Date post: | 05-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | octavia-walker |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 2 times |
1
Dimer Models, Integrable Systems and Gauge Theory
Maths of String and Gauge Theory, London
March 2012
Sebastián Franco
SLAC Theory Group
IPPP Durham University
2
Gauge group: P SU(N)
F-terms: monomial = monomial
On the worldvolume of D3-branes, N=1 superconformal field theory with:
Every field appears exactly
twice in W with opposite signs
(Toric Condition)
The Quiver Gauge Theory
D-branes over Toric Singularities
CY3
N D3-branes
Torus fibrations over base spaces
Described by specifying shrinking cycles and their relations
Toric Geometry2-sphere
compact 4-cycle
Encoded by web or toric diagramsToric Diagram
3
Brane Dimers
The dimer model is a physical configuration of NS5 and D5-branes
All the information defining the gauge theory can be encoded in a dimer model on T2
3
11
1 1
2 2
4
4
1 2
34
Example: complex cone over F0
Gauge Theory Dimer
SU(N) gauge group face
bifundamental (or adjoint) edge
superpotential term node
Franco, Hanany, Kennaway, Vegh, Wecht
4
Perfect matching: configurations of edges such that every vertex in the graph is an endpoint of precisely one edge
Perfect Matchings and Geometry
Moduli Space: perfect matchings are the natural variables solving F-term equations
Franco, Vegh
Franco, Hanany, Kennaway, Vegh, Wecht
p1 p2 p3 p4 p5
p6 p7 p9p8
(n1,n2) crossings of (z1,z2) directions
Perfect Matchings and Geometry
This correspondence trivialized formerly complicated problems such as the computation of the moduli space of the SCFT, which reduces to calculating the determinant of an adjacency matrix of the dimer model (Kasteleyn matrix)
There is a one to one correspondence between perfect matchings and GLSM fields describing the toric singularity (points in the toric diagram)
Franco, Vegh
Franco, Hanany, Kennaway, Vegh, Wecht
p1, p2, p3, p4, p5
p8
p6
p9
p7
K =
white nodes
black nodes
Kasteleyn Matrix Toric Diagram
det K = P(z1,z2) = nij z1i z2
j Example: F0
Multiple Applications
Mathematics Physics
Local constructions of MSSM + CKM
Dynamical SUSY breaking
AdS/CFT correspondence in 3+1 and 2+1 dimensions
BPS invariants of CYs (e.g. DT)
Mirror symmetry
Toric/Seiberg duality
D-brane instantons
Define an infinite class of interesting objects: largest classification of 4d, N=1 SCFTs
Make previous complicated calculations trivial: determination of their moduli space
The power of dimer models:
Can they do it again? YES!
Define an infinite class of quantum integrable systems
Constructing all integrals of motion becomes straightforward
Eager, SF
SF, Hanany, Kennaway, Vegh, Wecht
SF, Hanany, Krefl, Park, Uranga
SF, Uranga
SF, Hanany, Martelli, Sparks, Vegh, Wecht
SF, Hanany, Park, Rodriguez-Gomez
SF, Klebanov, Rodriguez-Gomez
Dimers Models and Integrable Systems
8
From a Dimer to Phase Space
1
3
3 3
32
2
4 4
Poisson Structure
One wi variable per gauge group:
Two 2-torus directions:
w1
z1
Example: F0
{wi,wj} = Iij wi wj Iij: intersection matrix
Idem for {wi,zj} and {z1,z2}
e.g: {w1,w3} = 4 w1 w3 {w1,w2} = -2 w1 w2
1 2
34
z2
exponential in p and q
1
3
3 3
32
2
4 4 1
3
3 3
32
2
4 4 1
3
3 3
32
2
4 4
Every perfect matching defines a closed path on the tiling by taking the difference with respect to a reference perfect matching
= = w1 w4
The commutators define a 0+1d quantum integrable system of dimension 2 + 2 Area (toric diagram), with symplectic leaves of dimension 2 Ninterior
Casimirs: ratios of boundary points (commute with everything)
Hamiltonians: internal points (commute with each other)
The Integrable System
Every perfect matching can be expressed in term of loops variables
Goncharov, Kenyon
Eager, Franco, Schaeffer
This theory has 9 perfect matchings
1
3
3 3
32
2
4 4
1 + w1 + w1w4 + w1w2 + w3-1
z2
z1-1
w1-1w2
-1z2-1
w1w4 z1
Casimirs:
Hamiltonian:
C1 = z1z2
C2 = w1w2z2 / z1
C3 = 1/(w12w2
2z1z2)
H = 1 + w1 + w1w4 + w1w2 + w3-1
An explicit example: F0
The Integrable System
Fully constructive prescription for building an integrable system given a spectral curve
e.g.: relativistic periodic Toda chain (Conifold/Zn)
quiver/dimer model mirror manifold
Feng, He, Kennaway, Vafa
Hamiltonians
Casimirs
Characteristic polynomial: P(z1,z2)coeficients and their ratios give
Hamiltonians and Casimirs
Spectral curve S
P(z1,z2) = 0
Mirror manifold
P(z1,z2) = W u v = W
Eager, Franco, Schaeffer
Franco
Brane configuration for: 5d, N=1, pure SU(n) gauge theory on S1
Connection to 4d and 5d Gauge Theory
Multiple avatars of the Riemann surface S
Among other things, we systematically address the question: what is the integrable system associated to an arbitrary 4d N=2 gauge theory? (spectral curve as SW curve)
5d N=1 gauge theory on S1
M5-brane wrapped on S M-theory on CY3
Relativistic Integrable System
Spectral curve S
Dimer Model
S inside mirror
4d N=2 gauge theory
Seiberg-Witten curve s
Non-Relativistic Integrable System
Spectral curve s
R → 0 pi → 0
Eager, Franco, Schaeffer
An example: Relativistic Periodic Toda Chain
Spectral curve S
1 2 3 p-1 p
p+1 p+2 p+3 2p-1 2p
p/2 + 1
Nekrasov It corresponds to Yp,0 (Zp orbifold of the conifold)
Dimer model:
reference p.m.
5d, N=1, pure SU(p) gauge theory on S1
Basic cyles: wi (i = 1, …, 2p), z1 and z2
di
i=1,…,p
ci
even i
Ci-1
even i
Two additional cycles fixed by Casimirs
Relativistic Toda Chain: The Integrable System
{ck,dk} = ck dk
{ck,dk-1} = ck dk-1
{ck,ck+1} = - ck ck+1
Hk = S P ci dj Hamiltonians in terms of non-intersecting paths:
k factors
A more convenient basis:
H1 = S (ci + di)
Eager, Franco, Schaeffer
Bruschi, Ragnisco
The Kasteleyn matrix is the adjacency matrix of the dimer
This is precisely the Lax operator of the non-relativistic periodic Toda chain!
p1 eq1-q2 eqp-q1w
eq1-q2 p2 eq2-q3
eq2-q3
eqp-1-qp
eqp-q1w-1 eq2-q3 pp
L(w) =
-H1-H1z1V1 Vp z2
V1 H2+H2z1-1 V2
V2
Vp-1
Vp z2-1 Vp-1 Hp+Hpz1
-1
K =
~~
~
~~
~~
P(z1,z2) = det K
Non-relativistic limit: linear orden in pi and z and define
L(w) - z ≡ K
Vi = Vi ≡ eqi-qi+1 Hi = -Hi ≡ e(-1) pi/2 z1 ≡ e-z z2 ≡ w~ ~
Rows: Columns:
It controls conserved quantities
Quiver Impurities = Spin Chain Impurities
Relativistic, periodic Toda chain 5d, N=1, pure SU(p) on S1
Quantized cubic coupling in prepotential: ccl = 0, …, p (disappears in 4d limit)
These are the toric diagrams for Yp,q manifolds
Yp,p : C3/(Z2×Zp)
Yp,0 : conifold/Zp
Quivers constructed iteratively starting for Yp,p and adding (p-q) impurities
s s ss tttt The quiver impurities are indeed impurities in XXZ spin chains
ccl = q
Benvenuti, Franco, Hanany, Martelli, Sparks
(0,1)(0,0)
(0,p)
(-1,p-q)
Y4,0Y4,1Y4,2Y4,3Y4,4
Eager, Franco, Schaeffer
Conclusions
In addition, they define an infinite class of quantum integrable systems
The computation of all integrals of motion becomes straightforward
These integrable systems are also associated to 5d N=1 and 4d N=2 gauge theories
Dimer models provide a systematic procedure for constructing the integrable system for an arbitrary gauge theory of this type
Dimer models are brane configurations in String Theory connecting Calabi-Yau’s and quantum field theories in various dimensions
Quantum Teichmüller Space: one-to-one correspondence between edges in dimer models and Fock coordinates in the Teichmüller space of S. The commutation relations required by integrability imply Chekhov-Fock quantization. Franco
Future Directions
Study the continuous (1+1)-dimensional integrable field theory limit
Classification of possible integrable impurities and interfaces in integrable field theories Franco, Galloni, He, and in progress
18
Applications to 3d-3d generalizations of the Alday-Gaiotto-Tachikawa (AGT) correspondence
M3 = S × I Z3d SL(2,R) CS = Z3d N=2 theory
Terashima, Yamazaki
Connection to quivers encoding the BPS spectrum of N=2 gauge theories, obtained from ideal triangulations of the SW curve.Alim, Cecotti, Cordova, Espahbodi, Rastogi, VafaAlso Gaiotto, Moore, Neitzke
Thank you!
Integrabe
Systems
5d, N=2 Gauge Theory
4d, N=1 Gauge Theory
4d, N=1, SCFT
quiversN=2 BPS
states
3d-3d AGT
Calabi-Yaus
Multiple Connections
Dimer models provide natural, systematic bridges connecting integrable systems to several physical systems.