Wisconsin Asphalt Pavement Association - Back to Basics … · 2017. 12. 8. · •Gyratory...

Post on 17-Mar-2021

2 views 0 download

transcript

Back to Basics - Volumetrics

November 28, 2017

Paul Eggen, P.G.

1

2

Informed by and “borrowing” from. . .

3

“I learn something new every day.  The problem is, most of it is stuff that I probably should already 

know.”Unknown

History of Mix Design & Volumetrics

1905• Clifford Richardson - New York Testing Co.• Calculates VMA and adjusts for correct %AC

1920’s• Hubbard Field Method - Asphalt Association• Used lab compacted specimens and volumetric

analysis.

1932• Hveem Design Method - California• Determined Asphalt content based on aggregate

surface area (film thickness)

4History of Asphalt Mix in North America – Asphalt Magazine

History of Mix Design & Volumetrics

1930’s• Marshall Mix Design - Mississippi• Used Voids and VFA

1962

• Asphalt Institute updates MS-2• Incorporates VMA into Marshall Design• VMA requirements based on NMAS

5History of Asphalt Mix in North America – Asphalt Magazine

Rutting in the 1980s eventually led to Superpave

6

History of Mix Design & Volumetrics

1993

• SuperPave Volumetric Mix Design – SHRP• Gyratory Compactor, VMA used to determine

minimum %AC• Consensus aggregate properties on blend.

2000• WisDOT adopts Superpave mix design

methodology

7History of Asphalt Mix in North America – Asphalt Magazine

ASPHTEC-1, January 1992 8

Terminology

•Volumetric – Of or relating to measurement by volume.

•Gravimetric – Of or relating to measurement by weight.

•Empirical – Based on observation or experience rather than logic or theory (measured).

9

10Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

Terminology: Specific Gravity

• Relates Density of an Object to the same Volume of Water

11

D = G x 1.000Density in g/cm3 specific

gravityof object

density of water

The “Rosetta Stone” for asphalt mix volumetrics

Terminology: Specific Gravity

• Specific Gravity Terms “G”• Gmb - bulk specific gravity of the compacted mix. (Gyratory Puck or Pavement Core)

• Gb - specific gravity of the binder (~1.03)

12

Teminology: Specific Gravity

• Specific Gravity Terms “G”• Gmm - theoretical maximum specific gravity of the mix. Uncompacted, no air voids. (Rice test)

13

Terminology: Specific Gravity

•Specific Gravity Terms “G”•Gmb - bulk specific gravity of the compacted mix. (Gyratory Puck or Pavement Core)

14

Terminology: Specific Gravity

•Specific Gravity Terms “G”•Gb - specific gravity of the binder (~1.03)

•Gsb - bulk specific gravity of the aggregate

•Gse - effective specific gravity of the aggregate

15

16Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

17Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

Terminology

• Air voids (Va) – Total volume of air in a compacted mix. (3%-4%)

• Va = 100 x (Gmm – Gmb)/Gmm

• Low voids – potential for rutting• High voids – lower compaction and loss of durability

• Voids are a big deal!18

Terminology

• Effective Asphalt Content (Pbe) – % of non-absorbed asphalt

• Pbe = Pb – Pba• Pba calculated using Gseand Gsb

• Gravimetric

19

20Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

21Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

Voids in Mineral Aggregate (VMA)

•Definition: volume of intergranular void space in a compacted mix % by volume total mix.

•VMA = 100-[Gmb x (100-Pb)/Gsb)•Strongly influenced by gradation. • Increased VMA = Increased Asphalt Content = Increased Film Thickness

22

airasphalt

agg

VOL MASS

VMA

Absorbed ACTotalVolume

Effective AC

12.5 mm Mix - .45 Power Curve

23

24

100.094.4

23.6

12.79.37.56.14.84.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

Sieve Size raised to 0.45 Power

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

Blend No. 58-4 Max Dens Cahill Specs

9.5 mm Porous - .45 Power Curve

Mix VMA RequirementsVoids in the Mineral Aggregate

25

5 9.5 15.0 (15.5)4 12.5 14.0 (14.5)3 19 13.02 25 12.01 37.5 11.0

Nom Max Size(Grade) (mm)

Minimum VMA%

% binder

VM

A

VMA vs. Asphalt Content

26

Terminology

•Voids Filled with Binder (VFB or VFA) – The percentage of VMA filled with asphalt binder.

•VFB = 100 x (VMA-Va)/VMA•Generally required to be between about 65 –75%.

•Volumetric

27

28Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

29Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

Why Focus on Effective Binder Content?

Why not just focus on total binder content?

31Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

32Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

Superpave fixed the rutting problem but lowered effective asphalt contents which

led to loss of durability

33

WisDOT Aggregate Specifications

Minimum VMA requirements increased for LT and MT mixes

Increase Asphalt Content by Lowering Voids

35

Determine Asphalt Content @ 4.0% Voids

LT 40MT 75HT 100

Mixture Type

DesignGyrations

% binder

air voids

Use linear regression to determine asphalt content at 3.0% air voids

4.0%

Asphalt Content @ 4.0% & 3.0% Voids

37

Increase in Pb goes directly to Pbe = increased film thickness

Bottom Line - VMA is King

•Allows for increased effective asphalt volume (film thickness) while maintaining voids.

•Improves durability while maintaining rut resistance.

38

39Dave Johnson – Asphalt Institute, 2016

Not to be  confused with “Balanced Mix Designs”

Calculating Effective Binder Content

What goes into the calculation?

41Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

42Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

43Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

44Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

45Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

46Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

47Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

48Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

49Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

50Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

51Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

52Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

53Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

54Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

55Gerry Huber – Heritage Research Group, 2017

Bottom Line - VMA is King

•Allows for increased effective asphalt volume (film thickness) while maintaining voids.

•Improves durability while maintaining rut resistance.

56

Volumetrics

•Relatively inexpensive testing and can be quickly determined.

•Has been used to predict performance in past.

•Will likely still play a role in the age of performance testing (surrogate properties).

57

airasphalt

agg

VOL MASS

VMA

Absorbed ACTotalVolume

Effective AC

Thank you!!

Questions?

58