+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 6th Annual SECA Workshop - National Energy Technology ... Library/Events/2005/seca/day2_3... · 60%...

6th Annual SECA Workshop - National Energy Technology ... Library/Events/2005/seca/day2_3... · 60%...

Date post: 03-May-2018
Category:
Upload: ngotuyen
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
43
April 2005 6 th Annual SECA Workshop April 18-21, 2005
Transcript

April 2005

6th Annual SECA WorkshopApril 18-21, 2005

April 2005

CERAMIC FUEL CELL INDUSTRIAL BASE MOBILIZATION

W. Grover CoorsChief ScientistFuel Cell R&D

April 2005

How big is the SOFC marketplace? How big is the SOFC How big is the SOFC marketplace?marketplace?

April 2005

How big is the SOFC marketplace?

1 gigawatt?1 1 gigawattgigawatt??

April 2005

How big is the SOFC marketplace?

1 gigawatt?1 1 gigawattgigawatt??

10 gigawatt?10 10 gigawattgigawatt??

April 2005

How big is the SOFC marketplace?

1 gigawatt?1 1 gigawattgigawatt??

10 gigawatt?10 10 gigawattgigawatt??

100 gigawatt?100 100 gigawattgigawatt??

April 2005

Natural Gas Power Generation

April 2005

Cost of delivered electric power

SECA Target ($400/kW, 40 khrs)(PNG Cost: $7 (whs), $10 (ret) per MMBTU)

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

40% (whs) 40% (ret) 50% (whs) 50% (ret) 60% (whs) 60% (ret)

Electrical Efficiency

Elec

trici

ty C

ost (

$/kW

h)

Fuel UsageTotal Fixed

April 2005

Cost of delivered electric power

$1000/kW, 40 khrs(PNG Cost: $7 (whs), $10 (ret) per MMBTU)

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

40% (whs) 40% (ret) 50% (whs) 50% (ret) 60% (whs) 60% (ret)

Electrical Efficiency

Elec

trici

ty C

ost (

$/kW

h)

Fuel UsageTotal Fixed

April 2005

Market size depends on efficiency

40% → 1 GW40% → 1 GW

50% → 10 GW50% → 10 GW

60% → 100 GW60% → 100 GW

April 2005

Two Elements of Commercial Success

• Low cost/ high volume manufacturing

Commercial Success Depends On:

• High fuel cell efficiency

April 2005

Pathway to Low Cost/High Volume Manufacturing

April 2005

CoorsTek Locations and Capacity

Serving our customers where they need us…

…from 18 facilities and over two million square feet worldwide!

April 2005

Mission

Our strategy is to provide valuein many diverse markets byemploying our Core Business Strengths in expanding or developing

technology niches.• Custom Engineering• Materials Expertise• Operational Excellence• Rapid Execution!

April 2005

Core Business Strengths – Materials Expertise

From materials design to the finished component, our vertically-integrated manufacturing ensures quality throughout the process…

Material Preparation FormingMaterials Design

Sintering Machining Finishing

April 2005

Core Business Strengths – Materials Expertise

CoorsTek solves customer challenges using a very large variety of materials…

High-Purity Aluminas

High-Performance PlasticsTechnical Ceramics

High-Temperature Fluoropolymers

Zirconias

Silicon Carbides

Tungsten Carbides Elastomers and Teflons

April 2005

Analytical Lab

• Powder characterization– BET, sedigraph

• Physical– Density, mercury, porosimetry– Phase assemblage by XRD

• Chemical composition– ICP-OES, XRF, Laser– Ablation-MS– ICP-MS

• Mechanical– Flexural, compressive, tensile– Strength, modulus, hardness, wear

• Thermal– Expansion– DSC, DTA, TGA

• Electrical– Dielectric constant, loss tangent– Volume resistivity

• Microstructural analysis– Digital SEM– EDS

• Failure analysis

April 2005

Core Business Strengths – Operational Excellence

OpX is a hybrid of several best-practice techniques including lean manufacturing,

quality control systems, and six sigma/black belt continuous improvement.

State-of-the-art manufacturing facilities – over TWO MILLION square feet of manufacturing

capacity worldwide!

Lean manufacturing techniques

ISO, QS, and TS-compliant manufacturing

April 2005

Raw materials needed for 1MW

Metric: 1Kg powder/1kW electricity

1 metric ton of powder = 1MW

April 2005

So…….What Does a GW Look Like?

1000 metric tons ~ 1GW

April 2005

Milling: GW/year

Mill Raw Materials

1MW/load, 1-2charges/day

1/2 GW/year

April 2005

Spray Dry: GW/year

Spray Dry Milled Body

2MW/hour

6-7 GW/year

April 2005

EHS Issues

Waste Collection and Treatment

Chemical Handling

Regulations

April 2005

EHS Issues

Waste Disposal

Water Treatment

April 2005

Extrusion: GW/yr

400,000 fired ft/year

40MW/year

1/25 GW/year

April 2005

Tape Cast: GW/year

1MW/2-3 days

1/10-1/5 GW/year

April 2005

Tape Cast: GW/year

3-7 m/hour, 17cm wide

0.5-1.2m2/hour

7-20MW/year 1/50 or less of a GW/year

April 2005

Roll Compaction: GW/year

300 ft/hour, 1ft wide

235 miles/year

>500 GW/year

April 2005

Firing: GW/year

12cars/day

45ft3/car

1GW/year

April 2005

Necessary Steps

• Develop strategic raw material infrastructure

• Design with cost-effective mfg. processes early on

• 10 GW by 2010? –we better get busy

April 2005

Pathway to High Efficiency

April 2005

Tubular SOFC Test Fixture

5 cm2 active area, isobaricApproximates a CSTR

April 2005

Nickel Oxidation at High Uf

April 2005

Traditional I-V Characterization

(1) F. Zhao and A.Virkar, J. Power Sources, 141 (2005) 79-95(2) M. Mogensen and P. Hendricksen, Fig. 10.7, High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,

Singhal and Kendall, Ed. (2004)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0

Current (A/cm2)

Cel

l vol

tage

(V)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Pow

er (W

/cm

2 )

Virkar(1)Riso(2)CoorsTekH2 at 800C

April 2005

Vcell vs.Fuel Utilization

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Fuel utilization

Cel

l vol

tage

(V)

TheoreticalCoorsTekRisoVirkar

H2 at 800C

April 2005

Electrical Efficiency vs. Fuel Utilization (Hydrogen)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Fuel utilization

Elec

tric

al E

ffici

ency

Theoretical Max. (H2)CoorsTekRisoVirkar

April 2005

Electrical Efficiency vs. Fuel Utilization (Hydrogen)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Fuel utilization

Elec

tric

al E

ffici

ency

Theoretical MaximumCoorsTekRisoVirkar

April 2005

Electrical Efficiency vs. Fuel Utilization (methane)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Fuel utilization

Elec

tric

al e

ffici

ency

Steam reformed 2:1 H2O:CH4

POX 0.3:1 O2:CH4

HydrogenSyngas 2:1 H2:CO

T = 800 C, P = 1 bar

April 2005

Electrical Efficiency vs. Vcell (methane)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Operating voltage (V)

Elec

tric

al e

ffic

ienc

y

Steam reforming 2:1 H2O:CH4POXHydrogenSyngas 2:1 H2:CO

T = 800 C, P = 1 bar

April 2005

Necessary Steps

• Cell and short stack testing near Ilim• Assess impact of design variants

on ηe (tubular vs. planar)• Evaluate cost/performance of raw

materials (eg. pre-calcined 8YSZ vs. “reaction sintered”)

April 2005

Necessary Steps

• Test hydrocarbon fuels at high Uf

• Better understand anode oxidation• Assess impact of gas impurities at

high fuel utilization (eq. sulfur)• Reallign power density expections

(Can affordable systems be constructed at 100 mW/cm2?)

April 2005

Summary

• Cost and Efficiency must me addressed together

• SECA cost targets must be met at >50% ηe

• Begin developing The Ceramic Manufacturing Industrial Base now(need ~ 10,000 tonnes by 2010)


Recommended