VAST Trail
Stand #1
E 138500mN 205500m
E 139000mN 205500m
E 139000mN 206000m
©
USE VALUE PROGRAM PROPERTY OF CHARLES & HELEN TAYLOR
WATERBURY, VTSPAN-696-221-11815
PARCEL ID # 10-072.000ORTHOPHOTO BASE SHEET 485204 & 485206 / 2018
DRAWN BY: D.A. SWEET - NOVEMBER 2019M I D D L E S E XM I D D L E S E X
W A T E R B U R YW A T E R B U R Y
Ring Rd
Zdon
Rd
Midd
lesex
Notc
h Rd
Bear Creek Ln
Shaw Hill Rd
417 0 417 834 1,251208.5 Feet
100 0 100 200 30050 MetersSCALE
1:5,0001 inch = 416.67 feet1 centimeter = 50 meters
Hunger Mountain Forestry, Inc., PO Box 250, Waterbury, VT 05676 P/F - (802) 244-7344 E - [email protected] / Forestry, Wildlife & GIS Services
THIS IS NOTA SURVEY
M I D D L E S E XM I D D L E S E X
W A T E R B U R YW A T E R B U R Y
REVISIONS:FEBRUARY 2003 ORIGINAL MAPOCTOBER 2012 FOR MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
ACREAGE ADJUSTMENT CHART1 Town Listed Acres 27.002 Acres to Be Excluded 2.003 Acres to be Entered 25.004 Acres to be Entered from Map 25.005 Factor To Prorate Acreage 1.0000
Enrolled Acres - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.00Excluded Acres - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.00Total Grand List - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.00
Stand Type Acres#1 NORTHERN HARDWOOD 25.00
25.0025.0TOTAL ACRES TO BE ENROLLED
STAND SUMMARY TABLE
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE FOREST
LegendProperty BoundaryUVA Program ExclusionWoods Roads and TrailsRoadsStreamTown Line
FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR
LANDS OWNED BY
CHARLES & HELEN TAYLOR WATERBURY
WASHINGTON COUNTY,
VERMONT
PARCEL ID. NO. 10-072.000
SPAN 696-221-11815
27 ACRES
2013 Update
Hunger Mountain Forestry, Inc
P.O. Box 250 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • Phone/Fax ~ (802) 244 -7344
2
2013 Update
UPDATED PLAN PREPARED BY:__________________________________________________________________
BRIAN T. SWEET, FORESTER DATE
ACCEPTED BY:_________________________________________________________________________________
CHARLES TAYLOR, OWNER DATE
ACCEPTED BY:_________________________________________________________________________________
HELEN TAYLOR, OWNER DATE
APPROVED BY:_________________________________________________________________________________
RUSSELL BARRETT, COUNTY FORESTER DATE
3
INTRODUCTION
The forest resources addressed in this report are owned by Charles and Helen Taylor Waterbury
Center, VT. With an address of 819 Maple Street, Waterbury Center, VT 05677.
The 27 acre ownership was purchased as a wood lot and potential camp lot, primarily to furnish
domestic firewood and to provide recreational opportunities. The parcel is all woodland with a 2.0
acres exclusion.
The objective of this inventory and management plan is to update a previously prepared
management plan done for the Use Value Appraisal program and to review the management
practices completed under the previous plan.
The purpose of this management plan is to prescribe silvicultural treatments for the forested land
that will result in maximizing the long term productivity for the forest land and set management
objectives including consideration for the wildlife, soil and water, and visual resources.
DESCRIPTION
Location: The property is located in the easterly side of the Town of Waterbury adjacent to the
Town Line between Waterbury and Middlesex. This area is referred to locally as the Ring Place
and is on the Worcester Mountain Range northerly of Chase Mountain in the Town of Middlesex.
The property is located in the Northern Green Mountain Biophysical Region.
Topography and Elevations: The terrain on the property is generally moderately to steeply sloping
land with a generally west and northwest aspect. Terrain adjacent to streams and in the southeast
corner of the property tends to be the steepest.
Elevations range from a low of 1580 feet above Mean Sea Level [MSL] along the westerly property
boundary where the primary brook exits the property to a high of 2000 feet above MSL in the
southeasterly corner of the property.
Access: Access is gained to the property over Town Highway #29 [Ring Road] which is a Class IV
road from its intersection with Town Highway #6 [Kneeland Flats road]. From the end of TH #29,
the property is reached by a private road network developed by this and other adjacent landowners
in the area. [See USGS Map and Use Value Map]
Existing Developments and Public Utilities: There are no utilities such as power lines on or near the
property. The only development on the property is the road which provides access from TH #29
and which also provides access to camps on the adjoining properties.
Visual Resources: The property is only somewhat visible from the heavily developed Shaw
Mansion and Kneeland Flats area. However it does contribute to the unbroken forested backdrop of
this area of the town.
All planned management activities including temporary road construction and harvesting activities
will be designed and carried out in a manner that seeks to maintain, improve and enhance the
aesthetic qualities of the visual resource on the parcel.
5
Wildlife - The wildlife resource
descriptions are based on general
observations in the field but are not the
result of a specific or structured wildlife
inventory. General observations include
evidence of white-tailed deer based on
browsing of woody vegetation and the
indications associated with song and
game birds such as direct sightings,
obvious feed area use and audible
recognition of bird songs and calls.
White-tailed deer populations in this
area are evident, habitat suitability
indicates that adequate summer range
areas exist within and adjacent to the
subject property. There are no mapped
deer yards within the Taylor ownership.
A 308 acre mapped deer wintering area
is situated to the west of the Perry Hill
road approximately one mile to the west
of the Taylor property. (See Figure 1)
Scattered evidence of moose and bear
utilizing the area for feeding was
observed during the inventory process.
Small game such as ruffed grouse and
varying hare, common songbirds
and other non-game species are well represented within the ownership and will be considered in all
management activities.
The management prescriptions contained in this report have been coordinated and modified in
accordance with the “MODEL HABITAT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES for DEER,
BEAR, HARE, GROUSE, TURKEY, WOODCOCK AND NON-GAME WILDLIFE”,
published by the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, Agency of Environmental Conservation,
February 1986. In addition, some prescriptions have been coordinated with the “MANAGEMENT
GUIDE FOR DEER WINTERING AREAS IN VERMONT”, published by the Vermont
Departments of Fish and Wildlife and Forests, Parks and Recreation in September 1990.
Water Resources: The headwaters of the primary stream known as Ring Brook is located on this
parcel. The stream network and tributaries flowing into it to the west form one of the many streams
of the headwaters group of Thatcher Brook that flows into the Winooski River in Waterbury
Village.
Other water resources on the parcel consist of areas of impounded water and small seeps scattered
throughout the ownership.
Adherence to the designs and criteria contained in the guides for "Acceptable Management
Practices for Maintaining Water Quality on Logging Jobs in Vermont" will be required on any
harvesting operation on the property.
Tha tc her Brook
GRAVES BROOK
WATER URY
MIDDLESEX
308
Rip
ley
Rd
Sha
w M
ansi
on R
d
Perry H
ill Rd
Ring Rd
Kneeland Flats
Valle
y V
iew
Rd
Loomis Hill Rd
Daniels F
arm R
d
Mid
dle
sex N
otc
h R
d
South
Bear S
wam
p R
d
Henry Hough Rd
Bal
sam
Ln
Mansio
n H
ollo
w R
d
Loomis Highlands
Shaw Hill Rd
Grove Ln
Mille
r Ln
Kneela
nd H
ill
Upla
nd
Mo
win
g R
d
Georges W
y
Marshall Ln
Thurston Ln
Spruce G
rove
Rin
g R
d
Taylor
Property
N
N
Deer
Wintering
Figure 1: Taylor Property showing proximity to
significant wildlife and water resources
6
Soils: The soil resources descriptions, symbols, names, and site classes were obtained from the
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Washington
County, Vermont.
The soil associations found on the ownership are commonly gently sloping to steep, somewhat
excessively drained to moderately well drained, shallow to deep, moderately coarse textured to fine
textures soils that formed in glacial till on hilly uplands.
The soils mapped on the property are listed in the following table with the soil symbol shown first
followed by the soil name.
Soil Symbol Soil Name Slope Classes Range in %
16D Dixfield Fine Sandy Loam, Very Stony A 0% to 3%
72D Elliotsville-Monson-Abram complex B 3% to 8%
C 8% to 15%
D 15% to 25%
E 25% to 35%
F 35% plus
Land Use Past and Present: This property was previously owned by Ancel Moulton, successor in
title to property owned by one F. Lee Minnott. The parcel served as a farm wood lot and provided
domestic firewood, building construction materials and summer pasturage for livestock. This use of
the property extended from the mid 1800’s to the mid 1900’s and was characterized by a keen
sense of land ethics common to subsistence farming in the region. In the early 1960’s heavy
harvesting of sawtimber quality trees took place, resulting in the present forest stand conditions.
Over the last 10 to 15 years efforts to improve forest stand conditions have begun to result in some
improvement in stocking and quality conditions. The property will continue to serve as a source of
domestic firewood and will yield small quantities of high value sawlogs in the future.
Boundary lines and Corners: The boundary lines of the ownership identifiable, however it is
recommended that all boundary lines be painted for future ease of identification and to prevent
innocent trespass by adjacent landowners.
Invasive Plants : There is no evidence of any invasive plan species on the property at this time.
Recreation Activities: The local connector route of the Middlesex and Waterbury VAST trail system cuts
across the southeast ¼ of the property. The trail appears to be well maintained with drainage structures
moving water off the trai`l in frequent locations
7
Resource Management Data Gathering Procedure
The descriptions of forest overstory and understory vegetative conditions are based on data collected using a
systematic Variable Plot Cruise [Bitterlich Method] with a 10 factor prism to sample overstory vegetation
and general point observations to sample understory vegetation. All measurable data was entered on field
data collection forms for SILVAH a computer program for analyzing and prescribing silvicultural treatments
for hardwood stands in the Allegheny Plateau in northeastern Pennsylvania. The inventory program has been
adapted to reflect conditions found in Vermont and the Northern Hardwood [beech, birch, maple] forest
type.
A total of 10, 10 factor sample plots were taken on this parcel, yielding a sample intensity of 1 plot per 2.5
forested acres. This sample intensity is sufficient for planning and stand prescription purposes but is not
sufficient for forest product sale purposes.
The resource descriptions resulting from the analysis of the field data are intended to give the
owner/manager a clear picture of the existing conditions and sufficient information to make a conclusive
judgment regarding the best treatment to meet long term objectives of the individual stand areas and
consequently the entire resource under management.
Definitions of Terms
The following definitions are of commonly used terms in describing forest stands and prescribing
silvicultural treatments for the stands. This glossary is included at this point in the report for easy reference
by the reader.
Basal Area [BA] - is used to express the density of growing stock and is defined as sum of all basal areas
for the trees over 4” in diameter on one acre. It is expressed in units of ft2/acre.
Acceptable Growing Stock [AGS] – are those commercial species trees that are well formed and will
produce high quality sawlogs now or in the future.
Unacceptable Growing Stock [UGS] - trees that are undesirable species or have conditions that will not
produce a high quality sawlog product now or in the future.
Diameter Breast High [DBH] - is the point 4 1/2 feet above the ground at which diameter and growth
measurements are made on standing trees.
Stand - an area of relatively homogeneous tree cover similar in age and species composition that can be
managed as a separate entity from the surrounding areas.
Matrix - is the entire combination of all the separate vegetative and soil communities that comprise the
homogeneous stand area.
Inclusion - a relatively small area, which may differ in some way from the primary stand matrix. A small
1/4 acre area of red spruce in a sugar maple stand would be an inclusion.
Site Index [SI] - a designation used to express the productivity potential of a particular location or site based
on the height of the dominant stand at an arbitrarily chosen age. For example, if the average height of a
fully stocked stand at age 50 years is 75 feet, the site index is 75 feet.
8
Even-Aged Management – Even-aged stands are stands in which all trees are of the same age plus or minus
10 years. Even-aged stands are commonly managed using a 2-cut shelterwood system. Shelterwood cuts can
be modified to retain a continual cover for aesthetic purposes and involve an initial cut to obtain
regeneration by removing approximately ½ the total stems in the stand. The final cut or removal cut is
conducted to release the established regeneration. The removal cut can be delayed until the established
regeneration is pole sized, 6 inch dbh +. 2-storied stands are the result of a successful 1st cut of a 2-cut
shelterwood. Even-aged stand stocking levels are expressed as “A”, “B” or “C” level stocking.
"A" Level Stocking - stands at "A" Level stocking are fully stocked even aged stands
"B" Level Stocking - stands at "B" Level stocking have the minimum level or density of stocking to fully
occupy the site and are even aged.
"C" Level Stocking – even aged stands at "C" level stocking are expected to achieve "B" level within 10
years if allowed to grow undisturbed.
Uneven-Aged Management: Uneven-aged stands are those which are characterized by three or more
distinct age classes and which have a wide distribution of size classes of trees present. Uneven-aged stands
of northern hardwoods, hemlock or mixed type are managed by controlling and manipulating the diameter
distribution of trees within the stand. (See appendix for a discussion of q-factor and its application for
controlling diameter distribution in the management of uneven-aged stands) Management is commonly
carried out by applying the single tree selection or small group selection method of removal. The
minimum acceptable stocking of stands after cutting is 60 ft2/acre.
Vegetation Size Classes - SEEDLINGS: 2 feet to 5 feet+ in height and less than l inch in diameter.
SAPLING: 2 inches to 4 inches DBH.
POLES: 6 inches to 10 inches DBH.
SAWTIMBER: 10 inches + for softwood and 12 inches + for hardwood.
Deer Winter Range – also know as "Yards" are areas of suitable forest type that provide cover, food, and
concealment during severe climactic conditions such as heavy snows in mid-winter. Mature softwood timber
types with abundant understory regeneration are considered to provide the best winter range area.
Deer Summer Range - are those areas which provide a high degree of diversity with grassy openings and
meadows, regenerating hardwoods and softwood forest types as well as a mixture of immature sapling and
pole size stands interspersed with mature timber type areas.
Mast - divided into hard and soft mast, they are the whole family of nut and fruit bearing shrubs and trees,
which produce nuts and fruits palatable to various wildlife species.
Soft Mast - species that produce soft fruits or berries such as pin cherries, blueberries, raspberries,
etc. These species generally produce fruits in mid to late summer.
Hard Mast - species that produce hard fruits or nuts and include beech, oak, butternut and related
species. This group tends to produce fruit in late summer and fall.
Q-Factor – refers to the average quotient or ratio between the numbers of trees in successively smaller
diameter classes. (See addendum for a description of Q-Factor and managing northern hardwoods by
implementation of a flexible Q.) Q-Factor is used to assist the land manager in the management of forest
stands under uneven-aged or all aged management systems.
9
Management Objectives
The objective of the Forest Management program is to provide a sustained yield of high quality
forest products consistent with the soil and other resource values and to maximize the productivity
of commercial forestland through the application of responsible silvicultural management practices.
Individual stand prescriptions have been carefully considered and will be periodically reviewed as
new information becomes available. All prescriptions are based on the concept of identification of
the featured stand with all prescribed treatments designed to bring the stand and individual trees to
the earliest maturity within site constraints. Proposed treatments will encourage the development
of young tree stands that maximize the productivity and potential of the existing site.
The dominant silvicultural system to be applied will be uneven-aged management of all forest types
with emphasis on the single tree selection method of removal. The desired management results are
high quality sawlogs, with pulpwood removed in early thinning operations or as an adjunct to the
production of high quality sawlogs to improve stand quality. The management objective for these
stands is to strive for a Q-Factor of 1.5 and a diameter objective of 18 inches. Reentry or the
cutting cycle will be 15 to 20 years.
10
Management Constraints
Management constraints are prohibited or controlled activities that are designed to protect the
resource and to avoid the commitment of irretrievable or irreversible actions.
The Management Constraints for this ownership are:
1. Protect all stream courses from sedimentation and completely restore and revegetate all woods
roads after use. Conduct all harvesting in accordance with the Acceptable Management Practices
for Maintaining Water Quality on Logging Jobs in Vermont [AMPs].
2. Lop all slash resulting from harvesting to lay less than 4 feet from the ground.
3. Modify Harvesting in areas adjacent to home sites, open land and high visibility areas to protect
and enhance the visual resource.
4. Conduct thinning in immature stands during non-growth periods whenever possible. [July
through March]
5. Utilize existing road locations when feasible and improve through use with full restoration after
use according to AMPs.
6. Conduct operations in wet areas and areas of shallow soils in winter during frozen ground
conditions in order to mitigate impacts from equipment on sensitive sites.
7. Protect all stonewalls and other historical features from damage or alteration.
11
Forest Stand Descriptions and Prescribed Treatments
For the purpose of description and management the ownership has been separated into specific
stand areas. For information regarding the location of the specific stand area and their relation to
existing facilities such as access or developed sites, refer to the Current Use Program Map in the
back of this report. [See Use Value Map.]
Work prescribed for each of the stands on the property assumes there will be no devastating
climatic occurrences. In the event of damaging climatic events such as ice storms, wind storms or
insect and disease outbreaks which threaten the condition or health of the forest resource it is
assumed that salvage operations should be undertaken without regard to previous scheduled
treatments.
12
STAND DESCRIPTIONS AND PRESCRIPTIONS
Stand #1: The entire parcel is being treated as one stand.
Stand #1 is 25 acres of northern hardwood small and medium sized sawtimber. The overall quality
of the stand is high and appears to be relatively disease free at this time. Soils are moderately well
drained and access is over a woods road which provides access to other adjacent properties.
The current stand structure and condition is based on 10 field data plots taken in November 2012.
Species composition of the stand is 66% sugar maple, 23% beech, and 7% yellow birch and 3%
White ash. Scattered paper birch and striped maple were observed in the Seen Area Plot.
The stream that runs generally along the southerly boundary of the stand will need to be considered
in any significant treatment of the area.
The current stand structure is as follows:
Total Basal Area (BA) - - - - - - - - - - - 95ft2/acre
Acceptable Growing Stock (AGS) - - - - 68 ft2/acre
AGS BA Breakdown:
Saplings (2”-4”) - - - - - - - - - - 0 ft2/acre
Poles (6”-10”) - - - - - - - - - - - 31 ft2/acre
Small Sawtimber (12”-16”) - - 29 ft2/acre
Medium Sawtimber (18” to 24”) 8 ft2/acre
Unacceptable Growing Stock (UGS) - - - 27 ft2/acre
Mean Stand Diameter (MSD) - - - - - - - - 11.3 inches
Quadratic Mean Stand Diameter (QMSD) -- 9.3 inches
Estimated average age is 90 years
Age structure is uneven aged
Trees per acre--- 201 total; 151 AGS
Q-Factor is 1.7
Site Index for northern hardwood is 60 (Site Class I)
The objective for this stand should be to manage for high quality hardwood sawtimber under an
uneven-aged management system. Use a Q-factor objective of 1.5 and a maximum diameter
objective of 16 - 18 inches.
Prescription: Continue to improve the overall quality of the stand by removing UGS hardwoods for
domestic firewood use. Retain the better formed AGS trees as the featured stand to be managed.
Reexamine in 2013.
USE VALUE APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY
STAND YEAR SUMMARY OF PLANNED ACTIVITY
#1 2023 Removing UGS trees for domestic firewood. Reexamine
13
UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT
OF
NORTHERN HARDWOODS IN THE NORTHEAST
In the application of uneven-aged management of the northern hardwood timber type, due
consideration must be given to residual stocking, maximum tree size, regeneration, and diameter
distribution all of which comprise stand structure.
It is known that growth of northern hardwood stands is essentially the same for a wide range of
stocking. Growth peaks at 60 to 100 sq. ft. of basal area per acre. To concentrate growth on as few
trees as possible without quality loss, a residual stocking of 70 ft2/acre of trees 5 inches and over is
recommended.
Maximum tree size is the tree diameter considered mature by the forester. Often referred to as the
diameter objective, maximum tree size can vary from 14 to 26 inches DBH, depending on site and
the landowner’s objective. As financial maturity is at l8 to 22 inches, the diameter objective is
usually set close to these diameters, or about 20 inches DBH.
Regeneration under uneven-aged management is obtained by two cutting methods -- single tree
selection and group selection. Single tree selection favors intolerant species such as beech and
sugar maple. Large group selections of 2 acres or less favor the establishment of intermediate and
intolerant species such as yellow birch and white ash. Small group selection [the removal of 2 or 3
trees in a group] is usually employed to release advanced growth of desirable understory trees.
The establishment of an appropriate diameter distribution or structure goal for a stand is the most
critical step in implementing uneven-aged management. These guidelines simplify the process,
making uneven-aged management relatively simple to apply. The approach calls for employment of
a flexible Q. The stand structure goal does not remain fixed throughout the stand development
period or rotation, but management is directed toward increasing the proportion of sawtimber by
progressively reducing the Q value.
Q value refers to the average quotient or ratio between numbers of trees in successively smaller
diameter classes. Stand Q values range from 1.3 to 2.0. Second growth stands with a large number
of small diameter trees have a Q value of 1.6 to 2.0. Mature stands with a high proportion of
sawtimber trees have a low Q value, of 1.3 to 1.4. As northern hardwood stands develop naturally,
changes in stand structure vary from a high Q value initially to a lower Q value as they approach
maturity. The best sites approach a lower Q value than medium or poor sites.
In order to establish a stand structure goal for an existing stand, it is necessary to determine its
present structure or the Q value that best describes the stand. A "Rule of Thumb" has been
developed that is sufficiently accurate for making this determination. As an example, a stand with
50% poles and 50% sawtimber has a Q value of about 1.6; therefore the appropriate stand structure
goal or selected Q for this stand would be 1.6 or 1.5. If markets are not available for small trees,
rather than consider TSI, which is an out-of-pocket expense, the best choice is to select a higher Q
value to concentrate harvest cuts in sawtimber and to carry a higher inventory of poles.
14
TABLE 1: Residual stand structure designed for 70 ft2 of residual basal area per acre, up through the
20-inch class.
DBH : Q=1.3 : Q=1.4 : Q=1.5 : Q=1.6: Q=1.7: Q=1.8 : Q=1.9: Q=2.0
Class : BA : BA : BA : BA : BA : BA : BA : BA
[Inches] : : : : : : : :
: : : : : : : :
6 TO 10 : 21 : 25 : 30 : 34 : 38 : 41 : 44 : 47
: : : : : : : :
12 TO 14 : 20 : 20 : 20 : 19 : 18 : 17 : 16 : 15
: : : : : : : :
16 + : 29 : 25 : 20 : 17 : 14 : 12 : 10 : 8
: : : : : : : :
TOTAL : 70 : 70 : 70 : 70 : 70 : 70 : 70 : 70
TABLE 2: “Rule of Thumb” - To identify existing stand structure or Q value, determine the
percentage of poles and sawtimber and pick the Q value that most closely approximates the stand.
Poles : Sawtimber : Estimated
6” to 10” : 12” + : Q Value
: :
30% : 70% : 1.3
: :
35% : 65% : 1.4
: :
40% : 60% : 1.5
: :
50% : 50% : 1.6
: :
55% : 45% : 1.7
: :
60% : 40% : 1.8
: :
63% : 37% : 1.9
: :
65% : 35% : 2.0