1

Mount Olive Township Public Schools

Pathways to ExcellenceFirst Quarter Report

2014-2014

December 22, 2104

District GoalsGraduate all students career and college ready Get kids thinking

Metrics used to measure progressScholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) used to assess reading ability for grades 2-8 provides a lexile score that reflects above grade level,

on grade level, or below grade level performance

Journeys Benchmark Exams Used in grades __ - __ to ___

Math in Focus Cumulative Assessments Used in grades __ - ___ to ___

Metrics used to measure progressQuarterly Assessments Used to assess performance in math, ELA, science

and social studies in grades 6 – 12

Marking period gradesDifferentials Used to evaluate comparability of marking period

grades and quarterly assessment scores

Analysis of DataThree reference points How are we doing compared to standard? How are we doing compared to ourselves? How are we doing compared to others?

SRI Results – District Comparison of SY 14-15 to 2009-2014 average Students outperformed the district average on

the Sept. and Nov. tests in every grade except 6th (1 point lower in Sept., 4.4 points lower in Nov.)

The difference between SY 14-15 and the district average widens over time (except grade 6), demonstrating the cumulative effect of improvement in cohort performance over time.

SRI Results - DistrictComparison of SY 14-15 to 2009-2014 average On the Sept. assessment:

Grade 2 was 25 points higher than 09-14 average Grade 8 was 66 points higher than 09-14 average

On the Nov. assessment: Grade 2 was 27 points higher than 09-14 average Grade 8 was 71 points higher than 09-14 average

SRI Results - DistrictComparison of SY 14-15 to 2009-2014 average As in previous years, improvement from Sept. to

Nov. is greatest in the early grades and gradually flattens over time.

In SY14-15, the greatest improvement from Sept. to Nov. was in grade 2 (98.8 point gain), followed by grade 3 (44.6 point gain) and grade 4 (35.4 point gain). The smallest increase was in grade 8 (7.8 points).

SRI Mean Lexile Comparison - Elementary 2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

1st Adm

in.

2nd Adm

in.

3rd Adm

in.

4th Adm

in.

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

1000.0

1200.0

1400.0

268.3

365.7

462.0

541.3565.9

608.2

658.2698.4

729.8767.1

810.6843.3

863.6894.3

927.4957.4968.0985.61003.5

1029.31045.51052.11082.2

1109.51091.3

1094.01125.5

1127.8

293.2

582.2

759

908.6

967

1087.9

1157.3

2009-2013 Grade Level Mean

2014-15 Performance

SRI Mean Lexile Growth - Elementary 2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

1st A

dmin

.

2nd

Adm

in.

3rd

Adm

in.

4th

Adm

in.

1st A

dmin

.

2nd

Adm

in.

3rd

Adm

in.

4th

Adm

in.

1st A

dmin

.

2nd

Adm

in.

3rd

Adm

in.

4th

Adm

in.

1st A

dmin

.

2nd

Adm

in.

3rd

Adm

in.

4th

Adm

in.

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

800.0

900.0

1000.0

268.3

365.7

462.0

541.3565.9

608.2

658.2698.4

729.8767.1

810.6843.3

863.6894.3

927.4957.4

293.2

392

582.2

626.8

759794.4

908.6930.5

Mount Olive Middle SchoolSRI Lexile Growth

2010-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

1st Admin. 2nd Admin.

3rd Admin. 4th Admin. 1st Admin. 2nd Admin.

3rd Admin. 4th Admin. 1st Admin. 2nd Admin.

3rd Admin. 4th Admin.

6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

900.0

950.0

1000.0

1050.0

1100.0

1150.0

1200.0

968.3981.7

1003.5

1029.3

1056.11065.7

1082.2

1109.5 1113.3

1129.6 1125.5 1127.8

967

981.2

1087.9 1093

1157.31165.1

Mount Olive District Grades 2-8 SRI Lexile Growth

2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

1st A

dmin

2nd

Adm

in

3rd

Adm

in

4th

Adm

in

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

800.0

900.0

1000.0

1100.0

1200.0

268.3

365.7

462.0

541.3565.9

608.2

658.2698.4

729.8767.1

810.6843.3

863.6894.3

927.4957.4 968.0

985.61003.5

1029.31045.51052.11082.2

1109.51091.31094.0

1125.51127.8

293.2

392

582.2

626.8

759794.4

908.6930.5

967981.2

1087.9 1093

1157.3 1165.1

SRI Results – School v. DistrictComparison of school performance in SY14-15 to district performance in SY14-15.

CMS Mt. View Tinc Sandshore

Grade 2 Above Above Below Below

Grade 3 Below Below Above Above

Grade 4 Below Above Similar Above

Grade 5 Below Below Above Above

SRI Results - School, SY 14-15 v. 2009-2014

Comparison of school performance in SY14-15 to average school performance in 2009-2014.

CMS Mt. View Tinc Sandshore

Grade 2 Above Above Above Below

Grade 3 Below Above Above Above

Grade 4 Below Above Above Above

Grade 5 Above Above Above Above

Chester M. Stephens SRI Lexile Growth 2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

2nd Grade 1st Admin.

2nd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

4th Ad-min.

3rd Grade 1st Admin.

3rd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

4th Ad-min.

4th Grade 1st Admin.

4th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

4th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

4th Grade

4th Ad-min.

5th Grade 1st Admin.

5th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

5th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

5th Grade

4th Ad-min.

2009-2014 Grade Level Mean

272.864 369.444 473.52 560.974 567.56 610.18 659.62 694.38 722.64 753.22 795.04 825.06 854.44070175438

6

883.86736842105

3

916.45614035087

7

945.10526315789

5

2014-15 Performance

328.5 416.6 NaN NaN 558.7 601.2 NaN NaN 699.8 746.1 NaN NaN 905.4 927.4 NaN NaN

2009-2014 District Grade Level Mean

268.34 365.7 462.04 541.264 565.88 608.24 658.2 698.42 729.78 767.06 810.62 843.34 863.57008264462

8

894.25108695652

2

927.39865229110

5

957.43358695652

2

2014-15 District Performance

293.2 392 NaN NaN 582.2 626.8 NaN NaN 759 794.4 NaN NaN 908.6 930.5 NaN NaN

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

Mountain View SRI Lexile Growth 2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

2nd Grade 1st Admin.

2nd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

4th Ad-min.

3rd Grade 1st Admin.

3rd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

4th Ad-min.

4th Grade 1st Admin.

4th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

4th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

4th Grade

4th Ad-min.

5th Grade 1st Admin.

5th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

5th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

5th Grade

4th Ad-min.

2009-2014 Grade Level Mean

258.46 347.28 445.26 520.04 558.9 602.4 656.8 701.38 730.66 766.16 801.94 833.46 848.62655172413

8

887.61517241379

3

920.53137931034

5

951.98724137931

2014-15 Performance

345.87 434 NaN NaN 569.7 608.3 NaN NaN 779.2 802.5 NaN NaN 879.6 908.2 NaN NaN

2009-2014 District Grade Level Mean

268.34 365.7 462.04 541.264 565.88 608.24 658.2 698.42 729.78 767.06 810.62 843.34 863.57008264462

8

894.25108695652

2

927.39865229110

5

957.43358695652

2

2014-15 District Performance

293.2 392 NaN NaN 582.2 626.8 NaN NaN 759 794.4 NaN NaN 908.6 930.5 NaN NaN

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

Sandshore SRI Lexile Growth 2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

2nd Grade 1st Admin.

2nd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

4th Ad-min.

3rd Grade 1st Admin.

3rd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

4th Ad-min.

4th Grade 1st Admin.

4th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

4th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

4th Grade

4th Ad-min.

5th Grade 1st Admin.

5th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

5th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

5th Grade

4th Ad-min.

2009-2014 Grade Level Mean

294.16 396.68 476.62 550.2 581.2 620.48 672.42 708.42 746.06 782.84 821.86 857.68 872.97639344262

3

906.74491803278

7

938.73096774193

6

969.36065573770

5

2014-15 Performance

242.9 366.5 NaN NaN 629.3 672.6 NaN NaN 839.3 874.1 NaN NaN 930.9 944.3 NaN NaN

2009-2014 District Grade Level Mean

268.34 365.7 462.04 541.264 565.88 608.24 658.2 698.42 729.78 767.06 810.62 843.34 863.57008264462

8

894.25108695652

2

927.39865229110

5

957.43358695652

2

2014-15 District Performance

293.2 392 NaN NaN 582.2 626.8 NaN NaN 759 794.4 NaN NaN 908.6 930.5 NaN NaN

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

Tinc Rd. SRI Lexile Growth 2009-14 Average vs. 2014-15 SY

2nd Grade 1st Admin.

2nd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

2nd Grade

4th Ad-min.

3rd Grade 1st Admin.

3rd Grade

2nd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

3rd Ad-min.

3rd Grade

4th Ad-min.

4th Grade 1st Admin.

4th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

4th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

4th Grade

4th Ad-min.

5th Grade 1st Admin.

5th Grade

2nd Ad-min.

5th Grade

3rd Ad-min.

5th Grade

4th Ad-min.

2009-2014 Grade Level Mean

241.8 350.94 451.62 540.74 557.48 605.38 652.3 693.94 727.3 776.2 822.2 862.84 884.02237623762

4

903.62509803921

6

939.07176470588

2

968.42891089108

9

2014-15 Performance

247.7 352.7 NaN NaN 595.4 649.5 NaN NaN 762.2 793.8 NaN NaN 918.2 941.9 NaN NaN

2009-2014 District Grade Level Mean

268.34 365.7 462.04 541.264 565.88 608.24 658.2 698.42 729.78 767.06 810.62 843.34 863.57008264462

8

894.25108695652

2

927.39865229110

5

957.43358695652

2

2014-15 District Performance

293.2 392 NaN NaN 582.2 626.8 NaN NaN 759 794.4 NaN NaN 908.6 930.5 NaN NaN

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

SRI Results – SY 14-15Sept. 2014 – Grade to grade comparison The percentage of students who score above

grade level increases steadily from grade 2 to grade 8 (9.1% to 51.7%).

The percentage of students who score below grade level decreases from grade 2 to grade 8 (67.9% to 16.6%) with the exception of grade 6.

September 2014 SRI AdministrationProficiency Levels - District

Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Below Grade Level

0.679245283018868

0.366666666666667

0.364705882352941

0.310769230769231

0.397368421052632

0.266666666666667

0.165841584158416

On Grade Level

0.229559748427673

0.472727272727273

0.435294117647059

0.347692307692308

0.218421052631579

0.224 0.316831683168317

Above Grade Level

0.0911949685534591

0.160606060606061

0.2 0.341538461538462

0.384210526315789

0.509333333333333

0.517326732673267

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

SRI Results – District SY 14-15Comparison of percentage of students who scored above grade level, on grade level, below grade level on the Sept. and Nov. SRI assessments. Above grade level performance increased in

every grade level (grade 2 – 5). Below grade level performance decreased in

every grade level (grade 2 – 5). The percent change from Sept. to Nov. in both

categories was greatest in grade 2 and decreased for each grade to grade 5.

Sept./Nov. District Grade Level Proficiency Comparison

September Grade 2

November Grade 2

September Grade 3

November Grade 3

September Grade 4

November Grade 4

September Grade 5

November Grade 5

Below Grade

0.667711598746082

0.501567398119122

0.357142857142857

0.303571428571429

0.361271676300578

0.323699421965318

0.306990881458967

0.288753799392097

On Grade 0.22884012539185

0.338557993730408

0.473214285714286

0.473214285714286

0.430635838150289

0.42485549132948

0.343465045592705

0.331306990881459

Above Grade

0.103448275862069

0.15987460815047

0.169642857142857

0.223214285714286

0.208092485549133

0.251445086705202

0.349544072948328

0.379939209726444

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

SRI Results - School SY 14-15 The percentage of students who scored Above

Grade Level increased in each grade, in each school, except 5th grade in Sandshore, which decreased by 1.5%.

The percentage of students who scored Below Grade Level decreased in each grade, in each school, except Mt. View, which increased by 1.4% in grade 3 and remained the same in grade 4 and grade 5.

SRI Results – School SY 14-15 Tinc began the year with the lowest Above Grade

Level performance (5%) and highest Below Grade Level performance (77.5%), followed by Sandshore (6% Above and 76.1% Below)

The most significant improvement in grade level performance (Sept. grade 2 to Nov. grade 5) occurred at Sandshore, followed by Tinc.

The highest percentage of Above Grade Level performance was Sanshore grade 5 (41.4%).

Sept./Nov. Chester M. Stephens Grade Level Proficiency Comparison

September Grade 2

November Grade 2

September Grade 3

November Grade 3

September Grade 4

November Grade 4

September Grade 5

November Grade 5

Below Grade

0.62037037037037

0.444444444444444

0.403225806451613

0.314516129032258

0.450819672131148

0.401639344262295

0.333333333333333

0.296296296296296

On Grade 0.268518518518519

0.388888888888889

0.42741935483871

0.443548387096774

0.385245901639344

0.385245901639344

0.333333333333333

0.324074074074074

Above Grade

0.111111111111111

0.166666666666667

0.169354838709677

0.241935483870968

0.163934426229508

0.213114754098361

0.333333333333333

0.37962962962963

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. Mountain View Grade Level Proficiency Comparison

September Grade 2

November Grade 2

September Grade 3

November Grade 3

September Grade 4

November Grade 4

September Grade 5

November Grade 5

Below Grade

0.515625 0.46875 0.342465753424658

0.356164383561644

0.348837209302326

0.348837209302326

0.371428571428571

0.371428571428571

On Grade 0.28125 0.25 0.520547945205479

0.465753424657534

0.441860465116279

0.430232558139535

0.3 0.271428571428571

Above Grade

0.203125 0.28125 0.136986301369863

0.178082191780822

0.209302325581395

0.22093023255814

0.328571428571429

0.357142857142857

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. Sandshore Grade Level Proficiency Comparison

September Grade 2

November Grade 2

September Grade 3

November Grade 3

September Grade 4

November Grade 4

September Grade 5

November Grade 5

Below Grade

0.761194029850746

0.611940298507463

0.271186440677966

0.220338983050847

0.242424242424242

0.166666666666667

0.228571428571429

0.214285714285714

On Grade 0.17910447761194

0.253731343283582

0.542372881355932

0.559322033898305

0.46969696969697

0.484848484848485

0.342857142857143

0.371428571428571

Above Grade

0.0597014925373134

0.134328358208955

0.186440677966102

0.220338983050847

0.287878787878788

0.348484848484849

0.428571428571429

0.414285714285714

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. Tinc Rd. Grade Level Proficiency Comparison

September Grade 2

November Grade 2

September Grade 3

November Grade 3

September Grade 4

November Grade 4

September Grade 5

November Grade 5

Below Grade

0.775 0.5125 0.3625 0.3 0.333333333333333

0.305555555555556

0.283950617283951

0.271604938271605

On Grade 0.175 0.4125 0.45 0.4625 0.458333333333333

0.430555555555556

0.395061728395062

0.358024691358025

Above Grade

0.05 0.075 0.1875 0.2375 0.208333333333333

0.263888888888889

0.320987654320988

0.37037037037037

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. 2nd Grade Proficiency Comparison by School

CMS Sep-tember

CMS No-vember

MV Sep-tember

MV No-vember

SS Septem-ber

SS Novem-ber

TR Septem-ber

TR Novem-ber

Dist Sep-tember

Dist No-vember

Below Grade

0.62037037037037

0.444444444444444

0.515625 0.46875 0.761194029850746

0.611940298507463

0.775 0.5125 0.667711598746082

0.501567398119122

On Grade

0.268518518518519

0.388888888888889

0.28125 0.25 0.17910447761194

0.253731343283582

0.175 0.4125 0.22884012539185

0.338557993730408

Above Grade

0.111111111111111

0.166666666666667

0.203125 0.28125 0.0597014925373134

0.134328358208955

0.05 0.075 0.103448275862069

0.15987460815047

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. 3rd Grade Proficiency Comparison by School

CMS Sep-tember

CMS No-vember

MV Sep-tember

MV No-vember

SS Septem-ber

SS Novem-ber

TR Septem-ber

TR Novem-ber

Dist Sep-tember

Dist No-vember

Below Grade

0.403225806451613

0.314516129032258

0.342465753424658

0.356164383561644

0.271186440677966

0.220338983050847

0.3625 0.3 0.357142857142857

0.303571428571429

On Grade

0.42741935483871

0.443548387096774

0.520547945205479

0.465753424657534

0.542372881355932

0.559322033898305

0.45 0.4625 0.473214285714286

0.473214285714286

Above Grade

0.169354838709677

0.241935483870968

0.136986301369863

0.178082191780822

0.186440677966102

0.220338983050847

0.1875 0.2375 0.169642857142857

0.223214285714286

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. 4th Grade Proficiency Comparison by School

CMS Sep-tember

CMS No-vember

MV Sep-tember

MV No-vember

SS Septem-ber

SS Novem-ber

TR Septem-ber

TR Novem-ber

Dist Sep-tember

Dist No-vember

Below Grade

0.450819672131148

0.401639344262295

0.348837209302326

0.348837209302326

0.242424242424242

0.166666666666667

0.333333333333333

0.305555555555556

0.361271676300578

0.323699421965318

On Grade

0.385245901639344

0.385245901639344

0.441860465116279

0.430232558139535

0.46969696969697

0.484848484848485

0.458333333333333

0.430555555555556

0.430635838150289

0.42485549132948

Above Grade

0.163934426229508

0.213114754098361

0.209302325581395

0.22093023255814

0.287878787878788

0.348484848484849

0.208333333333333

0.263888888888889

0.208092485549133

0.251445086705202

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. 5th Grade Proficiency Comparison by School

CMS Sep-tember

CMS No-vember

MV Sep-tember

MV No-vember

SS Septem-ber

SS Novem-ber

TR Septem-ber

TR Novem-ber

Dist Sep-tember

Dist No-vember

Below Grade

0.333333333333333

0.296296296296296

0.371428571428571

0.371428571428571

0.228571428571429

0.214285714285714

0.283950617283951

0.271604938271605

0.306990881458967

0.288753799392097

On Grade

0.333333333333333

0.324074074074074

0.3 0.271428571428571

0.342857142857143

0.371428571428571

0.395061728395062

0.358024691358025

0.343465045592705

0.331306990881459

Above Grade

0.333333333333333

0.37962962962963

0.328571428571429

0.357142857142857

0.428571428571429

0.414285714285714

0.320987654320988

0.37037037037037

0.349544072948328

0.379939209726444

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

SRI Results – MOMS SY 14-15 The percentage of students who scored Above

Grade Level increased in grades 6, 7 and 8. The percentage of students who scored Below

Grade Level decreased in grade 6 and increased by 1.1% in grade 7 an .3% in grade 8.

Seventh grade had the highest percentage of Above Grade Level performance in the district (54.6%).

6th Grade Septem-ber

6th Grade Novem-ber

7th Grade Septem-ber

7th Grade Novem-ber

8th Grade Septem-ber

8th Grade Novem-ber

Below Grade 0.388724035608309

0.376436781609195

0.252054794520548

0.263440860215054

0.164102564102564

0.167088607594937

On Grade 0.237388724035608

0.227011494252874

0.227397260273973

0.190860215053763

0.323076923076923

0.308860759493671

Above Grade 0.373887240356083

0.396551724137931

0.520547945205479

0.545698924731183

0.512820512820513

0.524050632911392

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

Sept./Nov. MOMS Proficiency Comparison by Grade

MOMS Distribution of Marking Period Grades and Quarterly Assessment Scores

Most marking period grades were in the A to B- range, with B being the most commonly earned grade in ELA, math and science. The most common grade in social studies was A.

Q1 assessment scores were distributed more evenly across performance levels.

The most commonly earned grade on the Q1 assessment for each subject area was B.

MOMS Q1 Marking Period vs Quarterly Assessment Grade Distribution – All ELA

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

Mark-ing Pe-riod Grade

0.0110192837465565

0.153351698806244

0.157943067033976

0.14692378328742

0.185491276400367

0.137741046831956

0.0844811753902663

0.0670339761248852

0.0266299357208448

0.0293847566574839

Quar-terly Assess-ment

0.0449954086317723

0.139577594123049

0.112947658402204

0.0578512396694215

0.218549127640037

0.112029384756657

0.0624426078971534

0.132231404958678

0.0642791551882461

0.0550964187327824

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOMS Q1 Marking Period vs Quarterly Assessment Grade Distribution – All Math

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

Mark-ing Pe-riod Grade

0.0417044424297371

0.153218495013599

0.14596554850408

0.14687216681777

0.174070716228468

0.105167724388033

0.0770625566636446

0.071622846781505

0.043517679057117

0.0407978241160472

Quar-terly Assess-ment

0.0743427017225748

0.129646418857661

0.127833182230281

0.0806890299184044

0.162284678150499

0.0951949229374433

0.0453309156844968

0.100634632819583

0.0643699002719855

0.119673617407072

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOMS Q1 Marking Period vs Quarterly Assessment Grade Distribution – All Science

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

Mark-ing Pe-riod Grade

0.0159716060337178

0.163265306122449

0.171251109139308

0.156166814551908

0.173025732031943

0.122448979591837

0.0763087843833186

0.0736468500443656

0.0346051464063886

0.0133096716947649

Quar-terly Assess-ment

0.0771960958296362

0.121561668145519

0.121561668145519

0.0825199645075422

0.160603371783496

0.107364685004437

0.0523513753327418

0.114463176574978

0.0869565217391304

0.0754214729370009

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOMS Q1 Marking Period vs Quarterly Assessment Grade Distribution – All Social Studies

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

Mark-ing Pe-riod Grade

0.0408525754884547

0.206039076376554

0.171403197158082

0.122557726465364

0.142095914742451

0.0941385435168739

0.0692717584369449

0.0808170515097691

0.0364120781527531

0.0364120781527531

Quar-terly Assess-ment

0.0373001776198934

0.134103019538188

0.124333925399645

0.0825932504440497

0.154529307282416

0.114564831261101

0.047069271758437

0.108348134991119

0.0923623445825933

0.104795737122558

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOMS Difference between Marking Period Average and Quarterly Assessment Average

The marking period average for each subject area was remarkably consistent (85.1 to 85.9).

The quarterly assessment average or each subject area was also consistent (82.2 to 83.3).

Outcomes on both measures, in each grade level, for each subject area, varied from a .3 to 6 point difference.

MOMS Q1 Marking Period Average vs Quarterly Assessment Average – All Subjects

ELA Math SCI SS

Marking Period Average 85.068870523416 85.1087941976428 85.7116237799468 85.9360568383659

Quarterly Assessment Aver-age

83.1838842975207 82.5444242973708 83.2803904170364 82.1807282415631

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOMS Q1 Marking Period Average vs Quarterly Assessment Average – ELA

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Marking Period Average 85.0686813186813 84.9550561797753 85.1788617886179

Quarterly Assessment Average 82.967032967033 83.1544943820225 83.4261517615176

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOMS Q1 Marking Period Average vs Quarterly Assessment Average – Math

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Marking Period Average 85.1358695652174 85.9078212290503 84.3236074270557

Quarterly Assessment Average 82.5244565217391 81.7178770949721 83.3488063660477

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOMS Q1 Marking Period Average vs Quarterly Assessment Average – Science

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Marking Period Average 84.4184782608696 86.1893333333333 86.484375

Quarterly Assessment Average 82.4021739130435 81.1626666666667 86.1901041666667

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOMS Q1 Marking Period Average vs Quarterly Assessment Average – Social Studies

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Marking Period Average 85.6711590296496 86.9865229110512 85.1770833333333

Quarterly Assessment Average 82.1617250673855 85.1832884097035 79.2981770833333

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Distribution of Marking Period Grades and Quarterly Assessment Scores

Most marking period grades were in the A- to B- range, with B being the most commonly earned grade in ELA, math and science and social studies.

Q1 assessment scores were distributed more evenly across performance levels.

The most commonly earned grade on the Q1 assessments for each subject area was B.

MOHS Full School Major Subjects First Quarter Grade v First Quarter Exam

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

1st Quarter Grades

0.00626304801670146

0.0853862212943633

0.123590814196242

0.148851774530271

0.215031315240084

0.148643006263048

0.0824634655532359

0.0843423799582464

0.0507306889352818

0.0546972860125261

1st Quarter Exam

0.0308977035490605

0.107933194154489

0.109812108559499

0.0791231732776618

0.218997912317328

0.121920668058455

0.0561586638830898

0.120250521920668

0.0563674321503132

0.0985386221294363

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOHS Full School EnglishFirst Quarter Grade v First Quarter Exam

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

1st Quarter Grades

0.00073583517292126

6

0.0529801324503311

0.126563649742458

0.167034584253127

0.236938925680648

0.155997056659308

0.0772626931567329

0.072111846946284

0.0522442972774099

0.05813097866078

1st Quarter Exam

0.0132450331125828

0.0676968359087564

0.0927152317880795

0.0927152317880795

0.252391464311994

0.141280353200883

0.072111846946284

0.13980868285504

0.0654893303899927

0.0625459896983076

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOHS Full School MathematicsFirst Quarter Grade v First Quarter Exam

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

1st Quarter Grades

0.015702479338843

0.12396694214876

0.118181818181818

0.134710743801653

0.169421487603306

0.141322314049587

0.0768595041322314

0.0892561983471074

0.059504132231405

0.0710743801652893

1st Quarter Exam

0.0619834710743802

0.147107438016529

0.11404958677686

0.0578512396694215

0.173553719008264

0.0867768595041322

0.0495867768595041

0.101652892561983

0.0586776859504132

0.148760330578512

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOHS Full School Science First Quarter Grade v First Quarter Exam

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

1st Quarter Grades

0.00421940928270042

0.0962025316455696

0.139240506329114

0.134177215189873

0.20168776371308

0.133333333333333

0.0919831223628692

0.0835443037974684

0.0565400843881857

0.0590717299578059

1st Quarter Exam

0.030379746835443

0.115611814345992

0.10042194092827

0.0742616033755274

0.19915611814346

0.125738396624473

0.0489451476793249

0.106329113924051

0.0556962025316456

0.143459915611814

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOHS Full School Social Studies First Quarter Grade v First Quarter Exam

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

1st Quarter Grades

0.00482625482625483

0.0704633204633205

0.108108108108108

0.158301158301158

0.254826254826255

0.165057915057915

0.0849420849420849

0.0955598455598456

0.0318532818532819

0.0260617760617761

1st Quarter Exam

0.0183397683397683

0.106177606177606

0.138030888030888

0.0916988416988417

0.250965250965251

0.133204633204633

0.0511583011583012

0.132239382239382

0.0424710424710425

0.0357142857142857

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

MOHS Difference between Marking Period Average and Quarterly Assessment Average

The marking period average for each subject area was remarkably consistent (82.4 to 83.4).

The quarterly assessment average or each subject area was also consistent (80.2 to 83.2).

The average Q1 marking period grade for all subjects was 82.8.

The average Q1 assessment grade was 81.3.

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – By Subject

English Math Science Social Studies Major Subjects

Average Q1 MP Grade

82.4466519499632 82.8165289256198 82.7940928270042 83.4256756756757 82.8377870563674

Average of Q1 Quarterly As-sessment

81.3278881530537 80.9154545454545 80.2164255575648 83.153278439765 81.3435408662443

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

English I English I CP English I H

Average Q1 MP Grade 82.3783783783784 84 89.1428571428571

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

84.5608108108108 80.3190954773869 85.3174603174603

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – English I

English II English II CP English II H

Average Q1 MP Grade 72.9393939393939 81.1627906976744 86.6526315789474

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

75.8030303030303 78.4418604651163 83

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – English II

English III English III CP English III H

Average Q1 MP Grade 75.1136363636364 82.4455958549223 90.5789473684211

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

72.4318181818182 83.8238341968912 86.4473684210526

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – English III

English IV English IV CP English IV H

Average Q1 MP Grade 66.6785714285714 81.3393939393939 86.4081632653061

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

73.0357142857143 81.0854545454546 86.9795918367347

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – English IV

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – RC English

RC English I RC English II RC English III RC English IV RC Reading I

Average Q1 MP Grade 79.4 78.3333333333333 70.4 84.4166666666667 79.3636363636364

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment

79.575 82.4444444444444 70.8 75.75 76.8181818181818

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Algebra

Algebra I CP Algebra II Algebra II CP Algebra II H

Average Q1 MP Grade 80.7884615384615 78.3023255813954 80.8054054054054 84.875

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

76.4262820512821 76.046511627907 78.1635135135135 87.7954545454546

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Geometry

Essen of Geom Geometry CP Geometry H

Average Q1 MP Grade 77.2553191489362 81.515625 92.1772151898734

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

77.4893617021277 80.0833333333333 92.8607594936709

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – CompSci and Prob Stat

Intro Comp Sci Prob & Stats CP

Average Q1 MP Grade 88.2307692307692 84.1276595744681

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment 43.6730769230769 85.0425531914894

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – PreCalculus

Pre-Calculus CP Pre-Calculus H

Average Q1 MP Grade 82.169696969697 85.959595959596

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment 83.7057575757576 87.1414141414142

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – RC Math

Found of Math RC Algebra RC Geometry RC Senior Math

Average Q1 MP Grade 84.2972972972973 80.6956521739131 84 87.3

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

81.945945945946 79.0869565217391 82.2307692307692 68.4

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Biology

Biology Biology H Biology Lab CP

Average Q1 MP Grade 80.5789473684211 88.0392156862745 84.3076923076923

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

77.921052631579 84.8235294117647 83.8348318348319

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Chemistry

Chem Lab A CP Chem Lab B CP Chemistry Lab H

Average Q1 MP Grade 80.3396226415094 74.5064102564103 86.2444444444444

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

78.5408805031447 73.8269230769231 87.4555555555556

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Human Anatomy

Human Anatmy HumAnatPhysH

Average Q1 MP Grade 88.9230769230769 91.4230769230769

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment 87.7692307692308 85.3653846153846

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Int. Science/STEM

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – Physics

Physics First CP Physics First H Physics Lab CP

Average Q1 MP Grade 81.7455357142857 88.1063829787234 87.8636363636364

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

80.3850446428571 84.1914893617021 84.6363636363636

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – RC Science

RC Biology RC Chemistry RC Int Sci/STEM

Average Q1 MP Grade 86.6 86.0909090909091 83.3913043478261

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment 67 90.0909090909091 59.1449275362319

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – RC History

RC US History I RC US History II RC World Hist 9

Average Q1 MP Grade 77.6315789473684 84 91.4545454545455

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assess-ment

78.9473684210526 85.125 89.9090909090909

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – US History

US History I US History I CP US History I H US History II US History II CP US History II H

Average Q1 MP Grade

78.7272727272727 81.3555555555556 87.4301075268817 88.6923076923077 84.3387096774194 87.7432432432432

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment

77.4415584415584 80.0611111111111 85.3010752688172 86.9038461538462 83.3655913978495 87.9481981981982

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

MOHS Q1 v. Quarterly Assessment Differentials – World History 9

World Hist 9 World Hist 9 CP World Hist 9 H

Average Q1 MP Grade 81.1625 81.2486187845304 85.9733333333333

Average of Q1 Quarterly Assessment 81.6828125 83.7267799437089 85.9661016949152

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

87.5

92.5

97.5

School Improvement Plans (SIPs)

Each school developed an action plan that includes SMART goals aligned to district goals.

Goals are designed to improve school performance in critical areas: ELA (all students and at-risk populations) Mathematics (all students and at-risk populations) College and Career Readiness (PSAT, SAT, AP) Technology use and integration Parent involvement

School Improvement Plans (SIPs)

Each SMART goal includes an ambitious target, persons responsible, timeline for action steps, and evidence of impact on learning.

SMART goals are supported by the district’s primary intervention strategies: Increase time Teach to understanding Teach what matters Increase effort Personalize learning

SMART Goals - MOHS

MATH/ELA – Improve teaching and learning practices to meet or exceed the designated PARCC Performance Based Assessment and End-of-Year Exam Targets for “all students” and subgroups in the ESEA Waiver. • Schoolwide - % Proficiency• ELA = 90% Math = 90%

• Students with Disabilities - % Proficiency • ELA = 74.3% Math = 60.8%

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. ELA – New Course – Critical Reading 1. Identified 9th, 10th and 11th Grade students scheduled for remedial reading program and PARCC readiness.

2. Math Workshop – 10th and 11th Grade 2. (34) students identified and scheduled

3. Foundations of Math Course 3. (44) students identified and scheduled

4. Algebra I CP – 9th and 10th Grade 4. (154) students identified and scheduled

5. Posting for ELA and Math Press and Pull-Out programs instructors

5. Having difficulty procuring services in this area. We will be working with part-time teachers and substitutes.

6. Introducing assignments and assessments utilizing on-line technology devices and tools (Google Forms)

6. December school-wide TESTNAV test run scheduled with Technology Department.

MOHS – Increase Time

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. ELA Workshop – 10th and 11th Grades 1. (45) students identified and scheduled.

2. English I General 2. (63) students identified and scheduled

3. PARCC Special Education Support will be scheduled.

3. Use of Compass Learning and Accellus in Lab Center

MOHS – Increase Time

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. All Essential Questions and Enduring Understandings will be aligned to focus on development and transfer of all skills.

1. Professional Learning Community minutes, Quarterly Exam comparisons, Understanding by Design, Rigor and Relevance

2. Teachers will use exit tickets – Google Classroom tools – flipped classroom – blended classroom techniques to promote “GKT”.

2. Technology reports – Teacher observations – PLC feedback – Student feedback

3. Development and use of PARCC-style EBSR questions, reading selections, and writing prompts in formative and summative assessments

3. Completed at PLC and department meetings – Professional Development /Teacher In-Service Days – September 2nd and October 13th

4. PARCC rubric used to assess every writing assignment (Prose Constructed Responses) in ELA and Social Studies, aligning with at least one SGO developed by every ELA and SS team member

4. In-house PARCC-based assessment scores have improved, as evidence by SGO development and tracking.

MOHS – Teach to Understanding

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. Added exposure to PARCC-style content, format, style, rigor (consistent with our ELA goals from the past 3 years and Math goals for the past year)

1. Students have been given practice PARCC test tutorials and exams on Pearson – practice using online platform and tools specific to testing platform.

2. PARCC trainings, informational sessions, and PLCs will update teachers on PARCC strategies, curricular addendums and skills alignment across the curriculum.

2. PLC minutes, Common Assessments, Unit and Marking Period Assignments and Expectations.

MOHS – Teach to Understanding

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. All curricula will be aligned with Common Core State Standards.

1. ELA completed and introduced 3 years ago. Math is the process of rewriting course curriculums. SGO Development – Unit Plan Development using Understanding by Design Principles

2. Development and use of PARCC-style EBSR questions, reading selections, and writing prompts in formative and summative assessments

2. Completed at PLC and department meetings – Professional Development/Teacher In-Service Days – September 2nd and October 13th

3. Assessment multiple choice questions will be written as Evidence-Based Structured Responses (EBSR), modeling PARCC expectations

3. PLC discussions/data analysis and department meeting minutes/trainings

MOHS – Teach What Matters

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. Students will participate in PARCC Readiness assemblies to heighten awareness and preparation efforts.

1. Class meetings scheduled in September and October to discuss PARCC points of emphasis.

2. Marking Period Grades and Quarterly Expectations are better aligned.

2. Identifying the balance between “earn” and “learn” values has provided students with realistic representations of understanding and learning levels.

3. Renaissance Monthly Academic Recognition Awards

3. Presented by Student Activities Coordinator in conjunction with staff and team leaders.

MOHS – Increase Effort

Actions, Strategies and Interventions – Regular Education and

Special Education

Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. Use of Technology (Chromebooks, Computer Labs) to enhance the delivery of instruction and student active participation in the learning process.

1. Volume and Quality of Technology Use

2. Use of “flipped”/”blended” classroom techniques and/or on-line remedial programs.

2. Volume and Quality of Technology Use

3. PARCC and Simulated Assessments will assist teachers and students as it pertains individual readiness.

3. Use of technology to practice PARCC assessments and related skills.

MOHS – Personalize Learning

SMART Goals - MOHS

COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS - Improve teaching and learning practices to meet or exceed the designated New Jersey Department of Education Report Card in the area of College and Career Readiness.

• Improve Scholastic Aptitude Test Participation – 77% to 79%• Improve % of Students Scoring a 1550 or Better on the Scholastic Aptitude

Test – 61% to 64%• Improve Average Scholastic Aptitude Test Score – 1615 to 1620• Increase PSAT Participation - 74% to 77% - Juniors• Increase Number of Students Enrolled in Advanced Placement Courses • Increase Number of Advanced Placement Exams Administered -356 to 365• Increase the % of Students Taking at Least (1) Advanced Placement Exam

in Science, Math, Language Arts, or Social Studies

Actions, Strategies and Interventions Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. Mount Olive High School will increase the percentage of students who participate in the PSAT.

1. Successfully promoted by Guidance Department, Administration and Board of Education.

College and Career Readiness

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140

50

100

150

200

250

300 266 252 276

223 224

198 180 187

266 264

186 176 175205 192

182 178146 162

190

11th Graders10th Graders

  2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201411th Graders 266 252 276 223 224 198 180 187 266 26410th Graders 186 176 175 205 192 182 178 146 162 190

Actions, Strategies and Interventions Evidence of Impact on Student Learning

1. Mount Olive High School will increase the percentage of students participating in the Scholastic Aptitude Test.

1. Promoted through the Guidance Department, Administration and Staff. Class meeting presentations emphasized SAT Registration, Preparation, and Performance.

2. Mount Olive High School will increase the percentage of students earning a 1550 or above on the Scholastic Aptitude Test.

2.

3. Mount Olive High School will increase the number of enrollments in Advanced Placement courses

3. Promotion of Advanced Placement goals with scheduling and college readiness.

4. Mount Olive High School will increase the number of Advanced Placement exams administered to students enrolled in Advanced Placement courses.

4. Promotion of Advanced Placement goals from staff and administration. Current incentive program under review by the Board of Education.

MOHS - College and Career Readiness

MOMS Sample SIP Strategies• NWEA Testing – To determine students’ areas of strength and

weakness. Any student 210 or below on the NJASK from 2013-2014 was tested.

• MOMS Academy – Direct, small group instruction after school in ELA/MATH for academically at risk students identified through multiple measures (grades, NJASK, teacher rec). Provides an individualized learning path developed through Compass Learning or Accellus. Paths consist of 5 skills per marking period.

• BSI/Title I interventions – All students 210 or below scheduled for supplemental instruction every other day

• Lunch/3R Support Program – Supports students who are unable to attend the MOMS academy in the afternoon.

MOMS SIP Technology Goal

Students will use technology in the classroom a minimum of 2 hours per day.• Google Docs- All team teachers have been trained in Google Docs. A graduated roll

out and training began in October. All ELA, SS, Science teachers are now using Google Docs for writing assignments and homework.

• Quizlet was introduced at a faculty meeting. MOMS is using all technology resources to prepare our students for 21st Century Skills as well as PARCC.

• Amplify Rollout – All Amplify tablets have been deployed and are in use. 8th grade teachers in all academic areas are using the tablets for internet usage or with the specialized program Amplify provides.

• Technology at MOMS is approximately 6393 hours of usage for the month of November. Per student, it is 5.3 hours per student over a ten day period

SIP – Compass Utilization

SIP - Edu Trends – Nov 2014

SIPs – Elementary Strategies Increase time

Sizzle (before school program) STARS (after school program) BSI (supplemental during school program) Revision of master schedule (Sandshore)

Teach to Understanding Data from benchmark assessments to ensure mastery Re-teach, retake policy for grades below C Smart shots (videotaped checks for understanding)

SIPs – Elementary Strategies

Teach What Matters PLCs develop lessons and assessments that address

curriculum and PARCC readiness SGOs focus on areas in need of improvement Implementation of standards-based report cards

Increase Effort Powerschool parent portal and automated notifications Rewards/recognitions for student achievement

SIPs – Elementary Strategies

Personalize Missing Skills Targeted instruction in small group settings Compass Learning Dreambox Accellus Response to Intervention

SIP School-based Initiatives Monthly parent tip sheets and meetings (Sandshore) Great Books for literacy (Sandshore) 25 Book Initiative (Mt. View) Minute Math Clubs (Mt. View) Math 24/First in Math (Mt. View, Tinc, Sandshore) AIMSWeb weekly progress monitoring (CMS) Parent Institutes and Coffee with Principal (CMS) Videotaped lessons analyzed in PLCs (CMS) Razz for Kids (Tinc)