03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 1

FP7 – EuCARD – NCLinac – CLIC

Erk Jensen, BE-RF

CLIC meetingCERN, 03-Apr-2009

THE LONG AND WINDING ROADfrom the “Letters of Intent” to the successful start of

EuCARD

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 2

Octobre 2006 Summary of LoI’s concerning CLIC:

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 3

Subject Contract Type

Specific Title Duration [y]

Cost [M€] Continuationof

Contact

CLIC I3 JRA Drive Beam issues 3 5   D. Schulte (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA Generation And Diagnostics Gear for tiny EmiTtance

4 5.9   H. Braun (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRAL-band, High Power and High Efficiency Multi Beam RF Amplifier

6 7   I. Syratchev (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA Luminosity Ensuring Design 5 5.4   D. Schulte (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA High-gradient RF structures 5 5   W. Wuensch (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA Ka-band Stand-Alone Power Source

4 7   E. Jensen (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA CLIC Two-Beam Test-Stand and Post Collision studies

5 1,5 ? V. Ziemann (U. Uppsala)

CLIC- ILC ? JRA Positron Polarized Sources 4 10 ? A. Variola (LAL)

LC-Sources

I3 JRA-WPDevelopment of various materials (e.g. Mg, Pb) films on Cu substrates

4 ? CARE/PHIN ? F. Tazzioli (LNF)

CLIC-ILC I3 WP

Infrastructure testing the new technologies concerning the high power-high repetition rate lasers

2 1,8 ? A. Variola (LAL)

Total 48.6+? (target number was 45 M€!)

May 2007 The scope was slightly changed, and an Integrating

Activity “Novel Accelerator Systems” was planned: Integrating Activity “Novel Accelerator Systems”:

High Gradient RF Structures (estimate 5.5 M€) Drive beam issues (estimate 5.0 M€) LED (Luminosity Ensuring Design, 5.4 M€) GaDGET (Generation & Diagnostic Gear for tiny emittance,

5.9 M€) FFAG (estimate 5 M€) Posipol (estimate 6.0 M€) High power RF (estimate 8 M€) Laptech (estimate 6 M€)

Total was then 46.8 M€ ! It became clear that this was too much – we asked for

guidance how to reduce!03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 4

23rd July 2007 – meeting with directors Outcome: Recommendation to reduce to 15 M€ total core + 8 M€

optional (for each of the 3 working groups)!

My proposal for WG “NAS” (WG meeting 30-Jul-2007):

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 5

JRA Old Indicative new

core optional

High Gradient 5.5 M€ 4 M€

EURODrive 5 M€ 2 M€ 1 M€

LED 5.4 M€ 2 M€ 1 M€

GADGET 5.9 M€ 3 M€ 1.5 M€

FFAG 5 M€ 3 M€

Posipol 6 M€ 3.5 M€

HP RF 8 M€ 1 M€

Laptech 6 M€

Network+TA 1 M€

total 46.8 M€ 15 M€ 8 M€

This didn’t work! Because ... Additional requests from the ILC community

(damping ring issues, undulator based positron source, low emittance beam transport, laserwire, beam dumps, crab cavity…)

Numbers had been “direct cost” only – now they were to be understood as “total cost” (effective increase by 60%)

After the “EuroCRAB” DS proposal was rejected by EC, an additional request for around 3.8 M€ had to be included.

“Laptech” – which I cut out, suggesting it should go into “Laserlab II” – was partly forced back in.

This was the status as presented in CLIC meeting on 31-Aug-07 and in ESGARD “OMIA”, 10-Sep-07.

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 6

Dec. 07: EuCARD was born The accelerator R&D proposals

were grouped together. Jean-Pierre Koutchouk was nominated

Coordinator of the Project-to-be “EuCARD”, European Coordination of Accelerator R&D.

The agreed target total cost of EuCARD was50 M€, with 15 M€ EC request.

“Novel Accelerator Systems” now became a “Work-Package” inside EuCARD – the name became “NCLinac” – the target total was11.2 M€ with 3.4 M€ EC request.

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 7

February 08 – EuCARD submission

Some fine tuning was done to finish the proposal (DR SC wigglers, positron source, crab cavity, FFAG and Laser plasma acceleration went into other work packages)

The NCLinac budget total in the proposal was9 M€ total with 2.65 M€ EC request.

The NCLinac proposal contained the following tasks:

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 8

28-Feb-08: NCLinac proposal submitted10. NCLinac    total  EC request

10.1 Coordination and communication

G. Blair/RHUL,E. Jensen/CERN

342,256 € 128,000 €

10.2 NC high gradient cavities

W. Wuensch/CERN 3,001,516 € 828,250 €

10.3 Linac & FF stabilization

A. Jeremie/CNRS (LAPP) 2,109,840 € 633,000 €

10.4 BDS (laser wire)

G. Blair/RHUL 1,243,501 € 375,580 €

10.5 Drive beam phase (monitor)

F. Marcellini/INFN (LNF) 1,068,920 € 321,800 €

10.6 DR vacuum (coatings, NEG, e-cloud)

P. Chiggiato/CERN 1,250,720 € 366,000 €

NCLinac total: 9,016,753 € 2,652,630 €

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 9

15-May-08: Proposal accepted

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 10

Score(15 max)

Number of projects

name

15 1 EuroFleets (Naval ships)

14.5 5 EmmaService (Biomed), EuCARD, ENES(environment), Mesoaqua(water), Synthesis (Museum)

14 20 …

13.5 11 HP2, …

13 12 EuroNS, ILIAS, …

<13 76 DevDet (12.5), …

37 out of 125 eligible proposals had to be financed out of 277 M€ foreseen by EC.

Ranking:

1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the call) (Threshold 3.00/5.00)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 11

Mark: 5.00This I3 selectively addresses some of the most critical S&T topics for advanced accelerators, thus laying the groundwork for decisions to be made on future European and Global accelerators in the next 5 years. The concept is sound and the quality of the objectives is world leading. The activities in the framework of this proposal are a useful, more technical complement to FAIR-PP, SLHC-PP, ILCPP, Hi-GRAD and EuroNu-DS. The proposal brings together all the leading European laboratories, and will reinforce and expand existing collaborations.The RTD activities will lead to clear progress beyond the state-of-the-art. These include, for example, prototyping next generation accelerator magnets of ~20T field, of a hybrid Nb3Sn + High-Tc superconductor design, which the Panel considered to be the strongest component of the JRA. It is also gratifying to see a concerted effort within this proposal in normal-conducting RF structures, now that CLIC has been redesigned for X-band, thus allowing the considerable technology investment of the world-wide high energy physics community over the past two decades to be leveraged. The proposal methodology is well-tailored to its objective to shape and inform intermediate-term decisions on future accelerators; it reflects the priorities of the CERN Council for high energy physics, and the ESFRI roadmap more broadly for the accelerator needs of nuclear science and light sources. The JRAs were thus selectively chosen and given precedence over NA and TA activities; and the ongoing R&D investments of the participating labs are highly leveraged. …

2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management (1) (Threshold 3.00/5.00)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 12

Mark: 5.00Responsibility for the management (WP1) resides with CERN, which has long-standing experience in the organisation of large, international collaborations. The partners are the leading EU accelerator labs plus a number of institutes with experience in the relevant fields or who joined recently in the effort. Especially welcome is the participation of industrial firms. The proponents have reached out and involved a large number of non-EU institutions, which will lay the groundwork for a long-term collaborative relationship, when hopefully some of these future facilities enter project construction phase.The consortium is well above the critical mass. Responsibilities and work are well-distributed over the institutes and the EU.

3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results (Threshold 3.00/5.00)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 13

Mark: 4.50A near-term technical impact of this work will be to facilitate the luminosity upgrade of LHC. Later, this work will optimally shape and inform decisions to be made within the time-frame of FP7 about future European and Global accelerator infrastructures. In particular, it may provide a critical catalytic effect for starting the ILC, once the LHC provides some insight about the TeV-scale physics landscape. The impact of this work will also be felt in other fields, particularly x-ray FELs, an increasing number of which are under construction or on the drawing boards around the world. More broadly, this I3 would link nearly all labs in EU which perform accelerator R&D. The large labs have already been well-connected, though this bonding has not been as strong as it could be, as possible synergies have been difficult to discern so far. A number of possible synergies have been taken up within this proposal, apparently under the impetus of the ESGARD Committee. The proposal has the merit to first strengthen the bonding in the fields with potential synergies, and second to include also the smaller institutes and to give them facilitated access to a number of leading-edge facilities, which is important (WP5-7). This will improve the structure in the field of accelerator R&D.

Any other remarks :

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 14

The Panel recommends that R&D on high-field magnets are given highest priority. There is considerable potential for cost-savings in the superconducting RF work which is requesting the lion's share of the EC funding. There are two non-EU partners in this proposal: The Russian Research Center "Kurchatov Institute" (RRC KI), which will contribute to studies of materials under thermal shocks; and the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (BINP) that will carry out beam dynamics simulations. The Panel agrees that both these institutes are making unique and high -value contributions to this proposal, and thus their participation is well-justified.This proposal builds upon a successful I3 project under FP6 (CARE). The present proposal makes a clear case that this collaboration should be continued and even expanded. In view of the need to achieve long-term sustainable integration of the infrastructures and services offered, the participants should urgently set out to develop lasting structures based on mutual interest, which will allow them to increase the efficiency of their own scientific activities as well as the services they offer to the user community. Activities with this aim should figure prominently in the description of work to be agreed during negotiation. The EC funding for the current proposal should clearly focus on a sustainable integration and on reaching a stronger commitment of the public authorities linked with the participating institutes and/or user communities, allowing a growing independence of external EC funding.

But ... ... in spite of these excellent marks,

the upper limit of EC funding request was set to 10 M€!

This meant another reduction by 33 %!

This was tough! Of course I made some enemies during this “negotiation” phase, which ended 6-Feb-09 ...

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 15

6-Feb-2009 – mission accomplished We’re through – we have

a Grant Agreement and are finalizing the “Consortium Agreement”!

Total “EuCARD”: Total: 31,244,304 €,EC request: 10,000,000 €

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 16

Wrong date!

TRANSNATIONAL ACCESS

JOINT RESEARCH ACTIVITIES

SLH

C-P

P

ColMat

HFM

SRF

NCLinac

ANAC

NETWORKING ACTIVITIES

External communcation & dissemination(incl. Public information website)

AccNet

HE

P c

omm

unity

at

larg

e, g

ener

al p

ublic

MICE (TA-STFC)

Project management and internal communication

EU

RO

nu

DS

La

serla

b I

IFA

IR

PP

ILC

-H

iGra

de

-PP

HiRadMat@SPS (TA-CERN)

EuroLumi

RFTech

NEU2012

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting

EuCARD (successor of CARE)

17

EuCARD (and NCLinac) has started! 5-Dec-08: EuCARD Kick-Off

Event in the frame of the “CARE08” workshop.

27-Mar-09: NCLinac Kick-Off meeting.

1-Apr-09: The project has started!

Total NCLinac:Total: 6,562,118 €,EC request: 2,001,478 €

Today: 1st EuCARD SC meeting.

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 18

NCLINACWork-Package 9 of EuCARD

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 19

NCLinac: the 5 tasks

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

EuCARD NCLinac

Task 9.1: NCLinac Coordination and Communication

Task 9.2: Normal Conducting High Gradient Cavities

Task 9.3: Linac & FF Stabilisation

Task 9.4: Beam Delivery System

Task 9.5: Drive Beam Phase Control

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 20

M0 M18 M36 M48

Planning is being refined!

NCLinac: the 11 partners (beneficiaries)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 21

# Short name

Full name and hyperlink Country

1 CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research INO

6 CIEMAT Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas

Spain

7 CNRS/LAPP

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France

17

INFN/LNF Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Italy

20

PSI Paul Scherrer Institut Switzerland

22

RHUL Royal Holloway University of London UK

25

STFC/ASTeC

Science and Technology Facilities Council UK

28

UH Helsingin Yliopisto (University of Helsinki) Finland

33

UNIMAN University of Manchester - Cockcroft Institute UK

34

UOXF-DL The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford

UK

36

UU Uppsala Universitet Sweden

NCLinac: people (by Task and Partner)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 22

Coordination

High Gradient

Stabilisation BDS Phase control

CERN Jensen Riddone Modena, Hauviller,Mainaud-Durand

Sladen, Andersson

CIEMAT Toral

CNRS/LAPP Jeremie

INFN/LNF Marcellini, Franzini

PSI Dehler

RHUL Blair Blair, Boogert

STFC/ASTEC

Angal-Kalinin

UH Österberg, Nordlund,Djurabekova

UNIMAN Jones, D’Elia Appleby

UOXF-DL Burrows, Urner

UU Ziemann, Ruber

NCLinac: Budget (total “project share” in €)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 23

WPName 9: NCLinac

NCLinac total cost

9.1: Coordination & Communication

9.2: NC High Gradient Cavities

9.3: Linac & FF Stabilization 9.4: BDS

9.5: Drive Beam Phase Project Share

CERN 204,768 0 733,920 0 259,040 1,197,728

CIEMAT 0 379,080 0 0 0 379,080

CNRS 10,434 0 459,600 0 0 470,034

INFN 11,968 0 0 0 354,880 366,848

PSI 0 0 0 0 342,480 342,480

RHUL 31,360 0 0 650,256 0 681,616

STFC 0 0 0 222,337 0 222,337

UH 0 824,320 0 0 0 824,320

UNIMAN 0 514,560 0 226,859 0 741,419

UOXF-DL 0 0 600,960 0 0 600,960

UU 0 735,296 0 0 0 735,296

Project Share [€] 258,530 2,453,256 1,794,480 1,099,452 956,400 6,562,118

NCLinac: Collaboration workspace

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 24

NCLinac: planning in progress

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 25

Task 9.2: Normal Conducting High Gradient Cavities (Germana Riddone)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 26

Sub-task 1: Design, manufacture, and validate experimentally a Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) prototype to improve CTF3 F. Toral, D. Carrillo/CIEMAT

Sub-task 2: Explore influence of alignment errors on wake fields, elaborate and demonstrate appropriate High Order Mode (HOM) damping in the presence of alignment errors. R. Jones, A. D’Elia/Univ. of Manchester

Sub-task 3: Breakdown simulation: Develop and use atomistic simulations of atom migration enhanced by the electric field or by bombarding particles, understand what kind of roughening mechanisms lead to the onset of RF breakdown in high gradient accelerating structures. F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund/HIP (Univ. Helsinki)

Sub-task 4: Design and build equipment to diagnose the electrons, ions and light emanating from the breakdown event both in the CTF3 Two-Beam Test-Stand at CERN and inside a scanning electron microscope in UU to analyze the surface science relevant to RF-breakdown R. Ruber, V. Ziemann/Univ. Uppsala

Sub-task 5: Precise assembly: Develop a strategy of assembly for the CLIC accelerating and power extraction structures satisfying the few to 10 micrometer precision requirement of positioning both radial and longitudinal taking into account dynamical effects present during accelerator operation. K. Österberg/HIP (Univ. Helsinki)

Task 9.3: Linac and FF Stabilisation (Andrea Jeremie/LAPP)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 27

Sub-task 1: CLIC quadrupole module A. Jeremie/LAPP, C. Hauviller, H. Mainaud-Durand, M. Modenao Test and evaluate inertial sensors for accelerator environment

(magnetic field, radiation, electrical and acoustic noise from accelerator components).

o Study vibration isolation for the main linac quadrupole (principle, mock-up, feedback to be adapted to new boundary conditions) and build a test bench.

o Study the design and construction of main linac prototype magnet, build a quadrupole mock-up.

o Use this mock-up to investigate the performance of the stabilisation equipment, test the compatibility (space, interferences, and complementarities) between the repositioning system and the stabilization system in the real environment of the two beam test stand.

Sub-task 2: Final Focus Test stand D. Urner, P. Burrows/Univ. Oxford Explore the potential to achieve 0.1 nm stability scale for the final doublet quadrupoles above a few Hz by working on the design, simulation, construction and installation of the support and on the feedback design depending strongly on the final doublet support chosen. Contribute to the development of optimized low-emittance beam transport and feedback for ILC and CLIC by completing an ILC prototype ATF2 intra-train and pulse-pulse feedback and FF system.

Task 9.4: BDS (Grahame Blair/RHUL) Sub-task 1: ATF Tuning procedures and CLIC IR design R. Appleby/Uni Manchester, D. Angal-Kalinin/ASTeCo Participation in ATF2 commissioningo Testing of different tuning procedures and knobso Give design feedback from ATF2 results to ILC/CLIC BDS FFS and

IR designo IR design studies for CLIC

Sub-task 2: Precision BPMs S. Boogert/RHULAt RHUL, high precision BPMs will be developed and tested at the ATF2 with particular emphasis on systems integration. The implications for ILC and CLIC beam diagnostics will be determined via full simulations using these experimental results.

Sub-task 3: Laser-wire at ATF2 and PETRAIII G. Blair/RHULAt RHUL, Laser-Wire systems will be developed and tested at the ATF2 and PETRAIII with particular emphasis on high-speed operation. The implications for ILC and CLIC beam diagnostics will be determined via full simulations using these experimental results.

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 28

Task 9.5: Drive Beam Phase Control (F. Marcellini/LNF)

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 29

Sub-task 1: RF monitor F. Marcellini/LNF, J. Sladen, A. Andersson

Electromagnetic design by CERN and INFN. Electronics development and realization by CERN. Monitor prototypes realization by INFN. Test of final version of the system in CTF3.

Sub-task 2: Electro-optical monitor M. Dehler/PSI

PSI will design the system (pickup, laser, e.o. detector and electronics), and will build and test prototypes at the existing facilities at PSI.Common characteristics: o Very low coupling impedanceo Filters to reject wake fields and RF noiseo Application also in other machines where precise high freq beam

phase detection is necessary.

NCLinac Organisational structure

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 3030

NCLinac Steering Committee

1 representative from each participating lab

Task 9.1: NCLinac Coordination and Communication

Task 9.2: Normal

Conducting High Gradient

Cavities

Task 9.3: Linac & FF Stabilisati

on

Task 9.4: Beam

Delivery System

Task 9.5: Drive Beam

Phase Control

External Advisory Committee

OTHER FP7 RELATED CLIC R&D

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 31

EuCARD Task 10.3:

Task “Crab cavities” in WP “SRF”: Design, build and test a single LHC and CLIC crab

cavity module, including input coupler, mode couplers and tuners.

Design, build and test a LLRF and synchronization system that meets the crab cavity phase and amplitude control specifications for LHC and CLIC.

If the beam time and the necessary hardware become available, validate and test the assembled crab system solutions and LLRF control systems on LHC and CTF3 in 2011; otherwise make performance predictions based on the measured noise characteristics.

Budget (for both): 1.22 M€ total, 364 k€ EC request.

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 32

Task “Short period helical superconducting undulator” in WP “HFM” (task 7.6): Design, build and test a prototype helical

coil undulator magnet with 11.5 mm period, high peak magnetic field in Nb3Sn technology.

This is a key element of a positron source. The request came from ILC.

Total: 539 k€, EC request: 159 k€

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 33

EuCARD Task 7.6:

Accelerator related projects under FP7

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 34

Project Type BeamType

Start date

DurationYears

Total Cost

EC contribution

SLHC-pp CNI proton 1/1/08 3 11.3 M€ 5.2 M€

ILC-HiGrade pp

CNI e+,e- (LC) 1/1/08 3 10 M€ 5.0 M€

EuroNu DS neutrino 1/9/08 4 14.4 M€ 4.0 M€

EuCARD IA All 1/4/09 4 31.7 M€ 10 M€

Total 67.4 M€ 24.2 M€

The next FP7 call is announced!

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 35

Activity Call 1(02.5.07)

Call 2(20.9.07)

Call 3(29.2.08)

Call 4(11.9.08)

Call 5(17.3.09)

Call 6(3.12.09)

Call 7(24.11.09)

Call 8(autumn

2010)

Call 9(autumn

2011)

Integrating activities 272.9 161 X X

e-Infrastructures 42 50 113 4 85 X XDesign studies 31 X

Construction – support to the preparatory phase

146.7 45

Construction – support to the implementation phase

20 X X

Support to policy development and programme implementation

8 14 9 5.6 11 10 X X

Budget

(EUR million)227.7 64 281.9 113 9.6 217 115