+ All Categories
Home > Business > 4. research process (part 2)

4. research process (part 2)

Date post: 29-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: muneer-hussain
View: 740 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
29
The Research Process – Steps 4 to 5 Chapter 4
Transcript
Page 1: 4. research process (part 2)

The Research Process – Steps 4 to 5

Chapter 4

Page 2: 4. research process (part 2)

The Research Process for Basic& Applied Research

04/09/23 2

1. ObservationBroad area ofresearch interestidentified

1. ObservationBroad area ofresearch interestidentified

2. Preliminary Data GatheringInterviewingLiterature survey

2. Preliminary Data GatheringInterviewingLiterature survey

3. Problem DefinitionResearch problemdelineated

3. Problem DefinitionResearch problemdelineated

7. Data CollectionAnalysis, and Interpretation

7. Data CollectionAnalysis, and Interpretation

8. DeductionHypotheses substantiated?Research question answered?

8. DeductionHypotheses substantiated?Research question answered?

4. Theoretical Framework

Variables clearlyidentified andlabelled

4. Theoretical Framework

Variables clearlyidentified andlabelled

5.Generation

of Hypothesis

5.Generation

of Hypothesis

6.ScientificResearch

Design

6.ScientificResearch

Design

9. Report Writing

9. Report Writing

10. Report Presentation

10. Report Presentation

11. Managerial

DecisionMaking

11. Managerial

DecisionMaking

NoNo YesYes

Page 3: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework A theoretical framework is the foundation of hypothetic-deductive

method. It represents the beliefs on how variables (phenomena) are related

to each other (model) and an explanation of why these variables are associated.

From the theoretical framework, then, testable hypothesis can be developed to examine whether the theory formulated is valid or not.

Even if hypotheses are not generated theoretical framework is important for examining the issue under investigation.

04/09/23 3

Page 4: 4. research process (part 2)

Variables

• A variable is anything that can take on varying values. The values can differ at various times for the same object or person, or at the same time for the different objects or persons.

04/09/23 4

Page 5: 4. research process (part 2)

Examples of Variables

• Production Units• Absenteeism• Motivation

04/09/23 5

Page 6: 4. research process (part 2)

Types of Variables

• The dependent variable (criterion variable)• The independent variable (predictor variable)• The moderating variable• The intervening variable

04/09/23 6

Page 7: 4. research process (part 2)

Dependent Variable

• The main variable that lends itself for investigation (the variable of primary interest of research)

• Through the analysis of dependent variable, it is possible to find solutions to the problem

04/09/23 7

Page 8: 4. research process (part 2)

Exercises of Dependent Variable An applied researcher wants

to increase the performance of organizational members in a particular bank

What would be the dependent What would be the dependent variable in this case?variable in this case?

A marketing manager wonders why the recent advertisement strategy does not work

What would be the dependent What would be the dependent variable here?variable here?

04/09/23 8

Page 9: 4. research process (part 2)

Independent Variable

• An independent variable is one that influences the dependent variable in either a positive or negative way

• Therefore, when independent variable is present, dependent variable is also present, and with each unit of increase in the independent variable, there is an increase or decrease in the dependent variable also. e-g,

04/09/23 9

Stock marketprice

Stock marketprice

New productsuccess

New productsuccess

Independent Variable Dependent Variable

Page 10: 4. research process (part 2)

4 conditions

• To establish that a change in independent variable causes a change in dependent variable 4 conditions should be met:– Both should covary– Independent variable should precede the

dependent variable– No other factor should cause change in

dependent variable.– A logical explanation about the affect of

independent on dependent variable.

04/09/23 Tahir M. Qureshi 10

Page 11: 4. research process (part 2)

Exercises of Independent Variable

A manager believes that good supervision and training would increase the production level of workers

the managers believes customer purchase intention would possible with word of mouth, promotions, brand image and product quality.

04/09/23 11

List the variables in the above mentioned two exercises, List the variables in the above mentioned two exercises, individually, and label them as dependent or independent,individually, and label them as dependent or independent,explaining why they are so labeled.explaining why they are so labeled.

Page 12: 4. research process (part 2)

Moderating Variable

• Moderating variable is a variable, the presence of which, modifies the original relationship between the independent and the dependent variables. e-g,

04/09/23 12

OrganizationalEffectiveness

OrganizationalEffectiveness

WorkforceDiversity

WorkforceDiversity

Independent Variable Dependent Variable

ManagerialExpertise

ManagerialExpertise

Moderating Variable

Page 13: 4. research process (part 2)

Exercises of Moderating Variable A manager finds that off-the-

job class room training has a great impact on the productivity of employees in her department. However, she also observes that employees over 60 years of age do not seem to derive much benefit and do not improve with such training

A teacher observed that effective teaching methodology can decrease students dropout rate. However, she also noted that students who remain frequently absent in the class still have high dropout rate even if effective teaching methodology is present.

04/09/23 13

List the variables in the above mentioned two exercises, List the variables in the above mentioned two exercises, individually, and label them as dependent or independent,individually, and label them as dependent or independent,also drawing a diagram of relationships.also drawing a diagram of relationships.

Page 14: 4. research process (part 2)

Intervening Variable

• The intervening variable surfaces between the time the independent variables start operating to influence the dependent variable and the time their impact is felt on. e-g,

04/09/23 14

OrganizationalEffectiveness

OrganizationalEffectiveness

WorkforceDiversity

WorkforceDiversity

Independent Variable Intervening Variable Dependent Variable

CreativeSynergy

CreativeSynergy

Page 15: 4. research process (part 2)

Effect of Four Variables

04/09/23 15

OrganizationalEffectiveness

OrganizationalEffectiveness

WorkforceDiversity

WorkforceDiversity

Independent Variable Intervening Variable Dependent Variable

CreativeSynergy

CreativeSynergy

ManagerialExpertise

ManagerialExpertise

Moderating Variable

Page 16: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework

• Theoretical Framework is the foundation on which whole research is based

• It is a logically developed, described & elaborated network of associations among the variables deemed relevant to the problem situation and identified through such processes as interviews, observations and literature survey

04/09/23 16

Page 17: 4. research process (part 2)

The Components of the Theoretical Framework

1. The variables considered relevant to the study should be clearly identified and labeled in the discussions

2. The discussions should state how two or more variables are related to one another.

3. Indication in the discussion as to whether the relationships would be positive or negative

4. There should be a clear explanation of why we should expect these relationships to exist. The arguments could be drawn from the previous research findings

5. A schematic diagram of theoretical framework should be given so that the reader can see and easily comprehend the theorized relationships

04/09/23 17

Page 18: 4. research process (part 2)

Hypothesis• A logically conjectured relationship between two or

more variables expressed in the form of testable statement.

• Relationships are conjectured on the basis of the network of associations established in the theoretical framework formulated for the research study.

• By testing the hypothesis and confirming the conjectured relationships, it is expected that solutions can be found to correct the problem encountered

04/09/23 18

Page 19: 4. research process (part 2)

Examples of Hypothesis

• Employees who are more healthy will take sick leave less frequently

• IfIf employees are more healthy, thenthen they will take sick leave less frequently

04/09/23 19

Page 20: 4. research process (part 2)

Directional Hypothesis

• If, in stating the relationship between two variables or comparing two groups, terms such as positive, negative, more than, less than and the like are used, then these hypothesis are directional

• e-g, The greater the stress experienced in the The greater the stress experienced in the job, the lower the job satisfaction of job, the lower the job satisfaction of employeesemployees

04/09/23 20

Page 21: 4. research process (part 2)

Non-directional Hypothesis

• Non-directional Hypotheses are those that do postulate a relationship, but offer no indication of the direction of these relationships.

• e-g, There is a relationship between age and There is a relationship between age and job satisfactionjob satisfaction

04/09/23 21

Page 22: 4. research process (part 2)

Example Delta Airlines

• According to the reports, Delta Airlines faced charges of air-safety violations when there were several near collisions in midair, and one accident that resulted in 137 deaths in 1987.

• Four important factors that seem to have influenced these are:

22

Page 23: 4. research process (part 2)

Example Delta Airlines

1. Poor communication among the cockpit crew members.

2. Poor coordination between ground staff and cockpit crew.

3. Minimal training given to the cockpit crew.4. Management philosophy that encouraged a

decentralized structure. Did these factors indeed contribute to the safety violations?

23

Page 24: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework for Example

• The dependent variable is safety violation, which is the variable of primary interest.

• The variance in the safety violation is attempted to be explained by the four independent variables of (1) communication among crew members, (2) communication between ground control and the cockpit crew, (3) training received by the cockpit crew, and (4) decentralization.

24

Page 25: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework for Example

• The less the communication among the crew members themselves, the greater is the probability of air-safety violations since very little information is shared among them.

25

Page 26: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework for Example

• When ground crew fail to give the right information at the right time, misfortunes are bound to occur with aborted flights and collisions.

• Coordination between ground and cockpit crew is at the very heart of air safety. Thus, the less the coordination between ground control and cockpit crew, the greater the possibility of air-safety violations taking place.

26

Page 27: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework for Example

• Both of the above factors are worsened by the management philosophy of Delta Airlines, which emphasizes decentralization.

• Centralized coordination and control assume great importance when increased flights overall in midair, and with all airlines operating many more flights.

• Thus, the greater the degree of decentralization, the greater is the scope for lower levels of communication both among in-flight staff and between ground staff and cockpit crew, and the greater the scope for air-safety violations.

27

Page 28: 4. research process (part 2)

Theoretical Framework for Example 10

• When cockpit crew members are not adequately trained, they may not have the requisite knowledge of safety standards or may suffer from an inability to handle emergency situations and avoid collisions.

• Thus, poor training also adds to the probability of increased safety violations.

These relationships are diagrammed in Figure

28

Page 29: 4. research process (part 2)

Figure

FIGURE 5.8Copyright © 2003 J ohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sekaran/RESEARCH 4E

29


Recommended