+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal...

0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal...

Date post: 04-Aug-2019
Category:
Upload: nguyenphuc
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
1 Supplementary information Carbon dots based nanopowders and their application for fingerprint recovery D. Fernandes a , M. J. Krysmann b , A. Kelarakis a * a Centre for Materials Science, School of Forensic and Investigative Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR12HE, U.K. b School of Pharmacy and Biosciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR12HE, U.K. email: [email protected], tel: 004417724172 Experimental Section Synthesis and characterization of C-dots To synthesize C-dots we followed a protocol previously described in the literature 1 . In short, citric acid monohydrate (CA) and ethanolamine (EA) (both reactants were obtained from Aldrich) were mixed with a molar ratio 1 to 3. The mixture was treated at 180 o C for 30 min under reflux. The reflux condenser was then removed, the temperature was raised to 230 o C and the reaction was carried on for additional 30 min. The product was then cooled at room temperature, dispersed in water and was dialyzed against deionized water using SnakeSkin Pleated Dialysis Tubing membrane with a molecular weight cut-off of 3500 Da. C-dots, thus received, have diameter within the range 15-25 nm (S.I. Figure 1). In a previous report 1 , elemental analysis indicated the presence of 44.85% C, 5.75% H, 10.85% N, while their quantum yield was estimated 15% relative to anthracene with λ ex =365 nm. Synthesis and characterization of biomass derived C-dots The synthesis of biomass based C-dots is based on a method described previously by us 2 . In particular, 100 g of freshly collected grass were mixed with 1 l of water and then processed in a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for ChemComm. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Transcript
Page 1: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C 7KLV (OHFWURQLF6XSSOHPHQWDU\0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP

1

Supplementary information

Carbon dots based nanopowders and their application for fingerprint recovery

D. Fernandesa, M. J. Krysmannb, A. Kelarakis a*

aCentre for Materials Science, School of Forensic and Investigative Sciences, University of

Central Lancashire, Preston PR12HE, U.K.

bSchool of Pharmacy and Biosciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR12HE,

U.K.

email: [email protected], tel: 004417724172

Experimental Section

Synthesis and characterization of C-dots

To synthesize C-dots we followed a protocol previously described in the literature1. In short,

citric acid monohydrate (CA) and ethanolamine (EA) (both reactants were obtained from

Aldrich) were mixed with a molar ratio 1 to 3. The mixture was treated at 180 oC for 30 min

under reflux. The reflux condenser was then removed, the temperature was raised to 230 oC

and the reaction was carried on for additional 30 min. The product was then cooled at room

temperature, dispersed in water and was dialyzed against deionized water using SnakeSkin

Pleated Dialysis Tubing membrane with a molecular weight cut-off of 3500 Da. C-dots, thus

received, have diameter within the range 15-25 nm (S.I. Figure 1). In a previous report1,

elemental analysis indicated the presence of 44.85% C, 5.75% H, 10.85% N, while their

quantum yield was estimated 15% relative to anthracene with λex=365 nm.

Synthesis and characterization of biomass derived C-dots

The synthesis of biomass based C-dots is based on a method described previously by us2. In

particular, 100 g of freshly collected grass were mixed with 1 l of water and then processed in

a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for ChemComm.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015

Page 2: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C 7KLV (OHFWURQLF6XSSOHPHQWDU\0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP

2

for 4 h in air. The approximately 10 g of carbonaceous material thus produced was dispersed

in water, refluxed in a 3 M HNO3 solution for 48 h, centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min at

least three times and dialyzed against deionized water for several days using a Snake Skin

Pleated Dialysis Tubing membrane with a molecular weight cutoff of 3500 Da. It has been

reported2 that the nanoparticles thus prepared have diameter within 25-30 nm and are

composed by 48.57% C, 2.64% H, 6.98% N.

Preparation of mixed powders

Colloidal silica Ludox HS-30 with a mean diameter of 18 nm was purchased from Sigma

Aldrich. To prepare the hybrid powders, C-dots were added the dispersion (weight ratio 1 to

150), followed by freeze-drying. Alternatively, TiO2 (Aldrich), laponite clay (Southern Clay

Products) and a commercially available white fingerprint powder (K9 Scene of Crime

Equipment Limited) were used. C-dots/laponite, C-dots/ white fingerprint powder and C-

dots/ TiO2 were prepared via freeze-drying in a similar manner. The quantum yield of C-

dots/silica, C-dots/fingerprint powder, C-dots/laponite was estimated 15%, 14% and 10%

respectively relative to anthracene with λex=365 nm.

Fingerprint recovery

A squirrel-hair brush was used to apply the powders to fingerprints deposited on glass slides,

polymers, papers, soft drink bottle foil and metal surfaces.

Fluorescence imaging

The fluorescence microscopy images were obtained via a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope

through band-pass filters of different wavelengths; UV excitation, blue excitation and green

excitation (dapi, gfp, texas red, respectively).

Page 3: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C 7KLV (OHFWURQLF6XSSOHPHQWDU\0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP

3

S.I. Figure 1. TEM images of C-dots.

S.I. Figure 2. Photoluminescence spectra (under different excitation wavelengths) of aqueous

dispersions containing 13 μg/ml C-dots in the presence of 150 times higher concentration of

a) fingerprint powder and b) laponite.

S.I. Figure 3. (a) Fingerprint deposited on a glass slide developed with 0.7wt% C-dots/

laponite and (b-d) fluorescence images (magnification x100) under UV, blue and green

radiation, respectively.

b c d

a

ab

300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 7000.0

5.0x105

1.0x106

1.5x106

2.0x106

290 nm 320 nm 350 nm 380 nm 410 nm 440 nm 470 nm

(a)

Inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

Wavelength (nm)300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700

0.0

5.0x105

1.0x106 290 nm 320 nm 350 nm 380 nm 410 nm 440 nm 470 nm

(b)

Inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

Wavelength (nm)

Page 4: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C 7KLV (OHFWURQLF6XSSOHPHQWDU\0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP

4

ab c d

S.I. Figure 4. (a) Fingerprint deposited on a metal surface developed with 0.7wt% C-dots/

laponite and (b-d) fluorescence images (magnification x100) under UV, blue and green

radiation, respectively.

S.I. Figure 5. (a) Fingerprint deposited on a metal surface developed with laponite and (b-d)

fluorescence images (magnification x100) under UV, blue and green radiation, respectively.

b c da

S.I. Figure 6. (a) Fingerprint deposited on a glass slide developed with 0.7wt% biomass

derived C-dots/TiO2and (b-d) fluorescence images (magnification x100) under UV, blue and

green radiation, respectively.

Page 5: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP 7KLV · a domestic blender. The mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in an oven at 300 °C 7KLV (OHFWURQLF6XSSOHPHQWDU\0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHP&RPP

5

a

b c d

S.I. Figure 7. (a) Fingerprint deposited on a glass slide developed with 0.7wt% biomass

derived C-dots/ laponite and (b-d) fluorescence images (magnification x100) under UV, blue

and green radiation, respectively.

References

1. A. Kelarakis, M.J. Krysmann, P. Dallas, E.P. Giannelis J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,747-

750

2. A. Kelarakis, M.J. Krysmann, E.P. Giannelis Green Chemistry, 2012, 14, 3141-3145.


Recommended