+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

Date post: 14-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
1 Person-centred care in Psychiatric Practice and Training @subodhdave1 Dr. Subodh Dave Associate Dean, Trainee Support Hon. Asso. Professor, University of Nottingham, V/Professor, SRM University, India and Consultant Psychiatrist, Derby Aims Person Centered Training and Curriculum Scoping Group (PCTC) Why should we be interested in Person Centred Care? What is Person Centred Care? Scope of Person Centred Care? Relevance to Postgraduate training Recommendations for training Non-Adherence rates (your patients) A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% ١ ٢ ٣ ٤ ٥ ٦
Transcript
Page 1: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

1

Person-centred care in Psychiatric Practice and Training

@subodhdave1Dr. Subodh Dave

Associate Dean, Trainee SupportHon. Asso. Professor, University of

Nottingham, V/Professor, SRM University, Indiaand Consultant Psychiatrist, Derby

Aims Person Centered Training and

Curriculum Scoping Group (PCTC)

Why should we be interested in Person Centred Care?

What is Person Centred Care? Scope of Person Centred

Care? Relevance to Postgraduate

training Recommendations for

training

Non-Adherence rates (your patients)

A. 25%B. 33%C. 50%

٢ ١

٤ ٣

٦ ٥

Page 2: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

2

Non-Adherence rates (yourself as a patient)

A. 25%B. 33%C. 50%

Non-Adherence rates

A. 25%B. 33%C. 50%

Reasons for non-adherence

Inadequate knowledge about a drug and its use

Not being convinced of the need for treatment

Fear of adverse effects of the drug Cost Complex treatment regime or dosing

schedules

Major cause of Non-adherence

Patient-physician discordance (seen in 60% of consultations)

Another 60% of patients did not understand the treatment plan

Another 60% felt they had no involvement in the design of the care plan

٨ ٧

١٠ ٩

١٢ ١١

Page 3: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

3

Patient and

Person Centred

Care

Patient v/s Person

At present a patient’s history, mental state examination, social circumstances, goals, strengths, values and beliefs are considered to inform decisions about diagnosis, treatment and support

Focusing on the person rather than the diagnosis allows us to see diagnosis, treatment and support as tools that will help the person achieve what they wish to in their life

Therapeutic Alliance

Focus on the patient’s concerns Positive regard and personal respect Shared decision making Genuineness and a personal touch Use of a psychological treatment

model (Priebe)

Good Psychiatric Practice

Compassionate Care Intelligent Kindness Values-based Practice Human-rights based approach Reflective Practice Spirituality Holistic Care Ethical Practice Recovery-oriented practice

١٤ ١٣

١٦ ١٥

١٨ ١٧

Page 4: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

4

Have you offered sub-optimal Rx to your

patients? (with their agreement)

A.YESB.NO

Why Person-centredcare?

The Case for Person Centred Care

Ethical Case Is it acceptable for healthcare to fail to offer people dignity, compassion or

respect? be poorly coordinated? treat people as a set of diagnoses or

symptoms, without taking into account their wider emotional, social and practical

maintain dependency, so that people fail to recognise and develop their own strengths

The Case for Person Centred Care

Consumer Case Institute of Health Improvement (IHI,

Harvard) global survey of patients: Safe Effective Humane

Psychiatry outpatients prefer collaborative model of working (Chewning, 2002)

The Case for Person Centred Care

Professional Case Professionals practising person-centred

care report Reduced stress Reduced burnout Improved work satisfaction

(Brownie, 2013; van den Pol-Grevelink, 2012)

٢٠ ١٩

٢٢ ٢١

٢٤ ٢٣

Page 5: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

5

The Case for Person Centred Care

Instrumental Case Person-centred care associated with

better patient outcomes - both physical and mental health (The Health Foundation, Priebe)

Improved patient satisfaction and compliance

In Psychosis, associated with fewer admissions and better social functioning (McCabe, 2016)

Active ingredient –therapeutic alliance

The Case for Person Centred Care

Economic Case Person-centred care associated with

Better self-management and Reduced service utilisation (Cochrane review, 2003)

In Psychiatry, co-production and peer support associated with Early discharges (Lawn, 2008) Reduced admissions (Min, 2007)

The Case for Person Centred Care

Legal Case Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board

(UK Supreme Court, 2015) Shared decision-making based on the

individual’s values the basis of consent to treatment

Supersedes Bolam test

Montgomery and Psychiatry

Better management of emotionally charged consultations

Reduced threat of litigation Reduced by shared decision making

Reduced need for resources (Australia)

Barriers to Implementing Person

Centred Care Clinician Attitudes Clinicians overestimate their ability to

involve patients in clinical decision making (Goosensen, 2007)

Clinician Knowledge Human rights legislation, SDM tools

Clinician Skills Psychiatrists vary in their ability to

engage in shared decision making (McCabe, 2016)

Not clearly signposted in the curriculum

Barriers to Implementing Person

Centred Care Resource Constraints 80% of psychiatric consultation time

spent in establishing diagnosis with very little time devoted to SDM (Loh, 2006)

Clinicians often mistakenly believe that person-centred care will be more time consuming and adversely affect patient outcomes when in fact the evidence points to the contrary

٢٦ ٢٥

٢٨ ٢٧

٣٠ ٢٩

Page 6: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

6

Training Issues

ICE (Ideas, Concerns, Expectations) + OSCE formats can encourage task-focused communication (breaking bad news) with focus on diseases rather than on people

Tick-box approach can lead to loss of humane connection

Embedding Person Centred Care in Practice Shared Decision Making Co-production Formualtion Skills Self-Management Support – Peer support Personal Recovery Values based Practice Human Rights legislation Staff Engagement – Compassion Reflective Practice

Co-production

Derbhyshire Healthcare Foundation Trust, University of Nottingham

> 40 Expert Patient teachers 2 Expert Patient Educators Involved in curriculum design,

delivery and formative assessments Highest feedback of all teaching

students receive

Formulation Skills

Shared exploration of the person’s protective factors and strengths as well as their difficulties

Assessment skills – asking the right question at the right times

Knowledge of attachment theory Knowledge of social theories

٣٢ ٣١

٣٤ ٣٣

٣٦ ٣٥

Page 7: A. 25% B. 33% C. 50% - ASUIP

7

Shared Decision Making

Clinician’s expertise (e.g. treatment options, risks and benefits)

expertise of the individual person (e.g. their preferences, personal circumstances, goals, values and beliefs)

Narrow (focused on compliance) v/s Broad (focused on outcomes)

(Davidson, 2013; Ramon, 2017)

Next Steps?

One thing that I can do differently is

Formulation Skills Shared decision making

From “We Should” to “I will”

@subodhdave1 subodhdave@nhs

.net

٣٨ ٣٧

٤٠ ٣٩


Recommended