Date: 22 - 23 March 2011
WP1.1 : Agenda Item 7.1 : Report
of AFI VSAT Managers Meeting
8th SADC SUPERVISORY BOARD MEETING
Cape Town, South Africa
Summary of Presentation
This presentation covers the following tasks conducted by the
Technical Group of the AFI Aeronautical VSAT Managers Meeting:
• Summary of the GAP analysis conducted
• Design philosophy and revision of the ATN connectivity diagramme
• Utilization of existing infrastructure
• Technical solutions considered
• Spectrum requirements
• Costing of various solutions
• Spares options
• Projected Life-cycle costing
• Recommendations
• Proposed technical solution for the AFI Region
Summary of GAP Analysis/1
• In accordance with the Best Practices established at the AFI
VSAT/1 meeting, an in depth GAP analysis was conducted by the
Technical Team
• A copy of the complete GAP analysis will be published on the ESAF
ICAO website and the following is a brief summary of the most
important GAPs found:
− Basically two access satellite methods are utilized in the four
relevant VSAT networks i.e. FDMA and TDMA. Operation on a
single access method is essential to ensure seamless operation
− Three out of the four networks operate on the same satellite – it
is therefore important to establish operation on the fourth
network on the same satellite, or to establish an alternative
solution to ensure cost effective interconnectivity
− An NCC is not available for all networks and efficient
management is lacking in some of the networks and must be
addressed effectively in a new solution.
Summary of GAP Analysis/1
− Maintenance philosophies, fault reporting procedures and
management of spares differs significantly – this must still be
addressed by the Technical Team
− All services are dependent on a single satellite and a cost
effective solution must be investigated together with
discussions with Intelsat to ensure continuity of services in
case of disruption or failure of IS10-02
− Availability of sufficient spectrum could become a problem in
future that will have to be addressed effectively by the VSAT
Managers in cooperation with Intelsat
• The deficiencies as listed above and others must be address in the
technical solution proposed by the Technical Group.
Original ATN BB Connectivity
as proposed by ATN Task Force
ATN Task Force
Regional Connectivity
Design Philosophy: From original to
New AFI ATN Network Design/1
• The objectives established by the First AFI Aeronautical VSAT
Managers meeting (AFI VSAT/1) in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal as
applicable to the Technical Group are listed below:
− Develop a sustainable and integrated/interoperable VSAT
network to provide aviation communications services in the AFI
Region.
− Upgrade the technical capabilities of the networks to comply
with the global best practice, user requirements and ICAO’s
requirement
− Achieve the ATN concept for AFI
− Apply appropriate cost-effective technologies.
Design Philosophy: From original to
New AFI ATN Network Design/2
Together with the objectives of the AFI VSAT/1 the inter-regional
connectivity of the original ATN BB Router connectivity design by the
ATN Task Force was studied and the following criteria were applied to
identify the shortcomings:
• Any two regions must be connected by at least two circuits; and
• The two circuits must be independent
The following changes were therefore proposed:
• The interconnection between AFISNET and NAFISAT contained
effectively only one circuit i.e. N'Djamena /Khartoum. It was
therefore necessary to add the Brazzaville/Nairobi circuit.
Design Philosophy: From original to
New AFI ATN Network Design/3
• Similarly there was also only one connection between SADC2 and
CAFSAT. A node was therefore added at Luanda as well as a
circuit between Luanda and Recife. It must also be noted that
Luanda is part of CAFSAT although the site has not yet been
implemented.
• In the case of SADC and NAFISAT there were two connections,
however both are connected to Nairobi and the two connections
are therefore not independent. It was therefore proposed to add
another circuit between Khartoum and Kinshasa to resolve this.
• The same argument also apply to SADC/AFISNET, albeit to a
lessor extend and a Brazzaville/Luanda circuit is therefore
included.
Design Philosophy: From original to
New AFI ATN Network Design/4
• A similar problem exists between CAFSAT and AFISNET where
there are not two independent circuits. It is however difficult to
resolve this in a cost effective manner and will have to be
addressed at a later stage.
• The following additional circuits were also added:
− Jeddah/Khartoum and Jeddah/Addis Ababa to address
connectivity with the Middle East region.
− Conakry/ Dakar and Conakry/Niamey
− Accra/Dakar and Accra/Niamey
− Kano/Niamey and Kano/N'Djamena
• These circuits were added basically because the nodes are not
operated and maintained by ASECNA although they are part of
AFISNET.
Design Philosophy: From original to
New AFI ATN Network Design/5
• The circuit Dakar/Alger was removed (to reduce the number of
circuits operating from/to Dakar (8 in total) and to get a more
balanced distribution)
Considering the above rational, the following Regional connectivity
was developed.
New Revised Regional AFI ATN
Connectivity
Revised AFI ATN Network/1
Using the new revised connectivity of the ATN a new connectivity
diagram was developed. The proposed solution of the Technical
Group is based on the following fundamental assumptions:
• All four networks i.e. AFISNET, SADC2, NAFISAT and CAFSAT
have made substantial investment in their existing infrastructure,
which have not yet reached the end of operational life
• Three of the networks operate on the same satellite i.e. IS 10-02.
The exception is CAFSAT, however connectivity can be establish
between this network and the AFI Region by obtaining spectrum on
the Global beam of IS 10-02
• It will be endeavored to establish a single satellite access method
for the proposed technical solution to provide the most cost
effective solution, while taking into account operational and
financial aspects
Revised AFI ATN Network/2
• Existing infrastructure will be utilized where possible to reduce the
cost of implementing the AFI ATN network.
• Although the new solution will mainly support IP based
applications, provision must still be made for services based on
legacy protocols for the foreseeable future.
• The overlay network must be secure and not dependent on
terrestrial services located outside the security areas of the
ANSP's, in other words where the ANSP does not have any control
over its availability, management, etc.
Revised AFI ATN Network/3
It was envisaged by the Technical Team that by implementing the
revised ATN connectivity requirements as an “overlay” on top of the
existing networks the above fundamental assumption will be
complied with i.e.
• The investment in all four networks will be retained in the
short/medium term. The services from the lower networks can be
transferred to the upper layer as and when required
• It is the intention to operate all four networks on the same
satellite thereby ensuring interoperability
• Establishing the same satellite access method will ensure
seamless operation
Revised AFI ATN Network/4
• The implementation of the ATN overlay will be cost-effective as
existing infrastructure will be utilized
• The bottom layers (existing networks) will continue to support
applications based on legacy protocols, while the new upper
(overlay) network will support all IP based applications
• ANSP will have full control over the ATN Network availability,
management, etc.
The result is shown in the following slide and is the revised ATN
Overlay that will be proposed to APIRG/18 for approval:
ATN Overlay Connectivity as
Proposed by Technical Group/1
ATN Overlay Connectivity as
Proposed by Technical Group/2AFI ATN OVERLAY
CAFSAT
AFISNET
NAFISAT
SADC/2
IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4IP6
IP4
IP6
IP4
Utilising Existing Infrastructure/1
Active
Co
mb
ine
r
RFT
Radio
Frequency
Transmitter
Active
Sp
litte
r
LNB
IDU5000
Indoor Unit
FRAD
Frame Relay
Access device
User
application:
ATS/DS
User
application:
AFTN
New Equipment
Option A : TDMA - IDU7000 1+0 IDU
(Typical NAFISAT/SADC2 VSAT Terminal)
RFT
Radio
Frequency
Transmitter
LNB
Sw
itch
Existing Equipment
CPE
AMHS
AIDC
CAD
TBD...
IP
Mo
de
m
RO
UT
ER
IDU7000
Utilising Existing Infrastructure/2
Co
mb
ine
rS
plit
ter
Modem
FADFrame Relay
Access
device
User
application:
ATS/DS
User
application:
AFTN
Option C - FDMA Comtech: 1 + 0 IDU
(Typical AFISNET VSAT Terminal)
TWT/SSPA
LNB
TWT/SSPA
LNBCPE
AMHS
AIDC
CAD
TBD...
New Equipment
Existing Equipment
Number of modems
depends on number
of circuits
Modem
Contech CDM570L
Modem
Contech CDM570L
Technical Solutions Considered
The following solutions were considered:
• A TDMA solution using NDSatcom Skywan IDU 7000 equipment
• An FDMA solution using Datum PSM500 modems, SDM9220
FRAD equipment and Cisco router equipment
• An FDMA solution using Comtech modems and Cisco router
equipment
The following configurations for each of the above options were
costed:
• Indoor equipment in 1 + 0 configuration (i.e. Main equipment only)
• Indoor equipment in 1 + 1 configuration (i.e. Main and Standby
equipment)
Spares Options Considered
The following spares options were considered and costed for
comparison purposes:
• Option 1: Provision of one set of spare equipment for each of the
4 regions. This is typical of what will be required if each region has
its own centralised maintenance centre.
• Option 2: Provision of one set of spares for each VSAT node.
This is typically of what will be required for decentralised
maintenance for 25 nodes.
• Option 3: A hybrid maintenance setup which is a combination of
the above options. In this case AFISNET & CAFSAT will have
decentralised- and SADC & NAFISAT centralised maintenance
Spectrum Requirements
• A network sizing was completed for both network access
techniques and the required carrier traffic and satellite bandwidth
calculated for both FDMA and TDMA.
• The carrier sizes as calculated and its associated parameters were
entered into the INTELSAT Transmission software program (LST)
to calculate the required occupied bandwidth.
• The occupied satellite bandwidth for both the FDMA and TDMA is
given in the table below:
− FDMA - 4.4620 MHz
− TDMA - 4.4828 MHz
• The calculations are based on certain assumptions for comparison
purposes and the final values may be different
Cost Comparisons of VSAT Solutions
NAFISAT Region SADC Region AFISNET Region CAFSAT RegionTotal Cost for AFI ATN
Network
435,623.78$ 569,582.30$ 859,220.50$ 670,638.85$ 2,535,065.43$
17.2% 22.5% 33.9% 26.5%
647,318.76$ 825,295.67$ 1,233,755.10$ 847,466.41$ 3,553,835.94$
18.2% 23.2% 34.7% 23.8%
587,432.36$ 749,136.43$ 1,133,398.20$ 802,618.95$ 3,272,585.94$
18.0% 22.9% 34.6% 24.5%
593,215.91$ 662,071.82$ 1,016,313.03$ 767,026.50$ 3,038,627.26$
19.5% 21.8% 33.4% 25.2%
995,816.44$ 1,266,047.46$ 1,782,694.96$ 1,125,783.44$ 5,170,342.30$
19.3% 24.5% 34.5% 21.8%
814,269.38$ 1,035,956.97$ 1,483,426.64$ 992,031.38$ 4,325,684.37$
18.8% 23.9% 34.3% 22.9%
Option E (FDMA)
Datum PSM500 Modem & SDM9220
Option F (FDMA)
Comtech CDM570L
Cost Comparison of VSAT Solutions for an AFI ATN Network (including Option 3 Spares)
Region -->
Option A (TDMA)
IDU7000
Option B (FDMA)
Datum PSM500 Modem & SDM9220
Option C (FDMA)
Comtech CDM 570 L
IDU
in 1
+ 1
Co
nfi
gura
tio
nID
U in
1 +
0 C
on
figu
rati
on
Percentage of Total cost
Percentage of Total cost
Percentage of Total cost
Percentage of Total cost
Option D (TDMA)
IDU7000
Percentage of Total cost
Percentage of Total cost
The costs are for comparison purposes and may differ for the
final solution
Life-Cycle Cost Comparison:
1 + 0 Configuration
Option A (TDMA: 1 + 0) USD Interest Rate = 9%
Capex (including Spares Option 3) 2,535,065.00 Period (years) = 6
Operational cost/month:
a) Spectrum Cost 15,689.80
b) Maintenance TBD
Life-cycle cost Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total for 5 Years
Cost of capital (9%, 6 years) 565,116.14 565,116.14 565,116.14 565,116.14 565,116.14 565,116.14 3,390,696.84
Operational cost 188,277.60 188,277.60 188,277.60 188,277.60 188,277.60 188277.6 941,388.00
Grand Total 4,332,084.84 Option C (FDMA Comtech: 1 + 0) USD
Capex (including Spares Option 3) 3,272,586.00
Operational cost/month:
a) Spectrum Cost 15,617.00
b) Maintenance TBD
Life-cycle cost Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total for 5 Years
Cost of capital (9%, 6 years) 729,524.16 729,524.16 729,524.16 729,524.16 729,524.16 729,524.16 4,377,144.97
Operational cost 187,404.00 187,404.00 187,404.00 187,404.00 187,404.00 187404 937,020.00
Grand Total 5,314,164.97
Life-Cycle Cost Comparison:
1 + 1 ConfigurationOption D (TDMA: 1 + 1) USD
Capex (including Spares Option 3) 3,038,627.00
Operational cost/month:
a) Spectrum Cost 15,689.80
b) Maintenance TBD
Life-cycle cost Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total for 5 Years
Cost of capital (9%, 6 years) 677,370.07 677,370.07 677,370.07 677,370.07 677,370.07 677,370.07 4,064,220.43
Operational cost 188,277.60 188,277.60 188,277.60 188,277.60 188,277.60 188277.6 941,388.00
Grand Total 5,005,608.43 Option F (FDMA: Comtech 1 + 1) USD
Capex (including Spares Option 3) 4,325,684.00
Operational cost/month:
a) Spectrum Cost 15,617.00
b) Maintenance TBD
Life-cycle cost Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total for 5 Years
Cost of capital (9%, 6 years) 964,280.54 964,280.54 964,280.54 964,280.54 964,280.54 964,280.54 5,785,683.24
Operational cost 187,404.00 187,404.00 187,404.00 187,404.00 187,404.00 187404 937,020.00
Grand Total 6,722,703.24
Recommendations
Considering the calculated cost options, it was recommended that
the Option D, i.e. the TDMA solution (satellite access method) be
accepted as the preferred technical solution. This decision is
proposed for the following reasons:
• Of the options considered both TDMA solutions are lower in cost than the FDMA
solutions in 1+0 and 1+1 configurations.
Subsequently one has to consider which of the TDMA
configurations to recommend:
• Although Option D (TDMA 1+0) has a lower Life-Cycle cost than Option F (TDMA
1+1), the proposed ATN solution will form the backbone network structure for the
AFI Region and availability must be maximised This can be done by using the
TDMA 1+1 solution.
• It must also be noted that Option F also includes the spares Option 3 i.e. a hybrid
maintenance setup. This is the maintenance philosophies presently supported by
the AFISNET/CAFSAT and SADC/NAFISAT Regions.
• If the 1 + 0 is recommended the maintenance philosophies have to be
reconsidered thus reducing the cost advantage of the 1+0 over 1+1 solution.
• The 1 + 1 configuration was therefore recommended by the Technical Group
Final Proposed Solution/1
Act
ive
Co
mb
ine
rA
ctiv
e S
plit
ter
IDU5000
Indoor Unit
FRAD
Frame Relay
Access device
User
application:
ATS/DS
User
application:
AFTN
Option D-1 : TDMA - IDU7000 1 + 1 IDU
(Typical NAFISAT/SADC2 VSAT Terminal)
RFT
Radio
Frequency
Transmitter
LNB
RFT
Radio
Frequency
Transmitter
LNB
Sw
itch
CPE
AMHS
AIDC
CAD
TBD...
IP
Mo
de
m
RO
UT
ER
IDU7000M
od
em
RO
UT
ER
IDU7000 New Equipment
Existing Equipment
Final Proposed Solution/1
Co
mb
ine
rS
plit
ter
Modem
FADFrame Relay
Access
device
User
application:
ATS/DS
User
application:
AFTN
Option D-2: FDMA + TDMA Overlay: IDU7000 1+1 IDU
(Typical AFISNET VSAT Terminal)
TWT/SSPA
LNB
TWT/SSPA
LNB
Sw
itch
CPE
AMHS
AIDC
CAD
TBD...
IPM
od
em
RO
UT
ER
IDU7000M
od
em
RO
UT
ER
IDU7000
New Equipment
Existing Equipment
Number of modems
depends on number
of circuits
User
application:
VHF
Thank You