+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Date post: 07-Oct-2016
Category:
Upload: rolf
View: 216 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
8
1934 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985 Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum Rolf Engleman, Jr. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Chemistry Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Received May 13, 1985; accepted July 24, 1985 High-resolution spectra of a platinum hollow-cathode lamp were obtained from 215 to 3100 nm with a Fourier- transform spectrometer. More than 320 Pt I lines were measured and used to derive accurate energy levels for 30 even and 52 odd levels. Ritz wavelength standards for Pt in the vacuum ultraviolet were calculated. INTRODUCTION General energy-levelanalyses of many heavy-element atom- ic spectra have not been reported for some time. However, significant advances in experimental techniques have oc- curred that allow greater resolution and improved precision in wavelength measurements. Earlier studies and the re- sulting energy-level values for Pt I and II have been summa- rized.' Platinum deserves special study because of the gen- eral need for more accurate energy levels and also because of its important role in a future scientific Earth satellite. A platinum/neon hollow-cathode light source was used in the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) spectrometer aboard the NASA International Explorer satellite (IUE), launched in 1977, as a wavelength and intensity calibration standard in the far ultraviolet down to 115 nm. Platinum was chosen because of the many sharp lines in the 310- to 115-nm region and the good stability of the platinum hollow cathode. 2 A new satel- lite, the Hubble Space Telescope (ST), 3 is due to be launched in 1986with a spectrometer capable of much great- er spectral resolution than the one used on IUE; it too will use a platinum standards source. Thus it is important that accurate line wavelengths be available for this light source. The direct wavelength measurements of the present study overlap only the uppermost wavelength range of the ST spectrometer; by applying the Ritz principle to the platinum energy levels derived in the present study, accurate stan- dards in the wavelength region below 220 nm can be ob- tained. EXPERIMENT A demountable hollow cathode developed for high-resolu- tion spectroscopic studies 4 was used with flowing argon gas. The platinum was in the form of a cylinder 16 mm long and having a 6-mm outside diameter with a 1-mm-thick wall. Current through the lamp was about 0.2 A with an argon pressure of about 2.5 Torr. All spectra were taken with the McMath 1-m Fourier- transform spectrometer (FTS) at Kitt Peak that is operated by the National Solar Observatory. This instrument 5 was used with a quartz beam splitter and appropriate detectors and filters. Spectra were taken in three overlapping re- gions. A broadband scan covered 215 to 1100 nm with a resolution of only 96 mK (1 mK = 0.001 cm-'); narrow-band scans covered 280 to 525 nm and 660 to 3100 nm with resolu- tions of about 25 mK. DATA ANALYSIS Initially, a wave-number and intensity-line list was compiled by conventional procedures, although, as detailed below, the platinum list was substantially modified by the use of cen- troid values. Small wave-number corrections were applied by using known argon standards. 6 Single sharp-line posi- tions are believed accurate to 1 mK. Argon lines were eliminated from this list by using extensive tables of Ar I and II.7 The lines of Pt II were eliminated by using Shenstone's analysis8 and a new preliminary Pt II analysis (to be pub- lished separately). Initial selection of strong Pt I lines was made with the analysis of Livingood 9 ; thus many relatively accurate energy levels could be determined. These levels were then used to compute, within the limitation of the usual AJ = 0, +1 (but AJ = 0 not allowed if J = 0) selection rule, other possible transitions. A search of the line list for these transitions was made, and those that were located were fit- ted into the level structure. Several iterations of this cycle resulted in accurate values for most levels and unambiguous classifications for many lines. Most of the Pt I lines were not sharp, and many showed considerable resolved structure. The narrowest Pt I lines (full width at half-maximum of about 90 mK in the 280- to 525-nm spectrum) correspond to a relatively high Doppler temperature of 3800 K. An example of a classified narrow Pt I line is shown in Fig. 1. A linewidth of around 50 mK would be more in line with other heavy-atom spectra in hollow cathodes. This excessivewidth is due not to insuffi- cient spectroscopic resolution or high temperatures but to un- resolved isotope or hyperfine structure. An example of a wide Pt I line with resolved structure is displayed in Fig. 2 along with a tentative assignment of isotopic components. These assignments are compatible with early Fabry-Perot stud- iesl 0 "' of this transition. A sizable isotope shift separates the even platinum isotopes, whereas the odd 95 Pt shows all four components predicted for a I = 1/2, J = 4 to J = 4 transition. It is interesting to note that the two strong 1 95 Pt components (Fig. 2, peaks 195b and 195c), which appear to be relatively unblended, have a measured FWHM of about 70 mK, corresponding to a Doppler temperature of 2100 K. At the present stage of analysis, these structured lines,, 0740-3224/85/121934-08$02.00 © 1985 Optical Society of America Rolf Engleman, Jr.
Transcript
Page 1: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

1934 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985

Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Chemistry Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

Received May 13, 1985; accepted July 24, 1985

High-resolution spectra of a platinum hollow-cathode lamp were obtained from 215 to 3100 nm with a Fourier-transform spectrometer. More than 320 Pt I lines were measured and used to derive accurate energy levels for 30even and 52 odd levels. Ritz wavelength standards for Pt in the vacuum ultraviolet were calculated.

INTRODUCTION

General energy-level analyses of many heavy-element atom-ic spectra have not been reported for some time. However,significant advances in experimental techniques have oc-curred that allow greater resolution and improved precisionin wavelength measurements. Earlier studies and the re-sulting energy-level values for Pt I and II have been summa-rized.' Platinum deserves special study because of the gen-eral need for more accurate energy levels and also because ofits important role in a future scientific Earth satellite. Aplatinum/neon hollow-cathode light source was used in thevacuum ultraviolet (VUV) spectrometer aboard the NASAInternational Explorer satellite (IUE), launched in 1977, as awavelength and intensity calibration standard in the farultraviolet down to 115 nm. Platinum was chosen becauseof the many sharp lines in the 310- to 115-nm region and thegood stability of the platinum hollow cathode. 2 A new satel-lite, the Hubble Space Telescope (ST),3 is due to belaunched in 1986 with a spectrometer capable of much great-er spectral resolution than the one used on IUE; it too willuse a platinum standards source. Thus it is important thataccurate line wavelengths be available for this light source.The direct wavelength measurements of the present studyoverlap only the uppermost wavelength range of the STspectrometer; by applying the Ritz principle to the platinumenergy levels derived in the present study, accurate stan-dards in the wavelength region below 220 nm can be ob-tained.

EXPERIMENT

A demountable hollow cathode developed for high-resolu-tion spectroscopic studies 4 was used with flowing argon gas.The platinum was in the form of a cylinder 16 mm long andhaving a 6-mm outside diameter with a 1-mm-thick wall.Current through the lamp was about 0.2 A with an argonpressure of about 2.5 Torr.

All spectra were taken with the McMath 1-m Fourier-transform spectrometer (FTS) at Kitt Peak that is operatedby the National Solar Observatory. This instrument5 wasused with a quartz beam splitter and appropriate detectorsand filters. Spectra were taken in three overlapping re-gions. A broadband scan covered 215 to 1100 nm with aresolution of only 96 mK (1 mK = 0.001 cm-'); narrow-band

scans covered 280 to 525 nm and 660 to 3100 nm with resolu-tions of about 25 mK.

DATA ANALYSIS

Initially, a wave-number and intensity-line list was compiledby conventional procedures, although, as detailed below, theplatinum list was substantially modified by the use of cen-troid values. Small wave-number corrections were appliedby using known argon standards. 6 Single sharp-line posi-tions are believed accurate to 1 mK. Argon lines wereeliminated from this list by using extensive tables of Ar I andII.7 The lines of Pt II were eliminated by using Shenstone'sanalysis8 and a new preliminary Pt II analysis (to be pub-lished separately). Initial selection of strong Pt I lines wasmade with the analysis of Livingood9; thus many relativelyaccurate energy levels could be determined. These levelswere then used to compute, within the limitation of the usualAJ = 0, +1 (but AJ = 0 not allowed if J = 0) selection rule,other possible transitions. A search of the line list for thesetransitions was made, and those that were located were fit-ted into the level structure. Several iterations of this cycleresulted in accurate values for most levels and unambiguousclassifications for many lines.

Most of the Pt I lines were not sharp, and many showedconsiderable resolved structure. The narrowest Pt I lines(full width at half-maximum of about 90 mK in the 280- to525-nm spectrum) correspond to a relatively high Dopplertemperature of 3800 K. An example of a classified narrowPt I line is shown in Fig. 1. A linewidth of around 50 mKwould be more in line with other heavy-atom spectra inhollow cathodes. This excessive width is due not to insuffi-cient spectroscopic resolution or high temperatures but to un-resolved isotope or hyperfine structure. An example of a widePt I line with resolved structure is displayed in Fig. 2 alongwith a tentative assignment of isotopic components. Theseassignments are compatible with early Fabry-Perot stud-iesl0 "' of this transition. A sizable isotope shift separatesthe even platinum isotopes, whereas the odd 95 Pt shows allfour components predicted for a I = 1/2, J = 4 to J = 4transition. It is interesting to note that the two strong 195 Ptcomponents (Fig. 2, peaks 195b and 195c), which appear tobe relatively unblended, have a measured FWHM of about70 mK, corresponding to a Doppler temperature of 2100 K.

At the present stage of analysis, these structured lines,,

0740-3224/85/121934-08$02.00 © 1985 Optical Society of America

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Page 2: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1935

300 I

200

E--

100

0:30 157

WA!: NIM131 'R

Fig.1. The 30 156.852-cm' line of Pt Iwith a measured half-widthof 95 mK and an assignment of 03-301564. Each interval on thehorizontal scale is 0.2 cm-.

1000

750

Cl)zEZ

500

250

029: 33: 3

WAV NM131R

Fig. 2. Structure of the 29 333.181-cm- 1 Pt I line with tentativepeak assignments. The transition is 8234-301564. The four 195peaks refer to the two major (195b, 195c) and two minor (195a, 195d)hyperfine components predicted for 95 Pt. The measured half-widths of peaks 195b and 195c were about 70 mK. Each interval onthe horizontal scale is 0.2 cm-1 .

caused by isotope shifts and hyperfine splitting of 95 Pt,were not considered in detail. Rather, the Pt I line positionwas approximated by the centroid of the pattern (see Ap-pendix A). Because of the good intensity linearity of theFTS spectra, accurate centroids could be readily derived.Table 1 gives centroid values of 337 Pt I lines found in thisstudy. Intensities were derived from the area of the Pt Ipatterns. The intensities were not corrected for the re-sponse of the FTS system. This becomes particularly no-

Table 1.

Wave Numbera

13 851.295e14 053.465e14 610.306e14 788.811e14 898.127e15 037.275e15 325.11915 801.95315 822.51315 910.34116 590.10616 595.03117 057.70017 104.46317 118.19817 345.56418 130.34118 248.16718 257.21618 545.04318 555.06418 620.32418 859.07218 912.28719 003.06319 123.74519 248.02419 355.89919 670.50219 688.20319 696.08919 759.36619 775.52119 819.79819 820.22219 841.55819 983.89420 002.53120 047.20020 073.17720 124.42220 488.00020 560.28220 596.15920 689.76520 692.94120 948.36020 966.93821 056.23021 092.26021 101.95821 342.87521 541.90221 824.76621 825.38421 840.27821 845.78021 949.68821 960.22121 962.49421 982.09922 103.05922 113.33922 139.09922 160.610

Measured Lines of Pt

Assignmentb

526672-388152185661-326202523793-377693523793-375904526672-3776935237934373422526672-373422219674-377693526672-368441606402-447303567844-401944597821-431871523793-353213556405-385365155012-326202526672-353213607903-426603567844-385365523793-341223526672-341223603571-418021155012-341223556405-367816598824-409703219674-409703134962-326202597643-405162598723-405162606402-409703598824-401944641284-444324523793-326202645054-447303155012-353213607903-409703603571-405162266382-466223607903-407872526672-326202645054-444324606402-405162567844-362964645054-439453607903-401944608834-401944219674-426603597643-388152597821-388152598723-388152599082-388152266382-477401155012-368441603571-388152606402-388152134962-353213155012-373422645054-426603185661-405162556405-336805597313-377693597513-377693598723-377693598824-377693599082-377693597513-375904

IC Coded

0 B1 NP1 N9 N3 N0 N4 N1 N1 N1 N3 N1 WP1 W3 N4 N1 N1 B

13 N11 N8 N2 N4 NP

31 N2 NB*1 N

14 N0 N0 NP0 N0 NP0 N*

25 N0 WP2 NPB2 NPB0 WP1 NP2 NP1 N2 NP0 N8 WPB1 NP4 WP1 NP1 NP1 WP1 NP2 WP1 WP0 NP0 WP2 N1 N5 NB0 WP0 WP2 WP

23 NP1 W4 W9 W

18 W0 W3 N

(continued overleaf)

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Page 3: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

1936 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985

Table 1. Continued

Wave Numbera Assignmentb IC Coded Wave Numbera Assignmentb Ic Coded

22 173.69622 221.30722 222.58722 281.57122 291.84722 347.84122 389.45622 422.16722 440.74622 488.12722 503.28822 530.03822 566.07022 647.54022 662.16422 763.19822 871.59622 905.97422 938.13423 015.71023 021.33623 063.45523 103.91923 199.76823 236.19323 298.58423 314.06023 348.42523 416.73323 448.29623 467.95323 535.67323 795.96123 845.83524 005.43624 272.80824 409.93324 429.52624 442.60324 458.93724 494.08024 560.76924 587.69124 655.37324 997.61025 014.39925 114.73125 204.92125 286.00825 319.63725 468.31525 468.73125 483.76625 562.35125 592.56225 604.99325 609.41225 629.01425 642.10325 749.98225 760.25825 785.9972f5 877,79026 179.57926 300.899

597643-375904185661-407872523793-301564598723-375904598824-375904608834-385365597313-373422597643-373422597821-373422101311-326202101163-326202598723-373422599082-373422266382-492863567844-341223219674-447303606402-377693266382-495441597821-368441603571-373422607903-377693599082-368441567844-336805607903-375904185661-418021606402-373422155012-388152134962-368441266382-500551607903-373422597643-362964645054-409703606402-368441134962-373422101163-341223134962-377693597313-353213597513-353213597643-353213266382-510973607903-362964598824-353213608834-362964219674-466223219674-469644155012-405162266382-517532101163-353213155012-407872134962-388152155012-409703607903-353213556405-301564608834-353213641284-385365641416-385365597313-341223597513-341223597643-341223598723-341223598824-341223599082-341223185661-444442101163-362964155012-418021

0 N0 W0 NB*1 N9 N4 WP0 NP2 W0 W3 WP

33 WP8 W

100 NB0 N4 WP6 NP0 N0 NP5 NP0 N0 N3 NP14 N1 WB*1 NP1 NP2 WP0 N0 NP1 WP1 NP1 WP2 N

11 WP27 WP31 NP0 NP6 NP1 NP0 WP6 WP0 NP7 NP0 NP1 NP5 WP0 W

56 WP0 NP12 WP7 WP1 WP

48 NP9 N

11 N10 NP3 WP26 WP12 NP0 NP0 NP0 W1 NP

121 NP8 WP

26 380.72326 518.50526 627.47326 668.22326 712.86226 736.77626 761.83027 019.97627 111.55027 144.25227 158.21027 162.84227 203.60727 210.21027 225.37027 288.16227 252.12527 291.58727 319.00427 359.60327 372.54427 473.84827 473.84827 554.69927 603.81827 685.98227 737.77227 832.41727 867.35328 170.37728 200.61228 209.54128 306.47128 443.68828 578.24328 684.02028 699.17928 754.28528 897.67929 130.40829 163.79029 174.00629 184.19529 333.18129 691.56329 896.64029 969.05130 077.50030 156.85230 277.24630 383.66230 384.35630 448.31030 449.27430 460.75630 655.95830 668.53630 704.53630 741.64230 774.64930 853.43030 918.11330 948.09930 978.01131 120.602

266382-530191606402-341223567844-301564607903-341223101311-368441645054-377693608834-341223134962-405162597313-326202597643-326202155012-426603597821-326202608834-336805101311-373422101163-373422599082-326202598723-326202134962-407872219674-492863641416-367816266382-540113134962-409703101163-37590465672-341223

185661-461702155012-431871603571-326202641284-362964185661-464330607903-326202266382-548393645054-362964134962-418021155012-439453266382-552161101311-388152101163-38815265672-353213

266382-555363219674-510973134962-426603185661-477401645054-353213

8234-301564134962-431871155012-453981185661-485352101163-401944

03-30156465672-368441

645054-341223101311-405162641284-336805134962-439453641416-336805101311-407872155012-46170261400-368441

101311-40873065672-373422

101163-409703155012-464192134962-444442

185661-495441155012-466223

0011013131993121217026121

141460

110030000

100

115188101

4101

1000470

19124234

03373

1804

423104510

02

NNNWPN*WPWPWNNNNWPWPWPNNWPWNWPWPB*WPBNPNWPNNNPNWNWPWPNNWPWB*NNPNPWPWPWPWNPWWNWPNWPNNNNNPNPNPNNPNPWPWPWP*

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Page 4: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1937

Table 1. Continued

Wave Numbera Assignmentb IC Coded Wave Numbera Assignmentb IC Coded

101163-4696448234-3776937752_377693

61400-43187103-373422

65672-4394531550j2-530191

03-375904134962-510973101311-477401

8234-38536503-377693

134962-51286265672-4444427752-388152

134962-51545265672-447303

101311-485352155012-54011365672-453981

101163-492863134962-527082

8234-401944101311-495441185661-579872134962-53019165672-4617027752-405162

101311-498802101163-49880265672-464192

101311-500557752-407872

65672-4662238234-409703

03-4019447752_409703

134962-539532134962-540113

03-40516203-40787203-409703

7752-418021101311-512862101163-51286265672-477401

134962-54839361400_477401

101311-517532101163-517532134962-552161

8234-4266037752-426603

101311-52071165672-485352

134962-55536365672-4877937752-431871

03-42660365672-492863

101311-53019165672-4954418234-439453

65672-49880261400_495441

7 N101 N133 NP23 N51 WP12 N0 N

216 WP1 N1 N

317 NP66 WP

1 NP13 N

120 N0 N3 N

12 N4 NP0 N1 N2 N

22 N2 NP0 W0 N6 N

25 WP2 N2 W4 N0 N

30 N12 N13 N34 WPB34 WPB*1 WP5 WP

22 NP3 WP

26 WP6 N0 N2 N1 N3 NP2 NP1 NP0 NP0 N7 N2 NP1 NP0 N0 N2 W6 WP1 WP1 N0 N0 N4 NP1 N0 N

(continued overleaf)

31 201.61531 234.04431 314.33131 488.70731 670.86231 844.12631 902.20632 044.04432 238.72532 248.44432 543.331f32 620.023f32 674.121f32 720.37232 856.724f32 872.10032 923.69433 033.74233 055.95433 126.289f33 298.489f33 346.268f33 505.13633 784.26333 948.78633 971.87134 122.163f34 141.79834 220.39134 244.291f34 312.47734 315.94034 327.641f34 348.98534 379.05534 402.699f34 497.976f34 545.759f34 553.46634 613.58235 039.33535 266.59635 321.653f35 472.632f35 539.07635 595.67735 662.55335 785.10935 789.84936 038.49436 043.71036 048.29936 053.65436 068.819f36 092.59936 288.071f36 302.02736 303.23736 384.60936 505.76436 559.03036 566.201f36 569.82936 620.372f36 766.883f

65672-377693134962-447303185661-498802185661-500551101311-418021

7752-326202134962-453981219674-540113155012-47740165672-388152

101163-42660303-326202

134962-461702185661-512862

8234-336805219674-548393134962-464192155012-485352101311-431871134962-466223

8234-3412237752-341223

185661-520711155012-49286365672-405162

641284-30156403-341223

185661-52708265672-407872

134962-477401101311-444442101163-444324101163-444442645054-301564155012-49880265672-4097038234-3532137752-353213

155012-500551101163-447303134962-485352101311-453981

03-3532138234-362964

219674-575063155012-51097361400-418021

155012-512862134962-492863101311-461702155012-515452134962-495441101163-461702

7752-36844165672-426603

101311-464192161311-464330101163-464192134962-498802101163-466223134962-500551

7752-373422155012-52071165672-4318718234-375904

86 NP49 NP0 NP1 N*

33 N100 NP

0 N1 WP1 NP

42 NP29 N

603 WP2 WP0 NP

788 WP0 N

17 NP0 N0 N8 WP*

40 WP426 WP

0 NP2 NP3 W

19 N261 WP

1 W6 N4 W

13 NP1 WP

12 NP1 N0 N6 W

46 NP99 NP3 NP2 NP2 WP

13 NP205 WP19 W0 N1 W

15 W0 N4 NP3 NP0 W3 N1 W

64 N7 N

23 NP7 NP0 W4 WP6 N3 WP

182 NP1 W

-15 N122 NP

36 847.95336 945.391f36 993.178f37 047.665f37 342.092f37 378.079f37 517.43937 590.571f37 601.26037 608.68437 712.487f37 769.077f37 790.66637 876.908f38 040.016f38 049.26238 162.854f38 403.708f38 509.308f38 831.008f39 169.38039 212.10339 370.552f39 412.668f39 420.83439 523.02939 602.929f39 740.349f39 748.98439 764.16039 852.500f39 923.42740 011.95840 055.03240 146.48940 194.23240 194.23240 457.09840 514.88840 516.23640 787.87040 970.165f41 026.85841 155.07341 170.22041 173.09941 342.93441 600.39841 621.43241 636.58141 720.55241 836.38241 884.17641 939.79741 968.121.42 040.01242 211.87642 411.95642 660.05742 718.65442 887.42842 977.12243 121.86443 313.41143 404.369

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Page 5: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

1938 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985

Table 1. Continued

Wave Numbera Assignmentb IC Coded Wave Numbera Assignmentb Ic Coded

43 608.986f 8234-444324 5 NP 44 432.659 03-444324 0 N43 668.457 7752-444442 1 N 44 444.377 03_444442 0 N,43 836.661 101163-539532 0 N 44 530.086 65672-510973 0 N43 906.665 8234-447303 0 N* 44 730.299 03-447303 0 N43 915.004 6140_500551 2 N* 44 978.049 65672-515452 0 N*43 945.541 03-439453 0 N 45 394.510 7752-461702 0 N43 954.415 7752-447303 2 N 45 419.547 101163-555363 0 N

a Measured centroid of transition.b Assignments given as integer wave number parts of even and odd levels with J values as superscripts.Intensity as area of centroid scaled to maximum of 1000. Zero intensity denotes a value less than 0.5 on this scale.

d Code is as follows: N, narrow line; W, wide line; P, resolved pattern; B, blended; *, line not used in least-squares-level analysis.Line also given in Ref. 13.

(Line also given in Ref. 2.

ticeable for lines greater than 40 000 cm-', which are muchstronger than indicated in Table 1.

ENERGY LEVELS

Final values of the energy levels were determined by leastsquares fitting using a version of an energy-level least-squares program described in an earlier study.12 Wave-number values and assignments given in Table 1 were used,except for lines marked with an *. Because those lines wereblended or otherwise compromised, they would notaccurately fit into the least-squares analysis. Equalweights were given to all measurements. This analysisresulted in the energy-level values in Tables 2 and 3. Theoverall standard deviation of the least-squares fit was 8mK. This appears reasonable, considering the approxima-tion introduced by using the centroids instead of the trueline positions. A good indication of the accuracy of individ-ual levels is given by the last columns of Tables 2 and 3.Levels connected by many transitions, such as the lower-lying ones, are probably accurate to a few millikeysers,whereas levels connected by only a few transitions may beless accurate. Some of the higher-lying levels are connectedby only a few transitions because of the lack of FTS spectrabelow 220 nm.

DISCUSSION

The new Pt I measurements are so much more accurate thanthose from the early studies that direct comparisons are notwarranted. A meaningful comparison can be made withplatinum standards generated for the IUE program.2 Acomparison of the present wave numbers (Table 1) withthose of Ref. 2 (Table 3 after conversion from air wave-lengths) yields an average difference of 32 + 71 mK for 45lines. There was considerable correlation of the differencewith transition wave number, which suggests possible wave-length-calibration problems in that photographic-gratingstudy. Comparison is also possible with another study thatpartially overlaps the present measurements. Six strongPt I lines measured in a photographic infared-grating study 3

are also found in Table 1. The agreement is 23 ± 10 mK,probably within the estimated accuracy of that study.

The Pt I energy levels derived in the present study aremuch more accurate than those available previously.' Nosystematic search for new levels was made and none were

found. Only one level given in the literature summary,' theodd level at 48 351.9 cm-', was not determined by the FTSspectra.

For the convenience of comparison with VUV measure-ments, Table 4 lists all allowed Pt I lines below 225 nmcomputed from the new-level lists. This list thus predictsaccurate VUV transition to below 180 nm, if those lines aresufficiently intense. A comparison of Livingood's VUV Pt Iline list9 with Table 4 yielded 43 probable matches, although4 were blended in that early list. The average differencebetween Table 4 and Livingood's values for the 39 unblend-

Table 2. Even Levels of Pt la

Level

0.000775.892823.678

6140.1806567.461

10 116.72910 131.88713 496.27115 501.84618 566.55821 967.11126 638.59152 379.37552 667.21355 640.62356 784.32559 731.57159 751.17759 764.26659 782.85359 872.14059 882.42159 908.17060 357.80460 640.66960 790.39360 884.00064 128.72264 141.15564 505.839

Config.

d 9sd 9sd 8S2

d10d 8s2

d 8S2

d 9sd 9sd8s2

d8S2

d 8S2

d8 S2

d 97sd 97sd 8s7s

d 97 Sd 97s

Term J Linesb

3D 3 163D 2 153F 4 13iS 0 53p 2 243F 3 233D 1 221D 2 333F 2 273p 1 15

1G 4 101D 2 123D 3 63D 2 7sF 5 4

4 63 53 43 81 53 74 52 6

3D 1 51D 2 8

3 104 64 46 34 10

o Configuration assignments from Ref. 1.b The number of transitions connected to this level in

energy-level fit.the least-squares

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Page 6: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1939

Table 3. Odd Levels of Pt a

Level Config. Term J Linesb Level Config. Term J Linesb

30 156.854 d8sp 5D 4 6 46 419.962 2 532 620.018 d9 p 2 16 46 433.912 d8sp 0 233 680.402 d8sp 5 6 46 622.489 d9p 3 434 122.165 d9 p 3 19 46 964.701 d8sp 4 235 321.653 d8sp 3 15 47 740.564 d9 p 1 736 296.310 d8sp 4 8 48 351.9c d 8sp 436 781.551 d8sp 6 2 48 535.596 2 536 844.710 d8sp 1 9 48 779.336 d 8sp 3 137 342.101 2 17 49 286.116 d 8sp 3 637 590.569 d9 p 4 8 49 544.565 1 637 769.073 d9 p 3 16 49 880.883 2 638 536.160 d 8sp 5 6 50 055.313 1 438 815.908 2 13 51 097.529 d 8sp 3 540 194.228 d8sp 4 7 51 286.946 2 540 516.243 2 11 51 545.544 2 240 787.857 2 8 51 753.317 2 340 873.529 d9 p 0 1 52 071.684 1 340 970.165 d8sp 3 9 52 708.365 2 241 802.744 1 7 53 019.303 1 442 660.058 d8sp 3 10 53 953.379 2 243 187.836 1 7 54 011.150 d8 sp 3 443 945.543 3 6 54 839.206 d8 sp 3 344 432.663 d8sp 4 4 55 216.828 1 244 444.364 2 7 55 536.276 d8 sp 3 344 730.312 d 8sp 3 8 57 506.187 3 145 398.478 1 4 57 987.392 2 146 170.386 2 7

a Configuration assignments from Ref. 1.b The number of transitions connected to this level in the least-squares energy-level fit.This level is given in Ref. 1 but was not determined in the present study.

Table 4. Predicted VUV Transitions of Pt a

Wave Number Assignmentb Wave Number Assignmentb

03_444442134962-57987265672-5109737752-453981

65672-512862101163-548393

03-44730365672-515452

101311-55216165672-5175327752-461702

101163-55536365672-5207117752-4641928234-4662237752-466223

61400-52071165672-5270828234-469644

03-46170203-464192

65672-53019103-466223

61400-5301917752-477401

03-46964465672-539532

101163-57506365672-540113

47 528.222c47 759.70347 855.505c47 870.663c47 955.659c48 003.444c48 271.745c48 3 5 1 .9 0 0 ed48 462.439c48 510.224c48 535.596c48 649.36748 768.673c48 779.336c48 968.815c49 076.64949 104.991c49 279.420c49 286.116c49 880.883c50 273.852c50 321.63750 511.054c50 769.651c50 938.726c50 977.42451 097.52951 286.946c51 295.792

8234-4835147752-485352

101311-579872101163-579872

8234-4877937752-487793

65672-54839303-483514

8234-4928637752-492863

03-48535265672-5521617752-495441

03-48779365672-55536361400-5521617752-4988027752_500551

03-49286303-498802

8234-5109737752-5109737752-5128627752-515452

65672-5750637752-517532

03-51097303-512862

7752-520711(continued overleaf)

44 444.36444 491.12144 530.06844 622.586c44 719.485c44 722.47744 730.313c44 978.083c45 084.941c45 185.85645 394.494c45 419.54745 504.223c45 644.069c45 798.811c45 846.596c45 931.504c46 140.904C46 141.024C46 170.38646 419.962c46 451.842c46 622.489c46 879.123c46 964.672c46 964.701c47 385.919c47 389.458c47 443.689

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

Page 7: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

1940 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985

Table 4. Continued

Wave Number Assignmentb Wave Number Assignmentb

51 419.931 65672-579872 54 063.314 7752-54839351 545.544 03-515452 54 440.936 7752-55216151 753.317 03-517532 54 712.599 8234-55536351 932.473 7752-527082 54 760.384 7752-55536352 243.411 7752-530191 54 839.206 03-54839352 708.365 03-527082 55 536.276 03-55536353 177.487 7752-539532 56 682.509 8234-57506353 187.472 8234-540113 56 730.295 7752-57506353 235.258 7752-540113 57 211.500 7752-57987253 953.379 03_539532 57 506.187 03-57506354 011.150 03-540113 57 987.392 03-57987254 015.528 8234-548393

Calculated using levels from Tables 2 and 3 and the J selection rules: AJ = 0, +1, but AJ = 0 is not allowed if J = 0.b Assignments given as integer wave-number parts of even and odd levels with J values as superscripts.I These calculated lines were matched with platinum lines measured in Ref. 9.d These transitions involve the odd 48 3514 level, for which an accurate value was not obtained in this study.

10

:30

20

10

0

100 200 300 400 500

RELATI\ WV.\\E NMBER (K)

Fig. 3. Isotope structure of a hypothetical platinum transition.The isotope shift between 1

94 Pt and '96 Pt was set at 100 mK. Thevery-low-abundance '90Pt (0.013%) was arbitrarily set at the 100-mK position. The 1

95 Pt line is shown without hyperfine structure.The centroid of this pattern is located at the arrow.

ed lines was 30 d 370 mK, not at all unreasonable since thosevalues are given only to the nearest 0.1 cm-'. There was asignificant correlation of the difference with the line wavenumber, suggesting that calibration problems were presentin this early study. Predictions of width or structure ofthese lines await detailed isotope shift and hyperfine struc-ture analysis of these levels but may be an important factorin using these calculated VUV lines for accurate wavelengthcalibrations.

APPENDIX A

The natural abundances of the platinum isotopes were com-bined with relative isotope shifts14 to generate Fig. 3. Theonly odd isotope, 1

95 Pt, would usually show hyperfine split-ting into several components, but the centroid of any suchpattern would be located as shown. For completeness, thelow-abundance isotope, 190Pt, is shown, although it does not

appreciably affect these results. The weighted mean orcentroid of the pattern in Fig. 3 is calculated to be near thelocation of the hypothetical unsplit 195 Pt component. Theexact location is 0.093 times the isotope shift (between the194 Pt and 196Pt components) greater than the 195 Pt location.Since the isotope shift between these isotopes is about 100mK or less, the centroid of any platinum line is a fairly goodmeasure of the location of the 195Pt component. A bettermeasure of the line position would require a detailed analy-sis of the isotope shifts and hyperfine patterns, which isbeyond the scope of the present paper. No accounting forthe effects of possible self-reversal of strong lines has beenmade, but they would generally be small.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am indebted to J. W. Brault and R. P. Hubbard for operat-ing the FTS and to the National Solar Observatory for allow-ing me to use it. I also thank B. A. Palmer for developingmany of the data-reduction programs used in this study, M.V. Phillips for help with the data analysis and the figures,and R. J. Winkel, Jr., and the reviewer for useful correctionsand comments. This research was performed under theauspices of the U.S. Department of Energy under contractW-7405-ENG-36.

REFERENCES

1. C. E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels, Nat. Bur. Stand. (US) Circ.467 (1958), Vol. III.

2. G. H. Mount, G. Yamasaki, W. Fowler, and W. G. Fastie, "Com-pact far ultraviolet source with rich spectral emission 1150-3100A," Appl. Opt. 16, 591 (1977).

3. D. S. Leckrone, "Spectroscopic equipment for the space tele-scope," Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London -Ser. A 307, 549 (1982).

4. B. A. Palmer, M. V. Phillips, and R. Engleman, "The infraredspectra of uranium and thorium," Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Eng.380,415 (1983).

5. J. W. Brault, "Rapid scan high resolution Fourier transformspectrometer for the visible," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 1081 (1976).

6. H. H. Li and C. J. Humphreys, "New interferometric observa-tions of Ar I in the photographic region," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64,1072 (1974).

7. A. R. Strigalsov and N. S. Sventitskil, Tables of Spectral Linesof Neutral and Ionized Atoms (Plenum, New York, 1968).

194 195

196

198

190 192

i . . . .

Rolf Engleman, Jr.

:1:t

Z

'r

71

.1

Page 8: Accurate energy levels for neutral platinum

Rolf Engleman, Jr. Vol. 2, No. 12/December 1985/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1941

8. A. G. Shenstone, "The first spark spectrum of platinum," Phi-los. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 237, 453 (1938).

9. J. J. Livingood, "The arc spectrum of platinum," Phys. Rev. 34,185 (1929).

10. B. Jaeckel and H. Kopfermann, "Zur Hyperfeinstructur derPlatinisotope I. Die Isotope des Platins und die Lage ihrerSchwerpunkte," Z. Phys. 99, 492 (1936).

11. B. Jaeckel, "Zur Hyperfeinstructur der Platinisotope II. DasHyperfeinstrukturtermschema des Platinisotops 195 und seinmechanisches Kernmoment," Z. Phys. 100, 513 (1936).

12. B. A. Palmer and R. Engleman, Jr., "A new program for the leastsquares calculation of atomic energy levels," Los Alamos Na-tional Laboratory Rep. LA-9710 (Los Alamos National Labora-tory, Los Alamos, N.M., 1983).

13. K. G. Kessler, W. F. Meggers, and C. E. Moore, "Extension ofthe arc spectrum of palladium and platinum (6500 to 12000 A),"J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 53, 225 (1954).

14. P. E. G. Baird and D. N. Stacey, "Isotope shifts and hyperfinestructure in the optical spectrum of platinum," Proc. R. Soc.London Ser. A 341, 399 (1974).


Recommended