+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 9 seq strat 1

9 seq strat 1

Date post: 28-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: okewole-olayemi-samuel
View: 327 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
50
JT, '11 1 A genetic approach to large- scale stratigraphic problems Sequence Stratigraphy 1 GEOL 755, Spring 2011 1 Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Transcript
Page 1: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 1

A genetic approach to large-scale stratigraphic problems

Sequence Stratigraphy 1

GEOL 755, Spring 2011

1Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 2: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 2

Resources at the DeLamare Library:

Van Wagoner, et al, 1990, “Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well Logs, Cores, and Outcrops”, AAPG Methods in Exploration Series No. 7.

Chapter 1 in Loucks and Sarg, 1992, “Carbonate Sequence Stratigraphy”, AAPG Memoir #57

2Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 3: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

resources on line:

two university sites seem to be the best and include tutorials– Univ. of South Carolina’s site at: http://

strata.geol.sc.edu/index.html– University of Georgiaʼs site at: http://

www.uga.edu/~strata/sequence/seqStrat.html

3

3Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 4: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 4

the “depositional sequence”

term has a long history of use, – e.g. Larry Sloss’ landmark North American

“sequence” scheme redefined as a seismic stratigraphic unit by

Exxon Production Research (now ExxonMobil) in 1970’s– 4th order scale (~500,000 yr)– Sloss sequences promoted to “supersequences”

4Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 5: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

the Sloss supersequences (2nd order)

5

5Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 6: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 6

“sequence” presently defined:

“a conformable succession of genetically related strata, bounded at base and top by unconformities or their correlative conformable surfaces”– Van Wagoner et. al., 1990

note* this supersedes and preempts all other uses

6Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 7: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

precedent: allostratigraphy

North American Stratigraphic Code (1983): “An allostratigraphic unit is a mappable stratiform body of sedimentary rock that is defined and identified on the basis of its bounding disconformities”– laterally and vertically variable– a geomorphic surface can be a boundary

7

7Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 8: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 8

implicit in the definition (1) -

deposition of a sequence occurs during a time of– generation of accommodation space

» keep up vs. catch up?

– delivery of sediment into a “depositional system”

» to be known as a “systems tract”

8Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 9: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 9

implicit in the definition (2) -

sequence deposition ends... – when sediment delivery stops, because ...– accommodation space moves elsewhere

area is then in hiatus until things change again -

creates a boundary unconformity/disconformity that is an isochron

9Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 10: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

the link to chronostratigraphy

• a) seismic section,• x = distance (all)• y = depth

• b) chronostrat. correlation, • y = linear time

• c) sea-level driver,• y = linear time

10

Wheeler diagram

10Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 11: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

Wheeler diagram exercise

11

11Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 12: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 12

The process: sea level change drives accommodation space

s.l. rise and s.l. fall - control of sedimentation– where– how much

12Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 13: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 13

when introduced, this was controversial! … why?

1. originally based on seismic sections– depositional systems tracts were not

documented with rocks– geophysicists were trying to do

sedimentology? (how dare they!) 2. authors tried to make the case that they

could use the technique to develop a global sea-level curve.

13Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 14: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 14

Why did the scheme come from seismic stratigraphy?

it’s a matter of scale!– seismic sections are thick– seismic sections are long

You can see big relationships

dept

h

distance14Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 15: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 15

What are we looking at?“raw” data

distance

2-w

ay ti

me “Variable area” plot

- fill in half the wave forms to show acoustic “events” more clearly

(difficult to see acoustic events)

15Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 16: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 16

visualizing scale … (Miall, 1984)

16Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 17: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 17

consensus now?

1. The genetic concept is valid, and field work has shown it works based on outcrop data.

2. The global sea-level curve is still controversial, but most of us think that the fundamental idea of sequence stratigraphy is sound without global correlation aspect.

17Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 18: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 18

Cycles and sequences

18Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 19: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

notice ordering inconsistencies

19

Boggs textbook

19Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 20: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 20

Where do “sequences” fit? “parasequences”?

20Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 21: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 21

Compare scales Boggs, from Einsele et al.

21Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 22: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 22

“sequence” defined again:

“a conformable succession of genetically related strata, bounded at base and top by unconformities or their correlative conformable surfaces”

Why do sequences form?

22Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 23: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 23

Why do sequences form?

In response to processes that make accommodation space– sea-level rise (relative or eustatic)– subsidence

23Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 24: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

facies shift with sea-level (review)

24Chris Kendall24Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 25: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

sedimentary record of sea-level is complex, even when the signal is simple

25

Sea level

deposition

Sea level

deposition

where is the strand line?• sed. supply• real s.l. change

progradation• = shallowing up• = s.l. fall

★ retrogradation• = deepening up

25Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 26: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

normal regression

26

After Catuneanu, 2002After Catuneanu, 2002

prograding facies as sea level rises

26Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 27: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

forced regression erosion and reworking as sea-level falls

27

27Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 28: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

transgression

flooding and reworking, facies shift landward

28After Catuneanu, 2002After Catuneanu, 200228Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 29: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

some terminology

how/where do sequence boundaries end?

29

After Catuneanu, 2002After Catuneanu, 2002

29Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 30: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

time when accommodation space is being generated

30

when does deposition occur? (subsidence always down, s.l. up and down)

subsidence

time

relatives.l.

30Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 31: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

time when accommodation space is being generated31

more possibilities: (subsidence always down, s.l. up and down)

subsidence

time

relatives.l.

31Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 32: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

time when accommodation space is being provided32

more possibilities: (subsidence always down, s.l. up or down)

relatives.l.

subsidence

time

32Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 33: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

compare tectonic subsidence and orbitally forced s.l. rise rates passive margin (thermal) subsidence ~ 2mm/100yrs cont. interior basins ~ 1mm/100yrs foreland basins - 1mm/70yrs strike-slip basins ~ 3mm/10yrs orbitally forced s.l. rise ~ 2mm/5yrs

33

*1) note that orbital forcing assumes significant ice formation to control ocean volume.2) the range of orbitally forced s.l. change is 10s of meters, while tectonic range may be kilometers.

33Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 34: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 34

building the sequence: the“systems tract” concept

sediments deposited as a depositional system in response to a sea level position– low stand systems tract (LST)– transgressive systems tract (TST)– high stand systems tract (HST)

*note that little or no deposition is expected during sea-level fall in this scheme.

34Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 35: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 35

sequences are built from systems tracts

lowstand systems tract (LST) lies on basal boundary, mainly in distal areas during proximal erosion

transgressive systems tract (TST) forms during s.l. rise, shifts progressively inland

highstand systems tract (HST) completes sequence, fills in proximal areas to sea level, beach moves seaward

35Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 36: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

relating the sedimentation to sea-level

36

review

resume

36Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 37: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 37

two, stacked sequences

HST TST LST

older HST

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

incised valley fill

37Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 38: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 38

two kinds of sequences:

Type 1 - subsidence less than s.l. drop rates– boundaries are erosional unconformities

Type 2 - subsidence exceeds s.l. drop rates– boundaries are not erosional, – deposition continues even during s.l. drop

38Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 39: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 39

two type 1 sequences (again)

HST TST LST

older HST

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

39Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 40: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 40

Sequence boundary definitions

Type 1 boundary - unconformity with– erosion associated with rejuvenation of

streams, incising older sediments– basinward shift in facies (deeper) related to

base-level shift– downward/outward shift in coastal onlap

40Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 41: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 41

two, type 2 sequences- what are the differences?

HST TST SMST*

older HST

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

*SMST - shelf margin systems tract (no LST for type 2 systems)

41Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 42: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 42

Sequence boundary definitions

Type 2 boundary - like #1 except– lacks significant erosion– lacks lowstand reworking

42Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 43: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

what are the “lighting bolts”?parasequences

the higher-order responses to base-level changes

43

sequence boundaryparasequence boundary

43Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 44: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

parasequence defined

a relatively conformable succession of genetically related beds, bounded by a marine flooding surface or a correlative surface

an outcrop-scale concept! landward shift in facies

44

44Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 45: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

examples of parasequence cycles

45

onshore

offshoreSteven Holland

floodingsurface

floodingsurface

45Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 46: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

parasequence key ideas: a single cycle of response to creation of

accommodation space (4th or 5th order) usually (but not necessarily) ~1-20 meters thick shallowing-up character predictable vertical facies associations

46

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

46Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 47: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 47

what about sediment delivery rate?D = delivery rateA = accommodation rate

D/A > 1

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

D/A < 1

D/A = 1

47Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 48: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 48

applications of sequence stratigraphy

local/regional chrono-correlation based on depositional facies

world-wide correlation based on global eustasy?

48Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 49: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11 49

getting to more realistic correlation:

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

Datum = top of sandstone

Datum = wellhead elevation

49Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Page 50: 9 seq strat 1

JT, '11

chronocorrelation shows true lateral relationships

50

Datum = top of sandstone

Datum = time

Van Wagoner et al, 199050Tuesday, April 5, 2011


Recommended