2007 General Meeting
Assemblée générale 2007
Montréal, Québec
2007 General Meeting
Assemblée générale 2007
Montréal, Québec
A structural credit risk model with A structural credit risk model with a reduced-form default triggera reduced-form default trigger
Applications to finance and insuranceApplications to finance and insurance
A structural credit risk model with A structural credit risk model with a reduced-form default triggera reduced-form default trigger
Applications to finance and insuranceApplications to finance and insurance
Mathieu Boudreault, M.Sc., F.S.A.Mathieu Boudreault, M.Sc., F.S.A.Ph.D. Candidate, HEC MontréalPh.D. Candidate, HEC Montréal
Mathieu Boudreault, M.Sc., F.S.A.Mathieu Boudreault, M.Sc., F.S.A.Ph.D. Candidate, HEC MontréalPh.D. Candidate, HEC Montréal
2 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Introduction – Credit riskIntroduction – Credit risk
• General definition of credit risk• Potential losses due to:
• Default;
• Downgrade;
• Many examples of important defaults• Enron, WorldCom, many airlines, etc.
• Need tools/models to estimate the distribution of losses due to credit risk
3 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Introduction – Credit riskIntroduction – Credit risk
• Credit risk models can be used for:– Pricing credit-sensitive assets (corporate
bonds, CDS, CDO, etc.)– Evaluate potential losses on a portfolio of
assets due to credit risk (asset side)– Measure the solvency of a line of business
(premiums flow, assets backing the liability) (liability side)
• Risk theory models (ruin probability) are an example of credit risk models
4 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Introduction – Classes of modelsIntroduction – Classes of models
• Models oriented toward risk management– Based on the observation of defaults, ratings
transitions, etc.– Goal: compute a credit VaR (or other tail
risk measure) to protect against potential losses
• Models oriented toward asset pricing– Based on financial and economic theory– 2 classes of models
• Structural models• Reduced-form (intensity-based)
5 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Introduction - ContributionsIntroduction - Contributions
• As part of my Ph.D. thesis, I introduce:– An hybrid (structural and reduced-form)
credit risk model– Can be used for all three purposes
• Characteristics of the model– Default is tied to the sensitivity of the credit
risk of the firm to its debt– Endogenous and realistic recovery rates– Model is consistent in both physical and
risk-neutral probability measures– Quasi closed-form solutions
6 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
OutlineOutline
1. Introduction
2. Credit risk modelsa) Review of the literature
b) Risk management models, structural and reduced-form models
3. Hybrid model
4. Practical applications
5. Conclusion
7 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Risk management modelsRisk management models
• CreditMetrics by J.P. Morgan– Based on credit ratings transitions– Revalue assets at each possible transition– Compute credit VaR
• CreditRisk + by CreditSuisse– Actuarial model of frequency and severity– Frequency (number of defaults): Poisson
process– Severity (losses due to default): some
distribution
8 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Risk management modelsRisk management models
• Moody’s-KMV– Based on the distance to default metric
– Distance to default (DD):
– Using their database, they relate the distance to default to an empirical default probability
– Can be used to determine a credit rating transition matrix
– Can be the basis of revaluation of the portfolio for credit VaR computations
DPTAEDD
1
9 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Structural modelsStructural models
• Suppose the debt matures in 20 years
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time
Mil
lio
ns
of
do
llar
sAssets
Liabilities
10 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Structural modelsStructural models
• Idea: default of the firm is tied to the value of its assets and liabilities
• Main contributions:– Merton (1974): equity is viewed as a call
option on the assets of the firm, debt is a risk-free discount bond minus a default put
– Black & Cox (1976): default occurs as soon as the assets cross the liabilities
– Longstaff & Schwartz (1995), Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein (2001): stochastic interest rates
11 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Reduced-form modelsReduced-form models
• Default is tied to external factors and take investors by surprise
• Parameters of the model are obtained using time series and/or cross sections of prices of credit-sensitive instruments– Corporate bonds, CDS, CDO
• Main contributions: Jarrow & Turnbull (1995), Jarrow, Lando & Turnbull (1997), Lando (1998).
• Idea: directly model the behavior of the default intensity
12 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Reduced-form modelsReduced-form models
• Moment of default r.v. is
where E1 is an exponential r.v. of mean 1.
• Default probability (under the risk-neutral measure)
• Example: Hu follows a Cox-Ingersoll-Ross process
10:0inf EduHt
t
u
T
t uQtt duHETQ exp1
13 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007ComparisonComparison
• Structural models– Default is predictable given the value of assets and
liabilities
– Short-term spreads are too low
– Recovery rates generated too high
• Reduced-form models– Default is unpredictable but not tied to debt of firm
– Spreads can be calibrated to instruments
– Recovery assumptions are exogenous
• Risk management models– Cannot price credit sensitive instruments
14 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – IdeasHybrid model – Ideas
• Hybrid model (presented in my Ph.D. thesis):– Model the assets and liabilities of the firm, as with
structural models
– Different debt structures are proposed
• Idea # 1: Default is related to the sensitivity of the credit risk of the company to its debt– McDonald’s (BBB+) vs Exxon Mobil (AA+)
– Similar debt ratio, other characteristics are good for McDonald’s
– Spreads of both companies very different
– Industry in which the firm operates is important
15 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – IdeasHybrid model – Ideas
• Idea # 2: firms do not necessarily default immediately when assets cross liabilities– Ford (CCC) and General Motors (BB-) have
very high debt ratios and still operate
• Idea # 3: firms can default even if their financial outlooks are reasonably good (surprises occur)– Recovery rates very close to 100%– Enron’s rating a few months before its
phenomenal default was BBB+
16 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – FrameworkHybrid model – Framework
• Suppose the assets and liabilities of the firm are given by the stochastic processes {At,t>0} and {Lt,t>0}
• Let us denote by Xt its debt ratio
• Idea of the model is to represent the stochastic default intensity {Hu,u>0} by
where h is a strictly increasing function
t
tt A
LX
uu XhH
17 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – FrameworkHybrid model – Framework
• Examples: h(x) = c, h(x) = cx2 and h(x) = cx10
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,5
0% 50% 100% 150% 200%
Debt ratio
Def
ault
inte
nsi
ty
Constant
Increasing
Fast increasing
18 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – MathematicsHybrid model – Mathematics
• Assume that under the real-world measure, the assets of the firm follow a geometric Brownian motion (GBM)
• Propose different debt structures– Under constant risk-free rate
• Debt grows with constant rate Lt = L0exp(bt)
• Debt is a GBM correlated with assets (hedging)
– Under stochastic interest rates• Debt is a risk-free zero-coupon bond
• Assets are correlated with interest rates
PttAtAt dBAdtAdA
19 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – MathematicsHybrid model – Mathematics
• Assume the transformation h is strictly increasing with the specific form
• Assume the assets and liabilities of the firm are traded– We proceed with risk neutralization
• Property: with h, most of the time, the default intensity remains a GBM i.e.
– The drifts and diffusions change with the probability measures.
0,1 xcxxh
PttHtHt dBHtdtHtdH
20 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Hybrid model – MathematicsHybrid model – Mathematics
• It is possible to show that the survival probability can be written as a partial differential equation (PDE)
• When µH(t) and σH(t) are constants, can use Dothan (1978) quasi-closed form equation.
• Otherwise, we have to rely on finite difference methods or tree approaches
02
12
222
H
SHt
H
SHt
t
SSH tHtHt
21 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Impact of hedging on credit risk– Use a stochastic debt structure– Impact of correlation between assets and
liabilities on the level of spreads
• Result– Depends on the initial condition of the firm– Impact of hedging is positive over short-
term– Reason: firms with poor hedging that
eventually survive have a long-term advantage because their debt ratio will have improved significantly
22 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Impact of hedging on credit risk
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
50
05
50
60
06
50
70
0
Time to maturity (in years)
Sp
rea
ds
in b
ps
50%80%95%
23 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Endogenous recovery rate distribution– Firm can survive (default) when its debt ratio is
higher (lower) than 100%
– Assets over liabilities at default, minus liquidation and legal fees can be a reasonable proxy for a recovery rate
– Altman & Kishore (1996):• Recovery rates between 40% to 70%
• Recovery rates decrease with default probability
• Recovery rates decrease during recessions
L
AR ;1min1
24 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Endogenous recovery rate distribution
• Obtained using 100 000 simulations• Asset volatilities of 10% and 15%• Initial debt ratios of 60% and 90%• No liquidation costs
25 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Credit spreads term structure– The price of defaultable zero-coupon bonds with
endogenous recovery rate is
• The following is obtained with a random debt structure and endogenous recovery (10% liquidation costs)
• Levels and shapes of credit spreads are consistent with literature– Three possible shapes
– See Elton, Gruber, Agrawal, Mann (2001)
TQtt
tTr RETQe 1
26 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Credit spreads term structure
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Time to maturity
Spr
eads
in b
ps
Increasing # 1
Increasing # 2Hump shape
Decreasing
27 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Model is defined under both physical and risk-neutral probability measures
• Default probabilities can be computed in both probability measures
• Can use accounting information to estimate parameters of the capital structure
• Can use prices from corporate bonds and CDS to infer the sensitivity of the credit risk to the debt
28 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Real-world default probabilities
29 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Credit VaR– Need to use the distribution of losses under
the real-world measure– Cash flows occur over a long-term time
period: need to discount– Which discount rate is appropriate ?– Answer: Radon-Nikodym derivative– Interpreted as the adjustment to the risk-free
rate to account for risk aversion toward the value of assets
30 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Credit VaR– Radon-Nikodym derivative can be obtained for
each debt structure– For example, under constant interest rates and
deterministically growing debt,
– Consequently, the T-year horizon Value-at-Risk for a defaultable zero-coupon bond is
where we recover a constant fraction R of the face value payable at maturity
T
rB
rT
dP
dQ
A
APT
A
A
2
2
1exp
TT
tTrP RTdP
dQeVaR 11%95
31 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
Practical applicationsPractical applications
• Credit VaR– Caution: there is dependence between the Radon-
Nikodym derivative and the payoff of the bond.
– Preferable to use simulation for example
– Current framework works for a single company only (multi-name extensions will be studied in my following paper)
– CreditMetrics uses 1-year horizons for their VaR.
– It is also possible to do so with the model.
32 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
ConclusionConclusion
• Intuitive model that provides results consistent with the literature– Shape and level of credit spread curves, especially
over the short-term;– Endogenous recovery rates;– Interesting calibration to financial data;
• Possible to use the model for risk management purposes– Real-world default probabilities;– Credit VaR and other tail risk measures;
• Future research– Correlated multi-name extensions
33 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007BibliographyBibliography
• Main paper– Boudreault, M. and G. Gauthier (2007), « A
structural credit risk model with a reduced-form default trigger », Working paper, HEC Montréal, Dept. of Management Sciences
• Other referenced papers– Altman, E. and V. Kishore (1996), "Almost Everything You Always
Wanted to Know About Recoveries on Defaulted Bonds", Financial Analysts Journal, (November/December), 57-63.
– Black, F. and J.C. Cox (1976), "Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions", Journal of Finance 31, 351-367.
– Collin-Dufresne, P. and R. Goldstein (2001), "Do credit spreads reflect stationary leverage ratios?", Journal of Finance 56, 1929-1957.
– Dothan, U.L. (1978), "On the term structure of interest rates", Journal of Financial Economics 6, 59-69.
34 of 34
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007
2007
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2007BibliographyBibliography
• Other referenced papers (continued)– Elton, E.J., M.J. Gruber, D. Agrawal and C. Mann (2001),
"Explaining the Rate Spread on Corporate Bonds", Journal of Finance 56, 247-277.
– Jarrow, R. and S. Turnbull (1995), "Pricing Options on Financial Securities Subject to Default Risk", Journal of Finance 50, 53-86.
– Jarrow, R., D. Lando and S. Turnbull (1997), "A Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads", Review of Financial Studies 10, 481-523.
– Lando, D. (1998), "On Cox Processes and Credit Risky Securities", Review of Derivatives Research 2, 99-120.
– Longstaff, F. and E. S. Schwartz (1995), "A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating debt", Journal of Finance 50, 789-819.
– Merton, R. (1974), "On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates", Journal of Finance 29, 449-470.