GMS Kunming–Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai– Lao ...

Post on 28-Feb-2023

0 views 0 download

transcript

Environmental Monitoring Report

Quarterly Report April–June 2012

VIE: Greater Mekong Subregion Kunming–Hai

Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai– Lao Cai Highway

Project

Prepared by Getinsa for the Vietnam Expressway Corporation, the Ministry of Transport, the

Government of Viet Nam, and the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 July 2012)

Currency unit – dong (D)

D1.00 = $0.000047 $1.00 = D20,885

NOTE

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated. This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

QUARTERLY ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY MONITORING REPORT

APRIL - JUNE 2012

Hanoi office : 12th floor, Ocean Park Building, Dao Duy Anh Street, Dong Da District Vinh Phuc office: Huu Thu Hamlet, Kim Long Ward, Tam Duong Dist, Vinh Phuc Province Madrid Spain head office: C/ Ramón de Aguinaga No 8, 28028 Madrid, Spain/ Web Page: www.getinsa.com

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

i

INDEX

1 INTRODUCTION. FRAMEWORK OF THIS REPORT .......................................................... 1

1.1 FRAMEWORK OF THE REPORT ................................................................................... 1

1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT. DIVISION IN PACKAGES ...................................... 1

2 CONSTRUCTION WORKS PROGRESS DURING THE PERIOD ........................................ 4

2.1 PACKAGE A1 .................................................................................................................. 4

2.2 PACKAGE A2 .................................................................................................................. 6

2.3 PACKAGE A3 .................................................................................................................. 7

2.4 PACKAGE A4 .................................................................................................................. 8

2.5 PACKAGE A5 .................................................................................................................. 9

2.6 PACKAGE A6 ................................................................................................................ 10

2.7 PACKAGE A7 ................................................................................................................ 12

2.8 PACKAGE A8 ................................................................................................................ 13

3 CARRIED OUT TASKS DURING THE PERIOD ................................................................. 15

4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING RESULTS. COMPLEMENTARY MEASURES TO BE

APPLIED ........................................................................................................................... 17

4.1 IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................ 17

4.2 IMPACT ON WATER RESOURCES .............................................................................. 39

4.3 IMPACT ON SOILS QUALITY ....................................................................................... 61

4.4 IMPACT ON NOISE AND VIBRATION LEVELS ............................................................ 73

4.5 STREAMS AND RIVERSIDES MAINTENANCE ............................................................ 91

4.6 EROSION RISKS AND STABILITY IN SLOPES .......................................................... 100

4.7 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MANAGEMENT ........................................................... 109

4.8 UNSUITABLE MATERIAL DISPOSALS AND BORROW PITS .................................... 119

4.9 WASTE AND CLEANLINESS IN SITE ......................................................................... 127

4.10 BIODIVERSITY PRESERVATION ............................................................................... 137

4.11 WORKERS’ CAMPS CONDITIONS ............................................................................. 143

4.12 LABOUR SAFETY EQUIPMENT ................................................................................. 154

4.13 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND SIGNPOSTING IN ROADS .......................................... 169

4.14 SIGNPOSTING IN DANGEROUS SURFACES ........................................................... 180

4.15 ACCIDENTS DUE TO THE LACK OF SAFETY MEASURES. RESPONSIBLES ......... 188

5 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND SAFETY

ISSUES ........................................................................................................................... 193

5.1 PACKAGE A1 .............................................................................................................. 193

5.2 PACKAGE A2 .............................................................................................................. 193

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

ii

5.3 PACKAGE A3 .............................................................................................................. 194

5.4 PACKAGE A4 .............................................................................................................. 195

5.5 PACKAGE A5 .............................................................................................................. 195

5.6 PACKAGE A6 .............................................................................................................. 196

5.7 PACKAGE A7 .............................................................................................................. 198

5.8 PACKAGE A8 .............................................................................................................. 199

6 STATUS ON THE ECAP IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................... 200

6.1 CONTRACTORS’ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY MANAGERS MOBILIZATION ... 200

6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ECAP). UPDATE 30TH/06/2012 . 202

7 GRIEVANCE INTAKES. PUBLIC CONSULTATION.......................................................... 249

ANNEX 1: PHOTOGRAPHIC REPORT ................................................................................... 251

ANNEX 2: GRIEVANCE INTAKES. PUBLIC CONSULTATION ............................................... 253

ANNEX 3: ACCIDENT IN LO RIVER BRIDGE. INCIDENTS AND COMPLAINTS

INFORMATION SYSTEMS. SPECIFIC REPORT ............................................................ 255

ANNEX 4: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS IN CONCRETE BATCHING PLANTS. SPECIFIC

REPORT .......................................................................................................................... 257

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

iii

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMR Environmental Monitoring Report

EPMU Expressway Project Management Unit

ESQR Environmental and Safety Quarterly Report

EWIR Environmental Weekly Inspection Report

MONRE Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment

MOT Ministry of Transport

NB-LC Noi Bai - Lao Cai

NS National Specialist (environmental)

PPE Personal Protection Equipment

PSC Project Supervision Consultant

SMR Safety Monitoring Report

TOR Terms Of Reference

VEC Vietnam Expressway Corporation

KPH Not detect

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

1

1 INTRODUCTION. FRAMEWORK OF THIS REPORT

1.1 FRAMEWORK OF THE REPORT

Within the framework of the Environmental Control Plans proposed by the contractors and the

duties of the Consultant (PSC) in this matter contained in the Consulting Services Contract, the

environmental team of national specialists (NS) in charge of inspecting the environmental

conditions of the works for the new highway, have done weekly inspections along the sites

and surroundings of all the Packages which nowadays are all with construction activities,

checking the environmental measures applied by the constructors and detecting any impacts

that could be generated by the building works during the period of reference of this report, that

means, January, February and March 2012. The results were included in the environmental

weekly inspection reports (EWIR) and the monthly environmental reports for each package

(EMR).

As the environmental team, therefore under its responsibility, is also in charge of monitoring

the healthy and safety conditions in site, specialists in site offices also have made weekly

inspections in all packages. Their results have been being included in the corresponding

monthly safety reports (SMR). Therefore these issues are also included in this quarterly report.

So, this document is defined as Environmental and Safety Monitoring Quarterly Report

(hereinafter called ESQR). It will be submitted to the Client, Vietnam Expressway Corporation

(VEC), through the Expressway Project Management Unit (EPMU) and following the Terms of

Reference (ToR) of the Consultant’s Contract, also to Asian Development Bank (ADB).

1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT. DIVISION IN PACKAGES

Noi Bai - Lao Cai (NB-LC) Highway is a part of Kunming - Hai Phong Transport Corridor, which

has been studied with a total length of 865 km passing Yunnan province of China and Lao Cai,

Yen Bai, Phu Tho, Vinh Phuc, Ha Noi, Bac Ninh, Hai Duong, Quang Ninh and Hai Phong

provinces of Vietnam.

Vietnam Expressway Corporation, which is a state owner company, is the proposer of this

project. Its executing agency is the Ministry of Transport (MOT), and it’s being financed by

Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Government of Vietnam.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

2

According to original design, NB - LC Highway has a total length of about 262.4 km, passing

through 72 communes and 18 districts of provinces and cities as Ha Noi, Vinh Phuc, Phu Tho,

Yen Bai and Lao Cai.

The construction of project is divided into two phases, in which the first phase will construct

244 km with 4 lanes from Ha Noi to Yen Bai and 2 lanes from Yen Bai to Lao Cai. The second

phase will be the widen section of the former with 6 lanes from Ha Noi to Yen Bai and 4 lanes

from Yen Bai to Lao Cai (Chinese border, 262 km).

Construction of the whole project, first phase, is divided into 8 packages including A1, A2, A3,

A4, A5, A6, A7 and A8. All of them have already begun their construction activities. The length,

location and the status of works in each package at the end of the period are described in the

following paragraphs and tables.

- Package A1 is about 26.630 km of length with start point at station Km 0+070 and finishes at

station Km 26+700. Package A1 goes through the Soc Son district of Hanoi City and Vinh

Phuc province.

- Package A2 is about 22.120 km of length and goes through the Vinh Phuc province and a

little of Phu Tho province. Package A2 has start point at station Km 26+700 and finishes at

station Km 48+820. It must cross over Lo River, with a long bridge.

- Package A3 is about 32.240 km of length with start point at station Km48+360 and ending

point at station Km 80+00. Package A3 goes through the Phu Tho province. The most

significant structure is the bridge to cross over Red River.

- Package A4 has start point at Km 80+000 in Cam Khe district, Phu Tho province and ending

point at Km109+750 in Tran Yen district, Yen Bai province. Its total length is 29.750 km.

- Package A5 has start point at Km109+750 in Tran Yen district, Yen Bai province and

ending point at Km150+900 in Van Yen district, Yen Bai province. Its total length is 41.150 km.

- Package A6 lengthens from start point Km150+900 of Van Yen district, Yen Bai province to

Km190+420 in Van Ban district, Lao Cai province. Its total length is 39.520 km. Almost

alignment goes through high mountains in Yen Bai and Lao Cai province and crosses over

natural streams by 18 bridges. This section also includes 1 tunnel under range of mountain at

Km186+500.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

3

- Package A7 lengthens from start point Km190+420 in Van Ban district to Km 218+040 in Bao

Thang district, Lao Cai province. Almost alignment also goes through high mountains and 18

bridges are needed. Its total length is 27,620 m. Khe Sang bridge with a length of 287m is the

biggest one.

- Package A8 begins at station Km 218+040 in Bao Thang district and finishes at Km 244+155

in Bao Thang district, Lao Cai province. Its total length is 26,115 m. Suoi Trat bridge with a

length of 374.8 m is the biggest one.

Table 1.1: Current Status of Works at the end of the quarter

A1 A2 A3 A4

Site clearing 92,08 56,03 55,17 81,32 Earthworks 77,92 51,67 46,71 25,97 Drainage 43,91 7,40 23,34 17,01 Structures 68,95 53,54 41,41 36,93 Overall progress 48,57 33,84 26,44 15,80

A5 A6 A7 A8 Site clearing 79,37 91,43 102,05 91,68 Earthworks 13,40 40,82 106,87 60,20 Drainage 3,29 46,04 67,85 54,02 Structures 7,54 31,77 46,58 46,97 Overall progress 5,92 24,23 51,80 32,24

Data expressed in percentage of the total planned in the project

The environmental monitoring program is carried out in compliance with regulations of Vietnam

Government and ADB safeguard policy in order to control environmental impacts and to

ensure that the environment in the surroundings of the project area is well preserved. The VEC

proponent should perform environmental protection measures stated in the EIA report as well

as requirements written in the approval decision made by MONRE. In accordance with article

23 of the Environmental Protection Law and article 15 of Decree 80/2006/ND-CP, MONRE will

organize, direct, and monitor the environmental protection measures performed by VEC as

stated in the EIA report approved.

At present, this environmental monitoring program is being undertaken by Environmental

specialists of Getinsa hired by Vietnam Expressway Corporation. EPMU, the Project Manager,

with the Consultant’s support, monitors the environmental protection measures applied by the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

4

contractors during the development of their works, incompliance with the environmental control

and protection plans proposed by contractors and already approved by PSC. Consultant

reports to EPMU-VEC as the main involved authority in the project.

In addition to that, during the monitoring process, the environmental specialists and contractors

will try to find out and mitigate unanticipated environmental impacts arising from the project

construction process.

2 CONSTRUCTION WORKS PROGRESS DURING THE PERIOD

In this chapter, they are included all the works already done or in process during the period, in

each package and detailing the section where the works are developed.

2.1 PACKAGE A1

April Sec 1: Km 0+900 ~ Km 4+350 Embankment work Sec 2: Km 0+080 ~ Km 1+000 & Km 4+350 ~ Km 7+661 Embankment work

Sec 3: Km 7+661 ~ Km 10+771 Embankment work Sec 4: Km 10+771 ~ Km15+030 Embankment work Sec 5: Km 15+030 ~ Km 18+400 Embankment work Sec 6: Km 18+400 ~ Km 21+900 Embankment work Sec 7: Km 21+900 ~ Km 23+900 Embankment work Sec 8: Km 23+900 ~ Km 26+700 Embankment work Underpass NH2 Structure work Kim Anh bridge (Km 1+901.05) Structure work TL402 bridge (Km 3+053.55) Structure work and PC voided slab Trung Kien bridge (Km 4+491.00) Structure work Dai Duong bridge (Km 7+392.65) Structure work Xuan Phuong bridge (Km 7+660.05) Structure work NTT bridge (Km 7 + 854.7) No activity Tan Loi bridge (Km 10+695.00) Structure work Ba Thien bridge (Km 14+026.00) Structure work I.C 3 bridge (Km 14+590.00) Structure work Bon bridge (Km 15+107.00) Structure work TL302B bridge (Km 15+825.00) No activity TL-TK bridge (Km 19+120.05) Structure work Cam I bridge (Km 21+910.05) Structure work Cam II bridge (Km 21+910.05) Structure work TL302CII bridge (Km 22+480.05) No activity Army I bridge (Km 23+855.45) No activity NH2B bridge (Km 24+946.00) Abutment backfilling

May Sec 1: Km 0+900 ~ Km 4+350 Embankment work Sec 2: Km 0+080 ~ Km 1+000 & Km 4+350 ~ Km 7+661 Embankment work

Sec 3: Km 7+661 ~ Km 10+771 Embankment work Sec 4: Km 10+771 ~ Km15+030 Embankment work Sec 5: Km 15+030 ~ Km 18+400 Embankment work

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

5

Sec 6: Km 18+400 ~ Km 21+900 Embankment work Sec 7: Km 21+900 ~ Km 23+900 Embankment work Sec 8: Km 23+900 ~ Km 26+700 Embankment work Underpass NH2 Structure work Kim Anh bridge (Km 1+901.05) Structure work TL402 bridge (Km 3+053.55) Structure work and PC voided slab Trung Kien bridge (Km 4+491.00) Structure work Dai Duong bridge (Km 7+392.65) Structure work Xuan Phuong bridge (Km 7+660.05)

Structure work

NTT bridge (Km 7 + 854.7) No activity Tan Loi bridge (Km 10+695.00) Structure work Ba Thien bridge (Km 14+026.00) Structure work I.C 3 bridge (Km 14+590.00) Structure work Bon bridge (Km 15+107.00) Structure work TL302B bridge (Km 15+825.00) No activity TL-TK bridge (Km 19+120.05) Structure work Cam I bridge (Km 21+910.05) Structure work Cam II bridge (Km 21+910.05) Structure work TL302CII bridge (Km 22+480.05) No activity Army I bridge (Km 23+855.45) No activity NH2B bridge (Km 24+946.00) Abutment backfilling

June Sec 1: Km 0+900 ~ Km 4+350 Embankment work Sec 2: Km 0+080 ~ Km 1+000 & Km 4+350 ~ Km 7+661 Embankment work

Sec 3: Km 7+661 ~ Km 10+771 Embankment work Sec 4: Km 10+771 ~ Km15+030 Embankment work Sec 5: Km 15+030 ~ Km 18+400 Embankment work Sec 6: Km 18+400 ~ Km 21+900 Embankment work Sec 7: Km 21+900 ~ Km 23+900 Embankment work Sec 8: Km 23+900 ~ Km 26+700 Embankment work Underpass NH2 Structure work Kim Anh bridge (Km 1+901.05) Structure work TL402 bridge (Km 3+053.55) Structure work and PC voided slab Trung Kien bridge (Km 4+491.00) Structure work Dai Duong bridge (Km 7+392.65) Structure work Xuan Phuong bridge (Km 7+660.05) Structure work NTT bridge (Km 7 + 854.7) No activity Tan Loi bridge (Km 10+695.00) Structure work Ba Thien bridge (Km 14+026.00) Structure work I.C 3 bridge (Km 14+590.00) Structure work Bon bridge (Km 15+107.00) Structure work TL302B bridge (Km 15+825.00) No activity TL-TK bridge (Km 19+120.05) Structure work Cam I bridge (Km 21+910.05) Structure work Cam II bridge (Km 21+910.05) Structure work TL302CII bridge (Km 22+480.05) No activity Army I bridge (Km 23+855.45) No activity NH2B bridge (Km 24+946.00) Abutment backfilling

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

6

2.2 PACKAGE A2

April Sec 1: Km 26+700~Km 32+700 Embankment work Sec 2: Km 32+700~Km 35+300 No activity Sec 3: Km 35+300~Km36+910 No activity Sec 4: Km 36+910~Km 39+850 Embankment work Sec 5: Km 39+580~Km 40+690 Embankment work Sec 6: Km 40+690~Km 43+400 No activity Sec 7: Km 43+400~Km 45+300 No activity Sec 8: Km 45+300~Km 47+660 Embankment work Army II Bridge (Km 27+015.00) Structure work Army III Bridge (Km 28+010.00) Structure work TL310 Bridge (Km 29+201.00) Structure work Ben Tre Bridge (Km 31+068.00) Structure work Tan Dung Bridge (Km 31+245.05) Structure work Muong Noi Bridge (Km 31+504.50) Bored pile work TL306I Bridge (Km 33+181.55) No activity Muong Dao Bridge (Km 33+295.00) Structure work Ben Gao Bridge (Km 35+211.05) Structure work TL305 Bridge (Km 37+951.55) Structure work Song Dao Bridge (Km 38+450.05) Structure work Phung Nguyen Bridge (Km 39+188.00) No activity Xuan Quang Bridge (Km 41+480.00) No activity Lo river Bridge (Km 48+181.30) Structure work

May Sec 1: Km 26+700~Km 32+700 Embankment work Sec 2: Km 32+700~Km 35+300 No activity Sec 3: Km 35+300~Km36+910 No activity Sec 4: Km 36+910~Km 39+850 Embankment work Sec 5: Km 39+580~Km 40+690 Embankment work Sec 6: Km 40+690~Km 43+400 No activity Sec 7: Km 43+400~Km 45+300 No activity Sec 8: Km 45+300~Km 47+660 Embankment work Army II Bridge (Km 27+015.00) Structure work Army III Bridge (Km 28+010.00) Structure work TL310 Bridge (Km 29+201.00) Structure work Ben Tre Bridge (Km 31+068.00) Structure work Tan Dung Bridge (Km 31+245.05) Structure work Muong Noi Bridge (Km 31+504.50) Bored pile work TL306I Bridge (Km 33+181.55) No activity Muong Dao Bridge (Km 33+295.00) Structure work Ben Gao Bridge (Km 35+211.05) Structure work TL305 Bridge (Km 37+951.55) Structure work Song Dao Bridge (Km 38+450.05) Structure work Phung Nguyen Bridge (Km 39+188.00) No activity Xuan Quang Bridge (Km 41+480.00) No activity Lo river Bridge (Km 48+181.30) Structure work

June Sec 1: Km 26+700~Km 32+700 Embankment work Sec 2: Km 32+700~Km 35+300 No activity Sec 3: Km 35+300~Km36+910 No activity Sec 4: Km 36+910~Km 39+850 Embankment work Sec 5: Km 39+580~Km 40+690 Embankment work Sec 6: Km 40+690~Km 43+400 Embankment work

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

7

Sec 7: Km 43+400~Km 45+300 Embankment work Sec 8: Km 45+300~Km 47+660 Embankment work Army II Bridge (Km 27+015.00) Structure work Army III Bridge (Km 28+010.00) No activity TL310 Bridge (Km 29+201.00) Structure work Ben Tre Bridge (Km 31+068.00) Structure work Tan Dung Bridge (Km 31+245.05) Structure work Muong Noi Bridge (Km 31+504.50) Bored pile work TL306I Bridge (Km 33+181.55) Structure work Muong Dao Bridge (Km 33+295.00) Structure work Ben Gao Bridge (Km 35+211.05) Structure work TL305 Bridge (Km 37+951.55) Structure work Song Dao Bridge (Km 38+450.05) Structure work Phung Nguyen Bridge (Km 39+188.00) No activity Xuan Quang Bridge (Km 41+480.00) Void slad girder Lo river Bridge (Km 48+181.30) Structure work

2.3 PACKAGE A3

April TL323B Bridge – Km 51 Finish. BaiBang railway Flyover - Km60+967.05 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure IC8 - Km54+640 Execute sub-structure (stop work)

Red river Bridge – km77+800 Drilling bored piles at P4 on Red river. Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure

National railway flyover – Km77+246 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Ho Chi Minh IC- Km65+540 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Phai Din bridge- Km70+236 Finish. TL320C bridge-Km72+580 Building Foundation platform of A2 abutment Cam Phu bridge Km61+583 Drilling bore pile Xuan Thanh bridge Km66+947 Drilling bore pile TL315B bridge Km67+662 Drilling bore pile Phong Chau bridge Km59+020 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Section 1: Km48+360-Km54+000 Excavation & filling work

Section 2: Km54+000-Km59+600 Earth work and Implement box culvert

Section 3: Km59+600-Km65+390 Embankment work and Implement box and pipe culvert Section 4: Km65+390-Km69+070 Excavation & filling work Section 5: Km69+070-Km73+070 Excavation & filling work

Section 6: Km73+070-Km77+620 Excavation & filling work and Implement pipe and box culvert

Section 7: Km77+620-Km80+000 Not yet active (Obstruction) May

TL323B Bridge – Km 51 Finish. BaiBang railway Flyover - Km60+967.05 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure IC8 - Km54+640 Execute sub-structure (stop work)

Red river Bridge – km77+800 Drilling bored piles at P4 on Red river. Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure

National railway flyover – Km77+246 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Ho Chi Minh IC- Km65+540 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Phai Din bridge- Km70+236 Finish. TL320C bridge-Km72+580 Building Foundation platform of A2 abutment Cam Phu bridge Km61+583 Drilling bore pile Xuan Thanh bridge Km66+947 Drilling bore pile TL315B bridge Km67+662 Drilling bore pile Phong Chau bridge Km59+020 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

8

Section 1: Km48+360-Km54+000 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km54+000-Km59+600 Earth work and Implement box culvert Section 3: Km59+600-Km65+390 Embankment work and Implement box and pipe culvert Section 4: Km65+390-Km69+070 Excavation & filling work Section 5: Km69+070-Km73+070 Excavation & filling work

Section 6: Km73+070-Km77+620 Excavation & filling work and Implement pipe and box culvert

Section 7: Km77+620-Km80+000 Not yet active (Obstruction) June

TL323B Bridge – Km 51 Finish. BaiBang railway Flyover - Km60+967.05 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure IC8 - Km54+640 Execute sub-structure (stop work)

Red river Bridge – km77+800 Drilling bored piles at P4 on Red river. Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure

National railway flyover – Km77+246 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Ho Chi Minh IC- Km65+540 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Phai Din bridge- Km70+236 Finish. TL320C bridge-Km72+580 Building Foundation platform of A2 abutment Cam Phu bridge Km61+583 Drilling bore pile Xuan Thanh bridge Km66+947 Drilling bore pile TL315B bridge Km67+662 Drilling bore pile Phong Chau bridge Km59+020 Finish drilling bore piles. Execute sub-structure Section 1: Km48+360-Km54+000 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km54+000-Km59+600 Earth work and Implement box culvert Section 3: Km59+600-Km65+390 Embankment work and Implement box and pipe culvert Section 4: Km65+390-Km69+070 Excavation & filling work Section 5: Km69+070-Km73+070 Excavation & filling work

Section 6: Km73+070-Km77+620 Excavation & filling work and Implement pipe and box culvert

Section 7: Km77+620-Km80+000 Not yet active (Obstruction)

2.4 PACKAGE A4

April Ngoi Lao bridge - Km97+100 Drilling bore pile QL32C bypass bridge - Km107+533 Drilling bore pile Ngoi Van bridge - Km108+960 Drilling bore pile Dam Nang bridge –Km108+287 Drilling bore pile TL321C bridge – Km84+400 Drilling bore pile Ngoi Gianh bridge – Km88+760 Drilling bore pile Section 1: Km80+000-Km85+000 Earth work Section 2: Km85+000-Km89+600 Site clearing and Earth work Section 3: Km89+600-Km96+200 Earth work and top soil remove Section 4: Km96+200-Km100+000 Embankment and filling work Section 5: Km100+000-Km105+000 Embankment and filling work Section 6: Km105+000-Km109+750 Embankment and filling work

May Ngoi Lao bridge - Km97+100 Drilling bore pile QL32C bypass bridge - Km107+533 Drilling bore pile Ngoi Van bridge - Km108+960 Drilling bore pile Dam Nang bridge –Km108+287 Drilling bore pile TL321C bridge – Km84+400 Drilling bore pile Ngoi Gianh bridge – Km88+760 Drilling bore pile

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

9

Section 1: Km80+000-Km85+000 Earth work Section 2: Km85+000-Km89+600 Site clearing and Earth work Section 3: Km89+600-Km96+200 Earth work and top soil remove Section 4: Km96+200-Km100+000 Embankment and filling work Section 5: Km100+000-Km105+000 Embankment and filling work Section 6: Km105+000-Km109+750 Embankment and filling work

June Ngoi Lao bridge - Km97+100 Drilling bore pile QL32C bypass bridge - Km107+533 Drilling bore pile Ngoi Van bridge - Km108+960 Drilling bore pile Dam Nang bridge –Km108+287 Drilling bore pile TL321C bridge – Km84+400 Drilling bore pile Ngoi Gianh bridge – Km88+760 Drilling bore pile Section 1: Km80+000-Km85+000 Earth work Section 2: Km85+000-Km89+600 Site clearing and Earth work Section 3: Km89+600-Km96+200 Earth work and top soil remove Section 4: Km96+200-Km100+000 Embankment and filling work Section 5: Km100+000-Km105+000 Embankment and filling work Section 6: Km105+000-Km109+750 Embankment and filling work

2.5 PACKAGE A5

April Van Phu bridge – Km114+100.05 Building Foundation platform Hop Minh My bridge – Km118+920.05 No activity Ngoi Lau bridge – Km120+615.85 Building Foundation platform QL 37 bridge – Km121+433.05 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Gua bridge – Km128+665.46 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Rao bridge – Km130+916.30 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Thu bridge – Km136+108.35 No activity Ngoi Thap bridge – Km138+447.15 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Vien bridge – Km140+788.50 Building Foundation platform Xuan Thu bridge – Km141+483.55 No activity Ngoi Thia bridge – Km145+434.05 Building Foundation platform and Excavation & filling works Ngoi Buc bridge – Km 150+704.65 No activity Section 1: Km109+750 - Km115+800 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km115+800 - Km120+000 Excavation & filling work Section 3: Km120+000 - Km125+000 Excavation & filling work Section 4: Km125+000 - Km130+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 5: Km130+000 - Km136+400 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 6: Km136+400 - Km142+000 Excavation & filling work Section 7: Km142+000 - Km148+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 8: Km148+000 - Km150+900 Site clearing and excavation & filling work

May Van Phu bridge – Km114+100.05 Building Foundation platform Hop Minh My bridge – Km118+920.05 No activity Ngoi Lau bridge – Km120+615.85 Building Foundation platform QL 37 bridge – Km121+433.05 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Gua bridge – Km128+665.46 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Rao bridge – Km130+916.30 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Thu bridge – Km136+108.35 No activity Ngoi Thap bridge – Km138+447.15 No activity Ngoi Vien bridge – Km140+788.50 Building Foundation platform Xuan Thu bridge – Km141+483.55 No activity Ngoi Thia bridge – Km145+434.05 Building Foundation platform and Excavation & filling works Ngoi Buc bridge – Km 150+704.65 No activity

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

10

Section 1: Km109+750 - Km115+800 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km115+800 - Km120+000 Excavation & filling work Section 3: Km120+000 - Km125+000 Excavation & filling work Section 4: Km125+000 - Km130+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 5: Km130+000 - Km136+400 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 6: Km136+400 - Km142+000 Excavation & filling work Section 7: Km142+000 - Km148+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 8: Km148+000 - Km150+900 Site clearing and excavation & filling work

June Van Phu bridge – Km114+100.05 Structure work Hop Minh My bridge – Km118+920.05 No activity Ngoi Lau bridge – Km120+615.85 Structure work QL 37 bridge – Km121+433.05 Structure work Ngoi Gua bridge – Km128+665.46 Structure work Ngoi Rao bridge – Km130+916.30 Structure work Ngoi Thu bridge – Km136+108.35 No activity Ngoi Thap bridge – Km138+447.15 No activity Ngoi Vien bridge – Km140+788.50 Structure work Xuan Thu bridge – Km141+483.55 No activity Ngoi Thia bridge – Km145+434.05 No activity Ngoi Buc bridge – Km 150+704.65 No activity Section 1: Km109+750 - Km115+800 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km115+800 - Km120+000 Excavation & filling work Section 3: Km120+000 - Km125+000 Excavation & filling work Section 4: Km125+000 - Km130+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 5: Km130+000 - Km136+400 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 6: Km136+400 - Km142+000 Excavation & filling work Section 7: Km142+000 - Km148+000 Excavation & filling work Section 8: Km148+000 - Km150+900 Site clearing and excavation & filling work

2.6 PACKAGE A6

April Khe Chuong bridge – Km153+355.05 Building Foundation platform Ngoi That bridge – Km155+971.55 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Rom bridge- Km157+517.05 No activity Ngoi Cong bridge – Km159+207.85 No activity Ngoi Giam I bridge – Km162+896.35 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Giam II bridge – Km163+126.00 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Hut bridge – Km165+110.50 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Chac bridge – Km169+412.00 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Pha bridge – Km170+312.50 No activity Suoi Quan bridge – Km173+434.00 No activity Ngoi Nhuoc bridge – Km176+661.85 Building Foundation platform Lang Nhay bridge – Km182+164.00 Building Foundation platform Lang Lau bridge – Km184+057.95 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Don bridge – Km185+077.75 Building Foundation platform and Excavation & filling works Dai Viet bridge – Km186+902.05 Building Foundation platform Van Xuan bridge – Km187+141.55 No activity Suoi Nau bridge – Km188+766.00 No activity Lang Nheo flyover – Km173+929 No activity Section 1: Km150+900 - Km156+000 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km156+000 - Km162+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 3: Km162+000 - Km165+000 Excavation & filling work Section 4: Km165+000 - Km168+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 5: Km168+000 - Km172+000 Excavation & filling work

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

11

Section 6: Km172+000 - Km176+713 Excavation & filling work Section 7: Km176+713 - Km182+214 Excavation & filling work Section 8: Km182+214 - Km186+200 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 9: Km186+730 - Km190+420 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Tunnel (Km 186+200 – Km 186+730) 2 Tunnel Portals are being constructed by the Contractor.

May Khe Chuong bridge – Km153+355.05 Building Foundation platform Ngoi That bridge – Km155+971.55 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Rom bridge- Km157+517.05 No activity Ngoi Cong bridge – Km159+207.85 No activity Ngoi Giam I bridge – Km162+896.35 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Giam II bridge – Km163+126.00 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Hut bridge – Km165+110.50 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Chac bridge – Km169+412.00 Excavation & filling works Ngoi Pha bridge – Km170+312.50 No activity Suoi Quan bridge – Km173+434.00 No activity Ngoi Nhuoc bridge – Km176+661.85 Building Foundation platform Lang Nhay bridge – Km182+164.00 Building Foundation platform Lang Lau bridge – Km184+057.95 Building Foundation platform Ngoi Don bridge – Km185+077.75 Building Foundation platform and Excavation & filling works Dai Viet bridge – Km186+902.05 Building Foundation platform Van Xuan bridge – Km187+141.55 No activity Suoi Nau bridge – Km188+766.00 No activity Lang Nheo flyover – Km173+929 No activity Section 1: Km150+900 - Km156+000 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km156+000 - Km162+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 3: Km162+000 - Km165+000 Excavation & filling work Section 4: Km165+000 - Km168+000 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 5: Km168+000 - Km172+000 Excavation & filling work Section 6: Km172+000 - Km176+713 Excavation & filling work Section 7: Km176+713 - Km182+214 Excavation & filling work Section 8: Km182+214 - Km186+200 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Section 9: Km186+730 - Km190+420 Site clearing and excavation & filling work Tunnel (Km 186+200 – Km 186+730) 2 Tunnel Portals are being constructed by the Contractor.

June Khe Chuong bridge – Km153+355.05 Structure work Ngoi That bridge – Km155+971.55 Structure work Ngoi Rom bridge- Km157+517.05 No activity Ngoi Cong bridge – Km159+207.85 Structure work Ngoi Giam I bridge – Km162+896.35 Structure work Ngoi Giam II bridge – Km163+126.00 Structure work Ngoi Hut bridge – Km165+110.50 Structure work Ngoi Chac bridge – Km169+412.00 Structure work Ngoi Pha bridge – Km170+312.50 No activity Suoi Quan bridge – Km173+434.00 No activity Ngoi Nhuoc bridge – Km176+661.85 Structure work Lang Nhay bridge – Km182+164.00 Structure work Lang Lau bridge – Km184+057.95 Structure work Ngoi Don bridge – Km185+077.75 Structure work Dai Viet bridge – Km186+902.05 Structure work Van Xuan bridge – Km187+141.55 No activity Suoi Nau bridge – Km188+766.00 No activity Lang Nheo flyover – Km173+929 No activity Section 1: Km150+900 - Km156+000 Excavation & filling work Section 2: Km156+000 - Km162+000 Excavation & filling work Section 3: Km162+000 - Km165+000 Excavation & filling work Section 4: Km165+000 - Km168+000 Excavation & filling work Section 5: Km168+000 - Km172+000 Excavation & filling work Section 6: Km172+000 - Km176+713 Excavation & filling work

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

12

Section 7: Km176+713 - Km182+214 Excavation & filling work Section 8: Km182+214 - Km186+200 Excavation & filling work Section 9: Km186+730 - Km190+420 Excavation & filling work Tunnel (Km 186+200 – Km 186+730) 2 Tunnel Portals are being constructed by the Contractor.

2.7 PACKAGE A7

April Khe Sang Brdge Structure concrete class C2: 100.0 m3; PC- I Girder, length

24m, height 1.45m: 2 each; P3, P7: Structure concrete class C2: 15m3, 6.6m3; PC- I Girder, length 24m, height 1.45m: 1 each

Khe Can Bridge PC- I Girder, length 24m, height 1.45m: 1 each Khe Dai bridge PC- I Girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1 each; Structure

concrete class C2: 50m3; PC- I Girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 2 each

Thin Thung II Bridge P1: Structure concrete class C2: 180m3 Tan An Bridge A2, Structure concrete class C2: 17.5m3 Xom Danh Bridge Left: Structure concrete class C2: 29.4 m3; Right: Structure

concrete class C2: 21.6 m3; Ram AII: Structure concrete class C2: 30m3; Ram B: Structure concrete class C2: 23.2 m3

Ram AII Bridge Structure concrete class C2: 387.5 m3 Xom Cam Bridge Structure concrete class C2: 24m3 Ngoi Bong Bridge PC- I Girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1 each Section1: Km190+420-Km201+000 Unsuitable material, Rock excavation to fill and Common

excavation Section2: Km201+000-Km207+000 Common excavation and Rock excavation to fill Section3: Km207+000-Km218+040 Common excavation and Unsuitable material

May Khe Sang Brdge P3, P8: Structure concrete class C2: 88.7m3, 29.3m3; PC- I

Girder, length 24m, height 1.45m: 1 each Khe Can Bridge PC- I Girder, length 24m, height 1.45m: 1 each Tan Tien Bridge P2, P3: Structure concrete class C2: 18m3, 24m3 Thin Thung II Bridge P1: Structure concrete class C2: 156m3 Tan An Bridge P4: Structure concrete class C2: 15.8m3 Xom Danh Bridge Structure concrete class C2: 500m3; PC- I Girder, length 33m,

height 1.65m: 1 each Ram AII Bridge No activity Xom Cam Bridge Cast-in-place concrete pile (A1, A2 hole): 14m; P1: Structure

concrete class C2: 27m3 Ngoi Bong Bridge PC- I Girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1 each Tan Thuong Bridge A1: Structure concrete class C2: 50m3 Khe Hong Bridge P3: Structure concrete class C2: 20m3 Cam Con Bridge P2: Structure concrete class C2: 100m3 Section1: Km190+420-Km201+000 Unsuitable material and Rock excavation to fill Section2: Km201+000-Km207+000 Common excavation and Rock excavation to fill Section3: Km207+000-Km218+040 Common excavation and Unsuitable material

June Khe Sang Brdge No activate Khe Can Bridge No activate Tan Tien Bridge PC- I Girder, length 24m, height 1.45m: 1 each; A2 Structure

concrete class C2: 76m3 Thin Thung II Bridge P1 (right); P1 (left): Structure concrete class C2: 200m3,

31.9m3 Tan An Bridge No activate Xom Danh Bridge Structure concrete class C2: 500m3; PC- I Girder, length

33m, height 1.65m: 1 each

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

13

Ram AII Bridge No activate Xom Cam Bridge Cast-in-place concrete pile (A1, A2 hole): 14m Ngoi Bong Bridge No activate Tan Thuong Bridge No activate Khe Hong Bridge No activate Cam Con Bridge Structure excavation without cofferdam: 200m3 Chau Que Rhuong Bridge A1, A2, P1, P2: Structure concrete class C2: 50m3, 30m3,

30m3, 30m3; A2, P1: Structure concrete class C2: 56.9m3; 24m3

Ram B Bridge PC-I girder long: 24m, height 1.45m: 1 each Section1: Km190+420-Km201+000 Unsuitable material Section2: Km201+000-Km207+000 Common excavation and Rock excavation to fill Section3: Km207+000-Km218+040 Common excavation and Unsuitable material

2.8 PACKAGE A8

April IC18 Bridge No activity

Suoi Trat Bridge

cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 32m; PC-I girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1each; Structure; cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 12m; PC-I girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1each

Ngoi Bo Bridge Structural concrete G: 3.79m3; PC-I girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1each; cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 143m; Structural concrete C2: 71.29m3;

Suoi Nhu Bridge Structural concrete: 176.00m3; PC-I girder, length 25m, height 1.65m: 1each

Lang Tra Bridge Structure concrete lass G: 21.82m3; cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 92m.

IC17 Bridge cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 60m; PC-I girder, length 24m, height 1.45m: 1each; Structural concrete C2: 15.00m3; cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 44m.

Son Ha Bridge cast-in-place concrete pile D=1000mm: 184m Section1: Km218+080-Km223+000 Back to fill, Unsuitable material and common excavation Section2: Km223+000-Km225+000 Back to fill and common excavation Section3: Km225+000-Km229+000 No activity Section4: Km229+000-Km232+000 Back to fill and Unsuitable material Section5: Km232+000-Km235+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation Section6: Km235+000-Km238+000 No activity Section7: Km238+000-Km241+000 Back to fill, Unsuitable material and common excavation Section8: Km241+000-Km243+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation Section9: Km243+000-Km244+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation RAM IC18: Km244+000-Km244+570 Unsuitable material and common excavation

May IC18 Bridge No activity Suoi Trat Bridge PC-I girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1each Ngoi Bo Bridge Structural concrete C2: 3.79m3

Suoi Nhu Bridge Structural concrete: 9.2m3; PC-I girder, length 25m, height 1.65m: 1each

Lang Tra Bridge No activity IC17 Bridge No activity Son Ha Bridge No activity Section1: Km218+080-Km223+000 Back to fill and Unsuitable material and common excavation Section2: Km223+000-Km225+000 Unsuitable material Section3: Km225+000-Km229+000 No activity Section4: Km229+000-Km232+000 Common excavation Section5: Km232+000-Km235+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

14

Section6: Km235+000-Km238+000 No activity Section7: Km238+000-Km241+000 Back to fill and Unsuitable material and common excavation Section8: Km241+000-Km243+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation Section9: Km243+000-Km244+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation RAM IC18: Km244+000-Km244+570 No activity

June IC18 Bridge Cast-in-place concrete Pile D=1000mm: 15m

Suoi Trat Bridge Structural concrete C2: 203,23m3 Ngoi Bo Bridge Cast-in-place concrete Pile D=1000mm: 31m Suoi Nhu Bridge PC-I girder, length 33m, height 1.65m: 1each

Lang Tra Bridge Cast-in-place concrete Pile D=1000mm: 14m; PC-I girder length 33m, height 1.65m: 1 each

IC17 Bridge Cast-in-place concrete Pile D=1000mm: 14m Son Ha Bridge Cast-in-place concrete Pile D=1000mm: 14m Section1: Km218+080-Km223+000 Back to fill and Unsuitable material and common excavation Section2: Km223+000-Km225+000 Unsuitable material Section3: Km225+000-Km229+000 Back to fill and Unsuitable material Section4: Km229+000-Km232+000 Common excavation Section5: Km232+000-Km235+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation Section6: Km235+000-Km238+000 Common excavation Section7: Km238+000-Km241+000 Back to fill and Unsuitable material and common excavation Section8: Km241+000-Km243+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation Section9: Km243+000-Km244+000 Unsuitable material and common excavation RAM IC18: Km244+000-Km244+570 No activity

Lo

an 2

391/

2392

– V

IE: G

MS

Kun

min

g –

Hai

Pho

ng T

rans

port

Cor

ridor

N

oi B

ai –

Lao

Cai

Hig

hway

Pro

ject

15

3 C

AR

RIE

D O

UT

TASK

S D

UR

ING

TH

E PE

RIO

D

Dur

ing

the

perio

d of

ref

eren

ce f

or t

his

quar

terly

rep

ort,

the

envi

ronm

enta

l tas

ks c

arrie

d ou

t by

the

spe

cial

ists

wer

e th

e fo

llow

ing

(see

tab

les

belo

w).

The

Wee

kly

Rep

orts

hav

e be

en in

clud

ed in

the

corr

espo

ndin

g M

onth

ly R

epor

ts. S

o, it

’s c

onsi

dere

d no

t nec

essa

ry o

r use

ful t

o in

clud

e ag

ain

that

info

rmat

ion

in th

is d

ocum

ent.

Pack

age

Gen

eral

Insp

ectio

n1 Pu

nctu

al In

spec

tion2

Wee

kly

Rep

ort

Subm

issi

on

Lette

r/Not

ifica

tion

Subm

issi

on

Wee

kly,

Mon

thly

and

Sp

ecifi

c M

eetin

g A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

A1

3, 1

0,

17, 2

4

3, 8

,

22, 2

9

5, 1

2,

19

12, 1

9 10

, 28

7,

14,

21, 2

7

5, 1

2,

19, 2

6

2, 9

,

16, 2

3

9, 2

0,

25, 2

6

4, 2

4,

28, 3

0 6,

22

20

4, 2

4,

28

A2

4, 1

1,

18, 2

5

4, 9

,

21

6, 1

3,

20

22

, 30,

31

7,

14,

21, 2

7

5, 1

2,

19, 2

6

2, 9

,

16, 2

3

5, 9

,

13, 2

3,

25, 2

6

4, 1

4,

24, 2

8,

30

4, 6

,

14, 1

5,

22

4,

24,

28

A3

5, 1

2,

19, 2

6

9

7, 1

4,

21, 2

8

16

, 17,

24

19

A4

4, 1

1,

18, 2

5

16

7,

14,

21, 2

8

4,

16,

24

19

Lo

an 2

391/

2392

– V

IE: G

MS

Kun

min

g –

Hai

Pho

ng T

rans

port

Cor

ridor

N

oi B

ai –

Lao

Cai

Hig

hway

Pro

ject

16

Pack

age

Gen

eral

Insp

ectio

n1 Pu

nctu

al In

spec

tion2

Wee

kly

Rep

ort

Subm

issi

on

Lette

r/Not

ifica

tion

Subm

issi

on

Wee

kly,

Mon

thly

and

Sp

ecifi

c M

eetin

g A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

A5

5, 9

,

17, 2

5

8, 1

4,

16, 2

5

7, 1

3,

19

3, 1

6 3,

17

1, 1

6,

25

7, 1

4,

21, 2

7

5, 1

2,

19, 2

5

2, 9

,

16, 2

3

3, 6

, 11,

12, 1

4,

18, 2

3,

24, 2

7

3, 7

, 9,

15, 1

6,

25, 2

6,

31

8, 1

3,

21

9, 2

3 2,

21,

28

11, 2

5

A6

9, 1

9,

25, 2

6

4, 1

0,

17, 2

3

1, 7

,

15, 2

2

2, 7

,

16

12, 1

5,

25

12

7, 1

4,

21, 2

7

5, 1

2,

19, 2

5

2, 9

,

16, 2

3

4, 1

0,

11, 1

9,

26, 2

7

3, 4

, 9,

14, 1

5,

25, 3

1

6, 1

3,

21

9, 2

3 2,

21,

28

11, 2

5

A7

6,

16,1

7 2,

16

29, 1

3 10

, 24

7, 2

1 7,

20

7, 1

4,

21, 2

7 12

, 19

2, 9

,

16, 2

3 2,

10

3, 4

, 8,

17, 2

2,

25

28, 3

0,

5, 1

2,

19, 2

5

5, 2

3 3,

18

31, 1

4

A8

13, 2

5 16

, 18,

24

30, 1

4 20

4,

8

6, 1

8 7,

14,

21, 2

7 12

, 19

2, 9

,

16, 2

3 2,

6

27, 3

28, 2

9,

8, 1

2,

18

5, 2

3 3,

18

31, 1

4

1 : Ins

pect

ions

alo

ng a

ll th

e pa

ckag

e or

, at l

east

, mos

t of i

t 2 : I

nspe

ctio

ns in

one

or f

ew lo

catio

ns, g

ener

ally

bec

ause

of a

ny s

peci

fic m

atte

r or p

robl

em

Lo

an 2

391/

2392

– V

IE: G

MS

Kun

min

g –

Hai

Pho

ng T

rans

port

Cor

ridor

N

oi B

ai –

Lao

Cai

Hig

hway

Pro

ject

17

4 EN

VIR

ON

MEN

TAL

MO

NIT

OR

ING

RES

ULT

S. C

OM

PLEM

ENTA

RY

MEA

SUR

ES T

O B

E A

PPLI

ED

4.1

IMPA

CT

ON

AIR

QU

ALI

TY

4.1.

1 Pa

ckag

e A

1

Tabl

e 4.

1: R

esul

ts o

f air

qual

ity in

Pac

kage

A1

in s

econ

d qu

arte

r, 20

12.

Stat

ion

Sens

itive

R

ecep

tors

Sa

mpl

ing

Dat

e &

Ti

me,

wea

ther

co

nditi

on

PAR

AM

ETER

S, µ

g/m

3 SO

2 C

O

NO

x TS

P PM

10

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

Km

4+2

20

Pag

oda

and

resi

dent

are

a

22-A

pr-2

012

22-M

ay-2

012

14-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny, l

ight

win

d)

20

18

29

530

5800

64

00

23

26

0.02

8 15

0 12

0 15

0 90

10

0 12

0

Km

13+

100

Res

iden

t are

a

23-A

pr-2

012

23-M

ay-2

012

15-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny, l

ight

win

d)

22

21

23

570

5600

59

00

19

21

0.02

5 13

0 11

0 13

0 12

0 11

0 13

0

Km

19+

650

Sch

ool a

nd

resi

dent

are

a

24-A

pr-2

012

24-M

ay-2

012

18-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny, l

ight

win

d)

18

21

25

500

5600

56

00

24

22

0.02

3 10

0 12

0 16

0 10

0 12

0 12

0

Km

24+

900

Nur

sery

G

arde

n

25-A

pr-2

012

25-M

ay-2

012

19-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny, l

ight

win

d)

25

29

37

580

5600

59

00

19

17

0.02

2 17

0 14

0 15

0 11

0 10

0 13

0

QC

VN

05:2

009/

BTN

MT

350

(1-h

r) 30

,000

(1-h

r) 20

0 (1

-hr)

300

(1-h

r) 15

0 (2

4-hr

)

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

18

April

In the site inspections, we still found that the dirt is being tracked onto public roads where the

construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also doesn’t clean these areas to keep them

in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes high spread of airborne dust in the hot

windy days.

At section Km 0+665 ~ Km 3+000, we also didn’t see the Contractor to spray water on surface

of embankment section in order to minimize the spread of dust in this area. The PSC had

many times warned the Contractor of this problem but till last site inspection on April 24 we still

didn’t perceive the Contractor to implement our requirement.

At section Km 19+650, the Contractor has already installed the fence of iron sheet surrounding

the construction area to minimize the spread of noise during carrying out construction activities

in this area.

We don’t find serious problems at other sections during the site inspections this month.

May

In the site inspection on May 03, we found that the Contractor still has not implemented

watering activity on surface of embankment sections such as sections Km 0+665 ~ Km 3+000,

Km 4+800 ~ Km 5+000 and at Interchange No. 3. The PSC has many times requested the

Contractor to wáter surface of embankment section to minize the spread of airborne dust

during hot windy day; however, the Contractor doesn’t implement our requirements. During the

remaining time of the month, it usually rained so there was almost no embankment work and

the dust was naturally minimized.

At Trung Kien Bridge and Dai Duong Bridge, during the site inspection on May 22, we found

that the workers had burned trash on sites. This activity is usually happened on sites despite

recommendation of the Engineer.

At other sections, we didn’t find serious problems during the site inspections this month.

June

In the site inspection on May 03, we found that the Contractor still has not implemented

watering activity on surface of embankment sections such as sections Km 0+665 ~ Km 3+000,

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

19

Km 4+800 ~ Km 5+000 and at Interchange No. 3. The PSC has many times requested the

Contractor to wáter surface of embankment section to minize the spread of airborne dust

during hot windy day; however, the Contractor doesn’t implement our requirements. During the

remaining time of the month, it usually rained so there was almost no embankment work and

the dust was naturally minimized.

At Trung Kien Bridge and Dai Duong Bridge, during the site inspection on May 22, we found

that the workers had burned trash on sites. This activity is usually happened on sites despite

recommendation of the Engineer.

At other sections, we didn’t find serious problems during the site inspections this month.

Lo

an 2

391/

2392

– V

IE: G

MS

Kun

min

g –

Hai

Pho

ng T

rans

port

Cor

ridor

N

oi B

ai –

Lao

Cai

Hig

hway

Pro

ject

20

4.1.

2 Pa

ckag

e A

2

Tabl

e 4.

2: R

esul

ts o

f air

qual

ity in

Pac

kage

A2

in s

econ

d qu

arte

r, 20

12.

Stat

ion

Sens

itive

R

ecep

tors

Sa

mpl

ing

Dat

e &

Tim

e,

wea

ther

co

nditi

on

PAR

AM

ETER

S, µ

g/m

3 SO

2 C

O

NO

x TS

P PM

10

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

A

pr

May

Ju

ne

Apr

M

ay

June

Km

34+

780

Pag

oda

and

resi

dent

are

a

17-A

pr-2

012

17-M

ay-2

012

11-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny a

nd li

ght

win

d)

26

26

28

650

640

680

14

15

18

120

110

150

130

130

130

Km

36+

500

Res

iden

t ar

ea

18-A

pr-2

012

18-M

ay-2

012

12-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny a

nd li

ght

win

d)

24

24

24

570

580

590

13

12

16

130

140

170

80

80

90

Km

39+

130

Res

iden

t ar

ea

23-A

pr-2

012

21-M

ay-2

012

13-J

un-2

012

(sun

ny a

nd li

ght

win

d)

18

18

18

560

570

630

18

16

19

120

130

150

150

110

130

QC

VN

05:2

009/

BTN

MT

350

(1-h

r) 30

,000

(1-h

r) 20

0 (1

-hr)

300

(1-h

r) 15

0 (2

4-hr

)

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

21

April

By observations during this month we still perceived that the dirt is being tracked onto public

roads where the construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also doesn’t clean these

areas to keep them in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes high spread of

airborne dust in the hot windy days.

Along through way we also didn’t see the Contractor to carry out the watering activity on

surface of embankment sections to minimize the spread of dust during the hot windy day

despite many requirements of the Engineer. We issued the last warning to request the

Contractor to implement our requirements and if he still fails we will recommend the Employer

to deduct money.

At Batch Plant C, due to the Contractor still doesn’t comply with our requirements to install the

fence surrounding material stockpile area in order to limit the spread of airborne dust, therefore

the PSC has already deducted money.

At other section, there is no serious problem noted during the site inspections.

May

By observations during this month, we still perceived that the dirt is being tracked onto public

roads where the construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also does not clean these

areas to keep them in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes high spread of

airborne dust in the hot windy days.

Along through way we also did not see the Contractor to carry out the watering activity on

surface of embankment sections to minimize the spread of dust during the hot windy day

despite many requirements of the Engineer. We issued the last warning to request the

Contractor to implement our requirements and if he still fails we will recommend the Employer

to deduct money.

At Batch Plant C, due to the Contractor still doesn’t comply with our requirements to install the

fence surrounding material stockpile area in order to limit the spread of airborne dust, therefore

the PSC has already deducted money.

At other section, there is no serious problem noted during the site inspections.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

22

June

The status of tracking of dirt onto public road has not been mitigated. This matter caused

dirtiness and high spread of airborne dust, especially in hot windy days. At sections of

embankment, the Contractor also didn’t water the surface in dry days and this caused high

spread of dust, too. The PSC many times requested the Contractor to solve these problems

but up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

We didn’t see any improvement at Batch Plant C – Km 39+200, and in the site inspection on

May 21, together with expert of ADB, the Employer and the Contractor, we have taken public

consultation action in these areas and the local people disclosed that the level of dust is very

high during operation of this CBP. The PSC also stopped the work of this CBP until the

Contractor corrects the defect.

We also found that the trash was burned on site at Muong Dao Bridge. This activity is usually

happened on sites despite recommendation of the Engineer.

At other section, there is no serious problem noted during the site inspections.

4.1.3 Package A3

April

The results of Air quality monitoring in April (table 4.3).

Table 4.3: Results of air quality in Package A3 in April, 2012.

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standard value

(mg/m3)

Km 48+500

CO 3,197 3,199 3,198 30 NOx 0,0164 0,0168 0,0166 0,2 TSP 0,181 0,183 0,182 0,30 SO2 0,072 0,070 0,071 0,35 PM10 0,148 0,150 0,149 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Vibration 0,053 0,051 0,052 0,055

Km 55+500

CO 3,466 3,464 3,465 30 NOx 0,0456 0,0454 0,0455 0,2 TSP 0,222 0,220 0,221 0,30 SO2 0,032 0,034 0,033 0,35 PM10 0,150 0,148 0,149 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Vibration 0,050 0,052 0,051 0,055

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

23

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standard value

(mg/m3)

Km 67+700

CO 3,616 3,614 3,615 30 NOx 0,0160 0,0162 0,0161 0,2 TSP 0,299 0,297 0,298 0,30 SO2 0,030 0,032 0,031 0,35 PM10 0,150 0,148 0,149 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Vibration 0,038 0,040 0,039 0,055

Km 78+900

CO 3,418 3,416 3,417 30 NOx 0,040 0,042 0,041 0,2 TSP 0,300 0,298 0,299 0,30 SO2 0,031 0,033 0,032 0,35 PM10 0,150 0,148 0,149 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Vibration 0,021 0,023 0,022 0,055

The analyzed results of the air environment show that: At the monitoring area, the other

analyzed results were within the allowed standard.

During April, when inspection in site we has found that all dump trucks were not covered. Soil

from trucks was fallen a lot on existing roads (Km51+100, Km62, Km67…). Therefore, dust

was distributed much in the air. The Consultant requested Contractor must collect all fallen soil

on existing roads, spread water regularly on both existing roads and access roads along

package A3 base on site minutes dated April 17th, 2012 at Km66+300 to Km66+300 and letter

ref. GET2-P0S-A3-1204 dated April 24th, 2012.

May

The result of Air quality monitoring in May as bellow:

Table 4.4: Results of air quality in Package A3 in May, 2012.

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standard value

(mg/m3)

Km 48+500

CO 3,245 3,247 3,246 30 NOx 0,0188 0,0186 0,0187 0,2 TSP 0,175 0,177 0,176 0,30 SO2 0,090 0,088 0,089 0,35 PM10 0,137 0,137 0,137 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Độ rung 0,051 0,051 0,051 0,055

Km 55+500

CO 3,550 3,552 3,551 30 NOx 0,0481 0,0483 0,0482 0,2 TSP 0,210 0,212 0,211 0,30 SO2 0,047 0,049 0,048 0,35

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

24

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standard value

(mg/m3) PM10 0,133 0,135 0,134 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Độ rung 0,053 0,053 0,053 0,055

Km 67+700

CO 3,632 3,634 3,633 30 NOx 0,0181 0,0183 0,0182 0,2 TSP 0,276 0,276 0,276 0,30 SO2 0,041 0,043 0,042 0,35 PM10 0,138 0,140 0,139 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Độ rung 0,040 0,042 0,041 0,055

Km78+900

CO 3,525 3,523 3,524 30 NOx 0,049 0,049 0,049 0,2 TSP 0,284 0,282 0,283 0,30 SO2 0,046 0,044 0,045 0,35 PM10 0,141 0,141 0,141 0,15 Phenol KPH KPH KPH 0,01 Độ rung 0,025 0,027 0,026 0,055

The analyzed results of the air environment show that: At the monitoring area, the other

analyzed results were within the allowed standard.

In May, after warning letter of Consultant from April, Contractor spread water for some existing

roads (Km68, Km75+400…). But when inspection in site we have found that on existing roads

(Km51+100, Km62, Km78+900…) dust was distributed much in the air so local people was

complain much about this problem.

Special after inspection tour of ADB mission on May 21st, 2012, the ADB’s specialist

interviewed some local people who lives next to construction site (Km78+900). These people

said that they can’t sleep because noise, vibration from construction activities during 24

hours/day. Beside, dust was full in the air on sunny and dry days, Contractor did not spread

water appropriately to minimize dust. Hence, ADB mission and Consultant requested

Contractor must build fence around construction site where next to residential area and limit

working time at night to minimize noise, vibration and avoid disturb local people’s life. On dry

days, Contractor must spread water appropriately to avoid dust.

The Consultant’s warning letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012 “Require to

overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

25

June

By observations during this month we still perceived that the dirt is being tracked onto public

roads where the construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also does not clean these

areas to keep them in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes high spread of

airborne dust in the hot windy days.

4.1.4 Package A4

April

The result of Air quality monitoring in April (table 4.5).

Table 4.5: Results of air quality in Package A4 in April, 2012.

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standard value(mg/m3) Exceeded Standard Value

(mg/m3)

QCVN 05:2009/ BTNMT

QCVN 06:2009/ BTNMT

TCVN 6962:2001

Km 91+150

CO 3,801 3,801 3,801 30 - - 0 NOx 0,0327 0,0327 0,0327 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,188 0,188 0,188 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,119 0,119 0,119 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,138 0,138 0,138 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration KPH KPH KPH - - 0,055 0

Km 95 + 100

CO 3,491 3,491 3,491 30 - - 0 NOx 0,049 0,049 0,049 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,144 0,144 0,144 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,041 0,041 0,041 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,062 0,062 0,062 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration KPH KPH KPH - - 0,055 0

Tan Thanh batching plant

CO 3,871 3,871 3,871 30 - - 0 NOx 0,043 0,043 0,043 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,275 0,275 0,275 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,071 0,071 0,071 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,130 0,130 0,130 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,041 0,041 0,041 - - 0,055 0

Km 88 + 300 to Km 88+500

CO 3,991 3,991 3,991 30 - - 0 NOx 0,0244 0,0244 0,0244 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,192 0,192 0,192 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,128 0,128 0,128 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,147 0,147 0,147 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,023 0,023 0,023 - - 0,055 0

Km 104 + 900 to Km 105 +

CO 3,855 3,855 3,855 30 - - 0 NOx 0,0531 0,0531 0,0531 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,193 0,193 0,193 0,30 - - 0

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

26

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standard value(mg/m3) Exceeded Standard Value

(mg/m3)

QCVN 05:2009/ BTNMT

QCVN 06:2009/ BTNMT

TCVN 6962:2001

350 SO2 0,133 0,133 0,133 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,142 0,142 0,142 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,018 0,018 0,018 - - 0,055 0

Km 106 + 500 to Km 107 + 600

CO 4,128 4,128 4,128 30 - - 0 NOx 0,198 0,198 0,198 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,155 0,155 0,155 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,135 0,135 0,135 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,148 0,148 0,148 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,015 0,015 0,015 - - 0,055 0

Km 106 + 227

CO 3,739 3,739 3,739 30 - - 0 NOx 0,037 0,037 0,037 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,126 0,126 0,126 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,029 0,029 0,029 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,099 0,099 0,099 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,024 0,024 0,024 - - 0,055 0

Ambient air monitoring results at the positions are in the Standard Value pursuant to QCVN

05:2009/BTNMT, QCVN 06:2009/BTNMT, QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT.

During April, we have detected that all dump trucks was not covered and it spread soil on

existing roads at Km88+200 box culvert, Km97+124, Km107+533, Km105-Km109… hence,

dust was distributed much on these roads. The Contractor was strongly requested to cover all

dump trucks, clean existing road and spread water appropriately and after April 25th, 2012 if

they still delay we will force to stop work in site. The Consultant’s letter ref. GET2-KEA-A4-630

dated April 24th, 2012.

May

The result of Air quality monitoring in May (table 4.6).

Table 4.6: Results of air quality in Package A4 in May, 2012.

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standardvalue(mg/m3) Exceeded Standard Value

(mg/m3)

QCVN 05:2009/ BTNMT

QCVN 06:2009/ BTNMT

TCVN 6962: 2001

Km 91+150

CO 3,601 3,603 3,602 30 - - 0 NOx 0,0410 0,0412 0,0411 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,193 0,191 0,192 0,30 - - 0

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

27

Station Monitoring Items

Max. value

(mg/m3)

Min. value

(mg/m3)

Average value

(mg/m3)

Standardvalue(mg/m3) Exceeded Standard Value

(mg/m3)

QCVN 05:2009/ BTNMT

QCVN 06:2009/ BTNMT

TCVN 6962: 2001

SO2 0,134 0,132 0,133 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,140 0,142 0,141 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration KPH KPH KPH - - 0,055 0

Km 95 + 100

CO 3,562 3,564 3,563 30 - - 0 NOx 0,057 0,059 0,058 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,173 0,171 0,172 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,050 0,048 0,049 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,080 0,082 0,081 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration KPH KPH KPH - - 0,055 0

Tan

Thanh batching

plant

CO 4,014 4,016 4,015 30 - - 0 NOx 0,055 0,053 0,054 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,255 0,257 0,256 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,081 0,083 0,082 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,119 0,119 0,119 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,041 0,039 0,040 - - 0,055 0

Km 88 + 300 to

Km 88+500

CO 4,114 4,116 4,115 30 - - 0 NOx 0,0288 0,0288 0,0288 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,185 0,183 0,184 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,140 0,140 0,140 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,140 0,142 0,141 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,029 0,027 0,028 - - 0,055 0

Km 104 + 900 to

Km 105 + 350

CO 3,942 3,942 3,942 30 - - 0 NOx 0,0589 0,0587 0,0588 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,186 0,184 0,185 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,148 0,146 0,147 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,137 0,139 0,138 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,016 0,014 0,015 - - 0,055 0

Km 106 +

500 to Km 107 +

600

CO 4,235 4,235 4,235 30 - - 0 NOx 0,206 0,204 0,205 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,142 0,144 0,143 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,148 0,148 0,148 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,141 0,139 0,140 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,019 0,020 0,018 - - 0,055 0

Km 106 + 227

CO 3,853 3,851 3,852 30 - - 0 NOx 0,051 0,049 0,050 0,2 - - 0 TSP 0,119 0,117 0,118 0,30 - - 0 SO2 0,036 0,036 0,036 0,35 - - 0 PM10 0,090 0,088 0,089 0,15 - - 0 Phenol KPH KPH KPH - 0,01 - 0 Vibration 0,021 0,021 0,021 - - 0,055 0

Ambient air monitoring results at the positions are in the Standard Value pursuant to QCVN

05:2009/BTNMT, QCVN 06:2009/BTNMT, QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

28

During May, we have detected that all dump trucks was not covered and it spread soil on

existing roads from section 1 to section 6. Hence, dust was distributed much in the air on dry

days. It gravely impacted to local people’s life. At some location (Km108+800), they set up

temporary barrier to stop all car or equipment go out or in construction site and requested

Contractor must spread water to minimize dust there. Consultant strongly requested

Contractor to cover all dump trucks, clean existing road and spread water appropriately but

they delay till May 12th 2012 they start spreading water for some existing roads at Km96-

Km97, Km106-Km107…

In inspection tour of ADB mission, they warned Contractor must water appropriately to

minimize dust and Contractor promise they will follow it. So Consultant will recheck carefully in

site on next month.

Consultant’s warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May 4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-

680 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

In june, we have detected that all dump trucks was not covered and it spreads soil on existing

roads from section 1 to section 6. Hence, dust was distributed much in the air on dry days. It

gravely impacted to local people’s life. At some location (Km108+800), they set up temporary

barrier to stop all car or equipment go out or in construction site and requested Contractor

must spread water to minimize dust there.

4.1.5 Package A5

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

environment control and protection of the Contractor did not have much improvement. The

Contractor still failed to fully implement the measures to minimize the impacts on environment

in the process of construction and transportation of raw materials, such as:

- Most of the Contractor's trucks were not covered with canvas in the process of

construction and transportation of raw materials.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

29

- The Contractor did not perform the watering to minimize dust generated on site as well

as on the materials transportation roads such as at Km111, Km112, Km123, Km145, ...

- At the factories of the Contractor such as the RC Pipe Culvert Factory No. 1 (Km117),

RC Pipe Culvert Factory No. 2 (Km132), concrete batching plant No. 1 (Km123),

concrete batching plant No. 2 (Km132), the Contractor did not apply any measures to

minimize dust during operation.

This has caused adverse impacts on the regional air quality. The Consultant has reminded the

Contractor on these outstanding issues (mentioned in Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-361

dated April 24, 2012). In addition, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to apply

adequate measures to minimize dust during construction and transportation of materials to

prevent adverse impacts on the regional air environment.

In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also frequently requested the Contractor to

fully comply with the Method Statement as well as the Environment control and protection plan

during construction to ensure the air quality.

This month, the Contractor carried out air quality observation on 15th April, 2012 in the

construction locations of the Contractor which are close to residential areas; the observation

results of air environment criteria are represented by the following table:

Table 4.7: Results of air quality in Package A5 in April, 2012.

No Station/sampling point Parameter (µg/m3) SO2 CO NOx TSP PM10

1

Bao Long church (Km 117+050) A1 122 1465 109 112 65 A2 132 1343 169 143 56 A3 143 1409 171 167 88

2

Hop Minh My bridge (Km 118+820) A4 252 2633 163 189 83 A5 234 2541 173 201 103 A6 212 2251 162 213 79

3

QL37 bridge (Km 121+433) A7 163 2441 143 148 63 A8 154 1248 141 164 72 A9 176 2321 146 204 62

Min 122 1248 109 112 56 Max 252 2633 173 213 103 Mean 176.4 1961.3 153.0 171.2 74.6 QCVN 05 :2009- Cột 1 350 30000 200 300 -

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

30

At the present, the construction at monitoring locations mostly is site clearance and leveling

but not complex activities. The results showed that all of the measured values are lower than

referred correspondents stipulated in QCVN 05:2009-column 1.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that there are still some

outstanding issues in the environment management of the Contractor during construction and

transportation of materials. This has affected the regional air environment, namely:

- The Contractor did not conduct water spraying to minimize dust generated during

construction and transportation of materials in some areas such as: Km111, Km117,

Km119, Km123, Km145, Km148...

- During the material transportation of the Contractor, most trucks were not covered with

canvas.

- The Contractor did not apply any measure to minimize dust generated in their factories,

such as the RC Pipe culvert factory No1 (Km117), RC Pipe culvert factory No 2

(Km132), concrete batching plant No 1 (Km123), concrete batching plant No 2

(Km132)...

To ensure the regional air environment, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these

outstanding issues (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-438 dated May 16, 2012 and GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 dated May 31, 2012). Besides, the Consultant has also required the

Contractor to quickly apply measures to resolve the outstanding issues. In addition, in the site

inspections, the Consultant has frequently required the Contractor to comply with the Method

Statement and the Environment Control and Protection Plan to prevent negative impact on the

region’s air environment during construction process.

This month, the Contractor carried out air quality observation on 10th May, 2012 in the

construction locations of the Contractor which are close to residential areas; the observation

results of air environment criteria are represented by the table 4.8.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

31

Table 4.8: Results of air quality in Package A5 in May, 2012.

No Station/sampling point Parameter (µg/m3) SO2 CO NOx TSP PM10

1

Bao Long church (Km 117+050) A1 113 1420 113 111 46 A2 142 1704 145 133 49 A3 129 1812 153 121 76

2

Hop Minh My bridge (Km 118+820) A4 267 2712 168 169 61 A5 241 2531 163 231 94 A6 225 2145 172 235 68

3

QL37 bridge (Km 121+433) A7 209 2342 163 135 68 A8 178 1453 153 154 73 A9 181 2413 152 183 57

Min 113 1420 113 111 113 Max 267 2712 172 235 267 Mean 187,2 2059,1 153,6 163,6 187,2 QCVN 05 :2009- Cột 1 350 30000 200 300 -

At the present, the construction at monitoring locations mostly is site clearance and leveling

but not complex activities. The results showed that all of the measured values are lower than

referred correspondents stipulated in QCVN 05:2009-column 1.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

environment control and protection of the Contractor in had not much improvement over the

previous month; there are still some outstanding issues unresolved, such as:

- Most of the Contractor's trucks were not equipped with canvases in the process of raw

materials transportation.

- The water spraying to minimize dust generated during construction and materials

transportation of the Contractor was not conducted on sites and on transportation roads

such as: Km111, Km113, Km117, Km130, Km145, Km148...

- Measures to minimize dust generated in the plants of the Contractor have not yet been

applied fully such as in the concrete batching plant No. 1 (Km123), concrete batching

plant No. 2 (Km132)...

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

32

- In the process of construction and materials transportation, soil dropped on the public

roads such as at Km123+680, Km126, Km145... this created dust when the vehicles

drove through this area, especially in hot days.

The Consultant has warned the Contractor on the outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-565 dated June 27, 2012. In addition, the Consultant has also required the

Contractor to quickly take steps to address them and ensure the regional air quality during the

construction process.

This month, the Contractor carried out air quality observation on 15th May, 2012 in the

construction locations of the Contractor which are close to residential areas; the observation

results of air environment criteria are represented in the table 4.9.

At the present, the construction at monitoring locations mostly is site clearance and leveling

but not complex activities. The results showed that all of the measured values are lower than

referred correspondents stipulated in QCVN 05:2009-column 1.

Table 4.9: Results of air quality in Package A5 in June, 2012.

No. Station/sampling point Parameter (µg/m3) SO2 CO NOx TSP PM10

1

Bao Long church (Km 117+050) A1 174 1310 132 112 39 A2 163 1504 151 141 51 A3 121 1632 134 125 67

2

Hop Minh My bridge (Km 118+820) A4 253 2513 155 157 56 A5 232 2350 157 204 76 A6 214 2033 162 224 56

3

QL37 bridge (Km 121+433) A7 212 2123 155 23 65 A8 167 1345 167 137 67 A9 168 2241 153 162 59

Min 121 1310 132 23 39 Max 253 2513 167 224 76 Mean 189.3 1894.6 151.8 142.8 59.6 QCVN 05 :2009- Cột 1 350 30000 200 300 -

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

33

4.1.6 Package A6

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

Contractor has continued to perform watering to minimize dust on the site at some locations

such as: Km157, Km184, Km186, Km187... Besides, in the month there were some rainy days,

so the amount of dust generated during construction process and transportation of raw

materials was reduced significantly.

However, in this month, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- Most of the Contractor's trucks were not carefully covered with canvas in the

transporting process of raw materials.

- At the construction locations Km151-Km152, Km174, many soil dropped on public

roads during transportation of rzaw materials of the Contractor; this has generated dust

in the hot days.

- At some stations such as Km174, Km176, Km165, Km183..., the watering work on the

public roads and on site has still not been carried out regularly. Therefore, on some hot

and windy days, the vehicles driving through these locations caused dust, which

affected the regional air quality.

- In the factories of the Contractor such as batching plant Km163, batching plant Km165,

batching plant Km180, measures for minimizing dust during production process were

not fully applied by the Contractor.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these outstanding issues (Ref. -DOOSAN-12-

A6-387 dated 19 April 2012). Besides, in the site inspections, the Consultant has also required

the Contractor to strictly comply with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and

Protection Plan which were approved by the Consultant to prevent negative impact on air

environment from the process of construction and materials transportation of the Contractor.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

34

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that

Contractor has still conducted water spraying to minimize dust at some construction locations

and transportation road of raw materials such as: Km157, Km158, Km165, Km184, Km185,

Km187... Besides, the amount of dust generated during construction and transportation of raw

materials has also been substantially reduced due to the number of rainy days in this month.

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The Contractor's trucks were not covered with canvas in the process of transporting

raw materials.

- Soil was dropped on the public roads during construction and transportation such as at

Km151, Km159, Km174, Km157... this is the cause of the situation of dust when

vehicles drove on these public roads, especially in hot and windy day.

- The process of construction and materials transportation of the Contractor are

responsible for the generation of dust in areas such as: Km151, Km156+300,

Km156+475, Km161... The Contractor has carried out water spraying in these areas to

minimize dust, but the work was not done regularly and the frequency of water spraying

was less, so the amount of dust was generated in the process of raw materials

transporting, especially on sunny days.

- The Contractor has not yet fully applied measures to minimize dust generated during

operation of the factories such as the concrete batching plant Km163, Km165 and

Km180.

To ensure environment of the Project, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these

outstanding issues. Also, the Consultant has required the Contractor to apply measures to

minimize dust during construction, transportation (Ref. DOOSAN GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-484

dated May 14, 2012) and during the operation of the Contractor’s batching plant (Ref. GET3-

DOOSAN-12-A6-452 dated May 3, 2012).

Besides, in the site inspections, the Consultant has required the Contractor to strictly comply

with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and Protection Plan approved by the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

35

Consultant to prevent the negative effects on the air environment from the construction

activities and materials transportation of the Contractor.

June

Rainy season has started in this month, so there were many rainy days in the month, which

significantly reduced the amount of dust generated during construction and transportation of

raw materials. Besides, water spraying to ensure dust minority has being deployed in some

areas such as: Km157, Km156, Km165, Km176, Km185, Km184, etc.

However, through our inspection and supervision on site, we found that there were still some

outstanding issues which influence the air quality in the area as follow:

- In areas of Km151, Km165, Km155, Km174, ... there was a lot of soil spillage on public

roads during transportation of materials; besides, on a rainy day, the land from the

Project area flooded the public roads in the area of Km159 +690 , Km157+090,

Km155+220, Km151+200, etc., which was the cause of the condition of dust from traffic

vehicles in the area, especially in hot and windy day.

- Currently, most of the Contractor's truck did not make full use of canvas in the process

of transporting raw materials.

- In some areas such as: Km176, Km174, Km187, etc., although the Contractor carried

out water injection in these areas, the frequency of water spraying was not enough; so

it still underlied the condition of dust when a number of vehicles ran through this area,

especially on hot days, which affected the air quality in the region.

- In areas of concrete batching such as Km163, Km165, Km180, etc. measures to

minimize dust during operation were not fully applied.

The Consultant reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues and we also required the

Contractor to implement measures to minimize dust generated during construction,

transportation of materials, in order to ensure air quality in the area (mentioned in Ref. GET3-

DOOSAN-12-A6-546 threads May 31, 2012 and GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-569 threads June 9,

2012).

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

36

4.1.7 Package A7

April

In April, the air quality affected by material vehicles which were not covered by tarps and

watering was not frequent in sensitive areas.

Most material vehicles from Khe Lech quarry to section 2 of package A7 were not covered by

tarps in during April.

In addition some other activate as excavation or embankment also affect to ambient air quality

but acceptable.

May

On During time of May, the air quality affected by material vehicles which wasn’t cover by tarps

and watering didn’t frequently at sensitive area.

Most material vehicles from Khe Lech quarry to section2 of package A7 didn’t cover by tarps in

during May.

In addition some other activate as excavation or embankment also affect to ambient air quality

but acceptable.

Result of the Contractor air quality monitoring (carried out by Institute of Environmental

technology in April 2012) showed that construction works not effected to ambient air quality.

Table 4.10: Results of air quality in Package A7 in May, 2012.

No

Sample

Monitoring parameters

TSP (µg/m3) CO (µg/m3) SO2 (µg/m3) NO2 (µg/m3)

1 KK01 32 930 63 27 2 KK02 39 1730 70 39 3 KK03 34 2251 77 41 4 KK04 34 2020 113 35 5 KK05 25 940 143 28 6 KK06 26 1110 67 29 7 KK07 30 1068 57 27 8 KK08 36 1827 117 32 9 KK09 25 930 83 28

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

37

No

Sample

Monitoring parameters

TSP (µg/m3) CO (µg/m3) SO2 (µg/m3) NO2 (µg/m3)

10 KK10 26 1116 67 30 11 KK11 37 1102 57 32 12 KK12 36 2520 60 35 13 KK13 52 1742 93 29 14 KK14 28 994 97 25 QCVN 05: 2009/BTNMT QCVN 06: 2009/BTNMT

300 30,000 350 -

Note:

KK01: Xuan Sang 1 Primary School, Xuan Sang 1 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van ban District

(coordinates N: 22007.895’; E:104023.844’)

KK02: Concrete mixing plant No.1, Ngam Thin Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban

District (coordinates N: 22009.615’; E:104020.459’)

KK03: Concrete mixing plant No.2, Dap Tran Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009.249’; E:104020.751’)

KK04: Bridge girder casting yard, Xuan Sang 2 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22007.442’; E:104024.026’)

KK05: Equipment gathering yard, worker’s living area, Khe U Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune,

Van Ban District (coordinates N: 22011.545’; E:104019.420’)

KK06: Cam Con Primary School, Khe Mai Hamlet, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22012.167’; E:104018.523’)

KK07: Cam Con Health Center, Tan Tien Commune, Bao Yen District (coordinates N:

22014.142’; E:104016.553’)

KK08: Drainage casting yard No.1, Khe Quat Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22008.585’; E:104022.537’)

KK09: Khe U Primary School, Khe U Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22011.604’; E:104019.474’)

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

38

KK10: Residential areas at the right side of project road, Ban Ly Hamlet, Cam Con Commune,

Bao Yen District (coordinates N: 22012.217’; E:104018.563’)

KK11: Tan Thuong Secondary School, Khe Tep Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban

District (coordinates N: 22011.021’; E:104020.370’)

KK12: Drainage casting yard No.2, Bong 1 Hamlet, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22013.532’; E:104016.995’)

KK13: Cam Con Secondary School, Hamlet 2, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22014.380’; E:104016.388’)

KK14: Tan An Kinder Garden, Tan Duong Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009.511’; E:104021.960’)

The results of air quality environmental monitoring in the above table are compared with the

limit values in the standards; it shows that most of the observation results are lower than the

prescribed limit values and ranges:

+ Dust concentration: Between 25 to 52 µg/m3,

+ CO concentration: Between 930 to 2520 µg/m3,

+ SO2 concentrations: Between 57 to 143 µg/m3,

+ NO2 concentration: Between 27 to 41 µg/m3,

June

During on June 2012 the contractor construction works the base and subbase layers at

section1; section2 and section3 with watering car according to project regulation in order to

mitigate the concentration of dust avoid effect to local people. Hence during the transfer

material (base and subbase) the contactor haven’t consequence watering along the exits

road, these are effects to local people, especial at section 3 Km207-Km218+040 date 28-June

2012.

So consultant required the contractor to consequences watering in order to mitigate

concentration of dust avoid effect to local people.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

39

4.1.8 Package A8

April

In April 2012, the contractor concentrated construction works the sub-base at Km238-

Km239+300 and foundation road belong package A8 combination with dry season created

dust on site, which can affect to ambient air quality. Hence consultant required the contractor

to support the watering car to decrease dust concentration and not effect to ambient air quality.

The contractors are reminded in letters No Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 534.

May

On 16- May 2012 the contractor concentrated construction works the sub-base at Km238-

Km239+300 and foundation road belong package A8 combination with dry season created

dust on site, which can effect to ambient air quality. Hence consultant required the contractor

to support the watering car to decrease dust concentration and not effect to ambient air quality.

June

During on June 2012 the contractor construction works the base and subbase layers at

Km238-Km239+300 with watering car according to project regulation in order to mitigate the

concentration of dust avoid effect to local people. Hence during the transfer material (base and

subbase) the contactor haven’t consequence watering along the exits road, these are effects

to local people, especial at Km218+040- Km225+000.

So consultant required the contractor to consequences watering in order to mitigate

concentration of dust avoid effect to local people.

4.2 IMPACT ON WATER RESOURCES

4.2.1 Package A1

April

There is no improvement in last month at Tan Loi Bridge; however, the Contractor also does

not worsen the situation. The PSC still closes the procedures of payment of progress of all

items of this work until the Contractor corrects defects.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

40

The similar status was also recorded at Underpass NH2, the direct discharge of untreated

wastewater containing sand and mud into existing irrigation canal is still going on. The PSC

has strongly warned the Contractor and if he still fails to meet our requirements we will

consider applying the measure of money deduction. The next site inspection will be held on

May 03, 2012 to check the implementation of the Contractor.

At other sections, we did not see the serious problem happening during the site inspections.

May

In the site inspections this month, we still found that at Tan Loi Bridge the Contractor has not

taken any action to improve the status here. Due to the heavy rains, Piers 2 and 3 construction

site is now under the water.

At Underpass NH2 the Contractor constructed a sediment basin to catch sediment from

wastewater before discharge of it offsite. However, the capacity of this device is not enough

and the PSC has requested the Contractor to construct one more to ensure that the sediment

is not spilled-over existing drainage. And this time is in harvest and straw is available, so traw

bales were recommended as a sediment check dam to be installed at outlet of untreated

wastewater discharge area to remove sediment from wastewater.

At other sections, we did not see the serious problem happening during the site inspections.

June

In the site inspections this month, we still found that at Tan Loi Bridge the Contractor has not

taken any action to improve the status here. Due to the heavy rains, Piers 2 and 3 construction

site is now under the water.

At Underpass NH2 the Contractor constructed a sediment basin to catch sediment from

wastewater before discharge of it offsite. However, the capacity of this device is not enough

and the PSC has requested the Contractor to construct one more to ensure that the sediment

is not spilled-over existing drainage. And this time is in harvest and straw is available, so traw

bales were recommended as a sediment check dam to be installed at outlet of untreated

watewater discharge area to remove sediment from wastewater.

At other sections, we didn’t see the serious problem happening during the site inspections.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

41

4.2.2 Package A2

April

In the site inspections we found that there is no improvement at Ben Tre Bridge; however, the

Contractor also does not let the problem worse. The procedures of payment progress

suspension of all items of this work is still going on until the Contractor corrects the defects

completely.

At Muong Dao and Ban Gao Bridge, we perceived that the Contractor still didn’t take any

action to correct the issues and he even discharged the untreated wastewater that contains

sand and mud directly into river at Ben Gao Bridge. The PSC has many times requested the

Contractor to solve these problems as well as instructed him how to treat wastewater before

discharge of it but there was no improvement recorded. For Ben Gao Bridge, we have already

recommended the Employer to deduct money due to the Contractor didn’t solve the problems

and let them worsened. We also still close the procedures of payment progress of all items of

these works until the Contractor implements our requirements.

On Mar 28, we found that the Contractor had discharged the bentonite slurry into river at Pier 7

of Lo River Bridge. The PSC has strongly warned the Contractor and requested him to stop

this activity. However, in the site inspection on April 11, we again found that he already

disposed all the bentonite slurry, sand and mud – by product due to bentonite slurry recycle

into river at the place as before. The PSC has requested the Contractor to remove all the

unsuitable material that remains on riverside concomitant with persons in charge discipline.

At Batch Plant 2 of Lo River Bridge, the improvement is very behindhand. The settling pond is

very unsettled and it seems to be broken easily in heavy rain. There is also no drainage on

surface to handle the surfaced runoff so the surfaced wastewater could flow directly into river

in the rain.

At other places, we didn’t detect any serious problem happening during the site inspections

this month.

May

In the site inspections we found that there is no improvement at Ben Tre Bridge; however, the

Contractor also does not let the problem worse. The procedures of payment progress

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

42

suspension of all items of this work is still going on until the Contractor corrects the defects

completely.

At Muong Dao and Ban Gao Bridge, we perceived that the Contractor still did not take any

action to correct the issues and he even discharged the untreated wastewater that contains

sand and mud directly into river at Ben Gao Bridge. The PSC has many times requested the

Contractor to solve these problems as well as instructed him how to treat wastewater before

discharge of it but there was no improvement recorded. For Ben Gao Bridge, we have already

recommended the Employer to deduct money due to the Contractor didn’t solve the problems

and let them worsened. We also still close the procedures of payment progress of all items of

these works until the Contractor implements our requirements.

On Mar 28, we found that the Contractor had discharged the bentonite slurry into river at Pier 7

of Lo River Bridge. The PSC has strongly warned the Contractor and requested him to stop

this activity. However, in the site inspection on April 11, we again found that he already

disposed all the bentonite slurry, sand and mud – by product due to bentonite slurry recycle

into river at the place as before. The PSC has requested the Contractor to remove all the

unsuitable material that remains on riverside concomitant with persons in charge discipline.

At Batch Plant 2 of Lo River Bridge, the improvement is very behindhand. The settling pond is

very unsettled and it seems to be broken easily in heavy rain. There is also no drainage on

surface to handle the surfaced runoff so the surfaced wastewater could flow directly into river

in the rain.

At other places, we didn’t detect any serious problem happening during the site inspections

this month.

June

During the site inspections, we found that there is no improvement at Ben Tre Bridge, Muong

Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge despite the requirements of the Engineer. The surfaced clear

water here is still being impacted due to the Contractor has not removed the soil from

riverbeds.

At CBP B – Km 28+500, it’s noted that cement-laden wastewater spilled-over the drainage.

The PSC has requested the Contractor to solve this by removing the sediment in settling pond

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

43

to ensure its capacity. On May 22, we found that the Contractor has implemented our

requirement.

On May 21, in the site inspection we found that the settling ponds of CBPs 1 and 2 of Lo River

Bridge were full already. To prevent leaking of untreated cement-laden wastewater into

adjacent water resources the PSC has requested the Contractor to immediately remove the

sediment in settling ponds to ensure their capacity or install new ones to replace. We will

recheck these area in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

At other places, we didn’t detect any serious problem happening during the site inspections

this month.

4.2.3 Package A3

April

The result of Water quality monitoring in April is described in table 4.11.

The results of analysis of environmental quality of surface water showed that the monitoring

items are within permitted limits under by regulation Vietnam QCVN 08:2008/ BTNMT, column

B1.

Table 4.11: Results of water quality in Package A3 in April, 2012.

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. value (mg/l)

Average Value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT

Column B1

Km 67+000

pH 6,91 6,91 6,91 5,5 – 9 TSS 49 49 49 50 Fecal Coli form 37 37 37 100 Total Coli form 7.300 7.300 7.300 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 14 14 14 15 COD 29 29 29 30 Total Nitrogen 1,80 1,80 1,80 - Total Phosphor 0,99 0,99 0,99 -

Km 78+000

pH 6,94 6,94 6,94 5,5 – 9 TSS 49 49 49 50 Fecal Coli form 42 42 42 100 Total Coli form 7.400 7.400 7.400 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 14 14 14 15 COD 29 29 29 30 Total Nitrogen 1,93 1,93 1,93 -

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

44

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. value (mg/l)

Average Value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT

Column B1 Total Phosphor 1,50 1,50 1,50 -

At P3 Red river bridge, the Contractor set up a big hole to collect all waste water contain

cement from batching plant here.

In inspection tour on April 12th, 2012, we has detected that the existing irrigation canal was

blocked by soil and rubbish which was fallen from construction activities at Km51. the

Contractor was strongly requested to unblock all irrigation canals which was blocked by

construction activities. The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-P0S-A3-1204 dated April 24th,

2012.

May

The result of Water quality monitoring in May is showed in table 4.12.

The results of analysis of environmental quality of surface water showed that the monitoring

items are within permitted limits under by regulation Vietnam QCVN 08:2008/ BTNMT, column

B1.

Table 4.12: Results of water quality in Package A3 in May, 2012.

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. Value (mg/l)

Average Value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT

Column B1

Km 67+000

pH 6,85 6,85 6,85 5,5 – 9

TSS 50 48 49 50 Fecal Coli 38 40 39 100 Tổng Coliform 7.260 7.240 7.250 7.500 Dầu mỡ KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 11 13 12 15 COD 24 26 25 30 Tổng Nitơ 1,80 1,80 1,80 - Tổng P 1,42 1,40 1,41 -

Km 78+000

pH 6,83 6,83 6,83 5,5 – 9 TSS 48 50 49 50 Fecal Coli 36 34 35 100 Tổng coliform 7.090 7.110 7.100 7.500 Dầu mỡ KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 10 12 11 15 COD 24 24 24 30

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

45

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. Value (mg/l)

Average Value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT

Column B1 Tổng Nitơ 1,64 1,62 1,63 - Tổng P 0,89 0,87 0,88 -

At P3 Red river bridge, the Contractor set up a big hole to collect all waste water contain

cement from batching plant here. But it’s too small compare with waste water volume, and it

had no canal to lead waste water from batching plant to sediment control hole. So we

requested Contractor must extend this hole to satisfy waste water volume of this plant. This

action will ensure that waste water contain cement not overflow into Red river.

At P7 Red river bridge, Contractor did not dig sediment control hole to collect waste water from

batching plant although Consultant requested many times.

In inspection tour of ADB mission, they requested Contractor must set up sediment control

hole on each Cement batching plant. Deadline is June 8th, 2012, if Contractor still delay

Consultant will force to stop work at these Cement batching plant.

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012 “Require to

overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3.

June

This month, rainfall should reduce. Consequently, the amount of suspended matter reduces

than the rainy season and is within permissible limits. However, the contractor should ensure

the safe method statement so it does not affect the water environment.

4.2.4 Package A4

April

The result of Water quality monitoring in April is showed in table 4.13.

Table 4.13: Results of water quality in Package A4 in April, 2012.

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. value (mg/l)

Average value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT Colume B1

Km 88+700

pH 6,74 6,74 6,74 5,5- 9 TSS 48 48 48 50

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

46

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. value (mg/l)

Average value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT Colume B1

Fecal Coliform 49 49 49 100 Total Coliform 6.900 6.900 6.900 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 14 14 14 15 COD 29 29 29 30 Total Nitrogen 1,27 1,27 1,27 - Total phosphorus 0,68 0,68 0,68 -

Km 97+500

pH 6,83 6,83 6,83 5,5- 9 TSS 45 45 45 50 Fecal Coliform 41 41 41 100 Total Coliform 6.900 6.900 6.900 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 14 14 14 15 COD 29 29 29 30 Total Nitrogen 1,30 1,30 1,30 - Total Phosphorus 0,81 0,81 0,81 -

Km 101+000 to Km 101 + 900

pH 6,81 6,81 6,81 5,5- 9 TSS 32 32 32 50 Fecal Coliform 30 30 30 100 Total Coliform 6.100 6.100 6.100 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 13 13 13 15 COD 28 28 28 30 Total Nitrogen 1,28 1,28 1,28 - Total Phosphorus 0,78 0,78 0,78 -

Km 109 + 000

pH 6,79 6,79 6,79 5,5- 9 TSS 42 42 42 50 Fecal Coliform 27 27 27 100 Total Coliform 6.600 6.600 6.600 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 13 13 13 15 COD 28 28 28 30 Total Nitrogen 1,21 1,21 1,21 - Total Phosphorus 0,89 0,89 0,89 -

Km 108 + 227

pH 6,91 6,91 6,91 5,5- 9 TSS 46 46 46 50 Fecal Coliform 34 34 34 100 Total Coliform 6.800 6.800 6.800 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 14 14 14 15 COD 29 29 29 30 Total Nitrogen 1,27 1,27 1,27 - Total Phosphorus 0,97 0,97 0,97 -

The analysis results of surface water quality shown that: All parameters are still under the

allow limits according to Vietnamese regulation QCVN 08:2008/ BTNMT, column B1.

Bentonite was poured directly into Ngoi Gianh river. Beside, pebble and soil which was

washout from access road filled more than haft of this river bed. It impacted to water quality of

this river.

In addition, at Ngoi Lao and Ngoi Van river, pebble and soil which was washout from

construction activities. Although Contractor have some solution in Ngoi Lao to avoid bentonite

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

47

overflow into river as: set up a small hole to collect waste bentonite but it was not efficient.

Now they finish drilling bore pile in this riverside but waste bentonite was not resolved

absolutely. It occupied a part of river bed. And the other riverside of Ngoi Lao, soil and stone

was fallen much into this river. The Consultant warned Contractor must resolve this problem

absolutely. If not we will force to stop work here in next month.

May

The result of Water quality monitoring in May is showed in table 4.14.

Table 4.14: Results of water quality in Package A4 in May, 2012.

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. value (mg/l)

Average value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT Colume B1

Km

88+700

pH 6,80 6,80 6,80 5,5- 9 TSS 51 49 50 50 Fecal Coliform 44 46 45 100 Total Coliform 6.750 6.750 6.750 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 12 12 12 15 COD 26 24 25 30 Total Nitrogen 1,10 1,12 1,11 - Total phosphorus 0,55 0,53 0,54 -

Km 97+500

pH 6,75 6,75 6,75 5,5- 9 TSS 49 47 48 50 Fecal Coliform 36 38 37 100 Total Coliform 6.710 6.730 6.720 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 12 14 13 15 COD 26 24 25 30 Total Nitrogen 1,19 1,17 1,18 - Total Phosphorus 0,76 0,74 0,75 -

Km 101+000

to Km 101 + 900

pH 6,89 6,89 6,89 5,5- 9 TSS 40 42 41 50 Fecal Coliform 27 29 28 100 Total Coliform 5.940 5.940 5.940 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 10 12 11 15 COD 25 25 25 30 Total Nitrogen 1,16 1,14 1,15 - Total Phosphorus 0,71 0,71 0,71 -

Km 109 + 000

pH 6,82 6,82 6,82 5,5- 9 TSS 47 47 47 50 Fecal Coliform 25 23 24 100 Total Coliform 6.470 6.490 6.480 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 10 12 11 15 COD 22 24 23 30 Total Nitrogen 1,18 1,18 1,18 - Total Phosphorus 0,78 0,76 0,77 -

Km

108 +

pH 6,86 6,86 6,86 5,5- 9 TSS 50 48 49 50 Fecal Coliform 31 29 30 100

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

48

Order Monitoring Items

Max. value (mg/l)

Min. value (mg/l)

Average value (mg/l)

QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT Colume B1

227 Total Coliform 6.660 6.680 6.670 7.500 Petroleum KPH KPH KPH 0,1 BOD 13 13 13 15 COD 26 26 26 30 Total Nitrogen 1,21 1,23 1,22 - Total Phosphorus 0,90 0,88 0,89 -

The analysis results of surface water quality shown that: All parameters are still under the

allow limits according to Vietnamese regulation QCVN 08:2008/ BTNMT, column B1.

During inspection tour of ADB mission, Consultant showed them many serious impacts on

water quality in package A4 which were not resolved by Contractor in long time as:

- Bentonite was poured directly into Ngoi Gianh river. Beside, pebble and soil which was

washout from access road filled more than haft of this river bed. It impacted to water

quality of this river.

- In addition, at Ngoi Lao and Ngoi Van river, pebble and soil which was washout from

construction activities. Although Contractor have some solution in Ngoi Lao to avoid

bentonite overflow into river as: set up a small hole to collect waste bentonite but it was

not efficient. Now they finish drilling bore pile in this riverside but waste bentonite was

not resolved absolutely. It occupied a part of river bed. And the other riverside of Ngoi

Lao, soil and stone was fallen much into this river.

ADB mission requested Contractor must dredge all waste mud or bentonite which was

occupying a part of riverbeds immediately they finish construction works (drilling bore pile,

concrete foundation of pier…). Contractor promised they will resolve it before June 15th, 2012.

Therefore, Consultant we will closely recheck in site on next month.

Consultant’s warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May 4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-

680 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

This month, rainfall should reduce. Consequently, the amount of suspended matter reduces

than the rainy season and is within permissible limits. However, the contractor should ensure

the safe method statement so it does not affect the water environment.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

49

4.2.5 Package A5

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that there are

some outstanding issues as follows:

- The bentonite was not strictly controlled by the Contractor at some construction

locations such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge... This has led to

the situation of bentonite running down to the stream areas.

- The fuel control of the Contractor has not been done well at the fuel stations such as

Km136, Km112, Km145... The Consultant has found traces of oil leaked on the ground.

- At most of the workers’ camps of the Contractor, appropriate wastewater treatment

systems have not been built such as at Km120, Km136... The wastewater from the

workers’ camps was discharged directly into the environment.

This situation has affected the region's water quality. The Consultant has reminded the

Contractor on these outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-361 dated April 24,

2012. Beside, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to apply measures to address

thoroughly these outstanding issues to ensure the region's water quality and prevent negative

impacts on the Project’s environment.

This month, the Contractor carried out observation of water quality in some areas; the

observation results are shown in the table 4.15.

Table 4.15: Results of water quality in Package A5 in April, 2012.

No Parameter pH DO TSS COD BOD5 (20oC) Surf. Oil and

Grease Fecal

Coliform Total

Coliform

Unit - mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l MPN/100ml MPN/100ml

1 W1 6,8 6,7 24 8,1 6 < 0,1 < 0,1 44 1200 2 W2 6,9 6,6 25 7,6 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 65 900 3 W3 6,8 6,5 25 7,8 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 45 830 4 W4 7,2 6,6 24 8,2 6 < 0,1 < 0,1 32 670 5 W5 7,1 6,5 23 7,5 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 46 770 6 W6 6,9 6,5 21 6,8 4 < 0,1 < 0,1 67 820 7 W7 6,9 6,9 25 7,2 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 52 830 8 W8 6,7 6,6 24 8,6 6 < 0,1 < 0,1 53 740 9 W9 7,1 5,5 21 21,9 14 0,20 0,13 460 5600 10 W10 6,8 5,7 21 26,8 16 0,27 0,13 650 6400

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

50

No Parameter pH DO TSS COD BOD5 (20oC) Surf. Oil and

Grease Fecal

Coliform Total

Coliform 11 W11 6,7 5,7 25 23,4 13 0,16 0,11 510 5500 12 W12 6,8 5,9 22 25,2 16 0,21 0,11 630 5600

QCVN08:08 5,5-

9 ≥ 4 50 30 15 0,4 0,1 - 7500

The data showed that the values of pollution parameters are below the limitation value in

QCVN 08:2008.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

Environment control and protection of the Contractor has not much been improved over the

previous month. The Contractor has not fully complied with the requirements of the Consultant

and of the Project, which has led to a number of outstanding issues as follows:

- The fuel control of the Contractor has not been implemented well at the fuel stations in

areas such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge... In the site

inspections, the Consultant found traces of oil leaked on the ground.

- The contractor did not comply with the requiremennts and the instructions of the

Consultant about the bentonite control in the construction process at the construction

locations such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Van Phu bridge... which has led

to bentonite running down to the stream areas.

- Suitable waste water treatment systems were not built by the Contractor in the workers’

camps such as Km136, Km145, Km120... As the result, the waste water from the

camps area was discharged directly into the environment.

- The Contractor has not built waste water treatment system at some factories such as

RC Pipe Culvert Factory No. 1, RC Pipe Culvert Factory No. 2, RC Pipe Culvert Factory

No. 3...

- At station Km123+740, the Contractor poured soil into the lake Y Kan, which has

affected the water quality of the lake.

These issues have affected the region's water quality. The Consultant has asked the

Contractor to quickly resolve these outstanding issues, ensuring the water quality of the area

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

51

(Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-387 dated 03 May 2012, GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-439 dated

16 May 2012, GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-437 dated 16 May 2012 and GET3-KEANGNAM-12-

A5-490 dated 31 May 2012).

This month, the Contractor carried out observation of water quality in some areas; the

observation results are shown in the table 4.16:

Table 4.16: Results of water quality in Package A5 in May, 2012.

No Parameter pH DO TSS COD BOD5

(20oC) Surf. Oil and Grease

Fecal Coliform

Total Coliform

Unit - mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l MPN/100ml MPN/100ml

1 W1 7,1 6,3 19 7,2 6 < 0,1 < 0,1 37 1300 2 W2 7,2 6,4 22 7,4 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 56 730 3 W3 7,1 6,4 20 7,2 4 < 0,1 < 0,1 41 630 4 W4 7,2 6,2 18 7,4 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 26 650 5 W5 7,1 6,4 23 7,1 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 35 720 6 W6 6,9 6,7 19 6,4 4 < 0,1 < 0,1 53 780 7 W7 6,9 6,5 24 7,3 4 < 0,1 < 0,1 46 730 8 W8 6,8 6,4 22 8,3 6 < 0,1 < 0,1 49 750 9 W9 7,1 5,2 20 18,9 13 0,17 0,08 430 5500

10 W10 7,1 5,4 22 17,3 13 0,16 0,05 540 6200 11 W11 6,9 5,5 28 19,4 14 0,16 0,09 520 5100 12 W12 6,9 5,7 24 23,2 13 0,17 0,12 610 5200

QCVN08:08 5,5-9 ≥ 4 50 30 15 0,4 0,1 - 7500

The data showed that the values of pollution parameters are below the limitation value in

QCVN 08:2008.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

Contractor did not fulfill the requirements of the Consultant and the Project; some outstanding

issues remained unresolved such as:

- Bentonite was not controlled tightly in the construction process of Van Phu bridge, Ngoi

Gua bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge... Bentonite has flooded down the streams in the area of

Van Phu bridge.

- The fuel management of the Contractor had no improvement; at the fuel stations of the

Contractor such as Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Gua

bridge... the Consultant still found the fuel tanks located directly on the ground without

any devices to prevent fuel leaks.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

52

- In Y Can Lake area, Km123+740, the Contractor poured soil into the lake. However, so

far, the Contractor have not yet collected and moved soil to the disposal area.

- At stations Km136, Km145, Km120... suitable wastewater treatment systems were not

built by the Contractor in the workers’ camps, and all wastewater from the camps was

discharged directly into the environment.

- In the RC pipe culvert factory No. 1, RC pipe culvert factory No. 2, RC pipe culvert

factory No. 3... the Contractor has still not built waste water treatment system.

To ensure the region's environment, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the

outstanding issues. Beside, the Consultant has also strongly requested the Contractor to

quickly adapt appropriate measures to solve the problems to ensure the region's water quality

during construction process.

This month, the Contractor carried out observation of water quality in some areas; the

observation results are shown in the table 4.17.

Table 4.17: Results of water quality in Package A5 in June, 2012.

No Parameter pH DO TSS COD BOD5

(20oC) Surf. Oil and Grease

Fecal Coliform

Total Coliform

Unit - mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l MPN/100ml MPN/100ml

1 W1 7,2 6,5 24 7 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 40 1400 2 W2 7,1 6,3 28 7 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 53 710 3 W3 6,9 6,3 26 7 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 40 610 4 W4 6,8 6,5 26 7 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 29 620 5 W5 7,1 6,3 23 6 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 33 710 6 W6 6,8 6,1 19 7 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 51 730 7 W7 6,9 6,5 26 6 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 43 750 8 W8 6,8 6,1 23 6 < 5 < 0,1 < 0,1 46 720 9 W9 6,8 5,6 25 20 14 0,13 0,09 410 5700

10 W10 7,2 5,3 26 18 12 0,14 0,03 510 6100 11 W11 6,9 5,3 24 19 12 0,14 0,05 520 5200 12 W12 7,1 5,5 22 23 15 0,16 0,09 570 5600

QCVN08:08 5,5-9

≥ 4 50 30 15 0,4 0,1 - 7500

The data showed that the values of pollution parameters are below the limitation value in

QCVN 08:2008.

Note: Locations are the following:

W1: Ngoi Thia river (Km145+500) – The bridge pier

W2: Ngoi Thia river (Km145+500) – 50m from the bridge pier (toward upstream)

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

53

W3: Ngoi Thia river (Km145+500 – 200 m from the bridge pier (toward downstream)

W4: Ngoi Thia river (Km145+500 – 400 m from the bridge pier (toward downstream)

W5: Y Can lake (Km126+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 1

W6: Y Can lake (Km126+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 2

W7: Y Can lake (Km126+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 3

W8: Y Can lake (Km126+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 4

W9: Nuoc Mat lake (Km122+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 1

W10: Nuoc Mat lake (Km122+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 2

W11: Nuoc Mat lake (Km122+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 3

W12: Nuoc Mat lake (Km122+000) – Surface water sample at position No. 4

4.2.6 Package A6

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor have not created serious impacts on the regional water

quality. Most of the Contractor's construction works did not produce hazardous substances to

the aquatic environment.

However, in this month, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The fuel management of the Contractor has not much been improved this month, such

as at Km186, Km173, Km155... there were still many oil barrels located directly on the

ground, and they did not have any equipment to prevent oil leakage, which could lead

to oil leakage. Then, when there was rain, the rain brought oil to the region's water

source, affecting the water quality.

- The factories of the Contractor such as batching plant Km165, batching plant Km163,

batching plant Km180, batching plant Km1184. The waste water treatment systems of

the plants were still not under construction.

- At the workers camps of the Contractor, proper waste water treatment systems were

not built; therefore, the waste water from the camps area was discharged directly into

the surrounding environment.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

54

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor about these outstanding issues (mentioned in

Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-387 dated 19 April, 2012, GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-435 dated 27

April, 2012). In addition, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to quickly apply

appropriate measures to address them thoroughly to ensure the region's water quality.

In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also frequently reminded the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement as well as the Environmental Control and Protection Plan of

the Project to prevent adverse impacts on the regional nature water from the construction

activities of Contractor.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

region's water quality has not been seriously affected by the construction activities of the

Contractor. Most of them were conducted within the project’s limit and have not made serious

impacts to the water quality. In addition, the Contractor also has built the trap basins in the

batching plant to deposit solids before discharging water from the plant area into the

surrounding environment. However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- In the south portal of tunnel areas, the Contractor has still not built waste waster

treatment system as in the requirements in the Method Statement, and the lack of

attention in the use of temporary waste water treatment system. This has led to the

situation of waste water from the tunnel construction area which was not thoroughly

treated before discharged into the surrounding environment. The Consultant has

warned the Contractor about this in Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-457 dated May 4,

2012.

- The fuel management of the Contractor has not yet been done well at some fuel

stations such as: Km186+200, Km155+300... in these areas, the Consultant has found

that the fuel tanks were placed directly on the ground and they did not have any

equipment to prevent fuel leakage. The Consultant has provided specific instruction for

this issue in Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-300.

- A number of workers’ camps of the Contractor such as Km184+057, Km182+160,

Km167+879, Km163+126... the Contractor has not built waste water treatment system

suitable for the workers’ camps, so the waste water from the camps area was

discharged directly into the surrounding environment. The Consultant has requested

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

55

the Contractor to resolve the outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-491

May 15, 2012.

Also, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has frequently reminded the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and Protection Plan of the

Project to prevent negative effects on the region's water quality from the contractor’s

construction activities.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor have not caused serious impacts to soil quality in the

region. During this period, the major construction activities of the Contractor remains

earthworks (excavation, embankment...) and built the piers of the bridge, etc., so there has

been no generated substances that cause serious impacts to water quality.

In addition, in concrete batching areas such as Km180, Km165, Km184,etc, the Contractor has

also built trap basins to recover waste water, as deposition of solids in the water before

discharge into surrounding environment.

However, through our supervision and inspection on site, we found that there were still some

outstanding issues as follows:

- The Contractor has started the tunnel construction work since a long time, but waste

water treatment system mentioned in the Application methods has not been under

construction yet.

- The fuel management of the Contractor has improved, however, there were still fuel

tanks placed directly on the ground as in Km186 +200, +300 Km155, Km178 +200, etc.

- Waste water treatment system at workers’ camps in the area of Km184+057,

Km182+160, Km163+126, etc., has not been built properly, waste water from the camp

area has been discharged directly into the environment.

To ensure the Project's environment, the Consultant reminded the Contractor on these

outstanding issues, at the same time, we also required the Contractor to apply measures to

resolve the outstanding issues in order to ensure environment quality of the Project in general

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

56

and the water quality in particular (mentioned in Ref. GET3- DOOSAN -12-A6-546 and GET3-

DOOSAN -12-A6-633).

4.2.7 Package A7

April

In April, the contractor had submitted the documents related to unsuitable material waste

disposal at Km191+300, Km194+486, Km194+800 and planting grass to prevent the erosion

and landside into Red river. However, the contractor dumping the earth at Km209+800 and

Km201+815, which serious violated the provision contacts and can effect to water quality. The

consultant has required the contractor to stop dumping and plant grass to protect the erosion

and landside into water source.

May

On 29-May 2012 the contractor had planted grass to prevent the erosion and landside into Red

river. However the contractor is dumping the earth at Km201+815 and Km204+581, which

serious violated the provision contacts and can effect to water quality. The consultant has

required the contractor to stop dumping and plan grass to protect the erosion and landside into

water source.

Other at moment the concrete batching plant Km209+329, Km194+765, Km198+400 haven’t

sediment control pond to collect and treatment waste water, now waste water from mixer

trucks and water washing the concrete batching plan discharged directly into ground and into

water source. Consultant required the contractor to provide the sediment control pond for each

concrete batching plan before 5-June 2012

Monitoring result of the Contractor about water surface quality of stream around construction

work (carried out by Institute of Environmental technology in April 2012) showed that

construction works not effected to water surface quality of stream.

The analyzed results of surface water samples were compared with QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT.

The National Technical Regulations on surface water quality are as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

57

Table 4.18: Results of water quality in Package A7 in May, 2012.

No Parameters Unit NM-1A NM-1B NM-2A NM-2B NM-3A NM-3B QCVN 08:2008/

BTNMT(A2)

1 pH - 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.0 7.2 7.0 6-8.5

2 Temperature oC 25 24.5 19 19.5 21 21 -

3 DO mg/l 6.8 6.9 6.7 6.5 6.4 6.6

≥5

4 TSS mg/l 0.10 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.16 30

5 COD mg O2/l 21 22 15 14.5 23 22 15

6 BOD5 mg/l 14.2 13.9 21 21.7 25.5 24.6 6

7 Coliform MPN/100ml

38 35 96 89 43 51 5000

8 Grease & oil mg/l 0.13 0.134 0.110 0.114 0.121 0.123 0.02

9 NO3- mg/l 0.325 0.341 0.436 0.423 0.512 0.493 5

10 NH4+

- N mg/l 0.012 0.011 0.031 0.029 0.045 0.043 0.2

11 SO42- mg/l 6.370 4.230 7.250 3.580 2.360 2.520 -

12 PO43- mg/l 0.015 0.010 0.032 0.040 0.006 0.007 0.2

13 Total N mg/l 0.735 0.743 0.893 0.887 0.912 0.889 -

14 Total P mg/l 0.020 0.015 0.037 0.040 0.008 0.009 -

15 Fe mg/l 1.300 1.250 0.650 0.700 0.800 0.750 1.0

16 Cd mg/l <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 0.005

17 As mg/l 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.003 0.002 0.02

18 Mn mg/l 0.100 0.096 0,088 0.09 0.122 0.124 -

19 Pb mg/l 0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.02

20 Zn mg/l 0.023 0.024 0.011 0.013 0.045 0.046 1.0

Table 4.18: Monitoring results of surface water in Package A7 in May, 2012.

No Parameters Unit NM-4A NM-4B NM-5A NM-5B NM-6A NM-6B QCVN

08:2008/ BTNMT(A2)

1 pH - 7.2 7.3 7.0 7.1 7.0 7.3 6-8.5 2 Temp. oC 24 24 25 24 22 22 - 3 DO mg/l 6.9 6.7 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.4 ≥5

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

58

No Parameters Unit NM-4A NM-4B NM-5A NM-5B NM-6A NM-6B QCVN

08:2008/ BTNMT(A2)

4 TSS mg/l 0.08 0.07 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.10 30 5 COD mg O2/l 17 18 22 22.5 23.0 22.5 15 6 BOD5 mg/l 20 21.2 17.7 17.3 26.2 26.1 6 7 Coliform MPN/100

mg/l 75 81 200 213 210 221 5000

8 Grease & oil

mg/l 0.110 0.125 0.132 0.135 0.100 0.112 0.02

9 NO3- mg/l 0.519 0.521 0.724 0.732 0.914 0.932 5

10 NH4+

- N mg/l 0.046 0.051 0.072 0.069 0.079 0.081 0.2 11 SO4

2- mg/l 1.820 2.100 2.030 2.870 4.150 3.920 - 12 PO4

3- mg/l 0.070 0.080 0.300 0.200 0.017 0.010 0.2 13 Total N mg/l 0.981 0.903 1.313 1.321 1.761 1.694 - 14 Total P mg/l 0.087 0.095 0.400 0.350 0.020 0.010 - 15 Fe mg/l 0.960 0.900 1.950 2.100 0.970 0.900 1.0 16 Cd mg/l <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 0.005 17 As mg/l 0.0031 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 0.003 0.003 0.02 18 Mn mg/l 0.125 0.123 0.314 0.324 0.229 0.301 - 19 Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.02 20 Zn mg/l 0.009 0.009 0.013 0.012 0.017 0.016 1.0

Table 4.19: Monitoring results of surface water in Package A7 in May, 2012.

No Parameters Unit NM-7ª NM-7B NM-8A NM-8B QCVN 08:2008/ BTNMT(A2)

1 pH - 6.9 7.0 6.7 6.9 6-8.5

2 Temperature oC 23 22.5 25 25 - 3 DO mg/l 6.4 6.5 7.0 6.9 ≥5 4 TSS mg/l 0.16 0.17 0.20 0.19 30 5 COD mg O2/l 23.5 24 25 24 15 6 BOD5 mg/l 15.7 16.1 27.6 27.3 6 7 Coliform MPN/100ml 240 239 43 47 5000 8 Grease & oil mg/l 0.100 0.121 0.110 0.114 0.02 9 NO3

- mg/l 0.639 0.705 1.205 1.217 5 10 NH4

+ - N mg/l 0.061 0.057 0.105 0.112 0.2

11 SO42- mg/l 3.150 3.260 4.070 4.530 -

12 PO43- mg/l 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.2

13 Total N mg/l 1.057 1.123 3.083 3.121 - 14 Total P mg/l 0.020 0.018 0.010 0.020 - 15 Fe mg/l 1.300 1.500 0.750 0.850 1.0 16 Cd mg/l <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 0.005 17 As mg/l 0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 0.02 18 Mn mg/l 0.150 0.152 0.212 0.224 - 19 Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.001 0.02 20 Zn mg/l 0.016 0.017 0.014 0.014 1.0

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

59

The analytical results of 16 surface water samples showed that: almost all of parameters are

lower than allowable limit values. However, the concentration of grease and oil, Fe, COD,

BOD5 in some samples are over the allowable limit values regulated in National Technical

Regulation (QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT).

Note: Locations are the following:

NM-1A: 100m upstream of Com Stream (Coordinates N: 22009,227’, E: 104020,747’)

NM-1B: 100m downstream of Com Stream (Coordinates N: 22009,294’, E: 104020,763’)

NM-2A: 100m upstream of Khe Sang Stream (Coordinates N: 22015,210’, E: 105048,008’)

NM-2B: 100m downstream of Khe Sang Stream (Coordinates N: 22007,448’, E: 104024,075’)

NM-3A: 100m upstream of Khe Quat Stream (Coordinates N: 22008,536’, E: 104022,536’)

NM-3B: 100m downstream of Khe Quat Stream (Coordinates N: 22008,560’, E: 104022,561’)

NM-4A: 100m upstream of Khe U Stream (Coordinates N: 22011,531’, E: 104019,354’)

NM-4B: 100m downstream of Khe U Stream (Coordinates N: 22011,544’, E: 104019,408’)

NM-5A: 100m upstream of Bong Stream (Coordinates N: 22013,446’, E: 104016,961’)

NM-5B: 100m downstream of Bong Stream (Coordinates N: 22014,536’, E: 104016,760)

NM-6A: 100m upstream of Cam 4 Stream (Coordinates N: 22009,509’, E: 104021,959’)

NM-6B: 100m downstream of Cam 4 Stream (Coordinates N: 22015,210’, E: 104015,445’)

NM-7A: 100m upstream of Mai Hong Stream (Coordinates N: 22008,572’, E: 104022,565’)

NM-7B: 100m downstream of Mai Hong Stream (Coordinates N: 22008,607’, E: 104022,597’)

NM-8A: 100m upstream of Ban Ly 1 Stream (Coordinates N: 22012,324’, E: 104018,185’)

NM-8B: 100m downstream of Ban Ly 1 Stream (Coordinates N: 22011,299’, E: 104019,176’)

June

At Km201+815 and Km204+581, the contractor stopped dumping the material here, so the

contractor didn’t apply the method of slope protection to avoid landside and erosion into

streams and rivers. Consultant required the contractor to apply according to consultant

instructions.

Date 15-June 2012 the contractor had installed the sediment control ponds at concrete

batching plan Km209+329 and Km198+400. However, the concrete batching plan at

Km194+765 was not installed the sediment control pond. Other at concrete batching plan

Km191+353 had sediment control pond but now it is already full and contractor was required to

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

60

recleaning, so far date 28-June the contractor didn’t recleaning according to consultant

instruction.

4.2.8 Package A8

April

On April 13th, 2012 while drilling the bore pile of Lang Tra Bridge Km220+993, Son Ha Bridge

Km224+369 and Suoi Trat Bridge Km231+889, the contractor had trenched to guide waste

water to sediment control pond, however the sediment control ponds is full and some

wastewater overflows. Due to the consultant required the contractor makes a bigger sediment

control ponds.

Addition, the batching plant at Suoi Nhu Bridge, Suoi Trat Bridge and Ngoi Bo Bridge now

don’t having sediment control ponds, which to collect and sediment the waste water before

discharging to water source. So consultant required the contractor make a sediment control

ponds for each batching plant before 15 April 2012. But up to now the contractor didn’t

according to the consultant instruction.

May

On 16-May 2012 the contractor is dumping the earth at Km231+889, which serious violated the

provision contacts and can effect to water quality. The consultant has required the contractor

to stop dumping and plan grass to protect the erosion and landside into water source.

Other at moment the concrete batching plant Km218+040, Km238+265; Km231+889 haven’t

sediment control pond to collect and treatment waste water, now waste water from mixer

trucks and water washing the concrete batching plan discharged directly into ground and into

water source. Consultant required the contractor to provide the sediment control pond for each

concrete batching plan before 5-June 2012.

June

On 16-June 2012 the contractor is dumping the earth at Km231+889, which seriously violated

the provision contracts and can effect water quality. The consultant has required the contractor

to stop dumping and plan grass to protect the erosion and landside into water source.

However, so far the contractor didn’t overcome according to the consultant instruction.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

61

Date 5-June 2012 the contractor had installed the sediment control ponds for concrete

batching plan at Suoi Trat Km231+889, Ngoi Bo Km238+265, Suoi Nhu Km218+040.

4.3 IMPACT ON SOILS QUALITY

4.3.1 Package A1

April

In the site inspections, we again detected the sloppy status in oil usage at Trung Kien Bridge,

Tan Loi Bridge, Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge, Km 4+700, the oil barrels were put on ground in

disorder and lying on their side. The PSC had strongly warned the Contractor of this issue and

requested him to comply with regulations in oil usage and management. In the site inspections,

on April 04, we found that there was improvement at Km 4+700 and Tam Long – Thien Ke

Bridge but Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi Bridge. At Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi Bridge,

the Contractor still let this issue happen that caused leak of oil on ground. In the next site

inspections we also did not see any improvement in these areas.

At Underpass NH2 construction site, the direct discharge of untreated wastewater that

contains sand and mud into existing irrigation canal is still going on. The Contractor does not

implement the requirements of Engineer to mobilize dewatering tank or gravity bag filter to

remove sediment from wastewater before discharge of it. The PSC already issued a warning

letter to request the Contractor to implement our requirements and if he still fails to meet

requirement of us, we will consider applying the measure of money deduction.

The riverside landslide risk is still high at Tan Loi Bridge, especially in the rainy season due to

the Contractor doesn’t apply any countermeasure in this area. Similar issue was found at Xuan

Phuong Bridge. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to solve this issue to

protect riversides but up to now he doesn’t take any action to implement our requirements.

At section Km 4+700 ~ Km 4+800, almost the unsuitable material was removed.

May

In the site inspections we found that the oil leaked on ground at Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi

Bridge. At Ba Thien Bridge and Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge the oil barrels were put on

ground in disorder and in lying on their side. The PSC has strongly requested the Contractor to

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

62

solve these issues, but till May 22, there was only improvement at Ba Thien and Tam Long –

Thien Ke Bridge. The PSC has seriously warned the Contractor and if in the next site

inspection we still realize that this problem is not solved we will consider deducting money.

The Contractor already constructed a sediment basin to catch sediment from waterwater at

Underpass NH2 construction site. However, this sediment basin is not enough capacity so the

Engineer has requested the Contractor to supplement another beside to ensure that almost

sediment will be remove from wastewater before it spills-over existing drainage. The straw

bales installation at outlet of wastewater discharge area were also recommended as a effective

measure to remove sand and mud from wastewater.

By observations during this month, we realized that there is no improvement at Tan Loi Bridge

and Xuan Phuong Bridge. The Contractor still has not applied any riverside protection

measures to prevent landslide happening on riversides.

June

In the site inspections we found that the oil leaked on ground at Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi

Bridge. At Ba Thien Bridge and Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge the oil barrels were put on

ground in disorder and in lying on their side. The PSC has strongly requested the Contractor to

solve these issues, but till May 22, there was only improvement at Ba Thien and Tam Long –

Thien Ke Bridge. The PSC has seriously warned the Contractor and if in the next site

inspection we still realize that this problem is not solved we will consider deducting money.

The Contractor already constructed a sediment basin to catch sediment from waterwater at

Underpass NH2 construction site. However, this sediment basin is not enough capacity so the

Engineer has requested the Contractor to supplement another beside to ensure that almost

sediment will be remove from wastewater before it spills-over existing drainage. The straw

bales installation at outlet of wastewater discharge area were also recommended as a effective

measure to remove sand and mud from wastewater.

By observations during this month, we realized that there is no improvement at Tan Loi Bridge

and Xuan Phuong Bridge. The Contractor still has not apply any riverside protection measures

to prevent landslide happening on riversides.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

63

4.3.2 Package A2

April

At section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670, there is still no improvement in this month, the Contractor

has not applied any erosion and sediment control measure so the soil is still being tracked into

the adjacent croplands. We still close the procedures of payment progress of all items in this

section until the Contractor implemented our requirements.

In the site inspections, at section Interchange No 6, we did not see any change in this area.

The unsuitable material is still being disposed on site where is close to croplands and local

resident area. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to remove all this material to

approved disposal places but up to now he still has not implemented requirements of us. We

have issued a warning letter and if the Contractor still fails to meet our requirements, we will

recommend the Employer to deduct money. The next site inspection will be held on May 04,

2012.

At Batch Plant 2 of Lo River Bridge, in the site inspection on March 28, we found that the

Contractor located the oil tank/barrels on ground without any leak/spillage control measure. A

leak of oil on ground was noted in this area and the PSC has requested the Contractor to

immediately to comply with regulations in oil usage and management to rearrange the oil

storage as well as remove polluted soil and disposed of it properly. Till April 18, we perceived

the Contractor had surrounded oil storage with fence and a brick berm to prevent spillage of

oil; the waterproof roof was also installed.

On April 11 we found that the Contractor had discharged the bentonite slurry and its by-

product after recycling on riverside at Pier 7 of Lo River Bridge. This issue contaminated top

soil in this area. The PSC has requested the Contractor to immediately collect and remove all

these materials to disposal place but up to the day he still has not implemented our

requirements.

May

At section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670, there is still no improvement in this month, the Contractor

has not applied any erosion and sediment control measure so the soil is still being tracked into

the adjacent croplands. We still close the procedures of payment progress of all items in this

section until the Contractor implemented our requirements.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

64

In the site inspections, at section Interchange No. 6 we didn’t see any change in this area. The

unsuitable material is still being disposed on site where is close to croplands and local resident

area. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to remove all this material to

approved disposal places but up to now he still has not implemented requirements of us. We

have issued a warning letter and if the Contractor still fails to meet our requirements, we will

recommend the Employer to deduct money. The next site inspection will be held on May 04,

2012.

At Batch Plant 2 of Lo River Bridge, in the site inspection on March 28, we found that the

Contractor located the oil tank/barrels on ground without any leak/spillage control measure. A

leak of oil on ground was noted in this area and the PSC has requested the Contractor to

immediately to comply with regulations in oil usage and management to rearrange the oil

storage as well as remove polluted soil and disposed of it properly. Till April 18, we perceived

the Contractor had surrounded oil storage with fence and a brick berm to prevent spillage of

oil; the waterproof roof was also installed.

On April 11 we found that the Contractor had discharged the bentonite slurry and its by-

product after recycling on riverside at Pier 7 of Lo River Bridge. This issue contaminated top

soil in this area. The PSC has requested the Contractor to immediately collect and remove all

these materials to disposal place but up to the day he still has not implemented our

requirements.

June

We didn’t see any improvement at section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670. The erosion still leads

the soil into cropland and the Contractor has not applied any countermeasure to mitigate.

At Interchange No. 6 section, the spoil is still being disposed along the site despite the warning

of the Engineer. The Engineer had approved the disposal place for unsuitable material in this

area and requested the Contractor to remove all this material to approved disposal place but

the Contractor doesn’t comply with our requirement.

High risk of leak of oil was found at Ben Tre Bridge, Km 42+200, and Lo River Bridge. The

PSC has requested the Contractor to solve this issue by contructing oil storage area with level

concreted ground and waterproof roof; a berm surrounding to prevent spill-over is also

required. However, up to now, the Contractor has not implemented our requirements.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

65

4.3.3 Package A3

April

Almost subcontractor store fuel in the big tanks and these tanks were put directly on ground or

buried underground without concreted foundation. After that, when they use fuel for satisfy

work in site they pump it into some oil drums and move it to site. In this process oil was leaking

much on ground. It can pollute soil or underwater resource. So we have some warning letter to

Contractor request them to resolve this violation.

We have some suggestion in site such as: The subcontractor explained that burry big oil tank

underground is safer than put it on ground because it’s avoid all fire risk and the skin of this

tank have 2 layer and it’s very firm. But the Consultant has realized that they burry the big tank

under ground it could avoid fire risk if oil was not leaked around from pumping oil process.

Beside, leaking oil will damage to soil and underwater resource (if have). So if the big oil tank

are full of oil and it’s difficult for subcontractor to pick up it on ground (in case this tank was

buried underground) to reinforce foundation by concrete, they can concrete ground around oil

modulator valve with suitable area. And they must concrete the foundation of oil drums

storage, install some sand drums and fire extinguishers.

The subcontractor clean up oil leaking on ground and reground all oil drums in a regulation

place in site but they still delay to concrete storage’s foundation. We continue push them must

concrete foundation to avoid oil spill over ground as before.

May

Almost subcontractor store fuel in the big tanks and these tanks were put directly on ground or

buried underground without concreted foundation. After that, when they use fuel for satisfy

work in site they pump it into some oil drums and move it to site. In this process oil was leaking

much on ground. It can pollute soil or underwater resource. So we have some warning letter to

Contractor request them to resolve this violation.

We have some suggestion in site such as: The subcontractor explained that burry big oil tank

underground is safer than put it on ground because it’s avoid all fire risk and the skin of this

tank have 2 layer and it’s very firm. But the Consultant has realized that they burry the big tank

under ground it could avoid fire risk if oil was not leaked around from pumping oil process.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

66

Beside, leaking oil will damage to soil and underwater resource (if have). So if the big oil tank

are full of oil and it’s difficult for subcontractor to pick up it on ground (in case this tank was

buried underground) to reinforce foundation by concrete, they can concrete ground around oil

modulator valve with suitable area. And they must concrete the foundation of oil drums

storage, install some sand drums and fire extinguishers.

The subcontractor clean up oil leaking on ground and reground all oil drums in a regulation

place in site but they still delay to concrete storage’s foundation.

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012 “Require to

overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3.

June

Construction operation on sites affects a little on quality of soils. Contractor should ensure safe

construction operation in order to avoid the erosion on sites.

4.3.4 Package A4

April

The Contractor stored fuel in site by the big tanks and drums to satisfy construction activities.

But they buried big oil tank underground (Km93+300) or put directly on ground without

protected measures (Km106+500 near worker’s camp of Long Giang subcontractor,

Km91+500, Km107+200, Km97+124). It pollute soil resource be cause oil was spilled over

ground a lot. So we warned them must carry out some suitable method to prevent this risk,

such as: concrete foundation to avoid oil spill over ground, set up sand drums and fire

extinguisher to prevent fire risk.

But the Contractor still delay.

May

The Contractor stored fuel in site by the big tanks and drums to satisfy construction activities.

But they buried big oil tank underground (Km93+300) or put directly on ground without

protected measures (Km106+500 near worker’s camp of Long Giang subcontractor,

Km91+500, Km107+200, Km97+124). It pollute soil resource be cause oil was spilled over

ground a lot. So we warned them must carry out some suitable method to prevent this risk,

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

67

such as: concrete foundation to avoid oil spill over ground, set up sand drums and fire

extinguisher to prevent fire risk.

But the Contractor still delay. Deadline is June 15th, 2012. Consultant’s warning letter is

ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May 4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-680 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

Construction operation on sites affects a little on quality of soils. Contractor should ensure safe

construction operation in order to avoid the erosion on sites.

4.3.5 Package A5

April

This month, the major items of the package’s construction works are soil work and some other

activities such as bridges, sewers, under pass box culvert... and the majority of them did not

make substances that cause serious impacts to soil quality in the region.

However, because the Contractor did not fully comply with the requirements of the Project as

well as the instructions of the Consultant, some outstanding issues has occurred as follows:

- The performance of the Contractor in managing fuel was still poor; this has led to oil

leakage at some fuel stations of the Contractor such as Km136, Ngoi Thia bridge, ...

This has affected the soil quality of the area.

- Bentonite has not been controlled tightly by the Contractor during the construction

process in areas such as Ngoi Rao brigde, Ngoi Gua bridge... This has led to the

bentonite surface runoff, which affected soil quality of the area.

- At some stations such as Km118 - Km119, Km116 - Km117, the soil from the Project’s

area flooded the production areas of local people (agricultural land, forest land,

aquaculture land). In the rain, this has affected the soil quality of the local people.

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to quickly apply effective measures to address

thoroughly these outstanding issues to ensure the region's soil quality. Besides, in the weekly

site inspections, the Consultant has also frequently required the Contractor to comply with the

Method Statement as well as the Environment Control and Protection Plan of the Project

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

68

during construction process to prevent negative impacts of the project on environment in

general and on the soil quality in particular.

May

Through the inspection and supervision this month, the Consultant found some outstanding

issues as follows:

- Because the Contractor did not fully comply with the instructions and requirements of

the Consultant. On some days of heavy rain, soil from the Project’s area flooded the

production areas of local people (agricultural land, forestry land, aquaculture land); this

has affected the regional soil quality such as Km116 - Km117, Km117 - Km118,

Km119, Km126, Km127...

- The Contractor has not fully applied necessary measures to control the bentonite

during the construction process. This has led to the phenomenon of bentonite surface

runoff in areas such as Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge...

- This month, the contractor's fuel management has had no improvement. At the fuel

station such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Van Phu bridge... the Consultant

has found traces of oil leaked on the ground.

- At some construction locations such as Km111, Km123, Km148..., the Contractor has

gathered unsuitable soil in areas which have not yet been approved by Consultant.

To ensure the regional soil quality, the Consultant has requested the contractor to quickly

apply effective measures to resolve these outstanding issues (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-

490 dated 31 May 2012). Besides, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also

frequently required the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement as well as the

Environment Control and Protection Plan of the Project during construction process to prevent

negative impacts of the Project on the environment in general and on the regional soil quality

in particular.

June

During this period, the major construction activities of the Contractor remained earthworks

(excavation, embankment...) and the bridge piles, so they did not generate substances that

can cause serious impacts to the soil quality.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

69

However, because the environment control and protection of the Contractor was not done well,

a number of outstanding issues has raised as follows:

- At stations Km116-Km117, Km117-Km118, Km119, Km126, Km127... the Contractor

did not fully comply with the instructions of the Consultant as well as the requirements

of the Project, so on a number of rainy days, soil from the Project’s area has flooded

the production areas of local people (agricultural land, forest land, aquaculture land).

This has affected the region's soil quality. However, so far, the Contractor have not yet

fully solved this problem (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-594 dated June 29, 2012).

- Bentonite was not tightly controlled during the construction process in areas such as

bridges Van Phu, Ngoi Rao, Ngoi Gua, Ngoi Thia,... this has led to the bentonite

surface runoff, affecting the soil quality.

- The fuel management of the Contractor was not done well in areas such as the fuel

stations Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Lau

bridge... The Consultant found that the fuel tanks were located directly on the ground

without any device to prevent fuel leakage, which may cause traces of leaked fuel on

the ground, affecting the soil quality.

To ensure the Project's environment quality in general and the soil quality in particular, the

Consultant has asked the Contractor to solve these outstanding issues. Besides, in the weekly

site inspection, the Consultant has also frequently required the Contractor to comply with the

Method Statement as well as the Environment Control and Protection Plan of the Project

during the construction process.

4.3.6 Package A6

April

This month, the major construction item of the Contractor on site was the soilwork (clearing,

digging and leveling...), so the soil quality of the area was not affected by the construction

activities of the Contractor. Most of the construction activities of the Contractor did not create

hazardous substances.

However, the contractor's fuel management was much improved over the previous month. In

some areas such as Km172+300, Km186+200, Km155+300... the Contractor still put fuel tanks

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

70

directly on the ground without any device to prevent oil leakage. This could lead to oil leakage,

affecting the soil quality of the area. To ensure the region's environment as well as to prevent

negative impacts on the regional soil quality, the Consultant has provided the Contractor

specific guidances for the fuel management work (Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-300). Also, in

the site inspections, the Consultant has usually required the Contractor to improve their fuel

management and to comply with the instructions of the Consultant.

May

During this period, the main construction categories of the Contractor on site is the earth work

such as site clearing, excavation work and embankment work,... They have not generated

substances that cause serious impacts to soil quality in the region. Besides, most of the

construction activities of the Contractor have been done within the limit of the project.

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The fuel management of the Contractor has not been implemented well at some fuel

stations such as: Km186+200, Km186+720, Km171, Km155+300,… the fuel stations

have not been equipped with adequate devices to prevent oil leakage. Besides, there is

still the phenomenon of the fuel tanks put directly on the ground; this could lead to oil

leakage, affecting the regional soil quality.

- Erosion has occurred in the embankment area of the Contractor on some rainy days of

the month, and this led to the phenomenon of soil from the project’s area flooded the

production area of the local people, afftecting the soil quality in production land such as

Km156, Km176, Km172...

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to apply effective measures to thoroughly

overcome the outstanding issues. Besides, in the site inspections, the Consultant has

frequently required the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement and the Environment

Control and Protection Plan during construction to prevent the negative effects from the

project’s construction activities on the region's soil quality.

June

Through the inspection and supervision in this month, we found that the activities of

construction have not caused serious impacts to soil quality of the area, however, there are still

some outstanding problems as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

71

- The fuel management of the Contractor has been improved, however, there were still

fuel tanks placed directly on the ground without any device to prevent oil leakage as in

Km186 +200, Km186+720, Km178 +200, Km155+300, Dai Viet bridge, etc.

- In the days of heavy rain, in areas under drainage construction as Km168, Km178, etc.,

the drainage pipes have not been completely constructed, which hindered the water

flow through these areas, led to the flooding in upstream drainage and erosion in the

drainage downstream, affecting soil quality production of local people.

The Consultant asked the Contractor to quickly apply the measures to resolve these

outstanding issues (mentioned in Ref. GET3-Doosan-12-A6-566 and GET3-Doosan-12-A6-

546). .

Because the rainy season began in early A6 bidding package, the Consultant has asked the

Contractor to apply measures to ensure the environment during the rainy season through

GET3- DOOSAN-12-A6-650 dated 29 June, 2012 .

This month, the Contractor continued to implement grass planting in the area of embankment

slope and cutting slope to limit the erosion, especially during the upcoming rainy season.

4.3.7 Package A7

April

In April 2012, the oil and waste oil barrels at Km202+770 keeping on the concrete (not keeping

on the ground). However the consultant always remind the contractor to using the oil barrel

and waste oil barrel in right way and keep in store area not effect to soil quality.

May

Soil quality is impacted by overflow of oil and waste oil which stored directly on the ground and

didn’t cover by anything. During time inspection date 16- May 2012 the ADB mission and

consultant showed for the contractor which place stored oil tanks and waste oil tanks not meet

project standard at Km209+800; Km202+400; Km198+400. Consultant required the contractor

to keep the oil tanks and waste oil tanks in the store and on a concrete floor to avoid effect to

surface soil lever in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required the contractor to

overcome before 30-June- 2012.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

72

June

Soil quality is impacted by overflow of oil and waste oil which stored directly on the ground and

didn’t cover by anything. During time inspection date 16- May 2012 the ADB mission and

consultant showed for the contractor which place stored oil tanks and waste oil tanks not meet

project standard at Km209+800; Km202+400; Km198+400. Consultant required the contractor

to keep the oil tanks and waste oil tanks in the store and on a concrete floor to avoid effect to

surface soil lever in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required the contractor to

overcome before 30-June- 2012. However until date 28-June 2012 the contractor didn’t

deploying according to ADB mission and consultant instruction.

4.3.8 Package A8

April

On April 2nd 2012, at construction works of IC17 Bridge Km233+540, some earth overflows on

the field which can effect to soil quality and crop productivity. And at Suoi Trat Bridge

Km231+889 while construction works some soil waste or earth overflows in field which can

effect to soil quality and crop productivity, so contractor are required to overcome before

citizen starting news crops.

May

Soil quality is impacted by overflow of oil and waste oil which stored directly on the ground and

didn’t cover by anything. During time inspection date 16- May 2012 the ADB mission and

consultant showed for the contractor which place stored oil tanks and waste oil tanks not meet

project standard at Km244+155; Km229+034; Km218+040. Consultant required the contractor

to keep the oil tanks and waste oil tanks in the store and on a concrete floor to avoid effect to

surface soil lever in the letter No: Ref. GET4- Vinaconex-565 and Ref. GET4- Vinaconex-566

and required the contractor to overcome before 30-June- 2012.

June

Soil quality is impacted by overflow of oil and waste oil which stored directly on the ground and

didn’t cover by anything. During time inspection date 16- June 2012 the ADB mission and

consultant showed for the contractor which place stored oil tanks and waste oil tanks not meet

project standard at Km244+155; Km229+034; Km218+040. Consultant required the contractor

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

73

to keep the oil tanks and waste oil tanks in the store and on a concrete floor to avoid effect to

surface soil lever in the letter No: Ref. GET4- Vinaconex-565 and Ref. GET4- Vinaconex-566

and required the contractor to overcome before 30-June- 2012. However, so far the contractor

didn’t overcome according to the consultant instruction.

4.4 IMPACT ON NOISE AND VIBRATION LEVELS

4.4.1 Package A1

April

During the site inspections this month there was no serious impact of noise and vibration on

local community recorded, including the sensitive areas such as Km 13+100 ~ Km 13+900. At

section Km 19+650, this time the Contractor is carrying out the drilling bored pile work and he

had already installed the fence of iron sheets surrounding the construction site in order to

minimize the spread of noise which arises from construction activities.

May

In the site inspection on May 22, together with ADB’s expert, Employer and the Contractor, we

have received grievance from local people at section Km 19+740 that the Contractor usually

carried out the construction work at night and this caused the noise pollution that impacte don

local community. The PSC has requested the Contractor to limit the work at night as well as

apply the noise mitigation measure to minimize impact of construction work of the project on

local community.

At other sensitive areas such as Km 13+100 ~ Km 13+900, Km 4+400, in the site inspections

we did not see the serious problems, which arised from construction work, impact on local

community.

June

In the site inspection on May 22, together with ADB’s expert, Employer and the Contractor, we

have received grievance from local people at section Km 19+740 that the Contractor usually

carried out the construction work at night and this caused the noise pollution that impacte don

local community. The PSC has requested the Contractor to limit the work at night as well as

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

74

apply the noise mitigation measure to minimize impact of construction work of the project on

local community.

At other sensitive areas such as Km 13+100 ~ Km 13+900, Km 4+400, in the site inspections

we didn’t see the serious problems, which arised from construction work, impact on local

community.

4.4.2 Package A2

April

This month, at sensitive areas such as Km 34+780 (close to resident area and a pagoda), Km

36+500 (close to resident area), Km 39+200 (close to resident area) there was almost none

construction work carried out so these areas were not affected by noise or vibration which

arises from construction work of project.

At other section, we also didn’t found any serious problem during site inspections.

May

This month, at sensitive areas such as Km 34+780 (close to resident area and a pagoda), Km

36+500 (close to resident area), Km 39+200 (close to resident area) there was almost none

construction work carried out so these areas were not affected by noise or vibration which

arises from construction work of project.

At other section, we also didn’t found any serious problem during site inspections.

June

In the site inspections, we perceived that there was almost none construction work at sensitive

areas such as Km 34+780 (close to resident area and a pagoda), Km 36+500 (close to

resident area), Km 39+200 (close to resident area) therefore these areas were not affected by

noise or vibration which arises from construction work of project.

At other section, we also didn’t found any serious problem during site inspections.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

75

4.4.3 Package A3

April

The results of Noise monitoring in April are shown in table 4.20.

Table 4.20: The result of Noise monitoring in Package A3 in April, 2012.

Station Monitoring Value

(dBA) Standard Value

(dBA)

Exceeded Standard

(dBA) 6.00-10.00 10.00-12.00 12.00 -18.00 6.00 - 21.00 6.00 - 21.00

Km 48+500 53 54 53 55 0 Km 55+550 68 69 69 70 0 Km 67+700 68 69 67 70 0 Km78+900 69 69 68 70 0

Recently, the noise generated from construction activities at monitoring place is still under the

allowed limitation.

The Contractor needs to control the construction activities to maintain the noise arising within

the allowed limitation.

Currently, the Contractor has not performed the construction activities during the night shift so

the noise monitoring at the night time from 18 pm to 6 am is unnecessary.

May

The results of Noise monitoring in May are shown in table 4.21.

Table 4.21: The result of Noise monitoring in Package A3 in May, 2012.

Station

Monitoring Value (dBA)

Standard Value (dBA)

Exceeded Standard

(dBA) 6.00-10.00 10.00-12.00 12.00 -

18.00 6.00 - 21.00 6.00 - 21.00

Km 48+500 55 53 54 55 0 Km 55+550 68 66 69 70 0 Km 67+700 67 68 67 70 0 Km78+900 69 69 69 70 0

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

76

Recently, the noise generated from construction activities at monitoring place is still under the

allowed limitation.

But during May, when inspection in site we received many complains from local people about

noise which arise from construction activities at Km78+900 Red river bridge, Km67+800

TL315B bridge, Km51+100, section 3… Consultant requested Contractor has to set up fence

to minimize noise and limit working time at night to avoid disturb local inhabitant’s life.

June

In june, the noise generated from construction activities at monitoring place is still under the

allowed limitation.

4.4.4 Package A4

April

The results of Noise monitoring in April are shown in table 4.21.

Table 4.22: The result of Noise monitoring in Package A4 in April, 2012.

Location Monitoring Value

(dBA) Standard

Value (dBA)

Exceeded Standard

(dBA)

Standard Value (dBA)

Exceeded Standard

(dBA) 6am-10am 10am-2pm 2pm-6pm 6am-9pm 6am-9pm 9pm–6am 9pm–6am

Km 91 + 150 45 47 46 55 0 - - Km 95 + 100 61 63 62 70 0 - - Tan Thanh batching plant 69 69 68 70 0 - -

Km 88 + 300 Km 88+500 68 69 68 70 0 - -

Km 104 + 900 Km 105 + 350 66 68 67 70 0 - -

Km 106 + 500 Km 107 + 600 67 68 69 70 0

- -

Km 106 + 800 52 54 53 55 0 - -

The analyzed results of the air environment show that: At the all monitoring areas, the

analyzed results were within the allowed standard.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

77

At Km 106+500 to Km 107+600, noise value from 6pm-6am was 60dBA over 1.09 times

compared with standard. Therefore the Contractor need to install fence to minimize noise and

avoid disturb to local people.

May

The results of Noise monitoring in May are shown in table 4.23.

The analyzed results of the air environment show that: At the all monitoring areas, the

analyzed results were within the allowed standard.

During May, Contractor started working all day (24 hours/ day) special at Km107+533 QL32C

bypass. Noise and vibration which arise from construction activities was very loud special at

night. Local people here had complaints that they could not sleep, their life were upset, their

house was impacted seriously by vibration from activities. They asked someone of

subcontractor must resolve this problem but they always ignore. Even they gave their

complaint to commune but nothing happen.

Table 4.23: The results of Noise monitoring in Package A4 in May, 2012.

Location

Monitoring Value (dBA)

Standard Value (dBA)

Exceeded Standard (dBA)

6am-10am 10am-2pm 2pm-6pm 6am-9pm 6am-9pm

Km 91 + 150 48 45 49 55 0

Km 95 + 100 67 65 68 70 0

Tan Thanh batching plant 69 67 69 70 0

Km 88 + 300 Km 88+500 68 65 67 70 0

Km 104 + 900 Km 105 + 350 69 67 70 70 0

Km 106 + 500 Km 107 + 600 66 64 67 70 0

Km 106 + 800 54 52 53 55 0

In inspection tour of ADB mission, when they interview some of these impacted households,

they warned Contractor must set up a small information board in construction sites to inform

telephone number, name of responsibility person of Contractor for anyone who want to give

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

78

complaint about safety and environmental problem can do it. It was also agreed that in no

more 24 hours, the complaints must be submitted to EPMU and to GETINSA. In agreement it’s

included that the way to inform local people about the system to submit the complaint to

contractor will be adding in information board in site. Also local and district authorities will be

informed about this system to complain.

This system must be implemented before June 30th 2012. As Consultant must check the

compliance in order to include the monitoring of this issue in monthly report for June and in the

corresponding quarterly report, Consultant establish a deadline for the compliance, before

June 23rd, 2012.

June

In june, the noise generated from construction activities at monitoring place is still under the

allowed limitation.

4.4.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no serious impact of noise from the construction activities of the Project on the surrounding

residential areas. Most of the construction activities of the Package have been conducted

within the limits of the Project and were restricted on night time.

However, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has frequently required the Contractor

to comply with the requirements in the Environment Control and Protection Plan to prevent

adverse effects of noise on the surrounding areas. Besides, the Consultant has also required

the Contractor to limit night time construction activities and apply measures to reduce noise in

the factories of the Contractor located close to residential areas.

In April, 2012, the Consultant has measured noise levels in some areas with the sound meter

SC-2c.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

79

Table 4.24: The results of Noise monitoring in Package A5 in April, 2012.

No Location Date Time Noise level (dBA)

Max Min Medium 1 Km117+050 10/04/2012 2:30 P.M 49 41 45.0 2 Km118+820 10/04/2012 3:40 P.M 68 51 59.5 3 Km121+433 10/04/2012 4:20 P.M 72 52 62.0

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

Compare with the results of noise measurement of the Contractor in May, 2012:

Table 4.25: The results of Noise monitoring in Package A5 in April, 2012 (Contractor).

Station Site Result (dB) (average) QCVN 26:2010 Exceeding value

Working shift 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h

Km 117+050

Bao Long church 47,1 44,7 55 45 - -

- The value of noise level referred to standards applied for commerce, office, industry areas. - Noise primarily generated from the vehicles but constructional equipment

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

Table 4.26: Noise level measured at Km118+820 and Km121+433

Station Site Result (dB) (average) QCVN 26:2010 Exceeding value

Working shift 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h

Km 118+820

Hop Minh My bridge 61,8 53,9 70 55 - -

Km 121+433

QL37 bridge 64,2 52,2 70 55 - -

- The value of noise level referred to standards applied for commerce, office, industry areas. - Noise primarily generated from the vehicles but constructional equipment

This noise level does not exceed Vietnamese Standards QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT (Acoustics –

Noise in public and residential areas maximum permitted noise level).

The individually-recorded results are relative random because the magnitude of noise level

recorded on site is depended on the number of vehicles on the road at the time of monitoring

but activities at the construction site.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

80

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor have not caused serious impacts of noise and vibration

on the population area around. However, in the site inspections, the Consultant has frequently

required the Contractor to comply with the requirements in the Environment Control and

Protection Plan to prevent the adverse effects of noise on the surrounding area. Also, the

Consultant has required the Contractor to limit night time activities and apply measures to

reduce noise, especially in the factories located near the regional population such as batching

plant No. 1 (Km123), batching plant No. No. 2 (Km132), RC Pipe Culvert factory No. 2

(Km132)... In May, 2012, the Consultant has measured noise levels in some areas with the

sound meter SC-2c.

Table 4.27: Noise levels at some stations under construction in Package A5 in May, 2012.

No Location Date Time Noise level (dBA) Max Min Medium

1 Km117+050 10/05/2012 8:30 A.M 50 43 46.5 2 Km118+820 10/05/2012 10:00 A.M 69 53 61.0 3 Km121+433 10/05/2012 2:30 P.M 71 56 63.5

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

Compare with the results of noise measurement of the Contractor in May, 2012:

Table 4.28: Noise level measured at Km 117+050.

Station Site Result (dB) (average) QCVN 26:2010 Exceeding value

Working shift 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h

Km 117+050

Bao Long church 51,1 43,3 55 45 - -

- The value of noise level referred to standards applied for commerce, office, industry areas. - Noise primarily generated from the vehicles but constructional equipment

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

Table 4.29: Noise level measured at Km118+820 and Km121+433

Station Site Result (dB) (average) QCVN 26:2010 Exceeding value

Working shift 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h

Km 118+820

Hop Minh My bridge 64,8 52,1 70 55 - -

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

81

Km 121+433

QL37 bridge 61,9 53,1 70 55 - -

- The value of noise level referred to standards applied for commerce, office, industry areas. - Noise primarily generated from the vehicles but constructional equipment

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

This noise level does not exceed Vietnamese Standards QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT (Acoustics –

Noise in public and residential areas maximum permitted noise level).

The individually-recorded results are relative random because the magnitude of noise level

recorded on site is depended on the number of vehicles on the road at the time of monitoring

but activities at the construction site.

June

Through the inspection and supervision of the Contractor’s construction activities this month,

the Consultant found that they did not cause serious impacts related to noise and vibration in

the surrounding residential areas.

However, at the batching plant No. 1 Km123, batching plant No. 2 Km132 and RC pipe culvert

factory No. 2 Km132, which are close to residential areas, the Contractor did not fully apply

measures to reduce noise during manufacturing. The Consultant has reminded the Contractor

on this issue. In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also instructed the Contractor

about the construction of walls to minimize noise in the batching plants area.

Besides, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to limit

night time activities and apply measures to reduce noise in the construction process to prevent

negative effects of noise on surrounding areas.

In June, 2012, the Consultant has measured noise levels in some areas with the sound meter

SC-2c.

Table 4.30: Noise levels at some stations under construction of A5

No Location Date Time Noise level (dBA) Max Min Medium

1 Km117+050 19/06/2012 8:30 A.M 51 43 47.0 2 Km118+820 19/06/2012 9:40 A.M 71 52 61.5 3 Km121+433 19/06/2012 2:40 P.M 72 53 62.5

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

Compare with the results of noise measurement of the Contractor in May, 2012:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

82

Table 4.31: Noise level measured at Km 117+050

Station Site Result (dB) (average) QCVN 26:2010 Exceeding value

Working shift 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h

Km 117+050

Bao Long church 53,3 42,8 55 45 - -

- The value of noise level referred to standards applied for commerce, office, industry areas. - Noise primarily generated from the vehicles but constructional equipment

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

Table 4.32: Noise level measured at Km118+820 and Km121+433

Station Site Result (dB) (average) QCVN 26:2010 Exceeding value

Working shift 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h 6 h – 21h 21h – 6h

Km 118+820

Hop Minh My bridge 62,5 51,3 70 55 - -

Km 121+433

QL37 bridge 67,2 48,5 70 55 - -

- The value of noise level referred to standards applied for commerce, office, industry areas. - Noise primarily generated from the vehicles but constructional equipment

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

This noise level does not exceed Vietnamese Standards QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT (Acoustics –

Noise in public and residential areas maximum permitted noise level).

The individually-recorded results are relative random because the magnitude of noise level

recorded on site is depended on the number of vehicles on the road at the time of monitoring

but activities at the construction site.

4.4.6 Package A6

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor did not create serious impacts on noise and vibration

on the surrounding areas.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

83

However, at some production plants which are located close to residential areas such as

Km180, Km165, Km163... the Contractor operated at night in some days this month. However,

the Contractor has not applied measures fully to minimize noise; this could create negative

effects of noise on the residential areas surrounding the plants. The Consultant has reminded

the Contractor on these outstanding issues in the site inspections. In addition, the Consultant

has required the Contractor to limit construction and production at night, and the construction

activities of the Contractor shall comply with the limits of the Project.

In April 2012, the Consultant conducted measuring the noise level in some areas with the

sound meter SC-2c.

Table 4.33: Noise levels at some stations under construction of A6

No Location Date Time Noise level (dBA) Max Min Medium

1 Km155+360 19/04/2012 10:20 AM 59 46 52.5 2 Km159+400 19/04/2012 2:00 PM 61 43 52.0 3 Km162+800 19/04/2012 3:10 PM 72 55 63.5 4 Km165+300 19/04/2012 4:05 PM 71 51 61.0

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

In coming months, the Consultant will regularly test noise level in the sensitive areas and

residential areas with the sound meter SC-2c to timely detect the areas with the noise levels

over permitted TCVN in order to advise the Contractor to implement the noise minimization

measures that are appropriate in that area.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no serious impact of noise and vibration from construction activities of the Contractor.

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At the batching plant close to residential areas such as Km180, Km165, Km163, ... the

Contractor has not fully applied measures to reduce noise in the operations process at

some nights in the month; this has created adverse impacts of noise on the residential

areas surrounding the plant.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

84

- The transportation of concrete from the batching plant to the site at some stations such

as Km164 - Km165, Km156 - Km175,.... was carried out by the contractor in some night

time; this has created noise affecting the surrounding residential areas.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these issues, and the Consultant has also

requested the Contractor to limit construction and production at night time as well as to comply

with the project’s limits during construction process.

In the portal of tunnel areas, during the operation of machinery, loud noises have arisen. The

Consultant has requested the Contractor to provide workers the protection and safety

equipment during the construction process.

In May 2012, the Consultant conducted measuring the noise level in some areas with the

sound meter SC-2c.

Table 4.34: Noise levels at some stations under construction of A6

No Location Date Time Noise level (dBA) Max Min Medium

1 Km155+360 14/05/2012 10:30 AM 58 49 53.5 2 Km159+400 14/05/2012 2:10 PM 60 43 51.5 3 Km162+800 14/05/2012 3:20 PM 71 58 64.5 4 Km165+300 14/05/2012 4:00 PM 72 58 65.0

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

In coming months, the Consultant will regularly test noise level in the sensitive areas and

residential areas with the sound meter SC-2c to timely detect the areas with the noise levels

over permitted TCVN in order to advise the Contractor to implement the noise minimization

measures that are appropriate in that area.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, Consultant found that the activities

of construction have not caused serious impact on noise and vibration to the surrounding area

of Provision Project.

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- Due to the construction of some bridges on the route, the pouring of concrete for bridge

construction items was implemented on night time, the vehicles which transported

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

85

construction materials caused noise to the residential sector at Km165, Km157, etc.

However, these effects were local only and did not last long, Consultant reminded the

Contractor on this issue, and also required the Contractor to comply with construction

measures at night time to minimize the effects on noise and vibration to the

surrounding areas.

- In the mixing region which was close to residential areas as Km180, Km165, Km163, ...

the Contractor has not fully applied measures to minimize noise during manufacturing

operations. The Consultant reminded the Contractors on this issue. In the weekly on-

site inspections, the Consultant also guided the Contractor for the construction of walls

to minimize noise in the mixing area.

In June 2012, the Consultant conducted measuring the noise level in some areas with the

sound meter SC-2c.

Table 4.35: Noise levels at some stations under construction of A6

No Location Date Time Noise level (dBA) Max Min Medium

1 Km155+360 15/06/2012 9:30 AM 60 51 55.5 2 Km159+400 15/06/2012 11:10 PM 59 47 53.0 3 Km162+800 15/06/2012 2:20 PM 72 59 65.5 4 Km165+300 15/06/2012 3:50 PM 70 58 64.0

(Source: Sound meter SC-2c)

In coming months, the Consultant will regularly test noise level in the sensitive areas and

residential areas with the sound meter SC-2c to timely detect the areas with the noise levels

over permitted TCVN in order to advise the Contractor to implement the noise minimization

measures that are appropriate in that area.

4.4.7 Package A7

April

The construction of road base operations, transportation of materials can also cause impacts

on noise and vibration but the impacts are appraised to be acceptable and in accordance with

standards noise and vibration levels.

The concrete mixing plants such as Km209 +329 of Tan Tien bridge, Km198 +400 of Xom

Danh bridge, Khe Sang bridge at Km191 +353 are located away from residential areas and

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

86

sensitive areas hence the operation of the stations did not affect on the around areas for the

level of noisy and vibration trauma. However, the consultant always reminds the contractor to

limit even forbid construction activities to create noisy and violence in the early morning,

noontime or middle night.

May

The construction of road base operations, transportation of materials can also cause impacts

on noise and vibration but the impacts are appraised to be acceptable and in accordance with

standards noise and vibration levels.

The concrete mixing plants such as Km209+329 of Tan Tien bridge, Km198+400 of Xom Danh

bridge, Khe Sang bridge at Km191+353 are located away from residential areas and sensitive

areas hence the operation of the stations did not affect on the around areas for the level of

noisy and vibration trauma. However, the consultant always reminds the contractor to limit

even forbid construction activities to create noisy and violence in the early morning, noontime

or middle night.

Result of the Contractor noise and vibration levels monitoring (carried out by Institute of

Environmental technology in April 2012) showed that construction works not effected to noise

and vibration levels

Noise measuring results are compared with QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National Technical

Regulation on Noise. Maximum allowable noise levels are shown in the following table:

Table 4.36: Noise measuring

Sample Noise (dBA)

Leq Lmax L50

L1 L2 L3 TB L1 L2 L3 TB L1 L2 L3 TB N01 57.2 57 57.5 57.2 75.6 74.5 76.2 75.4 52.8 50.6 52.2 51.9 N02 58.7 56.8 57.5 57.7 78.7 79.2 80.5 79.4 51.2 52.0 52.6 51.9 N03 63.4 64.2 63.2 63.6 86.1 87.2 86.7 86.7 52 53.5 52.8 52.8 N04 67.9 66.8 67.0 67.2 82.7 80.5 80.1 81.1 63.6 62.4 63.0 63.0 N05 63.4 63.6 63.0 63.3 82.8 81.7 81.5 82.0 54.4 54 53.6 54.0 N06 57.3 57.0 57.6 57.3 81.8 81.2 81.6 81.5 52.2 52.0 52.7 52.3 N07 62.4 62.8 62.0 62.4 76.3 76.8 76.0 76..4 58.7 59.0 58.5 58.7 N08 65.6 66.2 66.0 65.9 86.6 86.8 86.2 86.5 53.1 53.3 53.0 53.1 N09 63.4 63.6 63.0 63.3 82.8 81.7 81.5 82.0 54.4 54 53.6 54.0 N10 57.3 57.0 57.6 57.3 81.8 81.2 81.6 81.5 52.2 52.0 52.7 52.3 N11 59.9 60.2 61.3 60.5 85.3 86.2 85.8 85.8 51.1 52.3 52.0 51.8

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

87

Sample Noise (dBA)

Leq Lmax L50

L1 L2 L3 TB L1 L2 L3 TB L1 L2 L3 TB N12 60.6 61.2 61.0 60.9 83.5 84.3 84 83.9 55.2 53.8 53.5 54.2 N13 62 62.5 62.8 62.4 82.6 82.8 83 82.8 54.6 54.8 54.6 54.7 N14 66.6 67.0 66.5 66.7 91.6 91.8 91.4 91.6 54 56 55.8 55.3 TCVN 5949:1998 70 - -

As mentioned above, all the noise monitoring results are compared with National Technical

Regulation QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT. Most of the results are lower in compare to the prescribed

level in regulation and ranges of measured results are as follows:

Leq noise levels ranged from 57.2 dBA to 67.2 dBA. The highest value was found in Bridge

girder casting yard, Xuan Sang 2 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District (coordinates N:

22007,442’; E:104024,026’)

As the same as noise monitoring, the results of vibration monitoring will be compared with

QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on Vibration, and are described as

follows:

Table 4.37: Vibration Monitoring Results

Sample Laeq (m/s2) Lveq (m/s) Frequency

(Hz) L1 L2 L3 TB L1 L2 L3 TB V01 0.0013 0.000904 0.0009 0.001035 0.000258 0.00018 0.000179 0.000206 8Hz V02 0.000889 0.000587 0.000587 0.000688 0.000177 0.000117 0.000117 0.000137 8Hz V03 0.00173 0.00111 0.00102 0.001287 0.000345 0.00022 0.000203 0.000256 8Hz V04 0.00192 0.00198 0.00146 0.001787 0.000383 0.000394 0.000289 0.000355 8Hz V05 0.000881 0.000707 0.000552 0.000713 0.000175 0.000141 0.00011 0.000142 8Hz V06 0.00414 0.000667 0.000321 0.001709 0.0000824 0.000133 0.0000638 0.0000931 8Hz V07 0.000633 0.00074 0.000522 0.000632 0.000126 0.000147 0.000104 0.000127 8Hz V08 0.00122 0.00108 0.00101 0.001103 0.000243 0.000216 0.000202 0.000220 8Hz V09 0.000881 0.000707 0.000552 0.000713 0.000175 0.000141 0.00011 0.000142 8Hz V10 0.00414 0.000667 0.000321 0.001709 0.0000824 0.000133 0.0000638 0.0000931 8Hz V11 0.000594 0.000792 0.000496 0.000627 0.000118 0.000157 0.0000986 0.000125 8Hz V12 0.000594 0.000496 0.000492 0.000527 0.000118 0.000986 0.0000979 0.000401 8Hz V13 0.000411 0.00077 0.000615 0.000599 0.0000818 0.000153 0.000122 0.000119 8Hz V14 0.00139 0.000952 0.00118 0.001174 0.000277 0.000184 0.000235 0.000232 8Hz

TCVN 6962:2001 0.055

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

88

As a rule, the vibration acceleration should not exceed 0.055 m/s2 from 7h to 19h. According

to table 6, the average vibration values range from 0.000527 to 0.001787 m/s2 and below the

prescribed level.

Note: Locations for noise monitoring are the following:

N01: Xuan Sang 1 Primary School, Xuan Sang 1 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van ban District

(coordinates N: 22007,895’; E:104023,844’)

N02: Concrete mixing plant No,1, Ngam Thin Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009,615’; E:104020,459’)

N03: Concrete mixing plant No,2, Dap Tran Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009,249’; E:104020,751’)

N04: Bridge girder casting yard, Xuan Sang 2 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22007,442’; E:104024,026’)

N05: Equipment gathering yard, worker’s living area, Khe U Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune,

Van Ban District (coordinates N: 22011,545’; E:104019,420’)

N06: Cam Con Primary School, Khe Mai Hamlet, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22012,167’; E:104018,523’)

N07: Cam Con Health Center, Tan Tien Commune, Bao Yen District (coordinates N:

22014,142’; E:104016,553’)

N08: Drainage casting yard No,1, Khe Quat Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22008,585’; E:104022,537’)

N09: Khe U Primary School, Khe U Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22011,604’; E:104019,474’)

N10: Residential areas at the right side of project road, Ban Ly Hamlet, Cam Con Commune,

Bao Yen District (coordinates N: 22012,217’; E:104018,563’)

N11: Tan Thuong Secondary School, Khe Tep Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban

District (coordinates N: 22011,021’; E:104020,370’)

N12: Drainage casting yard No,2, Bong 1 Hamlet, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22013,532’; E:104016,995’)

N13: Cam Con Secondary School, Hamlet 2, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22014,380’; E:104016,388’)

N14: Tan An Kinder Garden, Tan Duong Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009,511’; E:104021,960’)

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

89

Note: Locations for vibrations monitoring are the following:

V01: Xuan Sang 1 Primary School, Xuan Sang 1 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van ban District

(coordinates N: 22007,895’; E:104023,844’)

V02: Concrete mixing plant No,1, Ngam Thin Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009,615’; E:104020,459’)

V03: Concrete mixing plant No,2, Dap Tran Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009,249’; E:104020,751’)

V04: Bridge girder casting yard, Xuan Sang 2 Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22007,442’; E:104024,026’)

V05: Equipment gathering yard, worker’s living area, Khe U Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune,

Van Ban District (coordinates N: 22011,545’; E:104019,420’)

V06: Cam Con Primary School, Khe Mai Hamlet, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22012,167’; E:104018,523’)

V07: Cam Con Health Center, Tan Tien Commune, Bao Yen District (coordinates N:

22014,142’; E:104016,553’)

V08: Drainage casting yard No,1, Khe Quat Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22008,585’; E:104022,537’)

V09: Khe U Primary School, Khe U Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22011,604’; E:104019,474’)

V10: Residential areas at the right side of project road, Ban Ly Hamlet, Cam Con Commune,

Bao Yen District (coordinates N: 22012,217’; E:104018,563’)

V11: Tan Thuong Secondary School, Khe Tep Hamlet, Tan Thuong Commune, Van Ban

District (coordinates N: 22011,021’; E:104020,370’)

V12: Drainage casting yard No,2, Bong 1 Hamlet, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22013,532’; E:104016,995’)

V13: Cam Con Secondary School, Hamlet 2, Cam Con Commune, Bao Yen District

(coordinates N: 22014,380’; E:104016,388’)

V14: Tan An Kinder Garden, Tan Duong Hamlet, Tan An Commune, Van Ban District

(coordinates N: 22009,511’; E:104021,960’)

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

90

June

The construction of road base operations, transportation of materials can also cause impacts

on noise and vibration but the impacts are appraised to be acceptable and in accordance with

standards noise and vibration levels.

The concrete mixing plants such as Km209 +329 of Tan Tien bridge, Km198 +400 of Xom

Danh bridge, Khe Sang bridge at Km191 +353 are located away from residential areas and

sensitive areas hence the operation of the stations did not affect on the around areas for the

level of noisy and vibration trauma. However, the consultant always reminds the contractor to

limit even forbid construction activities to create noisy and violence in the early morning,

noontime or middle night.

4.4.8 Package A8

April

Currently a number of constructions such as Suoi Nhu, IC 18 and Ngoi Bo Bridges did not

cause impacts on noisy and vibration because the location of construction of the bridge away

from residential areas and sensitive areas .

In addition, the construction of road base operations, transportation of materials can also

cause impacts on noise and vibration but the impacts are appraised to be acceptable and in

accordance with standards noise and vibration levels. However, the consultant always reminds

the contractor to limit even forbid construction activities to create noisy and violence in the

early morning, noontime or middle night.

May

Currently the batching plant of some bridge as: Suoi Trat Bridge, IC18 Bridge and Ngoi Bo

Bridge did not cause impacts on noisy and vibration because the location of construction of the

bridge away from residential areas and sensitive areas.

However the concrete batching plan of Suoi Nhu Km218+040 too near house of local people,

so consultant required the contractor no operation the concrete batching plan at night time to

avoid effect about noising and vibrations for citizens.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

91

In addition, the construction of road base operations, transportation of materials can also

cause impacts on noise and vibration but the impacts are appraised to be acceptable and in

accordance with standards noise and vibration levels. However, the consultant always reminds

the contractor to limit even forbid construction activities to create noisy and violence in the

early morning, noontime or middle night.

June

Currently the batching plant of some bridge as: Suoi Trat Bridge, IC18 Bridge and Ngoi Bo

Bridge did not cause impacts on noisy and vibration because the location of construction of the

bridge away from residential areas and sensitive areas.

However the concrete batching plan of Suoi Nhu Km218+040 too near house of local people,

so consultant required the contractor no operation the concrete batching plan at night time to

avoid effect about noising and vibrations for citizens.

In addition, the construction of road base operations, transportation of materials can also

cause impacts on noise and vibration but the impacts are appraised to be acceptable and in

accordance with standards noise and vibration levels. However, the consultant always reminds

the contractor to limit even forbid construction activities to create noisy and violence in the

early morning, noontime or middle night.

4.5 STREAMS AND RIVERSIDES MAINTENANCE

4.5.1 Package A1

April

In the site inspections we detected that there is no improvement at Tan Loi Bridge. The water

flow is still being blocked due to unsuitable working measures. The risk of riverside landslide is

still high, especially in the rainy season because there is no countermeasure applied. We also

found the similar status at Xuan Phuong Bridge, although the Contractor has already restarted

work in this area but he still doesn’t apply any countermeasure to prevent landslide on

riverside.

At other sections, we didn’t see serious problem during the site inspections.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

92

May

The small streams and temporary drainage maintenance on sites was well done this month.

However, at Tan Loi Bridge and Xuan Phuong Bridge, the Contractor has not taken any action

to improve the situation. Now it’s already in rainy season and after some rains, the Piers 2 and

3 of Tan Loi Bridge is being flooded, the soil in riverbed has not been removed. Beside, there

is no riverside protection measure applied so the risk of landslide on riverside is still visible.

The PSC has instructed and requested the Contractor to solve this matter but up to now, there

is no improvement.

At other sections, we didn’t see serious problem during the site inspections.

June

The small streams and temporary drainage maintenance on sites was well done this month.

However, at Tan Loi Bridge and Xuan Phuong Bridge, the Contractor has not taken any action

to improve the situation. Now it’s already in rainy season and after some rains, the Piers 2 and

3 of Tan Loi Bridge is being flooded, the soil in riverbed has not been removed. Beside, there

is no riverside protection measure applied so the risk of landslide on riverside is still visible.

The PSC has instructed and requested the Contractor to solve this matter but up to now, there

is no improvement.

At other sections, we didn’t see serious problem during the site inspections.

4.5.2 Package A2

April

During the site inspections this month we found that there is no improvement at Ben Tre

Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction sites. The water flows are being

blocked in these areas and the Contractor has not taken any action to solve this problem.

Therefore, the PSC still maintain the measure of suspending the procedures of payment

progress of all items of these works until the Contractor implements completely requirements

of us.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

93

At Km 42+620, many times we requested the Contractor to install a temporary culvert here to

prevent flooding in sunken area until the permanent culvert to be constructed. However, up the

day there is no action of the Contractor to resolve this matter.

At other sections, we didn’t find the serious problem during the site inspection this month.

May

During the site inspections this month we found that there is no improvement at Ben Tre

Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction sites. The water flows are being

blocked in these areas and the Contractor has not taken any action to solve this problem.

Therefore, the PSC still maintain the measure of suspending the procedures of payment

progress of all items of these works until the Contractor implements completely requirements

of us.

At Km 42+620, many times we requested the Contractor to install a temporary culvert here to

prevent flooding in sunken area until the permanent culvert to be constructed. However, up the

day there is no action of the Contractor to resolve this matter.

At other sections, we didn’t find the serious problem during the site inspection this month.

June

There is no improvement at Ben Tre Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge. The

water flows are still being blocked due the the Contractor has not removed the spoil into

riverbeds despite the warnings of the Engineer.

At Km 42+620, we didn’t see any change, we many times requested the Contractor to install a

temporary culvert here to prevent flooding in sunken area until the permanent culvert to be

constructed but the Contractor doesn’t take any action to resolve this matter.

At other sections, we didn’t find the serious problem during the site inspection this month.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

94

4.5.3 Package A3

April, May and June

At present, we have not found any problem in site or complaint from local people about

streams and riversides maintenance.

4.5.4 Package A4

April

Bentonite and waste mud after drilling bore pile is always poured directly into river (Ngoi Lao

river Km97+124) in long time, pollute water resource. The Contractor doesn’t pay attention to

protect water resource. So we force to stop work here until they resolve this problem

absolutely. After warning letter of Consultant the Contractor confined bentonite in the trench

but it is not efficient. Waste mud and bentonite still overflow into river. Now they finish drilling

bore pile in this riverside but waste bentonite was not resolved absolutely. It occupied a part of

river bed. And the other riverside of Ngoi Lao, soil and stone was fallen much into this river.

We request them must continue repair it.

Beside, at Ngoi Gianh river the Contractor reported that they removed temporary pipe culvert

pipes to allow undisrupted water flow but they still does not dredge river bed to remove all solid

which was fallen from construction activities. In addition, they poured directly waste bentonite

into this river.

At TL321C bridge, waste mud and bentonite blocked the existing irrigation canal. The access

canal was blocked by mud and rubbish. It impacted to local cultivation.

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-KEA-A4-5630 dated April 24th, 2012.

May

On May, at Ngoi Van bridge Km109+080, Contractor was drilling bore pile so all waste

bentonite and soil was overflowed into this river.

Bentonite and waste mud after drilling bore pile is always poured directly into river (Ngoi Lao

river Km97+124) in long time, pollute water resource. The Contractor doesn’t pay attention to

protect water resource. After warning letter of Consultant the Contractor confined bentonite in

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

95

the trench but it is not efficient. Waste mud and bentonite still overflow into river. Now they

finish drilling bore pile in this riverside but waste bentonite was not resolved absolutely. It

occupied a part of river bed. And the other riverside of Ngoi Lao, soil and stone was fallen

much into this river. We request them must continue repair it.

Beside, at Ngoi Gianh river the Contractor reported that they removed temporary pipe culvert

pipes to allow undisrupted water flow but they still does not dredge river bed to remove all solid

which was fallen from construction activities. In addition, they poured directly waste bentonite

into this river.

At TL321C bridge, waste mud and bentonite blocked the existing irrigation canal. The access

canal was blocked by mud and rubbish. It impacted to local cultivation.

Deadline is June 15th, 2012. Consultant’s warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May

4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-680 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

At Ngoi Van bridge Km109+080, Contractor was drilling bore pile so all waste bentonite and

soil was overflowed into this river. At Dam Nang bridge, while drilling bore pile, it rained heavily

so the water level of river is very high. It spilled over sediment pond of waste bentonite.

4.5.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

Contractor has carried out repairing some access roads across streams to ensure the natural

flow in areas such as Ngoi Lau bridge... At some construction locations such as Ngoi Thap

bridge, Ngoi Vien bridge, the construction activities of the Contractor have not affected the

conditions of the stream.

However, in some of the construction locations of the Contractor such as Ngoi Gua bridge,

Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge..., the Contractor has built the access

roads across the streams or rivers, but they were not built appropriately. In additions, the

drainage pipes of the access roads can hardly satisfy the natural water flow, especially in the

days of heavy rain; this has affected the flow of streams. To address these outstanding issues,

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

96

the Consultant has also given the Contractor specific instructions (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-

A5-282 dated 11 April 2012).

Also, in the weekly site inspection, the Consultant has frequently reminded the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and Protection Plan of the

Contractor to prevent adverse impacts on the regional irrigation sector as well as the Project’s

environment.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor have affected the regional irrigation systems, namely:

- At the areas Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge... the access roads of

the Contractor through streams and river have influenced the water flow in these areas.

At Ngoi Thia bridge, riverbank erosion phenomenon has occurred.

- In the construction process at stations Km112 - Km113, Km116 - Km117, Km118 -

Km119,..., the Contractor had no appropriate measure to ensure the irrigation system

of the region. When there was heavy rain, the regional irrigation systems were affected.

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to apply measures to resolve these outstanding

issues (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-392 dated May 7, 2012, GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-

428 dated May 15, 2012; GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-463 dated May 25, 2012 and GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 dated May 31, 2012).

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

irrigation system of the area was affected by the construction activities of the Contractor in

some areas such as:

- At the bridge area Ngoi Lau bridge and Ngoi Thia bridge, the Contractor built access

roads through streams that has increased the flow speed of water through the area.

This has led to erosion and landslide of stream banks in this area.

- The access roads of the Contractor in the area Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Gua brigde, Ngoi

Thia bridge, Van Phu bridge,... has interrupted the flow of water through this area.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

97

- In areas Km112-Km113, Km116-Km117, Km118-Km119... during construction process,

the Contractor did not fully applied appropriate measures to ensure the irrigation

system of the region. When there was heavy rain, the irrigation systems in the region

were affected.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues. Besides, the

Consultant has also required the Contractor to coordinate with local authorities and local

people to quickly overcome these effects.

In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to comply fully

with the Method Statement, the environment control and protection plan during construction to

prevent adverse impacts on the regional system irrigation.

4.5.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

regional streams and rivers were not seriously affected by the construction activities of the

Contractor.

However, at the bridge area Ngoi That (Km155+971), the access road across the stream was

damaged heavily in the heavy rainy days this month. This has affected the flow of streams as

well as caused erosion of stream’s edges at this construction location. The Consultant has

reminded the Contractor on this issue in Ref GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-360 dated 10 April, 2012.

Also, the Consultant has required the Contractor to apply appropriate measures to strengthen

the access road to prevent erosion and landslides in this area.

In some construction areas through streams and rivers such as Ngoi Rom bridge, Lang Nhay

bridge, Ngoi Nhuoc bridge, Ngoi Chac bridge, Suoi Quan bridge,... the Consultant found that

there was no serious effect from the construction activities of the Contractor's works on the

flow of streams and rivers through the areas.

To ensure the Project's environment, in the site inspections, the Consultant has frequently

reminded the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement as well as the Environmental

Control and Protection Plan of the Project to prevent adverse impacts on the regional irrigation

sectors.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

98

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor have not to seriously affected the conditions of streams

and river banks. However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At Suoi Quan bridge area, the access roads through the streams of the Contractor

have obstructed the flow of streams in a number of rainy days of the month.

- At the bridge area Ngoi That, the Contractors has built the access road accross the

stream, this has speeded up the flow of water through this area, leading to the stream’s

banks erosion.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor and requested them to apply measures to

overcome these outstanding issues. In additions, in the site inspections, the Consultant has

frequently reminded the Contractor to comply with the the Method Statement and the

Environment Control and Protection Plan of the Project to prevent adverse impacts on the

regional irrigation.

June

Through the inspection and supervision in this month, the Consultant found that the activities

of construction have caused some impacts on the status of streams and rivers as follows:

- In area of Ngoi That bridge, the Contractor built the access road over stream, which

increased water flow rate through the area, led to erosion and stream bank erosion

(mentioned in Ref. DOOSAN GET3-A6-569-12-June 9, 2012).

- In areas of Ngoi Cong and Ngoi Rom bridges, the access roads which were built over

the spring prevented the flow of streams, especially on rainy days in this month.

To ensure the Project's environment as well as irrigation systems of the region, the Consultant

asked the Contractor to apply measures to resolve these outstanding issues, and consultant

frequently reminded the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement along with

environmental control and protection plans of the Project during the construction process.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

99

In addition, consultant also required the Contractor to apply measures for safety and

environment control during rainy season, and prevented erosion phenomena from occurring

(Ref. GET3-Doosan-12-A6-650 June 29, 2012).

4.5.7 Package A7

April

In April, the unsuitable material dumping at Km191+300 and Km204+581 these locations near

stream and could obstruct the stream by landside. The consultant reminded the contractor plan

grass to protect the erosion and landside into stream and to maintenance the flow rate also

water quality.

May

On May the unsuitable material dumping at Km191+300 and Km204+581 these locations near

stream and could obstruct the stream by landside. The consultant reminded the contractor plan

grass to protect the erosion and landside into stream and to maintenance the flow rate also

water quality.

June

In June, the unsuitable material dumping at Km191+300 and Km204+581 these locations near

stream and could obstruct the stream by landside. The consultant reminded the contractor plan

grass to protect the erosion and landside into stream and to maintenance the flow rate also

water quality. So until date 28-June 2012 the contractor didn’t deploying according to ADB

mission and consultant instruction.

4.5.8 Package A8

April

On April 2012, at some bridge are executing the pier near river as: Ngoi Bo Bridge, Suoi Trat,

Suoi Nhu Bridge. While construction works of Suoi Trat Bridge, the contractor maintains the

flow, streams, and riversides. However while construction works of Ngoi Bo Bridge, Suoi Nhu

Bridge, spoil of the bore pile process dumping on site and some of earth overflow into river and

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

100

stream. Therefore, it makes to obstruct flow and effect to maintenance riversides and stream.

Consultant required the contractor serious resolve and no repeat.

May

On May 2012, at some bridge are executing the pier near river as: Ngoi Bo Bridge, Suoi Trat,

Suoi Nhu Bridge. While construction works of Ngoi Bo Bridge and Suoi Nhu Bridge, the

contractor maintains the flow, streams, and riversides. However while construction works of

Suoi Trat Bridge, spoil of the bore pile process dumping on site and some of earth overflow

into river and stream. Therefore, it could to obstruct flow and effect to maintenance riversides

and stream. Consultant required the contractor serious resolve and no repeat.

June

In June 2012, at some bridges they are executing the pier near river such as: Ngoi Bo Bridge,

Suoi Trat, Suoi Nhu Bridge. While construction works of Ngoi Bo Bridge and Suoi Nhu Bridge,

the contractor maintains the flow, streams, and riversides. However while construction works

of Suoi Trat Bridge, spoil of the bore pile process dumping on site and some of earth overflow

into river and stream. Therefore, it could to obstruct flow and effect to maintenance riversides

and stream. Consultant required the contractor serious resolve and no repeat.

4.6 EROSION RISKS AND STABILITY IN SLOPES

4.6.1 Package A1

April

At Tan Loi Bridge and Xuan Phuong Bridge construction sites the status of high risk of

landslide on riversides still has not been solved. The Contractor doesn’t take any action to

implement the requirements of the PSC to apply the countermeasures in order to prevent

riversides washing away going on.

At other sections, we also recommended the Contractor to pay attention to high embankment

sections to apply the suitable measures to minimize the erosion risk and ensure the stability on

slopes.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

101

May

We did not find any improvement at Tan Loi Bridge and Xuan Phuong Bridge where the

riversides are being undermined and the risk of landslide is visible on riversides. The PSC has

instructed and requested the Contractor to solve this problema, but till now the Contractor still

has not taken any action to implement requirements of us.

At section Km 15+120 ~ Km 15+900, the surfaced runoff caused erosion on slopes of

embankment but not serious. The PSC has requested the Contractor top pay attention to this

issue to apply the appropriate method in order to protect slopes.

At some others sections with high slopes of embankment, the Contractor began grassing on

slopes such as section Km 16+000 ~ Km 17+000, section Km 22+000 ~ Km 22+400 and

section Km 25+500 ~ Km 26+000.

June

We didnt’ find any improvement at Tan Loi Bridge and Xuan Phuong Bridge where the

riversides are being undermined and the risk of landslide is visible on riversides. The PSC has

instructed and requested the Contractor to solve this problema, but till now the Contractor still

has not taken any action to implement requirements of us.

At section Km 15+120 ~ Km 15+900, the surfaced runoff caused erosion on slopes of

embankment but not serious. The PSC has requested the Contractor top pay attention to this

issue to apply the appropriate method in order to protect slopes.

At some others sections with high slopes of embankment, the Contractor began grassing on

slopes such as section Km 16+000 ~ Km 17+000, section Km 22+000 ~ Km 22+400 and

section Km 25+500 ~ Km 26+000.

4.6.2 Package A2

April

At section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670, the Contractor still has not applied any erosion or

sediment control measure to prevent erosion leading soil into adjacent croplands. By

observations we found that this problem is going on. Therefore, we still close the procedures of

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

102

payment progress of all items in this section until the Contractor implemented our

requirements.

At section Km 34+780 ~ Km 35+000, we also detected the risk of erosion due to the

embankment in this area is high and the Contractor also has not applied any erosion

countermeasure to prevent similar issue as in section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670. The PSC has

requested the Contractor to pay attention to and apply necessary measures in this section.

At other sections, during the site inspections we didn’t see any serious issue happening on

construction sites.

May

At section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670, the Contractor still has not applied any erosion or

sediment control measure to prevent erosion leading soil into adjacent croplands. By

observations we found that this problem is going on. Therefore, we still close the procedures of

payment progress of all items in this section until the Contractor implemented our

requirements.

At section Km 34+780 ~ Km 35+000, we also detected the risk of erosion due to the

embankment in this area is high and the Contractor also has not applied any erosion

countermeasure to prevent similar issue as in section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670. The PSC has

requested the Contractor to pay attention to and apply necessary measures in this section.

At other sections, during the site inspections we didn’t see any serious issue happening on

construction sites.

June

At section Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+670, the erosion still leads the soil into croplands and the

Contractor didn’t take any action to correct this problem despite the warning of the

Engineer.

We also found the similar risk at section Km 34+780 ~ Km 35+000. The PSC has instructed

the Contractor how to correct this issue and requested him to apply the countermeasure to

solve this matter; however, up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

103

At other sections, during the site inspections we didn’t see any serious issue happening on

construction sites.

4.6.3 Package A3

April

Regarding compensation for impact households in Chi Tien commune because solid of slopes

washout into fields from July 2011, the Contractor and Chi Tien people’s committee had a

meeting on March 16th, 2012. Deadline of Contractor is March 28th, 2012 they will pay all

compensation money for Chi Tien. On middle of April Posco E&C contractor paid

compensation for Chi Tien people’s committee and requested they that when pay money for

impact households they must invite some representative of Contractor attend. Contractor had

money exchange statement.

May

During May, we have found that some cases of soil washout into field at Km58+217 TL325B

bridge. But Contractor explained that this field inside construction site’s limit. But we still

remind Contractor must careful and pay attention carry out suitable method to avoid soil

washout because we are coming the rain season.

June

At Baibang railway flyover bridge, erosion of soil appeared. At other areas, we did not detect

erosion of soil. In package A3, contractor were planting grass in section 1 and 2.

4.6.4 Package A4

April

In the construction progress, the soil environment will be affected by the earthworks that

results in erosion and landslide. Currently, there is no report or findings related to these

problems based on these points of view. However, the Consultant has warned the Contractors

to pay attention to regularly monitor and record on the issue.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

104

May

In the construction progress on May, we have found that at some location at Km103+800 and

Km104+200 soil washout a lot into fields next to site. Now it is going to rain season, so if

Contractor does not resolve this problem quickly it will impact seriously in next period.

Consultant requested Contractor must dredge all fallen soil out of this areas and give suitable

measures to prepare for coming rain season avoid effects for local cultivate.

June

We did not detect the erosion of soil.

4.6.5 Package A5

April

Because the Contractor has not fully complied with the requirements of the Project as well as

the instructions of the Consultant, so on some heavy rainy days in this month, erosion

continued to occur at some construction locations of the Contractor such as Km116-Km117,

Km117-Km119...., this has led to the situation of soil from the Project’s area flooded the

production land of local people, affecting the soil quality as well as filling some of their

aquaculture ponds.

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to resolve these outstanding issues in Ref

GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-213 and required them to coordinate with local people and local

authorities to solve the problems of erosion base.

The rainy season is coming soon, so in this month, the Consultant has also urgently required

the Contractor to submit the grass growing methods at the slopes to prevent erosions.

May

Because the Contractor did not fully comply with the instructions of the Consultant as well as

the requirements of the Project, some outstanding issues have occured as follows:

- On some rainy days in this month, the soil from the Project’s area followed the rain

running down to the production land areas of local people such as Km116 - Km117,

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

105

Km117 - Km118, Km119, Km126, Km127... affecting the soil quality (agricultural land,

forestry land, aquaculture land...).

- The Contractor has conducted access roads across the river at the bridge area Ngoi

Thia, but they have not complied with the Method Statement, this has led to increasing

of water flow speed through this area and the landslide of riverbanks.

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to resolve the outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-428 dated May 15, 2012 and GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 dated May

05, 2012. Also, the Consultant has required the Contractor to coordinate with local people and

local authorities to address thoroughly the issues relating to erosion.

June

Through the inspection and supervision of the Contractor’s construction activities this month,

the Consultant found that there are some outstanding issues as follows:

- At the bridge area Ngoi Lau bridge and Ngoi Thia bridge, the Contractor built access

roads through streams that has increased the flow speed of water through the area.

This has led to erosion and landslide of stream banks in this area.

- At stations Km116-Km117, Km117-Km118, Km119, Km126, Km127,..., on a number of

rainy days, erosion occurred; soil from the Project’s area following the rain flooded the

production areas of local people. This has affected the region's soil quality (agricultural

land, forest land, aquaculture land). However, so far, the Contractor have not yet fully

solved this problem

The Consultant has asked the Contractor to quickly apply measures to resolve these

outstanding issues (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-594 dated June 29, 2012). Besides, the

Consultant has also required the Contractor to coordinate with local people and local

authorities to address thoroughly the issues related to erosion.

In addition, the Consultant has urgently required the Contractor to submit the Method

Statement for the grass growing in the slopes areas to ensure the stability in slopes and

reduce erosion, especially in the upcoming rainy season.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

106

4.6.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no serious effect from erosion and landslides in the project area.

However, at the bridge area Ngoi That, the Contractor built access road across the stream, so

in a number of rainy days in the month, erosion happened in the stream edges (Ref. GET3-

DOOSAN-12-A6-360 dated 10 Ảpil, 2012). The Consultant requested the Contractor to resolve

this outstanding issue to ensure the Project's environment as well as to prevent erosion and

landslides occurring in the future.

At station Km176, when there was heavy rain, erosion occurred at some slopes (areas where

the Contractor have been planting grass), which has affected the stability in slopes as well as

the development of grass. To overcome this problem, the Consultant has reminded the

Contractor about this in GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-421 dated 26 April 2012.

During this time, the Contractor continued to implement planting of grass in some slopes of the

embankment areas (Km157, Km176, Km162, ...), and the Contractor are trying to complete

this job before the rainy season to minimize erosion and landslides.

This month, the Contractor also conducted test of grass planting on the positive slopes. The

results will be tested, and the Consultant will conduct growing grass at all positive slopes in the

near future.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, Consulting found that there are

some outstanding issues as follows:

- At the bridge area Ngoi That, the Contractors has built the access road accross the

stream, this has speeded up the flow of water through this area, leading to the stream’s

banks erosion.

- In some areas the slope cutting area, the Contractor has not fully complied with the

Method Statement. Therefore, landslides has occurred such as in the area:

Km179+490 - Km1789+550, Km 157+200 - Km157+400...

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

107

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these issues, and the Consultant has also

required Contractor to apply effective measures to prevent erosion and landslides in the future.

This month, the Contractor has continued to implement growing grass at the embankment

slope areas such as at Km154, Km156, Km174, Km176... to limit erosion and landslides

occurred.

The test of growing grass at the cutting slopes areas have brought positive results in the

month, and the Contractor will conduct mass planting grass at all of the cutting slopes areas in

the near future to ensure the stability in slope and limit erosion occuring.

June

This month, the Contractor continued to grow grass in the area of the embankment slopes as

in Km157, Km156, Km161, Km162, Km176... and the slopes of the excavation area as in

Km154, Km165... to ensure stability of slopes as well as limit erosion and landslides. However,

by inspection and supervision on site, Consultant found that there were still some outstanding

issues as follows:

- In areas of Km179 +490 - Km179 +550, Km 157 +200 - Km157+400... slope erosion at

positive slopes occurred; however, the Contractor has not yet applied measures to

resolve these outstanding issues so far.

- In areas of Ngoi That Bridge, the Contractor built the access roads through stream,

which increased water flow rate through the area, led to erosion and stream bank

erosion (mentioned in Ref. DOOSAN GET3-A6-569-12-June 9, 2012).

To ensure environment safety of the Project, the Consultant also required the Contractor to

apply effective measures to resolve these outstanding issues.

4.6.7 Package A7

April

In April 2012, along to package A7 the contractor had planted grass and make drainage

ditches in almost slope to prevent erosion and landside and in some slope, the grass has

grown. In May, the contractor continue grass and make drainage at remain location before

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

108

raining season. Some slope which planed grass now grow up, it could prevent erosion and

landside in coming raining season.

Other, Consultant remind Contractor at position height digits and deep excavation can causing

dangerous to worker and citizens by erosion.

May

On May 2012 along to package A7 the contractor had planted grass and make drainage

ditches from Km201+000 to Km209+000 to prevent erosion and landside. In May the

contractor continue plants grass and make drainage at remain location before raining season.

Some slope which planed grass now grow up, it helped to prevent erosion and landside in

coming raining season.

Other, Consultant remind Contractor at position height digits and deep excavation can causing

dangerous to worker and citizens by erosion.

June

In June 2012 along to package A7 the contractor had planted grass and make drainage

ditches from Km201+000 to Km217+000 to prevent erosion and landside. In July the

contractor continue plants grass and make drainage at remain location before raining season.

Some slope which planed grass now grow up, it helped to prevent erosion and landside in

coming raining season.

Other, Consultant reminded Contractor at position height digits and deep excavation can

causing dangerous to worker and citizens by erosion.

4.6.8 Package A8

April

In many construction locations, the contractor had dug up the positive slope and negative

slope, but until this time has not happened problem about erosion and landslide. However,

consultant and investor also remind the contractor to quickly finish top of the drainage of slop

to ensure drainage and prevent erosion, landside when the rainy season is coming.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

109

May

Date 28- May 2012 at Km219-Km220 Because of heavy raining leading to earth from

embankment overflow into field and decrease the farm produce, so consultant made letter No:

Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 567 required the contractor to apply the slope protection’s method and

compensate the farm produce for citizens

Date 29- May 2012 at Km230+267- Km230+660 Because of heavy raining leading to earth

from embankment overflow into 4E road, The contractor are required to clear and applying the

slope protection’s method according to technology design to avoid landside into 4E road.

June

Date 28- June 2012 at Km219-Km220 Because of heavy raining leading to earth from

embankment overflow into field and decrease the farm produce, so consultant made letter No:

Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 567 required the contractor to apply the slope protection’s method and

compensate the farm produce for citizens

Date 29- June 2012 at Km230+267- Km230+660 Because of heavy raining leading to earth

from embankment overflow into 4E road, The contractor are required to clear and applying the

slope protection’s method according to technology design to avoid landside into 4E road.

4.7 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MANAGEMENT

4.7.1 Package A1

April

During the site inspection on Mar 27 we again detected the sloppy status in oil usage and

management at Trung Kien Bridge, Tan Loi Bridge, Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge, Km 4+700;

the oil barrels were put on ground in disorder and in lying on their side. The PSC had strongly

warned the Contractor of this issue and requested him to comply with regulations in oil usage

and management. In the site inspection on April 04 we perceived that there was improvement

at Km 4+700 and Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge but Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi Bridge. At

Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi Bridge, the Contractor still let this issue happen that caused

leak of oil on ground. In the next site inspections we also didn’t see improvement in these

areas.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

110

At other sections, in the site inspections we didn’t detect the sign of serious leak of oil/fuel or

other substance such as bitumen, grease on site.

May

By observations, we detected that the oil leaked on ground at Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi

Bridge. At Ba Thien Bridge and Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge the oil barrels were put on

ground in disorder and in lying on their side. The PSC has strongly requested the Contractor to

solve these issues, but till May 22, there was only improvement at Ba Thien and Tam Long –

Thien Ke Bridge. The PSC has seriously warned the Contractor and if in the next site

inspection we still realize that this problem is not solved we will consider deducting money.

At other sections, in the site inspections we didn’t detect the sign of serious leak of oil/fuel or

other substance such as bitumen, grease on site.

June

By observations, we detected that the oil leaked on ground at Trung Kien Bridge and Tan Loi

Bridge. At Ba Thien Bridge and Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge the oil barrels were put on

ground in disorder and in lying on their side. The PSC has strongly requested the Contractor to

solve these issues, but till May 22, there was only improvement at Ba Thien and Tam Long –

Thien Ke Bridge. The PSC has seriously warned the Contractor and if in the next site

inspection we still realize that this problem is not solved we will consider deducting money.

At other sections, in the site inspections we didn’t detect the sign of serious leak of oil/fuel or

other substance such as bitumen, grease on site.

4.7.2 Package A2

April

At Batch Plant 2 of Lo River Bridge, during the site inspection on March 28, we detected that

the oil tank/barrels are located on ground without any leak/spillage control measure. A leak of

oil on ground was noted in this area and the PSC has requested the Contractor to immediately

to comply with regulations in oil usage and management to rearrange the oil storage as well as

remove polluted soil and disposed of it properly. Till April 18, we perceived the Contractor had

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

111

surrounded oil storage with fence and a brick berm to prevent spillage of oil; the waterproof

roof was also installed.

At other sections, we didn’t see any serious problem happening in the site inspections this

month.

May

In the site inspection on May 04, we found that the oil barrels were located on ground in

disorder and in lying on their side at section Interchange No. 6 (~Km 40+200). The PSC has

requested the Contractor to solve this issue by contructing oil storage area with level concreted

ground and waterproof roof; a berm surrounding to prevent spill-over is also required.

However, up to now, the Contractor has not implemented our requirements.

On May 21, we also found the similar status at Lo River Bridge and Ben Tre Bridge. We have

requested the Contractor to solve this issue in the same way. We will recheck these areas in

next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

At other sections, we didn’t see any serious problem happening in the site inspections this

month.

June

In the site inspection on May 04, we found that the oil barrels were located on ground in

disorder and in lying on their side at section Interchange No. 6 (~Km 40+200). The PSC has

requested the Contractor to solve this issue by contructing oil storage area with level concreted

ground and waterproof roof; a berm surrounding to prevent spill-over is also required.

However, up to now, the Contractor has not implemented our requirements.

On May 21, we also found the similar status at Lo River Bridge and Ben Tre Bridge. We have

requested the Contractor to solve this issue in the same way. We will recheck these areas in

next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

At other sections, we didn’t see any serious problem happening in the site inspections this

month.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

112

4.7.3 Package A3

April

The Consultant has detected that some big oil tanks were set up in site to satisfy construction

activities at Km76+700 (national railway flyover), Km65+540 (Ho Chi Minh IC), Km61+583,

Km62... The foundation of storage was not reinforced by concrete to avoid oil leaking or fire

risk except Km70, Km62. The Consultant required the Contractor must set up fire fighting

equipment, reinforcing foundation by concrete to ensure safety in site and avoid leaking oil.

The subcontractor clean up oil leaking on ground and reground all oil drums in a regulation

place in site but they still delay to concrete storage’s foundation. We continue push them must

concrete foundation to avoid oil spill over ground as before.

May

The Consultant has detected that some big oil tanks were set up in site to satisfy construction

activities at Km76+700 (national railway flyover), Km65+540 (Ho Chi Minh IC), Km61+583,

Km62... The foundation of storage was not reinforced by concrete to avoid oil leaking or fire

risk except Km70, Km62. At some places at IC10 oil was spill over ground. The Consultant

required the Contractor must set up fire fighting equipment, reinforcing foundation by concrete

to ensure safety in site and avoid leaking oil. The subcontractor clean up oil leaking on ground

and reground all oil drums in a regulation place in site but they still delay to concrete storage’s

foundation.

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012 “Require to

overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3.

June

The Consultant has detected that some big oil tanks were set up in site to satisfy construction

activities at Km76+700 (national railway flyover), Km65+540 (Ho Chi Minh IC), Km61+583,

Km62... The foundation of storage was not reinforced by concrete to avoid oil leaking or fire

risk except Km70, Km62.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

113

4.7.4 Package A4

April

At present, we have found that big oil tanks (tank capacity is 1100m3) was put directly on

ground or buried underground (Km92+300, Km88+760, Km107+100…) without safety method

to avoid pollute soil or prevent fire risk, such as: putting higher than flood level P=1%; minimum

distance with water resources is 500m; have safety fence around the fuel tanks and reinforce

foundation by concrete to avoid oil or fuel overflow risk. The Consultant required the Contractor

must strictly follow instruction of us regarding store fuel in site. But they still delay to do it.

May

At present, we have found that big oil tanks was put directly on ground or buried underground

(Km92+300, Km88+760, Km107+100…) without safety method to avoid pollute soil or prevent

fire risk, such as: putting higher than flood level P=1%; minimum distance with water resources

is 500m; have safety fence around the fuel tanks and reinforce foundation by concrete to avoid

oil or fuel overflow risk. The Consultant required the Contractor must strictly follow instruction

of us regarding store fuel in site. But they still delay to do it.

Deadline is June 15th, 2012. Consultant’s warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May

4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-680 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

At present, we have found that big oil tanks was put directly on ground or buried underground

(Km92+300, Km88+760, Km99+600…) without safety method to avoid pollute soil or prevent

fire risk. The Consultant required the Contractor must strictly follow instruction of us regarding

store fuel in site. But they still delay to do it.

4.7.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the fuel

management activities of the Contractor have no improvement over the previous month. The

fuel management of the Contractor has been performed very poorly, as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

114

- At the fuel stations such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge,

Km136, Ngoi Lau bridge, Van Phu bridge,... the fire fighting equipments have not been

fully supplied by the Contractor.

- At Ngoi Rao bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge..., the Contractor has not

provided a full range of equipments to prevent oil leakage, therefore, the Consultant

has found traces of oil leakages on the ground.

- At Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Km136, Ngoi Lau bridge, Van Phu bridge... the

Consultant found many fuel tanks which were discriminately thrown on the ground.

This condition may cause negative impacts on the environment and safety of the Project.

Therefore, the Consultant has requested the Contractor to improve the fuel management

(mentioned in Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-215). Besides, the Consultant has also required

the Contractor to maintain the fuel stations in safe and clean condition.

In the future, the Consultant will continue to check the hazardous substances management of

the Contractor to remind them to promptly implement measures to ensure the safety and

environment of the Project.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the fuel

management activities of the Contractor have not been performed well; there are still some

outstanding issues as follows:

- The fire fighting equipments have not been fully provided by the Contractor in fuel

stations such as bridges Van Phu, Ngoi Rao, Ngoi Thia, Ngoi Gua ...

- During the site inspections, the Consultant has found traces of oil leaked on the ground

in some areas such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, ...

- The fuel tanks were located directly on the ground in areas such as Ngoi Gua bridge,

Ngoi Thia bridge...

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-444 dated May 18, 2012. At the same time, the Consultant has also

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

115

required the Contractor to improve the fuel management to prevent negative impact on the

Project’s environment.

In the future, the Consultant will continue to check the hazardous substances management of

the Contractor to remind them promptly to implement measures to ensure the Project’s safety

and environment.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

Contractor's fuel management was not improved over the previous month; there are still some

outstanding issues as follows:

- At Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge,... fire

preventing equipments and fuel leakage prevention equipments have not been

supplied by the Contractor at the fuel stations.

- During the site inspections, the Consultant has found that fuel tanks were

indiscriminately thrown on the ground in the locations Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Gua

bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge,...

- There are oil leakages at the fuel stations of Ngoi Thia bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi

Rao bridge, Km126...

To ensure the safety and environment of the Project, the Consultant has asked the Contractor

to solve the outstanding issues. In additions, the Consultant has also required the Contractor

to improve the fuel management to prevent negative environment effects of the Project.

4.7.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the fuel

management of the Contractor had some improvement over the last month such as: the

Contractor has provided fire fighting equipment at some fuel stations such as Km186+200,

Km165+100, Km155+200...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

116

- In areas Km186 +720, Km186+200, Km155+100... Many fuel tanks were directly put on

the ground.

- At the fuel stations such as Km155+100, Km165+100,... the Contractor has not

provided adequate equipments to prevent fuel leakage.

- At Km155 +100, the fuel station is still not tidy and neat.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these outstanding issues. Besides, in the

weekly site inspections, the Consultant has also offered the Contractor specific guidelines for

improving the fuel management to prevent adverse impacts on the environment.

In the future, the Consultant will continue to check the hazardous substances management of

the Contractor to remind the Contractor promptly to implement measures to ensure safety and

environment of the Project.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the fuel

management activities of the Contractor had some improvements such as:

- At the fuel stations such as Km186+200, Km171... the Contractor has provided fire

fighting equipments.

- The fuel tanks have been collected to a separate area on site such as at Km186+200,

km171...

However, there are still some outstanding issues such as:

- At the fuel stations of the Contractor such as Km155+300, Km171, Km186+300, Ngoi

Hut bridge... the Contractor has not provided equipments to prevent fuel leakage. There

is still the phenomenon of the tank put directly on the ground.

- At Km155+100, Ngoi Hut bridge.... the fuel stations was not arranged in a neat

condition.

- The Contractor has not provided fire fighting equipment at the fuel station Km187+400.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

117

The Contractor has requested Consultant to address these outstanding issues (Ref. GET3-

DOOSAN-12-A6-546 dated May 31, 2012). In addition, in the weekly site inspections, the

Consultant has also offered the Contractor specific instruction to improve the fuel management

of the Contractor to prevent adverse impacts on the environment.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site, Consultant found that the fuel management

activities of the Contractor were deployed in this month as:

- The fire prevention equipment has been provided and maintained at the fuel station as

Km186 +200, Km186+720, Km171, Km165, etc.

- The Contractor arranged fuel stationseparately in the region Km186+200, Km171...

- Installation of signs at the fuel stations the region Km186+200, Km165...

However, there were still some outstanding issues in the fuel management of the Contractor

as:

- In these on-site inspection, the Consultant found that the barrels were placed directly

on the ground as at Km155 +200, Km178+200, Km186 +720, ...

- In some areas such as Ngoi Giam bridge, Km155 +100 ... fuel station has not yet been

arranged neatly.

- At km187+400, Km184, the fire fighting equipment and warning signs have not been

provided at the fuel storage area.

To ensure safety and environment of the Project, the Consultant prompted the Contractor on

the outstanding issues, at the same time, Consultant also offered specific guidelines for the

Contractor to improve the fuel management (referred in letters of GET3-Doosan-12-A6-300).

Besides, in the on-site inspections weekly, consultant still required the Contractor to comply

with the Project safety plan along with environmental control and protection plan during the

construction process, as well as improve management of hazardous materials to ensure safety

and environment of the Project.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

118

4.7.7 Package A7

April

The hazardous substances management at the equipment repair and maintain area at

Km202+770 and Sika tanks at Concrete batching plant Km198+400 and Km209+329.

Consultant required the contractor to collect and transports the hazardous substances to

treatment area according to ECP.

May

Date 16- May 2012 consultant with ADB mission showed for the contractor the place stored oil

tanks and waste oil tanks at Km209+800; Km202+400; Km198+400 weren’t meet project

standard according to regulation into ECP, so consultant required the contractor to keep oil

tanks and waste oil tanks in stored and provide signpost fire forbidden, fire-extinguishers and a

concrete floor according to contain in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required the

contractor to overcome before 30-June 2012.

June

Date 16- May 2012 consultant with ADB mission showed for the contractor the place stored oil

tanks and waste oil tanks at Km209+800; Km202+400; Km198+400 weren’t meet project

standard according to regulation into ECP, so consultant required the contractor to keep oil

tanks and waste oil tanks in stored and provide signpost fire forbidden, fire-extinguishers and a

concrete floor according to contain in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required the

contractor to overcome before 30-June 2012. However until date 28-June 2012 the contractor

didn’t deploying according to ADB mission and consultant instruction.

4.7.8 Package A8

April

In April 2012, store area of oil and waste oil at Km224+500 no signpost, no fire-extinguisher

and oil tank and waste oil tank keep directly on the ground. So the contractor has violated

about hazardous substance manager, which was shown in environment control plan.

Consultant required the contractor to build the store area to keep oil and waste oil and installed

signpost and fire-extinguisher at there.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

119

May

Date 16- May 2012 consultant with ADB mission showed for the contractor the place stored oil

tanks and waste oil tanks at Km244+155; Km229+034; Km218+040 weren’t meet project

standard according to regulation into ECP, so consultant required the contractor to keep oil

tanks and waste oil tanks in stored and provide signpost fire forbidden, fire-extinguishers and a

concrete floor according to contain in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required the

contractor to overcome before 30-June 2012.

June

Date 16- June 2012 consultant with ADB mission showed for the contractor the place stored oil

tanks and waste oil tanks at Km244+155; Km229+034; Km218+040 weren’t meet project

standard according to regulation into ECP, so consultant required the contractor to keep oil

tanks and waste oil tanks in stored and provide signpost fire forbidden, fire-extinguishers and a

concrete floor according to contain in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required the

contractor to overcome before 30-June 2012. However, so far the contractor didn’t overcome

according to the consultant instruction.

4.8 UNSUITABLE MATERIAL DISPOSALS AND BORROW PITS

4.8.1 Package A1

April

At Underpass NH2 construction site, the direct discharge of untreated wastewater that contains sand and mud into existing irrigation canal is still going on. The Contractor doesn’t implement requirements of the Engineer to mobilize dewatering tank or gravity bag filter to remove sediment from wastewater before discharge of it. The PSC already issued a warning letter to request the Contractor to implement our requirements and if he still fails to meet requirement of us, we will consider applying the measure of money deduction.

At section Km 4+700 ~ Km 4+800 in the site inspections we perceived that almost the unsuitable material had been removed due to the Contractor.

There is no improvement recorded at abutment 1 of Trung Kien Bridge; however, on the site inspection on April 24, the Contractor promised that he will solve the problem in the next week, till May 05, 2012. We will recheck this area on May 08 for his implementation.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

120

At other sections, we did not found the serious issues during the site inspections this month.

May

In the site inspections we perceived that the Contractor already constructed a sediment basin to catch sediment from waterwater at Underpass NH2 construction site. However, this sediment basin is not enough capacity so the Engineer has requested the Contractor to supplement another beside to ensure that almost sediment will be remove from wastewater before it spills-over existing drainage. The straw bales installation at outlet of wastewater discharge area were also recommended as a effective measure to remove sand and mud from wastewater.

In the site inspection on May 08, at abutment 1 of Trung Kien Bridge, we found that the Contractor had already removed the spoil that was disposed closed to cropland. We will consider reopening the procedures of payment progress of this item if the Contractor also improves the status of tracking dirt onto public road and maintain traffic condition well.

At other sections, we didn’t found the serious issues during the site inspections this month.

June

In the site inspections we perceived that the Contractor already constructed a sediment basin to catch sediment from waterwater at Underpass NH2 construction site. However, this sediment basin is not enough capacity so the Engineer has requested the Contractor to supplement another beside to ensure that almost sediment will be remove from wastewater before it spills-over existing drainage. The straw bales installation at outlet of wastewater discharge area were also recommended as a effective measure to remove sand and mud from wastewater.

In the site inspection on May 08, at abutment 1 of Trung Kien Bridge, we found that the Contractor had already removed the spoil that was disposed closed to cropland. We will consider reopening the procedures of payment progress of this item if the Contractor also improves the status of tracking dirt onto public road and maintain traffic condition well.

At other sections, we didn’t found the serious issues during the site inspections this month.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

121

4.8.2 Package A2

April

In the site inspections, at section Interchange No. 6 we didn’t see any change in this area. The

unsuitable material is still being disposed on site where is close to croplands and local resident

area. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to remove all this material to

approved disposal places but up to now he still has not implemented requirements of us. We

have issued a warning letter and if the Contractor still fails to meet our requirements, we will

recommend the Employer to deduct money. The next site inspection will be held on May 04,

2012.

At Ben Tre Bridge, Song Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction site, in the site

inspections this month we still didn’t see any improvement in these areas. The Contractor

doesn’t take any action to correct the problems despite many requirements of the Engineer.

For Ben Gao Bridge, money deduction measure already applied due to the Contractor didn’t

improve the status but let it worsen.

May

At Interchange No. 6 section, the spoil is still being disposed along the site despite the warning of the Engineer. The Engineer had approved the disposal place for unsuitable material in this area and requested the Contractor to remove all this material to approved disposal place but the Contractor doesn’t comply with our requirement.

At Ben Tre Bridge, Song Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction site, the Contractor has not taken any action to correct the problems and the spoil has not been removed from riverbeds. The PSC has many times strongly requested the Contractor to solve this matter but there is no improvement recorded in the site inspections.

June

At Interchange No. 6 section, the spoil is still being disposed along the site despite the warning of the Engineer. The Engineer had approved the disposal place for unsuitable material in this area and requested the Contractor to remove all this material to approved disposal place but the Contractor doesn’t comply with our requirement.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

122

At Ben Tre Bridge, Song Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction site, the Contractor has not taken any action to correct the problems and the spoil has not been removed from riverbeds. The PSC has many times strongly requested the Contractor to solve this matter but there is no improvement recorded in the site inspections.

4.8.3 Package A3

April, May and June

All disposal areas of section 1 in Phu Ninh commune, section 2, section 3, section 4, section 5

and section 6 were approved to implement.

Hung Lo disposal areas were rejected from 21st January 2012.

4.8.4 Package A4

April, May and June

The Contractor submitted disposal areas record for Cam Khe (section 1, 2) district and Ha Hoa

district (section 3, 4, 5, 6). Pursuant to item 2; article 10, section 1, chapter II of Decree

59/2007/ND-CP, the Consultant approved all disposal areas for package A4 to implement. The

Contractor was addendum all information about discharging area’s co-ordinates and they will

drive stake and stretch a wire at the angles to fix the boundaries of disposal areas.

4.8.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no adverse impact on the region's environment from the disposal areas approved by the

Consultant.

At some construction locations such as Km111, Km124, Km138.., because suitable disposal

areas have not been found, the Contractor has temporarily stored unsuitable soil in the site

and will transport it to the disposal area in the near future.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

123

This month, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to quickly complete the

procedures for disposal areas with the authorities to submit to the Consultant for consideration

and approval.

Currently, in the package A5, 14 disposal areas for the unsuitable materials were approved by

the Consultant. Some others have been submitted by the Contractor but have not yet been

approved by the Consultant due to lack of necessary permits.

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to inspect disposal areas for unsuitable

materials to ensure the Project’s environment.

May

Currently, in the package A5, 14 disposal areas for unsuitable materials have been approved

by the Consultant, some others have been submitted but not yet been approved by the

Consultant due to lack of necessary permits.

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that there is

no serious problem from the disposal areas which were approved by Consultant.

Because the Consultant could not find a suitable location for disposal area, at a number of

locations such as Km111, Km123, Km124, Km126..., they have temporarily stored unsuitable

soil at the location which has not been approved by the Consultant. The Consultant has

requested the Contractor to remove the unsuitable soil to the appropriate disposal area. Also,

the Consultant has required the Contractor to quickly complete the document of disposal area

to submit to the Consultant for review and acceptance.

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to inspect the disposal areas for unsuitable

materials to ensure the Project’s environment.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no serious problem from the disposal areas which were approved by Consultant.

Currently, the Contractor has submitted 41 disposal areas, including 14 disposal areas

approved and 27 not yet been approved (due to incomplete documents with the authorities or

these area are located near rivers, streams...).

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

124

In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has still regularly required the Contractor to

comply with the requirements in the environment control and protection plan as well as the

regulations related to the disposal process for unsuitable materials in the disposal areas to

ensure the Project's environment.

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to inspect the disposal areas for unsuitable

materials to remind the Contractor promptly to resolve outstanding issues.

4.8.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

disposal areas for unsuitable materials did not cause adverse effects on the regional

environment. In some disposal areas such as Km187, Km155..., the Contractor and local

people have planted trees to prevent erosion and landslides.

However, in some areas which soilworks were under construction, the Contractor has not

completed the procedures of the disposal areas with local authorities. Therefore, at some

stations such as Km161, Km184..., the Contractor has gathered unsuitable materials in areas

which have not yet been approved by the Consultant. The Consultant has reminded the

Contractor on these issues. Also, the Consultant has required the Contractor to quickly

complete the procedures for submission to the Consultant for inspection and approval.

Besides, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant also frequently reminded and requested

the Contractor to apply measures to ensure the environment in the disposal areas to prevent

the negative effects on the environment.

Currently, there were 42 disposal areas of A6 Package which were temporary accepted by the

Consultant. Some others have been submitted to the Consultant but have not yet been

approved (because they are lack of documentation with all authorities).

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to inspect the disposal areas for unsuitable

materials to ensure the Project’s environment.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

125

May

This month, through inspection and supervision of disposal areas, the Consultant found that

there was no negative impact from disposal areas for unsuitable materialson the environment.

In some disposal areas which have been filled full volume such as Km155, Km187, Km156, ...

local people have carried out growing plants, which contributed to ensure the region's

environment and minimize erosion and landslides occurred.

In some disposal areas such as Km161, Km165, Km167... the Contractor has not completed

the procedures for disposal areas with local authorities... so the Contractor has assembled

temporarily materials in areas which have not been approved by the Consultant. The

Consultant has requested the Contractor to quickly complete the procedures for disposal areas

to submit to the Consultant for considering and approval. At the same time, the Consultant has

also required the Contractor to transport all unsuitable materials to the areas approved.

Currently, there are 42 disposal areas of package A6 are temporarily approved by the

Consultant. Some others have been submitted by the Contractor but have not yet been

approved by the Consultant (due to incompleted documentation with all levels of government).

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to inspect disposal areas for unsuitable

materials to ensure the project’s environment.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, Consultant found that the disposal

areas which had been approved by Consultant got no serious environmental issues. In some

disposal areas as in Km155, Km156, Km188, Km187, ... residents planted trees at disposal

areas in sufficient quantity, which contributed to keep environmental standard in the discharge

area.

Currently, the Contractor has submitted 78 Disposal areas, in which 57 disposal areas have

been approved and 21 have not been approved (due to incomplete documents of the

authorities or locate near rivers, streams, ...).

In the site inspections weekly, the Consultant still regularly required the Contractor to comply

with the requirements in the environment control and protection plan as well as the regulations

involved in the disposal process to ensure the Project environment.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

126

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to monitor inspecting inappropriate disposal

areas to remind the Contractor promptly resolve outstanding issues related to urban disposal

areas.

4.8.7 Package A7

April

Date April 12th 2012 the contractor submitting the document of spoil area at section1

Km190+420-Km201+000 include 08 location in letter No: Ref. GRBCC/GETINSA/A7/1101, so

after checking actual conditions on site and checking document, consultant required the

contractor repair and resubmitted in next time.

On 16 April the contractor had plan grass to prevent the erosion and landside into Red river at

unsuitable material waste disposal Km191+300, Km194+486 and Km194+800. However the

contractor dumping the earth at Km209+800 and Km201+815, which serious violated the

provision contacts and can effect to water quality.

May

Date 17-May 2012 the contractor submitting the document of spoil area at section1

Km190+420-Km201+000 include 08 location in letter No: GRBCC/GETINSA/A7/1150- Version

A2, so after checking documents and actual conditions on site, consultant required the

contractor repair and resubmitted in next time.

On 29- May the contractor had plan grass to prevent the erosion and landside into Red river at

unsuitable material waste disposal at Km209+800. However the contractor dumping the earth

at Km201+815 and Km204+581, which serious violated the provision contacts and can effect

to water quality.

June

Two unsuitable material waste disposals at Km201+815 and Km204+518, these positions not

approved by local authority and consultant. Contractor was required to submitte the documents

which was approved by local authority and apply the method of slope protection avoid landside

and erosion into streams and rivers.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

127

4.8.8 Package A8

April

Also some unsuitable material disposals were approved by consultant and the contractor have

been used to gather soil organic now have stabilized (no erosion, landslides) and a number of

unsuitable materials disposal place were used to grow cassava, maize or grass as unsuitable

material waste disposal at Km240+100.

May

Also some unsuitable material disposals were approved by consultant and the contractor have

been used to gather soil organic now have stabilized (no erosion, landslides) and a number of

unsuitable materials disposal place were used to grow cassava, maize or grass as unsuitable

material waste disposal at Km240+100.

June

Also some unsuitable material disposals were approved by consultant and the contractor have

been used to gather soil organic now have stabilized (no erosion, landslides) and a number of

unsuitable materials disposal place were used to grow cassava, maize or grass as unsuitable

material waste disposal at Km240+100.

4.9 WASTE AND CLEANLINESS IN SITE

4.9.1 Package A1

April

In the site inspections, we still found that the dirt is being tracked onto public roads where the

construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also does not clean these areas to keep them

in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes dirtiness and high spread of airborne

dust in the hot windy days.

The dirty and untidy status at Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge still has not been solved; the site is

very dirty with trash, leftover material, and debris. Therefore, we still close the procedures of

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

128

payment progress of all items of these works until the Contractor implements our

requirements.

At Interchange No.3, there was a little improvement recorded but very behindhand.

May

Having inspected the construction sites, we still realized that the dirt is being tracked onto

public roads causing dirtiness. The PSC has requested the Contractor to clean these are ato

keep it in cleanliness and sanitary condition as well as ensure the safety for road users,

however, up to the day we didn’t see him to implement requirement of us.

The dirty and untidy status is still found at Tam Long – Thien Ke and Interchange No. 3

construction site; the site is very dirty with trash, leftover material, and debris. Therefore, we

still close the procedures of payment progress of all items of these works until the Contractor

implements our requirements.

June

Having inspected the construction sites, we still realized that the dirt is being tracked onto

public roads causing dirtiness. The PSC has requested the Contractor to clean these are ato

keep it in cleanliness and sanitary condition as well as ensure the safety for road users,

however, up to the day we didn’t see him to implement requirement of us.

The dirty and untidy status is still found at Tam Long – Thien Ke and Interchange No. 3

construction site; the site is very dirty with trash, leftover material, and debris. Therefore, we

still close the procedures of payment progress of all items of these works until the Contractor

implements our requirements.

4.9.2 Package A2

April

By observations during this month we still perceived that the dirt is being tracked onto public

roads where the construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also doesn’t clean these

areas to keep them in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes dirtiness, difficulty

for travelers and high spread of airborne dust in hot windy days.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

129

There is no improvement recorded at Interchange No.6 section. The unsuitable material is still

being disposed on site where is close to croplands and local resident area. We have many

times requested the Contractor to remove all this material to approved disposal places but he

still has not implemented requirements of us. The PSC has issued a warning letter of this issue

and if the Contractor still fails to meet our requirements, we will recommend the Employer to

deduct money. The next site inspection will be held on May 04, 2012.

At Batch Plant 2 of Lo River Bridge, the dirtiness status has not been solved when we take the

site inspection on Mar 28. The PSC has strongly requested the Contractor to urgently solve

this matter by hardening the surface of entrance/exit of this area. Till April 11. In the site

inspection we found that the Contractor had already concreted a part of this area.

May

The status of tracking of dirt onto public road has not been improved. This issue caused dirtiness and high spread of airborne dust and difficulty for road users, especially in hot windy days. The PSC many times requested the Contractor to solve these problems but up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

At Interchange No. 6 section, in the site inspections we still found that the spoil has not been removed from the construction site. This problem is causing the dirtiness on site and it affected local community due to it’s disposed close to this area. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to remove all the spoil to approved disposal places; however, up to now the Contractor still has not implemented requirement of us.

At Army III Bridge, on May 22 we detected that the Contractor has not cleaned the site after demobilizing the worker’s camp. The trash is disposed surrounding on site and causes dirtiness status here. The PSC has requested the Contractor to collect the trash and dispose of it properly. We will recheck this area in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

The dirty and untidy status is also found at Ben Tre Bridge. The material, debris and trash were put on ground in disorder. We have requested the Contractor to solve this matter in order to keep the site in cleanliness and tidiness condition.

June

The status of tracking of dirt onto public road has not been improved. This issue caused dirtiness and high spread of airborne dust and difficulty for road users, especially in hot windy

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

130

days. The PSC many times requested the Contractor to solve these problems but up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

At Interchange No. 6 section, in the site inspections we still found that the spoil has not been removed from the construction site. This problem is causing the dirtiness on site and it affected local community due to it’s disposed close to this area. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to remove all the spoil to approved disposal places; however, up to now the Contractor still has not implemented requirement of us.

At Army III Bridge, on May 22 we detected that the Contractor has not cleaned the site after demobilizing the worker’s camp. The trash is disposed surrounding on site and causes dirtiness status here. The PSC has requested the Contractor to collect the trash and dispose of it properly. We will recheck this area in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

The dirty and untidy status is also found at Ben Tre Bridge. The material, debris and trash were put on ground in disorder. We have requested the Contractor to solve this matter in order to keep the site in cleanliness and tidiness condition.

4.9.3 Package A3

April

During April, when inspected in site we have detected that many rubbish which was thrown

every where at Km51+100, Red river bridge, IC 8…

At National railway flyover, the Contractor poured waste water contain concrete from concrete

mixing trucks into the pond which provide water for fields near by construction site. Contractor

was requested to stop pouring waste water in surface water resource next to site immediately.

If Contractor continues repeat offence we will have stronger method.

May

During May, when inspected in site we have detected that many rubbish which was thrown

every where at Km64+080, Km51+100, Red river bridge, IC 10…

Oil drum was thrown every where in site (Km64+080 Tl320B bridge, Red river bridge

Km78+400). Surface of construction site was untidy. Therefore, Consultant requested

Contractor must clean up site as rearrange surface of construction site, collect and remove

rubbish out site regular.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

131

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012 “Require to

overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3.

June

In june, when inspected in site, we have detected that many rubbish which were thrown every

where at TL315 bridge, Red river bridge… Therefore, Consultant requested Contractor to

clean up site as rearrange surface of construction site, collect and remove rubbish out site

regularly.

4.9.4 Package A4

April

It was very dirty in site. Rubbish, waste bentonite, sacks, iron scraps, drums were everywhere

in site at Km88+600 Ngoi Gianh, Ngoi Van briges and Km84+400 TL321C bridge. Beside,

unsuitable material was piled up in site. Therefore, the Contractor was requested to remove all

waste and unsuitable material out site and clean construction site regular. The Consultant’s

letter was ref. GET2-KEA-A4-5630 dated April 24th, 2012.

May

At present, it was very dirty in site. Rubbish, waste bentonite, sacks, iron scraps, drums were

everywhere in site at Km107+533 QL32C bypass, Km88+600 Ngoi Gianh, Ngoi Van briges

and Km84+400 TL321C bridge. Beside, unsuitable material was piled up in site. Therefore, the

Contractor was requested to remove all waste and unsuitable material out site and clean

construction site regular.

Deadline is June 15th, 2012. Consultant’s warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May

4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-680 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

In june, when inspected in site, we have detected that many rubbish which were thrown every

where at QL32C bridge, Ngoi Lao bridge, Km 104+500… Therefore, Consultant requested

Contractor to clean up site as rearrange surface of construction site, collect and remove

rubbish out site regularly.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

132

4.9.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the sanitary works of

the Contractor on site has some improvement. Some of the construction locations were kept in

neat and clean condition such as Km113, Km114, Km117, Km118, Km138...

However, there are still some outstanding issues such as:

- At some construction locations such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia

bridge, Ngoi Vien bridge... the sites have not been kept in a neat conditionl the

materials were not neatly arranged.

- Bentonite was not controlled closely by the Contractor in the construction process at

some locations such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Van Phu bridge...; this has led to the

bentonite surface runoff.

- The fuel stations of the Contractor such as at Ngoi Thia bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi

Gua brigde... have not been kept in a state of neat and clean. The Consultant has

found traces of oil leaked on the ground.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-361 dated 24 April, 2012). Besides, the Consultant has also frequently

requested the Contractor to conduct periodically cleaning works at all construction locations of

the Contractor to ensure the environment and safety of the Project.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that some of

the construction locations of the Contractor were still kept in clean condition such as Km112,

Km114, Km116, Km117, Km118, Km147 , ... However, there are still some outstanding issues

such as:

- In bridge construction areas such as bridges Ngoi Gua, QL37, Ngoi Rao, Ngoi Thia,

Van Phu... the sites were not kept neat; the construction materials and construction

equipments were not neatly arranged.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

133

- Bentonite running on the ground at the construction sites Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia

bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge...

- There were traces of oil leaked on the ground at the fuel stations of the Contractor such

as Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge...

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to quickly resolve the outstanding issues in Ref.

GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-439 dated May 16, 2012 and -KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 dated May

31, 2012.

Besides, in the site inspections, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to regularly

carry out periodical cleaning on site at all construction locations of the Contractor to ensure the

environment and safety of the Project.

June

This month, through the inspection of conditions for workers’ camps of the Contractor, the

Consultant found that there was not much improvement in terms of workers’ camps conditions;

there are still some outstanding issues such as:

- The fire preventing equipments, trash cans, first aid kits... have not been provided by

the Contractor in many workers’ camps such as: Ngoi Thia bridge, Km120, Ngoi Gua

bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge...

- In areas of Ngoi Rao bridge, Km127, Km120... clean toilets have not been built by the

Contractor in the workers’ camps.

- Daily and periodical sanitary works have not been done at many workers’ camps.

- During the weekly site inspections, the Consultant found that waste was

indiscriminately thrown on the ground in some camps areas such as Ngoi Gua bridge,

Km120, Km112...

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues. In additions, the

Consultant has also required the Contractor to improve the conditions in living and working in

camps for the workers.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

134

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to check the working and living conditions

in camps for workers to remind the Contractor to promptly resolve outstanding issues.

4.9.6 Package A6

April

This month, through the inspection on site, the Consultant found that the Contractor had many

improvements in sanitation work on site. At many construction location of the Contractor, the

sites were kept in neat and clean conditions such as Ngoi Hut bridge, Km161, Km165, Lang

Nhay bridge, Ngoi Nhuoc bridge, Km184, Km182...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At some fuel stations of the Contractor such as Km155+100, Km186+720, Km171...

many fuel tanks were put discriminately on the ground.

- At the construction locations such as Ngoi Hut bridge, Ngoi Giam bridge, Lang Lau

bridge... the materials were not arranged in neatly.

In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these issues.

Also, the Consultant has required the Contractor to carry out regular cleaning at all of

construction locations and workers' camps of the Contractor to keep the construction locations

clean and neat, avoiding unfortunate accidents.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

sanitaty work in site of the Contractor has been remained in good condition. Many construction

locations have been kept clean such as Ngoi Nhuoc bridge area, Lang Nhay bridge, Ngoi That

bridge, Km161, Km162, Km182...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At the fuel s of stations of the Contractor such as Km155+100, Km171... the fuel tanks

were placed directly on the ground.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

135

- The construction locations Ngoi Nhuoc bridge, Lang Lau bridge... the construction

materials were not neatly and clean arranged.

- At the construction location of the tunnel area, the Contractor has not conducted

periodical sanitation work regularly, the construction materials were not neatly

arranged.

- In some workers’ camps such as Lang Nau bridge, Lang Nhay bridge, Km167+879,

Ngoi Giam bridge... The Contractor has not provided trashess, so there is still the

phenomenon of waste thrown indiscriminately on the ground.

The Consultant has required the Contractor to solve the outstanding issues. The Consultant

has also required the Contractor to carry out periodical cleaning at all construction locations of

the Contractor and the workers’ camps to keep the construction locations clean and neat.

June

This month, through the inspection in conditions of workers’ camps, Consultant found that

there was not much improvement in terms of workers’ camps. There were still some

outstanding issues such as:

- Most of the camps for workers have not yet equipped the appropriate wastewater

systems, so the majority of wastewater from the worker camp was discharged directly

into the environment.

- At Lang Lau bridge in Km184 +057, Lang Nhay bridge in Km182+160, Km167 +879

and Ngoi Giam bridge in Km 163+126..., camps were in bad conditions with no trash,

first aid kit and clean toilets.

The Consultant reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues; at the same time, the

Consultant also requires the Contractor to improve living and working conditions in camps for

workers.

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to check working and living conditions in

camps for workers to remind the Contractor promptly resolve outstanding issues.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

136

4.9.7 Package A7

April

At construction works Km194+765; Km201+815 date 6- April, at Km209+329 date 16- April

and at Km195+233 date 24-April the cement package and rubbish didn’t collect and transport

to treatment area according to ECP. Consultant required the contractor to collect and transport

the waste soil to treatment area according to regulation.

May

At construction works Km195+233; Km211+565; Km209+329; Km199+131; Km201+815 date

16- May the cement package and rubbish didn’t collect and transport to treatment area

according to ECP. Consultant required the contractor to collect and transport the waste soil to

treatment area according to regulation.

June

At construction works Km195+233; Km190+420; Km194+765; Km198+400; Km209+329;

Km199+050 date 7, 13, 20- June the cement package and rubbish didn’t collect and transport

to treatment area according to ECP. Consultant required the contractor to collect and transport

the waste soil to treatment area according to regulation.

4.9.8 Package A8

April

On 13-April 2012 at construction works of Girder casting yard of Suoi Nhu bridge Km218+040;

20-April at girder casting yard of IC18 Bridge Km244+570 and 25- April at Son Hai worker’s

camp package of cement and garbage didn’t collect and transport to treatment are according

to regulation. So the contractor is reminded to collect and transport the garbage on site to

treatment area according to regulation.

May

On construction works of Km218+040 and Km244+155 date 16-May 2012 package of cement

and garbage didn’t collect and transport to treatment is according to regulation. So the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

137

contractor is reminded to collect and transport the garbage on site to treatment area according

to regulation.

June

On construction works of Km218+040; Km224+369 date 6, 21-June 2012 package of cement

and garbage didn’t collect and transport to treatment is according to regulation. So the

contractor is reminded to collect and transport the garbage on site to treatment area according

to regulation.

4.10 BIODIVERSITY PRESERVATION

4.10.1 Package A1

April, May and June

During the site inspections this month, we didn’t find any serious impacts, which arise from

construction activities of the project, on biodiversity preservation.

4.10.2 Package A2

April

It’s noted that there is no improvement at Ben Tre Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao

Bridge construction site; therefore the aquatic ecosystem probably is being impacted due to

the water flows are being blocked in these area. The PSC has many times requested the

Contractor to solve this matter but the Contractor still has not implemented requirements of us.

The PSC still closes the procedure of payment progress of all items of these works until the

Contractor implements our requirements.

May

The stastus at Ben Tre Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction site still has not been improved; therefore the aquatic ecosystem probably is still being impacted due to the water flows are being blocked. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to solve this matter but the Contractor still has not taken any ation to implement our requirements. The PSC still closes the procedure of payment progress of all items of these works until the Contractor implements our requirements.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

138

June

The stastus at Ben Tre Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge construction site still has not been improved; therefore the aquatic ecosystem probably is still being impacted due to the water flows are being blocked. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor to solve this matter but the Contractor still has not taken any ation to implement our requirements. The PSC still closes the procedure of payment progress of all items of these works until the Contractor implements our requirements.

4.10.3 Package A3

April

According to the observed and based on the monitoring results of analysis the environmental

air quality, noise and surface water in the April, 2012 shows that ecosystems and the resident

activities of the local community people around of construction area are still normally, not

detected any bad impact from the construction activities on ecosystems and communities. Until

now, The Consultant have no report about plant, animals were died by machinery or vehicle

operations in limit of construction zone.

May and June

According to the observed and based on the monitoring results of analysis the environmental

air quality, noise and surface water in the May and June, 2012 shows that ecosystems and the

resident activities of the local community people around of construction area are still normally,

not detected any bad impact from the construction activities on ecosystems and communities.

Until now, The Consultant have no report about plant, animals were died by machinery or

vehicle operations in limit of construction zone.

4.10.4 Package A4

April

According to the observed and based on the monitoring results of analysis the environmental

air quality, noise and surface water in the April, 2012 shows that ecosystems and the resident

activities of the local community people around of construction area are still normally, not

detected any bad impact from the construction activities on ecosystems and communities. Until

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

139

now, The Consultant have no report about plant, animals were died by machinery or vehicle

operations in limit of construction zone.

May and June

According to the observed and based on the monitoring results of analysis the environmental

air quality, noise and surface water in the May and June, 2012 shows that ecosystems and the

resident activities of the local community people around of construction area are still normally,

not detected any bad impact from the construction activities on ecosystems and communities.

Until now, The Consultant have no report about plant, animals were died by machinery or

vehicle operations in limit of construction zone.

4.10.5 Package A5

April

This month, the major items of the Package are soil work and some other activities such as

bridge construction, drainage pipes, under pass box culvert... and the majority of them have

not created substances that cause serious impacts on fauna and flora of the region. Most of

the construction activities of the Contractor were conducted in the Project’s limit.

However, to ensure the region's environment, in the site inspections, the Consultant has

frequently reminded the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement, the environment

control and protection plan during construction process to prevent adverse impacts on fauna

and flora of the area.

In addition, the Consultant has also requested the Contractor not to conduct burning debris or

other materials on site to prevent the unwanted risk from fire to the fauna and flora of the area.

The Consultant has also recommended the Contractor held meetings to promote the

environmental awareness for employees about biodiversity in the process of the Project.

May

Through the inspection and supervision this month, the Consultant found that the fauna and

flora of the region have not been seriously affected by the construction activities of the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

140

Contractor. Most of the Contractor's construction activities have been done within the limits of

the Project.

However, to ensure the region's environment, in the site inspections, the Consultant has

frequently reminded the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement, the Environment

Control and Protection Plan to protect the environment during construction, preventing adverse

impacts on regional fauna and flora.

The Consultant has also recommended the Contractor to held meetings to promote the

awareness of employees about biodiversity preservation in the Project’s construction process.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

majority of the construction locations of the Contractor were kept in clean condition such as at

Km112, Km114, Km117, Km116, Km142...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At some construction locations such as Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Van Phu

bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Lau bridge... the construction materials were not neatly

arranged.

- Trash cans have also not been provided in many areas of workers’ camps such as:

Ngoi Thia bridge, Km120, Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge... In the site inspections,

the Consultant has found waste indiscriminately thrown on the ground in camps areas

such as Km112, Km120...

- Bentonite was not controlled tighly in the construction process in areas such as Ngoi

Gua bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge...

- There are oil leakages at the fuel stations of Ngoi Thia bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi

Rao bridge, Km126...

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the oustanding issues. Also, the Consultant

has required the Contractor to carry out regular cleaning at all construction locations of the

Contractor and workers’ camps to keep the construction locations in clean and neat condition.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

141

4.10.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

regional flora and fauna have not been seriously affected by the construction activities of the

Project. During this period, the major construction items of the package was still soilwork, and

some other items such as bridges, tunnels, irrigation drainage pipe... These construction

activities did not produce hazardous substances which may cause serious effects on the

regional environment, and most of them were done within the limits of the Project.

To ensure the region's environment and prevent adverse impacts on fauna and flora of the

region, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor to comply

with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and Protection Plan during the

Project’s process.

In addition, the Consultant has also frequently recommended the Contractor to hold meetings

and promotions for employees and engineers about the environment protection during

construction process.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities of the Contractor have not caused serious impacts to the fauna and flora

of the area. The major construction items of the Contractor this month is still earth work such

as clearing site, excavation work, filling work... so they have not risen hazardous substances

affecting the regional environment.

However, to ensure the region's environment, the Consultant has frequently required the

Contractor to comply with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and Protection

Plan of the Project during construction process. Also, the Consultant has required the

Contractor not to burn any material on site to prevent unwanted fire accidents, affecting the

fauna and flora of the area.

Besides, in the weekly site inspections, the Consulting has also recommended the contractor

to held meetings and the promotions for workers and engineers on the work of environment

protection during construction process.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

142

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, Consultant found that the majority

of the construction site has been kept in clean condition, as at Km151, Km165, Km190, Km184

...

However, there were still some outstanding issues as follows:

- In some areas such as Ngoi Giam bridge, Lang Lau bridge, Ngoi Don bridge and Dai

Viet bridge, the construction materials was not neatly arranged.

- In the basement construction area, the Contractor did not allocate construction

materials neatly and did not implement routine sanitation work.

- At Lang Lau bridge area in Km184 +057, Lang Nhay bridge in Km 182+160, Ngoi Giam

bridge in Km163+126, workers’ camps were in bad conditions with no trash and clean

toilets.

Consultant reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues, and also required the

Contractor to carry out regular cleaning in all areas of construction sites and workers’ camps to

keep the construction area in clean and tidy condition.

4.10.7 Package A7

April

Up to mow site cleaning of contractor most completed, construction work of contractor along of

package from Km190+420 to Km218+040. However whiling construction work didn’t have

animal extinct or damage by construction work of contractor, this showing in monthly report of

contractor.

May

Up to mow site cleaning of contractor most completed, construction work of contractor along of

package from Km190+420 to Km218+040. However whiling construction work didn’t have

animal extinct or damage by construction work of contractor, this showing in monthly report of

contractor.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

143

June

Up to mow site cleaning of contractor most completed, construction work of contractor along of

package from Km190+420 to Km218+040. However whiling construction work didn’t have

animal extinct or damage by construction work of contractor, this showing in monthly report of

contractor.

4.10.8 Package A8

April

Up to now the activities of the Contractor didn’t cause negative effect to animal and plan and

biodiversity preservation in area as well as. However, consultant always reminded the

contractor to apply some methods to mitigate impact to environment in general and living being

particularly on the construction site.

May

Up to now the activities of the Contractor didn’t cause negative effect to animal and plan and

biodiversity preservation in area as well as. However, consultant always reminded the

contractor to apply some methods to mitigate impact to environment in general and living being

particularly on the construction site.

June

Up to now the activities of the Contractor didn’t cause negative effect to animal and plan and

biodiversity preservation in area as well as. However, consultant always reminded the

contractor to apply some methods to mitigate impact to environment in general and living being

particularly on the construction site.

4.11 WORKERS’ CAMPS CONDITIONS

4.11.1 Package A1

April

The sanitary condition at worker’s camps in Cam I Bridge, Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge and

Underpass NH2 construction sites is improved. Trash has been collected and disposed of it

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

144

properly. However, the septic tanks are usually dirty with trash; the PSC has requested the

Contractor to often implement housekeeping work to keep these areas in cleanliness and

sanitary condition.

In the site inspections, we don’t see any improvement at Tan Loi Bridge, Bon Bridge and

Interchange No. 3; therefore, the PSC still maintain the measure of suspending the procedures

of payment progress of these works until the Contractor implements our requirements to

provide the workers with enough sanitary facilities and their living condition is ensured. At Tan

Loi Bridge and Bon Bridge, the workers aren’t provided first aid kits also and at Trung Kien

Bridge there is nothing inside first aid kit. The PSC has many times requested the Contractor

to solve this matter but up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

At box culvert Km 15+868 we found that the temporary camp is unsafe and very dirty, the PSC

has requested the Contractor to improve the condition here to ensure the good environment for

workers. We will recheck this area on next site inspection on May 03, 2012.

May

Insanitary status at worker’s camps was still found at Tan Loi Bridge, Bon Bridge and

Interchange No. 3. These areas also are not provide septic tanks. The PSC has many time

strongly requested the Contractor to solve these issue to ensure the healthy and sanitary

environment for workers; however, the Contractor doesn’t implement our requirements,

therefore, we still closet he procedures of payment progress of all ítems of these Works until

the Contractor corrects these defects.

At Underpass NH2, Cam I Bridge, Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge and Trung Kien Bridge we still

found the dirty backhouses in site inspection on May 03 and 08. We have strongly requested

the Contractor to solve this issue. Till May 22, in the site inspection we perceived that the

Contractor has implemented our requirements to provide the sanitary septic tanks for workers

in these areas..

At box culvert Km 15+868, the poor condition of worker’s camp has not been improved.

June

Insanitary status at worker’s camps was still found at Tan Loi Bridge, Bon Bridge and

Interchange No. 3. These areas also are not provide septic tanks. The PSC has many time

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

145

strongly requested the Contractor to solve these issue to ensure the healthy and sanitary

environment for workers; however, the Contractor doesn’t implement our requirements,

therefore, we still closet he procedures of payment progress of all ítems of these Works until

the Contractor corrects these defects.

At Underpass NH2, Cam I Bridge, Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge and Trung Kien Bridge we still

found the dirty backhouses in site inspection on May 03 and 08. We have strongly requested

the Contractor to solve this issue. Till May 22, in the site inspection we perceived that the

Contractor has implemented our requirements to provide the sanitary septic tanks for workers

in these areas..

At box culvert Km 15+868, the poor condition of worker’s camp has not been improved.

4.11.2 Package A2

April

In the site inspections we found that the sanitary condition at septic tank in Ben Gao Bridge

has not been improved. At Km 43+300, the Contractor still has not remobilized the workers for

work but this worker’s camp in this area is still dirty with trash surrounding and the septic tank

is unclean also.

At Ben Tre Bridge and Tan Dung Bridge, the Contractor also supplemented a septic tank for

workers to ensure the capacity.

At other sections, we didn’t see the serious problems during the site inspections.

May

worker’s camps at Ben Tre Bridge and Army II Bridge. The PSC has requested the Contractor to solve this issue to maintain the healthy living condition for workers; however, on May 22 we only seen improvement at Army II Bridge.

At Ben Gao Bridge we found that the trash had been collected and disposed properly but the septic tanks are still dirty and unusable. We have many times requested the Contractor to provide enough sanitation system and keep it in cleanliness condition but the Contractor has not implemented our requirements here.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

146

At other sections, we didn’t see the serious problems during the site inspections.

June

In the site inspection on May 09, 2012 we detected that the trash is being disposed surrounding worker’s camps at Ben Tre Bridge and Army II Bridge. The PSC has requested the Contractor to solve this issue to maintain the healthy living condition for workers; however, on May 22 we only seen improvement at Army II Bridge.

At Ben Gao Bridge we found that the trash had been collected and disposed properly but the septic tanks are still dirty and unusable. We have many times requested the Contractor to provide enough sanitation system and keep it in cleanliness condition but the Contractor has not implemented our requirements here.

At other sections, we didn’t see the serious problems during the site inspections.

4.11.3 Package A3

April

The subcontractor TGT cleaned up their camp: collected all rubbish, regrouped all oil drums to

regulation place far from kitchen. Although they did not concrete storage’s foundation but they

set up fire extinguisher and cleaned all oil leaking on ground. We still request Contractor must

concrete storage’s foundation to avoid oil spill over ground and maintain environmental

sanitation in every camps of package A3.

May

Almost worker’s camps along package A3 were lack of waste bins, first aid kit and fire

extinguisher. At Km78+100, we have found that many rubbish thrown in frond of camp. At

Km64+080, Contractor did not set up hygienic toilet, waste bins, first aid kit and fire

extinguisher. Consultant warned many times but Contractor still delay.

In inspection tour of ADB mission, they requested Contractor must set up hygienic toilet, waste

bins, first aid kit and fire extinguisher for each camp along package. Deadline is June 15th,

2012.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

147

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012 “Require to

overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3”.

June

Almost worker’s camps along package A3 were lack of waste bins, first aid kit and fire

extinguisher.

4.11.4 Package A4

April

Along package A4, the Contractor rented the houses of local people next to site (about 30-

40m) for worker’s camps. So their worker will use hygienic toilet, waste bins and fresh water in

those houses. But some places, the Contractor built some thatch house or camps for security

guard in site (Km107+533, Km97+124…). There are just provided fresh water for worker when

they work in site but no fire extinguisher to prevent fire risk.

Particularize at Km84+400 TL321C bridge, Contractor set up a thatch camp for worker in site,

but they did not set up hygienic toilet, waste bins, fire extinguisher and first aid box.

May

Along package A4, the Contractor rented the houses of local people next to site (about 30-

40m) for worker’s camps. So their worker will use hygienic toilet, waste bins and fresh water in

those houses. But some camps (Km101+200 Box culvert, Km87+000 Ngoi Gianh bridge…)

Contractor has just provided fresh water for worker drink but no fire extinguisher, no waste

bins, no first aid kit and have many rubbish around these camps.

Particularize at Km84+400 TL321C bridge, Contractor set up a thatch camp for worker in site,

but they did not set up hygienic toilet, waste bins, fire extinguisher, first aid box and it’s very

dirty.

Contractor was requested to provide hygienic toilet, waste bins, fire extinguisher, first aid box

and clean up all camps before June 15th, 2012. Consultant’s warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-

A4-638 dated May 4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-680 dated June 1st, 2012.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

148

June

Along package A4, the Contractor rented the houses of local people next to site (about 30-

40m) for worker’s camps. So their worker will use hygienic toilet, waste bins and fresh water in

those houses. But some camps (Km101+200 Box culvert, Km87+000 Ngoi Gianh bridge…)

Contractor has just provided fresh water for worker drink but no fire extinguisher, no waste

bins, no first aid kit and have many rubbish around these camps.

4.11.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection of the workers’ camps conditions this month, the Consultant found that

most of the workers’ camps were kept in good conditions (because the majority of the workers’

camps are the houses of the local population hired) such as Km142, Km111, Km120...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- Numerous of the workers’ camps of the Contractor were not provided with fire fighting

equipments, first aid kits... such as at Km120, Km128, Ngoi Rao bridge...

- The Contractor has not built clean toilets in camps at Km120, Km127, Ngoi Rao

bridge...

The Consultant has asked the Contractor to improve the living and working conditions in all

workers’ camps. Besides, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to provide all

necessary equipments such as bins, first aid kits, fire extinguishers... in all workers’ camps.

In the coming months, the Consultant will regularly inspect the working and living conditions in

workers’ camps of the Contractor to promptly request the Contractor to carry out measures to

meet the requirements of the Project.

May

Through the inspection of the workers’ camps conditions this month, the Consultant found that

there are some outstanding issues as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

149

- Many workers’ camps have not been provided sufficient fire fighting equipments, first

aid kits, trashes, such as Ngoi Thia bridge, Km120, Ngoi Gua bridge...

- The toilets have not been built by the Contractor in areas such as workers’ camps

Km120, Km127, Ngoi Gua bridge...

The Consultant has requested the Contractor to improve the living and working conditions in all

camps of the workers. Besides, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to provide all

the necessary equipments such as trashes, fire fighting equipments, first aid kits, fire

extinguishers,... in all the workers’ camps (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-387 dated May 3,

2012, Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-437 dated May 16, 2012 and Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-

12-A5-490 dated May 31, 2012).

In addition, at Km142, km111, Km120... the Contractor has hired houses of local people to use

as workers' camps; The camps were maintained in good conditions. However, the devices

such as first aid kits and fire extinguishers have not been provided adequately.

In the coming months, the Consultant will regularly inspect the working and living conditions in

the workers’ camps of the Contractor to promptly request the Contractor to carry out measures

to meet the project’s requirements.

June

During this period, the major construction items of the Contractor were still earthworks such as

site clearing, excavation, backfill... Therefore, they have not raised serious effects on the

regional environment. Besides, the construction activities of the Contractor were within the

limits of the Project and were not carried out in areas with rich biodiversity. Therefore, the

fauna and flora of the region have not been seriously affected by the construction activities of

the Contractor.

However, the Contractor has not applied well the measures to minimize dust during

construction process at some locations such as Km112, Km114, Km117, Km123, Km142...

This has generated dust, reduced the photosynthetic capacity of plants. However, this effect is

not serious; the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on this outstanding issue.

To ensure the region's environment, the Consultant has frequently required the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement and the Environment Control and Protection Plan during

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

150

construction process. Also, the Consultant has asked the Contractor not to burn anything on

site to prevent unwanted fire accidents, affecting the regional fauna and flora.

The Consultant has also recommended the Contractor to held meetings to promote the

environment awareness of employees about biodiversity preservation in the process of the

Project.

4.11.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection of conditions in workers’ camps of the Contractor in this month, the

Consultant found that most of the camps of the Contractor were maintained in good conditions

such as: Ngoi Hut bridge, Km157, 180 km, Km186+200...

However, there are still some workers’ camps which are not fully met the requirements of the

Project such as:

- At station Km187+420, Lang Nhay bridge, Ngoi Giam bridge... the clean toilets have not

been built, and fire fighting equipments, first aid kits, trashs have not been provided...

- In the area of workers' camps (Ngoi Giam bridge, Lang Nhay bridge...) garbage was

thrown discriminately on the ground.

- At most of the workers camps of the Contractor, appropriate wastewater systems have

not been developed; the majority of wastewater from the camps were discharged

directly into the environment.

To ensure the working and living conditions in camps for all workers, the Consultant has

reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues. The Consultant has also required the

Contractor to implement effective measures to improve the conditions in camps for the

workers.

May

Through the inspections of the condition in workers’ camps of the contractor this month, the

Consultant found that the Contractor has provided first aid kits and fire extinguishers for some

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

151

camps, such as Km186+200, Km171, Km165, ... In addition, the Contractor has also built

clean toilets for workers’ camps such as at Km185, Ngoi Hut bridge...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- Some camps are temporarily built, there are no trash can, first aid kit, fire extinguisher...

such as in the areas Lang Nau bridge Km184+057, Lang Nhay Km182+160,

Km167+879 and Ngoi Giam bridge Km163+126...

- Waste was indiscriminately thrown on the ground, not collected in camps such as at

Ngoi Giam bridge, Lang Lau bridge...

- Most of the workers’ camps of the Contractors have not yet been developed the

appropriate wastewater systems. The majority of wastewater from the workers’ camps

was discharged directly into the environment.

The Consultant has required the Contractor to improve the working and living conditions in

camps for the workers (such as in Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-453 dated May 3, 2012, GET3-

DOOSAN-12-A6-491 dated May 15, 2012 and GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-546 dated May 31,

2012).

In the coming months, the Consultant will continue to inspect the working and living conditions

in workers’ camps to remind the Contractor to promptly resolve the outstanding issues.

June

During this period, the major items of construction were still site clearing, excavation,

backfilling... so it did not create substances which seriously affected the environment of the

region. Besides, the construction activities were within the limitation of the Project and did not

go through extensive areas of high biodiversity. Therefore, the fauna and flora of the region

have not been seriously affected by the activities of construction.

However, because the Contractor did not apply measures to minimize dust during construction

in some areas such as Km165, Km157, Km184, Km185... it caused dust which reduced the

photosynthetic capacity of plants. However, this effect was local only and not serious. The

Consultant reminded the Contractor on these outstanding issues.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

152

To ensure the region's environment, the Consultant frequently required the Contractor to

comply with Method Statement, environment control and protection plan during construction.

At the same time, we also asked the Contractor not to burn anything in construction sites to

prevent unwanted fire accidents, which could affect fauna and flora of the area.

4.11.7 Package A7

April

Workers’ camp of Chau Que Thuong Bridge Km190+487 and Tan An Bridge Km194+765: Up

to now no rubbish bin and the toilet no provide septic tank according to Environment control

plan of the contractor. Required the contractor to provide rubbish bin and the toilet have septic

tank according to Environment control plan of the contractor.

May

At moment almost the toilet of all worker camps had provided the septic tanks, however the

worker’s camps following at Km211+565; Km209+329; Km202+400; Km198+400; Km191+353

are showed by consultant and ADB mission on 16-May is not meet project standard as:

Lacked fire- extinguisher, First kid aids, Rubbish bin. So the consultant required the contractor

to overcome according to consultant instruction in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650.

June

At moment almost the toilet of all worker camps had provided the septic tanks, however the

worker’s camps following at Km211+565; Km209+329; Km202+400; Km198+400; Km191+353

are showed by consultant and ADB mission on 16-June is not meet project standard as:

Lacked fire- extinguisher, First kid aids, Rubbish bin. So the consultant required the contractor

to overcome according to consultant instruction in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650.

However until date 28-June 2012 the contractor did not deploy according to ADB mission and

consultant instruction.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

153

4.11.8 Package A8

April

On 25-April 2012 at workers’ camp of Son Hai Bridge is building and no providing the rubbish

bin and sanitary toilet facility according to regulation in the Environmental control plan. The

consultant required the contractor to provide the rubbish bin and sanitary toilet facility before

May 15th 2012.

Addition the toilet of some workers’ camp provide septic tank according to regulation as:

workers’ camp of Da Phuc company Km244+155, workers’ camp of Truong Loc company

Km230+000, workers’ camp of Thanh An company Km228+000, workers’ camp of IC17 Bridge

Km233+540. However at these workers’ camp not provided rubbish bin according to

regulation. Consultant required the contractor to provided rubbish bin for these workers’ camp

before April 31st 2012.

May

At moment almost the toilet of all worker camps had provided the septic tanks, however the

worker’s camps following at Km244+155; Km238+265; Km218+040; Km220+993 are showed

by consultant and ADB mission on 16-May is not meet project standard as: Lacked fire-

extinguisher, First kid aids, Rubbish bin. So the consultant required the contractor to overcome

according to consultant instruction in the letter No: Ref. GET4- Vinaconex 565 and Ref. GET4-

Vinaconex 566.

June

At moment almost the toilet of all worker camps had provided the septic tanks, however the

worker’s camps following at Km244+155; Km238+265; Km218+040; Km220+993 are showed

by consultant and ADB mission on 16-June is not meet project standard as: Lacked fire-

extinguisher, First kid aids, Rubbish bin. So the consultant required the contractor to overcome

according to consultant instruction in the letter No: Ref. GET4- Vinaconex 565 and Ref. GET4-

Vinaconex 566. However, so far the contractor didn’t overcome according to the consultant

instruction.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

154

4.12 LABOUR SAFETY EQUIPMENT

4.12.1 Package A1

April

In the site inspections, the status of lack PPE at work was still noted at Underpass NH2, Kim

Anh Bridge, Bon Bridge, Tan Loi Bridge, and Interchange No. 3. The workers still didn’t use or

to be not provided enough PPE. This issue has not been improved month by month despite

the requirements of the Engineer.

At Underpass NH2, Dai Duong Bridge, Xuan Phuong Bridge, Tan Loi Bridge, Ba Thien Bridge,

Interchange No.3 and Cam I Bridge we perceived that the Contractor has not provided enough

safety scaffolds/ladders or safety net system to ensure the safety for working during carrying

out the work at height. The PSC has strongly requested the Contractor to solve this matter and

till now, the Contractor is implementing our requirements; the scaffold and safety net systems

are being supplemented to the construction sites. However, there some construction areas still

lack these facilities and we have requested the Contractor to supplement enough.

At Bon Bridge and Tan Loi Bridge, the Contractor still has not provided the workers safety work

ways to access the working areas. Besides, when the workers carried out the work at height,

there was also no safety platform provided.

May

During the site inspections we still detected some workers didn’t use enough PPE at work at

Dai Duong Bridge, Tan Loi Bridge and Trung Kien Bridge. The workers were not provided

enough PPE or didn’t use due to their unawareness. The PSC has many times strongly

requested the Contractor to provide enough PPE for workers as well as ensure that all workers

use enough PPE at work but this issue still usually happen.

We also found the lack of safety net/scaffold/ladder at Dai Duong Bridge, Ba Thien Bridge and

Interchange No.3. We have requested the Contractor to solve this problem and till May 22, in

the site inspection we perceived that the Contractor had improved the status in these area, the

safety net, scaffold had been installed. However, at Bon Bridge, we still found that the workers

used unsafe ladder to climp to piers for work at height. A serious warning was given to the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

155

Contractor to request him to solve this issue immediately. We will recheck this area in the next

site inspection on May 29, 2012.

At girder casting yard of Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge, unsafe electric system was detected in

the site inspection on May 22. Electric wires were installed and put on ground in disorder;

switches were not cover carefully to avoid rain-water. The PSC has requested the Contractor

to immediately resolve this issue in order to ensure the safety for workers.

June

During the site inspections we still detected some workers didn’t use enough PPE at work at

Dai Duong Bridge, Tan Loi Bridge and Trung Kien Bridge. The workers were not provided

enough PPE or didn’t use due to their unawareness. The PSC has many times strongly

requested the Contractor to provide enough PPE for workers as well as ensure that all workers

use enough PPE at work but this issue still usually happen.

We also found the lack of safety net/scaffold/ladder at Dai Duong Bridge, Ba Thien Bridge and

Interchange No.3. We have requested the Contractor to solve this problem and till May 22, in

the site inspection we perceived that the Contractor had improved the status in these area, the

safety net, scaffold had been installed. However, at Bon Bridge, we still found that the workers

used unsafe ladder to climp to piers for work at height. A serious warning was given to the

Contractor to request him to solve this issue immediately. We will recheck this area in the next

site inspection on May 29, 2012.

At girder casting yard of Tam Long – Thien Ke Bridge, unsafe electric system was detected in

the site inspection on May 22. Electric wires were installed and put on ground in disorder;

switches were not cover carefully to avoid rain-water. The PSC has requested the Contractor

to immediately resolve this issue in order to ensure the safety for workers.

4.12.2 Package A2

April

In the site inspections, the status of lack PPE (protection helmet/boot/glove/life-jacket/safety

belt) at work was still noted at Lo River Bridge, Song Dao Bridge, Ben Gao Bridge and Muong

Dao Bridge construction sites. The workers still didn’t use or to be not provided enough PPE.

This issue has not been improved month by month despite the requirements of the Engineer.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

156

At Ben Gao Bridge and Muong Dao Bridge, the work ways over the water body were not safe

enough. They’re made of small steel bars without handrail. In this site, the workers also were

not provided safety platform when carried out the work at height. We have requested the

Contractor to solve these issues to ensure the safety for workers but he still doesn’t implement

our requirements.

The lack of safety net, scaffold/ladder was noted at Army II Bridge, Army III Bridge, TL310

Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge, Ben Gao Bridge and Song Dao Bridge. The PSC has strongly

requested the Contractor to provide as well as install enough safety facilities for workers;

however, there was only improvement at Army II Bridge, Army III Bridge and TL310 Bridge. At

Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Gao Bridge, the Contractor has just supplemented the scaffold for

workers but it’s not enough and there is still no safety net installed under launched girders at

Ben Gao Bridge.

Unsafe electric system was noted at TL310 Bridge on April 11, too. The electric wires were put

on ground in disorder with connections that didn’t meet standard. This issue could cause

electric shock for workers. The PSC has requested the Contractor to immediately reinstall

electric system here and in the site inspection on April 18 we perceived that the Contractor had

implemented our requirements.

May

In the site inspections, we still found that the workers didn’t use enough PPE at work at Lo River Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and box culvert Km 39+576. The PCS has many times requested the Contractor to tightly control this issue to ensure that all the workers use enough PPE at work but this status still usually happen on sites.

At Army II Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Tre Bridge we found that the workers were not provided enough safety ladder/scaffold and safety net. The PSC has issued a warning letter to request the Contractor to provide and install enough safety facilities for workers in order to ensure the safety on sites. However, on May 21 and 22, in the site inspection we only perceived that the Contractor had supplemented scaffolds but safety net. We have strongly requested the Contractor to solve this issue immediately. We will recheck these areas in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

157

June

In the site inspections, we still found that the workers didn’t use enough PPE at work at Lo River Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and box culvert Km 39+576. The PCS has many times requested the Contractor to tightly control this issue to ensure that all the workers use enough PPE at work but this status still usually happen on sites.

At Army II Bridge, Muong Dao Bridge and Ben Tre Bridge we found that the workers were not provided enough safety ladder/scaffold and safety net. The PSC has issued a warning letter to request the Contractor to provide and install enough safety facilities for workers in order to ensure the safety on sites. However, on May 21 and 22, in the site inspection we only perceived that the Contractor had supplemented scaffolds but safety net. We have strongly requested the Contractor to solve this issue immediately. We will recheck these areas in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

4.12.3 Package A3

April

During April, when we inspected in site we have found some problems such as:

- Electric system was not safe: Interrupter was not safe, electric wire was laid on ground

(P3 Red river bridge, National railway flyover bridge, P9 Red river bridge).

- Ladder was not safe because it was not set up handrail to ensure safety. P2 Red river

bridge, Ho Chi Minh IC.

- Floor operation was not safe: no handrail, unreliable. Bai Bang bridge

- At some place, No access ladder, no scaffold, no floor operation was set up for work.

No safety handrail was set up. IC8, P3 Red river bridge

- Worker did not use safety labour. Sometime, they work dangerously at height. IC8, Bai

Bang bridge, Red river bridge

- No protective cover was set up for this machine. Xuan Thanh bridge

- Inhabitant was freely entry construction site. Km51+100

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

158

The Contractor was strongly requested to resolve all above violations. If it still repeat we will

force to stop work in site.

May

During May, when we inspected in site we have found some problems must be resolve such

as:

- The work’s camp at Km78+100 (near P3 Red river bridge), Km77+200 National railway

flyover, Km64+080 TL320B bridge, Km60+967 Bai Bang railway flyover must be supply

02 rubbish bin, fire-extinguishers and first- aid kit

- Oil tanks at Km78+400 (P5 Red river bridge), Km52 (worker’s camp of TGT

subcontractor)…must be keep in the store and on the concrete floor (not keep directly

on the ground).

- In general, worker must use PPEs such as safety hats, safety shoes, gloves, safety

goggles… when they work in site

- Along package A3, Electric system was not safe: electric wire was laid on ground, mud,

interrupter was broken, electrical junction was very dangerous, no box to put interrupter

in order to electrical insulation…

- Some access roads (Km75+400) which are damaged by project vehicles causing

difficulty to public who also use these roads, are required to repair by Contractor.

- At piers of bridges, on part K0 where preparing for launching beams or cantilever work,

worker worked at height distance 20m from ground, but the Contractor has not set up

handrails or safety barrier to ensure safety.

- Scaffold systems were not safe: set tilt, have some defect holes on the main pillar, lack

of screws…

- Operation floor systems at height, ladders were not set up handrail.

- Machines or equipments were too old, broken, or lack of protective cover…

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

159

The Contractor is strongly requested to resolve all above problems to avoid accident at work in

site. The Consultant will recheck all above items in all bridge construction sites along package

A3. If these violations are not repaired, we will force to stop work at some dangerous place.

Contractor must resolve above problems before June 15th 2012, at that time if the issue is not

resolved we will warn the related staffs.

June

Workers did not use PPEs such as safety hats, safety shoes, gloves, safety goggles… when

they work in site (Piers 5-7 of red river bridge, TL315B bridge, Bai Bang railway flyover

bridge...). There is not scaffold system at TL315B bridge.

Electric system was not safe: electric wire was laid on ground, mud, interrupter was broken,

electrical junction was very dangerous, no box to put interrupter in order to electrical insulation

(Red River bridge, Bai Bang railway flyover bridge...).

4.12.4 Package A4

April

When we checked in site, we have found that many violations such as:

- Worker did not use safety labour and they usually did not use safety belt when they

work at height. Km96+700, Km97+124 Ngoi Lao bridge, Ngoi Van bridge Km109+025.

- Electric system was not safe: interrupter box was not safe, electric wire was laid under

wet mud. Km107+533, Km84+400 TL321C, Ngoi lao bridge, Ngoi Gianh bridge

Km88+600.

- No signpost was installed at intersection between local road and construction site.

Km96+700, Km107+533.

- Deep area was not installed safety tape. Km97+124 Ngoi Lao bridge.

The Contractor was requested to resolve all above violations in site.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

160

May

When we checked in site, we have found that many violations such as:

- Worker did not use safety labour and they usually did not use safety belt when they

work at height. Km96+700, Km97+124 Ngoi Lao bridge, Ngoi Van bridge Km109+025.

- Electric system was not safe: electric wire was laid on ground, mud, interrupter was

broken, electrical junction was very dangerous, no box to put interrupter in order to

electrical insulation…( TL321C,Ngoi Lao, Ngoi Gianh and QL32C bridges).

- The work’s camp at Km84+400 TL321C bridge, Km101+200 Box culvert must be

supply 02 rubbish bins, fire-extinguishers and first- aid kit.

- Oil tanks at Km107+200 (worker’s camp of Long Giang subcontractor),

Km93+200…must be keep in the store and on the concrete floor (not keep directly on

the ground).

The Contractor was requested to resolve all above violations in site before June 15th, 2012, at

that time if the issue is not resolved we will force to stop work at some places. Consultant’s

warning letter is ref.GET2-KEA-A4-638 dated May 4th, 2012 and GET2-KEA-A4-680 dated

June 1st, 2012.

June

Workers did not use PPEs such as safety hats, safety shoes, gloves, safety goggles… when

they worked in site (Ngoi Van bridge, Km100 + 010, Km88 + 400, Km97 + 787…).

Electric system was not safe: electric wire was laid on ground, mud, interrupter was broken,

electrical junction was very dangerous, no box to put interrupter in order to electrical insulation

(Ngoi Lao bridge, QL32C bridge, Km97+124...).

4.12.5 Package A5

April

Although the Contractor has mobilized the Safety Manager position to work on site, through

the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant has still found that the safety

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

161

control of Contractor has not much been improved. At many construction locations, the safety

control of the Contractor has not been done well:

- Many workers do not use fully Personal Protection Equipment (helmet, safety shoes,

etc.) when they work on the site such as: RCPC factory No.1, RCPC factory No.2;

Batching Plant No.3, Ngoi Gua bridge; Ngoi Rao bridge; Van Phu bridge, etc.

- Safety fences and safety signboards: these safety elements have not been installed

fully at many construction sites (example such as: construction site of Ngoi Gua, QL37,

Van Phu bridges, etc.; access roads Km113, Km138, Km117-Km119, etc; other

construction sites such as Irrigation box culvert Km118+202, Underpass box culvert

Km118+224, Drainage pipe culvert Km118+060, Km118+860, etc; construction sites

intersecting with public roads Km123+860, Km145+220, Km148, etc) or these safety

elements are not meeting the Project’s requirements, not ensuring safety ( Ngoi Rao

bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, etc.).

- Safety of public: at many construction sites, local peoples entering into construction

sites without any the Contractor’s control and supervision, this situation may cause

unwanted accidents inside project areas at any time.

- First aid base: this First aid base still has not been supplied by the Contractor as the

project’s requirements.

- Fire extinguishers: the Contractor has not provided fully these equipments at workers’

camps (such as: Km120+460, Ngoi Gua bridge, etc) or fuel store areas (such as Ngoi

Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge, etc).

- The Contractor’s fuel control is not well performing (regarding to the Engineer’s letter

No.GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-215 dated 21st Mar, 2012).

For these reasons, the Engineer issue this official warning to Safety Manager of the

Contractor, who did not fulfill his responsibility in his position

The Engineer also reminded the Contractor that safety is a very important part in the process

of project implementation. Hence, the Contractor’s safety manager must take strong and

proper actions to make the site safe and prevent unsafe working practices or other

infringements on the safety plant or the statutory regulations.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

162

In addition, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to take strong actions to improve

the safety of the Project and to resolve these outstanding issues in order to ensure the safety

of the Project in the near future.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the safety

control of the Contractor has not been done well; some outstanding issues have occurred as

follows:

- Many workers still did not fully use PPE (such as safety helmets, safety shoes, seat

belts when working on high place...) when working on site. For example: Km111, bridge

Van Phu, Km123, Km148...

- The fences and warning signs: the safety elements have still not been fully installed at

the construction locations of the Contractor (such as bridge construction areas Ngoi

Gua, Ngoi Rao, Van Phu, Ngoi Thia... and the access roads Km114, Km118, Km119,

Km138, Km142 ... and the other construction locations such as irrigation and drainage

pipe, sewer, underpass culvert...) or the safety elements do not meet the requirements

of the Project, not safety (QL37 bridge, Km119...).

- The requirements and other reminders of the Consultant about the outstanding issues

in the safety works of the Contractor (Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-426) have been

still paid attention by the Contractor such as: safety for people, first aid stations, fire

fighting equipment, fuel management, safety sheet, safety meetings, safety documents,

Safety Inspection report sheet...

The Consultant has given the warnings to the Contractor on these issues (Ref. GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-444 dated May 18, 2012 and GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 dated May

31, 2012). In addition, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to quickly apply the

appropriate measures to resolve the outstanding issues, ensuring the safety of the project.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

safety control of the Contractor still had no improvement; some outstanding issues remained

unresolved, such as:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

163

- During working on site, many workers did not fully use PPE such as in Ngoi Gua

bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge, Km111, km112. More

dangerous, some workers worked on high place but without PPE such as safety belt,

safety net such as at QL 37 bridge.

- The fences and warning signs: the safety factors have not fully been installed at the

construction locations of the Contractor or the safety factors do not meet the

requirements of the Project that is not sure safety.

- Safety for people: at many construction locations, people went freely through the

construction locations without any control and monitor by the Contractor; this can lead

to unexpected accidents at any time.

- The fuel management of the Contractor was still poor in areas such as fuel stations of

Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Van Phu bridge...

To ensure the safety of the Project, the Consultant has asked Contractor to improve safety

structure on site and resolve the outstanding issues. Also, the Consultant has proposed EPMU

to replace the Safety Manager in Ref. GET3-GET-A5-019 dated June 21, 2012.

4.12.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

Contractor has continued to conduct other activities to improve the safety on sites:

- The safety fences and warning signs have been installed at some construction

locations such as Ngoi Hut bridge, Ngoi Rom bridge, Km165...

- The Contractor has arranged personnel to check the safety site and guide traffic at

some construction locations which intersect with the public roads: Km155+300, Km157,

Ngoi That bridge...

- The Contractor has conducted watering to minimize dust on the transportation roads

such as Km157, Km184, Km186, Km184...

- The Contractor has organized meetings about safety for workers and engineers.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

164

- The Contractor has installed safety slogans on the site (Km176, Lang Nhay bridge,

Ngoi Nhuoc bridge...) to warn workers about safety in the working process.

- Many workers have fully used Personal Protection Equipment during working on site.

- The Contractor has provided fire extinguishers in some fuel stations such as

Km186+200 and workers’ camps such as Km186+100, Km171...

However, this month, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At Ngoi Chac bridge, the Contractor has not provided fire fighting equipments for the

workers' camps.

- At the construction locations such as Km182, Ngoi Hut bridge, Khe Chuong bridge...

the Consultant found that there were still people going into the site area without the

control and supervision of the Contractor.

- In the tunnel construction area, some workers were not equipped with Personal

Protection Equipment in the working process (mentioned in the letter of GET3-

- At stations Km161+100, Km155+300... the construction locations are close to public

roads. However, the Contractor has not fully installed safety fences and warning signs.

- At station Km171, Km174, Km167... the Contractor has not yet fully installed safety

fences and warning signs on the access roads.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues. Also, the Consultant

has required the Contractor to rapid adopt measures to address thoroughly the outstanding

issues, ensuring the safety of the Project.

Also, in the site inspections, the Consultant has usually required the Contractor to strictly

comply with the Method Statement and the Safety Control Plan of the Project to prevent

unexpected accidents during implementing the Project.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the

Contractor has continued to implement activities to control safety on site as follow:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

165

- Installation of safety fences and warning signs on the access roads Km184, Km165,

Ngoi Hut bridge, Ngoi Giam bridge...

- Arranging staff for regular safety inspection on site for timely remind of the problems.

- Installation of warning signs at the construction locations which intersect with the public

roads such as Km156, Km184...

- Spraying water to minimize dust in areas such as Km157, Km165, Km184, Km186...

- The workers were more aware of using of PPE when working on site.

- Fire extinguishers and first aid kits for a number of workers camps such as

Km186+200, Km171... have been provided.

However, this month, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The first aid kits have not been fully provided in the workers’ camps such as Lang Nau

bridge, Lang Nhay bridge, Ngoi Giam bridge...

- At some construction locations, people still went into the site area without any

supervision and control of the Contractor.

- In the tunnel construction area, some workers were not equipped with PPE in the work

process (Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-430).

- The safety fences and warning signs have not fully been installed at some construction

locations near the public road such as Km151, Km161, Km188...

- The safety fences have been damaged or not fully provided on the access roads such

as Km161, Km171, Km172...

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the outstanding issues. The Consultant has

also required the Contractor to rapidly adopt measures to address thoroughly the outstanding

issues, ensuring the safety of the Project (Ref. GET-DOOSAN-12-A6-467 dated May 9, 2012

and GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-546 dated May 31, 2012).

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

166

Also, in the site inspections, the Consultant has usually required the Contractor to strictly

comply with the Method Statement and the Safety Control Plan of the Project to prevent

unexpected accidents during the project’s implementation process.

June

This month, through inspection and monitoring safety implementation on site, Consultant found

that the Contractor continued to apply and implement activities to control and ensure safety on

construction sites:

- Installation of safety fences and warning signs at dangerous areas such as foudation

pit of Lang Lau bridge, Lang Nhay bridge, Khe Chuong bridge, the access roads in

Km165, Km184, construction locations near public roads as Km182, Km165...

- Assignment of daily safety inspection personnel on site to promptly remind issues

which were not safe.

- The water irrigation to minimize dust in areas Km156, Km157, Km184, Km186...

- Many workers used protective gear.

- The fire extinguishers and first aid kit were equipped in the fuel station and regional

camps as Km186, Km171, Km165...

In addition, the Contractor also conducted daily exercise guide for engineers to improve their

health at Doosan office.

However, through supervision on site, Consultant found that there were some outstanding

issues as follows:

- In the area of Lang Lau bridge, Lang Nhay bridge, Ngoi Giam bridge... the Contractor

has not provided a full range of equipment such as fire extinguishers, first aid kit for

workers’ camps.

- Residental people still went to the construction area without Contractor’s control and

supervision as at Km176, Km182, Km184...

- There were till some workers who did not make full use of labor protective gear when

working on site as at Km184, tunnel construction area Km186 +200, km186+720...

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

167

- Safety fences and warning signs have not been fully installed in some of the access

roads sector as Km165, Km167, Km171, Km184, Km189...

- The fuel management was not guaranteed, there were some fuel tanks placed directly

on the ground as at Km155 +200, +200 km186, Km171...

To ensure safety of the Project, Consultant asked the Contractor to adequately address these

outstanding issues. In the on-site inspection, consultant also frequently asked the Contractor to

comply with Method Statement and safety control plan of the Project seriously to prevent

unexpected accidents during Project implementation.

4.12.7 Package A7

April

On 6-April 2012 at construction works of Xom Cam Bridge Km214+678. Workers did not wear

helmet and shoes when working on site.

On 24 April 2012 at construction works of Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400. Workers did not

wear helmet and shoes when working on site.

The consultant had reminded the contractor about this problem in the letter No: Fef. GET4-

GRBCC-613 and required the contractor to provided labour safety for all workers working on

site. In addition, remind the main contractor to inspection the subcontractor about the safety on

site.

May

On 16-May 2012 at construction works of Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400 and Tan Tien Bridge

Km209+329. Workers did not wear welder’s goggles.

The consultant had reminded the contractor about this problem in the letter No: Fef. GET4-

GRBCC-650 and required the contractor to provided labour safety for all workers working on

site. In addition, remind the main contractor to inspection the subcontractor about the safety on

site.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

168

June

At construction works of Tan Tien Bridge Km209+329 date 29-June 2012. Workers did not

wear welder’s goggles and safety belt during time working at high position.

The consultant had reminded the contractor about this problem and required the contractor to

provided labour safety for all workers working on site. In addition, remind the main contractor

to inspection the subcontractor about the safety on site.

4.12.8 Package A8

April

On April 2012 at construction works of Suoi Trat Bridge Km231+889; Lang Tra Bridge

Km220+993; IC17 Bridge Km233+540; Underpass culvert Km237+951; IC18 Bridge

Km244+570; Ngoi Bo Bridge Km238+265; Box culvert Km223+075 and Km233+540 workers

did not wear enough labour safety when working on site as clothes, shoes, safety belt and

helmet.

The consultant had reminded the contractor about this problem at letter No: Ref. GET4-

Vinaconex- 534 and required the contractor to provided labour safety for all workers working

on site. In addition, remind the main contractor to inspection the subcontractor about the

workers labour safety on site.

May

On May 2012 at construction works Km233+540; Km224+369 workers did not wear enough

labour safety when working on site as clothes, shoes, safety belt and helmet.

The consultant had reminded the contractor about this problem at letter No: Ref. GET4-

Vinaconex- 549 and required the contractor to provided labour safety for all workers working

on site. In addition, remind the main contractor to inspection the subcontractor about the

workers labour safety on site.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

169

June

In June 2012 at construction works Km231+889; Km233+540; Km227+290; Km220+794;

Km224+869 workers did not wear enough labour safety when working on site as clothes,

shoes, safety belt and helmet.

The consultant had reminded the contractor about this problem and required the contractor to

provided labour safety for all workers working on site. In addition, remind the main contractor

to inspection the subcontractor about the workers labour safety on site.

4.13 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND SIGNPOSTING IN ROADS

4.13.1 Package A1

April

By observations during this month we still found that the dirt is being tracked onto public roads

where the construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also doesn’t clean these areas to

keep them in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes dirtiness and high spread of

airborne dust in the hot windy days and difficulty for travelers.

At Trung Kien Bridge, in the site inspections we still didn’t see any improvement. Still there is

no signboard and lighting systems installed at this area and the public road deteriorated. The

Contractor still has not solved this issue despite the requirements of the Engineer.

At Tan Loi Bridge and section Km 0+665 we also didn’t see any change. At Tan Loi Bridge, the

Contractor complains about obstruction of local people that causes him to cannot install the

signboard, lighting systems and security fence here.

May

The status of tracking of dirt onto public roads has not been improved. The dirt is still tracked

onto public road and caused dirtiness on publica reas and difficulty for road users. The PSC

has many times requested the Contractor to solve this problem by constructing entrance and

exist tire wash and clean these areas but till now there is no improvement recorded.

At interseptions of construction sites and public roads such as Km 0+665, Trung Kien Bridge,

Tan Loi Bridge we found that the Contractor still has not installed signboard system to warn the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

170

travelers of construction site ahead. We have requested the Contractor to install enough

signboard and lighting systems in these areas, however the Contractor has not taken any

action to implement requirement of us.

At Ba Thien Bridge, the security fence broken and this can endanger the travelers. The

Contractor promised that he will reinforce and repair this fence by June 15.

June

The status of tracking of dirt onto public roads has not been improved. The dirt is still tracked

onto public road and caused dirtiness on publica reas and difficulty for road users. The PSC

has many times requested the Contractor to solve this problem by constructing entrance and

exist tire wash and clean these areas but till now there is no improvement recorded.

At interseptions of construction sites and public roads such as Km 0+665, Trung Kien Bridge,

Tan Loi Bridge we found that the Contractor still has not installed signboard system to warn the

travelers of construction site ahead. We have requested the Contractor to install enough

signboard and lighting systems in these areas, however the Contractor has not taken any

action to implement requirement of us.

At Ba Thien Bridge, the security fence broken and this can endanger the travelers. The

Contractor promised that he will reinforce and repair this fence by June 15.

4.13.2 Package A2

April

In the site inspections we still perceived that the dirt is being tracked onto public roads where

the construction sites intersect them. The Contractor also doesn’t clean these areas to keep

them in cleanliness and sanitary condition; this issue causes dirtiness, difficulty for travelers

and high spread of airborne dust in hot windy days.

At Xuan Quang Bridge, in the site inspection on Mar 28 we found that there was no

improvement. The broken fence has not been repaired and the local children access the

dangerous area without prevention of security guard. We have strongly requested the

Contractor to immediately solve this matter to ensure the safety for local people, especially for

children. On April 04, we still didn’t any change here. The PSC already issue a warning letter

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

171

to request the Contractor solve this matter and in the site inspection on April 11, we perceived

that the Contractor had already reinstalled the fence surrounding this area.

At other sections such as Muong Noi Bridge, Km 36+500, Km 39+200 we still didn’t see the

Contractor to install the signboard as our requirements.

May

The status of tracking of dirt onto public road has not been mitigated. This matter caused dirtiness and high spread of airborne dust and difficulty for road users, especially in hot windy days. At sections of embankment, the Contractor also didn’t water the surface in dry days and this caused high spread of dust, too. The PSC many times requested the Contractor to solve these problems but up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

At Muong Noi Bridge, the Contractor still has not installed the fence and signboard system to ensure the security on site as well as to warn the travelers of construction site. The PSC has requested the Contractor to urgently solve the problem of topography to install enough signboard and lighting systems and security fence in this area but up to the day, the Contractor has not implement our requirements.

June

The status of tracking of dirt onto public road has not been mitigated. This matter caused dirtiness and high spread of airborne dust and difficulty for road users, especially in hot windy days. At sections of embankment, the Contractor also didn’t water the surface in dry days and this caused high spread of dust, too. The PSC many times requested the Contractor to solve these problems but up to now, there is no improvement recorded.

At Muong Noi Bridge, the Contractor still has not installed the fence and signboard system to ensure the security on site as well as to warn the travelers of construction site. The PSC has requested the Contractor to urgently solve the problem of topography to install enough signboard and lighting systems and security fence in this area but up to the day, the Contractor has not implement our requirements.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

172

4.13.3 Package A3

April

The existing roads were broken by construction activities at Km62+300, Km75+400 (box

culvert). It’s full of mud and has many big holes, very difficult for local traffic. The local people

complained that there were some accidents on rainy day at Km75+400 because surface of this

existing road was too bad. The Contractor does not pay attention to repair broken existing road

which was impacted by construction activities after construction process. But at location

Km75+400 the Contractor still delay.

At all intersections between local road and construction site of our project were not set up

safety signpost or traffic signal to notice for inhabitant, ex: Km60+200, Km62, Km68,

Km75+400, Km66+947… The Contractor was requested to install signpost at these location to

ensure safety traffic. But they delay to resolve this problem.

May

The existing road was broken by construction activities at Km75+400 (box culvert). It’s full of

mud and has many big holes, very difficult for local traffic. The local people complained that

there were some accidents on rainy day at Km75+400 because surface of this existing road

was too bad. The Contractor does not pay attention to repair broken existing road which was

impacted by construction activities after construction process. Consultant warned many times

but Contractor still delay. Deadline is June 15th, 2012.

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-POS-A3-1285 dated June 1st, 2012.

June

The existing roads were broken by construction activities at Km62+300, Km75+400 (box

culvert). It’s full of mud and has many big holes, very difficult for local traffic. The local people

complained that there were some accidents on rainy day at Km75+400 because surface of this

existing road was too bad. The Contractor does not pay attention to repair broken existing road

which was impacted by construction activities after construction process. But at location

Km75+400 the Contractor still delay.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

173

4.13.4 Package A4

April

At all intersection between local road or national highway and project, the contractor did not set

up signpost to ensure safety for everyone there (Km107+533, Km97+124, Km93,

Km105+400…). And in these locations, dust was distributed much in the air so traffic condition

was very bad. The Consultant requested the Contractor must set up safety signpost, protected

fence, spreading water appropriately at these locations.

The Consultant’s letter was ref. GET2-KEA-A4-5630 dated April 24th, 2012.

May

At all intersection between local road or national highway and project, the contractor did not set

up signpost to ensure safety for everyone there (Km107+533, Km97+124, Km93,

Km105+400…). And in these locations, dust was distributed much in the air so traffic condition

was very bad.

From 12th May 2012, Contractor brought some signpost to sites but after that they picked up it

back their office. The Consultant requested the Contractor must set up safety signpost,

protected fence, spreading water appropriately at these locations.

Special at Nui Voi place, it’s very dangerous when construction activities will be carried out

because it is a high mountain and it lay beside existing road, Contractor was force to stop

working now and requested to submit safety method statement. Consultant requested

Contractor must set up barrier, signpost here to ensure safety for local traffic here.

June

At all intersection between local road or national highway and project, the contractor did not set

up signpost to ensure safety for everyone there (Km107+533, Km97+124, Km93,

Km105+400…). And in these locations, dust was distributed much in the air so traffic condition

was very bad.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

174

4.13.5 Package A5

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

construction activities have not affected much the traffic conditions of the area. However, there

are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The safety warnings signs and safety fences have not been fully installed at the

construction locations intersecting with the public roads, such as: Km122, Km112,

Km123, Km145, Ngoi Rao bridge...

- In some rainy days, the access roads of the Contractor were often badly damaged such

as at Km119, Km115.. which created traffic jams.

- At Km119, Ngoi Rao bridge, Km123... the construction and transportation activities of

the Contractor have affected the quality of public roads, which made it difficult for the

traffic in these area.

- The Contractor has not arranged personnel to guide traffic and control safety at the

construction locations near public roads or intersections with public roads, such as Ngoi

Rao bridge, Ngoi Thu bridge...

To ensure the traffic and safety of the Project, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on

these outstanding issues ( Ref. GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-361 dated 24 April, 2012). The

Consultant has also required the Contractor to comply with the Method Statement and the

Safety Control Plan of the Project during construction process.

This month, the Consultant has also issued instructions for the Contractor to build the access

roads cross streams consistently and to ensure safety and environment of the area (Ref.

GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-282 dated 11 April, 2012).

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that there are some

outstanding issues as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

175

- At some construction locations which intersect with public roads such as Km123+680,

Km145+220, Km112+200, Km148, Ngoi Rao bridge,... the safety fences and warning

signs have not been fully installed. In addition, the Contractor has not arranged any

personnel to guide and control the traffic safety in these locations.

- On several rainy days, the access roads of the Contractor were badly damaged,

especially those across the streams areas such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao, .... this

has affected the regional traffic.

- The construction activities of the Contractor has affected the quality of public roads in

the areas such as QL37 bridge, Hop Minh My bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, ...

To ensure traffic and safety of the Project, in the site inspections, the Consultant has asked the

Contractor to resolve these outstanding issues. Besides, the Consultant has also required the

Contractor to comply with the the Method Statement, the Safety and Traffic Plan to ensure the

project’s traffic during construction.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that there are

still some outstanding issues which have not been resolved as follows:

- The safety fences and warning signs have not been fully installed at the construction

locations near public roads such as Km148, Km 124, or the construction locations

intersecting with public roads such as QL37 bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Km112... The

Contractor has also not arranged any personnel to guide traffic and control safety in

these locations.

- The access roads of the Contractor were badly damaged on some rainy days such as

at Ngoi bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Gua bridge... This has affected the Project's

traffic. However, the Contractor has not fixed them.

- The quality of public roads in the areas Km148, Hop Minh My bridge, Ngoi Rao

bridge... was affected by the construction activities and materials transportation of the

Contractor, but the Contractor failed to repair the damages. This has affected the traffic

areas.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

176

To ensure the traffic of the region and of the project, the Consultant has asked the Contractor

to resolve these outstanding issues. Also, in the site inspections, the Consultant has frequently

asked the Contractor to seriously comply with the Method Statement and the Traffic Ensuring

and Maintenance Plan during construction process to prevent adverse impacts on traffic.

4.13.6 Package A6

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Contractor has continued to

repair the public roads which were affected by the construction activities and transportation of

materials such as Km175 , Km176, Km190, ... In addition, the Contractor has built access

roads across the stream such as at Km173, Km187, Km156, ... to maintain the project’s traffic.

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The access roads of the stream at the bridge area Ngoi That (Km155+971) was

severely damaged in a number of rainy days to a month; this made the traffic can not

flow through this location (Ref. GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-360 dated 10 April, 2012). The

Consultant has requested the Contractor to resolve these outstanding issues to ensure

the Project's traffic.

- At station Km151-Km152, there was much soil dropped on the public roads during the

transportation of construction materials of the Contractor.

- The station Km160+500 - Km160+800 intersects with the provincial road, but the safety

fences and warning signs of the Contractor have not been fully installed there.

To ensure traffic of the project and the region, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on

the outstanding issues. The Consultant has also urgently required the Contractor to fully install

signs at the construction locations, especially those intersect with public roads to ensure the

safety of the Project during construction process.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

Contractor has still continued to repair roads damaged by transportation and construction

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

177

activities such as at Km184, Km176... to maintain the traffic of the region and the project.

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At stations Km151+300, Km160+600, Km174, Km172... the quality of public roads have

been affected by the construction activities and materials transportation of the

Contractor; this has made it difficult for vehicles driving through these areas.

- The warning signs and safety fences have not been fully installed at several

construction location intersecting with public roads, such as: Km160+500 -

Km160+800, Km151, Km184, Km165+350, Km176+ 860...

- Much soil dropped on the public roads during construction and materials transportation

of the Contractor such as at Km151 - Km152, Km154, Km165... when the vehicles

driving through these areas, dust was created, especially in hot and windy days.

To ensure traffic of the project and the region, the Consultant has requested the Contractor to

resolve these outstanding issues. Besides, the Consultant has also urgently required the

Contractor to fully installed signs at the construction locations, especially those intersecting

with public roads to ensure the safety of the project during construction process.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, Consultant found that the

Contractor continued to implement activities to ensure traffic of the Project as well as maintain

good traffic conditions in the region.

- Installation of warning signs and safety fences at the construction sites which were

close to public roads as Km155, Km184, Km165...

- Fix public roads damaged by construction activities and transportation, such as in

Km188, Km165...

- Water irrigation to minimize dust generated during transportation of materials on the

road as in Km156, Km157, Km184, Km186...

However, there were still some outstanding issues in the month as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

178

- In areas of Km151 +300, Km160, Km161, Km174, Km155 +200... the process of

construction and materials transportation made soil up of public roads, which affected

the quality of public roads as well as created dust when vehicles ran through the area.

However, the Contractor has not adequately addressed these outstanding issues.

- The safety fences and warning signs have not been fully installed at the constructions

site which were near a public street as Km159, Km161, Km174... or the construction

locations which intersected with public roads as Km188, Km165...

To ensure the region's traffic and the Project, the Consultant asked the Contractor to resolve

these outstanding issues. In the on-site inspection, the Consultant also frequently asked the

Contractor to comply with Method Statement and traffic control plan of the Project seriously

during construction to prevent adverse impacts on traffic as well as the Project.

4.13.7 Package A7

April

On during April the contractor is transporting the material from Khe Lech quarry to construction

site, which can cause dust and corrupt on exist road. Hence, Engineer had reminded the

contractor in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-613 and required to follow this letter content.

In addition at A1 Abutment of Xom Danh Bridge the exist road through this location very

dangerous because the mud and slip nearly deep hole. The consultant has required the

contractor to overcome by letter No: Ref. GET4-GRBCC-621, however, to 24-April the

contractor only repairs the exits road but not install the safety fence and signpost.

May

On during May the contractor is transporting the material from Khe Lech quarry to construction

site, which can cause dust and corrupt on exist road. Hence, Engineer had reminded the

contractor in the letter No: Ref. GET4- GRBCC-650 and required to follow this letter content.

In addition at A1 Abutment of Xom Danh Bridge the exits road through this location very

dangerous because the mud and slip nearly deep hole. The consultant has required the

contractor to overcome by letter No: Ref. GET4-GRBCC-650.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

179

June

During June, the contractor is transporting the material from Khe Lech quarry to construction

site, which can cause dust and corrupt on exist road. Hence, Engineer had reminded the

contractor to consequences watering and repair if any broken.

In addition at A1 Abutment of Xom Danh Bridge the exits road through this location very

dangerous because the mud and slip nearly deep hole. The consultant has required the

contractor to overcome but so far the contractor did not overcome.

4.13.8 Package A8

April

On 13 and 20- April 2012, no signpost danger and safety barrier at construction work near

citizen road at Underpass box culvert Km220+794 and Underpass box culvert Km237+951.

The consultant has required the contractor Cleary delineate the construction site, install

barricades/fence as appropriate, provide warning signs and assign personnel to ensure that

the public are prohibited from entering the construction sites, especially in areas where are

safety hazards. However, during April 2012, the contractor did not overcome according to

consultant introduction.

May

On 16- May 2012, no signpost danger and safety barrier at construction work near citizen road

at Underpass box culvert Km244+155; Km220+794. The consultant has required the

contractor Cleary delineate the construction site, install barricades/fence as appropriate,

provide warning signs and assign personnel to ensure that the public are prohibited from

entering the construction sites, especially in areas where are safety hazards. However, during

May 2012, the contractor did not overcome according to consultant introduction.

June

On 6, 14, 21- June 2012, no signpost danger and safety barrier at construction work near

citizen road at Underpass box culvert Km220+794; Km244+155; Km237+951. The consultant

has required the contractor Cleary delineate the construction site, install barricades/fence as

appropriate, provide warning signs and assign personnel to ensure that the public are

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

180

prohibited from entering the construction sites, especially in areas where are safety hazards.

However, during June 2012, the contractor did not overcome according to consultant

introduction.

4.14 SIGNPOSTING IN DANGEROUS SURFACES

4.14.1 Package A1

April

During the site inspections this month, we did not see the serious problems happened on the

construction sites. However, the PSC still recommended the Contractor to pay attention to this

issue and immediately install the signboard and fence system surrounding dangerous area to

prevent accident happening.

May

We did not see the serious problems happened on the construction sites by observation during

this month. However, we recommended the Contractor to pay attention to this issue and

immediately install the signboard and fence system surrounding dangerous area, if any, to

prevent accident happening.

June

We did not see the serious problems happened on the construction sites by observation during

this month. However, we recommended the Contractor to pay attention to this issue and

immediately install the signboard and fence system surrounding dangerous area, if any, to

prevent accident happening.

4.14.2 Package A2

April

As mentioned in item “4.14 Traffic conditions and signposting in roads” we found that there

was no improvement at Xuan Quang Bridge. The broken fence has not been repaired and the

local children access the dangerous area without prevention of security guard. We have

strongly requested the Contractor to immediately solve this matter to ensure the safety for local

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

181

people, especially for children. On April 04, we still didn’t any change here. The PSC already

issue a warning letter to request the Contractor solve this matter and in the site inspection on

April 11, we perceived that the Contractor had already reinstalled the fence surrounding this

area.

At Pier 1 of Lo River Bridge, after handing-over the land, there are some deep wells on the site

without cover or backfilling. There was also no warning signboard of this issue in this area. The

PSC has requested the Contractor to immediately cover or backfill all these well to prevent

accident happen due to someone could be fallen into. On April 26, our site inspection reported

that the Contractor has backfilled and covered all these wells. We will recheck this area in the

site inspection on May 04, 2012.

May

In the site inspection on May 22, we found that the Contractor let the children enter the site for playing. The PSC has immediately requested the Contractor to solve this matter as well as install the fence and signboard system to prevent entering of unauthorized person to the construction site, especially the children. We will recheck this area in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

At other sections, we didn’t found the serious problem during the site inspection; however, we recommended the Contractor to pay attention to this issue and immediately install the signboard and fence system surrounding dangerous area, if any, to prevent accident happening.

June

In the site inspection on May 22, we found that the Contractor let the children enter the site for playing. The PSC has immediately requested the Contractor to solve this matter as well as install the fence and signboard system to prevent entering of unauthorized person to the construction site, especially the children. We will recheck this area in the next site inspection on May 30, 2012.

At other sections, we didn’t found the serious problem during the site inspection; however, we recommended the Contractor to pay attention to this issue and immediately install the signboard and fence system surrounding dangerous area, if any, to prevent accident happening.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

182

4.14.3 Package A3

April

Almost dangerous place in site was stretched of safety tape around by Contractor such as

deep areas, a pit foundation at Red river bridge, Phong Chau bridge…

Beside, some construction sites which are near by residential area was set up protective fence

construction and unallowed for local people freely entry and protected construction site but the

Contractor still did not set up signpost to ensure safety such as TL323B Km51+100,

Km66+900, Km59+020….

May and June

Almost dangerous place in site was stretched of safety tape around by Contractor such as

deep areas, a pit foundation at Red river bridge, Phong Chau bridge…

Beside, some construction sites which are near by residential area was set up protective fence

construction and unallowed for local people freely entry and protected construction site but the

Contractor still did not set up signpost to ensure safety such as TL323B Km51+100,

Km66+900, Km59+020...

4.14.4 Package A4

April

In April, when inspection in site we have found that have some deep and dangerous areas

were not set up safety tape and put warning signpost to ensure safety.

At some construction sites which are near by residential area was not set up protective fence

construction and prevent local people freely entry and protected construction site at QL32C

bypass, Km106+600…

May and June

At some construction sites which are near by residential area was not set up protective fence

construction and prevent local people freely entry and protected construction site at QL32C

bypass, Km106+600…

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

183

Nui Voi place, it’s very dangerous when construction activities will be carried out because it is

a high mountain and it lay beside existing road. Now it was force to stop working. But when

Contractor work here, we request them must set up barrier, signpost here to ensure safety for

local traffic.

4.14.5 Package A5

April

Through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that there are some

outstanding issues as follows:

- The safety fences and warning signs have not been fully installed at the construction

locations of the Contractor (such as Ngoi Gua brigde, QL37 bridge, Van Phu brigde....;

the access roads Km113, Km138, Km117-Km119...; other locations such as

construction of irrigations at Km118+202, Km118+224 underpass box culvert, and

drainage pipes Km118+060, Km118+860...; construction locations intersects with

public roads Km123+860, Km145+220, Km148...).

- Safety fences and warning signs have been damaged severely in some areas such as

Km112, Km114, Km138... However, the Contractor has not repaired these safety

elements yet.

- Safety fences and warning signs have been installed in some areas by the Contractor

such as Ngoi Rao bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge... these safety elements do not meet the

requirements of the Project and not guarantee safety.

The Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these outstanding issues in Ref. GET3-

KEANGNAM-12-A5-282 dated 11 April, 2012 and GET3 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-324 dated

14 April, 2012. The Consultant has also required the Contractor to quickly complete the

installation of warning signs in dangerous surfaces to alert personnel in the process of working

as well as people driving near the Project’s area to prevent unfortunate accidents.

May

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that the

fences and warning signs have not been fully installed at the construction locations of the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

184

Contractor (such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao brigde, Van Phu Bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge ...

access roads Km114, Km118, Km119, Km138, Km142... and other construction locations such

as irrigation pipe, drainage pipe, underpass culvert, ...) or the safety elements do not meet the

requirements of the Project, not safety (QL37 bridge, Km119...).

Besides, at the fuel stations of the Contractor such as Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, Van

Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia bridge...., the Contractor has not fully installed warning signs.

The Consultant has warned the Contractor on these issues in Ref.GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-

409 dated May 09, 2012 and GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 dated May 31, 2012/ The

Consultant has also urgently required the Contractor are to improve the safety structures on

site and fully install safety fences, warning signs, barriers, signposts indicating dangerous

areas, especially the contractor's excavation area. Beside, the Consultant has required the

Contractor to regularly repair safety fences, safety warning sings damaged to ensure adequate

warning signals at all times.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that the safety

control of the Contractor on site has still not been conducted well; At many locations, signs and

safety fences have still not been fully installed or:

- At the bridge areas Ngoi Gua bridge, Ngoi Rao brigde, Van Phu bridge, Ngoi Thia

bridge... the Contractor has not fully installed signs at the fuel stations.

- The safety fences have not fully been installed in access roads areas such as Km114,

Km115, Km117, Km118, Km119, the bridge construction locations such as Ngoi Gua

bridge, Ngoi Rao bridge, and other locations such as irrigation, drainage, underpass

culvert...

- The safety fences and signs did not meet the requirements of the Project or have been

damaged severely in the bridges area QL37, Van Phu, Ngoi Rao, Ngoi Thia...

However, the Contractor has failed to repair and improve the safety factors.

To ensure the safety of the Project, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on the issues.

Also, the Consultant has urgently required the Contractor to fully install signs at dangerous

surfaces as well as carry out repairs the safety fences and warning signs damaged.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

185

Besides, in the site inspections, the Consultant has frequently required the Contractor to

strictly comply with the Method Statement and Safety Control Plan of the project to prevent

unexpected accidents during the project’s implementation process.

4.14.6 Package A6

April

This month, the Contractor has continued to implement the installation of safety fences in

hazardous surfaces as well as repair fences and warning signs damaged in areas such as:

Ngoi Nhuoc bridge, Lang Nhay bridge, Ngoi Hut bridge, tunnel construction site... Besides, the

Contractor has also arranged personnel to ensure the traffic and safety on site in areas such

as Ngoi That bridge, tunnel construction area...

However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

- The stations Km161+100, Km155+300... are close to public roads. However, the

Contractor has not fully installed safety fences and warning signs.

- At stations Km171, Km174, Km167... the Contractor has not yet fully installed safety

fences and warning signs on the access roads.

To ensure the safety of the Project, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these

issues. In addition, the Consultant has urgently required the Contractor to fully install signs in

dangerous surfaces as well as carry out repairing the safety fences and safety warning signs

damaged.

Besides, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has regularly required the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement as well as the Safety Plan of the Project during construction

process.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that some

construction locations of the Contractor have been installed safety fences and warning signs

such as Km155+300, Khe Chuong bridge, Ngoi That bridge, Ngoi Hut bridge... In addition, the

Contractor has also arranged staff to regularly inspect the safety and traffic at the construction

locations. However, there are still some outstanding issues as follows:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

186

- The warning signs and safety fences have not been fully installed at the construction

locations intersecting with public roads, such as: Km160+500 - Km160+800, Km151,

Km184, Km165+350, Km176+860...

- The safety fences have been damaged or not fully provided in the access roads such

as Km161, Km171, Km172...

- The Contractor has not fully installed warning signs and safety fences in areas such as

fuel stations Km171, Km155+300...

To ensure the safety of the Project, the Consultant has reminded the Contractor on these

issues. Also, the Consultant has urgently required the Contractor to fully installf signs in

dangerous surfaces as well as to carry out repairing safety fences and the safety warning

signs damaged.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, Consultant found that the

Contractor continued the installation of safety fences, warning signs in hazardous surfaces

such as bridge construction locations: Khe Chuong bridge, Ngoi That, Ngoi Don bridge, Dai

Viet bridge, construction locations which intersected with public roads as Km155 +200, Km165,

Km184, access roads in Km156, Km186...

In addition, the Contractor assigned the safety personnel check on the construction site every

day to remind unsafe conditions.

However, there were still some outstanding issues as follows:

- At the construction site which intersected with public roads, such as: Km160 +500 -

Km160+800, Km151, Km184, Km165 +350, Km176+860... warning signs and safety

fences have not been fully installed.

- Many fences were damaged and unsafe but has not been repaired in the access roads

in Km171, Km172, Km155... Ngoi Hut bridge, Ngoi Rom bridge.

To ensure the safety of the Project, Consultant prompted the Contractor on unsafe issues, at

the same time, Consultant required the Contractor urgently install signs in dangerous areas as

well as repair damaged safety fences and warning signs.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

187

To ensure safety of the Project, Consultant asked the Contractor adequately addressed these

outstanding issues. In the on-site inspection, consultant also frequently asked the Contractor to

comply with Method Statement and safety control plan of the Project seriously to prevent

unexpected accidents during Project implementation.

4.14.7 Package A7

April

On April 2012, some location as: Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400, Tan Thuong Bridge

Km199+860 and Ram AII Bridge Km199+050 the safety barrier and danger signpost has

installed, but almost them are not meet standard, so consultant has required the contractor to

repair all this safety barrier and signpost of this location according to regulation.

May

During the May 2012, some location as: Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400, Khe Hong Bridge

Km193+379 and Ram AII Bridge Km199+050 the safety barrier and danger signpost has

installed, but almost them are not meet standard, so consultant has required the contractor to

repair all this safety barrier and signpost of this location according to regulation.

June

During the June 2012, some location as: Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400, Khe Hong Bridge

Km193+379 and Ram AII Bridge Km199+050 the safety barrier and danger signpost has

installed, but almost them are not meet standard, so consultant has required the contractor to

repair all this safety barrier and signpost of this location according to regulation.

4.14.8 Package A8

April

On April 2012 at construction works at Box culvert Km222+487; Lang Tra Bridge Km220+993

these are not the signpost and barrier at construction works, required the contractor to install

signpost and barrier at construction works, to prevent the citizen come construction.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

188

May

On 16- May 2012 at construction works of Underpass box culvert Km244+155; Km220+794,

Girder casting yard ò Suoi Nhu Bridge Km218+040, Suoi Trat Bridge Km231+889 these are

not the signpost and barrier at construction works, required the contractor to install signpost

and barrier at construction works, to prevent the citizen come construction.

June

On 6, 14, 21- June 2012 at construction works of Underpass box culvert Km220+794;

Km244+155; Km237+951, Girder casting yard of Suoi Nhu Bridge Km218+040, Suoi Trat

Bridge Km231+889 these are not the signpost and barrier at construction works, required the

contractor to install signpost and barrier at construction works, to prevent the citizen come

construction.

4.15 ACCIDENTS DUE TO THE LACK OF SAFETY MEASURES. RESPONSIBLES

4.15.1 Package A1

April, May and June

There were no accidents recorded on sites during these months.

4.15.2 Package A2

April

A fatal accident was recorded at Lo River Bridge on Sunday morning, out of working time, in

April 22, 2012. The worker did not use life-jacket while he was on water body and he fell into

the river. The PSC has requested the Contractor to investigate the accident and submit the

report. With the information provided by the Contractor, the Engineer has prepared a specific

report, which is included in this Quarterly Report as Annex 3.

May and June

There were no accidents recorded on sites during these months.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

189

4.15.3 Package A3

April, May and June

During these months, the Consultant did not receive any report regarding accidents due to lack

of safety measures in Package A3.

During May, the Contractor has continued to implement safety control activities on site to

ensure the safety in the construction process.

4.15.4 Package A4

April, May and June

During these months, the Consultant did not receive any report regarding accidents due to lack

of safety measures in Package A4.

4.15.5 Package A5

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that in the

package A5 did not have any serious accident due to lack of safety measures.

However, to ensure the safety of the Project as well as to prevent unfortunate accidents, in the

weekly site inspections, the Consultant has frequently required the Contractor to comply with

the Method Statement and the Safety Plan of the Project during the construction process. Also,

the Consultant has required the Contractor to strengthen the safety structures on site and

ensure adequate warning signals at the construction locations, especially the dangerous

areas.

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no serious accident occurred on the range of A5 package.

However, to ensure the safety of the Project as well as to prevent unfortunate accident

happened, in the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has frequently required the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

190

Contractor to comply with the Method Statement and the Safety Plan of the project during

construction.

In addition, the Consultant has also required the Contractor to strengthen the safety structures

on site, ensure adequate warning signals at the construction locations of the Contractor,

especially the dangerous surfaces.

The Consultant has also recommended the Contractor to regularly organize safety meetings

for employees and engineers, make promotion on the safety for pupils in schools near the

Project.

June

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there is

no serious accident that occurs on the range of package A5.

To ensure the safety of the Project as well as to prevent the unfortunate accidents, in the

weekly site inspections, the Consultant has still regularly required the Contractor to comply

with Method Statement and Safety Control Plan of the project during the Project’s construction

process.

4.15.6 Package A6

April

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, the Consultant found that in

package A6 there has been no serious accident due to lack of safety measures.

During this time, the Contractor had improvements in safety management at many construction

locations. Also, at many construction locations, the Contractor has fully installed warning signs

and safety fences to alert workers in the working process as well as local people driving near

the site.

In the site weekly inspections, the Consultant has still regularly required the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement and the Safety Plan of the Project to prevent unfortunate

accidents.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

191

May

Through the inspection and supervision on site this month, the Consultant found that there was

no serious accident occurred in the A6 package due to lack of safety measures.

During this period, the Contractor has continued to implement safety control activities on site to

ensure the safety in the construction process.

In the weekly site inspections, the Consultant has still regularly required the Contractor to

comply with the Method Statement and the Safety Control Plan of the Project to prevent

unfortunate accidents.

June

This month, through the inspection and supervision on site, Consulting found that there were

not any serious accidents occurred on the A6 bidding package due to the lack of safety

measures.

However, to ensure the safety of the Project during the construction process and prevent the

tragic accident occurred, Consultant frequently required the Contractor to comply with the

Method Statement and safety plan of the Project, and frequently improve the safety

management and control of the Contractor.

4.15.7 Package A7

April, May and June

There were not any accidents due to the lack of safety measures but in some cases the

Engineer had to remind the contractor as follow:

- At Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400, Tan Thuong Bridge Km199+860 and Ram AII Bridge

Km199+050 consultants reminds the contractor about signpost and safety barrier

around deep hole; because almost this safety barrier and signpost are unvalued and

not meet standard. So the contractor is required to repair safety barrier and signpost at

this location to safety for worker and citizens.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

192

4.15.8 Package A8

There were not any accidents due to the lack of safety measures but in some cases the

Engineer had to remind the contractor as follow:

April

- Labour safety while the process of working at construction works of Suoi Trat Bridge

Km231+889; Lang Tra Bridge Km220+993; IC17 Bridge Km233+540; Underpass

culvert Km237+951; IC18 Bridge Km244+570; Ngoi Bo Bridge Km238+265; Box culvert

Km223+075 and Km233+540. Require the subcontractor to remind and propose labour

safety for workers. If any worker continues to violate the regulation, will be fired.

- Safety for gas tanks and oxy tanks, Km218+040, April 25th 2012. Required the

contractor keep Limit distance for gas tanks and oxy tanks is 3m and never transfer

together gas tanks and oxy tanks.

May

- Labour safety while the process of working at construction works of Km233+540;

Km224+369. Require the subcontractor to remind and propose labour safety for

workers. If any worker continues to violate the regulation, will be fired.

- Safety for gas tanks and oxy tanks at Km218+040; Km238+265 date 4- May 2012.

Required the contractor keep Limit distance for gas tanks and oxy tanks is 3m and

never transfer together gas tanks and oxy tanks

June

- Labour safety while the process of working at construction works of Km231+889;

Km233+540; Km227+290; Km220+794; Km224+869. Require the subcontractor to

remind and propose labour safety for workers. If any worker continues to violate the

regulation, will be fired.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

193

5 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND SAFETY

ISSUES

5.1 PACKAGE A1

No Document reference Date Remark

1 GET1/POS/A1/1396 Mar 26, 2012 Underpass NH2: Reopen procedures of payment progress

2 GET1/POS/A1/1409 Apr 09, 2012 Report on Environmental Monitoring and Analysis – March, 2012

3 GET1/POS/A1/1426 Apr 25, 2012 Ba Thien Bridge and Interchange No. 3: Request to supplement scaffold and safety net

4 GET1/POS/A1/1427 Apr 25, 2012 Km 0+665 ~ Km 4+400: Request to water the surface of embankment

5 GET1/POS/A1/1428 Apr 25, 2012 Underpass NH2: Last warning of discharge of untreated wastewater

6 GET1/POS/A1/1429 Apr 26, 2012 Project safety on holiday

7 REF-A1-GET1-MOM-57 Mar 29, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

8 REF-A1-GET1-MOM-58 Apr 20, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

9 GET1/POS/A1/1429 Apr 26, 2012 Project safety on holiday

10 GET1/POS/A1/1440A May 11, 2012 Report on Environmental Monitoring and Analysis – April, 2012

11 REF-A1-GET1-MOM-59 May 04, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

12 REF-A1-GET1-MOM-50 May 24, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

13 GET1/POS/A1/1429 Apr 26, 2012 Project safety on holiday

14 GET1/POS/A1/1440A May 11, 2012 Report on Environmental Monitoring and Analysis – April, 2012

15 REF-A1-GET1-MOM-59 May 04, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

16 REF-A1-GET1-MOM-50 May 24, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

5.2 PACKAGE A2

No Document reference Date Remark

1 GET1/POS/A2/1228 Mar 26, 2012 Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+450: Removal Unsuitable Material

2 GET1/POS/A2/1229 Mar 26, 2012 Khang Minh section: Complaint Settlement

3 GET1/POS/A2/1243 Apr 05, 2012 Xuan Quang Bridge: Request to reinstall security fence and assign security guard on duty

4 GET1/POS/A2/1244 Apr 05, 2012 Report on Environmental Monitoring and Analysis – February, 2011

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

194

No Document reference Date Remark

5 GET1/POS/A2/1251 Apr 09, 2012 Report on Environmental Monitoring and Analysis – March, 2012

6 GET1/POS/A2/1263 Apr 13, 2012 Army II, Army III, TL310 and Ben Tre Bridges: Request to apply the safety measures

7 GET1/POS/A2/1264 Apr 13, 2012 Ben Gao Bridge: Last warning of environmental protection measures

8 GET1/POS/A2/1265 Apr 13, 2012 Batch Plant C: Money deduction

9 GET1/POS/A2/1277 Apr 23, 2012 Ben Gao Bridge: Money deduction

10 GET1/POS/A2/1278 Apr 23, 2012 Song Dao Bridge: Reopen procedure of payment progress and money deduction

11 GET1/POS/A2/1281 Apr 25, 2012 Km 42+200 ~ Km 42+450: Last warning of Unsuitable Material Removal

12 GET1/POS/A2/1285 Apr 26, 2012 Project safety on holiday

13 REF-A2-GET1-MOM-42 Mar 29, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

14 GET1/POS/A2/1285 Apr 26, 2012 Project safety on holiday

15 GET1/POS/A2/1297 May 04, 2012 Embankment sections: Last warning of dust suppression measures application

16 GET1/POS/A2/1309 May 14, 2012 Army II, Ben Gao and Lo River Bridges: Request to apply the safety measures

17 REF-A2-GET1-MOM-43 May 04, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

18 REF-A2-GET1-MOM-44 May 24, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

19 GET1/POS/A2/1285 Apr 26, 2012 Project safety on holiday

20 GET1/POS/A2/1297 May 04, 2012 Embankment sections: Last warning of dust suppression measures application

21 GET1/POS/A2/1307A May 11, 2012 Report on Environmental Monitoring and Analysis – April, 2012

22 GET1/POS/A2/1309 May 14, 2012 Army II, Ben Gao and Lo River Bridges: Request to apply the safety measures

23 REF-A2-GET1-MOM-43 May 04, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

24 REF-A2-GET1-MOM-44 May 24, 2012 Minutes of meeting between EPMU, GETINSA and POSCO

5.3 PACKAGE A3

Nº Document reference Date Remark

1 GET2-POS-A3-1193 April 16th, 2012 Approval of Environmental monitoring report on March, 2012

2 GET2-POS-A3-1204 April 24th, 2012 Request to resolve environmental and safety violation in package A3.

3 Site minutes April 17th, 2012 environmental and safety violation at Km66+300- Km67+300

4 GET2-POS-A3-1221 May 4th, 2012 Request to carry out the safety methods in bridges construction sites- package A3

5 GET2-POS-A3-1284 June 1st, 2012 Approval of Environmental monitoring report on April, 2012

6 GET2-POS-A3-1285 June 1st, 2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems in package A3”

7 GET2-POS-A3-1288 June 4th, 2012 Conclusion of meeting on safety at Red River

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

195

Nº Document reference Date Remark Bridge

8 GET2-POS-A3-1303 June 11th, 2012 Approval of Environmental monitoring report on May, 2012

9 GET2-POS-A3-1341 June 26th, 2012 New submission of Red River Bridge safety procedure for Scaffolding and working at height requested

10 GET2-EPMU2-A3-349 June 29th, 2012 Report actual situation of repairing for Environmental and safety violations in Package A3

5.4 PACKAGE A4

Nº Document reference Date Remark

1 GET2-KEA-A4-610 April 4th, 2012 Approval of Environmental monitoring report on February, 2012

2 GET2-KEA-A4-630 April 24th, 2012 Request to resolve environmental and safety violation in package A4

3 GET2-KEA-A4-631 April 24th, 2012 Request to submit new personnel for Senior environmentalist position-package A4

4 GET2-KEA-A4-622 April 16th, 2012 Reject to work with Mrs. Ha Thi Minh Chuc- package A4.

5 GET2-KEA-A4-638 May 4th, 2012 Request to repair the environmental and safety violations of package A4

6 GET2-KEA-A4-657 May 17th 2012 Request supplement Professional degree for Safety engineer- package A4

7 GET2-KEA-A4-637 May 2nd, 2012 Approval of Environmental monitoring report on March, 2012- package A4

8 GET2-KEA-A4-680 June 1st, 2012 Require to overcome Environmental and safety problems in package A4

9 GET2-KEA-A4-687 June 11th, 2012 Approval of Environmental monitoring report on April and May, 2012 – package A4

10 GET2-GET-A4-032 June 12th, 2012 Temporaty approval of Safety Engineer – package A4

11 GET2-GET-A4-033 June 12th, 2012 Temporaty approval of Senior environmentalist – package A4

12 GET2-EPMU2-A4-142 June 29th, 2012 Report actual situation of repairing for Environmental and safety violations in Package A4

5.5 PACKAGE A5

Nº Document reference Date Remark

1 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-270 April 3, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal areas for unsuitable materials

2 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-290 April 6, 2012 Comment on documents of disposal areas for unsuitable material

3 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-282 April 11, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on environmental and safety issues

4 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-316 April 12, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal areas for unsuitable materials

5 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-324 April 14, 2012 Warning to Safety Manager of Keangnam contractor

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

196

Nº Document reference Date Remark

6 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-355 April 23, 2012 Approval of Report on Environmental Monitoring for March 2012

7 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-361 April 24, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on safety and environmental issues

8 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-376 April 27, 201 Reminding the Contractor on ensure environment, safety and traffic during holidays

9 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-377 April 27, 201 Request the Contractor to ensure environmental control and protection in accordance

10 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-386 May 3, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures to control environment and safety at production factories

11 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-387 May 3, 2012 Request the Contractor to improve the living & working conditions in the workers’ camps

12 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-392 May 7, 2012 Warning to Keangnam Contractor

13 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-409 May 9, 2012 Warning the Contractor on safety issues

14 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-426 May 15, 2012 Notice for site check relating to environmental and safety issues

15 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-428 May 15, 2012 Warning to Keangnam Contractor

16 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-439 May 16, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures in order to ensure environment at construction site of Van Phu bridge

17 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-438 May 16, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures in order to minimize dust during construction and material transportation

18 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-437 May 16, 2012 Request the Contractor to improve the living & working conditions in the workers’ camps

19 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-444 May 16, 2012 Warning to Safety Manager of Keangnam contractor

20 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-463 May 25, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures in order to ensure environment

21 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-461 May 25, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures in order to ensure safety

22 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-463 May 25, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures in order to ensure environment

23 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-461 May 25, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures in order to ensure safety

24 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-489 May 31, 201 Approval of Report on Environmental Monitoring for April 2012

25 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-490 May 31, 201 Require to solve Environmental and Safety problems of Package A5

26 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-532 Jun 13, 201 Reminding the contractor on safety issues

27 GET3-KEANGNAM-12-A5-583 Jun 21, 201 Comment on documents of disposal areas

5.6 PACKAGE A6

Nº Document reference Date Remark

1 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-363 April 10, 2012 Provisional approval of the method statement for sodding at soil slope

2 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-360 April 10, 2012 Request the Contractor to maintain traffic and safety at Ngoi That bridge Km155+971

3 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-367 April 11, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal areas for unsuitable materials

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

197

Nº Document reference Date Remark

4 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-372 April 12, 2012 Requirements to grassing work at cutting slope

5 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-393 April 19, 2012 Approval of the Method Statement of Waste water Treatment for Tunnel Work

6 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-387 April 19, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on safety and environmental issues

7 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-422 April 26, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal areas

8 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-430 April 26, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on safety for tunnelling work

9 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-421 April 26, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on Sodding for embankment slope

10 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-422 April 26, 201 Approval with comments on Disposal areas

11 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-430 April 26, 201 Reminding the Contractor on safety for tunnelling work

12 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-421 April 26, 201 Reminding the Contractor on Sodding for embankment slope

13 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-434 April 27, 201 Reminding the Contractor on ensure environment, safety and traffic during holidays

14 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-435 April 27, 201 Request the Contractor to ensure environmental control and protection in accordance

15 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-443 April 28, 201 Approval with comments on Disposal areas

16 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-452 May 3, 2012 Request the Contractor to apply measures to control environment and safety at production factories

17 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-453 May 3, 2012 Request the Contractor to improve the living & working conditions in the workers’ camps

18 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A5-457 May 4, 2012 Warning to DOOSAN Contractor about environmental issues at construction site of the Tunnel

19 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-467 May 9, 2012 Warning the Contractor on safety issues

20 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A5-484 May 14, 2012 Warning the Contractor on environmental issues

21 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-491 May 15, 2012 Request the Contractor to improve the living & working conditions in the workers’ camps

22 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-530 May 25, 2012 Approval of Report on Environmental Monitoring for March 2012

23 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-545 May 31, 2012 Approval of Report on Environmental Monitoring for April 2012

24 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-546 May 31, 2012 Require to solve Environmental and Safety problems of Package A6

25 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-548 Jun 1, 2012 Information for Tunnel entrance card

26 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-558 Jun 6, 2012 Ensure safety for cutting slope areas

27 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-566 Jun 8, 2012 Request the Contractor to solve impacts caused

from construction activities to local residents production land and living

28 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-568 Jun 9, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal areas

29 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-569 Jun 9, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on environmental and safety issues

30 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-579 Jun 12, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal

31 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-586 Jun 12, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal

32 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-591 Jun 13, 2012 Grass work- seeds quality certificate and material source

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

198

Nº Document reference Date Remark

33 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-616 Jun 21, 2012 Approval of Report on Environmental Monitoring in May 2012

34 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-617 Jun 21, 2012 Approval with comments on Disposal

35 GET3-DOOSAN-12-A6-633 Jun 27, 2012 Reminding the Contractor on environmental and safety issues

5.7 PACKAGE A7

Nº Document reference Date Remark

1 Ref. GET4-GRBCC-613 1-April 2012 Reminding about safety and environment –package A7

2 Ref. GET4-GRBCC-614 1- April 2012 Approve the Environment Monitoring Report at Construction Stage (phase 5- February 2012) - package A7

3 Ref. GET4-GRBCC-621 10- April 2012 Recovering of safety at Abutment A1- Xom Danh Bridge Km198+400

4 Ref. GRBCC/GETINSA/A7/1101 12- April 2012 Addition document of waste areas

5 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-33 3- May-2012 Project safety at Box culvert Km200+862

6 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-34 4- May-2012 Require to stop pours land at Km201+815 and Km209+800

7 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-39 8- May-2012 Return the document of spoil area at section1: Km190+420-Km201+000 Rev.A1

8 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-48 22- May-2012 The First times warning to Mr Trinh Van Tho- Manager Director, seaction2 of contractor A7

9 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-49 22 May-2012 Return the document of spoil area at section1: Km190+420-Km201+000 Rev.A2

10 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-50 25- May-2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems of Package A7

11 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-653 28-May 2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems of Package A7 according to ADB’s instruction

12 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-656 30-May 2012 Approved 13 of spoil area at section3: Km207+000- Km218+040 Rev.A1

13 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-660 05-June 2012

Required the contractor to addition the document, file relates to import the grass seed source and material using for protection slope of Package A7

14 Ref.GET4-GRBCC-663 12-June 2012 Approved 03 in 08 of spoil area at section1: Km190+420-Km201+000 Rev.A2

15 Ref.GET-GUA-055 12-June 2012 Health and safety conditions in Site laboratory A7 Km195+900

16 Ref.GET-GUA-057 19-June 2012

Required the contractor to addition the document relates to import the grass seed source and material using for protection slope of Package A7- second time

17 Ref.GET-EPMU-1567 25-June 2012 Grass certificates- Package A7

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

199

5.8 PACKAGE A8

Nº Document reference Date Remark

1 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 534 1- April 2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems of Package A8

2 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 538 6- April 2012 Boosting the progress and ensuring construction safety in raining season at Suoi Nhu Bridge Km218+040- Package A8

3 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 549 3-May-2012 Project safety while working- LAST REMINDED

4 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 563 23-May-2012 Reminding to contractor’s personnel and to the maintenance of access roads- Package A8

5 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 565 25-May-2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems of Package A8

6 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 566 28-May-2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems of Package A8 according to ADB’s instruction

7 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 567 29-May-2012 Request to overcome the consequence because of contractor’s mistake

8 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 566 28-May 2012 Require to overcome Environmental and Safety problems of Package A8 according to ADB’s instruction

9 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 567 29-May 2012 Request to overcome the consequence because of contractor’s mistakes.

10 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 569 8-June 2012 Require to overcome the problem at Km230+527-Km230+660

11 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 570 12-June 2012 Approved the Report environmental monitoring on construction stage (phase 7- May 2012) – Package A8.

12 Ref. GET4- Vinaconex- 574 18-June 2012 Project safety while working at Suoi Trat Bridge Km231+889.60- LAST REMINDED

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

200

6 ST

ATU

S O

N T

HE

ECA

P IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N

6.1

CO

NTR

AC

TOR

S’ E

NVI

RO

NM

ENTA

L A

ND

SA

FETY

MA

NA

GER

S M

OB

ILIZ

ATI

ON

As

this

issu

e is

one

of t

he m

ost i

mpo

rtant

one

s fo

r th

e rig

ht im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e co

ntra

ctor

s’ E

CP

and

EC

AP

, her

e is

pre

sent

ed a

sum

mar

y

tabl

e of

the

cur

rent

ly s

ituat

ion,

upd

ated

till

July

201

2, i

n ea

ch p

acka

ge a

bout

the

mob

ilizat

ion

of c

ontra

ctor

s’ e

nviro

nmen

tal

and

safe

ty

man

ager

s. S

ome

rem

arks

are

als

o co

nsid

ered

insi

de th

e ta

ble.

It’s

not

incl

uded

the

upda

te o

nly

till t

he e

nd o

f Jun

e as

the

Clie

nt a

nd A

DB

wer

e

alre

ady

info

rmed

abo

ut th

is a

nd d

ue to

the

fact

that

whi

le th

is r

epor

t was

bei

ng p

repa

red,

som

e ne

w im

prov

emen

ts in

the

situ

atio

n ha

ppen

ed.

Und

er C

onsu

ltant

’s c

onsi

dera

tion,

the

full

com

plia

nce

with

this

item

that

now

aday

s w

e ca

n of

fer,

is e

noug

h si

gnifi

cant

to in

clud

e in

this

qua

rterly

repo

rt.

(Not

e: s

ome

man

ager

s w

ill be

eva

luat

ed b

y PS

C in

the

inco

min

g m

onth

s)

PAC

KA

GE

CU

RR

ENT

STA

TUS

POSI

TIO

N

PRO

POSE

D

APP

RO

VED

M

OB

ILIZ

ED

NAM

E R

EMA

RK

S

A1

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

In p

roce

ss

Yes

Jeon

Dae

Kyu

n P

ropo

sed

for t

empo

rary

app

rova

l

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Le D

inh

Quy

en

A2

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

In p

roce

ss

Yes

Kw

ak, K

i Jin

P

ropo

sed

for t

empo

rary

app

rova

l

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Kim

Jeo

ng H

o

A3

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

In p

roce

ss

Yes

Jo S

eung

Kw

an

Pro

pose

d fo

r tem

pora

ry a

ppro

val

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ngu

yen

Than

h C

ong

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

201

PAC

KA

GE

CU

RR

ENT

STA

TUS

POSI

TIO

N

PRO

POSE

D

APP

RO

VED

M

OB

ILIZ

ED

NAM

E R

EMA

RK

S

A4

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ta H

ong

Yen

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ngu

yen

Dan

h N

am

A5

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Lee,

Soo

Ki

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

You,

Jae

Eun

A6

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Son

g, H

wa

Seo

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Kw

on, O

h Li

n

A7

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Zhou

Guo

Mou

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pha

n Li

n Fe

ng

A8

Env

ironm

enta

l m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Tran

Van

Din

h

Safe

ty m

anag

er

Yes

Yes

Yes

Mai

Xua

n La

p

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

202

6.2

ENVI

RO

NM

ENTA

L C

OR

REC

TIVE

AC

TIO

N P

LAN

(EC

AP)

. UPD

ATE

30T

H/0

6/20

12

6.2.

1 Pa

ckag

e A

1

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Dirt

is tr

acke

d on

to

publ

ic ro

ad c

ausi

ng

dirty

and

diff

icul

ty fo

r ro

ad u

sers

at s

ectio

ns

whe

re li

nk to

pub

lic

road

s su

ch a

s U

nder

pass

QL2

, Tru

ng

Kie

n br

idge

, TL4

02

brid

ge, B

a Th

ien

brid

ge, I

.C3,

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n K

e br

idge

, TL

302C

II br

idge

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1236

G

ET/

EP

MU

/120

4 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0

Cle

an u

p th

e af

fect

ed a

rea

in re

gula

r bas

is; a

pply

the

sedi

men

t con

trol m

easu

res

to p

reve

nt tr

acki

ng o

f dirt

on

to p

ublic

road

s (c

onst

ruct

the

cons

truct

ion

site

ent

ranc

es a

nd e

xits

tire

w

ash)

Con

tract

or

June

30,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Wor

kers

wer

e as

sign

ed to

cl

ean

affe

cted

se

ctio

ns b

ut

sect

ions

Tru

ng

Kie

n B

ridge

, B

a Th

ien

Brid

ge a

nd I.

C

3

Con

stru

ctio

n si

tes

are

dirty

and

unt

idy

at T

am

Long

– T

hien

Ke

Brid

ged

and

Inte

rcha

nge

No.

3

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1285

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Rea

rran

ge th

e si

tes;

sto

re

ever

y m

ater

ial i

n its

pro

per

plac

e; c

lean

up

the

site

s an

d di

spos

e of

was

te

prop

erly

Con

tract

or

June

15,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

I.C 3

: m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

appl

ied

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n K

e B

ridge

: m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e be

ing

impl

emen

ted

Wor

ker’s

cam

ps a

re

dirty

with

tras

h su

rrou

ndin

g –

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

46

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1296

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/13

96

Cle

an c

onst

ruct

ion

site

; co

llect

tras

h an

d pr

oper

ly

disp

ose

of it

; pro

vide

tras

h C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 1

5,

2012

Und

erpa

ss

NH

2, T

rung

K

ien

Brid

ge:

Dai

Duo

ng

Brid

ge:

Miti

gatio

n

Tan

Loi

Brid

ge:

Miti

gatio

n

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

203

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Und

erpa

ss N

H2,

Tru

ng

Kie

n B

ridge

, In

terc

hang

e N

o.3,

Tan

Lo

i Brid

ge, D

ai D

uong

B

ridge

and

Bon

Brid

ge

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

bin;

per

iodi

cally

car

ry o

ut

hous

ekee

ping

wor

k in

or

der t

o ke

ep s

ites

and

wor

ker’s

cam

ps in

cl

eanl

ines

s an

d sa

nita

ry

cond

ition

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d O

ther

s:

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

mea

sure

s w

ere

appl

ied

Tan

Loi

Brid

ge a

nd

I.C 3

: m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

are

no

t im

plem

ente

d

mea

sure

was

im

plem

ente

d B

on B

ridge

an

d I.C

3: N

o im

prov

emen

t

The

wor

ker’s

cam

ps

are

not p

rovi

ded

sept

ic

tank

s or

sep

tic ta

nks

are

too

dirty

to u

se.

This

issu

e is

ha

ppen

ing

at I.

C 3

; B

on b

ridge

; Tan

Loi

br

idge

; Und

erpa

ss N

H2

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

46

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1296

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/13

14

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Sup

plem

ent t

he s

eptic

ta

nks

for w

orke

rs; r

epai

r an

d cl

ean

sept

ic ta

nks

to

ensu

re s

anita

ry fa

cilit

ies

bein

g pr

ovid

ed a

dequ

atel

y

Con

tract

or

June

15,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Tan

Loi

Brid

ge a

nd I.

C

3: S

eptic

tank

w

as b

uilt

Oth

ers:

No

impr

ovem

ent

Wor

ker’s

cam

ps a

t Bon

br

idge

and

Tan

Loi

br

idge

are

not

pro

vide

d fir

st a

id k

its

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

46

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1296

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/13

14

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Sup

plem

ent t

he fi

rst a

id k

it fo

r eve

ry w

orke

r’s c

amp

Con

tract

or

May

26,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Firs

t-aid

kits

w

ere

prov

ided

Dom

estic

/drin

king

w

ater

is n

ot s

afe

enou

gh fo

r use

at C

am

I brid

ge, I

.C 3

, Bon

br

idge

and

Tan

Loi

br

idge

and

Und

erpa

ss

NH

2

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

46

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1296

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/13

14

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Pro

vide

filte

r dev

ice

to

ever

y pu

mpe

d w

ater

; pr

ovid

e bo

ttled

drin

king

w

ater

for w

orke

rs

Cov

er th

e do

mes

tic w

ater

ta

nk to

pre

vent

pol

lutio

n

Con

tract

or

May

26,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e im

plem

ente

d

Wat

er q

ualit

y is

ser

ious

im

pact

ed a

t Tan

Loi

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1313

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

App

ly p

rope

rly is

olat

ion

tech

niqu

e; d

redg

e riv

er a

nd

Con

tract

or

June

30,

201

2M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

204

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Brid

ge

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

rem

ove

all s

poil

and

mud

to

dis

posa

l pla

ce

not

impl

emen

ted

not

impl

emen

ted

not

impl

emen

ted

Ser

ious

und

erm

inin

g an

d la

ndsl

ide

happ

en

on ri

vers

ide

at T

an L

oi

Brid

ge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/13

13

GE

T1/E

PM

U1/

A1/

348

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

App

ly ri

vers

ide

prot

ectio

n m

easu

res;

rein

stal

l stre

am

cros

sing

with

sui

tabl

e pi

pe

culv

erts

(tem

pora

ry b

ridge

is

reco

mm

ende

d)

Con

tract

or

June

30,

201

2

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

It’s

note

d th

at th

ere

trash

is b

urne

d on

site

s

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Pro

vide

eno

ugh

trash

bin

s to

wor

ker’s

cam

p; o

rient

w

orke

rs in

dom

estic

was

te

treat

men

t; pr

ohib

it bu

rnin

g tra

sh o

nsite

Con

tract

or

Dec

31,

201

1

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d bu

t thi

s is

sue

usua

lly

happ

ened

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d bu

t thi

s is

sue

usua

lly

happ

ened

Not

det

ecte

d

Unt

reat

ed w

aste

wat

er

cont

aini

ng s

and

and

mud

is d

irect

di

scha

rged

into

ex

istin

g dr

aina

ge

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1428

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0 O

ral r

equi

rem

ent

Con

stru

ct s

ettli

ng p

onds

w

ith e

noug

h ca

paci

ty;

loca

te s

traw

bal

es a

t ou

tlets

of s

ettli

ng p

ond

to

rem

ove

sedi

men

t fro

m

was

tew

ater

bef

ore

disc

harg

e of

it

Con

tract

or

Dec

28,

201

1

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

A s

edim

ent

basi

n w

as

cons

truct

ed

but i

t’s n

ot

enou

gh

capa

city

A s

edim

ent

basi

n w

as

cons

truct

ed b

ut

it’s

not e

noug

h ca

paci

ty;

was

tew

ater

w

as s

till

disc

harg

ed

dire

ctly

into

ex

istin

g dr

aina

ge

Hig

h sp

read

of

airb

orne

dus

t on

site

at

sect

ion

Km

0+6

65 ~

K

m 5

+000

and

In

terc

hang

e N

o. 3

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/14

27

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

t

Car

ryin

g ou

t wat

erin

g su

itabl

y on

sur

face

of

emba

nkm

ent s

ectio

ns

durin

g co

nstru

ctio

n w

ork

Con

tract

or

May

05,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

not

im

plem

ente

d

Wet

wea

ther

ca

used

dus

t su

ppre

ssio

n bu

t the

C

ontra

ctor

has

no

t mob

ilized

w

ater

wag

on

Not

det

ecte

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

205

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

to w

ater

su

rface

of

affe

cted

se

ctio

ns

durin

g ho

t w

indy

day

s

Oil

leak

s on

gro

und

at

Trun

g K

ien

Brid

ge,

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n Ke

B

ridge

and

Tan

Loi

B

ridge

, Km

4+7

00,

Bon

Brid

ge, I

.C 3

and

TL

302C

I Brid

ge

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

t

Kee

p oi

l bar

rels

in p

rope

r pl

aces

and

in u

psid

e po

sitio

n C

ontra

ctor

M

ar 2

7,

2012

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n K

e B

ridge

and

Km

4+

700:

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

impl

emen

ted

Oth

ers:

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n K

e B

ridge

and

K

m 4

+700

: M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

impl

emen

ted

Oth

ers:

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n K

e B

ridge

and

Km

4+

700:

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

impl

emen

ted

Oth

ers:

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d

Ther

e is

no

fe

nce

inst

alle

d to

ens

ure

the

safe

ty a

nd s

ecur

ity a

t Ta

n Lo

i Brid

ge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

36

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1285

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

14

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1277

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/14

29

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Rei

nsta

ll th

e su

itabl

e fe

nce

to

surro

und

cons

truct

ion

site

s in

ord

er to

ens

ure

the

safe

ty

Con

tract

or

Jan

19, 2

012

Loca

l peo

ple

caus

e ob

stru

ctio

ns to

im

plem

ente

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s

Loca

l peo

ple

caus

e ob

stru

ctio

ns to

im

plem

ente

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s

Loca

l peo

ple

caus

e ob

stru

ctio

ns to

im

plem

ente

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s

Lack

of

sign

boar

d an

d lig

htin

g sy

stem

s at

se

ctio

ns w

here

inte

rsec

t pu

blic

roa

d su

ch a

s Km

0+

665,

Tr

ung

Kie

n B

ridge

, Ta

n Lo

i B

ridge

, B

a Th

ien

Brid

ge,

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

36

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1285

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/12

14

GE

T1/P

OS

/A1/

1429

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

Inst

all

light

ing

and

sign

boar

d sy

stem

s C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 1

5,

2012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

bein

g im

plem

ente

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

206

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

TL30

2CI B

ridge

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Wor

k w

ays

are

not

safe

en

ough

at

B

on

Brid

ge

and

Tan

Loi

Brid

ge

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Inst

all s

uita

ble

scaf

fold

and

la

dder

sy

stem

to

en

sure

sa

fety

for w

orke

rs

Con

tract

or

Jan

19, 2

012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Hig

h ris

k of

col

laps

e of

w

alls

of

foun

datio

ns o

f K

im A

nh B

ridge

whi

ch

is c

lose

to a

cces

s ro

ad

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

Ora

l req

uire

men

t

App

ly

slop

e pr

otec

tion

mea

sure

s by

st

eel

shee

t pi

les

or r

educ

ing

the

slop

e of

ste

eps

of fo

unda

tions

Con

tract

or

Mar

28,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Slo

pe o

f fo

unda

tion’

s st

eeps

wer

e re

duce

d

Foun

datio

ns

has

been

ba

ckfil

led

Wor

kers

di

dn’t

use

enou

gh P

PE

at w

ork

at

kerb

pr

oduc

tion

area

; U

nder

pass

N

H2;

K

im

Anh

B

ridge

, B

on

Brid

ge; T

an L

oi B

ridge

; I.C

3; B

a Th

ien

Brid

ge;

Dai

Duo

ng B

ridge

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Tigh

tly c

ontro

l con

stru

ctio

n si

tes;

pro

vide

eno

ugh

labo

r sa

fety

eq

uipm

ent

for

wor

kers

an

d en

sure

al

l w

orke

rs

use

pers

onal

sa

fety

equ

ipm

ent

at w

ork

adeq

uate

ly

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

PP

E h

as b

een

prov

ided

but

la

ck o

f con

trol

of th

e C

ontra

ctor

and

th

is is

sue

still

us

ually

ha

ppen

s

PP

E h

as b

een

prov

ided

but

la

ck o

f con

trol

of th

e C

ontra

ctor

an

d th

is is

sue

still

usua

lly

happ

ens

PP

E h

as b

een

prov

ided

but

la

ck o

f con

trol

of th

e C

ontra

ctor

and

th

is is

sue

still

us

ually

ha

ppen

s La

ck

of

safe

ty

net/s

caffo

ld a

nd la

dder

at

Und

erpa

ss N

H2,

Dai

D

uong

B

ridge

, Xu

an

Phu

ong

Brid

ge,

Tan

Loi

Brid

ge;

Ba

Thie

n B

ridge

, I.C

3, a

nd C

am

I Brid

ge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

1/14

26

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

7 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-58

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

9 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Pro

vide

en

ough

sa

fety

fa

cilit

ies

to

ensu

res

the

safe

ty fo

r wor

kers

at w

ork

Con

tract

or

Apr

30,

201

2

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

bein

g im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e w

ell

mai

nten

ance

Ele

ctric

sy

stem

is

un

safe

at

cast

ing

yard

of

Tam

Lon

g –

Thie

n K

e B

ridge

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-57

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-5

8 R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-59

RE

F-A

1-G

ET1

-MO

M-6

0

Rei

nsta

ll el

ectri

c sy

stem

; el

ectri

c w

ires

mus

t be

hung

up

and

all

switc

hes

mus

t be

co

ver

care

fully

an

d

Con

tract

or

May

23,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

not

im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

not

im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

ap

plie

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

207

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Ora

l ins

truct

ions

en

sure

th

at

it’s

safe

en

ough

for u

se

Saf

ety

fenc

e de

riora

ted

and

enda

nger

tra

vele

rs

at B

a Th

ien

Brid

ge

R

EF-

A1-

GE

T1-M

OM

-60

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Rep

air

and

rein

forc

e th

e fe

nce

Con

tract

or

June

15,

20

12

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

is n

ot

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

not

im

plem

ente

d 6.

2.2

Pack

age

A2

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Hig

h ris

k of

ero

sion

an

d co

ntam

inat

ed

prod

uctiv

e so

il ha

s no

t be

en re

stor

ed a

t se

ctio

n K

m 4

2+40

0 ~

Km

42+

600

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/76

6 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/85

5 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/87

9 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

App

ly th

e su

rface

d ru

noff,

er

osio

n an

d se

dim

ent

cont

rol m

easu

res;

rest

ore

the

affe

cted

are

as

Con

tract

or

June

30,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Tem

pora

ry d

rain

age

is

dem

obiliz

ed b

ut th

ere

is n

o on

e in

stal

led

to

repl

ace

Km 4

2+62

0

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/76

5 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Rei

nsta

ll an

othe

r to

ensu

re

wat

er fl

ow in

rain

y se

ason

C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 2

8,

2012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Dirt

is tr

acke

d on

to

publ

ic ro

ad a

nd c

ause

d hi

gh le

vel o

f airb

orne

du

st a

nd d

iffic

ulty

for

road

use

rs a

t sec

tions

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/10

79

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1342

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

78

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

2 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

Cle

an u

p th

e pu

blic

road

; A

pply

sed

imen

t con

trol

mea

sure

s to

pre

vent

tra

ckin

g of

dirt

ont

o pu

blic

ro

ad

Con

tract

or

Dec

28,

20

11

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

has

not b

een

appl

ied

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

208

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

whe

re li

nk to

pub

lic

road

s R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

At A

rmy

II B

ridge

, Ben

Tr

e B

ridge

, Muo

ng D

ao

Brid

ge, B

en G

ao B

ridge

, se

ctio

n K

m 3

5+40

0 an

d se

ctio

n K

m 4

3+00

0, th

e w

orke

r’s c

amps

are

dirt

y w

ith tr

ash

surr

ound

ing

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1342

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

78

REF

-A2-

GET

1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Cle

an c

onst

ruct

ion

site

; co

llect

tras

h an

d pr

oper

ly

disp

ose

of it

; pro

vide

tras

h bi

n; p

erio

dica

lly c

arry

out

ho

usek

eepi

ng w

ork

in o

rder

to

kee

p si

tes

and

wor

ker’s

ca

mps

in c

lean

lines

s an

d sa

nita

ry c

ondi

tion

Con

tract

or

Oct

19,

201

1

Ben

Gao

B

ridge

: M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

impl

emen

ted

Km

34+

500

and

Km

43

+000

: to

be

aban

done

d

Ben

Gao

B

ridge

: Wel

l m

aint

enan

ce

Km

34+

500

and

Km

43

+000

: w

orke

r’s

cam

ps w

ere

dem

obiliz

ed

Arm

y II

Brid

ge

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d B

en T

re

Brid

ge: N

o im

prov

emen

t

Ben

Gao

B

ridge

: Wel

l m

aint

enan

ce

Arm

y II

Brid

ge

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d B

en T

re

Brid

ge,

Muo

ng D

ao

Brid

ge: N

o im

prov

emen

t

At B

en G

ao b

ridge

, Km

35

+400

, Km

43+

000

the

wor

ker’s

cam

ps

don’

t hav

e se

ptic

tank

or

sep

tic ta

nks

are

dirty

an

d un

avai

labl

e fo

r use

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

2 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Sup

plem

ent t

he s

eptic

ta

nks

for w

orke

rs; r

epai

r an

d cl

ean

sept

ic ta

nks

to

ensu

re s

anita

ry fa

cilit

ies

bein

g pr

ovid

ed a

dequ

atel

y

Con

tract

or

Oct

19,

201

1

Ben

Gao

B

ridge

: M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d K

m 3

4+50

0 an

d K

m

43+0

00: t

o be

ab

ando

ned

Ben

Gao

B

ridge

: M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d K

m 3

4+50

0 an

d K

m

43+0

00:

Wor

ker’s

ca

mps

wer

e de

mob

ilized

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d

At B

en T

re b

ridge

, the

irr

igat

ion

cana

l is

bein

g bl

ocke

d

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/10

35

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1047

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

Dre

dge

the

cana

l, re

mov

e al

l mud

and

spo

il to

di

spos

al p

lace

; ens

ure

Con

tract

or

June

30,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

209

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

wat

er fl

ow

impl

emen

ted

impl

emen

ted

impl

emen

ted

Wat

er fl

ow a

re b

eing

bl

ocke

d an

d sp

oil i

s di

spos

ed in

to

wat

erco

urse

s at

Son

g D

ao B

ridge

, Muo

ng

Dao

Brid

ge a

nd B

en

Gao

Brid

ge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/10

98

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1176

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/11

90

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1264

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/12

77

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1278

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

App

ly c

lear

wat

er d

iver

sion

m

easu

re; d

redg

e th

e riv

ers,

re

mov

e al

l spo

il an

d m

ud to

di

spos

al p

lace

Con

tract

or

June

30,

20

12

Song

Dao

B

ridge

: R

iver

bed

has

been

dre

dged

an

d so

il w

as

rem

oved

O

ther

s: N

o im

prov

emen

t

Song

Dao

B

ridge

: R

iver

bed

has

been

dre

dged

an

d so

il w

as

rem

oved

O

ther

s: N

o im

prov

emen

t

Song

Dao

B

ridge

: R

iver

bed

has

been

dre

dged

an

d so

il w

as

rem

oved

O

ther

s: N

o im

prov

emen

t

Unt

reat

ed w

aste

wat

er

cont

aini

ng m

ud a

nd

sand

is d

irect

ly

disc

harg

ed in

to ri

ver a

t B

en G

ao B

ridge

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Pro

hibi

t dis

char

ge o

f un

treat

ed w

aste

wat

er in

to

any

wat

er re

sour

ce;

mob

ilize

dew

ater

ing

tank

or

grav

ity b

ag fi

lter t

o re

mov

e se

dim

ent f

rom

was

tew

ater

be

fore

dis

char

ge

Con

tract

or

Apr

18,

201

2 M

itiga

tions

are

no

t im

plem

ente

d N

ot d

etec

ted

Not

det

ecte

d

Hig

h le

vel o

f dus

t alo

ng

thro

ughw

ay

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Spr

ay w

ater

sui

tabl

y th

roug

hway

to m

inim

ize

spre

ad o

f dus

t C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 2

1,

2012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

no

t im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

not

im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re is

not

im

plem

ente

d

No

first

aid

kit

is

prov

ided

at s

ectio

n K

m

35+4

00 a

nd s

ectio

n Km

43

+000

M

inut

es o

f mee

ting

with

A

DB

O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Pro

vide

firs

t aid

kits

for

ever

y w

orke

r’s c

amp

Con

tract

or

Oct

31,

201

1 W

orke

r’s

cam

ps w

ere

aban

done

d

Wor

ker’s

ca

mps

wer

e de

mob

ilized

Spo

il is

dis

pose

d on

si

tes

at s

ectio

n Km

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1166

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/12

28

Sub

mit

disp

osal

pla

ce a

nd

rem

ove

all u

nsui

tabl

e C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 0

7,

2012

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

210

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

39+5

80 ~

Km

40+

690

and

Km 4

8+40

0 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/12

81

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1342

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

78

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

2 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4

mat

eria

l fro

m s

ites

not

impl

emen

ted

not

impl

emen

ted

not

impl

emen

ted

Ther

e is

no

fenc

e in

stal

led

and

mat

eria

l is

not

cov

ered

to

prev

ent s

prea

d of

dus

t at

Bat

ch P

lant

C (K

m

39+2

00)

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/12

44

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1265

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Inst

all t

he fe

nce

and

cove

r m

ater

ial t

o pr

even

t spr

ead

of d

ust

Con

tract

or

June

30,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re w

as

appl

ied

Ben

toni

te s

lurr

y is

di

scha

rged

into

rive

r at

Lo R

iver

Brid

ge

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

Ora

l req

uire

men

t

Pro

hibi

t dis

char

ge o

f any

un

suita

ble

mat

eria

l int

o w

ater

reso

urce

C

ontra

ctor

A

pr 1

1, 2

012

Sto

pped

di

scha

rge

of

bent

onite

into

w

ater

reso

urce

Com

plie

d C

ompl

ied

Site

is d

irty

with

dirt

at

Bat

ch P

lant

2 o

f Lo

Riv

er B

ridge

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Har

den

surfa

ce o

f en

tranc

e/ex

it of

bat

ch p

lant

C

ontra

ctor

M

ar 2

0,

2012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re w

as

appl

ied

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Oil

leak

s on

gro

und

at

Bat

ch P

lant

2 o

f Lo

Riv

er B

ridge

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Con

stru

ct o

il st

orag

e w

ith

leve

l con

cret

ed g

roun

d an

d w

ater

proo

f roo

f; a

dike

su

rrou

ndin

g to

pre

vent

sp

illage

is a

lso

requ

ired

to

inst

all

Con

tract

or

Mar

30,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Hig

h ris

k of

ero

sion

th

at w

ould

lead

s so

il in

to c

ropl

and

at s

ectio

n K

m 3

4+78

0 ~

Km

35

+000

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/72

0 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/76

6 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/85

5 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/87

9 G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

App

ly s

urfa

ced

runo

ff,

eros

ion

and

sedi

men

t co

ntro

l mea

sure

s C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 3

0,

2012

Miti

gatio

n ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n ar

e no

t im

plem

ente

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

211

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4

Hig

h ris

k of

leak

of o

il on

gro

und

at s

ectio

n In

terc

hang

e N

o. 6

, Lo

Riv

er B

ridge

, B

en T

re

Brid

ge a

nd T

L306

B

ridge

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1371

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Con

stru

ct o

il st

orag

e w

ith

leve

l con

cret

ed g

roun

d an

d w

ater

proo

f roo

f; a

berm

su

rrou

ndin

g is

als

o re

quire

d; k

eep

the

oil

barr

els

in s

tora

ge a

nd in

up

side

pos

ition

Con

tract

or

June

21,

20

12

M

itiga

tion

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Lo R

iver

B

ridge

and

B

en T

re

Brid

ge:

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d O

ther

s: N

o im

prov

emen

t

Tras

h w

as b

urne

d on

si

te a

t Muo

ng D

ao

Brid

ge

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Orie

nt w

orke

rs a

bout

do

mes

tic w

aste

trea

tmen

t an

d pr

ohib

it bu

rnin

g tra

sh

on s

ite

Con

tract

or

May

05,

20

12

M

itiga

tion

wer

e im

plem

ente

d N

ot d

etec

ted

Cem

ent-l

aden

w

aste

wat

er s

pille

d-ov

er d

rain

age

at C

BP

B

(Km

28+

500)

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Rem

ove

sedi

men

t in

settl

ing

pond

in re

gula

r ba

sis

and

ensu

re th

e ca

paci

ty o

f set

tling

pon

d

Con

tract

or

May

10,

20

12

M

i tiga

tion

wer

e im

plem

ente

d

Wel

l m

aint

enan

ce

Con

stru

ctio

n si

tes

are

dirty

and

unt

idy

– A

rmy

III B

ridge

; Ben

Tre

B

ridge

and

TL3

06II

Brid

ge

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1342

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

71

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Col

lect

and

dis

pose

d of

tra

sh p

rope

rly; r

earra

nge

the

site

s to

kee

p it

in

clea

nlin

ess

and

tidin

ess

cond

ition

Con

tract

or

June

20,

20

12

Arm

y III

B

ridge

: M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

appl

ied

Ben

Tre

B

ridge

: No

impr

ovem

ent

Arm

y III

Brid

ge:

Wel

l m

aint

enan

ce

Ben

Tre

Brid

ge

and

TL30

6II

Brid

ge:

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e im

plem

ente

d La

ck o

f set

tling

pon

ds

at C

PB

C (k

m 3

9+20

0)

and

CB

Ps

1 an

d 2

of

Lo R

iver

Brid

ge

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1342

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

78

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Rem

ove

sedi

men

t in

regu

lar b

asis

to e

nsur

e th

e ca

paci

ty o

f set

tling

pon

ds

or in

stal

l oth

ers

Con

tract

or

June

01,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e im

plem

ente

d

Ben

toni

te s

lurr

y sp

illed -

over

pad

dy fi

eld

at T

L306

II B

ridge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

71

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

Rem

ove

all s

pille

d-ov

er

bent

onite

from

pad

dy fi

eld,

re

loca

te b

ento

nite

tank

s,

Con

tract

or

June

20,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e im

plem

ente

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

212

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

cons

truct

sed

imen

t bas

in

and

drai

nage

to h

andl

e su

rface

d ru

noff

to s

edim

ent

basi

n

Unc

ontro

l sur

face

d ru

noff

at K

m 2

7+60

0 ca

used

ero

sion

that

le

aded

soi

l int

o ex

istin

g dr

aina

ge a

nd a

djac

ent

crop

land

and

dam

aged

th

em

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1372

App

ly s

urfa

ced

runo

ff,

eros

ion

and

sedi

men

t co

ntro

l mea

sure

s; re

stor

e ex

istin

g dr

aina

ge a

nd

crop

land

s in

initi

al s

tatu

s;

cont

act l

and’

s ow

ner f

or

nego

tiatio

n to

com

pens

ate

for d

amag

ed a

sset

Con

tract

or

June

22,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

The

wor

kers

did

n’t u

se

enou

gh P

PE

at w

ork

at

Ben

G

ao

Brid

ge,

Lo

Riv

er

Brid

ge,

Son

g D

ao B

ridge

and

Muo

ng

Dao

Brid

ge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/13

42

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1378

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-42

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

3 R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Pro

vide

en

ough

pe

rson

al

safe

ty

equi

pmen

t fo

r w

orke

rs;

ensu

re

that

al

l w

orke

rs u

se e

noug

h la

bor

safe

ty e

quip

men

t at w

ork

Con

tract

or

Dai

ly

PP

E h

as b

een

prov

ided

but

la

ck o

f con

trol

of th

e C

ontra

ctor

an

d th

is is

sue

still

usua

lly

happ

ens

PP

E h

as b

een

prov

ided

but

la

ck o

f con

trol

of th

e C

ontra

ctor

an

d th

is is

sue

still

usua

lly

happ

ens

Not

det

ecte

d

Wor

k w

ays

are

not

safe

en

ough

at

B

en

Gao

Brid

ge (w

ork

way

s ov

er

the

wat

er

body

w

ithou

t ha

ndra

il)

and

scaf

fold

is

loca

ted

on

unle

vel

and

unst

able

gr

ound

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

2 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Inst

all

safe

ty

wor

k w

ays

such

as

scaf

fold

, la

dder

s,

etc.

to

en

sure

sa

fety

fo

r w

orke

rs

Con

tract

or

June

01,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

not

impl

emen

ted

Wor

k w

ays

wer

e in

stal

led

hand

rail

Sca

ffold

was

re

loca

ted

on

leve

l and

st

able

gro

und

Ele

ctric

sy

stem

s ar

e no

t sa

fe

enou

gh

for

use

at T

L310

Brid

ge

O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

R

eins

tall

elec

tric

syst

em

and

ensu

re t

hat

they

are

sa

fe e

noug

h fo

r use

C

ontra

ctor

A

pr 1

2, 2

012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re w

as

appl

ied

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Lack

of

safe

ty n

et a

nd

safe

ty

ladd

er/s

caffo

ld

durin

g ca

rryi

ng o

ut t

he

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/12

63

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1309

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-43

Pro

vide

sa

fety

ne

t/lad

der/s

caffo

ld

for

wor

kers

C

ontra

ctor

M

ay 1

6,

2012

Arm

y II,

Ben

G

ao, M

uong

D

ao a

nd S

ong

Arm

y II

Brid

ge, B

en

Gao

Brid

ge,

All

stru

ctur

e w

orks

wer

e in

stal

led

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

213

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

wor

k at

hei

ght a

t Arm

y II

Brid

ge,

Arm

y III

B

ridge

, TL

310

Brid

ge,

Ben

Tre

Brid

ge,

Son

g D

ao

Brid

ge,

Muo

ng

Dao

B

ridge

an

d B

en

Gao

Brid

ge

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

D

ao b

ridge

s:

No

impr

ovem

ent

Oth

ers:

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

impl

emen

ted

Muo

ng D

ao

Brid

ge a

nd

Son

g D

ao

Brid

ge:

Sca

ffold

s w

ere

prov

ided

but

no

t eno

ugh

safe

ty n

et

enou

gh

scaf

fold

s an

d sa

fety

net

s

Sec

urity

fen

ce b

roke

n at

Xua

n Q

uang

Brid

ge

G

ET1

/PO

S/A

2/12

43

Rei

nsta

ll se

curit

y fe

nce,

as

sign

se

curit

y gu

ard

to

cont

rol t

his

area

C

ontra

ctor

A

pr 0

9, 2

012

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

re h

as

been

app

lied

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

4 ab

ando

ned

wel

ls a

re

foun

d on

si

te

with

out

back

fillin

g or

cov

er

O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

B

ackf

ill or

co

ver

all

the

aban

done

d w

ells

C

ontra

ctor

A

pr 2

6, 2

012

In fo

llow

ing

The

wel

ls

wer

e fil

led

with

so

il

A fa

tal a

ccid

ent w

as

reco

rded

at L

o R

iver

B

ridge

on

Sun

day

mor

ning

, Apr

il 22

, 201

2

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1352

Inve

stig

ate

the

acci

dent

, su

bmit

the

repo

rt, a

pply

the

mea

sure

s to

pre

vent

si

mila

r iss

ue

Con

tract

or

June

10,

20

12

The

repo

rt ha

s no

t bee

n su

bmitt

ed

The

repo

rt ha

s no

t bee

n su

bmitt

ed

Rep

ort w

as

subm

itted

al

read

y

Chi

ldre

n en

tere

d th

e co

nstru

ctio

n si

te fo

r pl

ayin

g at

Muo

ng D

ao

Brid

ge

RE

F-A

2-G

ET1

-MO

M-4

4 O

ral r

equi

rem

ents

Inst

all t

he fe

nce

of b

arbe

d w

ires

and

sign

boar

ds

surr

ound

ing

wor

king

are

as;

prev

ent a

cces

s of

un

auth

oriz

ed p

erso

ns to

th

e si

tes

Con

tract

or

May

28,

20

12

Fo

llow

ing

No

child

ren

dete

cted

ac

cess

ing

site

bu

t fen

ce h

as

not b

een

inst

alle

d La

ck o

f fen

ce a

nd

sign

boar

d to

con

trol

traffi

c on

pub

lic ro

ads

at M

uong

Noi

Brid

ge

R

EF-

A2-

GE

T1-M

OM

-44

Ora

l req

uire

men

ts

Res

olve

the

obst

ruct

ion

of

terr

ain

and

inst

all t

he fe

nce

and

sign

boar

d sy

stem

to

cont

rol t

he tr

affic

con

ditio

n

Con

tract

or

May

29,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

are

bein

g im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d

Saf

ety

fenc

e su

rrou

ndin

g de

tour

ro

ad a

t TL3

06I B

ridge

br

oken

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1369

R

eins

tall

new

one

and

su

pple

men

t war

ning

si

gnbo

ard

syst

em

Con

tract

or

June

18,

20

12

Miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

wer

e ap

plie

d

Lack

of s

afet

y fe

nce

and

sign

boar

d an

d

GE

T1/P

OS

/A2/

1371

In

stal

l the

saf

ety

fenc

e,

sign

boar

d an

d lig

htin

g C

ontra

ctor

Ju

ne 2

0,

2012

M

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s w

ere

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

214

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by E

ngin

eer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

light

ing

syst

em a

t TL

306I

I Brid

ge

syst

em

appl

ied

6.2.

3 Pa

ckag

e A

3

Apr

il

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

Req

uire

d A

ctio

n Ta

ken

(by

Engi

neer

, ref

er to

do

cum

ents

bel

ow)

Dea

dlin

e C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

Ele

ctric

sys

tem

was

not

saf

e:

Inte

rrup

tor

was

no

t sa

fe,

elec

tric

wire

w

as

laid

on

gr

ound

…P3

Red

riv

er b

ridge

, N

atio

nal r

ailw

ay f

lyov

er b

ridge

, P

9 R

ed ri

ver b

ridge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y C

ontra

ctor

m

ust

rese

t up

el

ectri

c sy

stem

to e

nsur

e sa

fety

wor

k.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1204

Im

med

iate

ly

Con

tract

or

still

dela

y to

re

solv

e it.

Ladd

er w

as n

ot s

afe

beca

use

it w

as

not

set

up

hand

rail

to

ensu

re

safe

ty.

P2

Red

riv

er

brid

ge, H

o C

hi M

inh

IC.

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y Th

e C

ontra

ctor

do

esn’

t ca

re

abou

t sa

fety

.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

st

ill

dela

y to

re

solv

e it.

Floo

r op

erat

ion

was

not

saf

e:

no

hand

rail,

un

relia

ble.

Ba

i B

ang

brid

ge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y

Con

tract

or m

ust s

et u

p th

e st

eady

floo

r op

erat

ion

for

wor

ker

wor

k at

hei

ght.

And

at

he

ight

m

ore

than

2m

th

e C

ontra

ctor

m

ust

prov

ide

scaf

fold

to

en

sure

saf

ety

wor

k.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

st

ill de

lay

to

reso

lve

it.

At

som

e pl

ace,

N

o ac

cess

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

do

esn’

t C

ontra

ctor

mus

t set

up

the

stea

dy fl

oor

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

imm

edia

tely

A

fter

Con

sulta

nt

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

215

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

Req

uire

d A

ctio

n Ta

ken

(by

Engi

neer

, ref

er to

do

cum

ents

bel

ow)

Dea

dlin

e C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

ladd

er,

no

scaf

fold

, no

flo

or

oper

atio

n w

as s

et u

p fo

r w

ork.

N

o sa

fety

han

drai

l was

set

up.

IC

8, P

3 R

ed ri

ver b

ridge

care

abo

ut s

afet

y op

erat

ion

for

wor

ker

wor

k at

hei

ght.

And

at

he

ight

m

ore

than

2m

th

e C

ontra

ctor

m

ust

prov

ide

scaf

fold

to

en

sure

saf

ety

wor

k. B

esid

e, a

ll la

dder

s m

ust b

e in

stal

l han

drai

l.

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

war

ned

in

site

, C

ontra

ctor

re

ques

ted

and

push

ed

thei

r su

bcon

tract

or

to

mak

e ha

ndra

il an

d re

info

rce

the

floor

op

erat

ion

relia

bly.

N

o sa

fety

si

gnpo

st

at

inte

rsec

tion

bettw

een

cons

truct

ion

site

and

loca

l roa

d.

Pho

ng C

hau

brid

ge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y

Con

tract

or

has

to

inst

all

safe

ty

sign

post

at

in

ters

ectio

n be

ttwee

n co

nstru

ctio

n si

te

and

loca

l ro

ad

to

ensu

re s

afet

y.

GE

T2-P

OS

-A3-

1204

imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

st

ill de

lay

to

reso

lve

it.

Wor

ker

did

not

use

safe

ty

labo

ur.

Som

etim

e,

they

w

ork

dang

erou

sly

at h

eigh

t. IC

8, B

ai

Ban

g br

idge

, Red

rive

r brid

ge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y.

Con

tract

or m

ust r

eque

st a

ll w

orke

rs to

us

e sa

fety

equ

ipm

ent

whe

n th

ey w

ork

in s

ite, s

peci

al a

t hei

ght.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

Afte

r C

onsu

ltant

w

arne

d in

si

te,

Con

tract

or

rem

inde

d th

eir

wor

ker.

No

prot

ectiv

e co

ver

was

set

up

for

this

mac

hine

. Xu

an T

hanh

br

idge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y.

Con

tract

or

has

to

prov

ide

mac

hine

w

hich

are

fitte

d w

ith p

rote

ctiv

e co

ver t

o en

sure

saf

ety

wor

k.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

Afte

r C

onsu

ltant

w

arne

d in

si

te,

Con

tract

or

rem

inde

d th

eir

subc

ontra

ctor

to

se

t up

a

prot

ectiv

e co

ver

for t

his

mac

hine

.

Inha

bita

nt

was

fre

ely

entry

co

nstru

ctio

n si

te. K

m51

+100

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

do

esn’

t ca

re a

bout

saf

ety.

Con

tract

or

mus

t pr

otec

t co

nstru

ctio

n lim

it an

d en

sure

sa

fety

w

hen

you

acce

pt lo

cal p

eopl

e en

try c

onst

ruct

ion

site

.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

st

ill de

lay

to

reso

lve

it.

Oil

drum

s w

ere

put e

very

whe

re

in s

ite w

ithou

t sa

fety

mea

sure

. K

m68

+400

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

ab

out

prot

ect

envi

ronm

ent.

Con

tract

or m

ust

grou

p al

l oil

drum

s in

re

gula

tion

plac

e an

d ha

ve

safe

ty

mea

sure

to

avoi

d oi

l w

ill b

e sp

illed

over

gro

und

and

pollu

te s

oil r

esou

rce.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1204

Im

med

iate

ly

Con

tract

or

still

dela

y to

re

solv

e it.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

216

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

Req

uire

d A

ctio

n Ta

ken

(by

Engi

neer

, ref

er to

do

cum

ents

bel

ow)

Dea

dlin

e C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

Was

te

wat

er

cont

aine

d co

ncre

te

whi

ch

was

th

row

n af

ter

was

hing

pr

oces

s,

was

th

row

n in

to t

he p

ond.

Nat

iona

l ra

ilway

flyo

ver b

ridge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

ab

out

prot

ect

envi

ronm

ent.

Con

tract

or

mus

t st

op

imm

edia

tely

po

urin

g w

aste

w

ater

sp

ecia

l w

aste

co

ncre

ting

wat

er i

nto

pond

or

field

s ne

xt to

con

stru

ctio

n si

te.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

Con

tract

or

rem

inde

d th

eir

subc

ontra

ctor

st

op i

mm

edia

tely

po

urin

g w

aste

w

ater

sp

ecia

l w

aste

con

cret

ing

wat

er

into

po

nd

or fi

elds

.

All

dum

p tru

cks

wer

e no

t co

vere

d, s

oil

was

fal

len

muc

h on

ex

istin

g ro

ad.

Dus

t w

as

dist

ribut

ed

muc

h in

th

e ai

r. K

m51

+100

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

ab

out

prot

ect

envi

ronm

ent.

Con

tract

or m

ust c

lean

all

falle

n so

il on

ex

istin

g ro

ad

and

spre

ad

wat

er

appr

opria

tely

G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

04

Imm

edia

tely

Afte

r w

anin

g le

tter

of

Con

sulta

nt

ref.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1204

, C

ontra

ctor

st

art

spre

adin

g w

ater

fro

m

Apr

il 25

th, 2

012

Irrig

atio

n ca

nal w

as b

lock

ed b

y fa

llen

soil

and

rubb

ish.

K

m51

+100

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

ab

out

prot

ect

envi

ronm

ent.

Con

tract

or h

as to

rem

ove

all r

ubbi

sh in

si

te a

nd u

nblo

ck th

is ir

rigat

ion

cana

l

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

st

ill de

lay

to

reso

lve

it.

Rub

bish

was

muc

h in

site

. IC

8 Th

e C

ontra

ctor

do

esn’

t ca

re a

bout

env

ironm

enta

l pr

otec

tion.

Con

tract

or h

as t

o re

mov

e al

l ru

bbis

h ou

t site

eve

ryda

y.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

re

solv

ed it

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

217

May

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Ele

ctric

sys

tem

was

not

saf

e:

elec

trica

l jun

ctio

n, in

terr

upte

r w

ere

not s

afe,

ele

ctric

wire

was

la

id o

n gr

ound

… R

ed ri

ver

brid

ge, N

atio

nal r

ailw

ay fl

yove

r br

idge

, Bai

Ban

g ra

ilway

flyo

ver.

The

Con

tract

or s

et u

p el

ectri

c sy

stem

not

wel

l.

Con

tract

or m

ust r

eset

up

elec

tric

syst

em: l

ift u

p al

l ele

ctric

al c

apes

hi

gher

than

gro

und

at le

ase

2m;

elec

trica

l jun

ctio

n, in

terr

upte

r mus

t be

ensu

re s

afet

y.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1221

G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

85

15th

Jun

e,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Now

wat

er le

vel i

s ve

ry h

igh

so

it's

very

dan

gero

us w

hen

wor

ker w

ork

ther

e sp

ecia

l at

heig

ht. B

ut C

ontra

ctor

has

not

se

t up

safe

ty la

dder

for w

ork

at

heig

ht a

t P4

(at t

he m

iddl

e riv

erbe

d) o

f Red

rive

r brid

ge. I

n ot

her p

ier (

P5, P

6, P

7) s

caffo

ld

syst

ems

are

not s

afe.

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

give

sui

tabl

e sa

fety

m

etho

ds to

car

ry o

ut w

ork

at p

ier i

n th

e m

iddl

e riv

erbe

d an

d at

hei

ght.

- Con

tract

or is

requ

este

d to

sub

mit

safe

ty m

etho

d st

atem

ent w

orki

ng a

t he

ight

on

Red

Riv

er b

ridge

. - C

onsu

ltant

and

Con

tract

or w

ill u

se a

S

afet

y ch

eckl

ist f

or a

ll ite

ms

on b

ridge

s to

sho

w o

ut w

hat’s

pro

blem

mus

t be

reso

lve

to e

nsur

e sa

fety

.

-Con

tract

or a

nd C

onsu

ltant

w

ill h

ave

a m

eetin

g an

d gi

ve

dead

line

for C

ontra

ctor

car

ry

out s

uita

ble

mea

sure

s to

en

sure

saf

ety.

-w

e ch

ecke

d ac

tual

situ

atio

n af

ter C

ontra

ctor

rein

forc

ed

scaf

fold

ing

syst

ems

in s

ite.

May

28th

, 20

12.

-Con

tract

or

subm

itted

saf

ety

met

hod

stat

emen

t w

orki

ng a

t hei

ght

on R

ed R

iver

br

idge

. -S

caffo

ldin

g w

as

rein

forc

ed b

y C

ontra

ctor

.

Floo

r ope

ratio

n w

as n

ot s

afe:

no

hand

rail,

unr

elia

ble.

Bai

Ban

g br

idge

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

prov

ide

scaf

fold

s fo

r w

orki

ng a

t hei

ght.

Con

tract

or m

ust s

et u

p th

e st

eady

floo

r op

erat

ion

for w

orke

r wor

k at

hei

ght.

And

at h

eigh

t mor

e th

an 2

m th

e C

ontra

ctor

mus

t pro

vide

sca

ffold

to

ensu

re s

afet

y w

ork.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1221

15th

Jun

e,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

At s

ome

plac

e, N

o ac

cess

la

dder

, no

scaf

fold

, no

floor

op

erat

ion

was

set

up

for w

ork.

N

o sa

fety

han

drai

l was

set

up.

IC

8, P

3 R

ed ri

ver b

ridge

The

Con

tract

or d

oesn

’t ca

re a

bout

saf

ety

Con

tract

or m

ust s

et u

p th

e st

eady

floo

r op

erat

ion

for w

orke

r wor

k at

hei

ght.

And

at h

eigh

t mor

e th

an 2

m th

e C

ontra

ctor

mus

t pro

vide

sca

ffold

to

ensu

re s

afet

y w

ork.

Bes

ide,

all

ladd

ers

mus

t be

inst

all h

andr

ail.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1221

15th

Jun

e,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

218

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Wor

ker d

id n

ot u

se s

afet

y la

bour

at T

L315

B b

ridge

K

m67

+600

, TL3

20B

brid

ge

Km

64+0

80.

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

cont

rol t

heir

subc

ontra

ctor

an

d w

orke

r as

wel

l.

Con

tract

or m

ust r

eque

st a

ll w

orke

rs to

us

e sa

fety

equ

ipm

ent w

hen

they

wor

k in

site

, spe

cial

at h

eigh

t.

Con

sulta

nt d

irect

ly w

arne

d in

site

. G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

21

GE

T2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

re

min

ded

thei

r w

orke

r.

Fire

ext

ingu

ishe

rs, f

irst a

id k

its

wer

e no

t set

up

in w

orke

r’s

cam

ps a

t Nat

iona

l rai

lway

fly

over

, TL3

20B

brid

ge, B

ai

Ban

g ra

ilway

flyo

ver.

The

Con

tract

or d

oesn

’t ca

re a

bout

saf

ety

for t

heir

wor

ker’s

life

.

Con

tract

or m

ust p

rovi

de F

ire

extin

guis

hers

, firs

t aid

kits

for a

ll w

orke

r’s c

amps

alo

ng p

acka

ge A

3.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1221

G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

85

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

stil

l de

lay

to re

solv

e it.

Oil

drum

s w

ere

put e

very

whe

re

in s

ite w

ithou

t saf

ety

mea

sure

. K

m78

+400

, Km

52+2

00 (T

GT

wor

ker’s

cam

p)

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

conc

rete

the

stor

age’

s fo

unda

tion,

did

not

set

up

fire

extin

guis

her.

Con

tract

or m

ust g

roup

all

oil d

rum

s in

re

gula

tion

plac

e an

d ha

ve s

afet

y m

easu

re to

avo

id o

il w

ill b

e sp

illed

over

gro

und

and

pollu

te s

oil r

esou

rce.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

10

th J

une,

20

12.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

The

conc

rete

bat

chin

g pl

ants

at

Km

78+8

00, K

m78

+100

wer

e no

t set

up

sedi

men

t con

trol

pond

to c

olle

ct w

aste

wat

er

cont

ain

conc

rete

.

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

built

sed

imen

t con

trol

pond

for t

hese

con

cret

e ba

tchi

ng p

lant

s.

Con

tract

or h

as to

bui

ld s

edim

ent

cont

rol p

ond

to c

olle

ct w

aste

wat

er

cont

ains

con

cret

e at

eac

h C

oncr

ete

batc

hing

pla

nt.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

8th

Jun

e,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Loca

l peo

ple

com

plai

n m

uch

beca

use

nois

e, d

ust a

nd

vibr

atio

n fro

m c

onst

ruct

ion

activ

ities

.

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot c

arry

ou

t met

hods

to m

inim

ize

nois

e, d

ust a

nd v

ibra

tion.

Con

tract

or h

as to

bui

ld fe

nce

to

min

imiz

e no

ise,

wat

er a

ppro

pria

tely

to

min

imiz

e du

st a

nd li

mit

time

for

wor

king

at n

ight

.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

15

th J

une,

20

12.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Irrig

atio

n ca

nal w

as b

lock

ed b

y fa

llen

soil

and

rubb

ish.

K

m51

+100

The

Con

tract

or d

oesn

’t ca

re a

bout

pro

tect

en

viro

nmen

t.

Con

tract

or h

as to

rem

ove

all r

ubbi

sh in

si

te a

nd u

nblo

ck th

is ir

rigat

ion

cana

l G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

85

15th

Jun

e,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Rub

bish

was

muc

h in

site

. W

orke

r’s c

amp

near

P3

Red

riv

er b

ridge

.

The

Con

tract

or d

oesn

’t ca

re a

bout

env

ironm

enta

l pr

otec

tion.

Con

tract

or h

as to

rem

ove

all r

ubbi

sh

out s

ite e

very

day.

G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

85

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

re

solv

ed it

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

219

June

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Con

tract

or h

as s

et u

p sa

fety

sc

affo

ldin

gs a

t Red

rive

r brid

ge

site

s.

S

caffo

ldin

gs a

re a

ctua

lly s

afet

y an

d re

gula

rly c

heck

ed

GE

T2-P

OS

-A3-

1288

, dat

e 20

12,J

une,

04th

G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-13

41, d

ate

2012

, Jun

e 26

th

Afte

r ins

truct

ions

from

the

Eng

inee

r, th

e C

ontra

ctor

set

up

a c

ompl

ete

syst

em to

ch

eck

them

twic

e a

wee

k E

ngin

eer c

heck

ed a

ctua

l si

tuat

ion

afte

r Con

tract

or

rein

forc

ed s

caffo

ldin

g sy

stem

s in

site

.

5th J

une

-Con

tract

or

subm

itted

saf

ety

met

hod

stat

emen

t w

orki

ng a

t he

ight

on

Red

R

iver

brid

ge.

-Sca

ffold

ing

was

re

info

rced

by

Con

tract

or.

The

conc

rete

bat

chin

g pl

ants

at

Km

78+8

00, K

m78

+100

hav

e al

read

y se

t up

sedi

men

t con

trol

pond

to c

olle

ct w

aste

wat

er

cont

aini

ng c

oncr

ete.

At a

butm

ent 1

, sed

imen

t pon

d sh

ould

be

bet

ter p

rote

cted

from

spi

llage

s to

th

e riv

er

At a

butm

ent 2

, sed

imen

t pon

d ha

s to

in

crea

se th

e fro

nt d

ick

to in

crea

se th

e ca

paci

ty o

f the

pon

d.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

, dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

R

athe

r goo

d m

aint

enan

ce

Ele

ctric

sys

tem

was

not

saf

e:

elec

trica

l jun

ctio

n, in

terr

upte

rs

are

not p

rope

r, el

ectri

c w

ire w

as

laid

on

grou

nd…

Red

rive

r br

idge

, Nat

iona

l rai

lway

flyo

ver

brid

ge, B

ai B

ang

railw

ay fl

yove

r.

The

Con

tract

or d

idn’

t giv

e st

rong

inst

ruct

ions

to

subc

ontra

ctor

s

Con

tract

or m

ust r

eset

up

elec

tric

syst

em: l

ift u

p al

l ele

ctric

al c

apes

hi

gher

than

gro

und

at le

ase

2m;

elec

trica

l jun

ctio

n, in

terr

upte

r mus

t be

ensu

re s

afet

y.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

, dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

15th

Jul

y,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Wor

ker d

id n

ot u

se s

afet

y la

bor

at T

L315

B b

ridge

Km

67+6

00,

TL32

0B b

ridge

Km

64+0

80.

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

cont

rol t

heir

subc

ontra

ctor

s an

d th

e w

orke

rs d

on’t

wan

t m

any

times

to w

ear P

PE

s.

Con

tract

or m

ust r

eque

st a

ll w

orke

rs to

us

e sa

fety

equ

ipm

ent w

hen

they

wor

k in

site

, spe

cial

at h

eigh

t.

Con

sulta

nt d

irect

ly w

arne

d in

si

te a

nd s

ent l

ette

r GE

T2-

POS

-A3-

1285

, dat

e 20

12,

June

01st

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

re

min

ded

thei

r w

orke

r.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

220

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Fire

ext

ingu

ishe

rs, f

irst a

id k

its

wer

e no

t set

up

in w

orke

r’s

cam

ps a

t Nat

iona

l rai

lway

fly

over

, TL3

20B

brid

ge, B

ai

Ban

g ra

ilway

flyo

ver.

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

cont

rol t

heir

subc

ontra

ctor

s an

d th

e w

orke

rs d

on’t

wan

t m

any

times

to a

pply

saf

ety

mea

sure

s

Con

tract

or m

ust p

rovi

de fi

re

extin

guis

hers

, firs

t aid

kits

for a

ll w

orke

rs c

amps

alo

ng p

acka

ge A

3.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

, dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

Imm

edia

tely

C

ontra

ctor

stil

l de

lay

to re

solv

e it.

Oil

drum

s w

ere

put i

n si

te

with

out s

pilla

ge c

ontro

l m

easu

res.

Km

78+4

00,

Km

52+2

00 (T

GT

wor

ker’s

cam

p)

The

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot

prep

ared

a c

oncr

ete

surfa

ce to

sto

rage

the

haza

rdou

s dr

ums.

Con

tract

or m

ust g

roup

all

oil d

rum

s in

re

gula

tion

plac

e an

d ha

ve s

afet

y m

easu

re to

avo

id o

il w

ill b

e sp

illed

over

gro

und

and

pollu

te s

oil r

esou

rce.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

, dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

10th

Jul

y,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Irrig

atio

n ca

nal w

as b

lock

ed b

y fa

llen

soil

and

rubb

ish.

K

m51

+100

The

Con

tract

or d

idn’

t car

e ab

out t

he p

rote

ctio

n of

that

ca

nal.

Con

tract

or h

as to

rem

ove

all r

ubbi

sh

in s

ite a

nd u

nblo

ck th

is ir

rigat

ion

cana

l G

ET2-

PO

S-A

3-12

85, d

ate

2012

, Jun

e 01

st

10th

Jul

y,

2012

.

Con

tract

or s

till

dela

y to

reso

lve

it.

Muc

h ru

bbis

h ke

eps

on s

ite.

Wor

ker’s

cam

p ne

ar P

3 R

ed

river

brid

ge.

The

Con

tract

or a

nd

subc

ontra

ctor

s do

n’t c

are

abou

t cle

anlin

ess.

Sub

cont

ract

ors

have

to re

mov

e al

l ru

bbis

h ou

t site

eve

ry d

ay.

GET

2-P

OS

-A3-

1285

, dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

Imm

edia

tely

S

ubco

ntra

ctor

s ar

e cl

eani

ng

step

by

step

6.

2.4

Pack

age

A4

Apr

il

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

Req

uire

d A

ctio

n Ta

ken

(by

Engi

neer

, ref

er to

do

cum

ents

bel

ow)

Dea

dlin

e C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

Wor

ker

did

not

use

safe

ty

labo

ur a

nd t

hey

usua

lly d

id n

ot

use

safe

ty b

elt

whe

n th

ey w

ork

at

heig

ht.

Km96

+700

, K

m97

+124

N

goi

Lao

brid

ge,

Ngo

i Van

brid

ge K

m10

9+02

5

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y

The

Con

tract

or

mus

t pr

ovid

e sa

fety

la

bour

and

rem

ind

your

wor

ker

use

safe

ty la

bour

to e

nsur

e sa

fety

wor

k.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

co

ntro

ls

thei

r w

orke

r not

wel

l.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

221

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

Req

uire

d A

ctio

n Ta

ken

(by

Engi

neer

, ref

er to

do

cum

ents

bel

ow)

Dea

dlin

e C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

Ele

ctric

sys

tem

was

not

saf

e:

inte

rrup

ter

box

was

no

t sa

fe,

elec

tric

wire

was

laid

und

er w

et

mud

. K

m10

7+53

3, K

m84

+400

TL

321C

, N

goi

lao

brid

ge,

Ngo

i G

ianh

brid

ge K

m88

+600

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y C

ontra

ctor

ha

s to

re

set

up

elec

tric

syst

em to

ens

ure

safe

ty w

ork

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

630

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

No

sign

post

w

as

inst

alle

d at

in

ters

ectio

n be

twee

n lo

cal r

oad

and

cons

truct

ion

site

. K

m96

+700

, Km

107+

533

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y.

Con

tract

or

has

to

inst

all

safe

ty

sign

post

to e

nsur

e sa

fety

.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

Dee

p ar

ea

was

no

t in

stal

led

safe

ty

tape

. K

m97

+124

N

goi

Lao

brid

ge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y.

Con

tract

or h

as t

o in

stal

l sa

fety

tap

e ar

ound

dee

p ar

eas

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

Dum

p tru

cks

wer

e no

t co

vere

d so

so

il w

as

falle

n m

uch

on

exis

ting

road

. On

dry

days

dus

t w

as d

istri

bute

d a

lot

in t

he a

ir.

But

on

rain

y da

ys m

ud is

full

on

thes

e ex

istin

g ro

ads.

K

m97

+124

N

goi

Lao

brid

ge,

Km

107+

533

QL3

2C

bypa

ss,

Km

84+4

00

TL32

1C

brid

ge,

Km

88+1

00 b

ox c

ulve

rt.

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or h

as t

o co

llect

all

mud

and

re

mov

e to

dis

posa

l are

a to

avo

id d

ust

in th

e ai

r on

dry

days

.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

630

Req

uest

ed t

o sp

read

wat

er

at

leas

e 3

times

/day

to

m

inim

ize

dust

.

imm

edia

tely

Afte

r C

onsu

ltant

’s

lette

r, C

ontra

ctor

st

arte

d sp

read

ing

wat

er

1 tim

e/da

y.

Ben

toni

te w

as o

verfl

owed

int

o riv

er

alth

ough

C

ontra

ctor

re

paire

d th

is

viol

atio

n.

Km

97+1

24 N

goi L

ao b

ridge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or m

ust

cont

inue

ove

r co

me

this

pro

blem

and

we

will

rech

eck

in s

ite

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

630

Imm

edia

tely

Afte

r C

onsu

ltant

’s

lette

r, C

ontra

ctor

re

solv

ed

this

vi

olat

ion

but

it’s

not a

bsol

utel

y.

Mud

and

rub

bish

was

thr

own

into

acc

ess

irrig

atio

n ca

nal.

It bl

ocke

d th

is c

anal

. Km

84+4

00

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or m

ust c

olle

ct a

ll ru

bbis

h an

d m

ud to

unb

lock

this

can

al.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

Imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

de

lay

to r

esol

ve

this

pro

blem

.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

222

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

Req

uire

d A

ctio

n Ta

ken

(by

Engi

neer

, ref

er to

do

cum

ents

bel

ow)

Dea

dlin

e C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

TL32

1C b

ridge

. th

ey re

solv

e vi

olat

ions

.

Uns

uita

ble

mat

eria

l w

as

not

rem

oved

out

site

. Km

107+

533

QL3

2C b

ypas

s

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

The

Con

tract

or

mus

t

rem

ove

all

unsu

itabl

e m

ater

ial o

ut s

ite fo

llow

EC

P

G

ET2-

KE

A-A

4-63

0 Im

med

iate

ly

Afte

r C

onsu

ltant

’s

lette

r re

f.GE

T2-

KE

A-A

4-63

0,

Con

tract

or

reso

lved

th

is

viol

atio

n bu

t it’

s no

t abs

olut

ely.

Wor

ker’s

cam

p di

d no

t se

t up

to

ilet,

fire

extin

guis

her,

first

aid

bo

x. T

L321

C K

m84

+400

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n an

d sa

fety

for

w

orke

r.

Con

tract

or h

as t

o se

t up

toi

let,

fire

extin

guis

her,

first

aid

box

whe

n yo

ur

wor

ker

lives

in

ca

mp

insi

de

cons

truct

ion

site

.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

de

lay

to r

esol

ve

this

pro

blem

.

Rub

bish

, be

nton

ite

and

sack

s w

ere

thro

wn

ever

y w

here

in

si

te.

Ngo

i G

ianh

brid

ge,

Ngo

i V

an b

ridge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or h

as to

col

lect

all

was

te a

nd

rem

ove

out s

ite e

very

day.

We

requ

este

d or

war

ned

the

Con

tract

or

in

site

an

d by

w

eekl

y re

port

to

requ

est

they

reso

lve

viol

atio

ns.

Imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

de

lay

to r

esol

ve

this

pro

blem

.

Ben

toni

te

was

po

ured

di

rect

ly

into

riv

er.

Spe

cial

at

Ngo

i La

o K

m97

+124

an

d N

goi

Gia

nh

Km

88+6

00,

soil,

pe

bble

an

d be

nton

ite s

till w

as n

ot r

emov

ed

abso

lute

ly, i

t occ

upie

d a

part

or

mor

e th

an h

aft

of r

iver

bed

. A

t N

goi V

an r

iver

, so

il an

d pe

bble

w

as

falle

n a

lot

into

w

ater

re

sour

ce.

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut w

ater

res

ourc

e pr

otec

tion.

Con

tract

or

is

stro

ngly

re

ques

ted

to

dred

ge f

alle

n so

il an

d pe

bble

in

river

an

d re

mov

e it

to d

ispo

sal a

reas

. G

ET2-

KE

A-A

4-63

0 Im

med

iate

ly

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is

prob

lem

at

N

goi

Gia

nh

river

. A

fter

Con

sulta

nt’s

le

tter,

Con

tract

or

gave

so

me

solu

tions

to

re

solv

e th

is

viol

atio

n bu

t it’

s no

t abs

olut

ely

at

Ngo

i La

o an

d N

goi V

an ri

vers

.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

223

May

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Wor

ker

did

not

use

safe

ty l

abou

r an

d th

ey u

sual

ly d

id n

ot u

se s

afet

y be

lt w

hen

they

w

ork

at

heig

ht.

Km

97+1

24 N

goi L

ao b

ridge

, N

goi

Gia

nh

brid

ge

Km10

9+02

5,

Km

104+

500

box

culv

ert

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

cont

rol t

heir

wor

ker w

ell.

The

Con

tract

or

mus

t pr

ovid

e sa

fety

la

bour

and

rem

ind

your

wor

ker

use

safe

ty la

bour

to e

nsur

e sa

fety

wor

k.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

Ele

ctric

sy

stem

w

as

not

safe

: in

terr

upte

r bo

x w

as

not

safe

, el

ectri

c w

ire w

as l

aid

unde

r w

et

mud

. Km

107+

533,

K

m84

+400

TL

321C

, N

goi

lao

brid

ge,

Ngo

i G

ianh

brid

ge K

m88

+600

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut s

afet

y

Con

tract

or

has

to

rese

t up

el

ectri

c sy

stem

: lif

t up

all

elec

tric

wire

hig

her

than

gro

und

at l

east

2m

; al

l ju

nctio

n an

d in

terr

upte

r mus

t res

et u

p to

ens

ure

safe

ty w

ork

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

Wor

ker’s

cam

ps w

ere

not

set

up

fire

extin

guis

her,

was

te b

ins,

and

fir

st

aid

kit

at

Km

104+

500,

K

m84

+400

, N

goi

Gia

nh

brid

ge

Km

88+9

00

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot p

rovi

de

safe

ty e

quip

men

t for

eac

h w

orke

r cam

p.

Con

tract

or

mus

t se

t up

fir

e ex

tingu

ishe

r, w

aste

bin

s, a

nd f

irst

aid

kit f

or e

ach

wor

ker c

amp.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

Dum

p tru

cks

wer

e no

t cov

ered

so

soil

was

fal

len

muc

h on

exi

stin

g ro

ad.

On

dry

days

du

st

was

di

strib

uted

a lo

t in

the

air.

But

on

rain

y da

ys m

ud i

s fu

ll on

the

se

exis

ting

road

s.

Km

97+1

24

Ngo

i La

o br

idge

, Km

107+

533

QL3

2C

bypa

ss,

Km

84+4

00

TL32

1C

brid

ge, K

m88

+100

box

cul

vert.

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or h

as t

o co

llect

all

mud

and

re

mov

e to

dis

posa

l are

a to

avo

id d

ust

in th

e ai

r on

dry

days

.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

de

lay

to r

esol

ve

this

pro

blem

.

Ben

toni

te

was

ov

erflo

wed

in

to

river

alth

ough

Con

tract

or r

epai

red

this

vio

latio

n. K

m97

+124

Ngo

i Lao

br

idge

, N

goi

Gia

nh b

ridge

, N

Goi

V

an b

ridge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or m

ust

cont

inue

ove

r co

me

this

pro

blem

and

we

will

rech

eck

in s

ite

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is p

robl

em..

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

224

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Mud

and

rub

bish

was

thr

own

into

ac

cess

irrig

atio

n ca

nal.

It bl

ocke

d th

is

cana

l. Km

84+4

00

TL32

1C

brid

ge.

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or m

ust c

olle

ct a

ll ru

bbis

h an

d m

ud to

unb

lock

this

can

al.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is p

robl

em.

Soi

l w

as

was

hout

in

to

field

s at

K

m10

3+80

0, K

m10

4+20

0

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or m

ust

rem

ove

all f

alle

n so

il ou

t to

disp

osal

are

as.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is p

robl

em.

Wor

ker’s

cam

p di

d no

t set

up

toile

t at

TL3

21C

Km

84+4

00

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n an

d sa

fety

for

w

orke

r.

Con

tract

or h

as t

o se

t up

toi

let,

fire

extin

guis

her,

first

aid

box

whe

n yo

ur

wor

ker

lives

in

ca

mp

insi

de

cons

truct

ion

site

.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is p

robl

em.

Rub

bish

, be

nton

ite

and

sack

s w

ere

thro

wn

ever

y w

here

in

site

. N

goi

Gia

nh

brid

ge,

Ngo

i V

an

brid

ge

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut e

nviro

nmen

tal

prot

ectio

n.

Con

tract

or h

as to

col

lect

all

was

te a

nd

rem

ove

out s

ite e

very

day.

G

ET2-

KE

A-A

4-63

8 G

ET2-

KE

A-A

4-68

0 im

med

iate

ly

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is p

robl

em.

Ben

toni

te w

as p

oure

d di

rect

ly in

to

river

. S

peci

al

at

Ngo

i La

o K

m97

+124

an

d N

goi

Gia

nh

Km

88+6

00,

soil,

pe

bble

an

d be

nton

ite

still

was

no

t re

mov

ed

abso

lute

ly,

it oc

cupi

ed a

par

t or

m

ore

than

haf

t of

riv

er b

ed.

At

Ngo

i V

an r

iver

, so

il an

d pe

bble

w

as

falle

n a

lot

into

w

ater

re

sour

ce.

The

Con

tract

or

does

n’t

care

abo

ut w

ater

res

ourc

e pr

otec

tion.

Con

tract

or

is

stro

ngly

re

ques

ted

to

dred

ge f

alle

n so

il an

d pe

bble

in

river

an

d re

mov

e it

to d

ispo

sal a

reas

.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

638

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680

June

15

th,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

res

olve

th

is p

robl

em.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

225

June

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Wor

kers

did

not

use

full

safe

ty

labo

r and

they

usu

ally

did

not

use

sa

fety

bel

t whe

n th

ey w

ork

at

heig

ht. K

m97

+124

Ngo

i Lao

br

idge

, Ngo

i Gia

nh b

ridge

K

m10

9+02

5, K

m10

4+50

0 bo

x cu

lver

t

The

Con

tract

or d

oesn

’t co

ntro

l the

ir w

orke

r wel

l.

The

Con

tract

or m

ust p

rovi

de s

afet

y la

bor a

nd fo

rce

the

wor

kers

to u

se

safe

ty la

bor t

o en

sure

saf

ety

wor

k.

Sev

eral

lette

rs w

ere

writ

ten

abou

t thi

s pr

oble

m. I

n Ju

ne:

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680,

dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

st

ill d

elay

Soi

l fal

ls o

n ex

istin

g ro

ads.

On

dry

days

dus

t was

dis

tribu

ted

a lo

t in

the

air.

But

on

rain

y da

ys m

ud is

fu

ll on

thes

e ex

istin

g ro

ads.

K

m97

+124

Ngo

i Lao

brid

ge,

Km

107+

533

QL3

2C b

ypas

s,

Km

84+4

00 T

L321

C b

ridge

, K

m88

+100

box

cul

vert.

Dum

p tru

cks

are

usua

lly

not c

over

ed

Truc

ks m

ust b

e al

way

s co

vere

d w

hen

trans

porti

ng s

oil.

Con

tract

or h

as to

col

lect

all

mud

and

re

mov

e to

dis

posa

l are

a to

avo

id d

ust

in th

e ai

r on

dry

days

.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680,

dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

Con

tinuo

usly

inst

ruct

ing

on

site

imm

edia

tely

Th

e C

ontra

ctor

de

lay

to re

solv

e th

is p

robl

em.

Ben

toni

te w

as o

verfl

owed

into

the

river

alth

ough

Km

97+1

24 N

goi L

ao

brid

ge, N

goi G

ianh

brid

ge, N

Goi

V

an b

ridge

Con

tract

or d

idn’

t rem

ove

the

bent

onite

fully

La

ck o

f cle

anlin

ess

and

of s

ensi

bilit

y

Con

tract

or m

ust f

inis

h to

ove

rcom

e th

is p

robl

em

Inst

ruct

ed C

ontra

ctor

by

lette

r GE

T2-K

EA

-A4-

680,

da

te 2

012,

Jun

e 01

st

Eng

inee

r will

rech

eck

imm

edia

tely

B

ento

nite

is s

till

rem

aini

ng in

to

the

river

Ele

ctric

sys

tem

was

not

saf

e:

inte

rrup

ter b

ox w

as n

ot s

afe,

el

ectri

c w

ire w

as la

id u

nder

wet

m

ud.

Km

107+

533,

Km

84+4

00

TL32

1C, N

goi L

ao b

ridge

, Ngo

i G

ianh

brid

ge K

m88

+600

The

Con

tract

or d

oesn

’t ca

re a

bout

saf

ety

Con

tract

or h

as to

rese

t up

elec

tric

syst

em: l

ift u

p al

l ele

ctric

wire

hig

her

than

gro

und

at le

ast 2

m; a

ll ju

nctio

n an

d in

terr

upte

r mus

t res

et u

p to

en

sure

saf

ety

wor

k

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680,

dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

July

15th

, 20

12

The

Con

tract

or

still

del

ay

Wor

kers

cam

ps h

ave

not s

et u

p fir

e ex

tingu

ishe

r, w

aste

bin

s, a

nd

first

aid

kit

at K

m10

4+50

0,

Km

84+4

00, N

goi G

ianh

brid

ge

Con

tract

or d

id n

ot fo

rce

subc

ontra

ctor

to p

rovi

de

safe

ty e

quip

men

t for

ea

ch w

orke

r cam

p.

Con

tract

or m

ust s

et u

p fir

e ex

tingu

ishe

r, w

aste

bin

s, a

nd fi

rst a

id

kit f

or e

ach

wor

ker c

amp.

GET

2-K

EA

-A4-

680,

dat

e 20

12, J

une

01st

July

15th

, 20

12

The

Con

tract

or

still

del

ay

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

226

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

Cau

se

Solu

tion

requ

ired

Act

ion

take

n (b

y E

ngin

eer,

refe

r to

docu

men

ts b

elow

) D

eadl

ine

Cur

rent

sta

tus

Km

88+9

00

Mud

and

rubb

ish

was

thro

wn

into

ac

cess

irrig

atio

n ca

nal.

It bl

ocke

d th

is c

anal

. Km

84+4

00 T

L321

C

brid

ge.

Lack

of s

ensi

bilit

y C

ontra

ctor

mus

t col

lect

all

rubb

ish

and

mud

to u

nblo

ck th

is c

anal

.

Req

uest

ed b

y le

tter G

ET2

-K

EA

-A4-

680,

dat

e 20

12,

June

01st

to c

lean

the

cana

l

July

15th

, 20

12

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

reso

lve

this

pro

blem

.

Soi

l was

was

hout

into

fiel

ds a

t K

m10

3+80

0, K

m10

4+20

0 H

eavy

rain

s pl

us a

lack

of

sens

ibili

ty

Con

tract

or m

ust r

emov

e al

l fal

len

soil

out t

o di

spos

al a

reas

. In

stru

ctin

g co

ntra

ctor

on

site

Ju

ly 1

5th,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

reso

lve

this

pro

blem

.

Wor

ker’s

cam

p di

d no

t set

up

toile

t at

TL3

21C

Km

84+4

00

Con

tract

or d

idn’

t for

ce

enou

gh to

sub

cont

ract

ors

abou

t hea

lthy

cond

ition

s in

cam

ps

Con

tract

or h

as to

set

up

toile

t, fir

e ex

tingu

ishe

r, fir

st a

id b

ox w

hen

your

w

orke

r liv

es in

cam

p in

side

co

nstru

ctio

n si

te.

Sev

eral

lette

rs w

ere

sent

re

ques

ting

this

mat

ter

July

15th

, 20

12

The

Con

tract

or

dela

y to

reso

lve

this

pro

blem

.

6.2.

5 Pa

ckag

e A

5

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

At s

ome

cons

truct

ion

area

s of

brid

ges

such

as

Ngo

i Gua

, Ngo

i Lau

, N

goi R

ao, V

an P

hu a

nd

Ngo

i Thi

a… th

e C

ontra

ctor

con

stru

cted

se

rvic

e ro

ads

cros

sing

8-Fe

b, 2

012

GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

282

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

the

Pro

ject

’s re

quire

men

ts

as w

ell a

s E

nviro

nmen

tal C

ontro

l an

d P

rote

ctio

n - I

mpl

emen

t ful

ly th

e

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

30-A

pril,

12.

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

any

impr

ovem

e

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

any

impr

ovem

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

any

impr

ovem

e

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

227

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

river

s an

d st

ream

s.

How

ever

, the

se s

ervi

ce

road

s ar

e no

t sui

tabl

y co

nstru

cted

(reg

ardi

ng to

th

e E

ngin

eer’s

lette

r N

o.G

ET3

-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

282)

.

Engi

neer

’s in

stru

ctio

ns

and

requ

irem

ents

. nt

. en

t. nt

.

Ben

toni

te h

as n

ot b

een

cont

rolle

d cl

osel

y by

the

Con

tract

or d

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n at

Ngo

i G

ua, N

goi R

ao, V

an

Phu

, Ngo

i Thi

a br

idge

s,

etc.

9-Fe

b, 2

012

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

065;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-14

8;

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

189;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-21

2;

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

361;

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Con

trol c

lose

ly

bent

onite

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

in o

rder

to

prev

ent b

ad im

pact

ion

to

the

regi

on’s

en

viro

nmen

t. - I

mpl

emen

t ful

ly

inst

ruct

ions

and

re

quire

men

ts fr

om th

e En

gine

er.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

30-F

eb,

2012

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

any

impr

ovem

e

nt.

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

any

impr

ovem

ent.

The

Con

tract

or

has

not

solv

ed

abso

lute

ly

thes

e

outs

tand

ing

prob

lem

s

At K

m12

3+86

0, m

ost t

he

Con

tract

or’s

truc

ks s

till

have

not

bee

n co

vere

d w

ith c

anva

s du

ring

mat

eria

l tra

nspo

rtatio

n,

besi

des,

muc

h so

il ha

s be

en fa

llen

on th

e pu

blic

ro

ad d

urin

g m

ater

ial

trans

porta

tion,

this

20-A

pril,

201

2 G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-36

1

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

the

Pro

ject

’s re

quire

men

ts

as w

ell a

s E

nviro

nmen

tal C

ontro

l an

d P

rote

ctio

n - E

nsur

e th

at th

e w

hole

co

ntra

ctor

’s tr

ucks

will

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

Not

ye

t

impl

emen

t

ed

Not

ye

t

impl

emen

t

ed

Not

ye

t

impl

emen

te

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

228

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

situ

atio

n is

cau

sing

im

pact

to th

e re

gion

’s

envi

ronm

ent a

nd s

afet

y.

be u

sed

fully

can

vas

durin

g m

ater

ial

trans

porta

tion.

- I

mpl

emen

t ful

ly

inst

ruct

ions

and

re

quire

men

ts fr

om th

e En

gine

er.

Alth

ough

sev

eral

tim

es

bein

g re

min

ded

by th

e En

gine

er o

n so

lvin

g th

e im

pact

cau

sed

from

the

Con

tract

or’s

con

stru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es to

the

prod

uctio

n la

nd o

f loc

al

peop

le. H

owev

er, u

p to

no

w, t

he C

ontra

ctor

has

no

t sol

ved

abso

lute

ly

thes

e ou

tsta

ndin

g m

atte

rs (r

egar

ding

to th

e E

ngin

eer’s

lette

r, N

o.G

ET3

-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

213)

.

2- F

eb, 2

012

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-11

-A5-

047;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

11-A

5-14

5;

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-11

-A5-

224;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

11-A

5-23

2;

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-11

-A5-

250;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-21

3;

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

the

Pro

ject

’s re

quire

men

ts

as w

ell a

s E

nviro

nmen

tal C

ontro

l an

d P

rote

ctio

n - C

ompl

y w

ith M

etho

d S

tate

men

ts a

ppro

ved

by

the

Eng

inee

r dur

ing

proj

ect i

mpl

emen

tatio

n.

- Im

plem

ent f

ully

the

Engi

neer

’s in

stru

ctio

ns

and

requ

irem

ents

.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

The

Con

tract

or

has

not

solv

ed

abso

lute

ly

thes

e

outs

tand

in

g prob

lem

s.

The

Con

tract

or

has

not

solv

ed

abso

lute

ly

thes

e

outs

tand

in

g prob

lem

s.

The

Con

tract

or

still

has

not

solv

ed

abso

lute

ly

thes

e

outs

tand

ing

prob

lem

s.

The

Con

tract

or’s

fuel

co

ntro

l is

not w

ell

perfo

rmin

g (re

gard

ing

to

the

Eng

inee

r’s le

tter

No.

GE

T3-K

EA

NG

NA

M-

20-M

ar, 2

012

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

215;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

the

Pro

ject

’s re

quire

men

ts

as w

ell a

s

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

15-A

pr,

2012

Not

impr

oved

Not

impr

oved

Not

impr

oved

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

229

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

12-A

5-21

5 da

ted

21st

Mar

, 201

2).

E.g

. Ngo

i Rao

, Ngo

i G

ua, N

goi T

hia,

Van

Phu

br

idge

s, e

tc.

12-A

5-32

4;

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

361;

Env

ironm

enta

l Con

trol

and

Pro

tect

ion

- Im

prov

e th

e C

ontra

ctor

’s fu

el c

ontro

l. - I

mpl

emen

t ful

ly

inst

ruct

ions

and

re

quire

men

ts fr

om th

e En

gine

er.

Thro

ugh

site

che

ck a

nd

insp

ectio

n, th

e E

ngin

eer

easi

ly re

cogn

ize

that

m

any

wor

kers

do

not

use

fully

Per

sona

l P

rote

ctio

n E

quip

men

t (h

elm

et, s

afet

y sh

oes,

et

c.) w

hen

they

wor

k on

th

e si

te s

uch

as: R

CP

C

fact

ory

No.

1, R

CP

C

fact

ory

No.

2; B

atch

ing

Pla

nt N

o.3,

Ngo

i Gua

br

idge

; Ngo

i Rao

brid

ge;

Van

Phu

brid

ge, e

tc.

12 –

Apr

,201

2;

24 –

Apr

, 201

2

GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

324

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

Pro

ject

S

afet

y P

lan

appr

oved

by

the

Eng

inee

r dur

ing

cons

truct

ion.

- P

rovi

de fu

lly P

erso

nal

Pro

tect

ion

Equ

ipm

ents

fo

r all

wor

kers

and

en

sure

that

all

wor

kers

w

ill u

se fu

lly P

PE

dur

ing

the

who

le p

roce

ss o

f w

ork.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

Dai

ly

Not

impr

oved

Not

impr

oved

Con

tract

or

is

appl

ying

mea

sure

s

in o

rder

to

cont

inue

impr

ovin

g

this

mat

ter.

Safe

ty fe

nces

and

saf

ety

sign

boar

ds: t

hese

saf

ety

elem

ents

hav

e no

t bee

n in

stal

led

fully

at m

any

cons

truct

ion

site

s (e

xam

ple

such

as:

co

nstru

ctio

n si

te o

f Ngo

i G

ua, Q

L37,

Van

Phu

br

idge

s, e

tc.;

acce

ss

12 –

Apr

,201

2;

24 –

Apr

, 201

2

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

324

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-36

1

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Im

plem

ent f

ully

in

stru

ctio

ns a

nd

requ

irem

ents

from

the

Engi

neer

. - I

nsta

ll sa

fety

fenc

es

and

safe

ty s

ignb

oard

s at

al

l dan

gero

us a

reas

in

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

Not

impl

emen

t

ed y

et

Not

impl

emen

t

ed y

et

Not

impr

oved

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

230

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

road

s K

m11

3, K

m13

8,

Km11

7-K

m11

9, e

tc.;

othe

r con

stru

ctio

n si

tes

such

as

Irrig

atio

n bo

x cu

lver

t Km

118+

202,

U

nder

pass

box

cul

vert

Km

118+

224,

Dra

inag

e pi

pe c

ulve

rt K

m11

8+06

0,

Km

118+

860,

etc

.; co

nstru

ctio

n si

tes

inte

rsec

ting

with

pub

lic

road

s K

m12

3+86

0,

Km

145+

220,

orde

r to

keep

the

proj

ect’s

saf

ety.

Saf

ety

of p

ublic

: at m

any

cons

truct

ion

site

s, lo

cal

peop

les

ente

ring

into

co

nstru

ctio

n si

tes

with

out a

ny th

e C

ontra

ctor

’s c

ontro

l and

su

perv

isio

n, th

is

situ

atio

n m

ay c

ause

un

wan

ted

acci

dent

s in

side

pro

ject

are

as a

t an

y tim

e. E

.g. N

goi R

ao

brid

ge, K

m11

2, N

goi

Thia

brid

ge. e

tc.

12 –

Apr

,201

2

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

065;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-32

4

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

Pro

ject

S

afet

y P

lan

appr

oved

by

the

Eng

inee

r dur

ing

cons

truct

ion.

- I

mpl

emen

t ful

ly th

e En

gine

er’s

inst

ruct

ions

an

d re

quire

men

ts.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

Dai

ly

Not

impl

emen

t

ed y

et

Not

impl

emen

t

ed y

et

Not

impl

emen

te

d ye

t

Som

e w

orke

rs’ c

amps

ha

ve n

ot b

een

built

sa

nita

ry to

ilet b

y th

e C

ontra

ctor

suc

h as

: Ngo

i G

ua, N

goi R

ao b

ridge

,

8-M

ay, 2

012;

14

-May

, 201

2

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

387

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- San

itary

toile

ts,

suita

ble

sew

age

syst

em

mus

t be

cons

truct

ed a

t al

l wor

kers

’ cam

ps.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

30-M

ay,

2012

No

chan

ges

notic

ed

No

chan

ges

notic

ed

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

231

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Km

120,

etc

. 12

-A5-

437

- I

mpr

ove

the

livin

g an

d w

orki

ng c

ondi

tion

in th

e w

hole

wor

kers

’ cam

ps

as th

e re

quire

men

ts

from

the

Proj

ect a

nd th

e En

gine

er.

Som

e w

orke

rs’ c

amps

ha

ve n

ot b

een

prov

ided

fu

lly fi

re e

xtin

guis

hers

, fir

st-a

id k

its, e

tc. b

y th

e C

ontra

ctor

suc

h as

: Ngo

i G

ua, N

goi R

ao b

ridge

, K

m12

0, e

tc.

30-A

pr, 2

012

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

387;

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-43

7

Fire

ext

ingu

ishe

rs a

nd

first

-aid

kits

mus

t be

prov

ided

fully

by

the

Con

tract

or fo

r all

wor

kers

’ cam

ps.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

15-M

ay,

2012

No

chan

ges

notic

ed

No

chan

ges

notic

ed

Van

Phu

brid

ge’s

ele

ctric

sy

stem

is n

ot s

afe.

Ris

k of

ele

ctric

sho

cks.

14

-May

, 201

2 G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-44

4

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Re-

inst

all t

he e

lect

ric

syst

em, m

inim

izin

g an

y po

tent

ial r

isk.

- C

ompl

y w

ith P

roje

ct

Saf

ety

Pla

n ap

prov

ed b

y th

e E

ngin

eer d

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n.

- Im

plem

ent f

ully

in

stru

ctio

ns a

nd

requ

irem

ents

from

the

Engi

neer

.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

20- M

ay,

2012

Not

impr

oved

Con

tract

or

is

appl

ying

mea

sure

s

in o

rder

to

cont

inue

impr

ovin

g

this

mat

ter.

Was

te w

ater

trea

tmen

t sy

stem

for b

atch

ing

plan

ts, K

m12

3, K

m13

2,

Km14

5.

17-M

ay

- G

ET3-

KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

590.

-

GET

3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-38

6

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Pro

vide

all

batc

hing

pl

ants

with

dr

aina

ge/c

anal

and

se

tting

pon

d(s)

with

su

ffici

ently

cap

acity

to

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

5-Ju

ne,

2012

The

Con

tract

or

has

inst

alle

d

The

Con

tract

or

has

inst

alle

d

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

232

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

- G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-49

0

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

565

adeq

uate

ly tr

eat

cem

ent-l

aden

w

aste

wat

er a

nd to

en

sure

that

ther

e is

no

dire

ct d

isch

arge

of

untre

ated

was

tew

ater

. - P

rohi

bit d

ispo

sal o

f ce

men

t slu

dge

into

riv

er/w

ater

cou

rse,

ag

ricul

tura

l lan

d an

d ot

her s

ensi

tive

loca

tions

.

pond

s at

all

batc

hing

plan

ts

but

drai

nage

/c

anal

is n

ot

good

cond

ition

s

pond

s at

all

batc

hing

plan

ts

but

drai

nage

/c

anal

is

not

good

cond

ition

s

- At t

he N

goi T

hia

brid

ge

site

(Km

145+

300)

, the

su

bcon

tract

or h

as fi

led

abou

t 75

met

ers

of th

e 10

0 m

eter

wid

e riv

er to

cr

eate

tem

pora

ry a

cces

s an

d w

ork

area

s fo

r br

idge

con

stru

ctio

n. T

he

said

acc

ess

has

not

been

pro

vide

d w

ith

culv

erts

as

prev

ious

ly

requ

i red

by th

e C

onsu

ltant

As

such

, he

avy

scou

ring

and

eros

ion

of ri

ver

emba

nkm

ents

esp

ecia

lly

whe

n w

ater

leve

ls a

re

high

(rai

ny p

erio

ds).

2-Fe

b, 2

012

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-11

-A5-

282

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

189;

- R

ef.G

ET3

-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

212;

- R

ef.G

ET3

-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

392

date

d 7th

Jun

e,

2012

; - R

ef.G

ET3

-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

490

date

d 31

st M

ay,

2012

.

The

Con

tract

or m

ust

inst

all a

dequ

ate

num

ber

and

size

of c

ulve

rts

thro

ugho

ut th

e N

goi T

hia

brid

ge s

ite te

mpo

rary

ac

cess

.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

any

impr

ovem

e

nt

Not

impr

oved

Not

impr

oved

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

233

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

- Ref

.GE

T3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-56

5

At K

m12

3+71

4, s

uita

ble

soil

has

been

dis

pose

d in

to th

e ad

jace

nt

agric

ultu

ral l

and

and

Y C

an la

ke.

12-M

ay, 2

012

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

065,

9th

Febr

uary

, 201

2.

- Ref

.GE

T3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-49

0, 3

1st

May

, 201

2.

- Ref

.GE

T3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

12-A

5-56

5

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Rem

ove

spoi

ls a

nd

disp

ose

into

app

rove

d di

spos

al s

ites.

- E

nsur

e th

at s

poils

are

on

ly d

umpe

d to

dis

posa

l si

tes

appr

oved

by

loca

l au

thor

ities

and

the

Con

sulta

nt a

nd th

at

appr

opria

te s

tabi

lizat

ion.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

5- Jun,

2012

.

Not

impl

emen

t

ed y

et

Not

impr

oved

The

Con

tract

or’s

saf

ety

cont

rol i

s no

t wel

l pe

rform

ed a

t co

nstru

ctio

n si

te o

f N

atio

nal R

oad

37 b

ridge

, Km

121+

620

26-J

un, 2

012

GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

589

1. W

orke

rs a

re n

ot u

sing

PP

E at

wor

king

. Mor

e da

nger

ousl

y th

e w

orke

rs

wor

king

hei

ght w

ithou

t PP

E su

ch a

s: s

afet

y be

lt an

d ne

t,...

2. S

afet

y w

arni

ng

boar

ds a

re n

ot in

ef

ficie

ncy.

3.

The

saf

ety

fenc

es a

re

very

tem

pora

ry in

stal

led.

4.

The

Con

tract

or is

not

ar

rang

ing

any

pers

onne

l in

cha

rge

of c

ondu

ctin

g an

d as

surin

g tra

ffic

at

this

con

stru

ctio

n si

te.

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

15-J

un,

2012

Con

tract

or

is

appl

ying

mea

sure

s

in o

rder

to

cont

inue

impr

ovin

g

this

mat

ter.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

234

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Impr

oper

sto

rage

of

haza

rdou

s su

bsta

nces

su

ch a

s oi

l, fu

el a

nd

used

oil

was

not

ed a

t co

nstru

ctio

n/w

orke

rs’

cam

ps, c

onst

ruct

ion

site

, gi

rder

cas

ting

yard

s, e

tc.

Con

tain

ers

are

expo

sed

to e

lem

ents

. Lea

ks a

nd

spills

wer

e ev

iden

t. Fu

el/o

il dr

ums

wer

e of

ten

seen

lyin

g on

thei

r si

de w

hile

fuel

ta

nks/

disp

ense

rs a

re n

ot

prov

ided

with

bun

ded

impe

rmea

ble

floor

ing.

S

uch

tank

s ar

e of

ten

soon

hal

f bur

ied

in s

oil.

E.g

. Ngo

i Gua

, Ngo

i R

ao, N

goi T

hia,

Van

Phu

br

idge

s, e

tc.

17-M

ay

- KE

ANG

NA

M-

12-A

5-49

0 - G

ET3-

KEAN

GN

AM-

A5-0

80;

- GET

3-KE

ANG

NAM

-12

-A5-

215

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Equ

ipm

ent

mai

nten

ance

/repa

ir of

ve

hicl

es s

houl

d be

un

derta

ken

usin

g dr

ip

pans

or o

n im

perm

eabl

e su

rface

to c

onta

in le

aks

or s

pills

. - F

uel t

ank/

disp

ense

rs

as w

ell a

s dr

ums

and

rece

ptac

les

cont

aini

ng

oil,

fuel

and

use

d oi

l sh

ould

be

kept

in ro

ofed

ar

eas

with

bun

ded/

dike

d co

ncre

te fl

oor.

Keep

dr

ums

(eve

n if

empt

y) in

up

right

pos

ition

in s

uch

stor

age

faci

lity \

. - S

orbe

nt m

ater

ials

sh

ould

be

prov

ided

in a

ll ar

eas

whe

re o

il an

d fu

el

are

used

to re

adily

cl

ean -

up s

pills

and

le

aks.

Use

d oi

l and

ha

zard

ous

was

tes

shou

ld b

e st

ored

and

di

spos

ed o

f in

a m

anne

r th

at w

ill n

ot c

ause

co

ntam

inat

ion

of th

e en

viro

nmen

t. - F

ire e

xtin

guis

hers

Kean

gnam

Con

tract

or

15-J

un,

2012

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

muc

h

impr

ovem

ent f

or th

is

wor

k.

Ther

e ha

s

not

been

muc

h

impr

ovem

e

nt

for

this

wor

k.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

235

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

shou

ld b

e av

aila

ble

at o

il an

d fu

el s

tora

ge a

nd

disp

ensi

ng a

reas

. 6.

2.6

Pack

age

A6

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

At s

tatio

n Km

151-

Km

152,

muc

h so

il ha

ve

been

falle

n on

the

publ

ic

road

dur

ing

the

Con

tract

or’s

mat

eria

l tra

nspo

rtatio

n, th

is

situ

atio

n is

cau

sing

im

pact

to th

e re

gion

’s

envi

ronm

ent a

nd tr

affic

.

18-A

pr, 2

012.

G

ET3-

DO

OSA

N-1

2-A6

-387

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

the

Pro

ject

’s re

quire

men

ts

as w

ell a

s E

nviro

nmen

tal C

ontro

l an

d P

rote

ctio

n - I

mpl

emen

t ful

ly

inst

ruct

ions

and

re

quire

men

ts fr

om th

e En

gine

er.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

30-A

pr,

2012

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

This

wor

k ha

s no

t be

en

suffi

cien

tly

impl

emen

ted

by th

e C

ontra

ctor

This

wor

k ha

s no

t be

en

suffi

cien

tly

impl

emen

ted

by th

e C

ontra

ctor

.

At N

goi C

hac

brid

ge,

cond

ition

of t

he w

orke

rs’

cam

p is

not

mee

ting

the

proj

ect’s

requ

irem

ents

, th

is w

orke

rs’ c

amp

is

cons

truct

ed in

a v

ery

poor

and

tem

pora

ry

purp

ose,

for e

xam

ple

ther

e ar

e no

t san

itary

to

ilet,

no s

uita

ble

18-A

pr, 2

012.

G

ET3-

DO

OSA

N-1

2-A6

-387

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Ens

ure

that

all

wor

kers

’ cam

ps w

ill be

m

aint

aine

d in

goo

d co

nditi

on.

- Pro

vide

fully

eq

uipm

ent a

s du

stbi

ns,

first

-aid

kit,

fire

ex

tingu

ishe

rs, e

tc. F

or

the

who

le w

orke

rs’

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

30-A

pr,

2012

No

chan

ges

notic

ed

The

Con

tract

or

rem

oved

th

is

wor

ker’s

ca

mp

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

236

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

sew

age

syst

em a

nd th

e C

ontra

ctor

hav

e no

t pr

ovid

ed fu

lly e

quip

men

t as

dus

tbin

s, fi

rst -a

id k

it,

fire

extin

guis

hers

, etc

.

cam

ps.

- Im

plem

ent f

ully

the

requ

irem

ents

from

the

Pro

ject

as

wel

l as

the

Engi

neer

.

Acc

ess

road

cro

ssin

g th

e st

ream

at N

goi T

hat

brid

ge (K

m15

5+97

1) h

as

been

hea

vily

dam

aged

, th

is s

ituat

ion

is

obst

ruct

ing

the

vehi

cle

circ

ulat

ion

at th

is s

tatio

n an

d to

the

proj

ect’s

sa

fety

and

traf

fic

7-A

pr, 2

012

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-3

60

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Im

med

iate

ly c

arry

out

re

pair

for t

he d

amag

ed

poin

ts o

f thi

s ac

cess

ro

ad.

- con

solid

ate

bette

r thi

s ac

cess

road

to p

reve

nt

eros

ion

and

slid

ing

at

this

are

a.

- Im

plem

ent f

ully

re

quire

men

ts a

nd

inst

ruct

ions

from

the

Engi

neer

.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

tely

This

wor

k ha

s al

read

y co

mpl

eted

by

the

Con

tract

or.

The

Con

tract

or’s

saf

ety

cont

rol i

s no

t goo

d at

co

nstru

ctio

n si

te o

f the

tu

nnel

(reg

ardi

ng to

the

lette

r, N

o.G

ET3

-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

30)

25-A

pril

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

30

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Com

ply

with

Pro

ject

S

afet

y P

lan

appr

oved

by

the

Engi

neer

- C

ompl

y w

ith M

etho

d S

tate

men

ts d

urin

g th

e w

hole

pro

cess

of

cons

truct

ion.

-

Impl

emen

t ful

ly

requ

irem

ents

and

in

stru

ctio

ns fr

om th

e En

gine

er.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

30-A

pril

Con

tract

or i

s ap

plyi

ng

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is

mat

ter.

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is m

atte

r.

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is m

atte

r.

Som

e w

orke

rs’ c

amps

10

-May

, 201

2 - G

ET3-

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

Doo

san

20-M

ay,

N

o N

o ch

ange

s

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

237

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

have

not

bee

n bu

ilt

sani

tary

toile

t by

the

Con

tract

or s

uch

as:

Lang

Lau

Km

182+

160;

K

m16

7+87

9; N

goi G

iam

br

idge

Km

163+

126,

etc

.

DO

OSA

N-1

2-A6

-453

-.G

ET3-

DO

OSA

N-1

2-A6

-491

- San

itary

toile

ts,

suita

ble

sew

age

syst

em

mus

t be

cons

truct

ed a

t al

l wor

kers

’ cam

ps.

- Im

prov

e th

e liv

ing

and

wor

king

con

ditio

n in

the

who

le w

orke

rs’ c

amps

as

the

requ

irem

ents

fro

m th

e Pr

ojec

t and

the

Engi

neer

.

Con

tract

or

2012

ch

ange

s no

ticed

no

ticed

Was

te w

ater

Tre

atm

ent

Sys

tem

of t

he T

unne

l (S

outh

por

tal

Km

186+

200)

hav

e be

en

heav

ily d

amag

ed, a

nd

alm

ost n

o ef

ficie

ncy

to

was

te w

ater

trea

tmen

t at

Con

stru

ctio

n si

te o

f the

tu

nnel

3-M

ay, 2

012

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

57

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Im

med

iate

ly c

arry

out

co

nstru

ctio

n of

was

te

wat

er tr

eatm

ent s

yste

m

at th

e Tu

nnel

are

as to

m

eet t

he P

roje

ct’s

re

quire

men

ts.

- Com

ply

with

the

proj

ect’s

requ

irem

ents

as

wel

l as

the

Eng

inee

r’s re

quire

men

t an

d in

stru

ctio

ns.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

N

ot y

et

impl

emen

ted

Was

te

wat

er

Trea

tmen

t S

yste

m o

f th

e Tu

nnel

is

bui

ldin

g by

the

Con

tract

or

The

Con

tract

or’s

co

nstru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es

and

mat

eria

l tra

nspo

rtatio

n st

ill ar

e th

e m

ain

fact

ors

caus

ing

dust

ing

such

as:

Km

151,

K

m15

6+30

0,

Km

156+

475,

Km

161,

et

c.

12-A

pril,

201

2 G

ET3-

DO

OSA

N-1

2-A6

-484

Con

tract

or to

: - E

nsur

e th

at a

ll tru

cks

are

fully

cov

ered

with

ca

nvas

dur

ing

mat

eria

l tra

nspo

rtatio

n.

- Cle

an d

ust f

rom

road

s’

surfa

ce.

- Com

ply

with

the

Pro

ject

’s re

quire

men

ts

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

im

prov

e th

is m

atte

r

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

im

prov

e th

is m

atte

r

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

238

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

as w

ell a

s E

nviro

nmen

tal C

ontro

l an

d P

rote

ctio

n

At s

ome

wor

kers

’ cam

p (L

ang

Lau

Km18

2+16

0;

Km

167+

879;

Ngo

i Gia

m

brid

ge K

m16

3+12

6),

rubb

ish

was

in

disc

rimin

atel

y th

row

n on

the

grou

nd

10-M

ay, 2

012

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

53

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

91

Con

tract

or to

: 1.

Rem

ind

all r

elat

ed

staf

f abo

ut

envi

ronm

enta

l pro

tect

ion

and

cont

rol

2. U

sual

ly c

arry

out

cl

earin

g at

the

wor

kers

’ ca

mp

area

s.

3. C

olle

ct ru

bbis

h an

d re

mov

e it

to th

e rig

ht

plac

es.

4. C

ombi

ne w

ith lo

cal

auth

oriti

es in

ord

er to

tre

at d

omes

tic w

aste

an

d pr

even

t bad

im

pact

ion

to th

e re

gion

’s

envi

ronm

ent.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

N

o ch

ange

s no

ticed

No

chan

ges

notic

ed

Not

eno

ugh

safe

ty

fenc

es a

nd s

ignb

oard

s at

man

y lo

catio

ns s

uch

as: b

ridge

, Up -

box

culv

erts

, dra

inag

e cu

lver

ts, i

rrig

atio

n cu

lver

ts, e

tc. t

his

situ

atio

n is

cau

sing

im

pact

to th

e pr

ojec

t’s

safe

ty.

17-M

ay, 2

012

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

67

- Ins

tall

safe

ty fe

nces

an

d sa

fety

sig

nboa

rds

at

all d

ange

rous

are

as in

or

der t

o im

prov

e th

e pr

ojec

t’s s

afet

y.

- Ass

ign

suffi

cien

t pe

rson

nel t

o m

onito

r an

d su

perv

ise

the

wor

ks

on s

ite to

ens

ure

the

proj

ect’s

saf

ety

at

cons

truct

ion

area

s at

all

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

May

31st

20

12

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is m

atte

r.

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is m

atte

r.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

239

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

time.

- F

ully

impl

emen

t in

stru

ctio

ns a

nd

requ

irem

ents

from

the

Engi

neer

.

Wor

kers

do

not u

se

enou

gh P

erso

nal

Pro

tect

ive

Equ

ipm

ent

(PP

E) w

hen

wor

king

on

high

ly. K

m18

2, L

ang

Nha

y br

idge

17-M

ay, 2

012

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-0

87

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

30;

Con

tract

or to

: 1.

Rem

ind

all r

elat

ed

staf

f abo

ut th

e im

porta

nce

of w

earin

g th

e PP

E.

2. P

rovi

de P

erso

nal

Pro

tect

ive

Equ

ipm

ent f

or

all o

f the

m.

3. E

nfor

ce it

s us

e.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Dai

ly

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

som

e of

th

e sa

id

mea

sure

s

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

som

e of

the

said

m

easu

res

At K

m18

9+50

0,

Km

187+

900,

K

m17

8+20

0, W

orke

rs’

cam

ps la

ck s

anita

ry

toile

t fac

ilitie

s (w

ith

sept

ic ta

nks)

.

17-M

ay, 2

012

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

91

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-5

46

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-6

33

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Pro

vide

san

itary

toile

ts

(wat

er s

eale

d) w

ith

sept

ic ta

nks

at a

ll w

orke

rs’ c

amps

. - E

nsur

e th

at to

ilets

and

ba

thin

g ar

eas

are

regu

lar c

lean

ed to

el

imin

ate

foul

odo

r as

wel

l as

alga

l gro

wth

s th

at m

ake

the

area

s sl

ippe

ry.

- Ins

tall

wat

er s

eale

d ce

ram

ic to

ilets

to

prev

ent o

dors

.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

5 –J

un,

2012

- San

itary

to

ilets

fa

cilit

ies

wer

e pr

ovid

ed a

t so

me

wor

kers

’ ca

mps

(e.g

. K

m18

5+40

0)

- Som

e to

ilets

wer

e im

prov

ed

cond

ition

(e

.g.

Km

186+

800)

.

- Km

178+

200,

the

Con

tract

or

has

alre

ady

rem

oved

th

is

wor

ker’s

ca

mp.

- B

ut,

Wor

kers

’ ca

mps

stil

l la

ck s

anita

ry

toile

t fa

cilit

ies

at

Km

189+

500,

K

m18

7+90

0

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

240

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Was

te w

ater

trea

tmen

t sy

stem

for b

atch

ing

plan

ts. K

m16

5, K

m16

2,

Km18

0, K

m18

4.

17-M

ay, 2

012

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-11-

A6-0

67.

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-4

52 -

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-5

46

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Pro

vide

all

batc

hing

pl

ants

with

dr

aina

ge/c

anal

and

se

tting

pon

d(s)

with

su

ffici

ently

cap

acity

to

adeq

uate

ly tr

eat

cem

ent -l

aden

w

aste

wat

er a

nd to

en

sure

that

ther

e is

no

dire

ct d

isch

arge

of

untre

ated

was

tew

ater

. - P

rohi

bit d

ispo

sal o

f ce

men

t slu

dge

into

riv

er/w

ater

cou

rse,

ag

ricul

tura

l lan

d an

d ot

her s

ensi

tive

loca

tions

.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

5 –J

un,

2012

.

The

Con

tract

or

has

inst

alle

d po

nds

at a

ll ba

tchi

ng

plan

ts b

ut

drai

nage

/ca

nal i

s no

t go

od

cond

ition

s.

At K

m19

0+30

0 –

Km19

3 +43

0;

Km

188+

840

– K

m18

8+95

0;

Km

179+

490

– K

m17

9+55

0;

Km

179+

220

– K

m17

9+33

0;

Km

161+

100

– K

m16

1+20

0;

Km

157+

200

– K

m15

7+40

0;

Km

154+

020

– K

m15

4+08

0,…

Som

e

6-Ju

ne, 2

012

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-5

58

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Re-

chec

k al

l cut

ting

slop

e ar

eas

in o

rder

to

appl

y m

easu

res

for

slop

es p

rote

ctio

n an

d to

pr

even

t ris

ks o

f co

llaps

es fo

r ens

urin

g th

e P

roje

ct’s

saf

ety.

- U

rgen

t act

ions

mus

t be

impl

emen

ted

by th

e C

ontra

ctor

in o

rder

to

repa

ir co

llaps

es.

- Pro

mpt

ly im

plem

ent

mea

sure

s to

slo

pe

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is m

atte

r.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

241

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

cutti

ng s

lope

s w

ere

colla

psed

, thi

s si

tuat

ion

is c

ausi

ng im

pact

to th

e P

roje

ct’s

saf

ety.

prot

ectio

n su

ch a

s: b

uild

to

p di

tch

and

to g

row

gr

ass,

etc

. - C

ompl

y w

ith M

etho

d S

tate

men

ts a

nd S

afet

y P

roje

ct P

lan

appr

oved

by

the

Eng

inee

r dur

ing

the

who

le p

roce

ss o

f co

nstru

ctio

n.

Som

e of

the

loca

l/acc

ess

road

s ar

e da

mag

ed b

y pr

ojec

t veh

icle

s ca

usin

g di

fficu

lty to

the

publ

ic

who

als

o us

e th

ese

road

s su

ch a

s: K

m17

6,

Km18

6, K

m15

1, K

m15

5,

etc.

17-M

ay, 2

012

-.GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-11-

A6-6

78

- GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-3

87

The

Con

tract

or m

ust

repa

ir lo

cal a

cces

s ro

ads

whi

ch h

ave

been

da

mag

ed d

ue to

pro

ject

-re

late

d ac

tiviti

es

(tran

spor

t of m

ater

ial,

etc.

)

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

5 –J

un,

2012

Con

tract

or

is a

pply

ing

mea

sure

s in

ord

er to

co

ntin

ue

impr

ovin

g th

is m

atte

r.

Km

157+

058.

Hou

ses

wer

e no

ted

at th

e fo

ot o

f a

stee

p ro

ad

emba

nkm

ent s

lope

. S

lope

failu

re c

ould

oc

cur,

espe

cial

ly d

urin

g he

avy

rain

s, th

at w

ill

likel

y bu

ry th

e ho

uses

(a

nd it

s oc

cupa

nts)

.

17-M

ay, 2

012

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-5

46

The

cont

ract

or m

ust:

rem

ove

as m

uch

soil

as

poss

ible

to re

duce

the

slop

e gr

adie

nt a

nd

unde

rtake

sui

tabl

e sl

ope

stab

iliza

tion

mea

sure

s su

ch a

s be

nchi

ng,

gras

sing

, etc

. at t

he

sam

e tim

e, im

prov

e ex

istin

g dr

aina

ge to

en

sure

that

sto

rm w

ater

fro

m c

ulve

rt w

ill n

ot

caus

e flo

odin

g o

f su

rrou

ndin

g ar

eas

and

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

Imm

edia

te

N

ot y

et

prov

ided

The

Con

tract

or

has

disc

usse

d w

ith lo

cal

peop

le in

or

der t

o so

lve

this

ou

tsta

ndin

g.

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

242

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Par

ty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

impa

ct o

n ne

arby

ho

uses

At K

m18

9+50

0: E

lect

ric

syst

em is

uns

afe,

eve

n el

ectri

c w

ires

have

bee

n la

id d

irect

ly o

n th

e gr

ound

, thi

s si

tuat

ion

may

cau

se u

nwan

ted

elec

tric

shoc

k ac

cide

nt

at a

ny ti

me.

17-M

ay, 2

012

GET

3-D

OO

SAN

-12-

A6-5

46

The

Con

tract

or m

ust:

- Pro

vide

ele

ctric

sys

tem

at

this

sta

tion

in o

rder

to

ensu

re th

e P

roje

ct’s

sa

fety

. - C

ompl

y w

ith th

e E

ngin

eer’s

requ

irem

ents

an

d in

stru

ctio

ns re

latin

g to

this

pro

blem

.

Doo

san

Con

tract

or

5 –J

un,

2012

Ele

ctric

w

ires

syst

em

have

bee

n pr

ovid

ed a

t th

is

loca

tion

by

the

Con

tract

or

6.2.

7 Pa

ckag

e A

7

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Man

y ru

bbis

h on

site

at

Km

194+

765;

Km

201+

815;

K

m19

5+23

3; K

m20

9+32

9 6-

Apr

il

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-650

; R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RB

CC

-653

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

co

llect

s ru

bbis

h an

d tra

nspo

rts w

aste

soi

l to

was

te d

ispo

sal

GR

BCC

30

-A

pril1

2

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

The

cont

ract

or d

umpi

ng

unsu

itabl

e m

ater

ial a

t som

e lo

catio

n, w

hich

not

app

rove

d by

co

nsul

tant

and

som

e of

ear

th

over

flow

s in

to ri

ver a

nd s

tream

at

Km

191+

300;

Km

194+

486;

K

m19

4+80

0 K

m20

9+80

0;

13-

Janu

ary

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-634

; R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RBC

C-6

48;

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-650

Req

uire

d co

ntra

ctor

to

mov

ed th

is e

arth

to

unsu

itabl

e w

aste

dis

posa

l, w

hich

was

app

rove

d by

co

nsul

tant

, and

pla

n gr

ass

to m

aint

ain

river

side

and

st

ream

GR

BCC

30

-A

pril1

2

The

cont

ract

or

has

plan

ted

gras

s at

K

m19

4+48

6;

Km

194+

800

date

23-A

pril

The

cont

ract

or

has

plan

ted

gras

s at

K

m20

9+80

0 da

te 2

9-M

ay

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

wer

e no

t im

plem

ente

d K

m19

1+30

0 an

d K

m20

1+81

5

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

243

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Km

201+

815

Labo

ur s

afet

y w

hile

the

proc

ess

of w

orki

ng a

t Km

214+

678;

K

m19

2+93

0 6-

Apr

il R

ef. G

ET4

- G

RBC

C-6

13

Req

uire

the

subc

ontra

ctor

to

rem

ind

and

prop

ose

labo

ur s

afet

y fo

r wor

kers

. If

any

wor

ker c

ontin

ues

to

viol

ate

the

regu

latio

n, w

ill

be fi

red.

GR

BCC

Im

med

iat

ely

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

No

safe

ty fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

at K

m19

2+93

0;

Km

199+

050;

Km

198+

400;

K

m21

4+67

8

6-A

pril

Ref

. GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-613

The

cont

ract

or a

re re

quire

d to

inst

all t

he s

afet

y fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

, whi

ch

can

dang

er fo

r wor

ker a

nd

com

mun

ity p

eopl

e

GR

BCC

15

-Apr

il 12

Saf

ety

fenc

e ar

ound

dee

p ho

le a

t K

m19

8+40

0 w

as in

stal

led

but n

ot m

et

stan

dard

,d

ate

24-A

pril

Not

impr

oved

at

K

m19

2+93

0;

Km

199+

050;

K

m21

4+67

8

Not

im

prov

ed a

t K

m19

2+93

0;

Km

199+

050;

K

m21

4+67

8

Con

stru

ctio

n si

te m

any

mud

and

sl

ip a

t Con

cret

e ba

tchi

ng p

lan

Km

198+

400

24-A

pril

11

Rem

inde

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

th

roug

h w

eekl

y re

port

and

wee

kly

mee

ting

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

ensu

re th

e co

nstru

ctio

n si

te d

ry a

nd c

lean

G

RBC

C

30-A

pril

12

Not

impr

oved

N

ot im

prov

ed

Not

im

prov

ed

Man

y ru

bbis

h on

site

at

Km

195+

233;

Km

211+

565;

K

m19

9+13

1

7-M

ay; 1

6-M

ay

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-650

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

co

llect

s ru

bbis

h an

d tra

nspo

rts w

aste

soi

l to

was

te d

ispo

sal

GR

BCC

D

aily

M

itiga

ting

mea

sure

s no

t im

plem

ente

d

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

No

safe

ty fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

at K

m20

0+86

2 2-

May

R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RBC

C-6

33

The

cont

ract

or a

re re

quire

d to

inst

all t

he s

afet

y fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

, whi

ch

can

dang

er fo

r wor

ker a

nd

com

mun

ity p

eopl

e

GR

BCC

M

ay 1

5th

2012

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

The

wor

ker c

amp

didn

’t lo

ok v

ery

sani

tary

at K

m21

1+56

5;

Km

209+

329;

Km

202+

400;

K

m19

8+40

0; K

m19

1+35

3

16-M

ay11

R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RBC

C-6

50

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or

supp

ly ru

bbis

h bi

n, fi

re

extin

guis

her,

first

-aid

kit,

se

ptic

tank

s fo

r toi

let.

With

to

ilet h

ave

sept

ic ta

nks

GR

BCC

M

ay 3

1st

2012

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

not

impl

emen

ted

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

244

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

mus

t be

clea

n fre

quen

cies

The

batc

hing

pla

ns h

aven

’t se

dim

ent c

ontro

l pon

d at

K

m20

9+32

9; K

m19

8+40

0;

Km

194+

765

16-M

ay11

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-650

; R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RBC

C-6

53

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or to

su

pply

the

sedi

men

t con

trol

pond

for e

ach

batc

hing

pl

an

GR

BCC

M

ay 3

1st

2012

The

cont

ract

or

had

supp

ly

the

Sed

imen

t co

ntro

l pon

d at

20-

June

at

Km

209+

329,

K

m19

8+40

0

Did

n’t s

uppl

y S

edim

ent

cont

rol p

ond

at

Km

194+

765

Did

n’t s

uppl

y S

edim

ent

cont

rol p

ond

at

Km

194+

765

Not

saf

ety

whi

le e

lect

ric w

eldi

ng

at K

m19

8+40

0 21

-May

R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RBC

C-6

50

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

ors

to

supp

ly th

e w

elde

r’s g

oggl

e fo

r and

all

wor

kers

mus

t be

wea

r the

wel

der’s

gog

gle

whi

ling

elec

tric

wel

ding

GR

BCC

Im

med

iat

ely

N

ot im

prov

ed

Not

im

prov

ed

Pla

ce to

kee

p oi

l tan

ks a

nd

was

te o

il ta

nks

didn

’t ac

cord

ing

to p

roje

ct s

tand

ard

at

Km

209+

800;

Km

209+

329;

K

m20

2+40

0; K

m19

8+40

0

16-M

ay

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-650

Req

uire

all

the

oil t

anks

an

d w

aste

oil

tank

s ke

ep in

st

ore

and

stan

d on

the

conc

rete

floo

r

GR

BCC

M

ay 3

1st

2012

Not

impr

oved

N

ot

impr

oved

Saf

ety

fenc

e ar

ound

dee

p ho

le

had

inst

alle

d bu

t not

met

st

anda

rd a

t Km

193+

379

29-M

ay

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-653

The

cont

ract

or a

re re

quire

d to

inst

all t

he s

afet

y fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

, whi

ch

can

dang

er fo

r wor

ker a

nd

com

mun

ity p

eopl

e

GR

BCC

Im

med

iat

ely

N

ot im

prov

ed

Not

im

prov

ed

Uns

uita

ble

mat

eria

l dum

ping

ne

ar R

iver

sid

e at

Km

204+

581

29-M

ay

Ref

.GE

T4-

GR

BCC

-653

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or to

m

obiliz

e th

e eq

uipm

ent t

o st

abili

ty s

lope

and

pla

nt

gras

s to

pre

vent

the

eros

ion

and

land

side

in to

be

d R

iver

.

GR

BCC

15

-Jun

e-20

12

N

ot im

prov

ed

Not

im

prov

ed

Rub

bish

dum

ping

nea

r stre

am a

t K

m19

1+35

3 29

-May

R

ef.G

ET4

-G

RBC

C-6

53

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

colle

ct a

nd tr

ansf

er to

tre

atm

ent a

rea

GR

BCC

15

-Jun

e-20

12

N

ot im

prov

ed

Not

im

prov

ed

The

mai

ntai

n ar

e no

t cov

er a

t 29

-May

R

ef.G

ET4

-R

equi

red

the

cont

ract

or

GR

BCC

15

-Jun

e-

7-

June

had

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

245

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Km

193+

379

GR

BC

C-6

53

mak

e th

e co

ver f

or

mai

ntai

n ar

ea

2012

ov

erco

me

Ear

th o

verfl

ow in

to fi

elds

at

Km

191+

350

29-M

ay

Ref

.GET

4-G

RBC

C-6

53

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

appl

y th

e sl

ope

prot

ectio

n’s

met

hod

and

com

pens

ate

the

farm

pro

duce

for

citiz

ens

GR

BCC

15

-Jun

e-20

12

N

ot im

prov

ed

Not

im

prov

ed

6.2.

8 Pa

ckag

e A

8

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Man

y ru

bbis

h on

site

at G

irder

ca

stin

g ya

rd o

f Suo

i Nhu

brid

ge

Km

218+

040;

Km

244+

570

13-A

pril

Rem

inde

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

thro

ugh

wee

kly

repo

rt an

d w

eekl

y m

eetin

g

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

co

llect

s ru

bbis

h an

d tra

nspo

rts w

aste

soi

l to

was

te d

ispo

sal

Vin

acon

ex

30-A

pril

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Was

tew

ater

and

was

te s

oil o

f th

e bo

re p

ile p

rogr

ess

had

colle

ct in

to s

edim

ent c

ontro

l po

nds

but s

edim

ent c

ontro

l po

nds

now

full

and

over

flow

on

grou

nds

at S

on H

a B

ridge

K

m22

4+36

9; L

ang

Tra

Brd

ige

Km

220+

993

13-A

pril

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex-5

34

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

clea

n ou

t the

sed

imen

t co

ntro

l pon

ds to

pre

vent

the

was

tew

ater

and

was

te s

oil

over

flow

into

stre

ams.

Vin

acon

ex

Apr

il 15

th

2012

Had

re

clea

ning

da

te 2

5-A

pril

Had

re

clea

ning

da

te 2

5-A

pril

Had

re

clea

ning

da

te 2

5-A

pril

Dan

ger s

ignp

ost a

t co

nstru

ctio

n w

orks

cro

ss th

e ex

its ro

ads

at B

ox c

ulve

rt K

m22

0+79

4; K

m23

7+95

1

13-A

pril

and

20-

Apr

il

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex-5

34

The

cont

ract

or a

re re

quire

d to

inst

all t

he s

afet

y fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

, whi

ch

can

dang

er fo

r wor

ker a

nd

com

mun

ity p

eopl

e

Vin

acon

ex

Imm

edia

tely

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Labo

ur s

afet

y w

hile

the

proc

ess

of w

orki

ng a

t K

m22

0+99

3;

13, 2

0, 2

5-A

pril

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex-5

34

Req

uire

the

subc

ontra

ctor

to

rem

ind

and

prop

ose

labo

ur s

afet

y fo

r wor

kers

. If

Vin

acon

ex

Imm

edia

tely

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

246

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

Km

231+

889;

Km

237+

951;

K

m24

4+57

0; K

m22

3+70

5;

Km

238+

265;

Km

233+

540

any

wor

ker c

ontin

ues

to

viol

ate

the

regu

latio

n, w

ill

be fi

red.

Was

te s

oil k

eep

on th

e si

te a

t K

m23

1+88

9 20

-Apr

il R

ef. G

ET4

- V

inac

onex

-534

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

trans

port

the

was

te s

oil t

o un

suita

ble

mat

eria

l was

te

disp

osal

whi

ch w

as

appr

oved

by

cons

ulta

nt

Vin

acon

ex

Apr

il 30

th

2012

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

The

Son

Hai

wor

ker’s

cam

p do

n’t h

ave

rubb

ish

bin

at

Km

227+

065

25-A

pril

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex-5

34

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

inst

all t

he ru

bbis

h bi

n to

co

llect

and

tran

sfer

do

mes

tics

was

te to

tre

atm

ent a

re a

ccor

ding

to

loca

l reg

ulat

ion

Vin

acon

ex

Apr

il 30

th

2012

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Saf

ety

for g

as ta

nks

and

oxy

tank

s at

Km

218+

040

25-A

pril

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex-5

34

Lim

it di

stan

ce fo

r gas

tank

s an

d ox

y ta

nks

is 3

m a

nd

neve

r tra

nsfe

r tog

ethe

r gas

ta

nks

and

oxy

tank

s

Vin

acon

ex

Imm

edia

tely

O

verc

ome

imm

edia

tel

y

Saf

ety

for g

as ta

nks

and

oxy

tank

s at

Km

238+

265

4-M

ay

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

49

Lim

it di

stan

ce fo

r gas

tank

s an

d ox

y ta

nks

is 3

m a

nd

neve

r tra

nsfe

r tog

ethe

r gas

ta

nks

and

oxy

tank

s

Vin

acon

ex

Imm

edia

tely

Ove

rcom

e im

med

iate

ly

The

cons

truct

ion

wor

ks n

ot ti

dy

and

man

y ru

bbis

h on

site

at

Km

244+

155

16-M

ay

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

65;

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or to

ar

rang

e th

e co

nstru

ctio

n w

ork

and

colle

ct a

nd

clas

sific

atio

n ac

cord

ing

to

regu

latio

n

Vin

acon

ex

May

31st

20

12

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

The

wor

ker c

amp

didn

’t lo

ok

very

san

itary

at K

m24

4+15

5;

Km

238+

265;

Km

218+

040;

K

m22

0+99

3

16-M

ay

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

65;

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or

supp

ly ru

bbis

h bi

n, fi

re

extin

guis

her,

first

-aid

kit,

se

ptic

tank

s fo

r toi

let.

With

to

ilet h

ave

sept

ic ta

nks

mus

t be

clea

n fre

quen

cies

Vin

acon

ex

May

31st

20

12

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

The

batc

hing

pla

ns h

aven

’t 16

-May

R

ef. G

ET4

- R

equi

re th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

Vin

acon

ex

May

31st

C

BP

s ha

ve

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

247

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

sedi

men

t con

trol p

ond

at

Km

218+

040;

Km

238+

265;

K

m23

1+88

9

Vin

acon

ex- 5

65;

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

supp

ly th

e se

dim

ent c

ontro

l po

nd fo

r eac

h ba

tchi

ng p

lan

2012

se

dim

ent

cont

rol p

ond

at th

ese

loca

tions

, da

te 1

4-Ju

ne

Pla

ce to

kee

p oi

l tan

ks a

nd

was

te o

il ta

nks

didn

’t ac

cord

ing

to p

roje

ct s

tand

ard

at

Km

244+

155;

Km

229+

034;

K

m21

8+04

0;

16-M

ay

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

65;

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

Req

uire

all

the

oil t

anks

and

w

aste

oil

tank

s ke

ep in

st

ore

and

stan

d on

the

conc

rete

floo

r

Vin

acon

ex

May

31st

20

12

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Uns

uita

ble

mat

eria

l dum

ping

ne

ar s

tream

at K

m23

1+88

9 16

-May

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

65;

Ref

. GET

4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or to

m

obiliz

e th

e eq

uipm

ent t

o st

abili

ty s

lope

and

pla

nt

gras

s to

pre

vent

the

eros

ion

and

land

side

in to

stre

am.

Vin

acon

ex

May

31st

20

12

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Not

saf

ety

at U

nder

pass

box

cu

lver

t at K

m24

4+15

5 16

-May

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

65;

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or to

in

stal

l the

sig

npos

t, fe

nce

and

mak

e tre

nch

at th

at

cons

truct

ion

wor

k cr

oss

exis

t roa

d

Vin

acon

ex

May

31st

20

12

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Era

th fr

om e

mba

nkm

ent r

oad

over

flow

into

4E

road

at

Km

230+

237-

Km

230+

660

30

-May

R

ef. G

ET4

- V

inac

onex

- 569

The

cont

ract

or a

re re

quire

d to

cle

ar a

nd a

pply

ing

the

slop

e pr

otec

tion’

s m

etho

d to

av

oid

land

side

into

4E

road

Vin

acon

ex

15-J

une

2012

Ear

th

rem

oved

ou

t of 4

E

road

dat

e 1-

June

The

cons

truct

ion

wor

ks n

ot ti

dy

and

man

y ru

bbis

h on

site

at

Km

218+

040;

Km

224+

369

6-Ju

ne

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

Req

uire

the

cont

ract

or to

ar

rang

e th

e co

nstru

ctio

n w

ork

and

colle

ct a

nd

clas

sific

atio

n ac

cord

ing

to

regu

latio

n

Vin

acon

ex

30-J

une

2012

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Era

th o

verfl

ow in

to p

onds

and

la

kes

at K

m22

2+50

0;

Km

223+

000

6-Ju

ne

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

67

Req

uire

d th

e co

ntra

ctor

to

appl

y th

e sl

ope

prot

ectio

n’s

met

hod

and

com

pens

ate

the

farm

pro

duce

for

Vin

acon

ex

As

soon

as

poss

ibly

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Loan

239

1/23

92 –

VIE

: GM

S K

unm

ing

– H

ai P

hong

Tra

nspo

rt C

orrid

or

Noi

Bai

– L

ao C

ai H

ighw

ay P

roje

ct

248

Prob

lem

des

crip

tion

and

caus

e D

ate

first

ob

serv

ed

Act

ion

by

Engi

neer

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

Stat

us

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Res

pons

ible

Pa

rty

Dea

dlin

e A

pril

May

Ju

ne

citiz

ens

Saf

ety

fenc

e ar

ound

dee

p ho

le

had

inst

alle

d bu

t not

met

st

anda

rd a

t Km

232+

437

21-J

une

Ref

. GE

T4-

Vin

acon

ex- 5

66

The

cont

ract

or a

re re

quire

d to

inst

all t

he s

afet

y fe

nce

arou

nd d

eep

hole

, whi

ch

can

dang

er fo

r wor

ker a

nd

com

mun

ity p

eopl

e

Vin

acon

ex

30-J

une

2012

N

ot y

et

Impr

oved

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

249

7 GRIEVANCE INTAKES. PUBLIC CONSULTATION

As Annex 2 we include some grievance intakes (public consultations), written in a form sheet by Consultant, about complaints which were expressed by local people affected by the construction works, to the environmental or social impact specialists.

As Annex 3 there is included the information about the instructions given to contractors in order to establish a “complaints communication system” for local people. Although in some packages it was already implemented, the Engineer did not receive any complaint yet.

It’s supposed that these are not the only existing complaints, but the only ones received or collected by Consultant.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

250

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

251

ANNEX 1: PHOTOGRAPHIC REPORT

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

PACKAGE A1

� ������� �� ���������������� ���������!"#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����!�� ��>��*��?���������@����@���� ����Z �� �* �� *�� ������!"#!$�!%[��������\]!=

� ����^�] *>�������?� ��������������!"#!$�!

%-_$`{{|}-_^`$$$=� ������� �� ���������������� ���������!"#

!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� ����|��� ��������� ��� ������!"#!$�!%&�_���*�&> ��-�<� �*�=

� ����{�� �������������� �� ��������� ������!"#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!

� ����"�������� �������� � ������!"#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=� ������&���> �� ��������*���������!"#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ������������� �������� � ������!"#!$�!

%&���� <� �*�=� �����$�����������_� �� ���@ �>����>�������� �*����!"#!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� �������� �� ���������������� ���������$^#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� �����!�� �� ���������������� ���������$^#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^

� �����^�� ��������*���������$^#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ��������� ��������� ��� ������$^#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� �����|�<��� � �*���� �������� � ������$^#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� �����{�&���> �� �������������� �*����$^#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� �����"�<��� � �*���� �������� � ������$^#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� �������&���> �� �������������� �*����$^#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

� �������� ��������*����������$#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����!$�� ��������*����������$#!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� ����!��<��� � �*���� �������� � �������$#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����!!������ � �*���� �������� � �������$#!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� ����!^�� �� ���������������� ����������"#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����!��] *>�������?� ���������������"#!$�!%-_�`"$$}-_{`$$$=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|

� ����!|�] *>�������?� ���������������"#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� ����!{�] *>�������?� ���������������"#!$�!%-_�{`$$$}-_��`$$$=

� ����!"�� ��>��*��?���������@����@���� ��� �� *�� ��

����������"#!$�!%[��������\]!=

� ����!��� ��������*��������@������� �>�����������������_���*�_��������"#!$�!

%&���� <� �*�=

� ����!��� ��������*��������@������� �>�����������������_���*�_��������"#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����^$��� ��������� ����������� ��� �������"#!$�!%&�_���*�&> ��-�<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{

� ����^����� _�������� ���������������!�#!$�!

%[��������\]!=� ����^!�] *>�������?� ��������������!�#!$�!

%-_$`{{|}-_^`$$$=

� ����^^��_������ �� �_���*�_�������!�#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����^��&���> �� �������������� �*����!�#!$�!%�� ����*<� �*�=

� ����^|������ ��������>��������!�#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� ����^{���� _������ � ��� �*���������������$^#!$�!%[��������\]!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"

� ����^"��_������ �� �_���*�_�������$^#!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����^���_������ �� �_���*�_�������$^#!$�!%�� ����*<� �*�=

� ����^�������� ���� ���� ������$^#!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� �����$���������� �� ��� �* _����������$^#!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� �������� �� �� ��������� ������$^#!$�!%&�_���*�&> ��-�<� �*�=

� �����!�� �� ���������������� ���������$�#

!$�!%<�&> ��<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

� �����^��_������ �� �_���*�_�������$�#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ��������_������ �� �_���*�_�������$�#!$�!

%<�&> ��<� �*�=

� �����|����_���? ����� �� �����$^#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=� �����{�&���> �� �������������� �*@�������

��_�����$�#!$�!%�� ����*<� �*�=

� �����"��� ��������� ����������� ��� ������!!#

!$�!%&�_���*�&> ��-�<� �*�=

� �������� ���� �� ��� �*@��>���@������!!#

!$�!%�����>���*<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

� �������&���>@����������� ������!!#!$�!%��

����*<� �*�=� ����|$�&���>@����������� ������!!#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����|�������?���??����������������$^#!$�!

%�����>���*<� �*�=� ����|!������?�����@�������$^#!$�!%����

�>���*<� �*�=

� ����|^������?�����@�������$^#!$�!%&����

<� �*�=

� ����|�������?��?����������$^#!$�!

%<�&> ��<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$

� ����||�[���?�@���@������$^#!$�!

%&���� <� �*�=

� ����|{������ ������?��������!!#!$�!

%<�&> ��<� �*�=

� ����|"������?��?����������$^#!$�!%������>��*�

\��^=� ����|��� ����� ��>��*��?���������@����@����

������ ��*�����!�#!$�!%[��������\]!=

� ����|���_������ �� �_���*�_�������!�#!$�!

%���^=� ����{$�� ���� �� ��� �*@��>���@������!�#

!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ����{�������?�����@�������!�#!$�!%[��������\]!=

� ����{!������?��������?�������������??�����@�������!�#!$�!%&���� <� �*�=

� ����{^��� ��������� ��� ������!�#!$�!%&�_���*�&> ��-�<� �*�=

� ����{��&>������?� ���*����������$|#!$�!%<��<� �*�=

� ����{|��� ������������ ��� �������$|#!$�!

%- _��><� �*�=

� ����{{������?�����@��������$|#!$�!

%- _��><� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!

� ����{"�[���?����??��������$|#!$�!

%<��<� �*�=� ����{�������?�����@��������$|#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����{���_������ �� �_���*�_���������!#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� ����"$��_������ �� �_���*�_���������!#!$�!%������>��*�\��^=

� ����"���_������ �� �_���*�_���������!#!$�!

%&�^$!��<� �*�=

� ����"!��� ���������������� ���������!#!$�!

%[��������\]!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^

� ����"^������� ������ ��������!#!$�!

%&���� <� �*�=

� ����"��� ��������*������������#!$�!

%������>��*�\��^=

� ����"|������?����@�����? ��������������?��� _���

��� ��������#!$�!%[��������\]!=

� ����"{������������� �� �_���*�_����������#

!$�!%&���*- ��<� �*�=

� ����""�����������_� �� ���@ �>����>�������#!$�!

%&���*- ��<� �*�=� ����"������� �������� �*�����������#!$�!

%������>��*�\��^=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

PACKAGE A2

� ��!���� �� ���������������� ���������!�#!$�!

%-_^�`!$$=

� ��!�!�<�����?�������������@ �>�����������?�����

�> ���������!�#!$�!%��������*<� �*�=

� ��!�^�<�����?��������!�#!$�!

%��������*<� �*�=

� ��!���[���?�����������!�#!$�!

%���*���<� �*�=

� ��!�|�[���?�@���@������!�#!$�!

%<�����<� �*�=

� ��!�{�[���?�����������!�#!$�!

%<�����<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�|

� ��!�"�<����?�����������@�������!�#!$�!%���*

���<� �*�=

� ��!��������?��?����������$�#!$�!%<��&��

<� �*�=

� ��!���[���?�@���@������$�#!$�!%���*���

<� �*�=

� ��!��$������?��?������������#!$�!%��_����

<� �*�=

� ��!����[���?�@���@����������?>����� �

�������� �*�>���*��?��������������#!$�!%&�^�$<� �*�=

� ��!��!�[���?����??���������#!$�!

%��_����<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�{

� ��!��^�[���?�@���@��������#!$�!

%� �������� ���<� �*�=

� ��!����<���������?��?�����@���������#!$�!

%����*���<� �*�=

� ��!��|������?�����@���������#!$�!%����*���

<� �*�=

� ��!��{�[���?�����?��_?��@������������#!$�!

%����*���<� �*�=

� �� !��"� [������� ��������� @���� ��� � !|# !$�! %��� ���<� �*�<� �*�=

�� ��!������������� �� ��� �* _����������$�#!$�!%<�����<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�"

�� ��!���������?��@ ��� �*�����������$�#!$�!

%����*���<� �*�=

�� ��!�!$�[��� �����_���� �� ��� �*� ��������� ���

���$�#!$�!%���\��{=�

� ��!�!���_������ �� �_���*�_�������$�#!$�!%���

\��{=

�� ��!�!!�� �� ���������������� ���������$�#!$�!

%-_�!`!$$=

� ��!�!^��_������ �� �_���*�_�������$�#!$�!%��

� ���<� �*�=

� ��!�!��] *>�������?� ��������������$�#!$�!

%����*�>���*>@��=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ��!�!|������?��@ ��� �*�����������$�#!$�!

%<��&��<� �*�=

� ��!�!{������?��@ ��� �*������������ _����� ���

���$�#!$�!%<�����<� �*�=

� ��!�!"�] *>� ���?���� ������$�#!$�!%-_^�`"�$

}-_^|`$$$=

� ��!�!��� ����� ��>��*��?���������@����@���� ���

� �������$�#!$�!%<�����<� �*�=

� ��!�!������ ��������� ���������������$�#!$�!

%-_�!`�$$}-_�!`{"$=

� ��!�^$�\���� ��*����������?���� ������������

���$�#!$�!%-_�!`{!$=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ��!�^���� ��������� ��@���������_�����$�#!$�!

%<��&��<� �*�=

�� ��!�^!�� �� ��� �*��������������� ����������"#

!$�!%-_^�`"�$=

�� ��!�^^�� �������?�� � ���� �������!�#!$�!

%<�����<� �*�=

�� ��!�^��&���> �� ������ _������������!�#!$�!

%����*���<� �*�=�

�� ��!�^|���������� ��� �� �� ���@ �>����>����!!#

!$�!%��_����<� �*�=

�� ��!�^{�[�� ����������� ��� ������!!#!$�!

%<��&��<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!$

� ��!�^"������?�����@�������$�#!$�!%����*

���<� �*�=

� ��!�^�������?��?����������$�#!$�!

%��� ���<� �*�=

� ��!�^�������?�����@�������$�#!$�!%[��������

��Z�������-_�$`{|$=

� ��!��$������?��?����������$�#!$�!

%<�����<� �*�=

� ��!���������?��?����������$�#!$�!

%��_���<� �*�=

� ��!��!��> ������������ �*��� ������!�#!$�!

%����*���<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!�

� ��!��^������?�����@�������!�#!$�!%����*

���<� �*�=

�� ��!����� �� ��� �*��������������� ������

���^�#!$�!%&�^${��<� �*�=

�� ��!��|��� ������������ ��� ������^�#!$�!

%&�^${��<� �*�=

�� ��!��{�<����� �����������������������������? �������^�#!$�!%&�^${��<� �*�=

�� ��!��"���������������_����������?

��� ��*�����^�#!$�!%-_�!`{!$=

�� ��!�������� ��������� � ���������������

^�#!$�!%-_�!`!$$}-_�!`{"$=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!!

�� ��!�������� ��������� � ���������������

^�#!$�!%-_�!`!$$}-_�!`{"$=�

�� ��!�|$�[��� �����_���� �� ��� �*� ������

��� ������^�#!$�!%���{=�

�� ��!�|��[��� �����_���� �� ��� �*� ������

��� ������^�#!$�!%���{=�

�� ��!�|!�[����������??�������^�#!$�!

%<�����<� �*�=

�� ��!�|^������ ��?��������������${#!$�!

%&�^${�<� �*�=

�� ��!�|��&���� �*�?� ���������� ����������

${#!$�!%&�^${��<� �*�=�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!^

�� ��!�||��_������ �� �_���*�_��������${#

!$�!%&�^${��<� �*�=

�� ��!�|{������?��@ ��� �*������������${#

!$�!%����*���<� �*�=

�� ��!�|"�[���?�@���@�������${#!$�!%����*���<� �*�=

�� ��!�|��\�@��� _�������@���Z��������

����${#!$�!%�<�!�?��� ���<� �*�=�

�� ��!�|���� �����_�@ �>����>�����${#!$�!

%����*���<� �*�=

� ��!�{$�<����� �� �� ��>��*�� ��������

? ���������^#!$�!%&�^${��<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!�

� ��!�{��] *>�������?� ����������������^#

!$�!%-_�!`!$$}-_�|`$$$=

� ��!�{!����� ��������� ��??� ���������#

!$�!%-_!"`{!$=

� ��!�{^��Z �� �*��� ��*�@�������������� �������� _����� ���������#!$�!%-_!"`{!$=

� ��!�{���������� ��� �*�������@ �>�� �

?��_�_����_����������#!$�!%-_!"`{!$=

� ��!�{|������ ��?���������������^#!$�!

%&�^${�<� �*�=

� ��!�{{������?����� ��?������ *���������

� *>� �*�����_������^#!$�!%&�^${�<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!|

� ��!�{"������?����� ��?������ *���������

� *>� �*�����_������^#!$�!%&�^${�<� �*�=

� ��!�{��[���?�@���@��������^#!$�!

%� ��{���� ���<� �*�=

� ��!�{������������_����� ������ ���@ �>

����>�����!$#!$�!%����*���<� �*�=

� ��!�"$�����������_����� ������ ���@ �>

����>�����!$#!$�!%����*���<� �*�=

� ��!�"���_������ �� ��_��_���*�_��������

!$#!$�!%����*���<� �*�=

� ��!�"!�< ��_���������*����������!$#

!$�!%����*���<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!{

� ��!�"^�� ������?��� ���� �������!$#!$�!

%������>��*�\��{=

� ��!�"���Z����������� �*���������!$#!$�!

%<���>�������-_^�`!$$=

� ��!�"|���_����� ��������������� ��?��_�����? ��������!$#!$�!%&�^${��<� �*�=

� ��!�"{������ ��?����#� *���������� *>� �*�����_@��� �������������!$#!$�!%&�^${��

<� �*�=

� ��!�""���������>�?�������� *�����������_�

����!$#!$�!%&�^${�<� �*�=

� ��!�"�������?����� ��?����#� *���������� *>� �*�����_������^#!$�!%&�^$|<� �*�=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!"

PACKAGE A3

� ��^��������������@�������?����^���� ����� �*�%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ��^�!������� �@ ��@���� ���*��������^���� ����� �*�%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ��^�^�������@�������?����!���� ����� �*�%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ��^���@����@��������� ���������@> �>@���>��@��?���@��> �*�������#@���>��@� ����>�������

\�� ������ �@��?�������� �*�%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ��^�|� ������������Z@�������?���\�� ������ �@��

?�������� �*�%��������� �|�>#!$�!=

� ��^�{������� �@ ��@���� ���*�������\�� ������ �@��?�������� �*�%��������� �|�>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!�

� ��^�"�?���������� ��@�������?���<� <��*�� �*�

%��������� �|�>#!$�!=

� ��^�������?���� *������� �������� ������@���

��������� ��� �����������������>��*�>���� �*�%��������� �|�>#!$�!=

� ��^���� ����_�@�����������@>��� �� ��@ �>���

��?���_������-_{�`�$$%��������� �|�>#!$�!=

� ��^��$��� �@��?�����_��>���Z �� �*����

-_|�`�$$%��������� ��!�>#!$�!=

� ��^���� �� *�� �������@�����������?������� ����

���� �>-_|�`�$$%��������� ��!�>#!$�!=

� ��^��!�@������ ���������?������������%������

��� ��!�>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

!�

� ��^��^� �>�� ����@��?������������������� ��� ��

-_|�`�$$%��������� ��!�>#!$�!=

� ��^��������������� ��@�������?���<� <��*

�� �*�%��������� ��!�>#!$�!=

� ��^��|���� *�����@��������� �������� ��

����@������������ ��� ���������������>��*�>���� �*�%��������� ��!�>#!$�!=

� ��^��{�\�������������#�����??���#��?����

������ ��?��@������%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ��^��"������� ������_@���������*����������

� ����� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ��^����\�������� �������@�������?���> �_��> ��

����&>��>�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^$

� ��^����\���?���>����� �@����������^���� ���

�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ��^�!$�@�����@������*���������>� *>�<� <��*

�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ��^�!������ �>@��_��> �� �����%��������� �

���>#!$�!=

� ��^�!!�@�����@������*���������>� *>����� ���

�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ��^�!^������� �������� �� ������?�#�!���� ���

�� �*�#��� �!{�>#!$�!

� ��^�!���Z �� �*����@�������������������� � � ��#

-_"|`�$$#��� �!{�>#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^�

� ��^�!|��������� �> �� ��#&�^!|<�� �*�#

��� �!{�>#!$�!

� ��^�!{�@ �>��������� �����Z#-_{{`��|#���^��#

!$�!

� ��^�!"�?�������� ����������������� ����#

&�^�|<�� �*�#���^��#!$�!

� ��^�!��\�>����� �?���������� �*�#������ ���

�� �*�#���^��#!$�!

� ��^�!��\�������������?��@��� �*#����

&>��>�� �*�#������>#!$�!

� ��^�^$����������������?����#���$#������>#

!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^!

� ��^�^��� �@���� ���������*�����#���$#���

���>#!$�!

� ��^�^!�������� ���������?�������@>��>�@���

��>� *>�#�|���� ����� �*�#������>#!$�!

� ��^�^^�\��� �������?���_��>��?��@�����

@>���>��@�����>� *>�#�|���� ����� �*�#������>#!$�!

� ��^�^��� ����_�@�����������@>��� �� ��#�|

���� ����� �*�#���!���#!$�!

� ��^�^|��������� �> �� ��#�|���� ���

�� �*�#���!���#!$�!

� ��^�^{������� ������_@�������?�#�|���� ���

�� �*�#���!���#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^^

� ��^�^"�\�?������_ � _ ���� �������@��

� ��� �����_��> ��>�� ����Z �� �*����#������ ����� �*�#���!���#!$�!

� ��^�^���������� �>@�� �?�����?@���������_�#

@���������_������^���� ����� �*�#���!���#!$�!

� ��^�^���������������@����@����?��_

��_�������> �*��������> ���� _����������>���#�^���� ����� �*�#���!���#!$�!

� ��^��$��>���� _����������>�����-_{"`"$$����������*���*����#-_{"`"$$#���!���#!$�!

� ��^����������� �����������#-�{"`"$$#

���!���#!$�!

� ��^��!�������� �����������#&�^�|<�� �*�#

���!���#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^�

PACKAGE A4

� �������� �@���������Z �� �*�����������@��

� ��� �����_��> ��>�� ���-_�{`"$$%����>!��>#!$�!=

� ����!�������� ���������?�����������

-_�{`"$$%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ����^�@������ ���������?�������@>���>��@�������>� *>�-_�"`�!�\*� ����� �*�%����������>!��>#

!$�!=

� ������������ ��@������?��@�� ���� ������>��*>�������������� ����> �� ���� ��-_�"`�!�\*� ���

�� �*�%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ����|��� �@��?�����_��>���Z �� �*�����������

@��� ��� �����_��>���������-_��`�$$%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ����{�_��������� �>@���>��@� ��������� �� *�� �������-_��`�$$%����������>!��>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^|

� ����"�_��@�������� ����> ��������-_��`�$$

%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ������������ ������_@�������?���-_��`�$$

%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� �������� �@���������Z �� �*�����������@��

� ��� �����_��>�����������-_�$�`$!|%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� �����$������� ������_@�������?���-_�$"`|^^%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� ��������� �@���������Z �� �*�����������@��

� ��� �����_��> ��>�� ���-_�$"`|^^%����������>!��>#!$�!=

� �����!��� �@��?��������Z �� �*�����������@��� ��� �����_��> ��>�� �-_��`�$$%��������� ���>#

!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^{

� �����^�[��� �����_���� ��@�������_�������� ��

-_�$"`|^^%��������� ���>#!$�!=

� ��������� �@��?��������Z �� �*�����������@��� ��� �����_��> ��>�� �-_�$�`$!|%��������� �

��>#!$�!=

� �����|������� �@ ��@���� ������@��_��-_�$"`|^^

%��������� ����>#!$�!=� �����{���� *�����@��������� �������� ��

���@������������������������ ��� �������@��� ��� �����_��>���������-_�$"`|^^%��������� �

���>#!$�!=

� �����"������ ��@�������?���\*� ����� �*�%������

��� ����>#!$�!=

� ������������� ������_@�������?���\*� ���

�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^"

� ���������� *�����@�� ���������� �������� �����@���

��������������������� ��� ��-_�{`"$$%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ����!$�@���������_�� ����������� ���#? ���Z� �*� �>��#? ���� ���Z&�^!��-_��`�$$%������

��� ����>#!$�!=

� ����!������ �>@��_��> �� ��\*� ����� �*�

%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ����!!��� ����������@��?��������� ���\*� ���

� ���%��������� ����>#!$�!=

� ����!^������� ������_@���������*�����\*� ���

�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=� ������������ ����������@����>��@������@>���

�� ��\*� � ��>�� �*�%��������� ����>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^�

� ����!|��� �@��?������������Z �� �*����������@��� ��� �����_��>���������-_�$"`|^^%��������� �!|�>#

!$�!=

� ����!{����� �����_���� ��@��� ����� �� ��_�������-_�$"`|^^%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ����!"��� �@��?������������Z �� �*����������@��� ��� �����_��>���������-_�$�`$$$%��������� �!|�>#

!$�!=

� ����!��_��@�������� ���\*� ���� ���%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ����!��@������ ���������?���������%>��_��=��\*�

����� �*�-_�$�`$!|%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=� ����^$��� �@��?����� ���\*� ���� ���%������

��� �!|�>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

^�

� ����^���� ���������� ���� ��@�������_����

����������# ������ ��������?� ������-_�"`�!�\*� ����� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ����^!������� �@ ��@���� ���*�����-_�"`�!�\*� ����� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ����^^���������@����� ����������?�������

-_�"`�!�\*� ����� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=� ����^�������� ������_@�������?�-_�"`�!�

\*� ����� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ����^|�_��@��?����� �� *�� �������&�^!���� �*�

%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=� ����^{�� *�����@������������ �������� ��

���@������������������������ ��� ��-_�"`�!�\*� ����� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$

� ����^"��� ��������������� ��_���>�?��?� ������

\*� � ��>� ���%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=� ����^��� ����_�@��������� ���*���� �������

@ �>��?���_��>��\*� � ��>� ���%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ����^�������� ������_@�������?�\*� � ��>� ���

%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=� �����$������� ��@��������� ������ ���\*�

� ��>� ���%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� �������_��������� �>��������>��Z �� �* �� *�� ��

�������-_��`�$$&�^!���� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=� �����!��� �@��?������������Z �� �*����������@��� ��� �����_��>���������-_��`�$$&�^!��

�� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� �����^������� ������_@�������?�-_��`�$$&�^!��

�� �*�%��������� �!|�>#!$�!=

� ������������� ���@ ��@���� ���@��*�����#

��^!�������#�����>#!$�!

� �����|�������� �����������#\*� ����� �*�#���

��>#!$�!

� �����{�_��@���>��@� ���\*� ���� ���#\*�

����� �*�#�����>#!$�!

� �����"�_������� �@��?������Z �� �*�����\�

� *�����>���#-_��`"$$#�����>#!$�!

� �������_��@�������� ����> ������#-_��`�$$#

����$�>#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!

� �������������� �����������#��_\��*�� �*�#���

�$�>#!$�!

� ����|$������� ������_@���������*�����#

-_�$"`|^^#����$�>#!$�!

� ����|��������� �����������#-_�$"`|^^#����$�>#

!$�!

� ����|!�������� �����������#-_�$�`|$$#���

���>#!$�!

� ����|^����� �>@��_��>��@���������_�#

-_�$�`|$$#������>#!$�!

� ����|��]�����@����� ��#? ���Z� �*� �>�����

? ���� �� �#-_�$�`|$$#������>#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^

� ����||��� �@��?����� ���� ���#-_�"`�!�\�� ���

�� �*�#������>#!$�!

� ����|{�@����@��������� ���_�������?��@��

*�����#-_��`^$$��_�������> �*�����#������>#!$�!

� ����|"���� _����������>���@������_���#-_��`^$$

��_�������> �*�����#������>#!$�!

� ����|���� �@��@��>��� ���? ���#-_�$�`!$$#

������>#!$�!

� ����|���� �@��@��>��� ���? ���#-_�$^`�$$#���

���>#!$�!

� ����{$�������� �����������#\*� � ��>

�� �*�#������>#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ����{��� ����_�@����������@>��� �� ��#\*�

� ��>�� �*�#������>#!$�!

� ����{!������� �����_��@�������� ��������#

&�^!���� �*�#������>#!$�!

� ����{^������� ������ ��@�������?�#&�^!��

-_��`�$$#���!|�>#!$�!

� ����{�������� ������_@�������?�#&�^!��

-_��`�$$#���!|�>#!$�!

� ����{|�� ����_�@�������*�����@ �>����� �?������

��������#&�^!��-_��`�$$#���!|�>#!$�!

� ����{{����� �>@��?��� �� �������Z���@�������

��_�#&�^!���� �*�#���!|�>#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�|

PACKAGE A5

� ��|������������ ��� �� ��������@ �>���� �����#����>�����������>����� �������������?���� *��#

-_�!^`�{$#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!���?���?����������?���� *�������������

_��� �*�>�������������� ��_������\*� ����� �*�#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^���?���?����������?���� *�������� ��>���������� ������������������� ��� ���?��^��� �*�#

���>���#!$�!�

� ��|������������ ��� �� ����� ����������#\*�

����� �*�#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�|�������������?�������@>��>�@������

�>�� ��#�> � �����?�#\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|�{���?���?���������?���� *��������� ��>���������� ��������?��������������� ��� ���?\*� ���

�� �*�#�������� �*��?���#!��>��� �#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�{

� ��|�"�&>��� ���������?���?������?��� �*>����

�?\*� ����� �*�#�������� �*��?���#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|������������ ��� �� ��������@ �>���� �����#

����>������������� ��>����� �������������?���� *��#-_�!^`�{$#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|�����?���?���������?���� *��������� ��>���������� ��������?��������������� ��� ���?\*� ���

�� �*�#�������� �*��?���#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|��$���������� ��� �� ��������@ �>���� �����#

����>������������� ��>����� �������������?���� *��#-_��|`!!$#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|������?���?���������?���� *��������� ��>���������� ��������?��������������� ��� ���?\*� &> ��� �*�#�������� �*��?���#!��>��� �#

!$�!�

� ��|��!���?���� *������ ��������# � ����

_��� �*�>������������?���#\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�"

� ��|��^���?���� *������ ��������# � ����

_��� �*�>������������?���#\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|���������� �@ �������_ �����?�#

��������� ��� ���?\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|��|������? ���? *>� �*#�Z���� ����������*�

������� ����� �_����>�������������� �����?�������� �*����#\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|��{����������>�������������� ���������>�*�����#��������� ��� ���?\*� &> ��� �*�#!��>��� �#

!$�!�

� ��|��"������? ���? *>� �*#�Z���� ����������*�������� ����� �_����>�������������� �����

?�������� �*����#\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|����&>������������������>���������

�������@ �>��������� �*_���� ������������� ��#-_�!^`�{$#!��>��� �#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ��|����<����� ��� ��>�����������������������������>�������������� �*��������� ��#

��������� ��� ���?\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|�!$�<����� ��� ��>�����������������������������>�������������� �*��������� ��#��������� ��� ��

�?\*� ����� �*�#!��>��� �#!$�!�

� ��|�!������� ���?��� ��*�������������������

����_��� �*�>��������@����?��@��� �*�� ������#\*� ����� �*�#|�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!!������ ���?��� ��*�������������������

����_��� �*�>��������@����?��@��� �*�� ������#\*� ����� �*�#|�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!^��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

�������������������?�����������#-_��"`"^�#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!���� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

����*� �������������?�����������#-_��"`�"�#���>���#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ��|�!|��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

�������������������?�����������#-_��"`�"�#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!{��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

�������������������?�����������#-_��"`"!$#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!"��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

����*� �������������?�����������#-_��"#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!���� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

����*� �������������?�����������#-_��{#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�!��<���� �� ��� � �* ����>������_#����>�

�� �*�� ��#�{�>���#!$�!

� ��|�^$�&>�����������>��������� �����

_������� ��������������������� ��#����>��� �*�� ��#�{�>���#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|$

� ��|�^��&>������������������@������������

@ �>��������� �*_���� �������������� ��#-_��"#���>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^!�&>������������������@������������@ �>

��������� �*_���� �������������� ��#-_���#�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^^��� �?��_��������� ��� ���� � �* ���

���� ������#��^"�� �*�#�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^��&>������������������������_������� ��������_ � _ ����� �*��������� ��#-_�!^`{�$#

�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^|����� � ���?��_�?��@������ ����*���

\*� ����� �*�-_�^$`��$#�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^{��������� �������?�������%�����?

>��_��=@>���>��@������>�� ��#\*� ����� �*�#�"�>���#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|�

� ��|�^"��������� �������?�������%�����?>��_��#��?����>���=@>���>��@������>�� ��#

����>��� �*�#�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^���������� �������?�������%�����?

>��_��#��?����>���=@>���>��@������>�� ��#\*� &> ��� �*�#�"�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�^����?���?���������?���� *�������@���

��� �����������>������������������������#-_���#�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|��$���?���?���������?���� *�������@������

�����������>������������������������#-_��{#�{�>���#!$�!�

� ��|����&>��������� _�����_���� ��>�

������������?������������?�������� �*�����#\*� &> ��� �*�#�"�>���#!$�!�

� ��|��!�&>�������������*>@��� �*� *������

��������� ��� ��-_��|`��$#!^�����#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|!

� ��|��^�&>��Z��� ��� ��� ��@ �>> *>�����#@ �>

� ����?�� � �*���� _��������� �*�>���?���#-_���`!!$���^���#!$�!�

� ��|����&>�@������@��� �*��>� *>�@ �>��������������� ����� �_����#\�^"�� �*�#!|�>����#!$�!�

� ��|��|�&>���?���� *����������������_����� �� ��������# � ����_��� �*�>�������������� ��_����#

\�^"�� �*�#!|�>����#!$�!�

� ��|��{�&>���?���� *����������������_����� �� ��������# � ����_��� �*�>�������������� ��_����#

\�^"�� �*�#!|�>����#!$�!�

� ��|��"���������� ��_���� ��������� �*?����� �

�> �� ��#\�^"�� �*�#!|�>����#!$�!�

� ��|����&>���������������������� ��� ������ �*

������������������ �*�?��> �������> �������������@ �*��@��>����� ���������#\�^"�� �*�#

!|�>����#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|^

� ��|����&>��������������?���?��������

� *������������ ��*�� ���������#-_���#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|$�&>��������������?���?��������

� *��������� �� *�� ��� ���������#-_���#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|���> ���������� �* ������������ ��� ���@ �>���������������������������������� � ��#

-_���#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|!������� ������ �*��������������� ����� �_������� �*��������� ����� ��#����>�

�� �*�#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|^�&>�������������Z���� �����? ���

? *>� �*������� ����� �_������?�������� �*����#\*� ����� �*�#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|�������� ������_ �����?�#\*� ����� �*�#

���>����#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|�

� ��|�||���?���?�����@���>��� ����_�*��#���

����� �*��?���#��������� ��� ���?\*� ����� �*�#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|{�&>��������������?���?��������

� *���������[���Z�������#-_���#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|"���������� ��� ���?\*� &> ��� �*�#

<�����#�"�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�|��&>���>������������ _�����_���#\*�

&> ��� �*�#��&��#���>����#!$�!�

� ��|�|����������� ��� ���?\*� ����� �*�#

<�����#�"�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�{$���������������� �*���>������_ �>��� ����_�*����� �*�� ������#\*� ����� �*�#��&��#

���>����#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

||

� ��|�{����-_�!^`"��#�� ������� �>������

� ������ ����>����������*� ����������������-�������<�����#�"�>���#!$�!�

� ��|�{!�&>���>������������ _�����_����

��&��%���>����#!$�!=�

� ��|�{^����� ���?���� �����>������ _������

���>���������������������� ����� � � �����_���� ������������� ��#]��� �>���� �*��

<������

� ��|�{��&>���>������������ _�����_����

��&��%���>����#!$�!=�

� ��|�{|�<����� ������������� ������>������_���������>��� �*�� ��%-_���`�$$=�<�����

� ��|�{{���&���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|{

� ��|�{^�&>���>������������ _�����_���?��

�>�������������?������������\*� ����� �*��

� ��|�{����&���

� ��|�{|�&������ �>������������� �����������> �����> �*�����-_��|# �_���@ �>���������

� ��|�{{�&������ �>������������� �����������> �

����> �*�����-_�^!# �_���@ �>���������

� ��|�{"�&������ �>������������� �����������> �����> �*�����-_�!^# �_���@ �>���������

� ��|�{����������������������� ��� �� ��������

_ � _ ��������� �*_���� ��#�_��^�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|"

PACKAGE A6

� ��{������������������ �*�>������_ �>��� ��

��_�*����\*� &>���� �*�#"�>��� �#!$�!�

� ��{�!���������� ��� �� � ����������@ �>���� �����#����>��������������?���?���������?���� *�������#-_�{$`|$$�-_�{$`�$$#���>��� �#

!$�!�

� ��{�!����� ���?���� ���������>������ _���������>���������������������� ����� � � ��#-_�{$`|$$

�-_�{$`�$$#���>��� �#!$�!�

� ��{���&> �@���������_� ������������ ���������������_�������������#\*� �>���� �*�#���>

��� �#!$�!�

� ��{�|�&>�@������ �������?�������%��*�

>��_��#*�����# =��� �*@���#��������� ��� ���?�>�������#!��>��� �#!$�!

� ��{�{�������>��������� _������?�������%��*�

��?���*�**���#*���_���=��� �*������@���#!��>��� �#!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|�

� ��{�"�������>��������� _������?�������

%�Z�_��������?���*�**���#*���_���#*�����=��� �*������@���#!��>��� �#!$�!

� ��{���&>�@������ �������� ?�� ��@>��>�@�����> *>����>#��������� ��� ���?�>�������#!��>��� �#

!$�!

� ��{���������>��������� _������?�������

%�Z�_��������?���*�**���#*���_���=��� �*������@���#!��>��� �#!$�!

� ��{��$�&>��� ����������?���> �@�������� �*@���#��������� ��� ���?�>�������#!��>��� �#!$�!

� ��{������?���?����@�� ����������-_�"�#���>

��� �#!$�!�

� ��{��!������@������������>����������� �

��������������������?�_����_��������#-_�{�#���>��� �#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

|�

� ��{��^������@������������>����������� �

��������������������?�_����_��������#-_�{!#���>��� �#!$�!�

� ��{���������@������������>����������� �

��������������������?�_����_��������#-_�"�#���>��� �#!$�!�

� ��{��|������@������������>����������� �

��������������������?�_����_��������#-_�|�#���>��� �#!$�!�

� ��{��{���?������*���@��� ������������������� ��

� ���?\*� ��_�� �*�#���>��� �#!$�!�

� ��{��"�&�_������������� ��>���������������#

����>�������?����������#-_��{`!$$#��>���#!$�!�

� ��{��������������_� ����_��� �*?�����>�

������������� ��_����#���*\>���� �*��_��!`�{$#�$�>���#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{$

� ��{��������������_� ����_��� �*?�����>�

������������� ��_����#���*����� �*�-_���`$|"#�$�>���#!$�!�

� ��{�!$���?���?�������� *�������@������

������������� ��*�� ���������-_�"�#|�>���#!$�!�

� ��{�!�����������������?�������@>���>��@������>�� ��#[����������Z�������-_���#|�>

���#!$�!�

� ��{�!!�� �@�����������>�*�����#-_�||`^$$#

|�>���#!$�!�

� ��{�!^��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

������� ������#-_�|�`{�$#�������#!$�!�

� ��{�!���� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

������� ������#-_�|"`$�$#�������#!$�!�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{�

� ��{�!|��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

������� ������#-_�||`!!$#�������#!$�!�

� ��{�!{��� �?��_��������� ��� ��@������?��@��

������� ������#-_�|�#�������#!$�!�

� ��{�!"���\*� &>���� �*�#������>�����������

�������������_��������������� �*�>������_#���� �*���� ����������� � �*�������_�����#��>

����#!$�!�

� ��{�!��\�� ���������*�������� ����� �_���

������ �* �� �������� �*#�_�"�`!$$������|���#!$�!�

� ��{�!��� ����Z� �*� �>��������?������*���@���

���� ������������?? ���

� ��{�^$�� ����Z� �*� �>���@������� �����-_�"��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{!

� ��{�^��&>��� ������?���?����������������#

-_�"$`^�!#<������

� ��{�^!���&��

� ��{�^^�&>��� ������?���?����������������#

-_��{`!$$#<������

� ��{�^����&��

� ��{�^|����������������� �� ���������������

��� �����������������*��{#-_�""�

� ��{�^{����������������� �� ���������������

��� �����������������*��{#-_�|��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{^

� ��{�^"��������������?���� �*����-_�{|�

� ��{�^���������������?�_����_�������-_�{��

� ��{�^��&����� ����� �����@> �>>���������_�*������������������������� � � ��#-_�"��

� ��{��$�&����� ����� �����@> �>>���������_�*������������������������� � � ��#-_��{�

� ��{����&����� ����� �����@> �>>���������_�*������������������������� � � ��#-_�||�

� ��{��!�&������ �>������������� �����������> �

����> �*�����-_���# �_���@ �>���������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{�

� ��{��^�&������ �>������������� �����������> �����> �*�����-_��$# �_���@ �>���������

� ��{����&������ �>������������� �����������> �

����> �*�����-_�{|# �_���@ �>���������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{|

PACKAGE A7

� ��"����������� �>��� ��#-_���`"{|#��� �{�>

!$�!� ��"�!��������� �>��� ��#-_!$�`��|#��� �{�>

!$�!

� ��"�^�&>�������������_� �*���� �����_���� ������_������ ��#@> �>��������������������������

��_��?����>����?��@� ���� �����������_#-_!$�`�$$#��� �{�>!$�!

� ��"�������������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_��!`�^$#��� �{�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{{

� ��"�|�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!��`{"�#��� �{�>!$�!

� ��"�{�\���?���?��������������>���#-_���`$|$#��� �{�>!$�!

� ��"�"�\���?���?��������������>���#

-_��!`�^$#��� �{�>!$�!� ��"���\���?���?��������������>���#

-_���`�$$#��� ��$�>!$�!

� ��"����������� �>��� ��#-_!$�`^!�#��� ��{�>!$�!

� ��"��$�&>�������������_� �*���� �����_���� ������_������ ��#@> �>��������������������������

��_��?����>����?��@� ���� �����������_#-_!$�`�$$#��� ��{�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{"

� ��"������?���?��������������>�����-_���`�$$>�� ��������������_����������#��� ��{�>!$�!

� ��"��!�&>�����������>���������*���������� �����_���� ��@����� ����������������>����� �����

����� ��#-_���`��{#��� ��{�>!$�!

� ��"��^�&>�����������>������������*���������� �����_���� ��@����� ����������������>����� ��

�������� ��#-_���`�$$#��� ��{�>!$�!

� ��"������������� ��� ��_���_������� �#������������> �*�����-_���`�$$#��� �!��>!$�!

� ��"��|��������� �>��� ��#-_��|`!^^#��� �!��>!$�!

� ��"��{�&>�������������_� �*���� �����_���� ����

��_������ ��#@> �>����������������������������_��?����>����?��@� ���� �����������_#

-_!$�`�$$#��� �!��>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{�

� ��"��"�\���?���?��������������>���#

-_!$$`�{!#���!��!$�!

� ��"����\���?���?��������������>���#

-_���`$|$#���!��!$�!

� ��"������������ �>��� ��#-_��|`!^^#���"�>

!$�!

� ��"�!$�&>�������������_� �*���� �����_���� ����

��_������ ��#@> �>����������������������������_��?����>����?��@� ���� �����������_#

-_��$`�!$#���"�>!$�!

� ��"�!��&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_!��`!{!#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�!!�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_���`�^�#����{�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

{�

� ��"�!^����� �>�������>�@�������_��?->����*

<� �*�#-_���`^|^#����{�>!$�!� ��"�!��&>�����> �*�����>��������� _����������

����#-_!$�`^!�#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�!|�&>�����> �*�����>��������� _����������

����#-_���`�$$#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�!{�&>�� ���������@����� �������������� ��

%��������������> �*=���� ���������>�*�����#-_!$!`�$$#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�!"�&>�� ���������@����� �������������� ��%��������������> �*=���� ���������>�*�����#

-_!$�`�$$#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�!��[��� �����_���� ����_� �*����� ���� ��#-_��$`�!$#����{�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"$

� ��"�!��[��� �����_���� ����_� �*����� ���� ��#

-_!$�`�$$#����{�>!$�!� ��"�^$�&>�@������� ����@����>�@�������*�**�����>�@�������*�**�������?���#-_!$�`^!�#����{�>

!$�!

� ��"�^��&>�@������� ����@����>�@�������*�**����

�>�@�������*�**�������?���#-_!��`|{|#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�^!�� ����Z� �*� �>���>�� ����������������

��_��?->����*<� �*�#-_���`^|^#����{�>!$�!

� ��"�^^�[��� �����_���� ����_� �*����� ���� ��#-_!$�`��|#���!���!$�!

� ��"�^����?���?��������������>�����-_���`$|$>�� ��������������_����������#���!���!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"�

� ��"�^|�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_!$�`��|#���!���!$�!

� ��"�^{������� �@ �������?������ �������� �*�����?->��� <� �*�-_!$�`��|#���!���!$�!

� ��"�^"�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_���

���� �>��� ��#-_��|`!^^#!�����!$�!� ��"�^��&>���������� ��@�������� �����_���

���� �>��� ��#-_!$�`��|#!�����!$�!

� ��"�^����?���?��������������>�����-_��^`^"�

>�� ��������������_����������#!�����!$�!� ��"��$����� �>��_� �*���������_#-_���`^|^#

!�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"!

� ��"����&>�_� ��� ������������#-_��^`^"�#!�����!$�!

� ��"��!�����>����?��@ ���? ����#-_���`^|$#!�����!$�!

� ��"��^�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_���`"{|#"�����!$�!

� ��"����&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_��$`�!$#"�����!$�!

� ��"��|�&>�����> �*�����>��������� _��������������#-_���`"{|#"�����!$�!

� ��"��{�&>�����> �*�����>��������� _��������������#-_���`�$$#"�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"^

� ��"��"�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_���`�$$#�^�����#!$�!

� ��"����&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_���`$|$#�^�����#!$�!

� ��"����&>���������� ��@�������� �����_���

���� �>��� ��-_!$�`^!�#�^�����#!$�!

� ��"�|$�&>������ �*�����@���������*�����

������� �*#-_���`^|^#�^�����#!$�!

� ��"�|��&>�����> �*�����>��������� _����������

����#-_���`�$$#�^�����#!$�!

� ��"�|!�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_���

���� �>��� ��#-_!$"`�^{#!$�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"�

� ��"�|^�[��� �����_���� ����_� �*����� ���� ��#-_!$�`��|#!$�����!$�!

� ��"�|��[��� �����_���� ����_� �*����� ���� ��#-_!$�`|��#!$�����!$�!

� ��"�||�\���?���?��������������>���#-_���`$|$#!$�����!$�!

� ��"�|{���?���?��������������>���>�� ��������������_����������#-_���`�$$#!$�����!$�!

� ��"�|"�&>�����> �*�����>����� _����������

����#-_���`�$$#!$�����!$�!

� ��"�|��&>�����> �*�����>����� _����������

����#-_!$�`^!�#!$�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"|

� ��"�|����� �� ������#-_!$�`�$$#�{����!$�! � ��"�{$���� �� ������#-_!$�`�$$#!�����!$�!

� ��"�{����� �� ������#-_!$�`^!�#�{����!$�! � ��"�{!���� �� ������#-_!$�`^!�#!������!$�!

� ��"�{^�� ���������#-_���`�{!#�{����!$�!

� ��"�{��� ���������#-_���`�{!#�"�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"{

� ��"�{|�<��#-_���`�$$#�{����!$�! � ��"�{{�<��#-_���`�$$#��@@ �>�>������ �*������������� _������

� ��"�{"�<��#-_���`^|^#�{����!$�!

� ��"�{��<��#-_���`^|^#������ _������

� ��"�{������������ ����@����� �#-_���`�$$#�{����!$�!

� ��"�"$����������� ����@����� �#-_���`�$$#\��

_������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

""

� ��"�"��� ����� �� � �������������������_�#-_���`�$$

� ��"�"!�&>����� �>� � �������������������_�#-_���`�$$

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"�

PACKAGE A8

� �������������� �>��� ��#-_!��`$�$#��� ��^�>!$�!

� ����!����*��� *���������������� ��@����������>�

�Z �������#-_!!$`"��#��� ��^�>!$�!

� ����^������@�������@������ ��?�>������ ��

���*��������?��@�������_�#-_!!$`��^#��� ��^�>!$�!

� �����������@�������@������ ��?�>������ ��

���*��������?��@�������_�#-_!!�`^{�#��� ��^�>!$�!

� ����|������@�������@������ ��?�>������ �����*����>��������� ������ _������������������

��� _�����������������@?����������?��@��? ����#-_!^�`���#��� ��^�>!$�!

� ����{�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!^�`���#��� ��^�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

"�

� ����"�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!!$`��^#��� ��^�>!$�!

� ����������������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!^^`|�$#��� ��^�>!$�!

� �������������� �>��� ��#-_!��`|"$#��� �!$�>!$�! � �����$�������� ��������>�� ��#-_!^�`���#��� �!$�>!$�!

� ����������*��� *���������������� ��@����������>��Z �������#-_!^"`�|�#��� �!$�>!$�!

� �����!�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!^"`�|�#��� �!$�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$

� �����^�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!��`|"$#��� �!$�>!$�!

� �����������������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!^�`!{|#��� �!$�>!$�!

� �����|���?���?��*�����������Z������#-_!��`$�$#

��� �!|�>!$�!

� �����{�&>����]� @���������_������>������� �>

� �#-_!!"`${|#��� �!|�>!$�!

� �����"�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!!^`$"|#��� �!|�>!$�!

� �����������������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!^�`!{|#��� �!|�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� �����������������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!^^`|�$#��� �!|�>!$�!

� ����!$�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!^^`|�$#��� �!|�>!$�!

� ����!����?���?��*�����������Z������#-_!��`$�$#�����>!$�!

� ����!!���?���?��*�����������Z������#-_!^�`!{|#�����>!$�!

� ����!^�&>����*&��<� �*�@���������_������>������� �>� �#-_!!$`��^#�����>!$�!

� ����!����������?���@> ���>���������?@��� �*#-_!!�`^{�#�����>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!

� ����!|���������?���@> ���>���������?@��� �*#

-_!^^`|�$#�����>!$�!� ����!{����*��� *���������������� ��@���������

�>��Z �������#-_!!$`"��#�����>!$�!

� ����!"�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_!��`$�$#����{�>!$�!

� ����!������ �>�������>�@�������_�#-_!!�`$^�#����{�>!$�!

� ����!������ �>�������>�@�������_�#-_!^�`!{|#����{�>!$�!

� ����^$�&>�� ���������@����� �������������� ��%��������������> �*=���� ���������>�*�����#

-_!��`�||#����{�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^

� ����^��&>�� ���������@����� �������������� ��%��������������> �*=���� ���������>�*�����#

-_!��`$�$#����{�>!$�!

� ����^!�[��� �����_���� ����_� �*���������_#-_!^�`���#����{�>!$�!

� ����^^�&>������������ �����������>���� _��������������?������> �*�����#����{�>!$�!

� ����^����������� ��@���������Z ������� ����� *�����#?�������_�������#-_!��`�||#����{�>

!$�!

� ����^|�\����?���@ �>������ �@ ��#-_!^�`!{|#����{�>!$�!

� ����^{�\����?�����-_!!$`��^#����{�>!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ����^"�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!^�`���#^$����!$�!

� ����^������������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!^^`|�$#^$����!$�!

� ����^��[��� �����_���� ����_� �*���������_#

-_!^�`���#^$����!$�!

� �����$�����>?��_�_����_�����������?��@ �����

����#-_!^$`!^"#^$����!$�!

� �������&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_!��`$�$#{�����!$�!

� �����!�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!!"`!�$#{�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�|

� �����^�&>�����> �*�����>��������� _��������������#-_!��`$�$#{�����!$�!

� �������&>�����> �*�����>��������� _��������������#-_!^�`!{|#{�����!$�!

� �����|�\����?�����[����������Z�������#-_!!$`"��#{�����!$�!

� �����{�[��� �����_���� ����_� �*���������_#-_!^�`���#{�����!$�!

� �����"�����>����?��@ ����������������#-_!!^`$$$#{�����!$�!

� �����������>����?��@ ����������������#-_!!!`|$$#{�����!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�{

� �������&>�����> �*�����>����� _����������

����#-_!��`$�$#�������!$�!

� ����|$�&>�����> �*�����>����� _����������

����#-_!^�`���#�������!$�!

� ����|��&>�����> �*�����>����� _����������

����#-_!^�`!{|#�������!$�!

� ����|!�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!!$`"��#�������!$�!

� ����|^�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��@> ��@��� �*#-_!!�`�{�#�������!$�!

� ����|��\����?�����[����������Z�������#-_!��`�||#�������!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�"

� ����||������������� ���������@����� ������� ���������� �*�����������������#-_!��`�||#���

����!$�!

� ����|{�����������¡�@�������*>������������� ��

@> ��@��� �*#-_!!�`�{�#!������!$�!

� ����|"�&>���������� ��@�������� �����_������� �>��� ��#-_!��`|"$#!������!$�!

� �� ��|�� &>� ��������� �� @���� ��� � �� ��� _������� �>��� ��#-_!!�`^{�#!������!$�!

� ����|��\����?�����[����������Z�������#-_!^"`�|�#!������!$�!

� ����{$���?���?��������������>���>�� ��������������_����������#-_!^!`�^"#!������!$�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

ANNEX 2: GRIEVANCE INTAKES. PUBLIC CONSULTATION

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

PACKAGE A1

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �� Location -_�`!$$

Contact Information

\�_� \�[��\��\&]�\�

������ ���� Z

��_���

]�_�������� ��!#<����� ����#*� *����^�#��_� *����&�������__���#������� ��

�*�

�>���\��

� ������� ��� ]���

�_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question ������ ���� �� �>� ���� �� %@>�# @>��# @>��� ��� >�@= �? ����*� ������ ����@�� -_ �`�$$� ��� �� �>� ���������� ������� �����¡� ����� @���� �� ���?��� �? �_����_��� ���� �� �� ����� ��� ������������� �*��������� ����� � � �� �> *>���_�� _�#�>��������������� �����@���� �*�����������>������� ������>��¡��������*>��_ � _ ���>������

�����**��� �>�� �>�����������>�� �������@��������*@>���@��� �*���� �� �� � _ � �>��������?� ����������#����� ������� �*�>�����������

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !!�������

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

�]��\���&��\�

��� � ���?���?? �\����\��\&�����������&

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$

&����?�� ������ �������\&�\��[����&��\

��_����

� *�������?�>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

!"������! &>����������������¡��?���@���������?����?�_����_��� �����������>��� �> *>�������?� ������������� �*�>��������

$^������! &>���@����_���������������� ��@������� ����� ��> ������> �� _����>��������?����@���������

$|������! &>��� @�� ��_��� ���� ��������� �� @��� ���� �� ��� � �> � ���� ��� ��� �� �>� @��@���>�����>��������?����@���������

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �� Location -_�^`�$$

Contact Information

\�_� \�[��\&]�&][�\

������ ���� Z

��_���

]�_�������� ����*���� ���*�#����� ��__���#< �>������ ��

�*�

�>���\��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

� ������� ��� � �>�>��

�_� � Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question ������ ���� �� �>� ���� �� %@>�# @>��# @>��� ��� >�@= �? ����*� ������ ����@��-_�^`�$$}-_�^`�$$��>�����������>����������������@�����>����?����?�_����_������� ��#@>��� ��������������� ��#���>�������?� ���������� ����������������**����>���>�����������_� ��� ���> ���� ����_ � _ ���>�� ���������?��_��������� ��@��������� ���������>��*>�>��� ������������ ����� � �� ��> ����� ���> �� _��

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ����

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

�]��\���&��\�

��� � ���?���?? �\����\��\&�����������&

&����?�� ������ �������\&�\��[����&��\

��_����

� *�������?�>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

!$������!&>��������������� ������>��_����_���@��������� ���>�� ����������� ������������>��� ��> *>�������?� ���� ������������ �>����������� ���������>�������?� ���� ����� �*��������� ��@��� _���_����� ���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!

$^������!&>� ���������� ������� �����@���� �� ���?����? �_����_��� �� ������ �>� ������ �?���� ��� �>� �_����_��� @�� > *> ��@ �� �>� � ���� �� ��� �� ��������� �� @��� �����*���??������>�>�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^

PACKAGE A2

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �! Location -_!"`{!$

Contact Information

\�_� \�[��\��\\���

������ ���� Z

��_���

]�_�������� �����^#]���*�����__���#&�_����*� ��� ��

�*�

|"

�>���\��

� ������� ��� � �>�>��

�_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question ������ ���� �� �>� ���� �� %@>�# @>��# @>��� ��� >�@= �? ����*� ������ ����@���� �� �>����������������¡���������?��������??�������_������ �>���?��� �>��� � ���_����_������� �� �������� ��� �Z �� �* ��� ��*� ��� �������� ��������� &>� ��� ��*� @�� ������ ��� �>� ��������� ������ �������������> �*�������� _����� ���

�� ������� �>� ���������� �� ����� �> � ������ ����� �* �>� ���?��� ����?? �������_������ ��������� ���� ������ �* �� � ��� �Z �� �* @���� �� @��� �� ��� ���������¥ ������� �> � ���� � � � �� ��������� ���� ������� �>���������������_�������?�������_�*��������

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

�]��\���&��\�

��� � ���?���?? �\����\��\&�����������&

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

&����?�� ������ �������\&�\��[����&��\

��_����&>����>�� ������>� ������ ��������� �>����������� ��������� �������������������> � �����

� *�������?�>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �! Location -_^�`"�$

Contact Information

\�_� �]����\]�\�

������ ���� Z

��_���

]�_�������� ��� � ���*�#]���*�����__���#&�_����*� ��

�*�

�>���\��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�|

� ������� ��� � �>�>��

�_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question ������ ���� �� �>� ���� �� %@>�# @>��# @>��� ��� >�@= �? ����*� ������ ����@��-_^�`"�$��>��������������� ������>���������� ��@�������>��� ������ _����������_���������� �����>�� �� ����������������������� �����¥��� ����>����������������¡�@�����>����?����?�_����_������� �������� ��������>�������?� ���������� �> *>���_�� _�#�>��������������� ������>���������� ��@������ *>����� ��¡�������� ���������_�������>���?������������ ����� � � ��� ��������>���� ���������

���������� �>�������������������>��� �����_���������_ � _ ���>��������?� ������������� � _ � �>���������� ��@������ *>���������� �������������� ���������

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !!�������

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

�]��\���&��\�

��� � ���?���?? �\����\��\&�����������&

&����?�� ������ �������\&�\��[����&��\

��_���� �������*� _�#�>������������ �������������>���������� ��@��� ��> �����

� *�������?�>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

${������!&> �� _��>��� ������������ ����� � �� � �> ���������� �������� �����??���������������� �� @��� �? �������� ]�@����# �>� ���������� ����� �� � _ � �>� ����� �* �? � ���������� �����@>��>�������@�����_ � _ ���>��������?� ���������� ��> �����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�{

!"������! &>���@����_���������������� ��@������� ����� � �> ������> � � _����� ����������>���� ���������������� ����� � �� � ������� ����

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �! Location -_�!`�$$

Contact Information

\�_� \�[��\��\�][�\����[�&]�\� ������

���� Z

��_���

]�_�������� ����>�� ���*�#���*&> �>��__���#���*��� ��

�*�

�>���\��

� ������� ��� � �>�>��

�_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question ������ ���� �� �>� ���� �� %@>�# @>��# @>��� ��� >�@= �? ����*� ������ ����@��-_�!`!$$}-_�|`$$$ �>������������������ �������� �>�@���� �*��� � ���� �>����?����?�_����_������� ������� �*�>�����������>�������?� ���������� �����> *>�

�����������>������������������@������ ��������_����_������� ����_ � _ ���>��������?� �����������&>���������������_������>�����������������> �@����

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�"

�������� ���� !!�������

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

�]��\���&��\�

��� � ���?���?? �\����\��\&�����������&

&����?�� ������ �������\&�\��[����&��\

��_����&>������������� ��>�����_�� � ����>�@��������������������>�@���� �*���?����?�_����_��� ��> �������_ � _ ���>��������?� ����������

� *�������?�>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

!�������!&>��� ��� ���� _�����_������������� ���������� ���&>������������� ���������@�����>����?����?�_����_������� �����>��������?���� ��> ������� �> *>#����� ���� �>������������

!|������! &>� ���������� �� �� ������� @���� �>� ���?��� �? �_����_��� ���� �� �� �>� ������ �?���� ��� ��> *>#����� ������� �*>��@ �������

${������! &>���@������������� ��@������� ����� ��> ������> �� _���������@��@���>�����>��������?���� �_ � _ ���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

PACKAGE A5

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_��"

Contact Information

\�_� ������ ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� <��]��*��__���#&������� ��� ��

�*�

|$

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �� �> � ����� �� %-_��"=# @>�� � �� �# _���� �� ?��_ �>� ��������� �� � �� >�� ���� ?��@�� ���������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !����� ���!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_��"

Contact Information

\�_� ���� �> ������ ���� ���_���

]�_�������� <��]��*��__���#&������� ��� ��

�*�

��

�>���\¦

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$$

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@���� �> � ����� �� %-_��"=# �>� ��* ���� �� *�� �������_@�� _�������� �>���������������������� ����� � � ��#��� �*�� ������#@����?��@������ ������ ����? �>������@����� _�����������������?������������

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !����� ���!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$�

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_��"

Contact Information

\�_� ������ ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� <��]��*��__���#&������� ��� ��

�*�

|$

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �� �> � ����� �� %-_��"=# @>�� � �� �# _���� �� ?��_ �>� ��������� �� � �� >�� ���� ?��@�� ���������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$!

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !����� ���!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

���>������!��!

&>����������� ���_� ���@ �>��������>�� � ������>�>�����@�����*��� �*�>���������? ����� *�� ���������_ ���>�������?��_�*������������ ���Z�����<������ �>� ? �� �*�#��������� ?���>����� �� ��@����������� ���? �>���_��� ��

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� �������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$^

�?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_��"

Contact Information

\�_� ���� �> ������ ���� ���_���

]�_�������� <��]��*��__���#&������� ��� ��

�*�

��

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@���� �> � ����� �� %-_��"=# �>� ��* ���� �� *�� �������_@�� _�������� �>���������������������� ����� � � ��#��� �*�� ������#@����?��@������ ������ ����? �>������@����� _�����������������?������������

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !����� ���!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$�

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

���>������!��!

&>����������� ���_� ���@ �>��������>�� � ������>�>�����@�����*��� �*�>���������? ����� *�� ���������_ ���>�������?��_�*������������ ���Z�����<������ �>� ? �� �*�#��������� ?���>����� �� ��@����������� ���? �>���_��� ��

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_���

Contact Information

\�_� ������ ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� ]��� �>��__���#&������� ��� ��

�*�

|^

�>���\¦

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$|

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �� �> � ����� �� %-_���=# @>�� � �� �# _���� �� ?��_ �>� ��������� �� � �� >�� ���� ?��@�� ���������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�${

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_���

Contact Information

\�_� ����>���* ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� � �> ���� ��__���# &��� ���� ��� ��

�*�

��

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@���� �> � ����� �� %-_���=# �>� ��* ���� �� *�� �������_@�� _�������� �>���������������������� ����� � � ��#��� �*�� ������#@����?��@������ ������ �����*� �������������?�����������#�> �� ���� �� ����� �* _�������*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$"

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !|������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$�

Contact Information

\�_� ������ ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� ]��� �>��__���#&������� ��� ��

�*�

|^

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �� �> � ����� �� %-_���=# @>�� � �� �# _���� �� ?��_ �>� ��������� �� � �� >�� ���� ?��@�� ���������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�$�

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

���>������!$�! &> ��������� �*������_�� ��>������������������������>������������

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �| Location ��������� ��� ��#-_���

Contact Information

\�_� ����>���* ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� � �> ���� ��__���# &��� ���� ��� ��

�*�

��

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@���� �> � ����� �� %-_���=# �>� ��* ���� �� *�� �������_@�� _�������� �>���������������������� ����� � � ��#��� �*�� ������#@����?��@������ ������ �����*� �������������?�����������#�> �� ���� ��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��$

����� �* _�������*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !|������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

���>������!$�! &> ��������� �*������_�� ��>������������������������>������������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

���

PACKAGE A6

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �{ Location ��������� ��� ��#�_�|�

Contact Information

\�_� ���� �> ������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� &��]����__���

�*�

^"

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@���� �> � ����� �� %-_�|�=#_��>�� � >������� ?����� �>����� � ���� ��� �* �>�����������¡�_���� ������������� ��� <�� ���# ���� �� �? ���� � ���� >�� ���� _������ �� �>� ����������¡� ������� _���_����� ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��!

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>����>������������>����������� �� _���_�������������� � ������ �> ������ �� ��������_� ��� ��>���* ��¡���?���������?? ��<�� ���#�>�������������������������>�������������������� �����_������� ���������������>���>� ����������¡� ��������� �� ��� � � �� @ �� ��� �� _������ �� ���� �� �? ���� ������

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

������ ���! �&>��� ������� _�����_���?���> �������_�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��^

ATTACHED PHOTOS

Location -_�|� ���>����>#!$�!�

Description���>�� � >������� ?����� �>����� � ���� ��� �* �>�������������

_���� ������������� ���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

���

Location -_�|� ���>��� �#!$�!�

Description �&>��� ������� _�����_���?���> �������_�

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �{ Location ��������� ��� ��#�_�{�

Contact Information

\�_� �������* ������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� ���*����__���#������� ��� ��

�*�

�!

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �� �> � ����� �� %-_�{�=# @>�� � �� �# _���� �� ?��_ �>� ��������� �� � �� >�� ���� ?��@�� ���������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��|

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��{

ATTACHED PHOTOS

Location -_�{� ���>��� �#!$�!�

Description�>�� ��� �#_���� ��?��_�>���������� ��� ��>������?��@�� ���

������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �?

������� ��������@������*� ��������������� � ���

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �{ Location ��������� ��� ��#�_�{�

Contact Information

\�_� �������* ������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� ���*����__���#������� ��� �� �*�

�!

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

��"

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �� �> � ����� �� %-_�{�=# @>�� � �� �# _���� �� ?��_ �>� ��������� �� � �� >�� ���� ?��@�� ���������� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

���

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

�������!$�!

&>����������� ���_� ���@ �>��������>�� � ������>�>�����@�����*��� �*�>���������? ����� *�� ���������_ ���>�������?��_�*������������ ���Z�����<������ �>� ? �� �*�#��������� ?���>����� �� ��@����������� ���? �>���_��� ��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

���

ATTACHED PHOTOS

Location -_�{� ���>���#!$�!�

Description&>� ������������ ��* ���� �>��� �* �� �>� � �� ��*��>�� @ �> �����

���>�� � �����������������

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �{ Location ��������� ��� ��#-_�|^`�!$

Contact Information

\�_� ���]�� ������ ���� ��_��� �

]�_�������� ��&> �>��__���#������� ��� ��

�*�

�|

�>���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!$

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�����> ������ ��%-_�|^`�!$=#_���� ��?��_�>���������� ��� ��>������?��@�� ���������� �� ������� �* �� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!�

ATTACHED PHOTOS

Location -_�|^`�!$ ���>���#!$�!�

Description����� �� ?��_ �>���������� ��� ��>������ ?��@�� ���������� ��

������� �*�� ������# �> �� ���� �� ����� �* _���� ������ ���?

������� ��������@������*� ��������������� � ���

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �{ Location ��������� ��� ��#-_�|^`�!$

Contact Information

\�_� ���]�� ������ ����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!!

��_��� �

]�_�������� ��&> �>��__���#������� ��� ��

�*�

�|

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�����> ������ ��%-_�|^`�!$=#_���� ��?��_�>���������� ��� ��>������?��@�� ���������� �� ������� �* �� �� ����# �> � � ���� �� � ���� �* _���� �� ���� �� �? ������� �� ���� �� @��� �� �*� ��������������� � ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!^

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� ��������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� ��_������� �> � ��_�*� ?�� �����������#� _�����������# �>����������������� �>����������� ��������� �����_������� ������������������� ��@ ����>������� ���_ �*� _��]�@����#�>����������������¡� _���_���?�����>����� ��_����?��_�>�����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

�|������!$�!

&>����������� ���_� ���@ �>��������>�� � ������>�>�����@�����*��� �*�>���������? ����� *�� ���������_ ���>�������?��_�*������������ ���Z�����<������ �>� ? �� �*�#��������� ?���>����� �� ��@����������� ���? �>���_��� ��

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!�

ATTACHED PHOTOS

Location -_�|^`�!$ ���>���#!$�!�

Description����� �� ?��_ �>���������� ��� ��>������ ?��@�� ���������� ��

������� �*�� ������# �> �� ���� �� ����� �* _���� ������ ���?

������� ��������@������*� ��������������� � ���

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!|

Location -_�|^`�!$ �|�>����#!$�!�

Description&>� ������������ ��* ���� �>��� �* �� �>� � �� ��*��>�� @ �> �����

���>�� � �����������������

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �{ Location ��������� ��� ��#-_�|"

Contact Information

\�_� ���&>���* ������ ���� ��_��� �

]�_�������� &��]����__���#������� ��� ��

�*�

^|

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ���<� ���� ��� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!{

���� *� ������ ����@�����> ������ ��%-_�|"=#&>�����������¡���������� ����� � � �����_���� ������������� �� ����� �*�����#�> �� ���� ��>������ _��������� ����� ���

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� �|�������!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����� �>&���

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_��������� �� ����&^

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_���� &>� ��� >�� ��������� �>� ���������� �� @���� �� ����� �>� ���?��� �?�_����_������� ����_ � _ ���>��������?� ��������������*�>���*>@��

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!"

ATTACHED PHOTOS

Location -_�|" �|�>����#!$�!�

Description&>� ������������ _���� �� ����������� �� � ���� �* �����# �> �

� ���� ��>������ _��������� ����� ����@������>�������� ����

>����>

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!�

PACKAGE A7

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �" Location -_!$�`|�$

Contact Information

\�_� \*�������>&>��* ������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� ->�&���&��&>���*����<��

�*�

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ����� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@���> ����������� ���>�����>����?��@ �? ������-_!$�`|�$����>������������ ����������_�

����**����>���������������_�������?���>�? �����������? ����������>#���������>������������� ����_��>������� ����� ���������� ���@>��>������ � �*

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !����� �!$�!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�!�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����]��&���*

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_���������� �� ���&�

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>����>����������� �>����������� �� ����_������� ?�� �>� ? �����������? ���� �� ����># ��� ����� �>� ����� ������� ���� _��>�� �� ��� � ���� �� �������� ��� @>�� >���� �� � �*¥ >�@����# �>� ���������� �����¡� ��_��� @ �> ������� ��_����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �" Location \���->����*<� �*�-_���`^|$

Contact Information

\�_� �>�_���&>��* ������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� ��§����*��&§�����¨�<©�

�*�

�>���\¦

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^$

� ������� ��� ����� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@����-_���`^|$����>?��_�_����_�����������?��@ ���? ���#

����**����>���������������_�������?���>�? �����������? ����������>#���������>������������� ����_��>������� ����� ���������� ���@>��>������ � �*

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

�������� ���� !�����!$�!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����]��&���*

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_���������� �� ���&�

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>����>����������� �>����������� �� ����_������� ?�� �>� ? �����������? ���� �� ����># ��� ����� �>� ����� ������� ���� _��>�� �� ��� � ���� �� �������� ��� @>�� >���� �� � �*¥ >�@����# �>� ���������� �����¡� ��_��� @ �> ������� ��_����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^�

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �" Location -_!��`"{�

Contact Information

\�_� \*����&> ]�� ������ ���� ��_��� Z

]�_�������� �ª�!���_�ª��<«��¬�

�*�

��

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ����� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@����-_���`^|$����>?��_�_����_�����������?��@ �������#

����**����>���������������_�������?���>�������������? ����������>#���������>������������� ����_��>������� ����� ���������� ���@>��>������ � �*

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

�������� ���� $"�����!$�!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^!

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����]��&���*

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_���������� �� ���&�

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>����>������������>������������� ����_�������?���>�������������? ���� �� ����># ��� ����� �>� ����� ������� ���� _��>�� �� ��� � ���� �� �������� ��� @>�� >���� �� � �*¥ >�@����# �>� ���������� �����¡� ��_��� @ �> ������� ��_����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^^

PACKAGE A8

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �� Location -_!^�`�$$

Contact Information

\�_� &������>� �>

������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� ���*����� ��>��<��&>��*

�*�

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ����� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@�� �$$_ ����� �� -_!^�`�$$ ��� ���������� �� ��������� �� @���� ��� �>� ���������� � ����������_�

����**����>�������������_� ��� ��>�?��@��������������>������������� ����_��>������� ����� ���������� ���@>��>������ � �*

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

�������� ���� !|���� �!$�!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����]��&���*

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_���������� �� ���&�

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^�

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>����>������������>������������� ����_�������?���>�������������? ���� �� ����># ��� ����� �>� ����� ������� ���� _��>�� �� ��� � ���� �� �������� ��� @>�� >���� �� � �*¥ >�@����# �>� ���������� �����¡� ��_��� @ �> ������� ��_����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �� Location -_!^$`|!"�-_!^$`{{$

Contact Information

\�_� &���& �����

������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� �­�]« �<«�&>®�*

�*�

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ����� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@����-_!^$`|!"�-_!^$`{{$�>�����>?��_�_����_�����������?��@ �������#

����**����>���������������_�������?���>�������������? ����������>#���������>������

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^|

������� ����_��>������� ����� ���������� ���@>��>������ � �*

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ��������

�������� ���� !�����!$�!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����]��&���*

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_���������� �� ���&�

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����

&>����>������������>������������� ����_�������?���>�������������? ���� �� ����># ��� ����� �>� ����� ������� ���� _��>�� �� ��� � ���� �� �������� ��� @>�� >���� �� � �*¥ >�@����# �>� ���������� �����¡� ��_��� @ �> ������� ��_����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^{

������� \� <� � ��� �� @����_�� ��_��� ���# ��**��� ���# ��__���� ��� ���� �� ��*��� �* �>� ������� _���_����� �� ��� �� �����>������� �� �������*� ������ @ �> *� ������ �� ���� �� �>� � ��_� ��� ������� �?��_�� �� �� ������ �� �� *�� � ����> @ �> ��� ?�� ���� ? ��� �� ��� ?���������>��������>������ ���������������������� �����@����>�� �?��_�� ������_� ����? ���� ��#������ �?��_���� @� � �*���� �* ¢%��\����\&���=¢ ����� ��� ��_��&>�������

Package �� Location -_!!"`${|

Contact Information

\�_� ���]� ����������__ ����

������ ���� Z��_���

]�_�������� �­�]« �<«�&>®�*

�*�

�>���\¦

� ������� ��� ����� �_� �

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question���������� �� �>����� �� %@>�#@>��#@>������>�@=�?���� *� ������ ����@����-_!!"`${|#�����>����?��@ ���]� & �������������������� ��@�����?�>�����������

&>�����������@������ �����������_���� ��??����� ��*�� �������_�?�����������

]�@ �� ��� @��� �� �� ����> ��� ?�� ?������� �� ������ �� ���� ��__����*� ������£�������� ����]� ����������__ ����

����������� ������������������ ����������������!��"�#����$����%���&��� �����#�������'�(����)*+"

�^"

�������� ���� �$�����!$�!

���� ����>���*> ���������¤_� �¤�_� �¤?�Z¤�>���¤�_�

\�_� �? ���?? @>����� ��� ��__������_��� ��

\*����]��&���*

��� � ���?���?? ��� ���_���������� �� ���&�

&����?�� ������ ��_��� �������**��� ��

��_����&>����>������������>�������������������>������������� ����_��>������� ����� ���������� ���@>��>������ � �*¥>�@����#�>����������������¡���_���@ �>������� ��_����

� *������ �? �>����??

Update on the case:

����� [�����

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

252

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

254

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

255

ANNEX 3: ACCIDENT IN LO RIVER BRIDGE. INCIDENTS AND COMPLAINTS INFORMATION SYSTEMS. SPECIFIC REPORT

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

ACCIDENT IN LO RIVER BRIDGE. INCIDENTS AND COMPLAINTS INFORMATION SYSTEMS

SPECIFIC REPORT �

June 2012

�Loan�2391/2392�–�VIE:�GMS�Kunming�–�Hai�Phong�Transport�Corridor�

Noi�Bai�–�Lao�Cai�Highway�Project�

CT�TR�336��

V.�EN�

ACCIDENT IN LO RIVER BRIDGE. INCIDENTS AND COMPLAINTS INFORMATION SYSTEMS

SPECIFIC REPORT �

Written by: Sergio Mata Gallego

Approved by: Francisco Javier de Bonifaz

GETINSA INGENIERÍA S.L.

June 2012

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

1

I – INCIDENT HAPPENED IN LO RIVER BRIDGE

SCOPE OF THE REPORT

This report has been prepared in order to inform the Client about the unlucky events

happened in Lo River Bridge site, Package A2, and about the actions taken by the

Consultant related with it. Also, the report has been prepared according to ADB’s request.

This information will be included in the corresponding environmental, health and safety

quarterly report for the period.

THE FACTS

On April 25 2012, the environmental specialist in site team 1 was informed by Engineer’s

staff (inspector) on site that an accident happened in Lo River Bridge, by date April 22

2012.

When this information was received, the specialist went immediately to site in order to get

the information about that accident. The inspector from Consultant explained him that the

accident happened when a worker fell from the access way to a pier, which is located over

the flow, into the water and died by drowning.

In order to increase the information, the specialist investigated among local people around

Lo River Bridge and he was informed by them that, in fact, one person died into the water

on the last Sunday morning.

Whit this information, the Engineer requested the Contractor to investigate the facts, to

extend the information and to submit to Consultant a report about these facts. The report

from Contractor is included in this report as Annex 1.

In this report, more details are given about the accident:

� Number of workers involved: one.

� Data of the worker: name, age, address.

� Time of the events: 6.00 am, out of working time.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

2

� Weather and other external circumstances: because of hard rains those days,

the level of the flow had increased significantly. Also, the ships that sail

continuously along the river generated strong waves that crashed against the

floating path.

� Personal circumstance: the worker was not wearing the obligatory life-vest at the

moment he was crossing it.

� After falling down into the water, other workers in the surroundings noticed about

it and tried to rescue him and carried out first-aid treatment but finally,

unfortunately, the accident had fatal consequences.

CONSULTANT’S CONSIDERATIONS

Once described the facts, Consultant has to include its considerations and opinions about

the events, reasons, circumstances and explanations given by Contractor. They are the

following:

� The Engineer’s environmental specialists (site team 1 and core team) had

inspected this floating access path all weeks. As it is mentioned in all the reports,

our consideration was that it was strongly installed and with a good maintenance

to be considered no dangerous.

The path has, in fact, handrails installed in both sides, as well as several safety

floats distributed along the handrails (see picture 2).

Also, it must be mentioned that the height of the path is so short from the surface

of the water in order to avoid any additional risk in case of falling (see picture 1).

� The Engineer’s environmental specialists (site team 1 and core team) had

inspected every week the general safety measures implemented on site,

checking and proving that Contractor provided to all workers with personal

protective equipment (PPE), which they use as a custom and following

instructions from Consultant and Contractor, on site (see picture 1).

� The piers are provided with safety scaffoldings, made with metal and well fixed

all the bars, and surrounded in the four sides by a net to avoid falls from the

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

3

scaffolding. On the top of the piers, a fence or a net surrounds the working

surface to avoid falls (see picture 3).

� The ladders, located in other piers or other sides to scaffoldings, are metal ones,

fixed to metal girders and are provided with a handrail (see picture 4).

� Contractor has carried out training sessions, periodically since the beginning of

the works, about safety measures to be taken by the workers and about the use

of the PPEs: obligatory, need and how to use it (see picture 5).

PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCES

To clarify visually the status of Lo River Bridge site, referred to the implementation of safety

measures and facilities for workers, they are included some pictures. These pictures have

remarked the date when they were took by the Engineer’s environmental specialist, most of

them before the accident happened.

Picture 1.- All workers wear life-vest, available in all site. It can be seen, also, the slender height of the path and the handrails in both sides of it.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

4

Picture 2.- Safety floats are distributed along the access way, on the handrails.

Picture 3.- Safety scaffoldings installed in Lo River bridge site, with nets surrounding it. It can be also seen the fence installed on the top of the pier.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

5

Picture 4.- Ladders installed for the access to the top of the piers, with handrails from the bottom. The fence on the top in being installed.

Picture 5.- Training sessions were given periodically by Contractor to the workers about safety measures to be taken and the use of the PPEs.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

6

CONCLUSIONS

The conclusion for the events above mentioned, under Consultant’s consideration, are the

following:

1º Necessary safety measures to guarantee the safety conditions for workers on

site were applied in Lo River Bridge site.

2º A unexpected action from the worker, with a clear lack of precaution, happened.

3º Fortuitous adverse circumstances joined at that moment

According to these considerations, it can be asserted that the accident happened that day in Lo River Bridge was a completely unlucky accident, despite all the reasonable safety measures were implemented on site.

II – SAFETY INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM

According to the instructions from ADB, included in the Memorandum of Understanding

(MoU) of the last ADB Mission carried out in May 2012, the Engineer has informed to all

contractors about the decisions taken during that mission, related with the incidents

reporting system which has to be implemented in all packages.

In order to be informed in the first 24 hours after an incident related with safety happens in

site, the International Environmental Specialist has prepared a Incident Reporting Form,

which has been sent to all contractors, as well as the instructions to be followed in those

cases. This report form is included in this document as Annex 2.

III – COMPLAINTS INFORMATION AND RECEPTION SYSTEM

According to the instructions from ADB, included in the Memorandum of Understanding

(MoU) of the last ADB Mission carried out in May 2012, the Engineer has informed to all

contractors about the decisions taken during that mission, related with the complaints

information and reception system which has to be implemented in all packages. The

instructions given were the following:

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

7

- Contractors will appoint a responsible to receive all the complaints from the local

people around sites, who could be affected by the works.

- In no more than 24 hours, the complaints must be submitted to EPMU and to

GETINSA.

- The way to inform local people about the system to submit the complaints to

contractor will be by adding in all temporary signs existing on site (or in new ones

if no temporary signs in any location near houses), a new line with the name and

telephone number of the appointed responsible, detailing that he/she is the

responsible to receive complaints. Also local and district authorities will be

informed about this system to complain.

- This system must be implemented before 30th June 2012.

- As Consultant must check the compliance in order to include the monitoring of

this issue in the monthly report for June and in the corresponding quarterly

report, Engineer established a deadline for the compliance, before 23rd June

2012.

During the last week of June, site team specialists were checking the real implementation of

this measure, with the following results:

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

Compliance Yes Yes In phase1

No No No No No

1: Contractor in package A3 is implementing the system. Consultant has received in the

last days of June 2012 a document in which POSCO explains the procedure to

receive and communicate claims, which is basically the procedure they were

instructed to apply.

As it can be proved in the table, the system has been fully implemented only in packages

A1 and A2 (POSCO Contractor) and it’s in phase of implementing in package A3 (POSCO

Contractor).

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

8

Here are included some pictures showing some of the signs already installed on site in the

packages which have been implemented the system.

Picture 1.- Package A1. Km 19+740

Picture 2.- Package A2. Km 39+200

Engineer provided to all contractors a “complaint sheet form” to use in all cases. As Annex

3 it’s included in this report this complaint sheet form, prepared by the International

Environmental Specialist.

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

9

ANNEX 1: DOCUMENTATION FROM CONTRACTOR

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

10

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

11

ANNEX 2: INCIDENTS REPORTING FORM

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

12

PROJECT

SAFETY INCIDENT REPORTING SHEET

PACKAGE LOCATION

DATE TIME

INCIDENT DESCRIPTION

PERSONNEL/PROPERTY INVOLVED: DATA

ACTIONS TAKEN

COUNTERMEASURES PROPOSED

Safety Manager Project Manager

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

13

ANNEX 3: COMPLAINTS INFORMATION AND RECEPTION FORM

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

14

Project Noi Bai – Lao Cai welcomes complaints, suggestions, comments and queries regarding the project implementation and its stakeholders. We encourage person with grievance to provide their name and contact information to enable us to get in touch with you for clarification and feedback.

Should you choose to include your personal details but want that information to remain confidential, please inform us by writing/typing "(CONFIDENTIAL)" above you name.

Thank you.

Package Location

Contact Information

Name Gender Male Female

Home Address Age

PhoneNo

City/Province Email

Compliant/Suggestion/Comment/Question Please provide the details (who, what, where and how) of your grievance below:

How do you want us to reach you for feedback or update on your comment/grievance?

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

15

Portion to be filled in by the staff:

Date received:

Received through In person _mail _email _fax _phone _sms

Name of staff who received comment/ complaint

Position of staff

Type of Grievance

Remarks

Signature of the staff

Update on the case:

Date: Update

� �

� �

Loan 2391/2392 – VIE: GMS Kunming – Hai Phong Transport Corridor Noi Bai – Lao Cai Highway Project

257

ANNEX 4: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS IN CONCRETE BATCHING PLANTS. SPECIFIC REPORT