"A Geographical study of Tourism Potential with reference to Ware Beach in
Ratnagiri District (Maharashtra)”.
Sanjay B. Navale1*, Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra S. Suryawanshi
The e-mail address and telephone number(s) of the corresponding author
Sanjay B. Navale
Department of Geography,
S.N. Arts, D.J.M. Commerce and B.N.S. Science College, Sangamner, Dist.Ahmednagar,
Maharashtra (India). 422605.
* Corresponding author
Co-author:
Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra S. Suryawanshi,
Professor, Department of Geography, MES Abasaheb Garware College, Pune Maharashtra,
(India).
Abstract: This research was done for the Ware Beach in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra. The
main objective of the research is to assess the tourism potential and its scenic beauty
of coastal sites. Arc GIS (10.3), Global Mapper (2013), Microsoft excel, Filed survey, Filed
observation and AHP method has been adopted for this research. In a real sense, this research is
based on theoretical and applied studies that have analyzed the potential of coastal tourism and its
natural beauty from a scientific point of view. In this research, the researcher adopted the
appropriate research method based on various research scientific literature materials. Using the
AHP techniques, calculated the beach , scenic value and the value of scientific investigation, the
weight of the each criteria and sub-parameter pairwise comparison matrixes was indicated by the
matrix method. In addition, the AHP technique is useful for studying the potential of coastal
tourism and the beauty of coastal tourism, and is also useful in tourism planning, development and
management in the study area.
Keywords: Tourism potential, Analytical Hierarchy Processes, Pairwise comparison Matrix
1. Introduction:
The tourism industry is known as the fastest growing industry in the world (Kisi 2019;
Priskin 2001). This industry has an impact on the economy of every country along with the
international economy. According to the data from 2006 to 2019, the revenue from the tourism
industry in the GDP of the global economy is about 9,258 billion US dollars (WTO, 2013). It is
imperative to develop tourism from the perspective of the country which has the most natural
potential for natural beauty and tourism development. This is because tourism provides a lot of
employment and increases economic productivity. Moreover, the large number of jobs available
to the locals helps to improve their economic situation (Samanta et al. 2018). The beach,
scenic value and beach scientific value were considered for study the natural beauty and
development potential of coastal tourism in the present research. The coastal slope, area size,
adjacent land uses, beach morphology landscape features, sand color, sea, lake flows, beach,
sunrise and sunset view, beach water clarity all these physical parameters were used for the
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 371
geographical studies of scenic beauty and coastal tourism potential (Navale and Suryawanshi
2019).
Li Lin and Pussella 2017; Mani Murali et al. 2013; Francesca et al. 2018; Pralong and
Reynard 2005; Suryawanshi and Ranyewale 2018; Cetin and Sevik 2016; all above researcher
have been using using above tourist assessment values viz beach, scenic value (BSV) and beach
scientific investigation value (BSIV).Professor Thomas L. saaty (1970) was used AHP techniques
for solving complex problems related to group decision making based on Mathematics. The
method has been used around the world to solve a variety of environmental problems, therefore
researcher have chosen this method for research
2. Study area:
The Western Ghats in the “Sahyadri” Range are known as the “Konkan region”. Ratnagiri district
in this geographical region is rich in terms of natural resources. Moreover, the region has a good
coastline, which can be used for tourism development. That is why this part has been selected for
research. The geographical extent of this research is from 170 5’0'’s north of 170 6' 30’’ north
latitude and 730 16' 30’'east longitude (Figure 1). The natural beauty of this beach is great with
the Arabian Sea to the west, Ganpatipule Beach to the north and Aare beach nearby. Due to the
high geographical area on the east side of the coast, the beauty of this coastline is very good about
that place. The beautiful beach with white golden sand adds to the beauty of the beach and the
natural view of sunrise and sunset is very attractive for the tourists as the geographical location of
this beach is very good. As the region is coastal, the temperature is humid throughout the year.
Normally the temperature in this area is up to 30 degree Celsius in summer season. It is
characterized by more than 4000 mm of rainfall during the monsoon season. Majorly monsoon
season, skies are heavily clouded and wind velocities are very strong towards a southwesterly
direction up to western ghat (Figure1).
3. Research Method:
In order to identification the suitable tourism potential for ware beach, mainly physical parameters
like coastal slope, seas-lakes-streams, size of the area, beach Sand colour, beach water clarity,
adjacent land use, landscape features, beach morphology, beach sunrise and sunset view have
been assessed on the basis of field survey and literature review using GIS-based approach. The
AHP is one of the tools which are helping to solve complex decision making problems (Saaty,
1977). Therefore, the technique has been used for geographical study of coastal tourism potential
in this study in the following steps as below: (1) The source of the data (2) selection of criteria, (3)
score determination of criteria and sub-parameter, (4) weight calculation to criteria using a
pairwise comparison matrix (PCM), (5) weighted overlay analysis, and (6) tourism potential map
(Figure 2).
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 372
Figure 1. Study area: Ware beach
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 373
3.1 Source of the data:
The primary and secondary source data have been collected from field survey,
ASTER, topographic maps, Google image, Census of Ratnagiri district (2001,2011), and
Maharashtra Maritime board. The field work was carried out to collect the data about tourism
potential with the help of global positioning system (GPS) and identification of the study area and
surrounding physical feature's location (Table 1 and 2). GIS software was used for the preparation
of study area and tourism potential map.
Table1. Study area criteria, sub-parameter and sources
Criteria Sub-Parameter Sources
Beach Scenic
Value
(BSV)
Beach morphology Field survey, GPS data collection
Maharashtra Maritime Board
https://mahammb.maharashtra.gov.in
Google Image, Census of Ratnagiri district
(2001, 2011).
Landscape Features
Beach Sand colour
Beach Sunrise and sunset
view
Beach water clarity
Beach Scientific
investigatevalue
(BSIV)
Size of the area SOI (Survey of India )Toposheet 1:50000
Maharashtra Maritime Board
https://mahammb.maharashtra.gov.in
ASTER data,
Google Image, Census of Ratnagiri district
(2001, 2011).
Coastal slope (%)
Adjacent land use
Seas, lakes, streams
Table 2. Study area criteria and sub-parameter used for identified the coastal tourism potential and
scenic beauty.
Beach
Scenic
Value
(BSV)
Details of
Parameter /
score
Low
(1)
Moderate
(2)
High
(3)
Very High
(4)
(Francesca et al.2018)
Beach
morphology
Rocky
coast
Estuaries/
lagoons
Silt /Muddy Open /barren land/
Sandy coasts / Rocky
coast
(Li Lin and Pussella
2017;Mani Murali et
al.2013; researcher
complied)
Landscape
Features
single
Landscape
Features
2 or 3
Landscape
Features
4 To 6
Landscape
Features
More than 6 Landscape
Features
(Pralong and Reynard
2005)
Beach Sand
colour
Mud sand Black
sand
White sand White and golden sand
(researcher complied)
Beach Sunrise
and sunset view
Very
Simple
view
Simple
View
Beautiful
View
Ideal views(researcher
complied)
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 374
Beach water
clarity
Turbid Partially
Turbid
Partially
Transparent
Transparent
(Suryawanshi and
Ranyewale 2018)
Beach
Scientific
investigate
value
(BSIV)
Size of the area >0.50 ha 0.75 ha-
0.50 ha
1 – 0.75 ha >1(Cetin and Sevik
2016; researcher
complied))
Coastal slope
(%)
>1
>0.2
and <1
>0.1
and <0.2
>0 and <0.1
(Mani Murali et al.2013)
Adjacent land
use
Forest
/Shrubs
Agriculture Marshy/
water
Built up ( Li Lin and
Pussella 2017; Cetin and
Sevik 2016)
Seas, lakes,
streams
Creeks Shores of
stream
Shores of
lake
Sea cost (Cetin and
Sevik 2016)
Figure 2. Research Method
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 375
3.2 Selection of criteria and sub-parameters
The researcher mention in the field of geographical study of tourism potential has
assigned scores to sub-criteria on the basis of selected coast site (Figure 3).
3.2.1 Beach Scenic Value (BSV):
i) Beach morphology:
The shape of the beach depends mainly on the internal and external forces. The open barren
land and the white golden sand are the features of this beach and they are suitable for tourism.
Being a good coastline, there is a lot of scope for tourism development.
(Sources: Maharashtra Maritime Board, 2017,https://mahammb.maharashtra.gov.in)
Figure 3. Ware beach tourism potential map
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 376
ii) Landscape Features:
If there are different types of landscapes on the beach, then the natural beauty of the place
is more enchanting. This Ware beach is no exception as there is a huge scope for the development
of the tourist spot as there is a lot of scenic beauty.
iii) Beach Sand colour:
The color of the sand on the beach is a major tourist attraction. The natural beauty of this
beach attracts tourists as it has white golden sand on the beach. Small sand dunes are formed along
the coast as the ocean waves continue to work over the coast.
iv) Beach Sunrise and sunset view:
The enchanting view of sunrise and sunset in a calm atmosphere enchants the tourists on
the beach. The great location of Ware Beach, the natural coastline, the breathtaking sunrise and
sunset views that form over the coast are the natural tourist attractions of this coastline.
v) Beach water clarity:
The scenic beauty of the coast is mainly clean air, pollution free air and blue sea water.
Tourists visit the beaches where the water is clean. Tourists never visit a coastline whose water is
polluted. Since there is no human intervention on this coast, pollution is not found on the coast, so
the sea water on the coast is very clean and its natural features attract tourists for tourism.
3.3.2 Beach scientific investigates value (BSIV):
i) Size of the area:
The natural accessibility of the coastline depends mainly on the size of the coastal area. As
the size of the Ware beach area is about 1 hectare, it is possible to provide all kinds of services to
this place and tourists. These mainly include tourist lodging, hotels, horse riding, boating, food,
etc.
ii) Coastal slope (%):
If the slope of the coast is slow, it is considered very important for tourism development.
This factor is very important to ensure that the lives of the tourists are not endangered while they
are traveling on the beach. The slope of this coastline is mostly slow and is conducive to tourism.
In short, the development of this coastline can take place in the future if proper services are
provided at this place from the point of view of tourists.
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 377
iii) Adjacent land use:
The coastline, which is suitable for adjacent land use has more natural tourism potential.
Considering Ware Beach, most of the area is covered by natural vegetation. GIS-based technology,
ARC GIS 9.3 was used to evaluate the presence of mixed crops, including marsh / swamps,
orchards, paddy cultivation, thorn bushes, trees, social forestry, plantation, tourism land use.
iv) Sea Lake and Stream:
Coastal tourism potential depends on the natural structure of the Sea Islands or creeks and
rivers. In addition, natural vegetation, biodiversity, golden white sand, climate, etc. adds to the
natural tourist beauty. This is why tourists visit these places. All these features are found in this
coast.
3.3 Score determination to criteria and sub-parameter:
To determine the value of all the criteria and sub-criteria selected for this, used the 9 point
scale value table (Table 3) used by Thomas (1977). In determining this value, the researcher has
collected international research materials field visit and GPS survey to identify the potential of the
tourist destination. The values of all the criteria and sub-criteria selected on the basis of 1 to 9 are
clearly shown in the accompanying table. In the present study, scores for sub-criteria were assigned
based field survey and literature review related to study area. The scores were assigned to the
criteria and sub-parameter from 1 to 9. Higher score (9) indicates higher tourism potential of sub-
parameter, so the lowest value indicates (Table 4) that the tourism potential is low (1).
Table 3.Thomas L. Saaty 9 Point scale, 1977.
Intensity of
Importance
Explanation
1 Equal importance
3 Moderate importance
5 strong importance
7 Very strong important
9 Absolutely strong important
2,4,6,8
Reciprocals
Intermediate values
Values for inverse comparison
Table 4.Beach criteria and sub-parameter
Beach
Criteria
Parameter Details of beach characteristics Weight
Beach
Scenic
Value
(BSV)
Beach morphology Open/ barren land beach, rocky
coast
9
Landscape Features More than 6 Landscape Features
8
Beach Sand colour Light & Brown 7
Beach Sunrise & sunset view Ideal view 9
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 378
Beach water clarity Transparent
8
Beach
Scientific
investigate
value
(BSIV)
Size of area 1 – 0.75 ha 7
Coastal slope (%) 1:36 1
Adjacent land use Marshy/swamp land
Mixed crop with built up, paddy
field
Mangroves , social forest, forest,
plantation
8
Seas, lakes, streams River/Pond 1
3.4 GIS and AHP method:
GIS-software and AHP OS software considers a number of criteria in the decision-making
process for various geographical issues. It is developed for solving spatial complex problems
related to a geographical study of tourism potential and its scenic beauty. The role of the physical
criterion is significant in the decision making process.However, the weights of these criteria are
not equal in tourism potential criteria and sub-parameter. Moreover, GIS, AHP OS software and
Microsoft excel has been used for the determination of the weights of the criteria and scores of the
sub-criteria. Li Lin and Pussella 2017; Mani Murali et al. 2013; Francesca et al. 2018; Pralong and
Reynard 2005; Suryawanshi and Ranyewale 2018; Cetin and Sevik 2016; all above researcher
have been using physical criteria for weight determination for different criteria. In decision making
process, all criteria are measured according to their level of importance in AHP technique (Zolekar
and Bhagat 2015; Zolekar 2018). Therefore, AHP techniques have been used for geographical
study of coastal tourism potential in the present study.
3.5 Analytical hierarchy process
Prof. Thomas L. Saaty (1970) used the AHP techniques for solving complex problems
related to group decision making based on Mathematics. In addition, various researchers have been
using to AHP methods. The AHP method is based on weights of the criteria and is related to not
relevant decision, this is a measure the inconsistency of the decision of the respondent’s .AHP
decides the weights for different parameters using pairwise comparisons matrix (PCM).Prof. Saaty
(1980) put forward for consideration a pairwise comparison matrix, on the basis of the preference
scale.
3.5.1 Weight calculation to criteria using pairwise comparison matrix (PCM):
The field survey and literature review were used for formation of judgment between two
criteria (Table 4) and the pairwise comparison matrix table was prepared (Table5). Weights were
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 379
calculated by normalizing the PCM. The Normalized pairwise comparison matrix has been
obtained by dividing the column elements of the matrix by the sum of each column. The row
elements in the obtained matrix are summed and the total value is divided by the number of
elements in the row. The Normalized pairwise comparison matrix was calculated using Microsoft
Excel. Thus, weights were calculated for the selected criteria (Table6).The criteria were used for
the study of tourism potential in present research development. However, all selected criteria is
not suitable for tourism for site suitability (Gaikwad and Bhagat 2017, 2018).
Table 5 Pairwise comparisons matrix
coastal
slope
Seas,
lakes,
stream
s
Size of
area
Beach
Sand
colour
Beach
water
clarity
Adjacen
t land
use
Landscap
e Features
Beach
Morpholog
y
Beach
Sunrise
&
sunset
view
1.00 1.00 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.11
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.11
7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.13
7.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.13
8.00 7.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 0.50 0.33 0.14 0.13
8.00 8.00 5.00 7.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 0.25
8.00 8.00 6.00 8.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.33
9.00 9.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
58.00 46.00 33.14 36.64 21.77 12.09 6.38 3.90 3.18
Table 6 Normalized pairwise comparisons matrix
coastal
slope
Seas,
lakes,
stream
s
Size of
area
Beach
Sand
colour
Beach
water
clarity
Adjacen
t land
use
Landscap
e Features
Beach
Morpholog
y
Beach
Sunrise
& sunset
view
0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03
0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03
0.12 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04
0.12 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.04
0.14 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04
0.14 0.17 0.15 0.19 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.08
0.14 0.17 0.18 0.22 0.14 0.17 0.16 0.26 0.10
0.16 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.32 0.33 0.16 0.26 0.31
0.16 0.20 0.24 0.22 0.37 0.33 0.47 0.26 0.31
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 380
Calculation of vulnerability index:
Consistency Ratio
Professor Thomas has used the consistency ratio (CR) scaling method in 1977
and its priority hierarchy (AHP). Basically the consistency ratio is calculated by dividing the result
by the consistency index value (CI) and the Random Index Value (RI) as follows. The following
formula is used for this (equation 1),
CR = CI / RI.
Consistency Index (CI) and Random Index (RI):
The following equation is used to calculate the consistency index (Saaty 1977, 1983, 1990; Wind
and Saaty1980; Mani Murali et al. 2013 ) (equation 2)
CI= (λmax− n)/ (n−1)
Table 7Values of Random index (Thomas L.Saaty.1977).
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
R
I
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.5
8
0.9
0
1.1
2
1.2
4
1.3
2
1.1
4
1.4
5
1.4
9
1.5
1
1.4
8
1.5
6
1.5
7
1.5
9
Where
λ (Lambda ) = Principal Eigen value of the matrix.
n = number of the matrix.
RI = the random index (Table 7)
3.9 .3 Measure the evaluation of the consistency ratio:
Professor Thomas L. Saaty (1977) statement that measure the evaluation of the consistency
ratio (CR) of a value of 0.10 or less is considered relevant or accepted its means that is a significant
priority if consistency ratio (CR) of a value of > 0.10 or < 0.1 it’s not relevant or rejects or error,
its means not significant then calculating AHP sequence (Table 7) (Rocha et al.2020; Francesca et
al.2018; Mani Murali et al.2013). All these distributions are shown in the table below (Table 8)
Table 8 Measure the evaluation consistency ratio
CR ≤ 0.10 Relevant or accepted Significant
CR > 0.10 / CR ≤ 0.1 Not relevant or rejected Not significant
3.9.3 Physical vulnerability index (PVI):
The physical vulnerability index (PVI) calculating was used (Rocha et al. 2020; Francesca
et al. 2018; Mani Murali et al. 2013; Duriyapong and Nakhapakorn 2011) the following equation
(3),
PVI=W1X1+W2X2+W3X3+W4X4+W5X5+W6X6+W7X7+W8X8+W9X9+W10X10.
Here, Weight of each physical parameter and vulnerability score of each variable.
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 381
4. Result and Discussion:
4.1Computation of consistency ratio (CR) result:
Pairwise comparison matrix and normalized pairwise comparison matrix steps has used to
calculate the consistency ratio result (Table 5 and 6). The formula CI = (λ max− n) / (n - 1) has
used for this consistency Index ((CI=0.13). The value of the random index was
calculated with using the random index value (RI=1.45) (Table 7). Thus, using the hypothetical
findings (Table 8), a consistency ratio value has calculate (CR= 0.08). The calculation of the
consistency ratio (CR) has clearly shown in the following table 9.The fact that the calculated value
(CR=0.08) of is less than the table value (0.10), it means that the coastal tourism potential of the
Ware beach and the scenic beauty of the beach is relevant for the development of coastal tourism.
Table 9. Computation of consistency ratio (CR)
Parameters Physicalvariables
λ max 10.06
n 9
CI 0.13
RI 1.45
CR 0.08
4.2Physical vulnerability index (PVI) result:
Analyzed the criteria and sub-parameter selected to assess the potential and natural beauty
of tourism through the software AHP OS to calculate the physical insecurity index. Moreover,
physical vulnerability indexes (PVI) (equation 3) were calculating the value of all criteria and sub
parameters (table 10). The classification in this table (table 10) they're reported as preferred weight
(%), rank, and sum / final effect. The rank and priority weight of beach sunrise and sunset view
(rank 1, priority weight 28.44%), beach morphology (rank 2, priority weight 23.78%) and
landscape features (rank 3, priority weight 17.11%) appear to be the highest, meaning that this
criterion is favorable for tourism development and has the highest tourism potential.Adjacent land
use (rank 4, priority weight 11.56%), beach water clarity (rank 5, priority weight 8.22%), beach
sand color (rank 6, priority weight 3.78%) and area size (rank 7, priority weight 3.78 %) Their
location and preference weight appears to be moderate. This means that this criterion clearly
indicates that tourism development is favorable, and their tourism potential is moderate. Oceans,
lakes, streams (rank 8, priority weight 2%) and coastal slopes (rank 9, priority weight 1.56%) have
their characteristics and their tourist potential is relatively lower than other criteria. Naturally,
during the development of tourism, it is necessary to provide services to tourists regarding
maritime security. The scenic beauty of this beach is also very captivating and beautiful. In short,
all the selected criteria and parameters are favorable for coastal development. If the Government
of Maharashtra develops sustainable tourism development by providing all kinds of services along
this coastline, it will provide a lot of employment to the locals, and moreover, the development of
this beach will reduce the stress on the number of tourists on Ganpatipule Beach (Table 10).
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 382
Table 10. Weights for the criteria based on PCM
Criteria and
sub-parameter Rank
Sum/
Final
Influence
Priority
Weight
(%)
SUM*
Priority
Weight
Classification
of
Tourism
potential
1 Coastal slope 9 0.14 1.56 0.22 Low
2 Sea ,Lakes, streams 8 0.18 2.00 0.36
3 Size of the area 7 0.34 3.78 1.28
4 Beach sand colour 6 0.34 3.78 1.28
5 Beach water clarity 5 0.74 8.22 6.08
6 Adjacent land use 4 1.04 11.56 12.02
7 Landscape features 3 1.54 17.11 26.35 High
8 Beach Morphology 2 2.14 23.78 50.58
9 Beach sunrise & sunset view 1 2.56 28.44 72.82 Very high
09 100 Mean = 19.03
SD = 26.25
4.3Classification of the Tourism potential:
The accompanying table shows the weight distribution for the criteria based on PCM. The
common pair was compared, summed up all the criteria and parameters in the matrix, and then
multiplied by the sum and the preferred weight (%). Based on this, the values of average and
standard deviation were calculated. From that the low, high and very high tourism potential table
of the classification created the tourism potential table (Table10). By multiplying the sum and
priority weights of all the criteria, their average and standard deviations were
calculated. Accordingly, the findings of the table of tourism potential have clarified as follows:
4.3.1 Low Tourism potential: Coastal slope (0.22) Sea, lake, stream (0.66) Area size (1.228) Beach sand color (1.228)
Beach water clarity (6.08) and adjacent land use (12.02), all criteria indicated low tourist potential
4.3.2 High Tourism potential:
The Beach Morphology (50.58) and Landscape Features (23.35) have indicated high
tourism potential.
4.3.3 Very High Tourism potential:
The view of sunrise and sunset on the Ware beach is very attractive; it means this criterion
(72.82) is showing very high tourism potential.
5. Conclusion: In the presented research GIS and Global Mapper software, AHP OS free software and
Microsoft excel (2007) were used and find out the geographical tourism potential and its scenic
beauty in the present research. Beach morphology, landscape features, beach sand color, beach
sunrise and sunset view and beach water clarity, coastal slope, size of the area ,adjacent land use,
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 383
sea, lakes, stream Criteria were used to evaluate Ware beach tourism potential. The coastal tourism
potential and scenic beauty were studied on the basis of the physical vulnerability Index (PVI).
After a geographical study of all the above factors, it became clear that this coastline needs to be
developed for tourism. For this, along with the natural beauty, it is necessary to provide the
necessary financial and social services to the tourist destination. It is equally important to provide
security to the tourists at the tourist spot. If all these factors are implemented, this tourist
destination will be developed in the future and this will provide a lot of financial employment to
the local citizens in this area.
Acknowledgements:
I thank all the people who helped me during this research. My research used free AHP OS
software, I am personally thankful to for that.
Conflicts declaration of authors: The authors do not show any interest conflict.
Abbreviations: Tourism potential, Analytical Hierarchy Processes (AHP), Pairwise comparison
Matrix (PCM).
Reference:
1. Cetin, M., Zeren, I., Sevik, H. et al.(2018) A study on the determination of the natural
park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environ Monit Assess 190, 167.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6534-5
2. De Serio, Francesca & Armenio, Elvira & Mossa, Michele & Petrillo, Antonio.
(2018)How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment. Geosciences 8(11),
415; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110415
3. Duriyapong, F., & Nakhapakorn, K. (2011). Coastal vulnerability assessment: a case
study of Samut Sakhon coastal zone. Songklanakarin Journal of Science &
Technology, 33(4).
4. Gaikwad R D, Bhagat VS (2017) Multi-criteria watershed prioritizationof Kas Basin in
Maharashtra (India): AHP and influence approaches. Hydrosp Anal 1(1):41–61
5. Gaikwad R, Bhagat V (2018) Multi-criteria prioritization for sub-watersheds in medium
river basin using AHP and influence approaches. Hydrosp Anal Gatha Cognit. https
://doi.org/10.21523 /gcj3.18020 105
6. Goepel,K.D., (2017) BPMSG’s AHP Online System (Business Performance
Management Singapore), 53357427, 1-25. https://bpmsg.com/ahp/docs/BPMSG-AHP-
OS.pdf
7. Kişi, N.(2019) A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the
A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey. Sustainability , 11, 964.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040964
8. Lin, Li & Pussella, Pgrni. (2017) Assessment of vulnerability for coastal erosion with
GIS and AHP techniques case study: Southern coastline of Sri Lanka. Natural Resource
Modeling, 30(4), e12146. 10.1111/nrm.12146.
9. Mani Murali, R., Ankita, M., Amrita, S., & Vethamony, P. (2013) Coastal vulnerability
assessment of Puducherry coast, India, using the analytical hierarchical process.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3291-2013
10. Navale,S.B and Suryawanshi R.S.(2019) Morphological Analysis of Coastal Tourism
Potential in Budal Platform, Ratnagiri District (MS), India, 6(2), 689-704,
http://doi.one/10.1729/Journal.22491
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 384
11. Pralong, J. P., & Reynard, E. (2005)A proposal for a classification of geomorphological
sites depending on their tourist value. Il Quaternario, 18, 313-319,
https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.350
12. Priskin, J. (2001) Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism:: the case of
the Central Coast Region of Western Australia. Tourism management, 22(6), 637-
648.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00039-5
13. Rocha, C.; Antunes, C.; Catita, C.(2020) Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Due to Sea
Level Rise: The Case Study of the Atlantic Coast of Mainland
Portugal. Water,12(2),360. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020360
14. Saaty T.L. (1987) Principles of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Mumpower J.L.,
Renn O., Phillips L.D., Uppuluri V.R.R. (eds) Expert Judgment and Expert Systems.
NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol 35. Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg
15. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of
mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-
2496(77)90033-5
16. Saaty, T. L. (1990). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the
analytic hierarchy process”. Management science, 36(3), 259-268.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259
17. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European
journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-
2217(90)90057-I
18. Samanta da Costa Cristiano S., Portz L.C., Anfuso G., Rockett G.C., Barboza
E.G.(2018) , Coastal scenic evaluation at Santa Catarina (Brazil): Implications for
coastal management, Ocean and Coastal Management, 160 , pp. 146-157..
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.004
19. Suryawanshi, R. S., & Ranyewale, S. K. (2018) Tourism Potential of Geomorphosites:
A Comparative Assessment of Selected Beach Sites in Malvan Tahsil, Sindhudurg Coast
of Maharashtra (India). Transactions, 40(2), 285.
20. T. L. Saaty,(1983) "Priority setting in complex problems," in IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management, vol. EM-30, no. 3, pp. 140-155, doi:
10.1109/TEM.1983.6448606.
21. Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. L. (1980) Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy
process. Management science, 26(7), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641
22. Zolekar RB, Bhagat VS (2015) Multi-criteria land suitability analysis for agriculture in
hilly zone: Remote sensing and GIS approach.Comput Electron Agric 118:300–321.
23. Zolekar, R.B. (2018) Integrative approach of RS and GIS in characterization of land
suitability for agriculture: a case study of Darna catchment. Arab J Geosci 11, 780.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4148-4
Website:
24. https://mahammb.maharashtra.gov.in/site/upload/pdf/GIS-SMP.pdf /01/02/2020.
25. Census of India (2011) Maharashtra, District Census Handbook Ratnagiri, Series-28
Part Xii – A Village And Town Directory Directorate Of Census Operations
Maharashtra, Ministry of Home Affairs,Mumbai,
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB.html 4/2/2015.
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VIII, AUGUST/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 385