Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | drusilla-harvey |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
04pm13-1
Performance-Based Logistics
Status Report2 March 2004
04pm13-2
• Availability of parts• High maintenance levels• Retention/turnover of
maintenance personnel• Large maintenance/supply
footprint
Operational Challenges
Integrated strategy to achieve end-to-end accountability for weapon system support that meets transformation goals and requirements.
Structural Challenges
Weapon System Support Challenges
• Equipment designed to 75-85% availability
• Disjointed acquisition and logistics processes and accountability
• $67B per year in cost; no link to output
• Disjointed, functional support structure
• 16-day CWT for high priority parts• 50% of cost tied to maintenance;
vast majority at O&I level• Aging organic depot infrastructure
• Will not support rapid force projection
• Large footprint(people and equipment)
• Complex, disjointed logistics chains
• Limited asset visibility
Implications for Transformation
• Total Life Cycle Systems Management
• Performance-Based Logistics
• Depot Partnering• Conditioned-Based
Maintenance +
Mid-Term Solutions
04pm13-3
30 PilotPrograms DoD 5000
Policy
Oversight viaDAB/DAES
New programimplementation
OperationalDemonstrations
LessonsLearned
Adjustments
Oversight viaR-TOC Forum
ReengineerProduct Support
Quadrennial Defense Review• Performance-Based Logistics• Legacy Systems• FY03 DPG• Service Implementation Schedules
Performance-Based Logistics
A joint, disciplined program to successfully implement PBL!
JACG
• CY02/03 PEO/SYSCOM• PM Roundtables• AIA Product Support• Industry/Government
Tiger Team
04pm13-4Providing operational availability; not parts.
Future System Sustainment
Partnerships Force Provider
Weapon SystemManager
Visibility into cost/risk decisions across life cycleAcquisition
Provide continuous,reliable, affordable
support
Ensure system issustained at optimum
level
Disposal
Performance Agreement
Sustainment
Industry/GovernmentPerformance-
Based Logistics
Real-TimeSystem Status
(CBM+)
Performance Agreement
04pm13-5
PBL FY03 Accomplishments• Policy and workforce
development in place
• Program migration on schedule
• Documented $15B in savings in PBBE 05
• Demonstrated best in class readiness during OIF
• Initiated PBL Roadshows
• Established Logistics Community of Practice (DAU)
• Completed DBB Review
57
71
8592
0102030405060708090
100
2002 2003* 2004* 2005** Projected PBLs Based on Approved Service Plans
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
BL
Pro
gra
ms
PBL Implementation
57
71
8592
0102030405060708090
100
2002 2003* 2004* 2005** Projected PBLs Based on Approved Service Plans
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
BL
Pro
gra
ms
PBL Implementation
04pm13-6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Logistics Response Time*
Day
s
Calendar Year*National level fills,
all requisitions
PBL programs providing significantly improved response times.
•F-117•HIMARS
•MCRS
•F-18 E/F•APU
•C-17•Sentinel
PBLPrograms
(To date)
04pm13-7
Aircraft And Equipment Pre-PBL and PBL Logistics
Response Times (LRT’s) Availability Improvements
F/A-18 Stores Management System (SMS)
Pre - PBL LRT = 42.6 Days PBL LRT = 2 Days CONUS
7 Days OCONUS
ARC-210 Pre - PBL LRT = 22.8 Days PBL LRT = 5 Days
ARC-210 Pre - PBL LRT = 22.8 Days PBL LRT = 5 Days
Tires
Pre - PBL LRT 28.9 Days PBL LRT = 2 Days CONUS
4 Days OCONUS
F-14 LANTIRN
Pre - PBL LRT = 56.9 Days PBL LRT 5 Days
H-60 Avionics Pre - PBL LRT = 52.7 PBL LRT = 8 Days
H-60 Avionics Pre - PBL LRT = 52.7 PBL LRT = 8 Days
APU Pre-PBL = 35 Days PBL PBL LRT = 6.5 Days
PBL Logistics Response Time
Achieving Commercial Standards through PBL.
04pm13-8
JSTARS B-2
F-117
AWACSCommon Ground Station
C-17
F/A-18 E/F
* PBL programs readiness exceeded traditional support; several achieved historically high availability!
Programs Contributing to GWOT*
Delivering
Capability NOW!
Delivering
Capability NOW!
04pm13-9
GWOT PBL Results
Availability on DemandAvailability on Demand
F-117 FA-18E/ F AV-8B F-14D F-15C/ E F-16C
Figure 1 – PBL programs achieved readiness during OIF
0102030
4050
6070
8090
100M
issi
on
Cap
able
Rat
es
PBL Traditional Support
F-117 FA-18E/ F AV-8B F-14D F-15C/ E F-16C
Figure 1 – PBL programs achieved readiness during OIF
0102030
4050
6070
8090
100M
issi
on
Cap
able
Rat
es
PBL Traditional Support
04pm13-10
Common Ground Station
• PM is life cycle manager
• Government led PBL strategy
• Tobyhanna is product support integrator
• Deployed 30 CGS to support OIF
• Streamlined maintenance flow
• Achieved 99% Ao during OIF
• Forward-located repair activity at Baghdad International Airport
• Achieved real-time fleet management/asset visibility
04pm13-11
DBB RecommendationsMajor
RecommendationKey Elements
(From the DBB)Ongoing Action
1. Pursue PBL Aggressively • New and legacy system application as supported by business case
• Services on schedule for BCAs• Pending SPG language
2. Issue Standard Guidance • Consistent approach to PBL• Consistent Business Case Analysis• Consumable item manager
• BCA Tiger Team 11/7• Coordinated BCA guidelines• Updated Guidebook
3. Reform financial and contract management
• Move toward a single manager• Seek funding flexibility and multi-year authority
• Management Improvement Directive
4. Leverage DAU to accelerate PBL implementation
• Create PBL Center of Excellence• Partner with industry to share lessons learned• Create Exportable teams to assist PM offices
• Ongoing at DAU• Ongoing via LOGCOP and AIA• Roadshows emerging via DAU
regional centers
5. Increase exposure to private sector practices
• Expand AF education with industry• Leverage Defense Corporate Fellows Program to
include supply chain assignments
6. Change structure/culture of PM office
• Create a central “log provider” entity to coordinate all logistics activity for the PM
• Streamline program offices based on the F-117 and FCS models
• Review PM assignments for applicability of civilian PM
• Specify tenure for Deputy PM for Logistics• Enforce Congressional mandate to keep military PMs
in place for 4 years
04pm13-12
• Joint Strike Fighter
• Future Combat System
• Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle
Weapon System Sustainment Roadmap
Historic• Suppressed Readiness• Marginal reliability• Fractionated Accountability• $67B/year• Huge footprint
• Warfighter-driven readiness
• Ultra-reliability• Clear PM
accountability• Minimal
Footprint
PM accountable for life cycle
JROC established sustainment requirements
Enabling Depot legislation
Revised Maintenance Policy
Industry Supply ChainsReengineered Training
Financial Reform (PR05)Single-line AccountingLife Cycle Cost
Management• Operational requirements
synchronized with PBBS
2000 2005 2015
57
71
8592
0102030405060708090
100
2002 2003* 2004* 2005** Projected PBLs Based on Approved Service Plans
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
BL
Pro
gra
ms
PBL Implementation
57
71
8592
0102030405060708090
100
2002 2003* 2004* 2005** Projected PBLs Based on Approved Service Plans
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
BL
Pro
gra
ms
PBL Implementations
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Army Navy Air Force Marines
1998 2002
Num
ber
Number of Partnerships(1998 & 2002)
04pm13-13
FY 04 PBL Acceleration• Strategic Planning Guidance
– Directs assessment of PBL at system level for all ACAT I and II programs
• Management Initiative Directive– Lead programs for single-line accounting
• OSD Special Interest Programs– Application of commercial supply chain practices
• Weapon System Support Metrics– Implemented via Logistics Balanced Scorecard
• Government/Industry Tiger Team– Monthly meeting to eliminate barriers
04pm13-14
Still On Schedule!!
5000 Series Updates
FY02
TLCSM WG
FY03 FY04 FY05
Revised WSM Logistics Curriculum
TLCSM WG
ServicePBL Schedules
JROCAdjustments
PBL Road Ahead
Enabling Financial Mechanisms
Workforce Development
Program Transition per Service Schedules
04pm13-15
FIELDED CURRENT FUTURE
• Transaction-based • Fractured Supply Chains• Random Failures• Batch Process orders• Limited Accountability
• Performance-Based• Integrated Chains• Fleet Management• Integrated Systems• PM Accountability
• Capability-Based• Industrial Integration• Autonomic Logistics• End-to-End Solutions• Single-Line Accounting
F-18 C/D
DDG
BRADLEY
F-18 E/F
LPD-17
Stryker
JSF
DDX
FCS
2000 201016 days 5-8 days 1-5 days
We Must . . .
ResponseTime:
. . . therefore, we will!!