Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | helen-pearson |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2
An Energy Crisis?
The Bush Administration’s Energy Strategy Report stated: "America in the year 2001 faces the most serious energy shortage since the oil embargoes of the 1970's.”
Gas prices today (April 05) at $2.50 American imports over half of its oil Drilling for oil in Alaska’s Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge is supposed to be an important part of nation’s response to this crisis
3
Questions explored
Is opening up the Arctic Refuge a step in the right direction for U.S. energy policy, for the State of Alaska, and for the human and nonhuman communities involved?
What do Alaskans think about drilling and why?
Can there be environmentally-friendly drilling for oil in the Refuge?
Are there better alternatives?
6
Alaska’s Wild Beauty
Alaska’s size, remoteness, mountains, glaciers, and wildlife make it our country’s wilderness treasure
11
History of Alaskan land and oil policy
Alaska statehood in 1958 State received right to select 104
million acres State’s rights were contingent on
settling Natives’ land claims AK Natives claimed virtually all of
AK’s 375 million acres as their own
12
Oil Discovery Led to Native Settlement
1968 oil discovered at Prudhoe Bay
State wanted to build an 800 mile pipeline from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez, bisecting the state
Native Alaskans’ land claims made it impossible to get the needed rights of way
14
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1970
Natives got 44 million acres (12%) of AK
Included in ANCSA was a provision to withdraw 80 million acres for conservation lands
15
Battle Over AK Pipeline
800 mile pipeline bisecting America’s last great wilderness wasn’t going to get build easily
Three env. groups (FOE, EDF, WS) and 5 Native Alaska villages sued
In 1973, Congress resolved the suit by passing AK pipeline authorization act
Senate vote was 49 to 49, Nixon’s V.P. Spiro Agnew casting the tie breaking vote
17
Battle Over Alaska Conservation Lands
How much of Alaska would be set aside in conservation areas?
ANSCA deal was 80 million acres Mo Udall (Pres. Carter’s Sec. of Interior)
wanted 123 million acres with 60 million in wilderness
AK Senator Stevens wanted 60 million acres with 12 million wilderness
Stalemate until Pres. Carter used Antiquities Act to set aside 154 million acres in National Monuments
AK went berserk
18
1980 Compromise
Passage of the Alaska National Interests Lands Conservation Act
President Carter signed just as he left office.
104 million acres of new conservation land in AK with 50 million of that wilderness
This was a doubling of the total wilderness acreage in the U.S.
Carter has said this was the most important conservation legislation of 20th century
19
1989 Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
11 million gallons 53rd biggest “spill” 11,000 miles of coastline oiled (470
direct miles; SC to DC) Devastated Prince William Sound’s
wildlife and human communities Destroyed subsistence way of life of
local people? Huge wildlife losses (75% sea otters
killed; loons still not recovered) 20% of crude oil still was there 12 years
later
29
History of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Pres. Eisenhower—in response to a campaign of Muries and Supreme Court Justice William O Douglas set aside Refuge in 1960
19.8 million acres in north east AK, bordering Canada (slightly larger SC)
17.5 permanently off limits to development (wilderness)
1.5 million acre coastal plain (1002 area) Congress can open for oil/gas development
30
Special Place? Defenders unique
geography makes it a wildlife/wildland treasure
Brooks Range swings to within 40 miles of coast, range of arctic ecosystems in a small area
Interior Sec. Gale Norton has called it a flat white nothingness
“A Godforsaken mosquito-infested swamp shrouded in frozen darkness ½ year”
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service says
"The Arctic Refuge is among the most complete, pristine, and undisturbed ecosystems on earth. Here coastal lagoons, barrier islands, arctic tundra, foothills, mountains, and boreal forests provide a combination of habitats, climate, and geography unmatched by any other northern conservation area“
"This unique compression of habitats concentrates the occurrence of a wide variety of wildlife and fish species.... In fact, according to FWS, the Arctic Refuge coastal plain contains the greatest wildlife diversity of any protected area above the Arctic Circle."
33
Species in Refuge
• “The area's large mammals also include grizzly bears, polar bears, Dall sheep, wolves, moose, and a herd of rare muskoxen. 135 species of birds are known to use the 1002 area, including large flocks of snow geese which feed on the area's nutritious vegetation in the fall in preparation for their long flight to their wintering grounds in the Central Valley of California. Other animal species of the area include shorebirds, loons, songbirds, and raptors, as well as fish such as the Arctic char and Arctic grayling.
35
Arguments against ANWR drilling
95% of Alaska’s Arctic Coastal plain is already open to oil drilling
Prudhoe Bay’s poor env. record: 400 oil spills a year since 1996 Large amounts of air pollution Only one EPA worker on North
Slope
36
How much oil in ANWR?
USGS 1998: 3.2 to 6.3 billion barrels (7-13 month U.S. supply)
Proponents say 10-16 billion barrels (2-3 year supply)
USGS says 5% chance of 16 billion
37
Conservation/Efficiency Alternative
Enhancing energy efficiency in buildings and industry could easily save us as much oil
38
V.P. Dick Cheney
“Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy.”
39
Cheney on Conservation (continued)
To think that “we could simply conserve or ration our way out” of the energy crisis is 1970's era thinking.
Supports energy efficiency only when it does not reduce living standards or negatively impact U.S. industry.
Opposes any energy conservation measures based on the idea that Americans now “live too well” or that people should “do more with less.”
40
Fuel Economy Standards (CAFÉ)
Adopted in 1975, average rose from 14 to 27mpg by mid 80s
No significance increases in CAFÉ since Because of the popularity of SUVs (only
required to average 20.7 mpg vs 27.5 for cars), in 2002 average U.S. fuel economy fell to its lowest level since 1980
China has proposed more stringent rules Raising CAFÉ from 27 to 40 mpg would save
a billion barrels a year
41
Can there be Env. Friendly Drilling in ANWR?
New drilling technologies cast doubt on the claim that ANWR will be as devastated as Prudhoe Bay
Not clear that the Prudhoe Bay oilfields a disaster for wildlife
42
New Drilling Technology Small well pads with drills branching out 4-5
miles underground 2000 acres of total disturbance out of 1.5 million
acres? Drilling mud, contaminated water, spilled oil, and
discarded chemicals formerly put in waste pits can be ground into a slurry and pumped underground
Gravel roads (mined from river beds) spread all over fragile tundra can now be built from ice that melts in spring
The maze of oil collecting pipelines can be raised for animals to duck under and elevated elbows lessen effects of spills
47
New Survey Techniques
The success rate raised from 1 producing well for each 10 exploratory wells to 5 in 10.
Dynamite no longer used, but vibrating 10-ton “thumper trucks” crisscross tundra in an intensive way leaving scars disrupting wildlife
2000 acre figure doesn’t include this
52
Critics Aren’t Impressed
“Once the work shifts from exploration to extraction of oil, the result is always a sprawl of pipelines, roads, crew quarters, and fuel depots: In the end, even with all this technology, you’ve got a massive industrial complex.”
53
Alaska’s Oil Addiction 78% of state budget is funded by North
Slope oil revenue Alaskans pay no state income or sales
taxes Each Alaskan receives yearly check from
state oil revenues; Typically it is $1000 to $2,000.
Oil from Prudhoe Bay is running out (From 19 billion barrels to 6.4 now); Pipeline flow down 50%.
No wonder 75% of Alaskans support drilling in the arctic.
54
Natives’ perspective
Inupiat Eskimos who live in ANWR next to 1002 support it; 78% in Kaktovik
Own oil/gas rights in ANWR which can’t be leased unless ANWR opened up
Do not live a subsistence lifestyle but are part of the modern cash economy
One of the US’s wealthiest Native groups Oppose offshore oil development fearing
it would harm bowhead whale hunt important to their cultural identity
56
Gwich’in Indians oppose
Fear it will harm Porcupine Caribou herd Don’t live in ANWR but hunt caribou that
migrate there. Live (mostly) a subsistence lifestyle;
Caribou meat 80% of tribal diet Ethic of hunters sharing caribou meat
essential to their culture 1002: “Sacred birthing ground of caribou
and ultimately of Gwich’in people”
58
Effects on Porcupine Caribou herd?
150,000 animals migrate to coastal plain in summer for foraging, protection from predators and insect, and to calve
Canadian estimate: Drilling could cause 40% decline in birthrate
Central Artic herd near Prudhoe bay: “Thriving” (oil industry) or “calving near Prudhoe Bay nearly ceased”(Canadians)
Porcupine herd has no where to move
60
Tentative conclusions
Should not risk cultural genocide Even “environmentally-friendly” oil
development would ruin the Arctic Refuge’s pristine character
61
Should not risk cultural genocide
Gwich’in spokesperson Faith Gemmil: “Don’t’ sacrifice our way of life for short term economic gain.”
Some impact on Porcupine Herd likely; but probably not enough to undermine the Gwich’in subsistence hunt and way of life
But even a tiny chance of causing cultural genocide should prevent drilling Especially given our the history of our
treatment of Natives Americans
62
Oil development would ruin the Arctic Refuge’s pristine nature
A significant part of the value of this place is that it is untouched by modern human industrial desire
The pristine, virginal character of places like the Arctic Refuge are necessarily spoiled even by environmentally careful petro development
Temporary McDonalds in Louvre? Sexual assault while sedated?
63
Current politics of ANWR (April 2005)
On March 18, Senate voted 51-49 to include revenue from drilling in the Refuge in the federal budget
This means that opponents of drilling cannot use a filibuster to block oil development in the Refuge A filibuster can only be broken by 60 votes,
something drilling proponents don’t have Last year a federal budget was not passed, and
so drilling opponents have some hope this will occur again
They also hope that the drilling provision will be taken out of the budget in future votes