56
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2016 - 17)
INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2015 - 16)(Data are lagged a year.)
Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts
and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.
The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the
Student Information Repository System (SIRS).
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$9,043,839
PUPILS
1,000
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$9,044
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$3,797,173
PUPILS
151
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$25,147
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPAVERAGE NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$8,395,886,432
PUPILS
747,643
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$11,230
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$3,487,990,842
PUPILS
110,460
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$31,577
1 of 3
ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$33,423,609,457
PUPILS
2,649,519
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$12,615
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$14,485,942,729
PUPILS
460,996
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$31,423
Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and
instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as
transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all
pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but
attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education
program.
Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-
level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus
students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.
Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both
general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities.
TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
$18,228
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP
$21,790
NY STATE
$23,361
Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as
expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education
and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.
2 of 3
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 16, 2018, 3:47 PM EST
INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2016 - 17)Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with
disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.
STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULARCLASSROOM)
THIS SCHOOLDISTRICT
80% OR MORE
111 75.0%
40% - 79%
17 11.5%
LESS THAN 40%
16 10.8%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
3 2.0%
OTHER SETTINGS
1 0.7%
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPAVERAGE NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY
80% OR MORE
56.8%
40% - 79%
19.1%
LESS THAN 40%
16.9%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
4.5%
OTHER SETTINGS
2.7%
NY STATE
80% OR MORE
58.4%
40% - 79%
11.9%
LESS THAN 40%
19.6%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
5.9%
OTHER SETTINGS
4.5%
The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of
students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages
represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of
percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.
SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
15.9%
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP
13.4%
NY STATE
14.9%
This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are
parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)
responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed
students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the
Basic Education Data System (BEDS).
Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.
3 of 3
HOOSIC VALLEY CSD - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2016 - 17]
HOOSIC VALLEY CSD ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)K-12 ENROLLMENT 939
ENROLLMENT BY GENDERMALE
480 51%
FEMALE
459 49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITYGROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
1
6
12
3
897
20
PERCENT
0%
1%
1%
0%
96%
2%
OTHER GROUPSENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
— —
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
150 16%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
349 37%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADEGROUP
PRE-K (FULL DAY)
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
34
48
75
72
63
73
55
67
7
66
83
67
65
92
98
8
PERCENT
3%
5%
8%
7%
6%
8%
6%
7%
1%
7%
9%
7%
7%
9%
10%
1%
1 of 28
AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (2016 - 17)
ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)
TEACHER TURNOVER RATE (2015-16 TO 2016-17)
TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (2016 - 17)
GROUP
COMMON BRANCH
GRADE 8 ENGLISH
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS
GRADE 8 SCIENCE
GRADE 8 SOCIAL STUDIES
GRADE 10 ENGLISH
GRADE 10 MATHEMATICS
GRADE 10 SCIENCE
GRADE 10 SOCIAL STUDIES
CLASS SIZE
20
21
17
19
21
16
17
16
14
FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2016 - 17)ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
255 27%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
65 7%
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE95%
50 5%
TURNOVER RATE OF TEACHERS WITH FEWER THAN FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
13%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
13%
STAFF COUNTS (2016 - 17)GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
2
1
16
29
TOTAL TEACHERS 82
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE 0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE 2%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 1%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE 5%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES 388
PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 4%
2 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
23%
41%
29%
7%
36%
28% 29%36%
7%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
97
80
17
GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS)
92
80
12
REGENTS DIPLOMA
83 90%
78 98%
5 42%
GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
34 37%
33 41%
1 8%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
11 12%
10 13%
1 8%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
9 10%
2 3%
7 58%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5 5%
0 0%
5 29%
HIGH SCHOOL NON-COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
DROPPED OUT
_ _
_ _
_ _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION
PROGRAM
_ _
_ _
_ _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_ _
_ _
_ _
POST-GRADUATION PLANS OF COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
25 26%
25 31%
0 0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
42 43%
38 48%
4 24%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
4 4%
1 1%
3 18%
TO THE MILITARY
4 4%
4 5%
0 0%
GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
TO EMPLOYMENT
15 15%
10 13%
5 29%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1 1%
0 0%
1 6%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3 3%
0 0%
3 18%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3 3%
2 3%
1 6%
GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 311
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
GROUP
56
45
11
1
52
3
56
29
27
56
TOTAL TESTED
36%
44%
0%
_%
_%
_%
36%
62%
7%
36%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
13 23%
8 18%
5 45%
_ _
_ _
_ _
13 23%
6 21%
7 26%
13 23%
LEVEL 2
23 41%
17 38%
6 55%
_ _
_ _
_ _
23 41%
5 17%
18 67%
23 41%
LEVEL 3
16 29%
16 36%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 29%
14 48%
2 7%
16 29%
LEVEL 4
4 7%
4 9%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
4 7%
4 14%
0 0%
4 7%
3 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
30%
43%
18%
10%
28%24%
35%
25%
16%
41%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
47%
30%
17% 6% 23%
33% 32%
22%
13%
35%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
19
37
56
11%
49%
36%
9 47%
4 11%
13 23%
8 42%
15 41%
23 41%
2 11%
14 38%
16 29%
0 0%
4 11%
4 7%
GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 300
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
61
55
6
1
1
58
1
61
30
31
61
28
33
61
TOTAL TESTED
28%
31%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
28%
43%
13%
28%
11%
42%
28%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
18 30%
14 25%
4 67%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
18 30%
4 13%
14 45%
18 30%
13 46%
5 15%
18 30%
LEVEL 2
26 43%
24 44%
2 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
26 43%
13 43%
13 42%
26 43%
12 43%
14 42%
26 43%
LEVEL 3
11 18%
11 20%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 18%
9 30%
2 6%
11 18%
3 11%
8 24%
11 18%
LEVEL 4
6 10%
6 11%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 10%
4 13%
2 6%
6 10%
0 0%
6 18%
6 10%
GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 294
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
47
42
5
45
2
47
24
23
47
16
31
TOTAL TESTED
23%
26%
0%
_%
_%
23%
33%
13%
23%
19%
26%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
22 47%
17 40%
5 100%
_ _
_ _
22 47%
8 33%
14 61%
22 47%
10 63%
12 39%
LEVEL 2
14 30%
14 33%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
14 30%
8 33%
6 26%
14 30%
3 19%
11 35%
LEVEL 3
8 17%
8 19%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
8 17%
5 21%
3 13%
8 17%
2 13%
6 19%
LEVEL 4
3 6%
3 7%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
3 6%
3 13%
0 0%
3 6%
1 6%
2 6%
4 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
16%
37%
22% 25%
47%
29%
39%
16% 16%
32%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
15%
36% 38%
11%
49%
22%
36%29%
13%
42%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
NOT MIGRANT 47 23% 22 47% 14 30% 8 17% 3 6%
GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 314
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
51
44
7
1
2
46
2
5
20
31
51
12
39
51
TOTAL TESTED
47%
52%
14%
_%
_%
48%
_%
40%
55%
42%
47%
33%
51%
47%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
8 16%
4 9%
4 57%
_ _
_ _
6 13%
_ _
2 40%
3 15%
5 16%
8 16%
3 25%
5 13%
8 16%
LEVEL 2
19 37%
17 39%
2 29%
_ _
_ _
18 39%
_ _
1 20%
6 30%
13 42%
19 37%
5 42%
14 36%
19 37%
LEVEL 3
11 22%
11 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
10 22%
_ _
1 20%
4 20%
7 23%
11 22%
4 33%
7 18%
11 22%
LEVEL 4
13 25%
12 27%
1 14%
_ _
_ _
12 26%
_ _
1 20%
7 35%
6 19%
13 25%
0 0%
13 33%
13 25%
GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 314
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
47
36
11
1
45
1
47
20
27
47
12
35
47
TOTAL TESTED
49%
64%
0%
_%
_%
_%
49%
75%
30%
49%
17%
60%
49%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
7 15%
3 8%
4 36%
_ _
_ _
_ _
7 15%
0 0%
7 26%
7 15%
4 33%
3 9%
7 15%
LEVEL 2
17 36%
10 28%
7 64%
_ _
_ _
_ _
17 36%
5 25%
12 44%
17 36%
6 50%
11 31%
17 36%
LEVEL 3
18 38%
18 50%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
18 38%
11 55%
7 26%
18 38%
1 8%
17 49%
18 38%
LEVEL 4
5 11%
5 14%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 11%
4 20%
1 4%
5 11%
1 8%
4 11%
5 11%
5 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
42% 39%
12%7% 19%21%
33% 30%
15%
45%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
22%29% 29%
20%
49%
25% 27% 25% 23%
48%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 289
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
59
54
5
1
58
59
21
38
59
25
34
59
TOTAL TESTED
19%
20%
0%
_%
_%
19%
43%
5%
19%
4%
29%
19%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
25 42%
20 37%
5 100%
_ _
_ _
25 42%
3 14%
22 58%
25 42%
15 60%
10 29%
25 42%
LEVEL 2
23 39%
23 43%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
23 39%
9 43%
14 37%
23 39%
9 36%
14 41%
23 39%
LEVEL 3
7 12%
7 13%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
7 12%
6 29%
1 3%
7 12%
1 4%
6 18%
7 12%
LEVEL 4
4 7%
4 7%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
4 7%
3 14%
1 3%
4 7%
0 0%
4 12%
4 7%
GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS
MEAN SCORE: 310
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
55
44
11
1
51
3
55
28
27
55
19
36
55
TOTAL TESTED
49%
59%
9%
_%
_%
_%
49%
68%
30%
49%
21%
64%
49%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
12 22%
7 16%
5 45%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 22%
4 14%
8 30%
12 22%
7 37%
5 14%
12 22%
LEVEL 2
16 29%
11 25%
5 45%
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 29%
5 18%
11 41%
16 29%
8 42%
8 22%
16 29%
LEVEL 3
16 29%
15 34%
1 9%
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 29%
10 36%
6 22%
16 29%
3 16%
13 36%
16 29%
LEVEL 4
11 20%
11 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 20%
9 32%
2 7%
11 20%
1 5%
10 28%
11 20%
GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS6 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
23% 26%32%
19%
52%
27% 30%22% 21%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.043%
24% 22%
11%
33%32%25% 27%
16%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 307
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
62
55
7
1
1
59
1
62
31
31
62
28
34
62
TOTAL TESTED
52%
56%
14%
_%
_%
_%
_%
52%
55%
48%
52%
25%
74%
52%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
14 23%
8 15%
6 86%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 23%
6 19%
8 26%
14 23%
11 39%
3 9%
14 23%
LEVEL 2
16 26%
16 29%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 26%
8 26%
8 26%
16 26%
10 36%
6 18%
16 26%
LEVEL 3
20 32%
19 35%
1 14%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 32%
12 39%
8 26%
20 32%
2 7%
18 53%
20 32%
LEVEL 4
12 19%
12 22%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 19%
5 16%
7 23%
12 19%
5 18%
7 21%
12 19%
GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS
MEAN SCORE: 301
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
46
41
5
44
2
46
23
23
46
15
31
46
TOTAL TESTED
33%
37%
0%
_%
_%
33%
30%
35%
33%
20%
39%
33%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
20 43%
15 37%
5 100%
_ _
_ _
20 43%
10 43%
10 43%
20 43%
9 60%
11 35%
20 43%
LEVEL 2
11 24%
11 27%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
11 24%
6 26%
5 22%
11 24%
3 20%
8 26%
11 24%
LEVEL 3
10 22%
10 24%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
10 22%
6 26%
4 17%
10 22%
3 20%
7 23%
10 22%
LEVEL 4
5 11%
5 12%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
5 11%
1 4%
4 17%
5 11%
0 0%
5 16%
5 11%
GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS
7 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
13%
30%36%
21%
57%
30% 30%
19% 21%
40%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
19%
43%
34%
4%
38%33%
29%24%
14%
38%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 317
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
47
40
7
1
2
42
2
5
18
29
47
11
36
47
TOTAL TESTED
57%
65%
14%
_%
_%
60%
_%
40%
67%
52%
57%
45%
61%
57%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
6 13%
1 3%
5 71%
_ _
_ _
5 12%
_ _
1 20%
3 17%
3 10%
6 13%
2 18%
4 11%
6 13%
LEVEL 2
14 30%
13 33%
1 14%
_ _
_ _
12 29%
_ _
2 40%
3 17%
11 38%
14 30%
4 36%
10 28%
14 30%
LEVEL 3
17 36%
16 40%
1 14%
_ _
_ _
17 40%
_ _
0 0%
7 39%
10 34%
17 36%
3 27%
14 39%
17 36%
LEVEL 4
10 21%
10 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
8 19%
_ _
2 40%
5 28%
5 17%
10 21%
2 18%
8 22%
10 21%
GRADE 7 MATHEMATICSMean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.
For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu
of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 311
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
47
36
11
1
45
1
47
21
26
47
11
36
47
TOTAL TESTED
38%
50%
0%
_%
_%
_%
38%
48%
31%
38%
18%
44%
38%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
9 19%
2 6%
7 64%
_ _
_ _
_ _
9 19%
2 10%
7 27%
9 19%
3 27%
6 17%
9 19%
LEVEL 2
20 43%
16 44%
4 36%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 43%
9 43%
11 42%
20 43%
6 55%
14 39%
20 43%
LEVEL 3
16 34%
16 44%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 34%
9 43%
7 27%
16 34%
2 18%
14 39%
16 34%
LEVEL 4
2 4%
2 6%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
2 4%
1 5%
1 4%
2 4%
0 0%
2 6%
2 4%
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS8 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0
15
30
45
60
47%
29%
7% 17%24%
30% 27%
16%
27%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.
For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu
of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 276
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
WHITE
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
47
43
4
47
14
33
47
21
26
47
TOTAL TESTED
4%
_%
_%
4%
7%
3%
4%
0%
8%
4%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
28 60%
_ _
_ _
28 60%
8 57%
20 61%
28 60%
15 71%
13 50%
28 60%
LEVEL 2
17 36%
_ _
_ _
17 36%
5 36%
12 36%
17 36%
6 29%
11 42%
17 36%
LEVEL 3
2 4%
_ _
_ _
2 4%
1 7%
1 3%
2 4%
0 0%
2 8%
2 4%
LEVEL 4
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
12
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
0 0%
LEVEL 2
0 0%
LEVEL 3
2 17%
4 & ABOVE
10 83%
3 & ABOVE
12 100%
9 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
1%9% 32%
57%
89%
4%10% 33%
53%
86%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
GRADE 4 SCIENCE
MEAN SCORE: 82
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
75
67
8
1
1
72
1
75
37
38
75
32
43
75
TOTAL TESTED
89%
91%
75%
_%
_%
_%
_%
89%
95%
84%
89%
81%
95%
89%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
1 1%
1 1%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
1 1%
0 0%
1 3%
1 1%
1 3%
0 0%
1 1%
LEVEL 2
7 9%
5 7%
2 25%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
7 9%
2 5%
5 13%
7 9%
5 16%
2 5%
7 9%
LEVEL 3
24 32%
20 30%
4 50%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
24 32%
13 35%
11 29%
24 32%
13 41%
11 26%
24 32%
LEVEL 4
43 57%
41 61%
2 25%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
43 57%
22 59%
21 55%
43 57%
13 41%
30 70%
43 57%
10 of 28
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
20
40
60
80
19%26%
33%
21%
54%
10%21%
39%29%
68%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
GRADE 8 SCIENCEData in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 60
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
45
42
3
1
44
45
17
28
45
17
28
45
TOTAL TESTED
42%
_%
_%
_%
_%
42%
53%
36%
42%
35%
46%
42%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
11 24%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 24%
2 12%
9 32%
11 24%
3 18%
8 29%
11 24%
LEVEL 2
15 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
15 33%
6 35%
9 32%
15 33%
8 47%
7 25%
15 33%
LEVEL 3
15 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
15 33%
8 47%
7 25%
15 33%
5 29%
10 36%
15 33%
LEVEL 4
4 9%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
4 9%
1 6%
3 11%
4 9%
1 6%
3 11%
4 9%
GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS SCIENCE TEST
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
12
TOTAL TESTED
100%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
0 0%
LEVEL 2
0 0%
LEVEL 3
4 33%
LEVEL 4
8 67%
11 of 28
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
1% 1%34%
60%
94%
3% 3% 20%
65%
85%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
0%9%
64%
25%
89%
3% 7%
55%
30%
85%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGEARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
100
84
16
2
97
1
100
50
50
100
36
64
100
TOTAL TESTED
94%
98%
75%
_%
_%
_%
94%
96%
92%
94%
89%
97%
94%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
1 1%
0 0%
1 6%
_ _
_ _
_ _
1 1%
0 0%
1 2%
1 1%
1 3%
0 0%
1 1%
LEVEL 2
1 1%
0 0%
1 6%
_ _
_ _
_ _
1 1%
1 2%
0 0%
1 1%
0 0%
1 2%
1 1%
LEVEL 3
34 34%
25 30%
9 56%
_ _
_ _
_ _
34 34%
16 32%
18 36%
34 34%
17 47%
17 27%
34 34%
LEVEL 4
60 60%
57 68%
3 19%
_ _
_ _
_ _
60 60%
32 64%
28 56%
60 60%
15 42%
45 70%
60 60%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTERFOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
100
84
16
2
97
1
100
50
50
100
36
64
100
TOTAL TESTED
89%
95%
56%
_%
_%
_%
89%
92%
86%
89%
81%
94%
89%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
LEVEL 2
9 9%
4 5%
5 31%
_ _
_ _
_ _
9 9%
3 6%
6 12%
9 9%
5 14%
4 6%
9 9%
LEVEL 3
64 64%
55 65%
9 56%
_ _
_ _
_ _
64 64%
32 64%
32 64%
64 64%
25 69%
39 61%
64 64%
LEVEL 4
25 25%
25 30%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 25%
14 28%
11 22%
25 25%
4 11%
21 33%
25 25%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY AND
12 of 28
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
2%8%
51%
35%
86%
5% 6%
43%34%
78%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
0% 3%33%
60%
93%
3% 4% 32%
48%
81%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
GEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
100
84
16
2
97
1
100
50
50
100
36
64
100
TOTAL TESTED
86%
95%
38%
_%
_%
_%
86%
90%
82%
86%
75%
92%
86%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
2 2%
0 0%
2 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
2 2%
1 2%
1 2%
2 2%
1 3%
1 2%
2 2%
LEVEL 2
8 8%
2 2%
6 38%
_ _
_ _
_ _
8 8%
3 6%
5 10%
8 8%
5 14%
3 5%
8 8%
LEVEL 3
51 51%
46 55%
5 31%
_ _
_ _
_ _
51 51%
26 52%
25 50%
51 51%
21 58%
30 47%
51 51%
LEVEL 4
35 35%
34 40%
1 6%
_ _
_ _
_ _
35 35%
19 38%
16 32%
35 35%
6 17%
29 45%
35 35%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY ANDGOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
100
84
16
2
97
1
100
50
50
100
36
64
100
TOTAL TESTED
93%
98%
69%
_%
_%
_%
93%
94%
92%
93%
86%
97%
93%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
LEVEL 2
3 3%
0 0%
3 19%
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 3%
2 4%
1 2%
3 3%
2 6%
1 2%
3 3%
LEVEL 3
33 33%
24 29%
9 56%
_ _
_ _
_ _
33 33%
18 36%
15 30%
33 33%
16 44%
17 27%
33 33%
LEVEL 4
60 60%
58 69%
2 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
60 60%
29 58%
31 62%
60 60%
15 42%
45 70%
60 60%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOURYEARS OF INSTRUCTION
13 of 28
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
0% 4%
44% 48%
92%
3% 5%
45%38%
84%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)
REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
100
84
16
2
97
1
100
50
50
100
36
64
100
TOTAL TESTED
92%
98%
63%
_%
_%
_%
92%
94%
90%
92%
86%
95%
92%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
LEVEL 2
4 4%
0 0%
4 25%
_ _
_ _
_ _
4 4%
2 4%
2 4%
4 4%
2 6%
2 3%
4 4%
LEVEL 3
44 44%
35 42%
9 56%
_ _
_ _
_ _
44 44%
24 48%
20 40%
44 44%
20 56%
24 38%
44 44%
LEVEL 4
48 48%
47 56%
1 6%
_ _
_ _
_ _
48 48%
23 46%
25 50%
48 48%
11 31%
37 58%
48 48%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
112
93
19
1
110
1
112
56
56
112
42
70
112
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
5 4%
2 2%
3 16%
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 4%
2 4%
3 5%
5 4%
4 10%
1 1%
5 4%
LEVEL 2
4 4%
2 2%
2 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
4 4%
1 2%
3 5%
4 4%
1 2%
3 4%
4 4%
LEVEL 3
29 26%
21 23%
8 42%
_ _
_ _
_ _
29 26%
9 16%
20 36%
29 26%
14 33%
15 21%
29 26%
LEVEL 4
21 19%
18 19%
3 16%
_ _
_ _
_ _
21 19%
11 20%
10 18%
21 19%
6 14%
15 21%
21 19%
LEVEL 5
53 47%
50 54%
3 16%
_ _
_ _
_ _
53 47%
33 59%
20 36%
53 47%
17 40%
36 51%
53 47%
ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
WHITE
FEMALE
MALE
GROUP
6
6
6
4
2
TOTAL TESTED 55
2 33%
2 33%
2 33%
_ _
_ _
65
2 33%
2 33%
2 33%
_ _
_ _
85
1 17%
1 17%
1 17%
_ _
_ _
14 of 28
ALGEBRAI(COMMONCORE)
REGENTS COMMON CORE GEOMETRY
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
6
6
6
2 33%
2 33%
2 33%
2 33%
2 33%
2 33%
1 17%
1 17%
1 17%
…
…
…
…
COMMON CORE GEOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
53
51
2
2
51
53
26
27
53
14
39
53
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
6 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 11%
5 19%
1 4%
6 11%
2 14%
4 10%
6 11%
LEVEL 2
6 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 11%
4 15%
2 7%
6 11%
2 14%
4 10%
6 11%
LEVEL 3
28 53%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
28 53%
11 42%
17 63%
28 53%
8 57%
20 51%
28 53%
LEVEL 4
7 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
7 13%
4 15%
3 11%
7 13%
2 14%
5 13%
7 13%
LEVEL 5
6 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 11%
2 8%
4 15%
6 11%
0 0%
6 15%
6 11%
15 of 28
ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)
REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
36
36
1
35
36
23
13
36
7
29
36
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
2 6%
2 6%
_ _
_ _
2 6%
1 4%
1 8%
2 6%
0 0%
2 7%
2 6%
LEVEL 2
2 6%
2 6%
_ _
_ _
2 6%
2 9%
0 0%
2 6%
1 14%
1 3%
2 6%
LEVEL 3
17 47%
17 47%
_ _
_ _
17 47%
10 43%
7 54%
17 47%
4 57%
13 45%
17 47%
LEVEL 4
11 31%
11 31%
_ _
_ _
11 31%
8 35%
3 23%
11 31%
2 29%
9 31%
11 31%
LEVEL 5
4 11%
4 11%
_ _
_ _
4 11%
2 9%
2 15%
4 11%
0 0%
4 14%
4 11%
GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
99
79
20
1
97
1
99
46
53
99
40
59
99
TOTAL TESTED 55
84 85%
77 97%
7 35%
_ _
_ _
_ _
84 85%
43 93%
41 77%
84 85%
32 80%
52 88%
84 85%
65
72 73%
69 87%
3 15%
_ _
_ _
_ _
72 73%
37 80%
35 66%
72 73%
26 65%
46 78%
72 73%
85
25 25%
25 32%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 25%
13 28%
12 23%
25 25%
4 10%
21 36%
25 25%
16 of 28
REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT
REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT
U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
100
89
11
2
97
1
100
51
49
100
39
61
100
TOTAL TESTED 55
98 98%
88 99%
10 91%
_ _
_ _
_ _
98 98%
50 98%
48 98%
98 98%
39 100%
59 97%
98 98%
65
92 92%
85 96%
7 64%
_ _
_ _
_ _
92 92%
48 94%
44 90%
92 92%
35 90%
57 93%
92 92%
85
57 57%
55 62%
2 18%
_ _
_ _
_ _
57 57%
31 61%
26 53%
57 57%
18 46%
39 64%
57 57%
LIVING ENVIRONMENT
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
64
50
14
1
61
2
64
29
35
64
25
39
64
TOTAL TESTED 55
60 94%
50 100%
10 71%
_ _
_ _
_ _
60 94%
28 97%
32 91%
60 94%
21 84%
39 100%
60 94%
65
57 89%
50 100%
7 50%
_ _
_ _
_ _
57 89%
28 97%
29 83%
57 89%
20 80%
37 95%
57 89%
85
20 31%
20 40%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 31%
9 31%
11 31%
20 31%
3 12%
17 44%
20 31%
17 of 28
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY
PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
77
67
10
1
75
1
77
40
37
77
23
54
77
TOTAL TESTED 55
66 86%
60 90%
6 60%
_ _
_ _
_ _
66 86%
33 83%
33 89%
66 86%
18 78%
48 89%
66 86%
65
53 69%
51 76%
2 20%
_ _
_ _
_ _
53 69%
26 65%
27 73%
53 69%
13 57%
40 74%
53 69%
85
19 25%
19 28%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
19 25%
9 23%
10 27%
19 25%
6 26%
13 24%
19 25%
PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
34
34
1
33
34
20
14
34
6
28
34
TOTAL TESTED 55
34 100%
34 100%
_ _
_ _
34 100%
20 100%
14 100%
34 100%
6 100%
28 100%
34 100%
65
33 97%
33 97%
_ _
_ _
33 97%
20 100%
13 93%
33 97%
5 83%
28 100%
33 97%
85
7 21%
7 21%
_ _
_ _
7 21%
3 15%
4 29%
7 21%
0 0%
7 25%
7 21%
18 of 28
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS
PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
WHITE
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
19
19
19
11
8
19
4
15
19
TOTAL TESTED 55
17 89%
17 89%
17 89%
10 91%
7 88%
17 89%
_ _
_ _
17 89%
65
14 74%
14 74%
14 74%
7 64%
7 88%
14 74%
_ _
_ _
14 74%
85
10 53%
10 53%
10 53%
5 45%
5 63%
10 53%
_ _
_ _
10 53%
NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (2016 - 17)
GRADE 3 ELA
GRADE 3 MATH
GRADE 4 ELA
GRADE 4 MATH
GRADE 4 SCIENCE
GRADE 5 ELA
GRADE 5 MATH
GRADE 6 ELA
GRADE 6 MATH
GRADE 7 ELA
GRADE 7 MATH
GRADE 8 ELA
GRADE 8 MATH
GRADE 8 SCIENCE
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH
SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE
SECONDARY-LEVEL SOCIAL STUDIES
GROUP
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
TOTAL TESTED
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (2016 - 17)
GRADE 1
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
GROUP
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_
_
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NOGROUP MADE AYP TESTED 95% STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
PI EAMO SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
19 of 28
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
840*
1
2
5
1
806*
10
154*
0
311*
78%*
―
―
―
―
77%*
―
75%*
―
74%*
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
327
0
1
5
1
313
7
58✝
0
120
106
―
―
―
―
106
―
59✝
―
72
105
―
―
―
―
118
―
72
―
93
105
―
―
―
―
117
―
53
―
89
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
838*
836*
830*
838*
19
824*
686*
840*
529*
425*
415*
0
840*
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
78%*
78%*
78%*
78%*
―
78%*
78%*
78%*
80%*
82%*
74%*
―
78%*
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
327
326
322
326
14
320
272
327
207
179
148
0
327
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
106
105
107
105
―
106
115
106
125
81
135
―
106
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
TESTED 95%
841*
1
2
5
1
807*
10
154*
0
310*
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
74%*
―
―
―
―
74%*
―
71%*
―
69%*
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
320
0
1
4
1
307
7
58✝
0
114
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
116
―
―
―
―
117
―
52✝
―
82
PI
103
―
―
―
―
115
―
73
―
90
EAMO
103
―
―
―
―
115
―
63
―
90
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
20 of 28
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
839*
837*
831*
839*
19
825*
687*
841*
531*
425*
416*
0
841*
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
74%*
74%*
74%*
74%*
―
74%*
75%*
74%*
77%*
79%*
69%*
―
74%*
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
320
319
316
319
13
313
265
320
206
175
145
0
320
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
116
116
116
116
―
117
129
116
134
105
130
―
116
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
TESTED 80%
163
0
1
2
0
159
1
23
0
112*
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
83%
―
―
―
―
82%
―
―
―
80%*
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR
PROGRESS TARGET
132
0
0
2
0
130
0
13
0
52
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
165
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
160
PI
180
―
―
―
―
186
―
―
―
170
EAMO
180
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
170
PROGRESS TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
GROUP
163
162
161
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
83%
83%
83%
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
132
132
130
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
165
165
165
PI
21 of 28
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
163
4
162
140
163
93
82
143*
0
163
83%
―
83%
86%
83%
88%
88%
85%*
―
83%
132
2
132
119
132
80
72
60
0
132
165
―
165
166
165
169
153
180
―
165
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
TESTED 95%
92
0
0
2
0
89
1
12
0
29
12TH GRADERS
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PERCENT OF 12TH
GRADERS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
97
0
1
2
0
93
1
15
0
34
2013
ACCOUNTABILITY
COHORT MEMBERS
161
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
144
PI
168
―
―
―
―
176
―
―
―
151
EAMO
168
―
―
―
―
176
―
―
―
151
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
92
92
90
92
3
91
80
92
63
44
48
0
92
12TH GRADERS
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID
TEST SCORES
97
96
95
97
4
96
82
97
63
48
49
0
97
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS
161
160
161
161
―
160
170
161
170
158
163
―
161
PI
22 of 28
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
TESTED 95%
92
0
0
2
0
89
1
12
0
29
12TH GRADERS
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PERCENT OF 12TH
GRADERS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
97
0
1
2
0
93
1
15
0
34
2013
ACCOUNTABILITY
COHORT MEMBERS
143
―
―
―
―
143
―
―
―
118
PI
155
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
137
EAMO
153
―
―
―
―
154
―
―
―
137
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
92
92
90
92
3
91
80
92
63
44
48
0
92
12TH GRADERS
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID
TEST SCORES
97
96
95
97
4
96
82
97
63
48
49
0
97
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS
143
143
143
143
―
144
154
143
157
135
151
―
143
PI
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
GROUP
106
―
―
―
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI
116
―
―
―
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI
161
―
―
―
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI
143
―
―
―
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI
132
0
0
0
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
23 of 28
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
106
―
59
―
72
―
117
―
52
―
82
―
160
―
―
―
144
―
143
―
―
―
118
0
132
0
56
0
104
OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
MADE AYP
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
24 of 28
FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:
96
0
1
0
0
95
0
13
0
33
2012 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL
COHORT
94%
―
―
―
―
94%
―
―
―
94%
GRADUATION RATE
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
STATE STANDARD
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
75%
PROGRESS TARGET
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
25 of 28
FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:
89
0
1
0
0
85
3
20
0
27
2011 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL
COHORT
89%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
―
―
―
GRADUATION RATE
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
STATE STANDARD
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
PROGRESS TARGET
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
26 of 28
GRADUATION RATES FOR NON-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT
96
95
96
96
1
96
83
96
63
50
46
0
96
2012 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT
94%
94%
94%
94%
―
94%
96%
94%
94%
94%
93%
―
94%
GRADUATION RATE
FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT
89
88
89
89
4
86
69
89
62
42
47
0
89
2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT
89%
90%
89%
89%
―
88%
99%
89%
95%
93%
85%
―
89%
GRADUATION RATE
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
27 of 28
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 16, 2018, 3:58 PM EST
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 36%
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 31%
PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) 11%
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5%
PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES
28 of 28
