1

2006 AYP Update

Performance Reporting DivisionTexas Education Agency

ESC Title I MeetingSeptember 18, 2006

2

Overview of Session

2006 AYP Results

AYP Appeals and Exceptions

2007 Assessments and AYP

Overview of AYP Process 2006 AYP Process Plan for 2007 AYP Process

3

2006 AYP Results

87% of districts and 81% of campuses met AYP in 2006.

Title I School Improvement for the 2006-07 school year includes 60 districts and 291 campuses

4

2006 AYP Results

Seven districts and 22 campuses were Not Evaluated under the Hurricane Rita Provision

Only two campuses failed participation due to the Displaced Student group.USDE denied altering the AYP status or

School Improvement Requirements for these campuses

5

2006 AYP District Results

AYP Results2006

Count Percent

Did Not Meet AYP

Missed due to the 3% Federal Cap 88 59.8%

Missed due to Cap and Other Reasons 3 2.0%

Reasons other than 3% Cap 57 38.5%

Performance Only 22

Participation Only 6

Other Measure Only 9

Combination of Measures 20

Total Missed AYP 148 100.0%

6

2006 AYP Campus Results

AYP Results2006

Count Percent

Did Not Meet AYP

Missed due to the 3% Federal Cap 215 34.5%

Missed due to Cap and Other Reasons 41 6.6%

Reasons other than 3% Cap 368 59.0%

Performance Only 223

Participation Only 31

Other Measure Only 35

Combination of Measures 79

Total Missed AYP 624 100.0%

7

AYP Appeals

September 20: Appeals deadline (must be postmarked by this date)

Mid-December: Districts will receive their appeal decision notification letters and TEA will release final 2006 results updated with the results of appeals.

8

Overview of AYP Appeals Process

a. General Considerations

b. Special Circumstance Appeals

c. Other Circumstance Exceptions

9

General Appeals

Appeals are not a data correction opportunity.

Appeals are not considered for areas where a district/campus met AYP or was Not Evaluated.

Appeals are considered for areas where AYP was missed, even if the result would mean the district/campus still misses AYP overall.

10

Special Circumstance Appeals Hurricane Katrina/Rita Indicator Coding

Districts impacted by Hurricane Rita but not eligible for the Hurricane Rita Provision

Districts with students served by Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf

Title I Targeted Assistance Campuses

Inclusion of Grades 9 and 11 TAKS

Districts Annexed by Order of the Commissioner

11

Appeals based on Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf

Students were not identified as automatic exceptions

Districts do provide educational services for students with auditory impairments and possibly other disabilities

Appeals evaluated based on the PEIMS student disability and instructional arrangement

Student identifying information must be provided

12

Other Circumstance Exceptions

Texas did not exceed the 3% cap on proficient results even with all exceptions

Other circumstance exceptions will be considered

Submitted as a regular appeal by 9/20/06

Refer to 2005 Exceptions Guidelines www.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2005

13

AYP Exceptions to the Cap

Federal 3% cap is extended by the Count or Number of Exceptions

Total Cap applied to eligible districts:

Federal 3% cap + Total Exceptions

14

Total Exceptions Identified

Applicable to school districts registered through RF Tracker

Only students evaluated within the federal cap in AYP

Of these, students identified in PEIMS as receiving services in a Residential Treatment Facility

Total Count of students extends the cap

15

2007 Assessments and AYP

TAKS-INot offered in AYP subjects and grade levels

TAKS-AltField test results included as participants, but

counted as non-proficient (failing)

LDAA Not counted as participants

16

PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS

PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – without CAP

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED

Overview of AYP Process

17

Overview of AYP ProcessPARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS

Students Enrolled on the Day of Testing(Denominator)

PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

Students Tested, both scored and not scored(Numerator)

Not Included

Absent

Not Tested (blank document)

18

Overview of AYP ProcessPARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

Students Tested, both scored and not scored(Numerator)

PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

Scored, valid results(Denominator)

Not Included

• Mobile Students

• Tested but not scored

• Absent

• Not tested (blank document)

19

Overview of AYP ProcessPERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

Scored, valid results(Denominator)

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD

Proficient Results for all students (Numerator of Source Data Table)

Not Included

• Not Proficient (fail)

Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

20

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD

Proficient Results for all students meeting the assessment standard

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED

Proficient Results of 3% of District total number of Students Enrolled

on the Day of Testing

Overview of AYP Process

Not Included

Proficient Results from Alternative Assessments that

Exceed the Cap

21

2006 AYP Process

PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS

2006: LDAA Included

PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

2006: LDAA Included

Not Included

Absent

Not Tested (blank document)

22

2006 AYP ProcessPARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

2006: LDAA Included

PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

2006: LDAA Included

Not Included

• Mobile Students

• Tested but not scored

• Absent

• Not tested (blank document)

23

2006 AYP Process

PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

2006: LDAA Included

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD

2006: LDAA Included when Standard Met

Not Included

• Not Proficient (fail)

Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

24

2006 AYP Process

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD

2006: LDAA Included when Standard Met

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED

2006: LDAA Included if within Cap

Not Included

Proficient Results that Exceed Cap from

SDAA Below Grade Level

LDAA

25

Plan for 2007 AYP Process

PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS

2007: LDAA & TAKS ALT Included

PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

2007: TAKS ALT Included

Not Included 2007: LDAA Absent Not Tested (blank document)

26

Plan for 2007 AYP ProcessPARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING

2007: LDAA Not Included TAKS ALT Included

PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

2007: LDAA Not Included TAKS ALT Included

Not Included

• Mobile Students

• Tested but not scored

• Absent

• Not tested (blank document)

27

PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED

2007: LDAA Not Included TAKS ALT Included

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD

Plan for 2007 AYP Process

Not Included2007: TAKS ALT Not Proficient

• Not Proficient (fail)

Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

28

Plan for 2007 AYP ProcessPERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD

2007: TAKS Alt Not Included since resultsare Not Proficient

PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED

Not Included 2007Proficient Results that Exceed Cap from

SDAA Below Grade Level

29

AYP Resources AYP Guide

AYP Information Packet on TEASE

2006 Texas Consolidated State Application Workbook

August 22, 2006: August TETN Accountability Presentation (side 14 – 16)

April 12, 2006: ACET Presentation on Federal AYP process (slide 8)

30

AYP Contact Information

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Web www.tea.state.tx.us/ayp

Email performance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us

Phone (512) 463-9704