-09-23 · @EVANAHARI, YOW! AUSTRALIA 2016...

Post on 21-Jun-2020

1 views 0 download

transcript

@EVANAHARI, YOW! AUSTRALIA 2016

Something Old, Something New

A Talk about NLP for the Curious

Jabberwocky

– Lewis Carrollfrom Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, 1871

“`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:

All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe.”

Why are these monkeys following

me?

Arrfff!

LOL

Challenges• Mistakes

• Slang & sparse words

• Ambiguity types • Lexical • Syntax level • Referential

Human Language• The cortical speech center unique to humans • Evolution over hundred thousands of years

• Vocabulary • Grammar • Speed

• An advanced processing unit • Sounds • Meaning of words • Grammar constructs • Match against a knowledge base • Understanding context and humor!

Human Language ProcessingPhonology − organization of sounds

Morphology − construction of words

Syntax − creation of valid sentences/phrases and identifying the structural roles of words in them

Semantics − finding meaning of words/phrases/sentences

Pragmatics − Situational meaning of sentences

Discourse − order of sentences affecting interpretation

World knowledge − mapping to general world knowledge

Context awareness - the hardest part…?

Natural Language Processing

• Computers generating language

• Computers understanding human language

Lexical analysis

Syntactic analysis

Semantic analysis

Discourse Integration

Pragmatic Analysis

– J. R. Firth, 1957

“You should know a word by the company it keeps.”

Language Models• Represent language in a mathematical way

A language model is a function that captures the statistical characteristics of the word-sequence distribution in a language

• Dimensionality challenge

10-word sequence from a 100 000 word vocabulary —> 10^50 possible sequences

• Large sample set vs processing time & cost vs accuracy

Bag-of-words

• Not suited for huge vocabulary • Semantics are not considered • Order of words are lost

= [111100]= [111100]= [110011] = [111100]

= [443311]

Vocabulary:Happy birthday to you dear “name”

= [100000]= [010000] = [001000]= [000100] = [000010] = [000001]

Sample text:Happy birthday to you Happy birthday to you Happy birthday dear “name”Happy birthday to you

Term frequency

n-grams“Hello everyone who is eager to learn NLP!”

• “gram”: a unit, e.g. letter, phoneme, word, …

• uni-gram: Hello, everyone, who, is, …

• bi-gram: Hello-everyone, everyone-who, who-is, …

• n-gram: n-length sequences of units

• k-skip-gram: skip k units

• bi-skip-tri-gram: Hello-is-learn, everyone-eager-NLP

n-gram Probabilistic Model• Given a sequence of words what is the likelihood of the next?

• Using counts of n-grams extracted from a training data set we can predict the next word x based on probabilities

• Simple; only n-1 words determines the probability

• Difficult to handle infrequent words and expressions

• Smoothening (e.g. Good-Turing, Katz-Back-off model, etc)

• Use additional sampling (bi-grams, tri-grams, skip-grams)

P(xi | xi-(n-1),… ,xi-1) = count(xi-(n-1),… ,xi-1)

count (xi-(n-1),… ,xi-1, xi)

Example use: Named Entity Extraction (NER) Examples:

• Grammar based: “…live in <city>”

• Co-occurrence based: “new+york”, “san+francisco”, …

Common pattern: Inference of applying various models

AppleRound

Red

HasLeaf

+

+

0

Naive Bayes Probabilistic Model

Example Use: Text Classification

Sample Data AppleRed No

Green YesYellow YesRed YesRed Yes

Green YesYellow NoYellow NoRed Yes

Yellow YesRed No

Green YesGreen YesYellow No

Feature No YesGreen 4 4/14 0.29Yellow 3 2 5/14 0.36Red 2 3 5/14 0.36

Grand Total 5 95/14 9/140.36 0.64

Incoming fruit text says “red” - is it about an apple?P(Yes | Red) = P( Red | Yes) * P(Yes) / P (Red)

P (Red |Yes) = 3/9 = 0.33 P(Yes)= 9/14 = 0.64 P(Red) 0.36

P (Yes | Red) = 0.33 * 0.64 / 0.36 = 0.60

60% chance it’s about an apple!

Naive BayesThings to Consider:

• Easy and fast, good for multi-class, better than most

• Does not handle unknown categories well, needs smoothing

• Needs less training data, but well representative

• Assuming attributes to be truly independent

Combining Models

Things to Consider:

• How many models can you afford?

• How good are your models (i.e. training data)?

• Latency vs accuracy?

Bag of Words

0 0 0 1 =

= 0 1 0 0

=

=

Continuous Bag of Words (Embeddings)

2 3 8 1

7 5 6 2

Distributed Representation• A word is a dot in a multi-dimensional vector

space, where each dimension is features of a word

• Decide features?

• HUMAN: decides features; gender, plurality, semantic characteristics

• COMPUTER: learn the features; continuous values

Neural Net Language Model• A model based on the capabilities of NN is an

NNLM

• Rely on the NN to discover the features of a distributed representation

• Extrapolations makes it possible to keep a dense model - even for very large data sets

Mikolow et al’s CBOW vs Continuous Skip-gram

• CBOW - predict a term based on context (near-terms)

• w-2, w-1, w+1, w+2 —> w

• fast to train

• higher accuracy for frequent words

• conditioning on context needs larger data sets

• Continuous Skip-gram - predict context (near-terms) based on a word

• w —> w-2, w-1, w+1, w+2

• k-skip-n-gram: k and n determines complexity (training time vs accuracy)

• helps create more samples from a smaller data set (data sparsity, rare terms)

Diagram borrowed from Mikolow et al’s paper

1. Probability of next term, i.e. Bayes TheoremApproximate t with n - to gain simplicity of n-grams

2. d-dimensional feature vector Cwt-i (column wt-i of parameter matrix C):Ck contains learned features for word k

3. Use standard NN for probabilistic classification (Softmax):where

NN-based Probabilistic Prediction Model

P(w1, w2,… ,wt-1, wt) = P(w1)P(w2|w1)P(w3|w1,w2)…P(w1, w2,… ,wt-1)

x = (Cwt-n+1, 1, …, Cwt-n+1, d, Cwt-n+2, 1, …, Cwt-2, d, Cwt-1, 1, …, Cwt-1, d)

SUM(i=1 to N) eai eak P(wt = k|wt-n+1, … ,wt-1) =

ak = bk + SUM(i=1 to h) Wki tanh(ci + SUM(j=1 to (n-1)d) Vijxj)

Diagram borrowed from Bengio et al’s paper

NLP is not New…

ABBYY, Angoss, Attensity, AUTINDEX, Autonomy, Averbis, Basis Technology, Clarabridge, Complete Discovery Source, Endeca Technologies, Expert

System S.p.A., FICO Score, General Sentiment, IBM LanguageWare, IBM SPSS, Insight, LanguageWare,

Language Computer Corporation, Lexalytics, LexisNexis, Luminoso, Mathematica,

MeaningCloud, Medallia, Megaputer Intelligence, NetOwl, RapidMiner, SAS Text Miner and

Teragram;, Semantria , Smartlogic, StatSoft, Sysomos, WordStat, Xpresso, ….

…but Getting Hot (Again)• Big text data sets available

• Distributed processing tech & capacity cheaper

• ML-based training economically possible (and more accurate)

• Open source movement

• Large upswing potential…

No animals were harmed during this photo shoot

Cheat Sheet• openNLP-Java,Apache,familiar,easier,older• coreNLP-Java,Stanford,popular,goodtoolspan• NLTK-python,richinresources,easiest• spaCy-upandcoming,python,promising..• FasCext-nothingnew..?• Spark-“MLframework”,customimplementaKon,largescale

• Deeplearning4j-word2vec(java,scala)• Tensorflow(SyntaxNet)-separatedopKmizaKon&moretuningnobs,beCersyntaxparsingmodel,veryrecentlylargescaletoo

• Language key to our species’ success • Our multi-step process is complex and our brains

forgiving • A language models represents word sequence

distributions within a language • Bag-of-words, n-grams are common representations • Naive bayes common for probabilistic models • Distributed representations are dense and powerful • NNLM based on learned word-features • Positive NLP trends:

More open source tools and frameworks and generated

distributed representations available to all

Summary and Questions

@EVANAHARI, YOW! AUSTRALIA 2016

Jabberwocky

Vote!