301258 - semspub.epa.gov

IIIII• P.O. Box 348 Dunn Loring, Virginia'22027 "(703) 573-1690

301258

.HYDROSYSTEMS INC.

VOLUME 4 OF 5

SUPPLEMENTAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONU.S. TITANIUM SITEPINEY RIVER, VIRGINIA -

APPENDICES A - G

SEPTEMBER 17, 1987

PREPARED FOR: --------

AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANYONE CYANAMID PLAZAWAYNE, NJ 07470

PREPARED BY: ...._. _. ._.. —

HYDROSYSTEMS, INC.PO BOX 348DUNN LORING, VA 22027

301289

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDICES . .... 71 ? - " ;

A - WELL CHEMISTRY AND WATER LEVEL DATAB - PINEY- RIVER CHEMISTRY DATA .. ...C - PINEY RIVER DISCHARGE DATA _. _D - 1986 QUANTITATIVE BENTHIC SURVEY REPORTE - SOIL BORING LOGS ._F - CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR WELLS 5-1 THROUGH 5-9G - SOIL BATCH LEACHING DATA AND ANALYSES

301290JJYDROSYSTEMS

1pAPPENDIX A

WELL CHEMISTRY AND WATER LEVEL DATA

301291

J-IYDROSYSTEMS«c.

U.S. TITWIIH SITE SFPlflEHTAL RBEIfiL INVE5716ATIDKSITE GROJNDWftTER DATA "HHHHtHHinnnn

EPft-1 SURVM HELL ELEVATION = 635.35 FEET ABOVE t£LtHH»nH^

FIELD FIELD FIELD LAB _ LAB _ COME. ACIDITY HATES TABLEDATE ;. S9PL£ f " TENF. COHD. ." pK FE 'StfffiTE """1 25 C §9/1 DEPTH ELEVflTIDK

degrees C urios/ci ag/1 eg/1 uihos/CE iCaC03) FEET FEET ~«g*HHmi»innmm

iB-Nov-32 * -" -- -ffi NR NR 147.40 NR ffi NR NR Ml07-Sep-B3 * ._ )R NR 2.57 - 710.00 2100 ffi 1275 ffi (ft29-Sep-83 * " ~ . lf&_ Jft __ 3.61 ..1160.00 - 2753 . JR. 1820 . NF; NR29-flct-63 * NR NR 3.72 -907,00 2400 - NR 1877 NR mI3-Jun-36 EPA1-023 _ 16.0 4500 . "3,36" 1840.00 ".5040 4582 Nti 10.56 622.7920-fey-B7 ..Epftl-141 __J3.8 420 " "" 3.42 _- -.1820.00 5400 . 4419 3220 . - S.65 624.70 '

* DATA FKJH VFI (19845 flPPENDIX D)NR = NDT fEFGRTESNft = mi ffttLYZED FOR " .

EFA-2

FIELD ( FIELD FIELD ~ LAB LAB . CQN5. ACIBIT\ (JATER TABlf -DATE SAMPLE! 7ETP. ' OM). pH FE " SULf ftTE" "" i 25 C tig/lCaCD3) EPTrt ELEWTIft

s C iKihas/cm ^/l ig/1 uahos/cfi FEET " FEET<

* . ... ::. m j: ss.._._Oi _57o.x nt" IE NR NR NR07-Sep-S3 *" "=- ' NR m ffi 430.00 _"2IK •" ffi NR NR ft29-5ep-B3 "-r—— - ^ f f i - " ' ~ 3V35r~" "4447GO ~"W7 - - - ffi " 1280 NR m29-{3ct-e3" * ^------ffi-_- ^ --3iCr? 495.00' '2400 T - ffi " 1$42 NR *13-Jun-86 EPA2-024 15,0 2150 3.45 320,00 " - 2110 2154 NA 12.34 61B.2619-Msy-B7" EPA2-12? . 15..4 . 1730_ . 3,42 J130.0C 140G 1764 87 10.28 6?0.34tfHHiHHtfHftHM» *i iR ,IIIUiltm:*itt*KJJt*. *HtHtl iinniIHi,H»

* DATA FR& VPI (1964, flPP&ffllX D)m = NOT REPORTED ' -Nfi = NOT ANALfED FiS ' . " "

EPA-3 - - SURI rB iELL.a£VATi{»l =" 71L36 FEET

FIELD FIELD ..FIELD LAB L B CONU. ACIDITY HftTERDATE ' SAHPL£ S TEHP. _ CONS. pfi _ _FE"; aJLFflTE_ j 25 .Ig/lCaCOSJ DEPTH

degrees C mhoE/cs " ^/l .*3 ufiips/aJt , FEET FEET

ie-Nov-8207-Sep-8329-Sep-&3. * MR29-Oct-B3 * . . HP.20-fey-B7 EPAM39 14,5 19500 3,32 -4360.00 """"54000"" 1W1B 405XJ 23.77 693.59

* DfiTft FRffil VPI £1984, flPPENDIJTlDNR = NOT iSPORTSNA = NOT (WLYZEB FOR '

HYDROSYSTEMS

U.S. TITMIUH SITE SUFFLEJeTAL RB€DIAL INVESTIGATIONSITE GROMJittM MTfliHIHtilitHHHHit

EPA-4 SURVEYED "HELL ELECTION = 713.39 FEET ABEM HSL . --Hm

FIELD FIELD . FIfil1 LAB LAB COM). flCIDIT_Y WATER TABLEDATE - SAJfLE I TBF. CCND. pH FE SULFATE " 1 .25 C {sg/lCaC03) DEPTH ELOTIQN

degrees C whos/ci . §q/l eg/l trios/ci FEET " FEET

IS-Nov-SZ * NR NR 5.80 0.31 "NR NR NR NR NR07-5EP-S3 * ... ". NR NR " 5.66 ¥16 525" "" HR 0 ffi NR29-Sef-83 . *" "" . ffi to 5.10 3.83 . 180 NR 0 NR KR29-fct-83 * .. ..JR . NR 4.25 1.37 30 NR 0 & KR13-Jan-flD EPM-026 16.0 3300 5.49 0.96 3190 3360 Nfl NR NR20-H5y-B7 EPA4-137 13.6..... 3043 5,57 0.34. _ 3200" _ 3113 1 43.51 669,88-

* DATA FRffi VF-I (1984, APPENDIX D) "NR = NOT REPORTED - --- . . - • - _ :. -KA = NOT ANALYZED FOR

EPA-5 - SjRVDB HELL ELEVATION = 710.03 FEET ABOVE RSLTTTTTTTTl

FIELD FIELE' FIELD . LAB .. .. LAB _ . OK'. ACIDIPr' . HATER TABLEDATE StfPLI "I TE>F. _"t CC®, pH __ , FE . . . SULFATE. " J ..25 C , ( /1MD3I DEF'TH ElfVATION

degrees C uahas/ci ig/I «g/l .tnhDS/» FEET FEETt HHi HfH » i t H H«tm H* J HF-HrtHt

IB-Nov-82 . * ' - " NR m 3,30' 462."00 '- " NR NR ffi NR ffi07-3ep-S3 "*" ~ MR NR 4.40 _ 12.40 8 NR 0 " NR NR29-SEF-83 *;-. • -. -"-.m.. ...:._ w 3.?r 3.19 "~" 29" " NR 20 " m NR13-Jur-B6 EFA5-027 ~" 15,0 ... 420 5.31 0,01 282 429 NA 20.79 6S9.2920Hfey-B7 EPA5-136 14,3. 1698 ._ 3.& 1.83 1700 .1735 _..._S&4 36,32 693.76niiini[tHi'tii'ii»îiitHiiiHH

* DATA FROM VFI (1984, APPENDS D)NR = HOT REPORTED ""NA = mi fiNSLYZEB FOF;

MH SURVEYED HELL ELEVATIDTi = 645.28 FEET-AECrVE HSLMtHiii-innijiin'iu.iULin iiiii.n jtfttHiHjniut

TIED" " "FIELD" FIELD""" LAB""""~" LAB" cow-" ACIBITY WATER TABLEDATE SflflPLE i TEfff' . CQND. pH FE- SOFftTE 1 25 C (i/lCaCQ3) DFJ'TH ELEVATION!

. .... _. _ , . . . - _ . .. FEET FEET

Jan-81 " ' " 'Jul-81

07- Jan-8206-«ay-B207-Sep-8329-Sep-8329-Oct-B313-Jan-S619-tey-B7iniiiiiu* DATA FROH VPI (1984, APPENDH'D)* = »riEmEir~ " :Nfi = NOT AWIED'TOT " " "

345024001547674221440010000120601390014000

"3000,00830.002160.002050,002140.001740,002190.00

HYDROSYSTEMS •».

U.S. TITAKIltt SITE SUPftflBffflL REieiAL IWVEBTIBftTIDNSITE SRGUMTER DATA

«E1L ELBffinOW = M4.75 FEET fflOK MSLHmi^^^

FIELD FIELJ) FIELD LAB LAB CONS. ACIBffi HATER TABLE .DATE Sfflft£ f TEMF;, ' " " CQND. pH FE SUFATE " § 25 C (ig/lCaC03J DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C . . uohos/at *g/l ag/I uifios/ff FEET FEETm*«JHB«iHHttHjmt«HmnEmiHiiHHHtMminnnm^

Jan-81 * " NR 125 3.50 " 930.00 ""6500. ": 132 3000 NR NK08-Dec-S! * ffi r" $94 4,90 1. 00 . 3318. „. 7480 12 ffi ffi07-Jan-E2 *' ffi 7747 4.70 3.70 6i26 8155 490 ffi ffi04-Kay-er . . * .. _....._. ffi . . 7716 . 5.90 3.00"- " 6705 - 8122 652 NF: %04-ALJ9-B2 * «R._.'.. _..".RR" „ ,4,30 . -.JR ..._25QO. _.__...ffi . . . f f i . NR K-07-Sep-83 . -* • NR " "«R " 3.34 20.70 12500 :" " f f i 2450 Hi ffi '29-Sep-B3 *..... HR ffi 4.07 SIM - 9100 - NR 2500 NF (ft29-Dct-83 * NR NR 3,75 39.10 9750 ffi 233S ffi If13-Jur;-8b K2-029 . 15.0 .11000.. 3.66 340.00" - 17200. .."11224 «A 4,35 642.4019Hty-B7 .«2-155 "14J. 10|)30_" . 3,60 3? ; ^ tSOOO;.;.. 10254 4&CO 2.14 644.61

^HH<H*tHiiH

DATA FRGH V?I C1984, APPEND! D)= fST PORTED .= NOT flffiLYZED m ""

SffiiEVED IB1 REVATIGf,'. = 708. 54 FEET AEVE r6LtM*

FIELD FIELD FIELD LAB LAP - C Si. ACISITV HATER TABLEDftTE SftHPLEI TEff'. " ""COfflJ. pH FE" SUFfiTE fi 25 "C (ig/iCaC03) KPTH ELfVATIOfJ

desre£=.C . IB S/H . ._. . . 53/1 _. sg/1 uBits/ot FEET FEETH*HiHH HHHH*HHHnnnijrtf*tfttfe» ^

Jul-fil * ffi "" ffi 7.20 .1 : ffi 27 0 ' 4 ffi ffi08-BecrSl * NR " Nft 7.0) 18.00 NR 0 . Ifi Nft " NRQ7-Jan-82 « " "NF; E . 6.00T: -15.00 . 13 . . 8? 17 ffi ffiOQ y-82 t. . . ..... " NR 78 7.00" ' '3.40 ".. - ..10 82 . ' 31 NR ffi04-AurSl * =.-" .,= = £. - ®... ...i.3Q. ......_ffi ..__.. .!§.... .6_._ . .NR NR ffi07~5ep-33 *. :___.;: ;j€L . .ffi 6.59 2.09.. .10 0; 0 NR .ffi29-Sep-33 *~ ^ NR "liR. 5.84 0.39 7 0 ' 0 ffi ffi2v-Oct-£3 * NR "" NR " 6.51 " ' 1.03 "36 0 0 NR Nr:13-JiBi-84 H5-030 ."16.0 . 475 6.04 91.00 266 484 NA 48,62 659,9220-Kay-67 H5-138 .16.8 1237. ..4,55 .372,00- "1200 1253 902 43.17 665.37

* DATA FR»! !VF'I U9S4, APPENDIK D)NR = NOT REPORTSNA = NOT ANALYZED FOR

301294

MYDROSYSTEMS «e.

fu,s. TnflNiwi siTTsaroefAi feeii INVESTIKTION

SITE fiROUNDHATER OATfi

SJWEYS) mi ELEVATION - 699.31 FEET ABOVE HSL . .FIELD FIELD FIELD LAB LAB CCM). ACIDITY " HATES TABLE

DATE' "SAfREi TBF. :COND, pH FE SULBTE " # 25 C (ig/lCaCQ3) DEPTH ELEVATIONdegrees C tuhos/a ig/1 ig/I lutos/CK FEET FEET

JuI-81 * NR If 7.30 NR 880 . ... .NR 94 NF; KROS-Dec-81 * NR NF; ffi 20.00 . ft ffi ffi ffi NR06-Hay-S2 * - , ffi 6939 3.60 540.00 . 17S2£ tf* 3200 HR KS04-ftjg-82 * . ......ffi ffi 3.70 5570,00 - 2500" _ ffi_ ffi NR ffi07-Se?-83 * - f f i "ST 2.85". "_ 81.20 _ 4575" ffi1 " 1480 NR ffi29-Sep-fi3 * "~ ' - $T " "NR 143" " 157.00" " 4000 ffi" 1800 ffi ffi29-Gct-S3 * 7 -ffi "~ffi 3.27 154.00 .5600 HR 878 NR ffi'13-Jun-St H6-031 " 17.0 5500 3.60 55.00 ""S20_ 5589 NA 32.11 667.202Hby-B7 fc-lfl 14.6 "4440" 3.54 29.00 '"" "5300 4534 1230 30.87 668.44

* DATA FROU VPI (1984, APPENDIX D)NF; = NOT REPORTEDNA - 1ST fiNflLYZED FDF;

! MW-7 -: " "". "SKIVED HEU."aMrrOfi"=: "451.35JEETABD\EliSL _\ &!t*vi&f$ittntt&vffiinnit¥t¥ffiffi

FIELD FIELD FIEU) LAE .. LAE COWS, ACIDITY HfiTER TABLESAMPLE* TEHF. CES©, pfi" Ft SUJATE fi 25'C (•9/lCadB) DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C ushos/co . . . ig/I eg/l uriios/ca FEET FEETHHHiliniII

JuI-Bi * ... .. BT" NE" 2,50""" M7 ""22000' "~ - NR " 2420* 04-ltey-fi2 * " " ffi '" "NR "2.50 500.00 ..." "18154 . ffi 14325 . KF:» 04-&3-82 * -- ----JE.=-_- -NR 2.40. 'm . .2500 ' " ffi ffi ffi

07-Sep-83 * - - NR - ffi 2.65"" 3810.00 " 14200 " • ffi. 5750 NF;" "

_29-Sep-&3 * "rT .TTBT 'NR 2.57 "3340.00 'îX'" ffi 7200 ffi ffi29-Det-B3 * NF. ' NR 2.55 3660. OG 13MC _ . NR 8279 & NRI3-JUR-& .. «7-03z :. 15.0' '"" 700t 2.95"' '2540.00 "^B2M"^"7143 NA NA NA19-Jl3y-87 S7-134 14.2 7450 3,00. 3120,00" " . HOOO J 7614 8B5C' 9.78 641 ,5719-May-87 H7-135 "ffi NA NA 3200. Off ": ' " "11000 "" "" l£ 9250 8.13 443.22Hittnti:i^HnHH't^H^HHHi^HHtfteHHM4HinHninnniHnnninntHttHHiiinH*t*Hi»ti^Hn* DATA ?m VPI U9B4, flPPENHX D)W = HOT (SPORTED - --- .-.-- -. - . . .NA = NOT ANALYZED FOR

JYDROSYSTEMS

U.S. TITANIUH SITE SUPPLEMENTAL R£t£01AL IffiESTIEATIffiSITE ERQUMWATER DATA %>,.

imt«ttHmiHW^5.97 FEET ABOVE HSL ' ^

FIELB FIEU FIELD LAB LAB COND, ACIDITY HATER TABLEMTE~ —— SHP I -fcpt QHD. pH p£ syuflTr § 25 C f*g/lCa€03) DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C uihos/CDi . ag/i . _ 13/1 mhos/oa FEET FEET

CS-Dec-Sl * m 66 6.50 0.56 17 " " f f i 0 ffi M06-Hay-fl2 * NR NR 6.90 0.01 10" " HR 45 ffi ffi04-Au.g-BZ * "TR " "ffi 6,05.. ... NR ?____" "^ _ ffi ffi ^07-Sep-83 * m " NR~ "2",63"" 558.00 . " 1750. """ "ffi" " 1170 NR ffi29-Sep-B3. * , NF, NF; 5.50 469.00 " 750 " ffi 0 ffi ffi29-fct-S3 *. HP,. ffi. ..._5.47 331VOO 2150 " - NR " 0 NS MR

* DATA FRQH ffi (1984, APPENDIX D)ffi = NOT REPORTED

SUR&YEB .ELL ELEVATION = 632. 99 FEET ABOVE K3L ~=~ ." .

FIELD FIELD FIELD . LAB LAB. COKD, fiCIBITY KATER TABLEDATE SflMPLE i TEMP. CQND. pH FE SUFATE e 25 C (tg/lCaC03) DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C uahgs/cs _. . /l... __. fig/1 ..yiriioB/a!; . FEET FEET

19-Kay-87 51-127 15.4 ...,._._ 752 . ..4,93". 15.20 - . 550". V:.767 77 NA NA16-Jurr87 5-1150 18.2 672 5.06 18.40 420 "631 64 4.70 628.29

jf-Ji L t KV tt it S. jLiTUL ££K3LK££ittit JLiLJLJtJL^H^ l?*'f^VTT¥¥VT¥¥ Jl&tli *L fc = " g - " g g * i_ll.Jxl T - v T v L f-gV-T ' J > * v T t j T ]: T Vj'.j m.-e» JL E L v v L- v y f y ¥ v r r V v \ \fvvfrwTT T JT TT T T T T T t *T XJLJL111IX1 TTTTtTTT tttt^lÎAJl *t TTTT 1 f 1 '1 1 E llll*TTTtT I L 1. J. £ I JTt t J I TTTT I ( R 1 1 11 ITTT TTTT1 ft I I 1 tlTllH 1 1 rtTt 1 1 1 1 1 1 i'l I

NA = f€T ANdYZED FOR - . _ . , , . : . : . . . . -

5-2 . ,. - . :.- --.S&VLYED ICLL EIIVATIDN = 433.43 FEET ABOVE MSL*HHtH't^HiHHtHHti[ti:antH^MHtVtmHHHninininnniiinnHHHi^HJin»

FIELD FIELD FIEU' "LAB. i£B C&ffi. ACIPITY HATES TABLEDATE ... SAHPLEI TEHF. CQND. "" " " p"H FE "SULFfiTE 1 25 C («g/ICaCD3) DEPTH! ELEWIOK

de$ree5 C mhos/pt . tg/I ' ig/1 utfiOB/cffl FEET FEET'

20-Hay-S/- 52-142***«

5-3 SJRVEYED €LL ELEVfiTIC I = 631.73 FEET ABffVE fSL

FIELD FIELD FIELD " LAB LAB CQND. ACIDITY HATER TABL£DATE "SAMPLE I TEHF. OMS, pH FE SOFATE % 25 C ias/lDaC03) DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C UKIOS/CB . §g/l . s /1 lahos/cs FEET FEET

20-Hay-S7- 53-143 13.3 . --2150 3.83 102.00 2500 _ .. 2202 . 874 6.92 624,31jjf *Jtx rx tt 1 1 f1 1 1 1 1 1 t J,l! 11

iYDROSYSTEMS

U.S. TITANIUM BHE-SUfllENENTAL R0S3IAL IfftECTISlUQKSITE" KOH TER DATA . "

5-4 SURVEYED HELL ELEVATION =? '- FEET ABOVE RSL "HHHMHmHnH*IHiimminimiHH^mHHHm<«^^

I - __ FIELS ^ FI£LD. m LAB ,. CDND, ACIDITY WATER TABL£I DATE SAMPLE * "TBf ." " " CQND. : " " "p'H FE SULFfiTE ' § 25 C (ig/lCaC03) DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C . uihos/cs — . . eg/I «§/! lahos/CB FEET FEET .

j 2(Hfcy-57 . 54-144 DRY

5-5 SURWYED "HEL ELffflflN = 432.5|'FEET ABOVE HSL*HHtH**f*tHH*Ht»H*HtHH<*i«Hif HtttfiittiHUHHt 1 1 U I I.If 1 1 HH tHiHttH II 1 1 1«*»H»*H»1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 II >l » l****ii*

- 'FIELD'" FIEL2 FIELD UB ' LAB Cfflffl. ACIDITY HATER TABLEDATE SAMFlr I TEff . "CONS. T pH "FE SULFATE . .4 25 C (sg/ICaC03) DEPTH ELEVATION

e"C u .Ujfes/g, ...,.: . m., _ JH/1 .. ._ .J5/1 __y*Q5/OL . FEET " FEETH

I9-fey-B7 55-131 14.8 . 978 5.33 30.30 620 . .998 112 6.10 626.4816-Jun-S7 55 151 15.9" . 9S4 5.34"" 35.00- '.-. - oSJ '. " "' 10jQ2 110 5.51 627.07

^

5-6 " SURVEYED i-ELL ELFv'ATISi = 626.86 FEET ABOVE ffiL«mHHHMHni*HiHHmHU»HHHmm*HmH*HHMHm

FIELT' . FIELD FIELD LAS LAB_ . jrgffl. ACIDITY HATER TABLEDATE SAMPLE t TEF. COM3.""" pT ~ FE SOFATE " :"« 25 C (ns/lCaCtBj DEP'TH ELEVATION'

degrees C usfcos/i:! .._ . ... ig/J «g/l urios/ci FET FEET^

20-fey-87 56-145 "= - -13.9 . . 23frO. 3.70 -TTKi.cr " ~ 2000 2414 "" 1651 3.22 623.64

SIRVEyED iEi ELEVATION = 627.43"FEET ABQvE HSLEH **************** mHHHhHH III t nil H I IE-H i H t. II I H H i! U U H H^j « I Wttil mmtlU )H¥

FIELD FIEU) "FIELD" li" "J UE :""COKD." ACIDITY INTERTABLEDATE SftfPLE I TEHP. COND, pH FE fATE "* 25 C ( /ICaDEJ DEPTH EEVflTION

degrees C mhos/ci ^/l *g/I uaho§/c(! . FEET FEET

20-Hay-S7" 57-146 " 12J 2580 2.73 406,00 " " 2400 " : - 2647 193? 5.06 622.37

301296

MYDROSYSTEMS

U.S. TlTflmiBI SITE BIJPPLBENTAL tSOiAL INV'ESTISHTIDKSITE ffiDUNDHATER DATA -

iniH*t*m«

SURVEYED HELL ELEVfiTIDN = 626. 15 FEET ABOVE R3L

FIELD FIELD FIEU) IM LAB OK). ACIDITY HftTER TABLEDATE ; SAMPLE* TENF. COtJD. .r pH FE SULFftTE 1 25 C (ss/ICaC03; DEPTH ELEVATION

degrees C uahos/ca :. . : ..ig/1 «g/l U ICB/CB. FEET FEETHiHiHiHHSnnmHHHtHHtHim-HinHmHHtHtffH^

19-fey-57 59-130 ,.16,3_. ._ .1320 ..-4.44 120.00 - -1500 1S2 720 5.0(5 621.1516-JurrB? 5-9 153 17.7 '~ '-2310 . 3.0! " 336.00 "2060 2344 1270 5.43 620.72

^

301297

MYDROSYSTEMS

GKUEWTEl BEHISTRY DATft CdiECTB FOR SUFREfefTfiL flEMEEM. 2WIESTJSWTJWAT TE U.S. TITANIUM SITE, PINEY RIVER, VA, HA* 19B6 THROUGH JUf£ 1987

iinilifiili'iiifjH^HHHinHMHHHHfJHtfiUtHniintHHttfHHHHÎiIiiiniHHiHiH

Sailing Location Key

til mm 87= NELLS 1 THRUSH 7 A2S-147 BDKINS BEAR 6-S7 DN AREA 2£PA! THROUGH EPA5= &L1S EFA II THROUGH EFA 15 A2fl-14S SORING 4-37 ON AflEA 251 MOUGH 59 = KELL5 5-1 mm 5-9 A2N-149 8QRIf£_il-B7 ON AREA 2NA= WOT ANALYZED FOR "" ""T» tintui

DATE

13-Jiin-Bs13-Jun-S613-Jun-3613-Jun-S413-Jun-8613-Jun-B6"13-Jun-8613-Jun-B613-Jun-8613-Jim-B619-Kay-S719-Hay-8719-Kay-e?19-«ay-B719-Hay-8719-fey-6719-Hay-8719-fey-6719-ftay-S72&*ay-S720-fey-372&-Hay-B720-fiay"-8720-Hay-8720-Ksy-872CHiay-8720-fey-B720-Hay-e72GrJtey-8720-May-S702-Jun-8702-Jun-87

. ffi-Jun-87I6-Jun-8716-Jun-B7t6-Jai-8714-Jun-B7

;»i**»»««TTTi'Tir

SAMFlEtdeg:

:imnnnmiiEPA1-023EPA2-024K1-G25

EPA4-026EPfi5-027Hi-028H2-Q29H5-03Q™ .«6-031H7.-032 -

- 51-127" 58-128

- EFA2-12?59-130 ".55-131HI-132.K2-155... . ..

" K7-134M7-135

EFAf-136EPA4-137 ....16-139 .

..EPA3-139rH6-140 ..

EPftl-14.152-14253-143

. 54-144. DRY,..56-.145. .57-146A2S-147A2M-148

:;ffiN-149 " ""5K50 . ..55-15153-152..59-153 '-

TITTTTl

HELDTEMP.rees C

16.015,016,016,015.016.015.0

."16.017.0

"15.0"15,417.415.414.314.8.15.2.J4.114,2"NA

'14.313.3.14.814.514,6

..13,8lf.5"13.3

. 13,912.417,4016.5021.10IB. 20,15.902S,S(}-17.70

FIELD FIELD• COND. pH

UBtlK/CB.ILlilllllilir

45002150

"" MOOOO3300420

100001100G475

' 550C••'7000".

75225101730

: 182097890001.0030745QMA

1696'5)43

,.12571950044404320. 'I10992150

. _...,- ,2360.

2580.365044500122000."." . .672 :

934..3750.2310

D.LK11X

3.383.453.65"5,495.313.653'.6i '6.043.602.95"4."933.293,424.44".5.333.643.603,00NA

3,665.57i"55;3.32 "3.543.42.4.193.BT. _3.70 .2..T33.29'2.662,765.065,343,69 .3.01

LABFE

_ «g/l

1840, «'320.001740.00

0,960.01

1640.06:3.40.0-091.00"

' 55,002540. 0015.20618.00

' 130.00120.0030,30

2190.1)0354, CKi3120,003200.00

1.830.34

372.004340.00 "29.00

1820.00" 153YOO108.00

7BO.OO.406,00

2068760

"" "17720"."".""IB..-.-35. ,_m.

336

nrumiiii

LABSiFATE

- »9/l

50402110139063190282

: 15700* 17200

2665520

, . ".. 8250". -T 550

-200Q1400

"" . 1500620

14000. "15000. 11000'

.11000.'-'1706...3200

: v ™ :540005300

. : 5400""'920.JSOO

. .2000'2400

; 1680. .2300-0

. " 45000~ "". 420

680 .. ..3040. 2065

UXJuiXUlLU

tttlllHItlt

CQND. *625C

Ul lCS/Ci

45B22194101833360429

.10183112244S455S971437672549'1764

. 1S52' .998

91SC'1034

.. 7614NA

1735•'3113

" 125319916.45344419

:"H25'. 2202

.. 241426473097

' -45036122959-

68110523732

. 2344

IttlllHH

ACIDITY13/1CaCQ3

niinnnNA.NAmmNAmNANANANA77

1370S47720112

1005046008S509250864

"1902

4050.51230322u.533874

165119391430212004100C .

641102500 -1270

* Coridoctivity Correcticn to 25- degrees C a=L_recDffiaens'ed inOfficial Methods of Analysis of the Association of OfficialAnalytical Cheaists, Ed, Sidney HiiiiaES, 14th Edition, 1984,Arlington, W.

CojRpensated Coad. = unc«pBn5atH|/ [ ( (P/42) (,04T-1))+I)P - Tea erature ccefficie^t at "227aEg, CT = Taperature in degrees C . "

HYDROSYSTEMS •».

If

-v

[

301299

p, APPENDIX B

PINEY RIVER CHEMISTRY DATA

301300

JHYDROSYSTEMStt.

Fife' RIVER. HftTER'&EHISTKY DATS COLLECTED FOR M 5UPFLIENTALSEffiDIAL INVESTIGATION AT T£ U.S. 'TITANIUM SITE,Pita RIVER, Vft, m 19S6 TffiOEH AU3U3T 19B7TABULATED BV SffFUNB LOCATION AM)

TOTAL DISSOLVED IRSUN «g/l .. ..._ ^ . ..__ . _ ___.__'_.distance " - - - ------ — -- - - - - -----

S&Iur't.C

station

13•56

24

frw RT 151brides

UOO's of f£)

0234051

23 -_=40

OlHIay I"4-flay

0.13 -0.150,18 0,120,43 0.330.36 0.51

" 0.16 0.130,4? Q.53"

02-Jun

0,100.130.200,37

0.250,5?

"16-Jun

0.040.030,26(US

0,060.30

30-Jtm

0.05'0.060.190.20

0,050,14

i4-M

O.OS0.080.3!0.23

0.070,40

_04-§U5 20-Au~g i9-ftug

0.05 0.07 0.050.120.16 0.2c 0,13-0,18 Q.li - 0.05

0707V. /U

25 ,

0.07O.Q60.270,16"

- .05-' W

09-Sep

0.050,050.360.18

"'0.07" 0.5J

05-€ct Il-Nov

0.09 0,050.12 0.050.44 0.360.2? 0.64

O.li" 0.040.73 0.49

l/U.112-Jan 24-fer 12-Aug

0.17 0,04 0.140.05 0,04 0.200.17 0.07 0.400.51 0.25 0.33

0.15 0.03 0,200.49 0.19 0,77

pH IN STANDAFS UNITS' - "" ~ --=.- - - - --"-:-

samplestation

13C"

6

24

SPECIFIC

533= IEstation

1T

56

24

distanceiron RT 151

bridgeU'GO's of ft)

023

- 4051

23 ;40

CQ&XTIVITYdistance =

free RT 151bridge

UOO's ol ft)

023...4051 '

23 ..40

01-Kay 14-Hay

^ rt f ' ; ' *"L

6, 73 6.716.2 4.06

" 1.54 ...6.il_6,2?. 6...T3

in fc/ca.-.-. _

01 -May I4-flay

24 23_...25 26.

26 ...rs31 3iT

25_ 2629 31

. ._

02-Jiai

a ~*£"5.756,446,30

. 4.386,63

- - -—-

02-Jufi

24._ 24". 24• 24

2424

16-Jun

k 9S

6,4b" 6,65

_i,776,48

- _ _

li-Jun

2610

_. : _m"34

-•57

24

. . . __

30- Jim

6.416,53

6", 716.97'

-— -

^

. 3-3.. 30. 35

-50

2325

14-Jul

A S=t'-7.216.9S

6,92" 6.91

— --•- ---

14-Jul

30414S

, 50

- 25" 28

_ __ _ . . _ _ _ _ . — ..-

OHtag 20-Au"5 2I-fiy_3

6.9S h,T> 6.6"96=77' ' : "•"6.S7 4.93 J),-s56,75 6.16 6,75

.6,766.K

---- -- =~ ^ = =--— -

- — .- -. . _

04-Au-i 20-Aug 1'9-Hiig

. '35 ' 31 3045 - ..-'50 ... 52. 3255 , - . :35

23 . ... - ,.25 __ -

2&*.

6D'"i

" LE2,6.97

"" 6,79

" 6.79. 6,65"

- - -

25-Aug

" • -"."30""- 32"4046

...if22

09-Sep

t- T""6,67o,466.55

6,596,55

09-Sep

'. "23253237

16. 17

_ . .

05-Oct IHfev

6.S6 6.51"6.72 6.44fi.d6 6.516.61 5.93

6.73 6.446.43 6.42

~

05-Oct li-Mov

. "36 2655 3659 4070 40

23 1125 11

1 I'll:

12- Jar, 2;-Har 12 fijo

6.41 6,75 7,056,30 6.79 6.85 .6.22 5,92 6.816,19 6.22 6,50

6.23 6,55 6.305,89 6,24 6.47

12-Jan 24-fer 12-ftjg

' 12 14 4420 17 6322 18 7925 2 4 - 9 1

3 19 625 IS SS

301301

MYDROSYSTEMS AC.

PINEY RIVER &TER CffifflSlfiy DATA COLLECTED' FUR Tf£ SUPPLHENTALJEEJIAL INVtSTCSATIffl ATT£ U.S. TITANIlfl SITE,PINEY RIVER, VA, RAY 1986 THEUGH AUBUST 1987 "

Sailing Location Key:

0= Qfi/QC Sample, Dsionized water and Ritric acid1= Piney River upstreas pf sits .... ._ _2= Pinsy River, north bans-', jus; upstream of Area 53= Finey River, center of.river t just upstreas of Ares 5.4= Piney River, north bank, just upstreu of culvert at Area 75= Finey SiverV center o-f river, jest upstreas ot culvert at Ares 76= Piney River, dorfnstreasi of site at paer-line crossing7= Discharge fros culvert at Area 7

NA= NOT ANLAYZED PDF. " " ,

FIELD _ FIELD FIELD LAB_ LAB CGKJ.DATE "S&PLEf" ' "13?, ~"~ -dMi,"" "pH" " " "FT "ffilrffTE " 6 25 C

depress C ushus/csi ... . Sg/i 55/1 ushas/cE

OJ-Hay-84 KK)i 14.5 24 7.0s 7C,13 m 25GI-Hc/-66 - - 2-032. . 14,5 25 7,04 0.16 "" "ffi 26QI-flay-64 " 3-003:. =T<.5 .25- .7."OC"-""O"" NA " 2601-Hay-B4 4-KJ . ; 15.5 "29"6,29"'i 0.49 ' NAOHby^4 5-OOe" - ": £5.5 ' " 26 6.78' 0,43 " " ' NA01-&y-B4 6-004 15.0 31 6.24 0.34 " NH 3201-tey-8i "7-607 ." ""NA " 'ffi NS~ "245.QQ .--HA.

14-tey-B4 1-OOB 13.C . 23 6.6B 0.15 ' NA 2414-fey-86 2-009 " "13.0.. " "26 6.67" 0.13 NA 2714-lfey-fc 3-010 13,0 26 6,73 .0,12 NA 2714-«ay-8i . -, 4K'll . 13.0 " 31 6.73" 0.53. " NA 3214-fey-Sfi 5-012 13,0 ." - "- -31 4".7l " 0.33" '' 'm 3214-fey-Si ..6-013 ... 13."0 .. , "SB.- t>M'_ '0.51'.". , ; " 3714-fcy-86 7-014 13.0 ._ . ...NS ' m 294.00 . ffi "

1-015 48.5 . . 24 6.3S OT10 NA 24G2=Jun-Bi 2Hii6 19,0 ' 24 4.38 O.S NA 2402-Jia>-86 3.-01? ' 20.0 '" 24 6,75"" 0.13 tf 2402-Jun-86 4-016 21.0 24 '4,43 . 0.59 NA 2402-Jun-36 - 5-019 22.0 ... 24 6.44 0.20 NA 2402-Jun-S* 6-f320 25.0 24 6,30 0,37. ' m 2402-Jun-S6 -6-021 25,0 - 37 4.30 0,3! H5 37.02-Jim-86 0-022 - ffi NA NA 0.01 $ NA

* Conductivity Correction to 25 degrees C as recoMeaded inOfficial Methods of Analysis of ihs Association of officialAnalytical Ctesists, Ed. Sidney Killiaas, 14th Edition, 1984,Arlington,

Co ensated Cond, = uficospensaied/ (((P/41)" (. 04T-I})+1)P = TBSperatu1^ coefficient of 2£/deg. C"~T = Teisperature in degrees' C

MYDROSYSTEMS

(i1!PAS 2 OF 4 *£"'

PltEY RIVER WATER DBIISTfiY fiftTA COLLATE' FOR Tr€ SUPr,If£NTALFffleiAL .INVESTIGATION AT THE U.S. TITANIUH SITHjPIKEY RIVER, VA, HftY I9Sa TffiDUGK 19B7

"."" FIELD." FI.ELIJ HELD ".LAB LAB "CM.DATE SAMPLE I TEMP. (JND. pH Ft SULFfiTE § 25 C

degrees C mhos/a 13/1 ig/1 ushos/cB

16-Jun-S6 0-033. . -NA NA H4 0.01 NA NA16-Jun-& 1-034 . 22.0 "~. 26 6.98 0.04 NA 26

_16-Ji;rrB6 2- 35 23,0 .... 39 6,77 0,06 HA 3916-Jun-S6 3 036 ' 23.0 30.' 7.4C: 0.03 NA 3016-Jun-S& 4:037 24.0 ". "32 6.43 ' 0.30 '"" NA 32l&-Jun-S6 - 5-038. 25. G ; 30 4..48_ 0.26 NA 30I6-Jan-ffi " "6-039 _ \2§.0 ' ...34 "iTcB"" aiB NA ' 34'lK'un-36" 1-040'" 21.0 32 6,45 0..27 - NA 32

•30=Jun-Bi 1-041 , . 22.0 " "3-f 6.41" 0.05 NA 3B30-Jun-fl4" " " 2-(t42" 22.5 _ 33.: 4.71 .0.05 "" HA 3330-Jai-S4 - 3-043 23.0 - ' - - 30 "4.53 S.06 " NA 3030-Jii<i-86 4-044 .25.0 -. 37.. 6,97 0.24 Nr 3733-JtB?-84 ..._.5-Q4=.. ... 26.0 " 35 7.2B" 0.19 ffi 353<VJun-36" " D-046"" " 23,0 S) .7.10" 0,20" . NA 5030-Jur.-B4 -..G-047 NA . . NA NA. 0.07'" ffi MA

14-Jul-S6 1-04S " 24.0 30 4.BB O.CS " Nft 3C-14-Jul-Sa . .2-«? 25.0:.. .:. 45 6,92 0,07" KA 4514-Jui-&5 3-050-.. _.25.0 " 41 7.21 ( 0.08 KA 4114-Jd-Ba - 4-051"" 25,'S " '..'. ""4E 6,91 "'"" D.40 "" NA 4814-Jul-S6 5-C52 2S.O " 45 6,98 0.31 ffi 4514-M-B4 6-053 .. --31.0 . 50 7,02 0.23 . ffi 49"14-Jiil-S3._ 0-054 NA NA NH 0>0i _ NA NA!4-Ju!-86 ' -4-055""" 3"i.'0 " 50 7."02 " C-.'fi ' ffi 49

_ . 1-056 _ 22.Q ._.: 3?.. 4.95 .." 0._OBC .__., Nf> 35•04- 0-86 ' 2 5?""" "23.0 ._ ".. ..45 c.7c\.,. 0.066 " " KA 4504-ftuq-S6 3 58 ..24,0 . 45 ".. 4.77 "0.120- NA 4504-AU9-S6 4- 59 , 25.0- - - 50 4.64_ . OJBD " NA 5004-Au.q-S6 5-04C1" " " " 26, 0 50 6.B3 0. 164 NA 50G4-6ug-& ..4-041 2B.C 55 '"6.75" 0.1BO NA 5504-AU3-66 0-062 Nh NA NA O.OOE - NA NA

- 4-063 - "25.0 " 5G "6.66 0,300 HA 50

ZO-Aug-84 1HJ44 22,0 31 6.77 0.07 KA 3120-Aug-64 5-045 22.0 - - 52 .4,93 0.26 NA 5220HSq-S4 6-066 23.0. MA 6.16 _ 0.1 1 NA20-4JS-B6 7-067 .22.0 - KA 2.50. 24Q. . 2200

21-Aua-B6 -i-m 22.0 . 30ir4,49 .0,05 HA 30'2Hua-S6 5-069 22.0 ." .32 6.&5 0,13 " NA 322Hfcg-S6 6-070 24.0 35 6.75 0,05 HA 35 " o-.-^21-Auo-fc 7 071 SpFLW , NA .NA Kft N^ ffi O 01 30 321-feg-66 CK)72 NA NA NA 0. 01 NA NA

MYDROSYSTEMS «c.

PASE 3 DF 4 -<£•> '•

PINE1;' RIVER &TER CfSIISTRY MA CuUECTES FDF. T!£ SUPPLIflENTALRBEJIAL INVESTIGATION AT J}£ u.g. TITASIUK SITE,PINEY RIVER, VAt KftV 198= THROUGH AUGUST 19B7

FIEU) FIEU) FIRE iM LAS CGK.DATE Vm£% TBP. OWC. pH FE S1FATE § 25 C

degrees C uahos/cs. ag/1 fig/I uffihos/ciM-KH*tHHH«HtffHRinini»*iitiHHHH{HHiH»fIHHH'^tfHtHKfHH

25-AU3-B4 1-073 19.0 . " -30 4.90 0,"07 HA 3025-&i-& 2-074 .-19.0 39 6,79. 0.06 NA 3925-Aug-B6 3-375- 2C.5 32 6.S2 O.OS .HA 3225-Aas-fi4 . -4-07B 22.0 - "43 6,65 . Q..48 NH 4325-fius-36 - 5-077 23,0 - - 40 6.87 . 0.27 NA 4025-Aug-& 6-07E 25,0.. 46 _ 6,75. ..0,16 . NA 46•25-Aus-"S"""""""6HJ79 ^ 25.'D ; - 44 " 6.79 .0.14 ... fJA 46

05-SBF-B6 .o-D8C""";:::iNA NA... HA_. ajE"":::. m ..NA09-Ssc-B6" 1-031 ~ ""l4.iT" "" 23 dV/T "0.05"" m 2309-sep-ei. ..:'2-e5r'"" "ii;o" " "2? 6,59"" 5.07 " NA 30.CJ9-5sp-86 3-OSr . . . 17.0" 25 6.67 . 0,05 " HA 2509-5ep-& i-OS* . - " 17.0 35 4.55 -0,50 NA 34C?- p-36 "5-OB5..."- 17.5 32 6,46 U34 tf 3209-5ep-S6 :." 6-C&.-""•." -"-22,0 .J- -"•:.,37-i.55. C.'IS NA 37W-Sep-84 3-CS7 ^ 17.0 = 25'^ 6.67 0.0£ ffi 25

05-fet-Sfi OXSS .. NA _ . HH NA_ ..JUS ... ffi NAC5-Oct-8i 1- 89 23.0 ._: 3S_ 6.36 0,09 NH 53G5-jrt-86 "2-090 ._ 23,0 •' " 58 6,ZT 0.11 NA 5805-U:t-3s 3-091 24".0 " 55 6.72 0.12 NA 5505-fct-S6 4-0?2 " 25.0. 65" 6.43 0,73 """" ' NA 65S5-Qct-S6 5-093 . 24,5 ,. 59 6,66 0.44 NH 5905-fet-Bc "4-094" 26.5. 70 6,61 0.2J " "- ffl 7005-Qcf-36 " "1-095 23.0 38 6.6t '0,10 H= 38

li-fev-Bc ^96 "." rNA"~ "! N£ "NH V 0.03". . HA11-NOV-B4 1-097 li.'O 20 '6.51 0.05"" " & 21ll-fcv-B6 -2- ;98 ." 11",0 25 6.44 "0.04 " NA 26ll-tev-B4 3-099 11,0 36 6.66 . 0..05 .. .. NA 37il-ffcv-86 4-iOC 13.0 " 30 6.42 0,49 NA 3111-Npvffi" 5-101 11. C " 4& 6.51 0.36 KA 41lHfev-86 6-102 -" 11,0 40 5.93 0.56 NA 41ll-fcv-86 6-103 11,0 "40" 5,53 0,64 NA 41Il-tev-B6 7-104 11.0 20W 3.00 -470.«J "..3500 2050

12-Jan-87 0-105 " NA NA NA 0,02 & HA12-Jsn-B7 1-10& 3.0 ' " 12 1,41 0,17 NA 1312-Jan-87 1-107 3.0" -12 6.41 0,98 ffi 13,12rJan-87 _ . 2-1&L . 3,0. ",2$.. "&26 7 ;0.15 . ffi 2112-Jarr37 3-109 ..3.0 ' 'J" 6,30 0.05 " NA 2112-Jan-87 4-110 5.0 21 5.89 0.49 ffi 2212-JarrS7 5-111 4.0 22 4.22 0.17 NH 23 3Q130412-J3.n-S7 6-112 6.0 25 6,19 0,49 NA 2612-Jan-&7 6-113 6,0 ' 25 6.19 0.51" HA 2612-J3P-B7 " 7-114 8.0 . ,190Q ..3,10 287,00 2500.00 196712-Jan-87 0-115 "N>:" ' ffi ""Jfe"""0.02 ' <1 HA

"_______________________HYDROSYSTEMS «.

FASe4GF4

PINEY ROT HATER OEKISTRY DATA COLLECTED FOR THE SUFPLIHENTALREMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AT THE 0.5. THAN1UH SIT£SFIKEY RIVES, VA, HAY 1936 IHOJffi AUBUST 19S7

DATE"

24-fer-S724-flar-B7

- 24-Mar-S7"24-fer-8724-fer-8724-ter-S724"-Kar-8724-&r-S724-ter-8724-toHtf24-fkr-B7

12-fiuS-£712~Ati3-B712-Aug-B712-Aug-fl7I2-Aug-E712""ftuS""37j2~Au3-6712-&3-87

"Sflfflf 1degr

0-116 "1-117

' • -2-1183-119

' " -3-120 """ 4-121

-."" 5-122 "-"" 6-123 " '6-1247.-125

" 7-126

. 1-154"2-155 ...

-3-1544-137 .

' 5-158 '6-159 -6-1600-161

FIELDTEH?,ees C

~~m5.87,16,2

' "6.28.6

""8.6. 11.911.9

. -23.223,2

22.123,5

" 23,725,626.527,927,9._NA

FIELDOM5,

UriKB/d

m141917

" - 17ISIS2424

-.2670=" -2670"

446263

. - SB"799190NA_

FIELDFH

NA6.756.556,796.79s,245.926."226.212.S42.84

7.056.806.S56,476.816,50.6."50

NA"

LAPFE

"313/1

0.020.040.080.040.080,19

-XOZ'0,250.24

234,00222.00

. 0.14, 0.200,2T0,770.40T.33

7 0.33".0.02

LABSULFATE. ig/I

- <iNANfiNANHNA

'•"" NANANft

. 2150:. 2v®

NANA

- — NANANANfi

; . NANA

CGffi.S25C

ushos/ci

NA152018is

. 19192525

26802680

446263887990890

• IUIHL

ACIDITYASag/1CaCG3

N6'NANANANANAHP

" "Nfi11871214

NA&NA?$HANAKANH

301305

MYDROSYSTEMS «c.

I£?/-

SfffLIKB STATION 17, CULVERT DI5CHAR3E .

I 1986 - - ——— — r ~--1907 — -- - STB.OlHtey 14-fcy 20-Aug 11-ltov 12-Jan 24-fer MEAN EV1. " MA?: HIN

TOTAL CISS3LVEC IRON IN ag/; 243 . 294 24C) 470 267 228 ... 294 83 470 22e-?K if) STAKJARD HilTS .." -2,3 2.BO .2.50 .3.00 "3.10' 2.84 2.84 0.19 3.10 2.50SPECIFIC CDKSCTIVITY IN mhos 243 ' 3470 „ T,. ..„ .. . ..1657 1414 3470 243SULFATTIN^/I 2200 2053 19"67 2630 2226 275 2630 1967TQTAL ACIfilTY IK ig/1 CaC03 "' " """""" ~ ". .. ^T " .1201" ." 1201 0 1201 1201

301306

MYDROSYSTEMS *c.

ffft

[

301307

APPENDIX C

PINEY RIVER DISCHARGE DATA

301308

J-iYDROSYSTEMS

DAILY DISEMEE (XT 1, "1985 - S£? 30/1936)- P"INEY Rim AT PINEY RIVES, VIRGINIA

DAY OF DISCHARGE " BAY OF DISCH&SE DAY OF DISPERSE DAY DF DISCHARGE DAY OF DISCHAR8E DAY Dr DISCHARSE DAY DF DISCHARGE m OF DISCHARGEYEAR CFS YEAR CFS .YEffi CFS . YEAS ffS YEAR CFS YEAS CFS YEAR CFS YEAR CFS

KJHHHmtfiHmH tfEHHIHHHHHtfmHm

1 IS 51 BE' 101 38 151 B9 201 46 251 35 301 17 351 142 22 . _52_... -M .-102 40 152 85 202 _" -.44 252 33 302 13 352 133 . 32 ...-53 151 Id3 38 153 81 203" 52 253 31 303 10 353 124 24 - 54 154 104 . 33 -154' 78 204 € 254 31 304 9.1 354 135 20 - 55 -153 105 37 ' 155 : 76 " " 205. .47 255' 36 305 7.9 355 ' 126 19 56 145 106 36 154 _ 73 2fe 45 256 29 306 7,3 356 127 17 57 138 107 " 36 "157" """70"" 207 ~~ 44 """257 26 307 7.2 357 ' 12B 17 58 132 103 36 153 68 203 43 255 25 303 6,5 358 129 17 59 12S 109 35 159 ".._41 "205 . 42 " . 259" . 27 309 6.2 359 1110 16 60 198"" 110 ' 35 '" '160 .'". 60 ~' '2lV ' "" 41~ "260 26 310 6.5 360 1011 16 61 3V2 ill 49 161 59' 211 46 261 23 . 311 6.5 361 9.812 17 62 399." 112 53 142. . 59 212 ' 59 - 262 22" 312 6.5 362 9.913 17 63 35B ""1113 ""43 163" 54' " J2lT" ""5T " ~2tt "~ 19 313 6.2 363 9.914 17 64 m 114 43 164 57 214 47 264 20 314 6 364 1115 17 ... 65 262 115 41 . ...165..".. % . 215 „ 42 . ... .265. .20 315 6.4 365 . .1016 16 ffi" 230 - 116 40 - "l46 245 216 .....38 26c 20 316 7.S17 16 67 203 1"17 42 167 223 . 217 _"." 36 267. 22 - -- 317 6.5IB 16 68 17S 113 45 148 197 . 21S 35. 263. 21 318 6,719 16 '69.159. 119 40 169 175 2/9 "34 26? 17 31? 6.520T ' "16 "70" "143 120 "38' '"""170 *" ~159 220" " 33^ 270' ' 15 320 621 5fc 71 129 121 """" "35 171' ' 140 221" 32 271 14 321 S.422 84 72 118 122 37 172 125 222 ... 31 . ...272 24 322 9.523 94 73 . 110 123" .41 173 " 113 223 30 "= 273 19 323 1124 77 74 117 124 40 174 " 304 224 28 '274 21 324 2125 63 "775 KB. 125. . -41 175 % ' 225 - .43 275 2s 325 2726 55. ... 76 92 12a " ; 46" 176 90 226" 55 "":27h 22 326 1727 ~50 -77 '87 127 ..5B.. .177 .84 227 45 . 1/7 17 327 1228 46 "70 82"" "120" "•"5i"Z"_~178. """.79 ""228" ; :.42 ",278 . 14 ""328 1129 42 . 79 .77 129 51 179 '" 73 "229/, 41 ' ',279 15 329 93C> 39 ."80 71 130 :': 73 "' ISO " -69 230 : ' "64 "280 13 330 7.931 38 Bl 69 131 67 181 67 231 67 281 12 331 8.232- 71 B2 67 " 132 -=69 182 65 232 " 90. 2S2. . 10 "332 1833 401 ' S3 64 133 .74 .. 133 .61 233. Ill "" 263 9.5 333 1434 1580 84 61 134 89 184 59 234_ 103 284 8.5 "334 9.435 8110 85 60 "135 79 "185 " " 57" """""235 - : '99 """"285 "8 335 8.636 3400 .- 86 58 136 . 73 186 55 236 89 2& 7 , 5 - 3 3 6 8.637 1100 -'=i=B7 55 137 " ~6i" 18? 54 '237 81 "257 7.2 337 IS38 60S BS 71 138 64 IBS 53 238 75 288 6,8 338 22 -39 425 89 53 139 68 189 53 235 76 289 6.4 339 6140 325 "90 .51 140 68 190 49 240 72 7290' 8,4 340 5641 260 "91 49 141 80 - 191 47 241 62 291 12 341 4342 215 92 4£ 142 79 192 46 242 56 292 8 342 5343 184 93 49 143 "84 193 45 243 .. 53" 293 7 343 2944 160 94 47 144 86 194 43 244 _ 49 294 6 344 2645 145 95 - 46 145 ' ""98" "195 42 "245" 46 . "295 7.6 345 2346 1 3 0 - 9 6 45 146 103 196 41 246 ... 41 296 9 346 2247 121 97 44 147 100 197 53 247 39 297 32 347 2048 114 98 42 148 97 193 67 243 38 295 19 34S49 100 99 42 14? .95...__'199 49 249 36 ' 295' 18 34950 94 100 .. 39 ....ISO. _ ..' .95" . 2QG. _ . :47 I":250 - 37 '.'. 300 " : 25 350 16

SOURCE: US3S, HftTER HESSJRCES DIVISION, RESTQN, VA.

mY DISCHARGE (OCn; "1985 - SEP 30, 19563PIffiY RIVER AT PINEY RIVER, VIRGINIA

\ - - V

ininmiiinimmmniminiiiiininmiiiinnniunin

AVERA3E: 98.8 CFSSTD. DB1. 469.8 CFSHftXIHUK: B110.0CFSMIMII1UK: 6.0 CFS

AVERAGEWTHffilTiARESTORK: 53.9 CFS

301310

MYDROSYSTEMS «c——

rI

I

3C13U

APPENDIX D

1986 QUANTITATIVE BENTHIC SURVEY REPORT

301312

tfYDROSYSTEMS

of VIRGINIASTATE WATER CONTROL BOARD

RichardN.Burton 2/77 Hamilton Street .. BOARDMEMBKRSExecutive Director ._ ... _. . _ . . . - . . . . . —

Please reply to: Valley Regional Office Roben C. WmmgerPosiOff.ce Box 11143 _ r- - - - , . : ., ... . H6 North Main Street Chaifm3n

Richmond. Virginia 23230 _.. , . _.,- .... _,...___-- p Q Box 268 Henry 0 Holl.mon.Jr,(804)257-0056 • - - - Sridgewater. Virginia 22812 J *"™"

/imi or>o -»eo . . . . Millard B Rice. Jr_'---. ,- "_ •, _-_ v ""-'" \" " - QavidH Miller

r-.-" ".^ - , JV" . - :- , -- -~:;4r"-- "^ ij --"-:"- PainckL Standing,"4 March 1987 w,B.dgoodW8ir,jrVelma M Smith

-j . • "'-fe--; " ' • - "- -"'' * -- "Ti ' '" * •*'• ' ^ ^"

Mr. Jerome C. Muys, Jr.Breed, Abbott & Morgan t _.International Sguare --—--:- - _ . . . - - - - • * - : _ - , . , - • " . . - " . . •1875 Eye Street, N.W.Washington," D. C. 2 00 0 6 . .- ." . .=.

5 ~~ : • - • ""." „ ". -=- - -- • — -

Re: U.S. Titanium Site-,

Dear Mr. Muys:

Attached please find.a copy of the report on the quantitative benthicsurvey of the Piney River performed by VPI and SU. Please accept myapology for the., delay in providing this to you but I have been out ofthe office quite1 a lot lately and tied up with other work andconsequently fallen behind. Dr. Voshell has offered to meet with usto^discuss the report if 'there is any interest among the parties indoing this. Please-Met me know If you have/any questions or if ameeting is desired. .

Sincerely,

*

/jf

Tedd H. Jett, P.E.Regulatory Services Supervisor

cci. Mr. JoCL Jerome w/attachLyle Silka w/attach

John R. Butler, Esg.Mr. Michael Bass w/attach _Ms. Jeanie Grandstaff, Offlee of EnforcementVRO File #20-1147

301313

*

fBenthic Macroinvertebrate Survey

of the Piney Riverin the Vicinity of the U.S. Titanium Site

Report Submitted to

Virginia State Water ControlValley Regional Office

Bridgewaterr Virginia 22812

VALLEY REG10HALOFFICE

byJ. Reese Voshell, Jr., Ph.D.

Department of EntomologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Blacksburg, Virginia 24061

January 15, 1987

301314,

. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Surveyof the Piney River

in the Vicinity of the U.S. Titanium Site

INTRODUCTION

The Piney River has a long history of degraded water qualityresulting from the processing of ilmenite ore to titaniumdioxide. Although,.manufacturing stopped in 1971 and thesite was reclaimed during 1980, water quality continues tobe impaired. In the summer of 1986, the State Water ControlBoard (SWCB) contracted Virginia Polytechnic Institute andState University (VPI&SU) to conduct a survey which wasdesigned to quantify the remaining impacts to the river byanalyzing the benthic macroinvertebrate community. Theobjectives of this study were:

1} to take replicate quantitative samples of benthicmacroinvertebrates at sites representing maximum impact,recovery/ and reference (no impact);

2) to describe the structure and function of the communitiesat these sites by appropriate analyses; and

3) to conduct statistical analyses to document anydifferences that might exist among.the sites.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The history of water, quality problems in the Piney River hasbeen reviewed in a yar iety of reports and memoranda by theSWCB (e.g. Paessler 1981, Ayers 1982, Bolgiano, 1985, 1986}which will only be. summarized here. Titanium dioxide wasmanufactured at a site on the Piney River just below Route151 from 1932 to 1971. There were two major impacts fromthe manufacturing process: discharge of sulfuric aciddirectly into the river and leaching of stockpiles ofcopperas. While the plant was in operation the effects ofthe sulfuric acid probably far exceeded the effects of thecopperas leaching. Biological surveys in the 1950's and60 fs found no aquatic life in the Piney River below theplant nor any life in the Tye River from its confluence withthe Piney to where it. joins the James River. During the1950's there were several fish kills in the James River thatwere: attributed to heavy local, rainfall and discharge ofacid from the plant. After the plant shut down in 1971, thedischarge.of sulfuric acid ceased/ and there appeared to besome recovery of the biota in the Piney River. In the late

301315

1970fs, macroinvertebrates were found throughout the PineyRiver. Only a very few tolerant taxa occurred in thevicinity of .the plant, but the community increased indensity and diversity progressively downstream and the TyeRiver below the Piney was considered to exhibit good waterquality. The poor water quality that persisted in the PineyRiver after the plant closure was attributed to leaching ofthe large stockpiles of copperas. The copperas stockpileswere buried during 1980 as part of a. site reclamationeffort. Recent biological surveys in 1985 and 1986indicated that water quality was still much lower in thevicinity .of the former plant in comparison to areas upstreamand farther downstream. It is suspected that there is stillsome surface runoff from unreclaimed areas and that thegroundwater has become contaminated.

The sulfate process that was used for obtaining titaniumdioxide from ilmenite ore at the Piney River plant alsoproduced large quantities of copperas as a byproduct.Copperas is hydrated ferrous sulfate (FeSO4*7H20). When itenters surface waters, ferrous sulfate becomes oxidized toform the rust colored precipitate ferric hydroxide(Fe(OH)-), commonly called "yellow dog" or "yellow boy"(Koryak*e_t si. 1972).

The precipitation of ferric hydroxide in streams occurs froma variety of mining activities, and its effects have beenreported in the literature (Koryak et al. 1972, Aanes 1979,Moon and Lucostic 1979, Scullion and Edwards 1980,Wiederholm 1984). Ferric hydroxide may completely blanketthe stream bottom, producing conditions which aredeleterious to both macroinvertebrates and fish. There maybe a limited macroinvertebrate fauna which is usuallydominated by oligochaete worms and chironomid larvae.Several insect orders which are usually common in streams(Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Coleoptera) areeliminated or greatly reduced. Members of the Megaloptera,particularly Sialis, have . been reported to be moderatelyabundant in such conditions (Roback and Richardson 1969).

Although the changes in the biota that occur in streams withferric hydroxide precipitation are reasonably consistent,the causes for these changes are not completely understood.The precipitate probably clogs the gills and preventsadequate respiration in many species which rely on dissolvedoxygen. Some species of aquatic insects must havereasonably smooth substratum to attach themselves or theirsilk retreats (e.g. black flies, net-spinning caddisflies,water pennies) {Minshall 1984). The thick blanket of floewould eliminate suitable habitat for all taxa requiringclean, firm attachment sites. _ _The.. ferric hydroxide floealso fills the interstices within rocky substratum which areknown to be the preferred microhabitats for many taxa(Minshall 1984).

301316

The oxidation reaction that precipitates ferric hydroxidealso lowers the pH of the receiving stream. There isconsiderable literature on the acidification of streams as aresult of mining activities, as well as acid deposition fromthe atmosphere, which produces similar effects (Hall et al.1980, Wiederholm 1984). Streams with exceptionally low pHhave a fauna that is depauperate and low in diversity.Chironomidae are always the dominant aquatic insect group,along with a very few species of Megaloptera, Trichoptera,and Plecoptera which are able to withstand the conditions.There are several ways that acidification may adverselyaffect macroinvertebrates. Physiological functions ofindividual organisms which may be impaired at low pH includesodium regulation, respiration, calcium regulation/ andacid-base balance (Havas 1981). There is some evidence thatthe adverse effects of low pH on aquatic insects may be mostprofound during emergence (Bell 1971). In acidified waterstoxic metals may be mobilized; aluminum, cadmium, zinc, andlead are likely substances to exhibit negative impacts onmacroinvertebrates (Hall et al. 1980, Scullion and Edwards1980, Wiederholm 1984). Indirect effects tomacroinvertebrates resulting from reduced pH include changesin available food (both from allocthonous and autochthonoussources) and interactions from competition and predator/preyrelationships(Koryak et~al,1972r Eriksson et al. 1980).

STUDY SITES

Samples were taken at three study sites which were chosen tobe representative of maximum impact from the previoustitanium dioxide manufacturing plant, recovery from theseimpacts, and a reference with minimal impacts of any kind.These study sites were chosen with the corroborateon ofpersonnel from the SWCB.

"- - " " J- - -

Site A (Reference) — located just upstream from the Route151 bridge. This site corresponds to SWCB Station 2 in thereport by Ayers .(1982) and SWCB Station 1 in the reports byBolgiano (1985, 1986). Riparian vegetation providedmoderate shading of the stream channel (34 - 66% canopycover). The average width of the Piney River here was 10 -12 m, and the average depth was 28 cm. The riffle:poolratio was estimated to be 4:6. The substratum consistedmostly of bedrock/ cobble, gravel, and sand (size categoriesaccording to Hynes 1970). Cobble and gravel were thedominant sizes of substratum, as they were at all sites, butSite A was characterized by having much more sand than theother sites. There was sufficient sand to fill theinterstices among the loose cobble and gravel. The rocks atSite A were covered with a substantial layer of aufwuchs.There was no sign of ferric hydroxide precipitate, but the

301317

coating appeared to be heavier than what would be considerednormal in a stream.

Site B (Impact) — located just downstream of the formerplant, approximately 100 m below the power line crossing.The site used in this study was a little over 100 m belowSWCB Station 3 in the survey by Ayers (1982). It appearsthat Ayers sampled a bit above the power line crossing.Site B was at the same location as SWCB Station 2 in thereports by _Bolgiano (1985, 1986). Riparian vegetationprovided minimal shading of the stream channel (0 - 33%canopy cover). The riffle:pool ratio was estimated to be2:8. The average width at this site was 10 - 12 m, and theaverage depth was 10 cm. The substratum consisted mostly ofcobble and gravel, with a small amount of sand. The mostnoteworthy feature of the habitat at Site B was the ferrichydroxide precipitate on the substratum. The entire bottomwas covered with" the rust colored material in a layer thatwas at least 3 mm thick._ The ferric hydroxide occurred incombination with" "a mucilaginous substance that was probablycomposed of diatoms and bacteria. The floe covered thebottom so thoroughly that the cobble and gravel werecompletely sealed,. with_.no discernible interstices.

Site -C (Recovery) — located 6.64 km downstream from theformer plant and 0.61 km above the confluence with the TyeRiver. The site used in this study corresponded with SWCBStation 5 in the survey by Ayers. (1982) and SWCB Station 3in the surveys reported by Bolgiano (1985, 1986). Riparianvegetation provided minimal shading (0 - 33% canopy cover).The riffle.:pool ratio was estimated to be 2:8. The PineyRiver was 10 - 12 m wide at this point, and the averagedepth was 12 cm. The .substratum consisted primarily ofcobble, gravel, and pebbles. There was practically no sandin the riffles, at this site. The rocks here did not havethe thick covering of aufwuchs that was found at Site A/and.there was no sign of ferric hydroxide precipitate. Therocks at Site C appeared to have a normal amount of algaeattached to them. The substratum at Site C providedsuperior habitat for .jnacroinvertebrates than either Site Aor B.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study consisted of a single series of samples collectedat each of the three sites. Samples were collected fromSites A and B on September, 24 .and from Site C on September25 / 1986. Field and laboratory procedures followed therecommendations of the USEPA (1973), with modifications frommore recent literature (Merritt and Cummins 1984). Tenquantitative samples of - benthic macroinvertebrates werecollected at each site with a Portable Invertebrate BoxSampler (PIBS). The PIBS samplesan area of 0.1 m and has

301318

a catch net with 351 urn mesh. In order to reducevariability in the data, sampling was stratified torelatively homogenous cobble/gravel riffles (Resh 1979).Each sample was collected by the following procedure: sealthe foam bottom of the PIBS, brush the entire area enclosedby the PIBS, brush and examine all individual rocks as theyare removed, rake the fine particles that remain in thePIBS. In addition to the quantitative samples, a singlequalitative sample was taken with a D-frame dip net todevelop a comprehensive list of taxa for each site. For thequalitative samples, all of the different microhabitats ateach site were sampled briefly with the D-frame net. Allsamples were preserved in 5% formalin and returned to thelaboratory for sorting and identification.

Organisms were sorted from the organic detritus and mineralsediments by hand. All specimens were identified to thelowest possible taxonomic level with the most recent keys(primarily Brigham et al. 1982 and Merritt and Cummins19-84). After the organisms were, identified and enumerated/they were sorted into one of five trophic functional groups:shredders,~ collector-filterers, collector-gatherers,scraper-grazers, or predators (Merritt and Cummins 1984).The biomass of each functional group at each site wasdetermined as dry weight (DW). To determine DW theorganisms were placed in tared aluminum pans, oven dried at60 C for 24 hrs, cooled in a dessicator, and weighed to thenearest 0.01 mg on a Mettler AE 163 electronic microbalance.

Several physical/chemical parameters were also measured ateach study site:

Temperature - long stem thermometer

Dissolved oxygen - Azide modification of the Winklertechnique (APHA 1980)

pH - Fisher Accumet 640 meter with Fishercalomel reference electrode and Fisheruniversal glass electrode

Alkalinity - _ __250 ml water sample collected andpreserved with 2 ml chloroform (Gallowayet al. 1982); measured by doubleendpoint titration with 0.02N H,SO, topH 4.5 and 4.2 (APHA 1980) ^ *

Hardness - Each Model HA-71A dual range test kit

Conductivity - YSI Model 33 conductivity/salinity meter

In addition to the measurements listed above, severalhabitat attributes of each study site were estimated byobservation: riparian vegetation (% cover), riffle:pool

301319

ratio, dominant size classes of substratum, and width.Average depth was determined by measurements with a meterstick at several locations across a transect. Dischargedata were obtained from the USGS gauge at the Route 151bridge. :_.. ... . ....

All data were stored and analyzed using an IBM-PC personalcomputer. __T.wo software packages were used for storage andsummarizing the data: STATISTIX (NH Analytical Software,St. Paul, KN) and SUPERCALC3 (Sorcim/IUS Micro Software, SanJose, CA). Results of quantitative benthic sampling werereported as units (either number of individuals, amount ofbiomass, or number of taxa) per square meter of streambottom. Measures of overall abundance included both density(number of individuals) and standing stock (biomass).Analyses of the__benthic macroinvertebrate community includedboth structural and functional characteristics. Measures ofcommunity structure included diversity, number of taxa, andrelative abundance of different taxa. The relative abundanceof the different .trophic functional groups was used as ameasure of "community function. Statistical analyses wereconducted to determine if there were significant differencesbetween the study sites. Nonparametric methods were usedbecause there was only one set of samples for consideringthe assumptions of parametric tests. Kruskal-Wallis testswere conducted to determine if there were significantdifferences between the means for specified parameters atthe three study sites (Elliott 1977, Green 1979, Allan1984). The null hypothesis for all tests was stated as Eo:no significant difference between means. The nullhypothesis was rejected (significant difference betweenmeans) at the 5% level of significance (p < 0.05). Allstatistical an.alyses were . performed with the STATISTIXmicrocomputer software package (NH Analytical Software, St.Paul, MN).

RESULTS

The mean daily discharge of the Piney River from Januarythrough early November 1986 is presented in Fig. 1. Flowswere relatively stable during the entire year. Aftermoderate peaks in March and May, flows were exceptionallylow throughout the summer. There was an increase in flowduring the first week of September, but by the time thisstudy was conducted on September 24 and 25, flows hadreturned to low, stable conditions.

The physical and chemical properties of the Piney River thatwere measured during this study are reported in Table 1.Physical/chemical data from a single, occasion have limitedinterpretive value by themselves. These data are includedhere so that this study can be put into perspective with the

301320

8

range of environmental conditions that are known to occur.Temperature was uniform at all .sites; the slightly lowertemperature at Site C was probably the result of that sitebeing visited early in the morning. Dissolved oxygen wasalso uniform at the study sites... Conductivity and hardnessincreased markedly at both. Sites.. B. and. C. Alkalinity and pHdecreased sharply at Site B, then rose somewhat at Site C.None of the physical/chemical properties mentioned abovewould be deleterious to aquatic life.

The counts of. individuals belonging to the differentmacroinvertebrate taxa found in the separate replicate PIBSsamples are recorded in Appendices 1-3 which are attachedto the end of this report. These raw data are also storedpermanently on diskette.

Summaries of total macroinvertebrate abundance, number oftaxa, and diversity" are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 2.Statistical analyses of these data are also found in Table2. The null hypothesis was rejected in all tests (p<0.05).Means of density, standing stock, number of taxa, anddiversity were__significantly different between every site,and the ranking was the same for all parameters: Site C >Site A > Site B. . . . .

The trend for lowest density at Site B was consistent forall taxonomic categories except Megaloptera and Diptera(Fig. 3; Tables 3 and 4). Within the Diptera, Antocha andChironomidae, were slightly more numerous at Site B than A;the megalopteran/ Corydalus cornutus, exhibited considerablyhigher densities at both Sites B and C. The trend forhighest density at Site C was consistent for all taxonomiccategories in Fig. 3 and Table 3 except MiscellaneousInvertebrates and Coleoptera. The greater density ofMiscellaneous Invertebrates at Site A was due to thegastropod Ferrissja, the crayfish Cambarus, and theamphipod Hyalella azteca. JPlecoptera did not occur at SitesA and B, while measurable densities of Paragnetina occurredat C. The highest densities at Site C were members of theorders Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Diptera, in thatsequence. All genera of Trichoptera which were abundant atSite C were net spinners, with Ceratopsyche achievingnoticeably higher densities than the others. Within theEphemeroptera, four genera were particularly abundant at C:Baetis, Isonvchia, Pseudocloeon, and Stenonema.Chironomidae were primarily responsible for the highdensities of Diptera at C, but black flies in the genus"Simula urn 'occurred^ in moderate.._ densities _while they wereabsent at Sites A and B.

.In order to gain. insight into the function of the benthicmacroinvertebrate community, the constituent organisms ateach study site were summarized according to trophicfunctional groups (Fig. 4). Trophic (or feeding) functional

301321

groups combine species that may be taxonomically dissimilar,but they obtain their food in the same manner, thus, theyshould have the same function in the stream ecosystem(Cummins 1974). Shredders are those organisms that attackcoarse particulate organic matter ( > 1 mm). Collector-filterers feed on fine particulate organic matter ( < 1 mm)suspended in the water. Collector-gatherers are thoseorganisms that feed on fine particulate organic matter thatoccurs loosely on or in the substratum. Scrapers graze onalgae and accompanying material that is firmly attached tosolid substrates. Predators ingest other organisms.Trophic functional groups are usually compared as thepercent of the total biomass that they each compose (Fig.4), Site B was distinct from the other sites because of theexceptionally high proportion of predators. Site C wascharacterized by a high proportion of collector-filterers,primarily net-spinning caddisflies. Site A had the mostequal proportions of the different functional groups,considering that the collector-gatherers were primarilycomprised of a few crayfish that were much larger than therest of the organisms. Scrapers were noticeably reduced atSite B in comparison to A and C, while shredders were aminiscule component at all sites.

The qualitative samples were used in conjunction with thequantitative samples to develop a list of all taxa thatoccurred at each study site (Table 5). This informationmust be interpreted with caution because some taxa were onlyrepresented by a. very few specimens. However/ with thiscaveat in mind, it is possible to discern some obvioustrends. The most taxa were collected at Site A (38) withalmost an equal number at Site C (34), but only about halfas many taxa. were collected at Site B (19). It isnoteworthy that crustaceans (crayfish and amphipods) did notappear in the samples at either Sites B or C. Almost thesame members of the Ephemeroptera were found at Sites A andC, but the fauna at Site B was depauperate. Similarly,fewer taxa of Odonata, Trichoptera, and Coleoptera occurredat Site B than Sites A or C. Three genera of Plecopterawere found only at Site 3. The presence of Megaloptera wassimilar at all sites, as was most of-the Diptera.

DISCUSSION

The results pf,r Lall_ .benthic .macroinvertebrate - analysesindicate that Site B (Impact) is distinctly different fromSites A (Reference) and C (Recovery). The major factorcausing the difference appears to be the ferric hydroxideprecipitate. Koryak et al. (1972) found two major zones in astream in western Pennsylvania that was affected by acidmine drainage. In the upper section near the abandonedmine, pH was consistently < 3.0 and iron remained in

301322,

10

solution. Farther downstream the pH increased somewhat andiron precipitated. The upper zone was characterized by abenthic macroinvertebrate community having low diversity buthigh numbers of individuals. The lower zone had both lowdiversity and low numbers of individuals, a conditionsimilar to that observed in the Piney River at Site B. Thissite had dbar = 1.82, number of taxa = 5.3, and density =256 individuals/m ; these are all exceptionally low valuesfor a stream in the Virginia Piedmont. Scullion and Edwards(1980) reported similar findings in a small river in acoalfield of South Wales. They reported an 88% reduction inthe abundance of macroinvertebrates as the river left ahighly acidic^ zone and entered a. zone of ferric hydroxideprecipitation. Koryak et al. (1972) speculated on anexplanation for this distributional pattern. Conditions inthe highly acidic -.section are far from normal but stable,with few toxicants (ferrous iron, hydronium); the few taxathat can withstand these conditions (sometimes only one) areable to proliferate. In contrast, conditions in the zone offerric hydroxide precipitation are less stable (particularlyregarding pH) and there are many different adverse impacts(toxicity, reduction of both algae and detritus for food,loss of -habitable space, interference with respiration).This complex of unfavorable factors acts on -a wide spectrumof benthic macroinvertebrates and reduces both diversity andnumbers of - individuals.

Comparisons of Sites A and C are somewhat perplexing becausemost of .. the attributes of the benthic macroinvertebratecommunity at Site C .(Recovery) indicate better water qualitythan Site A (Reference). Density, standing stock, meannumber of taxa, and diversity were significantly higher atSite C than A, The heavy growth of aufwuchs on the rocksand the large amount of sand in the riffles is indicative ofsome degree of perturbation at Site A. Ayers (1982)mentions a former "Aplite Co." on this section of the PineyRiver, and USGS topographic maps show several quarries notfar away. " Perhaps these and other minor sources ofpollution lower water quality above Route 151 by a slightdegree. However/ if the data from Site A were examinedindependently, they would indicate moderately good waterquality.. ;;._. .. ".I " ; ;~~ : ._ .._..

Irregardless of the results from Site A, there is evidenceof strong recovery at Site C. The average dbar diversityindex value of 3.08 is above the criterion generallyregarded as indicative of good water quality (3..00). Themean density -(5759 individuals/m ) and standing stock(297.60 mgDW/m ) are within the range of values that wouldbe expected in a Virginia Piedmont stream the size of thePiney River. Community structure includes representationfrom all major orders of insects that would be expected tooccur in flowing waters. Four genera of Ephemeropteraachieve reasonably high densities, and one genus of

301323

Plecoptera occurs in low densities. Both of these ordersare usually indicative of good water qualtiy. The dominanceof net-spinning Trichoptera is typical in piedmont streamsbecause of the amount of suspended organic matter intransport. The only result of . this study that hints atincomplete recovery is the absence of several taxa from thelist at Site C that do appear in the list from Site A.

The adverse impacts at Site B are sufficient to impair theecological function of the macroinvertebrate community.Macroinvertebrates have an intermediate position in the flowof energy from allocthonous and autochthonous sources to thehighest consumer groups (fish and other vertebrates)*Shredders break down coarse particulate organic matter fromallocthonous sources (mostly leaves) and scrapers ingestalgal biomass which is produced autochthonously. Bothfunctional groups make energy available to other organismsby storing it temporarily in their own tissue and byegesting considerable portions in their feces. By capturingsuspended particulate organic matter, collector-filterersretard the downstream export of energy from flowing waterecosystems. Sites A .and C appear to support sufficientstanding stock and to have adequate representation in all ofthe functional groups for the macroinvertebrates toaccomplish their normal functions in the ecosystem. Whenthe overall abundance of macroinvertebrates is significantlyreduced and the remaining community is dominated by thepredator functional group, as is the case at Site B, themacroinvertebrate community is ___no longer capable ofachieving its normal function in the ecosystem.

. . - . CONCLUSIONS , ;

1) The benthic macroinvertebrate community in the vicinityof the former U. .S. Titanium, plant (Site B) issignificantly different ; from that found in upstream(Site A) and downstream (Site C) sections of the PineyRiver.

2) Analyses of quantitative samples indicate statisticallysignificant reductions in density/ standing stock,number of taxa/ and diversity at Site B.

3) All orders of insects are reduced in abundance at SiteB except Megaloptera and Diptera. Orders which areparticularly reduced in abundance includeEphemeroptera, Trichoptera/ and Coleoptera.

4) There is strong imbalance^ among trophic functionalgroups at Site B, with the fauna being composed almostentirely of predators.

301324

5) Analyses of the benthic macroinvertebrate communityindicate that water quality is seriously degraded inthe vicinity of the former U. S. Titanium plant. Theadverse impacts on the benthic macroinvertebratecommunity are most likely being caused by ferric

• hydroxide precipitation.

6) The existing benthic macroinvertebrate community atSite B is not capable of performing normal ecologicalfunctions regarding energy flow in.Jthe ecosystem.

7) The benthic macroinvertebrate community in the reach ofj the. Piney River above .the former U:. S. Titanium plant

(Site A) exhibits some signs of perturbation (lowabundance), but the well-balanced community structureand function indicates that water quality is stillreasonably good.

8) There appears to be a very strong recovery in the PineyRiver at downstream reaches (Site C). Results ofanalyses of abundance, structure, and function of thebenthic macroinvertebrate community are within normalexpectations for piedmont streams.

301325

LITERATURE CITED

Aanes , K . J . 1979 . A preliminary report from a study onthe environmental impact of pyrite mining and dressingin a mountain stream in Norway. Pp. 419 - 442 in J. F.Flannagan arid K. E. Marshall, eds. Advances inEphemeroptera biology. Plenum Press, New York.

Allan, J. D. 1984. Hypothesis testing in ecologicalstudies of aquatic insects. Pp. 484 - 507 in V. E.Resh and D. M. Rosenberg, eds. The ecology of aquaticinsects. Praeger Publishers/ New York.

American Public Health Association, American Water WorksAssociation, and Water Pollution Control Federation,.1980. Standard methods for the examination of waterand wastewater. 15th Edition. American Public HealthAssociation, Washington, D.C.

Ayers, R. 1982. Condition of benthic .life in Piney and TyeRivers. Memorandum to ..Jim Hensley. Virginia StateWater Control Board, Richmond, VA.

Bell, E. L. 1971. Effect of low pH on the survival andemergence 5£ aquatic insects. Water Res. 5: 313 - 319.

Bolgiano, R. W. 1985. Qualitative benthic survey - PineyRiver. Report QL 85-007. Virginia State Water ControlBoard, Valley Regional Office, Bridgewater, VA.

Bolgiano, R. W, 1986. Qualtitative benthic survey - PineyRiver. Report QL 86-005. Virginia State Water ControlBoard, Valley Regional Office, Bridgewater , VA.

Brigham, A. R. , W. U. Brigham, and A. Gnilka, eds. 1982.Aquatic insects and oligochaetes of North and SouthCarolina, Midwest Aquatic Enterprises, Mahomet, IL.

Cummins, K. W. 1974. Structure and function of streamecosystems. ...Bio-Science 24: 631 - 641.

Elliot t, J. M. 1977. Some methods for the statisticalanalysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. 2ndedition. Freshwater Biological Association ScientificPublication No. 25. The Ferry House, Ambleside, UnitedKingdom.

Eriksson, M. 0. G., L, Henrikson, B. I. Nilsson, G. Nyman,H, G. Oscar son, and A. E. Stenson. 1980. Fredator-prey relations ..important for the biotic changes inacidified lakes, Ambio 9: 2.48 -

Galloway, J, N. , G. E. Likens, W. C. Keene, and J. M.Miller. 1982. The composition of precipitation in

301326

remote areas of the world, J. Geophysical Res, 87r8771 - 8786.

Green, R«_H. 1979, Sampling design and statistical methodsfor environmental biologists. John Wiley and Sons, NewYork.

Hall, R. J., G. E. Likens, S, B. Fiance, and G. R. Hendrey.1980. Experimental acidification of a stream in theHubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire,Ecology 61: 976 - 989.

Havas, M. 1981. Physiological response of aquatic animalsto low pH. Pp. 49 - 65 in R. Singer, ed. Effects ofacidic precipitation on benthos. North AmericanBenthological Society, Springfield, IL.

Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters.University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario.

Koryak, M./ M. A. Shapiro/ and J. L. Sykora. 1972. Rifflezoobenthos in streams receiving acid mine drainage.Water Res. 6: 1239 - 1247.

Merritt, R. W. and K. W. Cummins, eds. 1984. Anintroduction to the aquatic insects of North America.2nd edition. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA*

Minshall, G. W. 1984. Aquatic insect-substratumrelationships. Pp. 358 - 400 in V. H. Resh and D. M,Rosenberg, eds. The ecology of aquatic insects.Praeger Publishers, New York.

Moon, T, C. and C. M. Lucostic. __1979. Effects of acid minedrainage on a"southwestern Pennsylvania stream. Wat.,Air, and Soil Pollut. 11: 377 - 390.

Paessler, A. H. 1981, American Cyanamid -Company - PineyRiver. Memorandum to Richard Ayers. Virginia StateWater Control Board, Richmond, VA.

Resh, V. H. 1979. Sampling variability and life historyfeatures: basic considerations in the design ofaquatic insect studies. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 36: 290- 311.

Roback, S.S. and J.W. Richardson. 1969. The effects of acidmine drainage on aquatic insects. Proceedings of theAcademy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 121:81-107

Scullion, J. and R. W. Edwards. 1980. The effects of coalindustry pollutants on the macroinvertebrate fauna of asmall river in the South Wales coalfield. Freshwat.Biol. 10: 141 - 162.

I

P U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1973. Biologicalfield and laboratory methods for measuring the qualityof surface waters and effluents. U.S.E.P.A,,Cincinnati, OH. ~ - - - _ - -

Wiederholm/ T. 1984. Responses of aquatic insects toenvironmental pollution. Pp. 508 - 557 in V. H. Reshand D. M. Rosenberg, eds. The ecology of aquaticinsects. Praeger Publishers, New York,

P 301328

Table 1. Physical/chemical measurements.

Tempp D.00 Cond0 Alkalinity HardnessSite (°C). - Cmg/1) Omhos) pH (mg/1 CaCCy (mg/1 CaCOj)

A 23.0 . 8.7 40 8.03 . 11.8 11

B 23.5 ...._ 8.6 _::: 60— 6.89 8.0 19

C 21.5 8,4 60 -: 7~IS - 10a6 20

30132,9

17

m

f

Table 2. Basic measurements of benthic macroinvertebrate community.; Density (number of individuals/m?); standing stock (mgDW/

m2); taxa Clumber/sample}; diversity (dbar). Values aremeans of 10 replicates. Means followed by a common letter

"are not significantly different (p<0.05).

Parameter

Density - - - - - . - •

Standing Stock

Taxa .. ..,__.. _=_,.,.,:

Diversity.

Sites. A B

779a 256b

86.33a . - „ _50.97b

„,_.. 1271*"..", L_-J"-- -5.3b_R n"7 f.f. 1 Q"JL , DO _ . . 1. Q4- :

C

5759°

297.60°

18. 1C

3.08°

301330

18

*

PTable 3. Community structure according to mean densities

(number of individuals/m2) of higher taxonomiccategories.

Taxa -

Misc. Inverts.

Ephemeroptera

Odonata

Plecoptera

Me gal opt era

Trichoptera

Coleoptera ..-.

Diptera :.

..._._ A

18

171

14

. 0

3

401.... -J g

.:• -33

SitesB

1

1

. 1

0

15

-. - ,.149

- ....... ...15.

--— ———— — 74_

C

0

1448

25

22

22

2958

118

1177

301331

19

Table 4. Community structure according to mean densities (number ofindividuals/m2) of dominant benthic raacroinvertebrates inlowest possible taxonomic categories. Dominant is arbi-trarily defined as having a mean density >=10 at one ormore sites. . . . i

>

SitesTaxa A

y

Ephemeroptera ...:...._. .!_"__.__Baetis sp. 2 0 192Isonychia sp. . ' . _ . . . . - 36 . : 0 297Pseudocloeon s p . 6 1 3 2 7Stenonema sp. " " 7llT = 0 614Tricorythodes sp. 5 0 12

Odonata _ .: . ..Argia s p . 9 0 2 0

PlecdpteraParagnetina sp. _ """""."" "01 ° 2^

Megaloptera " " . " " "Corydalus c6rnutus; " - ,1 13 19

Trichoptera ^ -Ceratopsyche sp.; '" 113- _..-..... - 141 1775Cheumatopsyche sp. 282 "" 7 280Chimarra sp. 3 " " 1 328Hydropsyche sp. ~ j 0 0 161Macrostemum sp." —. 0 0 396Neureclipsis crepuscularis 0 0 10

Coleoptera _ _ _ _ _ . _ . ._ _ . _ . _ . . .......: .......Microcylloepus s p . 4 1 9Optioservus sp. 128 14 104

Diptera . .Antocha sp. 5 37 21Chironomidae 27 36 955Simulium sp. " "" ~ "" 0 "" TJ ' 0 201

30133^

20

Table 5. List o£âll taxa collected. X and Y both denotepresence o'f taxa; Y denotes taxa collected only inqualitative samples.

SitesTaxa - A

Misc. Inverts. ~ ~ - - - - - - _— — -

Cambarus sp. XHyalella azteca ------ - _ x

Hydracarina . r _ X XOligochaeta " " " y - --- -

EphemeropteraBaetis sp X XCaenis sp. : " X XEphemerella sp. - • "'" XHeptagenia sp. • . - X.. XIsonychia sp. " X... XPseudocloeon s p . X X XStenonema sp. --'"-.. :::-~ -.- ..z'r-'--X— - - - - - - XTricoTythodes sp. X" X

Odonata „ ........ . . . „ . . , . - . . - ..:.Argia sp". . . : , - _ • = - X XArgia translata X

• Boyeria sp.''~~ - - - - - ... —-.=.= —- - x

Gomphus s p . ' - • . - . • - X Y XLanthus sp. XMacromia sp. Y Y

Plecoptera . ."_ . ._ ' _... .."Acroneuria sp. - •-- -•-" " - V :-:--' - xParagnetina sp. " " " ..J X

- Phasganophora capitata X

Hemiptera .. _". . . ^. . .• Gerr'.id.ae._. ..... . ....." :_. -.._.'-_. . ....--. ,..."_".."_.". . .... ..... Y

301333

21

Table" 5.* (Continued)

-SitesTaxa . A B

Megaloptera " . . . _ ~ _.'_ --,'Corydalus cornutas " • - " X X XNigronia serricomis ....._...... . .... ._ ---X . ... . X X

Sialis-sp. ^ -----^ «..'..,", ", _Y,.H „. YTrichoptera' : _ _ . _ _ _ . ... V"~ ...._.: '~Ceratopsyche sp. X X XCheumatopsyche sp. X X XChimarra.-sp. - - - ... - -X -_-_: . .. X XHydropsyche sp. Y Y XHydroptila sp. : ~ " ~ "XMacrostemum sp. XNeureclipsis crepuscularis - - __ _ _ _ _ _ ....... - XPolycentropus sp. X

Coleoptera —— '_Berosus-sp. -- "'"~""~" - "" " "'" Y Y

- Dineutus sp. ---------- - - yDubiraphia sp. YHelichus sp. YMacronychus-Sp. ' - • -• •—- y

Microcylloepus sp. - X X XOptloservus . sp." ™ ~~T~ ":T 7"; :" "" =~ - x :" ~~ "" " X XOulimnius latiusculus ... —..... . . .-X- --- - _ . .Promoresia "sp. "- - xPsephenus herricki X XStenelmis..sp. . " " : . , . . . _ . . _ , . . . . x

Diptera - .- . :,-• ..-.-. — --.-. •-.-.- ------- -_:

---Antocha sp. _ X X XChironomidae . . . . . . X - r X XSimuli.um sp. "'• " '' ' ' ~:" - "' "Y " XTipula sp. X " "" "Tipulidae . _. ~. .. .. •. .,_--" _;•;*._ -..._.-_..._ - -,:..,-,. .-X'

- ,' '<

301334

Table 5. (Continued)

"SitesTaxa " . . ^" "" •.-•- A

22

GastropodaFerrissia spPlanorMdae

PelecypodaSphaeriidae

TOTAL . 38 : , , 1 9 34

301335

23

&r

Cu

301336

24

301337

H- Trichoptera

-B- Diptera

-*- Ephemeroptera

-*- Coleoptera

Megaloptera

Plecoptera

Odonata

Misc

Fig 3. ^Community structure according to mean densities ofhigher taxonomic categories.

301338

26

1001 _____________ ___________SH

SO-

menoE 60

oJ*-*oIZ 40O

20-

sc

CG

CF

PR

Fig 4. Community function according to percent of biomasscomprised by each trophic functional group. SHshredders; SC = scrapers; CG = collector-gatherers; CFcollector-filterers; PR = predators.

301339

APPENDIX 1SITE A, PINEY RIVER, 24 SEPTEMBER 1986

Oraanisni .FunctionalGroup

1

Kisc. InvertebratesCanbepus sp.HyalelLa aztecaHydracarinaFeprieeia sp.Bphaepiidae

SUBTOTAL.............

EphemepopteraBeet is sp.Caen is sp.Keptagenia sp.Isonychia sp.PseudocLoeon sp.Stenonena sp.Tricorythodes sp.

OdonetaArgia sp.Apgia tPansUtaGomphus sp.Lanthus sp.

KegatopteraCopydatus cornutusNigronia seppicopnis

SUBTOTAL.............

TpichopteraCareto psyche sp.Cheumetopsyche sp.Chimarpa sp.Hydroptila sp.Polycentropue sp.

SUBTOTAL.............

CoteopteraHierocylloepus sp*Optlosepvus 8p.Oulimnius letiusculusPponoresie sp.Psephenus herricki

DlpteraAntocha sp.CMronomidaeTipule sp.

SUMMARYDensity [f ind./B88ipleJTotal TaxaDiversity [dbap]Total Biomass [ing/sample]

CG 1CGPR 1SC 1CF

CGCGSCCFSC 1SC 2CG

PRPRPRPR

PRPR

CF 4CF 10CF 1SCPR

SCSC 8SCSCSC

CG 1CG 1SH

31112.8

377.4

2

1

1

3

14

*••

11

1125

1

131

3

75122.723.8

Reolicate

3 4 5

1

11 4..-._.

3 115 2 11

112 2 20

2

1 1 6

1

13 7 1714 27 72

118 11 18

11 2

23 ' 21

75 58 15314 10 123.0 2.4 2.547.3 25.6 243. 7

6

11

111

7

1

2033

1

22

4

93122.532.0

7

B1

713

110

3

437

2.414.8

8

2

12

53231

1

1322

110

1

1

86142.926.9

9

1

1

213

1

7391

1

112

1

27

80152.633.9

10

1

1

17

201

1

11

14271

6

3

85142.632. B

Keen

.2

.2

.5

.8

.1

.2

.8

.33.6.6

11,1.5

.9

.1

.3

.1

.1

.2

11.328.2.3.1.2

.412.8.1.1.5

.52.7.1

77.91S.12.786.3

*/B£

2258118

283366

1115

171

S13114

123

113282312

401

4128115

139

527133

779

863.2

30134-0

APPENDIX 2SITE B, PINEY RIVER, 24 SEPTEMBER 1966

Orpanisra Functional Reolicate . Mean */n£Group

Kisc. InvertebratesHydracarina . .

EphameropteraPseudocloeon sp.

OdonateBoyeria sp.

Mega I opt eraCorydalus cornutusNlgponia serricopnis

SUBTOTAL.............

TrichopteraCeratopsyche sp.Cheumatopsyche sp.Chinarra sp.

ColeopteraMicrocyltoepus sp.Qptioeervus sp.

DipteraAntoc-ie sp.ChironomidaeTipulidae

SUMMARYTotal IndividualsTot el TaxaDiversity [dbarjTotal Bicisass [rag/sample)

PR

SC

PR

PRPR

CFCFCF

SCSC

CGCGSH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

- ———— -- ' - - ---1 ,1

1 .1

..." " " 1 .1

1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 . 31 1 .2

10 4 19 23 S 4 22 29 18 714.11 2 1 3 .7

1 .1

1 . .12 2 1 1 2 4 2 1 . 4

4 1 3 1 2 7 6 6 7 3.75 5 3 6 7 7 3 3 . 6

1 .1

12 15 28 32 10 10 41 47 38 23 25.63 4 5 5 5 6 7.5 7 65. 3.8 1.9 1.4 1.4 2,0 2.6 2.0 1.7 2.1 2.3 1.85.9 8.6 5.6 203.6 26.2 22.9 13.4 24.2 19.7 179.5 51.0

11

11

11

13215

14171

149

11415

3736174

256

S09.6

301341

APPENDIX 3SITE C, PINEY RIVER, 24 SEPTEMBER 19BB

Organism FunctioGroup

EpheiteropteraBaetis sp.Ceenifi ep«EphenepaUa sp.Haptsgan.a sp.Isonychia ep.Pseudocloeon sp.Stenonema sp.Tricorythodes sp.

SUBTOTAL..,........*..

OdonateArgta sp.Gomphus sp.

PtecopteraAcroneuria sp.Paragnetina sp.Phasgonophora capita ta

MegaloptepaCorydalus cornutusNigronia serricornis

TrfchoptersCere to psyche sp.Cheumatopsyche sp.Chimarrs sp.Hydrcpsyche sp.Macro sternum sp.Neuraclipeis crepuscular. s

ColeopteraMicPocy Lloepus sp.Qptioservus sp.Psephenus heprickiSteneLmis sp.

DipteraAntocha sp.ChironoBiidaeSi mull" urn sp.

SUBTOTAL..,....,.....,

CGCSCGSCCFSCSCCG

PRPR

FflPRPR

PRPR

CFCFCFCFCFCF

SCSCSCSC

CGCGCF

nal ,

1

191

3521414

41

1

11921- s1414-2

8

190

2

37

1142972

51

1

1

14617183122S

14

27539

3

35

1931513

3

2

2

1266

152

171

4962

4

4

81734

3

3

1232433357

3

1

16027

Rep

5

2

1

1519281

1

1

13455407371

16

1626

licatE

6

22

146177

1

18419412124

38

23582

!

7

27

354£!94

12

3

26137731667

132

3113B

8

28

10639821

2

-7

31

371457123934

123

210517

9

4

312446

33

21

2

10932182231

23

11184

10

16

6331641

3

2

31

2022428929

3

414116

Mesn

19.2.1.1.4

29.732.761. 41.2

2.5

.12.1

1.9.3

177.526

32.816.139.6

1

.910.4

.1

.4

2.195.520.1

f/n£

192114

297327614

' 121448

20525

120122

19322

177528032818139610

2950

S10414

118

219552011177

SUMMARYTotal Individuals 374 5S5 387 401 418 654 835 1022 456 640 576.2 5762Total Taxe 19 19 19 16 19 15 17 20 19 1B 18,1Diversity (dbar] 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.1 3,1 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.1TotaL B.amass (nig/sample) 188.6 197.5 164.5 270.8 106.8 267.S 458.3 729.9 259.8 332.3 297.6 2,976.0

301342

301343

_._- APPENDIX E

SOIL BORING LOGS

301344_HYDROSYSTEMS,«.

SOIL BORIHG LOGS , _jU.S. Titaniun Site, Piney River, Virginia ftfi *

Logged 1/31/86 - 2/3/86 by Jeffrey A. Sitter

Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence CommentsHi umber . in feet _____________________________ _ _______ _ __________________________ ...._._„__„._._1-86 0.0 - 0.5 red silty clay loam "firm _ _ J fill material, moist, (sample # 1)

0.5 - 5.0 yellow-orange clayey silt to silty friable fill material, highly weatheredclay loam rock fragments, moist,

•r. . .;•-• . , , ) (sarrple #'s 2 - 4>5.0 - 10.0 red-yellow silt to silt loam friable to firm ... . saprolite, moist, (sample # 5)

Note: Ho visible copperas was detected in this boring located in Area 3. __

2-86 0.0 - 4.0 red-brown to silty clay loam firm fill material, moist, (sample # 6)red-orange .

4,0 - 6.5 yellow-orange silty clay to clay friable to firm saprolite, moist, (sample #'s 7-9)to yellow-red loam

Note: Ho visible copperas was detected in this boring located in Area 3.

10)3-86 0.0 - 2.0 red silty clay loam very firm saprolite, moist, (sample #2.0 - 6.5 layered brown, silt loam firm to very friable saprolite, moist

green, black,and white . . . _ . . '. r ......

Hote: No visible copperas was detected in this boring. This area does not appear to have been disturbed other than having theupper horizons of the soil removed. : 'Material here is composed of undisturbed residual soils.

4-86 0.0 - 2.0 multi colored silt loam to silty ffrm to friable fill material, moistred-brown, clay Loamorange andwhite . . " . . . . . .

2.0 - 8.0 red play : . „ ... . plastic localized small wet zones, (sample # 11)8.0 - 13 orange silty clay plastic to friable 8 inch copperas clay mix layers with

2 inch interlayers of clay. Hoistwith a few wet zones near 13 feet.(sample # 12)

13.0 - 14.5 red "clay to silty clay plastic moist14.5 - 15.5 yellow-red silty clay loam to firm to friable saprolite, moist

silt loam

Mote: Overall, this burial cell was in good condition. Water appears to have been excluded by the cap, for the most part.

301345

Page 2AREA 1 SOIL BORING LOGS continued

Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence CommentsNumber _ jn feet ....Jiii. L '— -----

5-86 0.0 - 0,5 red-brown clay loam friable appears to be topsoil, moist0.5 - 1.0 orange silty clay friable saprolite, moist1.0 - 3.5 yellow-brown silty clay loam firm saprolite, moist

Note: No copperas was detected in this boring. This area does not appear to hjve been disturbed other than having the ippermost soil horizons removed. Material here is composed of undisturbed residual soils.

6-86 0.0 - 1.5 orange-yellow silty clay firm to f ri le , .fill material, moist1.5 - 2.0 gray silty clay to plastic fill material, moist, (sample # 13)

silty clay loam2.0 - 3.5 gray sl"Uy clay plastic fill material, moist3.5 - 4.0 red ---_- - clay plastic ... _ fill material, moist4.0 - 9.5 orange to silty clay to plastic to firm, copperas waste layered with and mixed

yellow orange clay loam friable where high with clay. Hoist with a few wet zones'-' ..---""..! :..'U. --. ;-=. - -copperas concentration belcw 5 feet, (sample it 14)

9.5 - 10 red clay to silty clay plastic fill material10.0 - 10.5 yeUow-red sUty clay loam firm to friable saprolite

Note: The copperas zone between 4.0 and 9.5 feet consisted of layered copperas rich clay, a few very thin, 1 to 2 inches,layers of pure copperas and numerous thin layers of clay, 1 to 2 inches.

7-86 0.0 - 2.0 red -clay very firm saprolite, moist2.0 - 6.0 black, brown, silt loam firm to friable saprolite, moist

green and tan """

Note: No copperas was detected in this boring. This area does not appear to have been disturbed other than having the uppermost sofl horizons removed. All materials here have been naturally deposited.

8-86 0.0 - 2.0 red clay very firm saprolite, moist2.0 - 5.0 red-orange clay loan very firm saprolite, moist, abundant weathered

rock fragments

Note: No copperas was detected in this boring. This area does not appear to have been disturbed other than having the tppermost soil horizons removed. Material here is composed of undisturbed residual soils.

301346


Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence Commentsfeet " ' _

9-86 0.0 - 6.0 red-brown clay firm . fill material, mc-ist with a few isolatedwet zones

6.0 - 8.5 orange to silty clay plastic mostly soH copperas mix, wet zonesyellow-orange (sample # 15)

8.5 - 9.0 yellow to sandy f.PHI to pure copperas, moistyellow-orange friable

9.0 - 12.0 orange to silty clay plastic clay copperas mix, wetyel low-orange :-.....„- .„, i -

12.0 - 12.5 red clay plastic moist to wet12.5 - 13.5 yellow-brown silt loam friable moist

Note: Very little pure copperas was found. The majority of the material is plastic in nature suggesting a high clay content.

10-86 0.0 - 2.0 red silty clay firm fill material, moist2,0 - .3.5 red and silty clay firm to plastic fill material

white3,5 - 4.0 red --- clay plastic fill material, moist4.0 - 15.5 yellow orange silty clay plastic to copperas and soil mix, very wet layers

to orange friable (sample #16, entire zone collected)

15.5 - 16.0 _ red silty clay plastic wet16.0 - 16.5 brown silt loam friable saprolite, moist


11-86 0.0 - 2.0 Brown, red, silty clay loam with firm fill material, moistand white rock fragments

2.0 - 6.5 red to red- silty clay very firm saprolite, moistbrown .. . - ,. , -.i.. ••-

Note: No copperas was found. Natural soils were encountered 2 feet below the surface.

12-86 0.0 - 2.0 tan, brown silt loam very friable fill material, moistand white

2.0 - 3.0 red-brown clay firm moist3.0 - 7.0 orange to silty clay plastic copperas and soil mixture, moist to wet

yellow-orange to friable7.0 - 8.5 red, tan, silty clay loam firm saprolite, moist

yellow andbrown


30134-7

Pa9e 4AREA 1 SOIL BORING LOGS continued

Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence CommentsNumber j__ jeet ________________ . _______ — - ^ _____

13-86 0.0-1.5 red silty clay _*[""...„.. fill material, moist1 1 . 5 - 2.0 tan, white silt loam friable. r fill material, moist

brown and red2.0 - 7.0 red silty clay plastic moist to wet, slight smell of copperas

! b u t none w a s visible, fill material7.0 - 7.5 red-brown silty clay loam firm to plastic appeared to be topsoil, moist7.5 - 9.0 red silty clay loam firm saprolite, moist9.0 - 10.0 tan silty clay loam firm to plastic saprolite, moist

. " ". . " ' - '' - iHote: No copperas was found. " - -

. ? : . . . ' , -. - - .- -'-'I -, . , • . - • - - ' • - . ' " . .

14-86 0.0 - 2.0 brown silt firm to plastic fill material, moist to wet2.0 - 23.0 orange to silty clay plastic copperas soil mix, wet to very wet

yellow-orange loam to friable ,23.0 - 25.0 white silt firm } saprolite, wet

Note: Very little pure copperas was found. The majority of the material is plastic in nature suggesting a high clay content.Water level in bore hole was measured on 2/3/86 at 5 feet below surface.

. - . . . - - • - - . . . . . -

15-86 0.0 - 1.5 red-brown silty clay firm fill material, moist, (sample # 17)1.5 - 3.5 orange silt loam very friable copperas soil mix, wet to moist

(sanple # 18)3.5 - 5.0 red .day, ._PlasM? moist5.0 • 6.0 red and silty clay plastic copperas soil mix, wet in pockets

orange -to friable6.0 - 6.5 red-brown silty clay firm to plastic saprolite, moist


16-86 0.0 - 7.5 red-brown silty clay firm to plastic fill material, wet below 6.5 feet(sample # 19)

7.5 - 8.0 dark brown silty clay loam plastic appears to be topsoil, abundant plant.: - - . . - . _.:- .- .T --: -^ ----f-- -- _ - ._^ —, --- - ^ -- debris, (sample # 20)

8.0 - 8.5 - brown to red- silty clay loam firm to plastic saprolite, moistbrown _- _ .

Note: No copperas was found.

301348


Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence CommentsNumber in feet _______;__________:______• -~ ' . :_________

17-86 0.0 - 3.0 brown silt to silt loam firm to friable fill material, moist, (sample # 21)3,0 - 9,0 red-brown silty clay plastic fill material, wet along horizontal

; . " - - - - " i partings9.0 - 13.5 red brown and silty clay plastic Layers of copperas soil mix and silty

orange . , . - - - to friable clay, wet, (sample # 22)13.5 - 15.0 yellow-red silt loam" firm"to plastic" " saprolite, moist

Note: Very little pure copperas was found, usually in layers less than 1.5 inches thick. The majority of the material isplastic in nature suggesting a high clay content.

18-86 0.0 - 3.0 red-brown silty clay plastic fill material, moist3.0 - 3.5 black silty clay very plastic appears to be topsail3.5 - 5.0 No recovery5.0 - 13.0 orange silty clay _ plastic ~ copperas and soil mixture, 5 inches of

.jL.. . _n:-;_ :r ^-rriU i ;?'" -'_;:!t.p"frfable ,_., H .„. pure copperas, wet, (sample #'s 23:„,,..„....... -..-,___. -._„,.,.._.,__-_. .. g^ ^j "

13.0 - 13.5 red and silt loam firm saprolite, moistyellow

Hote: Very little pure copperas was found, the majority of the material is plastic in nature suggesting a high clay content.Two layers of pure copperas were found, one uas 1 inch thick the other 4 inches thick.

19-86 0.0 - 0.5 tan and silt loan friable fill material, wet, (sairple # 25)white __. . . .

0.5 - 3.0 red-brown silty clay loam plastic fill material, wet, (sample #'s 26 - 28)3.0 - 20.0 orange silty clay loam very plastic copperas soil mixture, wet20.0 - 21.0 tan s^lt Loam firm to plastic moist to wet, saprolite


20-86 0.0 - 2.0 tan and silt loam friable moist to wet. fill materialwhite

2.0 - 3.0 red-brown silty clay plastic moist to wet, fill material3.0 - 4.0 orange silty clay plastic copperas soil mix, wet, (sample # 29)

(sample # 30)

5.0 - 24.0 orange silty clay loam plastic wet, copperas soil mixture(sanple #'s 31 - 33)

24.0 - 25.0 tan and silt loam firm to plastic saprolite, moist to wetwhite . . . . . . _ (sample f 34)

Note: Very little pure copperas was found, the majority of the material is plastic in nature suggesting a high clay content.One 2 inch layer of pure'copperas was "found near 8.5 feet In depth.

301349

AREA 2SOIL BORING LOGS

U.S. Titanium Site, Piney River, Virginia_ Logged on 4/20/87 - 4/22/87

« Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence CommentsNumber in feet_______:_____:_____________:ri,. T .;. m._____....:..""........~". ____:____:________

1-87 0.0 - 0.4 red clay plastic to firm moist0.4 - 7.0 reddish orange silty clay firm to"friable moist7.0 - 10.0 layered red, clayey silt firm to friable wet below 7 feet

orange, gray,and white

2-87 0.0 - 1.8 red orange clay very plastic moist, in seepage zone1.8 - 2.8 red, orange, clay to plastic wet

and white silty clay2.8 - 3.9 tan, white clayey silt friable wet

red and orange : ~" "3.9 - 6.5 red clay plastic copperas smell6.5 refusal

1 3-87 0.0 - 1.0 red orange clay plastic moist, in seepage areaI 1.0 - 3.5 - brown, orange silty clay plastic to slightly moist

red and white friable3.5 - 4.5 orange brown clayey silt plastic to liquid very wet4.5 - 6.0 refusal, soil liquldified, no recovery

4-87 0.0 - 1.0 red clay very firm moist| 1.0 - 3.5 - tan saprolite firm to friable moist1 ' ""clayey sflt"

3.5 refusal

5-87 0.0 - 1.0 red clay very firm moist, 1.0 - 3.0 tan clayey silt friable moist

3.0 - 5.5 reddish brown cCayey~silt " friable moist5.5 - refusal - . . - - . - .

6-87 0.0 - 2.0 red clay very firm moist2.0 - 2.5 — -brown clayey silt very firm2.5 - 6.0 tan clayey silt friable perched water

saprolite _ _ at 4 feet6.0 - 7.5 ' - - reddish brown clayey silt friable " wet7.5 - 10 brown silt loam friable wet

7-87 0.0 - 1.5 "red clay very firm moist1.5 - 10.0 brown silt.loam very firm moist

301350

Page 2AREA 2 SOIL BORING LOGS

U.S. Tltaniun Site, Piney River, "VirginiaLogged on 4/20/87 - 4/22/87

Boring Depth Color Texture " Consistence CommentsNumber ___ feet________u___,._...._ "_.:'.____'__ _ : _______"____ ____. ___________'

8-87 0.0 - 2.0 red clay very firm moist2.0 - 2.75 tan silt firm moist2.75 - 4.0 red clay very firm moist4.0-4.5 brown silty clay very firm moist4.5 - 6.0 red clay very firm moist6.0 - 8.0 reddish brown silty clay firm to friable moist

saprolite8.0 - 10.0 tan clayey silt firm to friable moist

saprolite

9-87 0.0 - 1.5 red clay very firm moist1.5 - 2.0 tan clayey silt very firm moist2.0 - 8.0 red clay very firm _ moist8.0 - 10.0 tan silty clay very firm moist

saprolite

10-87 0.0 - 1.5 red - clay very firm moist1.5 - 1.8 brown silty clay very firm moist1.8 - 2.0 tan, white clayey silt very firm moist

and red _ ... . ._._ ...2.0 - 7.5 red clay very firm moist7.5 - 10 reddish orange silty clay very firm moist

11-87 O.Q - 4.0 . red ... .. ,. clay plastic very wet, In seepage zone

301351

fAREA 3

SOIL BORING LOGSU.S. Titaniun Site, Piney River, Virginia

Logged on 4/22/87 - 4/23/87

Soring Depth Color Texture Consistence Commentslimber in feet _ _.. :__- -; -

j DB-1-87 2 red clay firm moist, fill5 orange red silty clay very firm moist, fill10 orange red silty clay very firm moist to wet15 red orange silty clay firm to friable . moist, mottled saprolite20 orange and clayey silt friable . moist to wet saprolite

yellow - saprolite! 30 red, yellow, clayey silt firm to friable wet saprolitej a n d black . . - • . . - . - • + . , ,

34 refusal on bedrockt •- . ' • - ' • . ;•• , ,• : .! DB-2-87 2 red silty clay " firm moist, fill

5 red and silty clay firm moist saprolite, fillblack L. . -.- -

} 10 red, black, clayey silt very firm moist saprolite, fill ?' white and red ~

15 yellow orange clayey silt friable to firm moist saprolite} 20 _ yellow orange clayey silt friable to firm moist to wet saprolite} 30 yellow and tan clayey silt friable moist to wet saprolite

40 tan, rock clayey, sandy friable to firm moist to wet saprolitefragments silt

50 same57.5 refusal on bedrock .._..... _.... . . . . . . . . .

DB-3-87 2 red silty clay firm moist, fill5 red clayey silt firm to very firm moist, fill10 red and clayey silt firm to friable moist, mottled

yellow . - - _15 layered red clayey silt .firm to friable moist saprolite20 end yellow30 layered red, clayey silt firm to friable moist to wet saprotite

brown and yellow40 red, brown and clayey silt firm moist to wet saprolite

green50 green, brown, clayey silt firm moist to wet saprolite

. and white56 refusal at bedrock

?

•301352

I

PAREA 4

SOIL BORING LOGS 0;.--,U.S. Titaniun Site, Piney River, Virginia to '/%.*

Logged on 4/21/87 - 4/22/87 &c/

Boring Depth Color Texture Consistence CommentsNumber Jn feet ______________ __ ______ -._.. . -—'- ______ - __ ..._ _________________

1-87 0 - 0.2 black coarse sand very friable unreacted oreto fine gravel

0-2 - 6 gray silt and clay friable to plastic wet, inreacted oresized

6 refusal on large rock

2-87 0 - 0.2 black coarse sand to very friable unreacted orefine gravel

°-2 - 4 gray silt and clay friable to plastic wet, unreacted oresized -- --

4 refusal on large rock ....._ _ .. ..,.:.. : _. "

3-87 0-0.2 black coarse sand to very friable unreacted orefine gravel

0.2 - 2.5 - white silt to clay plastic unreacted ore

2.5 - 3.5 ...Wack and coarse sand to . friable _ unreacted ore and elemental sulfuryellow fine gravel

3-5 - 6 black and coarse sand to friable to unreacted orewhite fine gravel and plastic

white clay to silt

6 refusal . . . . . .

4-87 0 - 1.5 gray silt to clay plastic to unreacted orefriable

1.5 refusal - - - - -

NOTE: Rounded cobbles and gravel are cannon throughout Area 4.

10 301353

SOIL BORING LOGS /.U.S. Titaniun Site, Piney River, Virginia I/J

Logged on 4/21/87 - 4/22/87

Boring Depth Color Texture " """' 'Consistence "" ConmentsNumber In ieet_______________________——————————————————————_———————————————————————1-87 0.0 - 0.3 black to silt to fine sand non-sticky saturated

gray water table at surface

0.3 -1.5 brown silt slightly sticky flood plain sediment

1.5 - 3.0 brown silt slightly sticky "flood plain sediments

3.0 no recovery, sediments liquifying

2-87 0.0 - 0.5 tan silt and fine sand non-sticky flood plain sediments, water- ,_,.„, . ,.,,.. - - -_,._,.,, ., „,.....,-v., T r. .-r.. ,.;,... ..,.:table at surface

-• ' ' ..' -.-... • •"' : '";' "--,-; ^ --^"^".-~ '".-i-.":', '"£- t £. '•&"-*} "'.rE?;'f«i-

0.5 - 1.5 tan silt and fine sand non-sticky flood plain sediments

-. -t -"-• - t1.5 - no recovery, sediments liquifying

3-87 0.0 - 0.5 tan fine sand non-sticky saturated, water table at surface

0.5 - 1.2 gray "fine sand and silt non-sticky

1.2 refusal on large cofcble.

11 301354-

SOIL BORING LOG A« t 2945HURT &. PROFFITT. Inc. Project: " Hydrosvstem.- U..S, Titanium Site .

2524 LanghorneRd. . Lo«iioa: Piney Kiver ."Virginia , i>aie: .-4/22/87"Lyncfaburg.Ya. 24501 IjItofBis: RocKb.it ... _ Record Mo. &

1-804/647-7797 Drilling Hetkoi: Auger LOQ No.: 1 Of 2

Boring *Surf.Elev.Water Table

Depth In Ft.

2-3 .-_.

5-6

10-11 -

.

*1

17'atOhrs... _. _

Soil Type

FillBrown Siltv

Loam

MottledSiltv Loam

MottledSilty ClayLoam

Blows/Ft,

6

21

*2————————————

Soil Bridge at 19* .

Soil Type

FillPed BrownSilty Loam

MottledYellow

Brown RedSand Clav

6Mottled Tan

YeliowSandy Loam

i

Blows/Ft,'

4

8

*3

31'elO.hr.s

Soil Type

FillP»d BrownSilly Loam

Pe.d BrownSilty Clay

i

17Mottled

Yellow RedBrown "Sano'v

Blows/ft. 1 Soil Type ! Blows/Ft.

5

12

!

.11i

ji

t ii I! ii !

H

Loanr

iiii!

15-16.

20-21

"

30-31 . .

40-41

50-51-

Mottled.Siltv Loam.

MoL.SiRy..Loam

w/&lue Otz.Pebbles ,

Hoi. .SillyLoam

w/' Blue Qtz,Pebbles

.

7

16 .

17 "

TB W^P34'

"

YellowBrown

Sandy Loam

YellowBrown

Sandv Loam

Tan WhiteSandy Loam

White SiltvLOaf.1 ==

WhiteYellow-Drown

tMotti&d

^ Yellow C'p'jBrown Sandy

! L.gm

| Mot vel -d6 Brown Sand

S Loam w/B!uei Qtz. Pebbles

| Brawn Sandy22 Loam

i

VpUfivy

15 j Brown" Sandy] Loam

———————— i ————————V«hite Brown

To Yellow Sanav!

i

I

15 ij

ii

Iii*ii

'7 ji1i

, — 110 1I

i

-1 'jii

i

(This Report reflects oniy "the material encountered at the exact Boring location.T.BXTefminated Boring, A.R. Auger Refusal. R= Red, 0- Olive, Y- Yellow, T- Tan, B= Brown. Bit" Blact. G^ Ore6r= Green, Wea= Weathered, r.ica= flicaceous, Or= Orange, S= Sand, Si= Silt or Silly, C- Clay, i1=Motlled

301355

SOIL BORING LOG Aee,t 29*HURT BtFRQFFITT, Inc. Troject: Hvdrosystem - U. S. THanium Site . '';';v

2524LanghorneRd. .. I OCMK Piney River. Virginia 'Dale: 4/22/8Lyricfaburg,Va. 24501 TyjtofEit: Roclcbit Record No.

1-304/647-7757 "~ " Drilli»ff Hetkoi: Auger Log No.; 2 of 2

Boring *Surf.Elev.Water Table

Depth In Ft.

60-61 ...

1

Soil Type Blows/Ft.

i

ii

*2. (Cont.) *3 (Cont.)i

Soil Bridge at 19' J 31'atQhrs.

Soil Type

57.5 - .56.5'No

Recovery

Blows/Ft. Soil Type Blows/ri. Soil Type Blows/Ft,! !

50/0"" . ~ T.B. VT/A.R.T.B. w/A.R, 56'

57. 51i ii

ii

!i ? i i! i 'i i1 11 1

! iii

i{ 1 j i

1i i t ;! ; !! !i ' ii l l————————————————————— i ——————————— . ——————————— : ————————————————————— , —————————

.

1 !i

! 1

J

ii1

i i)

ii

1 i 11 ! i !

_ : T i tI i i1 i i i) I i ;

i i i1 ! 1

! - : """" -"-"• """ ! :This Report reflects only the malerial encountered at the exact Boring Location.T.B.=Terminaled Boring. A.R. Auger Refusal, R= Red, 0= Olive, Y= Yellow, T- Tsn, 8= Brown, Blk.-- Black, G~ Ore6r= 6reen, Wea= Weathered. Mica= Micaceous. Or= Orange, S= Sand, Si= Sitt or Silty, C= Clay, n-Molttetf

301356

f

_; :-. , -Test". Uorlnc/s< " "'""•' •" :"" V" LJ .3. Titaniun_FariIity^ . . _'...'_ ... _ __ . "_..Piriey River, Virqinia

L J

0 u2 ••

z5 Z

-j) <•r Oi O

301357

E. 0. GOOCH & ASSOCIATESGeologists, and Engineers

Charlottesville _ Culpeper4.;-;,,.,

EXPLANATION OF TEST HOIE LOGGING SMBOLS Aid TERMS ''**:> "*

Hole- -Identification _ __ _.;: __^__-

DH - Drill Hole, logging .based on examination of samples.DP - Drill Probe, logging based on observation of penetration and cuttings onlyTP - Test Pit " - •-- .--- •:'.-:•'.- -.-- :. :.- -~-~:- ;_-; -HA -.Hand Auger HoleEP -:Exposed Profile, "bank or cut \;;" Example: _ Number

DH'lOb

Sample Identification . . . .

S3 - Split Sgoon .Sample, _imless otherwise -noted sample obtained in accordance""~ ' : 'with\ASTM Drlf86, 2" O.B. sampler, "11*0 lb,. hammer, 30" drop, blows.

dteitid for three consecutive increments of .0-5 --ft.

DS - Disturbed Sample, bag or jar ' - ----- -—US - Undisturbed Sample, Shelby Tube or hand cutRC - Rock Core "r - :

Example:

Unified .Soil- Classification System _ _ _ _ . . . "

G¥ - Clean gravel, wide range of sizes SC - Sand with clay finesGP - Clean gravel,, narrow "ringe bf" sizes'"" ' ~" "SM - Sand with silt finesSW - Clean' "sand, 'iri.de" range" "bf _ sizes " " ".";"'f'CL -"Clay, low Liquid Limit.SP - Clean sand, narrow range of sizes - _ k - JJH - Clay3 high Liquid LimitGC-- Gravel with clay "fines '. "T"..:" i ..":;HL~- Silt, "low Liquid LimitGM - Gravel with silt. fines - . ~. MH - Silt, high Liquid Limit

Parentheses with symbol indicates classificationby visual-manual. methods. •-

Size Classification:

Boulder -. over 12" .. . __ ._. ...__..Cobbles - 3" to 12"Gravels - #b sieve to. 3" ... .Sands - #200 sieve to #Ij sieveClays and Silts --Finer than #200 Sieve

301358

TEST HOLE LOGE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINE EBSCHAELOTTESVILLE . .. — ..." .. - . ".. CULPEPEE

Project Piney-River --OoTrperaa Pits " ' :...HoIe 1-86 Sheet JL of _L Date 1/31/afi

Location _____ As Staked . - : Surf. Elev. ____ Depth 10.0 Logged by SPf?

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

1.0

5.0

1CUO

Material Description

Red clayey silt (MH)Fill ,....,_,..__:..... _ ...... . ..." ,:

- Yellow silt (ML)Fill •.:...,',..... .... _ ... . ~

_ Red^yellow sandy silt (ML) .-Residual ".

— Hole terminated at 10.0 ft.

*eif*

Sampling DataSampless 1-1

ss 1-2

ss 1-3

ss 1-A-

ss 1-5 ,;,

ss-1-6. .,.

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55-05-56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09-5

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55-05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.0

301

lows445634867104573569469

359

Rec.

TEST HOLE L O G - - - - - - . -E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE .",,. CULPEPEK

Project Piney River- .•=•- .-Goppems-gyfcg- - - - - — Hole 2-86 Sheet X of _L Date 1/^1 /86

Location _____As Staked Surf. Elev. ____ Depth 6.5 Logged by SPG

Ground Water Data; _._.___._.__ . ___ _ . , = _ - _ _ -

Elev. Depth0.0

Material DescriptionSampling Data

Sample From lo_ glows RecRed-brown "clayey" silt (ML)Pill........ . - . ' '.: ..:;._._•

4.0

ss 2-1

ss 2-2

ss 2-3

Yellow-red sandy silt." (ML)"Residual." - - - - - -""".T." ".-..." '.:~L

ss 2-4

6.5 Hole, terminated . at 6.5 fti

•

0.00.51.01-52.02.53.03- .54.04.55.05-56,0

0.51.01-52.02.53-03.54.0M5-05.56.06.5

3013

34463483465811

0

f TEST HOLE LOG _ .... .E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE " . . . .:. . CULPEPER

Project Piney River.>."-Cop-peras Pits" Hole 3-86_ Sheet _l_of_jDate ——1/3/186

Location As Staged,..::. ::_.. .'••.;.___;.'. Surf,. Eley. . ."_ .L" Depth —£*£_Logged by _SEQ_

Ground Water Data: , . . . . . . .

Elev. Depth0.0

2.0

6.5


Red" clayey silt ..(m) ._ ..,.._Residual. . .;" . ."

- Brown silt (ML)Residual- .. .-.-,- .._.. ._..".._ .:". : _" "

Hole, terminated .at 6._5,ft.

— —

Sampling Data . - ._. . .

Sampless .-3-1 .

ss 3-2

ss 3-3

ss 3-4

From0.00-51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.0

To0.51.01.52.02.53-03.54.o4.55.05.56.06.5

30

Blows87765775710101317

136

Rec.

f TEST HOLE LOG . . " . :.v:•E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE / -777" .J7~-.; " _. "V7 -^CULPEPER

Project Finey Rivef - ."Copperas Pits.. Hole 4-86 Sheet JLof __L Date 1/31/86

I Location As Staked ...__-.-=...... nrf Elev> ____ Depth J^2_Logged by 5PG

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

2.0

8.0

13. Q

14.5

15.5


Red-brown clayey "silt (ML)- Fill ". .;::.„" • ; ;..: ".." ..-

-Red "clayey silt (MH)Fill...::.. '...I ; .. iv" ;-.. T ... . ._:.

—

»

- Copp_eras and red. silty. clay. "-

— —

— . . . . . —

— —

Red .clayey silt. (MH) Pill .:..— . _ _ —Yellow-re<l,.cla;ye"y~ silt.. ..(ML.)

— Resid.ua! . . . . . ._' ~~"_ Hole terminated .at 15.5 ft. -

_ ._.._. —

Sampling Data

Sampless 4-1 .

" ss"4-2

ss -4-3

ss 4-4 .

ss 4-5

ss 4-6 .

ss 4-7

ss 4-8

ss 4-9

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03-54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.010. 511.011.512.012.513.013-514.014.515.0

r_____ &

To0.51.01.52.02-53.03-54.04-55.05-56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5

10.010.511.011.512.012.513.013-514.014.515.015-5

0,13

Blows6

6713212112336786654654556667

Q2f —

Rec.'

TEST HOLE LOG ~" . "E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS ANP ENGINEERSCHAELOTTESVILLE % : .: """ CULPEPER

Project Pi ey" River - Copperas Pits ____ ; Hole S-8&. Sheet J. of J_ Date 1/3/186

Location As Staked . ..._.. Surf, "filey. ———— .Depth — 3jJL- Logged by — SEG.

Ground Water Data: — -- —

*

Elev. Depth0.0

• i.o

3.5.


Topsoil .=~ ._. .,....-_.

Yellow-brown clayey silt .(ML)...- Residual. . "".-"".-.." ... • ""

Hole terminated at 3.5/1...

— —

Sampling Data

Sampless 5-1

ss 5-2

From0.00.51.01-52.02.53-0

30

To0.51.01.52.02-53.03.5

136

Blowsr 61013157910

3

Ren.

TEST HOLE LOG :•:.__. _..-E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE ..:.. ._" :"....... :. 7..r :...

Piney River - Copperas Pits Hole 6-86 Sheet _L of _L Date l/?l/.86^—n v i ii ~— •" —

Location As Staked _•-.- Surf. Elev. ____ Depth ' 1° - 5 ... Logged by

Ground Water Data: ——

Elev. Depth0.0

3.0

9.510,010.5


Firu_. . . . . . .

— Copperas . -

Red clayey silt '(MS) Fill- 'Yellow-red clayey silt (ML):.Residual ... ..,!..Hole. -terminated at 10.5 ft.

Sampling Data

Sampless ,6-86 .

ss 6-2

ss 6-3

ss 6 4

ss 6-5

ss ; 6-6 .-- -

ss 6-7

From0.00.51.01-52.02.53.03.54.0M5-05-56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.0

30

To0.51.01.52.02.53-03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.010.5

i36X

Blows25562321341611102028307896

Reo.

TEST HOLE LOG - _,Vt. ..E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS ZCHARLOTTESVILLE .. .".. ..,._.._ ', ......:: ' .--CULPEPER '

Project Piney River - "Copperas Pits - Hole 7-86 Sheet _Lof _L Date __1/31/S6

Location _____As Staked :.'-l.... Surf. Elev." _____ Depth - 5_ Logged by -SPG

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

2.0

6.5


_ Red clay (CL)Residual ..._. "." ". "-. - _...":.

— Brown-yellow clayey silt " :" " ~(KL)" v •/- — - --

Hole terminated at 6.5 ft_.

Sampling Data

Sampless 7-1

ss 7-2

ss 7-3-

ss 7-4

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03-54.04.55.05-56.0

3o:

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.5

.365

Blows78910•4687911667

Rec.r

TEST HOLE LOG -E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE CULPEPER

Project Pinev River -" TCo-p'-peras" Pits - Hole ' 8-86 Sheet J. of J _ Date . 1/31 /R6

Location _____ As -Staked ______ Surf. Elev. ____ Depth -JLO__ Logged by - SPG

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

2.0

5.0


Red :clay (CL) " ;~* Residual .. ;........ .. •'..::.. ...r

Hed-yellow sandy clay (CL)

— Hole terminated .at 5.0 ft. — -

•AT •*

M ^ «VH^

Sampling Data

Sampless 8-1

ss 8 2

ss 8-3

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0

3

To0.51.01.52.02.53-03-54.04.55.0

)13€

Blows8677471091319

6

Rec.

•

V TEST HOLE LOG- E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS

CHARLOTTESVILLE. -...-"-. ".:":."-,= ." -^rV~ --CULPEPER

Project Piney River -: Copperas Pits Hole 9-86 Sheet JLof _L Date 1/31/86

Location See-..Boring Plan surf. EieVi _____ "Depth -JJL1 Logged by SPG

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

6,0

12.0"12.5

13.5


Red-brown clay (CL)Fill - . . .-.,-.. -_...._,. ,r ~

*

- Copperas" .- ".". _:~ "."."_:"""".:_•••

Red clayTCL. "TilT""""_ Yellow-Tirown" silt" (ML) " " _

Residual,... ' ~ '. . -.-..--- "~?.~".' l".."l.=""- Hole terminated at 13.53*t. _.~

— —


ss 9-2

ss-9-3-.

ss 9-4

ss 9-5

ss 9-6

ss 9-7

ss 9-8.

From0.00.51.01-52.02.53.0"3.54.04.55.05-56.06.57.07-58.08.59.09.510.010.511.011.512.012.513.0

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55-05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5

10.010.511.011.512,012.513.013-5

Blows345222223222312616.314127333687

30

Rec.

L36f

TEST HOLE LOGE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE " - CULPEPER

Project -Plnev River -"- •Cotroeras" Pits' " " "Hole 10-86 Sheet J_ of U- Date 1/31 /fi6

Location See- Bnrinsr Plan" Surf- Elev. ____ Depth -l£-JiL Logged by -S?G

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

4 n*T. U

15-5"16.016..5


Red clayey "= silt (ML) . ...Fill .. . :.._. _.. '. . ... ...;.:_

Copperas *:. __-..- '- -~- '. .;.... •_..-..;:

* "" . - . =- -.-. - .— --

mm ™

mm ^

~ ™~

m mf """""

Red clayey silt (ML) Fill"- Brown silt (MLJ Residual_ Hole terrainai_ed,_ at 16.5 ft-" *-

„ -

Sampling Data

Sampless 10-1 :

ss 10-2

ss 10-3

ss 1.0-4

ss 10-5

ss 10-.6

ss" 10-7

ss 10-8

ss 1.0-9

ss 10-10

From0.00.51.01.52.02-53-03.54.04.55.05-56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.010.511.0.11.512.012.513-013-514.014.515.015-516.0

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0I'56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.010.511.011-512.012.513.013-514.014.515-015-516.016.5

Blows2122222147612181010 .11116444106778222536

301,

Rec.

IBS

ffy< -'/.'

TEST HOLE_LOG^ _1 . . ' ''Ê. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES," GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE "" "."".... .;.::""; --'-'--..-' CULPEPER

Project Pinev River - Co-op-eras Pits Hole 11-86 Sheet J^ of _J_ Date

Location _____ As Staked Surf. Elev. ____ Depth ™£* __ Logged by

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0,0

2.0

4.51 H _y

6.5


Brown silt (ML) --- "- . :L Fill : ::. :~, . •-.-- . -,..,. -r

Red clayey silt (MH)— Residual. - - — - -

— Red-brown-clayey silt "(ML) ~-~ -

Hole terminated at 6.5. ft.

— —

Sampling Data

Sampless 11-1

ss 11-2

ss 11-3

ss 11-4

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55-05.56.0

To0.51.01-52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.5

Blows57894711101518101520

m-

Rec.

69

TEST HOLE LOG . Ofi.E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE ""::.": . . .7 CULPEPER

Project Piney River - Copperas Pits " ' 'Hole ' 12-86 sheet _Lof _1_ Date 1/31/86

Location As Staked - .... . . -" - - ~giirf. Elev, ____ Depth 8.5 Logged by -5PG

Ground Water Data: _ : _:"--. _ . . _ _ _ _ — ..:._..

Elev. Deptli0.0

3.0

7.0"~~ •"

8.5"


_ Red-"bro"wh clayey silt' (MH")~ _Fill .._..-.._.... •-. j-"-":-.__ ' ...

_ . —

— Copperas... ... ^ ... :; -_..-;, ... .....L: -

j. ' >~ Yellow-red ..clayey silt.. .(ML) "~

Residual i -:Hole terminated at 8.5 ft.

— —

Sampling Data

Sampless .12-1

ss 12-2. „. .

ss 12-3

ss 12-4

. ss .12-5 '-.

. . . . . - . - — -

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03-54.04.55.05-56.06.57.07.58.0

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.5

Blows24352314676985788

so:

Rec.

L37C

TEST HOLE"LOG - - - - - - "/:%;vE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS '' -. "':CHARLOTTESVILLE . _ . . . . . - - CULPEPER

Project Piney River._- "Cop-peras"-Pits - " 'Hole 13-86 Sheet _1_ of _1_ Date 1 /31

Location As Staked. .... -..--Surf. Elev. ____ .Depth -1£L£_ Logged by S

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

7.07.5

9-0

10.0


— -Red:: silty clay (CL) " "~

_ Fin ..... . " : ... '. -' ~ -._ -^

**•* «•

^ VPI

_ _

m • -tTopsoil ._ ......... ' __.._: "

ReR clayey; silt...(KH) .. .. . ",.Residual..;.,:. . .— -- — - — .-..—_=Y ellow-br own " sil t . ( ML )

— Hole terminated at 10.0 £t, -^

w.m «"

—— ——

Sampling Data

Sampless 13-1

ss 13-2

ss 13-3 -

ss 13-4

ss 13-5 . -

ss 13-6

From0.00.51.01.52.02-53-03.54.04.55.0I'56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09-5

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5

10.0

Blows46553331454454

69

810

301

Rec.

m

TEST HOLE LOG ' '"•'.'?/- E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS~AND ENGINEERS

CHARLOTTESVILLE - - :"--.- - - CULPEPER

Project Piney River -.:" Copperas'Pits HoTeJLihSS. Sheet J_ of Date 1/?1

Location ____As Staked_______ Surf. Elev. ____ Depth —25*0. Logged by sp

Ground Water Data: "-- " " : """ """ """""""- - - - _ - - - - -

Elev. Depth0.0

2 0t~t \j

20. 0_


Brown silt (ML)- Fill ..._..... .,.v._.:~" . . ._ -

_

"" Copperas _ . ; . . ' . . . , . _ ._-

_

" "

^ ^ v ~fe

^ ^

-

_ _

— -

— continued. oii"she.et 2 of 2 ~ '^~

- . . . . . . . . . .


ss 14-2 -

ss 14-3

ss 14-4

ss 14-5

ss 14-6

ss 14-7

ss-14-8

ss 14-9

ss 14-10.

ss .14-11

ss 14-12

-

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53-03.54.04.55-05-56.06.57.07.58.08.5"9.09-510.010.511.011.512.012.513.013-514.014.515.015.516.016.517.017.518,018.519.019.5

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03-.54.04.55-05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510,010.511.011.512.012.513.013..514.014.515.015-516.016.517.017.518.018.519.019.520.0

3

Blows36643611813168161616192022142624591391413206331252325487

D13'

Rec.

12

TEST HOLE LOG ,..: ,E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE - :.,:'" ... .... .- .: CULPEPER

Project Piney River - Copperas Pits_____ Hole 14-86 sheet JL of .2. Date 1/31/86

Location ———"As Staked •_... - gurf Eiev< ____ Depth ___2____gLogged by -SPG

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth20.0

23 0* / • *-*

25.0

Material Descriptioncontinued from sheet 1 of 2-

_ Copperas . . .. .-: - "- i.

_^ r_m

White silt (ME) Residual

— Hole terminated .at 25..0 fi.—

•-» -mm

*—— -Mtf

^*- nan •

Sampling Data

Sampless 14-13

ss 14-14

ss 14-15

From20.020.521.021.522.022.523.023.524.024.5

To20.521.021.522.022.523.023-524.024.525.0

i

Blows49176811961013

J01<

Ren.

73

TEST HOLE LOG ". ;E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE""" " " " " - CULPEPER

Project PIney~River -L;C-Op"p"eras"Tits _____ ..Hole 1 5-R6 Sheet _L of _L Date

Location ————— As Staked- ;... _..- .--.ijhirf. Elev. ____ Depth 6.5 Logged by

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

1-5

3-5.

6.5


Brown-red silty clay (CL)- Fill .._. -'.-.. " - "-— -

Copperas ' ' " " -mff *-

Brown-:red/ silty clay_.(.CL) '__Jj'iii - . _. . ..-_.."..._ ....:.:

Hole terminated at 6. .5 ft.

— —

Sampling Data

Sampless 15-1

ss 15-2

ss 15-3

ss 15-4

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03,54.04.55.05.56.0

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05-56.06.5

*\

Blows12348910344122

• f\ •* n013

Rec.'

74

•L

TEST HOLE LOG . %,-..,E. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS ,v,'CHARLOTTESVILLE = :-_:..:_..- CULPEPER

Project Piney River. - Copperas Pits Hole ' 16-86 Sheet _l_of _!_Date ?./3/ftfi

Location —————As Staked______^ Surf. Elev. ____ Depth .B.5 T.nggeH hy Rpr.

Ground Water Data: '.._..

Elev. Depth0.0

7.58/Y".U8 r "•0


Red -brown "'silty clay (CL)_ EUJL- "" ~ ." ""_ ." " "T .. .. = ..:.. . ".. _".. . . __

i—

Topsoil- ......Brown-red., clayey silt, (ME)

- Residual.. . ..._ ._... ... . ._ _„..-Hole . terminated, at 8,.5 ft.""~

Sampling Data

Sampless 16-1

ss 16-2

ss 16-3

ss 16-4

SS--16-5 _..

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07-58.0

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.5

Blows2344235222121491112

Ren.

TEST HOLE LOG _ .E/O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES; GEOLOGISTS ANU ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE : ."". "_. . CULPEPER

Project Piney River .-.Copperas its . ..Hole ' 17-86 Sheet _Jof _L Date _ 2/3/86

T.nnatinn As Staked- - - - - — , - surf TT.TAV Depth _15J2_ Logged by _£EG

Ground Water Data: -- —

Elev. Deptho.o-

3.0

9.0

14.515.0


Brown silt (ML) " ~Fin. . ._:-_• -.. .. - : :

mmm ' ——

- Red silty clay (CL)Fill-'.. •/• -.::"•• -. -• ::.-.;:;. ;r— -;;.;

_ Copperas ; v '- \ l.: .--_.;-,,. "- -

» . —

^ •—•

™* "~™Yellow-red, silt (ML) Residjoal. .Hole terminated. at 15.0 ft.

Sampling Data

Sampless 17-1

ss.17-2

ss-17-3- -

ss 17-4

ss 17-5 ;

ss.17-6

ss 17-7

ss 17-8

ss 17-9

From0.00.51.01-52.02.53.0

' 3.54.04.55-05.56.06.57.07-58.08.59.09.510.010.511.011.512.012.513.013-514.014.5

To0.51.01.52.02.53-03.54.04.55.05-56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.010.511.011.512.012.513.013.5.14.014.515.0

30

Blows1242352233i1112212232222222355

13?

"Reo.,

-\:>

TEST HOLE LOG . /frE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS #c_ft^CHARLOTTESVILLE - - ........ . : CULPEPER

Project Piney River -- Copperas Pits____ Hole 18-86 Sheet J_of _L Date 2/3/86

Location _____As Staked .gnrf "T?in» ____ Depth _12±JL_ Logged by -§HL_

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

3 ^JO

5.0

13.013-5"


Red-brown clayi with topsoilFill ... ... ... .... :_..._....._,"

- Topsoil-.. ..._.. . . . . . . . . . . ...-

- Copperas . . ;•--• -..„- .-. . ._-

—

^

Red-yellow.:, silt (ML) ResidualHole- terminated at -13.5 ft. -

— —


ss 18-2 ..

ss 18-3

ss"'iB-4

ss. 18-5 :

ss 18-6 -

ss 18-7

ss 18-8

From0.00.51.01-52.02.53-03.54.04.55-05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.0.10.511.011-512.012.513.0

To0.51.01-52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56,06.57,07.58.08.59.09.510.010.511.011-512.012.513.013-5

30

Blows355313211111235894784344567

137

Rec.t

?

P : . ... TEST HOLE LOG " _ Off/tyhE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS / /CHARLOTTESVILLE ' CULPEPER

Project - piney River -- Copperas Pits Hole 19-86 sheet JL of JL Date 2/3/86

Location As Staked ....... ....... .Rlirf Elev> ____ Depth _2j___0_Logged by

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth0.0

3.0

20". 0"

21.0


_ Red-brown "clayey "siltFill .---.". -_.. ..: .._;;._-.. _

— , —

__ MCopperas with _soil . . .

— -, —— ,m———

__

__

^

—— ~ '

Yellow-brown' clayey silt ..(ML J"Residual •"" ",. ".-.".::...:;. -— _Hole. ..terminated at 21.0 ft..

Sampling Data

Sampless 19-1

ss 19-2 .

ss 19-3 "

ss 19-4

ss 19-5 :

ss 1-9-6 ...

ss 19-7

ss 19-8.

ss 19-9

ss 19-10 . .

ss 19-H

ss.:19-l2

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58,0.8.59.09.510.010.511.011.512.012.513.013.514.014.515.015-5.16.016.517.017.518.018.519.019.520.020.5

To0.51.01.52.02.53.03-54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09-510.010.511.011 512.012.513.013-514.014.515.015.5.16.016.517.017.518.018.519.019.5-20.020.521.0

30

Blows1345269125891233223646765443542243259510127101213

L3?i

Ken.

!

IP TEST HOLE LOGE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE : . CULPEPER

Project " Piney River- --".Copperas Pits Hole 20-86 sheet _L of 2. Date _ 2/3/86

Location - - See Boring "Plan ~Surf: Elev; ___T Depth _ai£_ Logged by __ SE

Ground Water Data: — -- — _ __

Elev. Depth0.0

3-04 n*T «U

5-0

20. .0 ".


Eed-browrT clayey silt " " "Fill-. _r .. . . _. ^ ..

Copperas " ^. . .-.- " :

Red clayey" silt. (ML) Fill ....;

Copperas " . ._ -'..•'--. ._ ._ - . _,_.,__ -_z

•mm "

— —

•" •" ' *""

•» VA

— —

— —

-

— continued on sheet 2 of 2 — -

- -

Sampling Data

Sampless 20-1.

ss 20-2

ss _20-3

ss 20-4

ss"2D-5

ss 20-6.

ss 20-7

ss 20-8. .

ss 20-9

ss 20-10

ss 20-11

ss 20-12

From0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05-56,06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5

1Q.O.10.511.011.512.012.513.013-514.014.515.0-15.516.016.517.017.518.018.519.019.5

_To0.51.01.52.02.53-03-54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5

10.010.511.011.512.012.513.013'. 514.014.515-015.516.016.517.017.518.018.519.019.520.0

30

Blows224312513337

16 .1518. .18151118 .1971111231120141015-12131597112312138

137

Rec.f

3

P TEST HOLE LOGE. O. GOOCH & ASSOCIATES, GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERSCHARLOTTESVILLE . . ... - CULPEPER

Project iney River - Copperas pits ' .Hole ' 20 -86 sheet _2_ of _2_ Date 2/3/86

Location As Staked . . ; ..;:..-. surf. Elev. ____ Depth —2U1 Logged by - SPG

Ground Water Data:

Elev. Depth20.0

?4 n

25-0

Material Descriptioncontinued from sheet ..1. o£...2

Copperas ' .". .

Yellow-wfilte "silt (ML) Residual— Hole terminated at 25-0 ft.— -

_ —


ss 20-14

ss 20-15

From20.020.521.021.522.022.523.023.524.024.5

To20.521.021.522.022.523.023.524.024.525.0

Blows234242

18 -141312

RPP

P ———

i

p 301381

u, .r V*' • - - ' < •

_ „ . . . . . . _ . . . APPENDIX JF _ _ : _ _ ,

CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR WELLS 5-1 THROUGH 5-9

3013S2

J-IYDROSYSTEMS :.

Casing Elevation 632,99 FT — —

Protective Steel Casing ___ with Locking Cap

/VtnrbMAâ bk*.

Sentonite Seal ——————— |p»

Sch, 40, 2 inch PVC -^— -^— ~Casing

Gravel Pack —————————— £•

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUCScreen with 0,02 inch slots __

*

&•

X

•N

K

P

^X

x.x

>Nx

x"-

XX

x

Xr'

X

X

s>>

1Bgj£

"5/*>>">s>x.><vs~

^

*^<..• _

^X<*£

>**

rb-

"

8

^

^

X>

<

<'

>f

X

_ -N.

Xrf-rfx

J><<x"x

'x.<"•

\

g

1<<<<.<X

*C.<

x'V.,

Xx

j<

<

'••

^

X

c

HOKI TORINO HELL 5-1U.S. TITANIUH SITEPINEV. RIUEP, Ufi

CoMpletea Hay 11, 1987

L-1,7 FT—2.3 FT

—3.3 FT*

fllluvial SediHetitsC Grave lj Cobbles, Sand,and Silt)

. -

9ft IT

"

Alluvial SediM&nts: (Sand, Silt, Clay, andsowe Fine Gravel)

i-o -o FTJ. _ . - I i

301383

MYDROSYSTEMS

Casing Elevation 632.99 FT- — -

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUCCasing

Concrete —— - ——— - — |^

Bentonite Seal ——————— £^

Sand Pack.. ... — fcs

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUCScreen with 0.02 inch slots _ _

^ ^

y>&\'X-'xK>25??$mr --.j•-. Xk>-X0:">•v"X

c lr-:X

><5X>>v;;' >rS^ ^x^X^ "••-v^:->y '%,

•r

HONI TOEING HELL 5-2U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINE¥ RIUER, UA

CoMpleted toy 15, 1987*w"VK>C:on/V:XXfc<3S-0.5 FT• s& — L,u fi ,

X>j 2,12 FT.-. ^^x_V-l-4 FT-/NXjXI -v^,XNX.' 5rayr ver>« fine BasteC ^Xj (wet belo« 4 ft.)

$>><!x.XX xXX1o --" "--.

XXQ - - ..................Xxlk^3-J-4 FT.

grave!, cobfcles and silt

.HYDROSYSTEMS

Casing Elevation 631.73 FT_ —— -

Concise te ~— ————— — ——— ~^p

Bentonite Seal ————— = — 1^—^

Sch, 40, 2 inch PUC ———————Casing

Sand Pack ————————————— |fc

Seh, 40, 2 inch PUCScreen with 0,02 inch slots ——

*

ixC

>:>J s3

'-al

' >^

^-.x

QkxM\-|NsxX5

——

T

-

HONITORING HELL 5-3U.S. TITANIUM SITEPIHE¥ RIVER, VA

Completed Hay 14, 1937

8

1 -- 1.5 FT

IfS — -2iQ-FTL_" Xj - -- -Xj - 9i"QVf very fine was-:-2-.-7 FtXxX ""X v^1

^-4. FT

K^ ---^-rr...-v............t _,iL. . ...............XJ - .._X£fy wet, white,'>q ver. fine, wasteKVI ' . .x^N 6.0 "FT- - - * • - - - • • - . - • - -

X] ""'VI«rN very wefstit,,XN sand and aravei

^ :: "

30138S

JHYDROSYSTEMS

Casing Elevation 632~29 FT_— -

„^ ^

Hrnfnni fr tfiTiT - fc—

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUC —————— -Casing

Sand Pack —— ——————— - —— |^

Sch. 40, 2 inch PVCScreen with 0,02 inch slots ——

+~

5*$<$sb__ _."

«, N

^X,. _>^

\.

>''XV

^bnHJ^xx

\

—

-•

T

MONITORING WELL 5-4U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINEy RIVER, VA

Cowpleted Hay 14, 1987

x"xjR8j><5j gray, very fine wasfej> xljg- 1-5." FT " '

Plr- 2 0- FT ">XxL o, rt—— -XT 'XX

>>%xX

,5!

X]XJy

f ' X(

XX"XX

^J ~^ v1 I

xl ' /'"<:>| refuse!, very wet d

e

301386

HYDROSYSTEMS

Casing Elevation 632.58 FT —— H>

Protective Steel Casing ——— j^.with Locking Cap

Concrete —————————— — &

Bentonite Seal ——————— fcbb.

Scih. 40, 2 inch WC-- '"Casing .-— -.-- --

Gravel Pacfc -., - ———

Sch, 40, 2 inch PUCScreen with 0.02 inch slots __

6 inch Drilled. Hole ____ £t»-

|

MONITOIING WELL 5-5

OO

1>•*.>£Xv-^ £>

F

T>;x, .. 1

_v

>>

\ I

v-H

d$i:£-xxC ">-m jf

'?Xv>-xx. X'X,

x= -

U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINEY RIVER, VA

Completed Hay 12, 198?

'"<•* *"v 4 A T?f|g-1.0 FT

H-l.S FT

X-2,9 FT5<xx-- !><j^Xj Alluvial SedimentsXX <Sand, Silt, Clay, andrx_ i sowe Fi ne Gravel )

MX >

'" S">fi

^ -XkV]xvx

-•" "v

X Nj— i i a IT

301387

MYDROSYSTEMS

Casing Elevation 626.86 FT —— H^ ——

Rftl*. ifi, ? inrfe PUf1 ——— 1 _.

Casing j

w-

VISch, 40, 2 inch" PUC XjScreen with 0.02 inch slots __ ' fr*

>S*.nd Pafifc ————— — — — — fri>X

MONITORING WELL 5-6U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINEV RIVER, VA

Completed Kay 13, 1987kx3Xc*S=C*QJ — 1.0 FT.

^%— 1-5 FT. gray, very fine waste,Xj (wet Below 4 ft.)

x,X " "vj

x' •" • ! 4.3 FT, - • • • • • - • • • ' • - • • " •

gravel, cotbles and silt

3Q13S8

JiYDROSYSTEMS

Casing Elevation 627,43 FT - — *9*~

S^h. 4<\ ? in^ ™r ^~Casing

j|

Eentonite Seal ——————— E fep

>xSch. 40, 2 inch PUC xXScreen with 0.02 inch slots__L|

Sand Pack ——————— . —— . ——— |fc:p'"XD*C

——

_

MONITORING WELL 5-7U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINEV RIVER, VA

CoM?!etecl Kaij 13, 1987f vy" ~t

Xg_4.o FT.

^ —"2,0 FI.%V''f,--'X. gray, very fine wasteX _ 9 "i PT,-* -.. £4 t -J £ X •

'--__ .-""

<>-2.9S FT.

<->]j""''. '

XNV* ' K T TTT

ffpayelj cobtles and silt

301383MYDROSYSTEMS *c.

Casing Elevation 628.29 FT- ——

Protective Steel Casing. ——— bpwith Locking Cap

Concrete ———————————

Ben ton! te Seal —————— _ -

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUC -^— — Casing

Gravel Pack —————— . —— (^

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUCScreen with 0,02 inch slotsz: _

i^

x:.j-*

K;H;K1>Ci/iN•x•j"">-

^

N.iX>*b.

">

Nx

J>

'X.-•'

>

>X^)*jf

-

x••*•*R;'">frK

^

<f<;X*X;

>

X

Xx,'"

XX

x5"x:>xXV__J"

>y">

. __ .

.i —— ,

t-

-

MONITORING WELL 5-8U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINE. RIVER, VA

Co«pleted May 12, 198?X -'S'*x >%v Q

X P'S 1-5 nW-2.2 FTXNX''1X f-3.2 FTXNJxxj ftlluvial SediwentsC 5 _^XJ (Gravel, CotMes, Sand,

^Xj ^^ Silt).XXJXX X

)< f 3VI<rNM ~ ' "X NX ^1 O O TTT

<" Stf"x v"*«xX"N BedrockXxX'N GranuliteX.X

X— ••••a"' — 13,2 FT

301330

JiYDROSYSTEMS me.

Casing Elevation 626.15 FT —— -

Protective Steel Casing ___ bwith Locking Cap

Bentonite Seal ——— — ——— £*

Sch. 40, 2 inch PUC — ~ ^Casing

Gravel Pack ——————— fa^

Sch, 40, 2 inch PUCScreen with 0,02 inch slots ——

9

*•

R

">X

s

X•N,

S

?

X.

p*-

%Jr 1

E g

t*tXX"™

/•xx._xx^^

>x

s.%,

—

F-

MONITORING WELL 5-9~ U.S. TITANIUM SITEPINEY. RIVER, VA

Completed May H, 1987

;xx|ia-i.o FT_ _ ^

R_2.0 FT.

C7- -2.9 FT..x

<T^> filluvial Sediwents\/ (Gravel, Cothles, Sand,<^N „ and Silt)

, *t 1

^

V x'"Vx" xx"'xjxiXx""]X NJX :]- J— 9 5 FT - . t ...............

BedrockGranul i te

301391MYDROSYSTEMS

ii.:' ^

%•>-- - " ^ . ';?- L='--.rV\;; -=: : * '- .-V s"5 • -•• P C S 5*

301392

,APPENDIX G

SOIL BATCH ' LEACHING DATA AND ANALYSES

301393MYDROSYSTEMS*c.

SlIWARY OF BATCH HfiCHIffi" TESTS.FOR ACIDITY (HG/L CAC03)

»Uii*nt**ttttt*Tt.-*r«t*iiiT

PAR&ETERS

SAfPLENfflBER7.

CB-2-IOA2-1-2A2-1-9.5A2-2-4.5A2-3-2 -A2-4-2A2-5-2 •A2-6-5A2-7-2 -A2-8-2 .A2-B-10A2-9-2A2-10-2 -A2-11-7A3-7-3.5A3-DB1-2A3-DB1-15A3-BB1-30A3-DB2-10A3-DB2-30A3-DB2-50A3-DE3-2 -A3-DB3-15A3-DE3-30A4-1-6M-2-3 ..-A4-3-3

"•""••v"

TOTAL" -SOILACIDITV

5454-, 33500-

10400.70000.

— zito17400 .11000"2&30D""

•--mi- 46400

7950. 15400...-8950..

NA58400-1200011400.

..16000...8950.114006950-7450.16000"."16000.16000

v,i9450..51400

INITIALACIDITY

" : 50.--10SO-~4600: 60000

9QOG.. . 5000""1500

" iM.80

"- -901200.1500100®70000SO

•.-.:~4Q.. "50*1

:. =4800" "9ST.3500 :

-",.3000,"60".

9SOO..-" 6500-sro.

.... . 2so~. 400001

FROH CUR£ FITTINB OF BATCH DATA

HALFHJFE" TCH "lei "" "' S3(BATCH) TO ACHIEVE PI"— - BACKGROUND VO

• TD'flw™

...... 'hl • - - -

- -1.7""1,3

. 1.15., 1.51.:-_=: 1.6.... .. 1.8 '=~; 1.5 _...".""- .2.7"."~3T7 ".

:..— 1,84 •2,5

~~- "" 1-5-._"'Q*8_"". . 3.5 ""

1.97"""Z1_ . .-;:,.,i!2 .. „" ' -T.8.- .... : J™7,/:ZLlJ- ,._... .. _ 5

1,28. .1.5

T"T.9. "2 ...

..'-..: 3.-!--juiiuiii r 1 1 >

-

M*"""""13,19.212.412.2. .11.5

* 9.C__J2i?..."2,5 r"5.2

."""9,513.712.38.8

;'_i4,7Q.4.:9.3_8.68.6

..14.0. ..- 8.4. 4.1-JPvX---'.ir.'4"•"•".4"6.1.15.2

, IF tf TURATED3i€ SOILLUT£S THICKNESS -3fiEVE (FTJ3ROM1

..-.._,

82-S778

....:7672

. ' 61'J. ......

1532

_5985 'J*

.775592"3

.58..._5454

— JB53

. i '26"tS

" JL"4.38

_64 _

Ittti-JITlI

,, - „ , ,g

7- ' . NA

'fa4.5m

" 16107"7

..:. 1....*.3223

. 1" . .27

24'.". '24

.._..*3434NA32323:223212.1

Uiixm-ni

TOTAL RIS PERCOUTION TI«EPOROSITY LSBTH RATE OF. ,,.. . !FT) (FT/YR) RELEASE

: (YRJ

"^-"0,4[-0,40.4'

"' 0.4 '0.40.46.4""

~ OJ' :0.4

: 0,40.4"":

" ". 0".4"" ".0,4

-""0.4"' 0.4 '

-- <U."" 6.4 "/

0.40/4"C.4-0.4H3* .

. _*„ 0.1;" " 0.47'

'" 0.40.4

mmmtmn

38'229NANA137NA246"322""~ 43

91IK

"1093'70722995

.'.. 27""'55S'

UA

"735" "1193HA"328837 ."909424319536

-1.040.920.920.920,920.920.926.92"6.920.920.920,920.920.921.20

" i.201.200,921.201.200.921.201,20-1.201.761.76

" 1.76

tiimr 11

37250NftELMWNABELWMT149NABRftiHT2693524799NABELOHtfT

119477324827224MNAEaDWiiT611992^BELJStfT272695756241181304

301394-JiYDROSYSTEMS no.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST DATAU.S. TITfiRKT SITE . " . . .

SFPlfiENTOL REMEDIAL HBEnSATIQHII a II I II 1 1 l-m*-HmH«H*HHHH»H*HH-HH«*HtH I 111 IH 1 1 THHl 1 H M II I II 1 »*Ht

3W1£ " BATCfi" TOTC"- -—- SAKFtt BATCH 7TGJAL , , SfiffLE BATCH TOTS.NW3ER IW3ER ACIDITY ' NUKBER NUMBER 'OHTY " IMfcER MlfflE= ACIDITY

" " " " " - - - - - - ' -

EB-MQ 1 .. . 20 - A3-7-3>5 -= 2 435. A4-H 2 240' 2. 10 ----- 5 195 5 80

3 10 " " B 140 A4-2-3 2 146AH-9.5 2 - 1750. " ft3-IJEl-2 . 2_: 20. ; 5 50

:_ -- 2QO ."' ": ......_"' "1?2_,.;^ 'A4->1 . - . 2 ' 120008 65 .. 8. . 2.5 5 500

A2-1-2 ~ 2., "340(1. 7 - A3-DEH5 ".I~2" 230 8 150:?75 ;--:L . !: •_"... .120" "7 I A4-4-Q. .2 -15

8 '325 " "- •" -". -:..8 50 i M-l-1 2 5"2 18000" "ffi-fiBI-30 , -_..l _ I50CV. ffi-2-1 2 6.5- -'- 2450™;:. 777 '7; ,... :. .4. |£L,77.._JH- . .. ..2 -10"s" ' .570." " :'":" '"' irt '" '4\._ =" • _ . .

_ 5

A2-4-2 - 1 2SO"~ 77-I=7_T3-IS2-3C . .-"-"^5 160" "" "" " 5 420

. " ' :fi " i5C , 7" __. -' ""* § T ' SA2-5-2 " " - ' - J -"v. 70C1 "" " :.H!-DB2-5(L_.~ T~~ 1070

5 ISO . ". ". .._ " -M5 169"_ S "70 ' : S " " 4C_

A2-tr_~--"" '~-1 5153 . ._ fvKSH -- ~ - .~ ~ &5 . i30(T-= " ••=-="=-——- 5 — —317-.E 3GC; ..."•"-;_, . " " —

5 1 0 - - - - - - - -----~. --:- .

S 6.S. . " 4 . 1HX

A2-S-1C 2 --- 570 . " . . . -.- - B _ 165= -• -•- :. - 5 12C " -7 ".: - ..." " 3. L .'IS"

s 6 0 " " : " " 7 "-"—'-fir : m.A2-9-2---- r-7_2~— -.&?, ..';.7;...~7""7.."" U . .117.5.

-""•5 3 . ....... 7. IT ICO.8 160" ~~A3-DBo-30. ._.:. 2 2_5&-"

A2-10-2:.-----. i --40X-(r .: ".:i-T" ". . :"5 510.-:,- 5- - =90jf77 . ""_..-7 rr~' .7_7.,K7; 175

S 300 "" " -"- " -^--^-^-=A2-1H : - -2- 1205y "... .. L:T;T:;_ .... ;._:..:._;:. "7. .. . . . . . .. _. ._...

- . J .itUj . . - - ,^_-. ,,-..„. . - _ - - - -e /o .... . . . . . .i 1 1 1 1

NOTE:." iT.""7zzir :I::__I:irr_ -— "-CE =" CONTRQ-i BAT-DH "' .-..-•- -,. -----

ft3-ffi3-30T,flfiES 3, PEEP BEIffi 3, 30 FT TSTti " ~ """ ~- - - ~ rsn*^

_______________ HYDROSYSTEMS «c,

SRIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSSRE'NEtFMQ 7

1.1 i 111,11,

BATCHKG.

(NOTE-

-.0-'- -"c»i

2-j4cJ

7S910n1213

"TOTAL .. -—TOTAL .:._.:_..ffilDITY " : " ' ACIDITY

(HG/L CAC03) " ' fflG/L CACG3) "" . '

H "~" " • " CURIE FITTINE PfliWtTBB .

TOTS. SOIL ACIDITY= 545C HB/"KBIKnTIft.ffiIDITY"=""" 50K3/L .HALF-LIFE . ="" ".'1.1 KTQiS

50"" " " "20. : . . . !.._. u

. .JC .__....._ . . . . _ • -"• If. ' ..J(; " ^

4' 777. . ." ... j-:". 7-2 . . ;;;-"7"

i: ' " " . 0 .-^ . , . - . - - . . ... ^ ,=-t=.

.00o(l

BftTH i-fiKBEF. TO ACHIRt .BftCKBRGUKT =-::""=-0,£"(NOTE"2i " " " "" ""•"" '. ' ~ -

ffiTE 1: Efi>: BATCH REF'fB TTS SCJT 5 FiEE!CT£ 2";" ' ESmxti: IS JftftK ?S 34 MB/L 3C

301396

MYDROSYSTEMS «c.

SERIAL BATCH TEACH TESTSAMPLE CB-2-10

-. e -.. cl°. 12- . ,- r - , .. .. _ .^ . h-|

BATCH NUMBER

301397

JHYDROSYSTEMS

SEKIAL BATCH "LEACH TEST"" - - - - -vffi-i-r-- ——— -.. --., °$uify,

Wart i '**

BATCHNO,

{fflTE

. - -•*•-

Ci^3

. -4" " '--5"67.8910ii1213

. TOTKT •-• ™- ' -TOTAL....ACIDITY ftCnUTY -"iHG/L.CACOI) . . ...(MG/L.CAC03J. .....,._.

1! " " 'OIRVE. FITTING PARAMETERS" "*-e --L ._. L- . ti ,">, _ i. r

" TOTAL 3IL ACIDIC "33500 ffi/TS "'INTITIAL ACIDITY' = ?OOC H5/L " ' "

• •'-;. -t Lr-LIFE"; .= •; UBSTTSS'

7C<n? . ;. -"." " . . . ""fefe ---.;,. •_.- ;. .." 3400 ' "- ,.l - -'.- "7.. 3PS".' S;"; " 77i:"

- 20«!---. .. -.. .. _ 1370 . ;"

,., 775" 7' 7._.. 77>1.C ..."!'-"7.. " 'J"60_;"403

325V _".>; " :__ ._ ' "265 ,17E^ "

. T ...... ill?"79

.53. .,• 35 -

BATCH "NU1BB TO ACHIEVE B&KBRBJG =- - 13.1(NOTE 2) " " " '

NOTE1: £ A C H " B A T _KOTt 2: " SAQOTMTIS TflKDi AS 34 "HG/1 ACIDITY.

30153S

JiYDROSYSTEMS MC.

o o"

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST-• SAMPLE A2-1-2

BATCH NUMBER

301399MYDROSYSTEMS w.

Of-,Slffi. BATCH LEACH TEST "" ' ;'w/y

0. flH-9.5 'r':v?-

******************** *********

' BATCH"NO.

i

.: itJ0TE_"T!

•--:.

.-.. .92V

4L- 5. ""67

. ""• 8"" ' 9

10111213"

hEfiSlKED' ' " 'iMC-TtS "TOTAL _. . -7. _TCTAL- . . . .ACllltY '. fiCIpITf """ " :'

_______ --fgfg pj jjg raRftfcTSRs

TUTAL.SJIL ACIDITY 1MOC HB/'kE. - MITIALCIO.IT? = 4fiOOHBr.' -• HALF-LIFE "-7T *.. J BffeS '

74«ft .

1750 . - . . ' - . 7. "1584 .•929

,-- -" ,- . .. .35 ,...,;188 - "-110

, ,.A5 " "\_ _/ .. " 7 t5 ' " 7""""""' • '"' "' **"7=' "*

- 22 . -13

" - ". - =-,...... . = B4

BATCH NUKBEF" TO ACHIEVE BACKRDUffi' = ._ 9.2"..[.NOTE 23 7" . . ..... ... ._-.

TBTTT:" EACH BiTffl.REPflE3EmB ABffiJT c.25 PtSt VOL'JMS.

301400MYDROSYSTEMS «..

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPL£ A2-1-9.S

• _; - - 6 ' ' 8 ; 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301401MYDROSYSTEMS «*.

*f *********

TifrTr-nKliliri

Nl

' (1

INOTE.i).

0

2':-

' =676

' 910111213 "

KASU8E& ' .. . HBICTEB _ " " ,TOTAL . . . TOTAL.. ; . '

.ACIDITY "" " "" " "ACIMTYE/L BEET TI- -fflGTL-CKffi) ... 7

CURE FITTIH5 PARSERS

TOTAL BDIL ACIDITY 70000 H./K3 "INT1TIAL A.IDITY = SOOOO"S/LHALF-LIFE = 1.15BATC-HE5 .

60000 . . .32B3? ' " '"" -

LiW-.7... ..y 7. "'"fis/S1"". ."'9337 _;

•" ,2450 7 ; 7: . ....1947 7 ... .' '1613SS". __=_.

570 '"7". ------ "- -;45I". '!'264 ' "'14579 ""'" -4324

BATCH ttJGEft'TQ ffiHIEVE BfiCKGRDlK! = . 12,4.(NDTE"2J" - -

-- • 78" "

NOTE 1: " EACH BATCH "REPFBafS fflffiT 6.25 PORE VQLifrB,ffi095SWD,JS TfiflK AS 34 HS/L ACIDITV. !

JiYDROSYSTEMS AC.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH:TESTSAMPLE A2-2-4.5

i i i t12I

BATCH NUMBER

301*03

MYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTqaspir iir- fl7-T-7 -•tt -L IvJa Mi. -J L -

BATCHm.

r."

JNCTt"

-,:,-. '

0i

T

4-r- '2

' D

7- e

910111213

•" TOTAL .TDTflL .ACIDITY ACIDI?'

JK/L CACC3) ' " " (HSL CK031.. , " !

1) . . 7 "CURVE FIHIffi PAMHETERS ..-- --:,-- *•-• n- " .. -7:" . ..-.. . . t

TOTfi. SOIL fiCIDITY= 2400CM./KBINITIAL ACIDirr = WOO HS/L "

;7I:.. ,prnF , j , . -, % -W ,..900G" """" ""5637 ;

. . . . ^J ._..._..... .!4S"_., 7 "."

"' 805' , "7 ..„". .,7.' "'... :,9C7 ;. -'SJ/W

362- - .. .230 . ." .. :. "7- 225 7"-7 -" 7;. "V v : ifi .'.". ^7

915S3t .... .

"23" . " :

BATCH KISEn TD fiCHIFVE Bfi3HS5M? = " 12. J(KCTE2) •'---'- - - - ~- • ~ -

- IB

*****m**m*f-**f**j it F ***»*******)! i •!**** *•!»**********N[TE {; HACK B .TCH REPRESENT. fiBl" 6.25•NtHE. 2i B£KGEO5 15 TSBl flS 3* f /L

301404

o

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A2-3-2 . - ..

77 7" 78. - '10 12BATCH NUMBER

301405

JHYDROSYSTEMS no.

SERIAL BATCH IBSi TESTSAMPLE ffi. A2-4-2 .

frt":rf frff •F-y-tii'JL'jfi!* f • Ytv%**^*\ vfrYrt tf^vYTTyYJ'V J gi" * V?T1 M l l I, & L 1 riTTT r H 1 J, ?.TI TT~~*~* 1 1 i 1 IT TTTTTIT IT! K 1 J, IT TTT

NEftSURES ... PREICTED |BATCH TGT& TQI .NO. ACIDITY flCIBITV " ~~ ~~"

tSB/L CftCOil . . _ . . = EH3/L I3S3U7_' ." . "*' '

(NDTE.ir

••' i- £-'

V

-: " - 1- " 2

T

A•5..7

.;.. '• e91011

13

CURVE FTTTINE Pffi&ETERE

TOTAL SOIL ACKITY= "" 17400 ffi/KB '. . .,- IRTITIfiL ACIDITY = 5000 H./L " '

- ' .HfiLF-LIFE ' " ="" _3 BATOE3

5QOC.. -'.' ' '-'' " '*** "'3242 :•'.".'. SO. . "" .. "!'h , .7 .2102 .. ' '

...1363-" "..-- .- - - --. - -884 ,;.. 160 """ " : 573 '77: . "

372 t" - . -24i

.150 : . "...J_15t ."! .101664"

- ie

BATCH TQ ACHIEVE BACKBR3UND.= 11,5(NOTE 2? .i VDLUH5 TG ftCHIE BffiKBREfJHC = .. : - 72

**W*H*HH*f ***************

TE" 1.:.; E€H EfiTCH iSPRE N'TE AB3UT 6.25 PORE VDUM&.TE2;""BOrS JLiS' IS Tte"A5 34 fe'ACIEt vl

301406MYDROSYSTEMS

-SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE. A2-4-2

12

30140?

.HYDROSYSTEMS *c

SERIAL BATS LHffl TESTSWLE'ffl. A2~5-"2

tesftD " :BATCH "TOTAL "NO, .ACIDITY

tMS/L CAGES)

(NOTE i) " ' ' CURV

TOT& SOILINTITIA. AHALF-LIFE

012 7007 "34

- , 5 1BC61E - -70

•"" 9 '" " •10111213 _...

m% mm TO ACHIEVE BAB;

"" FteTED '/• 'TC'T . • " ;.ACIDITY*

rwr pArfr'iiFlbrL U-ft-i.1- J . ..

P PTTTTWS ^ R M-TP'-fR£_ 1 1 1 1 1 1U i fll u;.' it- J i-t VJ

KIDITY= -110(10 MG/iiSCIDIT'f = - 1500flG/L " "

" ""'=- --1.BBATCIE5 .

15007"."..:1021

-- ,: --^ ^ -_! .

."" " "472 " " '".321 - - — "- -..

.. " . . . . . 21? .....!- " 1 4 = " '

1G1' ' "69

-IT '

7-,

22-.. 15

10

ERQUND"= " "9.B " -":-r-!" ;

POREVDLUie"TO ACHIEVE BAKSiaiNL =• 61

If T ¥ K j. T h. j. v. if V V r V Y V tf 4-t.y.JL JhJf.X i..T F I v i T I jj T VTTT TTTT V IT JT i 1 J. i I Jl TTTTTTT lilJ!Zl£7TJlf I

KTE 1: . EACH BATCH REPRESENTS ABOUT fe.25ffiTE 2: -"SlEKBRraSC I5"Tfe "fiS WTB/L ACIDITY".

MYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL..BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A2-5-2

%

s.S

_6

BATCH NUMBER

301409

MYDROSYSTEMS me.

SERIAL BfiiBTlEKR TESTSAHPi£ NO. A2-C-5

ffifiSUFED - " " PFBBATCH"" TO. - - ' TO- ND. 'ACIDITY ftCI

(ffi/L CAD33) (NS/L

, .[NQTE "[)" " "" ~ -—-- "CURVE FITTIN5

TOTS. SOIL ACIDITY*. IN7ITIAL ACIDITY =- HALKIFE

C ..--.-; i . .. . . . . :..-----1 .''SlST - "7:7 " "

34

. 5 . 1390 . :. " " 7'6;

J- • :>a ".300'... .7" ......:;• " 9 -

101112 -1 3 " - - - - - -

BATCH NJtfflEHTD ftCKIE1 BAZXSEM =(NOTE 2) ....... -.. .. _ .

- FBF£ flLlKS110""flCHJEVE BACKSdiD =

ICTEDTflL """ -"DITYCACD3/ -. -.:PARAETESS 7

26000 ffi/KB13000 IE/L

-': 1,5 BATCrS- i ..13000" . ""SlSr "-5155. . _.! .

...;3250_. ' . -2.4TD?o' : 'S13512 " '

" -" 7322 "" :203 --

__.JB"Bl

-51~ 32

- 2"? : " ' '::-

•": • BO ""

JCTE f:" 7EACH Tffl SPRESeiTS fflTT ..25 FunENOTE 2:. CtOTJS' 15 TfflSS" 53.34"WL'"ACIDITY)

301410

MYDROSYSTEMS »c.

~S

is5 o_

I

SERIAL BATCH 'LEACH"TESTSAMPLE A2-6-5

Or,

4 - -;-—--" IBATCH'NUMBER

301411

MYDROSYSTEMS no.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH" TEST

iiiiif I J: 11 trtTt II )! t

BATCHffi.

f

(NOTE 1)

0i

2

4_ 567.JL

.' 9 '10111213

MEASURED ... . PREDICTS)TOTAL ".: " J3IAL-.ACIDITY •"""" 1ODTTY " '(E/LCAC03) WB/LCAEE31 . "_;:

" CL5M FIFTHS PARf ETERi

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITV= -tf_0!fi/K6IKTITIAL ACiaiTY = 80 ffi/L"WLF-LIFE = 2 BATCHES

I

- so . :.. .57

"40 40

" 20 . - . ..10 14

" - 15 '7

^ . . . . - 5 . ;4 • --- '3 "2

. . . . . . , . 1' • " . . . ' 1

- . . > ^ . . - . , .

OGTE2L -. . .. ...... ...... .._... ..PS£ VQLDIS TO CHIEVE BACKBRKM) = IS

B******H****H*****H

3T£ 1:" IKH BATT-nEPfESDfiS AB JT 6.25 P3E l/iNOTt'2: "BSK3RSRD. IS TAKEN fi3 34: IB/L ACIDITY.

301412

JHYDROSYSTEMS HC.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A2-7-2 : -

80

70 -

60 -

O - 50 -(3%rf-

| 40^

35 30-1

20 -

10 -

I I T 1 t I I _ I 7 I \ I

Z . .. .4 - , - 6. . _ .3 .. | 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301413JHYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BfiTCH LEAffi TEST . . - . . - - . ;SMPlf ffl. A2-6-2 ".. ; - : - - - - - -. ' '%,,

iiininntitiniMiiii.iiniiumiiUiiirii[[H[innifEASURED PREDICTEi

BATCH TDTftC " " " - TOTAL - -NO, ACIDITY flCIDm

(HG/L CAC03J " mil CK03)

WBTED" " CURVE FiniNE PHWETERS

TOTffi. SOIL flCIBITY= 16400 HB/KSINITIAL ACIDITY = -90H5/1*"HALE-LIFE" = 3.7 BATCHES

012 603 . : .4.5 22 .678 22 . _ . :9101112 .13

90 .7562

.-: 5143

. 35—, ;•; "21?24

- 7 .20. "• .17141110

. " 8 . '

BATCH UMBER TQ ACHIEVE BACKGROUND = "5.2(NOTE2iPORE VQLUKEE TO ACHIEVE BfiKEROUND = 32

EACH BATCH REPRESENTS ABuJT 6.25 PORE VOLUMES.BACKGROUND IS TAKEN AS 34 HG/L ACIDITY..THE TOTS. SOIL ACIDITY KAS DEIERHINED ffl S SPLITWHICH ffiST ffiffi OMAIIO HORE ACI2ITY THffi THISSATPLE; - - . . _ . . _ .

301414

MYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST, - ,. SAMPLE A2-8-2 ..= -.-.

80 -4

70

60

Q

"«

g" 30 -I

20 .

10 -

i i i i t i i r t i i i2 .4 :-'- 6 - - - - - - s. i 10 12

BATCH NUMBER "

301415

MYDROSYSTEMS

SAMPLE "HJ. ffi-8-lC

****HH***Hf********t***H**«***H*****t*t+**H***H

(EASIRED . . PREttiÊD . _BATCH TOTAL . . TOTAL

ffi." ACIDITY . " OilTY \(HS/LCAC03! . . ire/traces) "":.:

(NOTED

012 :

•J

4tr

67B"910"1112.13

BATCH NUMBER(NOTE 2)

CURVE FITTING PSRAETERS .. . .

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY= 7950 M6/K5INTITIfl. ACIDITY = 1200 SG/LHALF-LIFE _ 1.B4 BftTMS

1200 ". .:;,.B23 -;

570 . ..:. 5tf- -... . ._ . . _-.26c

120 . .',,= _. '!.. V 182125g£

6 0 • . " • " . 5 9 . ;' 40

...... . . . - _ _ . . ; 719

. . . . _ . . . . . _ 139

"TO ACHIEVE. KCKEffliKB =-: - 9,5... =. .. . . .

FURE VDUWES

T V gl JT i _• T V | i-I-fii t- te t vv P v tf E tf v * *' V VY VV ¥ T V 11 T E T • T JL!.¥ .El. T. • V.iiTTTTT T TfTT n r IT 1 R FT* Jl! ITTTA 111, jLiai^tllJllJllllllll TTTTTTT rT

NOTE 1: EfiCH &TCH REF8ESEOT5 "ABOUT 6,25" POTS VDLlflES.SURD IS TflrS' ffi 34 «S/L"ACID_IiV.

MYDROSYSTEMS »c.

1.2

O

fcgQ 0

,f_J *-•

I

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE-A2-&-10

6 . .-&_. . . . .10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301 17

MYDROSYSTEMS

_

.O 0

SERIAL BATCH LEACH ,i_o,SAMF1Z A2-9-2 a-.

_-_6r.-

BATCH NUMBER

3014-1

MYDROSYSTEMS no.

SERIfiL'BftTCKLEffiHtETSftfPLE KD. A2-9-2 " =

fEASURED " ' PREDICTED..PATCH"" •; TOTiU. ".. WftL' ' ffi. ACIDITY r ACIDITY

. me/IQJWEfJTTING PftRflrOERf _

TOTAL SOIL fiCIDITY=---"1540Q K5/K5IKTITIAL KIBITY = -saoHt/LHftLF-LIFF = "' "Z-TBATCfES

r " "." . ."..:.. .1137.2' " KG - :'~ ° Y 782"

• 4 4955 " .380 " :.. _ " 375. 234.7 . . . . . . 7 215

9 ' 1241C "" " "" " 94IS 7112 . ". 54

BATDi NUKSF TO ACHIE^ SfflffiROLK v(N0TE.2) ....... _ .._ . . .

i_s TO'

KDt'l: ."EACf BATCH REPRE3EHT5 AEQL T 6.25 PORE VOLNOTE":'; ' BGBfflUSJ IS TftBJ AS 34 tffi/L KIDITY.

301419

MYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAFLENO. A2--&-2-"-

SaSiKD " .~L .PREDICTEDBATCH TOTAL " " .TOTAL. ....NO, ACIDITY ' ACIDITY ' '" -'

(&/LCAC03) . WLCACQ3K. . .,

(NOTE i) CURVE FITTING PffiftJEltH_r "______-______": __j_________!

TOTAL SoTf ACIDITY'"' B95lf HE/KB*"INTITIAL ACIDITY =- lOOi

0127

4567S910U1213

I0000_. £°° :- ""T" "" 4005"" -^---- -— — -- - q- - --25C*Ci ......1575 .- .

900 .;"„, .. _ . _,, 992Y 625 :

394300 •" :- -~-.- -'248

-— ' iffiY98623925

BATCH fflfiBER'TO ACHIEVE BACKBROM) =-- - 12.3 . "(NOTE'2) . ." '-PIK VDLUSgS TO ACHIEVE BftCKBRDUND = " "-77

****HHH****iHiHH***iHH;iHHii]tlinitninHni[ih

- fSTE li" EAC-i KTCH REPRESEMT5 AHiT 6,.2 PfflE VGLl ES,"NOTE 2: BfiOffiROUrfi IS TtfSl ffi"34 RB/L'AClbm'. ' "

* THE .TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY HAS DETE ICirON A! SPLITSH;CH nlST HAVE CONTAINED L£SS~.AC!DITY THAf THIS

301420JHYDROSYSTEMS *c.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST. -: __ SAMPLE A2-1D-2 - - ---" -

-6 — — • 8 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301451

MYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST5ATFLE m, AMI-7

BATCHffi.

(1

(NOTTiS

0i*5_

3 ".. 4.567SV10n1213

HE&SiJRES PREDICTEDTQTAL: ." . . TOT& """"""" V;ACIDITY " " ACIDITTtf/L CCS) - " "{ffi/L CACD3J '. '

"' ~'~ " ""OliVE FITf INB PffiflSTEffi

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY r I .'K6IKTITIAL ACIDITY = ' 70000 J£/L !HALF-LIFE = -' .0,8 BATS£S

70Q0Q." YY .29431

12050 . ,- .-,- -- 12374; " ~" "5203 r; ...

21BS- 2SO - - " " - '92ff"

3B71 6 3 • • "

7 0 6 8 . .2-9 '-12 ;";52 -1

BATCH NUflfiS " TO A-Si'IE1 BflClSfflKD " = " " 8,"S(NDTE2) "_ .T "" - Y, "FORE vaUE-" TO ACflIS£ ''""""' "

'I <t?r IJJiiJftJ ill* 1TTT TTT R t trl t Pi 1 1 TT1 * 1 1 f1 1 1 1 1 t J A TTfl; 1 I i?

.NOTE L- :.EA(l T ""F;EFJ 3aTe.ferI £25Fl)i£ VDUIS.NOTE 2; BAD^RDUC IS TfiffiN AS" 141131; "ACIDITY."

NA; NCT" ANALYZED. . .

C.CO0=

MYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST

6 8 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301422

MYDROSYSTEMS INC.

7 - SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST. _S8HPLEJB. A3-7-3.5 "."

*********** n n i i n n in HHH-H: H«******teSURED PREDICTED

BATCH TOTAL: •——-•-—— --TOTAL. NO, ". ACIDIC: " "" - ACIDITY"

.. ffl5/LCKO_)

SNDTE 15" " -, -

V : "-. ,,= _. _

0 - -i2 .-7.14353 " .

. --4-*" "5, - 195"

_7a i4o9101112 ... ,13

' OFvE FITTING FAR&ETBS -, ;..; ' . . .(.:; "J- • ' ' '.'•: l

TOTAL SOIL ACISm= 5840C"H6/ffi " "INTITIAL ACIDITY. .= _.. 630_ ffiTL

. 630 : ::, ,51 /

- . " . 424.," . i34B

,2S5 :.:234 _.. . ".192158129"

" 106 -1.S7"71

. . . ........_. . 59" " •- . 48

BA'TWftJR^TD" ACHIEVE M3MJUHD= --"14.7 " "Y"(N:jTE 2) ..PORE Mp,7D ACHIEVE BACKSROUHD = . j ;; 92_ _;

itr xs. y ¥ V j • _' j '{ T V tr.jl r ff v f " Y.ST f T I1 ¥ £ * j_¥ tfj.lf Jtlf lit TTJ? v»Jf ¥ V V Y J VTTTT K 1 J JL1 J.TI J, 1 * J, TlTl 11111 TTTTTTT T T TT TTTTKT KJ1T11TJ.' r. 11~

NOTE .1: EAC5. BATOi RE?KfiT5 ABDJJT 6.25 RFt VDLlJfp.NijTE l titCRKW} IS TffH AS 34" HG/

301423

MYDROSYSTEMS

700

600 -

EDO -

^ 400 -

fe "D5* 300I

200 H

100 -

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A3-7-3,5

i i i i i i t i l t. .' 4 Y. 77..:€... . 1..._ ;. s_;_^'L- 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301424;MYDROSYSTEMS

•SERIAL BATCH i£ACH TESTSWFLEffl. A3-DBI-2

*mmnE

BATCH"NO.

('

(NOTE 1!

0i2734567

"fi910111213

HEASURED PREDICTEDTOTAL TOTAL

ACIDITY ACIDITYME/1 CACG3) ." (HS/L CACB3) . . ._..

ORE FITTING PARAMETERS

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY= 12003" H5/K6INTITIftl ACIDITY " = " 40 WB/L *

. HALf-LIFE = - 1.9. BATCHES

- - - 4028

7.20 '_•_ — 15-. 13

9'6 6

43 .

2 "" _ . :._ .7 .z, .;;:: --Î1l .o -

BATCH NUMEER TO ACHIRE BACKBRQUND = '- 0.4(NDTE2J - . . . .. ..PORE VOLUMES TO ACHIEVE BACKSRHI5) = 3

NOTE I: EACH BATCH REP8ESENTS ABOUT 6,25 POE VOLilEB.NOTE. 2; BfiCKSBDaE- IS TftSN AS 34'fS/L ACIDITY.

* M TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY «A5 DETEi IO BN A SPLITHHICH mi ffi'vE CffiTAICD HOPE ACIDITY W7KI5

301425

HYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST... $AMR_E A3-DB1-2

BATCH NUMBER

301426

MYDROSYSTEMS «..

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSATRE ffi. A>DBK5

BATCH__5--{

fNOTE 1)

0. -nK

~

4•j5

-..;i_ g '?10.li1213

(EfiSUREiJ PREDICTED 'TQT3. " ":. " TOTAL. "ACIDITY ACIDITY "

. CB^FTTTMPflJIffiffi..., -7.

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY- 11400 fE/KE" 'IKTITIAL ACIDITY =-~500ffi/L

• HALF-LIFE" " =--"2,4BATa£S --;" " . 7" 500- . " .

' ' "' '375 " '2BO " .. ".:r;_.,_. ;;2Si_.._. _"! .

.;.-- - ™ 210157

12( / " ' . .. UBBE :' ' '

"." scr ~: Y ___a) "•"-..••"'""•.• ;" : - "~ 'r ""-' 37 " "^

" ." _ .. " . " ' ."""28.21

: . 16... " 7.12 . .

<HDTE"2) "' ~"' -" '~ '5E

rl1 .1 fc i I'T T r±i i 1 i i I 'frlfTTT ri £ rrTl 1 1 TTTTT f1 i 1 1 M XJL£ Ttit

NOTE 1: Ep BST REPRESENTS AHI T 6.25 PORE~VOE 2; B&MlUK: 15 t&lK AS 34 HG/L IDITY. J

301427MYDROSYSTEMS •».

500

4OO

o2 300 -

J 200 -

I

1DO -

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A3-DB1-15

7T t I __ T I 1 I

6 .: --8 ' _! 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

30142(3MYDROSYSTEMS «

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST. 8HJB1-"3G~

*********************** ********* *********** HHtH***tt

BATCHffi.

{NOTE

01234

7 567

- . 8910n1213

"BATCH Ml(KDTE 7!

' T0T3L ^ - TOTAL" ;ACIDITY ACIDITY" " " " "~ "

(HB/L CAC03) .' ~ ,, /(HB/L uS03) . _. __'v _

D _ CURVE FITTING PARH,*ETERSTOTAL SOIL ACI,ITY= jfiOOO 53/13 ' 'INTITIAL ACIDITY = 4800" HE/TV

' HAL -LIFE" = --""1.2 BATCHES

woe- .. . .26

, ':1500. ' " 7-7- —— 1§12 " " '".- "" " "" " • 849 '_

476-2SI3; """. ."V" "z 7 2&7 . . . . . - "- - 150. " .Y •'

84, '""' 45 ... 4" "

• • - - - . - - 27::.' Yr -•15e53

M __ '2_ ' ' ' ' . ' - : ; " i

.ID'AMHTfcEteOto = : " S,6 "' "--[ "- - - ....... .- -™. .

«******H*?t***H+*t**Ht******H************H****HS

NDT£,.li "ESDf M7CH REPRE3ESTS IffiOUI fc.25 PGFI VOU|S.JJQTE7:. DSOK .IS TftlB AS 34 ffi/L ACDirf. ":"

301429JWDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A3-DB1-30

BATCH NUMBER

301430

.HVOTOSVSTEMS HC.

SERIAL BATCH LEAffl TESTSAMPLE'S. A3-DBMO

****** HS***H* H***lH*H f Hf H

refiSJRETBATCH TOTALC, ACUITY " '

fflBECflCrar- -

*m************«HHHf*(

PREDICTED. . TOTAL " - -- -" ACIDITY(!C/L DACC3J .

(NC.TE1T- - ------^mm?mzm-: ": -

TOTAL SOIL AC!IKTITIAL ACIBI

. HALF-LIFE

. 0

2 ' 450 " . ""34

"•-"-. 5 " 14067

• e""" T. 40 " . Y..910111213

Dm'= 8950* 'TY = " "TOW/L ' .

= --- i.SBATCr®

.950"

" •'--"-1440.. J299-2W. "- "i "13s?"""94

..64.. 44"" ."" ]." 30^ ^ !""_

• • 20 -, .14

..... 9- . -6

BATCH NUMBER TO ACfflEVTBfOHffliK:'= ,, -.. EJ>.(NOTE 2)"" --_-;------ ;-;. ""

ftCHIEV BAQSIOUH) = - ,54

****************H***************H***********tt***H**

fSTE "1 ; ' EACH BATCH 'REF SBrrS ABEKT .6. 25 PffiE .NQiri: BACKBR-aK- IS Tft>EN A5'34 flfi/L ACIDITY,

301431

mHYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A3-DB2-10 - /A--,;

12

BATCH NUMBER 7 Y . .

301432

JiYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH.LEACH TESTSAMPLE ND. A3-B32-30

H**Ht*********H**t**********************************

BATCHNC.

.(NOTE

01-- -j34

. .:: 567

. S"9"

H1213

TOTAL "TOTALACIDITY " — " ram ~ ~ ~ "

(MB/LCACD3) ^ ==""ffE/L fflCDJJ" ' \ "..'.

1) CURVE FITTIHB ?ARA!£TER_.: '-" ;

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY= iJ4ffi RE/KB ."INIIIlflLACIQITY = 55(C NS/L

- ' ;rmiF-LrFE . .. . .=-_ . _- 2. 1 BATG£= "

. .SOO .. - - , - , .." "" " 2516 " '

. IBIS. ...._"... ... " ." " "iso? .'.':" •"!. :... ' 1300"

935 . ."420". '.. ..-. .: "." ".:"" c72 .,.77 ......

4E3 " .: . ~347

f)c "''i - - -

;,,,-n9

9367..45

BATCH' SLINEEF.JD AGKIEVE SACKSaWC = .. ' 14.01NDTE2! .. :; . 7. ." "" ." '

tJOTE 1: tim WTCH iSPFESJTB AB&T 6,25 PEE VDLUN3TE 2; BAC 3K3iKD IB t EK AE 34 HB/L fclDlTY. "

301433

MYDROSYSTEMS »c.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A3-DB2-3Q

3.5

fc

3 -

2,5 -

2

§o o<£ 1.5

0.5 -J

i i r i i i i i i \ i2 4 € .8 ._, .10 12

' ""• BATCH NUMBER ' H

301434

MYDROSYSTEMS

SBUflL BATCH LEACH TEST'" ..SAHPLE.HJ. A3-DB2-50 . ..

"**********M**l******i*H*****fr**H****t*>**i**< F1111 ti;MEASURES " " PREDICTED

BATCH TOTAL. ": " TQTftL7 T.": "Y""~~w. ACIDITY; " Aci_rtrr

{HG/L.CAC03) " (HS/L.CACD3!

(NOTE ii . CURV£ FITTING PH

TOTAL SOIL ACI_m= *69S HE/IS"INITIAL ACIDITY = -.3P3D.H3/L '

. = '' 1,3 BATCHES

176C

-. c - \LT. '" • - • - • • ' ^-i !&.- . ..... iiK.

i 1227 . . . - . 72

- s -,4c.. >. Y " . ^2;9 '" "' ' " " ' " - 2.IQ . ..-.- .. -. - -"~:i_11 9

TCH NUHEr, TO ACHIEVE BACKERQUNT = - 8.4(ETE 2) . _ .

u7 i.25 fNOTE. 2; -BffifeROUfr IS T/¥H A3 34.HS/L ACIDIrf.

301 35

JiYDROSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A3-DB2-SO

so o

6

BATCH' NUMBER

301436

MYDROSYSTEMS MC.

.SESIflL BftTBHrACH TEE

itt't H*******Ht**t*t***t*t* i t i i i***tt ************** W-=t &-i- - 'J ———>:-'J£r-*TL ' ~ '["JM- l ."F*" <' T " "^ ftf&EEF fflECti/itD . .

BATCH TOTAL . IOJAL_ ' ;NO. ACI.ITY" '- "ACIDITY

m

_

"BATCH(NOTEPOREV. -• •!'

E 1; .OIRtt FITTIN5 ft

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY^ ---INITIAL ACIDITY ~*=

.. HALF-LIFE" . =

C1

" . " ' n? .r • - . - - .

4-5 • ..30 ,;:.,., ea.;7,; -f.i " • - .-7

•e 15 . - . . . " .

1011li!

13

TOES'TO ACr;iP/F:to:5csi =21 - - — -- :- — -'DL!J€S TO ACHIEVE BACK5R_ip =.

-U- - -.; - ..'... . u ;• i

WHETERE

-7450 fS/KB" , ..-" -iOTE,1

" "5 WCHEiJL

6052

" 4C'. .".! Y34

- ..,M=" . - = !'- " 26" -" ' !"

TT. - -

. _.2u "-•-"ITJ

.15131110

•lr: '.. ^ — .... . .

26 ---".:i;.r . - "- "* l

• - Jt. Ji<_ 3. i I.T. F fi. F. f.t' V f r t tfJ"J Z-EJi ]L ,>-K- F-t-v i-rTTTT^T*** I. ** *TrTTTTT~TTTrTTTTTT

H BATuf RE?1ESEKTSJffll3Ur.6.S RJRE VHK5.NQTE.2: "fiACfflRW IS TWIN AS'34 HS/L.ACIBm. .'!

301437

MYDROSYSTEMS

60

SERIAL BATCH LEA'CFTTFST. . . . SAMPLE A3-DB3-2

50 -

40 -

30

20-4 ,.__.....__, .... . ., ...D

10 -

l i \ i t i i6 .... 87 10 12

-J BATCH NUMBER

301438 I

MYDROSYSTEMS me.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE H:, A3-DEH5

BATCHNO,"

(

flOTE 1)

01ti-3

, .. 4- 5 '

67

Sg•

10

11

1213"

HEABiteTOTAL - -

ACIDITYHG7L~Taco_r

TOTALIKTITH8LF-

- - - - -

73-' •. . iJOiJ7 . -.. --'

IrS" 640 Y._

380" ""240165 """"; "IT* 'iij

"IOClit .ioo .-

... . ; •:-

, : PREDICTED"".::.: "TOTAL

ACIBITY•"' (H6/LCAC33) - .

OJR'VE FIHINS PARAHETERB

SOILflCIDITf=" T6ffiffl ffi/KS "IAL ACIDITY =- ~ 9800 J67L " ,LIFE " 1.Z6 BftTori'

. TH'Jv

57027 "-- .- -TT<£ - - , - . -...__..._.. _ .. .ji.»iy .

" "• 1931

"."' .'* :.6s;'.. tr:77 - . _33C '..._".,

' - ^ 221*"- " :Y " iH" ..:'Y" '-—' -"•—• ' :

- - - - - - - - - - - :3 ..... ...

"" " 4--25.

... - ,._ --..&._ __ „..9

- - - - - - . .-- • ! .

-- - --" "-- - • . - .".. .• .;L

(NOTE 2 ) ' _ -5 TO CHIB'E BAK3ROUND = ,65

»********{in Hi***************************************K3T£ 1:... EACH BATCH REPRSEK75 A30DJ.6.2f OT ' XLIHES,

2: "'BflKBiSEKlJ'lS lAf-H ATWH5/L ACIMTY. " """:

301433

MYDROSYSTEMS «c.

SERIAL: BATCH LEACH TEST--. SAMPLE A3-OB3-15

r8 : 10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301440

JiYDROSYSTEMS «c.

SERIAL. BATCH LEACH TESTS&REKD. A3-D&3-"30

• HEASUR3 PREDICTEDBATCH TOTAL . TOTftl

NO. ACIDITY "ACIDITY "(HE/LCASE) .- .--" ; (HB/LCACC3)

(NOTED

0i

-.2345.

7pK'1

1011

13

CURS F!TTIf£ PARSB5S

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY= 16000 HG/KS. 'INITIAL ACIDITY = U3& flB/LffiLF-LIFE '== " T,IBATCr££

65004095

2650 __.', ..... .... 2580. ..,'•.~16£":" " '

1024510 '- ^ M5 _

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S o ., _175 .. " .... Jo!-. • . . . . - . ; . -.,

6440

16

BATCH" mm TO ACHIBE BACKSRDUND = " "11.4(NOTE 2) " ." ^ " . 7 " "PORE VDUJHE3 TD ffiHIM BflCKERDUND = 71

NCTE 1: ERCH TCH f 'FESENTB ABOUT 6.25"PffiE VDL1K3,NOTE! 2; srasJUNT- is MN AS 34 HB/L ACID'STV. ••"•

301441

MYDRQSYSTEMS

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST ^-SAMPLE A3-DB3-30

BATCH NUMBER

30144&

MYDROSYSTEMS no.

-" • SERIAL BATCH lEACH TEST " ;

S&RE N5. A4-H " __ '

******************* *******yH*******t*H***< I i i*H**m

CE LIED " " " PREDICTEDBATCH TOTAL • TDTftL" . '.. .

NO, ACIDITT " ACKITY"

(ffi

BATCH(NOTE

•TED

0ii

4567e-910ii1213

NUHBEF2)VQPJUEE

Cl£VE FITTIffi PftRAKETERB :

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY^ 16000 MB/KB .INITIAL ACIDITY =-^ 500 HG/L

500 -347

240 , . _ . _ . _ . _ . 241

116K. - -" " . ",..8i . :.

5639 '171913 -96

. . _ _ 4

. ' " - ' 'TQAfflIKBAO(BR[)LBfiJ=--- 7,4 '" '

TO ACHIEVE EACKSRQi$E =- 4fr-

NOTE 1; EACH BATCH FEFfiEKTS ABOIT 6.25 PiSE VOLNOTE 2;" 'BACKERQUffi ISTfllSi AS 34 M3A

301443

JiYDROSYSTEMS •».

500

4OO -

2 300

2OO -

100 -J

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSSMPLEM-1-6 ..

I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I \^-2~— ~ - - - 4 -._- - € . . . . 8 .10 12

BATCH NUMBER

301444

MYDROSYSTEMS «e.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TEST '" "SAMPLE m. A4-2-3 -

**************t****H-**************rai(iiitiiii****HfEASlBES PREDICTED

BffTCH" TOTAL " ;i: TOTALNO, ACIDITY " CIDITY " ""

1HB/L C4C03] . (HS/L CAC035

(NOTE D

012 '345678910il1213

CURVE FITTO FffiflMEIERS

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY* =450 IC/KBINTITIAL ACIflm =• ---28016:1HALF-LIFE" ;= '= " BATHES

/ -..:.• . .m ' -'.-" -m

140 140. - .. ......W70

. a . .... . -•:._-. .49 ... . ..35 .....

- 25-•:- - IE "

12" "-•' "_ . _ . _ .

" 6 " "' "43. . -.=. -

"BATCH IPBER'TO ACHIEVE BACXGREKM) = -- - 6.1(W3TE 2)

" -;38

>Tg^!ftiTrfvii*?ri-v-/yTvJvvjg?rvg|j';tgi;!Fi: » L i f v i i v - trif* r v 1 1 v i c \Tl 1 fi ffTlXTT I J T. lTITTri7, TT Ji V1TTTVTTHTHX T F Tl 1 7 ) I li 1 )• i H 1 1 F 1 1 T

NOTE 1 ; EflCn WTQj. HEPEESEHTE. ABOIT.. 6, S POREtffiTE 2i" EftS M D IS TAiSi & 34 HG/LJCiBltY.

3014 5

MYDROSYSTEMS «c.

SERIAL-BATCH LEACH TEST-- -- TSAMF1_E A4-i-3 U -" '-'•''.

230

I

. . .__6._.__ .... 8 7 10 12

BATCH NUMBER !

301446

MYDROSYSTEMS «c.

SAffLENQ, M-3-3

BATCHNO,

fflDTE.'l

012.34Ew

. ' ., 67E.9101112.13

EASSffe." ". PREDICTED"TOTAL '. " ' 'TOTALACIDITY ' ACIDITY

(MB/lfflCflSJ (H3/LCAC03) :

) Q&€ FIT™ PARAISTERS .

TOTAL SOIL ACIDITY* 51400 HB/KB 'INITIAL ACIDITf = 40000 t!3/L

- HALF-LIFE 1 BATCf£E

" - - 40000 " .' "'20000 ." :.. . "

'12000 " " "ICOjO' " "~. .. 5000

Vfift£j\.-i.' . —

-'. SB""'" ':" " --•— -•___£.1 :" 625- . L-_-

313150 " " . ' . ' . . ' J5t

""7S " ' I "• - - 37 ; - -

20. ......_. _ . ._. .._._._ io

5

CHIEVE = ' 10,2(NOTE2) . _ . . . . _ -7: :. .

lJ£; TO ffiHIEff BffiKBROWD = 64

c tf 7 . g g-J.gT.3rT.j f j TT ? ST *-y.T.IT.TT.I t J * * * v-c.-TJ-J.-t. j 1 f > • T JJh^JhiTA IT! F I TTTT II 1 ?. 1. J. 1 1 1 J- TTTTTTE X 7. J( I £ T TTTTT F 1 1 TTTlTTT

IC-TE I: EACH BATCH ffiPEOTE SHIT 6.25 Pu E"yDL.L«Ef IE 2:. BAOffiROUND IS TAKES AS 34 HS'/L AClDiTf/' ' '

30144?

JJYDROSYSTEMS «c.

SERIAL BATCH LEACH TESTSAMPLE A4-3-3

£//.-

8 1O 12

BATCH NUMBER !

301448

JJYDROSYSTEMS *c.

IIIIII

cnmm.?

COcc

I

Date post:	02-Dec-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	3 times
Download:	0 times

301258 - semspub.epa.gov

Documents