1

PMSTPCOL PEmails

From: Tai, TomSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:16 PMTo: STPCOLCc: Wunder, GeorgeSubject: FW: STP - Post Audit DocumentsAttachments: 3.7 & 3.8 punch List 053111.pdf; 3.7 & 3.8 Action Items_05-27-11.pdf; Draft Agenda for May

23 11 STP Audit 05272011.pdf; Appendix B Ch 3.8 RAI History.docx; Appendix A Ch 3.7 RAI History.docx

Tom Tai DNRL/NRO (301) 415‐8484 Tom.Tai@NRC.GOV 

From: Tai, Tom Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:43 PM To: Hawkins, Kimberly; Chakrabarti, Samir; Chakravorty, Manas Cc: Mansour Tabatabaie; peter Arnold (E-mail); 'Basilio@SCSolutions.com'; M.K.Ravindra; Wunder, George; Tonacci, Mark Subject: STP - Post Audit Documents  To All, Attached are recent update from NINA/S&L: the agenda for last week’s audit, audit action items, and most importantly, the punch-list that we’ll using in future Wednesday telephone conferences. I have made three extra copies for this afternoon if you don’t have one. For our west-coast friends, you can either print the attached, or use the one you had last Friday. I also developed a history of all the RAIs prepared and NINA responded for Chapter 3.7 and Chapter 3.8. These are the attached EXCEL files and I named them Appendix A and Appendix B for Chapters 3.7 and 3.8, respectively. These spreadsheets are based on the best record I have but I cannot guarantee they represent all that we’ve received. I’ll share these with NINA and S&L. We can decide if and how we want to use these two appendices when we are preparing the SERs. I also made extra copies for this afternoon. Regards Tom Tai DNRL/NRO (301) 415‐8484 Tom.Tai@NRC.GOV  

Hearing Identifier: SouthTexas34Public_EX Email Number: 2925 Mail Envelope Properties (0A64B42AAA8FD4418CE1EB5240A6FED12A909431BA) Subject: FW: STP - Post Audit Documents Sent Date: 6/1/2011 1:15:54 PM Received Date: 6/1/2011 1:16:04 PM From: Tai, Tom Created By: Tom.Tai@nrc.gov Recipients: "Wunder, George" <George.Wunder@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "STPCOL" <STP.COL@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1357 6/1/2011 1:16:04 PM 3.7 & 3.8 punch List 053111.pdf 121471 3.7 & 3.8 Action Items_05-27-11.pdf 20670 Draft Agenda for May 23 11 STP Audit 05272011.pdf 46462 Appendix B Ch 3.8 RAI History.docx 26290 Appendix A Ch 3.7 RAI History.docx 27490 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

1M

esh

sens

itivi

ty

Rev

iew

ed d

urin

g M

arch

Aud

it

03.0

7.02

-25,

R1

03.0

7.02

-29,

R1

03.0

7.02

-22

3/15

/11

May

Aud

it3.

7 - D

.

203

.07.

02-2

83/

15/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

3N

/AP

rovi

de IT

AA

C to

clo

se 1

0CFR

21 is

sue

rela

ted

to d

ynam

ic a

naly

sis

of th

e Tu

rbin

e B

uild

ing

03.0

7.02

-31

3/28

/11

May

Aud

it3.

7 - D

.

4

Site

Spe

cific

Sei

smic

Ana

lyse

s of

Rad

was

te B

uild

ing

• A

mpl

ified

inpu

t mot

ion

c

onsi

derin

g th

e ef

fect

of n

earb

y

Rea

ctor

Bui

ldin

g •

Fix

ed b

ase

seis

mic

ana

lysi

s fo

r

det

erm

inat

ion

of s

eism

ic S

SE

fo

rces

for I

I/I d

esig

n

Not

Aud

ited

by N

RC

NR

C C

ompl

ete

Aud

it

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 13.

13.

8 - C

. 13.

2

53.

7-1

NR

C w

ould

like

to h

ave

an IT

AA

C fo

r II/I

des

ign

in a

dditi

on to

the

curr

ent d

iscu

ssio

ns

in C

OLA

, RA

I 03.

07.0

2-20

03.0

7.02

-20

S14/

13/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

63.

7-3

Che

ck R

SW

Pip

ing

Tunn

el S

SI a

naly

sis

desc

riptio

n to

see

if it

fully

des

crib

es h

ow th

e m

otio

n at

var

ious

poi

nts

of tu

nnel

wer

e ad

dres

sed

and/

or a

mpl

ified

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

73.

7-4

Che

ck D

GFO

S V

AU

LT S

SI a

naly

sis

desc

riptio

n to

see

if it

fully

des

crib

es h

ow th

e m

otio

n at

var

ious

poi

nts

of v

ault

wer

e ad

dres

sed/

ampl

ified

Pro

vide

add

ition

al d

escr

iptio

n in

CO

LA, a

s ne

eded

. See

Item

3.7

-22

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

89

In D

GFO

SV

cal

cuat

ion

for S

SI a

naly

sis,

U7-

CA

LC-D

SN

-600

1, R

ev. B

, the

refin

ed

mod

el s

pect

ra v

alue

s ar

e 14

.6%

hig

her a

t 3.8

Hz.

than

thos

e in

the

base

mod

el.

The

appl

ican

t is

requ

este

d to

pro

vide

just

ifica

tion

for r

econ

cilin

g th

is d

iffer

ence

.

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

9, N

o fu

rther

act

ion,

ans

wer

ed o

n a

prev

ious

RA

I

N/A

5/17

/11

May

Aud

it3.

7 - D

.

93.

7-5

Che

ck D

GFO

S T

UN

NE

L S

SI a

naly

sis

desc

riptio

n to

see

if it

fully

des

crib

es h

ow th

e m

otio

n at

var

ious

poi

nts

of tu

nnel

wer

e ad

dres

sed

and/

or a

mpl

ified

.

Pro

vide

add

ition

al d

escr

iptio

n in

CO

LA, a

s ne

eded

. See

Item

3.7

-22

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

103.

7-6

2

Iden

tify

soil

case

s us

ed fo

r all

SS

SI a

naly

sis,

and

pro

vide

bas

is.

As

a m

inim

um fo

r All

SS

SI a

nlay

sis

uppe

rbou

nd a

nd u

pper

boun

d ba

ckfil

l sho

uld

be

cons

ider

ed. R

evie

w C

OLA

mar

kup

for c

onsi

sten

cy w

ith s

oil c

ases

ana

lyze

d.

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- F. f

.

113.

7-8

2

Why

for S

SS

I of R

SW

Tun

nel w

as U

B in

situ

use

d vs

UB

bac

kfill

soi

l

As

a m

inim

um fo

r All

SS

SI a

nlay

sis

uppe

rbou

nd a

nd u

pper

boun

d ba

ckfil

l sho

uld

be

cons

ider

ed. R

evie

w C

OLA

mar

kup

for c

onsi

sten

cy w

ith s

oil c

ases

ana

lyze

d.

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- F. f

.

123.

7-36

2C

onfir

m th

at a

s a

min

imum

for A

ll S

SS

I anl

aysi

s up

perb

ound

in-s

itu a

nd u

pper

boun

d ba

ckfil

l sho

uld

be c

onsi

dere

d. P

rovi

de a

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion

in R

AI r

espo

nse

as

appr

opria

te03

.07.

01-2

7 S3

5/17

/11

May

Aud

it3.

7 - F

. f.

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

1 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

133.

7-7

1

Rev

ise

App

endi

x 3A

and

3H

.6 to

reco

ncile

gro

und

wat

er e

leva

tion

with

Cha

pter

2

Dem

onst

rate

that

soi

l spr

ings

val

ues

due

to g

roun

dwat

er e

leva

tion

reco

ncili

atio

n do

no

t affe

ct fo

unda

tion

desi

gn

Dem

onst

rate

that

cal

cula

ted

gap

valu

es a

re n

ot a

ffect

ed b

y du

e to

gro

undw

ater

el

evat

ion

reco

ncili

atio

n fo

r set

tlem

ent a

naly

sis

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- F. g

.

143

Cle

arly

des

crib

ing

in th

e FS

AR

how

sei

smic

dem

and

for n

on-s

eism

ic II

/I st

ruct

ures

for

stab

ility

eva

luat

ion

is d

eter

min

edS

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

n03

.07.

02-1

3 S3

7/28

/11

153.

7-10

Cla

rify

SS

SI s

oil p

ress

ures

in C

OLA

figu

res

to in

dica

te th

at th

ey re

pres

ent e

nvel

ope

of a

ll so

il ca

ses

anal

yzed

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

163.

7-11

Incl

ude

in F

SA

R th

e fo

llow

ing

info

rmat

ion

for t

he ti

me

hist

orie

s de

velo

ped

for 0

.3g,

1.

60 R

eg. G

uide

spe

ctru

m:

1) D

evel

opm

ent m

etho

d by

refe

renc

e to

DC

D;

2) P

lots

of t

hree

acc

eler

atio

n tim

e hi

stor

ies;

3) C

ompa

rison

of 5

% re

spon

se s

pect

ra

03.0

7.01

-2 S

24/

13/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

173.

7-15

Freq

uenc

y/ac

cele

ratio

n ev

alua

tion

for U

HS

col

umns

with

and

with

out h

ydro

dyna

mic

m

ass

Det

erm

ine

colu

mn

acce

lera

tions

for c

olum

n m

ass

and

hydr

odyn

amic

mas

s ba

sed

on

colu

mn

frequ

ency

and

spe

ctra

at t

op a

nd b

otto

m o

f the

col

umns

and

revi

se R

AI

03.0

8.04

-30

supp

lem

ent 1

to re

port

new

info

rmat

ion

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

8.04

-30

S46/

30/1

1

183.

7-18

Effe

ct o

f stru

ctur

al m

esh

refin

emen

t on

max

imum

acc

eler

atio

n fo

r des

ign

In th

e m

anua

l cal

cula

tion

for d

esig

n of

PH

Roo

f sla

b, in

crea

se th

e ve

rtica

l sei

smc

load

for P

H R

oof b

ased

on

exam

inat

ion

of s

truct

ural

mes

h se

nsiti

vity

resu

lts

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

8.04

-30

S46/

30/1

1

193.

7-2

Det

erm

ine

if FS

AR

(App

endi

x 3C

) rev

isio

n is

requ

ired

for t

he u

se o

f com

pute

r pr

ogra

ms

used

by

Wes

tingh

ouse

Will

pro

vide

info

rmat

ion

in C

OLA

03.0

7.01

-2 S

24/

13/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

207

Just

ify c

ompa

rison

of S

AP

2000

to A

NS

YS

03.0

7.02

-29

S15/

10/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- E.

213.

7-28

6

SA

SS

I Val

idat

ion

- Run

asp

ect r

atio

pro

blem

with

redu

ced

shea

r wav

e ve

loci

ty in

ve

rtica

l dire

ctio

n an

d ge

t tra

nsfe

r fun

ctio

n at

the

cent

er o

f the

sla

b

S&

L to

revi

se th

e S

AS

SI2

000

test

pro

blem

for t

wo

way

sla

b ac

tion

to m

atch

that

by

SG

H.

Add

a c

autio

nary

not

e to

SA

SS

I200

0 re

leas

e m

emo

for u

sers

to e

xam

ine

trans

fer

func

tions

for a

ny s

ign

of in

stab

ility

03.0

7.02

-29

S15/

10/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- E.

223.

7-19

Pro

vide

a fi

gure

in C

OLA

sho

win

g 0.

3g R

eg. G

uide

1.6

0 sp

ectra

env

elop

es a

mpl

ified

m

otio

ns fo

r all

thre

e st

orag

e va

ults

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

233.

7-22

Incl

ude

ampl

ified

site

-spe

cific

spe

ctra

for R

SW

Pip

ing

Tunn

el, D

GFO

SV

, and

DG

FO

Tunn

el in

FS

AR

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

243.

7-26

Con

firm

that

DG

FO ta

nk ri

gidt

y re

quire

men

t is

incl

uded

in th

e pr

ocur

emen

t sp

ecifi

catio

nN

/AM

ay A

udit

3.7

- F. h

.

253.

7-27

Con

solid

ate

all 0

3.07

.01-

27 re

spon

ses.

Als

o in

clud

e th

e sp

ectra

com

paris

ons

for

wha

t was

don

e in

the

audi

t for

cra

cked

con

cret

e ca

ses.

With

read

er's

gui

de p

rovi

ded,

ther

e is

no

need

to c

onso

lidat

e 3.

7.1-

27.

Spec

tra

com

paris

ons

will

be

prov

ided

.

03.0

7.01

-27

S35/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- D.

263.

7-28

6S

AS

SI V

alid

atio

n - R

un a

spec

t rat

io p

robl

em w

ith re

duce

d sh

ear w

ave

velo

city

in

verti

cal d

irect

ion

and

get t

rans

fer f

unct

ion

at th

e ce

nter

of t

he s

lab

03.0

7.02

-29

S15/

10/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.7

- E.

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

2 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

273.

7-33

8

For E

s us

e th

e S

SS

I pre

ssur

e di

agra

m a

s th

e dr

ivin

g fo

rce

in th

e st

abili

ty e

valu

atio

n an

d us

ing

pass

ive

on th

e re

sist

ing

side

for F

OS

Vau

lt, R

SW

Pip

ing

Tunn

el, F

OS

Tu

nnel

Pro

vide

requ

este

d in

form

atio

n in

RA

I res

pons

e

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

283.

7-35

8

Con

firm

for F

OS

Vau

lt th

at E

' is

mor

e th

an th

e in

ertia

l for

ce fo

r am

plifi

ed s

ite-s

peci

fic

SS

I ana

lysi

s in

the

stab

ility

eva

luat

ion

Pro

vide

requ

este

d in

form

atio

n in

RA

I res

pons

e

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

29P

erfo

rm s

ensi

tivity

ana

lysi

s re

late

d to

Poi

sson

's R

atio

NR

CN

/AM

ay A

udit

3013

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

13

For t

he R

adw

aste

Bui

ldin

g, p

rovi

de a

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion

and/

or ju

stifi

catio

n fo

r the

follo

win

g:1.

Des

ign

and

Ana

lysi

s (3

H.3

.5.1

& 2

)2.

II/I

Ana

lysi

s an

d de

sign

(3H

.3.5

.3)

3. L

oad

Com

bina

tion

for S

hear

(Ste

el) (

3H.3

.4.3

.4.2

)4.

Ulti

mat

e so

il be

arin

g ca

paci

ty (3

H.3

.4.2

.1)

5. T

orna

do P

aram

eter

s (3

H.3

.B &

3H

.3.4

.3.3

.1)

6. F

lood

Des

ign

(3H

.3.4

.2.3

)

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 13.

31R

evie

wed

dur

ing

Mar

ch A

udit

03.0

8.04

-18

3/15

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 13.

2

32R

evie

wed

dur

ing

Mar

ch A

udit

03.0

8.04

-18

R1

S23/

15/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- C. 1

3.4

33

Des

ign

of D

GFO

T in

clud

ing

desi

gn c

onsi

dera

tions

for s

eism

ic w

ave

prop

agat

ion

• D

esig

n in

puts

• S

truct

ural

ana

lysi

s m

odel

• D

esig

n of

wal

ls, f

loor

s, fo

unda

tions

,

an

d ot

her s

truct

ural

com

pone

nts

• S

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n

Not

Aud

ited

by N

RC

in M

arch

Aud

it

03.0

8.04

-30

S13/

15/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- H.

34

Des

ign

of U

HS

/RS

W P

umph

ouse

•

Des

ign

inpu

ts •

Stru

ctur

al a

naly

sis

mod

el •

Des

ign

of w

alls

, flo

ors,

foun

datio

ns,

a

nd o

ther

stru

ctur

al c

ompo

nent

s •

Sta

bilit

y ev

alua

tion

Not

Aud

ited

by N

RC

in M

arch

Aud

it

03.0

8.04

-30

S13/

15/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- A.

35

Dur

ing

the

audi

t hel

d on

Oct

ober

18

thro

ugh

22, 2

010,

the

staf

f not

ed th

at th

e ap

plic

ant d

id n

ot in

clud

e fo

unda

tion

bear

ing

pres

sure

cal

cula

tions

for w

ind

and

torn

ado

load

ings

for U

HS

/PH

The

appl

ican

t agr

eed

to in

clud

e th

e be

arin

g pr

essu

re e

valu

atio

ns fo

r win

d an

d to

rnad

o in

its

calc

ulat

ions

for t

he U

HS

/PH

acc

ordi

ngly

.

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - A

.

3614

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

14

For a

ll S

ite-S

peci

fic C

ateg

ory

I Stru

ctur

es, p

rovi

de a

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion

and/

or

just

ifica

tion

for e

xtre

me

win

d an

d to

rnad

o lo

adin

g (3

H.6

.4.3

.2)

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 14.

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

3 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

373.

8-1

RA

I 03.

08.0

1-9

+/- 2

5% o

f the

gap

: How

doe

s th

is c

ompa

re to

long

term

set

tlem

ent v

alue

s? C

larif

y if

25%

mov

emen

t env

elop

es lo

ng te

rm s

ettle

men

t.

The

25%

mov

emen

t env

elop

s th

e ex

pect

ed lo

ng te

rm s

ettle

men

t at t

he R

B/C

B

inte

rface

, bel

ow fl

ood

leve

l

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.04

.02-

6 &

03.

08.0

1-9

to re

quire

the

test

ing

to b

e th

e m

axim

um o

f +/-

25%

or l

ong

term

set

tlem

ent.

03.0

8.01

-9 S

14/

13/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- E.

383.

8-2

For S

ectio

n 3H

.6-7

in R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

17, S

uppl

emen

t 1, p

rovi

de c

larif

icat

ion

for l

ast

line

of th

e fir

st p

arag

raph

.

(Cla

rify

that

env

elop

of S

SS

I pre

ssur

e an

d A

SC

E 4

-98

is u

sed.

)

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

17 S

uppl

emen

t 1 to

cla

rify

that

the

enve

lop

is

used

.

03.0

8.04

-17

S14/

26/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- E.

393.

8-3

11

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-28

Bul

let 4

: Sho

w th

e ba

sis

for r

educ

tions

in th

e dy

nam

ic re

sist

ance

coe

ffici

ents

(Par

t C

of q

uest

ion)

.

Exp

lain

in re

vise

d re

spon

se to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-28

how

val

ues

wer

e de

term

ined

(fro

m

MA

CTE

C c

alcu

latio

n)

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

11A

pplic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to p

rovi

de a

com

paris

on b

etw

een

the

stra

in ra

nges

as

sum

ed in

the

abov

e re

fere

nce

and

the

stra

in v

alue

s ex

pect

ed b

enea

th th

e fo

unda

tion

of C

at I

build

ings

of U

nits

3&

4.

03.0

8.04

-28

S14/

26/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- E.

403.

8-5

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-32

NR

C to

com

pare

resp

onse

to o

ther

app

lican

t res

pons

es.

N/A

413.

8-6

RA

I 03.

08.0

1-7,

Rev

. 2

Rev

iew

resp

onse

- sh

ould

the

pres

sure

load

ing

be b

ased

on

a flo

od h

eigh

t of 8

' vs.

7'

?

The

pres

sure

load

ing

shou

ld b

e ba

sed

on a

hei

ght o

f 8',

but t

his

does

not

cha

nge

the

resu

lt.

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.01-

7 an

d re

late

d re

spon

ses

to c

larif

y th

is.

03.0

8.01

-7 S

14/

13/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- E.

423.

8-7

Doc

ket t

he d

esig

n pa

ram

eter

s ta

ble

(Age

nda

Item

A)

N/A

4/18

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 1.

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

4 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

433.

8-8

4 5

Con

cret

e an

d co

ncre

te to

wat

erpr

oofin

g fri

ctio

n co

effic

ient

of 0

.6 is

bas

ed o

n st

atic

, bu

t soi

l coe

ffici

ent o

f 0.4

7 is

bas

ed o

n dy

nam

ic.

Rev

ise

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-28

or 0

3.08

.04-

19 to

sho

w re

vise

d re

quire

d st

atic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fri

ctio

n of

con

cret

e an

d m

embr

ane

incr

ease

d to

� 0

.75

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

4D

esig

nate

whe

ther

the

frict

ion

coef

ficie

nts

repo

rted

in T

able

3H

.6-1

4 ar

e st

atic

or

dyna

mic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

valu

es. (

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to R

AI 3

.7.2

-13

S1)

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

5 (N

o ac

tion

requ

ired)

03.0

8.04

-19

S103

.07.

02-1

3 S2

4/26

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 2.

3.8

- C. 4

.

4416

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

16

Pro

vide

add

ition

al in

form

atio

n an

d/or

just

ifica

tion

for s

peci

fied

min

imum

sta

tic

coef

ficie

nt o

f fric

tion

at th

e va

rious

inte

rface

s, s

peci

fical

ly a

t the

wat

erpr

oofin

g m

embr

ane.

Als

o, th

e re

quire

men

t of i

nten

tiona

lly ro

ughe

ning

the

conc

rete

sur

face

sh

ould

be

incl

uded

in th

e FS

AR

.

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 16.

453.

8-9

S&

L to

eva

luat

e m

etho

d of

reco

ncili

atio

n fo

r soi

l pre

ssur

e fro

m e

quiv

alen

t pre

ssur

e m

etho

d fo

r bea

ring

pres

sure

eva

luat

ion

and

soil

pres

sure

from

fini

te e

lem

ent a

naly

sis.

Form

ally

pro

vide

the

prop

osed

reco

ncili

atio

n m

etho

d in

resp

onse

to R

AI 3

.8.4

-35.

03.0

8.04

-35

4/11

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 3.

463.

8-9

S&

L to

per

form

the

reco

ncili

atio

n ev

alua

tion

Form

ally

pro

vide

the

prop

osed

reco

ncili

atio

n m

etho

d in

resp

onse

to R

AI 3

.8.4

-35.

Ref

er to

Pun

ch L

ist I

tem

93

(Act

ion

Item

3.8

-38)

6/15

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 3.

4715

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

15

Pro

vide

add

ition

al in

form

atio

n an

d/or

just

ifica

tion

for f

ound

atio

n be

arin

g pr

essu

res

reco

ncili

atio

n.

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 15.

483.

8-11

Rev

iew

the

win

d lo

adin

g us

ed fo

r des

ign

and

stab

ilty

calc

ulat

ions

for t

he v

ault.

NR

C to

revi

ew th

e ju

stifi

catio

n fo

r the

impo

rtanc

e fa

ctor

for w

ind

pres

sure

cal

cula

tion

prov

ided

in re

spon

se to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-30

Sup

plem

ent 1

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 4.

493.

8-12

Dis

cuss

with

Joh

n P

rice

deliv

ery

of th

e R

evie

wer

's G

uide

to N

RC

N/A

4/8/

11M

ay A

udit

3.8

- E.

5017

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

17

Mis

cella

neou

s Q

uest

ions

from

Aud

it an

d R

evie

wer

s G

uide

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 17.

513.

8-15

DG

FOS

V d

esig

n ca

lcul

atio

n: C

onfir

m th

e to

rnad

o w

ind

load

use

d in

des

ign,

pg.

26

Rev

ise

desi

gn p

aram

eter

s ta

ble

(See

Item

3.8

-7).

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - E

.

523.

8-16

DG

FOS

V d

esig

n ca

lcul

atio

n: V

erify

acc

eler

atio

n va

lues

on

pg. 1

13 w

ith A

ttach

men

t B

Det

erm

ine

the

late

st re

visi

on o

f the

SS

I cal

cula

tion.

Ref

. 7.1

9 (d

esig

n) v

s 7.

30

(sta

bilit

y).

B is

the

corr

ect r

evis

ion;

refe

renc

e in

sta

bilit

y ca

lcul

atio

n w

ill b

e re

vise

d in

the

calc

ulat

ion.

(PIP

201

1-03

65)

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - E

.

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

5 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

5310

As

both

, the

SA

SS

I and

the

SA

P m

odel

s, s

houl

d be

bas

ed o

n th

e sa

me

geom

etry

an

d to

tal w

eigh

t and

are

sub

ject

to th

e sa

me

abso

lute

acc

eler

atio

ns, i

t is

not a

ppar

ent

why

an

addi

tiona

l, re

lativ

ely

larg

e am

plifi

catio

n w

ould

be

need

ed in

ver

tical

dire

ctio

n to

obt

ain

com

para

ble

tota

l bas

e se

ism

ic lo

ads.

The

refo

re, t

he a

pplic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to p

rovi

de a

just

ifica

tion

rega

rdin

g th

e di

ffere

nt b

ehav

ior o

f bot

h st

ruct

ural

mod

els.

03.0

8.04

-30

S25/

17/1

1M

ay A

udit

3.8

- C. 1

0.

543.

8-20

Use

of n

ewer

ver

sion

of A

CI-3

49 &

AS

ME

Sec

tion

III, D

ivis

ion

2 C

odes

, Res

pond

to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-36

03.0

8.04

-36

4/11

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - E

.

553.

8-21

Bea

m s

hear

dis

cuss

ion

Com

mitm

ent t

o in

corp

orat

e N

RC

feed

back

will

be

prov

ided

in a

n R

AI R

espo

nse

03.0

8.04

-34

4/11

/11

May

Aud

it3.

8 - E

.

563.

8-21

Bea

m s

hear

dis

cuss

ion

Cal

cula

tions

will

be

revi

sed

and

FSA

R ta

bles

will

be

upda

ted

as a

Con

firm

ator

y A

ctio

n

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

8.04

-30

S68/

17/1

1

573.

8-22

Atta

ch S

uppl

emen

t to

the

rele

ase

mem

o fo

r SA

FE (r

egar

ding

she

ar)

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 6.

58

Aud

it R

epor

t 3.8

K. C

ompu

ter S

oftw

are

Val

idat

ion

and

Ver

ifica

tion,

PC

AC

OLU

MN

, V

ersi

on 4

.10

AC

I 349

-97

used

in S

TP 3

&4

desi

gn is

not

cov

ered

by

this

V&

V, h

owev

er it

was

as

sure

d th

at re

sults

from

PC

AC

olum

n ar

e ev

alua

ted

in th

e ca

lcs

agai

nst t

he s

peci

al

code

requ

irem

ents

in A

CI 3

49-9

7. T

he s

taff

need

s to

revi

ew in

furth

er d

etai

l how

this

as

sura

nce

is im

plem

ente

d. T

his

will

be

incl

uded

in th

e ne

xt a

udit.

N/A

N/A

593.

8-23

Ver

ify th

at 0

.21

g us

ed in

the

basi

c de

sign

of R

SW

Tun

nel e

nvel

opes

the

seis

mic

ac

cele

ratio

ns

Pro

vide

d S

GH

cal

cula

tion

show

ing

whe

re th

e en

velo

ping

acc

eler

atio

ns c

ame

from

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 7.

603.

8-24

RS

W T

unne

l: C

onfir

m th

at s

oil p

ress

ures

con

side

r add

ition

al w

ave

prop

agat

ion

effe

ct

Cal

cula

tion

will

be

revi

sed

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 7.

6112

App

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

exp

lain

the

appa

rent

dis

crep

ancy

with

the

3,00

0 ft/

sec

shee

r w

ave

velo

city

den

oted

in th

e C

OLA

and

a v

alue

of 6

,600

ft/s

ec u

sed

for t

he w

ave

prop

ogat

ion

effe

ct in

the

calc

ulat

ions

calc

ulat

ion.

Cal

cula

tion

will

be

clar

ified

or r

evis

ed

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - C

. 12.

62N

ot U

sed

N/A

N/A

63

Aud

it re

port

3.8

I 8. C

alcu

latio

n no

. U7-

RS

W-S

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-6

001,

Rev

isio

n D

, “B

asic

S

truct

ural

Des

ign

of R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

(RS

W) T

unne

l”.

The

staf

f not

ed th

at s

ever

al a

reas

of d

esig

n of

the

tunn

el w

ere

not c

ompl

ete

at ti

me

of

the

audi

t, e.

g., g

loba

l tor

nado

mis

sile

impa

ct e

valu

atio

n fo

r the

acc

ess

regi

on o

f the

tu

nnel

, tun

nel w

alls

in th

e co

rner

regi

on, a

cces

s co

vers

, etc

.

N/A

N/A

643.

8-25

Rev

ise

Con

trol B

uild

ing

Ann

ex s

tabi

lity

calc

ulat

ion

to e

limin

ate

stat

emen

t reg

ardi

ng

desi

gn b

eing

app

licab

le to

DC

D S

tand

ard

Pla

nt

Cal

cula

tion

will

be

revi

sed

N/A

N/A

May

Aud

it3.

8 - B

. 8.

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

6 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

6518

Com

men

ts o

n R

espo

nse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.02-

22O

n th

e C

OLA

Mar

kup,

Sec

tion

3H.6

.6.2

.1 U

HS

bas

in, U

HS

Coo

ling

Tow

er E

nclo

sure

, an

d R

SW

Pum

p H

ouse

, pro

vide

an

expl

anat

ion

of th

e pr

essu

re d

istri

butio

n fo

r the

ca

lcul

ated

sei

smic

soi

l pre

ssur

es o

n th

e R

SW

Pum

p H

ouse

Nor

th W

all s

how

n in

Fi

gure

3H

.6-2

19 fr

om 2

D S

SS

I.

May

Aud

it3.

7 - F

May

Aud

it3.

7 - F

6619

Com

men

ts o

n R

espo

nse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.02-

24, S

uppl

emen

t 1, R

evis

ion

1O

n th

e C

OLA

Mar

kup,

Sec

tion

3H.6

.5.3

Sei

smic

Ana

lysi

s of

RS

W P

ipin

g Tu

nnel

, in

the

4th

bulle

t on

the

follo

win

g pa

ge (P

age

11 o

f 27)

, ple

ase

clar

ify fo

r whi

ch s

oil c

ase

the

crac

ked

conc

rete

and

soi

l sep

arat

ion

anal

ysis

was

per

form

ed. T

his

info

rmat

ion

is

not p

rovi

ded

in th

e C

OLA

mar

kup.

See

Act

ion

Item

3.

7-48

See

Act

ion

Item

3.

7-48

6720

Com

men

ts o

n R

espo

nse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

27, S

uppl

emen

t 1, R

evis

ion

1O

n th

e C

OLA

Mar

kup,

Sec

tion

3H.6

.7 D

iese

l Gen

erat

or F

uel O

il S

tora

ge V

ault

(DG

FOS

V),

prov

ide

furth

er c

larif

icat

ions

why

two

diffe

rent

inpu

t mot

ions

are

de

velo

ped

and

used

in s

epar

ate

SS

I ana

lyse

s of

DG

FOS

V

May

Aud

it3.

7 - F

May

Aud

it3.

7 - F

6821

Com

men

ts o

n R

espo

nse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.02-

29, S

uppl

emen

t 1

Pos

t Aud

it C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e #6

sub

mitt

ed a

s pa

rt of

the

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.02-

29, S

uppl

emen

t 1.

Bec

ause

the

shap

e of

the

resp

onse

tran

sfer

func

tions

are

stro

ngly

de

pend

ent o

n th

e a o

val

ue (e

.g. a

s sh

own

in F

ig. 0

3.07

.02-

29 S

1.6

prov

ided

with

this

re

spon

se),

the

appl

ican

t is

requ

este

d to

ext

end

the

resu

lts o

f the

abo

ve te

st p

robl

ems

in te

rms

of th

e fo

unda

tion

resp

onse

tran

sfer

func

tions

(inc

ludi

ng b

oth

com

plia

nce

and

scat

terin

g fu

nctio

ns) c

alcu

late

d us

ing

the

subt

ract

ion

met

hod

to a

o va

lues

up

to a

t le

ast 8

.

Issu

e a

revi

sion

to th

e S

AS

SI R

elea

se M

emo.

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

Upd

ate

Rel

ease

Mem

o6/

30/1

1

6922

DN

FSB

Issu

es R

elat

ed to

the

SA

SS

I Sub

tract

ion

Met

hod

The

Def

ense

Nuc

lear

Fac

ilitie

s S

afet

y B

oard

(DN

FSB

) iss

ued

a le

tter o

n A

pril

8th,

20

11 re

ques

ting

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f Ene

rgy

(DO

E) t

o ad

dres

s te

chni

cal a

nd s

oftw

are

qual

ity a

ssur

ance

issu

es re

late

d to

pot

entia

lly e

rron

eous

sei

smic

ana

lyse

s pe

rform

ed

usin

g th

e S

AS

SI S

ubtra

ctio

n m

etho

d. S

AS

SI s

ubtra

ctio

n m

etho

d ha

s be

en u

sed

for

STP

app

licat

ion

for e

mbe

dded

stru

ctur

es.

As

such

, the

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

re

view

thes

e co

ncer

ns a

nd a

sses

s th

e po

tent

ial i

mpa

ct o

n S

TP’s

sei

smic

ana

lysi

s.

See

Act

ion

Item

s 3.

7-37

& 3

.7-3

8S

ee A

ctio

n Ite

ms

3.7-

37 &

3.7

-38

70

Aud

it R

epor

t 3.8

D2

5. “T

he a

ccel

erat

ions

are

take

n fro

m th

e S

SI a

naly

sis

of th

e va

ult.

A re

fere

nce

is g

iven

in th

e re

port

from

whe

re th

e ac

cele

ratio

ns w

ere

take

n. A

s th

is in

form

atio

n w

as n

ot v

erifi

ed d

urin

g th

e au

dit,

the

staf

f pla

ns to

ver

ify th

e so

urce

an

d th

e ac

cele

ratio

n va

lues

dur

ing

the

next

aud

it.”

N/A

713.

7-37

Pro

vide

in a

n R

AI r

espo

nse

a pl

an to

reso

lve

the

issu

es re

late

d to

sub

tract

ion

met

hod

in S

AS

SI,

as d

escr

ibed

in th

e D

OE

lette

r. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 22

)S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

nTB

DTB

D

723.

7-38

Sub

sequ

ent t

o A

ctio

n Ite

m 3

.7-3

7, re

vise

the

resu

lts p

rese

nted

in C

OLA

as

nece

ssar

y. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 22

)S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

nTB

D S

18/

17/1

1

733.

7-39

Rev

ise

RW

B s

tabi

lity

calc

ulat

ion

cons

ider

ing

ampl

ified

mot

ion

at g

roun

d su

rface

and

re

vise

CO

LA a

s ne

cess

ary.

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

743.

8-26

Rev

ise

the

resp

onse

for I

mpo

rtanc

e Fa

ctor

use

d fo

r win

d lo

adin

g (R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

30

S1)

to s

tate

that

our

pos

ition

is d

evia

ting

from

SR

P 3

.3 g

uida

nce

base

d on

the

just

ifica

tion

prov

ided

in th

e R

AI r

espo

nse.

Als

o re

vise

the

Impo

rtanc

e Fa

ctor

from

1.

15 to

1.0

. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 14

)

S&

LP

. K. A

graw

al03

.08.

04-3

0 S3

6/20

/11

753.

8-27

Upd

ate

the

desi

gn p

aram

eter

s ta

ble

with

dam

ping

val

ues

for R

adw

aste

Bui

ldin

g D

esig

n, a

nd in

clud

e th

e ta

ble

in S

ectio

n 3.

8 of

CO

LA. (

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sues

13.

6 an

d 17

.6)

S&

LP

. K. A

graw

al03

.08.

04-3

0 S3

6/20

/11

763.

8-28

Exa

min

e am

plifi

ed in

put m

otio

n us

ed fo

r Ser

vice

Bui

ldin

g st

abili

ty e

valu

atio

n.S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

nS

ee A

ctio

n Ite

m

3.8-

27S

ee A

ctio

n Ite

m

3.8-

27

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

7 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

773.

8-29

Cla

rify

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

19 to

sta

te th

at th

e st

atic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

at th

e in

terfa

ce o

f mud

mat

and

soi

l will

not

exc

eed

0.75

. Als

o in

clud

e th

e re

quire

men

t for

ro

ughe

ning

the

conc

rete

sur

face

s in

the

CO

LA. (

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

16)

S&

LP

. K. A

graw

al03

.08.

04-1

9 S2

6/20

/11

783.

8-30

17.3

Pro

vide

mor

e le

gibl

e Fi

gure

s 3H

.6-1

38 a

nd 1

39 in

CO

LA. (

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

17.3

)S

&L

P. K

. Agr

awal

03.0

8.04

-30

S36/

20/1

1

793.

8-31

17.4

Add

in th

e FS

AR

that

the

Larg

e E

quip

men

t Acc

ess

Bui

ldin

g (L

EA

B) f

ound

atio

n w

ill b

e de

sign

ed s

uch

that

the

surc

harg

e on

the

DG

FOS

V lo

cate

d di

rect

ly e

ast o

f the

LE

AB

w

ill b

e ne

glig

ible

. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 17

.4)

S&

LP

. K. A

graw

al03

.07.

01-2

7 S4

7/8/

11

803.

8-32

17.1

The

CO

LA w

ill b

e re

vise

d to

refe

r to

Figu

res

3H.6

-212

thro

ugh

3H.6

-217

for R

SW

P

ipin

g Tu

nnel

des

ign.

(Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

17.1

)S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

n03

.07.

01-2

7 S4

7/8/

11

813.

8-33

17.5

Cla

rify

title

for F

igur

e 3H

.6-1

37 to

spe

cify

that

it is

app

licab

le to

Cat

egor

y I s

ite-s

peci

fic

stru

ctur

es (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 17

.5)

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

823.

8-34

12

Rev

ise

the

wav

e pr

opag

atio

n ca

lcul

atio

ns fo

r the

tunn

els

usin

g th

e fo

llow

ing:

1)

an

appa

rent

wav

e ve

loci

ty o

f 300

0 ft/

s2)

max

imum

gro

und

velo

city

bas

ed o

n si

te-s

peci

fic S

SE

max

imum

gro

und

acce

lera

tion

of 0

.13g

3)

a tr

iang

ular

pre

ssur

e di

strib

utio

n lim

ited

by th

e m

axim

um p

assi

ve p

ress

ure

Rev

ise

CO

LA to

refle

ct th

ese

chan

ges

also

.(C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 12

, AI 3

.8-2

3 an

d 3.

8-24

)

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

8.04

-30

S57/

18/1

1

833.

8-35

3 8P

rovi

de in

CO

LA th

e di

scus

sion

of s

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n fo

r eac

h st

ruct

ure

incl

udin

g a

disc

ussi

on o

f the

inpu

t mot

ion.

(C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

es 3

and

8)

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

843.

8-36

Ver

ify e

quiv

alen

t sta

tic lo

adin

g fo

r RS

W P

ipin

g Tu

nnel

and

Fue

l Oil

Tunn

el e

xcee

d th

at fr

om S

SI

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

853.

7-40

Pro

vide

resp

onse

to q

uest

ions

on

late

ral p

ress

ure

diag

ram

sS

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

nN

/AS

ee a

ctio

n ite

ms

3.7 -

42 a

nd 3

.7-4

4S

ee a

ctio

n ite

ms

3.7-

42 a

nd 3

.7-4

4

863.

7-41

Dis

cuss

the

effe

cts

of g

roun

dwat

er c

hang

e on

UH

S re

spon

ses

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

See

act

ion

item

3.

7-46

See

act

ion

item

3.

7-46

873.

7-42

Rev

ise

Figu

re 3

H.6

-219

to re

mov

e 2D

'Alo

ne' s

oil p

ress

ure

prof

ile. A

lso

revi

se th

e fig

ure

to p

rovi

de s

eism

ic p

ress

ure

prof

ile u

sed

for d

esig

n in

lieu

of s

tatic

+ d

ynam

ic.

Als

o ch

eck

othe

r fig

ures

for t

he s

ame

issu

es.

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.01

-27

S47/

8/11

883.

7-43

Add

the

fact

or o

f saf

ety

for f

loat

atio

n in

Tab

le 3

H.6

-14

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

7.02

-13

S37/

28/1

1

893.

7-44

Ver

ify th

at S

GH

's v

alid

atio

n fo

r SA

SS

I inc

lude

d ve

rific

atio

n fo

r soi

l pre

ssur

es a

nd

prov

ide

valid

atio

n fo

r NR

C re

view

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

N/A

N/A

903.

7-45

Turb

ine

Bui

ldin

g S

eism

ic C

alcu

latio

n, F

luor

cal

cula

tion

num

ber U

3-TB

-S-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-21

00 R

ev B

, sho

uld

be re

vise

d fo

r the

follo

win

g:1)

Ass

umpt

ion

1 on

she

et 9

of 2

88 s

houl

d be

cla

rifie

d to

cle

arly

des

crib

e ho

w m

ass

and

stiff

ness

es w

ere

deriv

ed fr

om d

iffer

ent T

urbi

ne B

uild

ing

mod

els

2) O

n sh

eet 8

of 2

88, c

orre

ct R

efer

ence

3 d

ocum

ent n

umbe

r fro

m U

3-TB

-S-C

ALC

-D

ES

N-2

001

to U

7-TB

-S-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-200

13)

Rev

ise

Sec

tion

5.15

to c

lear

ly d

escr

ibe

how

the

seis

mic

dem

and

was

det

erm

ined

. Fo

r exa

mpl

e, c

larif

y th

e st

atem

ent i

n th

e la

st p

arag

raph

of s

heet

250

"afte

r run

ning

th

e R

SA

sta

tic a

naly

sis

is th

en ru

n w

ith th

e R

SA

resu

lts to

det

erm

ine

the

base

she

ar".

Als

o de

scrib

e ho

w th

e R

ISA

anl

aysi

s w

as d

one

in 3

dire

ctio

ns a

nd h

ow th

e 3

dire

ctio

nal r

espo

nses

wer

e co

mbi

ned.

TAN

EJi

m F

isic

aro

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

8 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

913.

7-46

For g

roun

dwat

er re

solu

tion,

in a

dditi

on to

the

RA

I res

pons

e pr

ovid

ed, p

erfo

rm th

e fo

llow

ing:

1) U

se 2

8 ft

grou

ndw

ater

leve

l in

the

anal

ysis

bei

ng p

erfo

rmed

for D

OE

lette

r (A

I 3.7

-37

)2)

Rev

ise

the

CO

LA m

arku

p pr

ovid

ed in

the

prev

ious

RA

I res

pons

e 03

.07.

01-2

7 S

33)

Rev

ise

the

SS

I cal

cula

tions

to a

dd a

cla

rific

atio

n fo

r gro

undw

ater

leve

l

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

TBD

S1

8/17

/11

923.

8-37

For R

adw

aste

Bui

ldin

g, re

vise

the

CO

LA fo

r the

follo

win

g:--

Add

cla

rific

atio

n in

Sec

tion

3H.3

.5.1

, 2 a

nd 3

for s

eism

ic a

naly

sis

mod

els

(stic

k m

odel

for s

tabi

lity,

FE

M m

odel

for d

esig

n an

d II/

I) [C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 13

.1]

-- D

elet

e ve

rtica

l acc

eler

atio

ns fr

om T

able

3H

.3-1

[Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

13.1

]--

Rev

ise

Sec

tion

3H.3

.4.3

.4.2

to in

clud

e N

690

prov

isio

n fo

r she

ar a

llow

able

[C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 13

.3]

-- R

evis

e S

ectio

n 3H

.3.4

.2.1

to s

tate

that

bea

ring

pres

sure

cap

acity

is d

eter

min

ed

usin

g m

etho

dolo

gy d

escr

ibed

in C

OLA

Sec

tion

2.5S

.4 [C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 13

.4]

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

8.04

-18

S37/

28/1

1

933.

8-38

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

35 to

exp

lain

des

ign

in li

eu o

f fur

ther

ana

lysi

s fo

r eq

uiva

lent

bea

ring

pres

sure

.S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

n03

.08.

04-3

5 S1

6/30

/11

943.

8-39

Pro

vide

que

stio

ns o

n Tu

rbin

e B

uild

ing

and

Ser

vice

Bui

ldin

g st

abili

ty c

alcu

latio

ns b

y ab

out 1

0 a.

m. o

n 5/

26N

RC

Cha

krab

arti

See

Act

ion

Item

3.

7-45

See

Act

ion

Item

3.

7-45

953.

8-40

Dis

cuss

add

ition

al in

form

atio

n to

be

incl

uded

in C

OLA

for I

I/I e

valu

atio

ns o

f non

-se

ism

ic C

ate g

ory

I stru

ctur

es w

ith O

GC

NR

CTo

m T

aiN

/A

963.

8-41

Rev

ise

UH

S d

esig

n ca

lcul

atio

n to

use

N69

0-19

94 S

uppl

emen

t 2S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

n

U7-

UH

S-S-

CA

LC-D

ESN

-60

02U

7-YA

RD

-S-C

ALC

-DES

N-

6001

6/30

/11

973.

7-47

For S

ervi

ce B

uild

ing

stab

ility

cal

cula

tion

(U3-

SB

-S-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-210

0 R

ev. B

), ex

pand

Sec

tion

5.14

to fu

lly d

escr

ibe

how

the

seis

mic

ana

lysi

s w

as p

erfo

rmed

and

sp

ecifi

cally

add

ress

the

follo

win

g:1)

How

the

stic

k m

odel

mas

s an

d st

iffne

ss w

ere

calc

ulat

ed o

r pro

vide

a c

opy

of R

ef.

No.

23,

U3-

SB

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-2

001

Rev

. 0, "

Cal

cula

tion

of S

ervi

ce B

uild

ing

Mas

s an

d S

tiffn

ess

Mod

el" f

or re

view

.2)

RS

A d

etai

ls:

- 1.

mod

al c

ombi

natio

n m

etho

d -

2. c

ombi

natio

n of

3 d

irect

iona

l res

pons

esA

ttach

men

t 01

shee

ts 4

and

5 -

1. W

hat a

re m

odes

5 a

nd 6

with

freq

uenc

y >

3.0x

108

Hz?

Writ

e C

ondi

tion

Rep

ort t

o do

cum

ent r

espo

nse

and

track

cal

cula

tion

revi

sion

. See

A

ctio

n Ite

m 3

.8-4

0.

TAN

EJi

m F

isic

aro

983.

7-48

Cla

rify

CO

LA S

ectio

n 3H

.6.5

.3 to

spe

cify

that

UB

Bac

kfill

soi

l cas

e w

as u

sed

for

crac

ked

and

sepa

rate

d ca

ses

(Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

19)

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

03.0

8.04

-30

S36/

20/1

1

993.

7-49

Rev

ise

calc

ulat

ion

U7-

UH

S-C

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-6

007

to d

elet

e Ta

ble

3 (R

efer

ence

Mar

ch

2011

aud

it re

port)

S&

LJa

vad

Mos

lem

ian

U7-

UH

S-C

-CA

LC-D

ESN

-60

077/

28/1

1

100

Not

Use

dN

/AN

/A

101

3.8-

42R

evis

e th

e C

ontro

l Bui

ldin

g A

nnex

sta

bilit

y ev

alua

tion

to u

se A

SC

E 7

-05

inst

ead

of

AS

CE

7-8

8. A

lso

rem

ove

the

live

load

from

the

calc

ulat

ion

of th

e st

abili

zing

forc

e.S

&L

Java

d M

osle

mia

n03

.07.

02-1

3 S3

7/28

/11

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

9 of

17

May

31,

201

1

Punc

hLi

stIte

mA

I No.

Cl I

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Res

pons

ible

Eng

inee

rR

AI

Lette

r to

NR

CN

RC

Rev

iew

Punc

h Li

st fo

r Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

Sect

ions

3.7

& 3

.8

102

3.8-

43

Aud

it R

epor

t Sec

tion

3.8

I 8. C

alcu

latio

n no

. U7-

RS

W-S

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-6

001,

Rev

isio

n D

, “B

asic

Stru

ctur

al D

esig

n of

Rea

ctor

Ser

vice

Wat

er (R

SW

) Tun

nel”.

The

staf

f not

ed th

at s

ever

al a

reas

of d

esig

n of

the

tunn

el w

ere

not c

ompl

ete

at ti

me

of

the

audi

t, e.

g., g

loba

l tor

nado

mis

sile

impa

ct e

valu

atio

n fo

r the

acc

ess

regi

on o

f the

tu

nnel

, tun

nel w

alls

in th

e co

rner

regi

on, a

cces

s co

vers

, etc

.

Incl

ude

the

clos

ure

in th

e M

ay a

udit

repo

rt

NR

CC

hakr

abar

tiN

/A

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

10 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1

Inco

nsis

tenc

ies

wer

e no

ted

amon

g va

rious

Sec

tions

of t

he F

SA

R c

once

rnin

g th

e sp

ecifi

ed d

esig

n gr

ound

wat

er le

vel a

nd th

e gr

ound

wat

er le

vel u

sed

in th

e se

ism

ic a

naly

sis

for C

ateg

ory

I stru

ctur

es.

For e

xam

ple

in F

SA

R S

ectio

n 2.

4S.1

2.5,

it is

sta

ted

that

“In

sum

mar

y, b

ased

on

mea

sure

d gr

ound

wat

er le

vels

in

obse

rvat

ion

wel

ls a

nd m

odel

ed p

ost-c

onst

ruct

ion

grou

ndw

ater

leve

ls, t

he m

axim

um p

ost-c

onst

ruct

ion

grou

ndw

ater

ele

vatio

n at

the

STP

Uni

ts 3

and

4 s

ite is

es

timat

ed to

be

28 ft

MS

L, a

s re

flect

ed in

Tab

le 2

.0-2

. Th

e no

min

al fi

nish

ed p

lant

gra

de in

the

pow

er b

lock

are

a is

app

roxi

mat

ely

34 ft

MS

L, s

ix fe

et h

ighe

r th

an th

e si

te c

hara

cter

istic

max

imum

gro

undw

ater

leve

l.” A

ppen

dix

3H.6

.4.2

.2, D

esig

n G

roun

d W

ater

Lev

el, a

lso

spec

ified

gro

und

wat

er le

vel a

t 28

MS

L es

tabl

ishi

n g th

e de

pth

of w

ater

tabl

e at

six

feet

belo

w th

e gr

ade.

H

owev

er, i

n S

ectio

n 3A

.15,

Site

Con

ditio

ns, i

t is

stat

ed th

at “

Bas

ed o

n th

e si

te g

roun

dwat

er c

ondi

tions

des

crib

ed in

FS

AR

Sub

sect

ion

2.4S

.12,

the

grou

ndw

ater

ele

vatio

n of

app

roxi

mat

ely

eigh

t fee

t be

low

gra

de w

as u

sed

in th

e an

alys

is to

det

erm

ine

the

soil

prop

ertie

s.”

It is

als

o no

ted

that

SS

I mod

el fo

r th

e se

ism

ic a

naly

sis

of C

ateg

ory

I stru

ctur

es c

onsi

dere

d th

e gr

ound

wat

er ta

ble

to b

e ap

prox

imat

ely

at e

ight

feet

bel

ow th

e gr

ade

elev

atio

n. A

s su

ch, t

he

appl

ican

t is

requ

este

d to

add

ress

thes

e in

cons

iste

ncie

s am

ong

vario

us s

ectio

ns o

f the

FS

AR

and

the

seis

mic

ana

lysi

s m

odel

and

revi

se th

e ap

plic

able

FS

AR

se

ctio

ns o

n gr

ound

wat

er le

vel a

nd s

truct

ural

des

ign

crite

ria.

The

appl

ican

t is

spec

ifica

lly re

ques

ted

to d

emon

stra

te th

at th

e FI

RS

, GM

RS

, and

the

resu

lts o

f se

ism

ic a

naly

sis

of th

e C

ateg

ory

I stru

ctur

es in

clud

ing

the

resu

lts o

f sta

bilit

y ca

lcul

atio

ns a

s cu

rren

tly e

stab

lishe

d in

the

CO

LA a

re n

ot a

dver

sely

affe

cted

and

in

clud

e th

is ju

stifi

catio

n in

the

appl

icab

le F

SA

R s

ectio

ns.

Rev

iew

of r

espo

nses

to R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

27, S

uppl

emen

ts 1

, Rev

isio

n 1

indi

cate

s th

at tw

o 2D

SS

SI m

odel

s (E

ast-W

est a

nd N

orth

-Sou

th S

ectio

ns) a

re a

naly

zed

to e

valu

ate

the

effe

cts

of n

earb

y st

ruct

ures

on

the

thre

e D

GFO

SV

s an

d ca

lcul

ate

the

seis

mic

soi

l pre

ssur

es. I

n th

e E

ast-W

est d

irect

ion

2-D

SS

SI D

GFO

SV

m

odel

(DG

FOT

1C +

DG

FOS

V 1

A +

CFR

W),

five

case

s of

soi

l and

bac

kfill

pro

perti

es a

re c

onsi

dere

d to

eva

luat

e th

e ef

fect

s of

the

soil

and

back

fill p

rope

rties

va

riatio

n. A

lso

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

27, S

uppl

emen

t 2, R

evis

ion

2 in

dica

tes

that

in th

e E

ast-W

est d

irect

ion

for D

GFO

T 1A

(RB

+ D

GFO

T 1A

+ C

FRW

), fiv

e ca

ses

are

run

with

var

ious

com

bina

tions

of s

oil a

nd b

ackf

ill p

rope

rties

. H

owev

er, i

n th

e N

orth

-Sou

th d

irect

ion

(UH

S/R

SWPH

+ R

SW T

unne

l + D

GFO

SV

1B +

DG

FOSV

1C

+ R

B),

only

one

cas

e w

as ru

n w

ith U

B s

oil p

rope

rties

.A

lso

as d

iscu

ssed

in re

spon

se to

RA

I 03.

07.0

2-24

, Sup

plem

ent 1

, Rev

isio

n 1,

in th

e E

ast-W

est d

irect

ion

for d

ynam

ic s

oil p

ress

ure

eval

uatio

n fo

r RS

W

Tunn

el a

nd R

WB

wal

ls, t

he 2

D S

SS

I mod

el (

RB

+ R

SW T

unne

l + R

WB

) inc

lude

d on

ly th

e U

B in

situ

soi

l with

out a

ny e

valu

atio

n fo

r bac

kfill

pro

perti

es.

As

such

, the

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

dem

onst

rate

that

con

side

ratio

n of

onl

y U

B s

oil p

rofil

e in

stea

d of

usi

ng a

com

bina

tion

of U

B s

oil a

nd b

ackf

ill p

aram

eter

s fo

r th

e ci

ted

case

s w

ill s

till b

e co

nser

vativ

e fo

r the

wal

l des

ign

of a

ll si

te s

peci

fic C

ateg

ory

I and

RW

B s

truct

ures

(UH

S/R

SW

PH

, DG

FOS

V, R

SW

Tun

nel,

UH

S/a

nd R

WB

). T

he a

pplic

ant i

s al

so re

ques

ted

to in

clud

e th

is e

valu

atio

n in

the

appl

icab

le s

ectio

ns o

f the

FS

AR

.

It is

not

cle

ar fr

om th

e de

scrip

tions

in th

e FS

AR

as

to h

ow th

e se

ism

ic d

eman

d is

det

erm

ined

for t

he s

ite-s

peci

fic s

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n of

the

non-

seis

mic

II/I

stru

ctur

es c

onsi

derin

g th

e in

fluen

ce o

f nea

rby

heav

y st

ruct

ures

dur

ing

SS

E.

As

such

, the

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

des

crib

e in

suf

ficie

nt d

etai

l in

the

FSA

R

the

follo

win

g in

form

atio

n:

1.H

ow th

e in

put m

otio

n at

the

foun

datio

n le

vel o

f the

non

-sei

smic

II/I

stru

ctur

es a

re d

eter

min

ed u

sing

the

site

spe

cific

SS

E in

put s

pect

ra a

pplie

d at

the

grou

nd s

urfa

ce2.

How

the

effe

cts

of n

earb

y he

avy

stru

ctur

es a

re in

clud

ed in

the

inpu

t res

pons

e sp

ectra

for v

ario

us s

oil a

nd b

ackf

ill c

ondi

tions

3.D

emon

stra

te th

at h

oriz

onta

l inp

ut re

spon

se s

pect

ra a

t the

foun

datio

n le

vel o

f non

-sei

smic

II/I

stru

ctur

es is

bro

ad b

and

spec

tra w

ith p

eak

acce

lera

tion

grea

ter t

han

0.1g

and

env

elop

s FI

RS

4.Ty

pes

of s

eism

ic a

naly

sis

perfo

rmed

to d

eter

min

e se

ism

ic d

eman

d fo

r sta

bilit

y ev

alua

tion

(i.e.

, fix

ed b

ase

anal

ysis

, equ

ival

ent s

tatic

or d

ynam

ic a

naly

sis,

or

SS

I ana

lysi

s) a

nd h

ow th

e in

put i

s sp

ecifi

ed in

the

anal

ysis

5.

Incl

ude

5% d

ampe

d in

put r

espo

nse

spec

tra (v

ertic

al a

nd h

oriz

onta

l) as

am

plifi

ed b

y th

e pr

esen

ce o

f nea

rby

heav

y st

ruct

ures

use

d in

the

seis

mic

dem

and

eval

uatio

n fo

r site

-spe

cific

sta

bilit

y an

alys

is fo

r non

-sei

smic

II/I

stru

ctur

esD

iscu

ss o

r ref

er to

app

ropr

iate

FS

AR

sec

tion

of a

ny d

iffer

ence

s in

the

met

hod

of s

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n fro

m th

at o

f Cat

egor

y 1

stru

ctur

es

Des

igna

te w

heth

er th

e fri

ctio

n co

effic

ient

s re

porte

d in

Tab

le 3

H.6

-14

are

stat

ic o

r dyn

amic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

valu

es.

Issu

e 1

[Rec

eive

d 04

/04/

2011

] (A

udit

Act

ion

3.7-

7): R

evis

e A

ppen

dix

3A a

nd 3

H.6

to re

conc

ile g

roun

d w

ater

ele

vatio

n w

ith C

hapt

er 2

Issu

e 2

[Rec

eive

d 04

/04/

2011

] (A

udit

Act

ion

3.7-

6/3.

7-8/

3.7-

36):

Why

for S

SS

I of R

SW

Tun

nel w

as U

B in

situ

use

d vs

. UB

bac

kfill

soi

l?

Issu

e 3:

[R

ecei

ved

04/0

4/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

lear

ly d

escr

ibin

g in

the

FSA

R h

ow s

eism

ic d

eman

d fo

r non

-sei

smic

II/I

stru

ctur

es fo

r sta

bilit

y ev

alua

tion

is

Issu

e 4:

[Rec

eive

d 04

/04/

2011

] (A

udit

Act

ion

Item

3.8

-8) S

lidin

g Fr

ictio

n C

oeffi

cien

ts re

porte

d in

Tab

le 3

H.6

-14

Sout

h Te

xas

Proj

ect U

nits

3 &

4C

larif

icat

ions

from

NR

C

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

11 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1So

uth

Texa

s Pr

ojec

t Uni

ts 3

& 4

Cla

rific

atio

ns fr

om N

RC

Sec

tion

3H.6

.6.5

refe

rs to

Tab

le 3

H.6

-5 fo

r fac

tors

of s

afet

y ag

ains

t slid

ing

and

over

turn

ing

for R

SW

pip

ing

tunn

el.

How

ever

, Tab

le 3

H.6

-5 p

rovi

des

valu

es

for R

SW

pum

p ho

use.

Ple

ase

verif

y th

e ac

cept

abili

ty o

f thi

s re

fere

nce

Tabl

e.

In re

view

ing

the

SG

H S

AS

SI2

000

V&

V o

f the

sub

tract

ion

met

hod,

it w

as fo

und

that

the

test

pro

blem

s (S

AS

-3C

, SA

S-4

C a

nd S

AS

-8) a

re n

ot a

naly

zed

to

suffi

cien

tly h

igh

enou

gh fr

eque

ncie

s th

at c

an v

alid

ate

the

stab

ility

and

acc

urac

y of

the

subt

ract

ion

met

hod

for p

assi

ng fr

eque

ncy

of V

s/5h,

whe

re V

s is

the

low

est s

hear

wav

e ve

loci

ty o

f the

foun

datio

n m

edia

and

h is

the

larg

est e

lem

ent s

ize

in th

e so

il m

odel

.

In th

e ca

se o

f S&

L S

AS

SI2

000

V&

V T

est p

robl

ems

4 an

d 8

used

in v

alid

atio

n of

the

subt

ract

ion

met

hod,

the

anal

yses

wer

e ca

rrie

d ou

t to

suffi

cien

tly h

igh

frequ

enci

es to

cov

er th

e pa

ssin

g fre

quen

cy re

quire

men

t of V

s/5h.

How

ever

, the

con

clus

ion

does

not

add

ress

the

stab

ility

and

acc

urac

y of

the

subt

ract

ion

met

hod

used

in th

e co

ntex

t of t

he c

alcu

late

d re

sults

.

In b

oth

case

s, th

e ap

plic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to re

visi

t the

test

pro

blem

s an

d pr

ovid

e va

lidat

ion

that

ade

quat

ely

addr

esse

s th

e st

abili

ty a

nd a

ccur

acy

of th

e su

btra

ctio

n m

etho

d in

rela

tion

to th

e ac

cept

able

pas

sing

freq

uenc

y of

Vs/5

h us

ed in

the

STP

3&

4 de

sign

.

The

resp

onse

to R

AI.0

3.07

.02-

29, R

ev. 1

, doc

umen

ts a

dditi

onal

val

idat

ion

prob

lem

s fo

r SA

P 2

000.

The

val

idat

ions

incl

ude:

1)S

ectio

n cu

ts2)

Thic

k sh

ell o

ut-o

f-pla

ne re

spon

se3)

Tim

e hi

stor

y m

odal

sup

erpo

sitio

n w

ith s

hell

elem

ents

4)S

pect

ra c

alcu

latio

n us

ing

thic

k sh

ell e

lem

ents

Val

idat

ion

of it

em “1

” was

don

e by

han

d ca

lcul

atio

n. F

or it

ems

“2”,

“3” a

nd “4

”, th

e be

nchm

ark

solu

tions

for v

alid

atio

n w

ere

deve

lope

d w

ith A

NS

YS

util

izin

g “S

HE

LL43

“ele

men

t, w

hich

is w

ell s

uite

d to

mod

el li

near

, war

ped,

mod

erat

ely-

thic

k sh

ell s

truct

ures

acc

ordi

ng to

AN

SY

S U

ser’s

Man

ual.

For

item

s “2

”, “3

” and

“4

”, th

e fo

llow

ing

acce

ptan

ce c

riter

ia w

ere

used

: 5%

for f

requ

enci

es, 1

0% fo

r for

ces,

and

15%

for s

pect

ra.

The

5% d

iffer

ence

is c

onsi

dere

d ac

cept

able

w

ithin

the

engi

neer

ing

accu

racy

, whi

le th

e 10

% a

nd 1

5% c

riter

ia m

ay b

e ex

cess

ive.

The

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

ass

ess

the

impa

ct o

f the

abo

ve a

ccep

tanc

e cr

iteria

on

the

STP

3&

4 de

sign

.

Issu

e 5:

[Rec

eive

d 04

/04/

2011

] (A

udit

Act

ion

Item

3.8

-8) R

efer

enci

ng T

able

3H

.6-5

Issu

e 6:

[Rec

eive

d 04

/04/

2011

] (A

udit

Act

ion

Item

3.7

-28)

SA

SS

I200

0 S

ubtra

ctio

n M

etho

d V

alid

atio

n

Issu

e 7:

[R

ecei

ved

04/0

4/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] S

AP

2000

V&

V

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

12 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1So

uth

Texa

s Pr

ojec

t Uni

ts 3

& 4

Cla

rific

atio

ns fr

om N

RC

A b

rief p

rese

ntat

ion

of th

e st

abili

ty a

naly

sis

proc

edur

e w

as m

ade

by th

e ap

plic

ant d

urin

g th

e M

arch

14,

201

1 au

dit.

The

pre

sent

atio

n in

clud

ed a

rigi

d bo

dy

diag

ram

sho

win

g th

e fo

rces

act

ing

on th

e st

ruct

ure

for s

tabi

lity

calc

ulat

ions

. The

app

lican

t ind

icat

ed th

at th

e to

tal s

eism

ic d

eman

d is

cal

cula

ted

by s

umm

ing

all t

he in

ertia

forc

es a

nd m

omen

ts a

ctin

g on

the

stru

ctur

e. T

hese

iner

tia fo

rces

are

cal

cula

ted

by m

ultip

lyin

g th

e m

ass

of e

ach

node

by

the

abso

lute

val

ue o

f th

e m

axim

um a

ccel

erat

ion

resp

onse

at t

hat n

ode

obta

ined

from

the

SS

I ana

lysi

s.Th

e ca

lcul

atio

n of

the

seis

mic

ove

rturn

ing

mom

ent i

s ba

sed

on th

e ho

rizon

tal s

eism

ic lo

ad E

and

ver

tical

sei

smic

load

Ev

abou

t tip

ping

poi

nt A

, as

show

n in

th

e fig

ure

belo

w.

The

mom

ent d

ue to

hor

izon

tal e

arth

quak

e do

es n

ot in

clud

e E

v-H

(ver

tical

forc

e du

e to

hor

izon

tal i

nput

) whi

ch a

lso

prod

uces

ove

rturn

ing

mom

ent a

bout

A.

The

appl

ican

t is

requ

este

d to

pro

vide

just

ifica

tion

for n

ot in

clud

ing

the

verti

cal c

ompo

nent

of r

espo

nse

due

to h

oriz

onta

l sei

smic

inpu

t in

calc

ulat

ing

the

foun

datio

n ov

ertu

rnin

g m

omen

t.

E –

Hor

izon

tal s

eism

ic fo

rce

Ev –

Ver

tical

sei

smic

forc

eE

s – S

oil a

ctiv

e fo

rce

Ep –

Soi

l pas

sive

resi

stan

ceD

– 0

.9 o

f dea

d lo

adF b

– B

uoya

ncy

forc

eF r

–

Fric

tiona

l res

ista

nce

In D

GFO

SV

cal

cuat

ion

for S

SI a

naly

sis,

U7-

YA

RD

-C-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-600

1, R

ev. B

, the

refin

ed m

odel

spe

ctra

val

ues

are

14.6

% h

ighe

r at 3

.8 H

z. th

an th

ose

in

the

base

mod

el.

The

appl

ican

t is

requ

este

d to

pro

vide

just

ifica

tion

for r

econ

cilin

g th

is d

iffer

ence

.

Issu

e 8:

[Rec

eive

d 04

/04/

2011

] (A

udit

Act

ion

Item

3.7

-33

and

35)S

tabi

lity

Ana

lysi

s P

roce

dure

Issu

e 9:

[R

ecei

ved

04/1

3/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] D

GFO

SV

Cal

cula

tion

U7-

YA

RD

-C-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-600

1, R

ev. B

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

13 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1So

uth

Texa

s Pr

ojec

t Uni

ts 3

& 4

Cla

rific

atio

ns fr

om N

RC

The

seis

mic

des

ign

of th

e D

GFO

SV

is p

erfo

rmed

with

equ

ival

ent s

tatic

forc

es, w

here

by th

e in

ertia

l for

ces

are

com

pute

d as

pro

duct

s of

mas

ses

and

acce

lera

tions

. The

acc

eler

atio

ns a

re ta

ken

from

the

corr

espo

ndin

g S

SI a

naly

ses

as to

env

elop

e al

l soi

l con

ditio

ns, d

esig

n pa

ram

eter

s, a

nd s

eism

ic in

put

mot

ions

. The

mas

ses

are

dete

rmin

ed fo

rm th

e bu

ildin

g dr

awin

gs a

nd s

peci

fic w

eigh

ts fo

r con

cret

e, o

il, s

teel

and

soi

l. Th

e S

AP

stru

ctur

al m

odel

is d

ivid

ed in

to

regi

ons,

and

con

stan

t ave

rage

acc

eler

atio

n va

lues

are

app

lied

to e

ach

regi

on, s

imul

atin

g th

e ab

solu

te a

ccel

erat

ion

dist

ribut

ion

of th

e S

SI m

odel

. The

se

iner

tial f

orce

s ar

e ap

plie

d in

glo

bal X

, Y a

nd Z

dire

ctio

n as

ext

erna

l sta

tic lo

adin

g to

the

node

s an

d el

emen

ts o

f the

SA

P m

odel

. The

resp

onse

qua

ntiti

es, i

.e.

inte

rnal

forc

es, d

ispl

acem

ents

, etc

., re

sulti

ng fr

om e

ach

earth

quak

e co

mpo

nent

are

com

bine

d by

the

SR

SS

rule

. As

a ve

rific

atio

n of

the

equi

vale

nt s

tatic

pr

oced

ure,

the

resu

ltant

bas

e sh

ear,

tota

l ver

tical

bas

e fo

rce

and

over

turn

ing

mom

ents

obt

aine

d fro

m th

e S

AP

mod

el a

re c

ompa

red

to th

e co

rres

pond

ing

valu

es o

f the

SS

I (S

AS

SI)

mod

el. I

f req

uire

d, a

djus

tmen

t fac

tors

are

app

lied

to th

e in

put a

ccel

erat

ion

com

pone

nts

in S

AP

as

to p

rovi

de

base

forc

es a

nd m

omen

ts w

hich

env

elop

e th

e co

rres

pond

ing

SS

I bas

e va

lues

. The

max

imum

resu

ltant

SS

I abs

olut

e ac

cele

ratio

n va

lues

are

app

roxi

mat

ely:

X

=0.3

1g; Y

=0.3

1g a

nd Z

=0.3

3g. T

he e

quiv

alen

t hor

izon

tal a

ccel

erat

ion

valu

es o

btai

ned

from

the

SA

P a

naly

sis

are:

X=0

.33g

and

Y=0

.32g

and

ther

efor

e m

atch

clo

sely

the

SS

I acc

eler

atio

ns. T

he e

quiv

alen

t ver

tical

acc

eler

atio

n in

the

SA

P a

naly

sis

how

ever

, had

to b

e am

plifi

ed b

y a

fact

or o

f abo

ut 1

.27

to y

ield

Z=

0.42

g, in

ord

er to

mee

t the

tota

l bas

e fo

rces

and

mom

ents

from

the

SS

I ana

lysi

s. A

s bo

th, t

he S

AS

SI a

nd th

e S

AP

mod

els,

sho

uld

be b

ased

on

the

sam

e ge

omet

ry a

nd to

tal w

eigh

t and

are

sub

ject

to th

e sa

me

abso

lute

acc

eler

atio

ns, i

t is

not a

ppar

ent w

hy a

n ad

ditio

nal,

rela

tivel

y la

rge

ampl

ifica

tion

wou

ld b

e ne

eded

in v

ertic

al d

irect

ion

to o

btai

n co

mpa

rabl

e to

tal b

ase

seis

mic

load

s. T

here

fore

, the

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

pro

vide

a ju

stifi

catio

n re

gard

ing

the

diffe

rent

beh

avio

r of b

oth

stru

ctur

al m

odel

s.

Late

ral s

lidin

g st

abili

ty a

gain

st s

eism

ic lo

ads

is b

ased

on

soil

resi

stan

ce a

t the

foun

datio

n-so

il in

terfa

ce (f

rictio

n/ c

ohes

ion)

, and

on

late

ral e

arth

pre

ssur

es

actin

g on

the

embe

dded

bas

emen

t wal

ls. B

ased

on

anal

yses

and

test

ing,

dyn

amic

fric

tion

and

cohe

sion

val

ues

are

typi

cally

low

er th

an th

e co

rres

pond

ing

stat

ic v

alue

s. T

hus,

for t

he S

TP u

nits

, sta

tic c

ohes

ion

valu

es a

re re

duce

d 20

% to

acc

ount

for d

ynam

ic s

oil b

ehav

ior.

The

appl

ican

t’s ju

stifi

catio

n fo

r thi

s re

duct

ion

is b

ased

on

a pu

blic

atio

n by

Mak

disi

and

See

d fro

m J

uly

1978

, whi

ch s

tate

s th

at in

mos

t cas

es c

yclic

yie

ld s

treng

th o

f cla

yey

mat

eria

l app

ears

to b

e 80

% o

f the

sta

tic u

ndra

ined

stre

ngth

for t

ypic

al s

hear

stra

ins

obta

ined

from

ear

thqu

ake

soil

resp

onse

ana

lyse

s. A

ccor

ding

to th

e ab

ove

refe

renc

e, th

e dy

nam

ic re

duct

ion

of c

ohes

ion

stre

ngth

is s

how

n to

be

sign

ifica

ntly

affe

cted

by

the

stra

in le

vel p

rese

nt in

the

soil

laye

rs d

urin

g a

seis

mic

eve

nt. T

here

fore

, the

ap

plic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to p

rovi

de a

com

paris

on b

etw

een

the

stra

in ra

nges

ass

umed

in th

e ab

ove

refe

renc

e an

d th

e st

rain

val

ues

expe

cted

ben

eath

the

foun

datio

n of

Cat

I bu

ildin

gs o

f Uni

ts 3

&4.

App

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

exp

lain

the

appa

rent

dis

crep

ancy

with

the

3,00

0 ft/

sec

shee

r wav

e ve

loci

ty d

enot

ed in

the

CO

LA a

nd a

val

ue o

f 6,6

00 ft

/sec

use

d fo

r th

e w

ave

prop

ogat

ion

effe

ct in

the

calc

ulat

ions

.

Issu

e 11

: [R

ecei

ved

04/1

3/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] M

AC

TEC

Pre

sent

atio

n on

Fric

tion

and

Coh

esio

n V

alue

s us

ed in

Sta

bilit

y E

valu

atio

n of

R/B

Issu

e 10

: [R

ecei

ved

04/1

3/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] (

Issu

e 1

(New

)): C

alc

Rep

ort,

U7-

YA

RD

-S-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-600

1, R

ev. E

: “B

asic

Stru

ctur

al D

esig

n of

Die

sel G

ener

ator

Issu

e 12

: [R

ecei

ved

04/2

0/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] (

Act

ion

Item

3.8

-24)

RS

W T

unne

l Cal

cula

tions

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

14 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1So

uth

Texa

s Pr

ojec

t Uni

ts 3

& 4

Cla

rific

atio

ns fr

om N

RC

1. D

esig

n an

d A

naly

sis

( 3H

.3.5

.1 &

2)

Thes

e se

ctio

ns d

escr

ibe

the

seis

mic

and

stru

ctur

al a

naly

sis

of th

e R

W/B

, whe

reby

the

seis

mic

resp

onse

acc

eler

atio

ns a

re o

btai

ned

from

a fi

xed

base

stic

k m

odel

sub

ject

ed to

a 0

.15

RG

1.6

0 in

put g

roun

d m

otio

n sp

ectru

m. T

hese

acc

eler

atio

ns s

ubse

quen

tly a

re a

pplie

d to

a re

fined

3D

SA

P F

E m

odel

. The

ap

plic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to e

xpla

in w

hy u

sing

a fi

xed

base

mod

el w

as c

onsi

dere

d ad

equa

te.

Furth

erm

ore,

it is

not

cle

ar w

hat t

ype

of S

AP

ana

lysi

s w

as

perfo

rmed

and

how

the

resu

lts fr

om th

e se

ism

ic s

tick

mod

el a

naly

sis

wer

e ap

plie

d to

the

3D fi

nite

ele

men

t mod

el. C

larif

icat

ion

shou

ld b

e gi

ven

as to

how

lo

cal a

mpl

ifica

tion

effe

cts,

i.e.

of s

labs

and

wal

ls a

re c

onsi

dere

d in

the

desi

gn. I

n a

prev

ious

resp

onse

the

appl

ican

t sta

ted

that

the

influ

ence

of n

earb

y he

avy

build

ings

, i.e

. R/B

, on

the

seis

mic

inpu

t mot

ion

was

con

side

red.

The

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

incl

ude

in th

e FS

AR

how

the

effe

ct o

f the

adj

acen

t R/B

w

as c

onsi

dere

d in

the

inpu

t mot

ion

for t

he R

W/B

, and

to in

clud

e th

e in

put g

roun

d sp

ectra

for t

he a

ppro

pria

te d

ampi

ng u

sed

in d

esig

n of

the

RW

/B.

FSA

R T

able

3H

.3-1

pro

vide

s ve

rtica

l acc

eler

atio

ns fo

r the

RW

B a

t thr

ee fl

oor e

leva

tions

. It

is n

ot c

lear

why

hor

izon

tal a

ccel

erat

ions

are

not

incl

uded

in th

e FS

AR

. P

leas

e in

clud

e th

e ho

rizon

tal a

ccel

erat

ions

for t

he R

WB

in th

e FS

AR

.

2. II

/I A

naly

sis

and

desi

gn (3

H.3

.5.3

)FS

AR

Sec

tion

3H.3

.5.3

sta

tes

that

for I

I/I d

esig

n, th

e st

ruct

ure

is c

onse

rvat

ivel

y de

sign

ed to

rem

ain

elas

tic.

The

earth

quak

e in

put u

sed

at th

e fo

unda

tion

leve

l is

the

enve

lope

of 0

.3g

RG

1.6

0 re

spon

se s

pect

rum

and

the

indu

ced

acce

lera

tion

resp

onse

spe

ctru

m d

ue to

site

-spe

cific

SS

E.

How

ever

, the

FS

AR

do

es n

ot d

escr

ibe

how

the

seis

mic

ana

lysi

s an

d de

sign

is p

erfo

rmed

usi

ng th

e se

ism

ic in

put m

otio

n. P

leas

e de

scrib

e in

the

FSA

R h

ow s

eism

ic a

naly

sis

and

desi

gn is

per

form

ed fo

r the

RW

B fo

r II/I

des

ign.

3. L

oad

Com

bina

tion

for S

hear

(Ste

el) (

3H.3

.4.3

.4.2

)FS

AR

Sec

tion

3H.3

.4.3

.4.2

pro

vide

s lo

ad c

ombi

natio

ns fo

r stru

ctur

al s

teel

des

ign

for R

WB

. Th

e si

xth

load

com

bina

tion

has

a s

tress

coe

ffici

ent o

f 1.6

. A

ccor

ding

to A

NS

I/AIS

C N

690-

1994

(R20

04),

Sup

plem

ent 2

, Tab

le Q

1.5.

7.1,

Not

e g,

the

stre

ss li

mit

coef

ficie

nt in

she

ar s

hall

not e

xcee

d 1.

4 in

mem

bers

an

d bo

lts.

The

a ppl

ican

t is

requ

este

d to

not

e th

e ab

ove

limita

tion

in th

e FS

AR

.4.

Ulti

mat

e so

il be

arin

g ca

paci

ty (3

H.3

.4.2

.1)

This

sec

tion

show

s st

atic

and

dyn

amic

ulti

mat

e so

il be

arin

g ca

paci

ties

for t

he R

W/B

. The

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

sta

te in

the

FSA

R h

ow th

ese

valu

es w

ere

deriv

ed.

5. T

orna

do P

aram

eter

s (3

H.3

.B &

3H

.3.4

.3.3

.1)

Thes

e se

ctio

ns s

how

diff

eren

t par

amet

ers

to d

efin

e to

rnad

o lo

ads

whi

ch d

epen

d on

the

desi

gn g

oal.

The

Des

ign

Info

rmat

ion

Tabl

e pr

ovid

ed a

t the

Mar

20

11 A

udit

Mee

ting

diffe

rs fr

om th

e de

finiti

ons

in th

e FS

AR

text

and

pro

vide

s sp

ecifi

c de

sign

par

amet

ers

for t

hree

diff

eren

t situ

atio

ns: m

ain

desi

gn o

f the

st

ruct

ure,

sta

bilit

y an

alys

is a

nd II

/I de

sign

. The

app

lican

t is

requ

este

d to

reco

ncile

the

info

rmat

ion

in th

e FS

AR

text

with

the

cont

ents

of t

he D

esig

n In

form

atio

n Ta

ble,

and

to m

ake

refe

renc

e to

the

tabl

e if

it sh

ould

be

inco

rpor

ated

in th

e FS

AR

.

6. F

lood

Des

ign

(3H

.3.4

.2.3

)Th

is s

ectio

n de

fines

the

DB

F as

33

ft M

SL

and

is ta

ken

to c

orre

spon

d to

the

DC

D d

esig

n pa

ram

eter

for f

lood

ing

(one

ft b

elow

gra

de).

The

Des

ign

Info

rmat

ion

Tabl

e di

ffers

from

the

defin

ition

s in

the

FSA

R te

xt a

nd p

rovi

des

spec

ific

desi

gn p

aram

eter

s fo

r thr

ee d

iffer

ent s

ituat

ions

: mai

n de

sign

of t

he

stru

ctur

e, s

tabi

lity

anal

ysis

and

II/I

desi

gn. T

he a

pplic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to re

conc

ile th

e in

form

atio

n in

the

FSA

R te

xt w

ith th

e co

nten

ts o

f the

Des

ign

Info

rmat

ion

Tabl

e, a

nd to

mak

e re

fere

nce

to th

e ta

ble

if it

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

the

FSA

R.

Issu

e 13

: [R

ecei

ved

05/0

4/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-18

R1

S2

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

15 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1So

uth

Texa

s Pr

ojec

t Uni

ts 3

& 4

Cla

rific

atio

ns fr

om N

RC

7. E

xtre

me

win

d an

d to

rnad

o lo

adin

g (3

H.6

.4.3

.2)

In it

s re

spon

se to

this

RA

I the

app

lican

t use

s C

riter

ion

4 of

SR

P 3

.3.1

to ju

stify

50

year

win

d ve

loci

ty in

the

win

d pr

essu

re e

quat

ion.

How

ever

the

staf

f not

es

that

Crit

erio

n 4

just

mea

ns th

at u

sing

tabl

e C

6-7

of A

SC

E 7

is a

ccep

tabl

e to

con

vert

50 y

ear i

nto

100

year

MR

I and

doe

s no

t ref

er to

the

impo

rtanc

e fa

ctor

, an

d th

at th

eref

ore

the

proc

edur

e is

not

con

sist

ent w

ith S

RP

3.3

.1, w

hich

requ

ires

a 10

0 ye

ar w

ind

in a

dditi

on to

the

impo

rtanc

e fa

ctor

of 1

.15.

Thi

s ap

proa

ch

was

als

o co

nfirm

ed d

urin

g th

e re

view

of F

SA

R s

ectio

n 3.

3.1.

In li

ght o

f rec

orde

d hu

rric

ane

velo

citie

s ex

ceed

ing

134

mph

at t

he s

ite, t

he s

taff

need

s to

fu

rther

eva

luat

e th

is d

evia

tion

from

the

SR

P re

quire

men

ts. T

he s

taff

also

not

ed th

at th

e S

RP

3.3

.2 d

esig

n re

quire

men

ts a

re m

et fo

r tor

nado

load

ings

(in

clud

ing

the

impo

rtanc

e fa

ctor

of 1

.15)

, and

that

the

torn

ado

desi

gn th

us fo

llow

s th

e S

RP

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

8. F

ound

atio

n be

arin

g pr

essu

res

reco

ncili

atio

nIn

its

resp

onse

to th

is R

AI t

he a

pplic

ant s

tate

s th

at th

e sl

ab e

dges

hav

e to

be

fixed

in o

rder

to p

erfo

rm th

e ve

rific

atio

n an

alys

is. T

he a

pplic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to

expl

ain

this

app

roac

h, e

spec

ially

if b

ound

ary

cond

ition

s w

hich

do

not r

efle

ct re

al c

ondi

tions

are

goi

ng to

be

intro

duce

d in

the

anal

ysis

. All

poss

ible

load

ec

cent

riciti

es (p

lus

/ min

us c

ompo

nent

s) n

eed

to b

e ve

rifie

d. J

ustif

icat

ion

is n

eede

d to

bas

e th

e ve

rific

atio

n on

onl

y on

e lo

ad c

ombi

natio

n (w

ith th

e lo

wes

t sa

fety

fact

or).

9. C

oeffi

cien

t of F

rictio

nIn

its

resp

onse

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-19

, Sup

plem

ent 1

, dat

ed A

pril

25, 2

011,

the

appl

ican

t add

ress

ed th

e is

sue

of c

oeffi

cien

t of f

rictio

n ra

ised

in a

udit

item

3.8

-8.

The

appl

ican

t rev

ised

the

site

-spe

cific

ITA

AC

to re

quire

the

wat

erpr

oofin

g m

embr

ane

to h

ave

a m

inim

um s

tatic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

of 0

.75,

and

als

o pr

ovid

ed a

Tab

le th

at s

peci

fies

that

the

conc

rete

to c

oncr

ete

inte

rface

join

ts w

ill b

e in

tent

iona

lly ro

ughe

ned

to h

ave

a m

inim

um s

tatic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

of

0.75

. H

owev

er, t

he a

pplic

ant d

id n

ot e

xpla

in h

ow th

e sp

ecifi

ed m

inim

um s

tatic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

at th

e va

rious

inte

rface

s, s

peci

fical

ly a

t the

w

ater

proo

fing

mem

bran

e, w

as c

ompa

red

with

the

dyna

mic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

of 0

.47

assu

med

for s

oil,

and

cons

ider

ed a

ccep

tabl

e. A

lso,

the

requ

irem

ent

of in

tent

iona

lly ro

ughe

ning

the

conc

rete

sur

face

sho

uld

be in

clud

ed in

the

FSA

R.

1. F

SA

R S

ectio

n 3H

.6.4

.3.3

.3 re

fers

to F

igur

e 3H

.6-4

4 an

d Fi

gure

s 3H

.6-2

45 th

roug

h 3H

.6-2

47 fo

r lat

eral

soi

l pre

ssur

e fo

r des

ign

of R

SW

Pip

ing

Tunn

els.

It

is n

ot c

lear

why

Fig

ures

3H

.6-2

12 th

roug

h 3H

.6-2

17, w

hich

pro

vide

s la

tera

l soi

l pre

ssur

e on

RS

W T

unne

ls c

onsi

derin

g ef

fect

s fro

m a

djac

ent R

B a

nd

RW

B, a

re n

ot in

clud

ed h

ere.

2. F

i gur

e 3H

.6-4

4 in

the

Rev

iew

er’s

Gui

de d

id n

ot in

clud

e th

e co

ordi

nate

axe

s.3.

Fig

ures

3H

.6-1

38 a

nd 1

39 a

re n

ot c

lear

, and

, at l

east

, the

ZP

A v

alue

s sh

ould

be

anno

tate

d in

the

Figu

res.

4. P

leas

e de

scrib

e if

stat

ic s

urch

arge

pre

ssur

es fr

om a

djac

ent b

uild

ings

wer

e co

nsid

ered

in d

esig

n.5.

For

cla

rity,

Fig

ure

3H.6

-137

sho

uld

be a

ppro

pria

tely

ann

otat

ed re

gard

ing

its a

pplic

abili

ty.

6. P

leas

e cl

arify

if th

e de

sign

tabl

e pr

ovid

ed to

us

is g

oing

to b

e in

clud

ed in

the

FSA

R.

Bec

ause

of t

he c

ompl

exity

of t

he v

ario

us lo

adin

gs u

sed

for t

he

sam

e bu

ildin

g fo

r var

ious

type

s of

ana

lysi

s, it

is s

trong

ly re

com

men

ded

that

this

tabl

e be

incl

uded

in th

e FS

AR

.

CO

LA M

arku

p, S

ectio

n 3H

.6.6

.2.1

UH

S ba

sin,

UH

S C

oolin

g To

wer

Enc

losu

re, a

nd R

SW P

ump

Hou

seTh

e ca

lcul

ated

sei

smic

soi

l pre

ssur

es o

n th

e R

SW

Pum

p H

ouse

Nor

th W

all s

how

n in

Fig

ure

3H.6

-219

from

2D

SS

SI a

naly

sis

with

oth

er b

uild

ings

sho

w a

si

gnifi

cant

spi

ke a

t dep

ths

of a

bout

10

to 1

3 ft

belo

w g

rade

with

the

pres

sure

s fa

lling

to z

ero

from

abo

ut 1

3 to

44

ft be

low

gra

de c

orre

spon

ding

to th

e bo

ttom

of

RS

W p

ipin

g tu

nnel

. Ple

ase

prov

ide

expl

anat

ion

for t

his

pres

sure

dis

tribu

tion.

CO

LA M

arku

p, S

ectio

n 3H

.6.5

.3 S

eism

ic A

naly

sis

of R

SW

Pip

ing

Tunn

elIn

the

4th

bulle

t on

the

follo

win

g pa

ge (P

age

11 o

f 27)

, ple

ase

clar

ify fo

r whi

ch s

oil c

ase

the

crac

ked

conc

rete

and

soi

l sep

arat

ion

anal

ysis

was

per

form

ed.

This

info

rmat

ion

is n

ot p

rovi

ded

in th

e C

OLA

mar

kup.

Issu

e 14

: [R

ecei

ved

05/0

4/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-30

S1

Issu

e 15

: [R

ecei

ved

05/0

4/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-35

Issu

e 18

: [R

ecei

ved

05/1

9/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

07.0

2-22

Issu

e 19

: [R

ecei

ved

05/1

9/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

07.0

2-24

,

Issu

e 16

: [R

ecei

ved

05/0

9/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-19

, Sup

plem

ent 1

Issu

e 17

[Rec

eive

d 05

/09/

2011

; New

Act

ion

Item

] Mis

cella

neou

s Q

uest

ions

from

Aud

it an

d R

evie

wer

s G

uide

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

16 o

f 17

May

31,

201

1So

uth

Texa

s Pr

ojec

t Uni

ts 3

& 4

Cla

rific

atio

ns fr

om N

RC

CO

LA M

arku

p, S

ectio

n 3H

.6.7

Die

sel G

ener

ator

Fue

l Oil

Stor

age

Vaul

t (D

GFO

SV)

The

seco

nd a

nd th

ird p

arag

raph

s (P

age

38 o

f 54)

dis

cuss

two

diffe

rent

type

s of

inpu

t mot

ions

bei

ng d

evel

oped

for t

he s

eism

ic a

naly

sis

and

desi

gn o

f D

GFO

SV

. P

leas

e pr

ovid

e fu

rther

cla

rific

atio

ns w

hy tw

o di

ffere

nt in

put m

otio

ns a

re d

evel

oped

and

use

d in

sep

arat

e S

SI a

naly

ses

of D

GFO

SV

, as

disc

usse

d in

the

first

par

agra

ph o

n th

e fo

llow

ing

page

(Pag

e 39

of 5

4).

Post

Aud

it C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e #

6

In re

spon

se to

Pos

t Aud

it C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e #6

sub

mitt

ed a

s pa

rt of

the

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.07

.02-

29, S

uppl

emen

t 1 (s

ubm

itted

with

lette

r U7-

C-N

INA

-NR

C-

1100

75),

the

appl

ican

t has

pro

vide

d co

mpa

rison

s of

the

resp

onse

tran

sfer

func

tions

of a

circ

ular

em

bedd

ed fo

unda

tion

over

ela

stic

hal

f spa

ce to

theo

retic

al

solu

tions

to v

alid

ate

the

accu

racy

and

sta

bilit

y of

the

SA

SS

I200

0 su

btra

ctio

n m

etho

d. T

he re

spon

se c

ompa

rison

s co

ver a

freq

uenc

y ra

nge

corr

espo

ndin

g to

ao

val

ues

less

than

3, w

here

ao i

s a

dim

ensi

onle

ss p

aram

eter

equ

al to

2�

fr/V

s, f i

s th

e fre

quen

cy o

f ana

lysi

s, r

is th

e ra

dius

of f

ound

atio

n an

d V

sis

the

shea

r w

ave

velo

city

of f

ound

atio

n m

edia

. Th

e ap

plic

ant h

as s

tate

d th

at c

ompa

rison

s of

the

resp

onse

tran

sfer

func

tions

for a

o >3

is n

ot p

erfo

rmed

bec

ause

th

eore

tical

sol

utio

ns o

btai

ned

for s

imila

r pro

blem

s by

Aps

el &

Luc

o, 1

986

are

in a

gree

men

t with

the

resu

lts o

f Day

, 197

8 fo

r ao

less

than

abo

ut 3

, but

the

resu

lts s

tart

devi

atin

g at

ao

of h

ighe

r tha

n 3.

The

site

-spe

cific

Sei

smic

Cat

egor

y I s

truct

ures

at t

he S

TP 3

and

4 s

ites,

suc

h as

UH

S B

asin

/RS

W P

ump

Hou

se, a

re g

ener

ally

larg

e st

ruct

ures

with

si

gnifi

cant

foun

datio

n fo

otpr

int.

For

exa

mpl

e, U

HS

Bas

in h

as a

foun

datio

n fo

otpr

int o

f app

roxi

mat

ely

275

ft x

140

ft. W

ith a

n eq

uiva

lent

foun

datio

n ra

dius

of

110

ft, a

nd a

ssum

ing

an a

vera

ge s

hear

wav

e ve

loci

ty o

f abo

ut 1

000

ft/se

c an

d a

cut-o

ff fre

quen

cy o

f abo

ut 2

2Hz

used

in th

e S

SI a

naly

sis,

the

corr

espo

ndin

g ao

val

ue fo

r thi

s st

ruct

ure

is c

alcu

late

d to

be

on th

e or

der o

f abo

ut 1

5 w

hile

the

test

pro

blem

s ar

e ca

rrie

d ou

t to

ao v

alue

s le

ss th

an 3

. B

ecau

se th

e sh

ape

of th

e re

spon

se tr

ansf

er fu

nctio

ns a

re s

trong

ly d

epen

dent

on

the

ao v

alue

(e.g

. as

show

n in

Fig

. 03.

07.0

2-29

S1.

6 pr

ovid

ed w

ith th

is

resp

onse

), th

e ap

plic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to e

xten

d th

e re

sults

of t

he a

bove

test

pro

blem

s in

term

s of

the

foun

datio

n re

spon

se tr

ansf

er fu

nctio

ns (i

nclu

ding

bot

h co

mpl

ianc

e an

d sc

atte

ring

func

tions

) cal

cula

ted

usin

g th

e su

btra

ctio

n m

etho

d to

ao v

alue

s up

to a

t lea

st 8

. The

insp

ectio

n of

the

resu

lts is

nec

essa

ry to

en

sure

the

accu

racy

and

sta

bilit

y of

the

subt

ract

ion

met

hod

used

for a

naly

sis

of la

rge

embe

dded

stru

ctur

es. T

heor

etic

al c

lose

d-fo

rm s

olut

ions

are

ava

ilabl

e fo

r co

mpa

rison

to a

o val

ues

of 6

to 8

.

The

Def

ense

Nuc

lear

Fac

ilitie

s S

afet

y B

oard

(DN

FSB

) iss

ued

a le

tter o

n A

pril

8th,

201

1 re

ques

ting

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f Ene

rgy

(DO

E) t

o ad

dres

s te

chni

cal

and

softw

are

qual

ity a

ssur

ance

issu

es re

late

d to

pot

entia

lly e

rron

eous

sei

smic

ana

lyse

s pe

rform

ed u

sing

the

SA

SS

I Sub

tract

ion

met

hod.

SA

SS

I su

btra

ctio

n m

etho

d ha

s be

en u

sed

for S

TP a

pplic

atio

n fo

r em

bedd

ed s

truct

ures

. A

s su

ch, t

he a

pplic

ant i

s re

ques

ted

to re

view

thes

e co

ncer

ns a

nd a

sses

s th

e po

tent

ial i

mpa

ct o

n S

TP’s

sei

smic

ana

lysi

s.

Issu

e 22

: [R

ecei

ved

05/1

9/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] D

NFS

B Is

sues

Rel

ated

to th

e SA

SSI S

ubtr

actio

n M

etho

d

Issu

e 20

: [R

ecei

ved

05/1

9/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

07.0

1-27

,

Issu

e 21

: [R

ecei

ved

05/1

9/20

11; N

ew A

ctio

n Ite

m] C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

07.0

2-29

,

C:\D

ocum

ents

and

Set

tings

\030

021\

Des

ktop

\NR

C A

udit

0523

11\3

.7 &

3.8

pun

ch L

istA

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

ns: 3

.7 a

nd 3

.8

P

age

17 o

f 17

5/31

/201

1

6:4

8 P

M

No.

Sess

ion

Dat

eSe

ssio

nTi

me

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Req

uest

orR

espo

nsib

leO

rgan

izat

ion

Res

pons

ible

Pers

onD

ue D

ate

Res

pons

e/St

atus

Furt

her A

ctio

n R

equi

red

3.7-

375/

249

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Pro

vide

in a

n R

AI r

espo

nse

a pl

an to

reso

lve

the

issu

es re

late

d to

sub

tract

ion

met

hod

in S

AS

SI,

as

desc

ribed

in th

e D

OE

lette

r. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 22

)C

hakr

avor

tyS

&L

Mos

lem

ian

CLO

SE

DR

espo

nd to

futu

re R

AI

3.7-

385/

249

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Sub

sequ

ent t

o A

ctio

n Ite

m 3

.7-3

7, re

vise

the

resu

lts

pres

ente

d in

CO

LA a

s ne

cess

ary.

(Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

22)

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Res

pond

to fu

ture

RA

I

3.7-

395/

249

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Rev

ise

RW

B s

tabi

lity

calc

ulat

ion

cons

ider

ing

ampl

ified

mot

ion

at g

roun

d su

rface

and

revi

se C

OLA

as

nec

essa

ry.

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

RW

B c

alcu

latio

ns

and

CO

LA

3.7-

405/

259

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Pro

vide

resp

onse

to q

uest

ions

on

late

ral p

ress

ure

diag

ram

sC

hakr

avor

tyS

&L

Mos

lem

ian

CLO

SE

DS

ee a

ctio

n ite

ms

3.7-

42 a

nd

3.7-

44

3.7-

415/

259

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Dis

cuss

the

effe

cts

of g

roun

dwat

er c

hang

e on

UH

S

resp

onse

sC

hakr

avor

tyS

&L

Mos

lem

ian

CLO

SE

DS

ee a

ctio

n ite

m 3

.7-4

6

3.7-

425/

269

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Rev

ise

Figu

re 3

H.6

-219

to re

mov

e 2D

'Alo

ne' s

oil

pres

sure

pro

file.

Als

o re

vise

the

figur

e to

pro

vide

se

ism

ic p

ress

ure

prof

ile u

sed

for d

esig

n in

lieu

of

stat

ic +

dyn

amic

. Als

o ch

eck

othe

r fig

ures

for t

he

sam

e is

sues

.

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

figur

es in

CO

LA

3.7-

435/

269

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Add

the

fact

or o

f saf

ety

for f

loat

atio

n in

Tab

le 3

H.6

-14

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.7-

445/

269

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Ver

ify th

at S

GH

's v

alid

atio

n fo

r SA

SS

I inc

lude

d ve

rific

atio

n fo

r soi

l pre

ssur

es a

nd p

rovi

de v

alid

atio

n fo

r NR

C re

view

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Non

e

3.7-

455/

261

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Turb

ine

Bui

ldin

g S

eism

ic C

alcu

latio

n, F

luor

ca

lcul

atio

n nu

mbe

r U3-

TB-S

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-2

100

Rev

B

, sho

uld

be re

vise

d fo

r the

follo

win

g:1)

Ass

umpt

ion

1 on

she

et 9

of 2

88 s

houl

d be

cla

rifie

d to

cle

arly

des

crib

e ho

w m

ass

and

stiff

ness

es w

ere

deriv

ed fr

om d

iffer

ent T

urbi

ne B

uild

ing

mod

els

2) O

n sh

eet 8

of 2

88, c

orre

ct R

efer

ence

3 d

ocum

ent

num

ber f

rom

U3-

TB-S

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-2

001

to U

7-TB

-S-

CA

LC-D

ES

N-2

001

3) R

evis

e S

ectio

n 5.

15 to

cle

arly

des

crib

e ho

w th

e se

ism

ic d

eman

d w

as d

eter

min

ed. F

or e

xam

ple,

cla

rify

the

stat

emen

t in

the

last

par

agra

ph o

f she

et 2

50

"afte

r run

ning

the

RS

A s

tatic

ana

lysi

s is

then

run

with

th

e R

SA

resu

lts to

det

erm

ine

the

base

she

ar".

Als

o de

scrib

e ho

w th

e R

ISA

anl

aysi

s w

as d

one

in 3

di

rect

ions

and

how

the

3 di

rect

iona

l res

pons

es w

ere

com

bine

d.

Cha

krav

orty

/Ta

bata

baie

TAN

EFi

sica

roC

LOS

ED

Writ

e C

ondi

tion

Rep

ort t

o do

cum

ent r

espo

nse

and

track

cal

cula

tion

revi

sion

. S

ee A

ctio

n Ite

m 3

.8-4

0.

May

23

- 27,

201

1N

RC

Aud

it of

Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

3.7

& 3

.8 A

ctio

n Ite

ms_

05-2

7-11

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

n: 3

.8

P

age

1 of

5

5/31

/201

1

6:4

8 P

M

No.

Sess

ion

Dat

eSe

ssio

nTi

me

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Req

uest

orR

espo

nsib

leO

rgan

izat

ion

Res

pons

ible

Pers

onD

ue D

ate

Res

pons

e/St

atus

Furt

her A

ctio

n R

equi

red

May

23

- 27,

201

1N

RC

Aud

it of

Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

3.7-

465/

261

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

For g

roun

dwat

er re

solu

tion,

in a

dditi

on to

the

RA

I re

spon

se p

rovi

ded,

per

form

the

follo

win

g:1)

Use

28

ft gr

ound

wat

er le

vel i

n th

e an

alys

is b

eing

pe

rform

ed fo

r DO

E le

tter (

AI 3

.7-3

7)2)

Rev

ise

the

CO

LA m

arku

p pr

ovid

ed in

the

prev

ious

R

AI r

espo

nse

03.0

7.01

-27

S3

3) R

evis

e th

e S

SI c

alcu

latio

ns to

add

a c

larif

icat

ion

for g

roun

dwat

er le

vel

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

calc

ulat

ions

and

C

OLA

3.7-

475/

279

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

For S

ervi

ce B

uild

ing

stab

ility

cal

cula

tion

(U3-

SB

-S-

CA

LC-D

ES

N-2

100

Rev

. B),

expa

nd S

ectio

n 5.

14 to

fu

lly d

escr

ibe

how

the

seis

mic

ana

lysi

s w

as

perfo

rmed

and

spe

cific

ally

add

ress

the

follo

win

g:1)

How

the

stic

k m

odel

mas

s an

d st

iffne

ss w

ere

calc

ulat

ed o

r pro

vide

a c

opy

of R

ef. N

o. 2

3, U

3-S

B-

CA

LC-D

ES

N-2

001

Rev

. 0, "

Cal

cula

tion

of S

ervi

ce

Bui

ldin

g M

ass

and

Stif

fnes

s M

odel

" for

revi

ew.

2) R

SA

det

ails

: -

1. m

odal

com

bina

tion

met

hod

- 2.

com

bina

tion

of 3

dire

ctio

nal r

espo

nses

Atta

chm

ent 0

1 sh

eets

4 a

nd 5

- 1.

Wha

t are

mod

es 5

and

6 w

ith fr

eque

ncy

> 3.

0x10

8 Hz?

Bas

ilio

TAN

EFi

sica

roC

LOS

ED

Writ

e C

ondi

tion

Rep

ort t

o do

cum

ent r

espo

nse

and

track

cal

cula

tion

revi

sion

. S

ee A

ctio

n Ite

m 3

.8-4

0.

3.7-

485/

279

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Cla

rify

CO

LA S

ectio

n 3H

.6.5

.3 to

spe

cify

that

UB

B

ackf

ill s

oil c

ase

was

use

d fo

r cra

cked

and

sep

arat

ed

case

s (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 19

)C

hakr

avor

tyS

&L

Mos

lem

ian

CLO

SE

DR

evis

e C

OLA

3.7-

495/

279

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Rev

ise

calc

ulat

ion

U7-

UH

S-C

-CA

LC-D

ES

N-6

007

to

dele

te T

able

3 (R

efer

ence

Mar

ch 2

011

audi

t rep

ort)

Cha

krav

orty

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

calc

ulat

ion

3.7

& 3

.8 A

ctio

n Ite

ms_

05-2

7-11

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

n: 3

.8

P

age

2 of

5

5/31

/201

1

6:4

8 P

M

No.

Sess

ion

Dat

eSe

ssio

nTi

me

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Req

uest

orR

espo

nsib

leO

rgan

izat

ion

Res

pons

ible

Pers

onD

ue D

ate

Res

pons

e/S

tatu

sFu

rthe

r Act

ion

Req

uire

d

3.8-

265/

239

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Rev

ise

the

resp

onse

for I

mpo

rtanc

e Fa

ctor

use

d fo

r w

ind

load

ing

(RA

I 03.

08.0

4-30

S1)

to s

tate

that

our

po

sitio

n is

dev

iatin

g fro

m S

RP

3.3

gui

danc

e ba

sed

on

the

just

ifica

tion

prov

ided

in th

e R

AI r

espo

nse.

Als

o re

vise

the

Impo

rtanc

e Fa

ctor

from

1.1

5 to

1.0

. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 14

)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LA

graw

alC

LOS

ED

3.8-

275/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Upd

ate

the

desi

gn p

aram

eter

s ta

ble

with

dam

ping

va

lues

for R

adw

aste

Bui

ldin

g D

esig

n, a

nd in

clud

e th

e ta

ble

in S

ectio

n 3.

8 of

CO

LA. (

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sues

13

.6 a

nd 1

7.6)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LA

graw

alC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.8-

285/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Exa

min

e am

plifi

ed in

put m

otio

n us

ed fo

r Ser

vice

B

uild

ing

stab

ility

eva

luat

ion.

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Am

plifi

edm

otio

n at

gr

ade

is

used

Rev

ise

Des

ign

Par

amet

ers

Tabl

e to

refle

ct th

is

3.8-

295/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Cla

rify

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

19 to

sta

te th

at th

e st

atic

coe

ffici

ent o

f fric

tion

at th

e in

terfa

ce o

f mud

mat

an

d so

il w

ill n

ot e

xcee

d 0.

75. A

lso

incl

ude

the

requ

irem

ent f

or ro

ughe

ning

the

conc

rete

sur

face

s in

th

e C

OLA

. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 16

)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LA

graw

alC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to 0

3.08

.04-

19, r

evis

e C

OLA

3.8-

305/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Pro

vide

mor

e le

gibl

e Fi

gure

s 3H

.6-1

38 a

nd 1

39 in

C

OLA

. (C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 17

.3)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LA

graw

alC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.8-

315/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Add

in th

e FS

AR

that

the

Larg

e E

quip

men

t Acc

ess

Bui

ldin

g (L

EA

B) f

ound

atio

n w

ill b

e de

sign

ed s

uch

that

th

e su

rcha

rge

on th

e D

GFO

SV

loca

ted

dire

ctly

eas

t of

the

LEA

B w

ill b

e ne

glig

ible

. Als

o ad

dres

s po

tent

ial

effe

ct o

n th

e S

SI a

nd S

SS

I for

the

DG

FOS

V.

(Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

17.4

)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LA

graw

alC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.8-

325/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

The

CO

LA w

ill b

e re

vise

d to

refe

r to

Figu

res

3H.6

-21

2 th

roug

h 3H

.6-2

17 fo

r RS

W P

ipin

g Tu

nnel

des

ign.

(C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 17

.1)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.8-

335/

231

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Cla

rify

title

for F

igur

e 3H

.6-1

37 to

spe

cify

that

it is

ap

plic

able

to C

ateg

ory

I site

-spe

cific

stru

ctur

es

(Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

17.5

)C

hakr

abar

tiS

&L

Mos

lem

ian

CLO

SE

DR

evis

e C

OLA

May

23

- 27,

201

1N

RC

Aud

it of

Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

3.7

& 3

.8 A

ctio

n Ite

ms_

05-2

7-11

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

n: 3

.8

P

age

3 of

5

5/31

/201

1

6:4

8 P

M

No.

Sess

ion

Dat

eSe

ssio

nTi

me

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Req

uest

orR

espo

nsib

leO

rgan

izat

ion

Res

pons

ible

Pers

onD

ue D

ate

Res

pons

e/S

tatu

sFu

rthe

r Act

ion

Req

uire

d

May

23

- 27,

201

1N

RC

Aud

it of

Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

3.8-

345/

241

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Rev

ise

the

wav

e pr

opag

atio

n ca

lcul

atio

ns fo

r the

tu

nnel

s us

ing

the

follo

win

g:

1) a

n ap

pare

nt w

ave

velo

city

of 3

000

ft/s

2) m

axim

um g

roun

d ve

loci

ty b

ased

on

site

-spe

cific

S

SE

max

imum

gro

und

acce

lera

tion

of 0

.13g

3)

a tr

iang

ular

pre

ssur

e di

strib

utio

n lim

ited

by th

e m

axim

um p

assi

ve p

ress

ure

Rev

ise

CO

LA to

refle

ct th

ese

chan

ges

also

.(C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 12

, AI 3

.8-2

3 an

d 3.

8-24

)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Upd

ate

calc

ulat

ions

, rev

ise

RA

I res

pons

e, a

nd re

vise

C

OLA

3.8-

355/

241

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Pro

vide

in C

OLA

the

disc

ussi

on o

f sta

bilit

y ev

alua

tion

for e

ach

stru

ctur

e in

clud

ing

a di

scus

sion

of t

he in

put

mot

ion.

(C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

es 3

and

8)

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.8-

365/

241

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Ver

ify e

quiv

alen

t sta

tic lo

adin

g fo

r RS

W P

ipin

g Tu

nnel

and

Fue

l Oil

Tunn

el e

xcee

d th

at fr

om S

SI

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

calc

ulat

ions

3.8-

375/

251

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

For R

adw

aste

Bui

ldin

g, re

vise

the

CO

LA fo

r the

fo

llow

ing:

-- A

dd c

larif

icat

ion

in S

ectio

n 3H

.3.5

.1, 2

and

3 fo

r se

ism

ic a

naly

sis

mod

els

(stic

k m

odel

for s

tabi

lity,

FE

M m

odel

for d

esig

n an

d II/

I) [C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 13

.1]

-- D

elet

e ve

rtica

l acc

eler

atio

ns fr

om T

able

3H

.3-1

[C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 13

.1]

-- R

evis

e S

ectio

n 3H

.3.4

.3.4

.2 to

incl

ude

N69

0 pr

ovis

ion

for s

hear

allo

wab

le [C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 13

.3]

-- R

evis

e S

ectio

n 3H

.3.4

.2.1

to s

tate

that

bea

ring

pres

sure

cap

acity

is d

eter

min

ed u

sing

met

hodo

logy

de

scrib

ed in

CO

LA S

ectio

n 2.

5S.4

[Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

13.4

]

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

CO

LA

3.8-

385/

251

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Rev

ise

resp

onse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

35 to

exp

lain

de

sign

in li

eu o

f fur

ther

ana

lysi

s fo

r equ

ival

ent

bear

ing

pres

sure

.C

hakr

abar

tiS

&L

Mos

lem

ian

CLO

SE

DR

evis

e re

spon

se to

RA

I 03

.08.

04-3

5

3.8-

395/

251

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Pro

vide

que

stio

ns o

n Tu

rbin

e B

uild

ing

and

Ser

vice

B

uild

ing

stab

ility

cal

cula

tions

by

abou

t 10

a.m

. on

5/26

Agr

awal

NR

CC

hakr

abar

tiC

LOS

ED

See

act

ion

item

3.7

-45

3.8-

405/

251

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Dis

cuss

add

ition

al in

form

atio

n to

be

incl

uded

in C

OLA

fo

r II/I

eva

luat

ions

of n

on-s

eism

ic C

ateg

ory

I st

ruct

ures

Cha

krab

arti

NR

CTa

i6/

3/11

NR

C to

talk

to O

GC

3.8-

415/

251

p.m

. - 5

p.

m.

Rev

ise

UH

S d

esig

n ca

lcul

atio

n to

use

N69

0-19

94

Sup

plem

ent 2

Arn

old

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

UH

S d

esig

n ca

lcul

atio

n

3.7

& 3

.8 A

ctio

n Ite

ms_

05-2

7-11

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

n: 3

.8

P

age

4 of

5

5/31

/201

1

6:4

8 P

M

No.

Sess

ion

Dat

eSe

ssio

nTi

me

Act

ion

Item

Des

crip

tion

Req

uest

orR

espo

nsib

leO

rgan

izat

ion

Res

pons

ible

Pers

onD

ue D

ate

Res

pons

e/S

tatu

sFu

rthe

r Act

ion

Req

uire

d

May

23

- 27,

201

1N

RC

Aud

it of

Sou

th T

exas

Pro

ject

Uni

ts 3

& 4

3.8-

425/

279

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Rev

ise

the

Con

trol B

uild

ing

Ann

ex s

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n to

use

AS

CE

7-0

5 in

stea

d of

AS

CE

7-8

8. A

lso

rem

ove

the

live

load

from

the

calc

ulat

ion

of th

e st

abili

zing

forc

e.

Cha

krab

arti

S&

LM

osle

mia

nC

LOS

ED

Rev

ise

calc

ulat

ion

3.8-

435/

279

a.m

. -

12 n

oon

Aud

it R

epor

t Sec

tion

3.8

I 8. C

alcu

latio

n no

. U7-

RS

W-

S-C

ALC

-DE

SN

-600

1, R

evis

ion

D, “

Bas

ic S

truct

ural

D

esig

n of

Rea

ctor

Ser

vice

Wat

er (R

SW

) Tun

nel”.

The

staf

f not

ed th

at s

ever

al a

reas

of d

esig

n of

the

tunn

el w

ere

not c

ompl

ete

at ti

me

of th

e au

dit,

e.g.

, gl

obal

torn

ado

mis

sile

impa

ct e

valu

atio

n fo

r the

ac

cess

regi

on o

f the

tunn

el, t

unne

l wal

ls in

the

corn

er

regi

on, a

cces

s co

vers

, etc

.

Pric

eN

RC

Cha

krab

arti

CLO

SE

DIn

clud

e th

e cl

osur

e in

the

May

aud

it re

port

3.7

& 3

.8 A

ctio

n Ite

ms_

05-2

7-11

.xls

CO

LA S

ectio

n: 3

.8

P

age

5 of

5

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

Dat

e an

d T

ime

Com

bine

d (1

7E30

) 3.

7 (1

7E30

) 3.

8 (1

7E68

)

May

23,

201

1 08

:30-

09:0

0 En

tranc

e M

eetin

g �

Intro

duct

ions

�

Purp

ose

and

Obj

ectiv

es o

f A

udit

�R

evie

w o

f Aud

it Pl

an a

nd

Sche

dule

�

Stat

us o

f NR

C A

ccep

tanc

e of

R

AI R

espo

nses

�

Con

tact

s for

NIN

A a

nd N

RC

M

ay 2

3, 2

011

09:0

0-12

:00

A. D

eter

min

atio

n of

Sei

smic

Dem

and

for S

tabi

lity

Eval

uatio

ns:

�R

SW P

ipin

g Tu

nnel

�

DG

FOSV

(Mar

ch C

larif

icat

ion

Issu

e 8)

�

DG

FOST

[f

ollo

w-u

p fr

om M

arch

aud

it –

AI 3

.7-3

3 an

d 3.

7-35

; D

iscu

ss p

ropo

sed

appr

oach

, Cla

rific

atio

n 8]

A. U

HS

Bas

in a

nd R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

Pum

p-ho

use

Stru

ctur

al E

valu

atio

nB

. Rec

ap M

arch

Aud

it Ite

ms:

1.D

esig

n pa

ram

eter

tabl

e (3

.8-7

);

2.Fr

ictio

n co

effic

ient

s (3.

8-8)

; 3.

Eval

uatio

n of

soil

bear

ing

pres

sure

s (3.

8-9)

; 4.

Win

d/hu

rric

ane/

torn

ado

load

ings

(3.8

-11)

; 5.

Bea

m sh

ear (

3.8-

21);

6.

V&

V S

AFE

(3.8

-22)

; 7.

RSW

T w

ave

prop

agat

ion

(3.8

-23

& 2

4);

8.C

BA

stab

ility

cal

cula

tion

(3.8

-25)

May

23,

201

1 12

:00-

01:0

0 Lu

nch

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

May

23,

201

1 01

:00-

05:0

0 A

. Det

erm

inat

ion

of S

eism

ic D

eman

d fo

r Sta

bilit

y Ev

alua

tions

ana

lyse

s (C

ontin

ued)

B. I

I/I st

abili

ty e

valu

atio

n fo

r all

non-

cate

gory

I st

ruct

ures

(RW

B, C

BA

, TB

, SB

) with

pot

entia

l to

inte

ract

with

seis

mic

Cat

egor

y I s

truct

ures

(Mar

ch

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sue

3)

A. U

HS

Bas

in a

nd R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

Pum

p-ho

use

Stru

ctur

al E

valu

atio

n (C

ontin

ued)

C. P

ost A

udit

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sues

: 3

. Se

ism

ic d

eman

d fo

r non

-sei

smic

II/I

stru

ctur

es

for s

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n 4

. Fr

ictio

n co

effic

ient

s rep

orte

d in

Tab

le 3

H.6

-14

- st

atic

or d

ynam

ic v

alue

s. 8

. St

abili

ty A

naly

sis P

roce

dure

10

. C

orre

latio

n of

acc

eler

atio

n va

lues

for S

AP2

000

anal

ysis

with

SA

SSI r

esul

ts

12.

App

aren

t wav

e ve

loci

ty fo

r bur

ied

stru

ctur

es

13.

Com

men

ts o

n R

espo

nse

to R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

18 R

1 S2

– R

W/B

Ana

lysi

s and

Des

ign

13.1

. Se

ism

ic a

naly

sis a

ssum

ptio

ns

(3H

.3.5

.1&

2)

13.2

. II

/I A

naly

sis a

nd d

esig

n (3

H.3

.5.3

) 13

.3.

Load

Com

bina

tion

for S

hear

(Ste

el)

(3H

.3.4

.3.4

.2)

13.4

. U

ltim

ate

soil

bear

ing

capa

city

(3H

.3.4

.2.1

) 13

.5.

Torn

ado

Para

met

ers (

3H.3

.B &

3H

.3.4

.3.3

.1)

13.6

. Fl

ood

Des

ign

(3H

.3.4

.2.3

) 14

. C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-30

S1,

Ex

trem

e w

ind

and

torn

ado

load

ing

(3H

.6.4

.3.2

) 15

. C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-35

, Fo

unda

tion

bear

ing

pres

sure

s rec

onci

liatio

n 16

. C

omm

ents

on

Res

pons

e to

RA

I 03.

08.0

4-19

, Su

pple

men

t 1, C

oeff

icie

nt o

f Fric

tion

17.

Mis

cella

neou

s Que

stio

ns fr

om A

udit

and

Rev

iew

ers G

uide

D. O

utst

andi

ng D

GFO

SV is

sues

(acc

eler

atio

n,

ampl

ifica

tion

of v

ertic

al a

ccel

erat

ion,

stat

ic su

rcha

rge

effe

cts f

rom

adj

acen

t bui

ldin

gs, s

tabi

lity

eval

uatio

n)M

ay 2

3, 2

011

05:0

0-05

:30

NR

C C

aucu

s

May

23,

201

1 05

:30-

06:0

0 �

Sum

mar

y of

the

Day

and

A

ctio

n Ite

ms

�St

atus

of N

RC

Acc

epta

nce

of

RA

I Res

pons

es

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

Dat

e an

d T

ime

Com

bine

d (1

7E30

) 3.

7 (1

7E30

) 3.

8 (1

7E68

)

May

24,

201

1 08

:00-

12:0

0 D

OE

Lette

r on

Subt

ract

ion

Met

hod

C. E

ffec

t of H

igh

Pois

son’

s Rat

io:

Effe

ct o

f hig

h Po

isso

n’s r

atio

on

accu

racy

& st

abili

ty o

f ca

lcul

ated

tran

sfer

func

tions

for s

eism

ic S

SI a

naly

sis o

f U

HS

Bas

in/R

SW P

ump

Hou

se (R

AI 3

.7.1

-25)

D. R

AI r

espo

nses

rece

ived

prio

r to

May

17,

201

1

A. U

HS

Bas

in a

nd R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

Pum

p-ho

use

Stru

ctur

al E

valu

atio

n (C

ontin

ued)

E. R

AI r

espo

nses

rece

ived

prio

r to

May

17,

201

1

May

24,

201

1 12

:00-

01:0

0 Lu

nch

May

24,

201

1 01

:00-

05:0

0 E.

V&

V Is

sues

:�

SASS

I200

0 V

&V

rega

rdin

g th

e su

btra

ctio

n m

etho

d (R

AI 3

.7.2

-29

and

Aud

it Is

sues

6) [

RA

I 03

.07.

02-2

9 S1

] �

SASS

I 200

0 V

&V

rega

rdin

g as

pect

ratio

of s

hell

elem

ents

(RA

I 3.7

.2-2

9 an

d A

udit

Issu

es 7

) [R

AI

03.0

7.02

-29

S1]

�So

ftwar

e V

&V

for t

ime

hist

ory

gene

ratio

n [R

AI

03.0

7.02

-29

S1 a

nd A

udit

Issu

e 7]

�

Cla

rific

atio

n Is

sues

6 a

nd 2

1

A. U

HS

Bas

in a

nd R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

Pum

p-ho

use

Stru

ctur

al E

valu

atio

n (C

ontin

ued)

F. R

adw

aste

Bui

ldin

g de

sign

and

stab

ility

eva

luat

ion

May

24,

201

1 05

:00-

05:3

0 N

RC

Cau

cus

May

24,

201

1 05

:30-

06:0

0 �

Sum

mar

y of

the

Day

and

A

ctio

n Ite

ms

�St

atus

of N

RC

Acc

epta

nce

of

RA

I Res

pons

es

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

Dat

e an

d T

ime

Com

bine

d (1

7E30

) 3.

7 (1

7E30

) 3.

8 (1

7E68

)

May

25,

201

1 08

:00-

11:3

0 F.

Pre

viou

s Aud

it Ite

ms:

a.SS

E da

mpi

ng fo

r cra

cked

con

cret

e m

odel

of

RSW

T (R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

22)

b.Ju

stifi

catio

n fo

r ana

lyzi

ng e

mpt

y fu

el ta

nk a

nd so

il se

para

tion

case

s for

UB

soil

case

onl

y fo

r D

GFO

SV (R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

27) [

AI 3

.7-8

] c.

Just

ifica

tion

for a

naly

zing

em

pty

basin

and

soil

sepa

ratio

n ca

ses f

or U

B so

il ca

se o

nly

for

UH

SB/R

SWPH

[AI 3

.7-8

] d.

Rec

onci

liatio

n of

the

impa

ct o

f usi

ng a

low

er

grou

nd w

ater

ele

vatio

n in

the

SSI a

naly

sis (

Aud

it Is

sue

1) [A

I 3.7

-7; R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

27 S

3]

A. U

HS

Bas

in a

nd R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

Pum

p-ho

use

Stru

ctur

al E

valu

atio

n (C

ontin

ued)

G. S

tabi

lity

calc

ulat

ions

for o

ther

II/I

stru

ctur

es (T

B, S

B,

CB

A) a

nd sa

fety

fact

or re

porte

d in

FSA

R T

able

3H

.6-

14

May

25,

201

1 12

:00-

01:0

0 Lu

nch

May

25,

201

1 01

:00-

05:0

0 F.

Pre

viou

s Aud

it Ite

ms (

Con

tinue

d):

A. U

HS

Bas

in a

nd R

eact

or S

ervi

ce W

ater

Pum

p-ho

use

Stru

ctur

al E

valu

atio

n (C

ontin

ued)

G. S

tabi

lity

calc

ulat

ions

for o

ther

II/I

stru

ctur

es (T

B, S

B,

CB

A) a

nd sa

fety

fact

or re

porte

d in

FSA

R T

able

3H

.6-

14 C

ontin

ued)

May

25,

201

1 05

:00-

05:3

0 N

RC

Cau

cus

May

25,

201

1 05

:30-

06:0

0 �

Sum

mar

y of

the

Day

and

A

ctio

n Ite

ms

�St

atus

of N

RC

Acc

epta

nce

of

RA

I Res

pons

es

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

Dat

e an

d T

ime

Com

bine

d (1

7E30

) 3.

7 (1

7E30

) 3.

8 (1

7E68

)

May

26,

201

1 08

:00-

11:3

0 F.

Pre

viou

s Aud

it Ite

ms (

Con

tinue

d):

e.Se

ism

ic so

il pr

essu

res o

n U

HSB

/RSW

PH b

elow

-gr

ade

wal

ls

f.Lo

cal r

espo

nse

ampl

ifica

tions

and

des

ign

of U

HS

Bas

in su

bmer

ged

colu

mns

due

to h

ydro

dyna

mic

ef

fect

s (3.

7.2-

28) [

AI 3

.7-1

5 an

d 3.

7-18

] g.

2-D

SSS

I ana

lysi

s of (

RW

B+R

SWT+

RB

) and

(U

HSB

/RSW

PH+R

SWT+

DG

FOSV

-1C

+RB

) us

ing

UB

bac

kfill

(Aud

it Is

sue

2) [A

I 3.7

-6, 3

.7-8

, an

d 3.

7-36

); R

AI 0

3.07

.01-

27 S

3]

h.R

evis

ed sp

ecifi

catio

n fo

r DG

FOS

tank

rigi

dity

re

quire

men

ts [A

I 3.7

-26]

i.

Any

oth

er o

utst

andi

ng it

ems f

rom

Mar

ch a

udit*

H. D

esig

n of

DG

FOT

(sei

smic

inpu

t fro

m S

SI, s

eism

ic

and

win

d an

d to

rnad

o lo

adin

gs, f

lood

pro

tect

ion,

se

ism

ic w

ave

prop

agat

ion

effe

cts,

seis

mic

gas

p, a

nd

stab

ility

eva

luat

ion)

May

26,

201

1 12

:00-

01:0

0 Lu

nch

May

26,

201

1 01

:00-

05:0

0 F.

Pre

viou

s Aud

it Ite

ms (

Con

tinue

d)H

. Des

ign

of D

GFO

T (C

ontin

ued)

May

26,

201

1 05

:00-

05:3

0 N

RC

Cau

cus

May

26,

201

1 05

:30-

06:0

0 �

Sum

mar

y of

the

Day

and

A

ctio

n Ite

ms

�St

atus

of N

RC

Acc

epta

nce

of

RA

I Res

pons

es

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

Dat

e an

d T

ime

Com

bine

d (1

7E30

) 3.

7 (1

7E30

) 3.

8 (1

7E68

)

May

27,

201

1 08

:00-

9:00

R

evie

w P

lan

and

Scop

e of

the

Day

M

ay 2

7, 2

011

09:0

0-11

:00

Fina

lize

audi

t fin

ding

s and

co

mpl

ete

any

unfin

ishe

d ite

ms

May

27,

201

1 11

:00-

12:0

0 N

RC

Cau

cus

May

27,

201

1 12

:00-

01:0

0 Lu

nch

May

27,

201

1 01

:00-

02:0

0 Ex

it M

eetin

g

Sum

mar

y of

Aud

it �

Ope

n Ite

ms

�A

ctio

n Ite

ms

�St

atus

of N

RC

Acc

epta

nce

of R

AI R

espo

nses

D

raft

Age

nda

for

STP

3&4

Aud

it –

FSA

R S

ectio

ns 3

.7 a

nd C

hapt

er 3

.8

Yel

low

= N

RC

Rev

iew

Com

plet

e

ISSU

ES

NO

T L

IST

ED

IN A

GE

ND

A

NR

C A

ctio

ns fr

om M

arch

201

1 A

udit

�3.

7-X

X

Perf

orm

sens

itivi

ty a

naly

sis r

elat

ed to

Poi

sson

's R

atio

�

3.8-

5 R

AI 0

3.08

.04-

32, N

RC

to c

ompa

re re

spon

se to

oth

er a

pplic

ant r

espo

nses

.

NR

C A

ctio

ns fr

om M

arch

201

1 A

udit

Rep

ort

�3.

8 D

2 5.

“T

he a

ccel

erat

ions

are

take

n fr

om th

e SS

I ana

lysi

s of t

he v

ault.

A re

fere

nce

is g

iven

in th

e re

port

from

whe

re th

e ac

cele

ratio

ns w

ere

take

n. A

s thi

s inf

orm

atio

n w

as n

ot v

erifi

ed d

urin

g th

e au

dit,

the

staf

f pla

ns to

ver

ify th

e so

urce

and

the

acce

lera

tion

valu

es d

urin

g th

e ne

xt a

udit.

”�

3.8

K.

Com

pute

r Sof

twar

e V

alid

atio

n an

d V

erifi

catio

n, P

CA

CO

LUM

N, V

ersi

on 4

.10

AC

I 349

-97

used

in S

TP 3

&4

desi

gn is

not

cov

ered

by

this

V&

V, h

owev

er it

was

ass

ured

that

resu

lts fr

om P

CA

CO

LUM

N

are

eval

uate

d in

the

calc

s aga

inst

the

spec

ial c

ode

requ

irem

ents

in A

CI 3

49-9

7. T

he st

aff n

eeds

to re

view

in fu

rther

det

ail

how

this

ass

uran

ce is

impl

emen

ted.

Thi

s will

be

incl

uded

in th

e ne

xt a

udit.

�3.

8 I 8

. C

alcu

latio

n no

. U7-

RSW

-S-C

ALC

-DES

N-6

001,

Rev

isio

n D

, “B

asic

Stru

ctur

al D

esig

n of

Rea

ctor

Ser

vice

Wat

er (R

SW)

Tunn

el”.

The

staf

f not

ed th

at se

vera

l are

as o

f des

ign

of th

e tu

nnel

wer

e no

t com

plet

e at

tim

e of

the

audi

t, e.

g., g

loba

l tor

nado

mis

sile

impa

ct e

valu

atio

n fo

r the

acc

ess r

egio

n of

the

tunn

el, t

unne

l wal

ls in

the

corn

er re

gion

, acc

ess c

over

s, et

c. (S

ee A

ctio

n Ite

m

3.8-

43)

NIN

A A

ctio

ns fr

om M

arch

201

1 A

udit

Rep

ort

�3.

7 C

alc

U7-

UH

S-C

-CA

LC-D

ESN

-600

1, R

ev. B

, “So

il St

ruct

ure

Inte

ract

ion

Ana

lysi

s of U

HS

Pum

p H

ouse

Bui

ldin

gs, S

TP 3

&

4 fo

r Ful

l Bas

in (L

icen

sing

)”

Dis

crep

anci

es in

the

repo

rted

freq

uenc

ies f

or th

e fu

ll ba

sin

cond

ition

in T

able

3 w

ere

note

d. T

he a

pplic

ant w

as a

sked

to

chec

k th

is ta

ble

and

mak

e co

rrec

tions

, as n

eces

sary

. (S

ee A

ctio

n Ite

m 3

.7-4

9)

Appendix A

Chapter 3.8 Safety Evaluation Report RAI Number Issue Date Responses Respond Date ADAMS Nos.

03.08.01-1

03.08.01-1 03.08.01-1 S1

9/15/2009 10/28/2009

ML092610377 ML093070285

03.08.01-2 03.08.01-2 8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.08.01-3

03.08.01-3 03.08.01-3 R1

9/15/2009 6/29/2010

ML092610377 ML101830420

03.08.01-4

03.08.01-4 03.08.01-4 R1 03.08.01-4 R2

9/15/2009 9/15/2010 11/29/2010

ML092610377 ML102630145 ML103360074

03.08.01-5 03.08.01-5 9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.08.01-6

03.08.01-6 03.08.01-6 R1

1/14/2010 6/29/2010

ML100191524

ML101830420 03.08.01-7 03.08.01-7

03.08.01-7 R1 03.08.01-7 S1 03.08.01-7 R2

1/14/2010 9/15/2010 4/11/2011 11/29/2010

ML100191524

ML102630145 ML111050565 ML103360074

03.08.01-8

03.08.01-8 03.08.01-8 S1

1/14/2010 4/14/2010

ML100191524

ML101090143 03.08.01-9

03.08.01-9 03.08.01-9 R1 03.08.01-9 S1 03.08.01-9 R2

9/15/2010 11/29/2010 4/11/2011 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML103360074 ML111050565 ML110730067

03.08.01-10

03.08.01-10 03.08.01-10 R1

9/15/2010 11/29/2010

ML102630145 ML103360074

03.08.04-1

03.08.04-1

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.08.04-2

03.08.04-2 03.08.04-2 R1

9/15/2009 5/27/2010

ML092610377

ML101530610

03.08.04-3

03.08.04-3

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.08.04-4

03.08.04-4 03.08.04-4 R1

8/20/2009 5/27/2010

ML092370556

ML101530610

03.08.04-5

03.08.04-5

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.08.04-6

03.08.04-6

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.08.04-7

03.08.04-7

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.08.04-8

03.08.04-8

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.08.04-9

03.08.04-9

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.08.04-10

03.08.04-10

8/20/2009 ML092370556

Appendix A Chapter 3.8 Safety Evaluation Report

RAI Number Issue Date Responses Respond Date ADAMS Nos.

03.08.04-11 03.08.04-11 9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.08.04-12

03.08.04-12

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.08.04-13

03.08.04-13

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.08.04-14

03.08.04-14

9/16/2009 ML092610374

03.08.04-15

03.08.04-15

10/5/2009 ML092810321

03.08.04-16

03.08.04-16

9/16/2009 ML092610374

03.08.04-17

03.08.04-17 03.08.04-17 S1 03.08.04-17 S2

2/10/2010 3/7/2011 4/25/2011

ML100550613 ML110730067 ML11119A077

03.08.04-18

03.08.04-18 03.08.04-18 R1 03.08.04-18 R1 S1 03.08.04-18 R1 S1 03.08.04-18 R1 S2

2/10/2010 6/2/2010 8/19/2010 9/15/2010 3/15/2011

ML100550613

ML101580248

ML102350220

ML102630145 ML110770440

03.08.04-19

03.08.04-19 03.08.04-19 R1 03.08.04-19 S1

2/10/2010 4/29/2010 4/25/2011

ML100550613 ML101250162 ML11119A077

03.08.04-20

03.08.04-20

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.08.04-21

03.08.04-21

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.08.04-22

03.08.04-22 03.08.04-22 R1

2/10/2010 9/15/2010

ML100550613 ML102630145

03.08.04-23

03.08.04-23

2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.08.04-24

03.08.04-24

2/4/2010 2/10/2010

ML100480204 ML100550613

03.08.04-25

03.08.04-25 03.08.04-25 R1 03.08.04-25 R2

2/10/2010 4/14/2010 5/13/2010

ML100550613 ML101090143 ML101340651

03.08.04-26

03.08.04-26

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.08.04-27

03.08.04-27

2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.08.04-28

03.08.04-28 03.08.04-28 R1 03.08.04-28 S1

9/15/2010 3/7/2011 4/25/2011

ML102630145 ML110730067 ML11119A077

03.08.04-29

03.08.04-29 03.08.04-29 S1

9/15/2010 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML110730067

03.08.04-30

03.08.04-30 03.08.04-30 R1

1/17/2011 3/15/2011

ML110190806 ML110770440

Appendix A Chapter 3.8 Safety Evaluation Report

RAI Number Issue Date Responses Respond Date ADAMS Nos.

03.08.04-30 S1 3/15/2011 ML110770440

03.08.04-31

03.08.04-31 03.08.04-31 S1 03.08.04-31 S1 R1

9/15/2010 1/17/2011 1/31/2011

ML102630145 ML110190806

ML110330168

03.08.04-32

03.08.04-32 03.08.04-32 R1

9/15/2010 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML110730067

03.08.04-33

03.08.04-33

9/15/2010 ML102630145

03.08.04-34

03.08.04-34

4/5/2011 ML110980401

03.08.04-35

03.08.04-35

4/5/2011 ML110980401

03.08.04-36

03.08.04-36

4/5/2011 ML110980401

03.08.05-1

03.08.05-1

9/22/2009 ML092660655

03.08.05-2

03.08.05-2 03.08.05-2 R1 03.08.05-2 R2

1/14/2010 4/14/2010 5/13/2010

ML100191524

ML101090143 ML101340651

03.08.05-3

03.08.05-3 03.08.05-3 R1

1/14/2010 4/14/2010

ML100191524

ML101090143 03.08.05-4

03.08.05-4 03.08.05-4 S1

9/15/2010 11/17/2010

ML102630145

ML103230128

03.08.05-5

03.08.05-5 03.08.05-5 S1

9/15/2010 11/17/2010

ML102630145

ML103230128

Page  Page 1 

Appendix A

Chapter 3.7 Safety Evaluation Report RAI Number Issue Date Responses Response Date ADAMS Nos.

03.07.01-1

03.07.01-1

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.01-2

03.07.01-2 03.07.01-2 S1 03.07.01-2 R1 03.07.01-2 S2

8/20/2009 9/22/2009 5/13/2010 4/11/2011

ML092370556 ML092660655 ML101340651 ML111050565

03.07.01-3 03.07.01-3 9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.01-4

03.07.01-4

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.07.01-5

03.07.01-5

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.01-6

03.07.01-6

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.01-7

03.07.01-7

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.01-8

03.07.01-8

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.01-9

03.07.01-9

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.01-10

03.07.01-10

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.01-11

03.07.01-11

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.07.01-12

03.07.01-12

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.01-13

03.07.01-13 03.07.01-13 S1 03.07.01-13 S2

8/20/2009 11/19/2009 12/30/2009

ML092360772 ML093270047 ML100050225

03.07.01-14

03.07.01-14

8/26/2009 ML092430131

03.07.01-15

03.07.01-15

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.07.01-16

03.07.01-16

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.07.01-17

03.07.01-17

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.07.01-18

03.07.01-18 03.07.01-18 R1

2/4/2010 4/29/2010

ML100480204 ML101250162

03.07.01-19

03.07.01-19 03.07.01-19 R1 03.07.01-19 R2

2/4/2010 4/29/2010 6/7/2010

ML100480204 ML101250162 ML101620284

03.07.01-20

03.07.01-20

2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.07.01-21

03.07.01-21

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.07.01-22

03.07.01-22 03.07.01-22 R1

2/4/2010 3/7/2011

ML100480204 ML110730067

Page  Page 2 

Appendix A Chapter 3.7 Safety Evaluation Report

RAI Number Issue Date Responses Response Date ADAMS Nos.

03.07.01-23

03.07.01-23

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.07.01-24

03.07.01-24 03.07.01-24 S1 03.07.01-24 S1 R1

2/10/2010 4/14/2010 7/21/2010

ML100550613 ML101090143 ML102070067

03.07.01-25

03.07.01-25 03.07.01-25 S1 03.07.01-25 R1 03.07.01-25 S1 R1

9/15/2010 11/29/10 3/7/2011 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML103360074 ML110730067 ML110730067

03.07.01-26

03.07.01-26 03.07.01-26 R1

9/15/2010 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML110730067

03.07.01-27

03.07.01-27 03.07.01-27 S1 03.07.01-27 S2 03.07.01-27 S1 R1 03.07.01-27 S2 R1

9/15/2010 12/21/2010 1/17/2011 3/7/2011 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML103620340 ML110190806 ML110730067 ML110730067

03.07.01-28

03.07.01-28 03.07.01-28 R1

9/15/2010 3/7/2011

ML102630145 ML110730067

03.07.01-29

03.07.01-29

03.07.02-1

03.07.02-1

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.02-2

03.07.02-2

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.07.02-3

03.07.02-3

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.07.02-4

03.07.02-4

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.02-5

03.07.02-5

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.02-6

03.07.02-6

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.02-7

03.07.02-7

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.02-8

03.07.02-8

8/20/2009 ML092370556

03.07.02-9

03.07.02-9

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.07.02-10

03.07.02-10

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.02-11

03.07.02-11

9/9/09 ML092530685

03.07.02-12

03.07.02-12

9/9/09 ML092530685

03.07.02-13

03.07.02-13 03.07.02-13 S1 03.07.02-13 S2

2/10/2010 4/29/2010 4/25/2011

ML100550613 ML101250162 ML11119A077

Page  Page 3 

Appendix A Chapter 3.7 Safety Evaluation Report

RAI Number Issue Date Responses Response Date ADAMS Nos.

03.07.02-14

03.07.02-14

2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.07.02-15

03.07.02-15 2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.07.02-16

03.07.02-16

2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.07.02-17

03.07.02-17

2/4/2010 ML100480204

03.07.02-18

03.07.02-18

2/10/2010 ML100550613

03.07.02-19

03.07.02-19 03.07.02-19 R1

2/4/2010 4/29/2010

ML100480204 ML101250162

03.07.02-20

03.07.02-20 03.07.02-20 S1

2/4/2010 4/11/2011

ML100480204 ML111050565

03.07.02-21

03.07.02-21

3/25/2010 ML100890620

03.07.02-22

03.07.02-22

3/15/2011 ML110770440

03.07.02-23

03.07.02-23

9/15/2010 ML102630145

03.07.02-24

03.07.02-24 03.07.02-24 S1 03.07.02-24 S1 R1 03.07.02-24 S2

9/15/2010 11/29/2010 3/7/2011

12/14/2010

ML102630145 ML103360074 ML110730067

ML103550646

03.07.02-25

03.07.02-25 03.07.02-25 R1

12/14/2010 3/15/2011

ML103550646 ML110770440

03.07.02-26

03.07.02-26

12/14/2010 ML103550646

03.07.02-27

03.07.02-27

12/14/2010 ML103550646

03.07.02-28

03.07.02-28

3/15/2011 ML110770440

03.07.02-29

03.07.02-29 03.07.02-29 R1 03.07.02-29 S1

1/18/2011 3/15/2011 5/9/2011

ML110250368

ML110770440

ML11131A131

03.07.02-30

03.07.02-30

1/18/2011 ML110250368

03.07.02-31

03.07.02-31

3/28/2011 ML110900339

03.07.03-1

03.07.03-1

9/15/2009 ML092610377

03.07.03-2

03.07.03-2

9/3/2009 ML092510038

03.07.03-3

03.07.03-3 03.07.03-3 R1

12/16/2009 4/29/2010

ML093520627

ML101250162