IPSJ SIG Technical Report
1
†1 †1 †1 †1 †1 †2
(LV) LV
LV2 LV
LV ThurstoneLV LV
2 LV
(Circular Vection; CV) (Linear Vection; LV) 2
CV, LVCV
[1-3]
CVLV
[4][5]
CVLV
LV
LV[6] [7]
†1 Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering,
Ritsumeikan University †2 Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University
LV
180[8] LV
[9]
7.0m, 3.8m 7000
2.15m 3 PT-DW6300LK
360
Fig. 1 Immersive display system we constructed
ⓒ 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan
Vol.2017-HCI-171 No.282017/1/24
IPSJ SIG Technical Report
2
[10]
[11]VR CG
CG
3 120
[6][7] CG
CG
CG[6][7] 6.0m
4.0m/s2
1.6m
LV
[6][7]
(1.6m)
0 20 40 60 805
LVLV
LV
[4]CV [1-3]LV
LVLV
[6][7] LVLV
LV
LVLV
[6][7]10 8 2
0.55m
(a) LV (b) LV
LV Fig. 2 Conceptual diagram of generation visual stimuli
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3 Textures mapped onto virtual cylinder
Fig. 4 Position of subject and size (viewing angle) of masked area
ⓒ 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan
Vol.2017-HCI-171 No.282017/1/24
IPSJ SIG Technical Report
3
25 0
20 40 60 80 10
[6][7] Thurstone2
LV
110 10C2=45
(1) 1 2 (2) 1 (3) 2 (4) 1 2
(5)
(6) (1) (5)
(5) 9 1
2
LV
[6][7] Thurstone
(i)
20 40 60 80LV
(ii) 20LV 40 0 60
80 (iii) 20
40 0 60 (Avg.=0.269, SEM=0.039)
(iv) 0LV
(v) t p<.1
(i)LV
80LV
LVCV [1-3]
(ii)
20 40 0LV
LVLV
Table 1 The patterns of visual stimuli
0 20 40 60 80
0 20 40 60 80
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
1 LV
Fig. 5 Relationship between upward vection and central masked area
ⓒ 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan
Vol.2017-HCI-171 No.282017/1/24
IPSJ SIG Technical Report
4
[6]A 0 20
40 10 (iii) 20 40 0 60
LV
20 60 1 4060 10%
(ii)020 40 LV
(iv) (ii)
(i)
LV(v)LV
LV[6] A LV
LV
LV
LV1
LV
LV
1 21
10 8 24 1
2 510
Thurstone1 2
(1) 1 2 (2) 1 (3) 2 (4) 1 2
(5)
(6) (1) (5)
(5) 9 1
2
LV
(i)
20 40 60 80LV
(ii) 20 LV
(iii) 40 60 60 8020 0 0 40
t p<.05, p<.1 (iv)
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
2 LV Fig. 6 Relationship between downward vection and central masked area
ⓒ 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan
Vol.2017-HCI-171 No.282017/1/24
IPSJ SIG Technical Report
5
LVp<.05
(i) LVLV A
LV B LV 5LV
(ii) 20
0 LV1
LVLV
LV 020 10
(iii) 20 40 LV
LV
LVLV 5
LV LV
(iv)LV
60
LV [12]LV
LV A LV B LV 5
LV
LV (iii) LVLV LV
[13] LV LV
[14]
[6][7]3
LV1
LV4
LV
LV LV[6][7] LV
LV
LV 1 LV
LV
2 LV
1 LVLV
[6][7]
3 LV4
LV[1-3]
LV [12]
4.3 LV LV
(S)
[1] I.P. Howard and T. Heckmann: “Circular vection as a function of
the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays,” Perception, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 657 - 665, 1989.
[2]
Vol. J86-B, No. 1, pp. 45 - 56, 2003. [3] T. Brandt, J. Dichgans, and E. Koenig: “Differential effects of
central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception,” Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 476 - 491, 1973.
[4] Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 479 - 484, 1979.
[5] S.J. Anderson: HIP,
Vol. 98, No. 397, pp. 23 - 30, 1998.
ⓒ 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan
Vol.2017-HCI-171 No.282017/1/24
IPSJ SIG Technical Report
6
[6]
MVE, Vol. 115, No.495, pp. 223 - 228, 2016.
[7]
(2) 21
Vol. 31B-06, 2016.[8]
p. 172, 2009.[9] G. Johansson: “Studies on visual perception of locomotion,”
Perception, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 365 - 376, 1977.[10]
CVIM 2008, No. 36,pp. 43 - 46, 2008.
[11]
Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.111 - 117, 2003.
[12]Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 18 - 24, 2013.
[13]
HIP Vol. 101, No. 424, pp. 39 - 42, 2001.[14]
79 2EV-059, 2015.
[6][7] ThurstoneLV LV
LV
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
LV Fig. B Relationship between backward vection and central masked area
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
LV Fig. A Relationship between forward vection and central masked area
ⓒ 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan
Vol.2017-HCI-171 No.282017/1/24