Date post: | 14-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | carlos-cardenas |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 26
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
1/26
Universal ServiceElectricity vs. Telecommunications
Scott Wallsten
Twitter: @scottwallsten30 May 2013
Lima, Per
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
2/26
Why Universal Service/Access?
1. Equity.
2. Political-distributional goals.
3. Positive externalities.
Telecom Electricity
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
3/26
Why Universal Service/Access?
1. Equity.
2. Political-distributional goals.
3. Positive externalities.
Telecom Electricity
Possible externalities in electricity: Positive if affects sewerage. Negative from additional generation.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
4/26
Historically
In principle:Monopoly provider.Used cross-subsidies to fund un-economic areas.
In reality:Used to justify suppression of competition.
Poor job of providing service to poor/rural.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
5/26
Telecommunications
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
6/26
Mobile phones
Telephone lines
Internet users
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Progress in Universal Telecommunications Access(Latin and South America)
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
7/26
WHY?
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
8/26
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Costs Have Fallen Dramatically in Telecommunications
U.S. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers Producer Price Index
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
9/26
Fast Technological Change
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
10/26
Monopoly May Not Have Been Stable
Prices tended to be high relative to costs.
Telecom may never have been a natural monopoly.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
11/26
Key: Good Timing!
Pressure for reforms, desire to join WTO.
Incumbents and experts in 1980s: there willnever be a mass market for mobile phones.
Incumbents happy to stick with land line cash cow....
and allowed private entry into worthless industry.(Ooops!!)
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
12/26
In Telecom, Universal Service Programs LargelyNOT Responsible for Improvements
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
13/26
Electricity
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
14/26
Progress in Universal Electricity Access
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2000 2002 2005 2008 2010
Rural Urban
Share of Population With Access to Electricity in Latin America
Source: World Energy Outlook, various years.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
15/26
WHY?
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
16/26
Reforms (privatization, regulation)
the negative effects of layoffs and higher priceswere more than offset by increased access forpoor consumers, enhanced service quality, andchanges in public finances that benefited poorpeople more.
Kessides, Ioannis N. The Impacts of Electricity Sector Reforms in DevelopingCountries. The Electricity Journal 25, no. 6 (July 2012): 7988.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
17/26
Electricity Disadvantages
Technological change slower (even in generation).
Prices historically (often) too low relative to costs.
Certain parts remain natural monopolies. (But leaves somescope for cross-subsidies).
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
18/26
Hypothesis:
Different Institutions and HistoryAffect Universal Service Programs in
Electricity Relative to Telecom
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
19/26
Telecom Has Conventional Best PracticesFor Universal Service Despite Lack of Effectiveness
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
20/26
Where Did Universal Service Originate?
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
21/26
Electricity Does Not HaveMa Bell Historical Baggage
(with respect to universal service)
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
22/26
Is my hypothesis correct?
Maybe, maybe not.
(maybe my next paper?)
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
23/26
Discussion of distributional effects part of reforms, notnecessarily separate efforts.
Possible Institutional Differences andAdvantages For Electricity
Less institutionalized universal service programsallow more flexibility.
Variety of funding mechanisms.
Ability to focus on specific projects rather thanongoing support.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
24/26
If so, perhaps easier to set rules to makeensure effectiveness
The [universal service] program lacks
measures and goals to assessperformance. The program does notmeasure the impact of funds ontelephone subscribership in rural areasor other potential measures of programsuccess, nor does it base funding
decisions on measurable benefits.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/summary/10004451.2005.html
Extremely difficult to do so in Telecommunications (in US)Entrenched interest groups prevent it.
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
25/26
If so, perhaps easier to set good rules tomake universal service programs effective
Set measurable objectives.
Design programs in ways that make evaluation
Possible.
Set a budget and stick to it.
Even if Im wrong about institutional differences betweentelecom and electricity, thats just good advice!
7/30/2019 2.Universal Service-Scott Wallsten
26/26
Thank You!Gracias!