ODOT Advanced Remote AssetODOT Advanced Remote AssetCollection andCollection andODOT Educational PartnershipsODOT Educational Partnerships
2010 Ohio GIS Conference
September 15-17, 2010
Crowne Plaza North Hotel
Columbus, Ohio
2010 Ohio GIS Conference
September 15-17, 2010
Crowne Plaza North Hotel
Columbus, Ohio
Fred Judson GISP
GIS Coordinator - ODOT
Dan Wyandt
GIS Instructor – Penta Career Center
John Puente
Planning Administrator - ODOT
GIS Coordinator - ODOT
3Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Agenda
• Background• Asset Problem
• Technology• Review Possible Technologies
• Innovation• Solution
• Partnerships• Review of Partnerships
• Implementation• Penta Career Center• How Things Were Conducted• Benifits
• Results• Collection Results
• Questions
4Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Background - ODOT District 1 and 2
• Northwest Ohio• District 1
• John Puente GIS Coordinator
• District 2• Fred Judson GIS
Coordinator• Serving 16 counties• 7167 Lane Miles• 20,086,539 Miles Traveled
Yearly• 2031 Bridges
5Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Background - Asset Problem
• What Quantity?• Where Is It?• How Old Is It?• How Many Times Have We Performed Maintenance To It?• What Is Its Life Expectancy?
6Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Background - Asset Collection
Business Requirements• Asset Type
• Safety Related• Guardrail, Signs etc.
• Accuracy• Location On Earth• Collection Quality
• Frequency• How Often Does It Need Updated
• Cost• Restrictions
• Technology Limitations• Right Collection Tech. For The Asset
Technology For Collection• Remote Sensing
• LiDAR, Aerials etc.• GPS
• Mapping, Survey, Cell Phones• Inferential Statistics
• Calculate Base on Sample Sets
• Through Work Orders• Collect when work is performed to it.
• Project Inclusion• Require contractors to collect after a project is completed.
7Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Background - Asset Collection – Current Practices
• Multiple Data Formats• No Standardizations \ Localized Standards• Log Point As Primary Spatial Reference
•1 mi = 5280 ft Most Locations Carried To .01 = At +/- 52.8’• Average Error In Log Point +/- 300 ft.• Mile Marker Signs Would Be Placed Wrong• Mile Marker Signs Would Not Be Recorded Correctly• Locations Recorded By Multiple Methods
• Landmark, County Log Point, State Log Point And Intersection
8Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Background - Asset Collection – GPS Devices
2nd Most common location referencing method used by ODOT is GPS.Pros
• Accurate Locations• Electronic Upload• Customizable Applications
Cons• Requires Specialized Equipment And Software• Requires Logistical Planning• Compounding Deadhead Times For Complete Coverage• Requires Specialized Training• Subject To Weather Conditions• Increased Safety Risk To Field Crews And Public
9Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Technology - Asset Collection – Remote Sensing Methods
• Satellite Imagery• Some Free• Good Stuff Costs Big $$$• Most does not meet our resolution needs.• Limited By Weather
• LIDAR• OSIP LIDAR Very Accurate• 1 Meter spacing did not meet our resolution needs.• Freely Available
• Oblique Aerial Imagery• Most does not meet our resolution needs.• Expensive
• Orthorectified Aerial Imagery• Most does not meet our resolution needs.• Frequency of coverage is dependant of source.
10Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Technology - Asset Collection – Remote Sensing Methods - ODOT Video Log
•Video Log as a remote sensing method for asset inventories.
• Good Update Frequency• Established Internal Business Process• Cheap To Implement
•ODOT Video Log• Occurs Every 3-6 Years• Process Is In Place• Possible to project coordinates into image.• The van has a GPS.• We did not have software to accomplish our needs.
11Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Technology - Asset Collection – Methods
• Identified Assets• Identified Collection Methods• Prioritized Asset Collection• Identified Update Procedures
12Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Technology - Video Log Applications - Video Vehicles
13Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Technology - Video Log Applications - Vendor Evaluations
• Evaluated Several Vendors With Video Log Solutions For Asset Extraction• Researched Extensively• Found Vendors At Extremes (Good and Bad)• Hard Part Was Finding Their Actual Capabilities• No one knows our business better than us.• All were too expensive for the district.
14Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation - Asset Collection – Methods
15Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation - Build Our Own Asset Capture Software
16Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation - Software Requirements
• Web Based For Scalability• Throughout District Office 1 And 2, And County Garages
• Flexible• We can add delete or change any asset any time.
• Independent From Any Vendor• We will be able to use this with any video vendors’ image.
• User Friendly• Asset collection is accomplished by a few clicks.
• Leverage Existing Resources\Investments
• OGRIP – LBRS\OSIP\VRS
17Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation - Mobile Video Asset Capturing Application - Image Calibrations
• Issue• We were not sure of the camera configurations for the different video cycles.• We attempted to measure everything our selves and found that we could not be accurate enough.
• Solution • By manipulating Tao’s equations and coming up with a few of our own we were able to develop methods to develop a configuration for each video cycle.• Uses the imagery with known points and measurements to calibrate.
18Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation - Mobile Video Asset Capturing Application - Image Calibrations
19Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation – Asset Capturing
• Capture Any Asset• Video• Aerial
• Intelligent Attribute Forms• Efficient
Asset Data Entry
• Reposition• Video• Aerial
20Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation – Navigation
• Efficient Navigation
• Available For The Entire State
21Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation – Asset Capturing
• View Any Video Cycle
• 2 Different Vendors
• 3 Different Years
• Over 5 Terabytes Of Data
• Millions $$$ Invested
22Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation – Measurement
• Measure On Image• Vertical• Horizontal
• Measure on Aerial
23Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation – Zoom And Street View
• Zoom Any Portion Of The Image
• Link To Google Street View• Additional
Reference
24Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Innovation – Extended Use
• Data Integration
• Spatial Querying
• Reporting• Linking To
Other Datasets
25Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Partnerships
26Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Partnerships - Penta County and Rhodes College Sign Asset Collection
• Training and collection started 4/15/2010• Penta County High School GIS Program
• 22 Students – Juniors and Seniors• OSU Lima Campus GIS Majors
• 2 Students from OSU – Lima Campus• Student Benefits
• Real World Experience• Working With Cutting Edge Software
• ODOT Benefits• Capture of our sign assets.• Develop workflows and benchmarks for internal collection.• Developed a method to access potential resources that not only helps ODOT but also helps Ohio’s Future.
27Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Implementation
• ODOT officials providing the training.
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/HighwayOps/Traffic/
28Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Implementation
• Students learning the details for collecting the sign data:
29Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Results
• Students collecting asset data. • Collection Period : 4/15/2010 to 5/25/2010
• Total: 6699 Signs• Value: $466,054• 200-500 Average Per
Session
30Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Penta County Connections
•Penta GIS Advisory Committee Members:
Wood County Auditor
ODOT
31Ohio Department of Transportation District Two
Contact Information - Questions