+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 5. Changing Notions of State

5. Changing Notions of State

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: rohit-mohan
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 26

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    1/26

    Changing Notions of State

    Dr. Avinash Samal

    Assistant Professor

    Hidayatullah National Law University

    Raipur, Chhattisgarh

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    2/26

    Different Notions of State Ethical State

    Legal State

    Church-State

    National Sovereign State

    State A man-made artificial institution State An Unnecessary Evil

    State A Necessary Evil

    Totalitarian State

    Pluralist State

    State A Class instrument Welfare State

    Regulatory State

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    3/26

    Ethical State Plato & Aristotle Emphasis on ethics & Philosophy State - first and foremost condition of virtuous life It is the highest form of moral order A supreme, all powerful, all comprehensive and all-

    embracing institution It inculcates humanity in the being and hence

    human beings existence without state is notpossible

    It regards the state as an end in itself

    Self-perfection and self-fulfillment can only beachieved through the state

    Moral, intellectual & material development can onlybe possible through the instrumentality of state

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    4/26

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    5/26

    Legal State

    Roman empire emerged by merging the tiny city-states of theGreek world establishing: Unity, uniform law and order, strong administration, and a

    despotic political system While absence of unity was the weakness of Greek city-states,

    it was considered the strength of Roman empire Greece had developed democracy without unity, whereasRome secured unity without democracy - Gettell

    Romans taught the world that a large state might be stableand successfully governed

    Rome three stages of development Like Greek counterparts - city states

    Republic An Empire

    The first two stages were replaced by the third stage by theclose of the 1stCentury BC

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    6/26

    Cont

    Successful Commanders like Marius, Caesar, Augustusetc. established despotic empires with concentration ofauthority, uniformity of law, sovereign organization,limited participation of citizens in public affairs

    Nursed ideals like unity, order, law, discipline, strengthetc.

    Establishment of a universal code of law mostimportant contribution

    Taught the world that large states are much better and

    can provide stability, peace, order and good government Liberty of citizens sacrificed for the sake of stable

    political system

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    7/26

    Cont

    This gave birth to legal notion of state State was viewed as highest law making

    power

    Laws had universal character Political problems of Romans wereadministrative and legal rather than ethical

    Gave birth to Roman Law which is the basis ofmost of the legal systems of world even today

    Philosophers like Polybius and Ciceroconcentrated on the art of governing and law-making

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    8/26

    Cont

    The Roman Empire lasted about 500 yearswith all its cruelty and despotism

    Class structure masters and slaves

    Roman empire became very weak in 4thcentury corruption of officials, dictatorialregimes of emperors, slave unrest, lack ofliberty, equality and the advent of Christianity

    Emperor Constantine made a compromisewith Christianity by declaring it a statereligion leading to the establishment ofChurch-State

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    9/26

    Church-State

    There was mass unrest in the public against thedictatorial regimes of Roman emperors and they werefaced with unprecedented crisis from within and without

    Christianity became very popular for its progressive

    ideas It raised its voice against injustice and exploitation

    Roman Emperors tried to crush Christianity

    In the verge of decline, Roman emperors forged analliance with Christianity

    Assimilated Christianity and turned this potential enemyinto an ally an act of highest statesmanship on the partof the state

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    10/26

    Cont

    Partnership between church and the state helped establishpeace and order in the society for sometime

    Partnership between the cross and the Eagle brought gain andloss to both Lipson

    After the partnership, the progressive Church became a citadel

    of reaction, anti-progress and anti-people Becoming and integral part of the established order, the

    church ceased to be a victim of persecution and was ablehenceforth to do persecuting.

    Roman Empire could save itself from inner dangers but failedto face the external aggression

    In the fifth century, Teutonic people (Barbarians) attackedRoman Empire and destroyed it by establishing smallerkingdoms

    This led to the emergence of a feudal system

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    11/26

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    12/26

    Church and the State

    Feudalism and the Church Two important features ofthe medieval period

    Christian church survived the fall of Roman Empire Religion dominated the mentality of the people in the

    Middle Ages to a level unparalleled in the history ofWestern civilization

    Derived its strength from the absence of stronggovernment

    In the name of religion it mustered good amount ofpower, wealth and prestige

    Taught that world is nothing prayer is the solution foreverything religion is the main thing Diverted the attention of the exploited class by drawing

    them towards religion

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    13/26

    Cont

    As the Church was serving the interest of theruling classes indirectly, it became popularamong them and they adopted Christianity

    Started interfering on matters such ascollection of taxes and maintenance of lawand order

    Church power went on increasing and it beganto claim superiority over kings and princesand virtually became the sate

    King should be under the power of the ChurchSt. Augustine

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    14/26

    Cont

    Entry of Church into politics and,consequently, the bitter conflictbetween the two became thefundamental political issue of the age

    State was crushed between two forcesChurch and Feudalism

    Masses were exploited and were inslumber hoping for salvation in the nextworld

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    15/26

    Socio-Economic & PoliticalStructure

    Pope

    Kings

    Feudal Lords Big Landlords

    Masses, Serfs & small producers

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    16/26

    Conflict between the Church andthe State

    Churchs attempt to limit the authority of Kings and itsinterference in internal affairs

    Theory of two swords Pope Glasious interpreted differently King was not directly under the God but under the Pope who

    had the sole agency from God to conduct all the affairs

    Pope had acquired much wealth & power and startedchallenging the Kings

    Pope claimed to be the absolute master of all princes whowere bound to kiss his feet, and whom he could depose atwill

    This led to the open fight between the Church (religious order)

    and the King representing the secular order The kings became victorious, i.e. the Eagle swallowed theCross

    This lead to the emergence of modern national sovereignstates in European world putting an end to the feudal authorityand the international order represented by the Pope

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    17/26

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    18/26

    National Sovereign State

    Modern national sovereign states emerged duringthe 16-17thcenturies

    Political movements were directed against papacyand feudalism to support a strong monarchy

    Strong Kings emerged in the European world andwere identified as sovereign and unified nationalpowers

    Separation of religion from politics led toestablishment of secular state

    The state and the king were identified as one -Machiavelli and Bodin

    I am the state Luis XIV The state meant the power of the king and he

    personified the sate

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    19/26

    State An Artificial Man-madeInstitution

    Before the 17thcentury, in the ancient andmedieval times, the was considered eitheras natural order (Greek Philosophers) or a

    legal order (Roman Thinkers) or a divineorder (Church-Sate notion)

    During the 17thCentury it was seen as aproduct of a social contract

    This view regards the state as a machine an artificial man-made institution which isthe result of social contract among freeindividuals

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    20/26

    State A Necessary Evil: LiberalIndividualist Notion

    Individualists supporters of negativefreedom of the individual believe thestate as an evil because it limits the

    freedom of the individual State is necessary as without it law and

    order can not be maintained in the market

    society composed of selfish and egoisticindividuals

    Adam Smith, Herbert Spencer etc.

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    21/26

    State An Unnecessary Evil:Anarchist Notion

    Ultra individualists anarchists regard Statenot only an evil but also unnecessary

    State an instrument of oppression and with the

    moral development of man state will becomeredundant

    A healthy society does not need an unhealthyinstitution like the state

    Believes in a stateless society Aims at destroying state and placing the society

    under the control of self-governing institutions

    Godwin, Proudhon etc.

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    22/26

    Totalitarian State

    Emergence of Fascism

    State must have absolute powers and theindividuals cannot be allowed any rightsagainst the state

    State can do no wrong and hence it cannotbe opposed by any individual, group or

    association of the society Philosophers like Hegel and dictators like

    Mussolini and Hitler supported this view ofthe state

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    23/26

    Pluralist State

    This notion of state gained currencybecause of views of the supporters ofpluralist concept of sovereignty

    Decentralization of political power andopposition to absolute sovereignty of state

    State merely an association in society and

    in no way superior to other associationsperforming their functions

    Laski and MacIver

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    24/26

    Marxist State A ClassInstrument

    The basis of any society is the economicsub-structure, i.e. the mode of productionwhich determines classes in society

    Cultural, moral and political super-structure of the society is based oneconomic sub-structure

    State is an coercive instrument belonging

    to the capitalist class It uses it to oppress the other classes

    An instrument of political power of theeconomically dominating classes

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    25/26

    Welfare State ContemporaryLiberal State

    Liberalism considers the state as anwelfare or social service agency

    State is not merely a legal institution

    having law-making power and coercivepower to make laws

    It must serve the society and satisfy themaximum demands pf the maximum

    number of people Not only law and order but also promote

    social welfare and serve common interest

    Green, Laski acIver

  • 8/13/2019 5. Changing Notions of State

    26/26

    Regulatory State

    Crisis in welfare state

    Failure of state to manage everything

    Withdrawal of state from many sector

    Outsourcing and contracting out ofservices earlier performed by the state

    Entry of private players and State

    competing with them as one of the players Need for independent and impartial

    regulation


Recommended