DEVELOPING EDUCATION INMOZAMBIQUE

Improving quality and

promoting equal participation

1

REPÚBLICA DE MOÇAMBIQUEMINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO

Outline Presentation

1. The contribution of FTI to-date

2. Why a request for additional funding NOW?

3. What FTI will support in 2011-2013

4. Institutional arrangements

2

- Support to an expanding system -

3

FTI TO-DATE

FTI in Mozambique: background 2003: Mozambique joined FTI in 2002 and its plan was

endorsed in 2003.

→ education reforms (curriculum, teacher training, abolition of school fees, low cost accelerated school construction, …) to accelerate progress towards MDGs

2006: FTI plan integrated in 2nd Education Sector Strategic Plan (ESSP: 2006-2011)

→ increased bilateral funding through sector fund FASE

2007: USD 97 million from FTI Catalytic Fund

→ filling the financial gap of ESSP for 2008-20104

With the support of FTI….

• More schools

• More students in school,

- particularly girls

• More teachers hired

• More teachers trained

More children completing primary education

5

40%

42%

44%

46%

48%

50%

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

2003 2007 2010

Thou

sand

s Primary EducationSecondary Education% Girls, PE% Girls, ESG1

A SECOND REQUEST FOR FTI FUNDINGWhy now?

6

Sector funding on the decline 2011-2013

Increased funding 2005-2009 -

internal and external (incl FTI)Reduced external commitments 2010-2013 (without FTI)

70%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

05 06 07 08 090%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

10 11 12 13

US

D (m

illio

ns) Internal External

Total % External

Financing gap significant for 2011 – 2013

8

126 174168

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2010 2011 2012 2013

USD

(mill

ions

)

BudgetFinancial gapEstimated costs

Every year more money needed (estimated 5% annual budget increase) to:

• keep the expanding system (8% annual growth) running

• continue improving its quality

• maintain equity in participation

9

FASE - major contributor to financing gap in sharp decline

69%

23%8%

InternalExternal, FASEExternal funds, Bilateral projects

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

USD

(mill

ions

)

Commitments

Disbursements

FASE CONTRIBUTIONS

10

Filling the FASE gap = Filling the primary education gap

USD (millions) 2009(*)

‘11 ‘12 ‘13 Total

Bilateralcommitments

98 83 77 63 223,4

FTI request 30 45 51 65 160,6

Total 128 128 128 128 384

Overall Sector Financing Gap: USD 468 Million

FTI request of USD 160 Million (35% of gap) allows:moving towards universal primary education,

BUT............expansion of post-primary education is sacrificed

* 2009: actual expenditures

11

FTI SUPPORT TO ONGOING SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN 2011-2013

Continuity, consolidation and improvement

FTI-CF will support.................the longer term vision of education development as reflected in Government’s five year development plans (2005-2009, and 2010-2014)

that prioritizes ..... the expansion and improvement of quality primary education

concretized through ......The existing endorsed ESSP 2006-2011The programme document FTI prepared by the Ministry, that lays down the parameters for the next strategic plan (2012-2016)

benefiting from.... Progress made and lessons learned during implementation of current ESSP

12

Sector focus is on ....• Improving quality of primary education

Despite progress made in completion rates, pass- and completion rates decreased between 2008 and 2009 Curriculum revision, teacher training, school management, learning

outcomes, increased instruction time, ECD

• InclusivenessAround 300.000 children not attending primary school, many of them due to absolute poverty Direct support to school, school feeding, ECD

• Enhancing institutional capacityLimited capacity at decentralized levels concern for further improvement of implementation School management support, decentralized supervision, district-

level training

13

.... through continued support to existing programmes financed through FASE

50%

5%

33%

0%12%

69%

5%

10%

6%

10%

Primary Education

Literacy and Adult Educ

Secondary Education

Techn. Voc. Education

Institutional Development

FASE 2011-2013

FASE 2007-2009

14

By level of education

31%

6%

4%24%

22%

2%

11%

43%

3%7%

23%

6%

8%

10%

Books and learning materials Literacy campaignsTeacher training Descentralized ConstructionLarge Construction HIV/AIDS-Social protectionInstitutional Development

FASE 2007-2009

FASE 2011-2013

By programme

With USD 70 mln less to spend….

Number of children in primary and secondary school will continue growing

but…..

Universal Primary Completion …..... ................... A more distant objective

• Children learning under trees will increase from the current 13%

• Nº of books will be reduced with 25%

• Pupil/teacher ratio will return to 2006 value of 75/1 (2010: 66/1)

• Dropout rate will continue at current levels of 7-10%

• Transition rate to secondary education further reduced to 45% (currently 75%)

• Etc…………… 15

INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS- integrated in national planning,

budgeting and monitoring -16

FASE: most aligned external funding modality

FTI funds to be channelled through sector pool fund FASE (supervising entity: WB):

Preferred channel for direct external support to sector (75% of external funding through FASE)

Fully integrated in national and sector policy, planning, budgeting and monitoring processes

Facilitates the financing of on-going programmes already supported by FASE

Linked to a results-based monitoring and evaluation framework

17

Monitoring and evaluation framework

Agreed (2006) indicator framework (E-PAF) for joint monitoring implementation of strategic planCombines high level results with in-, output and

process indicators responding to current challenges

E-PAF used in established mechanism of dialogueE-PAF being revised for next strategic plan (i.e.

including indicator on measuring learning outcomes)Regular external evaluations - i.e. FTI, MICS,

evaluation of PEEC, UN reports, project evaluations and audits (DSS, school construction, book distribution, etc.), PETS, PSIA, PEFA…………

18

19OBRIGADO!