Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | evan-durdin |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 4 times |
1
GMACE Implementation
Pete Sullivan, CDN
&
Paul VanRaden*, USDA
2
Genomics Timeline
2007 50K SNP chips developed by NLD, USA
2008 Unofficial GEBV provided within country
2008 Interbull Genomics Task Force formed
2009 Official GEBV in several countries
2009 Genomic MACE methods developed
2010 Software provided to Interbull Centre
2010 Research on actual GEBVs beginning
???? GMACE test run and implementation
3
EBV Exchange History
1975-1994 Conversion formulas Exporting country j computes EBVj
Importing country i converts EBVi = a + b EBVj
1995-2010 MACE Countries each send EBVj, receive EBVi from Interbull Standard formats, 2n vs. n2 file transfers , less labor Combines information from daughters in all countries Trend validation introduced
2010-???? Genomic MACE Countries send young and old bull GEBVj to Interbull GEBVj combine information using traditional A-1
Validation tests revised, market barriers removed
4
Young Bulls
5
Genotype Exchanges
Combine genotypes within country groupsNorth AmericaNew Zealand and IrelandEuroGenomicsMany small countries are currently excluded
Combine reference genotypes worldwideBrown Swiss project at InterbullOther breeds less organizedHolstein global exchange could add reliabilityMulti-country genotype evaluation is theoretically better
than Genomic MACE
6
Objectives
Compare equations forMACE, GMACE and multi-country genotype
evaluation (mtGEN)Deregression methods, daughter equivalents
Demonstrate using simulated BSW9 countries, 8,073 proven bulls, 120 youngSame data as 2009, but split into 2 groups:
CHE, USA, CAN, NLD, and NZL DEU, ITA, FRA, and SVN
Update on actual GEBV test
7
De-regression
MACE: obtain y from EBV (a) and D [D + A-1k] a = D y GMACE: obtain yg from GEBV (g), D, Dg
[D+Dg + A-1k] g = (D+Dg) yg
Dg includes daughter equivalents from genomics and from foreign daughters of genotyped bulls
8
Foreign Daughter Equivalents in Dg
Foreign phenotypes included via MACE for foreign genotyped bullsExample: CAN reference bulls on USA scale
Alternative: compute GEBV from only domestic data for InterbullTwice as much work for national centersNot checked as carefully, not recommended
Use only domestic bulls in GMACE? Use multi-country deregression?
9
Multi-Country Evaluation
MACE: combine y across countries [D + A-1 T-1] a = D y GMACE: combine yg across countries
[D+Dg + A-1 T-1] g = (D+Dg) yg
mtGEBV: Multi-country genotype exchange [D + G-1 T-1] a = D y
T is genetic covariance matrix across countriesG is genomic relationship matrix for bulls
10
Multi-Country Evaluation
MACE: combine y across countries [D + A-1 T-1] a = D y GMACE: combine yg across countries
[E-1 + A-1 T-1] g = (E-1) yg
mtGEBV: Multi-country genotype exchange [D + G-1 T-1] a = D y
E accounts for residual covariances from data sharing
11
Residual Correlationsin GMACE
D and Dg are diagonal matricesResidual variances of de-regressed proofs
E accounts for shared genotypes, MACE EBVResiduals covariances from shared foreign data
Max correlation between genomic
predictions
% common (shared) data
Genomic portion of variance
c jiji EEgrijE
( = %EDC from genomics)
12
Example cij for BSW
CHE USA CAN NLD NZL DEU ITA FRA SVN
CHE 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
USA 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
CAN 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
NLD 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
NZL 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
DEU 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
ITA 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
FRA 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
SVN 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
13
3 Ways to Compute Dg
Dg1: Compare genomic to traditional RELConvert each to daughter equivalents Subtract D from Dtotal to get Dg1
Dg2: Equate diagonals of matrix inverses [D + Dg2 + A-1k]-1 = [D + G-1k]-1
Solve for Dg2 using math similar to Misztal and Wiggans (1988)
Dg3: Use constant Dg3 for all animalsDg3 = Σ(traditional REL – parent average REL) / r
Choose r to make genomic REL = observed
14
Compare Dg1, Dg2, Dg3
Dg from North American HolsteinsYoung bull means were 19.4, 19.1, and 22.3Proven bull means were 23.5, 22.9, and 22.3Young bull SD were 1.2, 1.4, and 0Proven bull SD were 11.3, 11.3, and 0
Dg1 and Dg2 were correlated by .81
Formula Dg1 used to test GMACE with BSW simulation
15
Reliabilities for Young BSW Bulls from USA
Ctry PA MACE n_GEBV r_GEBV GMACE mtGEN
CHE 14 17 65 68 72 73
USA 20 18 55 68 72 70
CAN 4 15 9 55 61 61
NLD 1 14 6 55 62 58
NZL 1 0 1 22 28 26
DEU 5 11 64 63 69 69
ITA 1 12 34 54 63 64
FRA 2 15 21 54 66 66
SVN 3 11 6 46 56 55n_GEBV = national GEBV, r_GEBV = regional GEBV
16
GMACE Reliability
MACE reliability approximationHarris and Johnson, 1998Within-country progeny absorptions
No residual correlations between countries
GMACE reliability approximationSimilar to MACE approximation, exceptMulti-country progeny absorptions
Residual correlations from genomic data sharing
17
Sire-Dam or MGS Pedigree?
Software tested with animal model Traditional MACE uses sire-MGS Conversion to AM-MACE planned
Initial study in NLD (van der Linde, 2005)Pilot study at Interbull (Fikse, 2008)All countries supply sire-dam pedigree
Animal model GMACE recommendedOption to include cow GEBVs in the future
18
Remaining GMACE Issues
Countries might report inconsistent Dg
Actual Dg should be similar if countries share genotypes and genetic correlations are high
If reported Dg differ too much, GMACE gives sub-optimal (surprisingly poor) results Restrict the variation of Dg among countries?
– Similar to bending correlation matrix T for MACE
Refine the GMACE equations? Research is ongoing…
19
Formats
GEBVs for proven and young bullsSame formats as 010, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019Genomic daughter equivalents (GEDCs)
Truncated GEBVs for validationSame formats, but 4 years less data
Validation test results (format 731)Squared correlations, regressions, bias
Top Proven Bulls in 2006
2006 Net Merit (adj) 2010 NM$
Dtrs Trad Gen Dtrs Gen
O Man 1,317 653 646 54,573 729
OBrian 94 385 496 877 448
Billion 73 470 461 1,687 249
Jet Stream 108 444 458 7,439 417
Alton 108 484 452 5,142 506
21
Top Young Bulls in 2006
2006 NM$ (adj) 2010 Net Merit
Name Trad Gen Dtrs Trad Gen
Freddie 467 762 70 801 824
Awesome 472 731 90 513 637
Garrett 509 688 126 604 589
Fortunato 523 669 97 475 556
Logan 521 646 101 617 642
22
Freddie
23
Conclusions
GEBVs now official in several countries GMACE software testing by Interbull
Accounts for data shared by country groupsPrograms applied to simulated BSW GEBVsReal HOL GEBVs sent Feb 22 by 9 countries
Genotype vs. GEBV exchange Fuller use of data with genotype exchangeLets smaller populations do genomic selection
24
Acknowledgements
Interbull genomics task forceGeorgios BanosMario CalusVincent DucrocqJoão DϋrrHossein Jorjani Esa MäntysaariZengting Liu
25