+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: johnathan-jefferson
View: 222 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity
Transcript
Page 1: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity

Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity

Page 2: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity THINK ABOUT IT Scientists have been trying to identify, name, and find order in the diversity of life for a long time. First classification and naming system was made before Darwin. Current shift towards using evolutionary theory to classify and name organisms.

Page 3: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Assigning Scientific Names Early naming methods:

Used Greek and Latin Included very long descriptions

- Example - the English translation of the scientific name of a tree might be “Oak with deeply divided leaves that have no hairs on their undersides and no teeth around their edges.” There was no standard because different scientists focused on different characteristics

Page 4: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Carolus Linnaeus In the 1730s, Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus developed binomial nomenclature.

Page 5: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity How to Classify and Why? Binomial nomenclature – formal naming system for living things - each a name is composed of two parts.1. In Latin2. It is written in italics. 3. First word begins with a capital letter. (Genus)4. Second word is lowercased. (Species) Goal = To organize living things into groups that have biological meaning.

Page 6: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Binomial Nomenclature The polar bear, for example, is called Ursus maritimus. The first part of the name —Ursus—is the genus to which the organism belongs.

Ursus contains five other species of bears.

Page 7: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Binomial Nomenclature The second part of a scientific name—maritimus for polar bears Unique to each species and is often a description of the organism’s habitat or of an important trait.

Example - The Latin word maritimus refers to the sea: polar bears often live on pack ice that floats in the sea.

Page 8: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Binomial Nomenclature The scientific name of the red maple is Acer rubrum. The genus Acer consists of all maple trees. The species rubrum describes the red maple’s color.

Page 9: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Assigning Scientific Names Scientific names are more specific

Assures scientists refer to the same organism Common names are less specific

Many common names for the same organisms Different common names based on location.

Page 10: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Common Name Confusion! What is the name of this animal?

Example, the names cougar, puma, panther, and mountain lion can all be used to indicate the same animal— Felis concolor.

Page 11: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Linnaean Classification System Linnaeus also developed a classification system.

Organized species into a hierarchy, or ranking. He grouped species according to structural similarities and differences.

Page 12: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Classifying Species into Larger Groups Systematics -The science of naming and grouping organisms.

The groups are called taxa (singular: taxon).

Page 13: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Linnaeus’s Seven Taxa Linnaeus identified just four levels in his original classification system, but expanded to seven taxa! 1. Kingdom2. Phylum3. Class4. Order5. Family 6. Genus7. Species

More Specific

Page 14: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Kingdom The largest and most inclusive of Linnaeus’s taxonomic categories is the kingdom. All multicellular animals are placed in the kingdom Animalia.

Page 15: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Phylum Includes organisms that are different but that share important characteristics.

Page 16: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Taxa Class - Includes similar orders. Order - Includes closely related families. Families - Includes many closely related genera Genus – Includes many closely related species

Page 17: 18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Chapter 18 – Classification 18.1 - Finding Order in Diversity.

18.1 – Finding Order in Diversity Problems With Traditional Classification Physical similarities are not always the result of close relationships. Genetic similarities more accurately show evolutionary relationships.


Recommended