01. All Bioenergy Proposed Methodologies GBEP ForMay8 2012

8/12/2019 01. All Bioenergy Proposed Methodologies GBEP ForMay8 2012

1/40

www.theme gallery.com

Methodologies for Measurement of GBEPIndicators for Bioenergy

Presented by:

Dr. Ir. Yandra Arkeman, M.Eng

Bilateral Workshop On Market Opportunities for RenewableEnergy and Sustainable Biomass


2/40

Introduction

Title of this workshop: Bilateral workshop on market opportunities for renew

able energy and sustainable biomass

Renewable energy Bioenergy

Bioenergy: Palm oil biodiesel Bioethanol (from Sugar Cane Molasses)

Biogas

Solid Biomass (from Agricultural Waste and Municipal

Waste)

Bioenergy Business Development Technology,

Financial and SUSTAINABILITY

http://sbrc.ipb.ac.id


3/40

Topics Covered

Focus of this presentation

Sustainability ofBioenergy in Indonesia

Indonesian perspective (UUD45, ISPO)

Global perspective (EU Standard, RSPO, etc GBEP)

Important Issues covered:

Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP)

GBEP Sustainability Indicators for Bioenergy

Methodologies for Measurement of GBEP Indicators

SBRCs Projects related to Bioenergy

Development and Sustainability


4/40

Questions :

Indonesian Bioenergy :

Sustainable or Not?

From upstream (Farming) to downstream

(Processing Industry, Distribution and Use)What are the INDICATORS for

sustainability?

How to MEASURE each indicator?(Methodology)


5/40

What is GBEP ?



6/40

A Global Commitment to Bioenergy In the 2005 Gleneagles Plan of Action, the

G8 +5 (Brazil, China, India, Mexico and SouthAfrica) agreed to launch a Global Bioenergy

Partnership(GBEP)to support wider, costeffective, biomass and biofuels deployment,particularly in developing countries.

Gleneagles Plan of Action is targeted at

combating CLIMATE CHANGE Bioenergy and GBEP are tools in the fight

against climate change



7/40

Following a consultation process amongdeveloping and developed countries,international agencies and the private sector, theGlobal Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) waslaunched at the 14th session of the Commissionon Sustainable Development (CSD-14) in NewYork on 11 May 2006.

We invite the Global Bioenergy PartnershipGBEP) to continue its work on biofuel best

practices and take forward the successful andsustainable development of bioenergy(G8 Summit Declaration - Heiligendamm, 7 June2007).



8/40

GBEP PARTNERS AND OBSERVERS

Italy and Brazil are currently Chair and co-Chair of the Partnership.

The Secretariat is hosted at theF O HQ in Rome

.

36 Partners (23 governments 13 organizations):

G8 Governments (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russian Federation,United Kingdom, United States of America) plus Argentina, Brazil, China,Colombia, Fiji Islands, Ghana, Mauritania, Mexico, Netherlands, Paraguay,

Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland and Tanzania, as well as ECOWAS,European Commission, FAO, IDB, IEA, UNCTAD, UNDESA, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO,

UN Foundation, World Council for Renewable Energy and EUBIA.

34 Observers (23 governments 11 organizations):

Angola, Australia, Austria, Cambodia, Chile, Egypt, El Salvador, Gambia, India,Indonesia, Kenya, Lao P.D.R., Madagascar, Malaysia, Morocco, Mozambique,

Norway, Peru, Rwanda, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia and Vietnam, alongwith the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, ECLAC,

European Environment Agency, GEF, IFAD, IRENA, OAS, UEMOA, World Bank,and the WBCSD.


9/40

What are GBEPs SustainabilityIndicators ?



10/40

AGREED BY 23 COUNTRIES & 13 INTERNATIONAL

ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVING A TOTAL OF 46 COUNTRIESAND 24 INT. ORGANIZATIONS (PS & OS)

24 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS3 PILLARS


11/40

Pillars


Environmental

Social

Economic


12/40

SBRCs Projects on Bioenergy Development andSustainability

At present 3 PhD, 3 Masters and 2 Under-graduate Students conducting research onBioenergy Sustainability

One collaborative research between IPB and

George Mason University (GMU), USA has juststarted this May, for three years

Title:Design of Adaptive Agro-industrial System forMitigating Global Climate Change and Securing Food,Water, Bioenergy and Natural Medicine Supply by

Using SMART-TIN Principal Investigators: Yandra Arkeman (IPB) and

Prof. Kenneth De Jong (GMU-USA)



13/40

www.theme gallery.com

E-mail : [email protected]

Office : +62 251 8330970

Thank you


14/40

Environmental Pillar


THEMES

GBEP considers the followingthemes relevant, and theseguided the development ofindicators under this pillar:

Greenhouse gas emissions,Productive capacity of the landand ecosystems, Air quality,

Water availability, use efficiencyand quality, Biological diversity,Land-use change, includingindirect effects

Back

Indi

cators1. Life-cycle GHG emissions

2. Soil quality3. Harvest levels of wood resou

rces

4. Emissions of non-GHG air pollutants, including air toxics

5. Water use and efficiency

6. Water quality

7. Biological diversity in the landscape

8. Land use and land-use change related to bioenergy feedstock production


15/40

Indicator 1


Lifecycle greenhouse gasemissions from bioenergyproduction and use, as per themethodology chosen nationally orat community level, and reportedusing the GBEP CommonMethodological Framework forGHG Lifecycle Analysis ofBioenergy

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality



Detailed Methodology


16/40

Indicator 2


Percentage of land for which soilquality, in particular in terms ofsoil organic carbon, is maintainedor improved out of total land onwhich bioenergy feedstock iscultivated or harvested

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





17/40

Indicator 3


Annual harvest of wood resourcesby volume and as a percentage ofnet growth or sustained yield, andthe percentage of the annualharvest used for bioenergy

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





18/40

Indicator 4


Emissions of non-GHG airpollutants, including air toxics,from bioenergy feedstockproduction, processing, transportof feedstock, intermediateproducts and end products, anduse; and in comparison with otherenergy sources

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





19/40

Indicator 5


Water withdrawn from nationally-determined watershed(s) for theproduction and processing ofbioenergy feedstock, expressed asthe percentage of total actualrenewable water resources(TARWR) and as the percentage oftotal annual water withdrawals(TAWW), disaggregated intorenewable and non-renewablewater sourcesVolume of water withdrawn from

nationally-determined watershed(s) used for the production andprocessing of bioenergy feedstockper unit of bioenergy output,disaggregated into renewable andnon-renewable water sources

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





20/40

Indicator 6


Pollutant loadings to waterwaysand bodies of water attributableto fertilizer and pesticideapplication for bioenergyfeedstock cultivation, andexpressed as a percentage ofpollutant loadings from totalagricultural production in thewatershedPollutant loadings to waterways

and bodies of water attributableto bioenergy processing effluents,and expressed as a percentage ofpollutant loadings from totalagricultural processing effluents inthe watershed

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





21/40

Indicator 7


Area and percentage of nationallyrecognized areas of high biodiversity value or critical ecosystemsconverted to bioenergy productionArea and percentage of the landused for bioenergy productionwhere nationally recognizedinvasive species, by risk category,are cultivatedArea and percentage of the land

used for bioenergy productionwhere nationally recognizedconservation methods are used

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





22/40

Indicator 8


Total area of land for bioenergyfeedstock production, and as comparedto total national surface and agriculturaland managed forest land areaPercentages of bioenergy from yield

increases, residues, wastes anddegraded or contaminated landNet annual rates of conversion betweenland-use types caused directly bybioenergy feedstock production,including the following (amongst others)

arable land and permanent crops,

permanent meadows and pastures,and managed forests;natural forests and grasslands(including savannah, excludingnatural permanent meadows andpastures), peat lands, and wetlands

Back

Indi



rces



6. Water quality





23/40

Social Pillar


Indi

cators

9. Allocation and tenure of land fornew bioenergy production

10. Price and supply of a national food basket

11. Change in income

12. Jobs in the bioenergy sector

13. Change in unpaid time spent bywomen and children collecting biomass

14. Bioenergy used to expand accessto modern energy services

15. Change in mortality and burdenof disease attributable to indoorsmoke

16. Incidence of occupational injury,illness and fatalities

THEMES

GBEP considers the followingthemes relevant, and these guidedthe development of indicatorsunder this pillar:

Price and supply of a national foodbasket, Access to land, water andother natural resources, Labor

conditions, Rural and socialdevelopment, Access to energy,Human health and safety

Back


24/40

Indicator 9


Percentage of land total and byland-use type used for newbioenergy production where:a legal instrument or domesticauthority establishes title andprocedures for change of title;the current domestic legalsystem and/or socially acceptedpractices provide due process andthe established procedures are

followed for determining legal title

Back

Indi

cators






14. Bioenergy used to expand access

to modern energy services15. Change in mortality and burden

of disease attributable to indoorsmoke




25/40

Indicator 10


Effects of bioenergy use and domesticproduction on the price and supply of afood basket, which is a nationally-definedcollection of representative foodstuffs,

including main staple crops, measured atthe national, regional, and/or householdlevel, taking into consideration:changes in demand for foodstuffs for food,feed, and fibre;changes in the import and export offoodstuffs;changes in agricultural production due to

weather conditions;changes in agricultural costs frompetroleum and other energy prices; andthe impact of price volatility and priceinflation of foodstuffs on the national,regional, and/or household welfare level,as nationally-determined

Back

Indi

cators












26/40

Indicator 11


Contribution of the following tochange in income due tobioenergy production:wages paid for employment inthe bioenergy sector in relation tocomparable sectorsnet income from the sale, barterand/or own-consumption ofbioenergy products, includingfeedstock, by self-employed

households/individuals

Back

Indi

cators












27/40

Indicator 12


Net job creation as a result ofbioenergy production and use,total and disaggregated (ifpossible) as follows:

skilled/unskilledtemporary/indefinite

Total number of jobs in thebioenergy sector and percentageadhering to nationally recognizedlabor standards consistent with

the principles enumerated in theILO Declaration on FundamentalPrinciples and Rights at Work, inrelation to comparable sectors

Back

Indicators












28/40

Indicator 13


Change in average unpaid timespent by women and childrencollecting biomass as a result ofswitching from traditional use ofbiomass to modern bioenergyservices

Back

Indicators












29/40

Indicator 14


Total amount and percentage ofincreased access to modernenergy services gained throughmodern bioenergy (disaggregatedby bioenergy type), measured interms of energy and numbers ofhouseholds and businessesTotal number and percentage ofhouseholds and businesses usingbioenergy, disaggregated into

modern bioenergy and traditionaluse of biomass

Back

Indicators












30/40

Indicator 15


Change in mortality and burden ofdisease attributable to indoorsmoke from solid fuel use, andchanges in these as a result of theincreased deployment of modernbioenergy services, includingimproved biomass-based cookstoves

Back

Indicators












31/40

Indicator 16


Incidences of occupational injury,illness and fatalities in the production of bioenergy in relation tocomparable sectors

Back

Indicators












32/40

Economic Pillar


THEMESGBEP considers the following themes relevant, and these guidedthe development of indicatorsunder this pillar:Resource availability and useefficiencies in bioenergyproduction, conversion,distribution and end-use,Economic development, Economic

viability and competitiveness ofbioenergy, Access to technologyand technological capabilities,Energy security/Diversification ofsources and supply, Energysecurity/Infrastructure andlogistics for distribution and use Back

Indicators17.Productivity

18.Net energy balance19.Gross value added

20.Change in consumption of fossil fuels and traditional useof biomass

21.Training and re-qualificationof the workforce

22.Energy diversity23. Infrastructure and logistics for distribution of bioenergy

24.Capacity and flexibility of use of bioenergy


33/40

Indicator 17


Productivity of bioenergyfeedstock by feedstock or byfarm/plantationProcessing efficiencies bytechnology and feedstockAmount of bioenergy endproduct by mass, volume orenergy content per hectare peryearProduction cost per unit of

bioenergy

Back









34/40

Indicator 18


Energy ratio of the bioenergyvalue chain with comparison withother energy sources, includingenergy ratios of feedstockproduction, processing offeedstock into bioenergy,bioenergy use; and/or lifecycleanalysis

Back









35/40

Indicator 19


Gross value added per unit ofbioenergy produced and as apercentage of gross domesticproduct

Back









36/40

Indicator 20


Substitution of fossil fuels withdomestic bioenergy measuredby energy content and in annualsavings of convertible currencyfrom reduced purchases of fossilfuelsSubstitution of traditional use ofbiomass with modern domesticbioenergy measured by energycontent

Back









37/40

Indicator 21


Percentage of trained workers inthe bioenergy sector out of totalbioenergy workforce, andpercentage of re-qualified workersout of the total number of jobslost in the bioenergy sector

Back









38/40

Indicator 22


Change in diversity of totalprimary energy supply due tobioenergy

Back

Indicator

s17.Productivity18.Net energy balance19.Gross value added







39/40

Indicator 23


Number and capacity of routes forcritical distribution systems, alongwith an assessment of theproportion of the bioenergy

associated with each

Back

Indicator








40/40

Indicator 24

Ratio of capacity for usingbioenergy compared with actualuse for each significant utilizationrouteRatio of flexible capacity whichcan use either bioenergy or otherfuel sources to total capacity

Back

Indicator






Date post:	03-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	mercygray
View:	214 times
Download:	0 times

01. All Bioenergy Proposed Methodologies GBEP ForMay8 2012

Documents