doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
[Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part 2)]
Date: 2009-11-19
Name Affiliations Address Phone emailAuthors:
Hirokazu Sawada Tohoku University 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, JAPAN
+81-22-217-6112 [email protected]
Shuzo Kato NICT/ Tohoku University
3-4, Hikarino-Oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan
pKatsuyoshi Sato NICT 3-4, Hikarino-Oka,
Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
AbstractNovember, 2009
Abstract This document updates proposed intra-cluster channel models for
TGad channel modeling On top of channel modeling presented in the last meeting in Hawaii
which focused on Living room, Vertical polarization, LOS environments with variable HPBW antenna this paper shows the restenvironments with variable HPBW antenna, this paper shows the rest for TGad channel modeling - intra-cluster channel modeling :1. Environments: extended to conference room,1. Environments: extended to conference room, 2. Polarization: extended to circular and horizontal from vertical
polarization, 3. Antenna HPBW: extended to 5, 15, 30, 60, 90 degrees,4. LOS: extended to NLOS in Living room.
By integrating the extracted intra-cluster parameters from the measured data shown in this paper and the inter-cluster channel modeling given by ref (Doc 09/334r4) the channel models for
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 2
modeling given by ref (Doc.09/334r4), the channel models for “conference room and living room environments” will be completed.
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Progress of intra cluster channel modelingNovember, 2009
Progress of intra-cluster channel modelingEnvironments LOS/NLOS Polarization Antenna HPBW [deg]
V 5 15 30 60 90
Conference
LOS H 5 15 30 60 90
C 5 15 30 60 90
NLOS
V 5 15 30 60 90
H 5 15 30 60 90NLOS H 5 15 30 60 90
C 5 15 30 60 90
LOS
V 5 15 30 60 90
H 5 15 30 60 90
Working status
Previous workDoc 09/721r1
Living
LOS H 5 15 30 60 90
C 5 15 30 60 90
NLOS
V: 5 15 30 60 90
H 5 15 30 60 90
Doc 09/721r1Doc 09/874r1Doc 09/936r1
This contributionNLOS H 5 15 30 60 90C 5 15 30 60 90
LOS
V 5 15 30 60 90
H 5 15 30 60 90
This contribution
CubicleC 5 15 30 60 90
NLOS
V 5 15 30 60 90
H 5 15 30 60 90
Submission Slide 3
5 5 30 60 90
C 5 15 30 60 90
Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Measurement system
I t t V t t k lInstrument: Vector network analyzerAntenna: Conical horn antenna
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Measurement set up in living room
Parameter ValueParameter ValueCenter frequency 62.5 GHz
Band width 3 GHzBand width 3 GHzNumber of frequency points 801
Frequency step 3.75 MHzq y pHPBW of antenna (Gain) 5, 15, 30, 60, 90 degree
Polarization Vertical, Horizontal, CircularCalibration Direct port connection without
antennas
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Antenna height:November, 2009
Li i i t Antenna height: 1.5m (LoS scenario)1.0 m (NLoS scenario)
Living room environment‘defined by TGad’
D = 3m
Submission Slide 6 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Conference room environment “defined by TGad”
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Proposed intra-cluster channel model
Two-side exponential decay model-Ray decay parameter, and -Ray arrival rate, and are assumed as Poisson process
Peak power ray in the cluster n
h )(
dB]
te te Peak power ray in the cluster
miith )(
02 te
t
Pow
er[d ee
0
02tete
tii
01 kP kk P
0 1 n1m …… 0,11 keP kkkk 0,11 keP kkkk
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 8
Relative time of arrival[ns] where k denotes the number of rays
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Intra cluster parameters for living room (LoS)November, 2009
Intra cluster parameters for living room (LoS)Environment Pol. HPBW [ns] [ns] [ns] [ns]
5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
V
15 4.76 N/A 0.902 N/A
30 0.652 1.29 1.79 1.11
60 0.469 0.510 0.466 0.616
LoS90 0.795 0.672 1.26 0.690
5 8.63 N/A 0.240 N/A
15 2 52 9 89 1 63 0 228
LivingRoom
H
15 2.52 9.89 1.63 0.228
30 0.645 1.03 3.63 0.699
60 0.543 0.773 0.720 0.842
90 0 474 0 537 0 790 0 49490 0.474 0.537 0.790 0.494
5 4.72 6.07 0.557 2.31
15 4.38 0.993 0.541 1.44
C 30 0.623 0.854 4.88 0.968
60 0.427 0.491 0.691 0.733
90 0.485 0.546 0.573 0.541
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 9
are inversely proportional to HPBW ※N/A:Non-cluster
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Intra cluster parameters for living room (NLoS)November, 2009
Intra cluster parameters for living room (NLoS)Environment Pol. HPBW [ns] [ns] [ns] [ns]
5 4.84 7.69 0.541 1.21
V
15 2.48 1.11 0.633 1.57
30 0.981 2.64 1.46 0.949
60 1.45 0.626 0.834 0.573
NLoS90 1.47 0.623 0.730 0.542
5 7.94 3.57 3.41 0.541
15 3 30 1 06 0 633 1 26
LivingRoom
H
15 3.30 1.06 0.633 1.26
30 2.66 2.14 0.424 0.984
60 0.855 0.596 0.580 0.738
90 0 722 0 732 0 828 0 85190 0.722 0.732 0.828 0.851
5 7.18 4.13 0.361 0.832
15 2.78 2.55 0.633 0.627
C 30 0.891 1.78 0.722 1.28
60 0.884 0.625 1.21 0.655
90 0.867 0.670 1.43 0.706
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0Intra cluster parameters for conference room (LoS)
November, 2009Intra cluster parameters for conference room (LoS)
Environment Pol. HPBW [ns] [ns] [ns] [ns]
5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
V
15 2.39 N/A 0.615 N/A
30 0.613 4.11 1.65 1.35
60 N/A N/A N/A N/A
L S
90 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 N/A 9.91 N/A 2.99
15 1.68 N/A 2.99 N/ALoSConference H
30 0.510 0.779 2.70 1.92
60 N/A N/A N/A N/A
90 N/A N/A N/A N/A90 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 N/A 2.75 N/A 0.739
15 0.682 0.632 1.28 0.924
30 0 569 0 831 2 02 1 73C 30 0.569 0.831 2.02 1.73
60 N/A N/A N/A N/A
90 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 11
※N/A: Reflection waves are as low as noise level
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0Intra cluster parameter for conference room (NLoS)
November, 2009Intra cluster parameter for conference room (NLoS)
Environment Pol. HPBW [ns] [ns] [ns] [ns]
5 13.1 0.891 0.341 1.75
V
15 2.39 1.31 0.615 0.841
30 0.795 0.693 1.25 0.271
60 N/A N/A N/A N/A
NL S
90 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 N/A 0.788 N/A 0.642
15 1.68 0.896 2.99 1.68NLoSConference H
30 0.798 0.853 2.44 1.82
60 N/A N/A N/A N/A
90 N/A N/A N/A N/A90 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.23
15 0.686 0.640 1.18 1.26
30 0 967 0 567 0 861 1 77C 30 0.967 0.567 0.861 1.77
60 N/A N/A N/A N/A
90 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 12
※N/A: Reflection waves are as low as noise level
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Summary Proposed channel model was updated with variable
HPBW antenna in living and conference room genvironments for TGad channel modeling
By integrating the intra-cluster(Doc.09/334r4) and t d i t l t d l th h l d lpresented intra-cluster models, the channel models
for “conference room and living room environments” will be completedwill be completed
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
I i i f h biliNovember, 2009
Investigation for human mobility (blockage) and reflection
Two preliminary measurement results are introduced for human mobility
Fading by human mobility (blockage)
Reflection by human body
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Human mobility fadingAntenna height: 1.0 m
Human mobility fading measurement in living room
D = 3m
Submission Slide 15 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Measurement set up in living room
Parameter ValueParameter ValueFrequency (CW) 62.5 GHz
HPBW of antenna (Gain) 30 degreeHPBW of antenna (Gain) 30 degreePolarization VerticalCalibration Direct port connection without p
antennas
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Patterns of human moving/still positions③
①③
②
④
⑤Rx
②Rx
⑤
Tx Tx
Rx⑥⑦
⑧
Route :①~⑤Rx⑥ Route :① ⑤Human Speed: Walking
H b dSubmission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 17
Tx : Human body
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Measurement result (Pattern1)-40
-50
40
[dB
]
-60Number of times
12e
pow
er [
①③-70
2 3
Rel
ativ
e
Rx②
0 5 10 15-80
Ti [ ]
Fading duration < 0.3s TxTime [s]
Submission
Max. attenuation: 30dBHirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Measurement result (Pattern 2 and 3)November, 2009
Measurement result (Pattern 2 and 3)
-50
-40
B]-50
-40
B]
-70
-60
ve p
ower
[dB
-70
-60
ve p
ower
[dB
Pattern ② Pattern ③-100
-90
-80Number of times
1 2 3
Rel
ativ
-100
-90
-80Number of times
1 2 3
Rel
ativ
Fading duration:0 3s①③
②
0 5 10 15-100
Time [s]0 5 10 15100
Time [s]
Fading duration:0.3sMax. attenuation: 35dB5 dB larger than pattern 1
Rx②
5 dB larger than pattern 1Tx
Fading duration and depth depends on a blocking position
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 19
g p p g pbetween Tx and Rx
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Measurement result (Pattern 4 and 5)November, 2009
Measurement result (Pattern 4 and 5)
-50
-40
B] -50
-40
B]
-70
-60
ve p
ower
[dB
-70
-60
ve p
ower
[dB
Pattern④ Pattern⑤-100
-90
-80Number of times
1 2 3
Rel
ativ
-100
-90
-80Number of times
1 2 3
Rel
ativ
④
0 5 10 15-100
Time [s]0 5 10 15-100
Time [s]
Fading duration: 1.3~1.7s Rx⑤
gMax. attenuation: 35dB
Tx
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
Measurement result (Pateren 6 7 and 8)November, 2009
Measurement result (Pateren 6, 7 and 8)
50
-40
]-60
-50w
er [d
B]
-80
-70
ativ
e po
w
-100
-90Shadowing point
2 Tx side⑥ 1 Center⑦ 3 Rx side⑧
Rel
Attenuation depends on position Rx⑦⑧
0 5 10 15-100
Time [s]p p
Attenuation difference is 9.7dBRx
⑥
Position Rx side Tx side Center
Submission
Tx
Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 21
Average attenuation 73.5 dB 65.2 dB 63.8 dB
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Reflection measurement of human body
d
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0November, 2009
Reflection power in frequency domain
-20
-40
20[d
B] Tx
-60
e po
wer
[
Rx Human body
-80
Rel
ativ
e
Distanse=1m Metal wallHuman body
61 62 63 64-100
f [GH ]
Human body Absorber wall
Human body make reflection wave, not only absorption effectR fl i l l b 10dB ll h l ll
f [GHz]
Submission
Reflection level became 10dB smaller than metal wallHirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1232r0
S f h bili f di dNovember, 2009
Summary of human mobility fading and human reflection measurements
Duration, decay and rising time modeling will be required for MAC design for beam switching timing
Reflection a es from h man bod ma ha e an impact onReflection waves from human body may have an impact on propagation characteristics, however, how to model is a future workwork
Submission Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 24