+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarkingf7be97cf-cef3-45e2-b223...The longer you participate, th e...

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarkingf7be97cf-cef3-45e2-b223...The longer you participate, th e...

Date post: 23-Mar-2019
Category:
Upload: phamthien
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 1 ® 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking In this document: Reporting Requirements, 1 Reporting Methods, 1 Scoring, 3 Benchmarks, 4 The Quality performance category replaces the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and the Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) component of meaningful use. Familiarity with these previous quality programs will help you choose measures that are appropriate for your practice. This document explains which measures are available, which submission options are available, and how those different submission methods are scored for each measure. Reporting Requirements To qualify for an incentive payment in 2018, you must report six measures, one of which must be an outcome measure. Quality accounts for 50% of your MIPS score. Reporting Methods ExamWRITER supports the following reporting methods, or submission mechanisms: Claims EHR In 2018, you must choose one reporting method for all of your quality measures. You cannot mix reporting methods (e.g., use claims-based reporting for some measures and EHR reporting for others). If you submit measures using multiple methods, CMS will give you credit only for your highest-scoring reporting method. NOTES In general, claims-based submissions score the lowest and EHR submissions score the highest. Attempt as many measures as you can. Periodically run the MIPS Quality calculator to check your progress. Use the MIPS Quality calculator to decide which measures to report and which reporting method to use.
Transcript

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 1®

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

In this document:• Reporting Requirements, 1

• Reporting Methods, 1

• Scoring, 3

• Benchmarks, 4

The Quality performance category replaces the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and the Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) component of meaningful use. Familiarity with these previous quality programs will help you choose measures that are appropriate for your practice.

This document explains which measures are available, which submission options are available, and how those different submission methods are scored for each measure.

Reporting Requirements

To qualify for an incentive payment in 2018, you must report six measures, one of which must be an outcome measure. Quality accounts for 50% of your MIPS score.

Reporting Methods

ExamWRITER supports the following reporting methods, or submission mechanisms:

• Claims

• EHR

In 2018, you must choose one reporting method for all of your quality measures. You cannot mix reporting methods (e.g., use claims-based reporting for some measures and EHR reporting for others). If you submit measures using multiple methods, CMS will give you credit only for your highest-scoring reporting method.

NOTES • In general, claims-based submissions score the lowest and EHR submissions score the highest.

• Attempt as many measures as you can. Periodically run the MIPS Quality calculator to check your progress. Use the MIPS Quality calculator to decide which measures to report and which reporting method to use.

2 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingReporting Methods

Not every reporting method is available for each measure; therefore, you’ll need to choose your reporting method based on measures in which you score highest. The following table lists each of the measures supported by ExamWRITER and which reporting methods are available for each.

QualityNo. Measure Category High Priority Claims EHR

Choose 1 Outcome measure

Choose 1 high priority if no Outcome is available

Choose 6 measures from one of these columns

1 Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (>9%) Intermediate Outcome

Yes ✓ ✓

12 Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG): Optic Nerve Evaluation

Process ✓ ✓

14 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): Dilated Macular Examination

Process ✓

18 Diabetic Retinopathy: Documentation of Presence or Absence of Macular Edema and Level of Severity of Retinopathy

Process ✓

19 Diabetic Retinopathy: Communication with the Physician Managing Ongoing Diabetes Care

Process Yes ✓ ✓

117 Diabetes: Eye Exam Process ✓ ✓

128 Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Process ✓

130 Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record Process Yes ✓ ✓

140 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): Counseling on Antioxidant Supplement

Process ✓

141 Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG): Reduction of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by 15% or Documentation of a Plan of Care

Outcome Yes ✓

226 Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention

Process ✓ ✓

236 Controlling High Blood Pressure Intermediate Outcome

Yes ✓ ✓

317 Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for High Blood Pressure and Follow-Up Documented

Process ✓ ✓

374 Closing the Referral Loop: Receipt of Specialist Report Process Yes ✓

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 3

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingScoring

Scoring This section explains how to calculate your MIPS Quality score.

• Calculating Individual Measure Scores, 3

• Reporting Sufficient Data, 3

• Earning Bonus Points, 3

• Calculating Your Quality Score, 4

Calculating Individual Measure Scores

When you submit measures for the Quality category, your percentage performance is assessed against benchmarks to determine how many points you earn for each measure. You can receive anywhere from 3 to 10 points for each measure, not including bonus points. Benchmarks are specific to the submission method: claims, EHR, registry.

Each measure’s benchmarks are represented in terms of deciles. Points are awarded within each decile. If your percentage performance falls within the first or second decile, you’ll receive 3 points. If you’re in the 3rd decile you’ll receive somewhere between 3 and 3.9 points depending on your exact position in the decile. Higher deciles earn a corresponding number of points, as shown in the table below.

Reporting Sufficient Data

You must report a minimum of 20 cases for each measure to qualify for higher scores. Measures for which you report fewer than 20 cases will receive the minimum score of 3 points. The longer you participate, the easier it will be for you to meet the minimum case requirements.

Earning Bonus Points

You must report one outcome (or intermediate outcome) measure. If no outcome measures are available, you may report one high-priority measure.

Decile Points

Below 3rd 3.0

3rd 3.0–3.9

4th 4.0–4.9

5th 5.0–5.9

6th 6.0–6.9

7th 7.0–7.9

8th 8.0–8.9

9th 9.0–9.9

10th 10.0

4 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

You can earn two bonus points for each additional outcome measure and one bonus point for each additional high-priority measure you report.

Although bonus points are available, scores in the Quality category are capped at 100%. In other words, the bonus points can help make up for deficiencies within the Quality category but cannot carried over to make up for deficiencies in other categories.

Calculating Your Quality Score

Quality is worth 50% of your total MIPS score. Your Quality performance is calculated using the following formula.

Benchmarks CMS establishes the benchmarks for each measure and reporting method. Higher benchmarks reflect higher reporting in prior performance years. The 2018 benchmarks are based on actual performance data submitted to PQRS in 2016.

This section lists the benchmarking criteria for each measure supported by ExamWRITER. Benchmarks are displayed as both charts and tables:

• The charts give you a visual representation and help you quickly compare benchmarks across different reporting methods.

• The tables list the specific benchmark criteria for each reporting method.

NOTE Bonus points are available for participants who improve their quality scores over the previous year. These bonus points are determined by calculating the percentage difference (excluding bonus points) and dividing by ten.

Quality Score (%)

Points earned on requir --- Any bonus points+

Any points over 60–

60 points possible------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100=

Points earned on required6 Quality measures

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 5

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

001: Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (>9%)

This is an inverse measure. A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. The “Performance Not Met” numerator option for this measure is the representation of the better clinical quality or control. Reporting that numerator option will produce a performance rate that trends closer to 0%, as quality increases.

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 33.33–23.54

23.53–18.25

18.24–14.30

14.29–11.55

11.54–8.90

8.89–6.26

6.25–3.34

≤ 3.33

EHR 83.10–67.96

67.95–54.09

54.08–43.22

43.21–34.12

34.11–27.28

27.27–21.75

21.74–15.74

≤ 15.73

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

6 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

012: Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG): Optic Nerve Evaluation

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 98.99–99.99

— — — — — — 100.00

EHR 82.75–87.40

87.41–90.76

90.77–93.62

93.63–96.16

96.17–97.87

97.88–98.96

98.97–99.99

100.00

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 7

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

014: Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): Dilated Macular Examination

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 99.60–99.99

— — — — — — 100

Claims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

8 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

018: Diabetic Retinopathy: Documentation of Presence or Absence of Macular Edema and Level of Severity of Retinop-athy

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

EHR 57.14–65.83

65.84–72.72

72.73–78.21

78.22–83.12

83.13–88.17

88.18–92.30

92.31–96.32

≥ 96.33

EHR

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 9

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

019: Diabetic Retinopathy: Communication with the Physician Managing Ongoing Diabetes Care

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims — — — — — — — 100

EHR 46.15–56.85

56.86–65.13

65.14–72.38

72.39–78.21

78.22–84.27

84.28–89.93

89.94–95.41

≥ 95.42

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

10 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

117: Diabetes: Eye Exam

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 88.98–98.44

98.45–99.99

— — — — — 100.00

EHR 84.83–92.85

92.86–95.32

95.33–96.96

96.97–98.19

98.20–99.17

99.18–99.82

99.83–99.99

100.00

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 11

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

128: Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Plan

Submission Method

28.22–31.92

31.93–35.34

35.35–38.76

38.77–42.88

42.89–49.18

49.19–64.83

64.84–85.93

≥ 85.94

EHR 28.22–31.92

31.93–35.34

35.35–38.76

38.77–42.88

42.89–49.18

49.19–64.83

64.84–85.93

≥ 85.94

EHR

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

12 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

130: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 97.20–99.23

99.24–99.79

99.80–99.99

— — — — 100.00

EHR 86.25–91.91

91.92–94.85

94.86–96.69

96.70–97.98

97.99–98.87

98.88–99.54

99.55–99.95

≥ 99.96

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 13

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

140: Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): Counseling on Antioxidant Supplement

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 97.33–99.99

— — — — — — 100

Claims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

14 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

141: Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG): Reduction of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by 15% or Documentation of a Plan of Care

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims — — — — — — — 100

Claims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 15

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

226: Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 96.65–98.59

98.60–99.61

99.62–99.99

— — — — 100.00

EHR 72.72–82.40

82.41–87.55

87.56–90.50

90.51–92.74

92.75–94.63

94.64–96.52

96.53–98.51

≥ 98.52

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

16 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

236: Controlling High Blood Pressure

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 58.02–63.90

63.91–68.36

68.37–72.91

72.92–76.91

76.92–81.65

81.66–86.95

86.96–94.06

≥ 94.07

EHR 51.10–56.51

56.52–60.77

60.78–64.28

64.29–67.46

67.47–70.93

70.94–74.88

74.89–80.42

≥ 80.43

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking 17

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

317: Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for High Blood Pressure and Follow-Up Documented

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

Claims 49.53–57.74

57.75–66.45

66.46–78.56

78.57–90.52

90.53–98.16

98.17–99.99

— 100.00

EHR 16.53–20.40

20.41–23.94

23.95–26.93

26.94–29.99

30.00–33.32

33.33–37.61

37.62–45.98

≥ 45.99

EHRClaims

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile

18 2018 Quality Scoring and Benchmarking

2018 Quality Scoring and BenchmarkingBenchmarks

374: Closing the Referral Loop: Receipt of Specialist Report

Submission Method

3rd Decile

4th Decile

5th Decile

6th Decile

7th Decile

8th Decile

9th Decile

10th Decile

EHR 14.29–24.13

24.14–33.57

33.58–43.65

43.66–54.33

54.34–63.78

63.79–74.99

75.00–88.63

≥ 88.64

EHR

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th

Decile9th

Decile8th

Decile7th

Decile6th

Decile5th

Decile4th

Decile3rd

Decile


Recommended