Date post: | 16-Nov-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hirensurat |
View: | 14 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 1
NExT April 2000
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 2
NExT April 2000
The Diagnostic PlotInstructional Objectives
1. Identify time regions.
2. Identify flow regimes.
3. List factors that affect pressure response in early time.
4. List boundaries that affect pressure response in late time.
Upon completion of this section, the student should be able to:
1. Identify the early, middle, and late time regions on a diagnostic plot.
2. Identify the following flow regimes from their characteristic shape on a diagnostic plot: volumetric/PSS/recharge behavior, radial flow, linear flow, bilinear flow, spherical flow.
3. List 3 things that may affect the pressure response during the early time region.
4. List 3 types of boundaries that may affect the pressure responseduring the late time region.
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 3
NExT April 2000
The Diagnostic Plot
Elapsed time, hrs
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive,
psi
The diagnostic plot is a log-log plot of pressure change and pressure derivative on the vertical axis vs. test time on the horizontal axis. The pressure derivative is defined as the derivative of pressure with respect to the natural logarithm of time.
Pressure change vs. time
Flow test -
Buildup test -
Pressure derivative
Change in pressure per unit fractional change in time
Mathematically,
Has units of pressure, can be plotted together with pressure on same graph
wfi ppp =( )0tppp wfws ==
( )tlnp
tp
t
=
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 4
NExT April 2000
Time Regions on the Diagnostic Plot
Elapsed time, hrs
Early-timeregion
Middle-time
region
Late-timeregionP
ress
ure
chan
ge, d
eriv
ativ
e,ps
i
Early-time region: wellbore and near-wellbore effects. These effects include wellbore storage, skin factor, partial penetration, phase redistribution, and finite- and infinite-conductivity hydraulic fractures.
Middle time region: infinite-acting reservoir behavior. A homogeneous reservoir will give a horizontal derivative responseduring the middle time region. Data during this region provide the best estimate of reservoir permeability.
Late-time region: boundary effects. There are a large number of different types of boundaries that may affect the pressure response, including sealing faults, closed reservoirs, and gas/water, oil/water, and gas/oil contacts.
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 5
NExT April 2000
Flow Regimes
Common geometric shapes
Different flow patterns may appear at different times in a single test
Flow regimes follow sequence within model
Common geometric shapes occur in many different reservoir models
A single reservoir model may exhibit different flow patterns at different times
- Flow regimes occur in a specific sequence for a given model
Flow Regimes
- Volumetric behavior
- Radial flow
- Linear flow
- Bilinear flow
- Spherical flow
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 6
NExT April 2000
Volumetric Behavior
Volumetric behavior occurs when the wellbore, the reservoir, or part of the reservoir acts like a tank. Perhaps the most common occurrence of volumetric behavior is in wellbore storage, although it is not limited to WBS.
Volumetric behavior can occur during either a flow test or a buildup test. However, if it occurs during a buildup test, it indicates that whatever part of the reservoir acts like a tank is being recharged from somewhere else. During a flow test, volumetric behavior may indicate a closed reservoir.
Causes
Wellbore storage
Pseudosteady state
Recharge
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 7
NExT April 2000
Volumetric Behavior
VV btmp +=General Form
Wellbore Storage
Pseudosteady-State Flow
C
qBtp
24=
+
+= s
r
r
kh
qB
hrc
qBtpp
w
e
etwfi 4
3ln
2.1410744.02
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 8
NExT April 2000
Volumetric Behavior
VV btmp +=General Form
Derivative ( )
tmt
btmt
t
pt
V
VV
=
+=
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 9
NExT April 2000
Volumetric Behavior
Time
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive
1
1
Volumetric behavior is recognized on the diagnostic plot by the pressure derivative following a unit-slope line, where the line moves one log cycle vertically for each log cycle of horizontal movement.
The pressure change may or may not follow the same unit slope line. During wellbore storage, typically the pressure change and the pressure derivative will lie on top of each other. During pseudosteady-state flow or recharge, the pressure and derivative will not coincide.
Shape of derivative
Unit slope line
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 10
NExT April 2000
Radial Flow
Radial flow occurs in many common situations.
Data within the radial flow regime can be used to estimate formation permeability and skin factor. Causes of radial flow
- Vertical well- Fractured well after transient has moved beyond tips of
fracture- Horizontal well before transient reaches top and bottom of
zone- Horizontal well after transient has moved beyond ends of
wellbore
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 11
NExT April 2000
Radial Flow
+
= s
rc
kt
kh
qBp
wt
869.023.3log6.162
2
( ) btmp += log
Vertical Well
General Form
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 12
NExT April 2000
Radial Flow
( ) btmp += logGeneral Form
( )( )
303.2
log
mt
btmt
t
pt
=
+=
Derivative
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 13
NExT April 2000
Radial Flow
Time
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive
On the diagnostic plot, radial flow is recognized by the horizontal derivative.
Shape of Derivative- Horizontal
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 14
NExT April 2000
Linear Flow
Linear flow is also quite common, occurring in channel reservoirs, hydraulically fractured wells, and horizontal wells.
From data within the linear flow regime, we can estimate channelwidth or fracture half-length, if we know the permeability. Or, we can estimate the permeability perpendicular to a horizontal well if we know how much of the well is open to flow. Causes of linear flow
- Well with a high-conductivity fracture- Well in a channel reservoir (reservoir with parallel no-flow
boundaries)- Horizontal well
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 15
NExT April 2000
Linear Flow
2126.16
=
tc
kt
khw
qBp
21064.4
=
tf c
kt
khL
qBp
Channel
Hydraulic Fracture
LL btmp +=21General Form
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 16
NExT April 2000
Linear Flow
LL btmp +=21General Form
Derivative( )
21
21
2
1tm
t
btmt
t
pt
L
LL
=
+=
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 17
NExT April 2000
Linear Flow
Time
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive
2
1
The linear flow regime is recognized on the diagnostic plot by the derivative following a half-slope line. The half-slope line moves one log cycle vertically for each two log-cycles of horizontal movement.
The pressure change may or may not also follow a half-slope line. In an undamaged hydraulically fractured well, the pressure change typically follows a half-slope line. In a channel reservoir, a hydraulically fractured well with damage, or a horizontal well, the pressure change will approach the half-slope line from above.
Shape of Derivative- slope
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 18
NExT April 2000
Bilinear Flow
Bilinear flow occurs primarily in low-conductivity hydraulically fractured wells.
From this flow regime, we can estimate fracture conductivity wkf.
Causes of bilinear flow- Well with a low-conductivity fracture (common)- Fractured or horizontal well in a transient dual porosity
reservoir (rare but theoretically possible)
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 19
NExT April 2000
Bilinear Flow
412111.44
=
kc
t
wkh
qBp
tf Hydraulic
Fracture
General Form BB btmp +=41
Wkf=fracture conducivity, md-ft
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 20
NExT April 2000
Bilinear Flow
General Form BB btmp +=41
Derivative( )
41
41
4
1tm
t
btmt
t
pt
B
BB
=
+=
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 21
NExT April 2000
Bilinear Flow
Time
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive
4
1
The bilinear flow regime is recognized on the diagnostic plot bythe derivative following a quarter-slope line. The quarter-slope line moves one log cycle vertically for every four log-cycles of horizontal movement.
The pressure change may or may not also follow a quarter-slope line. In an undamaged hydraulically fractured well, the pressure change typically follows the quarter-slope line as soon as wellbore storage effects have ended. In a hydraulically fractured well with damage, the pressure change will approach the quarter-slope line from above.
This flow regjme is easily confused with the linear flow regime.Particular attention should be paid to the slope of the derivative to distinguish these two flow regimes.
Shape of Derivative- slope
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 22
NExT April 2000
Spherical Flow
Spherical flow occurs when the pressure transient is free to propagate in three dimensions. This can occur for wells that penetrate only a short distance into the pay zone, or in wells that have only a limited number of perforations open to flow. This flow regime also commonly occurs during wireline formation tests.
From data in the spherical flow regime, we can estimate the geometric mean permeability.
Causes of spherical flow
- Vertical well with only a few perforations open
- Vertical well with only a small part of the zone perforated
- Some wireline formation test tools
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 23
NExT April 2000
Spherical Flow
General Form
=
kt
rc
kr
qpp pt
pwfi
2
14
Spherical Probe (RFT)
21= tmbp SS
Nomenclature
The Repeat Formation Tester (RFT) probe equation uses SI units:
ct - Total compressibility, Pa-1
k - Permeability, m2
pi - Initial pressure, Pa
pwf - Probe pressure, Pa
q - Flow rate, m3/s
rp - Probe radius, m
t - Time, s
- Porosity, fraction - Viscosity, Pas
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 24
NExT April 2000
RFT Units
Nomenclature The Repeat Formation Tester (RFT) probe equation us es
SI units: ct - Total compressibility, Pa -1
k - Permeability, m 2 p i - Initial pressure, Pa pwf - Probe pressure, Pa q - Flow rate, m 3/s rp - Probe radius, m t - Time, s - Porosity, fraction - Viscosity, Pas
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 25
NExT April 2000
Spherical Flow
21= tmbp SSGeneral Form
Derivative( )
21
21
2
1
=
=
tm
t
tmbt
t
pt
S
SS
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 26
NExT April 2000
Spherical Flow
Time
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive
1
2
The spherical flow regime is recognized on the diagnostic plot by the derivative following a negative half-slope line. The pressure change approaches a horizontal line from below. The pressure change during spherical flow will never exhibit a straight line with the same slope as the derivative.
Spherical flow can occur during either a drawdown or a buildup test.
Shape of Derivative
- Negative slope
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 27
NExT April 2000
Flow Regimes on the Diagnostic Plot
Wellborestorage Spherical flow
Radialflow
Recharge?
Elapsed time, hrs
Pre
ssur
e ch
ange
, der
ivat
ive,
psi
Indication of flow regime - One of the biggest advantages of the diagnostic plot is the ability to identify flow regimes. The slope of the derivative plot is a direct indication of the flow regime.
After radial flow period, it can be noticed a very definitive bounded reservoir behavior. A unit slope at late times indicatesthat kh/u is different out in the reservoir we have two zones with different mobilities
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 28
NExT April 2000
Exercise 1Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot
FLOWREGM.WTD (Diagnostic Plot)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Adj
uste
d pr
essu
re c
hang
e, p
si
Radial equivalent adjusted time, hr
Identify the flow regimes.
WELLBORE STORAGE & LINEAR FLOW ARE ALMOST THE ONLY PERIODS EASY TO IDENTIFY.!!.A HIGH SKIN ALSO IS PRESENT.
THE LAST PERIOD INDICATES CONSTANT PRESSURE AT THE BOUNDARY
THE RADIAL FLOW PERIOD IS VERY DIFFICULT TO DEFINE
A WELL NEAR THE CENTER OF A LONG CLOSED RECTANGLE WITH A HIGH SKIN MIGHT REPRODUCE THIS BEHAVIOR BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT IS THE ONLY MODEL THAT CAN REPRODUCE THE BEHAVIOR OF THIS WELL TEST..INTEGRATED WELL TEST INTERPRETATION IS THE ANSWER
Flow Regimes and the Diagnostic Plot 29
NExT April 2000
1. Stewart, G. and Wittmann, M.: Interpretation of the Pressure Response of the Repeat Formation Tester, paper SPE 8362 presented at the 1979 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, September 23-26.
2. Smolen, J. J., and Litsey, L. R.: Formation Evaluation Using Wireline Formation Tester Pressure Data, JPT (January 1979) 25-32.