130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK CALDWELL COUNTY, TEXAS...

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK CALDWELL COUNTY, TEXAS

TCEQ PERMIT APPLICATION NO. MSW 2383

TYPE I PERMIT APPLICATION

PART II EXISTING CONDITIONS AND

CHARACTER OF THE FACILITY AND SURROUNDING AREA

Prepared for

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK, LLC

August 2013 Revised February 2014

Revised June 2014

Revised August 2014

Prepared by

BIGGS & MATHEWS ENVIRONMENTAL 1700 Robert Road, Suite 100 • Mansfield, Texas 76063 • 817-563-1144

TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-256

And

TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOSCIENTISTS

FIRM REGISTRATION No. 50222

BIGGS & MATHEWS, INC. 2500 Brook Avenue • Wichita Falls, Texas 76301 • 940-766-0156

TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FIRM REGISTRATION No. F-834

CONTENTS

~~~""""' A::--f:,. OF 7.t-- 'f-"\ • • ••• • •• • • ''-+:

lc-;,";-······*···· ··.~.p

{#.L ................... :~~ .. ~. .... ~:~:.~~~.~~ ..... "-o\. 44639 / ~i!

'P_ '• •f'.t- G~ ,·,~· ~ o~····<:..Gtsi'E.~~····~v; ~ ~.rs,(;NAL"'(.~~

Biggs;=. Inc. P/zP, Firm Registration No. F-834

1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY ............................................................... 11-1

1.1 Easements and Buffer Zones ................................................................. 11-1 1.2 Site Specific Conditions .......................................................................... 11-2

2 WASTE ACCEPTANCE PLAN .......................................................................... II-3

2.1 Properties and Characteristics of Waste .......... ................................. ..... 11-3 2.2 Volume and Rate of Disposal ...................... ........................................... 11-4

3 GENERAL LOCATION MAPS ........................................................................... II-5

4 FACILITY LAYOUT MAPS ................................................................................ II-6

5 GENERAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ..................................................................... 11-7

6 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH .................. .. ............. .. ................................................ 11-8

7 LAND USE MAP ................... ............................................................................. 11-9

8 IMPACT ON SURROUNDING AREA .............................................................. II-10

8.1 Wells Within 500 Feet. .. ..... .. ................................................................. 11-1 0

9 TRANSPORTATION ............ ............................................................................ 11-11

9.1 Traffic and Roadways ...................... ... .. ................................................ 11-11 9.2 Airport Impact ....................................................................................... 11-11

10 GENERAL GEOLOGY AND SOILS STATEMENT ............ ............................. 11-12

10.1 General Geology ........ .. .... .......... ....................... .. ............ .. .. .... .. ........... 11-12 10.2 Site Stratigraphy .... .... .. .............. ............................ .............. ........... ... ... 11-14 10.3 General Soils ........................................................................................ ll-14

1 0.3.1 Stratum I - Soil Profile -Silty Clay with Pebbles and Cobbles ..................................................................................... ll-14

10.3.2 Stratum II - Weathered Midway- Silty Fat Clay ..... .. ... .. .......... 11-14 10.3.3 Stratum Ill- Unweathered Midway- Silty Dark Gray

Clay ............... .. .. ........................................................................ ll-15 10.4 FaultAreas .. .............................................................................. .. ......... ll-15 10.5 Seismic Impact Zones ............. .. .. ...................................... ............... .. .. 11-17 10.6 Unstable Areas ......................................... ............................................ ll-17

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\101\P\PART 2.DOCX

11-ii 130 Environmental Park - Type I Rev. 3, 8/21/2014

Part II

l

CONTENTS (Continued)

:."ttt.~~ ., OF t. - "-"'~·· ·· · ·· •••• !$' 'j, ·~~A._ f . • • * .. .,...,~-..

p.r.:~: ............. :>~~\ ~:~:.~~ .. 9 .. ~~~~····~ .

44639 !~8 ~ • ..p ~ /Q;; ~<'>···.~G/ST'f.~~.···~«;.., ~ ~ ... .. '";;,/A' ~~~

Biggs & Mathews, Inc. ~ '2.1) . Firm Registration No. F-834

11 GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ................................................... II-18

11.1 Groundwater .. ........ ... .... .. ...................................................................... 11-18 11.2 Regional Aquifers ................................................................................. 11-18

11.2.1 LeonaAquifer .. ............................................... .. ......... .. .... ......... ll-18 11 .2.2 Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer .............................................................. 11-18

11.3 SurfaceWater .................. .. ........................ .. ......................................... ll-19 11.4 Storm water Permitting .......................................................................... 11-20

12 ABANDONED OIL AND WATER WELLS ...................................................... 11-21

12.1 Water Wells .............................................................. ............................ 11-21 12.2 Oil and Gas Wells ................................................................................. 11-21

13 FLOODPLAINS AND WETLANDS ........... ...................................................... 11-22

13.1 Floodplains ........................................................................... .. .............. 11-22 13.2 Wetlands ..... .................. .. ......................... ... ......... .. ............................... ll-22

14 ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES ... ............................................ 11-24

15 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION REVIEW ....... .......... .. ............................ II-25

16 COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW REQUEST ............. .............................. .......................... ...... .............. 11-26


11-iii 130 Environmental Park - Type I Rev. 3, 8/21 /2014

Part II


APPENDIX IIA- MAPS AND DRAWINGS

APPENDIX liB- LAND USE ANALYSIS

APPENDIX IIC- TRANSPORTATION STUDY

APPENDIX liD- WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION

~~~ J1'. .<.,.J~· ······ .. -;o.., 11.~ .... · ·····~"\\ . •.... : ....................... : .... 1

K 0 .~~~.~~:· .. ~ 44639 :'~iJ ~ ">l~Ji cGtsn.~~,...~~_/~ ~~~~

Biggs & Mathews, Inc. ~~ Firm Registration No. F-834

APPENDIX liE - ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX IIF - CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY

APPENDIX IIG - TPDES PERMIT

APPENDIX IIH- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX Ill- CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX IIJ- FLOODPLAIN DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX IlK- LOCATION RESTRICTION CERTIFICATIONS

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\ 101\P\PART 2.DOCX

11-iv 130 Environmental Park- Type I Rev. 3, 8/21 /201 4

Part II

l


Biggs & Mathews Environmental, Inc. Firm Registration No. 50222

For Sections 8. 1, 10.1, 1 0.2, 1 0.3, 1 0.4, 1 0.5, 11.1, 11 .2, 12.1, 12.2.


Biggs & Mathews Inc. Firm Registration No. F-256

For Section 10.6.

11-v 130 Environmental Park -Type I Rev. 3, 8/21/2014

Part II

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK

APPENDIX IIA MAPS AND DRAWINGS

CONTENTS

IIA.1

IIA.2

IIA.3

IIA.4

IIA.5

IIA.6

I lA.?

IIA.8

IIA.9

IIA.9A

IIA.98

IIA.9C

IIA.10

IIA.11

IIA.12

IIA.13

IIA.14

IIA.15

IIA.16

IIA.17

IIA.18

IIA.19

IIA.20

IIA.21

IIA.22

IIA.23

IIA.24

Detailed Highway Map

General Topographic Map

General Locations Map

Water Wells Within 500 Feet of Facility Boundary

Locations of Oil and Gas Wells

FAA Airport Location Map

Aerial Photograph

General Site Plan

Geologic Vicinity Map

Geologic Vicinity Map Legend

Geologic Vicinity Map Legend

Generalized Regional Geologic Cross Section

Seismic Impact Zone

Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)

Facility Site Plan

Site Layout Plan

Groundwater and Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan

Cell 1 Development

Cell 4 Development

Cell 6 Development

Cell 8 Development

Cell 1 0 Development

Cell 13 and 14 Development

Landfill Completion Plan

Landfill Entrance and Access Road Plan

Facility Jurisdictional Wetlands and Appurtenances

Facility Screening Plan

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\ 129\06\101 \P\PART 2.DOCX

IIA-ii 130 Environmental Park - Type I Rev. 3, 8/21/2014

Part II, Appendix IIA

1l :c ,. 0>

~ ., .. ::>

Ol

~ :; 0 >.

.3 0> ,.

"'0

~ ·c ·u > 0 ., <.:> I

Ol

~ ~

~ Q. /

"' 0

/ ~ " Q.

0

~

"' 0 / Ol

"' / .:;

\ 97'45'

DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL CONTOUR INTERVAL 200 FEET

SUPPLEMENTAL 100-FOOT CONTOUR IN COASTAL REGION

GEOLOGIC MAP OF TEXAS 1992 REFERENCE:

BARNES, V.E., 1992, GEOLOGIC MAP OF TEXAS, BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOG'f, UNIVERSilY OF l£XAS, AUSllN, TEXAS.

0 2

SCALE IN WILES

tmE;

1. FOR GEOLOGIC LEGEND, SEE DRAWING IIA.9A AND IIA.9B.

2. MODIFlEO FROt.l FROM BARNES, 1992 BY ADDING:

A. APPROXIAMTE SITE LOCATION. B. PROPOSED LANDFlLL FOOlPRINT. C. MIDWAY/WILCOX CONTACT. D. LABELEb THE PLEISTOCENE LEONA FORMATION. E. LABELED THE PALEOCENE MIDWAY GROUP.

GEOLOGIC VICINITY MAP CALDv.n.L. COUNTY

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK. LLC 130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK

ISSUED FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES

2 8/1 4 1<.0 .0. NO. 2 RESPONSE GlW ESF ESF JNS DSN.

TYPE I PERMIT APPUCA liON BIGGS & MATHEWS

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL nNG ENGINEERS

MANSFIELD • WICHITA FALLS 817-563-11«

TBPG FIRM NO. ~0222

FIGURE

IIA.9 B/ 14 N.O.D. NO. , RESPONsE GlW ESF J IIS JIIS DWN. GLW

lEV OAlE IDOIP110N 0111 BY CD BY Ot< BY - BY CHK. JMS

" c:

~ .~ .c ::!: ;o

"' ;,: .. " =>

< "' ~ :; 0 >. .s

"' ;o .., c: 5 c: .. e,

I -, L;j / w

~ 0 :;;. t: 0 Q.

0

"' <D 0 /

"' "' :;;. .:;

[~ J ~J Osd Oou

Sand sheet, Os : dune sand sheet, Ods: sand dune, Osd : and sand deposits. undivided. Osu

I ~al -Alluvium. Oal ; and alkali flat deposits. Oaf

Leona Formation, Ole ; Onion Creek Mart, Oo : Seymour, Ose. ' Lingos. Qli . and Gatuna. Og • Formations: Toy Limestone, Ott, Blackwater Draw. Obd , Tahoka, 0ta • Double Lakes. Qdl. and Tule. Otu. Formations: pond. Oun . older alluvial, Oao • and high gravel, Qhg. deposits

Qualemary-Tertiary bolson deposits, Qlb: Quaternary· Tertiary deposits, undivided, OT; and Uvalde Gravel. OTu

Fill and spotl

[ Os Qds i Old l ~ ~~{~\' ... j Sand sheet. Os: dune sand sheel. Qds ; sand dune, Osd ; silt sheet, a.,; and clay dune. Ocd

Alluvium. Qal , subdiu1ded in R10 Grande delta into areas predominantly clay, Oac . and areas predominantly sand, Oas : and beach-ridge and barrier-fla; sand c:eposits, Qbr

------------------------~~

Terrace deposits. 01 : and DeweyvHie Format ion. Qd. with higher level, Qd?

~TOba I 00. . Qbb

Beaumont Formation subdivided into areas predominantly clay, Obc , areas predominantly sand, Obs , in the Rio Grande delta area clay veneer over meanderben sand, Q~ . and barr ier island deposits. Obb

I n • - -:

~ Lissie Formation

High gravel deposits

-- -------------------------------r::-r-----------~

Blanco, Pob , and Rita Blanca. Por , Formations: and unnamed Pliocene deposits, P.u

------------------~ Ogallala Formation

Goliad Formation

Willis Formation

Goliad Formation

REFERENCE:

G i Fleming Formation and Oakville Sandstone. undivided

Catahoula Formation and Frio Clay, undivided, ¢cf . Catahoula Formalion. ~c ; and Frio Clay, ¢1

Fleming Formation and Oakville Sandstone. undivided, """fo : Fleming Formation, -M-t : and Oakville Sandstone, -M-o

Catahoula Formation

~Ew - ---- ------------------------- ----~

Em

~Et -Ejl EWI)

:---Ea

Jackson Group. undivided, ¢Ej : Whitsett Formation, ¢Ew : Manning, Wellborn, and Cadell Formations. undivided, E~ ; Manning. Em, Wellborn. Ewb , and Cadell, Eca . Formations

Yegua Formation

Laredo Formation. El :Cook Mountain Formation, Ecm ; and Sparta Sand. Es

El Pice Clay, Eep : Weches Formation, Ew ; and Queen C~y Sand, Eqc

Bigford. Eb • and Reklaw, Er. Formations

ISSUm FOR PERMRnNG PURPOSES

Whitsett, ¢Ew • and Nash Creek, ~n . Formations

Manning. Em • Wellborn. Ewb . ahd Yazoo, Eya , Formations

I l ' Emo t '

Cadell, Eca • and Moodys Branch, Emb • Formations

Yegua Formation

Cook Mountain Formation

Sparta Sand

Weches Formation

Queen C~y Sand

GEOLOGIC VICINITY MAP LEGEND

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK, LLC 130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK

TYPE I PERMIT APPUCA llON BIGGS & MATHEWS

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL liNG ENGINEERS

MANSFIELD • VrlCHITA FALLS 8t 7- 563- 11 44

BARNES, V.E., 1992, GEOLOGIC MAP OF TEXAS, BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, UNIVERSilY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN, TEXAS.

e/ 14 N.O.D. NO. 2 RESPOIISE GlW ESF JMS JMS

6/14 N.O.O. NO. 1 RESI'ONSI: GI.W ESf JIIS JMS

DSN.

OWN.

TBPG FIRW NO. S0222

FIGURE

IIA.9A DAlE OCS<JIP110H D11C BY ID BY OIC BY iPI' BY CHK. JMS

.: .. ., ::>

m "' ~

§ w

Et

Carrizo Sand 1---Ec

----------\ EA.tn I EII.Wi ~------------------------------------ ERe

Indio Formation, ERin ; and Wtlcox Group, undivided. ERwi

Kincaid Formation. Rk ; and Midway Group. undivided. R.mi

Escondido Formation, Kes; and Navarro Group and Marlbrook Marl, undivided, Knb

Olmos, Kol , and San Miguel, Ksm • Formations: Upson Clay, Kuc ; Anacacho Limestone. Kac; Pecan Gap, Kpg . and Austin, Kau. Chalks; and igneous rocks of Austin age, Ki

lb ea .. Ell.u

lUI .,

A.w IIIIi

Ilk

Reklaw Formation. Er : Carrizo Sand. Ec: Calvert Bluff, EA.c • Simsboro, ll.s . and Hooper. A.h . Formations: Wilcox Group, undivided. ER.wi :Wills Point, A.w • and Kincaid, A.k • Formations: Midway Group. undivided, llmi ; and Reklaw Formation, Carrizo Sand, and Wilcox and Midway Groups. undivided, EA.u

Knt

Navarro and Taylor Groups, undivided, Knt ; Navarro Group and Marlbrook Marl. undivided, Knb ; Kemp Clay and Corsicana Marl, undivided, Kkc: Kemp Clay, Kke : Nacatoch Sand, Kns : Navarro Group, undivided, Kna : Neylandville and Marlbrook Marls, undivided, Knm; Neylandville Marl, Kne : Marlbrook Mart, Kmb: Pecan Gap Chalk, Kpg : Wolfe City Sand, Kwc ; Ozan Formation. Ko ; Annona Chalk, Kan ; and Upper Cretaceous rocks, undivided. Ku

Austin Chalk, Kau : Gober Chalk and Roxton Limestone, Kgc; Brownstown Marl, Kbr ; Blossom Sand, Kbl ; Bonham Formation, Kbn : Ector Chalk. Ker : and Upper Cretaceous rocks. undivided. Ku

GEOLOGIC MAP OF TEXAS 1992

Kef ----·'--~---

Boquillas. Kbo • and Eagle Ford. Kef . Formations; Bud a Limestone. Kbu; Del Rio Clay. Kdr; Buda Limestone and Del Rio Clay, undivided, Kbd; Santa Elena Limestone. Kse : Salmon Peak Limestone. Ksa ; Sue Peaks Formation. Ksu : McKnight Formation. Kmk : Del Carmen Limestone. Kdm; West Nueces Formation. Kwn : Devils River, Kdv . Edwards, Ked . and Comanche Peak. Kcp • Limestones; Hensen Sand, Kh: Glen Rose Limestone, Kgr : Paluxy Sand and Glen Rose Limestone, undivided. Kpgr; Paluxy Sand, Kpa ; Travis Peak Formation, Ktp ; Twin Mountains Formation. Ktm ; Edwards Limestone and Antlers Sand. undivided. Kea; Comanche Peak Limestone and Walnut Clay, undtvided. Kcw: Antlers Sand, Ka : and Comanche Peak Limestone. Walnut Clay, and Antlers Sand, undivided, Kca

Cow Creek Limestone. Hammell Shale. and Sycamore Sand. undivided

Fault Ball shows downthrown side

Eagle Ford Formation and Buda Limestone, undivided. Keb : Eagle Ford Formation, Kef : Eagle Ford and Woodbine Formations, undivided, Kew ; Woodbine Formation. Kwb : Del Rio Clay and Georgetown Limestone. undivided. Kdg ; Buda Limestone and Del Rio Clay. undivided. Kbd: Grayson Marl and Main Street Limestone, undivided. Kgm ; Georgetown Limestone. Kgt : Pawpaw Formation and upper limestone unit' of Weno Limestone, undivided, Kpw • lower part of Washita Group, Kwl; undivided part ol Washita Group. Kwu : Duck Creek Limestone, Kdc ; Pawpaw Formation. Weno Limestone. and Denton Clay, undivided, Kpd ; Fort Worth Ltmestone and Duck Creek Formation. undivided. Kf<! ; Fredencksburg Group, Kfr ; Edwards and Comanche Peak Limestones undtvided. Kec : Walnut Clay, Kwa ; undivided parts of Washita and Fredericksburg Groups. Kw1 : undivided part of Fredericksburg Group, Kfu, Kiamichi Formation, Kki: Goodland Limestone and Walnut Clay, undivided. Kgw ; and Upper Cretaceous rocks, undivided, Ku

Paluxy Sand, Kpa : Glen Rose Limestone. Kgr : Twin Mountains Formation, Ktm ; and Antlers Sand. Ka

GEOLOGIC VICINITY MAP LEGEND

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK, U.C 130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK

'NPE I PERMIT APPUCA llON BIGGS & MATHEWS

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TINC ENGINEERS

(/)

6 w (,)

~ a: (,)

ISSUED FOR PERMITT1NG PURPOSES MANSFIELD • WICHITA FALLS

817-563-1144

8/14 6/14 DA'I[

N.O.O. NO. 2 RESPONSE

N.O.D. NO. 1 RESPONSE

GLW ESF JhiS JMS

GLW ESf JNS JNS

D~ BY tl:S BY Ot< BY 1W BY

DSN.

OWN.

CHK. JMS

TSPG nRN NO. S0222

FIGURt

IIA.98

::: '0 c: ::> 0

"' i.:

" "' ::>

(.)

"' ~ .;.; ::> 0 >. .3 0> 3: "0 u " 1/) 0>

" "' I (.)

"' ~ ? li: Cf. / N 0

/ -t: 0 "-0

~

"' 0 /

"' N

/ .;.;

~

A

....... ....., ... ,.., -· -· .. -- ............ ,. ...... , -· -. .. -~

APPROXIMAT£ SITE LOCATION

APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION

.. ~.,. .... ...,. ... ........., ..... .,... .. ....... _,...,. !:~ =~ . ... -

I

A'

CALWELL COUNlY

REFERENCE: C.R. FOLlET, 1975, GROUNO-WAT£R RESOURSES OF CALDWELL COUNTY, TEXAS, TEXAS WAT£R OEVELOPt.IENT BOARD REPORT 12

Plate 2

Geologic Section A- A'

U.S Geok>Oicol Survey in cooperation with the Texas Water Development Boord,

Coldwell County Commissioners' Cour1 and Guodolupe- Blooco River Authority

..........., 4.1 .. ,.., ... .....,. ..... .,.,. ·-· -· ... • to ·-· .. ..... ..,..___. ..... ~ ;.....:: =-=

ISSUED FOR PERMITllNG PURPOSES ONLY

1/14 N.O.O. NO. 1 RESPON$[ GlW Jt.AS Jlr.IS JWS

REV OAT! OMf BY DES BY Of1C BY iPf BY

DSN.

00

200

200

00

• 800 :!.

\ IOOOi ~

1800

2000

2200

GENERAUZED REGIONAL GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION

130 ENVIRONMENTAl PARK. LLC 130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK

TYPE I PERMIT APPUCA liON BlGGS & MATHEWS

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL liNG ENGINEERS

l.tANSfiELD • \\ICHITA FALLS 617-563-1144

TBPG FIRI.t NO. 50222

FIGURE SCALE : GRAPHIC

CHK. JMS DWG : IIA.9C-RegSec.dwg IIA.9C

v 0

I u m e

2




VOLUME 2 OF 5

Prepared for


August2013 Revised February 2014

Revised June 2014

Revised August 2014

Prepared by


TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-256

And

T EXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL G EOSCIENTISTS

F IRM REGISTRATION N O. 50222


TEXAS B OARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

FIRM REGISTRATION No. F-834




VOLUME 2 OF 5

CONTENTS

PART Ill FACILITY INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN

Attachment A - Site Development Plan

Attachment B- General Facility Design

Attachment C -Facility Surface Water Drainage Report

Attachment C1 - Drainage Analysis and Design

Attachment C2 - Flood Control Analysis

Attachment C3 - Drainage System Plans and Details

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\101\P\COVERS INSIDE VOL2.DOCX

~"''"'"'-'-\\ ;-~~ .. 9.f. ... ~~- \\'1.

Jll#l'~-· *' ·. If} , -.J... . ·- ·.. '#. ~ '* . . · · ... ·~j ,.-;.* : . ·-·~ i!-... : ....................... : .... ~ ~ K.D. MARONEY ~ ~- · ··:··· .. ··········· .. ·· · ··:· ·· ·~ ~ 4 -.. 44639 /~I 6 1t{b/-~l!C.£NS\~-c-#~J: '\ <Ssto----- ···tt.~~ \~-.,..NAL _ ....

''\:,'"~"'"'" ~ Biggs & Mathews, Inc. o Firm Registration No. F-834 ~~

130 Environmental Park- Type I Rev. 2, 8/21 /2014

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK CALDWELL COUNTY, TEXAS TCEQ PERMIT NO. MSW 2383


PART Ill- FACILITY INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN

ATTACHMENT C FACILITY SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE REPORT

Prepared for


February 2014 Revised June 2014

Revised August 2014

Prepared by

BIGGS & MATHEWS ENVIRONMENTAL

Biggs & Mathews, Inc. Firm Registration No. F-834

1700 Robert Road, Suite 100 • Mansfield, Texas 76063 • 817-563-1144



And

TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOSCIENTISTS

FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 50222

BIGGS & MATHEWS, INC. 2500 Brook Avenue • Wichita Falls , Texas 76301 • 940-766-0156



CONTENTS

NARRATIVE ........................................ .................... ........................ ......................... .... C-1

Attachment C1 Attachment C2 Attachment C3

Drainage Analysis and Design Flood Control Analysis Drainage System Plans and Details

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\ 129\06\101\P\PART 3 ATT C.DOCX

C-ii 130 Environmental Park - Type I Rev. 2, 8/21 /2014

Part Il l , Attachment C

l




PART Ill- FACILITY INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN

ATTACHMENT C1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

Prepared for


February 2014 Revised June 2014

Revised August 2014

Prepared by



FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-256

And

TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOSCIENTISTS FIRM REGISTRATION No. 50222


TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-834

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. C1 -1 1 .1 Purpose ............................................................................... ................ C 1-1

2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ C1-3 2.1 Concepts and Methods ..................... ...... ............................................. C1-3 2.2 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling ..................................................... C1-4

2.2.1 HEC-HMS ................................................................................ C1-4 2.3 Hydrologic Elements Naming Convention ........................................... C1-4

3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................ C1-5

4 POSTDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS ............................................................ C1-7

5 PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN ................................................. C1-9 5.1 Perimeter Drainage System Design .................................................... C1-9 5.2 Final Cover Drainage Structure Design ............................................... C1-9

6 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ........................................... C1-11 6.1 Final Cover Stormwater System Control Plan ................................... C1-11 6.2 Final Cover Stormwater System Maintenance Plan ............... ........... C1-11 6.3 Intermediate Cover Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan ........... C1-12 6.4 Daily Cover Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan ....................... C1-12

7 EXISTING/POSTDEVELOPMENT COMPARISON ...................................... C1-14

8

APPENDIX C1-A Drainage Maps and Existing/Postdevelopment Comparison

APPENDIX C1-B Existing Condition Hydrologic Calculations

APPENDIX C1-C Postdevelopment Hydrologic Calculations

APPENDIX C1-D Perimeter Drainage System Design

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\101\P\PART 3 ATT C1 .DOCX

C1-ii


130 Environmental Park - Type I Rev. 2, 8/21/2014

Part Ill, Attachment C1


APPENDIX C1-E Final Cover Drainage Structure Design

APPENDIX C1-F Intermediate Cover Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan

APPENDIX C1-G Intermediate Cover Erosion Control Structure Design

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\101 \P\PART 3 ATT C1.DOCX

C1-iii


130 Environmental Park- Type I Rev. 2, 8/21 /2014

Part Il l, Attachment C1

At CPS the peak discharge will increase from 2SS.S cfs to 2S7.S cfs, a change of less than 0.8%, and at CP6 the peak discharge will decrease from 2121 .3 cfs to 2033.6 cfs, a change of approximately 4%. At CPS, the runoff volume will increase from S8.S acre-feet to S9.4 acre-feet, a change of only 1.S%, and at CP6, the runoff volume will increase from 6S9.3 acre-feet to 676.0 acre-feet, a change of less than 2.S%. CPS and CP6 are located in channels of unnamed tributaries on the west side of the 130 Environmental Park site. These tributaries merge approximately 3SO feet south of the permit boundary and flow into SCS Reservoir Site 21. CPS and CP6 are both located within the 1 00-year floodplain, as are the tributaries that flow from them in to the SCS reservoir site. The slight decreases in peak flow rates and CPS and CP6, and in the stream channels between them and the reservoir site will not result in an adverse alteration of existing drainage patterns. The slight increases in runoff volumes at and below CPS and CP6 will occur in stream channels and within the reservoir site, all of which are located within the 1 00-year floodplain, will not reduce total streamflows or increase the 1 oo..:year flood water surface elevation. The changes at CPS and CP6 will not result in adverse alterations of existing drainage patterns.

At CP7 the 2S-year storm peak discharge will decrease from 243.4 cfs to 141 .8 cfs, a reduction of approximately 42%, and at CP8 the peak discharge will decrease from 372.4 cfs to 327.2 cfs, a reduction of approximately 12.1%. At CP7, the 2S-year storm runoff volume will increase from 38.S acre-feet to 61 .8 acre-feet, an increase of approximately 60.S%, and at CP8 the runoff volume will decrease from 63.8 acre-feet to S3.3 acre-feet, a decrease of approximately 16.S%. CP7 and CP8 are both located within the same water body, 100 year floodplain of SCS Reservoir Site 21 , in the eastern portion ef the siteduring the 2S-year storm event. The reductions in peak flow rates at CP7 and CP8 will not result in adverse alterations of existing drainage patterns. The 2Syear storm runoff volume will increase at CP7; however, because the peak discharge rate will be reduced and the runoff volume will be distributed over a longer time period, that increase will not result in an adverse alteration of existing drainage patterns. And, while the 2S-year storm runoff volume will increase at CP7 and decrease at CP8 (a net increase of 12.8 acre feet, approximately 12.S% ), these changes will not reduce total streamflows or increase the 100 year flood water surface elevation be insignificant compared to the receiving body, SCS Reservoir Site 21 . For example. the peak storage volume of the SCS Reservoir Site 21 and peak inflow to the reservoir from Dry Creek exceed 2,300 ac-ft and 3,800 cfs. respectively, during the 2S-year storm event. Considering the proposed net changes within the water body of less than 4% decrease in peak discharge rate and less than 1% increase in volume,.,. +!he changes at CP7 and CP8 will not result in adverse alterations of existing drainage patterns.

Drawing C1-A-2 - Existing Condition Runoff Summary: This drawing depicts the existing locations (comparison points) where surface water enters or exits the facility and property boundaries. Each comparison point is shown on the drawing and the peak flow rate and runoff volume is provided in the summary table for each comparison point.

Drawing C1-A-4- Postdeveloped Runoff Summary: This drawing depicts the locations (comparison points) where surface water enters or exits the facility and property boundaries. Each comparison is shown on the drawing and the peak flow rate and runoff volume is provided in the summary table for each comparison point.

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\101 \P\PART 3 ATT C1 .DOCX

C1-14a 130 Environmental Park- Type I Rev. 2, 8/21/2014

Part Ill, Attachment C1

A table comparing the existing condition runoff summary and the postdeveloped runoff summary is provided on page C1-A-5. The existing condition and postdeveloped peak flow rate, runoff volume, and velocity at each comparison point for both the 25- and 1 00-year, 24-hour rainfall event is provided. The difference, if any, between the existing and postdeveloped runoff results is also provided in the table.

Conclusion

Because: (1) the postdevelopment stormwater discharge points are consistent with the existing site configuration, and (2) development of the 130 Environmental Park Landfill will not adversely alter peak flow rates, velocities, or runoff volumes, the proposed landfill development will not adversely alter existing drainage patterns consistent with §330.305(a).

Biggs & Mathews Environmental M:\PROJ\129\06\101\P\PART 3 ATT C1 .DOCX

C1-14b 130 Environmental Park- Type I Rev. 2, 8/21 /2014

Part Ill , Attachment C1

Date post:	25-May-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

130 ENVIRONMENTAL PARK CALDWELL COUNTY, TEXAS...

Documents