Stream Temperatures & Climate Change · Brannon et al. 2004 Incubation length - Chinook salmon...

Post on 09-Apr-2020

0 views 0 download

transcript

Stream Temperatures & Climate Change: Observed Patterns & Key Uncertainties

Air, Water & Aquatics Program

Dan Isaak, Bruce Rieman, Charlie Luce, Erin Peterson1, Jay Ver Hoef2, Jason Dunham3, Brett Roper, Erik Archer, Dona Horan, Gwynne Chandler, Dave Nagel, Sharon Parkes

U.S. Forest Service1CSIRO2NOAA3U.S. Geological Survey

Metabolic Ecology and Thermal Niches

McMahon et al. 2007

Brown 2004

Temperature &metabolic rates

Isaak & Hubert 2004

In the lab… & the field

Thermal Niche

Regional Scale

Stream Scale

Channel Unit ScaleStream Distance

Ele

vati

on

Bonneau & Scarnecchia 1996

Rieman et al. 2007

Temperature Regulation – Spatial Distributions

Temperature Regulation - Life Cycle

Brannon et al. 2004

Incubation length -Chinook salmon

Spawn timing - Chinook salmon

8/4

8/14

8/24

9/3

7 9 11 13 15 17

Mean Stream Temperature (C)

Media

n R

edd C

om

ple

tion D

ate

Beaver Marsh Sulphur Big Camas Loon

Thurow, unpublished

Dion and Hughes 1994

Growth -Arctic grayling

Migration timing -sockeye salmon

July stream temp

Crozier et al. 2008

Mote et al. 2005

Warmer Air Temps

Westerling et al. 2006

Wildfire Increases

Decreasing Baseflows

Western US – Observed TrendsDeclining Snowpacks

Mote et al. 2005

(Luce and Holden 2009)

Global Trends in Stream Temperatures

Moatar and Gailhard 2006

Webb and Nobilus 2007

River Loire, France (1880 – 2003)

Danube River, Austria (1901 – 2000)

Hari et al. 2006 NAO shift

Global Trends in Stream TemperaturesStreams in Switzerland (1978 – 2004)

•22 of 25 streams show statistically significant warming

Regional Trends In Stream Temperatures

Morrison et al. 2002

Petersen and Kitchell 2001;

Fraser River - Summer

Columbia River - Summer

∆ = 0.18°C/decade

Crozier et al. 2008

Date

∆ = 0.40°C/decade

= reservoir affected (11) = free-flowing (9)

Isaak et al., In review. Climatic Change

Regional Trends In Stream TemperaturesUSGS NWIS Monitoring Sites (1980 – 2009)

Isaak et al., In review. Climatic Change

Seasonal Trends In Stream TemperaturesUSGS NWIS Monitoring Sites (1980 – 2009)

Isaak et al., In review. Climatic Change

Spring Summer

Fall Winter

1980-2009 Warming TrendsMinimally Altered, Free-Flowing Sites

Application of Spatial Statistical Modelsfor Downscaling of Climate Effectson River Network Temperatures

Dan Isaak, Charlie Luce, Bruce Rieman,

Dave Nagel, Erin Peterson1, Dona Horan,

Sharon Parkes, and Gwynne Chandler

Boise Aquatic Sciences Lab

U.S. Forest Service

Rocky Mountain Research Station

Boise, ID 83702

1CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences

Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia

Stream Temperature Database14 year period (1993 – 2006)780 observations518 unique locations

Watershed CharacteristicsElevation range 900 – 3300 mFish bearing streams ~2,500 kmWatershed area = 6,900 km2

Boise River Temperature Database

Spatial Statistical Modelsfor Stream Networks

Peterson et al. 2006; Ver Hoef et al. 2006; Ver Hoef and Peterson 2010

Advantages:-flexible & valid covariance structures

by accommodating network topology-weighting by stream size-improved predictive ability & parameter

estimates relative to non spatial models

Boise River Temperature ModelsTraining on left 2007 validation on right

y = 0.68x + 3.82

4

9

14

19

4 9 14 19

Summer Mean

y = 0.55x + 7.79

5

10

15

20

25

30

5 10 15 20 25 30

y = 0.86x + 2.43

5

10

15

20

25

30

5 10 15 20 25 30

Summer Mean

MWMT MWMT

y = 0.93x + 0.830

4

9

14

19

4 9 14 19

Pre

dic

ted

(C

°)

Observed (C°)

Replace with validation

Data from 2007

r2 = 0.68; RMSE = 1.54°C

Training on left 2007 validation on right

y = 0.68x + 3.82

4

9

14

19

4 9 14 19

Summer Mean

y = 0.55x + 7.79

5

10

15

20

25

30

5 10 15 20 25 30

y = 0.86x + 2.43

5

10

15

20

25

30

5 10 15 20 25 30

Summer Mean

MWMT MWMT

y = 0.93x + 0.830

4

9

14

19

4 9 14 19

Pre

dic

ted (

C°)

Observed (C°)

Replace with validation

Data from 2007

r2 = 0.93; RMSE = 0.74°C

Spatial Multiple Regression Model

Non-spatialMultiple Regression Model

Mean Summer Stream Temp

Observed ( C)

Predic

ted (

C)

Non-spatial Stream Temp =– 0.0064*Ele (m)+ 0.0104*Rad+ 0.39*AirTemp (C)– 0.17*Flow (m3/s)

Spatial Stream Temp =– 0.0045*Ele (m)+ 0.0085*Rad+ 0.48*AirTemp (C)– 0.11*Flow (m3/s)

Isaak et al. 2010. Eco. Apps. 20:1350-1371

14

16

18

20

22

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Su

mm

er

Me

an

Air

(C

)

Summer Stream Flow

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

Sum

mer

dis

charg

e (

m3/s

)

Summer Air Temperature

Recent Wildfires

14% burned during 93–06 study period30% burned from 92-08

1946–2006-4.8%/decade

Sum

mer

Disch

arg

e

Sum

mer

Mean

Air (C)

Environmental Trends inthe Boise River Basin

Study period

Study period

1976-2006+0.44°C/decade

Changes in Summer StreamTemperatures (1993-2006)

Temperature ( C)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Basin Scale Burned Areas

Radiat ion

Air Temperature

Stream Flow

∆0.38 C0.27°C/10y

∆0.70 C0.50°C/10y

Thermal Gain Map

Isaak et al. 2010. Eco. Apps. 20:1350-1371

0

4

8

12

16

7 9 11 13 15

Summer Mean (C)

Juvenile b

ull t

rout

(#/1

00 m

2)

Suitable

High Quality

0

5

10

15

20

25

7 9 11 13 15

Summer mean (C)

Ra

inb

ow

tro

ut (#

/10

0 m

2)

Suitable

High Quality

Rai

nb

ow

tro

ut

(#/1

00

m2)

Effects on Thermal Habitat?

Juve

nile

bu

ll tr

ou

t (#

/10

0 m

2)

Suitable habitat = > 9.0°CHigh-quality habitat = 11.0-14.0°C

Suitable habitat < 12.0°CHigh-quality habitat < 10.0°C

Bull Trout

Rainbow Trout

93-06 Rainbow Trout Habitat ChangesHabitat is shifting, but no net gain or loss

GainNo changeLoss

High-quality habitat = 11.0-14.0°C

Isaak et al. 2010. Eco. Apps. 20:1350-1371

93-06 Bull Trout Natal Habitat ChangesNet loss of habitat occurring (8%-16%/decade)

No changeLossHigh-quality habitat < 10°C

Isaak et al. 2010. Eco. Apps. 20:1350-1371

2006 Mean Summer Temperatures

Temperature ( C)

Additional Applications: River Network Thermal Maps

When & where areTMDL standards met?

Additional Applications: Optimizing Sampling Efforts

SE of predictions

Temperature Prediction Precision

PNF

Maps of Spatial Uncertainty

River Network Temperature Models

PNF

BNF

SNFIDPower

USGS

JDUNF

Methods online @:

= Spatial

= Non-spatial

www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/stream_temperature.shtml

Google Search “Stream Temperature”

Large regional temperaturedatabases exist (n ~ 12,000 – 20,000 summers)

Regional Temperature Model Needed

•Historical & future stream temps•Species habitat summaries•1:100,000-Scale NHD+

ICB Streams ~ 250,000 km

A Step Towards a Regional Temperature Model

•42,000 stream km•1,800 temperature sites•6,000 summer observations

NCEAS Lower Snake Study Domain

Regional Bioclimatic AssessmentsNo Stream Temperature Component

Wenger et al., Submitted.

Rieman et al. 2007

Williams et al. 2009

Olden and Naiman 2009

Summer is Not the Whole StoryFull-year Temp Data Needed

Annual Temperature Cycle

Degree Day Chart 2007 - MF Salmon

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

Julian Day

Cu

mu

lati

ve

de

gre

e d

ay

(C

)Air temp MF Lodge

Marsh Cr, 1985m

SF Salmon R, 1569m

Big Cr, 1163m

Summer ~40%of degree days

Annual Accumulationof Thermal Units

??

Julian Day

Cum

ulat

ive

deg-

day

s

Summer

Retrieve data underwater

Acquiring Full-Year Temperature DataUnderwater Epoxy Protocol

Underwater epoxy

Sensors glued to boulders

$100 = 5 years of data

Isaak & Horan 2011. NAJFM 31:xxx-xxx

Regional Temperature Sensor NetworkCurrent full-year stream temperature sites = 1375Planned 2011 deployments ~1,000 (NOAA ~500, PIBO 150, USGS 100-

200, R6/AREMP 200-300, misc. others ? )

Dynamic GoogleMap Tool for Stream Temperature Monitoring Sites

Site Information•Stream name•Data steward contact

information•Agency•Site Initiation Date

www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/stream_temperature.shtml

Google Search “Stream Temperature”

Webpage:

Daly et al. 2008

Spatial Variation in Temperature Changes

Different Climate Forcing?

Past/present glaciationHari et al. 2006

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Present Future

Str

ea

m T

em

pe

ratu

reSystematic Change?

Or Different Sensitivity?

Site-level Change?

Groundwater buffering

Geomorphology

Which Factors Determine Sensitivity?

Riparian Type?

Wildfires?

Hydrology?

Elevational Trends in Warming of Northwest US Streams 1980-2009

Isaak et al., In review. Climatic Change

0

4

8

12

16

7 9 11 13 15

Summer Mean (C)

Juvenile b

ull t

rout

(#/1

00 m

2)

Defining/Refining Thermal Habitat CriteriaWhat is thermally suitable habitat?

Summer Mean Temp

Bul

l T

rout

Dens

ity

Suitable habitat < 12.0°CHigh-quality habitat < 10.0°C

Bull trout thermal criteria

Bear et al. 2007

Field Guesstimates

Lab Measurements

Ecological Temperature Sensor Networks

Salmon River -Chinook salmon natal & migratory habitats

Bull Trout natal habitats

Massive Sensor NetworksEcologically Relevant Climate Downscaling

Continuous Space/Time Air Temp Surface

Continuous Space/Time Stream Temp Surface

Wiens and Bachelet 2009

Better DownscalingHow will global trends affect my stream?

Integrated global-to-regional-to-landscape-to-stream systems

RCMGCM

Key Points:1) Stream temperature is a critical determinant of aquatic

species growth, survival, distribution, and reproduction.

2) Empirical evidence suggests streams are warming in response to climate change. Warming rates are greatest during the summer but will be heterogeneous due to variation in climate forcing, geomorphic factors, and human/vegetative responses.

3) Regional models are needed for accurately predicting thermal responses of streams in a consistent manner. Development of regional models is possible using existing temperature databases in conjunction with new spatial analytical techniques.

4) More full-year, long-term stream temperature monitoring is needed. Full-year data have many applications for understanding climate effects & are inexpensive to collect using modern digital sensors.

Climate Change, Aquatic

Ecosystems, and Fishes in the

Rocky Mountain West:

Implications and Alternatives for ManagementBruce E. Rieman and Daniel J. Isaak

Boise Aquatic Sciences Laboratory

Air, Water, and Aquatic Environments

Rocky Mountain Research Station

322 E. Front St., Suite 401

Boise, ID 83706

1) What is changing in the climate and related physical processes that may influence aquatic species and their habitats?

2) What are the implications for fish populations, aquatic communities and related conservation values?

3) What can we do about it?

Three Questions:

SynthesisDocument

Key ReferencesIsaak, D.J., C. Luce, B.E. Rieman, D. Nagel, E. Peterson, D. Horan, S. Parkes, and G. Chandler. 2010.

Effects of climate change and recent wildfires on stream temperature and thermal habitats for two salmonids in a mountain river network. Ecological Applications 20:1350-1371.

Isaak, D.J., and D.L. Horan. 2011. An assessment of underwater epoxies for permanently installing temperature sensors in mountain streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 31:000-000.

Isaak, D.J.; Horan, D.; Wollrab, S. 2010. A simple method using underwater epoxy to permanently install temperature sensors in mountain streams. Visual Guide Available @: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/stream_temperature.shtml/

Isaak, D.J., S. Wollrab, D.L. Horan, and G. Chandler. In Review. Trends in seasonal and ecologically relevant temperature attributes of streams and rivers in the northwest U.S. associated with anthropogenic climate change. Climatic Change.

Peterson, E.E., and J.M. Ver Hoef. 2010. A mixed-model moving-average approach to geostatisticalmodeling in stream networks. Ecology 91:644-651.

Rieman, B. E., D. Isaak, S. Adams, D. Horan, D., Nagel, and C. Luce. 2007. Anticipated climate warming effects on bull trout habitats and populations across the Interior Columbia River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:1552-1565.

Rieman, B. E., and D. J. Isaak. 2010. Climate change, aquatic ecosystems and fishes in the Rocky Mountain West: implications and alternatives for management. General Technical Report GTR-RMRS-250. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station

Ver Hoef, J.M., and E.E. Peterson. 2010. A moving average approach for spatial statistical models of stream networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105:6-18.

Wenger, S. J., D. J. Isaak, J. B. Dunham, K. D. Fausch, C. H. Luce, H. M. Neville, B. E. Rieman, M. K. Young, D. E. Nagel, D. L. Horan, and G. L. Chandler. In Press. Role of climate and invasive species in structuring trout distributions in the Interior Columbia Basin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

Wenger, S. J.; C.H. Luce, A.F. Hamlet, D.J. Isaak, H.M. Neville. 2010. Macroscale hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics. Water Resources Research. doi:10.1029/2009WR008839. Data for western US streams available @:http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/modeled_stream_flow_metrics.shtml

Most publications available through: www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/index.shtml orwww.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/awae_home.shtml

National Survey Finds Public Concern About Global Warming Drops

Sharply January 29, 2010 , CBB

Don’t Stop Believing

websites: www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/index.shtml www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/awae_home.shtml

US Forest ServiceRocky Mountain Research StationAir, Water, and Aquatics ProgramBoise Aquatic Sciences Lab