Date post: | 20-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | irind-cocoli |
View: | 12 times |
Download: | 0 times |
9/9/2011
1
A quick, selected review of strategic management as taught
at the undergraduate level
(I didn’t say a “short review”)
External Analysis of the Firm
9/9/2011
2
SWOT Analysis
• SWOT analysis (the acronym stands for…)
• Strengths
• Weaknesses
• Opportunities
• ThreatsIt’s a basic technique for analyzing the firm’s and the industry’s conditions – it starts profitable discussions
Why I’m not a fan of SWOT
• Leads to simplistic thinking
• Shortcuts evaluation of own and other firms
• Mistakes are too frequent in applying SWOT
– Industries don’t have strengths or weaknesses (except in rare circumstances)
I don’t expect to see SWOT used in anything written by MBAs
9/9/2011
3
(firm’s remote & close environments)Technological
Legal / Political
Demographic
Economic
Socio-cultural
GlobalCompetitors
Customers
Labor SuppliersThe firm’sInternal
Environment
The General Environment
Changes in the economy, for example such as…
• Interest rates
• Unemployment
• Consumer Price index
• Trends in GDP
…can exert pressures for change on our most important target market segments, competitors, suppliers,
etc.
9/9/2011
4
TechnologicalThe Competitive Environment
Legal / Political
Demographic
Economic
Sociocultural
Global Competitors
Customers
Labor SuppliersThe firm’sInternal
Environment
The Competitive Environment
• Forces for change in the competitive environment arise from:
– Competitors
– Customers
– Suppliers
– (Labor market)
• Sometimes called the task, competitive, or industry environment
• This leads us to Porter’s “five forces” model
9/9/2011
5
Porter’s Five Forces Model of Industry Competition
Using Porter’s 5‐forces model
• Porter’s Five Forces Model: BMW
– Threat of new entrants ‐‐ Very low
– Threat of substitutes ‐‐ Medium
–Power of suppliers ‐‐ Medium
–Power of buyers ‐‐ Medium
–Rivalry among existing firms ‐‐ Very High
Source: Developed from www.bmw.com
9/9/2011
6
The Threat of New Entrants
• Profits of established firms in the industry may be eroded by new competitors
• High entry barriers lessen threat of new entry– Economies of scale
– Product differentiation
– Capital requirements
– Switching costs
– Access to distribution channels
– Cost disadvantages independent of scale
The Bargaining Power of Buyers
Buyers may organize or become powerful enough to threaten an industry to…
– Force down prices
– Bargain for higher quality or more services
– Play competitors against each other
9/9/2011
7
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Suppliers can exert power by threatening to raise prices or reduce the quality of
purchased goods and services
The Threat of Substitute Products and Services
• Substitutes are NOT competitors’ products
– They are alternative ways of dealing with the need
– Water v. whiskey / Coke / coffee
• They limit the potential returns of an industry
– They act as a ceiling on the prices that firms in that industry can profitably charge
9/9/2011
8
The Intensity of Rivalry among Competitors in an Industry is signaled
by…
• Jockeying for position
• Price competition
• Advertising battles
• Product introductions
• Increased customer service or warranties
The Value Net
9/9/2011
9
Strategic Groups within Industries
Two unassailable assumptions in industry analysis, that
– No two firms are totally different
– No two firms are exactly the same leads us to…
Strategic groups, which are…
• Clusters of firms that share similar strategic approaches
– Breadth of product and geographic scope
– Price/quality
– Degree of vertical integration
– Type of distribution system
Strategic Group Map of US Retail Jewelry Industry
Pri
ce /
Qu
alit
y / I
mag
e
High
Low
Medium
Product Line / Merchandise Mix
Specialty Jewelers
Full-line Jewelers
Limited-category Retailers
Broad-category Retailers
Outlet Mall Retailers
National, Regional, & Local Guild -“Fine Jewelry”
Stores
National Jewelry Chains
Local Jewelers
Credit Jewelers Catalog
Showrooms
Off-Price Retailers
Small Independent
Guild Jewelers
Prestige Departmentalized Retailers
Upscale Department Stores
Chains
Discounters
9/9/2011
10
Strategic Groups within Industries
The value of strategic groups as an analytical tool is to…
– Identify barriers to mobility that protect a group from attacks by other groups
– Identify groups whose competitive position may be marginal or tenuous
– Chart the future direction of firms’ strategies
– Thinking through the implications of each industry trend for the strategic group as a whole
Internal Analysis of the Firm
9/9/2011
11
Resource‐Based View of the Firm
•Two perspectives – so far we’ve been talking about…‐ An external analysis of the industry and its competitive environment
But we also need to look within, at the…
‐ The internal analysis of phenomena within a company
• In firms we combine three key types of resources‐ Tangible resources
‐ Intangible resources
‐ Organizational capabilities
To create value‐added in the form of goods and services
Work together for 2 minutes; come up with an example of how firms cited by your book’s author sought advantage by improving in a
value chain area
9/9/2011
12
Tangible resources
Easiest to identify, sometimes easy to duplicate, they include…
Intangible resourcesDifficult for competitors (and the firm
itself) to account for or imitate, typically embedded in unique
routines and practices that have evolved over time
9/9/2011
13
Organizational capabilities
Skills that a firm uses to transform inputs to outputs, and capacity to combine tangible and intangible
resources to add value
What is competitive advantage?
How would we see it in…
9/9/2011
14
Firm Resources & Capabilities build toward sustainable Competitive Advantage
Is the resource or capability…
Valuable……………………..
Rare…………………………
Difficult to imitate…………..
Difficult to substitute …...….
That may imply…
It can help neutralize threats and exploit opportunities
Not many firms possess it, or
it’s physically unique
Path dependency
Causal ambiguity, or
Social complexity
No equivalent strategic resources or capabilities
Moving toward Sustainable Competitive Advantage?
Talk together for 2 min. Come up with a standardized product commonly subject to price competition.
9/9/2011
15
Assessing the state of a firm’s internal resources and capabilities is
part art and part science.
On a macro‐scale, we can evaluate “Firm Performance”
There are two approaches for evaluating firm performance‐ Financial ratio analysis
• Balance sheet
• Income statement
• Historical comparison
• Comparison with industry norms
• Comparison with key competitors
‐ Balanced scorecard (stakeholder perspective)
• Employees
• Customers
• Owners
9/9/2011
16
“Under the hood”‐ looking at processes ‐ we can use financial ratio
analysis•Five types of financial ratios‐ Short‐term solvency or liquidity
‐ Long‐term solvency measures (aka leverage)
‐ Asset management (aka activity or turnover ratios)
‐ Profitability
‐ Market value
•Meaningful ratio analysis must include…‐ Analysis of how ratios change over time
‐ How ratios are interrelated
Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/IrwinStrategic Management: Text and Cases, 4e
5Business-Level (or
Competitive) Strategy
9/9/2011
17
Generic Competitive Strategies
Mar
ket
Tar
get
Type of Advantage Sought
Overall Low-CostLeadership
Strategy
BroadDifferentiation
Strategy
FocusedLow-CostStrategy
FocusedDifferentiation
Strategy
Lower Cost Uniqueness
Broad Range of Buyers
Narrow Buyer
Segmentor Niche
Value‐Chain Activities: Cost Leadership
9/9/2011
18
Comparing Experience Curve Effects
Value‐Chain Activities: Differentiation
9/9/2011
19
Stages of the Industry Life
Cycle
Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/IrwinStrategic Management: Text and Cases, 4e
6Corporate‐Level Strategy:
Creating Value using Diversification
9/9/2011
20
Now, in corporate‐level strategy…
…the principle concern is to identify the industry or industries a company should participate in to maximize
long‐run profitability
But, be aware, just as tactical actions at the business‐unit level may be confused with “strategy” when they’re not (competitive strategy,
that is)……so too, at the corporate‐level there are actions taken under the name of
strategy that are not.
9/9/2011
21
1st Strategy: Concentration on a single industry (a single line of business)
• Here a corporation chooses to focus its resources and capabilities on competing successfully within the confines of a particular product market
• Examples of companies that pursue concentration:
– McDonalds ‐‐ Starbuck’s
– Neiman Marcus
2nd Strategy: Horizontal Integration
• The process of acquiring or merging with industry competitors to achieve the competitive advantage that comes with large size– Merger‐ an agreement between two companies to pool their resources in a combined operation
– Acquisition ‐ Occurs when a company uses capital resources to purchase another company.
• An increase in horizontal integration = an increased level of concentration in an industry
9/9/2011
22
3rd Strategy: Sharing Resources (Activities)
• Corporations can also create value by sharing tangible and value‐creating activities across their business units
– Common manufacturing facilities
– Distribution channels
– Sales forces
• Sharing activities provide two sources of value
– Cost savings
– Revenue enhancements
Sharing Resources at Procter & Gamble
9/9/2011
23
4th Strategy: Diversification into multiple lines of business
In order for the jointly owned lines of business to be worth more under one ownership the Corporation has to find
ways to develop, deploy, or use distinctive competencies between
subsidiaries
4th Strategy: Diversification (cont’d)
A diversification can help a company create value in 3 main ways:
1. Transferring competencies among businesses
2. Realizing economies of scope
3. Demanding superior internal governance (aka “parenting”)
A corporation’s diversification action is one of two types…
a. Related, or
b. Unrelated
9/9/2011
24
4a: Related Diversification:
Transferring Competencies
Related Diversification/Economies of scope:
Market Power
• Two principal means to achieve synergy through market power
– Pooled negotiating power
– Vertical integration
• Government regulations may restrict this power
9/9/2011
25
Pooled Negotiating Power
• Similar businesses working together can have stronger bargaining position relative to
– Suppliers
– Customers
– Competitors
• Abuse of bargaining power may affect relationships with customers, suppliers and competitors
Related Diversification / Economies of scope / market power:
Vertically integrating along the Value‐Added Chain
9/9/2011
26
Related or Unrelated DiversificationStrategies
Unrelated diversification has little to gain from horizontal relationships – so they also use these “related” strategies (and tactics)
– “Parenting”
– restructuring of businesses
– Capital Allocation of resources
– Appropriate human resources practices
– Financial controls (carrot and stick)
Corporate “Parenting” & Restructuring
• Corporate Parenting
– Parenting—creating value within business units; depends on…
• Experience of the corporate office to “teach” the sub how to compete better
• Support of the corporate office
• Corporate Restructuring
– Find poorly performing firms
• With unrealized potential
• On the threshold of significant positive change
– Focus effort into those with potential
– exiting business areas without potential
9/9/2011
27
A key part of restructuring the portfolio of the corporation’s subs is to understand
their role & potential
Key
Each circle represents one of the firm’s business units
Size of circle represents the relative size of the business unit in terms of revenue
Life‐cycle‐related tactics to manage Diversification
While growing…• Acquisitions or mergers• Pooling resources of other
companies with a firm’s own resource base through…– Joint ventures– Strategic alliances
• Internal development toward…– New products– New markets– New technology
While shrinking….
• Means of exit
– Divestiture
– Harvesting
– Liquidation
9/9/2011
28
Exit or “end‐game” Strategies(these are really tactics to manage
Diversification)
• Three main “exit strategies” are…
– Divestment ‐most favorable
– Harvesting ‐ only works under specific conditions
– Liquidation ‐ least favorable
Divestment
…selling a business unit as a going concern to the highest bidder.
Bidders might be…
Independent Investors
The subsidiary’s own managers
Other Companies – especially competitors
9/9/2011
29
Harvesting
• Halting investments in order to maximize short‐to‐medium‐term cash flow
• If employees catch on, morale can sink very quickly and the strategy may fail
Liquidation
• Shutting down the operation of a business or business unit
• Least attractive strategy because the company is required to write off its investments in the unit that is shutting down