7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

1/25

CHAPTER IV

FINDING AND DISCUSSION

As already mentioned in the first chapter, this study intended to provide a

pattern of how the teaching of English, appropriate in studying verb-ing technique

using a combination style of writing mind mapping and association methods. In

addition, this study was to determine how deep the students can master the lessons

verb-ing especially in learning gerund by using patterns of learning that is applied

by the researcher. To complement all this, researcher has gained very significant

results in the development of the students in grasping the lessons learned as an

object of research, although researcher has only done one cycle in this study,

researcher has found many changes and improvements in students as a form of

self-improvement in value and of their learning. In the cycle given by the

researcher, there are three sessions that have been conducted to see the

development of treatments that have been given in which the treatment was given

in the form of post-test.

In this case, researchers collected two kinds of data: quantitative data and

qualitative data. Quantitative data are collected based on the results already

obtained from post-test results of students from each session in the first cycle. As

for the qualitative data obtained based on the questionnaire given to students as a

form of comparison between the patterns previously learned by studying the

pattern given by the researchers at the end of the first session. All Components are

mentioned in this chapter as a form of discovery and discussion.

41

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

2/25

42

4.1 Overview

As described previously, the main purpose of this study was to determine

whether the combination of mind mapping techniques and associations are able to

enhance students' skills in studying the gerund or not. This is an important

concern for further action on student progress in learning, so that researchers can

determine the level of change and improvement in student learning, and success

and effectiveness of treatment formula given by researchers. Having observed

from the findings, researcher could say that the students ability in learning verb-

ing was really improved through combining mind mapping and association

method. So the researcher concluded that the technique of teaching that was given

is effective in teaching verb-ing forms. The researcher was presented in three

stages those were discussion of the initial reflection (pre-test), cycle I, and Cycle

II.

4.1.1 The Result of Pre-Test

The pre-test was conducted on Thursday, January 5th 2012 to the eleventh

grade students of SMAN 3 Denpasar. The result of pre-test was taken in order to

know the students prior knowledge of learning verb-ing before the action was

held. The mean scores on pre-test was 4. The average score of the correct answer

made by students was 40, it means that the percentage of the correct answer made

by students was 40%. This score was low in term of level mastery. The students

had low ability in mastering verb-ing forms. For further information about the

result of the pre-test, the following table should be referred to:

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

3/25

43

The Result of Pre-test

No. Name of StudentsTotal

Items

Items Answered

CorrectlyScore

Level of

MasteryTotal %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 40 40% 40 Low

5.

Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 30 30% 30 Very Low6.

Aryadi, Made 10 50 50% 50Almost

Enough

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

8.Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

10.Destarita Rahmawati 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

13.Dwi Widyantari, Made 10 40 40% 40 Low

14.Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 40 40% 40 Low

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 20 20% 20 Bad

17.Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

19.Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 20 20% 20 Bad

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 40 40% 40 Low

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

4/25

44

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

23.Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 40 40% 40 Low

24. Nurul Laelly 10 50 50% 50 AlmostEnough

25.Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 40 40% 40 Low

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

28.Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 20 20% 20 Bad

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu

10 40 40% 40 Low30.

Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 40 40% 40 Low

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 40 40% 40 Low

32.Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 40 40% 40 Low

33.Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 50 50% 50

Almost

Enough

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 50 50% 50 AlmostEnough

36.Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 40 40% 40 Low

37.Wiracana, I Made 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

38.Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 30 30% 30 Very Low

N = 38 X1 = 4X2 =

40%

X3 =

40Low

N = The total number of the students

X1 = The average scores of correct students answer

X2 = The percentage of correct students answer

X3 = The students mean score

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

5/25

45

4.1.1.1 Reflection

The researcher tried to obtain the exact data about the students weakness

in learning verb-ing forms and know the students ability in mastering verb-ing

forms.

Based on the result of pre-test, there were some possible factors that made

the students obtained low scores. First of all, the students were not well prepared

for having a test since the researcher did not inform the students of eleventh grade

previously that they were going to have a test. As the result, most of the students

seemed not ready to answer the test. Second, the students didnt know well about

how to differ gerund and participle deeply, so this is the main case that the

researcher wanted to give as the solution in mastering verb-ing forms.

4.1.2 Cycle I

4.1.2.1 Planning

Planning the materials that wanted to give before the action was

conducted, the researcher made some preparation, namely:

a. Selecting material to be used in the class

b. Preparing teaching learning scenario

c. Considering the time allocation given to the subject

d. Preparing the instrument needed in doing the observation

e. Making the post-test

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

6/25

46

4.1.2.2 Action

Action involves the teaching learning process. There were pre-activities, whilst-

activities, and post-activities. The activity of each stage would be presented

below:

Activity Teacher Students

Pre-Test

Greeting the students The students greet the

teacher

Checking the students

attendance list The students raise their hand

Introducing and giving some

examples about the materialto the students

Listening and taking a note

the examples given by theteacher

Asking the students to

answer the questions given

by teacher

Answering the questions

given by the teacher

Whilst-Activity

Introducing the mind

mapping technique and

association method to the

students

The student pay close

attention to the teachers

explanation about how to

make mind mapping and

association in learning verb-

ing forms

Giving the examples abouthow to use the mind

mapping and association

method in learning verb-ing

forms

The students pay closeattention to the teachers

explanation and write the

explanations

Asking the students to give

the explanation about verb-

ing forms

Giving the examples of

verb-ing forms

Post-

Activity

Giving the students chance

to ask and to do the post test

about the material that hasbeen discussed

The students ask and do the

post test about the material

that has been discussed

Concluding the materials

that have been given to the

students

Paying attention to the

teachers conclusion

Ending the class by saying

Good Morning Class and

See You Next Time

Students say Good

Morning Teacher and See

You Next Time

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

7/25

47

Those activities were carried out on Thursday and Saturday, from January

5th to 14th 2012 that was the time for doing the first and second meeting of cycle,

so in a month the researcher could finish the research. The researcher planned all

the things carefully and well in order to conduct the class. The action included

some activities, namely: pre-activity, whilst-activity, post-activity. Those actions

had been well done in the first and second meeting.

4.1.2.3 The Results of the Observation

The research observed classroom situation during the action conducted.

The researcher tried observing the students attitude toward the teaching learning

process and finding out the problems faced by students during the action. The

observation sheet was developed in the form of teachers diary which is consisted

of three phases, namely: pre-activity, whilst-activity, post-activity. Examining the

result of the post-test, the researcher wanted to know the weakness of the

technique and method that were used. For detailed information about the students

achievements are presented as follow:

The Result of Post-Test Session I

No. Name of StudentsTotal

Items

Items Answered

CorrectlyScore

Level of

MasteryTotal %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 6 60% 60 Enough

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

5.Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 4 40% 40 Low

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

8/25

48

6.Aryadi, Made 10 6 60% 60 Enough

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

8. Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 5 50% 50 AlmostEnough

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

10.Destarita Rahmawati 10 6 60% 60 Enough

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 6 60% 60 Enough

13.Dwi Widyantari, Made

10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough14.

Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 5 50% 50Almost

Enough

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 4 40% 40 Low

17.Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 4 40% 40 Low

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 6 60% 60 Enough

19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 4 40% 40 Low

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 4 40% 40 Low

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

23.Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

24.

Nurul Laelly 10 6 60% 60 Enough

25.Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 6 60% 60 Enough

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 6 50% 60 Enough

28.Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 3 30% 30 Very Low

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

9/25

49

30.Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 6 60% 60 Enough

32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 5 50% 50 AlmostEnough

33.Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 6 60% 60 Enough

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

35.Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 6 60% 60 Enough

36.Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

37.Wiracana, I Made

10 4 40% 40 Low38.

Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 4 40% 40 Low

N = 38X1 =

5,15

X2 =

51,5%

X3 =

51,5

Almost

Enough

The Result of Post-Test Session II

No. Name of Students TotalItems

Items Answered

Correctly Score Level ofMastery

Total %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 6 60% 60 Enough

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 6 60% 60 Enough

5. Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 6 60% 60 Enough

6.Aryadi, Made 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 6 60% 60 Enough

8.Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 6 60% 60 Enough

10.

Destarita Rahmawati 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

10/25

50

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 6 60% 60 Enough

13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 10 6 60% 60 Enough

14.Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 6 60% 60 Enough

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 7 70% 80 Good

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 6 60% 60 Enough

17.Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough19.

Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 5 50% 50Almost

Enough

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 6 60% 60 Enough

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 6 60% 60 Enough

23.Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 6 60% 60 Enough

24. Nurul Laelly 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

25.Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 6 60% 60 Enough

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 6 60% 60 Enough

28.Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu 10 6 60% 60 Enough

30.Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 6 60% 60 Enough

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

32.Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

33.Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 6 60% 60 Enough

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

11/25

51

35.Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

36.Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

37. Wiracana, I Made 10 5 50% 50 AlmostEnough

38.Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

N = 38X1 =

6,21

X2 =

62,1%

X3 =

62,1Enough

The Result of Post-Test Session III

No. Name of StudentsTotal

Items

Items AnsweredCorrectly

ScoreLevel of

MasteryTotal %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 6 60% 60 Enough

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 6 60% 60 Enough

5.Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 6 60% 60 Enough

6.Aryadi, Made 10 8 80% 80 Good

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

8.Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

10.Destarita Rahmawati 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 6 60% 60 Enough

13.Dwi Widyantari, Made 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

14.Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

12/25

52

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 8 80% 80 Good

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 6 60% 60 Enough

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

19.Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 6 60% 60 Enough

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 6 60% 60 Enough

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough23.

Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 8 80% 80 Good

24.Nurul Laelly 10 8 80% 80 Good

25.Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 8 80% 80 Good

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 6 60% 60 Enough

28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 5 50% 50 AlmostEnough

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu 10 5 50% 50

Almost

Enough

30.Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

32.Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 6 60% 60 Enough

33.

Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 6 60% 60 Enough

35.Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

36.Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

37.Wiracana, I Made 10 5 50% 60 Enough

38.Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 6 60% 60 Enough

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

13/25

53

N = 38X1 =

6,71

X2 =

67,1%

X3 =

67,1Enough

N = The total number of the students

X1 = The average scores of correct students answer

X2 = The percentage of correct students answer

X3 = The students mean score

The result of the test in the first cycle showed that there was an

improvement made by the students. It can be seen from the results of the test

where the average score of students mastery on the last test conducted on the first

cycle was 67,1. The correct answer made by students was 6,71, it means that the

percentage of the correct answer was 67,1%.

4.1.2.4 Reflection

After the researchers had analyzed the findings in the first cycle, it was

found that the increase in student mastery of verb-ing forms had been realized,

and had earned a good improvement, although there were still many deficiencies.

Researchers had been able to make improvements, both in motivation and

improvement materials that had been given.

From the overall results had been made in the first cycle, the researcher

was not still satisfied so that made researchers want to further enhance students'

ability to learn the verb-ing. This was done because the researchers had observed

there were many students who had not developed fully in this matter, so the

success of the techniques and methods were given apparent in this study, the

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

14/25

54

researchers decided to create a second cycle to the desired success could be

achieved by researchers in this study.

4.1.3 Cycle II

4.1.3.1 Planning

Based on the reflection done in the first cycle, the researcher had a new

plan to apply a different action in second cycle. Like the planning in the first

cycle, the preparation would be conducted as follows:

a. Selecting material to be used in the class

b. Preparing teaching learning scenario

c. Considering the time allocation given to the subject

d. Preparing the instrument needed in doing the observation

e. Making the post-test

4.1.3.2 Action

a. Pre-activities

1. Greeting the students

2. Checking the students attendance list

3. Giving warming up / brainstorming

b. Whilst-activities

1. Giving the explanation of verb-ing forms through combining mind

mapping and association

2. Giving the examples about how to use the mind mapping and

association method in learning verb-ing forms

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

15/25

55

3. Asking the students to give the explanation about verb-ing forms

4. Monitoring the students and trying to find what is their difficulties in

learning verb-ing forms

5. Checking the answer

6. Giving the individual task for finding the individual improvement

score considered as the post-test of cycle II.

c. Post-activities

1. Giving a short motivation

2. Giving questionnaire

3. Ending the class

In action that was divided into three session. The reader can see each session by

following as:

A. Session 1

The first meeting of second cycle was conducted on Thursday, January

19th 2012. Before conducting this session, the researcher firstly made some

preparation.

As usual, researcher entered into the classroom and gave a warm greeting

to the students continued to read out and then brainstormed. After giving the

brainstorming and it appeared that the students were ready to learn, the researcher

conditioning the class to learn by giving special emphasis and attention in learning

in the classroom. Researchers began to pay special attention to students who were

considered to have a low value. Learning pattern was made as easy as possible to

keep the attention focused and not boring, researcher also did a little joke as a

break for a moment before giving a post-test at the first session on the second

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

16/25

56

cycle. After giving the main material in the first session, the researchers then

provided post-test as a material for the evaluation to the next session. Researcher

asked students to discuss a little about how to learn their weaknesses, and provide

solutions and motivation. The activities were expected to be able to create a great

interaction that can trigger the desire to learn of students.

B. Session 2

At the second meeting on Thursday, 26th January 2012, the researchers re-

doing the same activity as had been done at the beginning of the session in the

second cycle. The only difference is the provision of brainstorming, the

researchers asked students to discuss for a moment about what had passed. Then

directing them to the verb-ing lessons learned by reminding them how the use of

notes using mind mapping techniques.

The provision of post-test was still being done at the end of the lesson

before the lesson was over. Of course, by providing the opportunity for students to

rest their minds for a moment with a story or a bit of motivation stories,

researchers found that the closeness between the researcher with the students were

very well established, this could all be seen from their enthusiasm in learning and

answering questions properly.

C. Session

The third session was the last session in the second cycle. That was

conducted on Saturday, January 28th 2012. In this last session, the researchers

totally focused on issue that was known by researchers in the observations that

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

17/25

57

was recorded. Researcher tried to make the last meeting to provide a clear

improvement of the verb-ing was taught in the classroom.

Brainstorming and short questions presented to students as a reminder of

the material that was taught. Therefore, researchers finally found the clarity of

meaning in this final session. The students found a solution how to answer that

better than ever, and the expected improvement has been proven.

All the records post-test assessments are following the increase can be

seen in the diagram form.

4.1.3.3 The result of the observation

The results are comparable to the second cycle that looks to an increase

that occurred after the students were given the object of research in the application

of verb-ing through combining mind mapping and association. From this diagram

we can see the progress that has occurred, and the increase in effective learning

outcomes. So the researchers felt that the techniques and methods have been

effective in learning verb-ing.

The Result of Post-Test Session I in cycle II

No. Name of StudentsTotal

Items

Items Answered

CorrectlyScore

Level of

MasteryTotal %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 8 80% 80 Good

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 8 80% 80 Good

5.Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

18/25

58

6.Aryadi, Made 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

8. Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 7 70% 70 MoreEnough

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 8 80% 80 Good

10.Destarita Rahmawati 10 8 80% 80 Good

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 8 80% 80 Good

13.Dwi Widyantari, Made 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough14.

Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 7 70% 70More

Enough

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 6 60% 60 Enough

17.Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 6 60% 60 Enough

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 6 60% 60 Enough

19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 7 70% 70 MoreEnough

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 8 80% 80 Good

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 8 80% 80 Good

23.Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 8 80% 80 Good

24.Nurul Laelly

10 9 90% 90 Very Good25.

Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 7 70% 70More

Enough

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 6 60% 60 Enough

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 6 60% 60 Enough

28.Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

19/25

59

30.Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 8 80% 80 Good

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 7 70% 70 MoreEnough

33.Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 6 60% 60 Enough

35.Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 8 80% 80 Good

36.Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

37.Wiracana, I Made

10 7 70% 70

More

Enough38.

Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 7 70% 70More

Enough

N = 38X1 =

7,3

X2 =

73%

X3 =

73,0

More

Enough

The Result of Post-Test Session II in cycle II

No. Name of StudentsTotalItems

Items Answered

CorrectlyScore

Level ofMastery

Total %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 8 80% 80 Good

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

5. Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 8 80% 80 Good

6.Aryadi, Made 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 8 80% 80 Good

8.Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 8 80% 80 Good

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 8 80% 80 Good

10.Destarita Rahmawati 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

20/25

60

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 8 80% 80 Good

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

14.Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 8 80% 80 Good

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 8 80% 80 Good

17.Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 8 80% 80 Good

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough19.

Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 8 80% 80 Good

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 8 80% 80 Good

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 8 80% 80 Good

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

23.Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

24.Nurul Laelly 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

25.Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 8 80% 80 Good

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 8 80% 80 Good

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 8 80% 80 Good

28.Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 8 80% 80 Good

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu 10 8 80% 80 Good

30.Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

32.Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 7 70% 70

More

Enough

33.Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 8 80% 80 Good

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 8 80% 80 Good

35.Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

21/25

61

36.Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 8 80% 80 Good

37.Wiracana, I Made 10 8 80% 80 Good

38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 7 70% 70 MoreEnough

N = 38X1 =

8,28

X2 =

82,8%

X3 =

82,8Good

The Result of Post-Test Session III in cycle II

No. Name of StudentsTotal

Items

Items Answered

CorrectlyScore

Level of

MasteryTotal %

1.Ade Kusuma W 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

2.Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

3.Agung Saraswati, I.A 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

4.Angga Mahaputra 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

5.Ariani, Ni Kadek 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

6.Aryadi, Made 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

7.Aryadinata, I.A.N 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

8.Astradita Djelantik, I.MD 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

9.Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

10.Destarita Rahmawati 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

11.Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

12.Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

13.Dwi Widyantari, Made 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

14.Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

15.Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

16.Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

22/25

62

17.Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

18.Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 10 8 80% 80 Good

19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 10 8 80% 80 Good

20.Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

21.Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

22.Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

23.Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

24.Nurul Laelly 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

25.Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

26.Prawira Aria R., I. Md 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

27.Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

28.Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

29.Sri Adnyasari, Putu 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

30.

Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

31.Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

32.Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 10 8 80% 80 Good

33.Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

34.Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

35.Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 10 10 100% 100 Excellent

36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

37.Wiracana, I Made 10 9 90% 90 Very Good

38.Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd 10 8 80% 80 Good

N = 38X1 =

9,28

X2 =

92,8%

X3 =

92,8Very Good

N = The total number of the students

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

23/25

63

X1 = The average scores of correct students answer

X2 = The percentage of correct students answer

X3 = The students mean score

4.1.3.4 Reflection

Based on the description given above, it could be concluded that learning

in the classroom ran as expected. An interest in students and their motivation had

been formed and very high, So it was with the existing of test results had proven

the effectiveness of the techniques and methods which was taught.

In this learning, two cycles had been carried out and completed as a result

of the increasing of students ability in learning verb-ing forms through

combining mind mapping and association.

4.2 Discussion of Finding

Researchers will discuss all the findings that was analyzed in the form of

assessment of post-test results the existing in the form of summary, to explain the

techniques and methods are provided to students has brought a nice change. The

mean score that was gained an indication of increasing the capability, the value,

and the student interest in learning English, especially the forms of verb-ing.

We can see all changes and improvements from the two cycles by

following this table form.

The Summary of the Result Test

INITIAL

REFLECTION

/ CYCLE

TESTMEAN

SCORESCORE

LEVEL OF

MASTERY

IR Pre-Test 40 40 Low

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

24/25

64

CYCLE I

Post Test 151,5

59,4 AlmostEnoughPost Test 2 59,7

Post Test 367,1

CYCLE II

Post Test 173

82,8 GoodPost Test 2

82,8

Post Test 392,8

The result of pre-test showed that the students average scores were 40.

This number was further on the conducted on the first cycle was 59,4 which

showed almost enough result in term of level mastery. This improvement was

further optimized after the second cycle conducted, and showed the average score

82,8 which mean the average score improvement was good.

For a clear description of the students improvement, the reader can see the

following graph.

0

20

40

60

80

100

Pre-Test Post-Test I Post-Test II

z

7/30/2019 6. Chapter IV

25/25

65

The graph showed that score from the test in pre-test to the first cycle was

increasing. Then the increase was good at second cycle. This improvement

showed that the teaching and learning process were running well.

4.2.1 Questionnaire

Questionnaire is a list of the answer sheet used to get detailed information

about a person's opinion. To obtain a qualitative assessment of the researchers

gave the questionnaire to determine the acquisition value of teaching students

about the patterns that already exist. The result of questionnaire indicated that

68,5% of the students really agreed that learning verb-ing forms through

combining mind mapping and association are very good and can improve their

skill in learning English. And the other result of questionnaire indicated that

31,5% of the students agreed that learning verb-ing forms through combining

mind mapping and association are very good and can improve their skill in

learning English.