+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into...

1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into...

Date post: 03-Mar-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
Pacific Journal of Mathematics COMMON FIXED POINTS AND ITERATION OF COMMUTING NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS SHIRO I SHIKAWA Vol. 80, No. 2 October 1979
Transcript
Page 1: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

Pacific Journal ofMathematics

COMMON FIXED POINTS AND ITERATION OF COMMUTINGNONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS

SHIRO ISHIKAWA

Vol. 80, No. 2 October 1979

Page 2: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICSVol. 80, No. 2, 1979

COMMON FIXED POINTS AND ITERATION OFCOMMUTING NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS

SHIRO ISHIKAWA

The following result is shown. Let Tt(i = 1, 2, , v) becommuting nonexpansive self-mappings on a compact convexsubset D of a Banach space and let x be any point in ZλThen the sequence

IΓ π Γ&, l ί T Γs, π \s2 itIL v-i-iL ^ - 2 = i L L w i = 1 L % o = 1

converges to a common fixed point of {Γ}ϊ=i, where S< =(1 — αjJ + (XiTi, 0 < at < 1, I is the identity mapping.

In [2], DeMarr proved that if Tt(i eJ,J is an index set) arecommuting nonexpansive self-mappings on a compact convex subsetD of a Banach space (i.e., || Tx — Ty\\ ̂ ||a? — y\\ for all α?, ?/ in D,and T ^ = TjT, for all i, i e J ) , then TlίeJ) have a common fixedpoint in Ώ.

The problem we shall consider in this paper is that of constructinga sequence of points {xn}n=ι in D that converges to the common fixedpoint of Ti (i e J, J is a finite index set).

If a Banach space is strictly convex (i.e., \\ax + (1 — a)y\\ <max {|| a? 11, \\y\\) for a? Φ y, 0 < α: < 1), the problem was solved in [5].

Throughout this paper, we denote an identity mapping by I andthe set of fixed points of T by F[T]. And we define UtS Tt =Tn+1(Ut=i Ti) for any positive integer n and Π U Tt = 2V

We have the following main theorem.

THEOREM. Let Tt{i = 1, 2, v) be commuting nonexpansivemappings from a compact convex subset D of a Banach space intoitself, and let x be any point in D.

Then Cΐί=ιF[Ti] is nonempty and the sequence {x^J converges toa point in Πϊ^-PΊTiL where xn^ is defined for each positive integernt by

Γ π Γ-s, ϊ ϊ 1 Γsu • . Γs3 π \s2 π sj\... J\]x

where S< = (1 - α4)/ + α^T*, 0 < α* < l(i = 1, 2, , v).

Before proving the theorem, we first prove the following lemmason which the proof of theorem is based.

LEMMA 1. Let T and P be nonexpansive mappings from a

493

Page 3: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA

bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfythe conditions

( 1 ) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) .

Let x0 be any point in D and let a be any number such that 0 < a < 1.Then the sequences {xn — Txn}%=Q and {xn — Pxn}n=o respectively convergeto zero, where xn is defined for each positive integer n by

( 2 ) xn = (1 - a)yn + aTyn , yn = P

that, is xn = (SP)nx0, where S = (1 - ά)I + aT.

Proof. We see from (1) that for all n ^ 1

( 3 ) yn = Pyn and Tyn

Since T and P are nonexpansive mappings, we have, from (2) and(3), for all n ^ 0

\\yn+1 - Tyn+1\\ = \\Pxn - PTyn+1\\ ^ \\xn - Tyn+1\\

and, from (2) and (3), for all n ^ 1

II*• - Γ^n + 1 | | ^ | | ^ - Tyn\\ + \\Tyn - Γ».+ 1 | |

^ (1 — α) | | l/ — Tyn\\ + \\yn-yn+1\\

^ (1 - a)\\yn - Tyn\\ + | \Py% - P x J (

- Γy.H + a\\yn - Γ y J | = \\yn - ΓyJI

from which, we obtain

\\yn+1 - Γ ^ + 1 | | ^ | |xw - Γy n + 1 | | ^ \\yn - Γy.H for all n ^ l .

Hence the sequence {\\yn — 2fyJ|}ίU, which is nonincreasing andbounded below, has a limit.

Suppose t h a t lim \\yn — Tyn\\ = r > 0, t h a t is, for any ε > 0,there is an integer m such t h a t

( 4 ) r^\\yn-Tyn\\<,(l + ε)r for all n^m.

Also, from the boundedness of D, we can choose M such t h a t

( 5 ) L <; (If — m)r < 2L , where L is a diameter of D .

We have from (3), (2) and (4) t h a t for any n^ m and k ^ 0

\\yn - yn+k+1\\ ^ \\y» - 2/»+ill + ll2/»+i - 2/ + 2 | | + ••• + ll3/»+* - 2

\yn+k - xn+k\

Page 4: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

ITERATION OF COMMUTING NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS 495

( 6 ) ^ a(k + 1)(1 + β)r .

Now we shall prove by induction that

( 7 ) (1 + ak){l + e)r - (1 - a)~hr S II TyM - yM-k\\

for any k such that 0 ^ k <̂ M — m.When & = 0, the result is trivial. Now we assume that (7) is

true for some k such that 0 ^ k <L M — m — 1. We see, from (3)and (2), that

\\TyM - yM-k\\ = \\PTyM - P ^ _ ( f c + 1 ) | | ^ \\TyM - ^_ ( f c + 1 ) | |

= | | (1 - a){TyM - yM-{k+1)) + a(TyM - TyM_{k+1))\\

^ ( 1 - ά)\\TyM - VM-U+DW +OL\\yM- yM-ik+i)\\

from which and (6), it follows that

II TyM - yM-k\\ ^ (1 - α ) | | TyM - yM-{k+1)\\ + a\k + 1)(1 + e)r .

From this and the assumption by induction, we have

(1 + ak)(l + e)r - (1 - ά)-kεr

^ (1 - α ) | | TyM - yM-{h+ι)\\ + ^2(& + 1)(1 + ε)r

and it is clear that this inequality is equal to (7) with k + 1 for k.Hence, by induction, it follows that (7) is true for any k such that0 ^ k ^ M - m.

Since log(l + ί) ^ £ for all £e( — 1, <*>), we have from (5) that

(1 - a)-'M~m) = expΓ(M - m) log (l + a )Ί

exp Γ(M - m ) — £ - ] ^ exp ( 2L

L 1 αJ] ^ exp (

Thus it follows from (7) with M — m for k that

2 LTyM - yu\\ ^ (1 + α(Jlf - m))(l + e)r - er exp

— a)r

Since ε is any positive number, this inequality is imcompatible withthe definition of L. Hence we obtain that r = 0, that is,

(8) lim\\yn-Tyn\\ - 0 .ίl.->oo

Now since T and P are nonexpansive mappings, we have from(2) and (3) that, for all n ^ 1,

Page 5: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

4% SHIRO ISHIKAWA

\\xn - Tx%\\ = | |(1 + a)yn + aTy, - Γ((l - a)yn + aTy.)\\

= ||(1 - α)y. - (1 - a)Tyn + 2ty. - Γ((l - a)yn + aTyn)\\

^{l-a)\\yn-Tyn\\+a\\yn-Tyn\\

= \\V.- 2V.II

and

||». - PxJI = ||(1 - a)yn + aTyn - P((l - a)yn + aTyn

- ||(1 - a)[Py, - P((l - α)y. + aTy.)]

+ a[PTyn - P((l - a)yn + aTyn)]\\

tZ2a(l-a)\\v.-Ty.\\.

Therefore we obtain that from (8) that

K - Txn\\ = lim \\xn - Px,\\ = 0 .

LEMMA 2. Let T and P be nonexpansive mappings from acompact convex subset D of a Banach space into itself such that

( 9 ) P(D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) .

Let x0 be any point in D. Define xn = Pnx0 for each positive integern, where Pn = (SP)n, S = (1 - a)I + aT, 0 < a < 1. Then it followsthat

(10) for any x0 in D, lim^^ (SP)nx0 — Px0 exists, which is, denotedby Px0,

(11) P{D) = F[P] =F[T]Π F[P]

and

(12) {PJn=i converges uniformly to P .

Proof. Since D is compact, there exists a subsequence {xn.}Z=iof {xn} that converges to a point u in D. From the boundedness ofD, Lemma 1 is applicable, so we have,

| |u - Tu\\ ̂ \im{\\u - xnt\\ + \\xnt - Tx%ί\\ + \\Txni - Tu\\}i—*oo

^ lim {21|α^ -n\\ + \\xni - TxH\\} = 0 ,

and similarly \\u — Pu\\ = 0.From this, it follows that

(13) ueF[T]ΓιF[P] .

Since (9) implies (3), we see from (13) and (3) that for all n ^ 0,

Page 6: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

ITERATION OF COMMUTING NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS 497

n - xn+1\\ = \\u - ((1 - a)yn+ί + aTyn+ί)\\

^ (1 - α)| |t* - yn+1\\ + α | | 2V - Tyn+ι\\

S \\u - ^ + 1 | | = \\Pu - Pa . 11 ̂ Hit - xn\\ .

From this, we obtain that limn_+oo\\u — xn\\=\imn.^oo\\u — xn.\\=0. Hencewe have proved that (10) is true, that is, for any xQ in D, P(x0) =lim^(SP)*x0 is well-defined. From (13), we see that P(x0) eF[T]Γ\ F[P]for all x0 in D, that is,

(14) P(D) (Z F(T) Π F[P] .

And we have that, for any v in F[T] Π -P[P],

= Km (SP) t; = Pv ,

so we see that

(15) F[T]nF[P]aF[P].

Also, clearly w = PweP(D) for all w in F[P]. From this, (14) and(15), we get (11).

Finally we shall prove (12). Let ε be any positive number.Since D is compact, there are finite points {x\, x\, •••, x%) such that,for any x in D,

(16) min{ | | x - α?S||i 1 ^ i ^ k} < ± .3

F r o m (10), we can choose N such t h a t

(17) | | (SP) a ? ί - P α ? ί | | < — for all n ^ N and l ^ i ^ k .3

Let #o be any point in D. From (16), we can take x{ such that

(18) Hso-ao'lK-f-.o

Since >SP is nonexpansive, clearly P is also nonexpansive. Hence weobtain from (17) and (18) that, for all n^N,

\\(spyχo - PxQ\\

^ \\(spyχo - (spyxiw + \\(SP)*χi - Pχt\\ + np&ί - Pa?0||

^ 2||aj0 - x{\\ + \\(SPyxi - Pxi\\ ^ ε

which implies (12).

LEMMA 3. Let T and Pn(n — 1, 2, •) δe nonexpansive mappingsfrom a compact convex subset D of a Banach space into itself. Assume

Page 7: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

498 SHIRO ISHIKAWA

that the following conditions are satisfied:

(19) for any x in D, lim% ̂ Pnx — Px exists ,

( 2 0 ) P{D) = F[P] c i ^ [ P J / o r α ί ϊ n ^ l

( 2 1 ) PTO converges uniformly to P

and

(22) T(P(D)) c P(D) .

Then it follows that

(23) for any x in D, l inv^ Pnx — Px exists, where Pn = Π?=i (SP<),S = (1 - α)I + αΓ, 0 < a < 1,

( 2 4 ) P C D ) - F [ P ] - F [ T ] ΓΊ F [ P ] c F [ P J for all n ^ l

and

(25) Pn converges uniformly to P .

Proof. Let ε be any positive number. Since P satisfies theconditions of P in Lemma 2, from (12), we can choose N such that

(26) \\(SP)Ny -py\\<± for all y i n ' f l ,Δ

where P is defined as in Lemma 2.Prom (21), there exists M such that

\\SPx - SPnx\\ ^ \\Px - Pnx\\ ^ ε

2N

for all n Ξ£ M and all x in Z>.This implies that, for all n such that n ^ M

W

From this and (26), we have that, for all n such that n >̂ max {AT, M},

\\Pnx- P{P^Nx)\\ £ \\Pnx - ^

< ε .

Page 8: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

ITERATION OF COMMUTING NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS 499

Since Lemma 2 says that P(D) = J^[JΓ] Π F[P], this implies that thereexists a subsequence {Pn.x}ΐ=1 that converges to a point u in F[T] ΠF[P]. Also we see, from (20), for all n ^ 1,

llΛ+i* - u\\ = \\SPn+1Pnx

Hence we get that lim^^W Pnx — u\\ = lim^JIP^.a; — w|| = 0 , that is,Pnx converges to a point in F[T] Π ̂ [ P ] for any x in D. This implies(23), and

(27)

If v e F[T] Π i*TP], then v = P%v = l i m ^ Pnv = Pv, so we see

(28) JP[Γ]Π F[P]dF[P].

Since clearly F [ P ] c P(D) and F[T] n F[P] c F [ P J for all w ^ 1, (24)follows from (27) and (28).

Now we shall prove (25). Let ε be any positive number. Asin the proof of Lemma 2, we can choose finite points {x\, xl, , x%)from D satisfying (16). From (23), we can choose N' such that

(29) WPX-PxlW^— for all n ^ N' and l ^ ί ^ k .3

Let x0 be any point in D. By (16), we can take x( that satisfies (18).Since P is nonexpansive, we obtain from (18) and (29) that, for

all n ^ N',

\\Pnx0~-Px0\\^ \\Pnx0 - Pnxi\\ + \\Pnxi - Pxi\\ + \\Pxi - Pxo\\

^ 2 | | α ? o - » o i l l + \\Pnxί - Px{\\ ̂ e .

This implies (25).

LEMMA 4. Let Γ^i = 1, 2, •••,&) be a commuting family ofmappings. Then it follows that

Proof. Let x be any point in f\ϊ=i F[Tt\. We see that Tkx =ΓfcTίίc = T̂ΓfcCC for all i such that 1 ^ ί ^ fc — 1, which implies thatTkx belongs to F[T%] for all 1 ^ i ^ & - 1.

Proof of theorem. For all i such that 1 ^ i ^ v, put

Γ Π Γs* IΪ 1 ΪS^ Γs2 Π Sx~\ ΊΊΊ* = Pi«aj .

Page 9: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

500 SHIRO ISHIKAWA

We shall prove the theorem by induction. Let us assume thatthe following conditions are true for some integer j such that 1 <Ξ3 ^ v - 1:

(30) for any x in D, lim^ ̂ P{J]x = PU)x exists,

(31) PU)(D) = F[Pij)] = h F f Γ J c f f P ί ] for all integers ns S 1 ,ί = l

(32) {-Pn]}̂ -=i converges uniformly to P ( i )

and

(33)

Since P ^ x = [Πϊjΐϊ 0S;+ 1P^)Jk we can apply Lemma 3 byregarding T^lf S, +1, P

u\ P%, Ptf™, Pi3'+1) and conditions (30)-(33) asT, S, P, PΛ, PΛ, P and conditions (19)-(22). Hence we have,

(34) for any x in D, lim% i + 1_0 OP^+1^ = Pu+1)x exists ,

Γ(35) Pu+ί)(D) = F[P{j+ί)] - Γ\F[Tt] c ίΊP&ϊ"] for all wyί = l

and

(36) { P ^ J ^ + ^ i converges uniformly to P o + 1 ) .

Moreover, if j + 2 ^v, Lemma 4 shows from (35) that

(37) Tj+1(P{j+1))(D) c P{j+1\D) .

When i = 1, conditions (30)-(32) immediately follow by regarding Pin Lemma 2 as an identity mapping. Also from (31) and Lemma 4,we get (33).

Therefore, by induction, it follows that lim^oo P^x — PMx ePM(D) - Γ\Ui F[Tt]. This completes the proof of the theorem.

From the finite intersection property, we have the followingresult due to DeMarr [2]. And note that we do not assume Zorn'slemma in our proof.

COROLLARY 1. Let Tt(i e J, J is an index set) he commutingnonexpansίve mapping from a compact convex subset of a Banachspace into itself. Then there exists a point u in D such that T{w — ufor all ie J.

When v = 1 and at = 1/2, we have the following corollary, whichis essentially equal to the result we have obtained as a Corollary 2in [3].

Page 10: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

ITERATION OF OCMMUTING NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS 501

COROLLARY 2. Let T be a nonexpansive mapping from a compactconvex subset D of a Banach space into itself. Then {((I + T)/2)wx}~=1

converges to a fixed point of T.

The author would like to thank the referee for letting me knowabout reference [5].

REFERENCES

1. L. P. Belluce and W. A. Kink, Fixed point theorems for families of contractionmappings, Pacific J. Math., 18 (1966), 213-217.2. R. E. DeMarr, Common fixed-points for commuting contraction mappings, PacificJ. Math., 13 (1963), 1139-1141.3. S. Ishikawa, Fixed points and iteration of a nonexpansive mapping in a Banachspace, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 59 (1976), 65-71.4. T. C. Lim, A fixed point theorem for families of nonexpansive mappings, PacificJ. Math., 53 (1974), 487-493.5. J. Linhart, Beitrdge zur Fixpunkttheorie nichtexpandierender Operatoren, Mona-tshefte fur Mathematik, 76 (1972), 239-249.

Received May 30, 1978.

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING KEIO UNIVERSITY

832 HIYOSHI-CHO, KOHOKU-KU

YOKOHAMA 223, JAPAN

Page 11: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any
Page 12: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS

EDITORSRICHARD A R E N S (Managing Editor)

University of CaliforniaLos Angeles, CA 90024

CHARLES W. CURTIS

University of OregonEugene, OR 97403

C. C. MOORE

University of CaliforniaBerkeley, CA 94720

J . DUGUNDJI

Department of MathematicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, CA 90007

R. FINN and J. MILGRAM

Stanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305

E. F. BECKENBAOH

ASSOCIATE EDITORSB. H. NEUMANN F. WOLF K. YOSHIDA

SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONSUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIACALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENONEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OREGON

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASTANFORD UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF HAWAIIUNIVERSITY OF TOKYOUNIVERSITY OF UTAHWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

The Supporting Institutions listed above contribute to the cost of publication of this Journal,but they are not owners or publishers and have no responsibility for its content or policies.

Mathematical papers intended for publication in the Pacific Journal of Mathematics shouldbe in typed form or offset-reproduced, (not dittoed), double spaced with large margins. Pleasedo not use built up fractions in the text of the manuscript. However, you may use them in thedisplayed equations. Underline Greek letters in red, German in green, and script in blue. Thefirst paragraph or two must be capable of being used separately as a synopsis of the entire paper.Items of the bibliography should not be cited there unless absolutely necessary, in which casethey must be identified by author and journal, rather than by item number. Manuscripts, intriplicate, may be sent to any one of the editors. Please classify according to the scheme of Math.Reviews, Index to Vol. 39. All other communications should be addressed to the managing editor,or Elaine Barth, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 90024.

50 reprints to each author are provided free for each article, only if page charges have beensubstantially paid. Additional copies may be obtained at cost in multiples of 50.

The Pacific Journal of Mathematics is issued monthly as of January 1966. Regular sub-scription rate: $72.00 a year (6 Vols., 12 issues). Special rate: $36.00 a year to individualmembers of supporting institutions.

Subscriptions, orders for numbers issued in the last three calendar years, and changes of addressshould be sent to Pacific Journal of Mathematics, P.O. Box 969, Carmel Valley, CA 93924, U.S.A.Older back numbers obtainable from Kraus Periodicals Co., Route 100, Millwood, NY 10546.

PUBLISHED BY PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONPrinted at Kokusai Bunken Insatsusha (International Academic Printing Co., Ltd.).

8-8, 3-chome, Takadanobaba, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan.

Copyright © 1978 by Pacific Journal of MathematicsManufactured and first issued in Japan

Page 13: 1BDJGJD +PVSOBM PG .BUIFNBUJDT494 SHIRO ISHIKAWA bounded convex subset D of a Banach space into itself that satisfy the conditions (1) P{D) = F[P] and T(P(D)) c P(D) . Let x 0 be any

Pacific Journal of MathematicsVol. 80, No. 2 October, 1979

K. Adachi, On the multiplicative Cousin problems for N p(D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297Howard Banilower, Isomorphisms and simultaneous extensions in C(S) . . . . 305B. R. Bhonsle and R. A. Prabhu, An inversion formula for a distributional

finite-Hankel-Laplace transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313Douglas S. Bridges, Connectivity properties of metric spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325John Patton Burgess, A selection theorem for group actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333Carl Claudius Cowen, Commutants and the operator equations

AX = λX A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337Thomas Curtis Craven, Characterizing reduced Witt rings. II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341J. Csima, Embedding partial idempotent d-ary quasigroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351Sheldon Davis, A cushioning-type weak covering property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359Micheal Neal Dyer, Nonminimal roots in homotopy trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371John Erik Fornaess, Plurisubharmonic defining functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381John Fuelberth and James J. Kuzmanovich, On the structure of finitely

generated splitting rings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389Irving Leonard Glicksberg, Boundary continuity of some holomorphic

functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425Frank Harary and Robert William Robinson, Generalized Ramsey theory.

IX. Isomorphic factorizations. IV. Isomorphic Ramsey numbers . . . . . . . 435Frank Harary and Allen John Carl Schwenk, The spectral approach to

determining the number of walks in a graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443David Kent Harrison, Double coset and orbit spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451Shiro Ishikawa, Common fixed points and iteration of commuting

nonexpansive mappings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493Philip G. Laird, On characterizations of exponential polynomials . . . . . . . . . . 503Y. C. Lee, A Witt’s theorem for unimodular lattices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509Teck Cheong Lim, On common fixed point sets of commutative

mappings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517R. S. Pathak, On the Meijer transform of generalized functions . . . . . . . . . . . . 523T. S. Ravisankar and U. S. Shukla, Structure of 0-rings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537Olaf von Grudzinski, Examples of solvable and nonsolvable convolution

equations in K′p, p ≥ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561Roy Westwick, Irreducible lengths of trivectors of rank seven and eight . . . . 575

PacificJournalofM

athematics

1979Vol.80,N

o.2


Recommended